[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views4 pages

Assignment 1: Muhammad Ali Asif

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 4

ASSIGNMENT 1

SUBMITTED TO : DOCTOR NADEEM OMAR TARAR

MUHAMMAD ALI ASIF


01-111182-056  
ASSIGNMENT 1

Q1: What is the significance of research methods in sociological research? Explain the 2
major types of research methods, along with examples.

Answer: Research methods are being used by sociologist to examine the world, the problems in
it and study their patterns to observe the society from level of individual to level of groups. Now
for this sociologist first have to design a research method. When entering a social environment
sociologist must be careful because there are times to be unknown and times to be obvious.
There are times to simply observe and times to take interview. Some needs to be informed that
they are being observed and some participants don’t. A scientist wouldn't walk around a
wrongdoing ridden neighborhood at 12 PM, calling out, "Any gang members around? So in
planning a research sociologist can use any of research method design. Each examination
technique comes with supporting arguments and opposing arguments, and the subject of study
firmly impacts which strategy or strategies are put to utilize.

The two main types of research method are qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative research is
descriptive in nature, because it generally deals with non-numerical and unquantifiable things.
Qualitative researchers use a variety of methods to develop deep understandings of how people
perceive their social realities and in consequence, how they act within the social world. A
genuine case of a qualitative research technique would be unstructured interviews which create
qualitative information using open inquiries. This permits the respondent to talk openly, picking
their own words. This enables the researcher to build up a genuine feeling of an individual's
understanding of a situation. For the qualitative researcher, there is no single reality, it is
subjective and exist only in reference to the observer. Theory is data driven, and emerges as part
of the research process, evolving from the data as they are collected.

Quantitative research is much more numbers-driven. The emphasis is on the collection of


numerical data. The conclusion then makes inferences based on that data. This type of data can
be used to construct graphs and tables of raw data. This Research is used to test a theory and
ultimately support or reject it. For example, a rating scale or closed questions on a questionnaire
would generate quantitative data as these produce either numerical data or data that can be
placed into categories (e.g., “yes,” “no” answers). Experimental techniques limit the potential
ways wherein a research participant can react to and express appropriate social behavior.
Discoveries are therefore liable to be context-bound and basically a reflection of the assumptions
which the researcher brings to the investigation. The design of the study is determined before it
begins. For the quantitative research, researcher reality is objective and exist separately to the
researcher, and is capable of being seen by anyone.
Q2: How sociological observation is informed by a perspective or theories? Explain your
answer, by giving examples of two theoretical perspectives.

Answer: Sociologists basically study patterns, interactions and social events. And then come up
with a theory that explains why things work as they do. In terms of sociology a theory is define
as a way to explain different social happenings. For example Sociologists develop theories to
explain social occurrences such as protest rallies. Theories vary in scope depending on the scale
of the issues that they are meant to explain or address. A few theories provide broad perspectives
explain many different aspects of social life, and these are called paradigms. Paradigms are
philosophical and theoretical frameworks used within a discipline to formulate theories,
generalizations, and the experiments performed in support of them. These paradigms are
structural functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism. These paradigms dominate
sociological thinking as they provide useful explanations. . For example,
Emile Durkheim developed theories of social structure that included functionalism, the division
of labor, and anomie.

Functionalism, also called structural-functional theory, sees society as a structure with


interrelated parts designed to meet the biological and social needs of the individuals in that
society. Functionalism perspective says that a society is a collection of different groups of people
which need to perform their duties, support each other, work together to achieve individual as
well as collective goals. Without assessing and supporting each other, it would be very difficult
to achieve goals for the betterment and stability of the society. Such as government, education,
family, healthcare, religion, and the economy. An early sociologist Durkheim believed that
individuals may make up society, but in order to study society, sociologists have to look beyond
individuals to social facts. Social facts are the laws, morals, values, religious beliefs, customs,
fashions, rituals, and all of the cultural rules that govern social life. According to Robert Merton
social processes have many function. Manifest functions are the consequences of a social
process that are sought while latent functions are unsought consequences of social process. A
manifest function of college education, for example, includes gaining knowledge, preparing for a
career, and finding a good. Latent functions of your college years include meeting new people,
participating in extracurricular activities. Another latent function of education is creating a
hierarchy of employment based on the level of education attained.

Conflict theory looks society as a competition for limited resources. Competition leads to
conflict. Because the individuals and groups of society compete for advantage, there is
constantly conflict for change. When there are large groups competing, the outcome is often
major social change. This conflict can arise from the desire to own the means of production, to
own the power or land, or to own the realm of political power, and can be revolutionary. Social
groups are always fighting with each other but it varies from society to society for example in
some societies people with dark complexion are consider weak. A sociologist. Weber noted that
different groups were affected differently based on education, race, and gender, and that people’s
reactions to inequality were moderated by class differences and rates of social mobility. Another
example of conflict theory was women march happening in Islamabad few days back.

What was that wasn’t it a large social group fighting for their identity or competing for limited
resources.

You might also like