Miller effect

In electronics, the Miller effect accounts for an increase in the equivalent input capacitance of an

inverting voltage amplifier due to amplification of capacitance between the input and output
terminals. Although Miller effect normally refers to capacitance, any impedance connected
between the input and another node exhibiting high gain can modify the amplifier input
impedance via the Miller effect.

This increase in input capacitance is given by

where AV is the gain of the amplifier and C is the feedback capacitance.

The Miller effect is a special case of Miller's theorem.

History
The Miller effect was named after John Milton Miller. When Miller published his work in 1920,
he was working on vacuum tube triodes, however the same theory applies to more modern
devices such as bipolar and MOS transistors.

Derivation
Consider an ideal voltage amplifier of gain AV with an impedance Z connected between its input
and output nodes. The output voltage is therefore  V0  AV Vi and the input current is

As this current flows through the impedance Z, this equation shows that because of the gain of
the amplifier a huge current flows in Z; in effect Z behaves as though it were much smaller than
it is. The input impedance of the circuit is

If Z represents a capacitor, then

and the resulting input impedance is

Thus the effective or Miller capacitance  CM is the physical C multiplied by the factor  (1  AV ) .

Notes
As most amplifiers are inverting amplifiers (i.e. AV <0) the effective capacitance at the input is
larger. For non-inverting amplifiers, the Miller effect results in a negative capacitor at the input
of the amplifier (compare Negative impedance converter).
Naturally, this increased capacitance can wreak havoc with high frequency response. For
example, the tiny junction and stray capacitances in a Darlington transistor drastically reduce the
high frequency response through the Miller effect and the Darlington's high gain.
The Miller effect applies to any impedance, not just a capacitance. A pure resistance or pure
inductance will be divided by 1 − AV . In addition if the amplifier is non-inverting then a negative
resistance or inductance can be created using the Miller effect.

1
It is also important to note that the Miller capacitance is the capacitance seen looking into the
input. If looking for all of the RC time constants (poles) it is important to include as well the
capacitance seen by the output. The capacitance on the output is often neglected since it sees
C (1  1/ AV ) and amplifier outputs are typically low impedance. However if the amplifier has a
high impedance output, such as if a gain stage is also the output stage, then this RC can have a
significant impact on the performance of the amplifier. This is when pole splitting techniques are
used.
The impact of the Miller effect is often reduced by using a cascode or cascade amplifier rather
than a common emitter. For feedback amplifiers the Miller effect can actually be very beneficial
since stabilizing the amplifier may require a capacitor too large to practically include in the
circuit, typically a concern for an integrated circuit where capacitors consume significant area.

Impact on frequency response

Figure 2: Operational amplifier with feedback capacitor CC.

Figure 3: Circuit of Figure 2 transformed using Miller's theorem, introducing theMiller

capacitance on the input side of the circuit.

Figure 2 shows an example of Figure 1 where the impedance coupling the input to the output is
the coupling capacitor CC. A Thévenin voltage source  VA drives the circuit with Thévenin
resistance RA . At the output a parallel RC-circuit serves as load. (The load is irrelevant to this
discussion: it just provides a path for the current to leave the circuit.) In Figure 2, the coupling
capacitor delivers a current jCC (vi  v0 ) to the output circuit.

2
Figure 3 shows a circuit electrically identical to Figure 2 using Miller's theorem. The coupling
capacitor is replaced on the input side of the circuit by the Miller capacitance  CM , which draws
the same current from the driver as the coupling capacitor in Figure 2. Therefore, the driver sees
exactly the same loading in both circuits. On the output side, a dependent current source in
Figure 3 delivers the same current to the output as does the coupling capacitor in Figure 2. That
is, the RC-load sees the same current in Figure 3 that it does in Figure 2.
In order that the Miller capacitance draw the same current in Figure 3 as the coupling capacitor
in Figure 2, the Miller transformation is used to relate  CM  to  CC . In this example, this
transformation is equivalent to setting the currents equal, that is

or, rearranging this equation

This result is the same as  CM  of the Derivation Section.

The present example with  AV  frequency independent shows the implications of the Miller effect,
and therefore of  CC , upon the frequency response of this circuit, and is typical of the impact of
the Miller effect (see, for example, common source). If  CC  = 0 F, the output voltage of the
circuit is simply AV v A , independent of frequency. However, when  CC is not zero, Figure 3 shows
the large Miller capacitance appears at the input of the circuit. The voltage output of the circuit
now becomes

and rolls off with frequency once frequency is high enough that CM RA  ≥ 1. It is a low-pass
filter. In analog amplifiers this curtailment of frequency response is a major implication of the
Miller effect. In this example, the frequency 3dB  such that 3dB CM RA = 1 marks the end of the
low-frequency response region and sets the bandwidth or cutoff frequency of the amplifier.
It is important to notice that the effect of  CM  upon the amplifier bandwidth is greatly reduced for
low impedance drivers ( CM RA  is small if RA  is small). Consequently, one way to minimize the
Miller effect upon bandwidth is to use a low-impedance driver, for example, by interposing
a voltage follower stage between the driver and the amplifier, which reduces the apparent driver
impedance seen by the amplifier.
The output voltage of this simple circuit is always AV vi . However, real amplifiers have output
resistance. If the amplifier output resistance is included in the analysis, the output voltage
exhibits a more complex frequency response and the impact of the frequency-dependent current
source on the output side must be taken into account. Ordinarily these effects show up only at
frequencies much higher than the roll-off due to the Miller capacitance, so the analysis presented
here is adequate to determine the useful frequency range of an amplifier dominated by the Miller
effect.

Miller approximation
This example also assumes  AV  is frequency independent, but more generally there is frequency
dependence of the amplifier contained implicitly in  AV . Such frequency dependence of  AV  also makes

the Miller capacitance frequency dependent, so interpretation of  CM  as a capacitance becomes a

stretch of imagination. However, ordinarily any frequency dependence of  AV arises only at frequencies
much higher than the roll-off with frequency caused by the Miller effect, so for frequencies up to the
Miller-effect roll-off of the gain,  AV  is accurately approximated by its low-frequency value.

3
Determination of  CM  using  AV at low frequencies is the so-called Miller approximation. With the

Miller approximation,  CM becomes frequency independent, and its interpretation as a capacitance at

low frequencies is secure.