Ruth Fuster
July 12, 2020
HTLH-710
The wide agreement that reimbursement systems for hospitals and physicians need to
move away from volume based to value based many times indirectly moves to show well-
defined dividing outlines between the two classifications. The two main reimbursement
methodologies that we have in our health care system are fee-for-service and Valued-based. The
latter being implemented more after the roll out of Obama care in 2010. Though, “most of what
are considered value-based payment reform models are being implemented on top of current,
volume-based payment approaches, or as HHS calls it, “fee-for-service architecture.” (Berenson
et. al., 2016). This demonstrates the importance of comprehending the characteristics of all
mutual reimbursement methodologies—the older ones and more modern developments—to
better review their strengths and also their weaknesses. With knowing these weakness and
strengths of these different systems, we can implement policies that progress the efficacy of
reimbursement models.
Every reimbursement classification has its strengths and its weaknesses and affects the
consumer as well as the provider, and “this highly unusual marketplace for healthcare services
has a profound effect on the supply of, and demand for, such services” (Gapenski & Reiter,
2015). With the integration of ACA, one of their main goal has been to move away from fee for
service and into a value-based payment model. In the latter services are paid based on the level
of service that is provided. This approach is measured in many different ways, either by
readmissions or bad quality of care, or infections due to poor sanitary practices in a hospital.
These reimbursement methodologies have an effect on the providers just as much as the
consumer, when moving into value-based purchasing it is beneficial to the consumer and the
provider, it allows for the consumer to receive high quality care and keep the provider
accountable for services it provides. Of course, like previously noted, there are weaknesses and
strengths to both methodologies. While a value-based payment may motivate the advancement of
cost-reducing services (from the viewpoint of the consumer), but it can also discourage from
innovation to grow on the provider.
When a consumer feels comfortable and can even afford to receive healthcare, being able
to receive high-value care at a reasonable price can keep the consumer coming back to receive
services. In the healthcare setting this is important on many levels, first we have our optimal
health which should be the main reason we go to the hospital, but also it helps the provider get
reimbursed. If the consumer does not come to get a service, the provider would make no money
at all. It is an interchangeable relationship for the consumer and provider in healthcare. With
transparency and readily information and communication available between provider and patient,
both parties can benefit from services provided and received. In all, the healthcare payment
system as introduced by ACA.
References
Berenson, R., Upadhyay, D., Delbanco, S., & Murray, R. (2016). Payment Methods and Benefit
Designs: How They Work and How They Work Together to Improve Health Care.
[Link]. Retrieved 11 July 2020, from
[Link]
[Link].
Gapenski, L., & Reiter, K. (2015). Healthcare Finance (6th ed.). Health Administration Press.