Sigma Thoery
Sigma Thoery
Sigma Thoery
Introduction
ABSTRACT: In the production of biopharmaceuticals disk-stack
centrifugation is widely used as a harvest step for the removal of Quality by Design (QbD) regulatory initiatives over the last decade
cells and cellular debris. Depth filters followed by sterile filters are have required that biopharmaceutical manufacturers develop a
often then employed to remove residual solids remaining in the thorough understanding of a product’s quality attributes and
centrate. Process development of centrifugation is usually manufacturing process through the generation of design spaces
conducted at pilot-scale so as to mimic the commercial scale (Rathore, 2009). High throughput scale-down techniques now enable
equipment but this method requires large quantities of cell culture
and significant levels of effort for successful characterization. A the rapid generation of extensive experimental data representative of
scale-down approach based upon the use of a shear device and a large-scale performance, both in the upstream and downstream
bench-top centrifuge has been extended in this work towards a manufacturing process. Such large experimental data sets generated
preparative methodology that successfully predicts the perfor- through these techniques allow for better identification of the effects
mance of the continuous centrifuge and polishing filters. The use of and interactions of the input parameters on the process performance
this methodology allows the effects of cell culture conditions and
large-scale centrifugal process parameters on subsequent filtration and product quality (Titchener-Hooker et al., 2008).
performance to be assessed at an early stage of process development Continuous flow disk-stack centrifugation is often used to
where material availability is limited. harvest commercial-scale cell culture processes because of its
Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016;9999: 1–8. robustness and relatively low running costs (Axelsson, 2002). The
ß 2016 The Authors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Published intermittent discharge provided by the disk-stack centrifuge
by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. enables removal of a considerable quantity of cells and large
KEYWORDS: centrifugation; continuous centrifugation; scale- cellular debris in a semi continuous fashion. However, one of the
down; primary recovery; mammalian cell; disk-stack centrifuge; disadvantages of disk-stack centrifugation is that in many designs
depth filter; capillary shear; filter capacity the cells enter the centrifuge through a feed zone in which high
levels of shear are present. This shear can damage shear-sensitive
mammalian cells resulting in the generation of submicron particles
which are carried over to the centrate (Jain et al., 2005). These fine
particles can cause subsequent fouling in later chromatographic
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution processes, resulting in high column pressures and accompanied
License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the reductions in column lifetime and efficiency (Kempken et al., 1995).
original work is properly cited. In order to avoid chromatographic column fouling, depth filtration
Abbreviations: CSD, capillary shear device; RSD, rotating shear device; USD, ultra
scale down; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; mAb, monoclonal antibody; NADH, is often used immediately after centrifugation to remove these
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; PEEK, polyetheretherketone; QbD, quality by submicron particles (Yigzaw et al., 2006). Hence, a typical process
design. sequence for a mammalian cell culture process might begin with the
Correspondence to: N. Titchener-Hooker
Received 20 October 2015; Revision received 19 February 2016; Accepted 24 February removal of cells and cell debris achieved through a combination of a
2016 centrifugal step followed by a depth filtration step (Shukla and
Accepted manuscript online xx Month 2016; Kandula, 2008).
Article first published online in Wiley Online Library
(wileyonlinelibrary.com). In order to scale among different types of centrifuges,
DOI 10.1002/bit.25967 correction factors are used to account for the deviations from
ß 2016 The Authors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 9999, No. xxx, 2016 1
ideal conditions such as those caused by differences in flow Materials and Methods
patterns (Mosqueira et al., 1981). Typically, Sigma theory is used
to scale centrifuges irrespective of size, geometry, and type Theoretical Considerations
(Ambler, 1959). However, Sigma theory does not take into
A detailed discussion of scale-down centrifugation is given in prior
account the generation of small particles through cell damage in
studies (Boychyn et al., 2001; Hutchinson et al., 2006). In essence by
the high shear regions of centrifuge feed zones. In order to
maintaining the ratio of flow rate to equivalent settling area and
capture accurately these effects at laboratory-scale, the shear
accounting for deviations from ideal flow conditions, Sigma theory
generated in the feed zone needs to be mimicked (Boychyn et al.,
enables the direct comparison of clarification efficiencies between
2001). A Rotating Shear Device (RSD) has been developed to
centrifuges of different sizes and geometries (Ambler, 1959). Hence,
reproduce the prevailing shear conditions in such feed zones
this methodology can be applied to predict the clarification
(Boychyn et al., 2001). Operated in combination with a bench-top
performance of a disk-stack centrifuge using a laboratory bench-top
centrifuge, this has been shown to successfully predict the
centrifuge:
clarification efficiency of mammalian cell culture in a pilot-scale
Qds V lab
disk-stack centrifuge (Hutchinson et al., 2006). The RSD has also ¼ ; ð1Þ
cds Sds t lab clab Slab
been used in conjunction with micro well plates using sub-
millilitre volumes to successfully model pilot-scale centrifugation where Qds is the volumetric flow rate into the disk-stack centrifuge,
performance (Tait et al., 2009). Vlab is the volume of material used in the laboratory centrifuge, tlab
In the routine development of primary recovery operations, the is the centrifugation time, and cds and clab are correction factors that
performances of both centrifugal and filtration processes need to account for the non-ideal flow properties in the disk-stack and
be characterized. The RSD was developed as an ultra scale-down laboratory scale centrifuges, respectively. The correction factor for
(USD) tool to investigate under well-controlled and -defined the disk-stack centrifuge is quoted to be 0.4 by (Pinheiro and
conditions using small quantities of feedstock. Extensive Cabral, 1993) while the correction factor for the laboratory scale
publications have shown the utility of the RSD to understand centrifuge is 1. Here, the relationship determined by Maybury et al.
the impact of exposure to various levels of shear as might be (2000) is used to describe the equivalent settling area of a
experienced in the centrifugal step at pilot to manufacturing scale laboratory-scale centrifuge (Slab):
(Boychyn et al., 2001; Hutchinson et al., 2006; Tait et al., 2009).
However, in order to test secondary depth filter capacity, large V lab v2 ð3 2x 2yÞ
Slab ¼ ; ð2Þ
quantity (1 L) of centrate is required. The RSD is limited to 6g ln ð2R2 =ðR2 þ R1 ÞÞ
shearing a maximum of 20 mL of material per run hence
restricting its ability to provide the quantity of feedstock needed v is the angular velocity of the rotor; x and y are the fractional
to characterize subsequent filtration performance. The Capillary acceleration and deceleration times. R1 is the distance from the top
Shear Device (CSD) has also shown to be a preparative device of the liquid level of the centrifuge tube to the center of the
with the ability to mimic feed zone shear. Flow through the laboratory-scale centrifuge’s axis of rotation, while R2 is the distance
capillary enables the generation of energy dissipation rates (EDR) from the bottom of the centrifuge tube to the center of the axis of
equivalent to those found in disk-stack centrifuges (Westoby rotation. The equivalent settling area for a disk-stack centrifuge
et al., 2011). Furthermore, this methodology has shown that it (Sds) is described by:
can generate centrates with a particle size distribution equivalent 2
to that from a large-scale centrifuge (Westoby et al., 2011). In Sds ¼ p z v2 cos u r2 2 r1 2 ; ð3Þ
3g
theory, such a device can be used to produce unlimited quantities
of sheared material. To date no comparison between the where z is the total number of disks, u is the half disk angle, r1 and r2
characteristics of the material prepared by the CSD and the are the inner and outer disk radii, respectively.
established RSD has been published.
In this paper, a combination of scale-down devices was used to
Cell Culture
explore the impact of centrifugal separation on filter capacity so
as to determine the best integration between the steps of Cell culture used in the experiments were generated using CHO cell
centrifugal solids removal and submicron particulate elimination lines expressing monoclonal antibody products. The cultures
by depth filtration ahead of packed bed high resolution steps of produced had a range of cell densities and viabilities measured at
purification. It explores the utility of the CSD to create a pool of the day of harvest as summarized in Table I. Bench-scale cell culture
sheared feed material for centrifugal separation and the creation was conducted in 3 L fed batch bioreactors while pilot-scale culture
of a realistic centrate pool for the subsequent characterization of was performed in 50, 100, and 2000 L stainless steel bioreactors. All
the following depth filtration step. In this sense, it is proposed to cultures are harvested between days 11 and 14 during the decline
use the CSD as a preparatory method for filtration studies greater phase of growth.
than 1 L or more of feed material. Critical to the success of this
approach is the quality of the CSD material. The process
Rotating Shear Device (RSD)
characteristics and properties of the CSD preparatory scale
material are compared against the RSD as a proven method for The design, theory, and application of the rotating shear device to
scale-down studies. mimic levels of shear found in centrifuge feed zones has been
Condition Centrifuge Flow rate (L/h) Relative centrifugal force (g) Q/cS, V/tS 108 (m/s) CSD flowrate (mL/min)
1 LAPX-404 90 6000 4.9 16.63
2 LAPX-404 105 7900 2.92 17.57
3 LAPX-404 120 10,000 1.65 18.03
4 BTPX-305 480 12,500 2.2 17.08
will contain large populations of cell debris which are small in size particles carried through from the high cell density culture which in
and have a lower density than viable cells. The removal of such cell turn lead to a more rapid rate of pore blockage and flux decline
debris by centrifugation is difficult and these particles often end up (Fig. 8C).
in the centrate resulting in a poor separation. However, the easy to
harvest broth has a lower solid content and a greater population of
Conclusion
large viable cells, which facilitates separation. Furthermore, it may
be expected that high cell viability may lead to healthy cells with This work examines the impact of primary recovery process
intact cell walls and consequently, more resistant to shear damage parameters and cell culture conditions on the performance of
within the centrifuge feed zone. This would be expected to yield a subsequent centrifugal harvest and both depth and sterile filtration
centrate of high clarity and fewer cell debris particles being passed as a process sequence. In order to characterize the process
on to subsequent filtration processes hence requiring much lower sequence, the ability to prepare adequate volumes of sheared
capacities when processing easy to harvest cultures (Fig. 8A). samples was necessary. This study commenced by establishing the
Figure 8B shows the X0HC pressures and turbidity profiles for conditions of operation for a preparative device based on capillary
centrates derived from both culture materials. Upon filtration, the shear to create levels of shear damage similar to the industrially
centrate material from difficult harvest conditions showed accepted standard RSD used routinely for scale-down studies.
significant increases in both the pressure and turbidity profiles Experiments were conducted to determine the flow rates through
(D15.5 psi, D8.7 NTU) compared to that of the easy to harvest the preparative CSD to generate equivalent levels to the shear
material (D6.0 psi, D2.8 NTU). This can be directly attributed to the developed in the standard RSD which has already been shown to
higher levels of smaller debris in the centrate of the high cell density match shear levels found in the feed zone of industrial disk-stack
culture causing a more rapid rate of pore blockage. centrifuges. The centrates generated were then filtered. In the
As noted in Figure 8A, processing of the difficult to harvest process of filtration, equivalent turbidity and pressure profiles were
culture yielded lower SHC capacities compared to the easy to observed to those obtained when filtering centrate generated from a
harvest culture. This was attributed to the larger amount of small large-scale disk stack centrifuge.
Figure 5. Comparison of pressure and turbidity profiles for 0.1–2.0 mm X0HC depth
Figure 4. Comparison of solids remaining in centrate generated using the filter when filtering centrate from the BTPX-305 machine ( ) and the mimic centrate
preparative CSD mimicking LAPX-404 and BTPX-305 at a range of conditions (Table II) (&) generated applying the preparative methodology presented in the paper. BTPX-
marked in and solids remaining from pilot, scale centrifuge runs marked in &. 305 centrate for this study was generated at a relative centrifuge force of 12,500g.
Centrates generated for LAPX-404 were sourced from Culture-B (Table I) while the Preparatory CSD centrate was processed to mimic the large-scale centrifuge. The
BTPX-305 centrate was sourced from Culture-C (Table I). The values plotted are shown material for this experiment was sourced from Culture-C (Table I) and filtered at
as mean SD (n ¼ 3). 200 LMH.
Pds equivalent disk stack centrifuge settling area (m2) biotechnology products. Trends Biotechnol 27(9):546–553.
equivalent laboratory centrifuge settling area (m2) Shukla AA, Kandula JR. 2008. Harvest and recovery of monoclonal antibodies: Cell
lab
removal and clarification. In: Gottschalk U, editor. Process scale purification of
v angular velocity (s1) antibodies. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p 53–78.
Tait A, Aucamp J, Bugeon A, Hoare M. 2009. Ultra scale-down prediction using
microwell technology of the industrial scale clarification characteristics by
References centrifugation of mammalian cell broths. Biotechnol Bioeng 104(2):321–331.
Titchener-Hooker N, Dunnill P, Hoare M. 2008. Micro biochemical engineering to
Ambler CM. 1959. The theory of scaling up laboratory data for the sedimentation accelerate the design of industrial-scale downstream processes for biopharma-
type centrifuge. J Biochem Microbiol Technol Eng 1(2):185–205. ceutical proteins. Biotechnol Bioeng 100(3):473–487.
Aucamp JP, Davies R, Hallet D, Weiss A, Titchener-Hooker NJ. 2014. Integration of Westoby M, Rogers JK, Haverstock R, Romero J, Pieracci J. 2011. Modeling industrial
host strain bioengineering and bioprocess development using ultra-scale down centrifugation of mammalian cell culture using a capillary based scale-down
studies to select the optimum combination: An antibody fragment primary system. Biotechnol Bioeng 108(5):989–998.
recovery case study. Biotechnol Bioeng 111(10):1971–1981. Yavorsky D, Blanck R, Lambalot C, Brunkow R. 2003. The clarification of bioreactor
Axelsson H. 2002. Cell separation, centrifugation. In: Flickinger MC, Drew cell cultures for biopharmaceuticals. Pharm Technol 27(3):62–67.
SW, editors. Encyclopedia of bioprocess technology. New York: Wiley. Yigzaw Y, Piper R, Tran M, Shukla AA. 2006. Exploitation of the adsorptive properties
p 513–531. of depth filters for host cell protein removal during monoclonal antibody
Badmington F, Wilkins R, Payne M, Honig ES. 1995. Vmax testing for practical purification. Biotechnol Prog 22(1):288–296.
microfiltration train scale-up in biopharmaceutical processing. Pharm Technol Zydney AL, Ho CC. 2002. Scale-up of microfiltration systems: Fouling phenomena
19(9):64–76. and Vmax analysis. Desalination 146(1–3):75–81.