FY18 Nike Impact-Report Final
FY18 Nike Impact-Report Final
Impact Report
Introduction Our Approach Unleash Human Potential Transform Manufacturing Minimize Environmental Footprint Appendix
Introduction
5 Letter From Our CEO
6 Purpose Committee
Our Approach
8 Issue Prioritization
9 Priority Issue Definitions
10 Targets Summary
Transform Manufacturing
27 FY18 Highlights
28 Sustainable Sourcing
31 Engaged Workforce
32 Partnerships to Accelerate Industry Change
33 Transform Manufacturing: Priority Issues
Appendix
58 PwC Assurance Report
59 NIKE, Inc. Management Assertion
64 Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Index
Note: The information in this report and NIKE, Inc.’s corporate responsibility/sustainability reporting and website, inclusive of charts, graphs and discussion, and all other information presented, may contain forward-looking statements, estimates or
projections based on expectations as of the original date of those materials. Those statements, estimates and projections are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. These risks and uncertainties
are detailed in our reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including Forms 8-K, 10-K and 10-Q. Presented information may also discuss non-public financial and statistical information and non-GAAP financial measures. All
information was current only as of the date originally presented. We do not update or delete outdated information contained in website materials, and we disclaim any obligation to do so. All content is the property of NIKE, Inc.
Report Content
The FY18 NIKE Impact Report focuses on our 2020
RM MANUFACTUR Our Moonshot Ambition
Targets and Priority Issues most relevant across NS FO ING
our value chain and to our stakeholders. TRA Carbon How can we double
our business while
halving our impact?
M
FY18 Priority Issues Child Labor IN
IM
L IZ Water
Existing Priority Issue IA
T
E
N
EN
Issues with Increased
TE
VI
Relevance in FY184
PO
RO
N
Chemistry
NM
Chemistry
MA
EN
HU
Active Kids
TAL
Energy
A SH
FOO
Occupational Health & Safety
UNLE
Material Waste
Total Compensation Waste
TPRIN
Non-Renewable
Workforce Development
Priority Issues5 Resource Depletion
T
Water Use
Purpose Committee
The Purpose Committee provides direction Purpose Governance at NIKE
and oversight for the end-to-end integration
of NIKE’s work in diversity and inclusion,
community, labor, and environmental impact. CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY, SUSTAINABILITY AND
Board
They challenge our business to better GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE (BOARD OF DIRECTORS)
Accountability
understand our social and sustainability
impacts, set ambitious targets for improvement,
and overcome obstacles in achieving progress. Executive Leadership and
The Purpose Committee, which includes Purpose Committee
Corporate Accountability
the scope of the former Performance and
Disclosure Committee established in 2012,
meets regularly to review these targets, Cross-Functional Leadership
Purpose Leadership Team
performance, and disclosures. and End-to-End Integration
Purpose Committee
This Committee includes:
President, NIKE Direct
EVP, Chief Financial Officer Heidi O’Neill
Andy Campion
EVP, Chief Communications Officer
Chief Marketing Officer Nigel Powell
Dirk-Jan van Hameren
President, Categories and Product
President, Consumer and Marketplace Michael Spillane
Elliott Hill
Chief Operating Officer
EVP, CAO and General Counsel Eric Sprunk
Hilary Krane
President, Jordan Brand
EVP, Global Human Resources Craig Williams
Monique Matheson
Issue Prioritization
For over 20 years, NIKE We continuously learn, grow, and refresh
our perspective by considering the global
FY18 Changes
has been striving to create perspective of our internal and external While there was great alignment between
this year’s issue prioritization survey and last
stakeholders6 in our analysis of priority
a better future for our sustainability issues. Similar to last year, year’s survey results, “Diversity and Equal
Opportunity” and “Climate Change Risks”
people and planet by better in FY18 we surveyed a wide range of
stakeholders, including employees, NGOs, were identified as key issues with a strong
understanding the most academics, suppliers, and corporate peers, increase in relevance for both internal and
external stakeholders.
to determine the most relevant issues at each
pressing issues confronting stage of our value chain and the impacts most
directly linked to those issues. At NIKE, we know that our culture is at
our global community, and its best when all employees feel included,
respected, and heard. The increased relevance
trying to innovate solutions Learn more:
FY16/17 Issue Prioritization Process of “Diversity and Equal Opportunity” is
to address them. Stakeholder Engagement consistent with our continued and enhanced
internal focus on building an inclusive and
NIKE’s Value Chain
accountable culture across our company.
6 In FY18, we considered the input of over 100 internal and external stakeholders in the analysis of our prioritization issues.
Active Kids Helping kids reach their full potential through play and sport and creating Community
more equal playing fields for all Impact
Diversity and Equal Opportunity Representation of female and minority employees in workforce and Employees
management positions equal to the consumers and communities we
serve, and the gap in average remuneration
Occupational Health and Safety Worker health and safety practices throughout the value chain Occupational
Health and Safety
Total Compensation Economic value generated for employees through wages and benefits Employees
Workforce Development Training and development for workers to build capability and Employees
career opportunities
TRANSFORM MANUFACTURING
Priority Issue Definition Location
Child Labor Operations and suppliers identified as having significant risk for incidents Child Labor
of child labor
Chemistry Chemicals used in making materials and products and substances Chemistry
released to the environment (air and water) that are toxic to humans
and ecosystems
Climate Change Risks Financial risks to NIKE due to operations exposed to changing climate Energy and
impacts throughout the value chain Carbon
Energy Energy used for electricity, use of fossil fuels, and other energy sources Energy and
Carbon
GHG Emissions Greenhouse gas emissions from energy, transportation, and NIKE’s other Energy and
business activities Carbon
Non-Renewable Resource Depletion Non-renewable resources depleted through materials and fuels used Materials
Material Waste Waste generated throughout NIKE’s value chain and activities to reduce, Waste
reuse, or recycle
Water Use Water used throughout our value chain and monitoring our impacts in Waste
water-scarce regions
Unfavorable
Community Impact
Annual Investments as % of Pre-Tax Income % 1.9% 1.8% 1.9% 1.8% N/A7 1.5%
TRANSFORM MANUFACTURING
Metric Unit of FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY18 Change FY20 Target
Measurement Baseline vs. Baseline
Manufacturing8
Factories Rated Bronze or Better 44 p.p.9
% 86% 87% 91% 93% (vs. FY11 BL)
100%
Factories with Excessive Overtime % 3.3% 3.2% 3.9% 2.4% 0.9 p.p 0%
Product
kg CO2e/
Average Product Carbon Footprint10 7.33 7.19 7.15 7.45 2%11 10%
unit
Product Scored on Sustainability Performance % 27% 68% 71% 73% 46 p.p. 80%
Materials
Sustainable Materials12 – Apparel (AP) % 19% 21% 33% 34% 15 p.p.
Sustainable Materials12 – Footwear (FW) % 31% 33% 32% 31% 0 p.p.
Cotton Sourced More Sustainably13 % 24% 35% 53% 58% 34 p.p. 100%
Carbon and Energy
Renewable Energy – Owned or Operated14 % 14% 20% 22% 19%15 5 p.p. 100%16
Energy Consumption Per Unit – Key Operations17 kWhe/unit 4.74 4.29 4.74 4.39 7% 25%
kg CO2e/
Carbon Emissions Per Unit – Key Operations17 1.75 1.62 1.75 1.71 2% 25%
unit
Energy Consumption Per Kg – Textile Dyeing and Finishing18 kWhe/kg 15.86 15.46 14.95 14.40 9% 35%
Carbon Emissions Per Kg – Textile Dyeing and Finishing18 kg CO2e/ kg 4.78 4.68 4.55 4.33 9% 35%
Waste
N/A
Waste to Landfill19 – Footwear Manufacturing % (FY16 BL)
6.6% 3.9% 1.8% 4.8 p.p. 0%
Chemistry
Tested Material in Compliance with NIKE Restricted Substance
% 95% 99% 98% 99% N/A23 100%
List (RSL)
Compliance with the ZDHC Manufacturing Restricted
% N/A N/A N/A 68%24 N/A 100%
Substances List (MRSL)
Focus Suppliers Meeting NIKE’s Wastewater Quality N/A
% 58% 73% 69% 11 p.p. 100%
Requirements – Textile Dyeing and Finishing18, 25 (FY16 BL)
Targets Summary
Footnotes
7 This is an annual target. Baseline and change vs. baseline are not relevant to this target.
8 Scope includes all finished goods manufacturing.
9 p.p. = percentage points.
10 This target includes NIKE-designed/developed Nike Branded, Brand Jordan, and NIKE Golf Global apparel styles, and Nike Branded, Brand Jordan,
and NIKE Golf Global footwear styles. We are using CO2e emissions as a proxy for other environmental impacts (e.g. energy, other air emissions).
11 Average product carbon footprint has increased compared to the FY15 baseline due to an increase in both material per unit (apparel getting heavier) and
manufacturing emissions intensity (driven by grid electricity in Vietnam and style/model mix). While NIKE has two other FY20 carbon targets that are both
trending in the right direction, these other carbon targets represent tier 1 (finished goods manufacturing) combined with other key operations, and tier 2
(materials finishing). The product target represents tiers 1 through 4 (which includes materials manufacturing and raw materials production).
12 We define more sustainable materials as those that reduce the environmental impact of a product through better chemistry, lower resource intensity,
less waste, and/or recyclability.
13 Certified organic, Better Cotton (cotton grown according to the Better Cotton Standard System) or recycled.
14 The target scope includes electricity only, where we make energy purchase decisions on strategic assets. Equivalent to absolute reductions in
Scope 1 and 2 CO2e emissions of at least 50% by FY25.
15 Slight decline in FY18 is due to the delay between WHQ and Air Manufacturing Innovation (Air MI) facility expansions and building construction going live
and being incorporated into the Oregon Power Purchase Agreement (delay is a regulatory requirement).
16 Target year to achieve 100% is FY25, not FY20.
17 Key operations = finished goods manufacturing, inbound and outbound logistics, DCs, HQs, and NIKE-owned retail. Previous years have been restated
due to inclusion of estimated retail natural gas consumption outside of the U.S. and Canada.
18 Measure includes focus suppliers only. Focus suppliers represent key suppliers involved in the dyeing and/or finishing of materials that directly
support finished product assembly.
19 Target covers waste to both landfill and incineration. Incineration does not include waste to energy recovery unless otherwise noted.
20 The waste index is a weighted average of our footwear manufacturing waste per unit, DCs waste per unit and HQs waste per occupant.
21 Baseline is FY15 except for Tier 1 FW Manufacturing and Converse HQ, which are FY16 and are included in Inc.-wide baseline for comparability
across years.
22 Baseline is FY15 except for Converse HQ, which is FY16 and included in Inc.-wide baseline for comparability across years.
23 As we add new chemicals and tighten the limits, we may see a small number of failures as the supply chain adapts to the more stringent requirements.
Due to these changes, we do not recognize a baseline or change vs. the baseline.
24 FY18 was NIKE’s first year tracking this metric.
25 Measurement of supplier adherence to NIKE’s wastewater quality standards between FY16 and 18 in this table is based on a prior standard.
FY18 Highlights
10% 10,000
Percentage of employees Number of employees
who received an who completed Manager
adjusted base salary Expectations Training
as part of ongoing
competitive pay
management
4% 3%
Increase of VP-level Increase of VP-level
representation of women, representation of U.S.
bringing the total to 36% underrepresented groups,
bringing the total to 19%
$7.5m $79.4m
Amount that NIKE NIKE’s investments in
employees, supported communities around the world
by the NIKE Foundation’s in FY18, totaling over $396m
matching gift program, since FY14
contributed to charitable
causes globally
1:1 16.5m
Pay ratio for Number of kids
men to women that NIKE helped to
(globally) and white get moving through
to underrepresented its Made to Play
groups (U.S.) commitment
Employees
Target Our global HR Strategy is focused on We want everyone who works at NIKE to
stewarding a people-first culture and we’re experience a level playing field and have the
Attract and develop an empowering our teams and strengthening opportunity to reach their full potential. In
order to advance this vision, we have taken
our culture by:
increasingly diverse, several important steps this past year including:
elevating diversity and inclusion to sit at the
engaged, and healthy
1 2
heart of our HR strategy to drive systemic
workforce progress; enhancing our HR processes; and
elevating our Employee Relations function. We
have also invested in more career development
Our employees are at the heart of our
Creating aligned Investing in and training for employees, managers, and
success as a business. We know that NIKE
and effective great leaders leaders across NIKE.
is at its best when every member of the
organizations and managers
team feels respected. That’s why we’re
To ensure we remain competitive to the
committed to fostering a culture of inclusion
marketplace, we have adjusted base salary for
and an environment where all employees are
3 4
about 10% of our employees across all bands,
empowered to move the world forward through
geographies, functions, and brands. And, at the
the power of sport.
beginning of FY19, we moved to one annual
bonus plan, our Performance Sharing Plan, for
This past year was a challenging and inspiring
Empowering Ensuring eligible employees to reinforce our culture and
year, marked by growth and learnings, and an
diverse and opportunity for reward behaviors that support collaboration and
increased focus on our team and culture. NIKE
innovative teams everyone to learn teamwork. We also continue to strive to reflect
is at its best when every member of the team
the diversity of our global consumer base.
feels included and heard – when everyone
can show up fully as themselves and do their
5
best work every day. And we have made new Total Employees26
commitments to strengthen our culture of
CY1627 CY17 CY18
inclusion, empowerment, and respect, including
% Change - 2% -2%
increasing diversity across our organization –
Employee Count 65,216 66,739 65,332
with a focus on leadership. Of course, there is Fostering an environment
no finish line and we continue to make progress where everyone feels valued 26 Employee numbers exclude external or temporary workers (ETWs)
and invest in the change we want to see within and is engaged and seasonal retail workers. Also, as part of our ongoing investment in
development and career experiences, we have approximately 45 U.S.
our teams. underrepresented groups (URG) employees working outside of the U.S.
in international assignments. These employees are not included in our
U.S. URG reporting. Upon return to their U.S. home location, they will be
included in U.S. representation going forward.
27 For this reporting period, we have adjusted our employee section
reporting to reflect calendar year data to provide more timely information.
Data included is through December 31, 2018 as opposed to fiscal year
ending on May 31, 2018, as used historically. To aid in comparisons to
past years’ data, NIKE has also reclassed its fiscal year data into calendar
year data.
Employees
Measure NIKE, Inc. Totals by Gender (Global)
All Employees Directors+28 VPs
Diverse representation Gender29 CY16 CY17 CY18 CY16 CY17 CY18 CY16 CY17 CY18
and culture of inclusion Female
48% 48% 49% 37% 38% 39% 28% 32% 36%
31,338 32,082 31,800 2,091 2,146 2,414 116 119 145
52% 52% 51% 63% 62% 61% 72% 68% 64%
Male
33,878 34,657 33,532 3,553 3,513 3,731 299 258 257
Total 65,216 66,739 65,332 5,644 5,659 6,145 415 377 402
28 All employees who are Director level and above. Director, in this instance, refers to a certain management level within the company.
29 Numbers include those employees who identified a gender.
as Deloitte’s first Chief Talent Officer and the Native Hawaiian or Other
someone whose racial or ethnic makeup is from one of the following: - - -
Pacific Islander
American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian, Black or African American,
Hispanic/Latino, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, or Two or
leader of Deloitte’s award-winning Women’s Two or More Races - - -
More Races. Initiative and broader inclusion focus; Peter B. Unknown - - -
32 investors.nike.com
33 In accordance with the 2018 Proxy Statement and NIKE’s corporate Henry, Dean Emeritus of New York University’s 75% 82% 77%
White
governance guidelines, nominees for Director are selected on the basis
of, among other things, distinguished business experience or other non-
Leonard N. Stern School of Business and 9 9 10
business achievements; education; significant knowledge of international William R. Berkley Professor of Economics and Total 12 11 13
business, finance, marketing, technology, human resources, diversity and
inclusion, law, or other fields that are complementary to, and balance the Finance; and John W. Rogers, Jr., Chairman,
knowledge of, other Board members; a desire to represent the interests
of all shareholders; independence; character; ethics; good judgment;
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment
diversity; and ability to devote substantial time to discharge Board Officer of Ariel Investments, LLC.
responsibilities.
Employees
Staying Focused on Representation The Diversity Sourcing and Programs Team At the conclusion of the program, students will
has also created new pipelines for recruiting have an opportunity to apply for open positions
talent. For example, NIKE has developed a within the company.
Employees
Measure FY18 Global Pay Equity New Benefits Initiatives: Taking Care of
Those Who Care for Others
Provide comprehensive, Several new benefits launched in early 2019
competitive, and equitable
pay and benefits $1 to $1 to provide even greater support for employees
to meet their personal needs. These include a
U.S. Military Leave benefit, increased adoption
and surrogacy benefits, as well as resources for
We know a personalized and holistic rewards Women vs. Men (global)
families caring for children with learning, social,
system is essential to attracting, inspiring, and
or behavior challenges.
developing talent. Through our Total Rewards
program, we strive to meet the diverse needs
$1 to $1
With the new Military Leave benefit, NIKE now
of our employees, deliver differentiated,
provides up to 12 weeks of paid time off every
competitive pay and benefits, and support
12 months.
a culture in which employees feel included
and empowered. URG vs. White (U.S.) For employees who need to step away from
work to care for their families, NIKE extended
Equal Pay for Equal Work We are committed to maintaining these pay equity ratios
every year and will continue to monitor this data. family care benefits effective January 1, 2019 in
We are committed to competitive pay and to
the Netherlands, our European Headquarters.
reviewing our pay and promotion practices
We significantly increased leave for non-birth
annually. At NIKE, we define pay equity as equal
parents (including adoption and surrogacy) to
compensation for women, men, and all races/
eight weeks paid leave. We also now pay Short-
ethnicities who undertake the same work at the
Term Care Leave at 100% of salary for up to ten
same level, experience, and performance.
days per year.
Measure
Employee growth,
development, and wellbeing
We engage and inspire our workforce by
investing in learning and development
opportunities that help them build on their
capabilities through learning tools, like the
more than 5,600 courses available online to
employees. With Career Central, we have
created a single resource to help employees
navigate their careers. The internal site equips
employees with tips, tools, and in-person
labs for their critical career-building moments.
Managers can also find tools here to better
support and guide their employees in planning
their careers and development.
Employees
Enabling Great Leadership discussions and suggestions of how to mitigate NIKEUNITED Networks
Leadership Defined, a new leadership the potential for bias. The training and tools NIKE has eight employee networks, collectively
framework, was launched with our senior will focus on everyday scenarios and look known as NIKEUNITED: Ability & Friends,
leaders in November 2018. The framework at moments that matter such as how teams Ascend Network & Friends, Black Employee &
provides common language for what great are created, decision-making, hiring, and Friends, Latino & Friends, PRIDE, Nike Military
leadership looks like at every level. We expect developing relationships. Veterans & Friends, Native American & Friends,
to roll this framework out across NIKE in and Women of Nike & Friends.
FY20. We have increased our focus on and Investing in Diverse Talent
investment in developing our current and future In June 2018, we launched Amplify, an internal These employee-formed and managed
leaders. Our most senior leadership have been development program for high-potential women communities are sponsored by our Global
through an assessment and development and URGs at the Director and Senior Director Diversity and Inclusion team and offer resources
experience aligned with NIKE’s leadership levels. We currently have 101 employees in to a diverse spectrum of individuals across
behaviors and growth drivers. We will expand our first cohort, which ends in June 2019. NIKE. They advance the development of their
our development approach to next level We will continue to review and expand our members, promote cultural awareness, and
leaders and continue to develop high potential leadership development offerings in support of strengthen our commitment to diversity and
future leaders through a combination of 360 diverse talent. inclusion by working with NIKEUNITED and
assessment, coaching, development programs, our employee base generally. In 2018, we
and career experiences. Mentoring Future Leaders increased our investment in these networks
We launched employee mentoring programs and supported a focus on programs advancing
Continuing Our Commitment to in New York, Los Angeles, Memphis, and career and culture. Our NIKEUNITED teams
a Culture of Inclusion Converse headquarters in Boston, with a meet regularly with their executive sponsors
We have continued to deliver Unconscious Bias sharp focus on career development. We are and bi-annually with our executive leadership
Awareness trainings to teams live and have also piloting a digital mentoring platform at our team to review programming success.
developed a new Unconscious Bias Awareness World Headquarters location in collaboration
digital training. This new accessible training with members of our NIKEUNITED employee Wellness for All
will be made available for all employees and resource groups to provide broad and diverse As a brand committed to sport, we encourage
offered in 30 languages. The training will help insights and measure effectiveness and future our workforce to engage in a healthy lifestyle
build awareness of where bias may occur, scalability across the company. to the best of their ability. In fact, we see health
and the tools will help create meaningful as imperative to a high-performing workplace.
To help our employees live healthy, active
lifestyles, we provide fitness facility discounts
and various wellness services. For example,
NIKE has partnered with Headspace to enable
employees at our World Headquarters to
access its meditation and mindfulness services.
Community Impact
Target
Invest a minimum of 1.5% 16.5m
of pre-tax income (PTI) kids moving
to drive positive impact
in our communities
Performance
21,000+
Annual Investment as % of PTI community coaches
FY15 / 1.9%
80+
FY16 / 1.8%
organizations
FY17 / 1.9%
FY18 / 1.8%
FY20 target
At least
1.5
%
Community isn’t just something we do, it’s
who we are. And our communities need our
help more than ever; the world is moving less,
and today’s kids are part of the least active
generation ever. That’s why NIKE is committed
to inspiring and supporting communities to get
kids moving, and the potential pay-offs are big.
Active kids are healthier, happier, and do better
– on the playing field, in the classroom and, one
day, in their careers and communities.
Community Impact
Our efforts focused on providing early, fun, and of their classrooms. Legendary athletes Li
positive experiences in play and sport, with the Na and Liu Xiang attended the ceremony
goal of inspiring a lifelong love of movement. that culminated with football star Cristiano
Ronaldo presenting a limited edition pair of
In the U.K., NIKE worked with Discovery CR7 Mercurial Campeones boots to Mr. Lv, one
Education, one of the leading sources of of the award-winning PE teachers. Forty-nine
educational content for teachers in the country, pairs of boots were auctioned off, with NIKE
to create an innovative online platform on matching the proceeds to donate, to the China
physical education. This initiative aims to reach Education and Development Foundation,
250,000 kids by the end of FY20 to get them NIKE’s Active Schools program, and Mr. Lv’s
moving more by working with parents and HeKou Primary School in Gansu Province in
schools. In February 2018, Olympic medalist northwest China, which used the funds to build
and NIKE athlete Daryll Saskia Neita joined 250 a soccer pitch using Nike Grind.
kids from the Beatrix Potter Primary School in
South London to officially launch Active Kids When it comes to getting kids to move, girls,
Do Better UK, which offers free online teacher in particular, urgently need our help; only about
resources to get kids active. one-third of girls aged 6–11 meet healthy
physical activity guidelines. Years worth of third-
In July 2017, NIKE and China’s Ministry of party impact data made the case for focusing
Education (MOE) hosted the country’s first on girls within our Made to Play portfolio, and
national Active Schools Innovation Awards also confirmed the need for more gender-
ceremony at Beijing’s iconic Water Cube. Out inclusive programming and coaching. For
of more than 1,000 applicants, the ceremony example, only 23% of U.S. youth coaches are
recognized 100 of the country’s most creative female, down from 28% in 2016. In FY18, NIKE
and inspiring teachers who are transforming announced a new relationship with Girls Inc. in
the culture of sport and physical activity in their the U.S. The work extends and builds on NIKE’s
schools. The Active Schools program is part of commitment to creating equal playing fields by
a long-term strategic relationship between integrating physical literacy and high-quality
NIKE and the Chinese MOE, which began in coaching into Girls Inc.’s curriculum for girls
2013, and in 2016 we set a goal of getting across the country.
2 million kids active — both inside and outside
Community Impact
Measure We also give employees who volunteer $10 per The NIKE Community Ambassador program
Inspire a majority of NIKE hour to donate to the cause of their choice. gives NIKE retail employees the opportunity
to pass their love of sport on to the next
employees to engage with generation. Community Ambassadors
In FY18…
their communities and support aren’t just getting kids active today – they’re
their giving of expertise, time, inspiring them to be active for life. Global retail
employees learn quality coaching skills, and
and money then coach kids in sport and play in their local
schools and communities. Since the program’s
Our employees are talented, generous,
inception in FY16, nearly 8,000 of our NIKE
passionate about sport and enthusiastic
retail employees have regularly coached kids
about giving back to their communities.
nearly in in their communities.
We are proud to fuel their efforts. The NIKE
Foundation matches donations to charitable
causes, dollar-for-dollar, up to $10,000 each
7,000 31 The NCIF brings employees into the grant-
making process to advise on where grants
year per employee. For causes supporting employees countries
should be awarded to support the work of
sport and play in the community, we give
local organizations in the communities where
$2 for every $1 donated by employees. In
they live and work. In FY18, NCIF expanded
FY18, our employees, supported by the
to Barcelona and Memphis, bringing the
NIKE Foundation’s matching gift program,
This is great total of NCIF programs operating around the
contributed approximately more than
progress and we world to 11. In Barcelona and Memphis alone,
$7.5 million to more than 1,900 schools and
will continue to employees helped direct more than $200,000
charitable organizations around the world.
offer opportunities in grants to local charities that use the power
tracked more than for our employees of sport to positively impact kids in their
to engage in their respective communities.
116,000 communities.
volunteer hours
Community Impact
Measure
Drive sustained community
impact in all of our primary
markets and sourcing backyards
In FY18, NIKE continued its sponsorship
of the Portland-based bike-share program,
BIKETOWN, with 1,002 bikes and 147 bike
300+
stations across the city. Launched in FY17,
the five-year commitment will provide $10
million to the program, contribute designs
for BIKETOWN’s stations and bicycles,
and increase accessibility. In FY18, NIKE, hours invested by top industry
in partnership with the Portland Bureau professionals in footwear and
of Transportation and other community apparel design to share their
organizations, helped launch Adaptive knowledge with students
BIKETOWN, with the goal of increasing biking
access for people of all abilities. NIKE also
launched the BIKETOWN Community Design
• Tokyo: NIKE worked with The Foundation empowering teachers to help promising
Challenge, a contest to create bike wraps
for Promoting Sound Growth of Children to students plan and work towards their high
representing the five “quadrants” of Portland.
launch JUMP-JAM, an innovative program school and college dreams. In FY18, the Wings
that merges sport and free play to give Scholars Program awarded full ride college
Throughout FY18, NIKE expanded its
elementary school aged children both the scholarships to 31 high school seniors in
relationships and programming investments to
physical activity and social skills they need. North America; 350 students in Greater China
get kids moving in several cities.
made it through their third and final year of
In our sourcing communities, we worked with high school with the Wings scholarship. The
• Berlin: NIKE celebrated the launch of Berlin
educators and community leaders to invest scholars program works in partnership with over
Kickt, a community football program created
in Unlock School Gates in Guangzhou and 30 nonprofit organizations around the world
with two organizations: the International
in Active With Sport in Ho Chi Minh City and who provide high school and college readiness
Rescue Committee and local NGO
Hanoi. With the goal of improving the quality services to underserved youth. In FY18, Wings
buntkicktgut. Berlin Kickt combines the
of physical education for primary school kids, provided operational grants to each partner to
universal language of football with social and
the NIKE-supported programs offered coach enable their powerful work in the communities
emotional skills training to help girls and boys
and educator training, and sport field days for they serve.
from primary schools across Berlin (including
families to drive activities for local kids. In FY18,
many refugees) to play, learn, and realize their
these programs reached more than 11,000 First-class product design is core to the Jordan
potential in a safe and secure environment.
primary school kids across 17 schools. Brand and Wings provides opportunities for
young people to pursue educational and
• Los Angeles and New York City: We inspired
The Jordan Brand Wings initiative supports career opportunities in the art and design fields
more than 12,000 runners to participate in
underserved youth around the world, with a through the Jordan Designers Program. In
the NIKE Go Races. These races helped raise
particular interest in communities that have FY18, top industry professionals in footwear
funds to support local schools and community
traditionally faced challenges accessing quality and apparel design invested over 300 hours in
organizations, like Students Run LA, the LA84
education. The Jordan Scholars Program sharing their knowledge with Chicago students.
Foundation, Lower East Side Girls Club, and
provides access to educational opportunities, Several student participants received the Jordan
Power Play NYC.
enabling young people around the world Wings scholarship and are pursuing higher
to dream beyond their circumstances and education in the field of design.
• Mexico City: NIKE brought play to schools
through “Juega Más: Escuelas Activas” (Play
More: Active Schools) in partnership with
From our home state of Oregon to offices worldwide, NIKE invests in communities where we have a
the nonprofit Yo Quiero, Yo Puedo (I Want
large employee presence. Below is a snapshot of two of our Oregon initiatives.
To, I Can), an initiative designed to improve
the quality of physical education in the city’s
FY18
primary schools. Initiative Goal FY18 Recipients
Giving Totals
NIKE School Increase Oregon high school graduation rates and help all
99 high schools $1.07 million
Innovation Fund students reach their full potential
• F
ire Safety: We require Tier 1 suppliers34
to adopt fire prevention and emergency
action plans to protect workers during
normal working operations and emergency
situations. To accelerate management
capability, worker involvement, and
understanding of fire safety issues and
preventative measures, NIKE engaged
with the Fair Labor Association (FLA) and
Institution of Occupational Safety and
Health on a global initiative to develop and
implement a portfolio of fire prevention
and fire safety tools for factories. In FY18,
the program expanded to over 33 factory
locations – more than 2,100 workers were
trained as safety leaders, and more than
90,000 workers completed training sessions
on fire safety.
34 O H&S data is reported using calendar year instead of fiscal year to align
data with regulatory reporting requirements, including OSHA and BLS
(which is used as an industry standard).
35 Focus factories are key strategic contract factories within our source base
that represent the majority of finished goods production of NIKE footwear,
apparel, and Converse footwear.
36 Using CY17 BLS rates as BLS rates for CY18 have not been published at
the time of the FY18 NIKE Impact Report publication.
37 The reported injury fates reflect a combination of NIKE full-time and
certain external temporary workers.
38 Data is collected based on U.S. legal reporting requirements, reporting
on all NIKE operations except retail which is excluded from OSHA
recordkeeping requirements. Retail will be included in future reports.
39 The industry average comes from the U.S. Department of Labor; Bureau
of Labor Statistics. Each industry classification (such as DC, Air MI,
Offices, Footwear Manufacturing, Apparel Manufacturing) reports a
separate average for recordable injuries and lost time rates (which
are captured).
40 For Tier 1 focus factories by Product Engine for calendar year 2016.
Self-reported by factories. The BLS does not calculate manufacturing
rates for equipment.
FY18 Highlights
93% 140,000
Percentage of NIKE’s 542 Number of workers in
contract factories that were contract factories deploying
rated Bronze or better, our NIKE’s engagement and
definition of sustainable wellbeing survey
0 1m
Number of child Number of contract
labor findings factory workers in
NIKE supply base
471
50% Number of audits
performed by NIKE
or on our behalf
Increase of contract factories
participating in a trade finance
program with the International
Finance Corporation (IFC)
Tier 2
NIKE added additional
strategic material
suppliers (Tier 2) to our
Manufacturing Map
Sustainable Sourcing 41
Manufacturing Map
An interactive list of our Tier 1 finished
goods manufacturers and strategic
Tier 2 materials suppliers is available at
http://manufacturingmap.nikeinc.com
The map includes detailed information
on factory location, supplier group, type
of product made, number of workers,
gender and migrant percentage, and
average age.
with leading international standards to 42 Audit counts were lower in FY17 and FY18 primarly due to NIKE’s
Performance protect worker rights, create a safe working introduction of the Factory Compliance Ownership (FCO) program. As
the next step in evolving sustainability and compliance management,
Factories Rated Bronze or Better (%) environment, safeguard communities where NIKE introduced the FCO program in early 2016. The program provides
incentive opportunities for factories that maintain NIKE’s compliance
suppliers operate, and advance environmental standards and move beyond minimum compliance. Included in the
protections. Across our compliance and incentives is reduced audit frequency with self-assessments when
a factory has met thresholds for maintaining compliance over a
41 We removed the “ELEVATE A CULTURE OF HEALTH AND SAFETY” measure from this section because we cover it in the “Additional Priority Issues: Occupational Health and Safety” section of the report.
Sustainable Sourcing
Sustainable Manufacturing and Sourcing Index (SMSI): Factory Ratings
2% <1%
Yellow: Inconsistent; remediation No rating
plans in place to return to compliance
4% 1%
Red: Serious issues or failure NIKE, Inc. ilver: Industry-leading manufacturing
S
to return to compliance; standards and innovation
remediation plans in place to 93% Bronze or better
address or under review for exit
542 factories 92%
Bronze: Baseline compliance
with our Code of Conduct
Footwear
Apparel
Equipment
IN COMPLIANCE with NIKE Code of Conduct and Code Leadership Standards
1 11 11 305 0 0
0 8 1 81 0 0
When facilities receive a below compliance and processes to prevent future reoccurrence. We continue to review the most frequent areas
rating, they are expected to remediate the For the situations where it was found workers of non-compliance, such as hours, wages, and
issue with onsite verification of the remediation had paid fees for their employment, we required benefits (see “Audits, Non-Compliance” table)
within six months. For example, in FY18, as a suppliers to repay workers for such fees. In all to identify ways we can work with our contract
result of our enhanced audit program, we found instances, full re-audits are conducted to verify factories to strengthen compliance.
a few isolated instances of foreign migrant corrective actions have been completed.
worker employment practices that were in After the SMSI was launched in 2012, NIKE
violation of NIKE’s Code of Conduct and Code If a facility does not sufficiently address an set the target of having 100% Bronze or better
Leadership Standards. The issues involved issue, it is placed on probation. Further failure factories by 2020. In 2012, 49% of 910 contract
workers paying fees related to their recruitment to meet compliance will lead to NIKE potentially factories were rated Bronze. By the end of
and employment and one instance where considering a responsible exit, which includes FY18, just over 93% of NIKE’s 542 contract
the facility had penalties for early contract providing early notice and a clear ramp-down factories were rated at Bronze or beyond. The
termination. In each case, we worked with the schedule. If critical issues are found, immediate higher percentage of Bronze is due both to
supplier to remediate the identified issues and remediation is required. improvements in factory compliance levels
to strengthen their Human Resource systems and a reduction of factories failing to achieve
baseline compliance in our source base.
Sustainable Sourcing
Factory Ratings Audits, Non-Compliance (%)45 As part of requiring fair working conditions at
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY16 FY17 FY18
our contract manufacturers, NIKE is continuing
No Rating 2 3 1 Working Hours 39 43 39
its work to incentivize contract manufacturers
Red 27 23 23 Wages and Benefits 35 36 34
to eliminate EOT under the 100% Bronze audit
Yellow 60 28 12 Regular Employment 11 2 7
program. This issue is prevalent throughout
Bronze 570 532 499 Forced Labor Risks 0 6 5
our industry and can affect the wellbeing of
Silver 4 5 7 Harassment and Abuse 4 4 3
workers, result in errors in product quality, and
Gold 0 0 0 Discrimination 2 2 3
has been shown to be of uncertain benefit as
Total 663 591 542 Freedom of Association the additional hours can be less productive than
and Collective 0 0 1 normal hours.
Bargaining
We continuously search for opportunities – like Age Standards 0 1 0
One of the requirements of the NIKE Code
improving the quality of audit data, addressing Other 8 5 8
Leadership Standards is to eliminate excessive
the root causes of issues, and working with
45 T
he top issues identified in audits in FY16, 17, and 18 remained similar working hours so that workers at supplier
other brands in the supply chain – to drive with working hours, wages, and benefits being the most common types
factories do not work more than 60 hours a
consistent performance as we strive for of findings. For all findings, the factories were required to remediate the
identified issues and the corrective actions were verified through another week and have at least 24 hours off in every
100% compliance. onsite audit.
seven-day period.
NIKE is a signatory of the Social Labor Worker Count Results46
In FY18, we saw a decrease in the number
Convergence Program, which seeks to drive FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 of factories failing to meet NIKE’s baselines
industry convergence on factory compliance to Americas 87,234 71,904 77,833 72,986 expectations for EOT, from 23 factories in
reduce audit duplication and free up resources EMEA 17,197 18,674 18,396 19,114 FY17 to 13 factories, representing 2.4% of
to invest in improving working conditions. It is N Asia 236,142 233,561 198,877 170,724 the supply base.
also based on a model of supplier ownership S Asia 287,862 304,932 296,984 286,938
that aligns with NIKE’s approach to sustainable SE Asia 386,293 436,970 444,907 473,258 However, a low rate of repeat findings continues
and consistent performance. During FY18, Total 1,014,728 1,066,041 1,036,997 1,023,020 to make it challenging to predict and anticipate
NIKE was actively involved in supporting
where EOT will occur. For example, of all the
the development of this tool and verification 46 Count of workers in NIKE source base at fiscal year-end for period shown.
factories with an EOT finding in FY18, none
methodology and in FY19 will work to pilot this
were repeat offenders from FY17. In fact, 45%
approach in our supply chain. Measure of factories with EOT incidents during FY18
Learn more: Eliminate excessive overtime (EOT) either resolved the issues and went on to return
to a Bronze rating by the end of the year or
Social Labor Convergence Program
were no longer NIKE factories.
Performance
Factory Ratings: by Product Engine44 Factories with EOT (%) While the Code of Conduct focuses on what
FY16 FY17 FY18 our suppliers do, we recognize that there is
T1 Apparel 394 363 328 more work that NIKE can do to accelerate
No Rating 2 0 1 FY15 / 3.3% compliance and progress in our suppliers’
Red 15 14 11 factories. We are actively working to support
Yellow 42 18 11 improvements in the enforcement of local
Bronze 335 331 305 FY16 / 3.2% laws through our support of Better Work
Silver 0 0 0 and training of factory management through
Gold 0 0 0
FY17 / 3.9% Lean 2.0. NIKE is also continuing to evolve
T1 Equipment 127 101 90 demand and production planning with our
No Rating 0 2 0 suppliers to smooth volume fluctuations and
Red 7 3 8
FY18 / 2.4% 0.9 p.p. (vs. FY15 baseline) enhance predictability. However, some of these
Yellow 8 6 1
FY20 target
factories are multi-brand facilities and require
0%
Bronze 112 90 81 a collaborative approach. Our long-term vision
Silver 0 0 0 is to facilitate greater industry engagement and
Gold 0 0 0 alignment that shifts the approach suppliers
T1 Footwear 142 127 124 take to forecasting.
No Rating 0 1 0
Red 5 6 4
Yellow 10 4 0
Bronze 123 111 113
Silver 4 5 7
Gold 0 0 0
Total 663 591 542
44 Represents Tier 1 (T1) or finished goods manufacturing.
Engaged Workforce
Target
Ensure contract factory
workers share in
productivity gains
Every contract factory worker in our supply
chain has the right to compensation sufficient
to meet their basic needs and provide some
discretionary income. We are engaging with
our suppliers to progressively meet this
requirement. We know that factory worker
wages can increase as overall factory
operational efficiency improves, and we
know that valued workers accelerate factory
performance to the benefit of workers,
factories, and NIKE.
34%
of facilities participate
in the ILO’s Better Work
Program in lieu of a NIKE
specific labor audit
FY18 Highlights
75%
73% Percentage of
renewable energy
secured in our owned
99.9%
Percentage of Nike brand or operated facilities Percentage of footwear
footwear and apparel styles through existing finished goods manufacturing
that used some recycled agreements waste that was recycled or
materials converted to energy in the
fourth quarter of FY18
6.4bn 10m
Number of plastic Pounds of athletic
bottles transformed footwear and surplus
into recycled polyester manufactured scrap
footwear and apparel turned into performance
since 2010 products through the
Nike Grind program
0 32bn
Amount of Liters of water
PFC-based saved by sourcing
finishes in our sustainable cotton
products by 2021
Environmental Moonshot
In the FY14/15 Sustainable Business Report, Our current 2020 targets are milestones in our industry, NIKE extrapolates much of our
we introduced our intent to double our business towards the moonshot. Our 2025 targets data in Tier 2, 3, and 4 using industry averages.
with half the environmental impact. This bold will expand the scope of coverage and aim We plan to work with our industry to expand our
moonshot was meant to spur progressive to further reduce our impact. In addition to ability to get accurate, reliable environmental
thinking within our organization and serves as a improving performance, we are also enhancing impact assessments across the value chain and
north star for our work in sustainability, guiding our capability to track performance further back embrace more systemic change to scale low-
our efforts in the near-term and informing the in the supply chain. Right now, like most impact solutions.
development of our long-term commitments.
Product
$2bn
of revenue generated
by Flyknit products
Learn more:
Product and Materials Sustainability Indices
Explore NIKE’s Value Chain Footprint
Product
We have scaled Nike Air – one of our most Apparel We continue to observe a shift in consumer and
sustainable innovations – to 50% of our In FY18, NIKE Apparel saw recycled polyester market demand toward cotton rich products,
NIKE footwear. Since 2008, all Nike Air soles usage increase by 13% compared to FY17. like cotton fleece and sportswear fabrics. We
are composed of at least 50% recycled This was driven by high volume products like know that cotton can have a large impact on
manufacturing waste. Released in FY18, the Legend Tee Shirt, NBA jerseys and shorts, our water and chemical footprint. As a result,
Nike Air Max 270 air sole contains more than global football kits (World Cup 2018 and clubs), NIKE Sportswear apparel teams are increasing
70% recycled manufacturing waste – a tribute and Women’s (bras and pants) and Men’s their focus on efficiency to counteract fabric
to the ever-increasing quality of our repurposed Training (Therma Fleece). weight increases while continuing to develop
materials. Our Air Manufacturing Innovation our portfolio of sustainable cotton options
facilities also divert over 95% of manufacturing (organic cotton, recycled cotton and BCI
waste from landfills. cotton). We are committed to responding
to consumer taste, while also balancing
sustainability impacts.
Measure
Greater than 80% of all NIKE
product will be scored on
sustainability performance
Performance
Product Scored on Sustainability
Performance (%)
FY15 / 27%
FY16 / 68%
FY17 / 71%
80%
NIKE’s Product Creation teams continue to
add new product areas to the scope of the
targets, to better measure our progress and
drive continued sustainability improvements in
all our products. In FY18, NIKE Apparel added
large volume product groups to the ASI scoring
process including Asia-Sized versions, NIKE
Direct Product, and Extended Size Range.
Materials
Target
Increase use of more
70%
sustainable materials recycled manufacturing
waste in every Nike
Air Max 270 Air sole
Performance
% More Sustainable Materials
Apparel
Footwear
19%
31%
FY15
21%
33%
FY16
33% Our materials – where they come from and continued to increase the use of EPMs in our
32% how they are used – represent the biggest products, growing their usage alongside our
FY17 opportunity to reduce our environmental overall material usage. In Apparel, NIKE’s
footprint, which is why we place so much continued ramp-up of Better Cotton and
15 p.p. (vs. FY15 baseline) emphasis on this area. strategic conversions to recycled polyester
34% has led to a steady increase in sourcing of
31% The MSI provides our material and product sustainable materials. Footwear’s use of lower
FY18 0 p.p. (vs. FY15 baseline) teams with the information they need to choose impact materials, specifically recycled polyester
the best options from amongst 70,000 different in Flyknit footwear, remains constant.
FY20 target materials from more than 600 vendors. This
allows them to make better decisions around In FY18, some recycled materials were used in
Increase which materials are the most sustainable with 73% of Nike brand footwear and apparel styles.
the ultimate goal of driving our environmental While we grew the number of styles that used
footprint lower. recycled materials in FY18, the overall number
of styles also increased, leading to an overall
In FY18, our relative use of Environmentally decrease of 2 percentage points since FY17.
Preferred Materials (EPM) remained flat across
apparel and footwear, although it has done Cotton
so during a period of growth for our overall See our Cotton measure for detail on our move
material buys. This indicates that we have towards sourcing cotton more sustainably.
Materials
Transforming Polyester to Lessen Our Impact with 60% recycled polyester content which Rubber
Polyester is a high-performance, comfortable quickly became NIKE’s highest volume By FY18, 92% of the rubber used in our
material. It is the number one material used performance fleece material used across products was environmentally preferred.
in our products by volume, and represents multiple programs. This increase is due to our increased use
approximately 32% of our overall carbon of environmentally preferred compounds,
footprint. Because of this, we are constantly Since 2010, NIKE has transformed more while slowly phasing out the less
looking for ways to reduce that impact through than 6.4 billion plastic bottles into recycled preferred compounds.
greater adoption of recycled polyester and polyester footwear and apparel. As a result,
other technologies. NIKE has been recognized as using the most Innovating New Super Materials – Flyleather
recycled polyester in the industry for the sixth For NIKE, leather is featured across many
As of FY18, 19% of the polyester used in our straight year by the Textile Exchange. iconic footwear styles – and it has the second-
products was recycled. All core Flyknit yarns highest environmental impact on the company’s
continue to be recycled polyester. Our global Learn more: carbon emissions. Flyleather can change that
football kits and NBA on-court and retail jerseys 2018 Preferred Fiber and Materials Market – a new super material made with at least 50%
and shorts are made with 100% recycled Report leather fiber introduced by NIKE in FY18.
polyester. We developed a new fleece fabric
During a typical leather manufacturing process,
up to 15% of a cow’s hide falls to the tannery
Top Five Materials by Volume (kg) floor, eventually going to landfill. To create
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Flyleather, we combine those leather fibers
Cotton
with synthetic ones, using a process that fuses
Organic 4,123,000 (7%) 4,613,000 (7%) 5,622,000 (8%) 7,147,000 (8%)
everything into one material.
Recycled 68,000 (<1%) 75,000 (<1%) 183,000 (<1%) 375,000 (<1%)
BCI 9,879,000 (17%) 17,629,000 (27%) 32,487,000 (45%) 42,335,000 (50%)
Flyleather is lighter and more durable than
Total 59,058,000 64,416,000 72,195,000 85,514,000
traditional leather (based on abrasion testing)
Polyester
and creating it has a lower carbon footprint
Recycled 22,769,000 (16%) 25,481,000 (18%) 25,856,000 (17%) 29,429,000 (19%)
than traditional leather manufacturing.
Total 138,494,000 144,499,000 156,492,000 157,611,000
Furthermore, because Flyleather is delivered on
Corrugate/Paper
a roll rather than as an irregularly shaped hide,
Recycled 95,424,000 (84%) 103,977,000 (84%) 107,052,000 (84%) 129,087,000 (84%)
it improves cutting efficiency and creates less
waste than traditional full-grain leather.
Total 113,568,000 123,622,000 127,236,000 153,425,000
Rubber
In FY18, we included this new material in a
Environmentally Preferred 63,414,000 (89%) 59,460,000 (91%) 65,808,000 (98%) 68,543,000 (92%)47
limited release of the Nike Flyleather Tennis
Total 71,380,000 65,382,000 67,382,000 74,379,000
Classic SE. As we think about the future,
Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate (EVA) Foam
Flyleather becomes an answer to retaining the
Recycled 185,000 (<1%) 151,000 (<1%) 66,000 (<1%) 158,000 (<1%)
qualities intrinsic to some of NIKE’s greatest
Total 81,221,000 97,214,000 103,182,000 97,001,000
icons (i.e., Air Force 1 and Air Jordan 1) with
47 Decline due to shifts in model mix.
an EPM.
Materials
Measure overall environmental footprint by developing Over 90% of our cotton is used by three
more sustainable cotton options that promote product groups: Nike brand apparel, socks, and
Source 100% of our cotton more not only better water stewardship, but pesticide Converse footwear. In FY18, Nike brand apparel
sustainably (certified organic, reduction and fairer labor practices. led the company by sustainably sourcing 68%
of its cotton, with Converse-branded apparel
Better Cotton Initiative, or NIKE is a leader in advancing better approaches close behind at 67%.
recycled) across NIKE by the to cotton. Since 1998, we’ve been blending
end of calendar year 2020 organic cotton into our cotton products, and We blend a minimum of 10% organic cotton
in 2002, we co-founded Organic Exchange into nearly every Nike brand apparel cotton
(now Textile Exchange) to drive industry fabric, a strategy that has made us one of
Performance transformation in preferred fibers, integrity and the top four buyers of certified organic cotton
Cotton Sourced More Sustainably (%) standards, and responsible supply networks. globally according to Textile Exchange’s (TE)
2018 Preferred Fibers and Materials Report.
Cotton Type Used in FY18 We also rank fifth in Better Cotton sourced
FY15 / 24% (per BCI’s report on 2017 calendar year).
FY18 / 58% 34 p.p. (vs. FY15 baseline) Looking ahead, we believe that converting
the final 20% of our cotton supply chain will
FY20 target
100 %
be the most difficult. We also need to further
In 2011, we made the commitment to ensure address water risk by collaborating beyond the
that, by 2020, 100% of our cotton is sourced standards and our 2020 target. We aim to be a
more sustainably – certified organic, Better leader by using our influence and reach to drive
Leading in Advancing Better Cotton (BCI), or recycled cotton. In FY18, we
Approaches to Cotton the cotton industry toward sustainability and
sourced over 58% more sustainable cotton, helping others on their journeys.
As one of our top-volume materials, cotton saving more than 32 billion liters of water and
represents more than one-half of our water 111,000 kilograms of pesticides. The biggest
footprint, consumed mostly during the NIKE Women Sportwear popular Leg-A-See
challenge is growing our sustainable cotton and Gym Vintage collections feature both
agricultural phase. In addition, 78% of global sourcing at a faster rate than our overall cotton
cotton farming water footprint is in high to organic cotton and recycled polyester in their
consumption – which grew about 20% in FY18, fabric blends.
extremely-high water stress areas. We believe driven by increased consumer preference for
we can create the most positive impact on our cotton-rich products like fleece and tee shirts.
Learn more:
RE100
FY17 / 22% 4. Working with other organizations (i.e. As we pursue coverage for the rest of our
corporate peers, government, NGOs, global operations, we see challenges in finding
manufacturing partners) to scale impact solutions that fit all our guiding principles
FY18 / 19%48 5 p.p. (vs. FY15 baseline) including cost, risk, proximity, and additionality.
and create better market conditions for
FY25 target We understand the need for urgent action
100 %
clean energy
and are working with other leading brands
and governments to advance renewable
energy globally.
48 Slight decline in FY18 is due to the delay between buildings going live
and the period of time required before the electricity meters can be
incorporated into the Oregon Power Purchase Agreement.
25%
4.0 inbound leg (origin to destination geography),
take up less space in transportation than boxes.
air freight is 25 times more carbon intensive
For apparel shipments that are switched to
than ocean freight.
envelopes, the estimated carbon savings per
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 unit is at least 50%.
As part of our efforts to optimize air freight
and help ensure decisions are demand-driven,
Carbon Emissions Per Unit – Key Operations We are also working with our logistics service
in FY18 cross-functional teams completed a
(kg CO2e/unit) providers to elevate their sustainable service
robust review of the current processes and
offerings. One way we have done this is by
tools. Through this work, teams identified
-2% (vs. FY15 baseline) deploying our SCSI for outbound logistics
key metrics, tools, operating models, and
1.8 services. As with inbound transportation, the
communications needed to support demand-
1.75 1.75 1.71 SCSI establishes clear minimum sustainability
driven decision-making. With the new process,
requirements and drives innovation discussions.
we are now using signals from the marketplace
1.6
1.62 Through partnering with our providers, we have
as we near the start of a season to gain clarity
begun taking advantage of available alternative
on when product is needed. This helps to ensure
FY20 target
fuels for transportation in Europe and China.
that we use air freight only when necessary.
25%
1.4
90%
of focus footwear factories
successfully improved their
boiler systems in FY18
emissions. Car Emissions 1,616 406 2,130 535 2,653 666 2,496 627
Corporate Jets 12,411 3,576 16,972 4,392 13,105 3,391 14,586 3,773
Learn more: Distribution Centers 40,970 8,084 34,026 6,698 39,872 7,861 52,377 10,048
PwC Assurance Report HQs 22,292 4,448 28,379 5,678 33,859 6,794 30,955 6,213
Headquarter Facilities Electricity Consumption (MWh) and Scope 2 Emissions (Metric Tonnes CO2e) by Business Division
At our Global HQs we continue to focus on FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
implementing our 100% renewable energy Electricity
commitment and reducing energy usage Air MI
through the following programs: Grid Electricity 39,121 40,647 50,249 66,50850
Distribution Centers
• W
orkspace optimization by reviewing the Grid Electricity 128,408 153,671 165,004 165,422
amount of new office space needed to fuel Onsite Solar 1,639 1,467 3,530 4,623
NIKE’s growth versus historic square footage Onsite Wind - - - 4,814
requirements while enhancing the employee HQs
workplace experience Grid Electricity 77,437 86,001 89,359 95,681
Onsite Solar 81 7 - -
• E
nergy efficient building standards for new Other Offices and Building Construction
construction globally Grid Electricity 52,113 54,557 56,907 53,487
Retail
• HVAC and other equipment upgrades to high Grid Electricity 185,280 199,352 209,300 216,982
efficiency models Steam 1,007 614 865 764
Total: NIKE 485,087 536,316 575,213 608,282
• L
ED lighting retrofits and maximizing natural Grid Electricity 482,359 534,229 570,818 598,081
light for new and renovated spaces Onsite Solar 1,721 1,474 3,530 4,623
Onsite Wind - - - 4,814
• HVAC SMART controls or other mechanisms Steam 1,007 614 865 764
to manage energy in occupied vs. Scope 2 Emissions
unoccupied spaces Air MI
Location-Based 25,792 25,028 33,737 34,492
In FY18, we completed the newly constructed Market-Based 18,099 14,873 18,156 36,781
Sebastian Coe and Coach K buildings at our Distribution Centers
World Headquarters. The Coach K building Location-Based 66,426 79,381 82,971 77,899
has been awarded LEED Platinum certification Market-Based 58,152 67,752 61,084 55,257
and the Sebastian Coe building is on track HQs
for certification. In addition, at our World Location-Based 33,457 31,481 39,176 33,235
Headquarters all HVAC and other equipment
Market-Based 27,038 15,935 14,577 14,317
replacements were upgraded to high
Other Offices and Building Construction
efficiency models.
Location-Based 27,046 26,795 28,158 20,170
Market-Based 27,238 27,254 27,280 19,908
At our Greater China Headquarters, the team
Retail
implemented air conditioning controls to reduce
Location-Based 97,772 99,670 103,215 93,307
air conditioning of unoccupied spaces. A facility
Market-Based 98,154 99,959 103,393 91,978
operations strategy which leverages weather
Total: NIKE, Inc.
forecasts to adjust morning cooldown scheduling
Location-Based 250,493 262,354 287,256 259,10351
has reduced air conditioning electricity
Market-Based 228,680 225,772 224,489 218,24051
consumption. And at our Hurley Headquarters,
50 Growth in FY18 energy consumption due to expansion of an existing Air MI facility and opening of an additional Air MI facility. Before the expansion, natural
we completed an LED lighting retrofit. gas was only used to heat a small section of the Beaverton Air MI facility. With the expansion, additional equipment was installed, some of which consumes
natural gas.
51 This metric is part of Management’s Assertion on select sustainability metrics, which PwC has performed limited assurance over for the period from June 1, 2017
to May 31, 2018, as indicated in the Report of Independent Accountants.
35%
10 This analysis identified future potential for 23%
regon Business for Climate
O further energy reductions. We used insights from
The Oregon Business Alliance for Climate is this assessment to develop training materials
a statewide initiative focused on mobilizing FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 for the textile dyeing and finishing industry to
industry support and business leadership encourage energy reductions at scale.
towards advancing climate policy and
instituting a price on carbon emissions while Carbon Emissions Per kg –
investing in Oregon’s clean economy. Textile Dyeing and Finishing (kg CO2e/kg)
35%
make commitments to set science-based 3.5
targets and then have two years to submit
their targets for validation by the initiative’s
team of experts. FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Waste
We Imagine a World
Where There is No Waste
We have an exciting opportunity to transform
everything around the design solution,
how we source, how we make, how the
product’s used, how it’s returned, and how
it’s ultimately reimagined – and to solve
problems holistically. Achieving a circular
future is a collective effort and we’re working
with partners like the Ellen MacArthur
Foundation to explore new approaches
to unlocking the circular economy for our
industry. In FY18, we also joined the Global
Fashion Agenda 2020 Circular Fashion
System Commitment which calls on fashion
brands and retailers to accelerate the
transition to a circular fashion system.
Brillia Running Stadium walkway for paralympic track surface made from Mondo Super X with a Nike Grind backing – Tokyo, Japan
Target NIKE is pushing the boundaries of the circular In addition, we are exploring new and better
economy – from reducing waste generation uses of factory scrap through the expansion
Eliminate footwear wherever possible to transforming remaining
waste into value. Our focus is on diverting
of the Nike Grind program and the NIKE Open
Innovation Challenge, which launched with
manufacturing waste to waste from landfill or incineration52 by reducing a focus on developing higher value recycling
waste generation, increasing recycling, and markets for manufacturing materials currently
landfill or incineration, converting waste that can’t be recycled into going to energy recovery. To enable this, we are
while continuing to reduce energy. It doesn’t just make sense for the
planet, it makes business sense too. NIKE
also working to improve scrap quality control,
inventory data, processing infrastructure,
overall waste recognizes that the amount of materials that supply chain operational efficiency, and cost
we extract and refine increases our carbon competitiveness.
emissions, water use, and chemical footprint.
Performance Nike Grind
Waste to Landfill – Footwear Manufacturing (%) By the fourth quarter of FY18, 99.9% of Driven by the belief that “waste” is simply
our footwear finished goods manufacturing excess materials in the wrong person’s hands,
waste was recycled or converted to energy53. the Nike Grind program is a platform to recycle
FY16 / 6.6%
Additionally, 100% of in-scope footwear athletic footwear and surplus manufacturing
finished goods manufacturing factories fully scrap into performance products. Internally,
FY17 / 3.9% implemented the Waste Minimum Program, we upcycle Nike Grind materials back in NIKE
which sets expectations for: performance footwear and apparel. Externally,
NIKE has recovered and supplied Nike Grind
FY18 / 1.8% 4.8 p.p. (vs. FY15 baseline) • Waste management commitment materials – such as rubber and foam – to sports
FY20 target
surface manufacturers since 1992, which
0%
• A
hierarchy of waste where disposal have been incorporated into more than
is a last resort 1 billion square feet of running tracks, gym
floors, and other surfaces worldwide.
eparation and handling of waste
• S
for recycling
Waste
Footwear Waste Volumes (Lbs) by Measure We’ve made some progress in waste reduction
at our HQs, due in large part to a durable
Nike Grind Program54
FY16 FY17 FY18 Reduce waste index by 10%, dishware program introduced in 2017 at NIKE’s
Factory Waste 9,336,826 11,257,883 9,374,920 covering footwear manufacturing, World Headquarters (WHQ) that replaces
Post-Consumer55 587,810 1,356,021 1,196,390 single-use plastic alternatives. And while this
distribution centers, and is good progress, we continue to review ways
54 Measured in pounds of Nike Grind for use in sports and other
flooring surfaces. headquarter locations to address other complex factors in footwear
55 Post-consumer includes waste from distribution centers, Reuse-A-Shoe
program, defective samples, and returns.
manufacturing that make waste reduction
challenging, including more complicated
Performance designs that can increase defect rates, new
NIKE’s premium materials are made with Waste Index – FW Manufacturing, Distribution
athletes in mind. By recycling those materials production shifting to factory locations that
Centers (DCs), and Headquarters (HQs)
into Nike Grind sports surfaces, we continue to have less experience managing waste efficiency
support the athlete in all of us. This year, NIKE 3% (vs. FY15 baseline)
programs, and an overall tension between
worked with Olympic marathoner Joan Benoit innovation and speed-to-consumer versus
105 material efficiency. For DCs, we have seen
Samuelson and the community of Freeport, ME
100 103 customer orders trend away from full-case
to install a new competition level track and field
using Nike Grind at the local high school. cartons, driving the need to debox inbound
100 100
factory cartons in our distribution centers,
98 resulting in additional waste.
Looking to the future, NIKE is exploring
new, non-sport uses for Nike Grind through FY20 target
10%
95
relationships across the automotive, furniture, NIKE’s cross-functional Material Efficiency
technology, and built-environment industries. Team has identified and is driving a portfolio
In April, Nike Grind launched the Design with FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 of manufacturing waste reduction initiatives
Grind Open Innovation Challenge, calling upon intended to mitigate the increase in
designers, engineers, and scientists to create manufacturing waste. Through data analysis
new products using Nike Grind materials. NIKE is actively working towards reducing and engagement of suppliers and key NIKE
After receiving over creative 600 creative waste from footwear manufacturing, DCs, stakeholders, broad agreement has been
submissions from 50 countries, we selected and HQs. While HQ are on track with waste reached on the most significant drivers of
five winners and are now supporting them to reduction efforts, footwear manufacturing and increased manufacturing waste. This is
develop scalable, beautiful products made with DCs, are experiencing challenges which are informing development of additional initiatives
Nike Grind. offsetting our gains, making the overall measure and 2025 waste reduction targets.
increase by 3% versus the FY15 baseline.
From Apparel to Acoustic Panels –
Distribution Centers
Corrugated cardboard cartons are the biggest
source of waste at our DCs, accounting for
about 85% of DC waste. Cardboard waste
generation continues to grow because of
changing customer order profiles to greater
variety of products and/or smaller orders at any
given time. This, in turn, means that our DCs
must debox cartons delivered from our factories
and repackage products into more customized
orders, a process that inherently creates
more waste.
Waste
More than half of the soles of NIKE shoes
are made using a process in which rubber or
plastic-based material is injected into a mold
– through channels – and formed into parts.
When this process is completed, the parts are
removed and there is leftover material in the
channels. Some material also gets pushed
out the sides of the mold. These sources
of waste account for 18% of total footwear
waste. In FY18, we rolled out guidelines
for designing injection molds in a way that
minimizes the volume of the injection channels
and associated waste. These guidelines will
be applied when new molds are designed.
This is expected to reduce waste from 500,000
1.2m kg
to 1 million kilograms per year and save more
than $1 million starting in FY19.
Waste
Reuse-a-Shoe Facility – Memphis, Tennessee USA
Waste (metric tonnes)
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Distribution Centers
Landfilled 2,719 3,117 3,270 3,507
Recycled 29,391 29,593 32,687 34,183
Composted 247 274 197 219
Waste to Energy Incineration 560 715 1,022 1,040
Total DC Waste 32,917 33,699 37,176 38,949
HQs
Landfilled 1,626 1,816 1,807 2,105
Recycled 2,063 1,708 1,927 2,325
Composted 707 1,042 1,157 868
Total HQs Waste 4,396 4,566 4,891 5,298
FW Manufacturing56
Reused and Recycled - 49,800 48,055 45,887
Energy Recovery - 30,356 38,335 45,389
Landfilled and Incinerated - 5,639 3,550 1,702
Total FW MFG Waste - 85,794 89,941 92,979
Measure can’t be recycled. In locations where recycling Though some smaller programs have helped
and composting infrastructure is non-existent diversion rates in our HQs globally, a change
Increase landfill diversion for particular waste streams, some DCs are in the municipal composting program at WHQ
at distribution centers and exploring alternative options for waste disposal, has eliminated non-food waste materials from
as well as material substitution. compost streams. Since WHQ account for
headquarter locations approximately 80% of the total HQs facility
Seeking New Opportunities to waste, this has negatively influenced our overall
Performance Reduce Waste – Distribution Centers diversion rates. However, Hurley HQ saw an
Landfill Diversion DCs and HQs (%) The waste diverted from landfills by our DCs increase in landfill diversion due to increased
has remained fairly constant since the FY15 focus on employee engagement programs to
baseline at 91%. promote recycling. The remaining campuses
FY15 / 88% have consistent diversion rates due to limited
Our European Logistics Campus, as well waste diversion opportunities in local markets.
as Japan and Converse Ontario distribution
FY16 / 87% centers, all continued to have 100% We continue to implement and explore viable
landfill diversion. options to improve diversion rates at our
HQs, including:
FY17 / 88%
At five of our largest North America distribution
centers in Memphis, Tennessee, we worked • Kitchens, cafes, and breakrooms have well-
FY18 / 87% 1 p.p. (vs. FY15 baseline) with an independent third-party to conduct marked compost bins
a comprehensive waste audit. The objective
FY20 target
was to have an in depth understanding of • Construction projects have waste diversion
our waste components to reduce overall features such as well-marked recycling bins
Increase waste and minimize, if not eliminate, sending and construction waste reduction policies
waste to landfill. In FY19, we will prioritize the
Despite NIKE’s effort to reduce overall opportunities identified during the audits and • A focus on reducing the amount of printing
waste, DCs and HQs are facing challenges develop a roadmap for implementation. – including quarterly employee engagement.
in increasing landfill diversion rates, leading Converse has experienced over a 30%
to 1 p.p. decrease from the FY15 baseline. Headquarter Facilities reduction in printing due to this program
One factor was a change in the municipal We continue to focus on waste diversion
composting program at WHQ that eliminated through the following programs:
non-food waste materials from compost
streams, ultimately directing compostable 1. Composting food waste from campus services
cups to landfills. In addition, headcount has
gone up, which led to an increase in cafeteria 2. Recycling for paper/corrugate, glass,
and recycling waste that once contaminated plastic, and miscellaneous streams such
as construction waste
Water
Target
Innovate and adopt new
approaches to reduce
water use in our supply
chain, with a 20%
reduction in freshwater
use in textile dyeing
and finishing per unit
of production
Performance
Freshwater Use Per Kg – Textile
Dyeing and Finishing (L/kg)
135
126.5
120
117.2 109.3
FY20 target
20%
105
FY16 FY17 FY18 NIKE employees at T-shirt dyeing workshop – WHQ, Beaverton, Oregon
At NIKE, we take a whole-facility approach57 By the end of FY18, we were 68% of the investing in manufacturing efficiency, they
to water sustainability, meaning that when we way to our FY20 target. Our key material realized a 70% reduction in their freshwater
reduce our water footprint, we help to reduce vendors saved a cumulative 8.7 billion liters withdrawals by the end of FY18 from their FY16
the facility’s overall impact on the surrounding of freshwater from our FY16 baseline, of baseline and became NIKE’s third most water-
watersheds. We work with 38 material vendor which 2.5 billion liters was the reduction of efficient vendor.
facilities – representing almost 80% of our NIKE’s freshwater footprint. For context, 8.7
global materials production – that primarily billion liters can supply approximately 50,000 The number of key material suppliers installing
dye and finish fabric. All 38 facilities have Vietnamese households with freshwater for or pursuing wastewater recycling continues
been reporting their freshwater withdrawals a year58. Because we share our supply chain to grow. In FY15, only 10% of our key vendor
since 2015. manufacturing capacity our whole-facility facilities were operating or planning to install
approach helps advance the industry at large. wastewater recycling systems. By the end of
NIKE encourages each vendor to have a FY18, 55% of those same vendor facilities
short-term strategy based on improving One of our success stories is Vertical Knits in were operating, building, or working to install
manufacturing process efficiencies – fixing Merida, Mexico, which primarily dyes cotton water recycling systems. As we move into
leaks; replacing old dyeing machines with fabric. The facility was consistently ranked FY19, we’re expecting continued water savings
more water-efficient equipment; optimizing 25th of our 38 material vendor facilities in as our vendors meet their commitments,
rinsing and scouring steps; and ensuring their terms of water efficiency. Through adopting moving towards and possibly exceeding our
wastewater meets the requirements of the NIKE’s Minimum Water Program, installing 2020 commitment.
ZDHC Wastewater Guideline – since all of these a 50% wastewater recycling system, and
will result in a more cost-effective long-term
strategy for wastewater recycling.
57 S
ome facilities have non-NIKE-related water-intensive manufacturing on property that are included in our overall key metric of liters freshwater withdrawn per kilogram of fabric produced. This requires the facility to improve in all aspects of their
operation, not just the portion that is related to NIKE business. Why take on a whole-facility approach that could put our 2020 target at risk? Because it’s the right thing to do.
58 Reference: “Vietnam’s Future Water Usage Model: A Controlled Living Experiment”, Journal of Water Resources and Protection, 18, 10, 204-214.
Water
Measure Water (million lliters)
FY16 FY17 FY18
Build resilience through supplier Air MI
water risk mitigation plans with Total Freshwater Use 31.9 41.9 82.759
materials processors HQs
Total Freshwater Use 597.8 604.7 792.5
Other Offices60
Performance Total Freshwater Use 28.0 30.3 25.2
Focus Factories in High-risk Zones Textile Dyeing and Finishing61
with Risk Mitigation Plans (%) Condensate Use 367.1 389.5 344.7
Ground Water 4,810.0 5,272.3 4,958.1
Municipal/City Water to Facility 8,480.2 9,269.7 9,887.6
Rain Water Collection 44.2 13.0 0.8
FY18 / 79% Surface Water 2,175.0 2,159.1 1,333.6
FY20 target
100 %
Total Freshwater Use 15,876.4 17,103.6 16,524.8
59 Increase in water consumption due to expansion of existing Air MI facility and additional facilities brought online.
60 Scope includes U.S. only.
61 Includes focus suppliers only. Focus suppliers represent key suppliers involved in the dyeing and/or finishing of materials, which directly support footwear and
apparel finished product assembly.
Extreme weather events, like flooding and For example, after a severe flood one of our key
drought, due to climate change have the footwear finished goods factories in Indonesia
potential to interrupt our supply chains so we installed flood gates, elevated some of their
are proactively working with our key finished buildings, and undertook other protective
goods factories and material vendors to help measures. When their risk was recalculated,
them prepare for a water event. they were no longer in high risk.
We use the WRI’s Aqueduct Tool to regularly Mitigation Efforts are Effective
monitor the “baseline” water scarcity and Of the 529 finished good factories across the
flooding risks of each of our key suppliers. globe, only ten key finished goods factories
in four countries – Brazil (1), India (1), China (3),
Learn more: and Indonesia (5) – are in regions flagged as
WRI Aqueduct Tool having a high baseline risk of flooding or
drought. Of the 38 key material vendor facilities,
NIKE developed a Water Risk Mitigation only three facilities in the Greater China region
Guideline for suppliers, giving them an were identified with a high baseline water risk.
overview of what is expected of them as they By the end of FY18, all ten key finished goods
better understand their water risks. Our local factories completed their water risk mitigation
field consultants work with these suppliers plans and were acting against those plans. The
to validate their WRI risk score, taking local three material vendors located in regions of
conditions into consideration, and help them high-water risk are on track to have their risk
develop mitigation and management plans. mitigation plans complete
Once these plans are developed, we recalculate by the end of FY19. If there are no significant
their risk score to determine if their plans changes to our supply chain, we are on track to
are effective. achieve 100% of focus factories in high-risk
zones acting against plans one year ahead
of schedule.
Nike Flyleather uses less water than traditional leather manufacturing
Chemistry
Target We know that chemicals must be managed It clearly outlines the expectations we place
properly to protect our workers, the on our suppliers in one single supplier-facing
Enable zero discharge environment, and our consumers. To achieve
this, we operate a chemistry program that
document and along with our updated
chemistry website, it represents a significant
of hazardous chemicals manages chemicals throughout the entire step forward for how we communicate our
product creation process – from innovation compliance requirements.
(ZDHC) and development, right through to raw material
and product creation. Chemical compliance Learn more:
is the foundation of our program, and our NIKE’s Chemistry Playbook
Chemistry is essential to our business. From suppliers must adhere to our updated Code of
raw material processing to product creation, it Conduct, which includes greater emphasis on In a shared supply base, industry-wide action
is used to manufacture the products we sell and chemical management. is essential for helping us work toward our goal
enables us to innovate new methods of make. of ZDHC. We continue to work within the ZDHC
Chemistry deeply influences product design, In April 2018, NIKE launched the Chemistry Foundation, a global industry collaboration of
performance, and the sustainability of our Playbook to support our compliance program currently 122 contributors, from co-creating
overall product creation process. and explain our end-to-end chemistry strategy. the ZDHC Wastewater guideline in FY17 to
actively monitoring continued compliance of our
focus suppliers. We also use software tools to
measure the uptake of manufacturing restricted
substance list (MRSL) compliant formulations
within key facilities and actively support use of
the ZDHC Chemical Gateway to help procure
compliant chemicals.
1. Elevating Chemicals
Management Capability
Association with the ZDHC, Sustainable
Apparel Coalition (SAC) and Apparel and
Footwear International RSL Management
Group (AFIRM) is being centered on the
creation of tools to improve chemicals
management across the supply chain
3. Prioritizing Chemicals
Following a multi-year effort to landscape
the chemicals used in our industry, we are
now able to prioritize key chemicals for
phase-out and action, reducing our overall
chemical footprint
Chemistry
their chemicals management practices
where needed. To assess such management
behaviors within a supplier’s facility and
evaluate how effectively they can meet our
requirements, we launched a new set of Code
Leadership Standard for Restricted Substance
Management, which we integrated into our
global audit framework for finished goods
facilities. This builds upon our updated Code
of Conduct and is also an expectation of our
raw material vendors, with assessments carried
out through industry-centric tools, such as the
Sustainable Apparel Coalition’s (SAC) Facilities
Environment Module (FEM).
Measure
NIKE Women’s Metallic Sheen Apparel
100% compliance with ZDHC
MRSL
Measure Since 2001, NIKE’s RSL program has been
at the center of our approach to managing
100% compliance with NIKE restricted chemicals. Continued commitment to Performance
Restricted Substance List (RSL) meeting global requirements supports our goal Compliance with the ZDHC MRSL62
of achieving 100% compliance and enables us
to see improvements in program performance.
Performance However, we recognize that tightening our FY18 / 68%
Tested Material in Compliance with NIKE own voluntary commitments or adapting FY20 target
100 %
RSL (%) manufacturing to meet new regulations can
result in materials initially not meeting our RSL
requirements. Such failures are resolved before
FY15 / 95% 62 FY18 was the first year we had a ZDHC standard.
products are placed on the market.
We believe that certain chemicals should not be
FY16 / 99% Consistently meeting increasingly stringent used to manufacture the materials and products
requirements demands a strong foundation of that we place on the market due to potential
capability across our supply base. To elevate health and environmental risks. Controlling
FY17 / 98% supplier understanding of our requirements, the chemicals used within manufacturing
we built a global RSL and chemicals is therefore a critical part of our chemicals
management training program and launched management program, as this can reduce risk
FY18 / 99% this to our supply base during FY16. We to our workers, the environment and support
FY20 target annually review the training curriculum to meet
100 %
the efforts of our product compliance (RSL)
suppliers’ needs and make training available program. However, we operate in a complex
to all suppliers across the globe. To date, we multi-tiered supply chain and achieving this
have trained over 1,000 facilities. NIKE also requires us to work across the industry to
leads an effort within the AFIRM Group to develop globally relevant solutions.
better coordinate and align training across our
shared facilities and the greater industry.
Once trained, it is essential that suppliers
implement these learnings and strengthen
Chemistry
The ZDHC Foundation is a center for Measure Measure
sustainable chemicals management and is
one of the industry’s leading examples of how Achieve better chemical input Lead industry change through
engagement across the supply chain can management through scaling collective action
positively impact the way chemicals are used to
produce footwear and apparel products globally.
more sustainable chemistries
As we commit to scaling sustainable
Through our continued efforts to support and
To scale more sustainable chemistry, NIKE has chemistry across our supply chain, we are
strengthen ZDHC solutions, and further integrate
launched several tools including our internal actively exploring even broader avenues for
these into our business, FY18 represented a
chemical assessment process to help our engagement across the industry. Without
year of progress on many levels. This included:
suppliers and vendors align on what better continued and sustained commitment to
chemistry looks like. Through this assessment industry collaboration, the tools that we use
• Improving credibility of the ZDHC MRSL by
process we apply a standard method for would not be as effective in shaping the global
creating a transparent governance framework
evaluating new chemistries which provides a supply chain. The value of multiple brands
that now includes oversight from a range
consistent measure that can be used across aligning on a common approach is clear: it
of independent stakeholders that represent
a variety of chemistry types and ensures new increases awareness, adoption, compliance
NGO, academia, regulators, and industry
chemistries coming into the supply chain and, importantly, reduces confusion.
• L
aunching the ZDHC Gateway – a support our sustainable chemistry goals. We
work closely with our innovation teams and Our external focus is on advancing work with
database of MRSL compliant formulations
contract manufacturers to assess chemical three groups:
– to enable suppliers to source MRSL
compliant chemistry hazards, allowing us to reduce the use of
particular chemicals and replace them with • AFIRM: We’ve actively engaged within
better alternatives. Alongside this program, we AFIRM for over a decade and remain focused
• C
ontinuing to roll-out “Cleanchain®”
have implemented methods to baseline our on providing leadership via our position
software to our key raw material vendors,
chemistry footprint and to track our progress on the AFIRM Steering Committee, further
enabling us to gain systematic visibility
toward reducing the usage of controversial enabling achievement of the Group’s goals.
into chemical formulations used across our
chemicals. We continue to support the evolution of the
manufacturing sites and compare this against
AFIRM RSL and have integrated this into our
the ZDHC Gateway. Currently, all NIKE’s
One example of our efforts is our commitment own Chemical Playbook.
focus suppliers are disclosing their chemical
inventories into this system. to eliminate all PFC-based finishes from our
products by 2021 – while still enabling the • SAC: The roll-out of the updated SAC Higg
aesthetics and functionality customers expect. FEM enables an assessment of our supply
• R
equiring focus suppliers to perform bi-
All PFC alternatives undergo our chemical chain’s chemical management capabilities.
annual wastewater testing against the ZDHC
assessment process to ensure that regrettable Use of the Higg FEM supports a unified
Wastewater Guideline to determine presence
substitutions are not introduced into the approach to measuring the environmental
of MRSL chemicals. During FY18, 68% of
supply chain. performance of our supply chain and
facilities were shown to be compliant against
identifying areas for improvement.
the ZDHC MRSL through wastewater testing.
• ZDHC: NIKE continues to provide leadership
within ZDHC and across all of ZDHC’s core
focus areas (Input, Process, and Output). We
have also leveraged technical expertise to
guide the continued development of the ZDHC
Gateway, the ZDHC Wastewater Guidelines,
and future ZDHC Air Emissions Guidelines.
Chemistry
Measure
100% of focus suppliers meeting
NIKE’s wastewater quality
requirements for textile dyeing
and finishing processes
Performance
Suppliers Meeting NIKE’s Wastewater
Quality Requirements – Textile Dyeing
and Finishing (%)63
NIKE collaboration with London Cloth Yields women’s-only
footwear collection created with hand-woven, indigo-dyed fabric
FY16 / 58%
vendors, we expected a significant decrease in last parameter is requiring more time to
those vendors who met our new requirements. resolve since it involves capital construction.
FY17 / 73%
In FY18, the first year of testing against the In addition, other consultants are also working
ZDHC standard rather than the previous with other vendors in various parts of the
FY18 / 69% 11 p.p. (vs. FY16 baseline) standard, approximately 40% of our key world to address their wastewater issues.
FY20 target materials vendors reported compliance to our
64 PetWin was developed by EnviroSim Associates, Ltd., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (https://envirosim.com/)
65 J.Rydzewski, S. Pattanayak, R. Woodling, and J. Summers, ”Activated Sludge Modeling for Evaluating Textile Wastewater Treatment Plant Operations and Performance,” WEF-EESS Conference on Advancement in Water and Wastewater Treatment
and Reuse, AWWTR 2019, Singapore, July 31-August 1, 2019.
We have reviewed the accompanying NIKE, Inc. (“NIKE”) Management Assertions management assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix
(Management Assertion), that the sustainability metrics identified below, for the year ended May 31, 2018, are presented in conformity with the assessment
criteria set forth in management’s assertion (the “assessment criteria”).
NIKE’s management is responsible for its assertion and for the selection of the criteria, which management believes provide an objective basis for measuring
and reporting on the sustainability metrics. Our responsibility is to express a conclusion on management’s assertion based on our review.
Our review was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) in AT-C
section 105, Concepts Common to All Attestation Engagements, and AT-C section 210, Review Engagements. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the review to obtain limited assurance about whether any material modifications should be made to management’s assertion in order to be fairly
stated. A review is substantially less in scope than an examination, the objective of which is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether management’s
assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects, in order to express an opinion. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. We believe that our review
provides a reasonable basis for our conclusion.
In performing our review, we have complied with the independence and other ethical requirements of the Code of Professional Conduct issued by the AICPA.
We applied the Statements on Quality Control Standards established by the AICPA and, accordingly, maintain a comprehensive system of quality control.
GHG emissions quantification is subject to inherent measurement uncertainty because of such things as GHG emission factors that are used in mathematical
models to calculate GHG emissions and the inability of those models, due to incomplete scientific knowledge and other factors, to accurately measure under
all circumstances the relationship between various inputs and the resultant GHG emissions. Environmental and energy use data used in GHG emissions
calculations are subject to inherent limitations, given the nature and the methods used for measuring such data. The selection by management of different
but acceptable measurement techniques could result in materially different amounts or metrics being reported.
Data related to total energy consumed is subject to inherent limitations given the nature and the methods used for determining such data. The selection by
management of different but acceptable measurement techniques could result in materially different amounts or metrics being reported.
As discussed in the accompanying NIKE, Inc. Management Assertion, NIKE has estimated GHG emissions for certain emission sources for which no
primary usage data is available.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying NIKE, Inc. Management Assertion in order for
it to be fairly stated.
Scope 3 Emissions from Commercial Air Travel (Metric tonnes CO2e) 75,645
Prior to conversion to CO2e, metric tonnes of GHG emissions by gas are 258,803, 17, and 3 of CO2, CH4, and N2O, respectively.
Overview
NIKE, Inc. (NIKE) captures, calculates, and reports direct and indirect GHG emissions data in accordance with the principles and guidance of the World
Resources Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development’s Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative’s Corporate GHG Accounting and
Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) (“GHG Protocol”) and the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard, which are recognized
external standards.
NIKE management is responsible for selecting or developing, and upholding, the assessment criteria, which management believes provide an objective
foundation for measuring and reporting on the selected sustainability metrics (the “metrics”) presented in the table above. NIKE management is also
responsible for the assessment, collection, quantification, and reporting of energy and emissions data, and for the completeness, accuracy, and validity of
the GHG emissions calculations for the Fiscal Year ended May 31, 2018.
Organizational Boundary
NIKE uses the operational control approach in conformance with the GHG Protocol to report energy consumption and direct and indirect GHG emissions for
100% of the facilities where NIKE has operational control.
SCOPE DESCRIPTION
RETAIL • Includes NIKE owned or operated Nike Brand, Converse, and Hurley stores globally.
• Energy consumed includes natural gas, electricity, and steam. Natural gas and electricity usage outside of the U.S. and
Canada, as well as for landlord-managed sites in the U.S. and Canada, is estimated. Our estimation methodology is
described below.
• Refrigerant leakage from HVAC units are not included in reporting at this time.
DISTRIBUTION CENTERS • Includes top 21 NIKE owned or operated DCs globally as of May 31, 2018, which represent more than 94% of shipped
(DCs) units and square footage.
• Energy consumed includes natural gas, hi-sene, diesel, propane, electricity, onsite solar, and onsite wind.
• Diesel is used in backup generators.
• Propane is used in at least two DCs for scrubbers/floor sweepers. A portion of propane usage is estimated leveraging
known propane usage. Our estimation methodology is described below.
• Refrigerant leakage from HVAC units are not included in reporting at this time.
HEADQUARTERS (HQs) • Includes emissions from building facilities at five HQs: World HQ U.S. (WHQ), European HQ, Greater China HQ, Converse
HQ, and Hurley HQ. This covers over 8 million square feet. Emissions from new construction at HQ locations are reported
separately under Other Offices and WHQ Building Construction discussed below until buildings become operational.
• Energy consumed includes natural gas, diesel, propane, and electricity.
• Diesel is used in backup generators.
• Propane is used in food services, vendor landscaping services, and some forklifts.
• Refrigerant leakage from HVAC units are not included in reporting at this time.
AIR MANUFACTURING • Includes NIKE-owned manufacturing facilities and related facilities that are the primary producers of NIKE Air units.
INNOVATION Included four sites in FY18, one of which was closed (ancillary storage site), one of which was opened, and one of which
was expanded.
• Energy consumed includes natural gas, diesel, propane, and electricity.
• Diesel is used in backup generators.
• Propane is used in a single limited application in one Air Manufacturing Innovation (Air MI) facility.
• Refrigerant leakage from HVAC units are not included in reporting at this time.
OTHER (NON- • Includes non-HQ office facilities (such as regional sales offices) and new building construction at WHQ prior to newly
HQ) OFFICES AND constructed sites becoming operational. Once new construction becomes operational, in alignment with NIKE’s financial
WHQ BUILDING reporting approach, new construction is reclassified to HQ scope. Three facilities transitioned to HQ scope during FY18.
CONSTRUCTION Energy consumed includes natural gas and electricity. Natural gas and electricity usage outside of the U.S. and Canada, as
well as for landlord-managed sites in the U.S. and Canada, is estimated. Our estimation methodology is described below.
VEHICLES • V
ehicles include service vehicles at WHQ. Company-leased vehicles for use by employees in other geographies are not
included in reporting at this time.
JETS • Includes jet aviation fuel from our business travel using NIKE’s two corporate jets, operated from the U.S.
COMMERCIAL TRAVEL • Data represents commercial business air travel across 48 countries.
• Commercial air travel emissions are estimated based on mileage calculated from number and route distance of trips.
As described in this assertion, activity data for Scope 1 and Scope 2 is sourced from estimates where actual consumption data is not available. NIKE
continues to work on obtaining systematic access to more actual consumption data. Estimates are described in more detail below. Reported data has
been rounded to the nearest whole number.
Estimation Methodology
Estimation methodologies employ reasonable assumptions to avoid understating NIKE’s emissions footprint and are described below.
Natural Gas (retail and Natural gas usage is estimated for sites outside of the U.S. and Canada, and for landlord-managed sites in the U.S. and
non-HQ offices outside of Canada where visibility on energy consumption is low. Square footage of retail and non-HQ offices per country is used, along
the U.S. and Canada) with country-level climate assumptions and CBECS energy use intensity applied to NIKE square footage based on climate
type. In the U.S. and Canada, where some sites are landlord-managed and visibility on energy consumption is low, our
internal known average country-level energy use intensity is used instead of the external CBECS benchmark. Approximately
88% of retail Scope 1 emissions in FY18 were estimated, and approximately 72% of non-HQ Scope 1 emissions in FY18
were estimated.
Electricity (retail and non- Electricity usage is estimated for sites outside of the U.S. and Canada, and for landlord-managed sites in the U.S. and
HQ offices outside of the Canada where visibility on energy consumption is low. Square footage of retail and non-HQ offices per country is used using
U.S. and Canada) actual FY18 square footage data, along with electricity intensity kWh per square foot of known FY15 NIKE retail or offices
electricity. About 72% of retail Scope 2 emissions in FY18 were estimated. About 87% of non-HQ Scope 2 emissions in FY18
were estimated.
Propane (DC) Propane usage at one DC is estimated leveraging propane consumption intensity at a comparable DC based on relative
square footage.
• F acilities’ emissions are reported in CO2e except within a limited subset of consumption data where emissions factors for other gases (CH4, N2O) are not
provided. These exceptions include AIB/EU Residual Mix Emissions factors and certain supplier-specific emissions factors. Although Green-E/US Residual
Mix only provides CO2, NIKE back-calculates CH4 and N2O leveraging eGRID.
• Commercial Travel emissions are in CO2 due to data availability. The emissions from other gases are not material to our reported GHG emissions.
Carbon dioxide emissions and equivalents resulting from the activities and business units described above have been determined on the basis of measured
or estimated fuel and electricity usage, multiplied by relevant, published carbon emission factors, which are updated annually according to an internal policy
to use the most recent emissions factors available before the annual internal cutoff date, which is 15 days after the fiscal year end. Carbon dioxide equivalent
emissions utilize Global Warming Potentials (GWPs) primarily sourced from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report
(Assessment Report 5 – 100 year), and EPA emissions factor sources use Assessment Report 4.
The tables below outline the emissions factors sources used in emissions calculations.
EMISSIONS
EMISSION SOURCE SOURCE TYPE EMISSION FACTOR EMPLOYED
Scope 1 Natural Gas GHG Protocol Emissions Factors from Cross-Sector Tools March 2017
Scope 1 Diesel GHG Protocol Emissions Factors from Cross-Sector Tools March 2017
Scope 1 Propane EPA Center for Corporate Climate Leadership’s Emission Factors for Greenhouse
Gas Inventories
Scope 1 Gasoline GHG Protocol Emissions Factors from Cross-Sector Tools March 2017
Scope 2 Electricity (U.S. and Canada) Supplier-specific emission factors (various sources)
Scope 2 Electricity (U.S.) Green-e Energy U.S. Residual Mix Emissions Rates
Scope 2 Electricity (U.S.) EPA Center for Corporate Climate Leadership’s Emission Factors for Greenhouse Gas
Inventories
Scope 2 Electricity (EU) Association of Issuing Bodies (AIB) European Residual Mixes
Scope 2 Steam 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
Scope 3 Air Travel U.K. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and the Department of
(Commercial Travel Only) Energy and Climate Change (DECC); GHG Protocol
EMISSION
SOURCE TYPE EMISSION FACTOR EMPLOYED
Direct Line Connection Not applicable
Energy Attribute Certificates NIKE applies a zero emission factor for onsite solar and wind generation where Renewable Energy Credits (or Guarantees
of Origin) generated are retained by NIKE; and for purchased renewable energy attribute certificates applied to NIKE’s
operations. Biomass renewable energy credits employ a zero emission factor for CO2; however, biomass source-specific
emissions factors are applied for CH4 and N2O.
Electricity Contracts NIKE applies a zero emission factor for all sites in scope of its power purchase agreement.
Energy Supplier-Specific U.S.: NIKE applies publicly available supplier-specific emission factors where available.
Emissions Factors
Residual Mix U.S.: NIKE applies residual mix emission factors from Green-e Energy U.S. Residual Mix Emissions Rates.
Location-Based Factors If none of the above options are available, NIKE uses location-based factors as described in the table above.
Uncertainty
GHG emissions quantification is subject to inherent measurement uncertainty because of such things as the GHG emissions factors that are used in
mathematical models to calculate GHG emissions and the inability of these models, due to incomplete scientific knowledge and other factors, to accurately
measure under all circumstances the relationship between various inputs and the resultant GHG emissions. Environmental and energy use data used in GHG
emissions calculations are subject to inherent limitations, given the nature and the methods used for measuring such data. The selection by management of
different but acceptable measurement techniques could result in materially different amounts of metrics being reported.
Data related to total energy consumed is subject to inherent limitations given the nature and the methods used for determining such data. The selection by
management of different but acceptable measurement techniques could result in materially different amounts or metrics being reported.
NIKE recognizes that commercial air travel remains an estimate since unforeseen circumstances can occur (e.g., different routes due to adverse weather or
unforeseen aircraft fleet changes); however, the figure presented is considered to be a reasonable estimate of NIKE’s commercial air travel emissions.
GENERAL DISCLOSURES
GRI UNGC
STANDARD NUMBER GRI DISCLOSURE LOCATION AND NOTES OMISSION PRINCIPLE SDG
ORGANIZATION
102-1 Name of the organization NIKE, Inc.
PROFILE
FY18 10-K: Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
102-2 Activities, brands, products, and services
Condition and Results of Operations: page 73 (Annual Report)
102-3 Location of headquarters One Bowerman Dr, Beaverton, OR 97005
FY18 10-K: Item 1. Business: pages 55–59 and Item 2. Properties: page 68
102-4 Location of operations (Annual Report)
NIKE Manufacturing Map
FY18 Proxy Statement
102-5 Ownership and legal form Company Bylaws
FY18 10-K: Item 1. Business: page 55 (Annual Report)
102-6 Markets served FY18 10-K: Item 1. Business: pages 55–59 (Annual Report)
102-7 Scale of the organization FY18 10-K: Item 1. Business: pages 55–59 (Annual Report)
Additional Information
TOTAL EMPLOYEES BY EMPLOYMENT TYPE AND GENDER1 (102-8C)
CY16 CY17 CY18
Female Male Female Male Female Male
Regular Full-Time 21,599 23,824 21,628 23,875 23,581 25,345
Regular Part-Time 9,741 10,052 10,456 10,780 8,219 8,187
TOTAL REGULAR 31,340 33,876 32,084 34,655 31,800 33,532
FULL-TIME 69% 70% 67% 69% 74% 76%
1 Temporary employees excluded.
GRI UNGC
STANDARD NUMBER GRI DISCLOSURE LOCATION AND NOTES OMISSION PRINCIPLE SDG
FY18 Proxy Statement: Corporate Governance: pages 14–23
GOVERNANCE 102-18 Governance structure Purpose Committee: page 6
Sustainability Governance
Additional Information
Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability and Governance Committee
The purpose of the Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee of the Board of Directors of NIKE, Inc. is to review NIKE’s significant strategies, activities, and policies regarding sustainability (including labor
practices), and community impact and charitable activities, and make recommendations to the Board. Learn more.
Responsibilities include:
• Review and provide guidance to management on sustainability issues and impacts, and the integration of sustainability into NIKE’s business, including innovation, product design, manufacturing and sourcing, and
operations.
• Review, provide guidance to management, and report to the Board on sustainability (including labor practices) within NIKE’s supply chain, and review reports of NIKE’s sustainability audits.
• Review and provide guidance to management regarding NIKE’s work with industry organizations and non-governmental organizations concerning corporate responsibility.
• Annually review the activities of the NIKE Foundation and NIKE community impact initiatives.
• Review and make recommendations to management on reporting to shareholders and other communities regarding corporate responsibility activities.
• Review, provide guidance to management, and report to the Board regarding the involvement of significant corporate responsibility issues in major business decisions, to protect NIKE’s valuable goodwill, and
human and intellectual capital.
• Review and make recommendations to the Board with respect to any shareholder proposal that relates to the matters overseen by the Committee.
• Annually evaluate the performance of the Committee and report the results of the evaluation to the Board.
• Review and assess annually the adequacy of the Committee’s charter.
• Perform such other duties and functions as may, from time to time, be assigned to the Committee by the Board.
FY18 10-K: Item 1A. Risk Factors: pages 60–67 (Annual Report)
Identifying and managing economic,
102-29 FY18 10-K: Risk Management and Derivatives: pages 113–116 (Annual Report)
environmental, and social impacts
Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
102-30 Effectiveness of risk management processes Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
STAKEHOLDER Issue Prioritization: page 8
102-40 List of stakeholder groups
ENGAGEMENT Partnerships & Collaborations
The Air MI Industry Code changed from 326100 (Plastics product manufacturing) to 326113 (Unlaminated plastics film and
sheet [except packaging] manufacturing) to reflect a more accurate classification of the current manufacturing practices at
NIKE, Inc. facilities.
The Offices Industry Code changed from 561400 (Business Support Services) to 551114 (Corporate, subsidiary, and
regional managing offices), which reflects a more accurate classification of the current NIKE, Inc. office activities.
• Materials Target: Increase use of more sustainable materials 10, 38, 39, 40 FY16 and 17 target and measure performance values were adjusted, along with underlying reported cotton and polyester
• Materials Measure: Source 100% of our cotton more sustainably volumes. Due to data availability limitations in the past, we reported Fall through Summer product in each fiscal year’s
(certified organic, better cotton initiative or recycled) across NIKE performance value (e.g. FY17 was reported as FA16–SU17). To align with the 2020 target year Spring through Holiday 20
by the end of calendar year 2020 (SP–HO20), we’re now able to report SP–HO product for each fiscal year. Additionally, an error discovered in underlying
data was corrected and the source for some material volume data was shifted.
• Waste Target: Eliminate footwear manufacturing waste to landfill 10, 47, 48, 50 FY17 target and measure performance values were adjusted, along with underlying reported manufacturing waste volumes.
or incineration, while continuing to reduce overall waste. The changes are due to improved data integrity and alignment with NIKE guidelines/definitions.
• Waste Measure: Reduce waste index by 10%, covering footwear
manufacturing, distribution centers, and headquarter locations
Scope 1 energy consumption and emissions data were also restated to reflect a broader scope of coverage, with the
addition of estimated natural gas consumption and associated emissions for retail facilities and non-HQ office facilities
outside of the U.S. and Canada (and for landlord-managed sites within the U.S. and Canada), along with diesel, propane,
and gasoline.
Data Integrity
Sustainability data is shaped by a landscape of evolving methodologies, advancing standards, and expansions in data accessibility over time. Adapting to these changes while maintaining comparability in our data
is critical to instilling integrity and confidence in the validity of the insights the data provides. We understand that we must adapt and be nimble to keep pace with broadening data sets and emerging standards. We
continue to focus on the internal controls in our sustainability data processes and systems.
For the first time, we have obtained external assurance on select reported metrics (Scope 1 and 2 energy consumption and emissions, and Scope 3 commercial air travel emissions). More information can be found
in the appendix.
In cases where shifts in scope, methodology, and/or data quality have led to changes in previously reported performance results, we’ve restated historically reported results and provided context on the changes in
the Restatements section of the Appendix.
The data presented in this report has been collected, reviewed, and internally validated and represents the most complete and accurate information at the time of publication. NIKE will continue to be transparent on
revisions to reported data in the future.
GRI LOCATION AND UNGC
STANDARD NUMBER GRI DISCLOSURE NOTES OMISSION PRINCIPLE SDG
Issue Prioritization: page 8
102-49 Changes in reporting
About This Report: page 2
102-50 Reporting period About This Report: page 2
102-51 Date of most recent report We published the FY16/17 Sustainable Business Report in May 2018.
102-52 Reporting cycle NIKE reports on an annual reporting cycle.
102-53 Contact point for questions regarding the report sustainability@nike.com
Claims of reporting in accordance with the
102-54 About This Report: page 2
GRI Standards
102-55 GRI content index GRI Index: pages 66–74
PwC Assurance Letter: page 58
102-56 External assurance
NIKE, Inc. Management Assertion: pages 59–63
ECONOMIC
GRI UNGC
STANDARD NUMBER GRI DISCLOSURE LOCATION AND NOTES OMISSION PRINCIPLE SDG
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
MATERIAL ASPECTS: Climate Change Risks
Issue Prioritization: page 8
Explanation of the material topic and its
103-1 Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
GRI 103: Boundaries
Energy & Emissions
MANAGEMENT
Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
APPROACH 103-2 The management approach and its components
Energy & Emissions
103-3 Evaluation of the management approach Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
GRI 201: Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
Financial implications and other risks and
ECONOMIC 201-2 Minimize Environmental Impact: Water: pages 51–52
opportunities due to climate change
PERFORMANCE Energy & Emissions
MATERIALS
MATERIAL ASPECTS: Non-Renewable Resource Depletion
Explanation of the material topic and its Issue Prioritization: page 8
103-1
GRI 103: Boundaries Minimize Environmental Impact: Materials: pages 38–40
MANAGEMENT The management approach and its Minimize Environmental Impact: Materials: pages 38–40
103-2
APPROACH components Materials
103-3 Evaluation of the management approach Minimize Environmental Impact: Materials: pages 38–40
GRI 301:
301-1 Materials used by weight or volume Minimize Environmental Impact: Materials: pages 38–40 8
MATERIALS
Additional Information
The top five material volumes reported include renewable materials: cotton and corrugate/paper; and non-renewable materials: polyester, rubber, and EVA foam. All material types reported are purchased
from external suppliers except for EVA foam, which is sourced internally. Data reported consists of both direct measurements and estimates. While many materials are measured directly for a wide variety
of products, total corrugate volumes are estimated using average packaging material used for each product group. The majority of cotton and polyester volume data is sourced using direct measurements,
though product creation data is used to estimate material volumes for certain parts of the business. In FY18, NIKE shifted the data source used for reporting Nike brand apparel and footwear volumes as
well as polyester volumes across all product engines.
ENERGY
MATERIAL ASPECTS: Energy
Issue Prioritization: page 8
Explanation of the material topic and its
103-1 Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
GRI 103: Boundaries
Energy & Emissions
MANAGEMENT
The management approach and its Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
APPROACH 103-2
components Energy & Emissions
103-3 Evaluation of the management approach Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
8
GRI 302: ENERGY 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
WATER
MATERIAL ASPECTS: Water Use
Issue Prioritization: page 8
Explanation of the material topic and its
103-1 Minimize Environmental Impact: Water: pages 51–52
GRI 103: Boundaries
Water
MANAGEMENT
The management approach and its Minimize Environmental Impact: Water: pages 51–52
APPROACH 103-2
components Water
103-3 Evaluation of the management approach Minimize Environmental Impact: Water: pages 51–52
GRI 303: WATER 303-1 Water withdrawal by source Minimize Environmental Impact: Water: pages 51–52 8
Additional Information
Contract manufacturers report their freshwater withdrawal volumes and source to NIKE in accordance with NIKE’s Water Program, which outlines measurement practices and defines freshwater sources.
The facility boundary is equivalent to the property boundary, and freshwater is inclusive of domestic and manufacturing uses.
EMISSIONS
MATERIAL ASPECTS: GHG Emissions
Issue Prioritization: page 9
Explanation of the material topic and its
GRI 103: 103-1 Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
Boundaries
MANAGEMENT Energy & Emissions
APPROACH The management approach and its Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
103-2
components Energy & Emissions
103-3 Evaluation of the management approach Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions 8
GRI 305:
305-2 Direct (Scope 2) GHG emissions Minimize Environmental Impact: Energy and Carbon: pages 41–46
EMISSIONS
305-3 Direct (Scope 3) GHG emissions
Additional Information
NIKE converts all energy consumed to kWhe using net calorific value of the direct fuels consumed, including transportation fuels. Emissions data for HFCs, PFCs, and SF6 are not reported.
NIKE has phased out SF6 and therefore doesn’t have SF6 emissions. Emissions for other greenhouse gases are either not relevant, immaterial or data is not available.
SCOPE 1 AND 2
For information on direct and indirect energy consumption, scope 1 and 2 emissions and the scope 3 emissions accounting standard used, see the Management Assertion letter.
Additional breakdowns of scope 1 and 2 emissions are shown below.
FUEL CONSUMPTION (MWh) & SCOPE 1 EMISSIONS (METRIC TONNES CO2e) BY COUNTRY/REGION
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Fuel Consumed Scope 1 Fuel Consumed Scope 1 Fuel Consumed Scope 1 Fuel Consumed Scope 1
Argentina 1,030 209 1,090 221 1,138 231 1,205 244
Australia 1,146 232 1,213 246 1,268 257 1,342 272
Austria 680 138 721 146 755 153 800 162
Belgium 11,399 2,309 10,959 2,220 15,155 3,070 12,745 2,582
Brazil 3,074 625 3,268 664 3,438 699 3,651 742
Canada 7,144 1,447 8,535 1,556 8,802 1,606 10,255 1,870
Chile 630 128 669 136 703 142 745 151
China 26,671 5,326 28,348 5,663 29,558 5,913 30,827 6,180
Croatia 209 42 218 44 224 45 235 48
Czech Republic 309 63 324 66 334 68 352 71
Denmark 432 88 456 92 473 96 500 101
Finland 96 20 99 20 99 20 103 21
France 3,504 710 3,712 752 3,885 787 4,115 834
Germany 5,316 1,077 5,589 1,132 5,787 1,172 4,643 940
Greece - - - - - - - -
Hong Kong 370 75 380 77 380 77 393 80
Hungary 391 79 413 84 429 87 453 92
India 242 49 248 50 248 50 257 52
Indonesia 225 46 231 47 231 47 239 48
Ireland 273 55 290 59 305 62 324 66
Israel - - - - - - - -
Italy 1,990 403 2,112 428 2,215 449 2,349 476
Japan 5,300 1,020 5,218 1,009 5,946 1,141 6,402 1,227
Malaysia 386 78 410 83 432 87 459 93
Mexico 3,454 700 3,685 747 3,896 789 4,147 840
Netherlands 1,183 240 1,253 254 1,310 265 1,387 281
New Zealand 84 17 89 18 93 19 98 20
Norway 422 86 440 89 450 91 472 96
Panama 21 4 21 4 21 4 22 4
Philippines 56 11 57 12 57 12 59 12
Poland 832 169 882 179 923 187 978 198
Portugal - - - - - - - -
Russia 2,207 447 2,349 476 2,474 501 2,629 533
FUEL CONSUMPTION (MWh) & SCOPE 1 EMISSIONS (METRIC TONNES CO2e) BY COUNTRY/REGION CONTINUED
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Fuel Consumed Scope 1 Fuel Consumed Scope 1 Fuel Consumed Scope 1 Fuel Consumed Scope 1
Singapore 630 128 656 133 669 135 699 142
Slovakia 88 18 95 19 101 20 107 22
South Africa 795 161 859 175 900 183 954 194
South Korea 5,007 1,250 5,115 1,269 5,289 1,310 5,587 1,245
Spain 2,560 519 2,735 554 2,897 587 3,087 625
Sri Lanka 8 2 8 2 8 2 8 2
Sweden 452 92 471 95 481 97 503 102
Switzerland 515 104 543 110 565 114 597 121
Taiwan 38 8 40 8 43 9 46 9
Thailand 405 82 430 87 452 92 479 97
Turkey 1,173 238 1,246 252 1,308 265 1,116 226
United Arab Emirates 6 1 6 1 6 1 7 1
United Kingdom 5,057 1,024 5,390 1,092 5,689 1,152 6,051 1,226
United States 75,481 16,047 79,129 16,893 85,468 17,978 93,833 19,562
Uruguay 151 31 162 33 172 35 - -
Vietnam 150 30 154 31 154 31 160 32
TOTAL 171,596 35,623 180,314 37,325 195,232 40,139 205,421 41,941
CARBON FOOTPRINT
PER UNIT REDUCTION2
CH4 166 171 179 110
CHAIN IMPACTS
10% PRODUCT
CO2 35,423 37,115 39,921 41,800
MOONSHOT
FULL VALUE
N2O 35 37 38 31
TOTAL 35,624 37,324 40,138 41,941
RE100
NIKE VALUE CHAIN TERMINOLOGY
CORPORATE SERVICES
STEAM CONSUMPTION (MWh) HQs
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Other Office Facilities and
Steam 1,007 614 865 764 WHQ Building Construction
Heat 0 0 0 0 Air MI
Cooling 0 0 0 0 Corporate Jets
Commercial Air Business Travel
RAW MATERIALS PRODUCTION
BIOMASS CO2 EMISSIONS (METRIC TONNES CO2) Raw Materials Production
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 MATERIALS MANUFACTURING
Biomass 4,696 4,254 3,051 2,422 Materials Manufacturing
MATERIALS FINISHING
Textile Dyeing and Finishing
FINISHED GOODS MANUFACTURING
FW, AP, and EQ Manufacturing
LOGISTICS
Inbound Logistics
Outbound Logistics
Distribution Centers
RETAIL
NIKE Direct
CONSUMER USE
Consumer Use
END OF LIFE
End of Life
1 Only NIKE-owned Retail (NIKE Direct) and Logistics (Distribution Centers, Inbound and
Outbound Logistics) are in scope of NIKE commitments where designated as in scope. Non-
NIKE-owned Retail and Logistics are included in the Full Value Chain Impacts.
2 Target covers Nike brand apparel and footwear only.
ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION (MWh) & SCOPE 2 EMISSIONS (METRIC TONNES ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION (MWh) & SCOPE 2 EMISSIONS (METRIC TONNES
CO2e) BY COUNTRY/REGION CO2e) BY COUNTRY/REGION
Emissions data is calculated using primary activity data and extrapolations. CO2e emissions
include CO2, CH4, and N2O. Nike Brand and Converse footwear finished goods manufacturing
emissions data is derived from 100% primary data and represents nearly 90% of the emissions in
Includes emissions across Nike brands and product finished goods manufacturing. For this subset, vendors provide monthly energy consumption: from
1 - PURCHASED
engines, including from raw materials production, materials the local utility grid, onsite generators, other fuels, and purchased steam. For electricity: kWh values
GOODS AND 10,497,428
manufacturing, materials finishing, and finished goods are multiplied by CO2e emissions factors for electricity purchased from the local utility grid by the
SERVICES
manufacturing. country/region the factory resides in. For onsite generation and other fuels: CO2e emissions are
calculated using the IPCC bottoms up calculation methodology. CO2e methodologies are used for
emissions estimates outside of footwear finished goods manufacturing based on lifecycle analysis
data and employ conservative assumptions to avoid understating NIKE’s footprint.
4- Includes ~95% of global inbound transportation and ~90% Transactional data is applied to a third-party transportation carbon calculator against industry
TRANSPORTATION of global outbound transportation via the following modes of standard emissions factors. For Air: Distance traveled (km) x cargo weight (kg) x Emission factor [g
647,907
AND DISTRIBUTION transportation: air, ocean, truck, and rail. Excludes non-NIKE of CO2/ (TEU x km)]. For all other modes: Distance traveled (km) x cargo volume (TEU) x Emission
(UPSTREAM) paid freight. factor [g of CO2/ (TEU x km)].
Air CO2 emissions are estimated based on number and distance of trips. Short haul trips are less
6 - BUSINESS
75,6451 Includes emissions from commercial air travel. fuel efficient per mile flown. Longer-haul flights become less efficient due to the need to carry
TRAVEL
more fuel.
DOWNSTREAM
There is no primary emissions data available for end of life treatment of NIKE’s products. To evaluate
NIKE’s value chain footprint, we identified and quantified CO2e emissions created at each stage
of the value chain. The impact of each individual product differs considerably, based on its profile,
12 - END-OF-LIFE
These emissions are associated with the disposal of products materials used, size and weight, method of manufacture, and location of production, use and
TREATMENT OF 448,759
including landfill, recycling, and incineration. disposal. Several internal and external tools were used to develop this estimation including NIKE’s
SOLD PRODUCTS
Business and Environmental Scenario Tool (BEST), Enablon database, NIKE’s Apparel Sustainability
Index, NIKE’s Footwear Sustainability Index, and NIKE’s Materials Sustainability Index. End of Life
Stage: at the disposal stage we assumed the finished good is disposed of at the end of one year.
5 - WASTE
Emissions relative to the fate of the waste generated in our own Total HQs and DC waste not diverted from landfill multiplied by a lifecycle assessment-based
GENERATED 2,245
operations including HQs and DCs. emission factor for municipal waste sent to landfill.
IN OPERATIONS
There is no primary emissions data available from use of NIKE’s products. To evaluate NIKE’s value
chain footprint, we identified and quantified CO2e emissions created at each stage of the value
chain. The impact of each individual product differs considerably, based on its profile, materials
These emissions are associated with washing and drying
used, size and weight, method of manufacture, and location of production, use, and disposal.
NIKE’s sold apparel and socks. We assumed for the value
Several internal and external tools were used to develop this estimation including NIKE’s Business
chain footprint exercise that footwear and equipment were
11 - USE OF and Environmental Scenario Tool (BEST), Enablon database, NIKE’s Apparel Sustainability Index,
8,090,266 not washed. Based on our footprinting work, we estimate
SOLD PRODUCTS NIKE’s Footwear Sustainability Index, and NIKE’s Materials Sustainability Index. Consumer Usage:
that about 36% of the emissions throughout our value chain
Water and Energy Usage was estimated based on the following assumptions – only apparel units
are emitted during the use phase of NIKE products. These
and socks were considered. Each item was assumed washed 52 times in one year. The washing
emissions are out of scope of NIKE’s moonshot ambition.
assumptions were based on regional consumer washing practices and estimates of washing
machine types by region. CO2e was based on regional conversion factors applied to the estimated
energy usage.
1 This metric is part of Management’s Assertion on select sustainability metrics, which PwC has performed limited assurance over for the period from June 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018, as indicated in the Report of Independent Accountants.
3 - FUEL AND
ENERGY-RELATED NIKE does not have significant use of fuel and energy-related
ACTIVITIES Not relevant activities as our manufacturing is completed by contract N/A
NOT INCLUDED IN factories.
SCOPE 1 OR 2
DOWNSTREAM
10 - PROCESSING
NIKE's products are finished consumer goods and do not
OF SOLD Not relevant N/A
undergo any additional processing once sold.
PRODUCTS
14 - FRANCHISES Not relevant NIKE does not have significant emissions from franchises. N/A
15 - INVESTMENTS Not relevant NIKE does not have significant emissions from investments. N/A
GRI UNGC
STANDARD NUMBER GRI DISCLOSURE LOCATION AND NOTES OMISSION PRINCIPLE SDG
EFFLUENTS AND WASTE
MATERIAL ASPECTS: Effluents and Waste
Explanation of the material topic and its Issue Prioritization: page 8
103-1
GRI 103: Boundaries Minimize Environmental Impact: Waste: pages 47–50
MANAGEMENT The management approach and its Minimize Environmental Impact: Waste: pages 47–50
103-2
APPROACH components Waste
103-3 Evaluation of the management approach Minimize Environmental Impact: Waste: pages 47–50
GRI 306:
EFFLUENTS AND 306-2 Waste by type and disposal method Minimize Environmental Impact: Waste: pages 47–50 8, 9
WASTE
Additional Information
Distribution center and office waste disposal method has been determined by information provided by waste disposal contractors. In some facilities, NIKE directly contracts with disposal providers for
material-specific streams or specific containers. In other facilities, NIKE uses one provider for all waste streams.
Contract manufacturers report their solid waste generation and disposal method to NIKE in accordance with NIKE’s Waste Program, which outlines separation and handling practices for non-hazardous
waste and defines waste items and management methods.
GRI UNGC
STANDARD NUMBER GRI DISCLOSURE LOCATION AND NOTES OMISSION PRINCIPLE SDG
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY
MATERIAL ASPECTS: Occupational Health and Safety
Issue Prioritization: page 8
Explanation of the material topic and its
103-1 Transform Manufacturing: Sustainable Sourcing: pages 28–30
GRI 103: Boundaries
Unleash Human Potential: Priority Issues: pages 23–25
MANAGEMENT
The management approach and its Unleash Human Potential: Priority Issues: pages 23–25
APPROACH 103-2
components Culture of Health and Safety
103-3 Evaluation of the management approach Unleash Human Potential: Priority Issues: pages 23–25
Additional Information
EMPLOYEES WHO RECEIVE PERFORMANCE
REVIEW (CFE RATING)
CY2017 CY2018 CY2017 CY2018
GENDER % % EMPLOYMENT TYPE % %
CFE Rating 92.21% 92.23% CFE Rating 93.67% 93.35%
Female Full-time
No CFE Rating 7.79% 7.77% No CFE Rating 6.33% 6.65%
CFE Rating 92.46% 92.63% CFE Rating 88.83% 89.34%
Male Part-time
No CFE Rating 7.54% 7.37% No CFE Rating 11.17% 10.66%
CFE Rating 92.34% 92.43%
Grand Total
No CFE Rating 7.66% 7.57%
Notes:
• Excludes temporary workers.
• With the shift in timing to Calendar Year for this report it allows us to provide information on our Annual Performance Review processes when they are complete. Previously, our data cut-off (May 31)
was in the early stages of our Performance Review cycles so we saw more employees without a performance rating. With the timing of our data being focused on later in the calendar year it allows
us to provide information once our annual processes are complete which leads to the variance from previous reports.
• Employees without a CFE include “Null” or “No Rating” values.
• Employees with a “Too New to Rate” are included with employees with a rating.
GRI UNGC
STANDARD NUMBER GRI DISCLOSURE LOCATION AND NOTES OMISSION PRINCIPLE SDG
CHILD LABOR
MATERIAL ASPECTS: Child Labor
Issue Prioritization: page 8
Explanation of the material topic and its Transform Manufacturing: Priority Issues: page 33
103-1
GRI 103: Boundaries Code of Conduct
MANAGEMENT Code Leadership Standards (CLS)
APPROACH The management approach and its Transform Manufacturing: Priority Issues: page 33
103-2
components Human Rights
103-3 Evaluation of the management approach Transform Manufacturing: Priority Issues: page 33
CHEMISTRY
MATERIAL ASPECTS: Chemistry
Explanation of the material topic and its Issue Prioritization: page 8
103-1
Boundaries Minimize Environmental Footprint: Chemistry: pages 53–56
ACTIVE KIDS
MATERIAL ASPECTS: Active Kids