Lopez, Maria [COB]

From: Chelsea Glenn <cfadgen545@gmail.com>

Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 9:33 AM
To: COB_Response
Subject: General Aviation Changes at JWA

OC Board of Supervisors,

As a resident of Orange, I am against expansion of the airport. John Wayne is perfectly fine as it is. I do not
want updated facilities that will attract more small and large airplane traffic above my house.

I support the petition to limit the expansion to:

o No more than two (2) full-service Fixed Base Operators.

o One (1) new and one (1) existing limited-service Fixed Base Operators.

o No General Aviation Facility (for processing international general aviation passengers).

o Increased hangar space for small general aviation planes.

o Maintain the current "GA mix", meaning, keep the current ratio of light general aviation aircraft
(single and twin engine) and general aviation jets.
Regards,

Chelsea Glenn

1
Lopez, Maria [COB]

From: Conrad Baumgartner <topazhouse@ymail.com>

Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 9:23 AM
To: COB_Response
Subject: Airport Expansion

I live on Balboa Island and have owned a home here since 1975 and observed the noise level steadily increase over the 
years. We seem to have lost the battle for planes to use a wider take off pattern, so they they don’t all fly directly over 
Balboa Island!!!... If you are going to approve this big increase in noise, can’t you at least as part of the approval, add a 
condition of approval and move the monitoring devices for noise to the end of Balboa pier, so that we can carry on a a 
normal uninterrupted conversation with family and friends while the planes are roaring overhead!  Thank you for your 
consideration. 

1
Lopez, Maria [COB]

From: McCool, Martha [JWA]

Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 9:22 AM
To: COB_Response
Subject: GAIP item 45 email part 2 of 2
Attachments: CFASE Commercial Status Availability of Zero Emissions Transportation Vehicles, CHE &
Construction Equipment 2-1-2019.docx; CFASE Cumultive Impact Bibilography
4-23-2013.docx; CFASE Environmental Justice Bibilography 4-17-2013.docx; CFASE
Mental Health Bibliography 1.2.2012.docx; CFASE Noise Bibliography 1-2-2014.docx;
CFASE Public Health Care Costs Bibliography 1-2-2012.docx; CFASE Public Health
Studies A1 - A7 10-1-2014.docx; CFASE Womens Breast Cancer 1-2-2012.docx;
Pregnant Women & Prenatal Air Pollution Health Impacts Bibliography
10-24-2014.docx

Here is part 2 of 2 from Jesse Marquez.  
 
 
Martha McCool | Staff Assistant, Planning and Environmental  
John Wayne Airport, Orange County 
3160 Airway Avenue | Costa Mesa, CA 92626 
O 949.252.5276 |  
ocair.com     Facebook     Twitter 
 

 
 
 
 
From: Jesse Marquez <jnm4ej@yahoo.com>  
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 7:42 AM 
To: EIR627 <eir627@ocair.com> 
Cc: Jesse Marquez <jnm4ej@yahoo.com>; Ricardo Pulido <mr.rpulido@gmail.com>; Jane Williams 
<dcapjane@aol.com>; Anabell Romero Chavez <anab3ll310@yahoo.com>; Magali Sanchez‐Hall 
<mssanchezhall7@gmail.com>; Joe R. Gatlin <joergatlin45k@gmail.com>; Cynthia Babich 
<delamoactioncommittee@gmail.com>; Robina Suwol <robinasuwol@earthlink.net>; John G. Miller MD 
<igornla@cox.net>; Mitzi Shpak <msmshpak@gmail.com>; Drew Wood <californiakidsiaq@gmail.com>; Modesta Pulido 
<vdepulido@gmail.com>; ocneighborscare@yahoo.com 
Subject: Agenda No. 45. John Wayne Airport ‐ OC Board of Supervisors June 25, 2019 Meeting John Wayne Airport – 
General Aviation Improvement Program 

Email # 3 Public Comment Attachments

Note: Attachments are being sent in 2 emails due to large email file size.

Respectfully Submitted,

1
Jesse N Marquez
Executive Director
Coalition For A Safe Environment
310-590-0177

2
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Zero Emission Transportation Vehicles, Cargo Handling Equipment

& Construction Equipment Commercial Availability Survey
Jesse N. Marquez - Author

2.1.2019

New Monthly Additions Are Highlighted

Electric Trucks Class 8

1. BYD Motors - 8TT Battery-Electric Truck

2. EMOSS - 16 Serie Electric Truck
3. EMOSS - 18 Serie Electric Truck
4. Kenworth - ZECT-Zero Emissions Cargo Transit T680 Hydrogen Fuel Cell
5. Nikola - Nikola One
6. Toyota - Electric Class 8 Truck - Hydrogen Fuel Cell
7. TransPower - ElecTruck
8. US Hybrid - Electric Class 8 Truck - eTruck
9. US Hybrid - Electric Class 8 Truck - H2Truck

Electric Yard Tractors Class 8

1. BYD Motors - 8Y Tractor

2. BYD Motors - T9 Battery-Electric Tractor
3. BYD Motors - Q1M Battery Electric Tractor
4. Hoist Liftruck - TE Series Electric-Powered Terminal Tractor
5. Kalmar Ottawa - T2E Electric Terminal Tractor
6. Orange EV - T-Series 4x2 Terminal Truck
7. Orange EV - T-Series 4x2 Terminal Truck Conversion of Kalmar Ottawa Truck
8. Orange EV - T-Series Reman (Conversion/Repower)
9. Terberg - YT202EV
10. Transpower - Elec Truck Yard Tractor

Electric Class 7 Truck

1.EMOSS - 12 Serie

Electric Trucks Class 6

1. Alkane/evLabs - Electric Class 6 Truck

2. BYD Motors - T7 Battery Electric Truck
3. EMOSS – 10 Serie
4. Lightning Systems - LEV100 All Electric Low Cab

Electric Trucks Class 5

 1. BYD Motors - 5F/T5 Battery-Electric Box Truck
2. ADOMANI - Class 5 Truck Cab & Chassis

Electric Trucks Class 4

1. ADOMANI - Class 4 Truck

Electric Trucks Class 3

1. ADOMANI - Class 3 Truck

Electric Pickup Trucks

1. Atlis Motor Vehicles - XT Electric Pickup Truck

2. Bollinger Motors - All-Electric B2 Pickup Truck
3. Havelaar Canada - Bison Electric Pickup Truck
4. Rivian - Electric Pickup Truck R1T
5. Workhorse Group - W15 All Wheel Drive Electric Truck

Electric SUV

1. Rivian - Electric Pickup Truck R1S

Electric Ship-to-Shore (STS) Rail-Mounted Gantry Cranes

1. Konecranes Electric Ship-to-Shore (STS) Gantry Cranes

2. Liebherr Rail Mounted Electric Gantry Crane
3. Shanghai Zhenua Heavy Industries Co. Electric Ship-to-Shore Cranes

Electric Rubber-Tired Gantry (RTG) Cranes

1. ANUPAM-MHI - E-RTG Electric Rubber Tired Gantry Crane

2. Konecranes - Electric Cable Reel Rubber-Tired Gantry (RTG) Cranes
3. Konecranes - Electric Busbar Rubber-Tired Gantry (RTG) Cranes
4. Kalmar - E-One2 Zero Emission RTG
5. Liebherr Container Cranes - e-RTG
6. Terex Port Solutions - E-RTGs

Electric Rail-Mounted Gantry Cranes

1. HY Crane Co. Electric RMG Rail Mounted Container Gantry Crane

Electric Bulk Handling Crane

1. Liebherr - LPS 420 E

Carry Deck Crane

1. Zero Emissions Equipment - ZEECRANE 4500 4.5 Ton Carry Deck Crane
2. Zero Emissions Equipment - ZEECRANE 9000 9-Ton Carry Deck Crane

Reach Stackers

1. Transpower - Electric Forklift Reach Stacker

2. Konecranes Hybrid Reach Stacker
Shuttle Carrier

1. Kalmar Electric Shuttle Carrier

Straddle Carrier
`
1. Konecranes Electric Straddle Carrier DE53
2. Konecranes Electric Straddle Carrier DE54
3. Konecranes Electric Boxrunner
4. Kalmar ESC440 Electric Straddle Carrier

Trailer Spreader

1. TEC Electric Trailer Spreader BA-030

Electric Forklifts

1. Bendi - Electric Narrow Aisle B-30

2. Bendi - Electric Narrow Aisle B-40
3. BYD Motors - ECB 16 Electric Forklift
4. BYD Motors - ECB 18 Electric Forklift
5. BYD Motors - ECB 20 Electric Forklift
6. BYD Motors - ECB 25 Electric Forklift
7. BYD Motors - ECB 27 Electric Forklift
8. BYD Motors - ECB 30 Electric Forklift
9. BYD Motors - ECB 35 Electric Forklift
10. CAT - EP16-20(C)N Electric Forklifts
11. CAT - EP10-15KRT PASC Electric Forklifts
12. CAT - EP10-16-20(C)PNT Electric Forklifts
13. Clark - GEX 40/45/50 Series Electric Forklifts
14. Clark - GEX ECX 20/25/30/32 Series Electric Forklifts
15. Clark - GEX 20/25/30 Series Electric Forklifts
16. Clark - GEX 16/18/20S Series Electric Forklifts
17. Clark - GTX 16/18/20S Series Electric Forklifts
18. Clark - TMX 12/15S/15/17/20/25 Series Electric Forklifts
19. Clark - ESX 12/15S/15/17/20/25 Series Electric Forklifts
20. Crown - RC 5500 Series Stand Up 3-Wheeled Electric Forklift
21. Crown - SC 5200 Series 3-Wheeled Electric Forklift
22. Crown - FC 4500 Series Four Wheeled Electric Forklift
23. Doosan - B40/45/50X-5 Series Electric 4-Wheel Forklift
24. Doosan - B45X-7 Electric 4-Wheel Forklift
25. Doosan - B22/25/30/35X-5 Series Electric 4-Wheel Forklift
26. Doosan - B20/25/25SE-7/30/32S-7 Series Electric 4-Wheel Cushion Forklift
27. Doosan - B15/18S/20SC-5 Series Electric 4-Wheel Cushion Forklift
28. Doosan - B15T/18TL/20T/20TL Electric 7 Series 3-Wheel Forklift
29. Doosan - B16/18/20X-7 Electric 7 Series 4-Wheel Forklift
30. Doosan - B13/15/16R-5 Series Rear Drive 3-Wheeled Forklift
31. Drexel - Electric Narrow Aisle SLT 30
32. Drexel - Electric Narrow Aisle SL-40
33. Hangcha - A Series 3 Wheeled Forklift
34. Hangcha - J Series 3 Wheeled Forklift
35. Hangcha - A Series 4 Wheeled Forklift
36. Hangcha - J Series 4 Wheeled Forklift
37. Hoist Liftruck - PE Series Heavy-Duty Pneumatic Lift Trucks
38. Hoist Liftruck - Lazer Series Cushion Tire Lift Truck
39. Hoist Liftruck - Neptune Electric Series Lift Truck
40. Hyster - E30-40XN Series Electric Lift 4 Wheel Truck
41. Hyster - J45-70XN Series Electric Pneumatic Tire
42. Hyster - J80-100XN Series Electric Pneumatic Tire
43. Hyster - Class 1 With Nuvera Hydrogen Fuel Cell
44. Hyster - Class 2 With Nuvera Hydrogen Fuel Cell
45. Hyster - Class 3 With Nuvera Hydrogen Fuel Cell
46. Hyundai Construction - Series 9 40B-9 Four Wheeled Forklift
47. Hyundai Construction - Series 9 45B-9 Four Wheeled Forklift
48. Hyundai Construction - Series 9 50B-9 Four Wheeled Forklift
49. Kalmar - EC50-90
50. Komatsu - FB10-FB18 Series Electric Forklifts
51. Komatsu - FB20 A Electric Forklift
52. Komatsu - FB15M-FB20M Series Electric Forklifts
53. Komatsu - FB25-FB30 Series Electric Forklifts
54. Komatsu - FB13RL-FB18RL Series Electric Forklifts
55. Konecranes - TX AC Electric Rider Lift Trucks
56. Konecranes - SRX AC Electric Reach Trucks
57. Linde Material Handling - Linde Roadster Fuel Cell Drive
58. Linde Material Handling - E20
59. Linde Material Handling - E20/600H
60. Linde Material Handling - E25
61. Linde Material Handling - E25/600H
62. Linde Material Handling - E25/600HL
63. Linde Material Handling - E25/600HL_’5Pz/625Ah’
64. Linde Material Handling - E25L
65. Linde Material Handling - E30
66. Linde Material Handling - E30/600H
67. Linde Material Handling - E30/600HL
68. Linde Material Handling - E30/600HL_’5Pz/625Ah’
69. Linde Material Handling - E30/600HL Beverage
70. Linde Material Handling - E30L
71. Linde Material Handling - E35HL
72. Mariotti - Electric AC
73. Raymond Corp. - 4150 Stand Up Forklift
74. Raymond Corp. - 4250 Stand Up Forklift
75. Raymond Corp. - 4460 Sit Down Forklift
76. Raymond Corp. - 4750 Stand Up Forklift
77. Raymond Corp. - 7200 Reach-Fork Truck
78. Raymond Corp. - 7300 Reach-Fork Truck
79. Raymond Corp. - 7500 Universal Stance Reach Truck
80. Raymond Corp. - 7500 Dockstance reach Forklift
81. Raymond Corp. - 7000 Series Deep-Reach Forklift Truck
82. Raymond Corp. - 7700 Reach-Fork Truck
83. Raymond Corp. - 7310 4-Directional Reach Truck
84. Raymond Corp. - 9600 Sw8ing Reach Turret Truck
85. Raymond Corp. - 9700 Sing Reach Truck
86. Raymond Corp. - 9800 Swing Reach Truck
87. Raymond Corp. - TRT Transtacker Truck
88. Raymond Corp. - 9300 Sideloader Long Load Forklift
 89. Raymond Corp. - 9400 Sideloader Forklift
90. Still - RX 50 1.0-1.6T Three-Wheeled Electric Forklift
91. Still - RX 20 1.4-2.0T Three-Wheeled Electric Forklift
92. Still - RX 20 1.4-2.0T Li-Ion Three-Wheeled Electric Forklift
93. Still - RX 60 1.6-2.0T Four Wheeled Electric Forklift
94. Still - RX 60 2.5-3.5T Four Wheeled Electric Forklift
95. Still - RX 60 3.5-5.0T Four Wheeled Electric Forklift
96. Still - RX 60 6.0-8.0T Four Wheeled Electric Forklift
97. Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - FB16PNT-FB20PNT Series Three-Wheeled Electric
98. Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - FBC15N-FBC18N Series Small Electric Cushion
99. Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - FBC22N2-FBC30LN3 Series Mid-Size Electric Cushion
100. Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - FBC15NS-FBC20NS Series Stand-Up End Control
101. Toyota - Core Electric Forklift
102. Toyota - Large Electric Forklift
103. Toyota - 3-Wheel Electric Forklift
104. Toyota - Stand-Up Rider Forklift
105. Toyota - Electric Pneumatic Forklift
106. Toyota - High-Capacity Electric Cushion Forklift
107. Yale - ESC 30 Three-Wheeled Forklift
108. Yale - ERC Four Wheeled Forklift
109. Yale - ERP30 Four Wheeled Forklift

Electric Pallet Truck

1. BYD - P20JW All-Electric Walkie Pallet Truck

Electric Dredger

1. Custom Dredge Works, Inc.

2. DSC Dredge
3. IMS Dredges
4. Ellicott Dredges. LLC
5. TV Dredging

Electric Tow Tractor

1. Clark - CTX 40/70 Series Electric Tow Tractor

2. Konecranes - TGX AC Electric Tow Tractor
3. Raymond - 8610 Tow Tractor

Tracked Dozer (Tractor)

1. Catepillar - D7E Hybrid Bulldozer

Excavators

1. Bobcat - E10 Electric Micro-Excavator

2. Kato - 9VXE- 3 Electric Mini Excavator
3. Kato - 17VXE Electric Mini Excavator
4. Wacker Neuson Group - Zero Tail EZ17e Mini Excavator

Top Front End Payloader

1. BYD Motors - Zero Emission Top Front Payloader

Skid Steer

1. Giant - E-Skid Steer Remote Control Skid-Steer Loader

2. Kovaco - eLise 900 Electric Skid Ster Loader
3. Schibeci - 32PE Electric Mini Skid Steer Loader
4. Sherpa - 100 ECO Electric Mini Skid-Steer

Wheeled Loader

1. Catepillar - 988K XE Electric Drive Wheel Loader

2. Hitachi - ZW220HYB-5 Hybrid Wheel Loader
3. John Deer - 944K Hybrid Wheel Loader
4. Kramer - KL25.5e Electric Wheeled Loader
5. Kramer - 5055e Electric Wheel Loader

Rope Shovels

1. Catepillar - Model 7295 Electric Rope Shovels

2. Catepillar - Model 7395 Electric Rope Shovels
3. Catepillar - Model 7495 HD Electric Rope Shovels

Wheel Dumper

1. Wacker Neuman Group - DW15e Electric Wheel Dumper

Concrete Mixers

1. BYD - J9C Concrete Mixer

Dump Trucks

1. BYD - T5 Dump Truck

2. California Truck Equipment Co. - All-Eectric Powertrain With Ford E450 Dump Truck
3. California Truck Equipment Co. - All-Eectric Powertrain With Ford F59 Dump Truck

Delivery Truck

1. AMP - E-100 V.2 All-Electric Step Van With Workhorse Chassis

2. BYD Motors - T7 Battery Electric Delivery Truck - Class 7
3. BYD Motors - T5 Battery Electric Delivery Truck - Class 5
4. Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Bus Corp. - Fuso eCanter Light Class 4 Delivery Truck
5. Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Bus Corp./E-Fuso Vision One Heavy Duty Class 5 Delivery Truck
6. Motive Power Systems - All-Electric Powertrain For Ford E450 Box Truck/Flat Bed
7. Motive Power Systems - All-Electric Powertrain For Ford F59 Walk In Van
8. UPS - Hydrogen Fuel Cell Class 6 Delivery Truck

Cab Chassis Delivery Truck

1. ADOMANI - Class 3 All-Electric Cutaway

2. ADOMANI - Class 5 Truck Cab & Chassis
3. Daimler - Freightliner eM2
4. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 4 Series
5. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 5 Series
6. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 6 Series
 7. Zenith - Electric Chassis Cab
8. Zenith - Electric Cutaway Cab

Flat Bed Truck

1. Motive Power Systems - All-Electric Powertrain For Ford E450 Box Truck/Flat Bed
2. Phoenix Motorcars - ZEUS Electric Flatbed Ford E350
3. Phoenix Motorcars - ZEUS Electric Flatbed Ford E450

Cargo Panel Van

1. ADOMANI - All-Electric Logistic Van

2. Chanje Energy Inc. - Class 5 - V8070 Electric Panel Van
3. Chanje Energy Inc. - V8100 Electric Panel Van
4. EMOSS – EMS 508 Electric Delivery Van
5. Morgan Olson Route Star - Motiv All-Electric Powertrain Ford F59 Walk-In-Van
6. Renault - SL31 i ZE Business Panel Van
7. Renault - SM31 i ZE Business Panel Van
8. Renault - MM31 i ZE Business Panel Van
9. Renault - LM31 i ZE Business Panel Van
10. Rockport Commercial Vehicles Cargoport - Motiv All-Electric Powertrain
11. Zenith Motors - Electric Step/Walk-In Van

Cargo Van

1. Green4U Technologies - Cargo Van

2. Lighting Systems - Electric Transit Cargo Van
3. Merceds-Benz – eSprinter
4. Nisssan - Electric E-NV200 Van
5. VIA - Cargo Van
6. Volkswagon - I.D. Buzz Cargo Van
7. Workhorse - NGen Electric Delivery Van
8. Zenith Motors - Electric Cargo Van

Utility/Electric Trucks

1. California Truck Equipment Co. - Motiv All-Eectric Powertrain With Ford E450 Utility Truck
2. California Truck Equipment Co. - Motiv All-Eectric Powertrain With Ford F59 Utility Truck
3. Phoenix Motorcars - ZEUS Electric Utility Service Vehicle Ford E350/E450 *

Aerial Boom Truck

1. Altec - Aerial Boom Vehicle with JEMS: 16-20 kWh Lithium-Ion Battery *
2. Hyster - Ascender AWP
3. JLG - Aerial Lift
4. Yale - AEREO AWP

Electric Refuse Trucks

1. BYD/Wayne Engineering - Class 8 Electric Refuse Truck

2. BYD - Class 6 Electric Refuse Truck
3. Motiv Power - ERV Battery-Electric Class 8 Refuse Truck
4. Petebuilt - Model 520 Battery-Electric Class 8 Refuse Truck
5. Wrightspeed - Electric Powertrain Refuse Truck
Street Sweeper

1. Dulevo International - D.Zero Electric Street Sweeper

2. Tenex International - Electra 1.0 Compact Street Sweeper
3. Tennant - Green Machines 500ze Electric Street Sweeper
4. Tropos - ABLE Sweep eCUV
5. U.S. Hybrid - Hydrogen Fuel Cell Street Sweeper

Fire Trucks

1. Suzhou Eagle Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Co.

2. Citecareelectricvehilces.com - CitEcar Fire Buddy Deluxe

Agricultural Tractors

1. Fendt - e100 Vario Electric Tractor

2. Solectrac - eFarmer Tractor
3. Solectrac - eUtility Tractor

Livestock/Equestrian Tractors

1. Solectrac - eUtility Tractor

Compact Utility Vehicles

1. Alke - Electric Cargo Van

2. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Payloader/Welding
3. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Payloader/Van Body
4. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Payloader/Metal Cage
5. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Payloader/Folding Side Rails
6. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Payloader/Steel Cab
7. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Payloader/Refuse Unit
8. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Utility MVP
9. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Utilitruck
10. GEM - GEM e2
11. GEM - GEM e4
12. GEM - GEM e6
13. GEM - GEM eL XD
14. GEM - GEM eM 1400 LSV
15. Tropos Motors - ABLE FRV - Electric Fire Response Vehicle
16. Tropos Motors - ABLE EMSo - Electric Medical Service Vehicle, Open Platform
17. Tropos Motors - ABLE EMSc - Electric Medical Service Vehicle, Closed Platform
18. Tropos Motors - ABLE Trades
19. Tropos Motors - ABLE Pickup
20. Tropos Motors - ABLE Cargo

Passenger Trains

1. ALWEG Rapid Transit Company – Monorail Passenger Train

2. Altrom - Prima M4 - AZ4A Passenger Locomotives
3. Altrom - Citadis Dualis Tram-Train
4. Altrom - Citadis Spirit Light Rail Vehicle
5. Altrom - Fuel Cell Coradia iLint
6. Altrom - Metropolis Metro
7. Altrom - Translohr Tramway On Tyres
8. Altrom - X’Trapolis Suburban Train
9. Bombardier Transportation
10. Bombardier - Innovia APM 100
11. Bombardier - Innovia APM 200 Automated People Mover System
12. Bombardier - Innovia APM 256
13. Bombadier - Innovia APM 300 Automated People Mover System
14. Bombardier - Innovia Monorail
15. Bombardier - Flexibility Trams
16. Bombardier - Flexibility 2 Trams
17. Bombardier - Flexibility Freedom
18. Bombardier - Flexibility Light Rail Vehicles
19. Bombardier - Single Deck Electric Multiple Units
20. Bombardier - Double-Deck Electric Multiple Units
21. BYD - Skyrail Monorail System
22. CAF - Electric Locomotive BB A 3000V
23. CAF - Electric Locomotive BBB A 3000V
24. CAF - Electric Locomotive C’C’ 3.000V
25. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - HX1D AC Rapid Electric Passenger Locomotive
26. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - ERP Passenger
27. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - Maglev Passenger Train
28. Hitachi - AT 100 Metro Dual Voltage
29. Hitachi - AT 200 Commuter Dual Voltage
30. Hitachi - AT 300 Intercity High Speed
31. Hitachi - Monorail Passenger Train
32. Hyundai Rotem - Manned Electric Passenger Trains
33. Hyundai Rotem - Unmanned Electric Passenger Trains
34. Inekon - Trio Low Floor Tram
35. Inekon - 04 Superior Low Floor Tram
36. Inekon - 11 Pento Low Floor Tram
37. JSC Kolomensky Zavoc - EP2K Passenger Electric Locomotive
38. Kawasaki - SWIMO Ultra Low Floor Tramway
39. Kawasaki - JR East 200 Electric Passenger Extreme Cold Weather Train
40. Kawasaki - 05 Series Electric Subway Train
41. Kawasaki - 22 Series Electric Subway Train
42. Kawasaki - 66 Series Electric Subway Train
43. Kawasaki - 70-000 High Speed Electric Rail Train
44. Kawasaki - 2000 Series High Speed Electric Rail Train
45. Kawasaki - 1000 Series Electric Subway Train
46. Kawasaki - 3000 Series Electric Subway Train
47. Kawasaki - 5000 Series Electric Subway Train
48. Kawasaki - 6300 Series Electric Subway Train
49. Kawasaki - 8000 Series Electric Subway Train
50. Kawasaki - 16000 Series Electric Subway Train
51. Kawasaki - R143 Series Electric Subway Train
52. Kawasaki - PA-5 Commuter Electric Train
53. Kawasaki - 30000 Series Electric Railway Train
54. Kawasaki - 1000 Series Monorail Vehicle
55. Kawasaki - efSET Electric High Speed Railway Vehicle
56. Nippon Sharyo - Light Rail Electric Vehicles (LACMTA)
57. Nippon Sharyo - Model 800 Low Floor Light Rail Electric Vehicles
 58. Nippon Sharyo - Gallery Type Bi-Level EMU
59. Nippon Sharyo - Highliner Gallery Type Bi-Level EMU
60. Nippon Sharyo - Commuter EMU
61. Nippon Sharyo - AE100 Express EMU
62. Nippon Sharyo - Series 215 EMU
63. Nippon Sharyo - Series 371 Express EMU
64. Nippon Sharyo - Series 683 Express EMU
65. Nippon Sharyo - Series 1700 Express EMU
66. Nippon Sharyo - Series 2000 Electric EMU
67. Nippon Sharyo - Series 2200 Electric EMU
68. Nippon Sharyo - Series 50000 Express EMU
69. Nippon Sharyo - Series 60000 Express EMU
70. Nippon Sharyo - Series 7000 Driverless Tram With Rubber tires
71. Nippon Sharyo - Model HSST-100 Linimo Maglev Train Fully Auitomated
72. Nippon Sharyo - Model 40 Suspended Monorail
73. Nippon Sharyo - Light Rail Vehicle
74. Patentes Taolgo Sl - Electric Locomotive
75. Scoda Electric - Emil Zatopek Electric Passenger Locomotive
76. Scoda Electric - Single Deck Electric Unit Passenger Train
77. Scoda Electric - Double Single Deck Electric Unit Passenger Train
78. Scoda Electric - Monorail Passenger Train
79. Siemens - Avenio Single Articulated Tram Low Floor
80. Siemens - Avenio Single Articulated Tram Low Floor
81. Siemens - Streetcar S70 Light Rail Passenger Train
82. Swiss Stadler Rail Group FLIRT High Speed Low Floor Multi Unit Passenger Rail
83. Swiss Stadler Rail Group FLIRT 160 High Speed Low Floor Single Decker Passenger Train
84. Swiss Stadler Rail Group - KISS200 long Distance Double Decker Passenger Train
85. Swiss Stadler Rail Group - TANGO City Train High or Low Floor
86. Swiss Stadler Rail Group - TRAMLINK Multi Link Low Floor Train
87. Titagarh - TSR Lenord Double Deck EMU
88. Titagarh - TAF Double Deck EMU
89. Titagarh - ETR500 High Speed Trainset
90. Titagarh - E403 Electric Loco
91. Titagarh - E404.600 High Speed Electric Loco
92. Titagarh - EMUCVS Articulated Single Deck EMU Metrostar
93. Toshiba - 15E Electric Locomotives
94. Toshiba - 19E Electric Locomotives Dual-Voltage
95. Toshiba - SciB Battery Light Rail Transit
96. Toshiba - HSR High Speed Rail
97. Tulomsas - E68000 Electric Outline Engine Passenger Train
98. WINDHOFF Bahn- und Anlagentechnik GmbH

Note: All electric trains in the Netherlands are now 100% Wind Powered

Freight Train

1. Alstrom - 800 Prima T8 (WAG12)

2. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - HX1F Electric Locomotive
3. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - HX 1B Electric Locomotive
4. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - HX 1C Electric Locomotive
5. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - HX 1 Electric Locomotive
6. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - SS Electric Locomotive
7. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - 22E Dual-Voltage
 8. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - 21E Dual-Voltage Narrow
9. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - 20E Dual-Voltage Narrow
10. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - KZ4AC
11. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - O’Z-Y
12. Kawasaki - JR Cargo EF 210 Electric Locomotive
13. Kawasaki - JR Cargo EF 510 Electric Locomotive
14. Kawasaki - JR Freight M 250 Super Rail Cargo Electric Locomotive
15. Kawasaki - 6K Freight Electric Locomotive
16. Schoma Lokomotiven - Electric Tunnel Locomotives
17. Siemens - eHighway Freight System
18. Swiss Stadler Rail Group - NG Shunting Locomotive
19. Swiss Stadler Rail Group - Tailor Made Locomotives
20. Tulomsas - E43000 Electric Locomotive
21. Tulomsas - E1000 Electric Maneuvering Engine
22. Tulomsas - E68000 Electric Outline Engine Freight Train

Passenger Van

1. Green4U Technologies - Passenger Cargo Van

2. Lightning Systems - Ford Transit EV 350HD Passenger Wagon
3. Mercedes-Benz - eVito Passenger Van
4. VIA - Passenger Van
5. Zenith Motors - Electric Passenger Van

Passenger/Shuttle Buses

1. Altrom – Aptis Electric Bus

2. Ameritrans Bus - All-Electric Motiv ePCS On Ford E450 Chassis 25 Passenger Shuttle Bus
3. Advanced Vehicle Manufacturing (AVM) - All Electric Mid-Size Shuttle Bus EV21
4. Advanced Vehicle Manufacturing (AVM) - All Electric Mid-Size Shuttle Bus EV27
5. Advanced Vehicle Manufacturing (AVM) - All Electric Mid-Size Shuttle Bus EV33
6. BYD Motors - C6 23-Ft Zero-Emission Electric Motor Coach
7. BYD Motors - K7M 30-Ft All Electric Zero-Emission Transit Bus
8. BYD Motors - K9s 35-Ft Zero-Emission Transit Bus
9. BYD Motors - K9M 40-Ft All Electric Zero-Emission Transit Bus
10. BYD Motors - K9S 40-Ft All Electric Zero-Emission Transit Bus
11. BYD Motors - C9 40-Foot Zero-Emission Electric Motor Coach
12. BYD Motors - C10M 45-Ft Articulated All Electric Coach
13. BYD Motors - K11M 60-Ft Articulated All Electric Zero-Emission Transit Bus
14. Green4U Technologies - Shuttle Bus
15. Green4U Technologies - Touring Bus
16. GreenPower - EV350 40-Foot All Electric
17. GreenPower - EV550 40-Foot All Electric Double Decker Bus
18. GreenPower - SYNAPSE 72 All Electric Shuttle Bus
19. International IC Bus - IC charge All-Electric Bus
20. Mercedes-Benz - eCitaro
21. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 4 Passenger Bus
22. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 6 Passenger Bus
23. New Flyer - Xcelior XE 35 Bus With Lithion-Ion Battery Pack
24. New Flyer - Xcelior XE 40 Bus With Lithion-Ion Battery Pack
25. Phoenix Motorcars - ZEUS-Zero Emissions Utility Shuttles
26. Proterra - Catalyst FC 35-Foot Urban Transit Bus
27. Proterra - Catalyst XR 35-Foot Urban Transit Bus
28. Proterra - Catalyst E2 35-Foot Urban Transit Bus
29. Proterra - Catalyst FC 40-Foot Urban Transit Bus
30. Proterra - Catalyst XR 40-Foot Urban Transit Bus
31. Proterra - Catalyst E2 40-Foot Urban Transit Bus
 32. Solaris - Urbino 8 LE Electric Bus
33. Solaris - Urbino 9 LE Electric Bus
34. Solaris - Urbino 12 LE Electric Bus
35. Solaris - Urbino 18 LE Electric Bus
36. Toshiba - Sora FC EV Bus
37. VDL Bus & Coach - Citea SLF-120 Electric Bus
38. VDL Bus & Coach - Citea SLF-121 Electric Bus
39. VDL Bus & Coach - Citea SLFA-180 Electric Bus
40. VDL Bus & Coach - Citea SLFA-181 Electric Bus
41. VDL Bus & Coach - Citea SLFA-187 Electric Bus
42. VDL Bus & Coach - Citea LLE - 99 Electric Bus
43. Zenith Motors - Electric Mini Bus

Compact Shuttle/MiniBus

1. Columbia - 6 Passenger Shuttle

2. Columbia - MVP 14 Passenger Shuttle
3. EMOSS - MB4 - 7 Passenger Electric Minibus
4. EMOSS - MB14 - 15 Passenger Electric Minibus
5. EMOSS - MB15 - 15 Passenger Electric Minibus
6. EMOSS - MB16 - 16 Passenger Electric Minibus

School Buses

1. ADOMANI - Electric School Bus

2. Blue Bird - Type D RE Electric School Bus
3. Blue Bird - Type A Micro Bird G5 Electric School Bus
4. Creative Bus Sales Inc. - Type C Motiv All-Eectric Powertrain With Ford F59 Starcraft School Bus
5. GreenPower - SYNAPSE 72 All Electric School Bus
6. LION Electric - eLion Type C School Bus
7. Motiv Power Systems - eQuest XL All-Eectric Powertrain With Ford F59 Starcraft School Bus
8. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 4 Type A School Bus
9. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 5
10. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 6 Type C School Bus
11. Thomas Built Buses – Saf-T-Liner C2 Jouley Electric School Bus
12. Transpower - Type C Transit School Bus
13. Trans Tech Bus - SSTe - Motiv ePCS On Ford E450 Chassis School Bus

Taxi

1. BYD - E6 Electric Taxi

2. Electric Cab North America - Micro Transit Shuttles
3. Nissan LEAF Electric Taxi

Underground Mining Equipment

1. Epiroc - Scooptram ST7 Battery Electric Loader

2. Epiroc - Scooptram EST1030 Electric Loader
3. Epiroc - Scooptram EST2D Electric Loader
4. Epiroc - Scooptram EST3.5 Electric Loader
5. Epiroc - Minetruck MT2010
6. Epiroc - Minetruck MT42
7. Epiroc - Boomer E2 Battery Face Drill Rig
Note: 1. CFASE conducts periodic searches for all vehicles and equipment that are zero emissions. Our survey
is the most comprehensive document of zero emission technologies.
2. CFASE contacted the manufacturer directly to obtain information or information was available on
the manufacturer website.
3. Commercially Available means that the manufacturer is accepting orders for delivery to customer
in less than one year. Time of delivery can vary due to the type and number of vehicles ordered.
4. Vehicles and Equipment can be new or used and be retrofitted to be zero emission.

Coalition For A Safe Environment

1601 N. Wilmington Blvd., Ste. B, Wilmington, CA 90744
www.cfasecares.org     jesse@cfasecares.org jnm4ej@yahoo.com 310-590-0177 424-264-5959
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Cumulative Impact
Bibliography

2.23.2013
54 Citations

1. Atkinson SF, Canter L. W., and Ravan M. D., “The Influence of Incomplete or Unavailable Information on
Environmental Impact Assessment in the USA”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol.26, Issue 5,
2006, pp. 448-467.

2. Bell ML, O'Neill MS, Cifuentes LA, Braga ALF, Green C, Nweke A, Rogat J, Sibold K, “Challenges and
recommendations for the study of socioeconomic factors and air pollution health effects.” Environmental Science
Policy (2005) Volume: 8, Issue: 5, Pages: 525-533

3. Burris RK., and Canter LW, "Cumulative Impacts are not Properly Addressed in Environmental
Assessments," EIA Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, January, 1997, pp. 5-18.

4. Burris RK, and Canter LW, "A Practitioner Survey of Cumulative Impact Assessment," Impact Assessment, Vol.
15, No. 2, June, 1997, pp. 181-194.

5. Burris RK, and Canter LW, “Facilitating Cumulative Impact Assessment in the EIA Process”, International Journal
of Environmental Studies, Vol. 53, 1997, pp. 11-29.

6. Caldwell JC, Woodruff TJ, Frosch RM, Axelrad DA, “Application of Health Information to Hazardous Air Pollutants
Modeled in EPA’s Cumulative Exposure Project.” Toxicology & Industrial Health, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.429-454, 1998

7. CAL EPA, “Environmental Justice Plan.” 11 pgs., October 2004 Sacramento, CA.,

8. CAL EPA, “EJ Action Plan Pilot Projects: Addressing Cumulative Impacts and Precautionary Approach.” Available
at: http://www.calepa.ca.gov/envjustice/ActionPlan/PhaseI/March2005/CI_PA.pdf. March 25, 2005 Sacramento,
CA.

9. CAL EPA, California Air Resources Board, “Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health
Perspective.”
http://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. April 2005, Sacramento, CA.

10. CAL EPA/OEHHA, “California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool.” 116pgs. April 2013
Sacramento, CA.

11. CAL EPA/OEHHA, “Cumulative Impacts: Building A Scientific Foundation.” 69 pgs., December 2010,
Sacramento, CA.

12. Caltrans (with FHWA and EPA), “Guidance for Preparers of Cumulative Impact Analysis”, June 30, 2005,
Sacramento, California. http://www.dot.ca.gov/ser/cumulative_guidance/purpose.htm

13. Canter LW, "Cumulative Effects and Other Analytical Challenges of NEPA," Ch. 8 in Environmental Policy and
NEPA: Past, Present, and Future, Clark, E.R., and Canter, L.W., Editors, St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida,
1997, pp. 115-137.

14. Canter L W, “Economics in Cumulative Effects Assessment”, Economics and Environmental Conference, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, New Orleans, Louisiana, July 16-18, 2002

15. Canter LW, "Environmental Impact Assessment," Ch. 2 in Environmental Engineers Handbook, Liu, D.H., and
Liptak, B.G., editors, Second Edition, Lewis Publishers/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1997, pp. 41-72.
16. Canter LW, "Cumulative Effects Assessment," Ch. 18 in Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, Vol. I,
Petts, J., Editor, Blackwell Science, Ltd., Oxford, England, 1999, pp. 405-440.

17. Canter LW, " Scientific Uncertainty and the Environmental Impact Assessment Process in the United States," Ch.
10 in Scientific Uncertainty and Environmental Problem-Solving, Lemons, J., editor, Blackwell Scientific
Publications, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996, pp. 298-326.

18. Canter, LW “Sources, Effects, and Fate of Pollutants," Section 1.1 (in Ch. 1) in Air Pollution, Liu, D.H., and Liptak,
B.G., Editors, Lewis Publishers/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2000, pp.3-20.

19. Canter, L.W., and Kamath, J., "Questionnaire Checklist for Cumulative Impacts," Environmental Impact
Assessment Review, Vol. 15, No. 4, July, 1995, pp. 311-339

20. CDC National Association of Local Boards of Health, “Land Use Planning for Public Health: The Role of Local
Boards of Health in Community Design and Development.”
http://www.cdc.gov/HEALTHYPLACES/publications/landuseNALBOH.pdf. 2006.

21. Corburn J, “Environmental Justice, Local Knowledge, and Risk: The Discourse of a Community-Based
Cumulative Exposure Assessment. Environmental Management.” Vol. 29, pages 451-466. 2002.

22. Council on Environmental Quality, “Forty Most Asked Questions Concerning CEQ's National Environmental Policy
Act Regulations.” Memorandum to Agencies. 46 Fed. Reg. 18026 (March 23, 1981).

23. Council on Environmental Quality, “Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act.” 40 CFR Parts 1500 - 1508. 1987

24. Council on Environmental Quality. 1997. Considering Cumulative Effects Under the National Environmental Policy
Act. Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC. January.

25. Crookes DJ, DeWit MP, “An Evaluation Of Tools For An Assessment Of Cumulative Effects In Socioeconomic
Impact Studies.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, Vol. 11, 311-329 pp March 2009.

26. Delfino RJ, “Epidemiologic evidence for asthma and exposure to air toxics: linkages between occupational,
indoor, and community air pollution research.” Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Aug;110 Suppl 4:573-89.

27. Diez-Roux A. 1997. Neighborhood environments and coronary heart disease: a multilevel analysis. Am J
Epidemiol 146:48–63.

28. Diez-Roux A. 1998. Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. Am J
Public Health 88:216–222.

29. EPA, “Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents,” U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Federal Activities (2252A) EPA 315-R-99-002/May 1999.

30. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “Community Impact Assessment: A Quick Reference for
Transportation.” FHWA, Office of Environment and Planning, Washington, DC. FHWA-PD-96, HEP-30. 1996.

31. Green RS, Smorodinsky,S, Kim, JJ, McLaughlin, R, Ostro,B, “Proximity of California Public Schools to Busy
Roads.” Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 112. No. 1, January 2004.

32. Gwynn RC, Thurston GD, “The burden of air pollution: impacts among racial minorities.” Environ Health Perspect.
2001 Aug;109 Suppl 4:501-6.

33. Herson AI, and Bogdan KM. 1991. “Cumulative impact analysis under NEPA: recent legal developments.” The
Environmental Professional 13:100-106.

34. Kamaras G, 1993. “Cumulative impact assessment: a comparison of federal and state environmental review
provisions.” Albany Law Review 57(1):113-143.

35. Lewtas, J, “Air pollution combustion emissions: characterization of causative agents and mechanisms associated
with cancer, reproductive, and cardiovascular effects.” Mutat Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;636(1-3):95-133. Epub 2007
Aug 17.
36. Makri, A, Stilianaskis, NI, “Vulnerability to air pollution health effects.” Int J Hyg Environ Health, 2008 Jul;211(3-
4):326-36. Epub 2007 Aug 24.

37. McCold, L.N. and J.W. Saulsbury, “Including Past and Present Impacts in Cumulative Impact Assessments.”
Environmental Management. Vol. 20 no.5 pp. 767-776, 1996.

38. Morello-Frosch R. 2002. The political economy of environmental discrimination. Environ Plann C Gov Policy
20:477–496.

39. Morello-Frosch R, Jesdale BM. 2006. Separate and unequal: residential segregation and estimated cancer risks
associated with ambient air toxics in U.S. metropolitan areas. Environ Health Perspect 114:386–393.

40. Morello-Frosch R, Pastor M, Sadd J. 2001. Environmental justice and southern California’s “Riskscape”: the
distribution
of air toxics exposures and health risks among diverse communities. Urban Affairs Rev 36:551–578.

41. Morello-Frosch, R, Shenassa, ED, “The Environmental Riskscape and Social Inequity: Implications for Explaining
Maternal and Child Health Disparities.” Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 114, No. 8, August 2006.

42. National Academy of Sciences. 2003. Cumulative Environmental Effects of Oil and Gas Activities on Alaska's
North Slope. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

43. NEJAC. 2004. Ensuring Risk Reduction in Communities with Multiple Stressors: Environmental Justice and
Cumulative Risks/Impacts—Draft Report. New Orleans: National Environmental Justice Advisory Council.

44. Ozkaynak H, Palma T, Touma JS, Thurman J, “Modeling population exposures to outdoor sources of hazardous
air pollutants.” J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008 Jan; 18(1):45-58. Epub 2007 Sep 19

45. Pratt, Gregory C, “Cumulative Impact. Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 108, page 162.”
http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2000/108-4/correspondence.html. 2002

46. Rosenbaum, AS, Ligocki, MP, Wei, Y, “Modeling cumulative outdoor concentrations of hazardous air pollutants.”
Technical report, San Rafael: Systems Applications International, Inc. 1998.

47. Rumrill JN, and Canter LW, "Addressing Future Actions in Cumulative Effects Assessment," Project Appraisal,
Vol. 12, No. 4, December, 1997, pp. 207-218.

48. Rumrill JN, and Canter LW, “Cumulative Air Quality Effects Assessment”, Federal Facilities Environmental
Journal, Autumn, 2000, pp. 19-38.

49. Smith, MD, “Recent Trends In Cumulative Impact Case,” National Association of Environmental Professionals
Annual Conference, Alexandria, VA, April 16-19, 2005.

50. Stanley M, “Indirect and Cumulative Impact Analysis”, NCHRP 25-25, Task 11, January, 2006, American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C.

51. Tricker RC, “Assessing cumulative environmental effects from major public transport projects,” Transport Policy,
Vol. 14, 293-305 pp, July, 2007.

52. Weisel CP, “Assessing exposure to air toxics relative to asthma,” Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Aug;110 Suppl 4:527-37.”

53. Woodruff TJ, Axelrad DA, Frosch RM, Rosenbuam A, “Assessing hazardous air pollutants: The need for a new
approach.” Epidemiol, January 1997.

54. Woodruff TJ, Axelrad DA, Caldwell JC, Frosch RM, Rosenbuam A, “Public health implications of air toxics
concentrations across the United States.” Environ. Health Perspectives, 1998.
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Environmental Justice

Bibliography
118 Citations
4.17. 2013

1. Allen, D. W. “Social class, race, and toxic releases in American counties, 1995.” Social Science Journal 38
(2001): 13-25.

2. Austin, Regina & Schill, Michael. "Black, brown, poor & poisoned: Minority grassroots environmentalism and the
quest for eco-justice:" Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy v1, n1 (1991): 69-82.

3. Baugh, John H,"African Americans and the Environment: A Review Essay." Policy Studies Journal 19 (2): 182-
191.1991

4. Bennet, James. "Hispanic voters and the Politics of Sludge." New York Times, 5 March 1993, B1.

5. Been, Vicki, What’s fairness got to do with it? Environmental justice and siting of locally undesirable land uses.
Cornell Law Review 78, 1001. 1993.

6. Been, Vicki, "Locally Undesirable Land Uses in Minority Neighborhoods: Disproportionate Siting or Market
Dynamics?" Yale Law Journal 103:1383-1422. 1994.

7. Been, Vicki, “Essays on environmental justice: Market dynamics and the siting of LULUs: Questions to raise in the
classroom about existing research.” West Virginia Law Review 96, 1069. 1994.

8. Been, Vicki, “Analyzing evidence of environmental justice. Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law,” 11(1): 1-
36.1995

9. Been, Vicki and Francis Gupta, “Coming to the nuisance or going to the barrios? A longitudinal analysis of
environmental justice claims.” Ecology Law Quarterly 24(1): 1-56. 1997.

10. Bell, J., and M. Standish. “Communities and health policy: a pathway for change.” Health affairs 24.3 (2005 Mar-
Apr): 339-42.

11. Bevc, Christine A., Brent K. Marshall and J. Steven Picou. 2006. “Toxic Exposure and Environmental Justice:
Toward A Spatial Model of Physical Health and Psychological Well-Being.” Social Science Research 35:

12. Binder, Denis. Index of environmental justice cases. The Urban Lawyer v27, n1 (1995): 163-167.

13. Blank, Linda D. Seeking solutions to environmental inequity: The Environmental Justice Act. Environmental Law v
24, n3 (1994): 1109-1136.

14. Booth, Annie L. and Harvey M. Jacobs. 1990. "Ties That Bind: Native American Beliefs as a Foundation for
Environmental Consciousness." Environmental Ethics 12 (1): 27-43.

15. Bowen, WM, Comments on Every Breath You take…, The demographics of toxic air releases in Southern
California, Economic Development Quarterly, v13,n2 May 1999: 124-134

16. Brajer, V. & J. Hall. “Recent evidence on the distribution of air pollution effects.” Contemporary Policy Issues, v2,
n5, April 1992: 63-70.

17. Brown, Alice L. "Environmental justice: New civil rights frontier." Trial v29, n7 (July 1993): 48.
18. Brown, Phil, Brian Mayer, Stephen Zavestoski, Theo Luebke, Joshua Mandelbaum and Sabrina McCormik. 2003.
“The Health Politics of Asthma: Environmental Justice and Collective Illness Experience in the United States.”
Social Science and Medicine 57(3): 453-464.

19. Brown, Phil, Stephen Zavestoski, Brian Mayer, Sabrina McCormick and Pamela Webster. 2002. "Policy Issues in
Environmental Health Disputes.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 584:175-202

20. Brulle, R. J., and D. N. Pellow. “Environmental justice: human health and environmental inequalities.” Annual
review of public health 27 (2006): 103-24.

21. Bryant, Bunyan and Paul Mohai, editors.,”Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards : A Time for
Discourse. Boulder,” CO: 251pp Westview Press. 1992.

22. Bryant, Bunyan and Paul Mohai,"The Michigan Conference: A Turning Point." EPA Journal 18 (1): 9-10. 1992

23. Bullard, Robert, and Glenn S. Johnson. “Environmental and Economic Justice: Implications for Public Policy.”
Journal of Public Management and Social Policy, v4, n4, 1998: 137-148.

24. Bullard, Robert, and Beverly H. Wright. “Environmental justice for all: Community perspectives on health and
research needs.” Toxicology and Industrial Health, v9, n5, September/October, 1993: 821-842.

25. Bullard, Robert D., ed.,”onfronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots.” Boston: South End
Press.1993.

26. Bullard, Robert D.,"The Threat of Environmental Racism." Natural Resources and Environment” 7 (3): 23- 26, 55-
56.1993.

27. Bullard, Robert D. “Race, justice, and the environment.” Who Cares, Spring 1995: 34-41.

28. Burke, Lauretta M. “Race & environmental equity: A geographic analysis in Los Angeles.” Geo Info Systems,
October 1993: 44, 46-47, 50.

29. Camacho, David E. (Ed.), “Environmental Injustices, Political Struggles: Race, Class, and the Environment.”
Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 1998.

30. Capek, Stella M. "The 'environmental justice' frame: a conceptual discussion and an application. (Special Issue on
Environmental Justice) Social Problems v40, n1 (February 1993): 5-25.

31. Carlin, B.P., and H. Xia. “Assessing environmental justice using Bayesian hierarchical models: two case studies.”
Journal Expo Anal Environmental Epidemiology, v9, n1, January/February 1999: 66-78.

32. Caron, Judi Anne. 1989. "Environmental Perspectives of Blacks: Acceptance of the `New Environmental
Paradigm'." Journal of Environmental Education 20 (3): 21-26.

33. Center, T. J., W. Kriesel, and A. G. Keeler. “Environmental justice and toxic releases: Establishing evidence of
discriminatory effect based on race and not income.” Wisconsin Environmental Law Journal 3 (1996): 119.

34. Chakraborty, J., and M. P. Armstrong. “Assessing the impact of airborne toxic releases on populations with
special needs.”Professional Geographer 53.1 (2001): 119-131.

35. Claudio, L., T. Torres, E. Sanjurjo, L.R Sherman, and P.J. Landrigan. “Environmental health sciences education
— a tool for achieving environmental equity and protecting children.” Environmental Health Perspectives, v106,
Suppl 3, June 1998: 849-855.

36. Cohen, M. J. “The spatial distribution of toxic chemical emissions: Implications for non-metropolitan
areas.” Society and Natural Resources 10 (1997): 17-41.

37. Cole, Luke and Sheila Foster, ‘From the Ground UP: Environmental Racism and the rise of the EJ Movement,’
New York University Press, 2001

38. Cole, D. C., J. Eyles, B. L. Gibson, et al. “Links between humans and ecosystems: the implications of framing for
health promotion strategies.” Health Promotion International 14 (1999): 65-72.

39. Collin, RW, "Environmental equity and the need for government intervention." Environment, v35, n9 (November
1993): 41-43.
40. Collin, RW, ““Environmental Equity: Law and Planning Approach Environmental Racism.” Virginia Environmental
Law Journal, 11, pp. 495-564. 1992.

41. Colopy, James H. "The road less traveled: Pursuing environmental justice through Title VI of the Civil Rights Act
1964." Stanford Environmental Law Journal v13, n1 (January 1994): 125-189.

42. Colquette, Kelly Michele, and Elizabeth A. Henry Robertson. "Environmental Racism: The Causes,
Consequences, and Commendations." Tulane Environmental Law Journal 5 (1): 153- 207, December 1, 1991.

43. Commission for Racial Justice. United Church of Christ. 1987. Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A
National Report on the Racial and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites.
New York: Public Data Access. xiii-xvi.

44. Committee on Environmental Justice, Institute of Medicine. Toward environmental justice : research, education,
and health policy needs. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999. readable
online:http://fermat.nap.edu/books/0309064074/html

45. De La Pena, Nonny, "Fighting for the Environment." Hispanic, 18-23. March 1991

46. DiBartolomeis, MJ, “Environmental Justice as a Component of Decision Making,” Environmental Toxicology and
human Health Vol. II, CAL EPA OEHHA 2003.

47. Dowie, Mark. "The New Environmentalism." Utne Reader, no. 52:104-111, July/August, 1992.

48. Edwards, Mencer Donahue. “Sustainability and people of color.” EPA Journal, v18, n4, September-October 1992:
50.

49. EPA, “A Citizen’s Guide to Using Federal Environmental Laws to Secure Environmental Justice,” Environmental
Law Institute, Washington, DC 202

50. EPA “Models gauge pollution in environmental justice disputes.” Environmental Science & Technology, v32,
n21, Nov. 1, 1998: 488A-489A

51. EPA Science Advisory Board. 1990. Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental
Protection. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.

52. EPA Office of Environmental Justice, “Toolkit for Assessing Potential Allegations of Environmental Injustice,” EPA
300-R-04-002, November 2004.

53. Executive Order 12898 - "Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-
Income Populations," February 11, 1994.

54. Executive Order 12948 – “Nondiscrimination, Environmental Justice, and Community Impact Assessment in
Planning and Project Development,” July 27, 1995, Amendment to Executive Order No. 12898.

55. Forknbrock, DJ, Schweitzer, LA, “Environmental Justice in Transportation Planning,” APA Journal. Winter 1999.

56. Garcia, AP, Walerstein, N, Hricko, A, Marquez, JN, Logan, A, Nasser, EG, Minkler, M, THE Impact Project: a
Community Based Participatory Research Environmental Justice Case Study, Environmental Justice, Vol. 6, No.
1, 2013.

57. Garcia, Stephanie J. “Environmentalism and Economic Justice.” Social Science Quarterly, v80, n2, June 1999:
426.

58. Gerrard, MB, “Environmental Justice and Local Land Use Decision Making,” American Bar Association 2001.

59. Gerrard, MB, Foster, SR, “The Law of Environmental Justice.” American Bar Association, 2008.

60. Godsil, Rachel D. "Remedying Environmental Racism." Michigan Law Review 90 (2): 394-427, November, 1991.

61. Goldman, Benjamin A. (1994). Not Just Prosperity: Achieving Sustainability with Environmental Justice.
Washington, D.C.: National Wildlife Federation.

62. Goldman, Lynn R. and Sudha Koduru. 2000. "Chemicals in the Environment and Developmental Toxicity to
Children: A Public Health and Policy Perspective." Environmental Health Perspectives 108: 443-448.
63. Gottlieb, Robert. “A question of class: The workplace experience.” Socialist Review, v22, n4, October-December
1992: 131-166.

64. Grossman, Karl, "Environmental Racism." Crisis 98 (4): 14-17, 31-32. 1991

65. Hammer, NM, “Title VI as a Means of Achieving Environmental Justice,” 16 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 693 (Summer 1996).

66. Institute of medicine, “Toward Environmental Justice: Research, Education and Health Policy Needs,” 137pp,
Washington, DC, National Academy Press 1999

67. Jones, Stephen C. "EPA targets environmental racism." (part 1) National Law Journal v15, n49 (August 9, 1993):
28.

68. Jones, Stephen C, “Inequities of industrial siting addressed. ”National Law Journal, v15, n50, Aug. 16, 1993: 20.

69. Jordan, Charles and Donald Snow, "Diversification, Minorities, and the Mainstream Environmental Movement." In:
Voices from the Environmental Movement: Perspectives for a New Era, edited by Donald Snow, 71- 109.
Washington, DC, Island Press. 1992

70. Jordan, Charles. "From toxic racism to environmental justice." E: The Environmental Magazine v3, n3 (June
1992): 28-35.

71. Kriebel, David et. al., "The Precautionary Principle in Environmental Science." Environmental Health Perspectives
109: 871-876. 2001

72. Kuzmiak, D.T., "The American Environmental Movement." Geographical Journal 157 (3): 265-278. 1991

73. Lampe, David. "The politics of environmental equity." National Civic Review v81, n1 (Winter/Spring 1992): 27.

74. Lee, Charles, "The Integrity of Justice: Evidence of Environmental Racism." Sojourners 19 (2): 22-25. 1990

75. Lee, Charles, "Beyond Toxic Wastes and Race." In: Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the
Grassroots, edited by Robert D. Bullard. Boston: South End Press, 41-52. 1993

76. Lee, Charles. “Developing working definitions of urban environmental justice. “Earth Island Journal, v8, n4, Fall
1993: 41.

77. Lewis, Sanford. “The corporate right to cover up: the environmental audit privilege and the public interest.”
Multinational Monitor, v19, May 1998: 9-11.

78. Link, Terry, "Environmental Racism/Environmental Equity: A Bibliography." Green Library Journal: Environmental
Topics in the Information World 2 (1): 17-22. 1993

79. Lyskowski, Kevin. "Environmental justice: A research guide." Our Earth Matters. NAACP Legal Defense and
Educational Fund (Spring 1994).

80. Maantay, J, “Zoning law, health, and environmental justice: what’s the connection?,” 4 J. of Law, Medicine and
Ethics 572 (December 2002).

81. Mank, Bradford C. Environmental justice and discriminatory siting: Risk-based representation and equitable
compensation. Ohio State Law Journal v56, n2 (1995): 329-425.

82. Mann, Eric. L.A.'s Lethal Air: New Strategies for Policy, Organizing and Action. Los Angeles Labor/Community
Strategy Center, 1991. 80 p.

83. Mazmanian, Daniel A. and Michael E. Kraft (eds.). (1999). Toward Sustainable Communities: Transition and
Transformations in Environmental Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

84. Merchant, Carol, Radical Ecology: The Search for a Livable World. New York: Routledge. 181 p. 1992

85. Meyer, Eugene L. "Environmental racism: Why is it always dumped in our backyard? Minority groups take a
stand." Audubon v94, n1 (Jan/Feb. 1992): 30-32.

86. Mohai, Paul, "Black Environmentalism." Social Science Quarterly 71 (4): 744-765. 1990

87. Mohai, Paul and Bunyan Bryant. "Race, Poverty, and the Environment." EPA Journal 18 (1): 6-8. 1992
88. Mohai, Paul, “Environmental Justice or Analytic Justice?” Social Science Quarterly 77:500-507. 1996

89. Mohai, Paul and Bunyan Bryant. “Environmental Racism: Reviewing the Evidence.” Pp. 163-176 in Race and the
Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time for Discourse, edited by Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai. Boulder,
CO: Westview. 1992

90. Morello-Frosch R, Pastor M, Porras C, Sadd J. 2002. “Environmental Justice and Regional Inequality in Southern
California: Implications for Future Research. Environmental Health Perspectives 110(2): 149-154.

91. Morello-Frosch R, Pastor M, Sadd L. 2002. "Integrating Environmental Justice and the Precautionary Principle in
Research and Policy Making: The Case of Ambient Air Toxics Exposures and Health Risks among Schoolchildren
in Los Angeles." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 584: 47-68.

92. Morello-Frosch R, Lopez R, “The Riskscape and the Color Line: Examining the Role of Segregation in
Environment Health Disparities.” US EPA, Environmental research 102.2 (2006 Oct): 181-96.

93. NAACP, "Environmental racism." Crisis v 98, n4 (April 1991): 14-17, 31-32.

94. Newton, DE, “Environmental Justice A Reference Handbook, Second Edition” ABC-CLIO, July 2009

95. Noe, Francis P. and Rob Snow, "Hispanic Cultural Influence on Environmental Concern." Journal of
Environmental Education 21 (2): 27-34. 1989

96. Ostheimer, John M. and Leonard G. Ritt. 1976. Environment, Energy, and Black Americans. Sage Research
Papers in the Social Sciences (Human Ecology subseries, no. 90- 025). Beverly Hills and London: Sage
Publications. p. 38.

97. Pastor, Manuel Jr. James L. Sadd and Rachel Morello-Frosch. 2004. “Waiting to Inhale: The Demographics of
Toxic Air Release Facilities in 21st Century California.” Social Science Quarterly 85: 420-440.

98. Pastor, M., J. Sadd, and J. Hipp.,” Which came first? Toxic facilities, minority move-in, and environmental justice”. Journal of
Urban Affairs 23 (1):1-21, 2001.

99. Perfecto, Ivette and Baldemar, Velasquez, "Farm workers: Among the Least Protected." EPA Journal 18 (1): 13-
14. 1992.

100.Pinderhughes, R. 1996. “The Impact of Race on Environmental Quality: An Empirical and Theoretical Discussion.”
Sociological Perspectives 39(2): 231-248.

101.Rechtschaffen, Clifford and Eileen Foster, “Environmental Justice: Law, Policy and Regulation,” Carolina
Academic Press, 2002

102.Rosen, Ruth. “Who gets polluted?” Dissent, v41, n2, Spring 1994: 223-230.

103.Russell, Dick. "Environmental Racism: Minority Communities and their Battle Against Toxic." Amicus Journal 11
(2): 22-32, Spring 1989.

104.Sadd, James L., Manuel Pastor Jr., J. Thomas Boer, and Lori D. Snyder. “Response to comments by William M.
Bowen.” Economic Development Quarterly, v13, n2, May 1999: 135-140.

105.Salkin, PE, “Environmental Justice and Land Use Planning and Zoning,”

106.Satchell, Mitchell, "A Whiff of Discrimination?" U.S. News & World Report 112 (17): 34-35. May 4,1992.

107.Schwartz, D, “Environmental Racism: Using Legal and Social Means to Achieve Environmental Justice, 12 J.
Envtl. L. & Litig. 409 (1997).

108.Sexton, K., Marcus, AA, Easter, KW, Burkhardy, TD, “Better Environmental Decisions: Strategies for
Governments, Business and Communities,” 475pp Wsahington, DC Island Press, 1999.

109.Sexton, K., and J.L. Adgate. “Looking at environmental justice from an environmental health perspective.”
Journal Expo Anal Environmental Epidemiology, v9, n1, January/February 1999: 3-8.

110.Sheppard E., H. Leitner, R.B. McMaster, and H. Tian. “GIS-based measures of environmental equity: exploring
their sensitivity and significance.” Journal Expo Anal Environmental Epidemiology, v9, n1, January/February
1999:18-28.
 111.Snow, Donald. “Inside the Environmental Movement: Meeting the Leadership Challenge.” Washington, DC: Island
Press. p. 213-214. 1992

112.Taylor, Dorceta E. 1989. "Blacks and the Environment: Towards an Explanation of the Concern and Action Gap
Between Blacks and Whites." Environment and Behavior 21 (2): 175-205.

113.Taylor, Dorceta E. 1992. "The Environmental Justice Movement: No Shortage of Environmental Volunteers."
EPA Journal 18 (1): 23-25.

114.United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Environmental Equity: Reducing Risk For All
Communities. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Planning and Evaluation.

115.Waller, L.A., T.A. Louis, and B.P. Carlin. “Environmental justice and statistical summaries of differences in
exposure distributions.” Journal Expo Anal Environmental Epidemiology, v9, n1, January/February 1999: 56-65.

116.Weinberg, Adam S. “The Environmental Justice Debate: A Commentary on Methodological Issues and Practical
Concerns.” Sociological Forum, v13, n1, March 1, 1998: 25-32.

117.Weinstock, Matthew P. “Tired of being dumped on.” Occupational Hazard, v56, n4, April 1994: 48-52.

118.Wernette, D.R., and L.A. Nieves. “Breathing Polluted Air.” EPA Journal, v18, March/April 1992: 16-17.

 
 
 
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Mental Health
Bibliography
1.2.2012

30 Citations
 

1.. Agin DP. 2010. “More than genes: what science can tell us about toxic chemicals, development, and the risk to
our children.” Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

2. "Air Pollution, Health Effects of." Encyclopedia of Energy. Oxford: Elsevier Science & Technology, 2004. Credo
Reference. 19 Mar. 2010. Web. 31 Mar. 2011.

3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington,
DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

4. Ashton J. 1994. “The Epidemiological imagination.” Buckingham; Philadelphia: Open University Press.

5. Barrett GW, Rosenberg R. 1981. “Stress effects on natural ecosystems.” Chichester; New York: Wwiley.

6. "Environmental Stress." Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. Oxford: Elsevier Science & Technology, 2004.
Credo Reference. 2 Sept. 2009. Web. 31 Mar. 2011

7. Evans GW. “The Interaction of Stressful Life Events and Chronic Strains on Community Mental Health.”
American Journal of Community Psychology. 15:1 (1987:Feb.) p.23.

8. Gallagher AG, Tierney K. 1996. “The Impact of the Environment of Physical and Mental Health”. The Irish
Journal of Psychology. 17:4: 361-372.

9. Ghadirian, Abdu’l- Missagh A, Lehmann HE. 1993. “Environment and psychopathology.” New York: Springer
Pub Co.

10. "Good Mental Health." The Hutchinson Unabridged Encyclopedia with Atlas and Weather Guide. Abington:
Helicon, 2010. Credo Reference. 4 Jan. 2011. Web. 31 Mar. 2011.

11. Gordon C, “Role of environmental stress in the physiological response to chemical toxins.” Environ Res 92:1-
7, 2003.

12. Greenberg MR, Schneider D. 1996. ”Environmentally devastated neighborhoods: perceptions, policies,
and realities.” New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.

13. Gurjar BR, Molina LT, Ojha CSP. 2010. “Air pollution: health and environmental impacts.” Boca
Raton, FL: CRC Press.

14. Guest AM, Hussey AG, JM, “The ecology of race and socioeconomic distress: infant and working age
Mortality in Chicago.” Demography 35:23-34, 1998.

15. Harris RG, Moore DP. 2009. “Indoor work and living environments: health, safety and performance.”
New York: Nova Science Publishers

16. "Health Care." World of Sociology, Gale. Farmington: Gale, 2001. Credo Reference. 20 Aug. 2004. Web.
31 Mar. 2011.

17. “Health and Environment Blog”. 2011. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal. 183:2.

18. Jacobs SV, “Air Pollution and Depressive Symptomatology: Exploratory Analyses of Intervening Psychosocial
Factors, Population and Environment,” 7:4 (1984:Winter) p.260.
19. McQuaid EL, “Latina mothers with symptoms of depression and children with persistent asthma.” Rhode
Island Hospital, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Ckinical Trails.Gov NCT01326182,
9-2011.

20. Miodovnik A. "Environmental Neurotoxicants and Developing Brain."Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 78.1
(2011): 58-77. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 31 Mar. 2011.

21. Paarlberg KM, Vingerhoets AJ, Passchier J, Dekker GA, Van Geijin HP, “Psychosocial factors and pregnancy
outcome: a revciew with emphasis on methodology issues.” J Psycosom Rews 39:563-595, 1995.

22. "Radiation, Risks and Health Impacts of." Encyclopedia of Energy. Oxford: Elsevier Science & Technology,
2004. Credo Reference. 19 Mar. 2010. Web. 31 Mar. 2011.

23. Rich-Edwards JW, Grizzard T, “Psychosocial stress and neuroendocrine mechanisms in preterm delivery.”
Am J Obster Gynecol 192: S30-S35, 2005.

24. Rotton J, “Psychological Costs of Air Pollution: Atmospheric Conditions, Seasonal Trends, and Psychiatric
Emergencies, Population and Environment,” 7:1 (1984:Spring) p.3.

25. Shankardass K, McConnell R, Jerrett M, Milam J, Richardson J, Berhane K. 2009. Parental stress increases
the effect of air pollution on childhood asthma incidence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12406–12411.

26. Sherry P, “The Health and Safety Effects of Accidents on Intermodal Transportation Workers: A Study of
Psychological Health Concerns and Depression of Operating Employees Involved in Critical Incidents.”
University of Denver May 2009.

27. “Social and environmental stressors in the home and childhood asthma”. 2010. Journal Of Epidemiology and
Community Health. 64:7: 636-642.

28. Stephens C. “The urban environment, poverty and health in developing countries”. Health Policy and
Planning, 10:2 (1995:June) p.109.

29. "Stress and Health." Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge UP,
2007. Credo Reference. 4 Dec. 2009. Web. 31 Mar. 2011.

30. Turner BS. 1995. “Medical power and social knowledge.” London; Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Noise
Bibliography
1.2.2014

61 Citations

1. Abel K, “Noise Pollution in the Classroom.“ Family Education.

2. Ando Y, “Effects of daily noise on fetuses and cerebral hemisphere speicialization in children.“ Journal of
Sound & Vibration, Dec.1988

3. Arnberg PW, Bennerhult O, et al. (1990). "Sleep disturbances caused by vibrations from heavy road traffic." "
J Acoust Soc Am 88(3): 1486-93. Also see abstract from: Griefahn, B. and M. Spreng (2004). "Disturbed
sleep patterns and limitation of noise." Noise Health 6(22): 27-33.

4. Attitudes to Noise From Aviation Sources in England, MVA Consultancy, October 2007.

5. Babisch W (2005). "Noise and Health." Environmental Health Perspectives 113(1): A14-5.

6. Babisch W, Beule B, et al. (2005). "Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infarction." Epidemiology 16(1): 33-40.

7. Berglund B, Lindvall T, Schwela DH, “Guidelines for Community Noise,” World Health Organization April,
1999.

8. Bronzaft A, (2003). “United States aviation transportation policies ignore health hazards of airport-related
noise.” World Transport Policy & Practice Vol 9, Number 1

9. Cohen S, Krantz DS, Evans GW, Stokols D, ”Cardiovascular and Behavioral Effects of Community Noise.”
American Scientist, , Vol.69,No.5 Sep.1981 pp528-535.

10. Cohen S, Evans GW, Krantz DS, Stokols D, ”Physiological, Motivational and Cognitive Effects of Aircraft
Noise on Children.” American Psychologist, March 1980, Vol.35, No. 3, 231-243.

11. De Jongh et al., 2003 R.F. De Jongh, K.C. Vissers, T.F. Meert, L.H. Booij, C.S. De Deyne and R.J. Heylen,
“Sustained sleep restriction reduces emotional and physical well-being. Pain, Volume 119, Issue 1-3, Pages
56-64.

12. Dugan E, “Children suffer in classrooms with poor acoustics.” The Independent.May2011.

13. Dunne DW, “New Standards Should Help Children in Noisy Classrooms.” Education World April 2000

14. Ehrlich G, “New classroom acoustic standard-ANSI S12.60-2002,” Wyle Laboratories, Oct. 2003

15. Evans GW, Hygge S, Bullinger M, “Chronic Noise and Psychological Stress.” American Psychological
Society: Vol.6, No.6 (Nov., 1995),pp333-338.

16. Federal Highway Administration (Apr 2000). “Highway Traffic Noise in the United States.”

17. Franssen E A, Van Wiechen CM, et al. (2004). "Aircraft noise around a large international airport and its
impact on
general health and medication use." Occupational Environmental Medicine 61(5): 405-13.
18. Gan, WQ, Davies HW, Koehoorn M, Brauer M, ”Association of Long-term exposure to community noise and
traffic related air pollution with coronary heart disease mortality.” Am J Epidmiol 2012 May 1;175(9):898-906.
Epub 2012
Apr 5.

19. Gukelberger D, “A new standard for Acoustics in the Classroom.” Engineers Newsletter, 2003, Vol. 32, No.1.

20. Haack M, Sanchez E, Mullington JM, “Elevated inflammatory markers in response to prolonged sleep
restriction are associated with increased pain experience in healthy volunteers.” Beth Isreal Deaconess
Medical Centre and Harvard Medical School, Boston. Sleep 2007;30(9):1145-52.

21. Haines MM, Stansfeld SA, Job RFS, Berglund B, Head J. (2001a). “Chronic aircraft noise exposure,, stress
responses mental health and cognitive performance in school children.” Psychological Medicine, 31, 265-277.

22. Haines MM, Stansfeld SA, Job RFS, Berglund B, Head J, (2001b). “A follow-up study of the effects of chronic
aircraft noise exposure on child stress responses and cognition.” International Journal of Epidemiology, 30,
839-845.

23. Haines MM, Brebtnall SL, Stansfield SA, Lineberg EK., ”Qualitative responses of children to environmental
noise.” Noise & Health 2003:5;19-30.

24. Haines MM, Stansfeld SA, Brentnall S, Head J, Berry B, Jiggins M, Hygge S, (2001). “West London Schools:
Study the effect of chronic aircraft noise exposure on child health.” Psychological Medicine, 31, 1385-1396.

25. Haines MM, Stansfield S A, et al. “Aircraft and road traffic noise and children's cognition and health: a cross-
national study.” The Lancet, Vol 365, June 4th, 2005.

26. Harbor Community Benefit Foundation, Landrum & Brown, “Noise Measurement Report # 1 – Wilmington
School & Residence Sound Attenuation Program.” September 2012, 46 pgs.

27. Harbor Community Benefit Foundation, Landrum & Brown, “Criteria & Prioritization Recommendations Report
# 2 - Wilmington School & Residence Sound Attenuation Program.” June 2013, 77 pgs.

28. Harbor Community Benefit Foundation, Landrum Brown, “Noise Contour Development Methodology Report #
3 - Wilmington School & Residence Sound Attenuation Program.“ December 2013, 25 pgs.

29. Harbor Community Benefit Foundation, Landrum & Brown, “Property Inventory & Mitigation
Recommendations Report # 4 - Wilmington School & Residence Sound Attenuation Program.” October 2013,
105 pgs.

30. Hygge S, “Classroom experiments on the effects of different noise sources and sound levels on long-term
recall and
recognition in children.” Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol.17, Issue 8, pp 895-914 Dec. 2003.

31. Integrated Working Group Letter to EPA; BTH; CARB re: “Impacts in Goods Movement Action Plan,” Feb 28,
2006.

32. Jakovljevic B, Paunovic K, Belojevic G, ”Road-traffic noise and factors influencing noise annoyance in an
urban population,” Environment International. 2009; 35(3): 552-556

33. Jarup L, Dudley ML, et al. (2005). "Hypertension and Exposure to Noise near Airports (HYENA): study design
and noise exposure assessment." Environmental Health Perspectives 113(11): 1473-8.

34. Kawada T, (2004). "The effect of noise on the health of children." J Nippon Medical School 71(1): 5-10.

35. Krähe D, “Why can low-frequency noise be extremely unpleasant?” Warum kann tieffrequenter Lärm
außergewöhnlich unangenehm sein?, Larmbekampfung. 2008; 3(2): 71-78

36. Landon P, Breysse P, et al. (2005). "Noise exposures of rail workers at a North American chemical facility."
American Journal Ind Medicine 47(4): 364-9.
37. Lercher P, Evans GW, Meis M, Kofler WW, “Ambient neighborhood noise and children’s mental health,”
Occupational Environmental Medicine, 2002:59:380-386.

38. Leventhall G, “Low frequency noise. What we know, what we do not know, and what we would like to know.”
Journal of Low Frequency Noise Vibration and Active Control. 2009; 28(2): 79-104

39. Lundquist P, Holmberg K, Landstrom U, ”Annoyance and effects on work from environmental noise at
school.” Noise & Health, Jan.2000., BVol. 2, Issue 8, pp39-46

40. Miedema HM, Oudshoorn CG, (2001). "Annoyance from Transportation Noise: Relationships with Exposure
Metrics DNL and DENL and Their Confidence Intervals." Environmental Health Perspectives 109(4): 409-416.

41. Miller NP, (2005). "Addressing the Noise from U.S. Transportation Systems, Measures and
Countermeasures." TR
News(240):4-16.

42. Nelson P, Kohnert K, Sabor S, ”Classroom Noise and Children Learning Through a Second
Language.”Schools, vol.36, 219-229, July 2005

43. Norlander T, Moas L, Archer T, ”Noise and Stress in Primary and Secondary School Children:Noise
Reduction and Increased Concentration Ability Through a Sort but Regular Exercise and Relaxation
Program.”WebofScienceVol.16, Issue 1, 2005, pp91-99.

44. Ollerhead JB et al. “Report of a field study of aircraft noise and sleep disturbance.” DFT for the UK
Department of Safety, Environment and Engineering, CAA, December 1992.

45. Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M, Dudarewicz A, Szymczak W, Sliwinska-Kowalska M, “Evaluation of annoyance

from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions,” Noise and Health. 2010; 12(48): 166-181.

46. Porter DN, Berry B F, Flindell IH, “Health Effect Based Noise Assessment Methods: A Review and Feasibility
Study. National Physical Laboratory,” NPL Report CMAM 16, Sept. 1998.

47. Prudence A, Allen C, Baker M,”Impact of Classroom Noise on Reading and Vocabulary Skills in Elementary
School-Aged Children.”147th ASSA Meeting, NY,NY May,2004.

48. Remington P J, Knight JS, et al. (2005). "A hybrid active/passive exhaust noise control system for
locomotives." J Acoust Soc Am 117(1): 68-78.

49. Sanz SA,“Road traffic noise around schools: a risk for pupil’s performance,“ Intl. Archives of Occupational &
Environmental Health, Vol.65, No.3, 2005-2007

50. Shield BM, Dockwell JE,“The effects of environment and classroom noise on the academic atttainment of
primary school children.“J Acoust Soc AM 2008 Jan:12391):133-44.

51. Shield BM, Dockwell JE,“The effects of noise on children at school:A review.“, Journal Building Acoustics,
2003, Vol.10(2):97-106.

52. Skanberg A, Ohrstrom E, (2002). "Adverse Health Effects in Relation to Urban Residential Soundscapes."
Journal of Sound and Vibration 250(1): 151-155.

53. Spreng M. “Noise induced nocturnal cortisol secretion and tolerable overhead flights.” Dept. Physiology,
University of Erlangen, Germany. Noise Health 2004;6(22):35-47.

54. Slater BR, “Effects of Noise on Pupil Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.59(4), Aug. 1968,
239-243.

55. Sohn E, “Background Noise Hurts Test Schools.” Discovery News Nov. 2011.

56. Standled SA, Berlund B, Clark C, Lopez-Barrio I, Fisher P, Ohrstrom E, Haines HH, Head J., Hygge S, Van
Kemp I, “Aircraft and road traffic noise and children’s cognition and health: a cross-national study.” The
Lancet, Vol. 365, 1942-49, June 2005.
57. Transportation Research Board, (2005) “Noise & Vibration Committee Conference.” Terminal 5 Rebuttal by
Professor Holland which included a critique by Dr. B. Berglund (see refs. 1, 2 and 3 above). Brigitta Berglund
is a joint author of the WHO Community Noise Report.

58. Transportation Research Board, “Transportation Noise: Measures and Countermeasures” TR NEWS Number
240, Sep-Oct 2005.

59. Van Kempen E, Fischer P, Janssen N, Houthuijs D, Van Kamp I, Stanfeld S, Cassee F, “Neurobehavioral
effects of exposure to traffic-related air pollution and transportation noise in primary school children.” Environ
Res 2012 May:115:18-25, Epub 2012 Apr 6.

60. Wilson Committee on the Problem of Noise, “Noise: Final Report,” Cmnd 2056, London, HMSO, 1963

61. Van Kempen EE, Van Kamp MM, Stellato L, Lopez-Barrio RK, Haines I, Nilsson MM, ”Children’s annoyance
reaction to aircraft and road noise.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2009;125(2):895-904.
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Public Health Care Costs

Bibliography

1.2.2012

65 Citations
 

1. Alberini, Anna and Alan Krupnick, 2000. “Cost-of-Illness and WTP Estimates of the Benefits of Improved Air
Quality: Evidence from Taiwan,” Land Economics 76(1), February 2000

2. Aunan, K et al., 1998. “Health and Environmental Benefits from Air Pollution Reductions in Hungary,” The
Science of the Total Environment, 212: 245-268.

3. American Lung Association of Oklahoma, “Dollars and Cents: The Economic and Health Benefits of Potential
Particulate Matter Reduction in the United States.” 7-12-1995.

4. Barnett, SB, Tursynbek, A, ”Costs of Asthma in the United States 2002-2007.” (2011): The Journal of Allergy
and Clinical Immuniology Immunology 127: 145-152.

5. Bernow, S, “Full Cost Economic Dispatch: Recognizing Environmental Externalities.”

6.. Brandt SJ, Perez L, Kunzli N, Lurmann F, McConnell R, “Costs of childhood asthma due to traffic-related
pollution in two California communities.” Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 363–370

7.. Burtraw, Dallas and Alan Krupnik, 1999.”Measuring the Value of Health Improvements from Great Lakes
Cleanup,” RFF, Discussion Paper 99-34 http://www.rff.org.

8.. Chen, Allen and Edward L. Vine, 1999, “A Scoping Study on the Costs of Indoor Air Quality Illnesses: An
Insurance Loss Reduction Perspective,” Environmental Science and Policy, 2, 457-464.

9..Cropper, Maureen, et al., 1997. “The Health Benefits of Air Pollution Control in Delhî,” American Journal of
Agricultural Economics, 79, 1625-1629.

10..Cropper, Maureen, et al., 1997. “Valuing Health Effects of Air Pollution in Developing Countries: The Case of
Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 34, 107-126.

11. Delucchi MA, Murphy JJ, McCubbin DR,”The health and Visibility Cost of Air Pollution: A Comparison of
Estimation Methods.” J Environ Manage 2002 Feb; 64(2):139-52.

12. Department of Health (1999), “Economic Appraisal of the Health Effects of Air Pollution, Ad-Hoc Group on
Economic Appraisal of the Health Effects of Air Pollution,” The Stationery Office, London.

13. Deschenes O, Greenstone Michael, Shapiro JS, “Defensive Investments and the Demand for Air Quality:
Evidence from the NOx Budget Program and Ozone Reductions.” MIT Department of Economics, July 2012.

14. Dixon, John A., “The Economic Valuation of Health Impactsî, World Bank Report.”
http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/environment/EEI.nsf/3dc00e2e4624023585256713005a1d4a/c2b8735dfad817
f085671c007d28a0/$FILE/HEALTH.pdf
15. DSS Management Consultants Inc, 2000. “Estimating Health and Economic Damages: Illness Costs of Air
Pollution.” Report submitted to Ontario Medical Association, July 26, 2000.
http://www.oma.org/phealth/report/techrep.pdf

16. Environmental Defense Fund, “Saving Lives and Reducing Health Care Costs: How Clean Air Rules Benefit
the Nation.” November 2011.

17. Gilliland FD, Berhane K, Rappaport EB, Thomas DC, Avol E, Gauderman WJ, et al. 2001. The effects of
ambient air pollution on school absenteeism due to respiratory illnesses. Epidemiology 12(1):43–54.

18. Graff-Zivin JS, Nediell MJ. “ The Impact of Pollution on Worker Productivity.’ National Bureau of Economic
Research, April 2011.

19. Grupp-Phelan J, Lozano P, Fishman P. Health care utilization and cost in children with asthma and selected
comorbidities. J Asthma 2001; 38: 363–373.

20. Hagnon, Nicolas (2007), “Unsafe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: Associated Health Impacts and the Costs
and Benefits of Policy Interventions at the Global Level.” background report for Costs of Policy Inaction,
forthcoming, 2008, OECD.

21. Hedley AJ, McGhee SM, Wong CH, Barron B, Chau P, Chau J, Thach TQ, Wong TW, Loh C, “Air Pollution:
Costs and Paths to a Solution.” Department of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, University of
Hong Kong. Institute for the Environment, University of Science & Technology, Department of Community and
Family Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Civic Exchange. June 2006.

22. Health Care Without Harm, The National Association of School Nurses, The Alliance of Nurses for Healthy
Environments, “The Economic Afflliction of Asthma and Risks of Blocking Air Pollution Standards.” April2001.

23. Janes H, Sheppard L, Lumley T. “Case-crossover analyses of air pollution exposure data: referent selection
strategies and their implications for bias.” Epidemiology. 2005;16:717–726. doi:
10.1097/01.ede.0000181315.18836.9d

24. Kattan M, Stearns S, Crain E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a homebased environmental intervention for inner-
city children with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 116: 1058–1063.

25. Künzli N, Schindler C. “A call for reporting the relevant exposure term in air pollution case-crossover
studies.” J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:527–530. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.027391.

26. Lamare, J, “Air Quality is a National Problem – Sacramento is a Prime Example.” Sierra Health Foundation 8-
15-2000.

27. Levy D, Lumley T, Sheppard L, Kaufman J, Checkoway H. “Referent selection in case-crossover analyses of
acute health effects of air pollution.” Epidemiology. 2001;12:186–192. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200103000-
00010

28. Levy, JI, Buonocore, JJ, Stackelberg, KV, “The Public Health Costs of Air Pollution from Traffic in U.S. Cities.”
Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health, May 2011, Environ Health 2010, 9:65

29. Li Y, Wang W, Kan H, et al. “Air Quality and outpatient visits for asthma in adults during the 2009 Summer
Olympic Games in Beijing.” Sci Total Environ2010: 408: 1226–1227.

30. Lin S, Luo M, Walker RJ, Liu X, Hwang SA, Chinery R, “Extreme high temperatures and hospital admissions
for respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.” Epidemiology 2009: 20(5): 738–746

31. Lvovsky, K., G. Hughes, D. Maddison, B. Ostro, D. Pearce. (2000). ”Environmental Costs of Fossil Fuel: A
rapid Assesment Method with Application to Six Cities.” Environment Department Paper No. 89.(World Bank,
Washington, DC.
32. Maclure M. The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute
events. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133:144–153

33. Matus K, Nam KM, Seklin NE, Lamsal LK, Reilly JM, Paltsev S, “Health damages from air pollution in China.”
Global Environmental Change 22 (2012) 55-66.

34. McCubbin, DR, Delucchi MA, 1999. “The Health Costs of Motor-VehicleRelated Air Pollutionî, Journal of
Transport Economics and Policy,” 33(3), 253-286.

35. McGhee SM, Yeung RYT, Wong LC, Chau J, Wong CM, Ho LM, Fielding R, “The health benefits of reduced
air pollution: value and trade-offs. Health Care and Promotion Fund.” Health, Welfare and Food Bureau, Hong
Kong SAR Government April 2005. Final report reference number 213018
http://hwfbgrants.netsoft.net/english/funded_search/funded_search.php

36. Moore K, Neugebauer R, Lurmann F, Hall J, Brajer V, Alcorn S, Tager I. “Ambient ozone concentrations
cause increased hospitalizations for asthma in children: an 18-year study in Southern California.” Environ
Health Perspect. 2008;116:1063–1070. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10497.

37. Muller, Nicolas. Z., and Robert Mendelsohn (2007), “Measuring the Damages of Air Pollution in the United
States.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 54, July.

38. Navrud, Stale, “THE COSTS OF INACTION WITH RESPECT TO HUMAN HEALTH IMPACTS FROM
POLLUTION.” Dept. of Economics and Resource Management Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 14 Ap.

39. NSW Department of Environment and Conservation, Australia, “Air Pollution Economics Health Costs of Air
Pollution in the Greater Sydney Metropolitan Region, November 2005.

40. O’Ryan R E, 1996, “Cost ñEffective Policies to Improve Urban Air Quality in Santiago,” Chile Journal of
Environmental Economics and Management, vol 31, Number 1996.

41. Ostro B, 1994, “Estimating the Health Effects of Air Pollutants: A Method with an Application to Jakarta,"
World Bank, Policy Research Department Working Paper, No. 1301.(http://econ.worldbank.org/resource.php)

42. Ostro BD, Tran H, Levy JI. 2006. The health benefits of reduced tropospheric ozone in California. J Air Waste
Manag Assoc 56(7):1007–1021.

43. Pearce, David, 1996. “Economic Valuation and Health Damage from Air Pollution in the Developing World.”
Energy Policy. 24(7): 627-630.

44. Pearce D, Maddison D, (1999), “Estimating the Health Damage Costs of Air Pollution', in Holgate, S., Koren
Pierce, D. and Maddison, D. (1999), ', H., Samet, J. and Maynard, R. (Eds), (Eds), Air Pollution and Health
Academic Press, , London, pp917-928.

45. Pervin T, Gerdtham UG, Lyttkens CH, “Societal costs of air pollution-related health hazards: A review of
methods and results.” Cost Eff Resour Alloc. September 2008; 6:19.

46. P, JA, Hackbarth A, Goldman DP, “The Impact of Air Quality on Hospital Spending.” Rand Health, Rand
Corporation, 2010.

47. Romley, JA, Hackbarth A, Goldman DP, “Impact of Air Quality on Hospital Spending.” Rand Corporation
2010.

48. Rosan A, 2001. “How to Measure Health Costs Induced by Air Pollution?” Schweizerische-Zeitschrift-fur
Volkswirtschaft-undStatistik/Swiss-Journal-of-Economics-and-Statistics, 137(1), 103-116.

49. Sangkapichai M, Saphores JD, Ogunseitan O, Ritchie S, You S, Lee G, “An Analysis of the health impacts
from PM and NOx emissions resulting from train operations in the Alameda Corridor, CA.” University of
California Transportation Center, University of Californa Berkeley, 3-1-2010.
50. Saroa da Motta, Ronaldo and Ana-Paula Fernades-Mendes, 1996. “Health Costs Associated with Air
Pollution in Brazil.” Peter M, edited Pricing the planet: Economic analysis for sustainable development. New
York: Columbia University, Press pp 101-122.

51. Scapecchi, Pascale (2007), “The Health Costs of Inaction with Respect to Air Pollution”, background report
for Costs of Policy Inaction, forthcoming, 2008, OECD.

52. Sommer H, Seethaler R, Chanel O, Herry M, Masson S, Vergnaud J Ch. “Economic Evaluation: Technical
Report on Economy. Health Costs due to Road Traffic-related Air Pollution: An impact assessment project of
Austria, France and Switzerland.” Bern: Federal Department of Environment, Transport, Energy and
Communications Bureau for Transport Stduies, June 1999.
http://www.euro.who.int/Document/Trt/Health_costs.pdf.

53. Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D: “Lost productive work time costs from health conditions in the
United States: results from the American Productivity Audit.” J Occup Environ Med 2003, 45:1234–1246.

54. Stieb DM, Szyszkowicz M, Rowe BH, Leech JA. “Air pollution and emergency department visits for cardiac
and respiratory conditions: a multi-city time-series analysis.” Environ Health.2009;8:25. doi: 10.1186/1476-
069X-8-25.

55. US EPA, “Final Regulatory Analysis: Control of Emissions from Nonroad Diesel Engines.” Office of
Transportation
and Air Quality, EPA420-R-04-007 May 2004

56. US EPA, “The benfits and costs of the clean Air Act from 1990-2020.” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Air and Radiation, March 2011.

57. Villeneuve PJ, Chen L, Rowe BH, Coates F. “Outdoor air pollution and emergency department visits for
asthma among children and adults: a case-crossover study in northern Alberta, Canada.” Environ
Health. 2007;6:40. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-6-40

58. Wang LY, Zhong Y, Wheeler L. 2005. Direct and indirect costs of asthma in school-age children [Abstract].
Prev Chronic Dis 2(1):A11.

59. Wang H, Wheeler D, 1996. “Pricing Industrial pollution control in China: An Econometric Analysis of the Levy
System”World Bank Policy Research Department Working Paper, No. 1644

60. Wan G J, Xu XP, Johnson TM, 1994, “Valuing the Health Effects of Air Pollution: Application to Industrial
Energy Efficiency Projects in Chinaî World Bank.”

61. Windham E, “The Economic Cost of Air Pollution in the U.S. & Florida.” http://www.flcv.com/cap.html

62. Wong CM, McGhee SM, Yeung RYT, Thach TQ, Wong TW, Hedley AJ. “Short term health impact and costs
due to road traffic-related air pollution. Final Report submitted to Environmental Protection Department. Hong
Kong Air Pollution and Health Joint Research Group, 2002.
http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/environmentinhk/air/studyrpts/files/ap_health_impact_02.pdf (accessed
20May2006)

63. World Bank (2007), “Costs of Pollution in China: Economic Estimates of Physical Damages.”
http://go.worldbank.org/FFCJVBTP40.

64. Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. Air pollution and emergency admissions in Boston, MA.” J Epidemiol Community
Health. 2006;60:890–895. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.039834

65. Zmirou DA, Balducci F, Boudet C, Dechenaux J,” Health effects costs of particulate air pollution.” J Occup
Environ Med. 1999 Oct;41(10):847-56.
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Public Health

Bibliography
 
10.1.2014

APPENDIX A:

Appendix A-1: Respiratory & Children’s Health Study

Appendix A-2: Traffic Proximity

Appendix A-3: Particulate Matter

Appendix A-4: Cardiovascular & Neurologic

Appendix A-5: Reproductive & Developmental

Appendix A-6: Cancer

Appendix A-7: Health Assessment & Monitoring     

 

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Note: 1. A-1 Throught A-6 Primary Public Health Studies Research Conducted By: USC Southern
California Environmental Health Sciences Center-Children’s Environmental Health Ctr.
2. A-7 Public Health Studies Research Conducted By: Coalition For A Safe
Environment
3. List is periodically updated by the Coalition For A Safe Environment
 Appendix A-1: Respiratory and Children’s Health Study

119 Citations

1… Al-Daghri, NM, Alokail, MS, Abd-Alrahman, SH, Draz, HM, Yakout, SM, Clerici, M, “Polycyclic aromatic
Hydrocarbon exposure and pediatric asthma in children: a case–control study.” Environmental Health 2013,
12:1.

2. Al-Daghri NM:” Serum polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons among children with and without asthma: correlation
to environmental and dietary factors.” Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2008, 21:211–217.

3. Amigou A, Sermage-Faure C, Orsi L, Leverger G, Baruchel A, Bertrand Y, Nelken B, Robert A, Michel G,

Margueritte G, Perel Y, Mechinaud F, Bordigoni P, Hemon D, Clavel J. “Road traffic and childhood leukemia:
the ESCALE study.” (SFCE) Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:566–572. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002429

4. Andersen ZJ, Loft S, Ketzel M, et al. Ambient air pollution triggers wheezing symptoms in infants. Thorax.
2008;63:710-716.

5. Ball TM, Castro-Rodriguez JA, Griffith KA, Holberg CJ, Martinez FD, Wright AL. 2000. “Siblings, day-care
attendance, and the risk of asthma and wheezing during childhood.” N Engl J Med 343:538–43.

6. Barck C, Lundahl J, et al. (2005). "Brief exposures to NO2 augment the allergic inflammation in asthmatics."
Environ Res 97(1): 58-66.

7. Barr DB, Wang RY, Needham LL. Biologic monitoring of exposure to environmental chemicals throughout the
life stages: requirements and issues for consideration for the National Children’s Study. Environ Health
Perspect 005;113:1083–91.

8. Borrego, M. Lopes, J. Valente, J. Santos, T. Nunes, H. Martins, A. I. Miranda & N. Neuparth, “Air pollution and
child respiratory diseases: the Viseu case study, Portugal.” WIT Transactions on Ecology and the
Environment, Vol 101, 2007 WIT Press.

9. Braun-Fahrländer C, Ackermann-Liebrich U, Schwartz J, Gnehm HP, Rutishauser M, Wanner HU. “Air

pollution and respiratory symptoms in preschool children.” Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Jan;145(1):42–47

10. Brunekreef B, Janssen NA, deHartog J, Harssema H, Knape M, van Vliet P. 1997. “Air pollution from truck
traffic and lung function in children living near motorways.” Epidemiology 8:298–303.

11. Castro-Rodriguez JA, Holberg CJ, Wright AL, Martinez FD. A clinical index to define risk of asthma in young
children with recurrent wheezing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:1403–1406.

12. Chay K.Y., and Greenstone M. Air Quality, Infant Mortality, and the Clean Air Act of 1970. National Bureau of
Economic Research Working Paper No. 10053, October 2003.

13. Ciccone G, Forastiere E, Agabiti N, Biggeri A, Bisanti L, Chellini E, et al. 1998. “Road traffic and adverse
respiratory effects in children.” SIDRIA Collaborative Group. Occup Environ Med 55:771-778.

14. Currie J, Neidell M, Schmieder JF. Air pollution and infant health: lessons from New Jersey. J Health Econ.
2009;28(3):688-703.

15. Dassen W, Brunekreef B, Hoek G, Hofschreuder P, Staatsen B, de Groot H, Schouten E, Biersteker K.

“Decline in children's pulmonary function during an air pollution episode.” J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1986
Nov;36(11):1223–1227

16. Delfino RJ, Quintana PJE, Floro J, et al. Association of FEV1 in asthmatic children with personal and
Microenvironmental exposure to airborne particulate matter. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:932–941.
17. Delfino RJ (2002). "Epidemiologic evidence for asthma and exposure to air toxics: linkages between
occupational, indoor, and community air pollution research." Environ Health Perspect 110 Suppl 4: 573-89.

18. Delfino RJ, Staimer N, Gillen D, et al. Personal and ambient air pollu tion is associated with increased
exhaled NO in children with asthma.Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1736 –1743.

19. Delfino RJ, Staimer N, Tjoa T, et al. Personal and ambient air pollution exposures and lung function
decrements in children with asthma. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:550 –555.

20. Delfino RJ, Chang J, Wu J, Ren C, Tjoa T, Nickerson B,Cooper C, Gillen DL, “Repeated hospital encounters
for asthma in children and exposure to traffic-related air pollution near the home.” Ann Allergy Asthma
Immunol. 2009;102:138–144.

21. Delfino RJ. Think globally, breath locally: why the worldwide health impact of air pollution on young children
begins in our neighborhoods. Thorax. 2006;61:184 –185.

22. Dey AN, Schiller JS, Tai DA. 2004. “Summary health statistics for US children: National Health Interview
Survey, 2002.” Vital Health Stat 10 (221)1–78.

23. Dockery DW, Ware JH, Ferris BG, Jr, Speizer FE, Cook NR, Herman SM. “Change in pulmonary function in
children associated with air pollution episodes.” J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1982 Sep;32(9):937–942

24. Dockery DW, Speizer FE, Stram DO, Ware JH, Spengler JD, Ferris BG Jr. 1989. “Effects of inhalable
particles on expiratory health of children.” Am Rev Respir Dis 139:587–94.

25. Dockery DW, Cunningham J, Damokosh AI, Neas LM, Spengler JD, Koutrakis P, Ware JH, Raizenne M,
Speizer FE. “Health effects of acid aerosols on North American children: respiratory symptoms.” Environ
Health Perspect. 1996 May;104(5):500–505.

26. Etzel RA. 2003. “How environmental exposures influence the development and exacerbation of asthma.”
Pediatrics 112(1 Pt 2):233–9.

27. Etzel RA, “Indoor Air Pollution and Childhood Asthma: Effective Environmental Interventions.” Health
Perspect. 1995;
103(Suppl 6): 55-58.

28. Evans D, Mellins R, Lobach K, Ramos-Bonoan C, Pinkett-Heller M, Wiessemann S, Klein I, Donahue C,

Burke D, Levison M, Levin B, Zimmerman B, Clark N. “Improving Care for Minority Children with Asthma:
Professional Education in Public Health Clinic.” Pediatrics. 99(2), 1997: 157-164.

29. Feychting M, Svensson D, Ahlbom A. “Exposure to motor vehicle exhaust and childhood cancer.” Scand J
Work Environ Health. 1998;24:8–11. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.272.

30. Gauderman WJ, McConnell R, et al. (2000). "Association between air pollution and lung function growth in
southern California children." Am J Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 162(4 Pt 1): 1383-90.

31. Gauderman WJ, Avol E, et al. (2004). "The effect of air pollution on lung development from 10 to 18 years of
age." New England Journal Medicine 351(11): 1057-67.

32. Gauderman WJ, Avol E, et al. (2005). "Childhood asthma and exposure to traffic and nitrogen dioxide."
Epidemiology 16(6): 737-43.

33. Gauderman W J, (2006). “Air Pollution and Children – An Unhealthy Mix.” New England Journal Medicine
355(1): 78-79.

34. Gilliland FD, Berhane K, et al. (2001). "The effects of ambient air pollution on school absenteeism due to
respiratory illnesses." Epidemiology 12(1): 43-54.
35. Gilliland FD, Berhane K, Islam T, McConnell R, Gauderman WJ, Gilliland SS, et al. 2003. Obesity and the risk
of newly diagnosed asthma in school-age children. Am J Epidemiol 158(5):406–415.

36. Hall JV, Brajer V, et al. (2003). "Economic valuation of ozone-related school absences in the South Coast Air
Basin of California." Contemporary Economic Policy 21: 407-417.

37. Henderson J, Granell R, Heron J, et al. Associations of wheezing phenotypes in the first 6 years of life with
atopy, lung function and airway responsiveness in mid-childhood. Thorax. 2008;63:974 –980.

38. Hoek G, Brunekreef B. “Effect of photochemical air pollution on acute respiratory symptoms in children.” Am J
Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jan;151(1):27–32.

39. Hoek G, Brunekreef B. “Acute effects of a winter air pollution episode on pulmonary function and respiratory
Symptoms of children.” Arch Environ Health. 1993 Sep-Oct;48(5):328–335.

40. Hoek G, Dockery DW, Pope A, Neas L, Roemer W, Brunekreef B. “Association between PM10 and
decrements in peak expiratory flow rates in children: reanalysis of data from five panel studies.” Eur Respir
J. 1998 Jun;11(6):1307–1311

41. Jedrychowski W, Galas A, Pac A, Flak E, Camman D, Rauh V, Perera F, “Prenatal ambient air exposure to
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and the occurrence of respiratory symptoms over the first year of life.” Eur J
Epidemiol 2005, 20:775–782.

42. Jerrett M, Shankardass K, Berhane K, Gauderman WJ, Künzli N, Avol E, et al. 2008. Traffic-related air
pollution and asthma onset in children: a prospective cohort study with individual exposure measurement.
Environ Health Perspect 116:1433–1438.

43. Johnson KG, Loftsgaarden DO, Gideon RA. “The effects of Mount St. Helens volcanic ash on the pulmonary
function of
120 elementary school children.” Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Dec;126(6):1066–1069

44. Juhn YJ, Sauver JS, Katusic S, Vargas D, Weaver A, Yunginger J. 2005. The influence of neighborhood
environment on the incidence of childhood asthma: a multilevel approach. Soc Sci Med 60(11):2453–2464.

45. Kalkbrenner AE, Daniels JL, Chen JC, Poole C, Emch M, Morrissey J. Perinatal exposure to hazardous air
pollutants and autism spectrum disorders at age 8. Epidemiology. 2010;21(5):631-641.

46. Kehrl HR, Peden DB, Ball B, Folinsbee LJ, Horstman D. 1999. Increased specific airway reactivity of persons
with mild allergic asthma after 7.6 hours of exposure to 0.16 ppm ozone. J Allergy Clin Immunol 104(6):1198–
1204.

47. Kim JJ; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Environmental Health. Ambient air pollution: health
hazards to children. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1699 –1707.

48. Knox EG. “Childhood cancers and atmospheric carcinogens.” J Epidemiol Community Health.2005;59:101–
105. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.021675.

49. Kramer U, Koch T, Ranft U, Ring J, Behrendt H. 2000. Traffic-related air pollution is associated with atopy in
children living in urban areas. Epidemiology 11(1):64–70.

50. Künzli, N., R. McConnell, et al. (2003). "Breathless in Los Angeles: the exhausting search for clean air." Am J
Public Health 93(9): 1494-9.

51. Langholz B, Ebi KL, Thomas DC, Peters JM, London SJ. “Traffic density and the risk of childhood leukemia in
a Los Angeles case-control study.” Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12:482–487. doi: 10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00317-9
52. Le TG, Ngo L, Mehta S. Do VD, Thach TQ, Vu XD, Nguyen DT, Cohen A, “Effects of short-term exposure to
air pollution on hospital admissions of young children for acute lower respiratory infections in Ho Chi Minh
City, Vietnam.” Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Jun;(169):5-72; discussion 73-83.

53. Lewis, T, “A Community-based Participatory Research (CBPR) Intervention for Childhood Asthma Using Air
Filters and Air Conditioners (CAAA).” Clinical Trials.Gov NCT00839046, University of Michigan, NIEHS, 8-
2011.

54. Lin S., Munsie J.P., Hwang S., Fitzgerald E., and Cayo M.R. Childhood asthma hospitalization and
residential exposure to state route traffic.Environ Res 2002: A(88): 73–81.

55. Lombardi E, Morgan WJ, Wright AL, Stein RT, Holberg CJ, Martinez FD. 1997. Cold air challenge at age
6 and subsequent incidence of asthma. A longitudinal study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156(6):1863–1869.

56. Magas OK, Gunter JT, Regens JL, “Ambient air pollution and daily pediatric hospitalizations for asthma.”
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2007 Jan;14(1):19-23.

57. Manchester-Neesvig JB, Schauer JJ, Cass GR. The distribution of particle-phase organic compounds in the
Atmosphere and their use for source apportionment during the Southern California Children’s Health Study.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2003;53:1065–79.

58. Martinez FD. 2003. “Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis and the pathogenesis of childhood asthma.”
Pediatr Infec Dis J 22(2 Suppl):76–82.

59. McCarthy MC, Ludwig JF, Brown SG, Vaughn D, Roberts PT, “Filtration Effectiveness of HVAC Systems at
Near
Roadway Schools.” Indoor Air, January 2013, doi: 10.1111/ina.12015.

60. McConnell R, Berhane K, Gilliland FD, London SJ, Vora H, Avol E. (1999) “Air Pollution and Bronchitic
Symptoms in Southern California Children with Asthma.” Environmental Health Perspectives 107(9):757-760

61. McConnell, R., K. Berhane, et al. (2002). "Asthma in exercising children exposed to ozone: a cohort study."
Lancet 359(9304): 386-91.

62. McConnel R, Talat Islam, Ketan Shankardass, Michael Jerrett, Fred Lurmann, Frank Gilliland, Jim
Gauderman, Ed Avol, Nino Künzli, Ling Yao, John Peters, and Kiros Berhane, “Childhood Incident Asthma
and Traffic-Related Air Pollution at Home and School.” Environ Health Perspect 118:1021–1026 (2010).

63. McConnell R, Berhane K, Gilliland F, Islam T, Gauderman WJ, London SJ, et al. 2002a. Indoor risk factors for
asthma in a prospective study of adolescents. Epidemiology 13(3):288–295.

64. McConnell R, Berhane K, et al. (2003). "Prospective Study of Air Pollution and Bronchitic Symptoms in
Children with Asthma." American Journal Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 168(7): 790-797.

65. McConnell R, et al. (2006). “Traffic, Susceptibility, and Childhood Asthma.” Environmental Health
Perspectives 114(5): 766–772.

66. Migliaretti G, Cavallo F. 2004. Urban air pollution and asthma in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 38(3):198–203.

67. Morgenstern V, Zutavern A, Cyrys J, Brockow I, Koletzko S, Kramer U, Behrendt H, Herbarth O, von Berg A,
Bauer CP, Wichmann HE, Heinrich J, “Atopic diseases, allergic sensitization, and exposure to trafficrelated air
pollution in children.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008, 177:1331–1337.

68. Natural Resources Defense Council. 2001. “No breathing in the aisles: diesel exhaust inside school buses.”
San Francisco, CA: National Resources Defense Council.
69. Nordling E, Berglind N, Melen E, Emenius G, Hallberg J, Nyberg F, et al. 2008. Traffic-related air pollution and
childhood respiratory symptoms, function and allergies. Epidemiology 19(3):401–408.

70. Oftedal B, Brunekreef B, Nystad W, et al. Residential outdoor air pollution and lung function in schoolchildren.
Epidemiology. 2008;19:129–137.

71. Pandya RJ, G. Solomon, et al. (2002). "Diesel exhaust and asthma: hypotheses and molecular mechanisms
of action." Environ Health Perspectives 110 Suppl 1: 103-12.

72. Peat JK, Salome CM, Toelle BG, Bauman A, Woolcock AJ. 1992. Reliability of a respiratory history
questionnaire and effect of mode of administration on classification of asthma in children. Chest 102(1):
153–157.

73. Peden DB, (2002). "Pollutants and asthma: role of air toxics." Environ Health Perspectives 110 Suppl 4:
565-8.

74. Pietropaoli, A. P., M. W. Frampton, et al. (2004). "Pulmonary function, diffusing capacity, and inflammation in
Healthy and asthmatic subjects exposed to ultrafine particles." Inhalation Toxicol 16 Suppl 1: 59-72.

75. Pekkanen J, Timonen KL, Ruuskanen J, Reponen A, Mirme A, “Effects of ultrafine and fine particles in urban
air on peak expiratory flow among children with asthmatic symptoms.” Environ Res. 1997;74(1):24-33.

76. Perera FP, Rauh V, Tsai WY, Kinney P, Camann D, Barr D, Bernert T, Garfinkel R, Tu YH, Diaz D, Dietrich J,
Whyatt RM: “Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental pollutants on birth outcomes in a multiethnic
population.” Environ Health Perspect 2003, 111:201–205.

77. Perera FP, Tang D, Wang S, Vishnevetsky J, Zhang B, Diaz D, Camann D, Rauh V, ”Prental Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Exposure and Child Behavior at Age 6-7.” Environmental Health
Perspectives, March 2012. doi:10.1289/ehp.1104315.

78. Peters A, Dockery DW, Heinrich J, Wichmann HE. Short-term effects of particulate air pollution on respiratory
morbidity in asthmatic children. Eur Respir J. 1997 Apr;10(4):872–879

79. Prescott SL, Macubus C, Holt BJ, Sly PD, Holt PG, “Development of allergen specific cell memopry in atopic
and normal children.” Lancet 1999;353:196-200.

80. Raaschou-Nielsen O, Hertel O, Thomsen BL, Olsen JH. “Air pollution from traffic at the residence of children
with cancer.” Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:433–443. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.5.433.

81. Rand, Cynthia, “Reducing Asthma Morbidity in High Risk Minority Preschool Children.” New study. Johns
Hopkins University, Clinical trial.Gov. NCT01519453, 1-2012.

82. Ransom MR, Pope CA., “3rd Elementary school absences and PM10 pollution in Utah Valley.” Environ
Res. 1992 Aug;58(2):204–219

83. Reynolds P, Behren J, Gunier RB, Goldberg DE, Hertz A. “Residential exposure to traffic in California and
childhood cancer.” Epidemiology. 2004;15:6–12. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000101749.28283.de.

84. Rolfsjord, LB, “Air Cleaners for Children and Adolescents With Asthma and Dog Allergy.” Sykehuset Innlandet
HF, Incen AG, Norway, Clinical Trails.Gov, NCT 00220753, 7-2009.

85. Roemer W, Hoek G, Brunekreef B. “Effect of ambient winter air pollution on respiratory health of children with
Chronic respiratory symptoms.” Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Jan;147(1):118–124.

86. Roemer W, Hoek G, Brunekreef B, Haluszka J, Kalandidi A, Pekkanen J.” Daily variations in air pollution and
 Respiratory health in a multicentre study: the PEACE project. Pollution Effects on Asthmatic Children in
Europe.” Eur Respir J. 1998 Dec;12(6):1354–1361.

87. Romieu I, Meneses F, Ruiz S, Sienra JJ, Huerta J, White MC, Etzel RA. Effects of air pollution on the
respiratory health of asthmatic children living in Mexico City. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Aug;154(2 Pt
1):300–307

88. Ronmark E, Jonsson E, Platts-Mills T, Lundback B. 2001. Incidence and remission of asthma in
schoolchildren: report from the obstructive lung disease in northern Sweden studies. Pediatrics 107(3):e37.

89. Savitz DA, Feingold L. “Association of childhood cancer with residential traffic density.” Scand J Work Environ
Health. 1989;15:360–363. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1848

90. Schwartz J, Dockery DW, Neas LM, Wypij D, Ware JH, Spengler JD, Koutrakis P, Speizer FE, Ferris BG., Jr ,
“Acute effects of summer air pollution on respiratory symptom reporting in children.” Am J Respir Crit Care
Med. 1994 Nov;150(5 Pt 1):1234–1242.

91. Schwartz J, Neas LM. 2000. “Fine particles are more strongly associated than coarse particles with acute
respiratory health effects in school children.” Epidemiology 11:6–10.

92. Selevan SG, Kimmel CA, Mendola P. Identifying critical windows of exposure for children’s health. Environ
Health Perspect 2000;108(Suppl 3):451–5.

93. Shima M, Nitta Y, Ando M, Adachi M. 2002. Effects of air pollution on the prevalence and incidence of asthma
In children. Arch Environ Health 57(6):529–535.

94. Shima M, Adachi M. 2000. “Effect of outdoor and indoor nitrogen dioxide on respiratory symptoms in
schoolchildren.” Int J Epidemiol 29:862–70.

95. Sidora-Arcoleo, Kimberly, “Asthma Disparities in Latino Children: Acculturation, Illness Representations &
CAM.” Arizona State University, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Scottsdale Healthcare, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University,
NY, Clinical Trials.gov NCT 0199800 6-22-2011.

96. Spektor DM, Thurston GD, Mao J, He D, Hayes C, Lippmann M. 1991. “Effects of single- and multiday ozone
exposures on respiratory function in active normal children.” Environ Res 55:107–22.

97. Steffen C, Auclerc MF, Auvrignon A, Baruchel A, Kebaili K, Lambilliotte A, Leverger G, Sommelet D, Vilmer E,
Hemon D, Clavel J. “Acute childhood leukaemia and environmental exposure to potential sources of benzene
and other hydrocarbons: a case-control study.” Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:773–778. doi:
10.1136/oem.2003.010868

98. Stelmach, Iwona, “Valuation of quality of Life in Children with Asthma.” Medical University of Lodz, Poland,
Ministry of Health, Clinical Trials.Gov NCT00491101, 9-10-2010.

99. Stern DA, Morgan WJ, Halonen M, Wright AL, Martinez FD. Wheezing and bronchial hyper-responsiveness in
Early childhood as predictors of newly diagnosed asthma in early adulthood: a longitudinal birth-cohort study.
Lancet. 2008;372:1058 –1064.

100. Tager, IB, “Effect of Air Pollution on Long Term Asthma Severity and Lung Function in Children (FACES)-
Fresno Asthmatic Children’s Environmental Study.” National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Mickey Leland
National Urban Air Toxics Research Center, Clinical Trials.Gov NCT 00336050, 2-2009.

101. Timonen KL, Pekkanen J. “Air pollution and respiratory health among children with asthmatic or cough
symptoms.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;156(2 Pt 1):546–552.

102. Talbert PE, Mulholland JA, MacIntosh DL, Xu F, Daniels D, Devine OJ, et al. 2000. “Air quality and pediatric
 emergency room visits for asthma in Atlanta, Georgia, USA.” Am J Epidemiol 151(8):798–810.

103. University of Southern California - Health Science News. (2005). "Air Pollution Found to Pose Greater
Danger to Health than Earlier Thought."

104. University of Southern California - Health Science News. (2005). "Researchers Link Childhood Asthma to
Exposure to Traffic-related Pollution."

105. Vedal S, Petkau J, White R, Blair J. “Acute effects of ambient inhalable particles in asthmatic and
nonasthmatic children.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Apr;157(4 Pt 1):1034–1043

106. Vedal S, Schenker MB, Munoz A, Samet JM, Batterman S, Speizer FE. “Daily air pollution effects on
children's Respiratory symptoms and peak expiratory flow.” Am J Public Health. 1987 Jun;77(6):694–698.

107. Vyskocil A, Fiala Z, Chenier VV, Krajak L, Ettlerova E, Bukac J, Viau C, Emminger S: “Assessment of
multipathway exposure of small children to PAH.” Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2000, 8:111–118.

108. Ware JH, Ferris BG Jr, Dockery DW, Spengler JD, Stram DO, Speizer FE. 1986. “Effects of ambient sulfur
oxides and suspended particles on respiratory health of preadolescent children.” Am Rev Respir Dis
133:834–42.

109. Weiland SK, Husing A, Strachan DP, Rzehak P, Pearce N. 2004. Climate and the prevalence of symptoms
of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic eczema in children. Occup Environ Med 61(7):609–615.

110. Weiland SK, Mundt KA, Ruckmann A, Keil U. 1994. Self-reported wheezing and allergic rhinitis in children
and traffic Density on street of residence. Ann Epidemiol 4:243–247.

111. Weiss KB, Wagener DK,”Changing Patterns of Asthma Mortality: Identifying Target Populations at High
Risk.” JAMA. 264(13), 1990: 1683-1687.

112. Weitzman M, Gortmaker SL, Sobol AM, Perrin M, ”Recent Trends in the Prevalence and Severity of
Childhood Asthma.” JAMA. 1992, 268: 267-271.

113. Whitworth KW, Symanski E, Coker AL. “Childhood lymphohematopoietic cancer incidence and hazardous
air pollutants in southeast Texas, 1995–2004.” Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:1576–1580. doi:
10.1289/ehp.11593

114. Wilkinson P, Elliott P, Grundy C, Shaddick G, Thakrar B, Walls P, et al. 1999. Case-control study of hospital
admission with asthma in children aged 5–14 years: relation with road traffic in north west London. Thorax
54:1070–1074.

115. Assow LS, Gittelsohn AM, Szklo M, Starfield B, Mussman M. 1988. Poverty, race, and hospitalization for
Childhood asthma. Am J Public Health 78(7):777–782.

116. Wjst M, Reitmeir P, Dold S, Wulff A, Nicolai T, von Loeffelholz-Colberg EF, et al. 1993. Road traffic and
adverse effects On respiratory health in children. BMJ 307(6904):596–600.

117. World Health Organization 1999, “Air Quality Guidelines,” http://www.who.int/environmental

information/Air/Guidelines

118. WHO. “Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide.” Global
update 2005. Summary of risk assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.

119. Zmirou D, Gauvin S, Pin I, Momas I, Sahraoui F, Just J, et al. 2004. Traffic related air pollution and
incidence of Childhood asthma: results of the vesta case-control study. J Epidemiol Community Health
58(1):18–23.
 Appendix A-2: Traffic Proximity

118 Citations

1..Adar SD, Kaufman JD. 2007. Cardiovascular disease and air pollutants: evaluating and improving
epidemiological data implicating traffic exposure. Inhal Toxicol 19(suppl 1):135–149..

2. Appatova AS, Ryan PH, Lemasters GK, Gruinshpun SA. 2008. Proximal exposure of public schools and
students to major roadways: a nationwide US survey. J Environ Plann Manage 51:631–646.

3. Baldauf R, Thoma E, Hays M, Shores R, Kinsey J, Gullett B, Kimbrough S, Isakov V, Long T, Snow R, Khlystov
A, Weinstein J, Chen FL, Seila R, Olson D, Gilmour I, Cho SH, Watkins N, Rowley P, Bang J. “Traffic and
meteorological impacts on near-road air quality: summary of methods and trends from the Raleigh near-road
study.” J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008;58:865–878. Doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.58.7.865

4. Batterman SA, Zhang K, and Kononowech R. 2010. “Prediction and analysis of near-road concentrations
using a reduced-form emission/dispersion model.” Environ Health 9, 29.

5. Benson P. 1989. Caline4—A Dispersion Model for Predicting Air Pollution Concentration Near Roadways.
Sacramento:California Department of Transportation, Office of Transportation Laboratory.

6. Brauer M, Lencar C, Tamburic L, Koehoorn M, Demers P, and Karr C. 2008. “A cohort study of traffic-related
air pollution impacts on birth outcomes.” Environ Health Perspect 116, 680-686

7. Brauer M, Hoek G, Smit HA, de Jongste JC, Gerritsen J, Postma DS, et al. 2007. Air pollution and
development of asthma, allergy and infections in a birth cohort. Eur Respir J 29(5):879–888.

8. Brauer M, Hoek G, et al. (2002). “Air pollution from traffic and the development of respiratory infections and
asthmatic and allergic symptoms in children.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166(8): 1092-8.

9. Briggs DJ, de Hoogh C, Gulliver J, Wills J, Elliott P, Kingham S, et al. 2000. “A regression based method for
mapping traffic-related air pollution: application and testing in four contrasting urban environments.” Sci Total
Environ 253, 151-167.

10. Broder I, Higgins MW, Mathews KP, Keller JP. 1974. Epidemiology of asthma and allergic rhinitis in a total
community, Tecumseh, Michigan. IV. Natural history. J Allergy Clin Immunol 54(2):100–110.

11. Brugge D, Durant JL, Rioux C. (2007) “Near highway pollutants in motor vehicle exhaust: A review of
epidemiologic evidence of cardiac and pulmonary health risks.” Environmental health 2007,6:23

12. Brunekreef B, Janssen NA, de Hartog J, Harssema H, Knape M, van Vliet P. 1997. “Air pollution from truck
traffic and lung function in children living near motorways.” Epidemiology 8:298-303.

13. Brunkreef, B. and J. Sunyer (2003). “Asthma, rhinitis and air pollution: is traffic to blame?” Eur Respir J 21(6):
913-5.

14. Brunekreef B, Beelen R, Hoek G, Schouten L, Bausch-Goldohm S, Fischer P, Armstrong B, Hughes E, Jerrett
M, Van Den Brandt P, “Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and
cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.” Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar;(139):5-
71; discussion 73-89.

15. Burr ML. 1992. Diagnosing asthma by questionnaire in epidemiological surveys. Clin Exp Allergy 22(5):
509–510.

16. Castro-Giner F, Kunzli N, Jacquemin B, Forsberg B, de Cid R, Sunyer J, et al, “Traffic-related air pollution,
Oxidative stress genes, and asthma (echrs).” Environmental health perspectives 117:1919-1924, 2009.
17. Chang J, Delfino RJ, Gillen D, Tjoa T, Nickerson B, Cooper D. Repeated respiratory hospital encounters
among children with asthma and residential proximity to traffic. Occup Environ Med.

18. Ciccone G, Forastiere E, Agabiti N, Biggeri A, Bisanti L, Chellini E, et al. 1998. “Road traffic and adverse
respiratory effects in children.” SIDRIA Collaborative Group. Occup Environ Med 55:771-778.

19. Clougherty JE, Wright RJ, Baxter LK, and Levy JI. 2008. “Land use regression modeling of intra-urban
residential
variability in multiple traffic-related air pollutants.” Environ Health 7, 17.

20. Clougherty JE, Levy JI, Kubzansky LD, et al. Synergistic effects of traffic-related air pollution and exposure to
violence on urban asthma etiology. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1140 –1146.

21. Crosignani P, Tittarelli A, Borgini A, Codazzi T, Rovelli A, Porro E, Contiero P, Bianchi N, Tagliabue G, Fissi
R, Rossitto F.,
”Childhood leukemia and road traffic: A population-based case-control study.” Int J Cancer. 2004 Feb
10:108(4):596-9.

22. Crouse DL, Goldberg MS, Ross NA, Chen H, LaLbreche F, ”Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Is Associated
with Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution in Montreal, Canada: A Case-Control Study.” Environ Health
Perspect, 2010; 118:1578-1583, Epub Oct 6.

23. Cyrys J, Heinrich J, et al. (2003). “Comparison between different traffic-related particle indicators: elemental
carbon (EC), PM2.5 mass, and absorbance.” J Expo Anal Environmental Epidemiology 13(2): 134-43.

24. Davis ME, Smith TJ, Laden F, Hart JE, Blicharz AP, Reaser P, Garshick E, “Driver exposure to combustion
particles in the U.S. Trucking industry.” J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007;4(11):848–854

25. De Kok TMCM, Driece HAL, Hogervorst JGF, Briede JJ, 2006. Toxicological assessment of ambient and
traffic-related particulate matter: a review of recent studies. Mutat Res 613(2-3):103–122.

26. Delfino RJ, Chang J, Wu J, Ren C, Tjoa T, Nickerson B,Cooper C, Gillen DL, “Repeated hospital encounters
for asthma in children and exposure to traffic-related air pollution near the home.” Ann Allergy Asthma
Immunol. 2009;102:138–144.

27. Delfino RJ. 2002. Epidemiologic evidence for asthma and exposure to air toxics: Linkages between
occupational, indoor, and community air pollution research. Environ Health Perspect 110(suppl 4):573–589.

28. Donaldson K, Gilmour MI, MacNee W. 2000. “Asthma and PM10.” Respir Res 1(1):12–5.

29. Duhme H, Weiland SK, Keil U, Kraemer B, Schmid M, Stender M, et al. 1996. “The association between self-
reported symptoms of asthma and allergic rhinitis and self-reported traffic density on street of residence in
adolescents.” Epidemiology 7:578-582.

30. Edwards J, Waiters S, Griffiths RK. 1994. “Hospital admissions for asthma in preschool children: relationship
to major roads in Birmingham.” United Kingdom. Arch Environ Health 49:223-227.

31. English P, Neutra R, Scalf R, Sullivan M, Waller L, Zhu k. 1999. “Examining associations between childhood
asthma and traffic flow using a geographic information system.” Environ Health Perspect 107:701-767.

32. Environmental Protection Agency (2004). “Study of Health Effects of Toxic Air Pollutants on Asthmatic
Children in Huntington Park.”

33. Gan WQ, Davies HW, Koehoorn M, Brauer M,”Association of Long-term exposure to community noise and
traffic related air pollution with coronary heart disease mortality.” Am J Epidmiol 2012 May 1;175(9):898-906.
Epub 2012
Apr 5.
34. Gauderman WJ, Avol E, Lurmann F, Kuenzli N, Gilliland F, Peters J, McConnell R, “Childhood Asthma and
Exposure to Traffic and Nitrogen Dioxide.” Epidemiology 2005;16: 737-743)

35. Gauderman, W.J. et al. (2007) “Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from 10 to 18years of age: a
cohort study.” Lancet 369(9561):571-7.

36. Gehring U, Cyrys J, Sedlmeir G, Brunekreef B, Bellander T, Fischer P, et al. 2002. Traffic-related air pollution
and respiratory health during the first 2 yrs of life. Eur Respir J 19(4):690–698.

37. Gehring U, Wijga AH, Brauer M, Fischer P, de Jongste JC, Kerkhof M, et al. 2009. Traffic-related air pollution
and the development of asthma and allergies during the first 8 years of life. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
181(6):596–603.

38. Gilbert NL, Woodhouse S, Stieb DM, Brook JR. 2003. Ambient nitrogen dioxide and distance from a major
highway. Sci Total Environ 312(1–3):43–46.

39. Gilliland FL, Saxon A; Diaz-Sanchez D; (2004). “Effect of glutathione-S-transferase M1 and P1 genotypes on
xenobiotic enhancement of allergic responses: 11ancer11zed, placebo-controlled crossover study.” Lancet
363:119.

40. Green RS, Smorodinsky S, et al. (2004). “Proximity of California public schools to busy roads.” Environmental
Health Perspectives 112(1): 61-6.

41. Guo YL, Lin YC, Sung FC, Huang SL, Ko YC, Lai JS, et al. 1999.”Climate, traffic-related air pollutants, and
asthma prevalence in middle-school children in Taiwan.” Environ Health Perspect 107:1001-1006.

42. Gunier RB, Hertz A, Von Behren J, Reynolds P. 2003 “Traffic density in California: socioeconomic and ethnic
differences among potentially exposed children.” J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 13:240-246.

43. Hitchins J, Morawsaka L, Wolff R, Gilbert D. 2000, “Concentrations of submicrometre particles from vehicle
emissions near a major road.”Atmos Environ 34:51-59.

44. Heck JE, Wu J, Meyers TJ, Wilhelm M, Cockburn M, Ritz , B, “Childhood cancer and traffic-related air
pollution exposure in pregnancy and early life.” American Association for Cancer Research, April 6-10, 2013
Abstract No. 2531

45. Heinrich J, Wichmann HE. 2004. Traffic related pollutants in Europe and their effect on allergic disease.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 4(5):341–348.

46. Hitchins J, Morawska L, Wolff R, Gilbert D. 2000. Concentrations of submicrometre particles from vehicle
emissions near a major road. Atmos Environ 34(1):51–59.

47. Hoek G, Beelen R, de Hoogh K, Vienneau D, Gulliver J, Fischer P, et al. 2008. A review of land-use
regression models to assess spatial variation of outdoor air pollution. Atmos Environ 42(33):7561–7578.

48. Jerret M, Shankardass K, Berhane K, Gauderman WJ, Künzli N, Avol E, Gilliland F, Lurmann F, Molitor JN,
Molitor JT, Thomas DC, Peters J, McConnell R, “Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Asthma Onset in Children:A
Prospective Cohort Study with Individual Exposure Measurement.” Environ Health Perspect 116:1433–1438
(2008).

49. Kim JJ, Huen K, Adams S, Smorodinsky S, Hoats A, Malig B, et al. 2008. Residential traffic and children’s
Respiratory health. Environ Health Perspect 116:1274–1279.

50. Kim S, Shen S, Sioutas C. 2002. Size distribution and diurnal and seasonal trends of ultrafine particles in
source and receptor sites of the Los Angeles basin. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 52(3):297–307.

51. Kim JJ, Smorodinsky S, Lipsett M, Singer BC, Hodgson AT, Ostro B. 2004. Traffic-related air pollution near
busy roads: the East Bay Children’s Respiratory Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 170(5):520–526.
52. Kramer U, Koch T, Ranft U, Ring J, Behrendt H. 2000. Traffic-related air pollution is associated with atopy in
children living in urban areas. Epidemiology 11(1):64–70.

53. Langholz B, Ebi KL, Thomas DC, Peters JM, London SJ, “Traffic density and the risk of childhood leukemia in
a Los Angeles case-control study.” Ann Epidemiol 12:482-487, 2002.

54. Lee YL, Shaw CK, et al. (2003). “Climate, traffic-related air pollutants and allergic rhinitis prevalence in
middle-school children in Taiwan.” Eur Respir J 21(6): 964-70.

55. Leikauf GD, Kline S, Albert RE, Baxter CS, Bernstein DI, Buncher CR. 1995. “Evaluation of a possible
association of urban air toxics and asthma.” Environ Health Perspect 103(Suppl 6):253–71.

56. Livingstone AE, Shaddick G, Grundy C, Elliott P. 1996. Do people living near inner city main roads have more
asthma needing treatment? Case control study. BMJ 312(7032):676–677.

57. McConnel R, Talat Islam, Ketan Shankardass, Michael Jerrett, Fred Lurmann, Frank Gilliland, Jim
Gauderman, Ed Avol, Nino Künzli, Ling Yao, John Peters, and Kiros Berhane, “ Childhood Incident Asthma
and Traffic-Related Air Pollution at Home and School.” Environ Health Perspect 118:1021–1026 (2010)

58. McConnell, R, Berhane, K, Yao, L, Jerrett M, Lurmann, F, Gilliland, F, Kunzli, N, Gauderman, J, Avol, E,
Thomas, D and Peters J, “Traffic, Susceptibility and Childhood Asthma,” Environmental Health Perspectives,
Volume 114, Number 5, May 2006.

59. McCreanor J, Cullinan P, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Stewart-Evans J, Malliarou E, Jarup L, et al, “Respiratory effects
of exposure to diesel traffic in persons with asthma.” N Engl J Med 357:2348-2358, 2007.

60. McDonald E, Cook D, Newman T, Griffith L, Cox G, Guyatt G. 2002. “Effect of air filtration systems on
asthma: a systematic review of randomized trials.” Chest 122(5):1535–42.

61. Morgan, TE, et al, ”Air Pollutants from Automotive Traffic Act on Glutamatergic Neurons.” Environmental
Health
Perspectives, July 2011, 1003-1009. Doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002973.

62. Morgenstern V, Zutavern A, Cyrys J, Brockow I, Koletzko S, Kramer U, et al. 2008. Atopic diseases, allergic
sensitization, and exposure to traffic-related air pollution in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
177(12):1331–1337.

63. Natural Resources Defense Council. 2001. “No breathing in the aisles: diesel exhaust inside school buses.”
San Francisco, CA: National Resources Defense Council.

64. Nel AE, Diaz-Sanchez D, Ng D, Hiura T, Saxon A, “Enhancement of allergic inflammation by the interaction
between diesel exhaust particles and the immune system.” J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998, 102:539–554.

65. Nel AE, Diaz-Sanchez D, Li N. The role of particulate pollutants in pulmonary inflammation and asthma:
evidence for the involvement of organic chemicals and oxidative stress. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2001;7:20–26.

66. Nicolai T, Carr D, et al. (2003). “Urban traffic and pollutant exposure related to respiratory outcomes and
atopy in a large sample of children.” Eur Respir J 21(6): 956-63.

67. Nielsen, OR, Hertel, O, Thomsen, BL, Olsen, JH, “Air Pollution from Traffic at the Residence of Chidlren with
12ancer.” Am
Joun of Epid. Vol. 153, Issue 5, 433-443.March 8, 2000.

68. Nitta H, Sato T, Nakai S, Maeda K, Aoki S, Ono M. 1993. Respiratory health associated with exposure to
Automobile exhaust. I. Results of cross-sectional studies in 1979, 1982, and 1983. Arch Environ Health
48(1):53–58.

69. Nordling E, Berglind N, Melen E, Emenius G, Hallberg J, Nyberg F, et al. 2008. Traffic-related air pollution and
 Childhood respiratory symptoms, function and allergies. Epidemiology 19(3):401–408.

70. Ntziachristos L, Ning Z, Geller MD, Sioutas C. Particle concentration and characteristics near a major freeway
wWith heavy-duty diesel traffic. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41(7):2223-2230.

71. Oosterlee A, Drijver M, Lebret E, Brunekreef B. 1996. Chronic respiratory symptoms in children and adults
living along streets with high traffic density.” Occup Environ Med 53(4):241–247

72. Panko, Julie M.; Chu, Jennifer; Kreider, Marisa L.; Unice, Ken M., “Measurement of Airborne Concentrations
of Tire and Road Wear Particles in Urban and Rural Areas of France, Japan and the United States.”
Atmospheric Environment, June 2013, Vol. 72.

73. Patel MM, Quinn JW, Jung KH, Hoepner L, Diaz D, Perzanowski M, Rundle A, Kinney PL, Perera FP, Miller
RL. “Traffic density and stationary sources of air pollution associated with wheeze, asthma, and
immunoglobulin E from birth to age 5 years among New York City children.” Environ Res. 2011
Nov;111(8):1222-9. Doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

74. Pearson RL, Wachtel H, Ebi KL. 2000. “Distance-weighted traffic density in proximity to a home is a risk factor
for leukemia and other childhood cancers. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 50:175-180.

75. Perez L, Lurmann, Wilson FJ, Pastor M, Brandt SJ, Künzli N, McConnell R, “Near-Roadway Pollution and
Childhood Asthma: Implications for Developing “Win–Win” Compact Urban Development and Clean Vehicle
Strategies.” Environ Health Perspect 120:1619–1626 (2012).

76. Pierse N, Rushton L, Harris RS, Kuehni CE, Silverman M, Grigg J.Locally generated particulate pollution and
respiratory symptoms in young children. Thorax. 2006;61:216 –220.

77. Ponce NA, Hoggatt KJ, Wilhelm M, Ritz B. 2005. Preterm birth: the interaction of traffic-related air pollution
with economic hardship in Los Angeles neighborhoods. Am J Epidemiol 162(2):140–148.

78. Power, MC, Weisskpf, MG, Alexeeff, SE, Coull, BA, Siro, A, Schwartz, J,”Trafffic-Related Air Pollution and
Congnitive Function in a Cohort of Older Men.” Environ Health Perspect, 2011; 119:682-687, Epub Dec 20.

79. Raaschou-Nielsen O, Hertel O, Thomsen BL, Bison JH. 2001. “Air pollution from traffic at the residence of
children with cancer.” Am J Epidemiol 153:433-443

80. Raaschou-Nielson, O. et al. “Air pollution from traffic and risk for lung cancer in three Danish cohorts. Cancer
Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2010. 19(5):1284-91.

81. Raaschou-Nielsen, O. et al. “Lung Cancer Incidence and Long-Term Exposure to Air Pollution from Traffic.”
Environmental Health Perspectives. 2011 Jan 12. (Epub ahead of print).

82. Reynolds P, Von Behren J, Gunier RB, Goldberg DE, Hertz A, Smith D. 2002. “Traffic patterns and childhood
cancer incidence rates in California, United States.” Cancer Causes Control 13:665-673.

83. Ryan PH, LeMasters G, Biagini J, Bernstein D, Grinshpun SA, Shukla R, et al. 2005. Is it traffic type, volume,
or distance? Wheezing in infants living near truck and bus traffic. J Allergy Clin Immunol 116(2):279–284.

84. Salam MT, Islam T, Gilliland FD. 2008. Recent evidence for adverse effects of residential proximity to traffic
sources on asthma. Curr Opin Pulm Med 14(1):3–8.

85. Salam MT, Lin PC, Avol EL, Gauderman WJ, Gilliland FD. 2007b. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase, glutathione
S-transferase P1, traffic and childhood asthma. Thorax 62(12):1050–1057.

86. Savitz DA, Feingold L. 1989. “Association of childhood cancer with residential traffic density.” Stand J Work
Environ Health 15:360-363.
87. Singer BC, Hodgson AT, Hotchi T, Kim JJ. 2004. Passive measurement of nitrogen oxides to assess traffic-
related pollutant exposure for the East Bay Children’s Respiratory Health Study. Atmos Environ 38(3):393–
403.

88. Slama R, Morgenstern V, Cyrys J, Zutavern A, Herbarth O, Wichmann HE, et al. 2007. Traffic-related
atmospheric pollutants levels during pregnancy and offspring’s term birth weight: a study relying on a land-
use regression exposure model. Environ Health Perspect 115:1283–1292.

89. Steenland K, Silverman DT, Hornung DW, “Case-control study of lung cancer and truck driving in the
Teamsters Union.” Am J Public Health.1990;80:670–674.

90. Steenland K, Deddens J, Stayner L.”Diesel exhaust and lung cancer in the trucking industry: exposure-
response
analyses and risk assessment.” Am J Ind Med. 1998;34:220–228.

91. Steenland K, Silverman DT, Zaebst D. “Exposure to diesel exhaust in the trucking industry and possible
relationships with lung cancer.” Am J Ind Med.1992;21:887–890.

92. Thiering E, Cyrys J, Kratzsch J, Meisinger C, Hoffmann B, Berdel D, Von Berg A, Koletzko S, Bauer CP,
Heinrich J. “Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and insulin resistance in children: results from
the GINIplus and LISAplus birth cohorts.” Diabetologia, April12, 2013DOI 10.1007/s00125-013-2925-x

93. Van Kempen E, Fischer, Jansssen P, Houthuijs N, Van Kamp D, Stanfeld IS, Cassee F, “Neurobehavioral
effects of exposure to traffic-realted air pollution and transportation noise in primary school children.” Environ
Res 2012 May:115:18-25, Epub 2012 Apr 6.

94. Van Vliet P, Knape M, et al. (1997), “Motor vehicle exhaust and chronic respiratory symptoms in children
living near freeways.” Environ Res 74(2): 122-32.

95. Vardoulakis S, Chalabi Z, Fletcher T, Grundy C, Leonardi GS, “Impact and uncertainty of a traffic
management intervention: Population exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.” Sci Total Environ 2008,
394:244–251.

96. Venn A, Lewis S, Cooper M, Hubbard R, Hill I, Boddy R, et al. 2000.” Local road traffic activity and the
prevalence, severity, and persistence of wheeze in school children: combined cross sectional and longitudinal
study.” Occup Environ Med 57:152-158.

97. Vinceti M, Rothman KJ, Crespi CM, Sterni A, Cherubini A, Guerra L, Maffeis G, Ferretti E, Fabbi S, Teggi
S, Consonni D, de Girolamo G, Meggiato A, Palazzi G,Paolucci P, Malagoli C,”Leukemia risk in children
exposed to benzene and PM10 from vehicular traffic: a case-control study in an Italian population.” Eur J
Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;27(10):781-90. Doi:10.1007/s10654-012-9727-1. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

98. Venn AJ, Lewis SA, Cooper M, Hubbard R, Britton J. 2001. “Living near a main road and the risk of wheezing
illness in children.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:2177-2180.

99. Venn A, Lewis S, Cooper M, Hubbard R, Hill I, Boddy R, et al. 2000. Local road traffic activity and the
prevalence, severity, and persistence of wheeze in school children: combined cross sectional and longitudinal
study. Occup Environ Med 57(3):152–158.

100. Volk HE, Hertz-Picciotto I, Delwiche L, Lurman F, McConnel R, “Residential Proximity to Freeways and
Autism in the CHARGE Study.” Environ Heal Perspect, 2011:119:873-877, Epub Dec16.

101. Volk HE, Lurmann F, Penfold B, Piccciotto IH, McConnel R, “Traffic-Related Air Pollution Particulate Matter
and Autism.” JAMA Psychiatry 2013;70(1):71-77.

102. Wang S, Zhang J, Zeng X, Zeng Y, Wang S, Chen S, ”Association of Traffic-Related Air Pollution with
Children with Neurobehavioral Functions in Quanzhou China.” Environ Heal Perspect, 2009:117:1612-
 1618,Epub May11.

103. Weichenthal S, Kulka R, Dubeau A, Martin C, Wang D, Dales R, “Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Heart
Rate Variability and Respiratory Function in Urban Cyclist.” Environmental Health Perspectives, October
2011. doi 10.1289/ehp.1003321.

104. Weiland SK, Mundt KA, Ruckmann A, Keg U. 1994 “Self-reported wheezing and allergic rhinitis in children
and traffic density on street of residence.” Ann Epidemiol 4:243-247.

105. White RH, Spengler JD, Kumkum MD, Barry BE, Samet JM, “Report of Workshop on Traffic, Health, and
Infrastructure Planning.” Arch Environ Occup Health. 2005; 60(2): 70–76.

106. Wilhelm M, Ritz B 2003. “Residential proximity to traffic and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles
County, California, 1994-1996.” Environ Health Perspect 111:207-216.

107. Wjst M, Reitmeir P, Dold S, Wulff A, Nicolai T, von Loeffelholz-Colberg EF, et al. 1993. “Road traffic and
adverse effects on respiratory health in children.” Br Med J 307:596-600.

108. Wu J, Ren C, Delfino RJ, Chung J, Wilhelm M, and Ritz B. 2009. “Association between local traffic-
generated air pollution and preeclampsia and preterm delivery in the south coast air basin of California.”
Environ Health Perspect 117, 1773-1779

109. Yamamoto M, Singh A, Sava F, Pui M, Tebbutt ST, Carlsten C, “MicroRNA Expression in Response to
Controlled Exposure to Diesel Exhaust: Attenuation by the Antioxidant n-Acetylcysteine in a Randomized
Crossover Study.” Environ Health Perspective April 12,2013

110. Volk HE, Fred Lurmann; Bryan Penfold;\Irva Hertz-Picciotto, PhD; Rob McConnell, “Traffic-Related Air
Pollution, Particulate Matter,and Autism.” JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(1):71-77.

111. Wu J, Houston D, Lurmann F, Ong P, Winer A. 2009. Exposure of PM2.5 and EC from diesel and gasoline
vehicles in communities near the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, California. Atmos Environ
43(12):1962–1971.

112. Yorifuji T, et al. “Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and mortality in Shizuoka, Japan.”
Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2010. 67(2):111-7.

113. Yorifuji T, Naruse H, Kashima S, Ohki S, Murakoshi T, Takao S, et al. 2011. “Residential proximity to major
Roads and preterm births.” Epidemiology 22, 74-80.

114. Zaebst D, Stern F, Heitbrink W, Cooper T. “Evaluation of techniques for reducing diesel forklift
emissions.‘ Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1992;7(1):17–18.

115. Zaebst DD, Clapp DE, Blade LM, Marlow DA, Steenland K, Hornung RW, Scheutzle D, Butler J.
“Quantitative determination of trucking industry workers’ exposures to diesel exhaust particles.”
AIHAJ. 1991;52(12):529–541

116. Zhu Y, Hinds WC, et al. (2002). “Study of ultrafine particles near a major highway with heavy-duty diesel
traffic.” Atmospheric Environment 36: 4323-4335.

117. Zhu Y, Hinds WC, et al. (2002)(2). “Concentration and Size Distribution of Ultrafine Particles Near a Major
Highway.” J Air & Waste Manage Assoc 52:1032-1042.

118. Zmirou D, Gauvin S, Pin I, Momas I, Sahraoui F, Just J, et al. 2004. Traffic related air pollution and incidence
Of Childhood Asthma: results of the vesta case-control study. J Epidemiol Community Health 58(1):18–23.
 Appendix A-3: Particulate Matter

73 Citations

1.. Atkinson RW, Anderson HR, Sunyer J, Ayres J, Baccini M, Vonk JM, et al. Acute effects of particulate air
pollution on respiratory admissions: Results from aphea 2 project. Air pollution and health: A European
approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:1860-1866, 2001.

2. Avol EL, Linn WS, Shamoo DA, Valencia LM, Anzar UT, Venet TG, et al. 1985. Respiratory effects of
photochemical oxidant air pollution in exercising adolescents. Am Rev Respir Dis 132(3):619–22.

3. Behndig AF, Mudway IS, Brown JL, Stenfors N, Helleday R, Duggan ST, et al. Airway antioxidant and
inflammatory responses to diesel exhaust exposure in healthy humans. The European respiratory journal :
official journal of the European Society for Clinical Respiratory Physiology 27:359-365, 2006.

4. Birger N, Gould T, Stewart J, Miller MR, Larson T, Carlsten C. The air pollution exposure laboratory (apel) for
controlled human exposure to diesel exhaust and other inhalants: Characterization and comparison to
existing facilities.Inhal Toxicol 23:219-225, 2011.

5. Bollati V, Marinelli B, Apostoli P, Bonzini M, Nordio F, Hoxha M, et al. Exposure to metal-rich particulate
matter modifies the expression of candidate micrornas in peripheral blood leukocytes. Environmental health
perspectives 118:763-768, 2010.

6. Brook RD, Rajagopalan S, Pope CA, 3rd, Brook JR, Bhatnagar A, Diez-Roux AV, et al. Particulate matter air
pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement from the american heart
association. Circulation 121:2331-237, 2010.

7. Campbell A, Araujo JA, Li H, Sioutas C, Kleinman M. Particulate matter induced enhancement of

inflammatory markers in the brains of apolipoprotein E knockout mice. J Nanosci Nanotechnol.
2009;9(8):5099-5104.

8. Castro-Giner F, Kunzli N, Jacquemin B, Forsberg B, de Cid R, Sunyer J, et al. Traffic-related air pollution,
oxidative stress genes, and asthma (ECHRS). Environmental health perspectives 117:1919-1924, 2009.

9. Chalupa, D. C., P. E. Morrow, et al. "Ultrafine particle deposition in subjects with asthma." Environmental
Health Perspectives 112(8): 879-82, 2004.

10. Charron, A. and R. M. Harrison "Primary particle formation from vehicle emissions during exhaust dilution in
the roadside atmosphere." Atmos Environ. 2003.

11. Cooper JA, Currie LA, Klouda GA [1981]. Assessment of contemporary carbon combustion source
contributions to urban air particulate levels using carbon-14 measurements. Environ Sci Techno 15(9):1045-
1050.

12. Crüts B, van Etten L, Törnqvist H, Blomberg A, Sandström T, Mills NL, et al. 2008. Exposure to diesel exhaust
induces changes in EEG in human volunteers. Part Fibre Toxicol 5:4.

13. Cuddihy RG, Griffith WC, McClellan RO [1984]. Health risks from light-duty diesel vehicles. Environ Sci
Technol 18(l):14A-21A.

14. Delfino RJ, Sioutas C, et al. "Potential role of ultrafine particles in associations between airborne particle
mass and cardiovascular health." Environmental Health Perspectives 113(8): 934-46, 2005.

15. Edling C, Anjou C-G, Axelson 0, Kling H [1987]. Mortality among personnel exposed to diesel exhaust. Int
Arch Occup Environ Health 59:559-565.

16. Environmental Protection Agency. "Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter Providing the Scientific
 Foundation for EPA Decision Making." Volumes 1 and 2, 2004.

17. Fann N, Lamson AD, Anenberg SC, Wesson K, Risley D, Hubbell BJ, “Estimating the National
Public Health Burden Associated with Exposure to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 32, No. 1,
2012.

18. Forbes LJ, Patel MD, Rudnicka AR, et al. Chronic exposure to outdoor air pollution and markers of systemic
inflammation. Epidemiology. 2009;20:245–253.

19. Fruin SA, Winera AM, et al. (2004). "Black carbon concentrations in California vehicles and estimation of in-
vehicle diesel exhaust particulate matter exposures." Atmos Environ 38:4123–4133.

20. Garshick E, Laden F, et al. (2004). "Lung cancer in railroad workers exposed to diesel exhaust."
Environmental
Health Perspectives 112(15): 1539-43.

21. Gan, WQ, Davies HW, Koehoorn M, Brauer M,”Association of Long-term exposure to community noise and
traffic related air pollution with coronary heart disease mortality.” Am J Epidmiol 2012 May 1;175(9):898-906.
Epub 2012
Apr 5.

22. Geiser M, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Kapp N, Schu¨rch S, Kreyling W, Schulz H, Semmler M, Im Hof V, Heyder
J, Gehr P Ultrafine particles cross cellular membranes by nonphagocytic mechanisms in lungs and in cultured
cells. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(11):1555-1560.

23. Gottipolu, RR, Wallenbron, JG, Karoly, ED, Schladweiler, MC, “One Month Disel Exhaust Inhalation Produces
Hypertension Gene Expression Pattern in Healthy Rats,” NIEHS, Environmental Health perspectives,
ehp.11647 September 12, 2008

24. Hauck H, Berner A, et al. (2003). "AUPHEP -Austrian Project on Health Effects of Particulates - general
overview." Atmos Environ .

25. Hauck H, Berner A, et al. (2003). "AUPHEP- Austrian Project on Health Effects of Particulates- general
overview." Atmos Environ .

26. Health Effects Institute (HEI) (2003). "Research on Diesel Exhaust and Other Particles."

27. Hoffmann B, Moebus S, Dragano N, et al. Chronic residential exposure to particulate matter air pollution and
Systemic inflammatory markers. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:1302–1308.

28. Holloway JW, Savarimuthu Francis S, Fong KM, Yang IA. 2012. “Genomics and the respiratory effects of air
pollution
exposure.” Respirology 17:590-600.

29. Hussain S, Laumbach R, Coleman J, Youssef H, Kelly-McNeil K, Ohman-Strickland P, et al. 2012. “Controlled
exposure to diesel exhaust causes increased nitrite in exhaled breath condensate among subjects with
asthma.” J Occup Environ Med 54:1186-1191.

30. Kim S, Shen S, Sioutas C. 2002. Size distribution and diurnal and seasonal trends of ultrafine particles in
source and receptor sites of the Los Angeles basin. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 52(3):297–307.

31. Ku¨nzli N, Jerrett M, Garcia-Esteban R, Basagan˜a X, Beckermann B, Gilliland F, Medina M, Peters J, Hodis
HN, Mack WJ. Ambient air pollution and the progression of atherosclerosis in adults. PLoS One.
2010;5(2):e9096.

32. Lepeule, Johanna; Laden, Francine; Dockery, Douglas; Schwartz, Joel, “Chronic Expoure to fine Particulates
 and Mortality: An Extended Follow-Up of the Harvard Six Cities Study from 1974-2008.” Environmental
Health Perspectives, March 2012. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104660.

33. Li N, Hao M, Phalen RF, Hinds WC, Nel AE. 2003. Particulate air pollutants and asthma. A paradigm for the
role of oxidative stress in PM-induced adverse health effects. Clin Immunol 109(3):250–265.

34. Lippmann, M., M. Frampton, et al. (2003). "The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Particulate Matter
Health Effects Research Centers Program: a midcourse report of status, progress, and plans." Environmental
Health Perspectives 111(8): 1074-92.

35. Lodovici M, Bigagli E. 2011. “Oxidative stress and air pollution exposure.” J Toxicol 2011:487074.

36. McCreanor J, Cullinan P, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Stewart-Evans J, Malliarou E, Jarup L, et al. “Respiratory effects
of exposure to diesel traffic in persons with asthma.” N Engl J Med 357:2348-2358, 2007.

37. Mills NL, Tornqvist H, Gonzalez MC, Vink E, Robinson SD, Soderberg S, et al. “Ischemic and thrombotic
effects of dilute diesel-exhaust inhalation in men with coronary heart disease.” N Engl J Med 357:1075-1082,
2007.

38. Montnémery P, Bengtsson P, Elliot A, Lindholm L-H, Nyberg P, Lofdahl C-G. (2000) Prevalence of obstructive
lung diseases and respiratory symptoms in relation to living environment and socio-economic group.
Respiratory Medicine, 95: 744-752

39. Mudway IS, Stenfors N, et al. (2004). "An in vitro and in vivo investigation of the effects of diesel exhaust on
human airway lining fluid antioxidants." Arch Biochem Biophys 423(1): 200-12.

40. Nikasinovic L, Momas L, et al. (2004). "A review of experimental studies on diesel exhaust particles and nasal
epithelium alterations." J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 7(2): 81-104.

41. Ning Z, Geller MD, Moore KF, Sheesley R, Schauer JJ, Sioutas C. 2007. Daily variation in chemical
characteristics of urban ultrafine aerosols and inference of their sources. Environ Sci Technol 41(17):6000–
6006.

42. Ntziachristos L, Ning Z, Geller MD, Sioutas C. Particle concentration and characteristics near a major freeway
with heavy-duty diesel traffic. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41(7):2223-2230.

43. Salmon LG, Mayo PR, et al. (2004). "Determination of Elemental Carbon and Organic Carbon Concentrations
During the Southern California Children’s Health Study, 1999-2001."

44. Saxon A, Diaz-Sanchez D, (2000). "Diesel exhaust as a model xenobiotic in allergic inflammation."
Immunopharmacology 48(3): 325-7.

45. Saxon A, Diaz-Sanchez D, (2005). "Air pollution and allergy: you are what you breathe." Nat Immunology
6(3): 223-6.

46. Froines J R, (2006). “Health Effects of Airborne Particulate Matter.” Presentation to the Southern California
Association of Governments May 17, 2006.

47. Pope CA, 3rd. “Mortality and air pollution: associations persist with continued advances in research
methodology.” Environ Health Perspect 107, 613-614, 1999.

48. Pope CA, 3rd. 2000. “Epidemiology of fine particulate air pollution and human health: biologic mechanisms
and who's at risk?” Environ Health Perspect 108 Suppl 4, 713-723.

49. Pope CA, 3rd, Dockery DW, Spengler JD, and Raizenne ME. 1991. “Respiratory health and PM10 pollution. A
daily time series analysis.” Am Rev Respir Dis 144, 668-674.
50. Pronk A, Coble J, Stewart P, “Occupational exposure to diesel engine exhaust: A literature.” J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol. 2009 July ; 19(5): 443–457. doi:10.1038/jes.2009.21.

51. Sava F, Carlsten C. “Respiratory health effects of ambient air pollution: An update. “ Clin Chest Med
33:759-769, 2012.

52.. Saxon A, Diaz-Sanchez D. “Air pollution and allergy: You are what you breathe.” Nat Immunol 6:223-226,
2005.

53. Scheepers PT, Bos RP, “Combustion of diesel fuel from a toxiological perspective.”Origin of incomplete
Combustion products.” Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1992;64:149-161.

54. Seaton A, Soutar A, Crawford V, et al. Particulate air pollution and the blood. Thorax. 1999;54:1027–1032.

55. Shoenfelt J, Mitkus RJ, Zeisler R, Spatz RO, Powell J, Fenton MJ, et al. “Involvement of tlr2 and tlr4 in
inflammatory immune responses induced by fine and coarse ambient air particulate matter.” J Leukoc Biol
86:303-312, 2009.

56. Siegel PD, Saxena RK, et al. (2004). "Effect of diesel exhaust particulate (DEP) on immune responses:
contributions of particulate versus organic soluble components." J Toxicol Environ Health A 67(3): 221-31.

57. Singh M, Phuleria HC, et al. (2005). "Seasonal and spatial trends in particle number concentrations and size
distributions at the children's health study sites in Southern California." J Expo Anal Environmental
Epidemiology.

58. Sioutas C. (2003). "Results from the Research of the Southern California Particle Center and Supersite
(SCPCS)."

59. Sioutas C, Delfino RJ, et al. (2005). "Exposure assessment for atmospheric ultrafine particles (UFPs) and
implications in epidemiologic research." Environmental Health Perspectives 113(8): 947-55.

60. Sydbom A, Blomberg A, Parnia S, Stefors N, Sandstrom T, Dahlen SE, “Health effects of diesel exhaust
emissions.” EUR Respir J 2001;17:733-746.

61. Takano H, Yoshikawa T, Ichinose T, Miyabara Y, Imaoka K, Sagai M: “Diesel exhaust particles enhance
antigen-induced airway inflammation and local cytokine expression in mice.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1997, 156:36–42.

62. Takeda K, Tsukue N, and Yoshida S. 2004. “Endocrine-disrupting activity of chemicals in diesel exhaust and
diesel exhaust particles.” Environ Sci 11, 33-45.

63. Takenaka H, Zhang K, Diaz-Sanchez D, Tsien A, Saxon A: “Enhanced human IgE production results from
exposure to the aromatic hydrocarbons from diesel exhaust: direct effects on B-cell IgE production. “J Allergy
Clin Immunol 1995, 95:103–115

64. Thompson AM, Zanobetti A, Silverman F, et al. Baseline repeated measures from controlled human exposure
Studies associations between ambient air pollution exposure and the systemic inflammatory biomarkers IL-6
and fibrinogen. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:120 –124.

65. Vostal JJ, [1986]. Factors limiting the evidence for chemical carcinogenicity of diesel emissions in long-term
inhalation experiments. In: lshinishi N, Koizumi A, McClellan RO, Stober W, eds. Carcinogenic and
mutagenic effects of diesel engine exhaust. Proceedings of the Symposium on Toxicological Effects of
Emissions from Diesel Engines, Tsukuba City, Japan, July 26-28, 1986. New York, NY: Elsevier Science
Publishers, pp. 381-396.

66. Wallace LA, Mitchell H, et al. (2003). "Particle concentrations in inner-city homes of children with asthma: the
effect of smoking, cooking, and outdoor pollution." Environmental Health Perspectives 111(9): 1265-72.
67. World Health Organization, “Review of Evidence on Health Aspects of Air Pollution.” REVIHAAP 2013

68. Zanobetti A, Schwartz J, Dockery DW.”Airborne particles are a risk factor for hospital admissions for heart
and lung disease.” Environ Health Perspect 108:1071-1077, 2000.

69. Zanobetti A, Schwartz J, and Gold D. 2000. “Are there sensitive subgroups for the effects of airborne
particles?” Environ Health Perspect 108, 841-845.

70. Zeka A, Zanobetti A, and Schwartz J. 2006.”Individual-level modifiers of the effects of particulate matter on
daily mortality.” Am J Epidemiol 163, 849-859.

71. Zeka A, Sullivan JR, Vokonas PS, Sparrow D, Schwartz J. Inflammatory markers and particulate air pollution:
characterizing the pathway to disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:1347–1354.

72. Zhu Y, Hinds WC, Kim S, Sioutas C. 2002. Concentration and size distribution of ultrafine particles near a
major highway. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 52(9):1032–1042.

73. Zhu Y, Hinds WC, Kim S, Shen S, Sioutas C. Study of ultrafine particles near a major highway with heavy-
duty diesel traffic. Atmos Environ. 2002;36(27):4323-4335. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00354-0.
 Appendix A-4: Cardiovascular and Neurologic

37 Citations

1…American Heart Association, “Particulate Matter, Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease.” Journal of the
AHA 121:2331-2378, May 10, 2010.

2. Brautbar, N., J. J.A. Williams II, M.P. Wu. Chapter 12. Cardiotoxicity of industrial chemicals and
environmental pollution. Cardiovascular Toxicology, Fourth Edition. D. Acosta Jr. (Ed). Informa Healthcare
USA, Inc. 2008:429-545.

3. Brunekreef B, Beelen R, Hoek G, Schouten L, Bausch-Goldohm S, Fischer P, Armstrong B, Hughes E,

Jerrett M, Van Den
Brandt P, “Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular
mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.” Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar;(139):5-71; discussion
73-89.

4. Delfino RJ, Staimer N, Tjoa T, et al. Circulating biomarkers of inflam mation, antioxidant activity, and platelet
Activation are associated with primary combustion aerosols in subjects with coronary artery disease. Environ
Health Perspect. 2008;116:898 –906.

5. Delfino R, , R. J., C. Sioutas, et al. "Potential role of ultrafine particles in associations between airborne
particle mass and cardiovascular health." Environmental Health Perspectives 113(8): 934-46, 2005.

6. Dockery, DW. (2001) Epidemiologic Evidence of Cardiovascular Effects of Particulate Air Pollution.
Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(Suppl 4): 483-486.

7. Doyle LW. 2008. Cardiopulmonary outcomes of extreme prematurity. Semin Perinatol 32(1):28–34.

8. Finkelstein MM, Verma DK, Sahai D, Stefov E. “Ischemic heart disease mortality among heavy equipment
operators.” J Ind Med. 2004;46(1):16–22

9. Hong YC, Lee JT, et al. (2002). "Effects of air pollutants on acute stroke mortality." Environmental Health
Perspectives 110(2): 187-91.

10. Ibald-Mulli, A., et al., 2004. Effects of particulate air pollution on blood pressure and heart rate in subjects with
cardiovascular disease: a multicenter approach. Environ. Health Perspect. 112, 369–377.

11 Jerrett M, Burnett RT, et al. (2005). "Spatial analysis of air pollution and mortality in Los Angeles."
Epidemiology 16(6): 727-36.

12. Jerrett M, Burnett RT, et al. (2005). "Spatial analysis of air pollution and mortality in Los Angeles."
Epidemiology 16(6): 727-36.

13. Johnson RL, Jr. (2004). "Relative effects of air pollution on lungs and heart." Circulation 109(1): 5-7.

14. Krewski D, Burnett R, et al. (2005). "Mortality and long-term exposure to ambient air pollution: ongoing
analyses
based on the American Cancer Society cohort." J Toxicology Environmental Health A 68(13-14): 1093-109.

15. Künzli N, Jerrett M, et al. (2005). "Ambient air pollution and atherosclerosis in Los Angeles."
Environmental Health Perspectives 113(2): 201-6.

16. Liao D, Creason J, Shy C, Williams R, Watts R, Zweidinger R, “Daily variation of partuclate air pollution and
poor cardiac autonomic control in the elderly.” Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:521-525.

17. Maheswaran, R. and P. Elliott (2003). "Stroke mortality associated with living near main roads in England and
 Wales: a geographical study." Stroke 34(12): 2776-80.

18. Middleton N, Yiallouros P, Kleanthous S, Kolokotroni O, Schwartz J, Dockery DW, et al. 2008. A 10-year time-
series analysis of respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity in Nicosia, Cyprus:the effect of short-term changes
in air pollution and dust storms. Environ Health 7, 39.

19. Miller KA, Siscovick DS, Sheppard L, Sullivan JH, Anderson GL, Kaufman JD,”Long term Exposure to Air
Pollution and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in Women.” The New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 356
No. 5 February 1, 2007.

20. Mills NL, Tornqvist H, Gonzalez MC, Vink E, Robinson SD, Soderberg S, et al. “Ischemic and thrombotic
effects of dilute diesel-exhaust inhalation in men with coronary heart disease.” N Engl J Med 357:1075-1082,
2007.

21. Mone SM, Gillman MW, Miller TL, Herman EH, Lipshultz SE. 2004. Effects of environmental exposures on
the cardiovascular system: prenatal period through adolescence. Pediatrics 113(4 suppl):1058–1069.

22. Oberdorster, G. and M. J. Utell (2002). "Ultrafine particles in the urban air: to the respiratory tract--and
beyond?" Environmental Health Perspectives 110(8): A440-1.

23. Oberdorster G, Sharp Z, et al. (2004). "Translocation of inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain." Inhalation
Toxicology 16(6-7): 437-45.

24. Peng RD, Bell ML, Geyh AS, McDermott A, Zeger SL, Samet JM, et al. “Emergency admissions for
cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and the chemical composition of fine particle air pollution.”
Environmental health perspectives 117:957-963.

25. Peters A, Pope CA,(2002). "Cardiopulmonary mortality and air pollution." Lancet 360(9341): 1184-5.

26. Pope CA, 3rd, Thun MJ, et al. (1995). "Particulate air pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective
study of U.S. adults." Am J Respiratory Critical Care Med 151(3 Pt 1): 669-74.

27. Pope CA, Burnett RT, et al. (2004). "Cardiovascular mortality and long-term exposure to particulate air
pollution: epidemiological evidence of general pathophysiological pathways of disease." Circulation 109(1):
71-7.

28. Pope C. Arden, Ezzati M, Dockey DW (2009). “Fine-Particulate Air Pollution and Life expectancy in the United
States.” The New England Journal of Medicine Jan 22; 360(4):376-386...

29. Riediker M, Williams R, et al. (2003). "Exposure to particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, and other
air pollutants inside patrol cars." Environmental Science Technology 37(10): 2084-93.

30. Riediker M, Cascio WE, et al. (2004). "Particulate matter exposure in cars is associated with cardiovascular
effects in healthy young men." Am J Respiratory Critical Care Med 169(8):934-40.

31. Ruckerl R, Ibald-Mulli A, Koenig W, et al. Air pollution and markers of inflammation and coagulation in patients
with coronary heart disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:432– 441.

32. Saldiva PH, Clarke RW, Coull BA, et al. Lung inflammation induced by concentrated ambient air particles is
related to particle composition. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:1610 –1617.

33. Saber AT, Bornholdt J, Dybdahl M, et al. Tumor necrosis factor is not required for particle-induced
genotoxicity and pulmonary inflammation. Arch Toxicol. 2005;79:177–182.

34. University of Rochester - Particulate Matter Center (2004). "Ultrafine Particles: Characterization, Health
Effects and Pathophysiological Mechanisms."
35. Utell MJ, Frampton MW. (2000) “Acute Health Effects of Ambient Air Pollution: the Ultrafine Particle
Hypothesis.” Journal of Aerosol Medicine, 13(4): 355-59.

36. Weinhold B. (2004). "Environmental cardiology: getting to the heart of the matter." Environmental Health
Perspectives 112(15): A880-7.

37. WHO. “Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide.” Global update
2005. Summary of risk assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
 Appendix A-5: Reproductive and Developmental

200 Citations

1..Arnould JP, Verhoest P, Bach V, Libert JP, Belegaud J. Detection of benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts in human
Placenta and umbilical cord blood. Hum Exp Toxicol 1997;16:716–21.

2..Banks WA, Farr SA, Morley JE. Entry of blood-borne cytokines into the central nervous system: effects on
Cognitive processes. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2002-2003;10(6):319-327.

3. Becerra TA, Wilhelm M, Olsen J, Cockburn M, Ritz B, “Ambient Air Pollution and Autism in Los Angeles
County, California.” Environ Health Perspect 121:380–386 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205827

4. Bell ML, Ebisu K, Belanger K. Ambient air pollution and low birth weight in Connecticut and Massachusetts.
Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1118 –1124.

5. Bobak M, Leon DA. “Air pollution and infant mortality in the Czech Republic,” 1986-1988.Lancet 340:1010-
1014 (1992).

6. Bobak M. Outdoor air pollution, low birth weight, and prematurity.Environ Health Perspect 2000;108:173–6.

7. Bosetti C, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Gallus S, Cipriani S, La Vecchia C, and Parazzini F. 2010. “Ambient particulate
matter and preterm birth or birth weight: a review of the literature.” Arch Toxicol 84, 447-460.

8. Bouayed J, Desor F, Rammal H, Kiemer AK, Tybl E, Schroeder H, et al. 2009. Effects of lactational exposure
to benzo[alpha]pyrene (B[alpha]P) on postnatal neurodevelopment, neuronal receptor gene expression and
behavior in mice. Toxicology 259(3):97–106.

9. Braunschweig D, Ashwood P, Krakowiak P, Hertz-Picciotto I, Hansen R, Croen LA, et al. 2008. Autism:
maternally derived antibodies specific for fetal brains. Neurotoxicology 29(2):226–231.

10. Brauer M, Lencar C, Tamburic L, Koehoorn M, Demers P, Karr C. 2008. A cohort study of traffic-related air
pollution impacts on birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect 116:680–686.

11. Brown LA, Khousbouei H, Goodwin JS, Irvin-Wilson CV, Ramesh A, Sheng L, McCallister MM, Jiang GC,
Aschner M, Hood DB. Down-regulation of early ionotrophic glutamate receptor subunit developmental
expression as a mechanism for observed plasticity deficits following gestational exposure to benzo(a)pyrene.
Neurotoxicology. 2007;28(5):965-978.

12. Buck L, “Persistant Environmental Pollutants and Couple Feciundity.” Germaine M.; et al. Environmental
Health Perspectives, November 2012. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205301.

13. Bukowski R, Smith GC, Malone FD, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, et al. 2007. “Fetal growth in early
pregnancy and risk of delivering low birth weight infant: prospective cohort study.” Bmj 334, 836.

14. Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Mora-Tiscareño A, Ontiveros E, Gómez-Garza G, Barragán-Mejía G, Broadway J,

et al. 2008. Air pollution, cognitive deficits and brain abnormalities: a pilot study with children and dogs. Brain
Cogn 68(2):117–127.

15. California Air Resources Board (2004). “Particulate Air Pollution and Infant Mortality.” Presentation May 20-
21, 2004.

16. Campbell DB, D’Oronzio R, Garbett K, Ebert PJ, Mirnics K, Levitt P, Persico AM. Disruption of cerebral cortex
MET signaling in autism spectrum disorder. Ann Neurol. 2007;62(3):243-250.

17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2007a. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders-autism and
developmental disabilities monitoring network, 14 sites, United States, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ 56(1):
12–28.
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2007b. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders-autism and

developmental disabilities monitoring network, six sites, United States, 2000. MMWR Surveill Summ 56(1):
1–11.

19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2009. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders-autism and
developmental disabilities monitoring network, United States, 2006. MMWR Surveill Summ 58(10):1–20.

20. Chauhan A, Chauhan V. 2006. Oxidative stress in autism. Pathophysiology 13(3):171–181.

21. Chen L, Bell EM, Caton AR, Druschel CM, Lin S. Residential mobility during pregnancy and the potential for
ambient air pollution exposure misclassification. Environ Res. 2010;110:162–168.

22. Choi H, Jedrychowski W, Spengler J et al. “International studies of prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic
Hydrocarbons and fetal growth.” Environ Health Perspect 2006;114:1744–50.

23. Choi H, Rauh V, Garfinkel R, Tu Y, Perera FP. 2008. Prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons and risk of intrauterine growth restriction. Environ Health Perspect 116:658–665.

24. Clark N, Demers P, Karr C, et al. Effect of early life exposure to air pollution on development of childhood
asthma. Environ Health Perspect 2010; 118: 284–290.

25. Currie J, Neidell M, Schmieder JF. 2009. Air pollution and infant health: lessons from New Jersey. J Health
Econ 28(3):688–703.

26. Darrow LA, Klein M, Flanders WD, Waller LA, Correa A, Marcus M, et al. 2009. “Ambient Air Pollution and
Preterm Birth”: A Time-series Analysis. Epidemiology.

27. De Medeiros AP, Gouveia N, Machado RP, et al. Traffic-related air pollution and perinatal mortality: a case-
control tudy. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:127–132.

28. Dejmek J, Selevan SG, Solansky I, Benes I, Lenicek J, Sram RJ. “Exposure to carcinogenic PAHs in utero
and fetal growth.” Epidemiology 10:S126 (1999).

29. Dejmek J, Selevan SG, Benes I, Solansky I, and Sram RJ. 1999. “Fetal growth and maternal exposure to
particulate matter during pregnancy.” Environ Health Perspect 107, 475-480

30. Dejmek J, Solansky I, Benes I, Lenicek J, Sram RJ. The impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fine
particles on pregnancy outcome. Environ Health Perspect 2000;108:1159–64.

31. Dietz PM, England LJ, Callaghan WM, Pearl M, Wier ML, Kharrazi M. 2007. A comparison of LMP-based and
ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21(suppl 2):62–71.

32. Doyle LW. 1995. Outcome to five years of age of children born at 24–26 weeks’ gestational age in Victoria.
The Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Med J Aust 163(1):11–14.

33. Dubowsky SD, Suh H, Schwartz J, Coull BA, and Gold DR. 2006. “Diabetes, obesity, and hypertension may
enhance associations between air pollution and markers of systemic inflammation.” Environ Health Perspect
114, 992-998.

34. Dugandzic R, Dodds L, Stieb D, and Smith-Doiron M. 2006. “The association between low level exposures to
ambient air pollution and term low birth weight: a retrospective cohort study.” Environ Health 5, 3.

35. Durkin MS, Maenner MJ, Meaney FJ, Levy SE, DiGuiseppi, C, Nicholas JS, et al. 2010. Socioeconomic
inequality in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder: Evidence from a U.S. cross-sectional study. PLoS
One; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011551 [Online 12 July 2010].

36. Edwards SC, Jedrychowski W, Butscher M, Camann D, Kieltyka A, Mroz E, et al. 2010. Prenatal exposure to
airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and children’s intelligence at 5 years of age in a prospective cohort
study in Poland. Environ Health Perspect 118:1326–1331.
37. Engel SA, Erichsen HC, Savitz DA, Thorp J, Chanock SJ, Olshan AF. Risk of spontaneous preterm birth is
Associated with common proinflammatory cytokine polymorphisms. Epidemiology 2005;16:469–77.

38. Enstrom A, Krakowiak P, Onore C, Pessah IN, Hertz-Picciotto I, Hansen RL, et al. 2009a. Increased IgG4
levels in children with autism disorder. Brain Behav Immun 23(3):389–395.

39. Enstrom AM, Lit L, Onore CE, Gregg JP, Hansen RL, Pessah IN, et al. 2009b. Altered gene expression and
function of peripheral blood natural killer cells in children with autism. Brain Behav Immun 23(1):124–133.

40. Filipek PA, Juranek J, Nguyen MT, Cummings C, Gargus JJ. 2004. Relative carnitine deficiency in autism. J
Autism Dev Disord 34(6):615–623.

41. Gardener H, Spiegelman D, Buka SL. 2009. Prenatal risk factors for autism: comprehensive meta-analysis. Br
J Psychiatry 195(1):7–14.

42. Gardener H, Spiegelman D, Buka SL. 2011. Perinatal and neonatal risk factors for autism: a comprehensive
meta-analysis. Pediatrics 128(2):344–355.

43. Gehring U, Wijga AH, Fischer P, de Jongste JC, Kerkhof M, Koppelman GH, et al. 2010. “Traffic-related air
pollution, preterm birth and term birth weight in the PIAMA birth cohort study.” Environ Res 111, 125-135.

44. Gehring U, Wijga AH, Fischer P, de Jongste JC, Kerkhof M, Koppelman GH, et al. 2011. “Traffic-related air
pollution, preterm birth and term birth weight in the PIAMA birth cohort study.” Environ Res 111, 125-135.

45. Ghosh JKC, Wilhelm M, Su J, Goldberg D, Cockburn M, Jerrett M, et al. 2012. Assessing the influence of
traffic-related air pollution on risk of term low birth weight on the basis of land-use-based regression models
and measures of air toxics. Am J Epidemiol 175(12):1262–1274.

46. Ghosh R, Rankin J, Pless-Mulloli T, and Glinianaia S. 2007. “Does the effect of air pollution on pregnancy
outcomes differ by gender? A systematic review.” Environ Res 105, 400-408.

47. Gilboa SM, Mendola P, Olshan AF, Langlois PH, Savitz DA, Loomis D, et al. 2005. “Relation between
ambient air
quality and selected birth defects, seven county study, Texas, 1997-2000. Am J Epidemiol 162, 238-252.

48. Glasson EJ, Bower C, Petterson B, de Klerk N, Chaney G, Hallmayer JF. 2004. Perinatal factors and the
development of autism: a population study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61(6):618–627.

49. Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Bell R, Pless-Mulloli T, and Howel D. 2004. “Particulate air pollution and fetal health:
a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence.” Epidemiology 15, 36-45.

50. Gold DR, Damokosh AI, Pope CA, 3rd, Dockery DW, McDonnell WF, Serrano P, et al. 1999. “Particulate and
ozone pollutant effects on the respiratory function of children in southwest Mexico City.” Epidemiology 10, 8-
16.

51. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. 2008. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet
371(9606):75–84.

52. Gonzalez-Pina R, Escalante-Membrillo C, Alfaro-Rodriguez A, Gonzalez-Maciel A. 2008. Prenatal exposure to

ozone disrupts cerebellar monoamine contents in newborn rats. Neurochem Res 33(5):912–918.

53. Ha EH, Hong YC, Lee BE, Woo BH, Schwartz J, and Christiani DC. 2001. “Is air pollution a risk factor for low
birth weight in Seoul?” Epidemiology 12, 643-648.

54. Hansen C, Neller A, Williams G, and Simpson R. 2006. “Maternal exposure to low levels of ambient air
pollution and preterm birth in Brisbane, Australia.” Bjog 113, 935-941.
55. Hansen CA, Barnett AG, Jalaludin BB, and Morgan GG. 2009. “Ambient air pollution and birth defects in
Brisbane, Australia”. PLoS One 4, e5408.

56. Hansen CA, Barnett AG, Pritchard G. 2008. The effect of ambient air pollution during early pregnancy on fetal
ultrasonic measurements during mid-pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect 116:362–369.

57. Heck JE, Wu J, Meyers TJ, Wilhelm M, Cockburn M, Ritz B,” Childhood cancer and traffic-related air pollution
exposure in pregnancy and early life.” Poster # 29 Abstract # 2531,

58. Herr CEW, Dostal M, Ghosh R, Ashwood P, Lipsett M, Pinkerton KE, et al. 2010b. Air pollution exposure dur
ing critical time periods in gestation and alterations in cord blood lymphocyte distribution: a cohort of livebirths.
Environ Health 9:46; doi:10.1186/1476-069X-9-46 [Online 2 August 2010].

59. Herr CEW, Ghosh R, Dostal M, Skokanova V, Ashwood P, Lipsett M, et al. 2010a. Exposure to air pollution in
critical prenatal time windows and IgE levels in newborns. Pediatr Allergy Immunol; doi: 10.1111/j.1399-
3038.2010.01074.x [Online 1 July 2010].

60. Hertz-Picciotto I, Delwiche L. 2009. The rise in autism and the role of age at diagnosis. Epidemiology
20(1):84–90.

61. Hertz-Picciotto I, Herr CEW, Yap P-S, Dostál M, Shumway RH, Ashwood P, et al. 2005. Air pollution and
lymphocyte phenotype proportions in cord blood. Environ Health Perspect 113:1391–1398.

62. Hertz-Picciotto I, Park H-Y, Dostal M, Kocan A, Trnovec T, Sram R. 2008. Prenatal exposures to persistent
and non-persistent organic compounds and effects on immune system development. Basic Clin Pharmacol
Toxicol 102(2):146–154.

63. Hertz-Picciotto I, Croen LA, Hansen R, Jones CR, van de Water J, Pessah IN. 2006. The CHARGE study: an
epidemiologic investigation of genetic and environmental factors contributing to autism. Environ Health
Perspect 114:1119–1125.

64. Hertz-Picciotto I, Delwiche L. 2009. The rise in autism and the role of age at diagnosis. Epidemiology
20(1):84–90.

65. Hougaard KS, Jensen KA, Nordly P, Taxvig C, Vogel U, Saber AT, et al. 2008. Effects of prenatal exposure
to diesel exhaust particles on postnatal development, behavior, genotoxicity and inflammation in mice. Part
Fibre Toxicol 5:3; doi:10.1186/1743-8977-5-3 [Online 11 March 2008].

66. Huynh M, Woodruff TJ, Parker JD, and Schoendorf KC. 2006. “Relationships between air pollution and
preterm birth in California.“Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 20, 454-461.

67. Ihrig MM, Shalat SL, and Baynes C. 1998. “A hospital-based case-control study of stillbirths and
environmental exposure to arsenic using an atmospheric dispersion model linked to a geographical
information system.” Epidemiology 9, 290-294.

68. Jafarabadi M. 2007. “Episodic air pollution is associated with increased DNA fragmentation in human sperm
without other changes in semen quality.” Hum Reprod 22, 3263; author reply 3264.

69. Jalaludin B, Mannes T, Morgan G, Lincoln D, Sheppeard V, and Corbett S. 2007. “Impact of ambient air
pollution on gestational age is modified by season in Sydney, Australia.” Environ Health 6, 16.

70. James SJ, Cutler P, Melnyk S, Jernigan S, Janak L, Gaylor DW, et al. 2004. Metabolic biomarkers of
increased oxidative stress and impaired methylation capacity in children with autism. Am J Clin Nutr
80(6):1611–1617.

71. James SJ, Melnyk S, Jernigan S, Cleves MA, Halsted CH, Wong DH, et al. 2006. Metabolic endophenotype
and related genotypes are associated with oxidative stress in children with autism. Am J Med Genet B
Neuropsychiatr Genet
141B(8):947–956.
72. James SJ, Rose S, Melnyk S, Jernigan S, Blossom S, Pavliv O, et al. 2009. Cellular and mitochondrial
glutathione redox imbalance in lymphoblastoid cells derived from children with autism. FASEB J 23(8):2374–
2383.

73. Jedrychowski W, Masters E, Choi H, Sochacka E, Flak E, Mroz E, et al. 2007. “Pre-pregnancy dietary vitamin
A intake may alleviate the adverse birth outcomes associated with prenatal pollutant exposure: epidemiologic
cohort study in Poland.” Int J Occup Environ Health 13, 175-180.

74. Jedrychowski W, Perera F, Mrozek-Budzyn D, Mroz E, Flak E, Spengler JD, et al. 2009. “Gender differences
in fetal growth of newborns exposed prenatally to airborne fine particulate matter.” Environ Res 109, 447-456

75. Kalkbrenner AE, Daniels JL, Chen JC, Poole C, Emch M, Morrissey J. 2010. Perinatal exposure to hazardous
air pollutants and autism spectrum disorders at age 8. Epidemiology 21(5):631–641.

76. Kanaka-Gantenbein C, Mastorakos G, and Chrousos GP. 2003. “Endocrine-related causes and
consequences of intrauterine growth retardation.” Ann N Y Acad Sci 997, 150-157.

77. Kannan S, Misra DP, Dvonch JT, and Krishnakumar A. 2006. “Exposures to airborne particulate matter and
adverse perinatal outcomes: a biologically plausible mechanistic framework for exploring potential effect
modification by nutrition.” Environ Health Perspect 114, 1636-1642.

78. Kashima S, Naruse H, Yorifuji T, Ohki S, Murakoshi T, Takao S, et al. 2011. “Residential proximity to heavy
traffic and birth weight in Shizuoka, Japan.” Environ Res.

79. Kavlock RJ, Meyer E, Grabowski CT. 1980. Studies on the developmental toxicity of ozone: Postnatal effects.
Toxicol Lett 5(1):3–9.

80. King M, Bearman P. 2009. Diagnostic change and the increased prevalence of autism. Int J Epidemiol
38(5):1224–1234.

81. Kim OJ, Ha EH, Kim BM, Seo JH, Park HS, Jung WJ, et al. 2007. “PM10 and pregnancy outcomes: a
hospital-based cohort study of pregnant women in Seoul.” J Occup Environ Med 49, 1394-1402.

82. Lacasana M, Esplugues A, Ballester F. Exposure to ambient air pollution and prenatal and early childhood
health effects. Eur J Epidemiol 2005;20:183–99.

83. Landgren O. 1996. “Environmental pollution and delivery outcome in southern Sweden: a study with central
registries.” Acta Paediatr 85, 1361-1364.

84. Lee BE, Ha EH, Park HS, Kim YJ, Hong YC, Kim H, et al. 2003. “Exposure to air pollution during different
gestational phases contributes to risks of low birth weight.” Hum Reprod 18, 638-643.

85. Lee PC, Talbott EO, Roberts JM, Catov Jm, Bilonick RA, Stone RA, Sharma RK, Ritz B, “Ambient air
pollution exposure and blood pressure changes during pregnancy.” Environmental research 117(2012) 46-53.

86. Lee PC, Evelyn O. Talbott,a James M. Roberts,a,b Janet M. Catov,a,b Ravi K. Sharma,c and Beate Ritzd,
“Particulate Air Pollution Exposure and C-reactive Protein During Early Pregnancy.” Epidemiology • Volume
22, Number 4, July 2011

87. Lee SJ, Hajat S, Steer PJ, and Filippi V. 2008. “A time-series analysis of any short-term effects of
meteorological and air pollution factors on preterm births in London, UK.” Environ Res 106, 185-194.

88. Leem JH, Kaplan BM, Shim YK, Pohl HR, Gotway CA, Bullard SM, et al. 2006. “Exposures to air pollutants
during pregnancy and preterm delivery.” Environ Health Perspect 114, 905-910.

89. Levitt P, Campbell DB. The genetic and neurobiologic compass points toward common signaling dysfunctions
in autism spectrum disorders. J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(4):747-754.
90. Li N, Sioutas C, Cho A, Schmitz D, Misra C, Sempf J, et al. 2003. Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce
oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Environ Health Perspect 111:455–460.

91. Li X, Chauhan A, Sheikh AM, Patil S, Chauhan V, Li XM, et al. 2009. Elevated immune response in the brain
of autistic patients. J Neuroimmunol 207(1–2):111–116.

92. Liu S, Krewski D, Shi Y, Chen Y, and Burnett RT. 2003. “Association between gaseous ambient air pollutants
and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vancouver, Canada.” Environ Health Perspect 111, 1773-1778.

93. Liu S, Krewski D, Shi Y, Chen Y, and Burnett RT. 2007. “Association between maternal exposure to ambient
air pollutants during pregnancy and fetal growth restriction.” J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 17, 426-432.

94. Llop S, Ballester F, Estarlich M, Esplugues A, Rebagliato M, and Iniguez C. 2010. “Preterm birth and
exposure to air pollutants during pregnancy.” Environ Res 110, 778-785.

95. Longo LD. The biological effects of carbon monoxide on the pregnant woman, fetus, and newborn infant. Am
J Obstet Gynecol 1977;129:69–103.

96. Madsen C, Gehring U, Walker SE, Brunekreef B, Stigum H, Naess O, et al. 2010.”Ambient air pollution
exposure residential mobility and term birth weight in Oslo, Norway. Environ Res 110, 363-371.

97. Maisonet M, Bush TJ, Correa A, and Jaakkola JJ. 2001. “Relation between ambient air pollution and low birth
weight in the Northeastern United States.” Environ Health Perspect 109 Suppl 3, 351-356.

98. Maisonet M, Correa A, Misra D, and Jaakkola JJ. 2004.”A review of the literature on the effects of ambient air
pollution on fetal growth.” Environ Res 95, 106-115.

99. Mannes T, Jalaludin B, Morgan G, Lincoln D, Sheppeard V, and Corbett S. 2005. “Impact of ambient air
pollution on birth weight in Sydney, Australia.” Occup Environ Med 62, 524-530.

100. Maroziene L, and Grazuleviciene R. 2002. “Maternal exposure to low-level air pollution and pregnancy
outcomes:a population-based study.” Environ Health 1, 6.

101. Marshall EG, Harris G, and Wartenberg D. 2010. “Oral cleft defects and maternal exposure to ambient air
pollutants in New Jersey.” Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 88, 205-215.

102. Ming X, Johnson WG, Stenroos ES, Mars A, Lambert GH, Buyske S. 2009. Genetic variant of glutathione
peroxidase 1 in autism. Brain Dev 32(2):105–109.

103. Ming X, Stein TP, Brimacombe M, Johnson WG, Lambert GH, Wagner GC. 2005. Increased excretion of a
lipid peroxidation biomarker in autism. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 73(5):379–384.

104. Mone SM, Gillman MW, Miller TL, Herman EH, Lipshultz SE. 2004. Effects of environmental exposures on
the cardiovascular system: prenatal period through adolescence. Pediatrics 113(4 suppl):1058–1069.

105. Muhle R, Trentacoste SV, Rapin I. 2004. The genetics of autism. Pediatrics 113(5):e472–e486.

106. Oberdo¨rster G, Elder A, Rinderknecht A. Nanoparticles and the brain: cause for concern? J Nanosci
Nanotechnol. 2009;9(8):4996-5007.

107. Olusanya BO, and Solanke OA. 2011. “Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Maternal Hypertensive
Disorders of Pregnancy in a Developing Country.” Hypertens Pregnancy.

108. Osmond C, and Barker DJ. 2000. “Fetal, infant, and childhood growth are predictors of coronary heart
disease, diabetes, and hypertension in adult men and women.” Environ Health Perspect 108 Suppl 3,
545-553.
109. On IJ, Daniels JL, Goldman BD, Herring AH, Siega-Riz AM, Rogan WJ. 2009. Lactational exposure to

polychlorinated biphenyls, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene and infant

neurodevelopment: an analysis of the pregnancy, infection, and nutrition babies study. Environ Health
Perspect 117:488–494.

110. Parker JD, Woodruff TJ, Basu R, and Schoendorf KC. 2005. “Air pollution and birth weight among term
infants in California.” Pediatrics 115, 121-128.

111. Patel J, Landers K, Li H, Mortimer RH, and Richard K. 2011.”Thyroid hormones and fetal neurological
development.” J Endocrinol 2011. Peters A, Doring A, Wichmann HE, and Koenig W. 1997

112. Perera FP, Rauh V, Tsai WY et al. Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental pollutants on birth
outcomes in a multiethnic population. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111:201–5.

113. Perera FP, Rauh V, Whyatt RM, Tsai WY, Tang D, Diaz D, et al. 2006. Effect of prenatal exposure to
airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on neurodevelopment in the first 3 years of life among inner-city
children. Environ Health Perspect 114:1287–1292.

114. Perera FP, Tang D, Rauh V, Tu YH, Tsai WY, Becker M, et al. 2007. Relationship between polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbon–DNA adducts, environmental tobacco smoke, and child development in the World
Trade Center cohort. Environ Health Perspect 115:1497–1502.

115. Perera FP, Hemminki K, Grzybowska E, Motykiewicz G, Michalska J, Santella RM, Young TL Dickey C,
Brandt-Rauf P, DeVivo I, et al. “Molecular and genetic damage from environmental pollution in Poland.”
Nature 360:256-258 (1992).

116. Perera FP, Jedrychowski W, Rauh V, Whyatt RM. Molecular epidemiologic research on the effects of
environmental pollutants on the fetus. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107 (Suppl 3):451–60.

117. Perera FP, Whyatt RM, Jedrychowski W, Raugh V, Manchester D, Santella RM, Ottman R. “Recent
Developments in molecular epidemiology. A study of the effects of environmental polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons on birth outcomes in Poland.” Am J Epidemiol 147:309-314(1998).

118. Peters A, Veronesi B, Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Gehr P, Chen LC, Geiser M, et al. 2006. Translocation and
potential neurological effects of fine and ultrafine particles a critical update. Part Fibre Toxicol 3:13;
doi:10.1186/1743-8977-3-13 Online 8 September 2006].

119. Petruzzi S, Fiore M, Dell’Omo G, Bignami G, Alleva E. 1995. Medium and long-term behavioral effects in
mice of extended gestational exposure to ozone. Neurotoxicol Teratol 17(4):463–470.

120. Pinkerton KE, Joad JP. 2006. Influence of air pollution on respiratory health during perinatal development.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 33(3):269–272.

121. Pitiphat W, Gillman MW, Joshipura KJ, Williams PL, Douglass CW, Rich-Edwards JW. Plasma C-reactive
protein in early pregnancy and preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:1108 –1113.

122. Ponce NA, Hoggatt KJ, Wilhelm M, Ritz B. 2005. Preterm birth: the interaction of traffic-related air pollution
with economic hardship in Los Angeles neighborhoods. Am J Epidemiol 162(2):140–148.

123. Rich DQ, Demissie K, Lu SE, Kamat L, Wartenberg D, and Rhoads G. 2009. “Ambient air pollutant
concentrations during pregnancy and the risk of fetal growth restriction.” J Epidemiol Community Health
63, 488-496.

124. Rinaudo PF, and Lamb J. 2008. “Fetal origins of perinatal morbidity and/or adult disease.” Semin Reprod
Med 26, 436-445.

125. Risom L, Moller P, and Loft S. 2005.”Oxidative stress-induced DNA damage by particulate air pollution.”
Mutat Res 592, 119-137.
126. Ritz, B, Wilhelm, M, “Air Pollution Impacts on Infants and Children,” UCLA Institute of the Environmental &
Sustainability.

127. Ritz B, Wilhelm M, and Zhao Y. “Air Pollution and infant death in Southern California, 1989-2000.”
Pediatrics 2006. 118:493-502.

128. Ritz B, Wilhelm M. “Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: Methodologic issues in an emerging
field.” Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2008;102:182-190.

129. Ritz B, Wilhelm M, Hoggatt KJ, and Ghosh JK. 2007. “Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the
environment and pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles.” Am J Epidemiol
166, 1045-1052.

130. Ritz B, Wilhelm M, Hoggatt KJ, Ghosh JK. Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the environment and
pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:1045–
1052.

131. Ritz B, Yu F, Chapa G, Fruin S. Effect of air pollution on preterm birth among children born in Southern
California between 1989 and 1993. Epidemiology 2000;11:502–11.

132. Ritz B, and Yu F. 1999. “The effect of ambient carbon monoxide on low birth weight among children born in
southern California between 1989 and 1993.” Environ Health Perspect 107, 17-25.

133. Ritz B, Yu F, Fruin S, Chapa G, Shaw GM, and Harris JA. 2002. “Ambient air pollution and risk of birth
defects in Southern California.” Am J Epidemiol 155, 17-25.

134. Robbins WA, Rubes J, Selevan SG, Perrault SD. “Air pollution and sperm aneuploidy in healthy young
men.” Environ Epidemiol Toxicol 1:125-131 (1999).

135. Rogers JF, Thompson SJ, Addy CL, McKeown RE, Cowen DJ, and Decoufle P. 2000. “Association of very
low birth weight with exposures to environmental sulfur dioxide and total suspended particulates” Am J
Epidemiol 151, 602-613.

136. Rubes J, Selevan SG, Evenson DP, Zudova D, Vozdova M, Zudova Z, et al. 2005. “Episodic air pollution is
associated with increased DNA fragmentation in human sperm without other changes in semen quality.”
Hum Reprod 20, 2776-2783.

137. Rudra C, Williams M. A prospective study of periconceptional ambient air pollutant exposures and
preeclampsia risk. Epidemiology 2006;17:S104.

138. Rudra CB, Williams MA, Sheppard L, Koenig JQ, and Schiff MA. 2011. “Ambient Carbon Monoxide and Fine
Particulate Matter in Relation to Preeclampsia and Preterm Delivery in Western Washington State.” Environ
Health Perspect.

139. Sagiv SK, Mendola P, Loomis D, Herring AH, Neas LM, Savitz DA, et al. 2005. “A time-series analysis of air
pollution and preterm birth in Pennsylvania, 1997-2001.” Environ Health Perspect 113, 602-606.

140. Salam M T, Millstein J, et al. (2005). "Birth outcomes and prenatal exposure to ozone, carbon monoxide,
and particulate matter: results from the Children's Health Study." Environmental Health Perspectives
113(11):1638-44.

141. Schwartz J, Dockery DW, Neas LM, Wypij D, Ware JH, Spengler JD, et al. 1994. “Acute effects of summer
air pollution on respiratory symptom reporting in children.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med 150, 1234-1242.

142. Seo JH, Leem JH, Ha EH, Kim OJ, Kim BM, Lee JY, et al. 2010. “Population-attributable risk of low
birthweight related to PM10 pollution in seven Korean cities. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 24, 140-148.
143. Selevan SG, Borkovec L, Zudova Z, Slott V, Hajnova R, Rubes J, Perrault SD. “Semen quality in young
men and air pollution in two Czech communities.” Epidemiology 6(suppl):S85 (1995)

144. Selevan SG, Lemasters GK. The dose-response fallacy in human reproductive studies of toxic exposures. J
Occup Med 1987;29:451–4.

145. Shah PS, and Balkhair T. 2011. “Air pollution and birth outcomes: a systematic review.” Environ Int 37, 498-
516.

146. Slama R, Darrow L, Parker J, Woodruff TJ, Strickland M, Nieuwenhuijsen M, et al. 2008. “Meeting report:
atmospheric pollution and human reproduction.” Environ Health Perspect 116, 791-798.

147. Slama R, Sinno-Tellier S, Thiebaugeorges O et al. Relation between atmospheric pollutants and head
Circumference in utero and at birth: a cohort study relying on ultrasound imaging during pregnancy.
Epidemiology 2006;17:S129.

148. Slama R, Morgenstern V, Cyrys J, Zutavern A, Herbarth O, Wichmann HE, et al. 2007. Traffic-related
atmospheric pollutants levels during pregnancy and offspring’s term birth weight: a study relying on a land-
use regression exposure model. Environ Health Perspect 115:1283–1292.

149. Smith GC, Crossley JA, Aitken DA et al. First-trimester placentation and the risk of antepartum stillbirth.
JAMA 2004;292:2249–54.

150. Sogut S, Zoroglu SS, Ozyurt H, Yilmaz HR, Ozugurlu F, Sivasli E, et al. 2003. Changes in nitric oxide levels
and antioxidant enzyme activities may have a role in the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in autism.
Clin Chim Acta 331(1–2):111–117.

151. Sokol R Z, Kraft P, et al. (2005). "Exposure To Environmental Ozone Alters Semen Quality." Environmental
Health Perspectives.

152. Somers CM, and Cooper DN. 2009. “Air pollution and mutations in the germline: are humans at risk?’ Hum
Genet 125, 119-130.

153. Somers CM, Yauk CL, White PA, Parfett CL, and Quinn JS. 2002. “Air pollution induces heritable DNA
mutations.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 15904-15907.

154. Sram RJ, Binkova B, Rossner P, Rubes J, Topinka J, Dejmek J.Adverse reproductive outcomes from
exposure to environmental mutagens. Mutat Res 1999;428:203–15.

155. Sram RJ, Binkova B, Dejmek J, Bobak M. Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the
literature. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:375–82.

156. Sram RJ, “Impact of Air Pollution on Reproductive Health,” Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 107,
No. 11, November 1999.

157. Strickland MJ, Klein M, Darrow LA, Flanders WD, Correa A, Marcus M, et al. 2009. “The issue of
confounding in epidemiological studies of ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes.” J Epidemiol
Community Health 63, 500- 504.

158. Suglia SF, Gryparis A, Wright RO, Schwartz J, Wright RJ. 2008. Association of black carbon with cognition
among children in a prospective birth cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 167(3):280–286.

159. Tabacova S, Nikiforov B, Balabaeva L. 1985. Postnatal effects of maternal exposure to nitrogen dioxide.
Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7:785–789.

160. Takeda K, Tsukue N, and Yoshida S. 2004. “Endocrine-disrupting activity of chemicals in diesel exhaust and
 diesel exhaust particles.” Environ Sci 11, 33-45

161. Thompson JN. 2007. “Fetal nutrition and adult hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and coronary artery
disease.” Neonatal Netw 26, 235-240.

162. Thompson MR, Boekelheide Kim. “Mutliple Environmental Chemcical Exposures to Lead, Mercury and
PCBs Among Childbearing-Aged Women.” Environmental Research, February 2013, doi:
10.1016/j.envres.2012.10.005.

163. Tong S and Colditz P. “Air pollution and sudden infant death syndrome: a literature review.” Paediatr
Perinat Epidemiol 2004; 18:327-35.

164. Toppari J, Larsen JC, Christiansen P, Giwercman A, Grandjean P, Guillette LI Jr, Jegou B, Jensen TK,
Jouannet P, Keiding N, et al. “Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens.” Environ Health
Perspect 104(suppl 4):741-803 (1996).

175. Topinka J, Binkova B, Mrackova G, Stavkova Z, Peterka V, Benes I, Dejmek J, Lenicek J, Pilcik T, Sram
RJ. “Influence of GSTM1 and NAT2 genotypes on placental DNA adducts in an environmentally exposed
population.” Environ Mol Mutagen 30:184-195 (1997).

176. Tran DQ, Ide CF, McLachlan JA, and Arnold SF. 1996. “The anti-estrogenic activity of selected polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons in yeast expressing human estrogen receptor.” Biochem Biophys Res Commun 229,
101-108.

177. Van Meter KC, Christiansen LE, Delwiche LD, Azari R, Carpenter TE, Hertz-Picciotto I. 2010. Geographic
distribution of autism in California: a retrospective birth cohort analysis. Autism Res 3(1):19–29.

178. Vassilev ZP, Robson MG, Klotz JB. 2001. Outdoor exposure to airborne polycyclic organic matter and
adverse reproductive outcomes: a pilot study. Am J Ind Med 40(3):255–262.

179. Volk HW, Fred Lurmann; Bryan Penfold;Irva Hertz-Picciotto, PhD; Rob McConnell, MD, “Traffic-Related Air
Pollution, Particulate Matter, and Autism.” JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(1):71-77.

180. Vorherr H. Factors influencing fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:577–88.

181. Wang X, Ding H, Ryan L, Xu X. “Association between air pollution and low birth weight a community-based
study.” Environ Health Perspect 105:514-520 (1997).

182. Wang K, Zhang H, Ma D, Bucan M, Glessner JT, Abrahams BS, et al. 2009. Common genetic variants on
5p14.1 associate with autism spectrum disorders. Nature 459(7246):528–533.

183. Watanabe N, Kurita M. 2001. The masculinization of the fetus during pregnancy due to inhalation of diesel
exhaust. Environ Health Perspect 109:111–119.

184. Wilhelm M. and Ritz B, (2005). "Local variations in CO and particulate air pollution and adverse birth
outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, USA." Environmental Health Perspectives 113(9): 1212-21.

185. Wilhelm M, Ritz B. Residential proximity to traffic and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles County,
California 1996. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:207–216.

186. Williams TA, Mars AE, Buyske SG, Stenroos ES, Wang R, Factura-Santiago MF, et al. 2007. Risk of autistic
disorder in affected offspring of mothers with a glutathione S-transferase P1 haplotype. Arch Pediatr
Adolesc Med 161(4):356–361.

187. Windham GC, Zhang L, Gunier R, Croen LA, Grether JK. 2006. Autism spectrum disorders in relation to
distribution of hazardous air pollutants in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environ Health Perspect 114:1438–
1444.
188. Woodruff T, Morello-Frosch R, Jesdale B. 2008. Air pollution and preeclampsia among pregnant women in
California, 1996–2004 [Abstract]. Epidemiology 19(6):S310.

189. Woodruff TJ, Parker JD, Darrow LA, Slama R, Bell ML, Choi H, et al. 2009. “Methodological issues in
studies of air pollution and reproductive health.” Environ Res 109, 311-320.

190. Woodruff TJ, Grillo J, Schoendorf KC. “The relationship between selected causes of postneonatal infant
mortality and particulate air pollution in the United States.” Environ Health Perspect 05:608-612 (1997).

191. Wyrobek AJ. “Methods and concepts in detecting abnormal reproductive outcomes of paternal origin. In:
Male-Mediated Developmental Toxicity.” (Olsen AF, Mattisson DR, eds.).NewYork:Plenum Press 1994;
1-21.

192. Wu J, Ren C, Delfino RJ, Chung J, Wilhelm M, Ritz B. Association between local traffic-generated air
pollution and preeclampsia and preterm delivery in the south coast air basin of California. Environ Health
Perspect. 2009;117:1773–1779.

193. Xiong, X., Fraser, W.D., 2004. Impact of pregnancy-induced hypertension on birthweight by gestational age.
Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 18, 186–191.

194. Xiong, X., et al., 1999. Impact of pregnancy-induced hypertension on fetal growth. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
180, 207–213.

195. Xu X, Ding H, and Wang X. 1995. “Acute effects of total suspended particles and sulfur dioxides on preterm
delivery: a community-based cohort study.” Arch Environ Health 50, 407-415.

196. Xu X, Sharma RK, Talbott EO, Zborowski JV, Rager J, Arena VC, et al. 2010.”PM10 air pollution exposure
during pregnancy and term low birth weight in Allegheny County,” PA, 1994-2000. Int Arch Occup Environ
Health 84, 251-257.

197. Xu, X, Kan, H, Ha, S, “Ambient Air Pollution and Reproductive Health,” Dept. of Epidemiology,College of
Public Health & Health Professions, University of Florida, Dept. of Environmental Health, School of Public
health, Fudan University, China

198. Yao Y, Walsh WJ, McGinnis WR, Pratico D. 2006. Altered vascular phenotype in autism: correlation with
oxidative stress. Arch Neurol 63(8):1161–1164.

199. Zhang, J., et al., 2007. Blood pressure dynamics during pregnancy and spontaneous preterm birth. Am. J.
Obstet. Gynecol. 197, 162 e1-6.

200. Zhao Q, Liang Z, Tao S, Zhu J, and Du Y. 2011. “Effects of air pollution on neonatal prematurity in
Guangzhou of China: a time-series study.” Environ Health 10, 2.
 Appendix A-6: Cancer

18 Citations

1. Boffetta P. “Human cancer from environmental pollutants: the epidemiological evidence.” Mutation Research.
2006. 608(2):157-62.

2. Boffetta P, Dosemeci M, et al. (2001). "Occupational exposure to diesel engine emissions and risk of cancer
in Swedish men and women." Cancer Causes Control 12(4): 365-74.

3. Cohen AJ. (2003). "Air pollution and lung cancer: what more do we need to know?" Thorax 58(12): 1010-2.

4. EPA,” Health Effects Information Used In Cancer and Noncancer Risk Characterization for the 2005 National-
Scale Assessment.”

5. Grant W, ”Air pollution in relation to U.S. cancer mortality rates: an ecological study; likely role of
carbonaceous aerosols and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.” Anticancer Research. 2009. 29(9):3537-45.

6. Guo J, Kauppinen T, et al. (2004). "Risk of esophageal, ovarian, testicular, kidney and bladder cancers and
leukemia among Finnish workers exposed to diesel or gasoline engine exhaust." Int J Cancer 111(2): 286-92.

7. Mack T. (2006). "Cancers in the Urban Environment." Presentation to the Southern California Association of
Governments, January 18, 2006. Book published by Elsevier Academic Press.

8. Mack T. (2005). "Cancers in the Urban Environment." Presentation at NIEHS Town Meeting February 2005.
Book published by Elsevier Academic Press.

9. Nafstad P, Haheim LL, et al. (2003). "Lung cancer and air pollution: a 27 year follow up of 16 209 Norwegian
men." Thorax 58(12): 1071-6.

10. Nicolich MJ, Gamble JF, (2001). "Urban air pollution and lung cancer in Stockholm." Epidemiology 12(5): 590-
2.

11. Pope CA, 3rd, Burnett RT, et al. (2002). "Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to
fine particulate air pollution." Jama 287(9): 1132-41

12. Raaschou-Nielson, O. et al. “Air pollution from traffic and risk for lung cancer in three Danish cohorts.” Cancer
Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2010. 19(5):1284-91.

13. Raaschou-Nielsen, O. et al.” Lung Cancer Incidence and Long-Term Exposure to Air Pollution from Traffic.”
Environmental Health Perspectives. 2011 Jan 12.

14. Roosli M, Kunzli N, et al. (2003). "Single pollutant versus surrogate measure approaches: do single pollutant
risk assessments underestimate the impact of air pollution on lung cancer risk?" J Occup Environ Med 45(7):
715-23.

15. South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) (1999). "Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES-
II)."

16. South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) (2008). "Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES-
III)."

17. Turner M, et al. “Long-Term Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Lung Cancer in a Large Cohort
of Never Smokers.” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. Published ahead of print on
October 6, 2011.
18. Vineis P, Forastiere F, et al. (2004). "Outdoor air pollution and lung cancer: recent epidemiologic evidence."
Int J Cancer 111(5): 647-52.
 Appedndix A-7: Health Assessment & Monitoring

86 Citations

1…Anderson HR, Spix C, Medina S, Schouten JP, Castellsague J, Rossi G, Zmirou D, Touloumi G, Wojtyniak B,
Ponka A, et al, “Air pollution and daily admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 6 European
cities: results from the APHEA project.” Eur Respir J. 1997 May;10(5):1064–1071.

2. Bates DV, Baker-Anderson M, Sizto R. “Asthma attack periodicity: a study of hospital emergency visits in
Vancouver.” Environ Res. 1990 Feb;51(1):51–70.

3. Bates DV, Sizto R. “Hospital admissions and air pollutants in southern Ontario: the summer acid haze effects.”
Environ Res 43:317-331 (1987).

4. Burnett RT, Brook JR, Yung WT, Dales RE, Krewski D. “Association between ozone and hospitalization for
respiratory diseases in 16 Canadian cities.” Environ Res. 1997 Jan;72(1):24–31

5. Burnett RT, Cakmak S, Brook JR, and Krewski D. “The role of particulate size and chemistry in the association
between summertime ambient air pollution and hospitalization for cardiorespiratory diseases.” Environ Health
Perspect 1997: 105(6): 614–620.

6. Burnett RT, Dales RE, Raizenne ME, Krewski D, Summers PW, Roberts GR, Raad-Young M, Dann T, Brook
J. “Effects of low ambient levels of ozone and sulfates on the frequency of respiratory admissions to Ontario
hospitals.” Environ Res. 1994 May;65(2):172–194.

7. Burnett RT, Dales R, Krewski D, Vincent R, Dann T, Brook JR. “Associations between ambient particulate
sulfate and admissions to Ontario hospitals for cardiac and respiratory diseases.” Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Jul
1;142(1):15–22.

8. Burnett RT, Smith-Doiron M, Stieb D, Cakmak S, Brook JR. “Effects of particulate and gaseous air pollution
on cardiorespiratory hospitalizations. Arch Environ Health.” 1999 Mar-Apr;54(2):130–139.

9. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2010b. National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR).
Registry Plus, a suite of publicly available software programs for collecting and processing cancer registry
data. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/ [accessed 8 December 2012].

10. Cohen AJ, Anderson HR, Ostro B, Pandey KD, Krzyzanowski M, Kunzli N, Gutschmidt K, Pope CA, Romieu
I, Samet J M, Smith KR, “Mortality impacts of urban air pollution. In Comparative Quantification of Health
Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Due To Selected Major Risk Factors,” Ezzati M, Lopez AD,
Rodgers A, Murray CJL, Eds.; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2004; Vol. 2, pp 1353–1394.

11. Dean B, Calimlim B, Kinderman S, et al. The impact of uncontrolled asthma on absenteeism and health
related quality of life. J Asthma 2009; 46: 861–866.

12. Delfino RJ, Becklake MR, Hanley JA, Singh B. “Estimation of unmeasured particulate air pollution data for an
epidemiological study of daily respiratory morbidity.” Environ Res. 1994 Oct;67(1):20–38.

13. Delfino RJ, Murphy-Moulton AM, Burnett RT, Brook JR, Becklake MR. “Effects of air pollution on emergency
 room visits for respiratory illnesses in Montreal, Quebec.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Feb;155(2):

568–576

14. Dockery DW, Schwartz J, Spengler JD, “Ir pollution and daily mortality: associations with particulates and
acid aerosols.” Environ Res. 1992 Dec;59(2):362-73.

15. Dockery DW, Pope CA, 3rd, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, Ferris BG, Jr, Speizer FE. “An
association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities.” N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 9;329(24):1753–
1759.

16. Galan I, Tobías A, Banegas JR, Aránguez E, “Short-term effects of air pollution on daily asthma emergency
Room Admissions. “ Eur Respir J. 2003 Nov;22(5):802-8.

17. Goldberg MS, Burnett RT, Bailar JC 3rd, Tamblyn R, Ernst P, Flegel K, Brook J, “Identification of persons
With cardiorespiratory conditions who are at risk of dying from the acute effects of ambient air particles. “
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Aug;109 Suppl 4:487-94.

18. Goldsmith JR, Griffith HL, Detels R, Beeser S, Neumann L, “Emergency room admissions, meteorologic
variables, and air pollutants: a path analysis.” Am J Epidemiol 118:759-778(1983).

19. Gouveia N, Fletcher T, “Time series analysis of air pollution and mortality: effects by cause, age and
socioeconomic status Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Oct;54(10):750-5.

20. Grineski S, Bolin B, Boone C. 2007. Criteria air pollution and marginalized populations: environmental
inequity in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. Soc Sci Q 88(2);535–554.

21. Hoggatt K, Flores M, Solorio R, Wilhelm M, Ritz B. 2012. The “Latina Epidemiologic Paradox” revisited: The
role of birthplace and acculturation in predicting infant low birth weight for Latinas in Los Angeles, CA. J
Immigr Minor Health 4(5):875–884.

22. Hubbell BJ, Hallberg A, McCubbin DR, and Post E. “Health-related benefits of attaining the 8-hr ozone
standard.” Environ Health Perspect 2005:113(1): 73–82.

23. Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR et al, “Disease Control in Develping Countries.” The Disease Control
Priorities Project, http://www.dcp2.org.

24. Laurent O, Pedrono G, Segala C, et al. Air pollution, asthma attacks, and socioeconomic deprivation: a small-
area case-crossover study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:58–65.

25. Lin S, Bell EM, Liu W, Walker RJ, Kim NK, and Hwang SA. “Ambient ozone concentration and hospital
admissions due to childhood respiratory diseases in New York State,” 1991–2001. Environ Res 2008:
108(1): 42–47

26. Lin S, Jones R, Pantea C, Ozkaynak H, Rao ST, Hwang S, Garcia VC, “Impact of NOx emissions reductions
policy on hospitalizations for respiratory disease in New York. “ Journal of Exposure Science and
Environmental Epidemiology (2013) 23, 73–80.

27. Lipfert FW, Hammerstrom T. “Temporal patterns in air pollution and hospital admissions.” Environ Res. 1992
Dec;9(2):374–399.

28. Lippmann M, Ito K, Nádas A, Burnett RT, “Association of particulate matter components with daily mortality
and mortality in urban populations.” Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2000 Aug;(95):5-72, discussion 73-82.

29. Lipsett M, Hurley S, Ostro B. Air pollution and emergency room visits for asthma in Santa Clara County,
California. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Feb;105(2):216–222.
30. Lipsett MJ, Tsai FC, Roger L, Woo M, Ostro BD, “Coarse particles and heart rate variability among older with
Coronary artery disease in the Coachella Valley, California.” Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Aug;114(8):1215-
20.

31. Lipsett MJ, Ostro BD, Reynolds P, Goldberg D, Hertz A, Jerrett M, Smith DF, Garcia C, Chang ET, Bernstein
L. “Long term exposure to air pollution and cardiorespiratory disease in the California teachers study cohort.”
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct 1;184(7):828-35. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201012-2082OC.

32. Lobdell DT, Isakov V, Baxter L, Touma JS, Smuts MB, and Özkaynak H. “Feasibility of assessing public
health impacts of air pollution reduction programs on a local scale: New Haven case study.” Environ Health
Perspect2011: 119(4): 487–493.

33. Lutz LJ, “Health effects of air pollution measured by outpatient visits.” J Fam Pract. 1983 Feb;16(2):307-13.

34. Malig BJ, Ostro BD, “Coarse particles and mortality: evidence from a multi-city study in California..” Occup
Environ Med. 2009 Dec;66(12):832-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.045393. Epub 2009 Jul 30.

35. Moolgavkar SH, Luebeck EG, Anderson EL. “Air pollution and hospital admissions for respiratory causes in
Minneapolis-St. Paul and Birmingham.” Epidemiology. 1997 Jul;8(4):364–370.

36. Moolqavkar SH, Luebeck EG, “A critical review of the evidence on particulate air pollution and mortality.”
Epidemiology. 1996 Jul;7(4):420-8.

37. Moore C, Uyeda K, Cuevas Y, et al. Los Angeles Unified School District’s comprehensive asthma program:
results show decreased asthma symptoms and missed school days among students with asthma. NASN Sch
Nurse 2010; 25: 210–212.

38. Morgan G, Corbett S, Wlodarczyk J. “Air pollution and hospital admissions in Sydney, Australia, 1990 to
1994.” Am J Public Health. 1998 Dec;88(12):1761–1766.

39. Nevalainen J, Pekkanen J. “The effect of particulate air pollution on life expectancy.” Sci Total Environ. 1998
Jun 30;217(1-2):137–141.

40. Ostro BD. “Associations between morbidity and alternative measures of particulate matter.” Risk Anal. 1990
Sep;10(3):421–427.

41. Ostro BD, Rothschild S. “Air pollution and acute respiratory morbidity: an observational study of multiple
pollutants.” Environ Res. 1989 Dec;50(2):238–247.

42. Ostro BD, Hurley S, Lipsett MJ, “Air pollution and daily mortality in the Coachella Valley, California: a study of
PM10 dominated by coarse particles> “Environ Res. 1999 Oct;81(3):231-8.

43. Ostro BD, “Air pollution and morbidity: a sensitivity analysis of alternative monitors, pollutants, and averaging
times.” Sci Total Environ. 1984 Oct;39(1-2):111-24.

44. Ostro BD, Lipsett MJ, Wiener MB, Selner JC. “Asthmatic responses to airborne acid aerosols.” Am J Public
Health. 1991 Jun;81(6):694–702.

45. Ostro BD, Lipsett MJ, Mann JK, Krupnick A, Harrington W. “Air pollution and respiratory morbidity among
adults in southern California.” Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Apr 1;137(7):691–700.

46. Ostro BD, Broadwin R, Lipsett MJ, “Coarse and fine particles and daily mortality in the Coachella Valley,
California: a follow-up study.” J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2000 Sep-Oct;10(5):412-9.
47. Ostro BD, Roth LA, Green RS, Basu R, “Estimating the mortality effect of the July 2006 California heat wave.
Environ Res 2009. Jul;109(5):614-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 Apr 25.

48. Ostro BD, “Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in two Southern California counties.” Emviron Res. 1995
Aug:70(2):98-104.

49. Ostro BD, Feng WY, Broadwin R, Green S, Lipsett M, “The effects of components of fine particulate air
pollution on Mortality in California: results from CALFINE.” Environ Health Perspect . 2007 Jan;115(1):13-9.

50. Ostro BD, Tran H, Levy JI, “The health benefits of reduced tropospheric ozone in California.” J Air Waste
Manag Assoc 2008 Ju ;56(7):1007-21.

51. Peel J.L., Metzger K.B., Klein M., et al. “Ambient air pollution and cardiovascular emergency department
visits in potentially sensitive groups.” Am J Epidemiol 2007: 165(6): 625–633

52. Peters A, Döring A, Wichmann HE, Koenig W. “Increased plasma viscosity during an air pollution episode:
a link to mortality?” Lancet. 1997 May 31;349(9065):1582–158

53. Peters JM, Avol E, Navidi W, London SJ, Gauderman WJ, Lurmann F, Linn WS, Margolis H, Rappaport E,
Gong H, et al. “A study of twelve Southern California communities with differing levels and types of air
pollution. Prevalence of respiratory morbidity.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Mar;159(3):760–767.

54. Pope CA, 3rd, Schwartz J, Ransom MR. “Daily mortality and PM10 pollution in Utah Valley.Arch Environ
Health.” 1992 May-Jun;47(3):211–217

55. Pope CA, 3rd, Thun MJ, Namboodiri MM, Dockery DW, Evans JS, Speizer FE, Heath CW, “Particulate air
pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective study of U.S. adults.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995
Mar;151(3 Pt 1):669–674

56. Pope CA, “Respiratory hospital admissions associated with PM1O pollution in Utah, Salt Lake, and Cache
Valleys.” Arch Environ Health 46:90-97 (1991).

57. Pope CA, 3rd, Kalkstein LS. “Synoptic weather modeling and estimates of the exposure-response
relationship between daily mortality and particulate air pollution.” Environ Health Perspect. 1996
Apr;104(4):414–420.

58. Ransom MR, Pope CA 3rd, “Elementary school absences and PM10 pollution in Utah Valle” Environ Res.
1992 Aug;58(2):204-19.

59. Romieu I, Lugo MC, Velasco SR, Sanchez S, Meneses F, Hernandez M, “Air pollution and school
absenteeism among children in Mexico City, “ Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Dec 15;136(12):1524-31.

60. Samet JM, Speizer FE, Bishop Y, Spengler JD, Ferris BG Jr., “The relationship between air pollution and
emergency room visits in an industrial community.” J Air Pollut Control Assoc 31:236-240 (1981).

61. Schwartz J, Slater D, Larson TV, Pierson WE, Koenig JQ, “Particulate air pollution and hospital emergency
visits for asthma in Seattle.” Am Rev Respir Dis 147:826-831 (1993).

62. Schwartz J. “Particulate air pollution and daily mortality in Detroit.” Environ Res. 1991 Dec;56(2):204–213.

63. Schwartz J. “Air pollution and daily mortality in Birmingham, Alabama.” Am J Epidemiol. 1993 May
15;137(10):1136–1147. [PubMed]
64. Schwartz J, “Air pollution and hospital admissions for respiratory disease.” Epidemiology. 1996 Jan;7(1):20-8.

65. Schwartz J. “Total suspended particulate matter and daily mortality in Cincinnati, Ohio.” Environ Health
Perspect. 1994 Feb;102(2):186–189.

66. Schwartz J, Dockery DW. “Particulate air pollution and daily mortality in Steubenville, Ohio.” Am J
Epidemiol. 1992 Jan 1;135(1):12–25.

67. Schwartz J, Dockery DW. “Increased mortality in Philadelphia associated with daily air pollution
concentrations.” Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Mar;145(3):600–604.

68. Schwartz J, Dockery DW, Neas LM. “Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles?” J Air Waste
Manag Assoc. 1996 Oct;46(10):927–939.

69. Schwartz J, Marcus A. “Mortality and air pollution in London: a time series analysis.” Am J Epidemiol. 1990
Jan;131(1):185–194

70. Sunyer J, Anto JM, Murillo C, Saez M, “Effects of urban air pollution on emergency room admissions for
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.” AmJ Epidemiol 134:277-286 (1991).

71. Thurston GD, Ito K, Kinney PL, Lippmann M. “A multi-year study of air pollution and respiratory hospital
admissions in three New York State metropolitan areas: results for 1988 and 1989 summers.” J Expo Anal
Environ Epidemiol. 1992 Oct-Dec;2(4):429–450.

72. Thurston GD, Ito K, Hayes CG, Bates DV, Lippmann M. “Respiratory hospital admissions and summertime
haze air pollution in Toronto, Ontario: consideration of the role of acid aerosols.” Environ Res. 1994
May;65(2):271–290

73. Tinkelman D, Khandker R, Calimlim B, et al. Absenteeism from school or work among uncontrolled asthma
patients. Pediatric Asthma 2007; 132: 484a.

74. Wilhelm M, Meng YY, Rull RP, English P, Balmes J, Ritz B. Environmental public health tracking of childhood
asthma using California Health Interview Survey, traffic, and outdoor air pollution data. Environ Health
Perspect. 2008;116:1254–1260.

75. Wolstein J, Meng YY, Babey S. Income disparities in asthma burden and care in California. UCLA Center for
Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, CA, 2010 www.healthpolicy.ucla.edu/pubs/files/asthma-burden-report-
1210.pdf Date last accessed: April 23, 2012.

76. Woodruff TJ, Grillo J, Schoendorf KC. “The relationship between selected causes of postneonatal infant
mortality and particulate air pollution in the United States.” Environ Health Perspect.1997 Jun;105(6):608–612

77. Wordley J, Walters S, Ayres JG. “Short term variations in hospital admissions and mortality and particulate air
pollution.” Occup Environ Med. 1997 Feb;54(2):108–116.

78. World Health Organization. “Global environmental monitoring system-urban air pollution, 1973-80.” London:
University of London, 1984.
79. Xu X, Li B, Huang H, “Air pollution and unscheduled hospital outpatient and emergency room visits.” Environ
Health Perspect. 1995 Mar;103(3):286-9.

80. Xu X, Gao J, Dockery DW, Chen YD, “Air pollution and daily mortality in residential areas of Beijing, China.
Arch Environ Health 49:216-222 (1994).

81. Xu X, Dockery DW, Christiani DC, Li BL, Huang HY. “Association of air pollution with hospital outpatient
visits in Beijing.” Arch Environ Health.

83. Yang W, Jennison BL, Omaye ST. Cardiovascular disease hospitalization and ambient levels of carbon
monoxide. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 1998 Oct 9;55(3):185–196.

84. Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. “Air pollution and emergency admissions in Boston, MA.” J Epidemiol Community
Health 2006: 60(10): 890–895.

85. Zeger SL, Dominici F, Samet J. “Harvesting-resistant estimates of air pollution effects on
mortality.” Epidemiology. 1999 Mar;10(2):171–175.

86. Zeka A, Zanobetti A, Schwartz J, “Short term effects of particulate matter on cause specific mortality: effects
of lags and modification by city characteristics.” Occup Environ Med. 2005 Oct;62(10):718-25.

 
 
 
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Women’s Breast Cancer

Bibliography

1.2.2014

37 Citations
 

1..Argo J, “Chronic diseases and early exposure to airborne mixtures: Part III. Potential origin of pre-menopausal
breast cancers, chronic diseases and early exposure to airborne mixtures.” Journal of Exposure Science and
Environmental Epidemiology 20, 147-159 (March/April 2010) doi:10.1038/jes.2009.12

2. Belpomme D, Irigaray P, Hardell L, Clapp R, Montagnier L, Epstein S, Sasco AJ, “The multitude and diversity
of environmental carcinogens.” Environmental Research Volume 105, Issue 3, November 2007, Pages 414–
429.

3. Bidgoli SA, Eftekhari T, Sadeghipour R, “Role of xenoestrogens and endogenous sources of estrogens on the
Occurrence of premenopausal breast cancer in iran.” Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(9):2425-30.

4. Boeglin ML, Wessels D, Henshel D, “An investigation of the relationship between air emissions of volatile
organic compounds and the incidence of cancer in Indiana counties,” Environ Res 2006, 100:242-254

5. Bonner MR, Han D, Nie J, Rogerson P, Vena JE, Muti P, Trevisan M, Edge SB, Freudenheim JL, “Breast
cancer risk and exposure in early life to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using total suspended particulates
as a proxy measure.” Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jan;14(1):53-60.

6. Brody JG, Moysich KB, Humblet O, Attfield KR, Beehler GP, Rudel RA, “Environmental pollutants and breast
cancer:epidemiologic studies.” Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;109(12 Suppl):2667-711.

7. Brody JG, Moysich KB, Humblet O, Attfield KR, Beehler GP, Rudel RA, “Environmental pollutants and breast
cancer:epidemiological studies.” Rev Environ Health 2010 Jan-Mar;25(1):1-7.

8. Brody JG, “Everyday Exposures and Breast Cancer,” Rev Environ Health 2010 Jan-Mar;25(1):1-7.

9. Bryant K, “Impact of Air Pollution on Women's Health,” SAGE Journals, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck
Surgery October 2, 1995.

10. Coyle YM, “The effect of environment on breast cancer risk,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 84:273-
288, 2004.

11. Crouse DL, Goldberg MS, Ross NA, Chen H, LaLbreche F, ”Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Is Associated
with Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution in Montreal, Canada: A Case-Control Study.” Environ Health
Perspect, 2010; 118:1578-1583, Epub Oct 6.

11. Das A, Banerjee S, De A, Haque I, Maity G, McEwen M, Banerjee SK, ”The green tea polyphenol EGCG
Induces mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET) and tumor regression in triple negative breast cancer
(TNBC) cells and mouse xenograft model: Involvement of CCN5.” Poster # 8, Abstract # 4385

12. Freudenheim, Jo L, “Environmental Exposures at Birth and at Menarche and Risk of Breast Cancer,” State
Univ of New York at Buffalo Amherst Annual rept. 1 Jun 2001-31 May 2002.

13. Frumkin H, Hess J, Vindigni S, “Energy and Public Health: The Challenge of Peak Petroleum,” Public Health
 Rep. 2009
Jan-Feb; 124(1): 5–19.
14. Gammon MD, Sagiv SK, Eng SM, Shantakumar S, Gaudet MM, Teitelbaum SL, Britton JA, Terry MB,
Wang LW, Wang Q, Stellman SD, Beyea J, Hatch M, Kabat GC, Wolff MS, Levin B, Neugut AI, Santella RM,
“Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts and breast cancer: a pooled analysis.”
Arch Environ Health. 2004 Dec;59(12):640-9.

15. Graham A, Colditz D, Hunter J, “Cancer prevention: the causes and prevention of cancer.” Cancer Causes
and Control, 1996;7(Suppl 1) and 1997; 8(Suppl 2).

16. Grant WB, “Air Pollution in Relation to U.S. Cancer Mortality Rates: An Ecological Study; Likely Role of
Carbonaceous Aerosols and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons,”International Institute of Anticancer
Research April 2, 2009.

17. Gray J, “State of the Evidence: the Connection Between Breast Cancer and the Environment.” Breast Cancer
Fund, 5th Report 2008.

18. Hang B, “Benzene-derived N2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-deoxyguanosine adduct: UvrABC incision and its

conformation in DNA,” LBNL Paper LBNL-3840E, 8-31-2010

19. Hester RE, Harrison RM, “Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals.” Issues in Environmental Science and Technology

20. Hombach-Klonisch S, Pocar P, Kietz S, Klonisch T, “Molecular Actions of Polyhalogenated Arylhydrocarbons

(PAHs) in Female Reproduction.” Current Medicinal Chemistry, Volume 12, Number 5, March 2005, pp. 599-
616(18).

21. Interagency Breast Cancer and Environmental Research Coordinating Committee (IBCERCC), ”Breast
Cancer and the Environment: Prioritizing Prevention.”

22. Just J, Kobuszewska-Faryna M, Gajl-Peczalska K, Kopczyński J, Kruś S, Maziarka S, Wyszyńska H., PMID:,
“Studies on the composition and carcinogenic properties of substances contained in dust suspended in
atmospheric air. II. Studies on carcinogenic properties of benzene extracts from the atmospheric dust
collected in 10 towns in Poland,“PMID:Rocz Panstow, 1970;21(3):221-39.

23. Lewis EL, JM Melieu, Kallenbach LE, Ju CL, Talbot JO, Orr MF, “Breast Cancer Risk and Residence near
Industry or Traffic in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, Long Island, New York,” Archives of Environmental Health:
An International Journal Volume 51, Issue 4, 1996 pages 255-265.

24. Smith MT, Jones RM, Smith AH, “Benzene Exposure and Risk of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.” Center for
Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.

25. Mordukhovich I, Rossner P, Terry MB, Santella R, Zhang YJ, Hibshoosh H, Memeo L, Mansukhani M, Long
CM, Garbowski G, Agrawal M, Gaudet MM, Steck SE, Sagiv SK, Eng SM, Teitelbaum SL, Neugut AI,
Conway-Dorsey K, Gammon MD, “Associations between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-related
exposures and p53 mutations in breast tumors.” Environ Health Perspect 2010.

26. Morris JJ, Seifter E, “The role of aromatic hydrocarbons in the genesis of breast cancer.”
Med Hypothesis 1992 Jul;38(3):177-84.

27. Musafia-Jeknic T, Mahadevan B, Pereira C, Baird WM, “Long-term effects of a standardized complex mixture
of urban dust particulate on the metabolic activation of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in
human cells in culture.” Toxicol Sci. 2005 Dec;88(2):358-66. Epub 2005 Sep 14.

28. Nie J, Beyea J, Bonner MR, Han D, Vena JE, Rogerson P, Vito D, Muti P, Trevisan M,
Edge SB, Freudenheim JL, “Exposure to traffic emissions throughout life and risk of breast cancer: the

29. Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) study,” Cancer Causes Control. 2007
Nov;18(9):947-55. Epub 2007 Jul 14.
30. Nudelman J, Brynn T, Evans E, Rizzo J, Gray J, Engel C, Walke M, “Policy and Research Recommendations
Emerging from the Scientific Evidence Connecting Environmental Factors and Breast Cancer,” INT JO CCUP
ENVIRON HEALTH 2009;15:79-10.

31. Rorie CH, Richardson SL, Lucas AC, Thomas PA, Gurley, KM, Franks MA, “Styrene compounds induce
apoptosis in triple negative breast cancer cell lines. ”Cell Death & Cancer Therapy, Poster Board # 24
Abstract # 604, AACR Annual Meeting 2013, Washington DC, April6-10, 2013.

32. Sadikovic B, Rodenhiser DI, “Benzopyrene exposure disrupts DNA methylation and growth dynamics
in breast cancer cells,“ Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2006 Nov 1;216(3):458-68. Epub 2006 Jun 30.

33. Sagiv SK, Gaudet MM, Eng SM, Abrahamson PE, Shantakumar S, Teitelbaum SL, Bell P,
Thomas JA, Neugut AI, Santella RM, Gammon MD, “Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts
and survival among women with breast cancer,” Environ Res. 2009 Apr;109(3):287-91. Epub 2009 Jan 31.

34. Saleh F, Abdallah Behbehani, Sami Asfar, Islam Khan and Ghada Ibrahim, “Abnormal Blood Levels of Trace
Elements and Metals, DNA Damage, and Breast Cancer in the State of Kuwait.”

35. Shen M, Lan Q, Zhang L, Li S, Ermeulen R, Rappaport SM, Guo W, Hayes RB, Linet M, Yin S, Yeager
M, Welch R, Forrest MS, “Polymorphisms in genes involved in DNA double-strand break repair pathway and
susceptibility to benzene-induced hematotoxicity,” Oxford Journals Life Sciences & Medicine Carcinogenesis,
Volume 27, Issue 10 Pp. 2083-2089

36. Vrabie CM, Candido A, Van den Berg H, Murk AJ, Van Duursen MBM, Jonker MTO, “Specific in vitro toxicity
of crude and refined petroleum products: 3. Estrogenic responses in mammalian assays.” Environmental
Toxicology and Chemistry, Volume 30, Issue 4, pages 973–980, April 2011.

37. Yilmaz B, Sempebwa J, Mackerer CR, Arcaro KF, Carpenter DO, “Effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-
Containing oil mixtures on generation of reactive oxygen species and cell viability in MCF-7 breast
cancer cells, “ J Toxicol Environ Health 007 Jul;70(13):1108-15.

38. Zheng T, Holford TR, Mayne ST, Owens PH, Ward B, Carter D, Dubrow R, Zahm SH, Boyle P, Tessari J,
“Beta-benzene hexachloride in breast adipose tissue and risk of breast carcinoma,“ Cancer. 1999 May
15;85(10):2212-8.
 
 
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Pregnant Women & Prenatal Air Pollution Health Impacts 
 
Bibliography 
 
10.24.2014 
 
178 Citations 
 
 
1. Abbas I, Garçon G, Saint‐Georges F, Andre V, Gosset P, Billet S, Goff JL, Verdin A, Mulliez P, Sichel F, Shirali P.  
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons within airborne particulate matter (PM(2.5) ) produced DNA bulky stable adducts 
in a human lung cell coculture model.  J Appl Toxicol. 2011 Sep 13. doi: 10.1002/jat.1722.  
 
2. Aguilera I, Garcia‐Esteban R, Iñiguez C, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Rodriguez A, Paez M, et al. Prenatal exposure to traffic‐
related air pollution and ultrasound measures of fetal growth in the INMA Sabadell cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 
2010;118:705–711.  
 
3. Aguilera I, Sunyer J, Fernández‐Patier R, et al . Estimation of outdoor NO(x), NO(2), and BTEX exposure in a cohort of 
pregnant women using land use regression modeling. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42:815–21 
 
4. Alexander FE, Patheal SL, Biondi A, Brandalise S, Cabrera ME, Chan LC, Chen Z, Cimino G, Cordoba JC, Gu LJ, Hussein 
H, Ishii E, Kamel AM, Labra S, Magalhaes IQ, Mizutani S, Petridou E, de Oliveira MP, Yuen P, Wiemels JL, Greaves MF 
(2001). “Transplacental chemical exposure and risk of infant leukemia with MLL gene fusion.” Cancer Res 
61(6):2542‐2546. 
 
5. Archibong AE, Inyang F, Ramesh A, Greenwood M, Nayyar T, Kopsombut P, et al. Alteration of pregnancy related 
hormones and fetal survival in F‐344 rats exposed by inhalation to benzo(a)pyrene. Reprod Toxicol. 2002;16:801–
808.  
 
6. ATSDR (1997) “Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.  Toxicological Profile for Benzene.”  U.S. 
Department of Health and Human Services, September, 1997, Atlanta, GA. 
 
7. Baccarelli A.  Breathe deeply into your genes!: genetic variants and air pollution effects.., Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 
2009 Mar 15;179(6):431‐2. 
  
8. Baccarelli A, Wright RO, Bollati V, Tarantini L, Litonjua AA, Suh HH, Zanobetti A, Sparrow D, Vokonas PS, Schwartz J. 
Rapid DNA methylation changes after exposure to traffic particles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr 
1;179(7):523‐4.  
 
9. Badham HJ, LeBrun DP, Rutter A, Winn LM, “Transplacental benzene exposure increases tumor incidence in mouse 
offspring: possible role of fetal benzene metabolism.” (Children) Carcinogenesis vol.31 no.6 pp.1142–1148, 2010 
 
10. Ballester F, Estarlich M, Iñiguez C, Llop S, Ramón R, Esplugues A, et al. 2010. Air pollution exposure during pregnancy 
and reduced birth size: a prospective birth cohort study in Valencia, Spain. Environ Health 96; doi:[Online 29 January 
2010]10.1186/1476‐069X‐9‐6  
 
11. Barker DJ. Fetal programming of coronary heart disease. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2002;13:364–368.  
 
12. Barker DJ, Martyn CN. 1992. The maternal and fetal origins of cardiovascular disease. J Epidemiol Community Health 
46:8–11[ 
  
13. Bass V, Gordon CJ, Jarema KA, Macphail RC, Cascio WE, Phillips PM, Ledbetter AD, Schladweiler MC, Andrews D, 
Miller D, Doerfler DL, Kodavanti UP.  Ozone Induces Glucose Intolerance and Systemic Metabolic Effects in Young 
and Aged Brown Norway Rats.  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013 Oct 5. pii: S0041‐008X(13)00429‐8. doi: 
10.1016/j.taap.2013.09.029.  
 
14. Bobak M. Outdoor air pollution, low birth weight, and prematurity. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Feb;108(2):173–
176. 
 
15. Bocskay K, Tang D, Orjuela M, et al.  Chromosomal Aberrations in Cord Blood Are Associated with Prenatal Exposure 
to Carcinogenic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons.  Cancer Epidem Biomarkers and  Prev.  Vol. 14, 506‐511, Feb 
2005 
 
16. Bonzini M, Carugno M, Grillo P, Mensi C, Bertazzi PA, Pesatori AC. Impact of ambient air pollution on birth outcomes: 
systematic review of the current evidences. Med Lav. 2010;101:341–363.  
 
17. Boström Carl‐Elis, Gerde Per, Hanberg Annika, Jernström Bengt, Johansson Christer, Kyrklund Titus, Rannug Agneta, 
Törnqvist Margareta, Victorin Katarina, Westerholm Roger. Cancer risk assessment, indicators, and guidelines for 
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Jun;110 (Suppl 3):451–488.  
 
18. Bourc’his D, Proudhon C. Sexual dimorphism in parental imprint ontogeny and contribution to embryonic 
development. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008;282:87–94.  
 
19. Breton MC, Beauchesne MF, Lemiere C, Rey E, Forget A, Blais L. Risk of perinatal mortality associated with asthma 
during pregnancy. Thorax. 2009;64:101–6.  
 
20. Bruner‐Tran KL, Osteen KG. Developmental exposure to TCDD reduces fertility and negatively affects pregnancy 
outcomes across multiple generations. Reprod Toxicol. 2010 
 
21. Buffett P, Jourenkova N, Gustavsson P. 1997. Cancer risk from occupational and environmental exposure to olycyclic 
aromatic hydrocarbons. Cancer Causes Control 8:444–472  
 
22. Calderon‐Garciduenas L, Reed W, Maronpot RR, Henriquez‐Roldan C, Delgado‐Chavez R, Calderon‐Garciduenas A, et 
al. Brain inflammation and Alzheimer’s‐like pathology in individuals exposed to severe air pollution. Toxicol Pathol. 
2004;32:650–8.  
 
23. Castillo P, Ibanez F, Guajardo A, Llanos MN, Ronco AM. Impact of cadmium exposure during pregnancy on hepatic 
glucocorticoid receptor methylation and expression in rat fetus. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44139. doi: 
10.1371/journal.pone.0044139.  
 
24. Chaikind S, Corman H. The impact of low birthweight on special education costs. J Health Econ. 1991 Oct;10(3):291–
311.  
 
25. Choi H, Jedrychowski W, Spengler J, Camann DE, Whyatt RM, Rauh V, et al. International studies of prenatal 
exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fetal growth. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1744–1750.  
 
26. Choi H, Rauh V, Garfinkel R, Tu Y, Perera FP. Prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk 
of intrauterine growth restriction. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:658–65.  
 
27. Ciranni R, Barale R, Marrazzini A, Loprieno N (1988). “Benzene and the genotoxicity of its metabolites I. 
“Transplacental activity in mouse fetuses and in their dams”. Mutat Res 208:61‐67. 
 
28. Corti M, Snyder CA (1996). “Influences of gender, development, pregnancy and ethanol consumption on the 
hematotoxicity of inhaled 10 ppm benzene.” Arch Toxicology 70(3‐4):2009‐2017. 
 
29. Davis DA, Bortolato M, Godar SC, Sander TK, Iwata N, Pakbin P, Shih JC, Berhane K, McConnell R, Sioutas C, Finch CE, 
Morgan TE.  PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e64128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064128. Print 2013.  Prenatal 
exposure to urban air nanoparticles in mice causes altered neuronal differentiation and depression‐like responses. 
 
30. Dejmek J, Selevan SG, Beneš I, Solansky I, Šrám RJ. Fetal growth and maternal exposure to particulate matter during 
pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107:475–480.  
 
31. Dejmek J, Solansky I, Beneš I, Lenicek J, Šrám RJ. The impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fine particles 
on pregnancy outcome. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:1159–1164. 
 
32. Devlin TF, Weeks BJ. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 646–651; 1986. Spline Functions for Logistic Regression Modeling. 
Proceedings of the 11th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. 
 
33. Demarini DM.  Genotoxicity biomarkers associated with exposure to traffic and near‐road atmospheres: a review.  
Mutagenesis. 2013 Sep;28(5):485‐505. doi: 10.1093/mutage/get042. 
34. Edwards TM, Myers JP. Environmental exposures and gene regulation in disease etiology. Environ Health Perspect. 
2007;115:1264–70. 
 
35. Edwards SC, Jedrychowski W, Li Z, Wang Q, Rauh V, Camann D, et al. Prenatal exposure to PAHs and child 
intelligence at age 5. ISEE‐ISEA joint conference; Pasadena, CA. 2008. 
 
36. Estarlich M, Ballester F, Aguilera I, et al. Residential exposure to outdoor air pollution during pregnancy and 
anthropometric measures at birth in a multicenter cohort in Spain. Environ Health Perspect 2011;119:1333–38. 
 
37. European Commission. Directive 2002/49/EC, Relating to The Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise. 
2002. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/noise/directive.htm [accessed 8 May 2011] 
 
38. Fell DB, Dodds L, King WD. Residential mobility during pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2004;18:408–414.  
 
39. Ferguson KK, O'Neill MS,  Meeker JD. Environmental Contaminant Exposures and Preterm Birth: A Comprehensive 
Review. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B: Critical Reviews 
 
40. Fleming JL, Huang TH, Toland AE. The role of parental and grand‐parental epigenetic alterations in familial cancer 
risk. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9116–21.  
 
41. Fredrik’s AM, van Buuren S, Burgmeijer RJ, Meulmeester JF, Beuker RJ, Brugman E, et al. Continuing positive secular 
growth change in the Netherlands 1955–1997. Pediatr Res. 2000;47:316–323.  
 
42. Fustinoni S, Rossella F, Polledri E, Bollati V, Campo L, Byun HM, Agnello L, Consonni D, Pesatori AC, Baccarelli A, 
Bertazzi PA.  Global DNA methylation and low‐level exposure to benzene.  Med Lav. 2012 Mar‐Apr;103(2):84‐95. 
 
43. Gehring U, Wijga AH, Fischer P, de Jongste JC, Kerkhof M, Koppelman GH, et al. Traffic‐related air pollution, preterm 
birth and term birth weight in the PIAMA birth cohort study. Environ Res. 2011;111(1):125–135.  
 
44. Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Bell R, Pless‐Mulloli T, Howel D. Particulate air pollution and fetal health: a systematic review 
of the epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiology. 2004;15:36–45.  
 
45. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, Thornburg KL. 2008. Effect of in utero and early‐life conditions on adult health 
and disease. N Engl J Med 359:61–73 
 
46. Godfrey KM, Barker DJ. 2001. Fetal programming and adult health. Public Health Nutr 4:611–624  
 
47. Gonzalez‐Pina, R. et al. (2008) Prenatal exposure to ozone disrupts cerebellar monoamine contents in newborn rats. 
Neurochem. Res. 33, 912–918 
 
48. Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. Lancet. 2006;368:2167–2178.  
 
49. Groom A, Elliott HR, Embleton ND, Relton CL. Epigenetics and child health: basic principles. Arch Dis Child. 2010  
 
50. Guo L, Byun HM, Zhong J, Motta V, Barupal J, Zheng Y, Dou C, Zhang F, McCracken JP, Diaz A, Marco SG, Colicino S, 
Schwartz J, Wang S, Hou L, Baccarelli AA.  Effects of short‐term exposure to inhalable particulate matter on DNA 
methylation of tandem repeats.  Environ Mol Mutagen. 2014 Jan 17. doi: 10.1002/em.21838.  
 
51. Guxens M, Aguilera I, Ballester F, Estarlich M, Fernández‐Somoano A, Lertxundi A, Lertxundi N, Mendez MA, Tardón 
A, Vrijheid M, Sunyer J; INMA (INfancia y Medio Ambiente) Project. Prenatal exposure to residential air pollution and 
infant mental development: modulation by antioxidants and detoxification factors. Environ Health Perspect. 2012 
Jan;120(1):144‐9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103469. Epub 2011 Aug 25. 
 
52. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and 
femur measurements – a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:333–337.  
 
53. Hairston IS, Waxler E, Seng JS, Fezzey AG, Rosenblum KL, Muzik M. The role of infant sleep in intergenerational 
transmission of trauma. Sleep. 2011;34(10):1373–1383. doi: 10.5665/SLEEP.1282.]  
 
54. Hansen CA, Barnett AG, Pritchard G. The effect of ambient air pollution during early pregnancy on fetal ultrasonic 
measurements during mid‐pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:362–369.  
 
55. Hansen C, Neller A, Williams G, Simpson R. Low levels of ambient air pollution during pregnancy and fetal growth 
among term neonates in Brisbane, Australia. Environ Res. 2007;103:383–389.  
 
56. Harper BL, Sadagopa Ramanujam VM, Legator MS (1989). “Micronucleus formation by benzene, cyclophosphamide, 
Benzo(a)pyrene, and benzidine in male, female, pregnant female, and fetal mice.” Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 9:239‐
252. 
 
57. Herbstman JB, Tang D, Zhu D, Perera FP. Prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and CpG 
methylation. International society for environmental epidemiology. 21st ISEE conference: food, environment and 
global health; 2009. 
 
58. Herbstman JB, Tang D, Zhu D, Qu L, Sjödin A, Li Z, et al. 2012. Prenatal Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic 
Hydrocarbons, Benzo[a]pyrene–DNA Adducts, and Genomic DNA Methylation in Cord Blood. Environ Health 
Perspect 120:733‐738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104056 
 
59. Herr CE, Dostal M, Ghosh R, Ashwood P, Lipsett M, Pinkerton KE, Sram R, Hertz‐Picciotto I.  Air pollution exposure 
during critical time periods in gestation and alterations in cord blood lymphocyte distribution: a cohort of livebirths.  
Environ Health. 2010 Aug 2;9(1):46. 
 
60. Hood DB, Nayyar T, Ramesh A, Greenwood M, Inyang F. Modulation in the developmental expression profile of Sp1 
subsequent to transplacental exposure of fetal rats to desorbed benzo[a]pyrene following maternal inhalation. Inhal 
Toxicol. 2000;12:511–35.  

61. Ho SM, Johnson A, Tarapore P, Janakiram V, Zhang X, Leung YK. Environmental epigenetics and its implication on 
disease risk and health outcomes. ILAR J. 2012;53(3‐4):289‐305. doi: 10.1093/ilar.53.3‐4.289. 
 
62. Hou L, Zhang X, Dioni L, Barretta F, Dou C, Zheng Y, Hoxha M, Bertazzi PA, Schwartz J, Wu S, Wang S, Baccarelli AA.  
Inhalable particulate matter and mitochondrial DNA copy number in highly exposed individuals in Beijing, China: a 
repeated‐measure study.  Part Fibre Toxicol. 2013 Apr 29;10(1):17.  
 
63. Huang YC, Schmitt M, Yang Z, Que LG, Stewart JC, Frampton MW, Devlin RB.  Gene expression profile in circulating 
mononuclear cells after exposure to ultrafine carbon particles.  Inhal Toxicol. 2010 May 27.  
 
64. Hutt AM, Kalf GF (1996). “Inhibition of human DNA topoisomerase II by hydroquinone and pbenzoquinone, reactive 
metabolites of benzene.” Environmental Health Perspectives 104(Suppl 6): 1265‐1269. 
 
65. Iñiguez C, Ballester F, Estarlich M, et al . Estimation of personal NO2 exposure in a cohort of pregnant women. Sci 
Total Environ 2009;407:6093–99. 
 
66. Jaddoe V, van Duijn C, van der Heijden A, Mackenbach J, Moll H, Steegers E, et al. The Generation R Study: design 
and cohort update 2010. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:823–841.  
 
67. Janssen BG, Godderis L, Pieters N, Poels K, Kici Ski M, Cuypers A, Fierens F, Penders J, Plusquin M, Gyselaers W, 
Nawrot TS.  Placental DNA hypomethylation in association with particulate air pollution in early life.  Part Fibre 
Toxicol. 2013 Jun 7;10(1):22.  
 
68. Janssen BG, Munters E, Pieters N, Smeets K, Cox B, Cuypers A, et al. 2012. Placental Mitochondrial DNA Content and 
Particulate Air Pollution During in Utero Life. Environ Health Perspect :‐. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104458 
 
69. Jedrychowski W1, Whyatt RM, Camann DE, Bawle UV, Peki K, Spengler JD, Dumyahn TS, Penar A, Perera FF. Effect of 
prenatal PAH exposure on birth outcomes and neurocognitive development in a cohort of newborns in Poland. 
Study design and preliminary ambient data. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2003;16(1):21‐9. 
 
70. Jedrychowski WA, Perera FP, Maugeri U, Mroz E, Klimaszewska‐Rembiasz M, Flak E, Edwards S, Spengler JD.  Effect 
of prenatal exposure to fine particulate matter on ventilatory lung function of preschool children of non‐smoking 
mothers.  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;24(5):492‐501. 
 
71. Jedrychowski W, Bendkowska I, Flak E, Penar A, Jacek R, Kaim I, et al. Estimated risk for altered fetal growth resulting 
from exposure to fine particles during pregnancy: an epidemiologic prospective cohort study in Poland. Environ 
Health Perspect. 2004;112:1398–1402.  
 
72. Jedrychowskia W,  et al.  Gender differences in fetal growth of newborns exposed prenatally to airborne fine 
particulate matter.  DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.01.009 
 
73. Jedrychowski WA, Perera FP, Spengler JD, Mroz E, Stigter L, Flak E, Majewska R, Klimaszewska‐Rembiasz M, Jacek R.  
Intrauterine exposure to fine particulate matter as a risk factor for increased susceptibility to acute broncho‐
pulmonary infections in early childhood.  Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2013 Jan 16. pii: S1438‐4639(12)00150‐2. doi: 
10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.12.014.  
 
74. Kanaka‐Gantenbein C. Fetal origins of adult diabetes. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2010;1205:99–105.  
 
75. Kannan S, Misra DP, Dvonch JT, Krishnakumar A. Exposures to airborne particulate matter and adverse perinatal 
outcomes: a biologically plausible mechanistic framework for exploring potential effect modification by nutrition. 
Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1636–1642. 
 
76. Keller KA, Snyder CA (1986). “Mice exposed in utero to low concentrations of benzene exhibit enduring changes in 
their colony forming hematopoietic cells.” Toxicology 42:171‐181. 
 
77. Keller KA, Snyder CA (1988). “Mice exposed in utero to 20 ppm benzene exhibit altered numbers of recognizable 
hematoppietic cells up to seven weeks after exposure.” Fundamental Appl Toxicology 10(2):224‐232. 
 
78. Kim E, Park H, Hong YC, Ha M, Kim Y, Kim BN, Kim Y, Roh YM, Lee BE, Ryu JM, Kim BM, Ha EH. Prenatal exposure to 
PM₁₀ and NO₂ and children's neurodevelopment from birth to 24 months of age: mothers and Children's 
Environmental Health (MOCEH) study. Sci Total Environ. 2014 May 15;481:439‐45. doi: 
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.107. Epub 2014 Mar 12. 
 
79. Kim OJ, Ha EH, Kim BM, Seo JH, Park HS, Jung WJ, et al. PM10 and pregnancy outcomes: a hospital‐based cohort 
study of pregnant women in Seoul. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49:1394–402.  
 
80. Koehler C, Thielen S, Ginzkey C, Hackenberg S, Scherzed A, Burghartz M, Paulus M, Hagen R, Kleinsasser NH.  
Nitrogen dioxide is genotoxic in urban concentrations.  Inhal Toxicol. 2013 May 23.  
81. Lacasaña M, Esplugues A, Ballester F. Exposure to ambient air pollution and prenatal and early childhood health 
effects. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20:183–199.  
 
82. Latini G, De Lelice C, Presta G, Vecchio AD, Paris I, Ruggieri F, et al. In utero exposure to di‐(2‐ethylhexyl)phthalate 
and duration of human pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1783–5.  
 
83. Lin CM, Li CY, and Mao IF. 2004.” “Increased risks of term low‐birth‐weight infants in a petrochemical industrial city 
with high air pollution levels.” Arch Environ Health 59, 663‐668. 
 
84. Liu S, Krewski D, Shi Y, Chen Y, Burnett RT. Association between maternal exposure to ambient air pollutants during 
pregnancy and fetal growth restriction. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007;17:426–32.  
 
85. Ljubimova JY, Kleinman MT, Karabalin NM, Inoue S, Konda B, Gangalum P, Markman JL, Ljubimov AV, Black KL.  Gene 
expression changes in rat brain after short and long exposures to particulate matter in Los Angeles basin air: 
Comparison with human brain tumors.  Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2013 May 17. pii: S0940‐2993(13)00054‐7. doi: 
10.1016/j.etp.2013.04.002.  
 
86. Lo CL1, Zhou FC2. Environmental alterations of epigenetics prior to the birth. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2014;115:1‐49. doi: 
10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐801311‐3.00001‐9. 
 
87. Lowengart RA, Peters JM, Cicioni C, Buckley J, Bernstein L, Preston‐Martin S, Rappaport E (1987). “Childhood 
leukemia and occupational and home exposures.” JNCI 79:39‐46. 
 
88. Lucas A, Fewtrell MS, Cole TJ. 1999. Fetal origins of adult disease—The hypothesis revisited. BMJ 319:245–249 
 
89. Madrigano J,  Baccarelli A,  Mittleman MA,  Wright RO,  Sparrow D,  Vokonas PS,  Tarantini  L, and  Schwartz J.  
Prolonged exposure to particulate pollution, genes associated with glutathione pathways, and DNA methylation in a 
cohort of older men. Environmental Health Perspectives http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002773. 
 
90. Maisonet M, Correa A, Misra D, Jaakkola JJ. A review of the literature on the effects of ambient air pollution on fetal 
growth. Environ Res. 2004;95:106–115.  
 
91. Maltoni C, Cotti G, Valgimigli L, Mandrioli A, ”Hepatocarcinomas in Sprague‐Dawley rats, following exposure to 
benzene by inhalation. First experimental demonstration.” Med Lav. 1982;73:446–50. 
 
92. Manchester DK, Gordon SK, Golas CL, Roberts EA, Okey AB. Ah receptor in human placenta: stabilization by 
molybdate and characterization of binding of 2,3,7,8‐tetrachlorodibenzo‐p‐dioxin, 3‐methylcholanthrene, and 
benzo(a)pyrene. Cancer Res. 1987 Sep 15;47(18):4861–4868. 
 
93. Manikkam M, Guerrero‐Bosagna C, Tracey R, Haque MM, Skinner MK. 2012. Transgenerational actions of 
environmental compounds on reproductive disease and identification of epigenetic biomarkers of ancestral 
exposures. PLoS One 7:e3190  
 
94. Martinez‐Zamudio R, Ha HC. 2011. Environmental epigenetics in metal exposure. Epigenetics 6:820–827] [PubMed] 
 
95. Metzger R, Delgado JL, Herrell R. Environmental health and Hispanic children. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Sep;103 
(Suppl 6):25–32 
 
96. Mook‐Kanamori DO, Steegers EA, Eilers PH, Raat H, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW. Risk factors and outcomes associated  Commented [Ma1]:  
with first‐trimester fetal growth restriction. JAMA. 2010;303:527–534.    
 
97. Morales E1, Garcia‐Esteban R1, Asensio de la Cruz O2, Basterrechea M3, Lertxundi A4, Martinez López de Dicastillo 
MD5, Zabaleta C6, Sunyer J. Intrauterine and early postnatal exposure to outdoor air pollution and lung function at 
preschool age. Thorax. 2014 Oct 20. pii: thoraxjnl‐2014‐205413. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl‐2014‐205413.  
 
98. Morello‐Frosch RA, Woodruff TJ, Axelrad DA, Caldwell JC. ”Air toxics and health risks in California: the public health 
implications of outdoor concentrations.” Risk Anal. 2000 Apr;20(2):273‐91. 
 
99. Mortimer K, Neugebauer R, Lurmann F, et al Air pollution and pulmonary function in asthmatic children: effects of 
prenatal and lifetime exposures. Epidemiology 2008;19:550–7 
 
100.Neophytou AM, Hart JE, Chang Y, Zhang JJ, Smith TJ, Garshick E, Laden F.  Short‐term traffic related exposures and  
       biomarkers of nitro‐PAH exposure and oxidative DNA damage.  Toxics. 2014 Sep;2(3):377‐390. 
 
101.Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment. Air Quality Decree (Regeling beoordeling Luchtkwaliteit  
        2007). 2007. Available: http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0022817 [accessed 12 September 2010] 
 
102.Nethery E, Leckie SE, Teschke K, et al From measures to models: an evaluation of air pollution exposure assessment  
        for epidemiological studies of pregnant women. Occup Environ Med 2008;65:579–86. 
 
103.Niklasson A, Ericson A, Fryer JG, Karlberg J, Lawrence C, Karlberg P. An update of the Swedish reference standards 
        for weight, length and head circumference at birth for given gestational age (1977–1981). Acta Paediatr Scand.  
        1991;80:756–762.  
 
104.Ning H, Kado NY, Kuzmicky PA, Hsieh DPH (1991). “Benzene‐induced micronuclei formation in mouse fetal liver  
        blood, peripheral blood, and maternal bone marrow cells.” Environ Mol Mutagen 18(1):1‐5. 
 
105.OEHHA (1997). “Hazard Identification of the Developmental and Reproductive Toxic Effects of Benzene.” Office of  
        Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, California.  
        Draft, September 1997, located at www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/pdf/benzene.pdf. 
 
106.Oh SM, Park YR, Kim HR, Park YJ, Kim MJ, Son BH, Lee MJ, Lee SY, Chung KH.  Organic extracts of urban air pollution 
        particulate matter (PM2.5)‐induced genotoxicity and oxidative stress in human lung bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS‐ 
        2B cells).  Mutat Res. 2011 Apr 16.  
 
107.Pedersen M, Wichmann J, Autrup H, Dang DA, Decordier I, Hvidberg M, Bossi R, Jakobsen J, Loft S, Knudsen  
        LE.  Increased micronuclei and bulky DNA adducts in cord blood after maternal exposures to traffic‐related air 
        pollution.  Environ Res. 2009 Nov;109(8):1012‐20. Epub 2009 Sep 23. 
 
108.Perera F, Tang D, Tu Y, Biomarkers in Maternal and Newborn Blood Indicate Heightened Fetal Susceptibility to 
        Procarcinogenic DNA Damage.  Environ Health Persp Vol 112 Number 10 July 2004 
 
109.Perera FP 2008. Children Are Likely to Suffer Most from Our Fossil Fuel Addiction. Environ Health Perspect 116:987‐ 
        990. doi:10.1289/ehp.11173 
 
110.Pereira FP, Rauh V, Whyatt RM, Tsai WY, Tang D, Diaz D, et al. Effect of prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic 
        aromatic hydrocarbons on neurodevelopment in the first 3 years of life among inner‐city children. Environ Health  
        Perspect. 2006;114:1287–92.  
 
111.Perera FP, Rauh V, Tsai WY, Kinney P, Camann D, Barr D, et al. Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental 
        pollutants on birth outcomes in a multiethnic population. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:201–205.  
 
112.Perera FP1, Rauh V, Whyatt RM, Tsai WY, Bernert JT, Tu YH, Andrews H, Ramirez J, Qu L, Tang D. Molecular evidence  
        of an interaction between prenatal environmental exposures and birth outcomes in a multiethnic population.  
        Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Apr;112(5):626‐30 
 
113.Perera FP, Herbstman J. Prenatal environmental exposures, epigenetics, and disease. Reprod Toxicol. 2011  
        Apr;31(3):363‐73. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.12.055. Epub 2011 Jan 20. 
 
114.Perera F, et al. Prenatal Exposure to Air Pollution, Maternal Psychological Distress, and Child Behavior. Pediatrics, 
        October 2013 
 
115.Perera FP, Li Z, Whyatt R, Hoepner L, Wang S, Camann D, et al. Prenatal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure 
        and child intelligence at age 5. Pediatrics. 2009;124:e195–202. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 
 
116.Perera FP, Whyatt RM, Jedrychowski W, Rauh V, Manchester D, Santella RM, et al. Recent developments in  
        molecular epidemiology: a study of the effects of environmental poly‐cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on birth  
        outcomes in Poland. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:309–314.  
 
117.Perera F, Tang WY, Herbstman J, Tang D, Levin L, Miller R, Ho SM. 2009. Relation of DNA methylation of 5′‐CpG 
        island of ACSL3 to transplacental exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and childhood asthma. 
        PLoS One 4:e4488.  
 
118.Perera FP, Wang S, Vishnevetsky J, Zhang B, Cole KJ, Tang D, Rauh V, Phillips DH. 2011. Polycyclic aromatic  
        hydrocarbons‐aromatic DNA adducts in cord blood and behavior scores in New York City children. Environ Health 
        Perspect 119:1176–1181  
 
119.Pratt MM, John K, MacLean AB, Afework S, Phillips DH, Poirier MC. 2011. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) 
        exposure and DNA adduct semi‐quantitation in archived human tissues. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8:2675–2691  
 
120.Protano C, Scalise, Orsi GB, Vitali M. A systematic review of benzene exposure during pregnancy and adverse  
        outcomes on intrauterine development and birth: still far from scientific evidence. Ann Ig. 2012 Nov‐Dec;24(6):451‐ 
        63. 
 
121.Ramírez N, Cuadras A, Rovira E, Marcé RM, Borrull F. “Risk assessment related to atmospheric polycyclic aromatic 
        hydrocarbons in gas and particle phases near industrial sites.” Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Aug;119(8):1110‐ 
        6.doi:10.1289/ ehp.1002855. Epub 2011 Apr 8. 
 
122.Reddy P, Naidoo RN, Robins TG, Mentz G, Li H, London SJ, Batterman S.  GSTM1 and GSTP1 gene variants and the 
        effect of air pollutants on lung function measures in South African children.  Am J Ind Med. 2012 Jan 6. doi:  
        10.1002/ajim.22012. 
 
123.Ritz B, Wilhelm M. Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: methodologic issues in an emerging field. 
        Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;102:182–190. 
 
124.Rocha ESIR, Lichtenfels AJ, Amador Pereira LA, Saldiva PH. Effects of ambient levels of air pollution generated by 
        traffic on birth and placental weights in mice. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1921–1924.  
 
125.Rodríguez‐Trigo G, Zock J‐P, Pozo‐Rodríguez F, Gómez, F, et al.  Health Effects in Fishermen 2 Years After Assisting 
        With Oil Spill Clean‐up Ann Intern Med October 19, 2010 153:I‐28; published ahead of print August 23, 2010. 
 
126.Ross JA, Potter JD, Reaman GH, Pendergrass TW, Robison LL (1996). “Maternal exposure to potential inhibitors of 
        DNA topoisomerase II and infant leukemia (United States): a report from the Children's Cancer Group Control  
        7(6):581‐590. 
 
127.Rubesa J,  Rybara R, Prinosilovaa P, Veznika Z, et al.  Genetic polymorphisms influence the susceptibility of men to  
        sperm DNA damage associated with exposure to air pollution.  Mutation Research 683 (2010) 9–15. 
 
128.Ruden DM, Xiao L, Garfinkel MD, Lu X. 2005. Hsp90 and environmental impacts on epigenetic states: A model for 
        the trans‐generational effects of diethylstibesterol on uterine development and cancer. Hum Mol Genet 14 Spec No  
        1:R149–R155  
 
129.Salam MT, Millstein J, Li YF, Lurmann FW, Margolis HG, Gilliland FD. Birth outcomes and prenatal exposure to ozone,  
       carbon monoxide, and particulate matter: results from the Children’s Health Study. Environ Health Perspect.  
       2005;113:1638–1644. [PMC free article]  
 
130.Salma R, Darrow L, Parker J, Woodruff TJ, Strickland M, Nieuwenhuijsen M, et al. Meeting report: atmospheric  
        pollution and human reproduction. Environ Health Perspect. 2008a;116:791–798.  
 
131.Sánchez‐Guerra M, Pelallo‐Martínez N, Díaz‐Barriga F, Rothenberg SJ, Hernández‐Cadena L, Faugeron S, Oropeza‐ 
         Hernández LF, Guaderrama‐Díaz M, Quintanilla‐Vega B.  Environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) 
         exposure and DNA damage in Mexican children.  Mutat Res. 2011 Dec 17.  
 
132.Sancini G, Farina F, Battaglia C, Cifola I, Mangano E, Mantecca P, Camatini M, Palestini P.  Health Risk Assessment for 
        Air Pollutants: Alterations in Lung and Cardiac Gene Expression in Mice Exposed to Milano Winter Fine Particulate  
        Matter (PM2.5).  PLoS One. 2014 Oct 8;9(10):e109685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109685. eCollection 2014.n 
 
133.Sexton K Adgate JL, Church TR. et al (2005). “Children's exposure to volatile organic compounds as determined by  
       longitudinal measurements in blood.” Environmental Health Perspectives, March 1, 2005. 
 
134.Shah PS, Balkhair T.; Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm and LBW births. 2011. Air  
pollution and birth outcomes: a systematic review. Environ Int 37498–516.516  
 
135.1.Shang Y1, Zhang L1, Jiang Y1, Li Y2, Lu P3.  Airborne quinones induce cytotoxicity and DNA damage in human  
lung epithelial A549 cells: The role of reactive oxygen species.  Chemosphere. 2014 Jan 27. pii:S0045‐ 
6535(14)00016‐2. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.079.  
 
136.Skinner MK, Guerrero‐Bosagna C. Environmental signals and transgenerational epigenetics. Epigenomics. 
2009;1:111–7.  
 
137.Slama R, Khoshnood B, Kaminski M. How to control for gestational age in studies involving environmental effects on 
fetal growth. Environ Health Perspect. 2008b;116:A284–A285.  
 
138.Slama R, Thiebaugeorges O, Goua V, Aussel L, Sacco P, Bohet A, et al. Maternal personal exposure to airborne 
benzene and intrauterine growth. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:1313–1321 
 
139.Slama R, Bottagisi S, Solansky I, Lepeule J, Giorgis‐Allemand L, Sram R.Short‐Term Impact of Atmospheric Pollution  
        on Fecundability.  Epidemiology. 2013 Sep 18.  
 
140.Smith MT, Zhang L (1998). “Biomarkers of leukemia risk: benzene as a model” Environ Health Perspect 106(Suppl  
        4):937‐946. 
 
141.Šrám RJ, Binková B, Dejmek J, Bobak M. Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature.  
        Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:375–382.  
 
142.Stephanou P, Konstandi M, Pappas P, Marselos M. Alterations in central monoaminergic neurotransmission induced 
by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in rats. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1998;23:475–81.  
 
143.Steffen C, Auclerc MF, Auvrignon A, Baruchel A, Kebaili K, Lambilliotte A, Leverger G, Sommelet D, Vilmer E, Hemon 
         D, Clavel J. “Acute childhood leukaemia and environmental exposure to potential sources of benzene and other  
        hydrocarbons: a case‐control study.” Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:773–778. doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.010868 
 
144.Takeda K, Tsukue N, Yoshida S. Endocrine‐disrupting activity of chemicals in diesel exhaust and diesel exhaust  
        particles. Environ Sci. 2004;11:33–45. 
 
145.Tang WY, Levine L, Cheung YY, Talaska G, Herbstman J, Miller RL, Perera F, Ho SM. 2012. Maternal exposure to  
        polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons is associated with methylation at a 5′‐CpG island of interferon‐gamma in cord  
        white blood cells. Environ Health Perspect 120:1195–1200 
 
146.Terry MB, Ferris JS, Pilsner R, Flom JD, Tehranifar P, Santella RM, et al. Genomic DNA methylation among women in 
         a multiethnic New York City birth cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:2306–10. 
 
147.Thomson E, Kumarathasn P, Calderon‐garcidueas L, Vincent R.  Air pollution alters brain and pituitary endothelin‐1 
        and inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expressions  Environmental Research   2007, vol. 105, no2, pp. 224‐233 [10  
        page(s) (article)] (1 p.1/2) 
 
148.Tillett T 2012. Potential Mechanism for PM10 Effects on Birth Outcomes: In Utero Exposure Linked to Mitochondrial  
        DNA Damage. Environ Health Perspect 120:a363‐a363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.120‐a363b 
 
149.Timmermans S, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Steegers‐Theunissen RP, Steegers EA. Periconception folic acid  
        supplementation, fetal growth and the risks of low birth weight and preterm birth: the Generation R Study. Br J  
        Nutr. 2009;102:777–785. 
 
150.Tonne C, Whyatt RM, Camann DE, Perera FP, Kinney PL. Predictors of personal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon  
        exposures among pregnant minority women in New York City. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:754– 
         759  
 
151.Topinka J, Rossner P Jr, Milcova A, Schmuczerova J, Svecova V, Sram RJ.  DNA  Adducts and Oxidative DNA Damage 
         Induced by Organic Extracts From PM2.5 in an Acellular Assay.  Toxicol Lett. 2011 Feb 14.  
  
152.Tsukue N, Tsubone H, Suzuki AK. Diesel exhaust affects the abnormal delivery in pregnant mice and the growth of 
        their young. Inhal Toxicol. 2002;14:635–651.  
 
153.Tunon K, Eik‐Nes SH, Grottum P. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as  
        predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8:178–185.  
 
154.van Buuren S. Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Stat Methods 
        Med Res. 2007;16:219–242.  
 
155.Van den Hooven EH, de Kluizenaar Y, Pierik FH, Hofman A, van Ratingen SW, Zandveld PY, et al. 2012. Chronic Air  
        Pollution Exposure during Pregnancy and Maternal and Fetal C‐reactive Protein Levels. The Generation R Study.  
        Environ Health Perspect :‐. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104345 
 
156.Van den Hooven EH, Jaddoe VW, de Kluizenaar Y, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Steegers EA, et al. 2009. Residential  
        traffic exposure and pregnancy‐related outcomes: a prospective birth cohort study. Environ Health 859; doi:[Online  
22 ecember 2009]10.1186/1476‐069X‐8‐59  
 
157.Vassilev ZP, Robson MG, Klotz JB. Associations of poly‐cyclic organic matter in outdoor air with decreased birth 
        weight: a pilot cross‐sectional analysis. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A. 2001;64:595–605.  
 
158.Verburg BO, Mulder PG, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW, Witteman JC, Steegers EA. Intra‐ and interobserver reproducibility  
        study of early fetal growth parameters. Prenat Diagn. 2008a;28:323–331.  
 
159.Verburg BO, Steegers EA, De Ridder M, Snijders RJ, Smith E, Hofman A, et al. New charts for ultrasound dating of 
        pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population‐based cohort study.  
 
160.Verhulst SL, Nelen V, Hond ED, Koppen G, Beunckens C, Vael C, et al. Intrauterine exposure to environmental  
        pollutants and body mass index during the first 3 years of life. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:122–6. 
 
161.Vrijheid M, Martinez D, Aguilera I, Ballester F, Basterrechea M, Esplugues A, et al. 2010. Socioeconomic status and 
        exposure to multiple environmental pollutants during pregnancy: evidence for environmental inequity? J Epidemiol  
        Community Health; doi:[Online 25 October 2010]10.1136/jech.2010.117408  
 
162.Weldy CS, Y Liu, YC Chang, IO Medvedev, JR Fox, TV Larson, WM Chien, MT Chin. In utero and early life exposure to 
        diesel exhaust air pollution increases adult susceptibility to heart failure in mice. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. 2013.  
        http://bit.ly/18znRIR 
 
163.Wen SW, Kee Fung KF, Huang L, Demissie K, Joseph KS, Allen A, et al. Fetal and neonatal mortality among twin  
        gestations in a Canadian population: the effect of intrapair birth‐weight discordance. Am J Perinatol. 2005;5:279– 
         286.  
 
164.Whysner J, Reddy MV, Ross PM, Mohan M, Lax EA. “Genotoxicity of benzene and its metabolites.” Mutat  
        Res. 2004;(566):99–130 
 
165. Whyatt RM, Perera FP. Application of biologic markers to studies of environmental risks in children and the 
         developing fetus. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Sep;103 (Suppl 6):105–110. 

166.Wigle DT, Arbuckle TE, Turner MC, Bérubé A, Yang Q, Liu S, Krewski D. Epidemiologic evidence of relationships 
        between reproductive and child health outcomes and environmental chemical contaminants. J Toxicol Environ   
        Health B Crit Rev. 2008 May;11(5‐6):373‐517. doi: 10.1080/10937400801921320. 
 
167.Wigle DT, Arbuckle TE, Walker M, Wade MG, Liu S, Krewski D. Environmental Hazards: Evidence for Effects on Child 
       Health. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B: Critical Reviews Volume 10, Issue 1‐2, 2007 

168.Wilhelm M1, Wittsiepe J, Lemm F, Ranft U, Krämer U, Fürst P, Röseler SC, Greshake M, Imöhl M, Eberwein G,  
      Rauchfuss K, Kraft M, Winneke G. The Duisburg birth cohort study: influence of the prenatal exposure to PCDD/Fs  
        and dioxin‐like PCBs on thyroid hormone status in newborns and neurodevelopment of infants until the age of 24  
        months. Mutat Res. 2008 Jul‐Aug;659(1‐2):83‐92. Epub 2007 Nov 12. 
 
169.Windham G, Fenster L. Environmental contaminants and pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:e111–6.  
        discussion e7. 
 
170.Wong EY, Gohlke J, Griffith WC, Farrow S, Faustman EM. Assessing the health benefits of air pollution reduction for  
        children. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:226–232.  
 
171.World Health Organization. Air Quality Guidelines. Global Update 2005. Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide 
        and Sulfur Dioxide. 2006. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2006/WHO_SDE_PHE_OEH_06.02_eng.pdf  
         
172.Wu J, Ramesh A, Nayyar T, Hood DB. Assessment of metabolites and AhR and CYP1A1 mRNA expression subsequent  
        to prenatal exposure to inhaled benzo(a)pyrene. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2003;21:333–46.  
 
173.Yokota S, Mizuo K, Moriya N, Oshio S, Sugawara I, Takeda K. Effect of prenatal exposure to diesel exhaust on  
       dopaminergic system in mice. Neurosci Lett. 2009;449:38–41.  
 
174.Yu Ting L, Yungling L, Chau‐Ren J, et al.  Air pollution and limb defects: A matched‐pairs case‐control study in 
        Taiwan.  Environmental Research.  Volume 132, July 2014, Pages 273–280 
 
175.Xing SG, Shi X, Wu ZL, Chen JK, Wallace W, Whong WZ, Ong T (1992). “Transplacental genotoxicity of 
        triethylenemelamine, benzene, and vinblastine in mice.” Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 12(5):23‐30. 
 
176.Xu DQ,   ZHANG W.  Monitoring of Pollution of Air Fine Particles (PM2.5) and Study on Their Genetic Toxicity 
        BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 17, 452‐458(2004)   
 
177.Zhang A, Hu H, Sánchez BN, Ettinger AS, Park SK, Cantonwine D, et al. 2011. Association between Prenatal Lead 
Exposure and Blood Pressure in Female Offspring. Environ Health Perspect :‐  
.http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103736 
 
178.Zhang L, McHale CM, Rothman N, Li G, Ji Z, Vermeulen R, et al. Systems biology of human benzene exposure. Chem 
        Biol Interact. 2010;184:86–93.  
 
Lopez, Maria [COB]

From: McCool, Martha [JWA]

Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 9:21 AM
To: COB_Response
Subject: GAIP item 45 email part 1 of 2
Attachments: LAX MMRP-1.pdf

Here is part of the email from Mr. Jesse Marquez.  I heard you were having issues with emails.  I will send the other as 
part 2 
 
Thank you,  
 
 
 
Martha McCool | Staff Assistant, Planning and Environmental  
John Wayne Airport, Orange County 
3160 Airway Avenue | Costa Mesa, CA 92626 
O 949.252.5276 |  
ocair.com     Facebook     Twitter 
 

 
 

1
 Alternative D
Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program
April 2004
Preface
Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is the primary commercial air transportation hub of the Los Angeles region and is the
dominant U.S. international gateway to the Pacific Rim. It is the third busiest airport in the United States in terms of aircraft
operations and the world’s fifth busiest in terms of passengers. It plays an essential role in meeting the current and projected
transportation needs of passengers and shippers, and in producing economic vitality, within the surrounding five-county region. But
LAX’s aircraft and traffic activity produce noise, congestion, air pollution and other environmental impacts that need to be mitigated.
In 1995, Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), the operator of LAX, began the LAX Master Plan Program with the goal of producing
plans, policies, and mitigation programs that would strike an appropriate balance in addressing these challenges.

In November 2000, LAWA published the Draft LAX Master Plan describing and analyzing four alternatives: the No Action/No
Project Alternative and Alternatives A, B and C. In accord with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIS/EIR) was
published in January 2001, which used the Draft LAX Master Plan as the basis for its project descriptions of each alternative, analyzed
the potential environmental impacts of these alternatives. At that time, the Draft EIS/EIR was publicly circulated to start the agency
review and comment process and obtain public input.

Taking into account the public comments on Alternatives A, B and C and the Draft EIS/EIR, as well as the September 11, 2001
terrorist attacks, the Mayor of the City of Los Angeles directed LAWA to develop a security and safety plan now known as
Alternative D as a fifth LAX Master Plan alternative, which is the staff-preferred alternative. In mid-2003, a two-volume Addendum
to the Draft LAX Master Plan was published, describing Alternative D in the same manner that the previous alternatives were
described. Additionally, using the two-volume Addendum as the basis for its project description of Alternative D, a Supplement to the
Draft EIS/EIR, evaluating the potential environmental impacts of the new alternative, was prepared and publicly circulated at that
time.

The proposed Final LAX Master Plan, which is based on the two-volume Addendum published in mid-2003, presents the essential
elements of the staff-preferred alternative, Alternative D. Accordingly, this document has provided the basis for LAWA’s preparation
of the following proposed regulatory entitlements and/or mitigation measures that would implement Alternative D: the LAX Plan, the
LAX Specific Plan, the Airport Layout Plan, the Tentative Tract Maps, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and the
LAX Master Plan Program Relocation Plan. It is anticipated that the City Planning Commission and the Los Angeles City Council
will review and approve this Final LAX Master Plan. Upon such approval, LAWA would use this document as a broad policy

Los Angeles International Airport LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Preface

statement regarding the conceptual strategic framework for future improvements at LAX and as working guidelines to be consulted by
LAWA as it formulates and processes future site-specific projects under the LAX Master Plan Program.

The documents comprising the regulatory entitlements and mitigation measures that implement Alternative D are as follows:

♦ LAX Plan. The LAX Plan is the City’s general plan for the airport, setting out goals, policies, objectives and programs for the
long-term development and use of the airport consistent with the vision established by the preferred alternative, Alternative D. It
also sets forth policy for the LAX/El Segundo Dunes and LAX Northside. As a component of the City’s land use element of the
General Plan, the LAX Plan establishes land use categories that are consistent with the goals and objectives for modernization of
the airport, first identified in the LAX Master Plan, and provides policies and programs that further these goals and objectives.

♦ LAX Specific Plan. Whereas the LAX Plan establishes a land use policy framework, the LAX Specific Plan establishes zoning
and development regulations and standards consistent with the LAX Plan for the airport and LAX Northside. It is a principal
mechanism by which the goals and objectives of the LAX Plan are achieved and the policies and programs are implemented. It
establishes procedures for processing future specific projects and activities that are anticipated under the LAX Master Plan
Program. The LAX Specific Plan is also to be approved by the Los Angeles City Council.

♦ Airport Layout Plan. The proposed Airport Layout Plan (ALP) consists of a series of drawings that illustrate the layout of
existing facilities at the airport and proposed facilities that are consistent with Alternative D. The FAA-required ALP is intended
to serve as a record drawing for the airport, as well as a guide for the airport’s future development. The ALP package also
includes a narrative description of the drawings that explains the reasoning behind, and the key features of, the ALP. More
specifically, the ALP provides a graphic depiction of existing and proposed airport layouts for runways, roadways, parking, and
other airport facilities. It shows (a) the existing and proposed boundaries of the airport and all off-site area owned and controlled
by the airport for airport purposes, (b) the location of existing and proposed airport facilities and structures (such as runways,
taxiways, aprons, terminal buildings, hangars and roads), and (c) the location of all existing and proposed non-aviation areas and
of all existing improvements thereon. The ALP also includes an airport airspace plan, runway protection zone plan, and a property
inventory map. Planning, budgeting, and implementation for FAA activities on airports are based on the ALP. LAWA will review
and approve the proposed ALP before it is forwarded to the FAA. Revisions, modifications, and alterations of an ALP must be
approved by the FAA before they take effect, and will be reviewed by that agency in terms of airport safety, utility, and efficiency.

Los Angeles International Airport LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Preface

♦ Proposed Tentative Tract Maps. The primary purpose of the tentative tract maps is to vacate public streets that would no longer
be necessary if Alternative D is approved and to provide for the orderly and proper abandonment or relocation of utilities that may
be affected. It will also consolidate parcels that are no longer necessary. The proposed tentative tract maps fulfill requirements
under the California Subdivision Map Act and the Division of Land Regulations. All subdivision maps are consistent with the
applicable general and specific plans. The proposed tract maps must be approved by the City’s Advisory Agency, and their
approval is subject to appeal to the City Planning Commission and to the Los Angeles City Council.

♦ Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is a program by
which compliance with the proposed mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR is ensured. It also includes various master
plan commitments. The MMRP describes the method and timing of implementation, monitoring frequency, and actions indicating
compliance. Oversight will be conducted by way of annual status reports submitted to the Board of Airport Commissioners and
the City Planning Department. The MMRP will be approved by the Los Angeles City Council as part of the Final EIR
environmental review process.

♦ LAX Master Plan Program Relocation Plan. To address the acquisition of properties and relocation of businesses and residents,
if any, associated with Alternative D, LAWA will adopt a residential and business relocation plan in compliance with federal,
state, and local law prior to the commencement of acquisition. The objectives of the relocation plan, as discussed in Section
4.4.2.5 of the Final EIR, include fully informing eligible residential occupants and business owners of the nature of and procedures
for obtaining relocation assistance and benefits, and providing such assistance and benefits in accordance with federal, state, and
local law. The plan is also to be approved by the Los Angeles City Council and provided to the FAA for reference.

♦ Other General Plan Amendments. Other general plan amendments are required in order to approve the project and establish
consistency between the LAX Plan and other elements of the City’s General Plan. These amendments include changes to the
boundaries of the Westchester Playa del Rey Community Plan, to incorporate all airport property and master plan program
boundaries into one plan under the LAX Plan, to delete or otherwise amend policies, programs, and any other LAX references
(land use, transportation improvements, recreation facilities) to those areas. Amendments to the City’s Framework Element
include updating references to the “LAX Interim Plan” and the “Department of Airports” to the “LAX Plan” and “LAWA” and
revising various maps as a result of new LAX boundaries. Changes to the Noise Element will update new noise contours based on
the approved plan and will update several facts regarding LAX, such as airport background, statistics, zoning, noise, and master
plan efforts. Transportation Element amendments will mostly involve revisions to various maps as transportation improvements

Los Angeles International Airport LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Preface

and classifications will be revised with the adoption of the LAX Master Plan Program. Lastly, the LAX Interim Plan will be
amended to replace its text and maps with the LAX Plan text and maps.

♦ Other Zoning Actions. Other zoning actions include changes to the Los Angeles Municipal Zoning Code to add the new LAX
Zone and any references to that zone that may be pertinent in other sections of the code.

Los Angeles International Airport LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Table of Contents
PREFACE
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1
MASTER PLAN COMMITMENTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .............................................................................................................. 3

Noise........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Land Use .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Surface Transportation: On-Airport ........................................................................................................................................................ 14
Surface Transportation: Off-Airport ........................................................................................................................................................ 16
Relocation of Residences and Businesses................................................................................................................................................. 23
Air Quality................................................................................................................................................................................................ 29
Hydrology & Water Quality ..................................................................................................................................................................... 42
Historical/Architectural and Archaeological/Cultural Resources........................................................................................................... 47
Paleontological Resources ....................................................................................................................................................................... 52
Biotic Communities .................................................................................................................................................................................. 54
Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna....................................................................................................................... 66
Energy Supply........................................................................................................................................................................................... 80
Light Emissions ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 82
Solid Waste ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 83
Construction Impacts ............................................................................................................................................................................... 85
Design, Art, and Architecture Applications/Aesthetics ............................................................................................................................ 87
Hazardous Materials................................................................................................................................................................................ 89
Water Use ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 92
Wastewater ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 93
Fire Protection ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 94
Law Enforcement...................................................................................................................................................................................... 97

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING PLAN ........................................................................................................................T1-T8

Los Angeles International Airport i LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Table of Contents

List of Tables
Table F5-1 Structural BMP Expected Pollutant Removal Efficiency................................................................................................................ 45
Table F5-8 Estimated Ranges of Emission Reductions for Construction-Related Air Quality Mitigation Measures ..................................... 31
Table F5-9 Estimated Emission Reductions (Tons) for 8 New FlyAway Terminals - 2015 ............................................................................. 34
Table F5-10 Estimated Ranges of Emission Reductions for GSE Conversion.................................................................................................... 40
Table F5-11 Mitigation Land Evaluation Procedure for the Mitigation Site....................................................................................................... 76

List of Figures
Figure F5-2 Vernal Pool Restoration Opportunities Considered ......................................................................................................................... 70
Figure F5-3 North Area Ephemerally Wetted Pools and Buffer Areas ............................................................................................................... 71
Figure F5-4 South Area Ephemerally Wetted Pools and Buffer Areas ............................................................................................................... 72
Figure F5-5 Mitigation Site for El Segundo Blue Butterfly Relocation .............................................................................................................. 79

List of Acronyms
ACHP........................................................................................................................................................... Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
ANMP ....................................................................................................................................................................... Aircraft Noise Mitigation Program
AOA.......................................................................................................................................................................................... Airport Operations Area
APE........................................................................................................................................................................................... Area of Potential Effects
APM........................................................................................................................................................................................ Automated People Mover
ATCS ...........................................................................................................................................................................Adaptive Traffic Control System
ATP.................................................................................................................................................................................Archaeological Treatment Plan
ATSAC ...................................................................................................................................................... Automated Travel Surveillance and Control
BMP ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Best Management Practices
CARB.............................................................................................................................................................................California Air Resources Board
CDFG.............................................................................................................................................................. California Department of Fish and Game
CEQA...................................................................................................................................................................California Environmental Quality Act

Los Angeles International Airport ii LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Table of Contents

CFR.....................................................................................................................................................................................Code of Federal Regulations

CNDDB ............................................................................................................................................................. California Natural Diversity Data Base
CNEL ......................................................................................................................................................................Community Noise Equivalent Level
CTA ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Central Terminal Area
DTSC .............................................................................................................................................................. Department of Toxic Substances Control
EIR ....................................................................................................................................................................................Environmental Impact Report
EIS ...............................................................................................................................................................................Environmental Impact Statement
FAA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Federal Aviation Administration
GSE...................................................................................................................................................................................... Ground Support Equipment
GTC ................................................................................................................................................................................. Ground Transportation Center
HABS..................................................................................................................................................................... Historic American Buildings Survey
HMP........................................................................................................................................................................................Habitat Management Plan
HTP.........................................................................................................................................................................................Hyperion Treatment Plant
IPWP.......................................................................................................................................................... Integrated Plan for the Wastewater Program
ITC ..............................................................................................................................................................................Intermodal Transportation Center
ITS ............................................................................................................................................................................ Intelligent Transportation Systems
LADBS ............................................................................................................................................... Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety
LADOT ........................................................................................................................................................Los Angeles Department of Transportation
LADPW ........................................................................................................................................................ Los Angeles Department of Public Works
LAFD ................................................................................................................................................................................ Los Angeles Fire Department
LAPD .............................................................................................................................................................................Los Angeles Police Department
LARWQCB .................................................................................................................................. Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
LAWA ................................................................................................................................................................................Los Angeles World Airports
LAWAPD ............................................................................................................................................ Los Angeles World Airports Police Department
LAX ........................................................................................................................................................................... Los Angeles International Airport
LAX MP-MPAQ.............................................................................................................................LAX Master Plan - Mitigation Plan for Air Quality
MEP ............................................................................................................................................................................ Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing
NFPA ........................................................................................................................................................................... National Fire Protection Agency
NHPA........................................................................................................................................................................ National Historic Preservation Act
NPS ............................................................................................................................................................................................... National Park Service
OHP ................................................................................................................................................................................ Office of Historic Preservation
PMTP ....................................................................................................................................................... Paleontological Management Treatment Plan
RAC ................................................................................................................................................................................................................Rent-a-Car
RWQCB............................................................................................................................................................. Regional Water Quality Control Board

Los Angeles International Airport iii LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Table of Contents

SCAQMD ............................................................................................................................................... South Coast Air Quality Management District

SEL .............................................................................................................................................................................................. Sound Exposure Level
SHPO ..........................................................................................................................................................................State Historic Preservation Office
SULEV..................................................................................................................................................................... Super Ultra Low-Emission Vehicle
SUSMP ......................................................................................................................................................Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan
SWPPP...............................................................................................................................................................Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
ULEV................................................................................................................................................................................. Ultra Low-Emission Vehicle
USEPA.................................................................................................................................................United States Environmental Protection Agency
USFWS ............................................................................................................................................................. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
VMT...........................................................................................................................................................................................Vehicle Miles Travelled
ZEV..............................................................................................................................................................................................Zero Emission Vehicle

Los Angeles International Airport iv LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Introduction
The California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires that the City of Los Angeles establish a reporting and monitoring
program for mitigation measures adopted as part of the environmental review process to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the
environment.1 Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA”) Record
of Decision must include a monitoring and enforcement program for each mitigation measure.2 This Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program (“MMRP”) is designed to comply with these requirements by ensuring that the mitigation measures identified in
the Final EIS/EIR are implemented.

In addition to identifying and describing the applicable mitigation measures, the LAX Master Plan MMRP includes LAX Master
Plan commitments which are primarily activities, policies, and practices that were formulated to avoid or reduce adverse
environmental impacts where mitigation measures would not be appropriate: (1) where standards and regulations exist with which
compliance is already required by the applicable regulating agency; (2) where impacts would be adverse but not significant; and (3)
where design refinements could be incorporated into the project to reduce or avoid potential impacts. The funding and
implementation of the Master Plan commitments, as well as the mitigation measures, are subject to LAWA’s ability to use airport
revenue to the extent permissible under federal law and policies, or to develop other state or federal funding sources.

The MMRP, as set forth in the following table, describes the timing of implementation, monitoring frequency and actions indicating
compliance for each Master Plan commitment and mitigation measure. Annual reports, detailing among other things, status and
compliance, will be submitted to the City Planning Department and the Board of Airport Commissioners. The MMRP’s content is
described briefly below.

Master Plan Commitments/Mitigation Measures: Each Master Plan commitment and mitigation measure in the Final EIS/EIR is
listed verbatim and maintains the same assigned number. They are categorized by the environmental discipline to which they pertain.
Although much project-level information is included, the Final EIS/EIR has been prepared to address the more general level of detail
that is required for program-level entitlements. As individual projects of the Master Plan are advanced for implementation and future
environmental analyses occur, as appropriate, additional mitigation details may be provided. As such, the mitigation measures (or
equivalent types of mitigation measures) and how they should be applied at the project level may evolve as each project is developed.

1
Pub. Res. Code § 21081.6(a).
2
40 C.F.R. 1505.2(c).

Los Angeles International Airport 1 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Introduction

Monitoring Agency: The monitoring agency is the city department responsible for various aspects of monitoring or reporting,
including ensuring compliance with the Master Plan commitment and mitigation measure. Los Angeles World Airports has lead
responsibility for administering the program and support responsibilities.

Timing of Implementation: The appropriate time by which the Master Plan commitment/mitigation measure must be implemented
in order to effectively accomplish the intended outcome. This is based on current information. Although much project-level
information is included, the Final EIS/EIR has been prepared to address the more general level of detail that is required for program-
level entitlements. As individual projects of the Master Plan are advanced for implementation and future environmental evaluation
occurs, as appropriate, additional mitigation details may be provided. As such, the timing may evolve as each project is developed.

Monitoring Frequency: Frequency at which the monitoring agency will verify that the measure is being implemented.

Actions Indicating Compliance: The means by which the monitoring agency will verify that the measure is being carried out. This is
based on current information. Compliance may be demonstrated through alternative means, subject to the approval of the monitoring
agency. If an alternative means for demonstrating compliance is approved, the monitoring frequency may be adjusted accordingly.

Los Angeles International Airport 2 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Noise
N-1 Maintenance of Applicable Elements of Existing Aircraft Noise Noise impacts that may Already being Ongoing Submission of Annual
Abatement Program. All components of the current airport noise result from airport implemented. Will Report per Variance
abatement program that pertain to aircraft noise will be maintained. operations without the continue noise Conditions to County
Monitoring measures in place abatement program of Los Angeles
Agency: throughout
implementation and use
LAWA

MM-N-4 Update the Aircraft Noise Abatement Program Elements as Noise impacts that may Upon commissioning of Once, upon Update of Aircraft
Applicable to Adapt to the Future Airfield Configuration. result from air traffic relocated runways commissioning of each Noise Abatement
When existing runways are relocated or reconstructed as part of the dispersion without the relocated runway and Program to reflect
Monitoring Master Plan, the aircraft noise abatement actions associated with measures in place then on-going relocated runways and
Agency: those runways shall be modified and re-established as appropriate submission of Annual
to assure continuation of the intent of the existing program. Report per Variance
LAWA
Conditions to County
of Los Angeles

MM-N-5 Conduct Part 161 Study to Make Over-Ocean Procedures Night noise impacts Initiation within 30 Once, upon submission Submission of Part 161
Mandatory. A 14 CFR Part 161 Study shall be initiated to seek generated by aircraft days from City Council of Part 161 Application application and
federal approval of a locally-imposed Noise and Access Restriction departing to the east approval of the LAX to the FAA, or upon supporting documents
Monitoring on departures to the east during Over-Ocean Operations, or when when over-ocean Plan execution of voluntary to the FAA for
Agency: Westerly Operations remain in effect during the Over-Ocean procedures are in effect agreement between approval, or execution
Operations time period. LAWA and the Airlines of a voluntary
LAWA
agreement between
LAWA and the
Airlines to implement
restrictions

MM-N-7 Construction Noise Control Plan. A Construction Noise Control Significant noise Prior to the earliest of Once, upon completion Inclusion of
Plan will be prepared to provide feasible measures to reduce impacts at noise- either the issuance of a of Noise Control Plan requirement for a Noise
significant noise impacts throughout the construction period for all sensitive receivers grading permit, for each project and as Control Plan in
Monitoring projects near noise sensitive uses. For example, noise control during construction issuance of a specified in the Noise subcontract agreement
Agency: devices shall be used and maintained, such as equipment mufflers, demolition permit, or Control Plan & subsequent approval
enclosures, and barriers. Natural and artificial barriers such as construction of the noise control
LAWA
ground elevation changes and existing commencement plan by

Area: Noise 3
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-N-7 (Cont'd)
buildings can shield construction noise. of each project with LAWA.
noise sensitive uses
within 600 feet of
project site
MM-N-8 Construction Staging. Construction operations shall be staged as Significant noise Prior to the earliest of Once, upon approval of Approval of
far from noise-sensitive uses as feasible. impacts at noise- either the issuance of a construction staging construction staging
sensitive receivers grading permit, area by LAWA area by LAWA
Monitoring during construction issuance of a
Agency: demolition permit,
or construction
LAWA
commencement of each
project with noise
sensitive uses within
600 feet of project site

MM-N-9 Equipment Replacement. Noisy equipment shall be replaced Significant noise Prior to the earliest of Once, upon completion Inclusion of
with quieter equipment (for example, rubber tired equipment rather impacts at noise either the issuance of a of Noise Control Plan requirement for a Noise
than track equipment) when technically and economically feasible. sensitive receivers grading permit, for each project and as Control Plan in
Monitoring during construction issuance of a specified in the Noise subcontract agreement
Agency: demolition permit, or Control Plan and subsequent
construction approval of the Noise
LAWA
commencement of each Control Plan by LAWA
project with noise
sensitive uses within
600 feet of the project
site

MM-N-10 Construction Scheduling. The timing and/or sequence of the Significant noise Prior to the earlier of Once, upon completion Inclusion of
noisiest on-site construction activities shall avoid sensitive times of impacts at noise- either the issuance of a of Noise Control Plan requirement for a Noise
the day, as feasible (9 p.m. to 7 a.m. Monday - Friday; 8 p.m. to 6 sensitive receivers grading permit, for each project and as Control Plan in
Monitoring a.m. Saturday; anytime on Sunday or Holidays). during construction issuance of a specified in the Noise subcontract agreement
Agency: demolition permit, or Control Plan. and subsequent
construction approval of the Noise
LAWA
commencement of Control Plan by

Area: Noise 4
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-N-10 (Cont'd)
each project with noise LAWA
sensitive uses within
600 feet of project site
MM-N-11 Automated People Mover (APM) Noise Assessment and To avoid significant Prior to issuance of any Once, upon completion Completion of APM
Control Plan. In conjunction with detailed design and engineering noise levels/impacts to permit for the APM of the APM Noise Noise Control Plan
of the proposed APM systems, a noise control plan shall be the hotels indicated in Control Plan
Monitoring prepared specifying noise attenuation measures to reduce APM the mitigation measure
Agency: noise levels at the two significantly impacted hotels to acceptable
level (i.e. less than 67 dBA CNEL for the Courtyard by Marriott
LAWA
and the Four Points Sheraton). Potential options for such noise
control/reduction include but are not limited to, the following:

‹ Measures that Mitigate Noise at the Source

− Stringent vehicle and equipment noise specifications
− Operational restrictions
− Vehicle skirts (i.e., steel/fiberglass panels that extend
down to enclose wheel and undercarriage noise)
− Undercar sound absorption
− Limited turning radii

‹ Measures that Mitigate Noise Along the Source-to-Receptor

Propagation Path
− Sound barriers close to vehicles
− Sound barriers at Right-of-Way line
− Alteration of horizontal and vertical alignments (i.e.,
altering the height or path of the APM alignment to
reduce the exposure of noise sensitive receptors)
− Acquisition of buffer zones
− Resilient support on aerial guideway

Area: Noise 5
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-N-11 (Cont'd)
‹ Measures that Mitigate Noise at the Receptor
− Construction of sound barriers within affected properties
− Building noise insulation or insulation upgrades

Area: Noise 6
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Land Use
LU-1 Incorporation of City of Los Angeles Ordinance No. 159,526 Incompatibility of LAX Upon City Council Once, upon City Adoption of LAX
[Q] Zoning Conditions for LAX Northside into the LAX Northside with adjacent approval of the LAX Council approval of Zone/LAX Specific
Northside/Westchester Southside Project. To the maximum residential uses to the Zone/LAX Specific LAX Zone/LAX Plan to include the [Q]
Monitoring extent feasible, all [Q] Conditions (Qualifications of Approval) north Plan Specific Plan conditions as feasible
Agency: from City of Los Angeles Ordinance No. 159,526 that address the
Northside project area will be incorporated by LAWA into a new
LAWA
LAX Zone/LAX Specific Plan for the LAX Northside/Westchester
Southside project. Accepting that certain conditions may be
updated, revised, or determined infeasible as a result of changes to
the LAX Northside project, the final conditions for the LAX
Northside/Westchester Southside project will ensure that the level
of environmental protection afforded by the full set of existing
LAX Northside project [Q] conditions is maintained or increased.

LU-2 Establishment of a Landscape Maintenance Program for Incompatibility with Prior to first land On-going throughout Approval of Landscape
Parcels Acquired Due to Airport Expansion. Land acquired and adjacent uses during acquisition Master Plan Maintenance Program
cleared for airport development will be fenced, landscaped, and acquisition development by LAWA
Monitoring maintained regularly until the properties are actually developed for
Agency: airport purposes.
LAWA
LU-4 Neighborhood Compatibility Program. Ongoing coordination Land use Throughout Master On-going throughout Compliance with the
and planning will be undertaken by LAWA to ensure that the incompatibility with Plan development Master Plan provisions of the LAX
airport is as compatible as possible with surrounding properties and nearby residential uses development Zone/LAX Specific
Monitoring neighborhoods. Measures to enforce this policy will include: 1) Plan and LAX Plan
Agency: Along the northerly and southerly boundary areas of the airport,
LAWA will provide and maintain landscaped buffer areas that will
LAWA
include setbacks, landscaping, screening or other appropriate view
sensitive improvements with the goal of avoiding land use
conflicts, shielding lighting, enhancing privacy and better
screening views of airport facilities from adjacent residential uses.
Use of existing facilities in buffer areas may continue as required
until LAWA can develop alternative facilities.

Area: Land Use 7

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

LU-4 (Cont'd)
2) Locate airport uses and activities with the potential to adversely
affect nearby residential land uses through noise, light spill-over,
odor, vibration and other consequences of airport operations and
development as far from adjacent residential neighborhoods as
feasible. 3) Provide community outreach efforts to property owners
and occupants when new development on airport property is in
proximity to and could potentially affect nearby residential uses.

LU-5 Comply with City of Los Angeles Transportation Element Insufficient bicycle Prior to issuance of Once, upon issuance of Issuance of permits by
Bicycle Plan. LAWA will comply with bicycle policies and plans facilities certificate of occupancy certificate of occupancy LADOT, LADPW or
in the vicinity of LAX, most notably those outlined in the City of for each project that for each project that LADBS, as appropriate
Monitoring Los Angeles Transportation Element Bicycle Plan and the General will incorporate bicycle will incorporate bicycle
Agency: Plan Framework, including Pershing Drive, Sepulveda Boulevard, facilities facilities
and Aviation Boulevard. As a priority, a Class I bike path will be
LAWA
incorporated on Aviation Boulevard, as practical and feasible, per
the standards identified in the City of Los Angeles Transportation
Element Bicycle Plan generally extending from the Inglewood City
limits (Arbor Vitae Street) to the north to Imperial Highway to the
south. As a primary objective, LAWA will provide maximum
feasible incorporation of other bike paths and bike lanes into the
design of projects that will be constructed under the LAX Master
Plan program with a fundamental emphasis on ensuring safe and
efficient bicycle and vehicular circulation. In addition, bicycle
access and parking facilities will be provided at the Ground
Transportation Center, Intermodal Transportation Center, and
major parking lots. Bicycle facilities such as lockers and showers
will also be provided where feasible to promote employee bicycle
use.

MM-LU-1 Implement Revised Aircraft Noise Mitigation Program. Residential and other Initiation upon City Annually Submission of Annual
LAWA shall expand and revise the existing Aircraft Noise noise-sensitive uses Council approval of the ANMP Progress
LAX Plan Reports and

Area: Land Use 8

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-LU-1 (Cont'd)
Monitoring Mitigation Program (ANMP) in coordination with affected newly exposed to high Periodic ANMP Report
Agency: neighboring jurisdictions, the State, and the FAA. The expanded noise levels or Updates to County of
Program shall mitigate land uses that would be rendered significant increases in Los Angeles
LAWA incompatible by noise impacts associated with implementation of existing noise levels
the LAX Master Plan, unless such uses are subject to an existing
avigation easement and have been provided with noise mitigation
funds. LAWA shall accelerate the ANMP's timetable for
achieving full compatibility of all land uses within the existing
noise impact area pursuant to the requirements of the California
Airport Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21,
Subchapter 6) and current Noise Variance. With the exception of a
possible new interior noise level standard for schools to be
established through the study required by Mitigation Measure MM-
LU-3, Conduct Study of the Relationship Between Aircraft Noise
Levels and the Ability of Children to Learn, the relevant
performance standard to achieve compatibility for land uses that
are incompatible due to aircraft noise (i.e., residences, schools,
hospitals and churches) is adequate acoustic performance (sound
insulation) to ensure an interior noise level of 45 CNEL or less. As
an alternative to sound insulation, incompatible property may also
achieve compatibility if the incompatible use is converted to a
noise-compatible use.

LAWA shall revise the ANMP to incorporate new, or expand

existing measures, including, but not necessarily limited to, the
following:

‹ Continued implementation of successful programs to convert

existing incompatible land uses to compatible land uses
through sound insulation of structures and the acquisition and
conversion of incompatible land use to compatible land use.

Area: Land Use 9

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-LU-1 (Cont'd)
‹ Ongoing monitoring and provision of annual updates in
support of the requirements of the current LAX Noise
Variance pursuant to the California Airport Noise Standards,
with the updates made available (upon request) to affected
local jurisdictions, the Airport Land Use Commission of Los
Angeles County, and other interested parties.

‹ Continue the current pre- and post-insulation noise monitoring

to ensure achievement of interior noise levels at or below 45
CNEL.

‹ Accelerated rate of land use mitigation to eliminate noise

impact areas in the most timely and efficient manner possible
through:
− Increased annual funding by LAWA for land use
mitigation.
− Reevaluating avigation easements requirements with
sound insulation mitigation.
− Provision by LAWA of additional technical assistance,
where needed, to local jurisdictions to support more rapid
and efficient implementation of their land use mitigation
programs.
− Reduction or elimination, to the extent feasible, of
structural and building code compliance constraints to
mitigation of sub-standard housing.

‹ Revised criteria and procedures for selection and prioritization

of properties to be sound insulated or acquired in
consideration of the following:
− Insulation or acquisition of properties within the highest
CNEL measurement zone.
− Acceleration of the fulfillment of existing commitments
to owners wishing to participate within the current
ANMP boundaries prior to proceeding with newly
eligible properties.

Area: Land Use 10

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-LU-1 (Cont'd)
− Insulation or acquisition of incompatible properties with
high concentrations of residents or other noise-sensitive
occupants such as those housed in schools or hospitals.

‹ Amend ANMP to include libraries as noise-sensitive uses

eligible for aircraft noise mitigation.

‹ Upon completion of acquisition and/or soundproofing

commitment under the current Program, expand the
boundaries of the ANMP as necessary over time. LAWA will
continue preparing quarterly reports that monitor any
expansion of the 65 CNEL noise contours beyond the current
ANMP boundaries. Based upon these quarterly reports,
LAWA will evaluate and adjust the ANMP boundaries,
periodically as appropriate, so that as the 65 CNEL noise
contours expand, residential and noise sensitive uses newly
impacted by 65 CNEL noise levels would be included within
the Program.

MM-LU-2 Incorporate Residential Dwelling Units Exposed to Single Residential uses newly Initiation upon City Annually Submission of Annual
Event Awakenings Threshold into Aircraft Noise Mitigation exposed to high single Council approval of the ANMP Progress
Program. In addition to any restrictive measures that may be event noise levels that LAX Plan Reports and Periodic
Monitoring implemented resulting from completion of Mitigation Measure result in nighttime ANMP Report Updates
Agency: MM-N-5, Conduct Part 161 Study to Make Over-Ocean awakening that are to County of Los
Procedures Mandatory, the boundaries of the ANMP will be located outside the Angeles
LAWA
expanded to include residential uses newly exposed to single event current ANMP
exterior nighttime noise levels of 94 dBA SEL, based on the boundaries
Master Plan alternative that is ultimately approved and periodic
reevaluation and adjustments by LAWA. Uses that are newly
exposed would be identified based on annual average conditions as
derived from the most current monitored data.

Area: Land Use 11

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-LU-3 Conduct Study of the Relationship Between Aircraft Noise Classroom disruption Initiation of study upon Once, upon approval of LAWA approval of
Levels and the Ability of Children to Learn. Current studies of due to exposure to high City Council approval the study by LAWA completed study
aircraft noise and the ability of children to learn have not resulted single event or of the LAX Plan
Monitoring in the development of a statistically reliable predictive model of the cumulative noise levels
Agency: relative effect of changes in aircraft noise levels on learning.
Therefore a comprehensive study shall be initiated by LAWA to
LAWA
determine what, if any, measurable relationship may be present
between learning and the disruptions caused by aircraft noise at
various levels. An element of the evaluation shall be the setting of
an acceptable replacement threshold of significance for classroom
disruption by both specific and sustained aircraft noise events.

MM-LU-4 Provide Additional Sound Insulation for Schools Shown by Classroom disruption Within six (6) months Annually Conduct noise
MM-LU-3 to be Significantly Impacted by Aircraft Noise. due to exposure to of commissioning of measurements based on
Prior to completion of the study required by Mitigation Measure noise levels in excess of any relocated runways interim LAX interior
Monitoring MM-LU-3, Conduct Study of the Relationship Between Aircraft threshold of (for interim LAX noise thresholds and on
Agency: Noise Levels and the Ability of Children to Learn, and within six significance established interior noise thresholds newly established noise
months of the commissioning of any relocated runways associated in MM-LU-3 component); and upon thresholds set by MM-
LAWA
with implementation of the LAX Master Plan, LAWA shall completion of the study LU-3, and make
conduct interior noise measurements at schools that could be newly in Mitigation Measure schools eligible for
exposed to noise levels that exceed the interim LAX interior noise MM-LU-3 (for MM- ANMP participation, as
thresholds for classroom disruption of 55 dBA Lmax, 65 dBA LU-3 component) appropriate
Lmax, or 35 Leq(h), as presented in Section 4.1, Noise, of the Final
EIS/EIR. All school classroom buildings (except those within
school subject to an avigation easement) that are found through the
noise measurements to exceed the interim interior noise thresholds,
as compared to the 1996 baseline conditions presented in the Final
EIS/EIR, would become eligible for soundproofing under the
ANMP.

Upon completion of the study required by Mitigation Measure

MM-LU-3 and acceptance of its results by peer review of industry
experts, any schools found to exceed a newly

Area: Land Use 12

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-LU-4 (Cont'd)
established threshold of significance for classroom
disruption based on comparison with 1996 baseline conditions due
to implementation of the LAX Master Plan, shall be eligible for
participation in the ANMP administered by LAWA, unless they are
subject to an existing avigation easement. A determination of
which schools become eligible will be made following application
of the new threshold based on measured data.

MM-LU-5 Upgrade and Expand Noise Monitoring Program. LAWA shall Residential and other Initiation of system Once, upon Caltrans Caltrans certification of
upgrade and expand its existing noise monitoring program in noise-sensitive uses upgrade within 30 days certification upgraded system
surrounding communities through new system procurement, noise newly exposed to high from City Council
Monitoring monitor siting, and equipment installation. Permanent or portable noise levels or approval of the LAX
Agency: monitors shall be located in surrounding communities to record significant increases in Plan
noise data 24 hours per day, seven days per week for correlation existing noise levels
LAWA
with FAA radar data to cross-reference noise episodes with flight
patterns. The upgraded system will support LAWA and other
jurisdictional ANMP's when considering adjustments to airport
noise mitigation boundaries.

Area: Land Use 13

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Surface Transportation (On-Airport)

ST-2 Non-Peak CTA Deliveries. Deliveries to the CTA terminal Traffic congestion and During construction of On-going during Periodic reporting by
reconstruction projects will be limited to non-peak traffic hours delays as they relate to any LAX Master Plan construction the Construction
whenever possible. the LAX Master Plan related CTA terminal Coordination Office
Monitoring program construction reconstruction projects
Agency: activities
LAWA
ST-7 Adequate GTC, ITC, and APM Design. LAWA will ensure that Over- crowding, Advance design stage Once, at approval of Approval of design
the surface transportation system and curbfront for the GTC and congested curbfront design plans plans by Bureau of
ITC, commercial vehicle staging areas, and APM systems will be space for passenger and Engineering, LADOT,
Monitoring designed to adequately accommodate all forecast vehicular activity commercial vehicles and LADBS, as
Agency: through 2015. appropriate
LAWA
ST-8 Limited Short-Term Lane Closures. When construction of any Traffic Congestion and During construction of When short-term lane Periodic reporting by
new ramps at the Century Boulevard/Sepulveda Boulevard delays as they relate to new ramps at Century closures are scheduled Construction
interchange or construction for the GTC, ITC, or APM elevated the LAX Master Plan Boulevard/ Sepulveda during construction Coordination Office
Monitoring structures require short-term lane closures, the lane closures will be program construction Boulevard interchange;
Agency: for as brief a period as practical and with a goal that activities construction of elevated
closures would principally be scheduled for non-peak periods. structures for the GTC,
LAWA
ITC or APM

MM-ST-1 Require CTA Construction Vehicles to Use Designated Lanes. Traffic congestion and During CTA On-going during LAWA approval of
Whenever feasible, construction vehicles shall be restricted to delay as they relate to reconstruction projects construction Construction Traffic
designated roadways or lanes of traffic on CTA roadways adjacent the LAX Master Plan Management Plan
Monitoring to the existing close-in parking, thus limiting the mix of program construction
Agency: construction vehicles and airport traffic. activities
LAWA
MM-ST-2 Modify CTA Signage. During construction, additional signage Traffic congestion and Prior to start of As stipulated in the Sign installation
will be installed, as required, to separate construction traffic from delays as they relate to construction of CTA Construction Traffic
non-construction traffic to the extent feasible. the LAX Master Plan reconstruction projects Management Plan,
Monitoring program construction approved by LAWA's
Agency: activities Construction
Coordination Office
LAWA
Area: Surface Transportation (On-Airport) 14
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ST-3 Develop Designated Shuttle Stops for Labor Buses and ITC- Traffic congestion and Prior to demolition of As stipulated in the Establishment of new
CTA Buses. Develop shuttle stops for labor buses (i.e., buses delays as they relate to CTA parking structures Construction Traffic CTA shuttle stops
carrying construction workers) and the ITC-CTA shuttle buses at the LAX Master Plan Management Plan,
Monitoring the CTA arrivals level. All ITC-CTA shuttle buses will be routed program construction approved by LAWA's
Agency: to these lower level (arrivals) curb areas. These buses will not activities Construction
circulate through the upper level (departures) curbfront. Coordination Office
LAWA

Area: Surface Transportation (On-Airport) 15

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Surface Transportation (Off-Airport)

ST-9 Construction Deliveries. Construction deliveries requiring lane Traffic congestion and During construction On-going during Periodic reporting by
closures shall receive prior approval from the Construction delays as they relate to construction Construction
Coordination Office. Notification of deliveries shall be made with the LAX Master Plan Coordination Office
Monitoring sufficient time to allow for any modifications of approved traffic program construction
Agency: detour plans. activities
LAWA
ST-12 Designated Truck Delivery Hours. Truck deliveries shall be Traffic congestion and LAWA approval of On-going during Periodic reporting by
encouraged to use nighttime hours and shall avoid the peak periods delays as they relate to delivery schedule as construction Construction
of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. the LAX Master Plan part of the Construction Coordination Office
Monitoring program construction Traffic Management
Agency: activities Plan
LAWA
ST-14 Construction Employee Shift Hours. Shift hours that do not Traffic congestion and Prior to construction Once, upon approval of LAWA approval of
coincide with the heaviest commuter traffic periods (7:00 a.m. to delays as they relate to activity for each Master employees' work employee work
9:00 a.m., 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.) will be established. Work the LAX Master Plan Plan project schedule on a project- schedule as part of the
Monitoring periods will be extended to include weekends and multiple work program construction by-project basis Construction Traffic
Agency: shifts, to the extent possible and necessary. activities Management Plan
LAWA
ST-16 Designated Haul Routes. Every effort will be made to ensure that Traffic noise At issuance of approved Once, at approval of Approval of haul route
haul routes are located away from sensitive noise receptors. haul route each haul route by LADBS

Monitoring
Agency:
LAWA
ST-17 Maintenance of Haul Routes. Haul routes on off-airport streets Roadway safety As dictated by LAWA's On-going during Field inspection report;
will be maintained periodically and will comply with City of Los Construction construction maintenance logs
Angeles or other appropriate jurisdictional requirements for Coordination Office
Monitoring maintenance. Minor striping, lane configurations, and signal and LADBS
Agency: phasing modifications will be provided as needed.
LAWA
ST-18 Construction Traffic Management Plan. A complete Traffic congestion, Prior to commencement On-going during LAWA approval of
construction traffic plan will be developed to designate detour delay and safety, as of construction construction, as Construction Traffic
Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 16
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

ST-18 (Cont'd)
and/or haul routes, variable message and other sign locations, they relate to the LAX stipulated by LAWA's Management Plan by
Monitoring communication methods with airport passengers, construction Master Plan program Construction LAWA's Construction
Agency: deliveries, construction employee shift hours, construction construction activities Coordination Office Coordination Office
LAWA employee parking locations and other relevant factors.
ST-19 Closure Restrictions of Existing Roadways. Other than short Traffic congestion and As construction dictates As stipulated in the Street closure permit;
time periods during nighttime construction, existing roadways will delays as they relate to Construction Traffic approval by LAWA's
remain open until they are no longer needed for regular traffic or the LAX Master Plan Management Plan, Construction
Monitoring construction traffic, unless a temporary detour route is available to program construction approved by LAWA's Coordination Office
Agency: serve the same function. This will recognize that there are three activities Construction
functions taking place concurrently: (1) airport traffic, (2) Coordination Office
LAWA
construction haul routes, and (3) construction of new facilities.

ST-20 Stockpile Locations. Stockpile locations will be confined to the Traffic congestion and Prior to construction of Once, upon approval of LAWA approval of
eastern area of the airport vicinity, to the extent practical and delays as they relate to each eastern facility stockpile locations by stockpile locations as
feasible. After the eastern facilities are under construction in the LAX Master Plan LAWA's Construction part of the Construction
Monitoring Alternative D, stockpile locations will be selected that are as close program construction Coordination Office Management Traffic
Agency: to I-405 and I-105 as possible, and can be accessed by construction activities Plan
vehicles with minimal disruption to adjacent streets. Multiple
LAWA
stockpile locations may be provided, as required.

ST-21 Construction Employee Parking Locations. During construction Traffic congestion and Prior to construction of Once, upon approval of LAWA approval of
of the eastern airport facilities, employee parking locations will be delays as they relate to each eastern facility Employee Parking parking locations as
selected that are as close to I-405 and I-105 as possible and can be the LAX Master Plan Locations by LAWA's part of Construction
Monitoring accessed by employee vehicles with minimal disruption to adjacent program construction Construction Traffic Management
Agency: streets. Shuttle buses will transport employees to construction sites. activities Coordination Office Plan
In addition, remote parking locations (of not less than 1 mile away
LAWA
from project construction activities) will be established for
construction employees with shuttle service to the airport. An
emergency return system will be established for employees that
must leave unexpectedly.

ST-22 Designated Truck Routes. For dirt and aggregate and all other Traffic congestion and At issuance of haul Once, upon approval Approval of haul route

Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 17

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

ST-22 (Cont'd)
materials and equipment, truck deliveries will be on designated delay as they relate to route approval of each haul route by LADBS
Monitoring routes only (freeways and non-residential streets). Every effort will the LAX Master Plan
Agency: be made for routes to avoid residential frontages. The designated program construction
routes on City of Los Angeles streets are subject to approval by activities
LAWA LADOT's Bureau of Traffic Management and may include, but
will not necessarily be limited to: Pershing Drive (Westchester
Parkway to Imperial Highway); Florence Avenue (Aviation to I-
405); Manchester Boulevard (Aviation to I-405); Aviation
Boulevard (Manchester Avenue to Imperial Highway);
Westchester Parkway/Arbor Vitae Street (Pershing to I-405);
Century Boulevard (Sepulveda to I-405); Imperial Highway
(Pershing to I-405); La Cienega Boulevard (north of Imperial
Highway); Airport Boulevard (Arbor Vitae to Century); Sepulveda
Boulevard (Westchester Parkway to Imperial Highway); I-405; and
I-105.

MM-ST-6 Add New Traffic Lanes. Traffic lanes shall be added to select Traffic congestion and By 2008 or 2015, or Once, at issuance of Acceptance of
intersections to the satisfaction of LADOT or other appropriate delays as they relate to prior to certificate of certificate of occupancy construction by
jurisdiction, sufficient to increase the capacity of the intersection the LAX Master Plan occupancy for of related project LADOT and LADPW,
Monitoring without unnecessarily reducing sidewalk widths, removing on- program activities associated project or affected jurisdiction
Agency: street parking, or encroaching onto other land uses. By 2008: Arbor component, as specified
Vitae Street & La Cienega Boulevard, Aviation Boulevard & 111th in the Transportation
LAWA
Street, Aviation Boulevard & Imperial Highway, Centinela Avenue Improvements Phasing
& Sepulveda Boulevard, Continental City Drive & Imperial Plan
Highway, I-105 off-ramp and Imperial Highway, La Cienega
Boulevard & 111th Street, Lincoln Boulevard & 83rd Street,
Centinela Avenue & La Cienega Boulevard, Century Boulevard &
La Brea Avenue. By 2015: Imperial Highway and Main Street,
Imperial Highway & Pershing Drive, Lincoln Boulevard and
Manchester Boulevard.

MM-ST-7 Restripe Existing Facilities. Existing traffic lanes shall be Traffic congestion and By 2008 or 2015, or Once, at issuance of Approval of restriping
restriped to the satisfaction of LADOT or other appropriate delays as they relate to prior to certificate of certificate of by LADOT or affected

Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 18

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ST-7 (Cont'd)
Monitoring jurisdiction, so that additional lane capacity will be provided the LAX Master Plan occupancy for occupancy of related jurisdiction
Agency: without adding any new pavement to the intersection or road program activities associated project project
segment. By 2008: Airport Boulevard & Arbor Vitae Street, component, as specified
LAWA Aviation Boulevard & El Segundo Boulevard, Century Boulevard in the Transportation
& Sepulveda Boulevard, Florence Avenue & La Cienega Improvements Phasing
Boulevard, La Cienega Boulevard & Manchester Avenue, La Plan
Tijera Boulevard & Sepulveda Boulevard, Manchester Avenue &
Sepulveda Boulevard, Hawthorne Boulevard & Imperial Highway,
Imperial Highway & Inglewood Avenue. By 2015: Airport
Boulevard & Manchester Avenue, Aviation Boulevard &
Manchester Boulevard, Century Boulevard & La Cienega
Boulevard, Grand Avenue & Vista del Mar, La Tijera Boulevard &
Manchester Avenue, Centinela Avenue & Culver Boulevard, Arbor
Vitae Street & Inglewood Avenue.

MM-ST-8 Add ATSAC, ATCS or Equivalent. Automated Traffic Traffic congestion and By 2008 or 2015, or Once, at issuance of Approval of signal
Surveillance and Control (ATSAC) or Adaptive Traffic Control delays as they relate to prior to certificate of certificate of occupancy upgrade from LADOT
System (ATCS) capability or equivalent shall be added to select the LAX Master Plan occupancy for of related project and LADPW, or
Monitoring intersections to the satisfaction of LADOT or other appropriate program activities associated project appropriate jurisdiction
Agency: jurisdiction. The improved capability will result in a more effective component, as specified
traffic signal network. By 2008: Aviation Boulevard & El Segundo in the Transportation
LAWA
Boulevard, El Segundo Boulevard & Sepulveda Boulevard, Improvements Phasing
Continental City Drive & Imperial Highway, I-105 off-ramp & Plan
Imperial Highway, Mariposa Avenue & Sepulveda Boulevard,
Rosecrans Avenue & Sepulveda Boulevard, I-105 W/B off-ramp &
Sepulveda Boulevard, Hawthorne Boulevard & Imperial Highway,
Century Boulevard & Inglewood Avenue, Imperial Highway &
Inglewood Avenue, Overland Avenue S/O Venice Boulevard
(link). By 2015: Aviation Boulevardl & Manchester Avenue, El
Segundo Boulevard & La Cienega Boulevard, Arbor Vitae Street
& La Brea Avenue, Centinela Avenue E/O La Brea Avenue (link),
Imperial Highway W/O

Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 19

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ST-8 (Cont'd)
Hawthorne Boulevard (link), El Segundo Boulevard W/O
Hawthorne Boulevard (link).
MM-ST-10 Modify Signal Phasing. The traffic signal phasing of select Traffic congestion and By 2008 or 2015, or Once, at issuance of Approval of signal
intersections shall be modified to the satisfaction of LADOT or delays as they relate to prior to certificate of certificate of occupancy improvement from
other appropriate jurisdiction, to allow more efficient use of the the LAX Master Plan occupancy for of related project LADOT or appropriate
Monitoring intersections, particularly those that will experience a notable program activities associated project jurisdiction
Agency: change in traffic characteristics as a result of the project. By 2008: component, as specified
Aviation Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue, Centinela Avenue & in the Transportation
LAWA
Jefferson Boulevard, Douglas Street & Imperial Highway, El Improvements Phasing
Segundo Boulevard & Sepulveda Boulevard, Florence Avenue & Plan
La Cienega Boulevard, Imperial Highway & Sepulveda Boulevard,
La Cienega Boulevard & 111th Street, La Cienega Boulevard &
Manchester Avenue, Lincoln Boulevard & 83rd Street, Manchester
Avenue & Sepulveda Boulevard. By 2015: Highland Avenue/Vista
del Mar & Rosecrans Boulevard, Imperial Highway & Main Street,
Imperial Highway & Vista del Mar.

MM-ST-12 Provide New Ramps Connecting I-105 to LAX Between Traffic congestion and Prior to certificate of Twice: Once, upon Approved design plans;
Aviation Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard. These ramps delays as they relate to occupancy for GTC LAWA's approval of Issuance of Caltrans
shall be provided to allow for direct access and egress to/from the the LAX Master Plan design plans; Once, encroachment permit;
Monitoring ITC and GTC via I-105, between Aviation Boulevard and La program activities upon Caltrans approval Start of construction
Agency: Cienega Boulevard. A feasibility study is underway to determine of design plans
the best design for these ramps.
LAWA
MM-ST-13 Create A New Interchange at I-405 and Lennox Boulevard. Traffic congestion and Prior to certificate of Once, upon LAWA's LAWA approval of
This interchange shall provide grade-separated ramps from I-405 delays as they relate to occupancy for GTC approval of design design plans
directly into airport property, and vice-versa. It shall be located the LAX Master Plan plans
Monitoring approximately mid-way between Century Boulevard and Imperial program activities
Agency: Highway. A feasibility study is underway to determine the best
design for the interchange. Should this proposed interchange not
LAWA
be constructed, suitable and alternate traffic mitigation measures
shall be designed and implemented to the satisfaction of LADOT
and the Bureau of Engineering.

Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 20

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ST-14 Ground Transportation/Construction Coordination Office Traffic congestion and Prior to commencement As major development LAWA approval of
Outreach Program. The construction coordination office delays as they relate to of construction of any projects occur in airport outreach program
proposed in Master Plan Commitment C-1, Establishment of a the LAX Master Plan major development area
Monitoring Ground Transportation/Construction Coordination Office, shall program construction project within the
Agency: establish appropriate mechanisms to involve and coordinate with activities vicinity of LAX
other major airport-area development projects to the extent
LAWA
feasible, to ensure that the cumulative impacts of construction in
the airport area are coordinated and minimized.

MM-ST-15 Provide Fair-Share Contributions to Transit Improvements. Traffic congestion and By 2008 or 2015, or Once, at issuance of Approval of fair-share
Provide fair-share contributions to benefit transit to and from LAX delays as they relate to prior to certificate of certificate of occupancy contribution by
to the satisfaction of LADOT and/or other appropriate jurisdiction the LAX Master Plan occupancy for of related project LADOT or appropriate
Monitoring or agency. By 2008: Imperial Highway & Sepulveda Boulevard, program activities associated project jurisdiction and/or
Agency: Jefferson Boulevard & Lincoln Boulevard, La Tijera Boulevard & component, as specified agency
Sepulveda Boulevard, Lincoln Boulevard & Teale Street, Lincoln in the Transportation
LAWA
Boulevard and Washington Boulevard, Manchester Avenue & Improvements Phasing
Sepulveda Boulevard, Mariposa Avenue & Sepulveda Boulevard, Plan
I-105 W/B off-ramp at Sepulveda Boulevard, Overland Avenue
S/O Venice Boulevard (link). By 2015: Howard Hughes Parkway
& Sepulveda Boulevard, Lincoln Boulevard & Manchester
Avenue, Sepulveda Boulevard & 76th Street/77th Street, Fiji Way
& Lincoln Boulevard, Lincoln Boulevard and Marina Expressway,
Sepulveda Boulevard & 79th Street/80th Street, Sepulveda
Boulevard & 83rd Street, Lincoln Boulevard S/O Venice
Boulevard (link), Centinela Avenue S/O Venice Boulevard (link),
Sawtelle Boulevard S/O Venice Boulevard (link), Sepulveda
Boulevard S/O Venice Boulevard (link), Jefferson Boulevard E/O
Lincoln Boulevard (link), Lincoln Boulevard S/O Jefferson
Boulevard (link), Culver Boulevard W/O Jefferson Boulevard
(link)

MM-ST-16 Provide Fair-Share Contribution to LA County's project to Traffic congestion and By 2008 or 2015, or Once, at issuance of Approval of fair-share
extend the Marina Expressway. Provide fair-share contribution delays as they relate to prior to certificate of certificate of contribution or

Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 21

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ST-16 (Cont'd)
Monitoring to Los Angeles County's project to extend the Marina Expressway the LAX Master Plan occupancy for occupancy of related alternative
Agency: (Route 90) to Admiralty Way or complete alternative off-site program activities associated project project improvement by
improvements at the following intersections: By 2015: Lincoln component, as specified LADOT and/or Los
LAWA Boulevard & Washington Boulevard, Bali Way & Lincoln in the Transportation Angeles County
Boulevard, Fiji Way & Lincoln Boulevard, Lincoln Boulevard & Improvements Phasing
Marina Expressway, Lincoln Boulevard & Maxella Avenue, Plan
Lincoln Boulevard & Mindanao Way

Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 22

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Relocation of Residences and Businesses

RBR-1 Residential and Business Relocation Program. To address the Minimize adverse Prior to commencement Once, upon approval of City Council approval
acquisition of properties and relocation of businesses and residents acquisition or of relocation activities the Relocation Plan of the Relocation Plan
associated with the proposed Master Plan, LAWA will prepare a relocation impacts
Monitoring Residential and Business Relocation Plan (Relocation Plan) in
Agency: compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, state and
LAWA
local regulations, and FAA Advisory Circular 150/5100-17, prior
to the commencement of acquisition. LAWA will achieve the
following objectives:

‹ Fully inform eligible project-area residential occupants and

business owners of the nature of and procedures for obtaining
relocation assistance and benefits.
‹ Determine the needs of each residential relocatee and business
owner.
‹ Provide an adequate number of referrals to comparable,
decent, safe, and sanitary housing units within a reasonable
time prior to relocation. No residential occupant would be
required to move until comparable decent, safe, and sanitary
housing is made available.
‹ Provide at least 90 days advance written notice to vacate, as
required by law. The notice period may be extended according
to the needs of the affected relocatees.
‹ Provide current and continuously updated information
concerning replacement housing and business choices and
opportunities.
‹ Ensure that the relocation process does not result in different
or separate treatment because of race, religion, national origin,
gender, marital status, or other arbitrary circumstances.
‹ Ensure that the unique needs of minority and low-income
persons and businesses are addressed, including the provision
of assistance and materials in Spanish and other languages as
necessary.

Area: Relocation of Residences and Businesses 23

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

RBR-1 (Cont'd)
‹ Supply information concerning federal, state, city, and other
governmental programs providing assistance to displaced
persons or businesses.
‹ Assist each eligible person or business in the completion of all
applications and claims for payment of benefits.
‹ Make relocation payments in accordance with Federal
Relocation Regulations, including the provisions of Last
Resort Housing, where applicable.
‹ Inform all affected occupants of LAWA's policies with regard
to eviction and property management.
‹ Establish and maintain a formal grievance procedure for use
by relocatees seeking administrative review of LAWA
decisions with respect to relocation assistance.

Although it is expected that comparable replacement housing

resources are available, LAWA will take all reasonable steps to
make such resources available, including but not limited to the
following:

‹ Provide vacated project structures to agencies that could

relocate the structures to new sites and make them available
for program-affected residents.
‹ Provide funding for possible construction of replacement
housing.
‹ Provide funding for rehabilitation of housing units being sold
or rented to program-affected residents.
‹ Consider other innovative actions to ensure the availability of
replacement housing.

Area: Relocation of Residences and Businesses 24

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

RBR-1 In addition to the above services, distinct business assistance

services will include but not be limited to the following:

‹ LAWA will implement a business relocation assistance

program to insure prompt and equitable relocation and re-
establishment of businesses displaced as a result of the
proposed Master Plan. The business relocation assistance
program will include: 1) a determination of the relocation
needs and preferences of each business to be displaced; 2) the
maintenance of listings and contacts with commercial real
estate brokers, commercial lenders, and government economic
development agencies to assist displaced businesses in
locating suitable replacement sites; 3) the provision to
displaced businesses of information on programs administered
by the Small Business Administration and other federal and
state programs offering assistance to displaced persons; 4) the
provision of special assistance to those who wish to remain
close to their current sites or close to an airport in finding such
sites, including sites on the airport such as LAX
Northside/Westchester Southside, or other airport owned
properties or developments; and 5) the provision of special
assistance to address the specific needs of minority-owned
businesses.
‹ LAWA will coordinate with the County of Los Angeles and
the cities of Inglewood, Hawthorne, and El Segundo to locate
properties within their jurisdictions suitable for businesses
displaced by the acquisition program.
‹ LAWA will investigate and consider the use of the separate
and ongoing Aircraft Noise Mitigation Program to redevelop
noise impacted residential areas into commercial areas
suitable for businesses displaced by the Master Plan
acquisition program. As part of these efforts, LAWA will
coordinate with the City of Inglewood and the County of Los
Angeles to identify areas east of I-405 where land acquisition
and conversion to compatible land uses is contemplated under
applicable plans or is otherwise deemed appropriate.

Area: Relocation of Residences and Businesses 25

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

RBR-1 (Cont'd)
‹ LAWA will provide opportunities for air freight, flight
kitchens and other airport-related uses displaced by the
acquisition program to relocate onto airport property, to the
maximum extent practicable.
‹ LAWA will, to the maximum practicable extent, develop its
property in LAX Northside/Westchester Southside so as to
provide relocation opportunities for businesses displaced by
the acquisition program.
‹ With respect to any and all residential acquisition under
Alternative D, LAWA will implement a housing program
similar to the existing "Move On Housing Program," which is
currently being implemented in conjunction with the existing
ANMP Relocation Plan. The Move On Housing Program is a
collaborative effort between public and not-for-profit
organizations to move and rehabilitate Manchester Square and
Belford area structures in order to transfer housing assets to
residential areas in Los Angeles County, provide reasonable
housing for displaced tenants, and provide construction-
related employment opportunities to community residents.

MM-RBR-1 Phasing for Business Relocations. To maximize opportunities for Minimize adverse Prior to commencement Once, upon approval of LAWA approval of
airport/airport-dependent businesses and other businesses acquisition or of relocation activities phasing plan phasing plan for
relocation impacts for business relocation business relocation

Area: Relocation of Residences and Businesses 26

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-RBR-1 (Cont'd)
Monitoring being acquired to relocate in proximity to their current sites,
Agency: LAWA shall, to the maximum degree feasible, schedule
acquisition phasing and/or development phasing to accommodate
LAWA interested parties on airport property in a manner that would avoid
delays to the overall construction and development schedule. First
priority shall be given to airport/airport-dependent businesses, such
as air freight forwarders and hotels, whose relocation off of the
airport would present a unique hardship. Master Plan Commitment
RBR-1, Residential and Business Relocation Program, can also
serve to mitigate significant effects stemming from the acquisition
program by using LAWA ANMP funds to redevelop noise
impacted residential property for industrial uses.

MM-RBR-2 Relocation Opportunities through Aircraft Noise Mitigation Minimize adverse Within 60 days Once, upon initiation of Provide evidence of
Program. As a special project under the Aircraft Noise Mitigation acquisition or from City Council coordination efforts coordination
Program (ANMP) for LAX, LAWA shall coordinate with the City relocation impacts approval of with the County of Los
Monitoring of Inglewood and the County of Los Angeles to identify residential the Relocation Plan, Angeles and City of
Agency: land uses that are subject to high levels of aircraft noise where land LAWA shall initiate Inglewood
acquisition and conversion to compatible land uses is contemplated coordination
LAWA
under applicable plans or is otherwise deemed appropriate. As efforts with the County
residential uses are relocated outside of noise impacted areas under of Los Angeles and
the ANMP, in compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance City of Inglewood
and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended,
LAWA shall work with the jurisdictions to identify airport-related
businesses interested in these sites. With support from the
jurisdictions, as well as other businesses and organizations such as
Gateway to LA that interact with LAWA, LAWA shall promote
these sites for businesses subject to acquisition as part of the
proposed LAX Relocation Plan business relocation assistance
program. The multiple objectives of the effort shall be to mitigate
noise impacted land uses, retain and promote local

Area: Relocation of Residences and Businesses 27

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-RBR-2 (Cont'd)
businesses dependent on airport proximity, and support local
employment and economic growth. Areas under the City of
Inglewood General Plan and redevelopment plan that are proposed
for land use recycling along Century Boulevard shall be given high
priority.

Area: Relocation of Residences and Businesses 28

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Air Quality
MM-AQ-1 LAX Master Plan - Mitigation Plan for Air Quality. LAWA Overall air pollutant Basic LAX MP-MPAQ Twice: Once, Annual progress
shall expand and revise the existing air quality mitigation programs emissions associated and the Construction- upon confirmation of reports, summarizing
at LAX through the development of an LAX Master Plan- with construction and Related component to the basic LAX MP- the nature and
Monitoring Mitigation Plan for Air Quality (LAX MP-MPAQ). The LAX MP- operation of the LAX be completed prior to MPAQ (i.e., basic effectiveness of air
Agency: MPAQ shall be developed in consultation with the FAA, USEPA, Master Plan issuance of grading or framework of Plan), quality mitigation
CARB and SCAQMD, as appropriate, and shall include demolition permit for and once measures that were
LAWA
technologically/legally feasible and economically reasonable first Master Plan upon confirmation of implemented during the
methods to reduce air pollutant emissions from aircraft, GSE, project. The the full LAX MP- year, will be prepared
traffic, and construction equipment both on and off the airport. The Transportation-Related MPAQ, when all three
overall effect, and minimum requirement, of the LAX MP-MPAQ component and the implementation plans
shall be reduced potential air pollutant emissions associated with Operations-Related (one for each category
implementation of the LAX Master Plan to levels equal to, if not component to be of air quality mitigation
less than, the post-mitigation levels identified in the Final EIS/EIR completed in measures) are complete
for the project. The LAX MP-MPAQ shall include feasible conjunction with
mitigation measures that are grouped into the following three (3) implementation of the
categories: Master Plan
components that
‹ Construction-Related Measures; materially affect
‹ Transportation-Related Measures; and surface transportation
‹ Operations-Related Measures. emissions and
operations emissions
The LAX MP-MPAQ will, initially, present the basic framework
of the overall air quality mitigation program (basic LAX MP-
MPAQ), and will, ultimately, define the specific measures to be
implemented within the context of three (3) individual components
specific to the categories of emissions indicated above (full LAX
MP-MPAQ). Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-AQ-2,
Construction-Related Mitigation Measure, will define the specific
measures to be included in the construction-related component;
Mitigation Measure MM-AQ-3, Transportation-Related Mitigation
Measure, will define the specific measures to be included in the
surface

Area: Air Quality 29

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-1 (Cont'd)
transportation-related component; and Mitigation Measure MM-
AQ-4, Operations-Related Mitigation Measure, will define the
specific measures to be included in the operations-related
component. The basic framework of the LAX MP-MPAQ and the
Construction-Related component will be developed prior to
initiation of construction activities for the first project to be
developed under the LAX Master Plan, and the development of the
other two components will occur in conjunction with
implementation of the Master Plan components that materially
affect surface transportation emissions and operations emissions.

MM-AQ-2 Construction-Related Mitigation Measures. The Construction-related air Prior to issuance of Once, upon completion Completion of
required components of the construction-related air quality pollutant emissions grading or demolition of implementation plan implementation plan
mitigation measure are itemized below. These elements include permit for first Master for construction-related for construction-related
Monitoring numerous specific actions to reduce emissions of fugitive dust and Plan project. measures, and as measures within the
Agency: of exhaust emissions from on-road and nonroad mobile sources specified in the LAX MP-MPAQ
and stationary engines. All of these elements must be in place implementation plan
LAWA
prior to commencement of the first Master Plan construction
project and must remain in place through build out of the Master
Plan. An implementation plan will be developed which provides
available details as to how each of the elements of this
construction-related mitigation measure will be implemented and
monitored. Each construction subcontractor will be responsible to
implement all measures that apply to the equipment and activities
under his/her control, an obligation which will be formalized in the
contractual documents, with financial penalties for
noncompliance. LAWA will assign one or more environmental
coordinators whose responsibility it will be to ensure compliance
with the construction-related measure by use of direct inspections,

Area: Air Quality 30

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-2 (Cont'd)
records reviews, and investigation of complaints with reporting to
LAWA management for follow-up action. The estimated ranges of
emissions reductions quantified for this mitigation measure for
Alternative D are shown in Table F5-8, Estimated Ranges of
Emission Reductions for Construction-Related Air Quality
Mitigation Measures. Reliable emissions reductions were not able
to be quantified for all of these components.

Table F5-8

Estimated Ranges of Emission Reductions for

Construction-Related Air Quality Mitigation Measures

Pollutant Alternative D1 (tons)

ROG 1 - 10
NOX 300 - 1,100
CO 10 - 30
PM10 140 - 400
SOX 1 - 10
1
In the year of peak construction emissions.

Source: Camp, Dresser, & McKee, Inc., 2004.

The specific components of this construction-related air quality

mitigation measure include:

1. Fugitive Dust Source Controls:

‹ Apply non-toxic soil stabilizer to all inactive construction

areas (i.e., areas with disturbed soil).
‹ Following the addition of materials to, or removal of materials
from, the surface of outdoor storage piles, said piles shall be
effectively stabilized of fugitive dust emissions utilizing non-
toxic soil stabilizer.

Area: Air Quality 31

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-2 (Cont'd)
‹ Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number
and person to contact regarding dust complaints; this
person shall respond and take corrective action within 24
hours.
‹ Prior to final occupancy, the applicant demonstrates that
all ground surfaces are covered or treated sufficiently to
minimize fugitive dust emissions.
‹ All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. being installed
as part of project should be completed as soon as
possible; in addition, building pads should be laid as soon
as possible after grading.
‹ Pave all construction access roads at least 100 feet on to
the site from the main road.

2. On-Road Mobile Source Controls:

‹ To the extent feasible, have construction

employees work/commute during off-peak hours.
‹ Make available on-site lunch trucks during construction
to minimize off-site worker vehicle trips.

3. Nonroad Mobile Source Controls:

‹ Prohibit staging or parking of construction vehicles

(including workers' vehicles) on streets adjacent to
sensitive receptors such as schools, daycare centers, and
hospitals.
‹ Prohibit construction vehicle idling in excess of ten
minutes.
‹ Utilize on-site rock crushing facility during construction
to reuse rock / concrete and minimize off-site truck haul
trips.

Area: Air Quality 32

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-2 (Cont'd)
4. Stationary Point Source Controls:

‹ Specify combination of electricity from power poles and

portable diesel- or gasoline-fueled generators using
"cleaner burning diesel" fuel and exhaust emission
controls.

5. Mobile and Stationary Source Controls:

‹ Specify combination of construction equipment using

"cleaner burning diesel" fuel and exhaust emission
controls.
‹ Suspend use of all construction equipment during a
second-stage smog alert in the immediate vicinity of
LAX.
‹ Utilize construction equipment having the minimum
practical engine size (i.e., lowest appropriate horsepower
rating for intended job).
‹ Require that all construction equipment working on site is
properly maintained (including engine tuning) at all times
in accordance with manufacturers' specifications and
schedules.
‹ Prohibit tampering with construction equipment to
increase horsepower or to defeat emission control
devices.

6. Administrative Controls

‹ The contractor or builder shall designate a person or

persons to ensure the implementation of all components
of the construction-related measure through direct
inspections, records reviews, and investigations of
complaints.

Area: Air Quality 33

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-3 Transportation-Related Mitigation Measures. The primary Surface Transportation- Prior to issuance of Once, upon completion Completion of
feature of the transportation-related air quality mitigation measure related air pollutant building permit for ITC of implementation plan implementation plan
Monitoring is the development and construction of at least eight (8) additional emissions and within 6 months for transportation- for transportation-
Agency: sites with FlyAway service similar to the service provided by the following City Council related measures and as related measures within
Van Nuys FlyAway currently operated by LAWA. The intent of approval of the LAX specified in the the LAX MP-MPAQ
LAWA
these FlyAway sites is to reduce the quantity of traffic going to and Plan implementation plan
from LAX by providing regional locations where LAX employees
and passengers can pick up an LAX-dedicated, clean-fueled bus
that will transport them from a FlyAway closer to their home or
office into LAX and back. The reduction in vehicle miles traveled
(VMT) translates directly into reduced air emissions, as well as a
reduction in traffic congestion in the vicinity of the airport. An
implementation plan will be developed which provides available
details as to how each of the elements of this transportation-related
mitigation measure will be implemented and monitored. The
estimated emissions reductions associated with this component of
the transportation-related air quality mitigation measure are shown
in Table F5-9, Estimated Emissions Reductions (Tons) for Eight
New FlyAway Terminals - 2015.
Table F5-9

Estimated Emissions Reductions (Tons)

for Eight New FlyAway Terminals – 2015

Pollutant1 Alternative D
ROG 56.0
NOx 82.9
CO 1064.5
PM10 152.6
SOx 1.7
Note: Reductions are the combined totals from all new Flyaway
capacity, and may include expansion of the existing Flyaway.
1
Based on EMFAC2002 Emission Factors for Calendar Year 2015.

Source: Camp, Dresser, & McKee, Inc., 2004.

34
Area: Air Quality
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-3 (Cont'd)

The required two (2) elements of this transportation-related air

quality mitigation measure include:

1. Development of New FlyAway Capacity:

Additional service capacity from at least eight (8) FlyAway service

terminals are required under this measure, and all eight must be
operational by 2015. LAWA has already begun analyzing
potential FlyAway locations. Selection of the eight general
locations should be made and included in the overarching air
quality mitigation program plan discussed in Mitigation Measure
MM-AQ-1, LAX Master Plan Mitigation Plan for Air Quality, as
well as in the implementation plan for the transportation-related
measures noted above. Final selection of the sites must be
completed on a schedule that allows for property acquisition or
leasing, terminal design, construction, and implementation of all
sites by 2015.

The sites may include, but are not limited to the following:

‹ West San Fernando Valley/Eastern Ventura County

‹ Santa Monica/Pacific Palisades
‹ Central Los Angeles
‹ Long Beach/South Bay/San Pedro
‹ East San Fernando Valley
‹ San Gabriel Valley
‹ Southeast Los Angeles County
‹ North Los Angeles County

Area: Air Quality 35

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-3 (Cont'd)
2. Public Outreach Program for FlyAway Service:

This measure also requires a public outreach program to inform

potential users of the terminals about their existence and their
locations. The outreach program would be geared towards
encouraging the use of the FlyAways with convenience and low
cost being the primary selling points.

Other feasible mitigation elements may be developed to ensure that

the emission reductions for this transportation-related measure are
achieved. These may include, for example:

‹ Transit Ridership measures such as:

− Constructing on-site or off-site bus turnouts, passenger

benches, or shelters to encourage transit system use.
− Constructing on-site or off-site pedestrian
improvements/including showers for pedestrian
employees to encourage walking/bicycling to work by
LAX employees.

‹ Highway and Roadway Improvements measures such as:

− Linking ITS with off-airport parking facilities with ability

to divert/direct trips to these facilities to reduce
traffic/parking congestion and associate air emissions in
the immediate vicinity of the airport.

Area: Air Quality 36

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-3 (Cont'd)
− Expanding ITS/ATCS systems, concentrating on I-405
and I-105 corridors, extending into South Bay and
Westside surface street corridors to reduce traffic/parking
congestion and associate air emissions in the immediate
vicinity of the airport.
− Linking LAX traffic management system with airport
cargo facilities, with ability to reroute cargo trips to/from
these facilities to reduce traffic/parking congestion and
associate air emissions in the immediate vicinity of the
airport.
− Developing a program to minimize the use of
conventional-fueled fleet vehicles during smog alerts to
reduce air emissions from vehicles at the airport.

‹ Parking measures such as:

− Providing free parking and preferential parking locations

for ULEV/SULEV/ZEV in all (including employee) LAX
lots; providing free charging stations for ZEV; including
public outreach to reduce air emissions from automobiles
accessing airport parking.
− Measures to reduce air emissions of vehicles in line to
exit parking lots such as pay-on-foot (before getting into
car) to minimize idle time at parking check out, including
public outreach.
− Implementing on-site circulation plan in parking lots to
reduce time and associated air emissions from vehicles
circulating through lots looking for parking.
− Encouraging video conferencing and providing video
conferencing capabilities at various locations on the
airport to reduce VMT in associated air emissions in the
vicinity of the airport.

Area: Air Quality 37

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-3 (Cont'd)
‹ Additional Ridesharing measures such as:

− Expanding the airport's ridesharing program to include all

airport tenants

‹ Clean Vehicle Fleets measures such as:

− Promoting commercial vehicles/trucks/vans using

terminal areas (LAX and regional intermodal) to install
SULEV/ZEV engines to reduce vehicle air emissions.
− Promoting "best-engine" technology (SULEV/ZEV) for
rental cars using on-airport RAC facilities to reduce
vehicle air emissions.
− Consolidating nonrental car shuttles using SULEV/ZEV
engines to reduce vehicle air emissions.

‹ Energy Conservation measures such as:

− Covering, if feasible, any parking structures that receive

direct sunlight, to reduce volatile emissions from vehicle
gasoline tanks; and installing solar panels on these roofs
where feasible to supply electricity or hot water to reduce
power production demand and associated air emissions at
utility plants.

Area: Air Quality 38

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-3 (Cont'd)
These other components may require the approval of other federal,
state, regional, and/or local government agencies. It should be
noted that no air quality benefit (i.e., pollutant reduction) was
estimated in the EIS/EIR for these additional components; hence,
implementation of any of these other components would, in
conjunction with the FlyAways described above, provide for
additional air quality benefits over and above amount of
transportation-related pollutant reductions accounted for in
the Final EIS/EIR.

MM-AQ-4 Operations-Related Mitigation Measures. The primary Operations-related air Within six (6) months Once, upon completion Completion of
component of the operations-related air quality mitigation measure pollutant emissions following City Council of implementation plan implementation plan
consists of one airside item, the conversion of ground support approval of the LAX for operations-related for operations-related
Monitoring equipment (GSE) to extremely low emission technology, such as Plan measures and measures within the
Agency: electric power, fuel cells, or other future technological as specified in the LAX MP-MPAQ
developments. Due to the magnitude of the effort to convert GSE, implementation plan
LAWA
it must be a phased program and must be completed at build out of
the Master Plan in 2015. An implementation plan will be
developed which provides available details as to how each of the
elements of this operations-related mitigation measure will be
implemented and monitored. Because this effort will apply to all
GSE in use at LAX, both LAWA-owned equipment and tenant-
owned equipment, the effort must begin upon City approval of
the LAX Plan with a detailed inventory of the number, types, sizes,
and usage history of all GSE at LAX. Because some of the tenant
organizations (mainly the major domestic commercial airlines)
have signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the
California Air Resources Board (CARB) that requires the
signatories to replace a proportion of their GSE fleet with clean-
fuel alternatives (including zero-emission equipment), it will be
necessary for LAWA to evaluate the level of its commitment
within the framework of the MOU. Because LAWA

Area: Air Quality 39

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-4 (Cont'd)
anticipates facilitating this component by providing incentives or
tenant lease requirements, early negotiations with tenant
organizations may allow LAWA to accommodate cost-sharing
agreements to implement the GSE conversions in a timely manner,
to make LAWA's financial commitment as cost effective as
possible. LAWA will assign a GSE coordinator whose
responsibility it will be to ensure the successful conversion of GSE
in a timely manner. This coordinator must have adequate authority
to negotiate on behalf of the City and have sufficient technical
support to evaluate technical issues that arise during
implementation of this measure. The estimated ranges of
emissions reductions quantified for this component of the
operations-related measure for Alternative D are shown in Table
F5-10, Estimated Ranges of Emissions Reductions for GSE
Conversion.

Table F5-10

Estimated Ranges of Emissions Reductions

for GSE Conversion
Pollutant Alternative D1 (tons)
ROG 10 - 100
NOX 300 - 400
CO 500 - 1000
PM10 1 - 10
SOX 1-5
1
In the build-out year, 2015

Source: Camp, Dresser, & McKee, Inc., 2004.

The successful conversion of all GSE at LAX to extremely low or

zero emission equipment by 2015 is the required component of this

Area: Air Quality 40

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-4 (Cont'd)
Consideration of other operations-related measures may include
components such as contracting with commercial landscapers who
operate lowest emitting equipment. Reliable emissions reductions
have not been quantified for these other components.

Area: Air Quality 41

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Hydrology and Water Quality

HWQ-1 Conceptual Drainage Plan. Once a Master Plan alternative is Significant changes in Prior to issuance of a Once, upon completion Completion of
selected, and in conjunction with its design, LAWA will develop a surface hydrology or grading/building permit of conceptual drainage conceptual drainage
conceptual drainage plan of the area within the boundaries of the adverse impacts to for the first Master Plan plan plan
Monitoring Master Plan alternative (in accordance with FAA guidelines and to surface water quality project involving
Agency: the satisfaction of the City of Los Angeles Department of Public due to new substantial surface
Works, Bureau of Engineering). The purpose of the drainage plan development associated alternations or
LAWA
will be to assess area-wide drainage flows as related to the Master with the Master Plan substantial changes to
Plan project area, at a level of detail sufficient to identify the existing operations
overall improvements necessary to provide adequate drainage
capacity to prevent flooding. The conceptual drainage plan will
provide the basis and specifications by which detailed drainage
improvement plans will be designed in conjunction with site
engineering specific to each Master Plan project. Best
Management Practices (BMPs) will be incorporated to minimize
the effect of airport operations on surface water quality and to
prevent a net increase in pollutant loads to surface water resulting
from the selected Master Plan alternative.

To evaluate drainage capacity, LAWA will use either the Peak

Rate Method specified in Part G - Storm Drain Design of the City
of Los Angeles' Bureau of Engineering Manual or the Los Angeles
County Modified Rational Method, both of which are acceptable to
the LADPW. In areas within the boundary of the selected
alternative where the surface water runoff rates are found to exceed
the capacity of the storm water conveyance infrastructure with the
potential to cause flooding, LAWA will take measures to either
reduce peak flow rates or increase the structure's capacity. These
drainage facilities will be designed to ensure that they adequately
convey storm water runoff and prevent flooding by adhering to the
procedures set forth by the Peak Rate Method/Los Angeles County
Modified Rational Method.

Area: Hydrology and Water Quality 42

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

HWQ-1 (Cont'd)
Methods to reduce the peak flow of surface water runoff could
include:

‹ Decreasing impervious area by removing unnecessary

pavement or utilizing porous concrete or modular pavement.
‹ Building storm water detention structures.
‹ Diverting runoff to pervious areas (reducing directly-
connected impervious areas).
‹ Diverting runoff to outfalls with additional capacity (reducing
the total drainage area for an individual outfall).
‹ Redirecting storm water flows to increase the time of
concentration.

Measures to increase drainage capacity could include:

‹ Increasing the size and slope (capacity) of storm water

conveyance structures (pipes, culverts, channels, etc.).
‹ Increasing the number of storm water conveyance structures
and/or outfalls.

To evaluate the effect of the selected Master Plan alternative on

surface water quality, LAWA will prepare a specific Standard
Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) for the selected
alternative, as required by the LARWQCB. The SUSMP addresses
water quality and drainage issues by specifying source control,
structural, and treatment control BMPs with the objective of
reducing the discharge of pollutants from the stormwater
conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Once
BMPs are identified, an updated pollutant load estimate will be
calculated that takes into account reductions from treatment control
BMPs.

Area: Hydrology and Water Quality 43

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

HWQ-1 (Cont'd)
These BMPs will be applied to both existing and future sources
with the goal of achieving no net increase in loadings of pollutants
of concern to receiving water bodies. LAWA will therefore address
water quality issues, including erosion and sedimentation, and
comply with the SUSMP requirements by designing the storm
water system through incorporation of the structural and treatment
control BMPs specified in the SUSMP.

The following list includes some of the BMPs that could be

employed to infiltrate or treat storm water runoff and dry weather
flows, and control peak flow rates:

‹ Vegetated swales and strips

‹ Oil/Water separators
‹ Clarifiers
‹ Media filtration
‹ Catch basin inserts and screens
‹ Continuous flow deflective systems
‹ Bioretention and infiltration
‹ Detention basins
‹ Manufactured treatment units
‹ Hydrodynamic devices

Other structural BMPs may also be selected from the literature and
the many federal, state and local guidance documents available.
Performance of structural BMPs varies considerably based on their
design. USEPA has published estimated ranges of pollutant
removal efficiencies for structural BMPs based on substantial
document review.

Area: Hydrology and Water Quality 44

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

HWQ-1 (Cont'd)
These ranges of removal efficiencies are presented in Table F5-1,
Structural BMP Expected Pollutant Removal Efficiency.

Table F5-1

Structural BMP Expected Pollutant Removal Efficiency

Typical Pollutant Removal (percent)

Suspended
BMP Type Solids Nitrogen Phosphorus Metals

Dry Detention Basins 30-35 15-45 15-45 15-45

Retention Basins 50-80 30-65 30-65 50-80
Infiltration Basins 50-80 50-80 50-80 50-80
Infiltration Trenches/Dry Wells 50-80 50-80 15-45 50-80
Porous Pavement 65-100 65-100 30-65 65-100
Grassed Swales 30-65 15-45 15-45 15-45
Vegetated Filter Strips 50-80 50-80 50-80 30-65
Surface Sand Filters 50-80 <30 50-80 50-80
Other Media Filters 65-100 15-45 0 50-80

Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Preliminary Data Summary of Urban

Storm Water Best Management Practices Methodology, August 1999.

In addition to the structural BMP types that will be used, non-

structural/source control BMPs will continue to be a part of the
LAX program to reduce pollutant loadings.

Area: Hydrology and Water Quality 45

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

HWQ-1 (Cont'd)
Existing practices and potentially new ones will be extended to
acquisition areas and to the areas where airport operations will
increase in frequency or duration. These source control BMPs will
be incorporated into the LAX Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP) and will consequently be required of LAWA and all
airport tenants at all locations where industrial activities occur that
have the potential to impact water quality.

The overall result of Master Plan Commitment HWQ-1 will be a

drainage infrastructure that provides adequate drainage capacity to
prevent flooding and control peak flow discharges, that
incorporates BMPs to minimize the effect of airport operations on
surface water quality, and that prevents a net increase of pollutant
loads to either receiving water body as a result of the selected
Master Plan alternative.

MM-HWQ-1 Upgrade Regional Drainage Facilities. Regional drainage Increased runoff from Prepare status report on Annual reports Annual updates on
facilities should be upgraded, as necessary, in order to Master Plan the status of regional the status of
accommodate current and projected future flows within the improvements drainage improvements improvements needed
Monitoring watershed of each stormwater outfall resulting from cumulative exacerbating existing prior to issuance of a for offsite drainage
Agency: development. This could include upgrading the existing outfalls, or deficiencies in offsite grading or building facilities. Once the
building new ones. The responsibility for implementing this drainage facilities permit for the first necessary
LAWA
mitigation measure lies with the Los Angeles County Department Master Plan project improvements to the
of Public Works and/or the City of Los Angeles Department of involving substantial offsite facilities have
Public Works, Bureau of Engineering. A portion of the increased surface alterations or been approved, the
costs for the upgraded flood control and drainage facilities would substantial changes to need for monitoring
be paid by LAX tenants and users in accordance with the existing operations ceases
possessory interest tax laws and other legal assessments, consistent
with federal airport revenue diversion laws and regulations and in
compliance with state, county and city laws. The new or upgraded
facilities should be designed in accordance with the drainage
design standards of each agency.

Area: Hydrology and Water Quality 46

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Historical / Architectural and Archaeological / Cultural Resources

HR-1 Preservation of Historic Resources. In implementing the LAX Avoiding loss of Prior to approval of Once, at sign-off of Plans signed off by
Plan and conducting on going activities associated with operation significant historical final plans for demolition plan (for qualified architectural
of the airport, LAWA will support the preservation of identified resources, and their demolition of buildings preservation historian or historic
Monitoring significant historic/architectural resources through careful review historic character, within the International component); Once, at architect
Agency: of design and development adjacent to those resources and by identified within the Airport Industrial sign-off of
undertaking any modifications to those resources in a manner Area of Potential District associated with soundproofing plan (for
LAWA
consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Effects (APE) the GTC-ITC sound insulation
Treatment of Historic Properties. Additionally, where sound Roadways and Century component)
insulation is proposed for identified significant Bridge, and associated
historic/architectural resources under the Aircraft Noise Mitigation open-space area (for
Program, LAWA will ensure that methods are developed with the preservation
approval of a qualified architectural historian or historic architect, component); In
who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional conjunction with
Qualifications Standards, in compliance with the Secretary of the ongoing ANMP and
Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. prior to approval of
sound proofing plan for
affected historic
resources (for sound
insulation component)

MM-HA-1 Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) Document. For Loss of important Prior to issuance of Twice: Once, upon Acceptance letter for
historic properties eligible at the federal, state or local levels that historical resources demolition permits for review of draft HABS final HABS document
are proposed for demolition or partial demolition (i.e., from demolition affected historical document by NPS and from NPS
Monitoring the International Airport Industrial District), a Historic American resources once, upon approval of
Agency: Buildings Survey (HABS) document shall be prepared by LAWA final HABS document
in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for
LAWA
Architectural and Engineering Documentation Standards. The level
of documentation (I, II, III) shall be determined by the National
Park Service (NPS). Documentation shall adequately explicate and
illustrate what is significant or valuable about each of the historic
resources. Documentation data shall be collected prior to
commencement of demolition of the buildings.

Area: Historical / Architectural and Archaeological / Cultural Resources 47

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-HA-1 (Cont'd)
Archival copies of the recordation document shall be submitted to
the National Park Service, Library of Congress, and the California
Office of Historic Preservation. Non-archival copies of the
document shall be distributed to the City of Los Angeles Planning
Department, City of Los Angeles Cultural Affairs Department, Los
Angeles Public Library (main branch), Los Angeles Conservancy,
and LAWA's Public Relations Division.

MM-HA-2 Historic Educational Materials. For the significant historic Demolition of historical Initiate development of Once, prior to Approval of
resources proposed for demolition or partial demolition, resources educational materials demolition of affected educational materials
educational materials suitable for the general public, secondary prior to demolition of historical resources by LAWA
Monitoring school use, and/or aviation historians and enthusiasts shall be affected historical
Agency: designed with the assistance of a qualified historic preservation resources. Complete
professional and implemented by LAWA. The purpose of these educational materials
LAWA
materials shall be to present in two- or three-dimensional format, no later than one year
the history of the airport and surrounding area. Such materials shall after demolition of
include, but not be limited to, a video/film documentary, affected historical
curriculum program and teacher's guide, architectural models, and resources
a historical brochure or pamphlet. These materials shall be made
available via LAWA's public relations department to the general
public, local community school history programs, and related
interest groups.

MM-HA-4 Discovery. The FAA shall prepare an archaeological treatment Loss or destruction of Prior to issuance of any Once, at approval of Approval of ATP by
plan (ATP), in consultation with SHPO, that ensures the long-term important excavation and grading ATP LAWA
protection and proper treatment of those unexpected archaeological archaeological permits associated with
Monitoring discoveries of federal, state, and/or local significance found within resources the first Master Plan
Agency: the APE of the selected alternative. The ATP shall include a project
monitoring plan, research design, and data recovery plan. The ATP
LAWA
shall be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards
and Guidelines for Archaeological Documentation; California
Office of Historic Preservation's (OHP) Archaeological Resources
Management Report; Recommended Contents and Format (1989),

Area: Historical / Architectural and Archaeological / Cultural Resources 48

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-HA-4 (Cont'd)
and the Guidelines for Archaeological Research Design (1991);
and shall also take into account the ACHP's publication Treatment
of Archaeological Properties: A Handbook. The ATP shall also be
consistent with the Department of the Interior's Guidelines for
Federal Agency Responsibility under Section 110 of the NHPA. In
addition, those steps outlined in Section 21083.2(i) of CEQA and
Section 15064.5(f) of the CEQA Guidelines shall be implemented,
as necessary.

MM-HA-5 Monitoring. Any grading and excavation activities within LAX Loss or destruction of Retain archaeologist Once, upon retention of Retention of
proper or the acquisition areas that have not been identified as important prior to issuance of archaeologist and on- archaeologist and filing
containing redeposited fill material or having been previously archaeological excavation and grading going during of periodic monitoring
Monitoring disturbed shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist. The resources permits for first Master excavation and grading reports with LAWA, as
Agency: archaeologist shall be retained by LAWA and shall meet the Plan project, with activities, as identified stipulated in the ATP
Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards. continued monitoring in ATP
LAWA
The project archaeologist shall be empowered to halt construction efforts in accordance
activities in the immediate area if potentially significant resources with the ATP
are identified. Test excavations may be necessary to reveal whether
such findings are significant or insignificant. In the event of
notification by the project archaeologist that a potentially
significant or unique archaeological/cultural find has been
unearthed, LAWA shall be notified and grading operations shall
cease immediately in the affected area until the geographic extent
and scientific value of the resource can be reasonably
verified. Upon discovery of an archaeological resource or Native
American remains, LAWA shall retain a Native American monitor
from a list of suitable candidates obtained from the Native
American Heritage Commission.

MM-HA-6 Excavation and Recovery. Any excavation and recovery of Loss or destruction of Upon discovery of On-going during Filing of appropriate
identified resources (features) shall be performed using standard important potential excavation and reports (i.e.

Area: Historical / Architectural and Archaeological / Cultural Resources 49

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-HA-6 (Cont'd)
Monitoring archaeological techniques and the requirements stipulated in the archaeological archaeological grading activities as excavation/recovery
Agency: ATP. Any excavations, testing, and/or recovery of resources shall resources resources by qualified identified in ATP report) with LAWA by
be conducted by a qualified archaeologist selected by LAWA. archaeologist project archaeologist
LAWA pursuant to ATP. If no
resources are found, a
report indicating as
much should be filed

MM-HA-7 Administration. Where known resources are present, all grading Loss or destruction of Prior to approval of Once, upon approval of Sign off of plans by
and construction plans shall be clearly imprinted with all of the important excavation and grading excavation and grading project archaeologist
archaeological/cultural mitigation measures. All site workers shall archaeological plans (for MM/MPC plans (for MM/MPC (for MM/MPC imprint
Monitoring be informed in writing by the on-site archaeologist of the resources imprint component); imprint component); component); Filing of
Agency: restrictions regarding disturbance and removal as well as Prior to excavation and Prior to initiation of sign-in sheet with
procedures to follow should a resource deposit be detected. grading activities excavation and grading LAWA by project
LAWA
pursuant to ATP (for activities, and with archaeologist, as
on-site training construction staff specified by ATP (for
component) change-outs, pursuant on-site training
to ATP (for on-site component)
training component)

MM-HA-8 Archaeological/Cultural Monitor Report. Upon completion of Loss or destruction of Upon completion of Once, upon completion Receipt of final report
grading and excavation activities in the vicinity of known important grading & excavation of excavation and on a project-by-project
archaeological resources, the Archaeological/Cultural monitor shall archaeological activities per ATP grading activities on a basis by LAWA
Monitoring prepare a written report. The report shall include the results of the resources project-by-project
Agency: fieldwork and all appropriate laboratory and analytical studies that basis, pursuant to ATP
were performed in conjunction with the excavation. The report
LAWA
shall be submitted in draft form to the FAA, LAWA and City of
Los Angeles-Cultural Affairs Department. City representatives
shall have 30 days to comment on the report. All comments and
concerns shall be addressed in a final report issued within 30 days
of receipt of city comments.

MM-HA-9 Artifact Curation. All artifacts, notes, photographs, and other Loss or destruction of Upon completion of Once, at completion of Acceptance letter of
project-related materials recovered during the monitoring important each project during excavation and curated artifacts from

Area: Historical / Architectural and Archaeological / Cultural Resources 50

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-HA-9 (Cont'd)
Monitoring program shall be curated at a facility meeting federal and state archaeological which resources were grading activities on a selected repository, or
Agency: standards. resources recovered, as stipulated project-by-project offer letter from
in ATP basis, as stipulated in LAWA to repository
LAWA ATP
MM-HA-10 Archaeological Notification. If human remains are found, all Loss or destruction of During excavation and When any bone Completion of those
grading and excavation activities in the vicinity shall cease important grading activities material is encountered steps outlined in
immediately and the appropriate LAWA authority shall be notified: archaeological and project Section 15064.5(e) of
Monitoring compliance with those procedures outlined in Section 7050.5(b) resources archaeologist identifies the CEQA Guidelines
Agency: and (c) of the State Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94(k) it as human remains and sign off by project
and (i) and Section 5097.98(a) and (b) of the Public Resources archaeologist and, if
LAWA
Code shall be required. In addition, those steps outlined in Section applicable, selected
15064.5(e) of the CEQA Guidelines shall be implemented. Native American
monitor

Area: Historical / Architectural and Archaeological / Cultural Resources 51

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Paleontological Resources
MM-PA-1 Paleontological Qualification and Treatment Plan. A qualified Loss or destruction of Prior to issuance of any Once, upon retention of Retention of
paleontologist shall be retained by LAWA to develop an important excavation and grading paleontologist and paleontologist and
acceptable monitoring and fossil remains treatment plan (that is, a paleontological permits for first Master approval of the PMTP approval of the PMTP
Monitoring Paleontological Management Treatment Plan - PMTP) for resources Plan project by LAWA
Agency: construction-related activities that could disturb potential unique
paleontological resources within the project area. This plan shall be
LAWA
implemented and enforced by the project proponent during the
initial phase and full phase of construction development. The
selection of the paleontologist and the development of the
monitoring and treatment plan shall be subject to approval by the
Vertebrate Paleontology Section of the Natural History Museum of
Los Angeles County to comply with paleontological requirements,
as appropriate.

MM-PA-2 Paleontological Authorization. The paleontologist shall be Loss or destruction of Continued monitoring On-going during Filing of periodic
authorized by LAWA to halt, temporarily divert, or redirect important in accordance with the excavation and grading monitoring reports with
grading in the area of an exposed fossil to facilitate evaluation and, paleontological PMTP activities as identified LAWA, as stipulated in
Monitoring if necessary, salvage. No known or discovered fossils shall be resources in the PMTP the PMTP
Agency: destroyed without the written consent of the project paleontologist.
LAWA
MM-PA-3 Paleontological Monitoring Specifications. Specifications for Loss or destruction of Prior to finalization and Once, upon approval Review and approval of
paleontological monitoring shall be included in construction important approval of of each construction relevant construction
contracts for all LAX projects involving excavation activities paleontological construction contracts contract on a project- contracts by project
Monitoring deeper than six feet. resources for projects involving by-project basis paleontologist and the
Agency: excavation deeper than filing of such contracts
six feet with LAWA
LAWA

MM-PA-4 Paleontological Resources Collection. Because some fossils are Loss or destruction of During excavation and On-going during Filing of collection/
small, it will be necessary to collect sediment samples of promising important grading activities, as excavation and grading recovery reports with
horizons discovered during grading or excavation monitoring for paleontological stipulated in the PMTP activities, as outlined in LAWA by project
Monitoring processing through fine mesh screens. Once the samples have been resources the PMTP paleontologist, as
Agency: screened, they shall be examined microscopically for small fossils. stipulated in the PMTP
LAWA
Area: Paleontological Resources 52
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-PA-5 Fossil Preparation. Fossils shall be prepared to the point of Loss or destruction of Upon discovery of During grading and Filing of appropriate
identification and catalogued before they are donated to their final important significant fossils by excavation activities as reports by
repository. paleontological project paleontologist identified in the PMTP paleontologist with
Monitoring resources LAWA, as stipulated in
Agency: the PMTP
LAWA
MM-PA-6 Fossil Donation. All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, Loss or destruction of Upon completion of Once, upon completion Acceptance letter of
nonprofit institution with a research interest in the materials, such important each project during of grading and fossils from accepting
as the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History. paleontological which fossils were excavation activities on repository, or offer
Monitoring resources discovered, as outlined a project-by-project letter from LAWA to
Agency: in the PMTP basis repository
LAWA
MM-PA-7 Paleontological Reporting. A report detailing the results of these Loss or destruction of Upon completion of Once, upon completion Receipt of
efforts, listing the fossils collected, and naming the repository shall important excavation activities, as of excavation activities paleontological report
be submitted to the lead agency at the completion of the project. paleontological outlined in the PMTP on a project-by-project by LAWA. If no
Monitoring resources basis resources are found, a
Agency: report indicating as
much should be filed
LAWA

Area: Paleontological Resources 53

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Biotic Communities
MM-BC-1 Conservation of State-Designated Sensitive Habitat Within and Temporary construction Preconstruction/constru Once, upon completion Completion of pre-
Adjacent to the El Segundo Blue Butterfly Habitat Restoration impacts to sensitive ction of pre-construction construction evaluation
Area. LAWA or its designee shall take all necessary steps to areas and degradation evaluation and then on- and presence of
Monitoring ensure that the state-designated sensitive habitats within and of state-designated going during environmental monitor
Agency: adjacent to the Habitat Restoration Area are conserved and sensitive habitats construction if within when construction is
protected during construction, operation, and maintenance. 100 feet of the Habitat within 100 feet of state-
LAWA
Restoration Area; designated sensitive
These steps shall, at a minimum, include the following: Annually during habitat; Periodic
operation and Monitoring Report
Implementation of construction avoidance measures in areas maintenance
where construction or staging are adjacent to the Habitat
Restoration Area. Prior to the initiation of construction of LAX
Master Plan components to be located adjacent to the Habitat
Restoration Area, LAWA or its designee shall conduct a pre-
construction evaluation to identify and flag specific areas of state-
designated sensitive habitats located within 100 feet of
construction areas. Subsequent to the pre-construction evaluation,
LAWA or its designee shall conduct a pre-construction meeting
and provide written construction avoidance measures to be
implemented in areas adjacent to state-designated sensitive
habitats. Construction avoidance measures include erecting a 10-
foot-high tarped chain-link fence where the construction or staging
area is adjacent to state-designated sensitive habitats to reduce the
transport of fugitive dust particles related to construction
activities. Soil stabilization, watering or other dust control
measures, as feasible and appropriate, shall be implemented to
reduce fugitive dust emissions during construction activities within
2,000 feet of the El Segundo Blue Butterfly Habitat Restoration
Area, with a goal to reduce fugitive dust emissions by 90 to 95
percent. In addition, to the extent feasible, no grading or
stockpiling for construction activities should take place within 100
feet of a

Area: Biotic Communities 54

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-1 (Cont'd)
state-designated sensitive habitat. LAWA or its designee shall
incorporate provisions for the identification of additional
construction avoidance measures to be implemented adjacent to
state-designated sensitive areas. All construction avoidance
measures that address Best Management Practices shall be clearly
stated within construction bid documents. In addition, LAWA shall
include a provision in all construction bid documents requiring the
presence of a qualified environmental monitor. Construction
drawings shall indicate vegetated areas within the Habitat
Restoration Area as "Off-Limits Zone."

Ongoing maintenance and management efforts for the El Segundo

Blue Butterfly Habitat Restoration Area. LAWA or its designee
shall ensure that maintenance and management efforts prescribed
in the Habitat Management Plan (HMP) for the Habitat Restoration
Area shall continue to be carried out as prescribed.

MM-BC-2 Conservation of Floral Resources: Lewis' Evening Primrose. Loss of individuals of At least five (5) years As per Conservation Preparation of
LAWA or its designee shall prepare and implement a plan to Lewis' evening prior to initiation of Plan for Lewis' Evening Conservation Plan for
compensate for the loss of individuals of the sensitive Lewis' primrose construction of North Primrose Lewis' Evening
Monitoring evening primrose, currently located at the westerly end of the north Runways Primrose; Periodic
Agency: runway and within the Habitat Restoration Area. LAWA or its Monitoring Report
designee shall collect seed from those plants to be removed, and
LAWA
properly clean and store the collected seed until used. If possible,
seeds shall be collected in multiple years to ensure an adequate
seed supply for planting. A mitigation site of suitable habitat equal
to the area of impact shall be delineated within areas of the Los
Angeles/El Segundo Dunes as described in MM-BC-13. Collected
seed shall be broadcast (distributed) after the first wetting rain.
LAWA or its designee shall implement a monitoring plan to
monitor the establishment of

Area: Biotic Communities 55

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-2 (Cont'd)
individuals of Lewis' evening primrose for a period of not more
than five years. Performance criteria shall include the
establishment of an equal number of plants as that impacted in the
first year following the distribution of seed within the mitigation
site. Performance criteria shall also include confirmation of
recruitment for two years following the first year flowering is
observed and establishment of individuals throughout the
mitigation area within three years following the first year flowering
is observed. Monitoring shall be undertaken in the manner set forth
in MM-BC-8.

MM-BC-3 Conservation of Floral Resources: Mature Tree Replacement. Loss of mature trees Preparation of As per Replacement Completion of survey
LAWA or its designee shall prepare and implement a plan to Replacement Plan for Plan for Mature Trees and preparation of
compensate at a ratio of 2:1 for the loss of approximately 300 Mature Trees within Replacement Plan for
Monitoring mature trees, which would occur as a result of implementation of one (1) year of City Mature Trees; Periodic
Agency: the LAX Northside project. The plan shall include provisions to Council approval of the Monitoring Report
census and map all mature trees with a diameter of at least 8 inches LAX Plan; Replanting
LAWA
at breast height, which may be removed due to implementation of as dictated by
LAX Northside project. This information shall be gathered prior to Replacement Plan;
initiation of construction. The plan shall include a program by Preparation of survey
which replacement (at a ratio of 2:1) of all impacted mature trees prior to initiation of
shall be included in plans prepared for landscape treatments within construction of LAX
the Master Plan boundaries, which would then be implemented by Northside project
LAWA. The species of newly planted replacement trees shall be
local native tree species to the extent feasible. Each mitigation tree
shall be at least a 15-gallon or larger specimen.

MM-BC-8 Replacement of Habitat Units. LAWA or its designee shall Loss of habitat/open Preparation of As per Replacement Preparation of
undertake mitigation for the loss of habitat units resulting from space Replacement Plan for Plan for Habitat Units Replacement Plan for

Area: Biotic Communities 56

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-8 (Cont'd)
Monitoring implementation of Alternative D. Implementation of Alternative D Habitat Units within Habitat Units; Periodic
Agency: would result in the loss of 45.43 habitat units. These habitat units three (3) years of City Monitoring Report
shall be replaced at a 1:1 ratio within the Los Angeles/El Segundo Council approval of the
LAWA Dunes. Opportunities for compensation for the loss of 45.43 LAX Plan;
habitat units include 13.52 habitat units (16.9 acres x 0.8 Habitat Implementation per
Value) from restoration of Non-Native Grassland/Ruderal habitat Replacement Plan
to a Valley Needlegrass Grassland; 14.4 habitat units from removal
and restoration of 50 percent of the existing roadways to Southern
Foredune (36.11 acres of streets within the Los Angeles/El
Segundo Dunes x 0.5 x 0.8 Habitat Value); and 59.68 habitat units
from restoration of Disturbed Dune Scrub/Foredune to Southern
Foredune (74.6 acres x 0.8 Habitat Value). A habitat value of 0.8
is considered to be the maximum feasible target value for
restoration and enhancement of biotic communities. The
restoration and enhancement of biotic communities as related to
the establishment or enhancement of wildlife habitat shall consider
and comply with the provisions of FAA Advisory Circular
150/5200-33 regarding hazardous wildlife attractants on or near
airports. Additionally, such restoration and enhancement shall take
into account, as appropriate, the Memorandum of Agreement
between FAA and other federal agencies, including the US Fish
and Wildlife Service, pertaining to environmental conditions that
could contribute to aircraft-wildlife strikes.

Valley Needlegrass Grassland restoration efforts consist of site

preparation, propagation and planting of species characteristic of
the Valley Needlegrass Grassland community at the Los
Angeles/El Segundo Dunes, and maintenance and monitoring of
the restoration site. The species to be planted include native
perennials as described in the Long-Term Habitat Management
Plan for Los Angeles Airport/El Segundo Dunes. The

Area: Biotic Communities 57

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-8 (Cont'd)
characteristic species include nodding needlegrass (Nasella
cernua): 1,500 plants/habitat unit; white everlasting (Gnaphlium
microcephalum): 40 plants/habitat unit; doveweed (Eremocarpus
setigerus): 40 plants/habitat unit; California croton (Croton
californica): 45 plants/habitat unit; and dune primrose (Camissonia
chieranthifolia): 70 plants/habitat unit. Site preparation includes
physical demarcation of the site, mapping of the restoration site
onto a one inch equals 40 feet aerial photograph, and removal of all
non-native species (weed abatement). Removal of non-native
herbaceous species shall take place by mowing prior to seed set,
raking to remove cut material, and hand-pulling the remainder.
Removal of non-native shrubs shall be undertaken by cutting and
daubing with herbicide. Propagation and planting of nodding
needlegrass shall be accomplished by propagation from seed
collected on-site during late spring/early summer. Seed shall be
properly cleaned, dried, and stored until used. In late summer,
nodding needlegrass seed shall be propagated at an on-site nursery
in two-inch thimble pots and properly maintained. Nodding
needlegrass shall be planted at a rate of 1,500 plants per habitat
unit within Non-Native Grassland/Ruderal community, within the
Los Angeles/El Segundo Dunes, which has undergone site
preparation as described above. Planting shall take place in the fall
or after the first wetting rain. Maintenance of restoration plantings
shall consist of adequate irrigation and weed abatement. Given the
irregularity of rainfall in southern California, supplemental
irrigation shall be provided for two years to ensure the successful
establishment of mitigation plantings. Irrigation of the site shall be
adjusted to adequately provide for the establishment of the out-
plantings. Weed abatement shall take place on a quarterly basis for
a period of five years. Monitoring shall be undertaken on a
quarterly basis

Area: Biotic Communities 58

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-8 (Cont'd)
for the first three years following planting, and twice a year
thereafter. Monitoring shall consist of qualitative and quantitative
monitoring; quantitative monitoring shall take place once a year.
Performance criteria to be met include the attainment of at least a
10 percent cover of native cover in the first year and 20, 30, 40,
and 45 percent cover of native species over a five-year period as
determined by the point-intercept transect method (the CDFG has
adopted a 10 percent threshold of native cover as its criteria for
significance of native grasslands). This plan assumes the
performance criteria outlined below shall be met. If monitoring
discerns any failure in performance goals, remedial plantings shall
be undertaken. Habitat restoration shall be conducted by a
qualified habitat restoration specialist.

Southern Foredune restoration efforts consist of site preparation,

propagation, and planting of the species characteristic of the
Southern Foredune community at the Los Angeles/El Segundo
Dunes, and maintenance and monitoring of the restoration site.
The species to be planted include primary and secondary perennial
plants as described in the Long-Term Habitat Management Plan for
Los Angeles Airport/El Segundo Dunes. Site preparation,
propagation and planting, and maintenance and monitoring shall
take place as described above. Performance criteria to be met
include the attainment of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 45 percent cover of
native species over a five-year period as determined by the point-
intercept method. The Long-Term Habitat Management Plan for
Los Angeles Airport/El Segundo Dunes assumes the performance
criteria stated above shall be met. If monitoring discerns any
failure in performance goals, remedial plantings shall be
undertaken. Habitat restoration shall be conducted by a qualified
habitat restoration specialist.

Area: Biotic Communities 59

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-8 (Cont'd)
Any combination of habitat replacement completed by LAWA or
its designee drawn from the opportunities listed under Alternative
D that equals at least 45.43 habitat units shall be considered
sufficient replacement for loss of habitat units resulting from
implementation of Alternative D.

MM-BC-9 Conservation of Faunal Resources. LAWA or its designee shall Loss of habitat Preparation of As per Conservation Preparation of
develop and implement a relocation and monitoring plan to occupied by sensitive Conservation Plan for Plan for Faunal Conservation Plan for
compensate for the loss of 1.34 habitat units (0.3 habitat units + species Faunal Resources Resources Faunal Resources;
Monitoring 1.04 habitat units) of occupied western spadefoot toad habitat and within three (3) years Periodic Monitoring
Agency: for the loss of western spadefoot toad individuals currently in the of City Council Report
southwestern portion of the AOA. LAWA or its designee shall approval of the LAX
LAWA
identify possible relocation sites in consultation with the CDFG Plan; Implementation
and USFWS and shall develop and implement a monitoring plan to per ConservationPlan.
monitor the success of the relocated tadpoles for a period of not Toad relocation and
more than five years. LAWA or its designee shall relocate the monitoring component
western spadefoot toad population currently inhabiting three of the Conservation
locations on the AOA. One potential site is the Madrona Marsh Plan to be undertaken
Nature Center in Torrance, 20 miles south of LAX, which supports in connection with
several vernal pools and one large pond capable of supporting MM-ET-1 (Riverside
western spadefoot toads. Spadefoot toad experts suggest the best Fairy Shrimp Habitat
approach to accomplish relocation is to transport tadpoles and Restoration)
metamorphs only, as adults return to their birth site. Site
preparation shall include confirmation by a permitted biologist that
no predators, such as mosquitofish or bullfrogs, are present within
the proposed relocation site or in waterways surrounding the
relocation site. The CDFG has suggested that if the first relocation
effort is not successful, another attempt should be made the
following year. Therefore, western spadefoot toads shall be
collected two consecutive years prior to construction activities
taking place in existing occupied spadefoot toad habitat. In
addition, since the western

Area: Biotic Communities 60

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-9 (Cont'd)
spadefoot toad is known to become reproductively mature within
three years, an additional performance criterion shall be the
identification of tadpoles at the relocation site between years three
and four. The success criteria should be 50 percent survival of all
tadpoles and metamorphs for the first, second, and third years
following the last relocation. This shall be accomplished through a
five-year monitoring plan, with bi-monthly monitoring between
January 31 and June 1, to document the success of this relocation
effort.

LAWA or its designee shall develop and implement a relocation

and monitoring plan to compensate for the loss of 2.38 habitat units
of occupied San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit habitat located
within the AOA. LAWA or its designee shall relocate the San
Diego black-tailed jackrabbit population currently inhabiting the
AOA. Relocation efforts shall be coordinated with CDFG. The San
Diego black-tailed jackrabbit shall be captured on the AOA using
live traps and shall be released into the Habitat Restoration Area.
Compensation for the loss of 2.38 habitat units shall be the
utilization of at least 2.38 habitat units within the Los Angeles/El
Segundo Dunes by the San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit
individuals relocated to the site. Black-tailed jackrabbit is currently
absent for the Los Angeles/El Segundo Dunes. Opportunities for
compensation for the loss of 2.38 habitat units include 13.52
habitat units from restoration of Non-Native Grassland/Ruderal
habitat to a Valley Needlegrass Grassland; 14.4 habitat units from
removal and restoration of 50 percent of the existing roadways to
Southern Foredune; and 59.68 habitat units from restoration of
Disturbed Dune Scrub/Foredune to Southern Foredune. LAWA or
its designee shall implement a monitoring plan to monitor the
success of the relocated individuals for a period of not more than
five years.

Area: Biotic Communities 61

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-9 (Cont'd)
Performance criteria shall include confirmed success of survival
for three years of the San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit within the
Habitat Restoration Area. This shall be accomplished through a
quarterly monitoring plan to document the success or failure of this
relocation effort.

LAWA or its designee shall compensate for the loss of areas

utilized by loggerhead shrike currently located on the western
airfield and composed of 10.83 habitat units (equivalent to 83.25
acres). Compensation for the loss of 10.83 habitat units of habitat
utilized by the loggerhead shrike shall be the utilization of at least
10.83 habitat units within the Los Angeles/El Segundo Dunes.
Opportunities for compensation for the loss of 10.83 habitat
units include 13.52 habitat units from restoration of Non-Native
Grassland/Ruderal habitat to a Valley Needlegrass Grassland; 14.4
habitat units from removal and restoration of 50 percent of the
existing roadways to Southern Foredune; and 59.68 habitat units
from restoration of Disturbed Dune Scrub/Foredune to Southern
Foredune. Compensation for the loss of at least 10.83 habitat units
shall take place prior to construction. LAWA or its designee shall
implement a monitoring program for a period of not more than five
years. Performance criteria shall include the use of at least 10.83
habitat units of improved habitat by the loggerhead shrike for
foraging and nesting. Monitoring shall take place quarterly for the
first three years and biannually thereafter. Monitoring shall be
timed appropriately to include monitoring during the breeding
period, which is between February and June.

As a means of minimizing incidental take of active nests of

loggerhead shrike, LAWA or its designee shall have all areas to be
graded surveyed by a qualified biologist at least 14 days

Area: Biotic Communities 62

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-9 (Cont'd)
before construction activities begin to ensure maximum avoidance
to active nests for loggerhead shrike. Construction avoidance
measures shall include flagging of all active nests for loggerhead
shrike and a 300 feet wide buffer area shall be designated around
the active nests. A biological monitor shall be present to ensure
that the buffer area is not infringed upon during the active nesting
season, March 15 to August 15. In addition, LAWA or its designee
shall require that vegetation clearing within the designated 300 feet
buffer be undertaken after August 15 and before March 15.

LAWA or its designee shall conduct pre-construction surveys to

determine the presence of individuals of sensitive arthropod
species, the silvery legless lizard, the San Diego horned lizard, and
the burrowing owl within the proposed area of impact within the
Los Angeles/El Segundo Dunes. Surveys will be conducted at the
optimum time to observe these species. Should an individual be
observed, they will be relocated to suitable habitat for that species
within the Habitat Restoration Area. Prior to construction, LAWA
or its designee shall develop and implement a relocation plan to
avoid the potential loss of individuals from the installation of
navigational aids and associated service roads. Relocation efforts
shall be undertaken by a qualified biologist, in coordination with
CDFG.

MM-BC-13 Replacement of State-Designated Sensitive Habitats. LAWA or Loss of state designated Preparation of As per Replacement Preparation of
its designee shall undertake mitigation for the loss of State- sensitive habitat Replacement Plan for Plan for State- Replacement Plan for
designated sensitive habitat within the Los Angeles/El Segundo State-Designated Designated Sensitive State-Designated
Monitoring Dunes, including the Habitat Restoration Area. Installation of Sensitive Habitats prior Habitats Sensitive Habitats;
Agency: navigational aids and associated service roads under Alternative D to relocation of Periodic Monitoring
would result in impacts to 66,675 square feet (1.53 acres) of State- navigational aids; Report
LAWA
designated sensitive habitat within the Implementation per

Area: Biotic Communities 63

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-13 (Cont'd)
Los Angeles/El Segundo Dunes, including 33,334 square feet (0.77 Replacement Plan
acre) within the Habitat Restoration Area of which 10,597 square
feet (0.24 acre) are within habitat occupied by the El Segundo blue
butterfly. These square feet shall be replaced at a no net loss ratio
of 1:1 ratio within the Los Angeles/El Segundo Dunes. The
replacement of 66,675 square feet (1.53 acres) of State-designated
sensitive habitat shall be undertaken through restoration of 66,675
square feet (1.53 acres). Opportunities for restoration include:16.9
acres of Non-Native Grassland/Ruderal habitat to a Valley
Needlegrass Grassland; 36.11 acres from removal and restoration
of 50 percent of the existing roadways to Southern Fordune; and
74.6 acres of Disturbed Dune Scrub/Foredune to Southern
Fordune. The restoration and enhancement of biotic communities
as related to the establishment or enhancement of wildlike habitat
shall consider and comply with the provisions of FAA Advisory
Circular 150/5200-33 regarding hazardous wildlife attractants on
or near airports. Additionally, such restoration and enhancement
shall take into account, as appropriate, the Memorandum of
Agreement between the FAA and other federal agencies, including
the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), pertaining to
environmental conditions that could contribute to aircraft-wildlife
strikes.

Valley Needlegrass Grassland restoration efforts consist of site

preparation, propagation and planting of Valley Needlegrass
Grassland species, and maintenance and monitoring of the
restoration site as described in Mitigation Measure MM-BC-8,
Replacement of Habitat Units.

Southern Foredune restoration efforts consist of site preparation,

propagation, and planting of the species

Area: Biotic Communities 64

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-13 (Cont'd)
characteristic of the Southern Foredune community at the Los
Angeles/El Segundo Dunes, and maintenance and monitoring of
the restoration site as described in Mitigation Measure MM-BC-8,
Replacement of Habitat Units. Replacement of the 10,597 square
feet (0.24 acre) of habitat occupies by the El Segundo Blue
Butterfly shall be undertaken as described in Mitigation Measure
MM-ET-4, El Segundo Blue Butterfly Conservation: Habitat
Restoration.

Area: Biotic Communities 65

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna

MM-ET-1 Riverside Fairy Shrimp Habitat Restoration. LAWA or its Loss of occupied Preparation of a Vernal As per Vernal Pool Preparation of a Vernal
designee shall undertake mitigation for direct impacts to 0.04 acre habitat of endangered Pool Creation, Creation, Maintenance, Pool Creation,
(1,853 square feet) of degraded wetland habitat containing Riverside Fairy Shrimp Maintenance, and and Monitoring Plan for Maintenance, and
Monitoring embedded cysts of Riverside fairy shrimp and potential indirect Monitoring Plan for the Riverside Fairy Shrimp Monitoring Plan for the
Agency: impacts to 1.26 acres of degraded wetland habitat containing embedded cysts of the embedded cysts of the
embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp. As specified in the Riverside Fairy Shrimp for Riverside Fairy
LAWA
Biological Opinion, soils containing embedded cysts of the prior to issuance of Shrimp; Periodic
Riverside fairy shrimp in 0.04 acres (1,853 square feet) shall be grading or demolition Monitoring Report
salvaged and relocated to property owned by the FAA and permit for any project
designated a habitat preserve at the former Marine Corps Air impacting the Riverside
Station at El Toro, or comparable site(s) approved by the USFWS Fairy Shrimp;
at a ratio of not more than 3:1. The 1.26 acres of degraded wetland Implementation per
habitat containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp Plan
retained on the LAX airfield shall be avoided through the
implementation of construction avoidance measures, including
Best Management Practices (BMPs), and the creation of a buffer
area around the occupied, degraded areas. The FAA shall oversee
the development of a Vernal Pool Creation, Maintenance, and
Monitoring Plan for the embedded cysts to ensure that Alternative
D would be consistent with the recommendations provided in the
Recovery Plan for Vernal Pools of Southern California, and with
the conservation measures provided in the Biological Opinion. As
specified in the Biological Opinion, LAWA shall be responsible
for all costs identified in the Vernal Pool Creation, Maintenance,
and Monitoring Plan related to off-site relocation of soils
containing cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp, including
entitlement for use and designation for long-term conservation, site
preparation, monitoring, and maintenance.

Ongoing Section 7 consultation among LAWA, FAA, and

USFWS has been necessary to identify suitable mitigation sites
pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. As a result,
extensive research has been conducted to identify sites that
historically or currently support vernal pools or vernal pool-
associated species in southern California. Information was gathered

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 66

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-1 (Cont'd)
from the Recovery Plan for Vernal Pools of Southern California,
the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), and
coordination with recognized experts in the field. This information
was augmented through a review of geologic maps of the coastal
portions of Los Angeles and topographic quadrangles for locations
known to have historically supported vernal pools. A total of 35
potential relocation sites were identified for further site
characterization (Figure F5-2, Vernal Pool Restoration
Opportunities Considered).

Each of the 35 sites was visited and inspected by teams of

biologists and environmental analysts. Analysis of site topography,
historic or extant vernal pools, historic or extant vernal pool
species, drainage features, climate, and parent material (from
regional geologic maps) was conducted. Hazardous materials
databases were consulted for information on known potential
sources of contamination for those sites. In-field soil texture
analysis was conducted, followed by laboratory analysis of
collected soil samples. Land use at the site and surrounding the site
was characterized, plant communities were characterized, and the
presence or absence of suitable hydrology was determined.

Prioritization of the potential sites for the relocation of soils

containing cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp was based solely on
the presence of physical and biological characteristics provided in
the Recovery Plan for Vernal Pools of Southern California and did
not reflect planning constraints indicated by current land uses.
LAWA and FAA, in consultation with the USFWS, recommended
the relocation of cysts to alternate locations within the Los Angeles
County portion of the Los Angeles Basin-Orange Management
Area for vernal pools (Figure F5-2). The use of these sites within
Los Angeles County was determined infeasible and LAWA
undertook evaluation of the feasibility of vernal pools or vernal
pool complexes located in the Orange County portion of the Los

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 67

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-1 (Cont'd)
Angeles Basin-Orange Management Area and the Ventura County
portion of the Transverse Management Area. As a result of
consultation with the USFWS, property owned by FAA and
designated a habitat preserve at the former Marine Corps Air
Station at El Toro was identified as a mitigation site for the receipt
of soils containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp,
or an alternate comparable site(s).

Once a suitable mitigation site(s) is secured, vernal pool creation

shall be undertaken by LAWA or its designee, in consultation with
the USFWS. Methods of vernal pool creation may vary depending
on the physical and biological characteristics of the selected sites.
LAWA or its designee, in conjunction with the USFWS and a
qualified wildlife biologist, shall develop a program to monitor the
progress of vernal pool creation. LAWA or its designee shall
undertake the relocation of soils containing embedded cysts of
Riverside fairy shrimp from the western portion of the airfield to
the vernal pool mitigation sites. Soils containing embedded cysts of
the Riverside fairy shrimp shall not be salvaged and translocated
until the created vernal pool(s) is established and has met certain
success criteria as described in detail below and included in the 12
conservation measures within the Biological Opinion.

Soils containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp

from EW001 and EW002 (Figure F5-3, North Area Ephemerally
Wetted Pools and Buffer Areas) shall be salvaged and translocated
to created vernal pool habitat on property owned by the FAA and
designated as a habitat preserve at the former Marine Corps Air
Station at El Toro (El Toro), or another site as approved by the
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office. The created vernal pool(s) shall
contain a minimum of 5,559 square feet of vernal pool surface area
(as determined by a 3:1 mitigation ratio). Soils containing
embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp from EW001 and
EW002 will not be salvaged and translocated from LAX until the

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 68

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-1 (Cont'd)
created vernal pool(s) is established and has met certain success
criteria specified in the Biological Opinion. As a contingency
measure, if the specified success criteria for the created vernal
pools have not been attained within six years of project
authorization, in spite of good faith effort on the part of LAWA,
soils containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp will
be salvaged from EW001 and EW002 and placed in appropriate
storage at the San Diego Zoological Society’s Center for the
Reproduction of Endangered Species. Soils containing embedded
cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp from EW006 (Figure F5-4,
South Area Ephemerally Wetted Pools and Buffer Areas) shall be
salvaged and stored prior to implementation of Alternative D and
shall be translocated to the created vernal pool(s) with EW001 and
EW002 once the success criteria are met. Soils containing
embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp from EW006 shall be
placed in appropriate storage at the San Diego Zoological Society's
Center for the Reproduction of Endangered Species. Until soils
bearing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp have been
appropriately salvaged and stored, or vernal pool creation has been
completed and embedded cysts have been appropriately salvaged
and translocated to the created vernal pool(s), habitat-altering
activities associated with Alternative D in these areas shall be
avoided.

LAWA shall be responsible for implementing construction

avoidance measures for the six areas (EW009, EW012, EW013,
EW014, EW015 and EW016) that would not be directly affected,
as indicated in the Biological Opinion. Construction avoidance
measures shall include implementation of construction avoidance
measures, including BMPs required pursuant to the Standard
Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan and the LAX Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan, and establishment of a buffer area
around the six occupied areas retained on the LAX airfield (Figure
F5-4).

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 69

F5-2
F5-4

F5-3
F5-4

F5-4
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-1 (Cont'd)
In addition, LAX operations personnel with vehicular access to the
airfield operations area shall be apprised of these off-limit buffer
areas annually. The construction avoidance measures shall be
periodically inspected by LAWA, or its designee throughout
construction to ensure the efficacy of the BMPs, and corrective
action shall be undertaken as necessary to ensure that construction
and operation of airport facilities do not result in adverse impacts
to surface water quality.

Soils containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp will

not be translocated to the created vernal pool(s) until the vernal
pool(s) is established and has met certain success criteria specified
in the Biological Opinion. Success criteria for the created vernal
pool(s) includes holding water for a minimum of 60 days, having
less than 10 percent absolute cover of exotic herbaceous species in
the pool(s), having less than 20 percent absolute cover of exotic
herbaceous species with 300 feet of the area from limits of the
pool, removal of all non-herbaceous plant species within the pool
and 300 feet from the pool annually,and provide suitable water
quality for the Riverside fairy shrimp. Duration of inundation,
exotic species removal, and water quality analyses may be
undertaken within the first year after vernal pool creation. The
performance criteria for percent absolute cover of exotic
herbaceous species within 300 feet of the area from limits of the
pool may be redesigned by mutual agreement of FAA, LAWA and
USFWS.

Upon meeting success criteria and approval from the USFWS, soils
containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp may be
brought to the pool(s). LAWA shall make every effort to collect
all cyst-bearing soils from the entire surface area of EW001,
EW002 and EW006, however, it is expected that some small
number of undetected individual cysts will remain in the soil. Soil
containing the cysts shall be salvaged and translocated during the
dry season to minimize damage ot the cysts during transport.

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 73

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-1 (Cont'd)
The soil shall be collected using a hand trowel, removed in chucks,
and kept out of direct sunlight to ensure viability. Soil shall be
stored in properly labeled boxes or bags with adequate ventilation.
The soils shall then be redeposited and spread out in small basins
or pool-like areas of similar size without active mechanical
compaction to minimize potential damage to the cysts. Any
potential indirect environmental impacts resulting from vernal pool
construction activities shall be compliant with BMPs and terms and
conditions stipulated by the permitting agencies.

LAWA or its designee, in conjunction with the USFWS and a

qualified wildlife biologist, shall also develop a program to
monitor created habitat for the presence of Riverside fairy shrimp
as described in the Vernal Pool Creation, Maintenance, and
Monitoring Plan. As specified in the Biological, LAWA shall be
responsible for implementing a monitoring and reporting program
to demonstrate successful achievement of the performance
standards for off-site relocation over a 25-year period:

‹ Monthly during the first year, following relocation of soils

containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp
‹ Quarterly in the second, third, and fourth years, following
relocation of soils containing embedded cysts of the Riverside
fairy shrimp
‹ Biannually in the fifth, seventh, and ninth years, following
relocation of soils containing embedded cysts of the Riverside
fairy shrimp
‹ Annually in the tenth, fifteenth, twentieth, and twenty-fifth
years, following relocation of soils containing embedded cysts
of the Riverside fairy shrimp

LAWA shall provide the USFWS with annual monitoring reports

as specified in the Vernal Pool Creation, Maintenance, and
Monitoring Plan. The monitoring report, due on September 1 of
each specified monitoring year, shall provide information

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 74

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-1 (Cont'd)
regarding the implementation of the vernal pool creation,
restoration, and maintenance activities. The yearly report shall
also discuss the effectiveness of the project as it pertains to the
existing condition of the created vernal pool(s) and Riverside fairy
shrimp population. To measure the effectiveness of the created
vernal pool(s), the FAA and LAWA shall work with the USFWS to
develop long-term goals and objectives as part of their habitat
creation plan.

Lastly, LAWA shall coordinate with the USFWS to create

educational materials on the Riverside fairy shrimp for integration
into LAWA’s public outreach program. Educational opportunities
regarding federally endangered Riverside fairy shrimp include
public outreach in the form of an educational brochure made
available through the LAWA Public Affairs Department,
information provided on LAWA’s web site describing the
ephemeral habitat required to support the species, and LAWA’s
outreach to local schools.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-ET-1 would provide

for the replacement of 0.04 acres (1,853 square feet) of degraded
wetland habitat containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy
shrimp, with an estimated habitat value of 0.15; with 0.12 acres
(5,559 square feet) of created vernal pool habitat with an estimated
habitat value of 0.75 (see Table F5-11, Mitigation Land Evaluation
Procedure for the Mitigation Site). By relocating embedded cysts
to habitat restoration sites that are managed for the existence of the
species, the opportunity for embedded cysts to complete the adult
phase of their life cycle would be enhanced.

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 75

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Table F5-11

Mitigation Land Evaluation Procedure for the Mitigation Site

Habitat Riverside Fairy Shrimp

Reference Sites Wetland Habitat Mitigation
Site
Topography/Hydrology 0.20 0.20
Mound-Depression Microrelief 0.05 0.05
Native Soils w/Slope <10% 0.05 0.05
Areas w/Period of Inundation ≥30 days 0.05 0.05
Summer Desiccation 0.05 0.05
Flora 0.20 0.20
>10% Vegetative Cover 0.05 0.05
Native Grasses >10% 0.05 0.05
Vernal Pool Associated Species 0.05 0.05
Listed Vernal Pool Associated Species 0.05 0.05
Fauna 0.20 0.15
Dominated by Native Fauna (reproducing) 0.05 0.05
Grassland-Associated Species (reproducing) 0.05 0.05
Sensitive Vernal Pool-Associated Species (reproducing) 0.05 0.05
Listed Vernal Pool-Associated Species (reproducing) 0.05 0.00
Ecosystem Functional Integrity 0.40 0.20
Contiguous w/Wetland and State-designated Sensitive Terrestrial Habitat 0.10 0.00
Under Regulatory Conservation 0.10 0.10
Variety of Pollinator/Dispersal Mechanisms Present (Wind, Wildlife) 0.10 0.10
Contiguous Native Habitat >40 acres 0.10 0.00
Total Habitat Value (HV) 1.00 0.75

Source: Sapphos Environmental, Inc. 2003.

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 76

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-3 El Segundo Blue Butterfly Conservation: Dust Control. To Temporary construction Preconstruction/ Once, upon execution Inclusion of measure in
reduce the transport of fugitive dust particles related to impacts construction of contracts, and construction contracts;
construction activities, soil stabilization, watering or other dust periodically during Periodic reporting by
Monitoring
control measures, as feasible and appropriate, shall be implemented construction construction monitor
Agency:
with a goal to reduce fugitive dust emissions by 90 to 95 percent
LAWA during construction activities within 2,000 feet of the El Segundo
Blue Butterfly Habitat Restoration Area. In addition, to the extent
feasible, no grading or stockpiling for construction activities
should take place within 100 feet of occupied habitat of the El
Segundo blue butterfly.

MM-ET-4 El Segundo Blue Butterfly Conservation: Habitat Restoration. Loss of habitat Preparation of Habitat As per Habitat Preparation of Habitat
LAWA or its designee shall take all necessary steps to avoid the occupied by Restoration Plan for El Restoration Plan for the Restoration Plan for El
flight season of the El Segundo blue butterfly (June 14 - September endangered El Segundo Segundo Blue Butterfly El Segundo Blue Segundo Blue
Monitoring
30) when undertaking installation of navigational aids and blue butterfly 3 years prior to Butterfly Butterfly; Periodic
Agency:
associated service roads proposed under Master Plan Alternative D construction activities Monitoring Report
LAWA within habitat occupied by the El Segundo blue butterfly. within its habitat, or as
Installation of navigational aids within the Habitat Restoration approved by USFWS;
Area should be required to take place between October 1st and Monitoring for a period
May 31st. In conformance with the Biological Opinion, activities of not more than 5
associated with navigational aids development shall be limited to years
the existing roads and proposed impacts areas as depicted in the
Final EIS/EIR. Coast buckwheat shall be planted a minimum of
three years prior to the impact, not only to allow for establishment
of the plants, but also to ensure that the plants are mature enough to
bloom. The plantings of coast buckwheat shall be located within
the southwest corner of subsite 23 of the Habitat Restoration Area,
as depicted in Figure F5-5, and shall encompass 1.25 acres in
conformance with the Biological Opinion. Coast buckwheat plants
will be planted at an initial density of 200 plants per acre to ensure
the long-term planting density target (130 plants per acre). Coast

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 77

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-4 (Cont'd)
buckwheat plants will be placed in clusters or groupings based on
microtopographic features present within subsite 23 to better
support the El Segundo blue butterfly, which is known to prefer
large clusters of plants for nectaring and shelter. As possible,
depending on the location and condition of individual plants, FAA
and LAWA shall salvage existing coast buckwheat plants and any
larvae on the plant or pupae in the soil below the plant that would
be removed to accommodate the replacement navigational aids to
further conserve this species. These plants shall be salvaged
immediately prior to the installation of the replacement
navigational aids outside of the butterfly flight season. These
salvaged plants shall be transported in a suitable container and
replanted after the onset of winter rains in subsite 23 near the area
restored as described in MM-BC-13. This area shall be the
designated mitigation site for planting coast buckwheat and the site
to which El Segundo blue butterfly pupae shall be relocated.
Gathering of coast buckwheat seed shall take place from
September 15 through June 1. Propagation and planting
methodologies successfully employed by LAWA during 1984
through 1994 restoration efforts shall be employed for propagation
of additional coast buckwheat plants. An existing irrigation system
proximal to subsite 23 will be used to increase the success of the
restoration effort. Prior to navigational aid installation, a permitted
and qualified biologist shall salvage El Segundo blue butterfly
larvae in coordination with the USFWS in order to minimize
impacts to the butterfly. Based on LAWA's restoration experience
within the Habitat Restoration Area, occupation of restored habitat
can occur within two to three years of restoration efforts.
Therefore, there would be no net loss in acres or value of occupied
habitat.

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 78

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Energy Supply
E-1 Energy Conservation and Efficiency Program. LAWA will Avoid a substantial Prior to approval of Once prior to approval Approval of building
seek to continually improve the energy efficiency of building increase in energy building plans for each of building plans plans by LADBS or
design and layouts during the implementation of the LAX Master consumption due to the project involving new LADPW, as
Monitoring Plan. Title 24, Part 6, Article 2 of the California Administrative development of new or substantially appropriate
Agency: Code establishes maximum energy consumption levels for heating facilities renovated buildings that
and cooling of new buildings to assure that energy conservation is consume electricity or
LAWA
incorporated into the design of new buildings. LAWA will design natural gas
new facilities to meet or exceed the prescriptive standards required
under Title 24. Some of the energy conservation measures that
LAWA may incorporate into the design of new buildings and
airports facilities may include the use of energy-efficient building
materials, energy-saving lighting systems, energy-efficient air-
conditioning systems, energy-efficient water-heating systems, and
designed-in access for alternative means of surface transportation,
including the Green Line and the APM. These energy conservation
measures may be further improved upon as energy-saving design
approaches and technologies develop.

E-2 Coordination with Utility Providers. LAWA will implement Potential for Plan for each project to Once prior to issuance Submittal of utility
Master Plan activities in coordination with local utility providers. incompatibility and/or be completed prior of applicable permit compatibility plan to
Utility providers will provide input on the layout of utilities at inefficiency of new to issuance of the satisfaction of
Monitoring LAX to assure that LAX and the surrounding region receive both utilities demolition permit, affected utilities
Agency: safe and uninterrupted service. When service by existing utility grading permit,
lines could be affected by airport design features, LAWA will building plans or B-
LAWA
work with the utility to identify alternative means of providing Permit, whichever
equivalent or superior post-construction utility service. occurs first, as
applicable

PU-1 Develop a Utility Relocation Program. LAWA will develop and Disturbance of existing Plan to be completed Once prior to issuance Submittal of utility
implement a utilities relocation program to minimize interference utility lines/systems prior to issuance of of applicable permit relocation plan to the
with existing utilities associated with LAX Master Plan facility satisfaction of affected
construction. utilities

Area: Energy Supply 80

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

PU-1 (Cont'd)
Monitoring Prior to initiating construction of a Master Plan component, demolition permit,
Agency: LAWA will prepare a construction evaluation to determine if the grading permit,
proposed construction will interfere with existing utility location or building permit or B-
LAWA operation. LAWA will determine utility relocation needs and, for Permit, whichever
sites on LAX property, LAWA will develop a plan for relocating occurs first, as
existing utilities as necessary before, during, and after construction applicable
of LAX Master Plan features. LAWA will implement the utility
relocation program during construction of LAX Master Plan
improvements.

Area: Energy Supply 81

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Light Emissions
LI-2 Use of Non-Glare Generating Building Materials. Prior to Avoidance of adverse Prior to issuance of a Twice: Once during Sign-off on plans by
approval of final plans, LAWA will ensure that proposed LAX glare effects on aviation building permit for each plan review and once LAWA prior to
facilities will be constructed to maximize use of non-reflective and other sensitive uses Master Plan project during project issuance of building
Monitoring materials and minimize use of undifferentiated expanses of glass. (excluding airfield construction, on a permit and completion
Agency: projects) project-by-project basis of site inspection for
materials during
LAWA
construction

LI-3 Lighting Controls. Prior to final approval of plans for new Avoidance of adverse Prior to issuance of any Once, during review of Approval of lighting
lighting, LAWA will conduct reviews of lighting type and light and glare effects MEP permits or B- lighting plans on a plans by LAWA prior
placement to ensure that lighting will not interfere with on aviation activities permits which include project-by-project basis to issuance of MEP
Monitoring aeronautical lights or otherwise impair Airport Traffic Control and other sensitive uses lighting permits or B-permits
Agency: Tower or pilot operations. Plan reviews will also ensure, where involving lighting
feasible, that lighting is shielded and focused to avoid glare or
LAWA
unnecessary light spillover. In addition, LAWA or its designee will
undertake consultation in selection of appropriate lighting type and
placement, where feasible, to ensure that new lights or changes in
lighting will not have an adverse effect on the natural behavior of
sensitive flora and fauna within the Habitat Restoration Area.

Area: Light Emissions 82

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Solid Waste
SW-1 Implement an Enhanced Recycling Program. LAWA will Generation of Prior to issuance Annually Annual confirmation
enhance their existing recycling program, based on successful additional solid waste of certificate that LAX and LAX
programs at other airports and similar facilities. Features of the due to increased of occupancy for any Northside are
Monitoring enhanced recycling program will include: expansion of the existing activity levels at LAX use developed in LAX exceeding waste
Agency: terminal recycling program to all terminals, including new Northside, or approval reductions
terminals; development of a recycling program at LAX of building permits for requirements of AB
LAWA
Northside/Westchester Southside; lease provisions requiring that CTA improvements, 939
tenants meet specified diversion goals; and preference for recycled whichever occurs first
materials during procurement, where practical and appropriate.

SW-2 Requirements for the Use of Recycled Materials during Indirect impacts to solid Prior to issuance of Once, upon approval of Confirmation that
Construction. LAWA will require, where feasible, that waste management RFP/RFB for each construction contract general contractor's bid
contractors use a specified minimum percentage of recycled facilities/capacity (i.e., construction project. for each project includes usage of
Monitoring materials during construction of LAX Master Plan improvements. increased use of specified minimum
Agency: The percentage of recycled materials required will be specified in recycled materials percentage of recycled
the construction bid documents. Recycled materials may include, would reduce the materials.
LAWA
but are not limited to, asphalt, drywall, steel, aluminum, ceramic amount of waste
tile, cellulose insulation, and composite engineered wood products. materials that would
The use of recycled materials in LAX Master Plan construction otherwise need to be
will help to reduce the project's reliance upon virgin materials and managed/disposed of)
support the recycled materials market, decreasing the quantity of
solid waste requiring disposal.

SW-3 Requirements for the Recycling of Construction and Indirect impacts to solid Prior to issuance of Once, upon approval of Confirmation that
Demolition Waste. LAWA will require that contractors recycle a waste management RFP/RFB for each construction contract general contractor's bid
specified minimum percentage of waste materials generated during facilities/capacity (i.e., construction project for each project includes specified
Monitoring construction and demolition. The percentage of waste materials recycling of minimum percentage of
Agency: required to be recycled will be specified in the construction bid demolition/construction demolition/construction
documents. Waste materials to be recycled may include, but are not wastes would reduce waste to be recycled
LAWA
limited to, asphalt, concrete, drywall, steel, aluminum, ceramic tile, the amount of waste
and architectural details. materials that would
otherwise need to be
managed/disposed of)
Area: Solid Waste 83
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

SW-3 (Cont'd)

MM-SW-1 Provide Landfill Capacity. Additional landfill capacity in the Cumulative increases in Preparation of first Annually Annual updates on
Los Angeles region should be provided through the siting of new solid waste generation report on landfill solid waste disposal
landfills, the expansion of existing landfills, or the extension of that could reduce capacity prior to capabilities/capacity of
Monitoring permits for existing facilities. As an alternative, or to augment existing available issuance of certificate City of Los Angeles
Agency: regional landfill capacity, landfill capacity outside the region could landfill capacity of occupancy for any
be accessed by developing the necessary rail haul infrastructure. use developed in LAX
LAWA
The responsibility for implementing this mitigation measure lies Northside, or approval
with state, county, and local solid waste planning authorities. The of building permits for
costs for implementing this mitigation measure will be passed on to CTA improvements,
LAX and other solid waste generators through increase solid waste whichever occurs first
disposal costs.

Area: Solid Waste 84

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Construction Impacts
C-1 Establishment of a Ground Transportation/Construction Traffic congestion and Prior to issuance of any Once, at establishment Establishment of
Coordination Office. Establish this office for the life of the delays as they relate to permits for first Master of LAWA's Ground
construction projects to coordinate deliveries, monitor traffic the LAX Plan Plan project. Complete Construction Transportation/Constru
Monitoring conditions, advise motorists and those making deliveries about construction activities set of duties for this Coordination Office ction Coordination
Agency: detours and congested areas, and monitor and enforce delivery office will be Office; Notification
times and routes. LAWA will periodically analyze traffic established prior to regarding duties,
LAWA
conditions on designated routes during construction to see whether issuance of any permit business hours,
there is a need to improve conditions through signage and other for a project that may telephone numbers via
means. significantly impact the Internet and print
surface streets media to the public
This office may undertake a variety of duties, including but not
limited to:

‹ Inform motorists about detours and congestion by use of static

signs, changeable message signs, media announcements,
airport website, etc.
‹ Work with airport police and the Los Angeles Police
Department to enforce delivery times and routes.
‹ Establish staging areas.
‹ Coordinate with police and fire personnel regarding
maintenance of emergency access and response times.
‹ Coordinate roadway projects of Caltrans, City of Los Angeles,
and other jurisdictions with those of the airport construction
projects.
‹ Monitor and coordinate deliveries.
‹ Establish detour routes.
‹ Work with residential and commercial neighbors to address
their concerns regarding construction activity. .
‹ Analyze traffic conditions to determine the need for additional
traffic controls, lane restriping, signal modifications, etc.

Area: Construction Impacts 85

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Construction Personnel Airport Orientation. All construction Traffic congestion and Prior to commencement As required by arrival Contractor
C-2
personnel will be required to attend an airport project-specific delays as they relate to of construction for each of new personnel certification; signatures
orientation (pre-construction meeting) that includes where to park, the LAX Plan project of orientation attendees
Monitoring where staging areas are located, construction policies, etc. construction activities
Agency:
LAWA

Area: Construction Impacts 86

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Design, Art, and Architecture Applications / Aesthetics

DA-1 Provide and Maintain Airport Buffer Areas. Along the Avoidance of view Prior to approval of Once, during plan Provision of landscape
northerly and southerly boundary areas of the airport, LAWA will degradation development plans for review on a project-by- buffer areas, to the
provide and maintain landscaped buffer areas that will include projects abutting project basis extent feasible, in
Monitoring setbacks, landscaping, screening or other appropriate view- residential and view the development and
Agency: sensitive improvements with the goals of avoiding land use sensitive uses along the landscape plans
conflicts, shielding lighting, enhancing privacy and better northern & southern
LAWA
screening views of airport facilities from adjacent residential uses. boundaries of airport by
Use of the existing facilities in buffer areas may continue as LAWA
required until LAWA can develop alternative facilities.

DA-2 Update and Integrate Design Plans and Guidelines. The Avoidance of view Prior to issuance of any Once, upon approval of Board of Airport
following plans and guidelines will be individually updated or degradation/incompatib permits for first Master design-related Commissioners
integrated into a comprehensive set of design-related guidelines le land use Plan project (excluding guidelines and plans by approval of design-
Monitoring and plans: LAX Street Frontage and Landscape Development Plan runways) the Board of Airport related guidelines and
Agency: (June 1994), LAX Air Cargo Facilities Development Guidelines Commissioners plans
(April 1998; updated August 2002), and LAX Northside Design
LAWA
Plan and Development Guidelines (1989), including conditions
addressing heights, setbacks and landscaping. The update will
serve as a basis for reviewing future public and private
development projects at LAX. The update will incorporate key
provisions in current plans with an equivalent or greater level of
compatibility and visual quality supported between LAX and
adjacent land uses.

DA-3 Undergrounding of Utility Lines. In conjunction with the Avoidance of view During plan design Once, during plan Preparation of
extension of the Century Freeway and other roadway/right-of-way degradation phase for applicable design phase of each feasibility assessment
improvement projects, LAWA will pursue opportunities to place roadway/right-of-way roadway/right-of-way prior to approval of
Monitoring existing overhead utility lines underground wherever feasible and improvement projects improvement project roadway/right-of-way
Agency: appropriate. improvement plans
LAWA
MM-DA-1 Construction Fencing. Construction fencing and pedestrian Avoidance of Prior to issuance of Once, prior to issuance Installation of
canopies shall be installed by LAWA to the degree feasible to temporary view grading or building of grading or building construction fencing
degradation

Area: Design, Art, and Architecture Applications / Aesthetics 87

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-DA-1 (Cont'd)
Monitoring ensure maximum screening of areas under construction along permits for each project permits for each project and/or pedestrian
Agency: major public approach and perimeter roadways, including along a major public along a major public canopies to the extent
Sepulveda Boulevard, Century Boulevard, Westchester Parkway, approach or perimeter approach or perimeter feasible
LAWA Pershing Drive, and Imperial Highway west of Sepulveda roadway roadway
Boulevard. Along Century Boulevard, Sepulveda Boulevard, and
in other areas where the quality of public views are a high priority,
provisions shall be made by LAWA for treatment of the fencing to
reduce temporary visual impacts.

Area: Design, Art, and Architecture Applications / Aesthetics 88

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Hazardous Materials
HM-1 Ensure Continued Implementation of Existing Remediation Potential for Prior to initiation of Once prior to Preparation of
Efforts. Prior to initiating construction of a Master Plan construction activities construction of each construction of each Construction
component, LAWA will conduct a pre-construction evaluation to to interfere with Master Plan project Master Plan project Compatibility
Monitoring determine if the proposed construction will interfere with existing existing soil or Assessment/Plan. If
Agency: soil or groundwater remediation efforts. For sites currently on LAX groundwater remediation will be
property, LAWA will work with tenants to ensure that, to the remediation efforts disrupted by
LAWA
extent possible, remediation is complete prior to the construction. construction, approval
If remediation must be interrupted to allow for Master Plan-related of the Construction
construction, LAWA will notify and obtain approval from the Compatibility
regulatory agency with jurisdiction, as required, and will evaluate Assessment/Plan will
whether new or increased monitoring will be necessary. If it is require the necessary
determined that contamination has migrated during construction, approvals from
temporary measures will be taken to stop the migration. As soon as RWQCB, DTSC, and
practicable following completion of construction in the area, LAFD, as appropriate
remediation will be reinstated, if required by the Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB) or another agency with
jurisdiction. In such cases, LAWA will coordinate the design of the
Master Plan component and the re-design of the remediation
systems to ensure that they are compatible and to ensure that the
proposed remediation system is comparable to the system currently
in place. If it is determined during the pre-construction evaluation
that construction will preclude reinstatement of the remediation
effort, LAWA will obtain approval to initiate construction from the
agency with jurisdiction.

For properties to be acquired as part of the Master Plan, LAWA

will evaluate the status of all existing soil and groundwater
remediation efforts. As part of this evaluation, LAWA will assess
the projected time required to complete the remediation activities
and will coordinate with the land owner and the agency with
jurisdiction to ensure that remediation is completed

Area: Hazardous Materials 89

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

HM-1 (Cont'd)
prior to scheduled demolition and construction activities, if
possible. In cases where remediation cannot be completed prior to
demolition and construction activities, LAWA will undertake the
same steps required above, namely, an evaluation of the need to
conduct monitoring; implementation of temporary measures to stop
migration, if required; and reinstatement of remediation following
completion of construction, if required.

HM-2 Handling of Contaminated Materials Encountered During Potential for Prior to initiation of Once prior to Preparation of
Construction. Prior to the initiation of construction, LAWA will encountering hazardous construction of first construction of first Hazardous
develop a program to coordinate all efforts associated with the materials/waste during Master Plan project Master Plan project Materials/Wastes
Monitoring handling of contaminated materials encountered during construction activities Management Plan
Agency: construction. The intent of this program will be to ensure that all
contaminated soils and/or groundwater encountered during
LAWA
construction are handled in accordance with all applicable
regulations. As part of this program, LAWA will identify the
nature and extent of contamination in all areas where excavation,
grading, and pile-driving activities are to be performed. LAWA
will notify the appropriate regulatory agency when contamination
has been identified. If warranted by the extent of the
contamination, as determined by the regulatory agency with
jurisdiction, LAWA will conduct remediation prior to initiation of
construction. Otherwise, LAWA will incorporate provisions for the
identification, segregation, handling and disposal of contaminated
materials within the construction bid documents. In addition,
LAWA will include a provision in all construction bid documents
requiring all construction contractors to prepare site-specific
Health and Safety Plans prior to the initiation of grading or
excavation. Each Health and Safety Plan would include, at a
minimum, identification/description of the following: site
description and features; site map; site history; waste types
encountered; waste characteristics; hazards of

Area: Hazardous Materials 90

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

HM-2 (Cont'd)
concern; disposal methods and practices; hazardous material
summary; hazard evaluation; required protective equipment;
decontamination procedures; emergency contacts; hospital map
and contingency plan.

In the event that any threshold of significance listed in the

Hazardous Materials section of the EIS/EIR for the LAX Master
Plan is exceeded due to the discovery of soil or groundwater
contaminated by hazardous materials, or if previously unknown
contaminants are discovered during construction or a spill occurs
during construction, LAWA will notify the lead agency(ies) with
jurisdiction and take immediate and effective measures to ensure
the health and safety of the public and workers and to protect the
environment, including, as necessary and appropriate, stopping
work in the affected area until the appropriate agency has been
notified.

Area: Hazardous Materials 91

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Water Use
W-1 Maximize Use of Reclaimed Water. To the extent feasible, Reduce demands for, Prior to approval of Once, prior to approval Approval of plans for
LAWA will maximize the use of reclaimed water in Master Plan- and use of, potable building plans for each of plans for affected affected project
related facilities and landscaping. The intent of this commitment is water project involving new project
Monitoring to maximize the use of reclaimed water as an offset for potable or substantially
Agency: water use and to minimize the potential for increased water use renovated buildings that
resulting from implementation of the LAX Master Plan. This use water, and prior to
LAWA
commitment also will facilitate achievement of the City of Los approval of landscaping
Angeles’ goal of increased beneficial use of its reclaimed water plans
resources. This commitment will be implemented by various
means, such as installation and use of reclaimed water distribution
piping for landscape irrigation.
W-2 Enhance Existing Water Conservation Program. LAWA will Avoid a substantial Prior to approval of Once, prior to approval Preparation of Water
enhance the existing Street Frontage and Landscape Plan for LAX increase in water building plans or of building plans or Conservation Program
to ensure the ongoing use of water conservation practices at LAX consumption due to the landscaping plans for landscaping plans for
Monitoring facilities. The intent of this program, to minimize the potential for development of new first Master Plan project first Master Plan project
Agency: increased water use due to implementation of the LAX Master Plan facilities involving water use
program, is also in accordance with regional efforts to ensure (i.e., CTA Landside
LAWA
adequate water supplies for the future. Features of the enhanced Terminal or LAX
conservation program will include identification of current water Northside development,
conservation practices and an assessment of their effectiveness; whichever occurs first)
identification of alternate future conservation practices;
continuation of the practice of retrofitting and installing new low-
flow toilets and other water-efficient fixtures in all LAX buildings,
as remodeling takes place or new construction occurs; use of Best
Management Practices for maintenance; use of water efficient
vegetation for landscaping, where possible; and continuation of the
use of fixed automatic irrigation for landscaping.

Area: Water Use 92

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Wastewater
MM-WW-1 Provide Additional Wastewater Treatment Capacity to Cumulative increases in Prepare first wastewater Annually. Upon Annual reports on
Accommodate Cumulative Flows. Additional wastewater wastewater generation capacity report prior to approval of the IPWP existing wastewater
capacity within the City of Los Angeles should be provided by the that could exceed issuance of any improvements, which treatment capabilities
Monitoring expansion/upgrade of the City's wastewater treatment systems via a currently planned building permits for any will provide for the and plans/provisions
Agency: combination of improvements to address the projected wastewater capacity of the building within the additional capacity of for additional
shortfall resulting from cumulative development. Such Hyperion Treatment LAX Plan area that HTP, the monitoring capabilities/capacity as
LAWA
improvements could include increasing capacity at the Hyperion Plant (HTP) generates wastewater requirements would provided for through
Treatment Plant (HTP), building new reclamation capacity cease the IPWP
upstream of HTP, conservation of potable water, and
infiltration/inflow reduction. Implementation of this mitigation
measure is the responsibility of the City of Los Angeles
Department of Public Works, Bureau of Sanitation. Specific
improvements will be identified in the City's IPWP and
Wastewater Facilities Plan component of the City's Integrated
Resources Plan. The cost for implementing this mitigation measure
would be passed on to LAX and other wastewater generators
through increased wastewater fees.

Area: Wastewater 93
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Fire Protection
FP-1 LAFD Design Recommendations. During the design phase prior Avoidance of Prior to issuance of Once, upon sign-off of LAFD sign-off on
to initiating construction of a Master Plan component, LAWA will compromised fire building permits or B- plans for each project plans prior to issuance
work with LAFD to prepare plans that contain the appropriate prevention and permits of building permits or
Monitoring design features applicable to that component, such as protection prior to issuance of B-
Agency: those recommended by LAFD, and listed below: permit for street
improvements
LAWA
‹ Emergency Access. During Plot Plan development and the
construction phase, LAWA will coordinate with LAFD to
ensure that access points for off-airport LAFD personnel and
apparatus are maintained and strategically located to support
timely access. In addition, at least two different ingress/egress
roads for each area, which will accommodate major fire
apparatus and will provide for major evacuation during
emergency situations, will be provided.
‹ Fire Flow Requirements. Proposed Master Plan development
will include improvements, as needed, to ensure that adequate
fire flow is provided to all new facilities. The fire flow
requirements for individual Master Plan improvements will be
determined in conjunction with LAFD and will meet, or
exceed, fire flow requirements in effect at the time.
‹ Fire Hydrants. Adequate off-site public and on-site private
fire hydrants may be required, based on determination by the
LAFD upon review of proposed plot plans.
‹ Street Dimensions. New development will conform to the
standard street dimensions shown on the applicable City of
Los Angeles Department of Public Works Standard Plan.
‹ Road Turns. Standard cut-corners will be used on all proposed
road turns.
‹ Private Roadway Access. Private roadways that will be used
for general access and fire lanes shall have at least 20 feet of
vertical access. Private roadways will be built to City of Los
Angeles standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
the LAFD.

Area: Fire Protection 94

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

FP-1 (Cont'd)
‹ Dead-End Streets. Where fire lanes or access roads are
provided, dead-end streets will terminate in a cul-de-sac or
other approved turning area. No fire lane shall be greater than
700 feet in length unless secondary access is provided.
‹ Fire Lanes. All new fire lanes will be at least 20 feet wide.
Where a fire lane must accommodate a LAFD aerial ladder
apparatus or where a fire hydrant is installed, the fire lane will
be at least 28 feet wide.
‹ Building Setbacks. New buildings will be constructed no
greater than 150 feet from the edge of the roadways of
improved streets, access roads, or designated fire lanes.
‹ Building Heights. New buildings exceeding 28 feet in height
may be required to provide additional LAFD access.
‹ Construction/Demolition Access. During demolition and
construction activities, emergency access will remain
unobstructed.
‹ Aircraft Fire Protection Systems. Effective fire protection
systems will be provided to protect the areas beneath the
wings and fuselage portions of large aircraft. This may be
accomplished by incorporating foam-water deluge sprinkler
systems with foam-producing and oscillating nozzle (per
NFPA 409, aircraft hangars for design criteria).

PS-1 Fire and Police Facility Relocation Plan. Prior to any Avoidance of Prior to any Master Once, upon completion Completion of Fire and
demolition, construction, or circulation changes that would compromised fire Plan activities affecting of Fire and Police Police Facility
prevention and on-airport fire and Facility Relocation Relocation Plan
protection police facilities Plan; as necessary
during the relocation
process
Area: Fire Protection 95
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

PS-1 (Cont'd)
Monitoring affect LAFD Fire Stations 51, 80, and 95, or on-airport police
Agency: facilities, a Relocation Plan will be developed by LAWA through a
cooperative process involving LAFD, LAWAPD, the LAPD LAX
LAWA Detail, and other airport staff. The performance standards for the
plan will ensure maintenance of required response times, response
distances, fire flows, and a transition to new facilities such that fire
and law enforcement services at LAX will not be significantly
degraded. The plan will also address future facility needs,
including details regarding space requirement, siting, and design.

PS-2 Fire and Police Facility Space and Siting Requirements. Avoidance of Prior to any Master On-going during early Approval of facility
During the early design phase for implementation of the Master compromised fire Plan activities affecting design phase program requirements
Plan elements affecting on-airport fire and police facilities, LAWA prevention and on-airport police and by involved agencies
Monitoring and/or its contractors will consult with LAFD, LAWAPD, LAPD, protection fire facilities
Agency: and other agencies as appropriate, to evaluate and refine as
necessary, program requirements for fire and police facilities. This
LAWA
coordination will ensure that final plans adequately support future
facility needs, including space requirements, siting and design.

Area: Fire Protection 96

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Law Enforcement
LE-1 Routine Evaluation of Manpower and Equipment Needs. Avoidance of Ongoing Weekly (via meetings Operations Plan and
LAWA will assure that LAWAPD and LAPD LAX Detail substantial deficiencies with law enforcement Deployment Logs
continue to routinely evaluate and provide additional officers, in law enforcement agencies); deployment
Monitoring supporting administrative staff, and equipment, to keep pace with personnel & equipment monitored daily
Agency: forecasted increases in activity and development at LAX in order
to maintain a high level of law enforcement services. This will be
LAWA
achieved through LAWA notification to LAWAPD and LAPD
regarding pending development and construction and through
LAWA review of status reports on law enforcement services at
LAX.

LE-2 Plan Review. During the design phase of terminal and cargo Unsafe Prior to issuance of Once, prior to issuance Plan sign-off by
facilities and other major airport development, the LAPD, facility/architectural building permits for of building permits for LAWAPD and LAX
LAWAPD, and other law enforcement agencies will be consulted design each Master Plan each project Detail
Monitoring to review plans so that, where possible, environmental contributors project
Agency: to criminal activity, such as poorly-lit areas, and unsafe design, are
reduced.
LAWA

Area: Law Enforcement 97

 LAX Master Plan Alternative D
Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Grand Avenue and Vista del Mar MM-ST-7
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Highland Avenue/Vista del Mar and Rosecrans MM-ST-10
Boulevard
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Imperial Highway and Main Street MM-ST-6
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Imperial Highway and Pershing Drive MM-ST-6
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Imperial Highway and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-10

1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Imperial Highway and Vista del Mar MM-ST-10
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Jefferson Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard MM-ST-7
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Lincoln Boulevard and Manchester Avenue MM-ST-6

1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Lincoln Boulevard and Teale Street MM-ST-10
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Rosecrans Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-8

1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at 83rd Street and Lincoln Boulevard MM-ST-6
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at 83rd Street and Lincoln Boulevard MM-ST-10
1A West Employee Parking Structure Provide fair-share contribution to LA County’s “Marina Expressway to Admiralty Way” project MM-ST-16
OR complete alternative off-site intersectional improvements at the following intersections:
- Bali Way and Lincoln Boulevard
- Fiji Way and Lincoln Boulevard
- Lincoln Boulevard and Marina Expressway
- Lincoln Boulevard and Maxella Avenue
- Lincoln Boulevard and Mindanao Way
- Lincoln Boulevard and Washington Boulevard

Los Angeles International Airport T1 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

1A West Employee Parking Structure Provide a “fair-share” contribution toward the LAC-MTA's Metro Rapid Bus Line Expansion MM-ST-15
Program (possible concepts include but are not limited to paying for larger or additional buses
from those planned by the LAC-MTA or paying the cost of retrofitting some buses to better
accommodate airline passengers and their baggage to and from LAX) OR other enhancements to
benefit transit to and from LAX (possible concepts include but are not limited to traffic signal
priority improvements for bus flow, transit marketing, airport employee and/or air passenger fare
subsidies) to mitigate the following intersections:
- Imperial Highway and Sepulveda Boulevard
- Jefferson Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard
- Lincoln Boulevard and Manchester Boulevard
- Lincoln Boulevard and Marina Expressway
- Lincoln Boulevard and Teale Street
- Lincoln Boulevard and Washington Boulevard

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete pedestrian connection between ITC and Green Line light rail station south of Imperial
Highway
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete the project-component widening of Aviation Boulevard between Century Boulevard and MM-ST-6
Imperial Highway. This includes the mitigation of adding a second southbound left-turn lane at
111th Street.
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete the project-component roadway improvements (discontinuous widening) along 111th MM-ST-6
Street between Aviation Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard. This work includes the mitigation
of adding a second westbound right-turn lane at Aviation Boulevard.

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Widen northbound I-405 off-ramp at Imperial Highway MM-ST-6
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at northbound I-405 off-ramp at Imperial Highway. MM-ST-8

Los Angeles International Airport T2 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Provide a “fair-share” contribution toward the LAC-MTA's Metro Rapid Bus Line Expansion MM-ST-15
Program (possible concepts include but are not limited to paying for larger or additional buses
from those planned by the LAC-MTA or paying the cost of retrofitting some buses to better
accommodate airline passengers and their baggage to and from LAX) OR other enhancements to
benefit transit to and from LAX (possible concepts include but are not limited to traffic signal
priority improvements for bus flow, transit marketing, airport employee and/or air passenger fare
subsidies) to mitigate the following intersections:
- Centinela Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard
- Howard Hughes Parkway and Sepulveda Boulevard
- Manchester Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard
- Mariposa Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard
- 76th St/77th St and Sepulveda Boulevard
- 79th St/ 80th St and Sepulveda Boulevard
- 83rd Street and Sepulveda Boulevard
- I-105 Freeway westbound off-ramp at Sepulveda Boulevard

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at I-105 Freeway ramps/Continental City Drive & MM-ST-6
Imperial Highway (at-grade intersectional improvement only)
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Aviation Boulevard and El Segundo Boulevard MM-ST-7

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Aviation Boulevard and El Segundo Boulevard MM-ST-8

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Aviation Boulevard and Imperial Highway MM-ST-7
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Aviation Boulevard and Rosecrans Boulevard MM-ST-10

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Douglas Street and Imperial Highway MM-ST-10
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at El Segundo Boulevard and La Cienega MM-ST-8
Boulevard
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at La Cienega Boulevard and 111th Street MM-ST-10
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Manchester Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-7

Los Angeles International Airport T3 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Manchester Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-10

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Mariposa Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-8

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at 79th St/80th St and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-6
1C Southeast Surface Parking Complete construction of the project-component internal north-south airport roadway that bisects
the surface parking lot and terminates at 111th Street.
1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Airport Boulevard and Arbor Vitae Street MM-ST-7
1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Airport Boulevard and Manchester Avenue MM-ST-7
1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Centinela Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard MM-ST-10
1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Centinela Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-6

1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Century Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-7

1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at La Tijera Boulevard and Manchester Avenue MM-ST-7

1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at I-105 Freeway westbound off-ramp and MM-ST-8
Sepulveda Boulevard
1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at La Tijera Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-7

1E CTA Landside Terminals None

1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete project-component GTC/ITC Roadways and Century Bridge
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete project-component realignment of 104th Street east of the internal airport roadways to
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) connect to 102nd Street
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete project-component widening of Arbor Vitae Street between Aviation Boulevard and La MM-ST-6
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Cienega Boulevard. This work includes the mitigation of adding a second westbound left-turn
lane at Aviation Boulevard and an eastbound right-turn lane at La Cienega Boulevard.

Los Angeles International Airport T4 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete project-component widening of Aviation Boulevard between Arbor Vitae Street and
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Century Boulevard
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete project-component roadway improvements on La Cienega Boulevard between Arbor MM-ST-6
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Vitae Street and Imperial Highway. This work includes the mitigation of installing an additional
through lane for northbound traffic at Arbor Vitae Street.
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete project-component roadway improvements on Century Boulevard between Aviation
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Boulevard and Glasgow Place
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Widen the off-ramp from southbound I-405 Freeway north of Century Boulevard at La Cienega MM-ST-6
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Boulevard
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Arbor Vitae Street and Inglewood Avenue MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Arbor Vitae Street and La Brea Avenue MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Aviation Boulevard and Manchester Boulevard MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Aviation Boulevard and Manchester Boulevard MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Centinela Avenue and Culver Boulevard MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Centinela Avenue and La Cienega Boulevard MM-ST-6
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Century Boulevard and Hawthorne Blvd/La Brea MM-ST-6
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Avenue
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Century Boulevard and Inglewood Avenue MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Century Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at El Segundo Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)

Los Angeles International Airport T5 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at El Segundo Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-10
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Florence Avenue and La Cienega Boulevard MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Florence Avenue and La Cienega Boulevard MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Florence Avenue and La Cienega Boulevard MM-ST-10
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Hawthorne Boulevard and Imperial Highway MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Hawthorne Boulevard and Imperial Highway MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Imperial Highway and Inglewood Avenue MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Imperial Highway and Inglewood Avenue MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at La Cienega Boulevard and Manchester MM_ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Boulevard
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at La Cienega Boulevard and Manchester MM-ST-10
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Boulevard
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Begin construction of direct connection between I-105 Freeway ramps and internal airport MM-ST-12
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) roadways east of ITC (See Note 7)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Begin construction of I-405 Interchange at Lennox Boulevard (See Note 7) MM-ST-13
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)

Los Angeles International Airport T6 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

Note 1 For a detailed description of intersectional improvements, see Tables F4.3.2-28 and F4.3.2-29 of
the Final EIS/EIR

Note 2 LADOT may recommend that temporary Certificates of Occupancy be granted in the event of any
delay:1) by Caltrans on encroachment permits, or 2) in obtaining required approvals from other
City departments, government agencies or jurisdictions through no fault of Los Angeles World
Airports, provided that LAWA has demonstrated reasonable efforts and due diligence to the
satisfaction of LADOT.

Note 3 In all cases, except as noted in (2) above, the required Traffic Mitigation or Project Component of
each sub-phase for the corresponding land use sub-phase shall be guaranteed to the satisfaction of
LADOT and City of Los Angeles Public Works prior to the issuance of any Building Permit and
completed prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy permit.

Note 4 Where appropriate, as determined by LADOT, revisions may be made to this Phasing Plan.

Note 5 Appropriate transit improvements to the LAC-MTA bus system to and from LAX and “fair-share”
contributions to the LA County’s “Marina Expressway to Admiralty Way” project must be agreed
upon by LAWA, LADOT, FAA, and the respective outside agency. Depending on the outcome of
the negotiations to determine LAWA’s appropriate level and types of transit improvement or
“fair-share” contribution, this phasing plan may be altered at the discretion of LADOT. FAA
approval may still be required for substitute mitigations. Mitigation measures are applicable only
to the extent that airport revenue to fund such measures is permissible under federal law and
policies.
Note 6 In the event the applicant is unable to obtain necessary construction permits from the concerned
agencies in a timely fashion, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be granted by the City
provided the applicant has demonstrated reasonable efforts to complete the necessary designs and
improvements to the satisfaction of LADOT. Should any improvement not receive required
approval, the City may substitute an alternative measure of an equivalent effectiveness.

Los Angeles International Airport T7 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

Note 7 LAWA will strive for completion of both the direct freeway connections from the I-405 Freeway
at Lennox Boulevard and from the I-105 Freeway onto the airport roadways east of the ITC. If
these freeway improvements are not completed in time for the opening of the Ground
Transportation Center (GTC), LAWA will implement substitute mitigation improvements prior to
opening the GTC, including, but not limited to Changeable Message Signs to direct traffic and/or
Closed Circuit Television Cameras to monitor its flow, to the satisfaction of LADOT.

Note 8 For proposed LAX Master Plan facilities not listed, such as the CTA Landside Terminals, South
CTA Concourse Rework, Satellite Concourse, Tom Bradley International Terminal Rework,
North CTA Concourse, or LAX Northside, there are no traffic mitigations or project components
to be specifically phased with the construction of those components.

Note 9 Prior to the issuance of any final certificate of occupancy in the final phase of the Off-Airport
Traffic Improvements Phasing Plan, all required improvements in the entire phasing plan shall be
funded, completed, or resolved to the satisfaction of LADOT.

Los Angeles International Airport T8 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Lopez, Maria [COB]

From: Sue Leal <sue@specceramics.com>

Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 8:24 AM
To: COB_Response
Subject: GAIP

 
I support the City of Newport Beach refined GAIP Alternative 1! 
Sent from my iPhone 

1
Lopez, Maria [COB]

From: EIR627 <eir627@ocair.com>

Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 8:20 AM
To: COB_Response
Subject: FW: Agenda No. 45. John Wayne Airport - OC Board of Supervisors June 25, 2019
Meeting John Wayne Airport – General Aviation Improvement Program
Attachments: LAX MMRP-1.pdf; CFASE Commercial Status Availability of Zero Emissions
Transportation Vehicles, CHE & Construction Equipment 2-1-2019.docx; CFASE
Cumultive Impact Bibilography 4-23-2013.docx; CFASE Environmental Justice
Bibilography 4-17-2013.docx; CFASE Mental Health Bibliography 1.2.2012.docx; CFASE
Noise Bibliography 1-2-2014.docx; CFASE Public Health Care Costs Bibliography
1-2-2012.docx; CFASE Public Health Studies A1 - A7 10-1-2014.docx; CFASE Womens
Breast Cancer 1-2-2012.docx; Pregnant Women & Prenatal Air Pollution Health Impacts
Bibliography 10-24-2014.docx

 
And this one as well.  
 
 
Thank you,  
 
From: Jesse Marquez <jnm4ej@yahoo.com>  
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 7:42 AM 
To: EIR627 <eir627@ocair.com> 
Cc: Jesse Marquez <jnm4ej@yahoo.com>; Ricardo Pulido <mr.rpulido@gmail.com>; Jane Williams 
<dcapjane@aol.com>; Anabell Romero Chavez <anab3ll310@yahoo.com>; Magali Sanchez‐Hall 
<mssanchezhall7@gmail.com>; Joe R. Gatlin <joergatlin45k@gmail.com>; Cynthia Babich 
<delamoactioncommittee@gmail.com>; Robina Suwol <robinasuwol@earthlink.net>; John G. Miller MD 
<igornla@cox.net>; Mitzi Shpak <msmshpak@gmail.com>; Drew Wood <californiakidsiaq@gmail.com>; Modesta Pulido 
<vdepulido@gmail.com>; ocneighborscare@yahoo.com 
Subject: Agenda No. 45. John Wayne Airport ‐ OC Board of Supervisors June 25, 2019 Meeting John Wayne Airport – 
General Aviation Improvement Program 

Email # 3 Public Comment Attachments

Note: Attachments are being sent in 2 emails due to large email file size.

Respectfully Submitted,

Jesse N Marquez
Executive Director
Coalition For A Safe Environment
310-590-0177

1
 Alternative D
Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program
April 2004
Preface
Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is the primary commercial air transportation hub of the Los Angeles region and is the
dominant U.S. international gateway to the Pacific Rim. It is the third busiest airport in the United States in terms of aircraft
operations and the world’s fifth busiest in terms of passengers. It plays an essential role in meeting the current and projected
transportation needs of passengers and shippers, and in producing economic vitality, within the surrounding five-county region. But
LAX’s aircraft and traffic activity produce noise, congestion, air pollution and other environmental impacts that need to be mitigated.
In 1995, Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), the operator of LAX, began the LAX Master Plan Program with the goal of producing
plans, policies, and mitigation programs that would strike an appropriate balance in addressing these challenges.

In November 2000, LAWA published the Draft LAX Master Plan describing and analyzing four alternatives: the No Action/No
Project Alternative and Alternatives A, B and C. In accord with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIS/EIR) was
published in January 2001, which used the Draft LAX Master Plan as the basis for its project descriptions of each alternative, analyzed
the potential environmental impacts of these alternatives. At that time, the Draft EIS/EIR was publicly circulated to start the agency
review and comment process and obtain public input.

Taking into account the public comments on Alternatives A, B and C and the Draft EIS/EIR, as well as the September 11, 2001
terrorist attacks, the Mayor of the City of Los Angeles directed LAWA to develop a security and safety plan now known as
Alternative D as a fifth LAX Master Plan alternative, which is the staff-preferred alternative. In mid-2003, a two-volume Addendum
to the Draft LAX Master Plan was published, describing Alternative D in the same manner that the previous alternatives were
described. Additionally, using the two-volume Addendum as the basis for its project description of Alternative D, a Supplement to the
Draft EIS/EIR, evaluating the potential environmental impacts of the new alternative, was prepared and publicly circulated at that
time.

The proposed Final LAX Master Plan, which is based on the two-volume Addendum published in mid-2003, presents the essential
elements of the staff-preferred alternative, Alternative D. Accordingly, this document has provided the basis for LAWA’s preparation
of the following proposed regulatory entitlements and/or mitigation measures that would implement Alternative D: the LAX Plan, the
LAX Specific Plan, the Airport Layout Plan, the Tentative Tract Maps, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and the
LAX Master Plan Program Relocation Plan. It is anticipated that the City Planning Commission and the Los Angeles City Council
will review and approve this Final LAX Master Plan. Upon such approval, LAWA would use this document as a broad policy

Los Angeles International Airport LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Preface

statement regarding the conceptual strategic framework for future improvements at LAX and as working guidelines to be consulted by
LAWA as it formulates and processes future site-specific projects under the LAX Master Plan Program.

The documents comprising the regulatory entitlements and mitigation measures that implement Alternative D are as follows:

♦ LAX Plan. The LAX Plan is the City’s general plan for the airport, setting out goals, policies, objectives and programs for the
long-term development and use of the airport consistent with the vision established by the preferred alternative, Alternative D. It
also sets forth policy for the LAX/El Segundo Dunes and LAX Northside. As a component of the City’s land use element of the
General Plan, the LAX Plan establishes land use categories that are consistent with the goals and objectives for modernization of
the airport, first identified in the LAX Master Plan, and provides policies and programs that further these goals and objectives.

♦ LAX Specific Plan. Whereas the LAX Plan establishes a land use policy framework, the LAX Specific Plan establishes zoning
and development regulations and standards consistent with the LAX Plan for the airport and LAX Northside. It is a principal
mechanism by which the goals and objectives of the LAX Plan are achieved and the policies and programs are implemented. It
establishes procedures for processing future specific projects and activities that are anticipated under the LAX Master Plan
Program. The LAX Specific Plan is also to be approved by the Los Angeles City Council.

♦ Airport Layout Plan. The proposed Airport Layout Plan (ALP) consists of a series of drawings that illustrate the layout of
existing facilities at the airport and proposed facilities that are consistent with Alternative D. The FAA-required ALP is intended
to serve as a record drawing for the airport, as well as a guide for the airport’s future development. The ALP package also
includes a narrative description of the drawings that explains the reasoning behind, and the key features of, the ALP. More
specifically, the ALP provides a graphic depiction of existing and proposed airport layouts for runways, roadways, parking, and
other airport facilities. It shows (a) the existing and proposed boundaries of the airport and all off-site area owned and controlled
by the airport for airport purposes, (b) the location of existing and proposed airport facilities and structures (such as runways,
taxiways, aprons, terminal buildings, hangars and roads), and (c) the location of all existing and proposed non-aviation areas and
of all existing improvements thereon. The ALP also includes an airport airspace plan, runway protection zone plan, and a property
inventory map. Planning, budgeting, and implementation for FAA activities on airports are based on the ALP. LAWA will review
and approve the proposed ALP before it is forwarded to the FAA. Revisions, modifications, and alterations of an ALP must be
approved by the FAA before they take effect, and will be reviewed by that agency in terms of airport safety, utility, and efficiency.

Los Angeles International Airport LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Preface

♦ Proposed Tentative Tract Maps. The primary purpose of the tentative tract maps is to vacate public streets that would no longer
be necessary if Alternative D is approved and to provide for the orderly and proper abandonment or relocation of utilities that may
be affected. It will also consolidate parcels that are no longer necessary. The proposed tentative tract maps fulfill requirements
under the California Subdivision Map Act and the Division of Land Regulations. All subdivision maps are consistent with the
applicable general and specific plans. The proposed tract maps must be approved by the City’s Advisory Agency, and their
approval is subject to appeal to the City Planning Commission and to the Los Angeles City Council.

♦ Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is a program by
which compliance with the proposed mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR is ensured. It also includes various master
plan commitments. The MMRP describes the method and timing of implementation, monitoring frequency, and actions indicating
compliance. Oversight will be conducted by way of annual status reports submitted to the Board of Airport Commissioners and
the City Planning Department. The MMRP will be approved by the Los Angeles City Council as part of the Final EIR
environmental review process.

♦ LAX Master Plan Program Relocation Plan. To address the acquisition of properties and relocation of businesses and residents,
if any, associated with Alternative D, LAWA will adopt a residential and business relocation plan in compliance with federal,
state, and local law prior to the commencement of acquisition. The objectives of the relocation plan, as discussed in Section
4.4.2.5 of the Final EIR, include fully informing eligible residential occupants and business owners of the nature of and procedures
for obtaining relocation assistance and benefits, and providing such assistance and benefits in accordance with federal, state, and
local law. The plan is also to be approved by the Los Angeles City Council and provided to the FAA for reference.

♦ Other General Plan Amendments. Other general plan amendments are required in order to approve the project and establish
consistency between the LAX Plan and other elements of the City’s General Plan. These amendments include changes to the
boundaries of the Westchester Playa del Rey Community Plan, to incorporate all airport property and master plan program
boundaries into one plan under the LAX Plan, to delete or otherwise amend policies, programs, and any other LAX references
(land use, transportation improvements, recreation facilities) to those areas. Amendments to the City’s Framework Element
include updating references to the “LAX Interim Plan” and the “Department of Airports” to the “LAX Plan” and “LAWA” and
revising various maps as a result of new LAX boundaries. Changes to the Noise Element will update new noise contours based on
the approved plan and will update several facts regarding LAX, such as airport background, statistics, zoning, noise, and master
plan efforts. Transportation Element amendments will mostly involve revisions to various maps as transportation improvements

Los Angeles International Airport LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Preface

and classifications will be revised with the adoption of the LAX Master Plan Program. Lastly, the LAX Interim Plan will be
amended to replace its text and maps with the LAX Plan text and maps.

♦ Other Zoning Actions. Other zoning actions include changes to the Los Angeles Municipal Zoning Code to add the new LAX
Zone and any references to that zone that may be pertinent in other sections of the code.

Los Angeles International Airport LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Table of Contents
PREFACE
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1
MASTER PLAN COMMITMENTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .............................................................................................................. 3

Noise........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Land Use .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Surface Transportation: On-Airport ........................................................................................................................................................ 14
Surface Transportation: Off-Airport ........................................................................................................................................................ 16
Relocation of Residences and Businesses................................................................................................................................................. 23
Air Quality................................................................................................................................................................................................ 29
Hydrology & Water Quality ..................................................................................................................................................................... 42
Historical/Architectural and Archaeological/Cultural Resources........................................................................................................... 47
Paleontological Resources ....................................................................................................................................................................... 52
Biotic Communities .................................................................................................................................................................................. 54
Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna....................................................................................................................... 66
Energy Supply........................................................................................................................................................................................... 80
Light Emissions ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 82
Solid Waste ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 83
Construction Impacts ............................................................................................................................................................................... 85
Design, Art, and Architecture Applications/Aesthetics ............................................................................................................................ 87
Hazardous Materials................................................................................................................................................................................ 89
Water Use ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 92
Wastewater ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 93
Fire Protection ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 94
Law Enforcement...................................................................................................................................................................................... 97

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING PLAN ........................................................................................................................T1-T8

Los Angeles International Airport i LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Table of Contents

List of Tables
Table F5-1 Structural BMP Expected Pollutant Removal Efficiency................................................................................................................ 45
Table F5-8 Estimated Ranges of Emission Reductions for Construction-Related Air Quality Mitigation Measures ..................................... 31
Table F5-9 Estimated Emission Reductions (Tons) for 8 New FlyAway Terminals - 2015 ............................................................................. 34
Table F5-10 Estimated Ranges of Emission Reductions for GSE Conversion.................................................................................................... 40
Table F5-11 Mitigation Land Evaluation Procedure for the Mitigation Site....................................................................................................... 76

List of Figures
Figure F5-2 Vernal Pool Restoration Opportunities Considered ......................................................................................................................... 70
Figure F5-3 North Area Ephemerally Wetted Pools and Buffer Areas ............................................................................................................... 71
Figure F5-4 South Area Ephemerally Wetted Pools and Buffer Areas ............................................................................................................... 72
Figure F5-5 Mitigation Site for El Segundo Blue Butterfly Relocation .............................................................................................................. 79

List of Acronyms
ACHP........................................................................................................................................................... Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
ANMP ....................................................................................................................................................................... Aircraft Noise Mitigation Program
AOA.......................................................................................................................................................................................... Airport Operations Area
APE........................................................................................................................................................................................... Area of Potential Effects
APM........................................................................................................................................................................................ Automated People Mover
ATCS ...........................................................................................................................................................................Adaptive Traffic Control System
ATP.................................................................................................................................................................................Archaeological Treatment Plan
ATSAC ...................................................................................................................................................... Automated Travel Surveillance and Control
BMP ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Best Management Practices
CARB.............................................................................................................................................................................California Air Resources Board
CDFG.............................................................................................................................................................. California Department of Fish and Game
CEQA...................................................................................................................................................................California Environmental Quality Act

Los Angeles International Airport ii LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Table of Contents

CFR.....................................................................................................................................................................................Code of Federal Regulations

CNDDB ............................................................................................................................................................. California Natural Diversity Data Base
CNEL ......................................................................................................................................................................Community Noise Equivalent Level
CTA ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Central Terminal Area
DTSC .............................................................................................................................................................. Department of Toxic Substances Control
EIR ....................................................................................................................................................................................Environmental Impact Report
EIS ...............................................................................................................................................................................Environmental Impact Statement
FAA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Federal Aviation Administration
GSE...................................................................................................................................................................................... Ground Support Equipment
GTC ................................................................................................................................................................................. Ground Transportation Center
HABS..................................................................................................................................................................... Historic American Buildings Survey
HMP........................................................................................................................................................................................Habitat Management Plan
HTP.........................................................................................................................................................................................Hyperion Treatment Plant
IPWP.......................................................................................................................................................... Integrated Plan for the Wastewater Program
ITC ..............................................................................................................................................................................Intermodal Transportation Center
ITS ............................................................................................................................................................................ Intelligent Transportation Systems
LADBS ............................................................................................................................................... Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety
LADOT ........................................................................................................................................................Los Angeles Department of Transportation
LADPW ........................................................................................................................................................ Los Angeles Department of Public Works
LAFD ................................................................................................................................................................................ Los Angeles Fire Department
LAPD .............................................................................................................................................................................Los Angeles Police Department
LARWQCB .................................................................................................................................. Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
LAWA ................................................................................................................................................................................Los Angeles World Airports
LAWAPD ............................................................................................................................................ Los Angeles World Airports Police Department
LAX ........................................................................................................................................................................... Los Angeles International Airport
LAX MP-MPAQ.............................................................................................................................LAX Master Plan - Mitigation Plan for Air Quality
MEP ............................................................................................................................................................................ Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing
NFPA ........................................................................................................................................................................... National Fire Protection Agency
NHPA........................................................................................................................................................................ National Historic Preservation Act
NPS ............................................................................................................................................................................................... National Park Service
OHP ................................................................................................................................................................................ Office of Historic Preservation
PMTP ....................................................................................................................................................... Paleontological Management Treatment Plan
RAC ................................................................................................................................................................................................................Rent-a-Car
RWQCB............................................................................................................................................................. Regional Water Quality Control Board

Los Angeles International Airport iii LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Table of Contents

SCAQMD ............................................................................................................................................... South Coast Air Quality Management District

SEL .............................................................................................................................................................................................. Sound Exposure Level
SHPO ..........................................................................................................................................................................State Historic Preservation Office
SULEV..................................................................................................................................................................... Super Ultra Low-Emission Vehicle
SUSMP ......................................................................................................................................................Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan
SWPPP...............................................................................................................................................................Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
ULEV................................................................................................................................................................................. Ultra Low-Emission Vehicle
USEPA.................................................................................................................................................United States Environmental Protection Agency
USFWS ............................................................................................................................................................. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
VMT...........................................................................................................................................................................................Vehicle Miles Travelled
ZEV..............................................................................................................................................................................................Zero Emission Vehicle

Los Angeles International Airport iv LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Introduction
The California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires that the City of Los Angeles establish a reporting and monitoring
program for mitigation measures adopted as part of the environmental review process to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the
environment.1 Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA”) Record
of Decision must include a monitoring and enforcement program for each mitigation measure.2 This Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program (“MMRP”) is designed to comply with these requirements by ensuring that the mitigation measures identified in
the Final EIS/EIR are implemented.

In addition to identifying and describing the applicable mitigation measures, the LAX Master Plan MMRP includes LAX Master
Plan commitments which are primarily activities, policies, and practices that were formulated to avoid or reduce adverse
environmental impacts where mitigation measures would not be appropriate: (1) where standards and regulations exist with which
compliance is already required by the applicable regulating agency; (2) where impacts would be adverse but not significant; and (3)
where design refinements could be incorporated into the project to reduce or avoid potential impacts. The funding and
implementation of the Master Plan commitments, as well as the mitigation measures, are subject to LAWA’s ability to use airport
revenue to the extent permissible under federal law and policies, or to develop other state or federal funding sources.

The MMRP, as set forth in the following table, describes the timing of implementation, monitoring frequency and actions indicating
compliance for each Master Plan commitment and mitigation measure. Annual reports, detailing among other things, status and
compliance, will be submitted to the City Planning Department and the Board of Airport Commissioners. The MMRP’s content is
described briefly below.

Master Plan Commitments/Mitigation Measures: Each Master Plan commitment and mitigation measure in the Final EIS/EIR is
listed verbatim and maintains the same assigned number. They are categorized by the environmental discipline to which they pertain.
Although much project-level information is included, the Final EIS/EIR has been prepared to address the more general level of detail
that is required for program-level entitlements. As individual projects of the Master Plan are advanced for implementation and future
environmental analyses occur, as appropriate, additional mitigation details may be provided. As such, the mitigation measures (or
equivalent types of mitigation measures) and how they should be applied at the project level may evolve as each project is developed.

1
Pub. Res. Code § 21081.6(a).
2
40 C.F.R. 1505.2(c).

Los Angeles International Airport 1 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Introduction

Monitoring Agency: The monitoring agency is the city department responsible for various aspects of monitoring or reporting,
including ensuring compliance with the Master Plan commitment and mitigation measure. Los Angeles World Airports has lead
responsibility for administering the program and support responsibilities.

Timing of Implementation: The appropriate time by which the Master Plan commitment/mitigation measure must be implemented
in order to effectively accomplish the intended outcome. This is based on current information. Although much project-level
information is included, the Final EIS/EIR has been prepared to address the more general level of detail that is required for program-
level entitlements. As individual projects of the Master Plan are advanced for implementation and future environmental evaluation
occurs, as appropriate, additional mitigation details may be provided. As such, the timing may evolve as each project is developed.

Monitoring Frequency: Frequency at which the monitoring agency will verify that the measure is being implemented.

Actions Indicating Compliance: The means by which the monitoring agency will verify that the measure is being carried out. This is
based on current information. Compliance may be demonstrated through alternative means, subject to the approval of the monitoring
agency. If an alternative means for demonstrating compliance is approved, the monitoring frequency may be adjusted accordingly.

Los Angeles International Airport 2 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Noise
N-1 Maintenance of Applicable Elements of Existing Aircraft Noise Noise impacts that may Already being Ongoing Submission of Annual
Abatement Program. All components of the current airport noise result from airport implemented. Will Report per Variance
abatement program that pertain to aircraft noise will be maintained. operations without the continue noise Conditions to County
Monitoring measures in place abatement program of Los Angeles
Agency: throughout
implementation and use
LAWA

MM-N-4 Update the Aircraft Noise Abatement Program Elements as Noise impacts that may Upon commissioning of Once, upon Update of Aircraft
Applicable to Adapt to the Future Airfield Configuration. result from air traffic relocated runways commissioning of each Noise Abatement
When existing runways are relocated or reconstructed as part of the dispersion without the relocated runway and Program to reflect
Monitoring Master Plan, the aircraft noise abatement actions associated with measures in place then on-going relocated runways and
Agency: those runways shall be modified and re-established as appropriate submission of Annual
to assure continuation of the intent of the existing program. Report per Variance
LAWA
Conditions to County
of Los Angeles

MM-N-5 Conduct Part 161 Study to Make Over-Ocean Procedures Night noise impacts Initiation within 30 Once, upon submission Submission of Part 161
Mandatory. A 14 CFR Part 161 Study shall be initiated to seek generated by aircraft days from City Council of Part 161 Application application and
federal approval of a locally-imposed Noise and Access Restriction departing to the east approval of the LAX to the FAA, or upon supporting documents
Monitoring on departures to the east during Over-Ocean Operations, or when when over-ocean Plan execution of voluntary to the FAA for
Agency: Westerly Operations remain in effect during the Over-Ocean procedures are in effect agreement between approval, or execution
Operations time period. LAWA and the Airlines of a voluntary
LAWA
agreement between
LAWA and the
Airlines to implement
restrictions

MM-N-7 Construction Noise Control Plan. A Construction Noise Control Significant noise Prior to the earliest of Once, upon completion Inclusion of
Plan will be prepared to provide feasible measures to reduce impacts at noise- either the issuance of a of Noise Control Plan requirement for a Noise
significant noise impacts throughout the construction period for all sensitive receivers grading permit, for each project and as Control Plan in
Monitoring projects near noise sensitive uses. For example, noise control during construction issuance of a specified in the Noise subcontract agreement
Agency: devices shall be used and maintained, such as equipment mufflers, demolition permit, or Control Plan & subsequent approval
enclosures, and barriers. Natural and artificial barriers such as construction of the noise control
LAWA
ground elevation changes and existing commencement plan by

Area: Noise 3
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-N-7 (Cont'd)
buildings can shield construction noise. of each project with LAWA.
noise sensitive uses
within 600 feet of
project site
MM-N-8 Construction Staging. Construction operations shall be staged as Significant noise Prior to the earliest of Once, upon approval of Approval of
far from noise-sensitive uses as feasible. impacts at noise- either the issuance of a construction staging construction staging
sensitive receivers grading permit, area by LAWA area by LAWA
Monitoring during construction issuance of a
Agency: demolition permit,
or construction
LAWA
commencement of each
project with noise
sensitive uses within
600 feet of project site

MM-N-9 Equipment Replacement. Noisy equipment shall be replaced Significant noise Prior to the earliest of Once, upon completion Inclusion of
with quieter equipment (for example, rubber tired equipment rather impacts at noise either the issuance of a of Noise Control Plan requirement for a Noise
than track equipment) when technically and economically feasible. sensitive receivers grading permit, for each project and as Control Plan in
Monitoring during construction issuance of a specified in the Noise subcontract agreement
Agency: demolition permit, or Control Plan and subsequent
construction approval of the Noise
LAWA
commencement of each Control Plan by LAWA
project with noise
sensitive uses within
600 feet of the project
site

MM-N-10 Construction Scheduling. The timing and/or sequence of the Significant noise Prior to the earlier of Once, upon completion Inclusion of
noisiest on-site construction activities shall avoid sensitive times of impacts at noise- either the issuance of a of Noise Control Plan requirement for a Noise
the day, as feasible (9 p.m. to 7 a.m. Monday - Friday; 8 p.m. to 6 sensitive receivers grading permit, for each project and as Control Plan in
Monitoring a.m. Saturday; anytime on Sunday or Holidays). during construction issuance of a specified in the Noise subcontract agreement
Agency: demolition permit, or Control Plan. and subsequent
construction approval of the Noise
LAWA
commencement of Control Plan by

Area: Noise 4
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-N-10 (Cont'd)
each project with noise LAWA
sensitive uses within
600 feet of project site
MM-N-11 Automated People Mover (APM) Noise Assessment and To avoid significant Prior to issuance of any Once, upon completion Completion of APM
Control Plan. In conjunction with detailed design and engineering noise levels/impacts to permit for the APM of the APM Noise Noise Control Plan
of the proposed APM systems, a noise control plan shall be the hotels indicated in Control Plan
Monitoring prepared specifying noise attenuation measures to reduce APM the mitigation measure
Agency: noise levels at the two significantly impacted hotels to acceptable
level (i.e. less than 67 dBA CNEL for the Courtyard by Marriott
LAWA
and the Four Points Sheraton). Potential options for such noise
control/reduction include but are not limited to, the following:

‹ Measures that Mitigate Noise at the Source

− Stringent vehicle and equipment noise specifications
− Operational restrictions
− Vehicle skirts (i.e., steel/fiberglass panels that extend
down to enclose wheel and undercarriage noise)
− Undercar sound absorption
− Limited turning radii

‹ Measures that Mitigate Noise Along the Source-to-Receptor

Propagation Path
− Sound barriers close to vehicles
− Sound barriers at Right-of-Way line
− Alteration of horizontal and vertical alignments (i.e.,
altering the height or path of the APM alignment to
reduce the exposure of noise sensitive receptors)
− Acquisition of buffer zones
− Resilient support on aerial guideway

Area: Noise 5
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-N-11 (Cont'd)
‹ Measures that Mitigate Noise at the Receptor
− Construction of sound barriers within affected properties
− Building noise insulation or insulation upgrades

Area: Noise 6
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Land Use
LU-1 Incorporation of City of Los Angeles Ordinance No. 159,526 Incompatibility of LAX Upon City Council Once, upon City Adoption of LAX
[Q] Zoning Conditions for LAX Northside into the LAX Northside with adjacent approval of the LAX Council approval of Zone/LAX Specific
Northside/Westchester Southside Project. To the maximum residential uses to the Zone/LAX Specific LAX Zone/LAX Plan to include the [Q]
Monitoring extent feasible, all [Q] Conditions (Qualifications of Approval) north Plan Specific Plan conditions as feasible
Agency: from City of Los Angeles Ordinance No. 159,526 that address the
Northside project area will be incorporated by LAWA into a new
LAWA
LAX Zone/LAX Specific Plan for the LAX Northside/Westchester
Southside project. Accepting that certain conditions may be
updated, revised, or determined infeasible as a result of changes to
the LAX Northside project, the final conditions for the LAX
Northside/Westchester Southside project will ensure that the level
of environmental protection afforded by the full set of existing
LAX Northside project [Q] conditions is maintained or increased.

LU-2 Establishment of a Landscape Maintenance Program for Incompatibility with Prior to first land On-going throughout Approval of Landscape
Parcels Acquired Due to Airport Expansion. Land acquired and adjacent uses during acquisition Master Plan Maintenance Program
cleared for airport development will be fenced, landscaped, and acquisition development by LAWA
Monitoring maintained regularly until the properties are actually developed for
Agency: airport purposes.
LAWA
LU-4 Neighborhood Compatibility Program. Ongoing coordination Land use Throughout Master On-going throughout Compliance with the
and planning will be undertaken by LAWA to ensure that the incompatibility with Plan development Master Plan provisions of the LAX
airport is as compatible as possible with surrounding properties and nearby residential uses development Zone/LAX Specific
Monitoring neighborhoods. Measures to enforce this policy will include: 1) Plan and LAX Plan
Agency: Along the northerly and southerly boundary areas of the airport,
LAWA will provide and maintain landscaped buffer areas that will
LAWA
include setbacks, landscaping, screening or other appropriate view
sensitive improvements with the goal of avoiding land use
conflicts, shielding lighting, enhancing privacy and better
screening views of airport facilities from adjacent residential uses.
Use of existing facilities in buffer areas may continue as required
until LAWA can develop alternative facilities.

Area: Land Use 7

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

LU-4 (Cont'd)
2) Locate airport uses and activities with the potential to adversely
affect nearby residential land uses through noise, light spill-over,
odor, vibration and other consequences of airport operations and
development as far from adjacent residential neighborhoods as
feasible. 3) Provide community outreach efforts to property owners
and occupants when new development on airport property is in
proximity to and could potentially affect nearby residential uses.

LU-5 Comply with City of Los Angeles Transportation Element Insufficient bicycle Prior to issuance of Once, upon issuance of Issuance of permits by
Bicycle Plan. LAWA will comply with bicycle policies and plans facilities certificate of occupancy certificate of occupancy LADOT, LADPW or
in the vicinity of LAX, most notably those outlined in the City of for each project that for each project that LADBS, as appropriate
Monitoring Los Angeles Transportation Element Bicycle Plan and the General will incorporate bicycle will incorporate bicycle
Agency: Plan Framework, including Pershing Drive, Sepulveda Boulevard, facilities facilities
and Aviation Boulevard. As a priority, a Class I bike path will be
LAWA
incorporated on Aviation Boulevard, as practical and feasible, per
the standards identified in the City of Los Angeles Transportation
Element Bicycle Plan generally extending from the Inglewood City
limits (Arbor Vitae Street) to the north to Imperial Highway to the
south. As a primary objective, LAWA will provide maximum
feasible incorporation of other bike paths and bike lanes into the
design of projects that will be constructed under the LAX Master
Plan program with a fundamental emphasis on ensuring safe and
efficient bicycle and vehicular circulation. In addition, bicycle
access and parking facilities will be provided at the Ground
Transportation Center, Intermodal Transportation Center, and
major parking lots. Bicycle facilities such as lockers and showers
will also be provided where feasible to promote employee bicycle
use.

MM-LU-1 Implement Revised Aircraft Noise Mitigation Program. Residential and other Initiation upon City Annually Submission of Annual
LAWA shall expand and revise the existing Aircraft Noise noise-sensitive uses Council approval of the ANMP Progress
LAX Plan Reports and

Area: Land Use 8

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-LU-1 (Cont'd)
Monitoring Mitigation Program (ANMP) in coordination with affected newly exposed to high Periodic ANMP Report
Agency: neighboring jurisdictions, the State, and the FAA. The expanded noise levels or Updates to County of
Program shall mitigate land uses that would be rendered significant increases in Los Angeles
LAWA incompatible by noise impacts associated with implementation of existing noise levels
the LAX Master Plan, unless such uses are subject to an existing
avigation easement and have been provided with noise mitigation
funds. LAWA shall accelerate the ANMP's timetable for
achieving full compatibility of all land uses within the existing
noise impact area pursuant to the requirements of the California
Airport Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21,
Subchapter 6) and current Noise Variance. With the exception of a
possible new interior noise level standard for schools to be
established through the study required by Mitigation Measure MM-
LU-3, Conduct Study of the Relationship Between Aircraft Noise
Levels and the Ability of Children to Learn, the relevant
performance standard to achieve compatibility for land uses that
are incompatible due to aircraft noise (i.e., residences, schools,
hospitals and churches) is adequate acoustic performance (sound
insulation) to ensure an interior noise level of 45 CNEL or less. As
an alternative to sound insulation, incompatible property may also
achieve compatibility if the incompatible use is converted to a
noise-compatible use.

LAWA shall revise the ANMP to incorporate new, or expand

existing measures, including, but not necessarily limited to, the
following:

‹ Continued implementation of successful programs to convert

existing incompatible land uses to compatible land uses
through sound insulation of structures and the acquisition and
conversion of incompatible land use to compatible land use.

Area: Land Use 9

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-LU-1 (Cont'd)
‹ Ongoing monitoring and provision of annual updates in
support of the requirements of the current LAX Noise
Variance pursuant to the California Airport Noise Standards,
with the updates made available (upon request) to affected
local jurisdictions, the Airport Land Use Commission of Los
Angeles County, and other interested parties.

‹ Continue the current pre- and post-insulation noise monitoring

to ensure achievement of interior noise levels at or below 45
CNEL.

‹ Accelerated rate of land use mitigation to eliminate noise

impact areas in the most timely and efficient manner possible
through:
− Increased annual funding by LAWA for land use
mitigation.
− Reevaluating avigation easements requirements with
sound insulation mitigation.
− Provision by LAWA of additional technical assistance,
where needed, to local jurisdictions to support more rapid
and efficient implementation of their land use mitigation
programs.
− Reduction or elimination, to the extent feasible, of
structural and building code compliance constraints to
mitigation of sub-standard housing.

‹ Revised criteria and procedures for selection and prioritization

of properties to be sound insulated or acquired in
consideration of the following:
− Insulation or acquisition of properties within the highest
CNEL measurement zone.
− Acceleration of the fulfillment of existing commitments
to owners wishing to participate within the current
ANMP boundaries prior to proceeding with newly
eligible properties.

Area: Land Use 10

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-LU-1 (Cont'd)
− Insulation or acquisition of incompatible properties with
high concentrations of residents or other noise-sensitive
occupants such as those housed in schools or hospitals.

‹ Amend ANMP to include libraries as noise-sensitive uses

eligible for aircraft noise mitigation.

‹ Upon completion of acquisition and/or soundproofing

commitment under the current Program, expand the
boundaries of the ANMP as necessary over time. LAWA will
continue preparing quarterly reports that monitor any
expansion of the 65 CNEL noise contours beyond the current
ANMP boundaries. Based upon these quarterly reports,
LAWA will evaluate and adjust the ANMP boundaries,
periodically as appropriate, so that as the 65 CNEL noise
contours expand, residential and noise sensitive uses newly
impacted by 65 CNEL noise levels would be included within
the Program.

MM-LU-2 Incorporate Residential Dwelling Units Exposed to Single Residential uses newly Initiation upon City Annually Submission of Annual
Event Awakenings Threshold into Aircraft Noise Mitigation exposed to high single Council approval of the ANMP Progress
Program. In addition to any restrictive measures that may be event noise levels that LAX Plan Reports and Periodic
Monitoring implemented resulting from completion of Mitigation Measure result in nighttime ANMP Report Updates
Agency: MM-N-5, Conduct Part 161 Study to Make Over-Ocean awakening that are to County of Los
Procedures Mandatory, the boundaries of the ANMP will be located outside the Angeles
LAWA
expanded to include residential uses newly exposed to single event current ANMP
exterior nighttime noise levels of 94 dBA SEL, based on the boundaries
Master Plan alternative that is ultimately approved and periodic
reevaluation and adjustments by LAWA. Uses that are newly
exposed would be identified based on annual average conditions as
derived from the most current monitored data.

Area: Land Use 11

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-LU-3 Conduct Study of the Relationship Between Aircraft Noise Classroom disruption Initiation of study upon Once, upon approval of LAWA approval of
Levels and the Ability of Children to Learn. Current studies of due to exposure to high City Council approval the study by LAWA completed study
aircraft noise and the ability of children to learn have not resulted single event or of the LAX Plan
Monitoring in the development of a statistically reliable predictive model of the cumulative noise levels
Agency: relative effect of changes in aircraft noise levels on learning.
Therefore a comprehensive study shall be initiated by LAWA to
LAWA
determine what, if any, measurable relationship may be present
between learning and the disruptions caused by aircraft noise at
various levels. An element of the evaluation shall be the setting of
an acceptable replacement threshold of significance for classroom
disruption by both specific and sustained aircraft noise events.

MM-LU-4 Provide Additional Sound Insulation for Schools Shown by Classroom disruption Within six (6) months Annually Conduct noise
MM-LU-3 to be Significantly Impacted by Aircraft Noise. due to exposure to of commissioning of measurements based on
Prior to completion of the study required by Mitigation Measure noise levels in excess of any relocated runways interim LAX interior
Monitoring MM-LU-3, Conduct Study of the Relationship Between Aircraft threshold of (for interim LAX noise thresholds and on
Agency: Noise Levels and the Ability of Children to Learn, and within six significance established interior noise thresholds newly established noise
months of the commissioning of any relocated runways associated in MM-LU-3 component); and upon thresholds set by MM-
LAWA
with implementation of the LAX Master Plan, LAWA shall completion of the study LU-3, and make
conduct interior noise measurements at schools that could be newly in Mitigation Measure schools eligible for
exposed to noise levels that exceed the interim LAX interior noise MM-LU-3 (for MM- ANMP participation, as
thresholds for classroom disruption of 55 dBA Lmax, 65 dBA LU-3 component) appropriate
Lmax, or 35 Leq(h), as presented in Section 4.1, Noise, of the Final
EIS/EIR. All school classroom buildings (except those within
school subject to an avigation easement) that are found through the
noise measurements to exceed the interim interior noise thresholds,
as compared to the 1996 baseline conditions presented in the Final
EIS/EIR, would become eligible for soundproofing under the
ANMP.

Upon completion of the study required by Mitigation Measure

MM-LU-3 and acceptance of its results by peer review of industry
experts, any schools found to exceed a newly

Area: Land Use 12

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-LU-4 (Cont'd)
established threshold of significance for classroom
disruption based on comparison with 1996 baseline conditions due
to implementation of the LAX Master Plan, shall be eligible for
participation in the ANMP administered by LAWA, unless they are
subject to an existing avigation easement. A determination of
which schools become eligible will be made following application
of the new threshold based on measured data.

MM-LU-5 Upgrade and Expand Noise Monitoring Program. LAWA shall Residential and other Initiation of system Once, upon Caltrans Caltrans certification of
upgrade and expand its existing noise monitoring program in noise-sensitive uses upgrade within 30 days certification upgraded system
surrounding communities through new system procurement, noise newly exposed to high from City Council
Monitoring monitor siting, and equipment installation. Permanent or portable noise levels or approval of the LAX
Agency: monitors shall be located in surrounding communities to record significant increases in Plan
noise data 24 hours per day, seven days per week for correlation existing noise levels
LAWA
with FAA radar data to cross-reference noise episodes with flight
patterns. The upgraded system will support LAWA and other
jurisdictional ANMP's when considering adjustments to airport
noise mitigation boundaries.

Area: Land Use 13

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Surface Transportation (On-Airport)

ST-2 Non-Peak CTA Deliveries. Deliveries to the CTA terminal Traffic congestion and During construction of On-going during Periodic reporting by
reconstruction projects will be limited to non-peak traffic hours delays as they relate to any LAX Master Plan construction the Construction
whenever possible. the LAX Master Plan related CTA terminal Coordination Office
Monitoring program construction reconstruction projects
Agency: activities
LAWA
ST-7 Adequate GTC, ITC, and APM Design. LAWA will ensure that Over- crowding, Advance design stage Once, at approval of Approval of design
the surface transportation system and curbfront for the GTC and congested curbfront design plans plans by Bureau of
ITC, commercial vehicle staging areas, and APM systems will be space for passenger and Engineering, LADOT,
Monitoring designed to adequately accommodate all forecast vehicular activity commercial vehicles and LADBS, as
Agency: through 2015. appropriate
LAWA
ST-8 Limited Short-Term Lane Closures. When construction of any Traffic Congestion and During construction of When short-term lane Periodic reporting by
new ramps at the Century Boulevard/Sepulveda Boulevard delays as they relate to new ramps at Century closures are scheduled Construction
interchange or construction for the GTC, ITC, or APM elevated the LAX Master Plan Boulevard/ Sepulveda during construction Coordination Office
Monitoring structures require short-term lane closures, the lane closures will be program construction Boulevard interchange;
Agency: for as brief a period as practical and with a goal that activities construction of elevated
closures would principally be scheduled for non-peak periods. structures for the GTC,
LAWA
ITC or APM

MM-ST-1 Require CTA Construction Vehicles to Use Designated Lanes. Traffic congestion and During CTA On-going during LAWA approval of
Whenever feasible, construction vehicles shall be restricted to delay as they relate to reconstruction projects construction Construction Traffic
designated roadways or lanes of traffic on CTA roadways adjacent the LAX Master Plan Management Plan
Monitoring to the existing close-in parking, thus limiting the mix of program construction
Agency: construction vehicles and airport traffic. activities
LAWA
MM-ST-2 Modify CTA Signage. During construction, additional signage Traffic congestion and Prior to start of As stipulated in the Sign installation
will be installed, as required, to separate construction traffic from delays as they relate to construction of CTA Construction Traffic
non-construction traffic to the extent feasible. the LAX Master Plan reconstruction projects Management Plan,
Monitoring program construction approved by LAWA's
Agency: activities Construction
Coordination Office
LAWA
Area: Surface Transportation (On-Airport) 14
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ST-3 Develop Designated Shuttle Stops for Labor Buses and ITC- Traffic congestion and Prior to demolition of As stipulated in the Establishment of new
CTA Buses. Develop shuttle stops for labor buses (i.e., buses delays as they relate to CTA parking structures Construction Traffic CTA shuttle stops
carrying construction workers) and the ITC-CTA shuttle buses at the LAX Master Plan Management Plan,
Monitoring the CTA arrivals level. All ITC-CTA shuttle buses will be routed program construction approved by LAWA's
Agency: to these lower level (arrivals) curb areas. These buses will not activities Construction
circulate through the upper level (departures) curbfront. Coordination Office
LAWA

Area: Surface Transportation (On-Airport) 15

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Surface Transportation (Off-Airport)

ST-9 Construction Deliveries. Construction deliveries requiring lane Traffic congestion and During construction On-going during Periodic reporting by
closures shall receive prior approval from the Construction delays as they relate to construction Construction
Coordination Office. Notification of deliveries shall be made with the LAX Master Plan Coordination Office
Monitoring sufficient time to allow for any modifications of approved traffic program construction
Agency: detour plans. activities
LAWA
ST-12 Designated Truck Delivery Hours. Truck deliveries shall be Traffic congestion and LAWA approval of On-going during Periodic reporting by
encouraged to use nighttime hours and shall avoid the peak periods delays as they relate to delivery schedule as construction Construction
of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. the LAX Master Plan part of the Construction Coordination Office
Monitoring program construction Traffic Management
Agency: activities Plan
LAWA
ST-14 Construction Employee Shift Hours. Shift hours that do not Traffic congestion and Prior to construction Once, upon approval of LAWA approval of
coincide with the heaviest commuter traffic periods (7:00 a.m. to delays as they relate to activity for each Master employees' work employee work
9:00 a.m., 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.) will be established. Work the LAX Master Plan Plan project schedule on a project- schedule as part of the
Monitoring periods will be extended to include weekends and multiple work program construction by-project basis Construction Traffic
Agency: shifts, to the extent possible and necessary. activities Management Plan
LAWA
ST-16 Designated Haul Routes. Every effort will be made to ensure that Traffic noise At issuance of approved Once, at approval of Approval of haul route
haul routes are located away from sensitive noise receptors. haul route each haul route by LADBS

Monitoring
Agency:
LAWA
ST-17 Maintenance of Haul Routes. Haul routes on off-airport streets Roadway safety As dictated by LAWA's On-going during Field inspection report;
will be maintained periodically and will comply with City of Los Construction construction maintenance logs
Angeles or other appropriate jurisdictional requirements for Coordination Office
Monitoring maintenance. Minor striping, lane configurations, and signal and LADBS
Agency: phasing modifications will be provided as needed.
LAWA
ST-18 Construction Traffic Management Plan. A complete Traffic congestion, Prior to commencement On-going during LAWA approval of
construction traffic plan will be developed to designate detour delay and safety, as of construction construction, as Construction Traffic
Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 16
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

ST-18 (Cont'd)
and/or haul routes, variable message and other sign locations, they relate to the LAX stipulated by LAWA's Management Plan by
Monitoring communication methods with airport passengers, construction Master Plan program Construction LAWA's Construction
Agency: deliveries, construction employee shift hours, construction construction activities Coordination Office Coordination Office
LAWA employee parking locations and other relevant factors.
ST-19 Closure Restrictions of Existing Roadways. Other than short Traffic congestion and As construction dictates As stipulated in the Street closure permit;
time periods during nighttime construction, existing roadways will delays as they relate to Construction Traffic approval by LAWA's
remain open until they are no longer needed for regular traffic or the LAX Master Plan Management Plan, Construction
Monitoring construction traffic, unless a temporary detour route is available to program construction approved by LAWA's Coordination Office
Agency: serve the same function. This will recognize that there are three activities Construction
functions taking place concurrently: (1) airport traffic, (2) Coordination Office
LAWA
construction haul routes, and (3) construction of new facilities.

ST-20 Stockpile Locations. Stockpile locations will be confined to the Traffic congestion and Prior to construction of Once, upon approval of LAWA approval of
eastern area of the airport vicinity, to the extent practical and delays as they relate to each eastern facility stockpile locations by stockpile locations as
feasible. After the eastern facilities are under construction in the LAX Master Plan LAWA's Construction part of the Construction
Monitoring Alternative D, stockpile locations will be selected that are as close program construction Coordination Office Management Traffic
Agency: to I-405 and I-105 as possible, and can be accessed by construction activities Plan
vehicles with minimal disruption to adjacent streets. Multiple
LAWA
stockpile locations may be provided, as required.

ST-21 Construction Employee Parking Locations. During construction Traffic congestion and Prior to construction of Once, upon approval of LAWA approval of
of the eastern airport facilities, employee parking locations will be delays as they relate to each eastern facility Employee Parking parking locations as
selected that are as close to I-405 and I-105 as possible and can be the LAX Master Plan Locations by LAWA's part of Construction
Monitoring accessed by employee vehicles with minimal disruption to adjacent program construction Construction Traffic Management
Agency: streets. Shuttle buses will transport employees to construction sites. activities Coordination Office Plan
In addition, remote parking locations (of not less than 1 mile away
LAWA
from project construction activities) will be established for
construction employees with shuttle service to the airport. An
emergency return system will be established for employees that
must leave unexpectedly.

ST-22 Designated Truck Routes. For dirt and aggregate and all other Traffic congestion and At issuance of haul Once, upon approval Approval of haul route

Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 17

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

ST-22 (Cont'd)
materials and equipment, truck deliveries will be on designated delay as they relate to route approval of each haul route by LADBS
Monitoring routes only (freeways and non-residential streets). Every effort will the LAX Master Plan
Agency: be made for routes to avoid residential frontages. The designated program construction
routes on City of Los Angeles streets are subject to approval by activities
LAWA LADOT's Bureau of Traffic Management and may include, but
will not necessarily be limited to: Pershing Drive (Westchester
Parkway to Imperial Highway); Florence Avenue (Aviation to I-
405); Manchester Boulevard (Aviation to I-405); Aviation
Boulevard (Manchester Avenue to Imperial Highway);
Westchester Parkway/Arbor Vitae Street (Pershing to I-405);
Century Boulevard (Sepulveda to I-405); Imperial Highway
(Pershing to I-405); La Cienega Boulevard (north of Imperial
Highway); Airport Boulevard (Arbor Vitae to Century); Sepulveda
Boulevard (Westchester Parkway to Imperial Highway); I-405; and
I-105.

MM-ST-6 Add New Traffic Lanes. Traffic lanes shall be added to select Traffic congestion and By 2008 or 2015, or Once, at issuance of Acceptance of
intersections to the satisfaction of LADOT or other appropriate delays as they relate to prior to certificate of certificate of occupancy construction by
jurisdiction, sufficient to increase the capacity of the intersection the LAX Master Plan occupancy for of related project LADOT and LADPW,
Monitoring without unnecessarily reducing sidewalk widths, removing on- program activities associated project or affected jurisdiction
Agency: street parking, or encroaching onto other land uses. By 2008: Arbor component, as specified
Vitae Street & La Cienega Boulevard, Aviation Boulevard & 111th in the Transportation
LAWA
Street, Aviation Boulevard & Imperial Highway, Centinela Avenue Improvements Phasing
& Sepulveda Boulevard, Continental City Drive & Imperial Plan
Highway, I-105 off-ramp and Imperial Highway, La Cienega
Boulevard & 111th Street, Lincoln Boulevard & 83rd Street,
Centinela Avenue & La Cienega Boulevard, Century Boulevard &
La Brea Avenue. By 2015: Imperial Highway and Main Street,
Imperial Highway & Pershing Drive, Lincoln Boulevard and
Manchester Boulevard.

MM-ST-7 Restripe Existing Facilities. Existing traffic lanes shall be Traffic congestion and By 2008 or 2015, or Once, at issuance of Approval of restriping
restriped to the satisfaction of LADOT or other appropriate delays as they relate to prior to certificate of certificate of by LADOT or affected

Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 18

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ST-7 (Cont'd)
Monitoring jurisdiction, so that additional lane capacity will be provided the LAX Master Plan occupancy for occupancy of related jurisdiction
Agency: without adding any new pavement to the intersection or road program activities associated project project
segment. By 2008: Airport Boulevard & Arbor Vitae Street, component, as specified
LAWA Aviation Boulevard & El Segundo Boulevard, Century Boulevard in the Transportation
& Sepulveda Boulevard, Florence Avenue & La Cienega Improvements Phasing
Boulevard, La Cienega Boulevard & Manchester Avenue, La Plan
Tijera Boulevard & Sepulveda Boulevard, Manchester Avenue &
Sepulveda Boulevard, Hawthorne Boulevard & Imperial Highway,
Imperial Highway & Inglewood Avenue. By 2015: Airport
Boulevard & Manchester Avenue, Aviation Boulevard &
Manchester Boulevard, Century Boulevard & La Cienega
Boulevard, Grand Avenue & Vista del Mar, La Tijera Boulevard &
Manchester Avenue, Centinela Avenue & Culver Boulevard, Arbor
Vitae Street & Inglewood Avenue.

MM-ST-8 Add ATSAC, ATCS or Equivalent. Automated Traffic Traffic congestion and By 2008 or 2015, or Once, at issuance of Approval of signal
Surveillance and Control (ATSAC) or Adaptive Traffic Control delays as they relate to prior to certificate of certificate of occupancy upgrade from LADOT
System (ATCS) capability or equivalent shall be added to select the LAX Master Plan occupancy for of related project and LADPW, or
Monitoring intersections to the satisfaction of LADOT or other appropriate program activities associated project appropriate jurisdiction
Agency: jurisdiction. The improved capability will result in a more effective component, as specified
traffic signal network. By 2008: Aviation Boulevard & El Segundo in the Transportation
LAWA
Boulevard, El Segundo Boulevard & Sepulveda Boulevard, Improvements Phasing
Continental City Drive & Imperial Highway, I-105 off-ramp & Plan
Imperial Highway, Mariposa Avenue & Sepulveda Boulevard,
Rosecrans Avenue & Sepulveda Boulevard, I-105 W/B off-ramp &
Sepulveda Boulevard, Hawthorne Boulevard & Imperial Highway,
Century Boulevard & Inglewood Avenue, Imperial Highway &
Inglewood Avenue, Overland Avenue S/O Venice Boulevard
(link). By 2015: Aviation Boulevardl & Manchester Avenue, El
Segundo Boulevard & La Cienega Boulevard, Arbor Vitae Street
& La Brea Avenue, Centinela Avenue E/O La Brea Avenue (link),
Imperial Highway W/O

Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 19

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ST-8 (Cont'd)
Hawthorne Boulevard (link), El Segundo Boulevard W/O
Hawthorne Boulevard (link).
MM-ST-10 Modify Signal Phasing. The traffic signal phasing of select Traffic congestion and By 2008 or 2015, or Once, at issuance of Approval of signal
intersections shall be modified to the satisfaction of LADOT or delays as they relate to prior to certificate of certificate of occupancy improvement from
other appropriate jurisdiction, to allow more efficient use of the the LAX Master Plan occupancy for of related project LADOT or appropriate
Monitoring intersections, particularly those that will experience a notable program activities associated project jurisdiction
Agency: change in traffic characteristics as a result of the project. By 2008: component, as specified
Aviation Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue, Centinela Avenue & in the Transportation
LAWA
Jefferson Boulevard, Douglas Street & Imperial Highway, El Improvements Phasing
Segundo Boulevard & Sepulveda Boulevard, Florence Avenue & Plan
La Cienega Boulevard, Imperial Highway & Sepulveda Boulevard,
La Cienega Boulevard & 111th Street, La Cienega Boulevard &
Manchester Avenue, Lincoln Boulevard & 83rd Street, Manchester
Avenue & Sepulveda Boulevard. By 2015: Highland Avenue/Vista
del Mar & Rosecrans Boulevard, Imperial Highway & Main Street,
Imperial Highway & Vista del Mar.

MM-ST-12 Provide New Ramps Connecting I-105 to LAX Between Traffic congestion and Prior to certificate of Twice: Once, upon Approved design plans;
Aviation Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard. These ramps delays as they relate to occupancy for GTC LAWA's approval of Issuance of Caltrans
shall be provided to allow for direct access and egress to/from the the LAX Master Plan design plans; Once, encroachment permit;
Monitoring ITC and GTC via I-105, between Aviation Boulevard and La program activities upon Caltrans approval Start of construction
Agency: Cienega Boulevard. A feasibility study is underway to determine of design plans
the best design for these ramps.
LAWA
MM-ST-13 Create A New Interchange at I-405 and Lennox Boulevard. Traffic congestion and Prior to certificate of Once, upon LAWA's LAWA approval of
This interchange shall provide grade-separated ramps from I-405 delays as they relate to occupancy for GTC approval of design design plans
directly into airport property, and vice-versa. It shall be located the LAX Master Plan plans
Monitoring approximately mid-way between Century Boulevard and Imperial program activities
Agency: Highway. A feasibility study is underway to determine the best
design for the interchange. Should this proposed interchange not
LAWA
be constructed, suitable and alternate traffic mitigation measures
shall be designed and implemented to the satisfaction of LADOT
and the Bureau of Engineering.

Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 20

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ST-14 Ground Transportation/Construction Coordination Office Traffic congestion and Prior to commencement As major development LAWA approval of
Outreach Program. The construction coordination office delays as they relate to of construction of any projects occur in airport outreach program
proposed in Master Plan Commitment C-1, Establishment of a the LAX Master Plan major development area
Monitoring Ground Transportation/Construction Coordination Office, shall program construction project within the
Agency: establish appropriate mechanisms to involve and coordinate with activities vicinity of LAX
other major airport-area development projects to the extent
LAWA
feasible, to ensure that the cumulative impacts of construction in
the airport area are coordinated and minimized.

MM-ST-15 Provide Fair-Share Contributions to Transit Improvements. Traffic congestion and By 2008 or 2015, or Once, at issuance of Approval of fair-share
Provide fair-share contributions to benefit transit to and from LAX delays as they relate to prior to certificate of certificate of occupancy contribution by
to the satisfaction of LADOT and/or other appropriate jurisdiction the LAX Master Plan occupancy for of related project LADOT or appropriate
Monitoring or agency. By 2008: Imperial Highway & Sepulveda Boulevard, program activities associated project jurisdiction and/or
Agency: Jefferson Boulevard & Lincoln Boulevard, La Tijera Boulevard & component, as specified agency
Sepulveda Boulevard, Lincoln Boulevard & Teale Street, Lincoln in the Transportation
LAWA
Boulevard and Washington Boulevard, Manchester Avenue & Improvements Phasing
Sepulveda Boulevard, Mariposa Avenue & Sepulveda Boulevard, Plan
I-105 W/B off-ramp at Sepulveda Boulevard, Overland Avenue
S/O Venice Boulevard (link). By 2015: Howard Hughes Parkway
& Sepulveda Boulevard, Lincoln Boulevard & Manchester
Avenue, Sepulveda Boulevard & 76th Street/77th Street, Fiji Way
& Lincoln Boulevard, Lincoln Boulevard and Marina Expressway,
Sepulveda Boulevard & 79th Street/80th Street, Sepulveda
Boulevard & 83rd Street, Lincoln Boulevard S/O Venice
Boulevard (link), Centinela Avenue S/O Venice Boulevard (link),
Sawtelle Boulevard S/O Venice Boulevard (link), Sepulveda
Boulevard S/O Venice Boulevard (link), Jefferson Boulevard E/O
Lincoln Boulevard (link), Lincoln Boulevard S/O Jefferson
Boulevard (link), Culver Boulevard W/O Jefferson Boulevard
(link)

MM-ST-16 Provide Fair-Share Contribution to LA County's project to Traffic congestion and By 2008 or 2015, or Once, at issuance of Approval of fair-share
extend the Marina Expressway. Provide fair-share contribution delays as they relate to prior to certificate of certificate of contribution or

Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 21

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ST-16 (Cont'd)
Monitoring to Los Angeles County's project to extend the Marina Expressway the LAX Master Plan occupancy for occupancy of related alternative
Agency: (Route 90) to Admiralty Way or complete alternative off-site program activities associated project project improvement by
improvements at the following intersections: By 2015: Lincoln component, as specified LADOT and/or Los
LAWA Boulevard & Washington Boulevard, Bali Way & Lincoln in the Transportation Angeles County
Boulevard, Fiji Way & Lincoln Boulevard, Lincoln Boulevard & Improvements Phasing
Marina Expressway, Lincoln Boulevard & Maxella Avenue, Plan
Lincoln Boulevard & Mindanao Way

Area: Surface Transportation (Off-Airport) 22

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Relocation of Residences and Businesses

RBR-1 Residential and Business Relocation Program. To address the Minimize adverse Prior to commencement Once, upon approval of City Council approval
acquisition of properties and relocation of businesses and residents acquisition or of relocation activities the Relocation Plan of the Relocation Plan
associated with the proposed Master Plan, LAWA will prepare a relocation impacts
Monitoring Residential and Business Relocation Plan (Relocation Plan) in
Agency: compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, state and
LAWA
local regulations, and FAA Advisory Circular 150/5100-17, prior
to the commencement of acquisition. LAWA will achieve the
following objectives:

‹ Fully inform eligible project-area residential occupants and

business owners of the nature of and procedures for obtaining
relocation assistance and benefits.
‹ Determine the needs of each residential relocatee and business
owner.
‹ Provide an adequate number of referrals to comparable,
decent, safe, and sanitary housing units within a reasonable
time prior to relocation. No residential occupant would be
required to move until comparable decent, safe, and sanitary
housing is made available.
‹ Provide at least 90 days advance written notice to vacate, as
required by law. The notice period may be extended according
to the needs of the affected relocatees.
‹ Provide current and continuously updated information
concerning replacement housing and business choices and
opportunities.
‹ Ensure that the relocation process does not result in different
or separate treatment because of race, religion, national origin,
gender, marital status, or other arbitrary circumstances.
‹ Ensure that the unique needs of minority and low-income
persons and businesses are addressed, including the provision
of assistance and materials in Spanish and other languages as
necessary.

Area: Relocation of Residences and Businesses 23

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

RBR-1 (Cont'd)
‹ Supply information concerning federal, state, city, and other
governmental programs providing assistance to displaced
persons or businesses.
‹ Assist each eligible person or business in the completion of all
applications and claims for payment of benefits.
‹ Make relocation payments in accordance with Federal
Relocation Regulations, including the provisions of Last
Resort Housing, where applicable.
‹ Inform all affected occupants of LAWA's policies with regard
to eviction and property management.
‹ Establish and maintain a formal grievance procedure for use
by relocatees seeking administrative review of LAWA
decisions with respect to relocation assistance.

Although it is expected that comparable replacement housing

resources are available, LAWA will take all reasonable steps to
make such resources available, including but not limited to the
following:

‹ Provide vacated project structures to agencies that could

relocate the structures to new sites and make them available
for program-affected residents.
‹ Provide funding for possible construction of replacement
housing.
‹ Provide funding for rehabilitation of housing units being sold
or rented to program-affected residents.
‹ Consider other innovative actions to ensure the availability of
replacement housing.

Area: Relocation of Residences and Businesses 24

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

RBR-1 In addition to the above services, distinct business assistance

services will include but not be limited to the following:

‹ LAWA will implement a business relocation assistance

program to insure prompt and equitable relocation and re-
establishment of businesses displaced as a result of the
proposed Master Plan. The business relocation assistance
program will include: 1) a determination of the relocation
needs and preferences of each business to be displaced; 2) the
maintenance of listings and contacts with commercial real
estate brokers, commercial lenders, and government economic
development agencies to assist displaced businesses in
locating suitable replacement sites; 3) the provision to
displaced businesses of information on programs administered
by the Small Business Administration and other federal and
state programs offering assistance to displaced persons; 4) the
provision of special assistance to those who wish to remain
close to their current sites or close to an airport in finding such
sites, including sites on the airport such as LAX
Northside/Westchester Southside, or other airport owned
properties or developments; and 5) the provision of special
assistance to address the specific needs of minority-owned
businesses.
‹ LAWA will coordinate with the County of Los Angeles and
the cities of Inglewood, Hawthorne, and El Segundo to locate
properties within their jurisdictions suitable for businesses
displaced by the acquisition program.
‹ LAWA will investigate and consider the use of the separate
and ongoing Aircraft Noise Mitigation Program to redevelop
noise impacted residential areas into commercial areas
suitable for businesses displaced by the Master Plan
acquisition program. As part of these efforts, LAWA will
coordinate with the City of Inglewood and the County of Los
Angeles to identify areas east of I-405 where land acquisition
and conversion to compatible land uses is contemplated under
applicable plans or is otherwise deemed appropriate.

Area: Relocation of Residences and Businesses 25

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

RBR-1 (Cont'd)
‹ LAWA will provide opportunities for air freight, flight
kitchens and other airport-related uses displaced by the
acquisition program to relocate onto airport property, to the
maximum extent practicable.
‹ LAWA will, to the maximum practicable extent, develop its
property in LAX Northside/Westchester Southside so as to
provide relocation opportunities for businesses displaced by
the acquisition program.
‹ With respect to any and all residential acquisition under
Alternative D, LAWA will implement a housing program
similar to the existing "Move On Housing Program," which is
currently being implemented in conjunction with the existing
ANMP Relocation Plan. The Move On Housing Program is a
collaborative effort between public and not-for-profit
organizations to move and rehabilitate Manchester Square and
Belford area structures in order to transfer housing assets to
residential areas in Los Angeles County, provide reasonable
housing for displaced tenants, and provide construction-
related employment opportunities to community residents.

MM-RBR-1 Phasing for Business Relocations. To maximize opportunities for Minimize adverse Prior to commencement Once, upon approval of LAWA approval of
airport/airport-dependent businesses and other businesses acquisition or of relocation activities phasing plan phasing plan for
relocation impacts for business relocation business relocation

Area: Relocation of Residences and Businesses 26

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-RBR-1 (Cont'd)
Monitoring being acquired to relocate in proximity to their current sites,
Agency: LAWA shall, to the maximum degree feasible, schedule
acquisition phasing and/or development phasing to accommodate
LAWA interested parties on airport property in a manner that would avoid
delays to the overall construction and development schedule. First
priority shall be given to airport/airport-dependent businesses, such
as air freight forwarders and hotels, whose relocation off of the
airport would present a unique hardship. Master Plan Commitment
RBR-1, Residential and Business Relocation Program, can also
serve to mitigate significant effects stemming from the acquisition
program by using LAWA ANMP funds to redevelop noise
impacted residential property for industrial uses.

MM-RBR-2 Relocation Opportunities through Aircraft Noise Mitigation Minimize adverse Within 60 days Once, upon initiation of Provide evidence of
Program. As a special project under the Aircraft Noise Mitigation acquisition or from City Council coordination efforts coordination
Program (ANMP) for LAX, LAWA shall coordinate with the City relocation impacts approval of with the County of Los
Monitoring of Inglewood and the County of Los Angeles to identify residential the Relocation Plan, Angeles and City of
Agency: land uses that are subject to high levels of aircraft noise where land LAWA shall initiate Inglewood
acquisition and conversion to compatible land uses is contemplated coordination
LAWA
under applicable plans or is otherwise deemed appropriate. As efforts with the County
residential uses are relocated outside of noise impacted areas under of Los Angeles and
the ANMP, in compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance City of Inglewood
and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended,
LAWA shall work with the jurisdictions to identify airport-related
businesses interested in these sites. With support from the
jurisdictions, as well as other businesses and organizations such as
Gateway to LA that interact with LAWA, LAWA shall promote
these sites for businesses subject to acquisition as part of the
proposed LAX Relocation Plan business relocation assistance
program. The multiple objectives of the effort shall be to mitigate
noise impacted land uses, retain and promote local

Area: Relocation of Residences and Businesses 27

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-RBR-2 (Cont'd)
businesses dependent on airport proximity, and support local
employment and economic growth. Areas under the City of
Inglewood General Plan and redevelopment plan that are proposed
for land use recycling along Century Boulevard shall be given high
priority.

Area: Relocation of Residences and Businesses 28

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Air Quality
MM-AQ-1 LAX Master Plan - Mitigation Plan for Air Quality. LAWA Overall air pollutant Basic LAX MP-MPAQ Twice: Once, Annual progress
shall expand and revise the existing air quality mitigation programs emissions associated and the Construction- upon confirmation of reports, summarizing
at LAX through the development of an LAX Master Plan- with construction and Related component to the basic LAX MP- the nature and
Monitoring Mitigation Plan for Air Quality (LAX MP-MPAQ). The LAX MP- operation of the LAX be completed prior to MPAQ (i.e., basic effectiveness of air
Agency: MPAQ shall be developed in consultation with the FAA, USEPA, Master Plan issuance of grading or framework of Plan), quality mitigation
CARB and SCAQMD, as appropriate, and shall include demolition permit for and once measures that were
LAWA
technologically/legally feasible and economically reasonable first Master Plan upon confirmation of implemented during the
methods to reduce air pollutant emissions from aircraft, GSE, project. The the full LAX MP- year, will be prepared
traffic, and construction equipment both on and off the airport. The Transportation-Related MPAQ, when all three
overall effect, and minimum requirement, of the LAX MP-MPAQ component and the implementation plans
shall be reduced potential air pollutant emissions associated with Operations-Related (one for each category
implementation of the LAX Master Plan to levels equal to, if not component to be of air quality mitigation
less than, the post-mitigation levels identified in the Final EIS/EIR completed in measures) are complete
for the project. The LAX MP-MPAQ shall include feasible conjunction with
mitigation measures that are grouped into the following three (3) implementation of the
categories: Master Plan
components that
‹ Construction-Related Measures; materially affect
‹ Transportation-Related Measures; and surface transportation
‹ Operations-Related Measures. emissions and
operations emissions
The LAX MP-MPAQ will, initially, present the basic framework
of the overall air quality mitigation program (basic LAX MP-
MPAQ), and will, ultimately, define the specific measures to be
implemented within the context of three (3) individual components
specific to the categories of emissions indicated above (full LAX
MP-MPAQ). Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-AQ-2,
Construction-Related Mitigation Measure, will define the specific
measures to be included in the construction-related component;
Mitigation Measure MM-AQ-3, Transportation-Related Mitigation
Measure, will define the specific measures to be included in the
surface

Area: Air Quality 29

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-1 (Cont'd)
transportation-related component; and Mitigation Measure MM-
AQ-4, Operations-Related Mitigation Measure, will define the
specific measures to be included in the operations-related
component. The basic framework of the LAX MP-MPAQ and the
Construction-Related component will be developed prior to
initiation of construction activities for the first project to be
developed under the LAX Master Plan, and the development of the
other two components will occur in conjunction with
implementation of the Master Plan components that materially
affect surface transportation emissions and operations emissions.

MM-AQ-2 Construction-Related Mitigation Measures. The Construction-related air Prior to issuance of Once, upon completion Completion of
required components of the construction-related air quality pollutant emissions grading or demolition of implementation plan implementation plan
mitigation measure are itemized below. These elements include permit for first Master for construction-related for construction-related
Monitoring numerous specific actions to reduce emissions of fugitive dust and Plan project. measures, and as measures within the
Agency: of exhaust emissions from on-road and nonroad mobile sources specified in the LAX MP-MPAQ
and stationary engines. All of these elements must be in place implementation plan
LAWA
prior to commencement of the first Master Plan construction
project and must remain in place through build out of the Master
Plan. An implementation plan will be developed which provides
available details as to how each of the elements of this
construction-related mitigation measure will be implemented and
monitored. Each construction subcontractor will be responsible to
implement all measures that apply to the equipment and activities
under his/her control, an obligation which will be formalized in the
contractual documents, with financial penalties for
noncompliance. LAWA will assign one or more environmental
coordinators whose responsibility it will be to ensure compliance
with the construction-related measure by use of direct inspections,

Area: Air Quality 30

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-2 (Cont'd)
records reviews, and investigation of complaints with reporting to
LAWA management for follow-up action. The estimated ranges of
emissions reductions quantified for this mitigation measure for
Alternative D are shown in Table F5-8, Estimated Ranges of
Emission Reductions for Construction-Related Air Quality
Mitigation Measures. Reliable emissions reductions were not able
to be quantified for all of these components.

Table F5-8

Estimated Ranges of Emission Reductions for

Construction-Related Air Quality Mitigation Measures

Pollutant Alternative D1 (tons)

ROG 1 - 10
NOX 300 - 1,100
CO 10 - 30
PM10 140 - 400
SOX 1 - 10
1
In the year of peak construction emissions.

Source: Camp, Dresser, & McKee, Inc., 2004.

The specific components of this construction-related air quality

mitigation measure include:

1. Fugitive Dust Source Controls:

‹ Apply non-toxic soil stabilizer to all inactive construction

areas (i.e., areas with disturbed soil).
‹ Following the addition of materials to, or removal of materials
from, the surface of outdoor storage piles, said piles shall be
effectively stabilized of fugitive dust emissions utilizing non-
toxic soil stabilizer.

Area: Air Quality 31

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-2 (Cont'd)
‹ Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number
and person to contact regarding dust complaints; this
person shall respond and take corrective action within 24
hours.
‹ Prior to final occupancy, the applicant demonstrates that
all ground surfaces are covered or treated sufficiently to
minimize fugitive dust emissions.
‹ All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. being installed
as part of project should be completed as soon as
possible; in addition, building pads should be laid as soon
as possible after grading.
‹ Pave all construction access roads at least 100 feet on to
the site from the main road.

2. On-Road Mobile Source Controls:

‹ To the extent feasible, have construction

employees work/commute during off-peak hours.
‹ Make available on-site lunch trucks during construction
to minimize off-site worker vehicle trips.

3. Nonroad Mobile Source Controls:

‹ Prohibit staging or parking of construction vehicles

(including workers' vehicles) on streets adjacent to
sensitive receptors such as schools, daycare centers, and
hospitals.
‹ Prohibit construction vehicle idling in excess of ten
minutes.
‹ Utilize on-site rock crushing facility during construction
to reuse rock / concrete and minimize off-site truck haul
trips.

Area: Air Quality 32

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-2 (Cont'd)
4. Stationary Point Source Controls:

‹ Specify combination of electricity from power poles and

portable diesel- or gasoline-fueled generators using
"cleaner burning diesel" fuel and exhaust emission
controls.

5. Mobile and Stationary Source Controls:

‹ Specify combination of construction equipment using

"cleaner burning diesel" fuel and exhaust emission
controls.
‹ Suspend use of all construction equipment during a
second-stage smog alert in the immediate vicinity of
LAX.
‹ Utilize construction equipment having the minimum
practical engine size (i.e., lowest appropriate horsepower
rating for intended job).
‹ Require that all construction equipment working on site is
properly maintained (including engine tuning) at all times
in accordance with manufacturers' specifications and
schedules.
‹ Prohibit tampering with construction equipment to
increase horsepower or to defeat emission control
devices.

6. Administrative Controls

‹ The contractor or builder shall designate a person or

persons to ensure the implementation of all components
of the construction-related measure through direct
inspections, records reviews, and investigations of
complaints.

Area: Air Quality 33

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-3 Transportation-Related Mitigation Measures. The primary Surface Transportation- Prior to issuance of Once, upon completion Completion of
feature of the transportation-related air quality mitigation measure related air pollutant building permit for ITC of implementation plan implementation plan
Monitoring is the development and construction of at least eight (8) additional emissions and within 6 months for transportation- for transportation-
Agency: sites with FlyAway service similar to the service provided by the following City Council related measures and as related measures within
Van Nuys FlyAway currently operated by LAWA. The intent of approval of the LAX specified in the the LAX MP-MPAQ
LAWA
these FlyAway sites is to reduce the quantity of traffic going to and Plan implementation plan
from LAX by providing regional locations where LAX employees
and passengers can pick up an LAX-dedicated, clean-fueled bus
that will transport them from a FlyAway closer to their home or
office into LAX and back. The reduction in vehicle miles traveled
(VMT) translates directly into reduced air emissions, as well as a
reduction in traffic congestion in the vicinity of the airport. An
implementation plan will be developed which provides available
details as to how each of the elements of this transportation-related
mitigation measure will be implemented and monitored. The
estimated emissions reductions associated with this component of
the transportation-related air quality mitigation measure are shown
in Table F5-9, Estimated Emissions Reductions (Tons) for Eight
New FlyAway Terminals - 2015.
Table F5-9

Estimated Emissions Reductions (Tons)

for Eight New FlyAway Terminals – 2015

Pollutant1 Alternative D
ROG 56.0
NOx 82.9
CO 1064.5
PM10 152.6
SOx 1.7
Note: Reductions are the combined totals from all new Flyaway
capacity, and may include expansion of the existing Flyaway.
1
Based on EMFAC2002 Emission Factors for Calendar Year 2015.

Source: Camp, Dresser, & McKee, Inc., 2004.

34
Area: Air Quality
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-3 (Cont'd)

The required two (2) elements of this transportation-related air

quality mitigation measure include:

1. Development of New FlyAway Capacity:

Additional service capacity from at least eight (8) FlyAway service

terminals are required under this measure, and all eight must be
operational by 2015. LAWA has already begun analyzing
potential FlyAway locations. Selection of the eight general
locations should be made and included in the overarching air
quality mitigation program plan discussed in Mitigation Measure
MM-AQ-1, LAX Master Plan Mitigation Plan for Air Quality, as
well as in the implementation plan for the transportation-related
measures noted above. Final selection of the sites must be
completed on a schedule that allows for property acquisition or
leasing, terminal design, construction, and implementation of all
sites by 2015.

The sites may include, but are not limited to the following:

‹ West San Fernando Valley/Eastern Ventura County

‹ Santa Monica/Pacific Palisades
‹ Central Los Angeles
‹ Long Beach/South Bay/San Pedro
‹ East San Fernando Valley
‹ San Gabriel Valley
‹ Southeast Los Angeles County
‹ North Los Angeles County

Area: Air Quality 35

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-3 (Cont'd)
2. Public Outreach Program for FlyAway Service:

This measure also requires a public outreach program to inform

potential users of the terminals about their existence and their
locations. The outreach program would be geared towards
encouraging the use of the FlyAways with convenience and low
cost being the primary selling points.

Other feasible mitigation elements may be developed to ensure that

the emission reductions for this transportation-related measure are
achieved. These may include, for example:

‹ Transit Ridership measures such as:

− Constructing on-site or off-site bus turnouts, passenger

benches, or shelters to encourage transit system use.
− Constructing on-site or off-site pedestrian
improvements/including showers for pedestrian
employees to encourage walking/bicycling to work by
LAX employees.

‹ Highway and Roadway Improvements measures such as:

− Linking ITS with off-airport parking facilities with ability

to divert/direct trips to these facilities to reduce
traffic/parking congestion and associate air emissions in
the immediate vicinity of the airport.

Area: Air Quality 36

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-3 (Cont'd)
− Expanding ITS/ATCS systems, concentrating on I-405
and I-105 corridors, extending into South Bay and
Westside surface street corridors to reduce traffic/parking
congestion and associate air emissions in the immediate
vicinity of the airport.
− Linking LAX traffic management system with airport
cargo facilities, with ability to reroute cargo trips to/from
these facilities to reduce traffic/parking congestion and
associate air emissions in the immediate vicinity of the
airport.
− Developing a program to minimize the use of
conventional-fueled fleet vehicles during smog alerts to
reduce air emissions from vehicles at the airport.

‹ Parking measures such as:

− Providing free parking and preferential parking locations

for ULEV/SULEV/ZEV in all (including employee) LAX
lots; providing free charging stations for ZEV; including
public outreach to reduce air emissions from automobiles
accessing airport parking.
− Measures to reduce air emissions of vehicles in line to
exit parking lots such as pay-on-foot (before getting into
car) to minimize idle time at parking check out, including
public outreach.
− Implementing on-site circulation plan in parking lots to
reduce time and associated air emissions from vehicles
circulating through lots looking for parking.
− Encouraging video conferencing and providing video
conferencing capabilities at various locations on the
airport to reduce VMT in associated air emissions in the
vicinity of the airport.

Area: Air Quality 37

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-3 (Cont'd)
‹ Additional Ridesharing measures such as:

− Expanding the airport's ridesharing program to include all

airport tenants

‹ Clean Vehicle Fleets measures such as:

− Promoting commercial vehicles/trucks/vans using

terminal areas (LAX and regional intermodal) to install
SULEV/ZEV engines to reduce vehicle air emissions.
− Promoting "best-engine" technology (SULEV/ZEV) for
rental cars using on-airport RAC facilities to reduce
vehicle air emissions.
− Consolidating nonrental car shuttles using SULEV/ZEV
engines to reduce vehicle air emissions.

‹ Energy Conservation measures such as:

− Covering, if feasible, any parking structures that receive

direct sunlight, to reduce volatile emissions from vehicle
gasoline tanks; and installing solar panels on these roofs
where feasible to supply electricity or hot water to reduce
power production demand and associated air emissions at
utility plants.

Area: Air Quality 38

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-3 (Cont'd)
These other components may require the approval of other federal,
state, regional, and/or local government agencies. It should be
noted that no air quality benefit (i.e., pollutant reduction) was
estimated in the EIS/EIR for these additional components; hence,
implementation of any of these other components would, in
conjunction with the FlyAways described above, provide for
additional air quality benefits over and above amount of
transportation-related pollutant reductions accounted for in
the Final EIS/EIR.

MM-AQ-4 Operations-Related Mitigation Measures. The primary Operations-related air Within six (6) months Once, upon completion Completion of
component of the operations-related air quality mitigation measure pollutant emissions following City Council of implementation plan implementation plan
consists of one airside item, the conversion of ground support approval of the LAX for operations-related for operations-related
Monitoring equipment (GSE) to extremely low emission technology, such as Plan measures and measures within the
Agency: electric power, fuel cells, or other future technological as specified in the LAX MP-MPAQ
developments. Due to the magnitude of the effort to convert GSE, implementation plan
LAWA
it must be a phased program and must be completed at build out of
the Master Plan in 2015. An implementation plan will be
developed which provides available details as to how each of the
elements of this operations-related mitigation measure will be
implemented and monitored. Because this effort will apply to all
GSE in use at LAX, both LAWA-owned equipment and tenant-
owned equipment, the effort must begin upon City approval of
the LAX Plan with a detailed inventory of the number, types, sizes,
and usage history of all GSE at LAX. Because some of the tenant
organizations (mainly the major domestic commercial airlines)
have signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the
California Air Resources Board (CARB) that requires the
signatories to replace a proportion of their GSE fleet with clean-
fuel alternatives (including zero-emission equipment), it will be
necessary for LAWA to evaluate the level of its commitment
within the framework of the MOU. Because LAWA

Area: Air Quality 39

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-4 (Cont'd)
anticipates facilitating this component by providing incentives or
tenant lease requirements, early negotiations with tenant
organizations may allow LAWA to accommodate cost-sharing
agreements to implement the GSE conversions in a timely manner,
to make LAWA's financial commitment as cost effective as
possible. LAWA will assign a GSE coordinator whose
responsibility it will be to ensure the successful conversion of GSE
in a timely manner. This coordinator must have adequate authority
to negotiate on behalf of the City and have sufficient technical
support to evaluate technical issues that arise during
implementation of this measure. The estimated ranges of
emissions reductions quantified for this component of the
operations-related measure for Alternative D are shown in Table
F5-10, Estimated Ranges of Emissions Reductions for GSE
Conversion.

Table F5-10

Estimated Ranges of Emissions Reductions

for GSE Conversion
Pollutant Alternative D1 (tons)
ROG 10 - 100
NOX 300 - 400
CO 500 - 1000
PM10 1 - 10
SOX 1-5
1
In the build-out year, 2015

Source: Camp, Dresser, & McKee, Inc., 2004.

The successful conversion of all GSE at LAX to extremely low or

zero emission equipment by 2015 is the required component of this

Area: Air Quality 40

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-AQ-4 (Cont'd)
Consideration of other operations-related measures may include
components such as contracting with commercial landscapers who
operate lowest emitting equipment. Reliable emissions reductions
have not been quantified for these other components.

Area: Air Quality 41

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Hydrology and Water Quality

HWQ-1 Conceptual Drainage Plan. Once a Master Plan alternative is Significant changes in Prior to issuance of a Once, upon completion Completion of
selected, and in conjunction with its design, LAWA will develop a surface hydrology or grading/building permit of conceptual drainage conceptual drainage
conceptual drainage plan of the area within the boundaries of the adverse impacts to for the first Master Plan plan plan
Monitoring Master Plan alternative (in accordance with FAA guidelines and to surface water quality project involving
Agency: the satisfaction of the City of Los Angeles Department of Public due to new substantial surface
Works, Bureau of Engineering). The purpose of the drainage plan development associated alternations or
LAWA
will be to assess area-wide drainage flows as related to the Master with the Master Plan substantial changes to
Plan project area, at a level of detail sufficient to identify the existing operations
overall improvements necessary to provide adequate drainage
capacity to prevent flooding. The conceptual drainage plan will
provide the basis and specifications by which detailed drainage
improvement plans will be designed in conjunction with site
engineering specific to each Master Plan project. Best
Management Practices (BMPs) will be incorporated to minimize
the effect of airport operations on surface water quality and to
prevent a net increase in pollutant loads to surface water resulting
from the selected Master Plan alternative.

To evaluate drainage capacity, LAWA will use either the Peak

Rate Method specified in Part G - Storm Drain Design of the City
of Los Angeles' Bureau of Engineering Manual or the Los Angeles
County Modified Rational Method, both of which are acceptable to
the LADPW. In areas within the boundary of the selected
alternative where the surface water runoff rates are found to exceed
the capacity of the storm water conveyance infrastructure with the
potential to cause flooding, LAWA will take measures to either
reduce peak flow rates or increase the structure's capacity. These
drainage facilities will be designed to ensure that they adequately
convey storm water runoff and prevent flooding by adhering to the
procedures set forth by the Peak Rate Method/Los Angeles County
Modified Rational Method.

Area: Hydrology and Water Quality 42

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

HWQ-1 (Cont'd)
Methods to reduce the peak flow of surface water runoff could
include:

‹ Decreasing impervious area by removing unnecessary

pavement or utilizing porous concrete or modular pavement.
‹ Building storm water detention structures.
‹ Diverting runoff to pervious areas (reducing directly-
connected impervious areas).
‹ Diverting runoff to outfalls with additional capacity (reducing
the total drainage area for an individual outfall).
‹ Redirecting storm water flows to increase the time of
concentration.

Measures to increase drainage capacity could include:

‹ Increasing the size and slope (capacity) of storm water

conveyance structures (pipes, culverts, channels, etc.).
‹ Increasing the number of storm water conveyance structures
and/or outfalls.

To evaluate the effect of the selected Master Plan alternative on

surface water quality, LAWA will prepare a specific Standard
Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) for the selected
alternative, as required by the LARWQCB. The SUSMP addresses
water quality and drainage issues by specifying source control,
structural, and treatment control BMPs with the objective of
reducing the discharge of pollutants from the stormwater
conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Once
BMPs are identified, an updated pollutant load estimate will be
calculated that takes into account reductions from treatment control
BMPs.

Area: Hydrology and Water Quality 43

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

HWQ-1 (Cont'd)
These BMPs will be applied to both existing and future sources
with the goal of achieving no net increase in loadings of pollutants
of concern to receiving water bodies. LAWA will therefore address
water quality issues, including erosion and sedimentation, and
comply with the SUSMP requirements by designing the storm
water system through incorporation of the structural and treatment
control BMPs specified in the SUSMP.

The following list includes some of the BMPs that could be

employed to infiltrate or treat storm water runoff and dry weather
flows, and control peak flow rates:

‹ Vegetated swales and strips

‹ Oil/Water separators
‹ Clarifiers
‹ Media filtration
‹ Catch basin inserts and screens
‹ Continuous flow deflective systems
‹ Bioretention and infiltration
‹ Detention basins
‹ Manufactured treatment units
‹ Hydrodynamic devices

Other structural BMPs may also be selected from the literature and
the many federal, state and local guidance documents available.
Performance of structural BMPs varies considerably based on their
design. USEPA has published estimated ranges of pollutant
removal efficiencies for structural BMPs based on substantial
document review.

Area: Hydrology and Water Quality 44

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

HWQ-1 (Cont'd)
These ranges of removal efficiencies are presented in Table F5-1,
Structural BMP Expected Pollutant Removal Efficiency.

Table F5-1

Structural BMP Expected Pollutant Removal Efficiency

Typical Pollutant Removal (percent)

Suspended
BMP Type Solids Nitrogen Phosphorus Metals

Dry Detention Basins 30-35 15-45 15-45 15-45

Retention Basins 50-80 30-65 30-65 50-80
Infiltration Basins 50-80 50-80 50-80 50-80
Infiltration Trenches/Dry Wells 50-80 50-80 15-45 50-80
Porous Pavement 65-100 65-100 30-65 65-100
Grassed Swales 30-65 15-45 15-45 15-45
Vegetated Filter Strips 50-80 50-80 50-80 30-65
Surface Sand Filters 50-80 <30 50-80 50-80
Other Media Filters 65-100 15-45 0 50-80

Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Preliminary Data Summary of Urban

Storm Water Best Management Practices Methodology, August 1999.

In addition to the structural BMP types that will be used, non-

structural/source control BMPs will continue to be a part of the
LAX program to reduce pollutant loadings.

Area: Hydrology and Water Quality 45

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

HWQ-1 (Cont'd)
Existing practices and potentially new ones will be extended to
acquisition areas and to the areas where airport operations will
increase in frequency or duration. These source control BMPs will
be incorporated into the LAX Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP) and will consequently be required of LAWA and all
airport tenants at all locations where industrial activities occur that
have the potential to impact water quality.

The overall result of Master Plan Commitment HWQ-1 will be a

drainage infrastructure that provides adequate drainage capacity to
prevent flooding and control peak flow discharges, that
incorporates BMPs to minimize the effect of airport operations on
surface water quality, and that prevents a net increase of pollutant
loads to either receiving water body as a result of the selected
Master Plan alternative.

MM-HWQ-1 Upgrade Regional Drainage Facilities. Regional drainage Increased runoff from Prepare status report on Annual reports Annual updates on
facilities should be upgraded, as necessary, in order to Master Plan the status of regional the status of
accommodate current and projected future flows within the improvements drainage improvements improvements needed
Monitoring watershed of each stormwater outfall resulting from cumulative exacerbating existing prior to issuance of a for offsite drainage
Agency: development. This could include upgrading the existing outfalls, or deficiencies in offsite grading or building facilities. Once the
building new ones. The responsibility for implementing this drainage facilities permit for the first necessary
LAWA
mitigation measure lies with the Los Angeles County Department Master Plan project improvements to the
of Public Works and/or the City of Los Angeles Department of involving substantial offsite facilities have
Public Works, Bureau of Engineering. A portion of the increased surface alterations or been approved, the
costs for the upgraded flood control and drainage facilities would substantial changes to need for monitoring
be paid by LAX tenants and users in accordance with the existing operations ceases
possessory interest tax laws and other legal assessments, consistent
with federal airport revenue diversion laws and regulations and in
compliance with state, county and city laws. The new or upgraded
facilities should be designed in accordance with the drainage
design standards of each agency.

Area: Hydrology and Water Quality 46

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Historical / Architectural and Archaeological / Cultural Resources

HR-1 Preservation of Historic Resources. In implementing the LAX Avoiding loss of Prior to approval of Once, at sign-off of Plans signed off by
Plan and conducting on going activities associated with operation significant historical final plans for demolition plan (for qualified architectural
of the airport, LAWA will support the preservation of identified resources, and their demolition of buildings preservation historian or historic
Monitoring significant historic/architectural resources through careful review historic character, within the International component); Once, at architect
Agency: of design and development adjacent to those resources and by identified within the Airport Industrial sign-off of
undertaking any modifications to those resources in a manner Area of Potential District associated with soundproofing plan (for
LAWA
consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Effects (APE) the GTC-ITC sound insulation
Treatment of Historic Properties. Additionally, where sound Roadways and Century component)
insulation is proposed for identified significant Bridge, and associated
historic/architectural resources under the Aircraft Noise Mitigation open-space area (for
Program, LAWA will ensure that methods are developed with the preservation
approval of a qualified architectural historian or historic architect, component); In
who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional conjunction with
Qualifications Standards, in compliance with the Secretary of the ongoing ANMP and
Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. prior to approval of
sound proofing plan for
affected historic
resources (for sound
insulation component)

MM-HA-1 Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) Document. For Loss of important Prior to issuance of Twice: Once, upon Acceptance letter for
historic properties eligible at the federal, state or local levels that historical resources demolition permits for review of draft HABS final HABS document
are proposed for demolition or partial demolition (i.e., from demolition affected historical document by NPS and from NPS
Monitoring the International Airport Industrial District), a Historic American resources once, upon approval of
Agency: Buildings Survey (HABS) document shall be prepared by LAWA final HABS document
in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for
LAWA
Architectural and Engineering Documentation Standards. The level
of documentation (I, II, III) shall be determined by the National
Park Service (NPS). Documentation shall adequately explicate and
illustrate what is significant or valuable about each of the historic
resources. Documentation data shall be collected prior to
commencement of demolition of the buildings.

Area: Historical / Architectural and Archaeological / Cultural Resources 47

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-HA-1 (Cont'd)
Archival copies of the recordation document shall be submitted to
the National Park Service, Library of Congress, and the California
Office of Historic Preservation. Non-archival copies of the
document shall be distributed to the City of Los Angeles Planning
Department, City of Los Angeles Cultural Affairs Department, Los
Angeles Public Library (main branch), Los Angeles Conservancy,
and LAWA's Public Relations Division.

MM-HA-2 Historic Educational Materials. For the significant historic Demolition of historical Initiate development of Once, prior to Approval of
resources proposed for demolition or partial demolition, resources educational materials demolition of affected educational materials
educational materials suitable for the general public, secondary prior to demolition of historical resources by LAWA
Monitoring school use, and/or aviation historians and enthusiasts shall be affected historical
Agency: designed with the assistance of a qualified historic preservation resources. Complete
professional and implemented by LAWA. The purpose of these educational materials
LAWA
materials shall be to present in two- or three-dimensional format, no later than one year
the history of the airport and surrounding area. Such materials shall after demolition of
include, but not be limited to, a video/film documentary, affected historical
curriculum program and teacher's guide, architectural models, and resources
a historical brochure or pamphlet. These materials shall be made
available via LAWA's public relations department to the general
public, local community school history programs, and related
interest groups.

MM-HA-4 Discovery. The FAA shall prepare an archaeological treatment Loss or destruction of Prior to issuance of any Once, at approval of Approval of ATP by
plan (ATP), in consultation with SHPO, that ensures the long-term important excavation and grading ATP LAWA
protection and proper treatment of those unexpected archaeological archaeological permits associated with
Monitoring discoveries of federal, state, and/or local significance found within resources the first Master Plan
Agency: the APE of the selected alternative. The ATP shall include a project
monitoring plan, research design, and data recovery plan. The ATP
LAWA
shall be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards
and Guidelines for Archaeological Documentation; California
Office of Historic Preservation's (OHP) Archaeological Resources
Management Report; Recommended Contents and Format (1989),

Area: Historical / Architectural and Archaeological / Cultural Resources 48

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-HA-4 (Cont'd)
and the Guidelines for Archaeological Research Design (1991);
and shall also take into account the ACHP's publication Treatment
of Archaeological Properties: A Handbook. The ATP shall also be
consistent with the Department of the Interior's Guidelines for
Federal Agency Responsibility under Section 110 of the NHPA. In
addition, those steps outlined in Section 21083.2(i) of CEQA and
Section 15064.5(f) of the CEQA Guidelines shall be implemented,
as necessary.

MM-HA-5 Monitoring. Any grading and excavation activities within LAX Loss or destruction of Retain archaeologist Once, upon retention of Retention of
proper or the acquisition areas that have not been identified as important prior to issuance of archaeologist and on- archaeologist and filing
containing redeposited fill material or having been previously archaeological excavation and grading going during of periodic monitoring
Monitoring disturbed shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist. The resources permits for first Master excavation and grading reports with LAWA, as
Agency: archaeologist shall be retained by LAWA and shall meet the Plan project, with activities, as identified stipulated in the ATP
Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards. continued monitoring in ATP
LAWA
The project archaeologist shall be empowered to halt construction efforts in accordance
activities in the immediate area if potentially significant resources with the ATP
are identified. Test excavations may be necessary to reveal whether
such findings are significant or insignificant. In the event of
notification by the project archaeologist that a potentially
significant or unique archaeological/cultural find has been
unearthed, LAWA shall be notified and grading operations shall
cease immediately in the affected area until the geographic extent
and scientific value of the resource can be reasonably
verified. Upon discovery of an archaeological resource or Native
American remains, LAWA shall retain a Native American monitor
from a list of suitable candidates obtained from the Native
American Heritage Commission.

MM-HA-6 Excavation and Recovery. Any excavation and recovery of Loss or destruction of Upon discovery of On-going during Filing of appropriate
identified resources (features) shall be performed using standard important potential excavation and reports (i.e.

Area: Historical / Architectural and Archaeological / Cultural Resources 49

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-HA-6 (Cont'd)
Monitoring archaeological techniques and the requirements stipulated in the archaeological archaeological grading activities as excavation/recovery
Agency: ATP. Any excavations, testing, and/or recovery of resources shall resources resources by qualified identified in ATP report) with LAWA by
be conducted by a qualified archaeologist selected by LAWA. archaeologist project archaeologist
LAWA pursuant to ATP. If no
resources are found, a
report indicating as
much should be filed

MM-HA-7 Administration. Where known resources are present, all grading Loss or destruction of Prior to approval of Once, upon approval of Sign off of plans by
and construction plans shall be clearly imprinted with all of the important excavation and grading excavation and grading project archaeologist
archaeological/cultural mitigation measures. All site workers shall archaeological plans (for MM/MPC plans (for MM/MPC (for MM/MPC imprint
Monitoring be informed in writing by the on-site archaeologist of the resources imprint component); imprint component); component); Filing of
Agency: restrictions regarding disturbance and removal as well as Prior to excavation and Prior to initiation of sign-in sheet with
procedures to follow should a resource deposit be detected. grading activities excavation and grading LAWA by project
LAWA
pursuant to ATP (for activities, and with archaeologist, as
on-site training construction staff specified by ATP (for
component) change-outs, pursuant on-site training
to ATP (for on-site component)
training component)

MM-HA-8 Archaeological/Cultural Monitor Report. Upon completion of Loss or destruction of Upon completion of Once, upon completion Receipt of final report
grading and excavation activities in the vicinity of known important grading & excavation of excavation and on a project-by-project
archaeological resources, the Archaeological/Cultural monitor shall archaeological activities per ATP grading activities on a basis by LAWA
Monitoring prepare a written report. The report shall include the results of the resources project-by-project
Agency: fieldwork and all appropriate laboratory and analytical studies that basis, pursuant to ATP
were performed in conjunction with the excavation. The report
LAWA
shall be submitted in draft form to the FAA, LAWA and City of
Los Angeles-Cultural Affairs Department. City representatives
shall have 30 days to comment on the report. All comments and
concerns shall be addressed in a final report issued within 30 days
of receipt of city comments.

MM-HA-9 Artifact Curation. All artifacts, notes, photographs, and other Loss or destruction of Upon completion of Once, at completion of Acceptance letter of
project-related materials recovered during the monitoring important each project during excavation and curated artifacts from

Area: Historical / Architectural and Archaeological / Cultural Resources 50

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-HA-9 (Cont'd)
Monitoring program shall be curated at a facility meeting federal and state archaeological which resources were grading activities on a selected repository, or
Agency: standards. resources recovered, as stipulated project-by-project offer letter from
in ATP basis, as stipulated in LAWA to repository
LAWA ATP
MM-HA-10 Archaeological Notification. If human remains are found, all Loss or destruction of During excavation and When any bone Completion of those
grading and excavation activities in the vicinity shall cease important grading activities material is encountered steps outlined in
immediately and the appropriate LAWA authority shall be notified: archaeological and project Section 15064.5(e) of
Monitoring compliance with those procedures outlined in Section 7050.5(b) resources archaeologist identifies the CEQA Guidelines
Agency: and (c) of the State Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94(k) it as human remains and sign off by project
and (i) and Section 5097.98(a) and (b) of the Public Resources archaeologist and, if
LAWA
Code shall be required. In addition, those steps outlined in Section applicable, selected
15064.5(e) of the CEQA Guidelines shall be implemented. Native American
monitor

Area: Historical / Architectural and Archaeological / Cultural Resources 51

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Paleontological Resources
MM-PA-1 Paleontological Qualification and Treatment Plan. A qualified Loss or destruction of Prior to issuance of any Once, upon retention of Retention of
paleontologist shall be retained by LAWA to develop an important excavation and grading paleontologist and paleontologist and
acceptable monitoring and fossil remains treatment plan (that is, a paleontological permits for first Master approval of the PMTP approval of the PMTP
Monitoring Paleontological Management Treatment Plan - PMTP) for resources Plan project by LAWA
Agency: construction-related activities that could disturb potential unique
paleontological resources within the project area. This plan shall be
LAWA
implemented and enforced by the project proponent during the
initial phase and full phase of construction development. The
selection of the paleontologist and the development of the
monitoring and treatment plan shall be subject to approval by the
Vertebrate Paleontology Section of the Natural History Museum of
Los Angeles County to comply with paleontological requirements,
as appropriate.

MM-PA-2 Paleontological Authorization. The paleontologist shall be Loss or destruction of Continued monitoring On-going during Filing of periodic
authorized by LAWA to halt, temporarily divert, or redirect important in accordance with the excavation and grading monitoring reports with
grading in the area of an exposed fossil to facilitate evaluation and, paleontological PMTP activities as identified LAWA, as stipulated in
Monitoring if necessary, salvage. No known or discovered fossils shall be resources in the PMTP the PMTP
Agency: destroyed without the written consent of the project paleontologist.
LAWA
MM-PA-3 Paleontological Monitoring Specifications. Specifications for Loss or destruction of Prior to finalization and Once, upon approval Review and approval of
paleontological monitoring shall be included in construction important approval of of each construction relevant construction
contracts for all LAX projects involving excavation activities paleontological construction contracts contract on a project- contracts by project
Monitoring deeper than six feet. resources for projects involving by-project basis paleontologist and the
Agency: excavation deeper than filing of such contracts
six feet with LAWA
LAWA

MM-PA-4 Paleontological Resources Collection. Because some fossils are Loss or destruction of During excavation and On-going during Filing of collection/
small, it will be necessary to collect sediment samples of promising important grading activities, as excavation and grading recovery reports with
horizons discovered during grading or excavation monitoring for paleontological stipulated in the PMTP activities, as outlined in LAWA by project
Monitoring processing through fine mesh screens. Once the samples have been resources the PMTP paleontologist, as
Agency: screened, they shall be examined microscopically for small fossils. stipulated in the PMTP
LAWA
Area: Paleontological Resources 52
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-PA-5 Fossil Preparation. Fossils shall be prepared to the point of Loss or destruction of Upon discovery of During grading and Filing of appropriate
identification and catalogued before they are donated to their final important significant fossils by excavation activities as reports by
repository. paleontological project paleontologist identified in the PMTP paleontologist with
Monitoring resources LAWA, as stipulated in
Agency: the PMTP
LAWA
MM-PA-6 Fossil Donation. All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, Loss or destruction of Upon completion of Once, upon completion Acceptance letter of
nonprofit institution with a research interest in the materials, such important each project during of grading and fossils from accepting
as the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History. paleontological which fossils were excavation activities on repository, or offer
Monitoring resources discovered, as outlined a project-by-project letter from LAWA to
Agency: in the PMTP basis repository
LAWA
MM-PA-7 Paleontological Reporting. A report detailing the results of these Loss or destruction of Upon completion of Once, upon completion Receipt of
efforts, listing the fossils collected, and naming the repository shall important excavation activities, as of excavation activities paleontological report
be submitted to the lead agency at the completion of the project. paleontological outlined in the PMTP on a project-by-project by LAWA. If no
Monitoring resources basis resources are found, a
Agency: report indicating as
much should be filed
LAWA

Area: Paleontological Resources 53

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Biotic Communities
MM-BC-1 Conservation of State-Designated Sensitive Habitat Within and Temporary construction Preconstruction/constru Once, upon completion Completion of pre-
Adjacent to the El Segundo Blue Butterfly Habitat Restoration impacts to sensitive ction of pre-construction construction evaluation
Area. LAWA or its designee shall take all necessary steps to areas and degradation evaluation and then on- and presence of
Monitoring ensure that the state-designated sensitive habitats within and of state-designated going during environmental monitor
Agency: adjacent to the Habitat Restoration Area are conserved and sensitive habitats construction if within when construction is
protected during construction, operation, and maintenance. 100 feet of the Habitat within 100 feet of state-
LAWA
Restoration Area; designated sensitive
These steps shall, at a minimum, include the following: Annually during habitat; Periodic
operation and Monitoring Report
Implementation of construction avoidance measures in areas maintenance
where construction or staging are adjacent to the Habitat
Restoration Area. Prior to the initiation of construction of LAX
Master Plan components to be located adjacent to the Habitat
Restoration Area, LAWA or its designee shall conduct a pre-
construction evaluation to identify and flag specific areas of state-
designated sensitive habitats located within 100 feet of
construction areas. Subsequent to the pre-construction evaluation,
LAWA or its designee shall conduct a pre-construction meeting
and provide written construction avoidance measures to be
implemented in areas adjacent to state-designated sensitive
habitats. Construction avoidance measures include erecting a 10-
foot-high tarped chain-link fence where the construction or staging
area is adjacent to state-designated sensitive habitats to reduce the
transport of fugitive dust particles related to construction
activities. Soil stabilization, watering or other dust control
measures, as feasible and appropriate, shall be implemented to
reduce fugitive dust emissions during construction activities within
2,000 feet of the El Segundo Blue Butterfly Habitat Restoration
Area, with a goal to reduce fugitive dust emissions by 90 to 95
percent. In addition, to the extent feasible, no grading or
stockpiling for construction activities should take place within 100
feet of a

Area: Biotic Communities 54

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-1 (Cont'd)
state-designated sensitive habitat. LAWA or its designee shall
incorporate provisions for the identification of additional
construction avoidance measures to be implemented adjacent to
state-designated sensitive areas. All construction avoidance
measures that address Best Management Practices shall be clearly
stated within construction bid documents. In addition, LAWA shall
include a provision in all construction bid documents requiring the
presence of a qualified environmental monitor. Construction
drawings shall indicate vegetated areas within the Habitat
Restoration Area as "Off-Limits Zone."

Ongoing maintenance and management efforts for the El Segundo

Blue Butterfly Habitat Restoration Area. LAWA or its designee
shall ensure that maintenance and management efforts prescribed
in the Habitat Management Plan (HMP) for the Habitat Restoration
Area shall continue to be carried out as prescribed.

MM-BC-2 Conservation of Floral Resources: Lewis' Evening Primrose. Loss of individuals of At least five (5) years As per Conservation Preparation of
LAWA or its designee shall prepare and implement a plan to Lewis' evening prior to initiation of Plan for Lewis' Evening Conservation Plan for
compensate for the loss of individuals of the sensitive Lewis' primrose construction of North Primrose Lewis' Evening
Monitoring evening primrose, currently located at the westerly end of the north Runways Primrose; Periodic
Agency: runway and within the Habitat Restoration Area. LAWA or its Monitoring Report
designee shall collect seed from those plants to be removed, and
LAWA
properly clean and store the collected seed until used. If possible,
seeds shall be collected in multiple years to ensure an adequate
seed supply for planting. A mitigation site of suitable habitat equal
to the area of impact shall be delineated within areas of the Los
Angeles/El Segundo Dunes as described in MM-BC-13. Collected
seed shall be broadcast (distributed) after the first wetting rain.
LAWA or its designee shall implement a monitoring plan to
monitor the establishment of

Area: Biotic Communities 55

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-2 (Cont'd)
individuals of Lewis' evening primrose for a period of not more
than five years. Performance criteria shall include the
establishment of an equal number of plants as that impacted in the
first year following the distribution of seed within the mitigation
site. Performance criteria shall also include confirmation of
recruitment for two years following the first year flowering is
observed and establishment of individuals throughout the
mitigation area within three years following the first year flowering
is observed. Monitoring shall be undertaken in the manner set forth
in MM-BC-8.

MM-BC-3 Conservation of Floral Resources: Mature Tree Replacement. Loss of mature trees Preparation of As per Replacement Completion of survey
LAWA or its designee shall prepare and implement a plan to Replacement Plan for Plan for Mature Trees and preparation of
compensate at a ratio of 2:1 for the loss of approximately 300 Mature Trees within Replacement Plan for
Monitoring mature trees, which would occur as a result of implementation of one (1) year of City Mature Trees; Periodic
Agency: the LAX Northside project. The plan shall include provisions to Council approval of the Monitoring Report
census and map all mature trees with a diameter of at least 8 inches LAX Plan; Replanting
LAWA
at breast height, which may be removed due to implementation of as dictated by
LAX Northside project. This information shall be gathered prior to Replacement Plan;
initiation of construction. The plan shall include a program by Preparation of survey
which replacement (at a ratio of 2:1) of all impacted mature trees prior to initiation of
shall be included in plans prepared for landscape treatments within construction of LAX
the Master Plan boundaries, which would then be implemented by Northside project
LAWA. The species of newly planted replacement trees shall be
local native tree species to the extent feasible. Each mitigation tree
shall be at least a 15-gallon or larger specimen.

MM-BC-8 Replacement of Habitat Units. LAWA or its designee shall Loss of habitat/open Preparation of As per Replacement Preparation of
undertake mitigation for the loss of habitat units resulting from space Replacement Plan for Plan for Habitat Units Replacement Plan for

Area: Biotic Communities 56

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-8 (Cont'd)
Monitoring implementation of Alternative D. Implementation of Alternative D Habitat Units within Habitat Units; Periodic
Agency: would result in the loss of 45.43 habitat units. These habitat units three (3) years of City Monitoring Report
shall be replaced at a 1:1 ratio within the Los Angeles/El Segundo Council approval of the
LAWA Dunes. Opportunities for compensation for the loss of 45.43 LAX Plan;
habitat units include 13.52 habitat units (16.9 acres x 0.8 Habitat Implementation per
Value) from restoration of Non-Native Grassland/Ruderal habitat Replacement Plan
to a Valley Needlegrass Grassland; 14.4 habitat units from removal
and restoration of 50 percent of the existing roadways to Southern
Foredune (36.11 acres of streets within the Los Angeles/El
Segundo Dunes x 0.5 x 0.8 Habitat Value); and 59.68 habitat units
from restoration of Disturbed Dune Scrub/Foredune to Southern
Foredune (74.6 acres x 0.8 Habitat Value). A habitat value of 0.8
is considered to be the maximum feasible target value for
restoration and enhancement of biotic communities. The
restoration and enhancement of biotic communities as related to
the establishment or enhancement of wildlife habitat shall consider
and comply with the provisions of FAA Advisory Circular
150/5200-33 regarding hazardous wildlife attractants on or near
airports. Additionally, such restoration and enhancement shall take
into account, as appropriate, the Memorandum of Agreement
between FAA and other federal agencies, including the US Fish
and Wildlife Service, pertaining to environmental conditions that
could contribute to aircraft-wildlife strikes.

Valley Needlegrass Grassland restoration efforts consist of site

preparation, propagation and planting of species characteristic of
the Valley Needlegrass Grassland community at the Los
Angeles/El Segundo Dunes, and maintenance and monitoring of
the restoration site. The species to be planted include native
perennials as described in the Long-Term Habitat Management
Plan for Los Angeles Airport/El Segundo Dunes. The

Area: Biotic Communities 57

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-8 (Cont'd)
characteristic species include nodding needlegrass (Nasella
cernua): 1,500 plants/habitat unit; white everlasting (Gnaphlium
microcephalum): 40 plants/habitat unit; doveweed (Eremocarpus
setigerus): 40 plants/habitat unit; California croton (Croton
californica): 45 plants/habitat unit; and dune primrose (Camissonia
chieranthifolia): 70 plants/habitat unit. Site preparation includes
physical demarcation of the site, mapping of the restoration site
onto a one inch equals 40 feet aerial photograph, and removal of all
non-native species (weed abatement). Removal of non-native
herbaceous species shall take place by mowing prior to seed set,
raking to remove cut material, and hand-pulling the remainder.
Removal of non-native shrubs shall be undertaken by cutting and
daubing with herbicide. Propagation and planting of nodding
needlegrass shall be accomplished by propagation from seed
collected on-site during late spring/early summer. Seed shall be
properly cleaned, dried, and stored until used. In late summer,
nodding needlegrass seed shall be propagated at an on-site nursery
in two-inch thimble pots and properly maintained. Nodding
needlegrass shall be planted at a rate of 1,500 plants per habitat
unit within Non-Native Grassland/Ruderal community, within the
Los Angeles/El Segundo Dunes, which has undergone site
preparation as described above. Planting shall take place in the fall
or after the first wetting rain. Maintenance of restoration plantings
shall consist of adequate irrigation and weed abatement. Given the
irregularity of rainfall in southern California, supplemental
irrigation shall be provided for two years to ensure the successful
establishment of mitigation plantings. Irrigation of the site shall be
adjusted to adequately provide for the establishment of the out-
plantings. Weed abatement shall take place on a quarterly basis for
a period of five years. Monitoring shall be undertaken on a
quarterly basis

Area: Biotic Communities 58

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-8 (Cont'd)
for the first three years following planting, and twice a year
thereafter. Monitoring shall consist of qualitative and quantitative
monitoring; quantitative monitoring shall take place once a year.
Performance criteria to be met include the attainment of at least a
10 percent cover of native cover in the first year and 20, 30, 40,
and 45 percent cover of native species over a five-year period as
determined by the point-intercept transect method (the CDFG has
adopted a 10 percent threshold of native cover as its criteria for
significance of native grasslands). This plan assumes the
performance criteria outlined below shall be met. If monitoring
discerns any failure in performance goals, remedial plantings shall
be undertaken. Habitat restoration shall be conducted by a
qualified habitat restoration specialist.

Southern Foredune restoration efforts consist of site preparation,

propagation, and planting of the species characteristic of the
Southern Foredune community at the Los Angeles/El Segundo
Dunes, and maintenance and monitoring of the restoration site.
The species to be planted include primary and secondary perennial
plants as described in the Long-Term Habitat Management Plan for
Los Angeles Airport/El Segundo Dunes. Site preparation,
propagation and planting, and maintenance and monitoring shall
take place as described above. Performance criteria to be met
include the attainment of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 45 percent cover of
native species over a five-year period as determined by the point-
intercept method. The Long-Term Habitat Management Plan for
Los Angeles Airport/El Segundo Dunes assumes the performance
criteria stated above shall be met. If monitoring discerns any
failure in performance goals, remedial plantings shall be
undertaken. Habitat restoration shall be conducted by a qualified
habitat restoration specialist.

Area: Biotic Communities 59

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-8 (Cont'd)
Any combination of habitat replacement completed by LAWA or
its designee drawn from the opportunities listed under Alternative
D that equals at least 45.43 habitat units shall be considered
sufficient replacement for loss of habitat units resulting from
implementation of Alternative D.

MM-BC-9 Conservation of Faunal Resources. LAWA or its designee shall Loss of habitat Preparation of As per Conservation Preparation of
develop and implement a relocation and monitoring plan to occupied by sensitive Conservation Plan for Plan for Faunal Conservation Plan for
compensate for the loss of 1.34 habitat units (0.3 habitat units + species Faunal Resources Resources Faunal Resources;
Monitoring 1.04 habitat units) of occupied western spadefoot toad habitat and within three (3) years Periodic Monitoring
Agency: for the loss of western spadefoot toad individuals currently in the of City Council Report
southwestern portion of the AOA. LAWA or its designee shall approval of the LAX
LAWA
identify possible relocation sites in consultation with the CDFG Plan; Implementation
and USFWS and shall develop and implement a monitoring plan to per ConservationPlan.
monitor the success of the relocated tadpoles for a period of not Toad relocation and
more than five years. LAWA or its designee shall relocate the monitoring component
western spadefoot toad population currently inhabiting three of the Conservation
locations on the AOA. One potential site is the Madrona Marsh Plan to be undertaken
Nature Center in Torrance, 20 miles south of LAX, which supports in connection with
several vernal pools and one large pond capable of supporting MM-ET-1 (Riverside
western spadefoot toads. Spadefoot toad experts suggest the best Fairy Shrimp Habitat
approach to accomplish relocation is to transport tadpoles and Restoration)
metamorphs only, as adults return to their birth site. Site
preparation shall include confirmation by a permitted biologist that
no predators, such as mosquitofish or bullfrogs, are present within
the proposed relocation site or in waterways surrounding the
relocation site. The CDFG has suggested that if the first relocation
effort is not successful, another attempt should be made the
following year. Therefore, western spadefoot toads shall be
collected two consecutive years prior to construction activities
taking place in existing occupied spadefoot toad habitat. In
addition, since the western

Area: Biotic Communities 60

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-9 (Cont'd)
spadefoot toad is known to become reproductively mature within
three years, an additional performance criterion shall be the
identification of tadpoles at the relocation site between years three
and four. The success criteria should be 50 percent survival of all
tadpoles and metamorphs for the first, second, and third years
following the last relocation. This shall be accomplished through a
five-year monitoring plan, with bi-monthly monitoring between
January 31 and June 1, to document the success of this relocation
effort.

LAWA or its designee shall develop and implement a relocation

and monitoring plan to compensate for the loss of 2.38 habitat units
of occupied San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit habitat located
within the AOA. LAWA or its designee shall relocate the San
Diego black-tailed jackrabbit population currently inhabiting the
AOA. Relocation efforts shall be coordinated with CDFG. The San
Diego black-tailed jackrabbit shall be captured on the AOA using
live traps and shall be released into the Habitat Restoration Area.
Compensation for the loss of 2.38 habitat units shall be the
utilization of at least 2.38 habitat units within the Los Angeles/El
Segundo Dunes by the San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit
individuals relocated to the site. Black-tailed jackrabbit is currently
absent for the Los Angeles/El Segundo Dunes. Opportunities for
compensation for the loss of 2.38 habitat units include 13.52
habitat units from restoration of Non-Native Grassland/Ruderal
habitat to a Valley Needlegrass Grassland; 14.4 habitat units from
removal and restoration of 50 percent of the existing roadways to
Southern Foredune; and 59.68 habitat units from restoration of
Disturbed Dune Scrub/Foredune to Southern Foredune. LAWA or
its designee shall implement a monitoring plan to monitor the
success of the relocated individuals for a period of not more than
five years.

Area: Biotic Communities 61

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-9 (Cont'd)
Performance criteria shall include confirmed success of survival
for three years of the San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit within the
Habitat Restoration Area. This shall be accomplished through a
quarterly monitoring plan to document the success or failure of this
relocation effort.

LAWA or its designee shall compensate for the loss of areas

utilized by loggerhead shrike currently located on the western
airfield and composed of 10.83 habitat units (equivalent to 83.25
acres). Compensation for the loss of 10.83 habitat units of habitat
utilized by the loggerhead shrike shall be the utilization of at least
10.83 habitat units within the Los Angeles/El Segundo Dunes.
Opportunities for compensation for the loss of 10.83 habitat
units include 13.52 habitat units from restoration of Non-Native
Grassland/Ruderal habitat to a Valley Needlegrass Grassland; 14.4
habitat units from removal and restoration of 50 percent of the
existing roadways to Southern Foredune; and 59.68 habitat units
from restoration of Disturbed Dune Scrub/Foredune to Southern
Foredune. Compensation for the loss of at least 10.83 habitat units
shall take place prior to construction. LAWA or its designee shall
implement a monitoring program for a period of not more than five
years. Performance criteria shall include the use of at least 10.83
habitat units of improved habitat by the loggerhead shrike for
foraging and nesting. Monitoring shall take place quarterly for the
first three years and biannually thereafter. Monitoring shall be
timed appropriately to include monitoring during the breeding
period, which is between February and June.

As a means of minimizing incidental take of active nests of

loggerhead shrike, LAWA or its designee shall have all areas to be
graded surveyed by a qualified biologist at least 14 days

Area: Biotic Communities 62

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-9 (Cont'd)
before construction activities begin to ensure maximum avoidance
to active nests for loggerhead shrike. Construction avoidance
measures shall include flagging of all active nests for loggerhead
shrike and a 300 feet wide buffer area shall be designated around
the active nests. A biological monitor shall be present to ensure
that the buffer area is not infringed upon during the active nesting
season, March 15 to August 15. In addition, LAWA or its designee
shall require that vegetation clearing within the designated 300 feet
buffer be undertaken after August 15 and before March 15.

LAWA or its designee shall conduct pre-construction surveys to

determine the presence of individuals of sensitive arthropod
species, the silvery legless lizard, the San Diego horned lizard, and
the burrowing owl within the proposed area of impact within the
Los Angeles/El Segundo Dunes. Surveys will be conducted at the
optimum time to observe these species. Should an individual be
observed, they will be relocated to suitable habitat for that species
within the Habitat Restoration Area. Prior to construction, LAWA
or its designee shall develop and implement a relocation plan to
avoid the potential loss of individuals from the installation of
navigational aids and associated service roads. Relocation efforts
shall be undertaken by a qualified biologist, in coordination with
CDFG.

MM-BC-13 Replacement of State-Designated Sensitive Habitats. LAWA or Loss of state designated Preparation of As per Replacement Preparation of
its designee shall undertake mitigation for the loss of State- sensitive habitat Replacement Plan for Plan for State- Replacement Plan for
designated sensitive habitat within the Los Angeles/El Segundo State-Designated Designated Sensitive State-Designated
Monitoring Dunes, including the Habitat Restoration Area. Installation of Sensitive Habitats prior Habitats Sensitive Habitats;
Agency: navigational aids and associated service roads under Alternative D to relocation of Periodic Monitoring
would result in impacts to 66,675 square feet (1.53 acres) of State- navigational aids; Report
LAWA
designated sensitive habitat within the Implementation per

Area: Biotic Communities 63

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-13 (Cont'd)
Los Angeles/El Segundo Dunes, including 33,334 square feet (0.77 Replacement Plan
acre) within the Habitat Restoration Area of which 10,597 square
feet (0.24 acre) are within habitat occupied by the El Segundo blue
butterfly. These square feet shall be replaced at a no net loss ratio
of 1:1 ratio within the Los Angeles/El Segundo Dunes. The
replacement of 66,675 square feet (1.53 acres) of State-designated
sensitive habitat shall be undertaken through restoration of 66,675
square feet (1.53 acres). Opportunities for restoration include:16.9
acres of Non-Native Grassland/Ruderal habitat to a Valley
Needlegrass Grassland; 36.11 acres from removal and restoration
of 50 percent of the existing roadways to Southern Fordune; and
74.6 acres of Disturbed Dune Scrub/Foredune to Southern
Fordune. The restoration and enhancement of biotic communities
as related to the establishment or enhancement of wildlike habitat
shall consider and comply with the provisions of FAA Advisory
Circular 150/5200-33 regarding hazardous wildlife attractants on
or near airports. Additionally, such restoration and enhancement
shall take into account, as appropriate, the Memorandum of
Agreement between the FAA and other federal agencies, including
the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), pertaining to
environmental conditions that could contribute to aircraft-wildlife
strikes.

Valley Needlegrass Grassland restoration efforts consist of site

preparation, propagation and planting of Valley Needlegrass
Grassland species, and maintenance and monitoring of the
restoration site as described in Mitigation Measure MM-BC-8,
Replacement of Habitat Units.

Southern Foredune restoration efforts consist of site preparation,

propagation, and planting of the species

Area: Biotic Communities 64

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-BC-13 (Cont'd)
characteristic of the Southern Foredune community at the Los
Angeles/El Segundo Dunes, and maintenance and monitoring of
the restoration site as described in Mitigation Measure MM-BC-8,
Replacement of Habitat Units. Replacement of the 10,597 square
feet (0.24 acre) of habitat occupies by the El Segundo Blue
Butterfly shall be undertaken as described in Mitigation Measure
MM-ET-4, El Segundo Blue Butterfly Conservation: Habitat
Restoration.

Area: Biotic Communities 65

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna

MM-ET-1 Riverside Fairy Shrimp Habitat Restoration. LAWA or its Loss of occupied Preparation of a Vernal As per Vernal Pool Preparation of a Vernal
designee shall undertake mitigation for direct impacts to 0.04 acre habitat of endangered Pool Creation, Creation, Maintenance, Pool Creation,
(1,853 square feet) of degraded wetland habitat containing Riverside Fairy Shrimp Maintenance, and and Monitoring Plan for Maintenance, and
Monitoring embedded cysts of Riverside fairy shrimp and potential indirect Monitoring Plan for the Riverside Fairy Shrimp Monitoring Plan for the
Agency: impacts to 1.26 acres of degraded wetland habitat containing embedded cysts of the embedded cysts of the
embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp. As specified in the Riverside Fairy Shrimp for Riverside Fairy
LAWA
Biological Opinion, soils containing embedded cysts of the prior to issuance of Shrimp; Periodic
Riverside fairy shrimp in 0.04 acres (1,853 square feet) shall be grading or demolition Monitoring Report
salvaged and relocated to property owned by the FAA and permit for any project
designated a habitat preserve at the former Marine Corps Air impacting the Riverside
Station at El Toro, or comparable site(s) approved by the USFWS Fairy Shrimp;
at a ratio of not more than 3:1. The 1.26 acres of degraded wetland Implementation per
habitat containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp Plan
retained on the LAX airfield shall be avoided through the
implementation of construction avoidance measures, including
Best Management Practices (BMPs), and the creation of a buffer
area around the occupied, degraded areas. The FAA shall oversee
the development of a Vernal Pool Creation, Maintenance, and
Monitoring Plan for the embedded cysts to ensure that Alternative
D would be consistent with the recommendations provided in the
Recovery Plan for Vernal Pools of Southern California, and with
the conservation measures provided in the Biological Opinion. As
specified in the Biological Opinion, LAWA shall be responsible
for all costs identified in the Vernal Pool Creation, Maintenance,
and Monitoring Plan related to off-site relocation of soils
containing cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp, including
entitlement for use and designation for long-term conservation, site
preparation, monitoring, and maintenance.

Ongoing Section 7 consultation among LAWA, FAA, and

USFWS has been necessary to identify suitable mitigation sites
pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. As a result,
extensive research has been conducted to identify sites that
historically or currently support vernal pools or vernal pool-
associated species in southern California. Information was gathered

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 66

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-1 (Cont'd)
from the Recovery Plan for Vernal Pools of Southern California,
the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), and
coordination with recognized experts in the field. This information
was augmented through a review of geologic maps of the coastal
portions of Los Angeles and topographic quadrangles for locations
known to have historically supported vernal pools. A total of 35
potential relocation sites were identified for further site
characterization (Figure F5-2, Vernal Pool Restoration
Opportunities Considered).

Each of the 35 sites was visited and inspected by teams of

biologists and environmental analysts. Analysis of site topography,
historic or extant vernal pools, historic or extant vernal pool
species, drainage features, climate, and parent material (from
regional geologic maps) was conducted. Hazardous materials
databases were consulted for information on known potential
sources of contamination for those sites. In-field soil texture
analysis was conducted, followed by laboratory analysis of
collected soil samples. Land use at the site and surrounding the site
was characterized, plant communities were characterized, and the
presence or absence of suitable hydrology was determined.

Prioritization of the potential sites for the relocation of soils

containing cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp was based solely on
the presence of physical and biological characteristics provided in
the Recovery Plan for Vernal Pools of Southern California and did
not reflect planning constraints indicated by current land uses.
LAWA and FAA, in consultation with the USFWS, recommended
the relocation of cysts to alternate locations within the Los Angeles
County portion of the Los Angeles Basin-Orange Management
Area for vernal pools (Figure F5-2). The use of these sites within
Los Angeles County was determined infeasible and LAWA
undertook evaluation of the feasibility of vernal pools or vernal
pool complexes located in the Orange County portion of the Los

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 67

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-1 (Cont'd)
Angeles Basin-Orange Management Area and the Ventura County
portion of the Transverse Management Area. As a result of
consultation with the USFWS, property owned by FAA and
designated a habitat preserve at the former Marine Corps Air
Station at El Toro was identified as a mitigation site for the receipt
of soils containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp,
or an alternate comparable site(s).

Once a suitable mitigation site(s) is secured, vernal pool creation

shall be undertaken by LAWA or its designee, in consultation with
the USFWS. Methods of vernal pool creation may vary depending
on the physical and biological characteristics of the selected sites.
LAWA or its designee, in conjunction with the USFWS and a
qualified wildlife biologist, shall develop a program to monitor the
progress of vernal pool creation. LAWA or its designee shall
undertake the relocation of soils containing embedded cysts of
Riverside fairy shrimp from the western portion of the airfield to
the vernal pool mitigation sites. Soils containing embedded cysts of
the Riverside fairy shrimp shall not be salvaged and translocated
until the created vernal pool(s) is established and has met certain
success criteria as described in detail below and included in the 12
conservation measures within the Biological Opinion.

Soils containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp

from EW001 and EW002 (Figure F5-3, North Area Ephemerally
Wetted Pools and Buffer Areas) shall be salvaged and translocated
to created vernal pool habitat on property owned by the FAA and
designated as a habitat preserve at the former Marine Corps Air
Station at El Toro (El Toro), or another site as approved by the
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office. The created vernal pool(s) shall
contain a minimum of 5,559 square feet of vernal pool surface area
(as determined by a 3:1 mitigation ratio). Soils containing
embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp from EW001 and
EW002 will not be salvaged and translocated from LAX until the

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 68

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-1 (Cont'd)
created vernal pool(s) is established and has met certain success
criteria specified in the Biological Opinion. As a contingency
measure, if the specified success criteria for the created vernal
pools have not been attained within six years of project
authorization, in spite of good faith effort on the part of LAWA,
soils containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp will
be salvaged from EW001 and EW002 and placed in appropriate
storage at the San Diego Zoological Society’s Center for the
Reproduction of Endangered Species. Soils containing embedded
cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp from EW006 (Figure F5-4,
South Area Ephemerally Wetted Pools and Buffer Areas) shall be
salvaged and stored prior to implementation of Alternative D and
shall be translocated to the created vernal pool(s) with EW001 and
EW002 once the success criteria are met. Soils containing
embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp from EW006 shall be
placed in appropriate storage at the San Diego Zoological Society's
Center for the Reproduction of Endangered Species. Until soils
bearing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp have been
appropriately salvaged and stored, or vernal pool creation has been
completed and embedded cysts have been appropriately salvaged
and translocated to the created vernal pool(s), habitat-altering
activities associated with Alternative D in these areas shall be
avoided.

LAWA shall be responsible for implementing construction

avoidance measures for the six areas (EW009, EW012, EW013,
EW014, EW015 and EW016) that would not be directly affected,
as indicated in the Biological Opinion. Construction avoidance
measures shall include implementation of construction avoidance
measures, including BMPs required pursuant to the Standard
Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan and the LAX Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan, and establishment of a buffer area
around the six occupied areas retained on the LAX airfield (Figure
F5-4).

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 69

F5-2
F5-4

F5-3
F5-4

F5-4
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-1 (Cont'd)
In addition, LAX operations personnel with vehicular access to the
airfield operations area shall be apprised of these off-limit buffer
areas annually. The construction avoidance measures shall be
periodically inspected by LAWA, or its designee throughout
construction to ensure the efficacy of the BMPs, and corrective
action shall be undertaken as necessary to ensure that construction
and operation of airport facilities do not result in adverse impacts
to surface water quality.

Soils containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp will

not be translocated to the created vernal pool(s) until the vernal
pool(s) is established and has met certain success criteria specified
in the Biological Opinion. Success criteria for the created vernal
pool(s) includes holding water for a minimum of 60 days, having
less than 10 percent absolute cover of exotic herbaceous species in
the pool(s), having less than 20 percent absolute cover of exotic
herbaceous species with 300 feet of the area from limits of the
pool, removal of all non-herbaceous plant species within the pool
and 300 feet from the pool annually,and provide suitable water
quality for the Riverside fairy shrimp. Duration of inundation,
exotic species removal, and water quality analyses may be
undertaken within the first year after vernal pool creation. The
performance criteria for percent absolute cover of exotic
herbaceous species within 300 feet of the area from limits of the
pool may be redesigned by mutual agreement of FAA, LAWA and
USFWS.

Upon meeting success criteria and approval from the USFWS, soils
containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp may be
brought to the pool(s). LAWA shall make every effort to collect
all cyst-bearing soils from the entire surface area of EW001,
EW002 and EW006, however, it is expected that some small
number of undetected individual cysts will remain in the soil. Soil
containing the cysts shall be salvaged and translocated during the
dry season to minimize damage ot the cysts during transport.

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 73

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-1 (Cont'd)
The soil shall be collected using a hand trowel, removed in chucks,
and kept out of direct sunlight to ensure viability. Soil shall be
stored in properly labeled boxes or bags with adequate ventilation.
The soils shall then be redeposited and spread out in small basins
or pool-like areas of similar size without active mechanical
compaction to minimize potential damage to the cysts. Any
potential indirect environmental impacts resulting from vernal pool
construction activities shall be compliant with BMPs and terms and
conditions stipulated by the permitting agencies.

LAWA or its designee, in conjunction with the USFWS and a

qualified wildlife biologist, shall also develop a program to
monitor created habitat for the presence of Riverside fairy shrimp
as described in the Vernal Pool Creation, Maintenance, and
Monitoring Plan. As specified in the Biological, LAWA shall be
responsible for implementing a monitoring and reporting program
to demonstrate successful achievement of the performance
standards for off-site relocation over a 25-year period:

‹ Monthly during the first year, following relocation of soils

containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy shrimp
‹ Quarterly in the second, third, and fourth years, following
relocation of soils containing embedded cysts of the Riverside
fairy shrimp
‹ Biannually in the fifth, seventh, and ninth years, following
relocation of soils containing embedded cysts of the Riverside
fairy shrimp
‹ Annually in the tenth, fifteenth, twentieth, and twenty-fifth
years, following relocation of soils containing embedded cysts
of the Riverside fairy shrimp

LAWA shall provide the USFWS with annual monitoring reports

as specified in the Vernal Pool Creation, Maintenance, and
Monitoring Plan. The monitoring report, due on September 1 of
each specified monitoring year, shall provide information

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 74

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-1 (Cont'd)
regarding the implementation of the vernal pool creation,
restoration, and maintenance activities. The yearly report shall
also discuss the effectiveness of the project as it pertains to the
existing condition of the created vernal pool(s) and Riverside fairy
shrimp population. To measure the effectiveness of the created
vernal pool(s), the FAA and LAWA shall work with the USFWS to
develop long-term goals and objectives as part of their habitat
creation plan.

Lastly, LAWA shall coordinate with the USFWS to create

educational materials on the Riverside fairy shrimp for integration
into LAWA’s public outreach program. Educational opportunities
regarding federally endangered Riverside fairy shrimp include
public outreach in the form of an educational brochure made
available through the LAWA Public Affairs Department,
information provided on LAWA’s web site describing the
ephemeral habitat required to support the species, and LAWA’s
outreach to local schools.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-ET-1 would provide

for the replacement of 0.04 acres (1,853 square feet) of degraded
wetland habitat containing embedded cysts of the Riverside fairy
shrimp, with an estimated habitat value of 0.15; with 0.12 acres
(5,559 square feet) of created vernal pool habitat with an estimated
habitat value of 0.75 (see Table F5-11, Mitigation Land Evaluation
Procedure for the Mitigation Site). By relocating embedded cysts
to habitat restoration sites that are managed for the existence of the
species, the opportunity for embedded cysts to complete the adult
phase of their life cycle would be enhanced.

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 75

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Table F5-11

Mitigation Land Evaluation Procedure for the Mitigation Site

Habitat Riverside Fairy Shrimp

Reference Sites Wetland Habitat Mitigation
Site
Topography/Hydrology 0.20 0.20
Mound-Depression Microrelief 0.05 0.05
Native Soils w/Slope <10% 0.05 0.05
Areas w/Period of Inundation ≥30 days 0.05 0.05
Summer Desiccation 0.05 0.05
Flora 0.20 0.20
>10% Vegetative Cover 0.05 0.05
Native Grasses >10% 0.05 0.05
Vernal Pool Associated Species 0.05 0.05
Listed Vernal Pool Associated Species 0.05 0.05
Fauna 0.20 0.15
Dominated by Native Fauna (reproducing) 0.05 0.05
Grassland-Associated Species (reproducing) 0.05 0.05
Sensitive Vernal Pool-Associated Species (reproducing) 0.05 0.05
Listed Vernal Pool-Associated Species (reproducing) 0.05 0.00
Ecosystem Functional Integrity 0.40 0.20
Contiguous w/Wetland and State-designated Sensitive Terrestrial Habitat 0.10 0.00
Under Regulatory Conservation 0.10 0.10
Variety of Pollinator/Dispersal Mechanisms Present (Wind, Wildlife) 0.10 0.10
Contiguous Native Habitat >40 acres 0.10 0.00
Total Habitat Value (HV) 1.00 0.75

Source: Sapphos Environmental, Inc. 2003.

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 76

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-3 El Segundo Blue Butterfly Conservation: Dust Control. To Temporary construction Preconstruction/ Once, upon execution Inclusion of measure in
reduce the transport of fugitive dust particles related to impacts construction of contracts, and construction contracts;
construction activities, soil stabilization, watering or other dust periodically during Periodic reporting by
Monitoring
control measures, as feasible and appropriate, shall be implemented construction construction monitor
Agency:
with a goal to reduce fugitive dust emissions by 90 to 95 percent
LAWA during construction activities within 2,000 feet of the El Segundo
Blue Butterfly Habitat Restoration Area. In addition, to the extent
feasible, no grading or stockpiling for construction activities
should take place within 100 feet of occupied habitat of the El
Segundo blue butterfly.

MM-ET-4 El Segundo Blue Butterfly Conservation: Habitat Restoration. Loss of habitat Preparation of Habitat As per Habitat Preparation of Habitat
LAWA or its designee shall take all necessary steps to avoid the occupied by Restoration Plan for El Restoration Plan for the Restoration Plan for El
flight season of the El Segundo blue butterfly (June 14 - September endangered El Segundo Segundo Blue Butterfly El Segundo Blue Segundo Blue
Monitoring
30) when undertaking installation of navigational aids and blue butterfly 3 years prior to Butterfly Butterfly; Periodic
Agency:
associated service roads proposed under Master Plan Alternative D construction activities Monitoring Report
LAWA within habitat occupied by the El Segundo blue butterfly. within its habitat, or as
Installation of navigational aids within the Habitat Restoration approved by USFWS;
Area should be required to take place between October 1st and Monitoring for a period
May 31st. In conformance with the Biological Opinion, activities of not more than 5
associated with navigational aids development shall be limited to years
the existing roads and proposed impacts areas as depicted in the
Final EIS/EIR. Coast buckwheat shall be planted a minimum of
three years prior to the impact, not only to allow for establishment
of the plants, but also to ensure that the plants are mature enough to
bloom. The plantings of coast buckwheat shall be located within
the southwest corner of subsite 23 of the Habitat Restoration Area,
as depicted in Figure F5-5, and shall encompass 1.25 acres in
conformance with the Biological Opinion. Coast buckwheat plants
will be planted at an initial density of 200 plants per acre to ensure
the long-term planting density target (130 plants per acre). Coast

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 77

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-ET-4 (Cont'd)
buckwheat plants will be placed in clusters or groupings based on
microtopographic features present within subsite 23 to better
support the El Segundo blue butterfly, which is known to prefer
large clusters of plants for nectaring and shelter. As possible,
depending on the location and condition of individual plants, FAA
and LAWA shall salvage existing coast buckwheat plants and any
larvae on the plant or pupae in the soil below the plant that would
be removed to accommodate the replacement navigational aids to
further conserve this species. These plants shall be salvaged
immediately prior to the installation of the replacement
navigational aids outside of the butterfly flight season. These
salvaged plants shall be transported in a suitable container and
replanted after the onset of winter rains in subsite 23 near the area
restored as described in MM-BC-13. This area shall be the
designated mitigation site for planting coast buckwheat and the site
to which El Segundo blue butterfly pupae shall be relocated.
Gathering of coast buckwheat seed shall take place from
September 15 through June 1. Propagation and planting
methodologies successfully employed by LAWA during 1984
through 1994 restoration efforts shall be employed for propagation
of additional coast buckwheat plants. An existing irrigation system
proximal to subsite 23 will be used to increase the success of the
restoration effort. Prior to navigational aid installation, a permitted
and qualified biologist shall salvage El Segundo blue butterfly
larvae in coordination with the USFWS in order to minimize
impacts to the butterfly. Based on LAWA's restoration experience
within the Habitat Restoration Area, occupation of restored habitat
can occur within two to three years of restoration efforts.
Therefore, there would be no net loss in acres or value of occupied
habitat.

Area: Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna 78

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Energy Supply
E-1 Energy Conservation and Efficiency Program. LAWA will Avoid a substantial Prior to approval of Once prior to approval Approval of building
seek to continually improve the energy efficiency of building increase in energy building plans for each of building plans plans by LADBS or
design and layouts during the implementation of the LAX Master consumption due to the project involving new LADPW, as
Monitoring Plan. Title 24, Part 6, Article 2 of the California Administrative development of new or substantially appropriate
Agency: Code establishes maximum energy consumption levels for heating facilities renovated buildings that
and cooling of new buildings to assure that energy conservation is consume electricity or
LAWA
incorporated into the design of new buildings. LAWA will design natural gas
new facilities to meet or exceed the prescriptive standards required
under Title 24. Some of the energy conservation measures that
LAWA may incorporate into the design of new buildings and
airports facilities may include the use of energy-efficient building
materials, energy-saving lighting systems, energy-efficient air-
conditioning systems, energy-efficient water-heating systems, and
designed-in access for alternative means of surface transportation,
including the Green Line and the APM. These energy conservation
measures may be further improved upon as energy-saving design
approaches and technologies develop.

E-2 Coordination with Utility Providers. LAWA will implement Potential for Plan for each project to Once prior to issuance Submittal of utility
Master Plan activities in coordination with local utility providers. incompatibility and/or be completed prior of applicable permit compatibility plan to
Utility providers will provide input on the layout of utilities at inefficiency of new to issuance of the satisfaction of
Monitoring LAX to assure that LAX and the surrounding region receive both utilities demolition permit, affected utilities
Agency: safe and uninterrupted service. When service by existing utility grading permit,
lines could be affected by airport design features, LAWA will building plans or B-
LAWA
work with the utility to identify alternative means of providing Permit, whichever
equivalent or superior post-construction utility service. occurs first, as
applicable

PU-1 Develop a Utility Relocation Program. LAWA will develop and Disturbance of existing Plan to be completed Once prior to issuance Submittal of utility
implement a utilities relocation program to minimize interference utility lines/systems prior to issuance of of applicable permit relocation plan to the
with existing utilities associated with LAX Master Plan facility satisfaction of affected
construction. utilities

Area: Energy Supply 80

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

PU-1 (Cont'd)
Monitoring Prior to initiating construction of a Master Plan component, demolition permit,
Agency: LAWA will prepare a construction evaluation to determine if the grading permit,
proposed construction will interfere with existing utility location or building permit or B-
LAWA operation. LAWA will determine utility relocation needs and, for Permit, whichever
sites on LAX property, LAWA will develop a plan for relocating occurs first, as
existing utilities as necessary before, during, and after construction applicable
of LAX Master Plan features. LAWA will implement the utility
relocation program during construction of LAX Master Plan
improvements.

Area: Energy Supply 81

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Light Emissions
LI-2 Use of Non-Glare Generating Building Materials. Prior to Avoidance of adverse Prior to issuance of a Twice: Once during Sign-off on plans by
approval of final plans, LAWA will ensure that proposed LAX glare effects on aviation building permit for each plan review and once LAWA prior to
facilities will be constructed to maximize use of non-reflective and other sensitive uses Master Plan project during project issuance of building
Monitoring materials and minimize use of undifferentiated expanses of glass. (excluding airfield construction, on a permit and completion
Agency: projects) project-by-project basis of site inspection for
materials during
LAWA
construction

LI-3 Lighting Controls. Prior to final approval of plans for new Avoidance of adverse Prior to issuance of any Once, during review of Approval of lighting
lighting, LAWA will conduct reviews of lighting type and light and glare effects MEP permits or B- lighting plans on a plans by LAWA prior
placement to ensure that lighting will not interfere with on aviation activities permits which include project-by-project basis to issuance of MEP
Monitoring aeronautical lights or otherwise impair Airport Traffic Control and other sensitive uses lighting permits or B-permits
Agency: Tower or pilot operations. Plan reviews will also ensure, where involving lighting
feasible, that lighting is shielded and focused to avoid glare or
LAWA
unnecessary light spillover. In addition, LAWA or its designee will
undertake consultation in selection of appropriate lighting type and
placement, where feasible, to ensure that new lights or changes in
lighting will not have an adverse effect on the natural behavior of
sensitive flora and fauna within the Habitat Restoration Area.

Area: Light Emissions 82

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Solid Waste
SW-1 Implement an Enhanced Recycling Program. LAWA will Generation of Prior to issuance Annually Annual confirmation
enhance their existing recycling program, based on successful additional solid waste of certificate that LAX and LAX
programs at other airports and similar facilities. Features of the due to increased of occupancy for any Northside are
Monitoring enhanced recycling program will include: expansion of the existing activity levels at LAX use developed in LAX exceeding waste
Agency: terminal recycling program to all terminals, including new Northside, or approval reductions
terminals; development of a recycling program at LAX of building permits for requirements of AB
LAWA
Northside/Westchester Southside; lease provisions requiring that CTA improvements, 939
tenants meet specified diversion goals; and preference for recycled whichever occurs first
materials during procurement, where practical and appropriate.

SW-2 Requirements for the Use of Recycled Materials during Indirect impacts to solid Prior to issuance of Once, upon approval of Confirmation that
Construction. LAWA will require, where feasible, that waste management RFP/RFB for each construction contract general contractor's bid
contractors use a specified minimum percentage of recycled facilities/capacity (i.e., construction project. for each project includes usage of
Monitoring materials during construction of LAX Master Plan improvements. increased use of specified minimum
Agency: The percentage of recycled materials required will be specified in recycled materials percentage of recycled
the construction bid documents. Recycled materials may include, would reduce the materials.
LAWA
but are not limited to, asphalt, drywall, steel, aluminum, ceramic amount of waste
tile, cellulose insulation, and composite engineered wood products. materials that would
The use of recycled materials in LAX Master Plan construction otherwise need to be
will help to reduce the project's reliance upon virgin materials and managed/disposed of)
support the recycled materials market, decreasing the quantity of
solid waste requiring disposal.

SW-3 Requirements for the Recycling of Construction and Indirect impacts to solid Prior to issuance of Once, upon approval of Confirmation that
Demolition Waste. LAWA will require that contractors recycle a waste management RFP/RFB for each construction contract general contractor's bid
specified minimum percentage of waste materials generated during facilities/capacity (i.e., construction project for each project includes specified
Monitoring construction and demolition. The percentage of waste materials recycling of minimum percentage of
Agency: required to be recycled will be specified in the construction bid demolition/construction demolition/construction
documents. Waste materials to be recycled may include, but are not wastes would reduce waste to be recycled
LAWA
limited to, asphalt, concrete, drywall, steel, aluminum, ceramic tile, the amount of waste
and architectural details. materials that would
otherwise need to be
managed/disposed of)
Area: Solid Waste 83
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

SW-3 (Cont'd)

MM-SW-1 Provide Landfill Capacity. Additional landfill capacity in the Cumulative increases in Preparation of first Annually Annual updates on
Los Angeles region should be provided through the siting of new solid waste generation report on landfill solid waste disposal
landfills, the expansion of existing landfills, or the extension of that could reduce capacity prior to capabilities/capacity of
Monitoring permits for existing facilities. As an alternative, or to augment existing available issuance of certificate City of Los Angeles
Agency: regional landfill capacity, landfill capacity outside the region could landfill capacity of occupancy for any
be accessed by developing the necessary rail haul infrastructure. use developed in LAX
LAWA
The responsibility for implementing this mitigation measure lies Northside, or approval
with state, county, and local solid waste planning authorities. The of building permits for
costs for implementing this mitigation measure will be passed on to CTA improvements,
LAX and other solid waste generators through increase solid waste whichever occurs first
disposal costs.

Area: Solid Waste 84

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Construction Impacts
C-1 Establishment of a Ground Transportation/Construction Traffic congestion and Prior to issuance of any Once, at establishment Establishment of
Coordination Office. Establish this office for the life of the delays as they relate to permits for first Master of LAWA's Ground
construction projects to coordinate deliveries, monitor traffic the LAX Plan Plan project. Complete Construction Transportation/Constru
Monitoring conditions, advise motorists and those making deliveries about construction activities set of duties for this Coordination Office ction Coordination
Agency: detours and congested areas, and monitor and enforce delivery office will be Office; Notification
times and routes. LAWA will periodically analyze traffic established prior to regarding duties,
LAWA
conditions on designated routes during construction to see whether issuance of any permit business hours,
there is a need to improve conditions through signage and other for a project that may telephone numbers via
means. significantly impact the Internet and print
surface streets media to the public
This office may undertake a variety of duties, including but not
limited to:

‹ Inform motorists about detours and congestion by use of static

signs, changeable message signs, media announcements,
airport website, etc.
‹ Work with airport police and the Los Angeles Police
Department to enforce delivery times and routes.
‹ Establish staging areas.
‹ Coordinate with police and fire personnel regarding
maintenance of emergency access and response times.
‹ Coordinate roadway projects of Caltrans, City of Los Angeles,
and other jurisdictions with those of the airport construction
projects.
‹ Monitor and coordinate deliveries.
‹ Establish detour routes.
‹ Work with residential and commercial neighbors to address
their concerns regarding construction activity. .
‹ Analyze traffic conditions to determine the need for additional
traffic controls, lane restriping, signal modifications, etc.

Area: Construction Impacts 85

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Construction Personnel Airport Orientation. All construction Traffic congestion and Prior to commencement As required by arrival Contractor
C-2
personnel will be required to attend an airport project-specific delays as they relate to of construction for each of new personnel certification; signatures
orientation (pre-construction meeting) that includes where to park, the LAX Plan project of orientation attendees
Monitoring where staging areas are located, construction policies, etc. construction activities
Agency:
LAWA

Area: Construction Impacts 86

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Design, Art, and Architecture Applications / Aesthetics

DA-1 Provide and Maintain Airport Buffer Areas. Along the Avoidance of view Prior to approval of Once, during plan Provision of landscape
northerly and southerly boundary areas of the airport, LAWA will degradation development plans for review on a project-by- buffer areas, to the
provide and maintain landscaped buffer areas that will include projects abutting project basis extent feasible, in
Monitoring setbacks, landscaping, screening or other appropriate view- residential and view the development and
Agency: sensitive improvements with the goals of avoiding land use sensitive uses along the landscape plans
conflicts, shielding lighting, enhancing privacy and better northern & southern
LAWA
screening views of airport facilities from adjacent residential uses. boundaries of airport by
Use of the existing facilities in buffer areas may continue as LAWA
required until LAWA can develop alternative facilities.

DA-2 Update and Integrate Design Plans and Guidelines. The Avoidance of view Prior to issuance of any Once, upon approval of Board of Airport
following plans and guidelines will be individually updated or degradation/incompatib permits for first Master design-related Commissioners
integrated into a comprehensive set of design-related guidelines le land use Plan project (excluding guidelines and plans by approval of design-
Monitoring and plans: LAX Street Frontage and Landscape Development Plan runways) the Board of Airport related guidelines and
Agency: (June 1994), LAX Air Cargo Facilities Development Guidelines Commissioners plans
(April 1998; updated August 2002), and LAX Northside Design
LAWA
Plan and Development Guidelines (1989), including conditions
addressing heights, setbacks and landscaping. The update will
serve as a basis for reviewing future public and private
development projects at LAX. The update will incorporate key
provisions in current plans with an equivalent or greater level of
compatibility and visual quality supported between LAX and
adjacent land uses.

DA-3 Undergrounding of Utility Lines. In conjunction with the Avoidance of view During plan design Once, during plan Preparation of
extension of the Century Freeway and other roadway/right-of-way degradation phase for applicable design phase of each feasibility assessment
improvement projects, LAWA will pursue opportunities to place roadway/right-of-way roadway/right-of-way prior to approval of
Monitoring existing overhead utility lines underground wherever feasible and improvement projects improvement project roadway/right-of-way
Agency: appropriate. improvement plans
LAWA
MM-DA-1 Construction Fencing. Construction fencing and pedestrian Avoidance of Prior to issuance of Once, prior to issuance Installation of
canopies shall be installed by LAWA to the degree feasible to temporary view grading or building of grading or building construction fencing
degradation

Area: Design, Art, and Architecture Applications / Aesthetics 87

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

MM-DA-1 (Cont'd)
Monitoring ensure maximum screening of areas under construction along permits for each project permits for each project and/or pedestrian
Agency: major public approach and perimeter roadways, including along a major public along a major public canopies to the extent
Sepulveda Boulevard, Century Boulevard, Westchester Parkway, approach or perimeter approach or perimeter feasible
LAWA Pershing Drive, and Imperial Highway west of Sepulveda roadway roadway
Boulevard. Along Century Boulevard, Sepulveda Boulevard, and
in other areas where the quality of public views are a high priority,
provisions shall be made by LAWA for treatment of the fencing to
reduce temporary visual impacts.

Area: Design, Art, and Architecture Applications / Aesthetics 88

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Hazardous Materials
HM-1 Ensure Continued Implementation of Existing Remediation Potential for Prior to initiation of Once prior to Preparation of
Efforts. Prior to initiating construction of a Master Plan construction activities construction of each construction of each Construction
component, LAWA will conduct a pre-construction evaluation to to interfere with Master Plan project Master Plan project Compatibility
Monitoring determine if the proposed construction will interfere with existing existing soil or Assessment/Plan. If
Agency: soil or groundwater remediation efforts. For sites currently on LAX groundwater remediation will be
property, LAWA will work with tenants to ensure that, to the remediation efforts disrupted by
LAWA
extent possible, remediation is complete prior to the construction. construction, approval
If remediation must be interrupted to allow for Master Plan-related of the Construction
construction, LAWA will notify and obtain approval from the Compatibility
regulatory agency with jurisdiction, as required, and will evaluate Assessment/Plan will
whether new or increased monitoring will be necessary. If it is require the necessary
determined that contamination has migrated during construction, approvals from
temporary measures will be taken to stop the migration. As soon as RWQCB, DTSC, and
practicable following completion of construction in the area, LAFD, as appropriate
remediation will be reinstated, if required by the Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB) or another agency with
jurisdiction. In such cases, LAWA will coordinate the design of the
Master Plan component and the re-design of the remediation
systems to ensure that they are compatible and to ensure that the
proposed remediation system is comparable to the system currently
in place. If it is determined during the pre-construction evaluation
that construction will preclude reinstatement of the remediation
effort, LAWA will obtain approval to initiate construction from the
agency with jurisdiction.

For properties to be acquired as part of the Master Plan, LAWA

will evaluate the status of all existing soil and groundwater
remediation efforts. As part of this evaluation, LAWA will assess
the projected time required to complete the remediation activities
and will coordinate with the land owner and the agency with
jurisdiction to ensure that remediation is completed

Area: Hazardous Materials 89

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

HM-1 (Cont'd)
prior to scheduled demolition and construction activities, if
possible. In cases where remediation cannot be completed prior to
demolition and construction activities, LAWA will undertake the
same steps required above, namely, an evaluation of the need to
conduct monitoring; implementation of temporary measures to stop
migration, if required; and reinstatement of remediation following
completion of construction, if required.

HM-2 Handling of Contaminated Materials Encountered During Potential for Prior to initiation of Once prior to Preparation of
Construction. Prior to the initiation of construction, LAWA will encountering hazardous construction of first construction of first Hazardous
develop a program to coordinate all efforts associated with the materials/waste during Master Plan project Master Plan project Materials/Wastes
Monitoring handling of contaminated materials encountered during construction activities Management Plan
Agency: construction. The intent of this program will be to ensure that all
contaminated soils and/or groundwater encountered during
LAWA
construction are handled in accordance with all applicable
regulations. As part of this program, LAWA will identify the
nature and extent of contamination in all areas where excavation,
grading, and pile-driving activities are to be performed. LAWA
will notify the appropriate regulatory agency when contamination
has been identified. If warranted by the extent of the
contamination, as determined by the regulatory agency with
jurisdiction, LAWA will conduct remediation prior to initiation of
construction. Otherwise, LAWA will incorporate provisions for the
identification, segregation, handling and disposal of contaminated
materials within the construction bid documents. In addition,
LAWA will include a provision in all construction bid documents
requiring all construction contractors to prepare site-specific
Health and Safety Plans prior to the initiation of grading or
excavation. Each Health and Safety Plan would include, at a
minimum, identification/description of the following: site
description and features; site map; site history; waste types
encountered; waste characteristics; hazards of

Area: Hazardous Materials 90

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

HM-2 (Cont'd)
concern; disposal methods and practices; hazardous material
summary; hazard evaluation; required protective equipment;
decontamination procedures; emergency contacts; hospital map
and contingency plan.

In the event that any threshold of significance listed in the

Hazardous Materials section of the EIS/EIR for the LAX Master
Plan is exceeded due to the discovery of soil or groundwater
contaminated by hazardous materials, or if previously unknown
contaminants are discovered during construction or a spill occurs
during construction, LAWA will notify the lead agency(ies) with
jurisdiction and take immediate and effective measures to ensure
the health and safety of the public and workers and to protect the
environment, including, as necessary and appropriate, stopping
work in the affected area until the appropriate agency has been
notified.

Area: Hazardous Materials 91

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Water Use
W-1 Maximize Use of Reclaimed Water. To the extent feasible, Reduce demands for, Prior to approval of Once, prior to approval Approval of plans for
LAWA will maximize the use of reclaimed water in Master Plan- and use of, potable building plans for each of plans for affected affected project
related facilities and landscaping. The intent of this commitment is water project involving new project
Monitoring to maximize the use of reclaimed water as an offset for potable or substantially
Agency: water use and to minimize the potential for increased water use renovated buildings that
resulting from implementation of the LAX Master Plan. This use water, and prior to
LAWA
commitment also will facilitate achievement of the City of Los approval of landscaping
Angeles’ goal of increased beneficial use of its reclaimed water plans
resources. This commitment will be implemented by various
means, such as installation and use of reclaimed water distribution
piping for landscape irrigation.
W-2 Enhance Existing Water Conservation Program. LAWA will Avoid a substantial Prior to approval of Once, prior to approval Preparation of Water
enhance the existing Street Frontage and Landscape Plan for LAX increase in water building plans or of building plans or Conservation Program
to ensure the ongoing use of water conservation practices at LAX consumption due to the landscaping plans for landscaping plans for
Monitoring facilities. The intent of this program, to minimize the potential for development of new first Master Plan project first Master Plan project
Agency: increased water use due to implementation of the LAX Master Plan facilities involving water use
program, is also in accordance with regional efforts to ensure (i.e., CTA Landside
LAWA
adequate water supplies for the future. Features of the enhanced Terminal or LAX
conservation program will include identification of current water Northside development,
conservation practices and an assessment of their effectiveness; whichever occurs first)
identification of alternate future conservation practices;
continuation of the practice of retrofitting and installing new low-
flow toilets and other water-efficient fixtures in all LAX buildings,
as remodeling takes place or new construction occurs; use of Best
Management Practices for maintenance; use of water efficient
vegetation for landscaping, where possible; and continuation of the
use of fixed automatic irrigation for landscaping.

Area: Water Use 92

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Wastewater
MM-WW-1 Provide Additional Wastewater Treatment Capacity to Cumulative increases in Prepare first wastewater Annually. Upon Annual reports on
Accommodate Cumulative Flows. Additional wastewater wastewater generation capacity report prior to approval of the IPWP existing wastewater
capacity within the City of Los Angeles should be provided by the that could exceed issuance of any improvements, which treatment capabilities
Monitoring expansion/upgrade of the City's wastewater treatment systems via a currently planned building permits for any will provide for the and plans/provisions
Agency: combination of improvements to address the projected wastewater capacity of the building within the additional capacity of for additional
shortfall resulting from cumulative development. Such Hyperion Treatment LAX Plan area that HTP, the monitoring capabilities/capacity as
LAWA
improvements could include increasing capacity at the Hyperion Plant (HTP) generates wastewater requirements would provided for through
Treatment Plant (HTP), building new reclamation capacity cease the IPWP
upstream of HTP, conservation of potable water, and
infiltration/inflow reduction. Implementation of this mitigation
measure is the responsibility of the City of Los Angeles
Department of Public Works, Bureau of Sanitation. Specific
improvements will be identified in the City's IPWP and
Wastewater Facilities Plan component of the City's Integrated
Resources Plan. The cost for implementing this mitigation measure
would be passed on to LAX and other wastewater generators
through increased wastewater fees.

Area: Wastewater 93
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Fire Protection
FP-1 LAFD Design Recommendations. During the design phase prior Avoidance of Prior to issuance of Once, upon sign-off of LAFD sign-off on
to initiating construction of a Master Plan component, LAWA will compromised fire building permits or B- plans for each project plans prior to issuance
work with LAFD to prepare plans that contain the appropriate prevention and permits of building permits or
Monitoring design features applicable to that component, such as protection prior to issuance of B-
Agency: those recommended by LAFD, and listed below: permit for street
improvements
LAWA
‹ Emergency Access. During Plot Plan development and the
construction phase, LAWA will coordinate with LAFD to
ensure that access points for off-airport LAFD personnel and
apparatus are maintained and strategically located to support
timely access. In addition, at least two different ingress/egress
roads for each area, which will accommodate major fire
apparatus and will provide for major evacuation during
emergency situations, will be provided.
‹ Fire Flow Requirements. Proposed Master Plan development
will include improvements, as needed, to ensure that adequate
fire flow is provided to all new facilities. The fire flow
requirements for individual Master Plan improvements will be
determined in conjunction with LAFD and will meet, or
exceed, fire flow requirements in effect at the time.
‹ Fire Hydrants. Adequate off-site public and on-site private
fire hydrants may be required, based on determination by the
LAFD upon review of proposed plot plans.
‹ Street Dimensions. New development will conform to the
standard street dimensions shown on the applicable City of
Los Angeles Department of Public Works Standard Plan.
‹ Road Turns. Standard cut-corners will be used on all proposed
road turns.
‹ Private Roadway Access. Private roadways that will be used
for general access and fire lanes shall have at least 20 feet of
vertical access. Private roadways will be built to City of Los
Angeles standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
the LAFD.

Area: Fire Protection 94

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

FP-1 (Cont'd)
‹ Dead-End Streets. Where fire lanes or access roads are
provided, dead-end streets will terminate in a cul-de-sac or
other approved turning area. No fire lane shall be greater than
700 feet in length unless secondary access is provided.
‹ Fire Lanes. All new fire lanes will be at least 20 feet wide.
Where a fire lane must accommodate a LAFD aerial ladder
apparatus or where a fire hydrant is installed, the fire lane will
be at least 28 feet wide.
‹ Building Setbacks. New buildings will be constructed no
greater than 150 feet from the edge of the roadways of
improved streets, access roads, or designated fire lanes.
‹ Building Heights. New buildings exceeding 28 feet in height
may be required to provide additional LAFD access.
‹ Construction/Demolition Access. During demolition and
construction activities, emergency access will remain
unobstructed.
‹ Aircraft Fire Protection Systems. Effective fire protection
systems will be provided to protect the areas beneath the
wings and fuselage portions of large aircraft. This may be
accomplished by incorporating foam-water deluge sprinkler
systems with foam-producing and oscillating nozzle (per
NFPA 409, aircraft hangars for design criteria).

PS-1 Fire and Police Facility Relocation Plan. Prior to any Avoidance of Prior to any Master Once, upon completion Completion of Fire and
demolition, construction, or circulation changes that would compromised fire Plan activities affecting of Fire and Police Police Facility
prevention and on-airport fire and Facility Relocation Relocation Plan
protection police facilities Plan; as necessary
during the relocation
process
Area: Fire Protection 95
 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

PS-1 (Cont'd)
Monitoring affect LAFD Fire Stations 51, 80, and 95, or on-airport police
Agency: facilities, a Relocation Plan will be developed by LAWA through a
cooperative process involving LAFD, LAWAPD, the LAPD LAX
LAWA Detail, and other airport staff. The performance standards for the
plan will ensure maintenance of required response times, response
distances, fire flows, and a transition to new facilities such that fire
and law enforcement services at LAX will not be significantly
degraded. The plan will also address future facility needs,
including details regarding space requirement, siting, and design.

PS-2 Fire and Police Facility Space and Siting Requirements. Avoidance of Prior to any Master On-going during early Approval of facility
During the early design phase for implementation of the Master compromised fire Plan activities affecting design phase program requirements
Plan elements affecting on-airport fire and police facilities, LAWA prevention and on-airport police and by involved agencies
Monitoring and/or its contractors will consult with LAFD, LAWAPD, LAPD, protection fire facilities
Agency: and other agencies as appropriate, to evaluate and refine as
necessary, program requirements for fire and police facilities. This
LAWA
coordination will ensure that final plans adequately support future
facility needs, including space requirements, siting and design.

Area: Fire Protection 96

 LAX MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE D
MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM

Master Plan Commitments/ Potential Impact Timing of Monitoring Actions Indicating

Mitigation Measures Being Addressed Implementation Frequency Compliance

Law Enforcement
LE-1 Routine Evaluation of Manpower and Equipment Needs. Avoidance of Ongoing Weekly (via meetings Operations Plan and
LAWA will assure that LAWAPD and LAPD LAX Detail substantial deficiencies with law enforcement Deployment Logs
continue to routinely evaluate and provide additional officers, in law enforcement agencies); deployment
Monitoring supporting administrative staff, and equipment, to keep pace with personnel & equipment monitored daily
Agency: forecasted increases in activity and development at LAX in order
to maintain a high level of law enforcement services. This will be
LAWA
achieved through LAWA notification to LAWAPD and LAPD
regarding pending development and construction and through
LAWA review of status reports on law enforcement services at
LAX.

LE-2 Plan Review. During the design phase of terminal and cargo Unsafe Prior to issuance of Once, prior to issuance Plan sign-off by
facilities and other major airport development, the LAPD, facility/architectural building permits for of building permits for LAWAPD and LAX
LAWAPD, and other law enforcement agencies will be consulted design each Master Plan each project Detail
Monitoring to review plans so that, where possible, environmental contributors project
Agency: to criminal activity, such as poorly-lit areas, and unsafe design, are
reduced.
LAWA

Area: Law Enforcement 97

 LAX Master Plan Alternative D
Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Grand Avenue and Vista del Mar MM-ST-7
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Highland Avenue/Vista del Mar and Rosecrans MM-ST-10
Boulevard
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Imperial Highway and Main Street MM-ST-6
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Imperial Highway and Pershing Drive MM-ST-6
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Imperial Highway and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-10

1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Imperial Highway and Vista del Mar MM-ST-10
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Jefferson Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard MM-ST-7
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Lincoln Boulevard and Manchester Avenue MM-ST-6

1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Lincoln Boulevard and Teale Street MM-ST-10
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Rosecrans Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-8

1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at 83rd Street and Lincoln Boulevard MM-ST-6
1A West Employee Parking Structure Complete off-site intersectional improvements at 83rd Street and Lincoln Boulevard MM-ST-10
1A West Employee Parking Structure Provide fair-share contribution to LA County’s “Marina Expressway to Admiralty Way” project MM-ST-16
OR complete alternative off-site intersectional improvements at the following intersections:
- Bali Way and Lincoln Boulevard
- Fiji Way and Lincoln Boulevard
- Lincoln Boulevard and Marina Expressway
- Lincoln Boulevard and Maxella Avenue
- Lincoln Boulevard and Mindanao Way
- Lincoln Boulevard and Washington Boulevard

Los Angeles International Airport T1 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

1A West Employee Parking Structure Provide a “fair-share” contribution toward the LAC-MTA's Metro Rapid Bus Line Expansion MM-ST-15
Program (possible concepts include but are not limited to paying for larger or additional buses
from those planned by the LAC-MTA or paying the cost of retrofitting some buses to better
accommodate airline passengers and their baggage to and from LAX) OR other enhancements to
benefit transit to and from LAX (possible concepts include but are not limited to traffic signal
priority improvements for bus flow, transit marketing, airport employee and/or air passenger fare
subsidies) to mitigate the following intersections:
- Imperial Highway and Sepulveda Boulevard
- Jefferson Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard
- Lincoln Boulevard and Manchester Boulevard
- Lincoln Boulevard and Marina Expressway
- Lincoln Boulevard and Teale Street
- Lincoln Boulevard and Washington Boulevard

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete pedestrian connection between ITC and Green Line light rail station south of Imperial
Highway
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete the project-component widening of Aviation Boulevard between Century Boulevard and MM-ST-6
Imperial Highway. This includes the mitigation of adding a second southbound left-turn lane at
111th Street.
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete the project-component roadway improvements (discontinuous widening) along 111th MM-ST-6
Street between Aviation Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard. This work includes the mitigation
of adding a second westbound right-turn lane at Aviation Boulevard.

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Widen northbound I-405 off-ramp at Imperial Highway MM-ST-6
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at northbound I-405 off-ramp at Imperial Highway. MM-ST-8

Los Angeles International Airport T2 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Provide a “fair-share” contribution toward the LAC-MTA's Metro Rapid Bus Line Expansion MM-ST-15
Program (possible concepts include but are not limited to paying for larger or additional buses
from those planned by the LAC-MTA or paying the cost of retrofitting some buses to better
accommodate airline passengers and their baggage to and from LAX) OR other enhancements to
benefit transit to and from LAX (possible concepts include but are not limited to traffic signal
priority improvements for bus flow, transit marketing, airport employee and/or air passenger fare
subsidies) to mitigate the following intersections:
- Centinela Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard
- Howard Hughes Parkway and Sepulveda Boulevard
- Manchester Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard
- Mariposa Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard
- 76th St/77th St and Sepulveda Boulevard
- 79th St/ 80th St and Sepulveda Boulevard
- 83rd Street and Sepulveda Boulevard
- I-105 Freeway westbound off-ramp at Sepulveda Boulevard

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at I-105 Freeway ramps/Continental City Drive & MM-ST-6
Imperial Highway (at-grade intersectional improvement only)
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Aviation Boulevard and El Segundo Boulevard MM-ST-7

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Aviation Boulevard and El Segundo Boulevard MM-ST-8

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Aviation Boulevard and Imperial Highway MM-ST-7
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Aviation Boulevard and Rosecrans Boulevard MM-ST-10

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Douglas Street and Imperial Highway MM-ST-10
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at El Segundo Boulevard and La Cienega MM-ST-8
Boulevard
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at La Cienega Boulevard and 111th Street MM-ST-10
1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Manchester Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-7

Los Angeles International Airport T3 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Manchester Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-10

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Mariposa Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-8

1B Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Complete off-site intersectional improvements at 79th St/80th St and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-6
1C Southeast Surface Parking Complete construction of the project-component internal north-south airport roadway that bisects
the surface parking lot and terminates at 111th Street.
1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Airport Boulevard and Arbor Vitae Street MM-ST-7
1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Airport Boulevard and Manchester Avenue MM-ST-7
1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Centinela Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard MM-ST-10
1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Centinela Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-6

1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Century Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-7

1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at La Tijera Boulevard and Manchester Avenue MM-ST-7

1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at I-105 Freeway westbound off-ramp and MM-ST-8
Sepulveda Boulevard
1D Consolidated Rental Car Facility Complete off-site intersectional improvements at La Tijera Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-7

1E CTA Landside Terminals None

1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete project-component GTC/ITC Roadways and Century Bridge
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete project-component realignment of 104th Street east of the internal airport roadways to
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) connect to 102nd Street
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete project-component widening of Arbor Vitae Street between Aviation Boulevard and La MM-ST-6
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Cienega Boulevard. This work includes the mitigation of adding a second westbound left-turn
lane at Aviation Boulevard and an eastbound right-turn lane at La Cienega Boulevard.

Los Angeles International Airport T4 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete project-component widening of Aviation Boulevard between Arbor Vitae Street and
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Century Boulevard
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete project-component roadway improvements on La Cienega Boulevard between Arbor MM-ST-6
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Vitae Street and Imperial Highway. This work includes the mitigation of installing an additional
through lane for northbound traffic at Arbor Vitae Street.
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete project-component roadway improvements on Century Boulevard between Aviation
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Boulevard and Glasgow Place
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Widen the off-ramp from southbound I-405 Freeway north of Century Boulevard at La Cienega MM-ST-6
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Boulevard
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Arbor Vitae Street and Inglewood Avenue MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Arbor Vitae Street and La Brea Avenue MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Aviation Boulevard and Manchester Boulevard MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Aviation Boulevard and Manchester Boulevard MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Centinela Avenue and Culver Boulevard MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Centinela Avenue and La Cienega Boulevard MM-ST-6
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Century Boulevard and Hawthorne Blvd/La Brea MM-ST-6
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Avenue
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Century Boulevard and Inglewood Avenue MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Century Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at El Segundo Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)

Los Angeles International Airport T5 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at El Segundo Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard MM-ST-10
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Florence Avenue and La Cienega Boulevard MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Florence Avenue and La Cienega Boulevard MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Florence Avenue and La Cienega Boulevard MM-ST-10
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Hawthorne Boulevard and Imperial Highway MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Hawthorne Boulevard and Imperial Highway MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Imperial Highway and Inglewood Avenue MM-ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at Imperial Highway and Inglewood Avenue MM-ST-8
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at La Cienega Boulevard and Manchester MM_ST-7
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Boulevard
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Complete off-site intersectional improvements at La Cienega Boulevard and Manchester MM-ST-10
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) Boulevard
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Begin construction of direct connection between I-105 Freeway ramps and internal airport MM-ST-12
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area) roadways east of ITC (See Note 7)
1F Ground Transportation Center (including Begin construction of I-405 Interchange at Lennox Boulevard (See Note 7) MM-ST-13
Commercial Vehicle Holding Area)

Los Angeles International Airport T6 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

Note 1 For a detailed description of intersectional improvements, see Tables F4.3.2-28 and F4.3.2-29 of
the Final EIS/EIR

Note 2 LADOT may recommend that temporary Certificates of Occupancy be granted in the event of any
delay:1) by Caltrans on encroachment permits, or 2) in obtaining required approvals from other
City departments, government agencies or jurisdictions through no fault of Los Angeles World
Airports, provided that LAWA has demonstrated reasonable efforts and due diligence to the
satisfaction of LADOT.

Note 3 In all cases, except as noted in (2) above, the required Traffic Mitigation or Project Component of
each sub-phase for the corresponding land use sub-phase shall be guaranteed to the satisfaction of
LADOT and City of Los Angeles Public Works prior to the issuance of any Building Permit and
completed prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy permit.

Note 4 Where appropriate, as determined by LADOT, revisions may be made to this Phasing Plan.

Note 5 Appropriate transit improvements to the LAC-MTA bus system to and from LAX and “fair-share”
contributions to the LA County’s “Marina Expressway to Admiralty Way” project must be agreed
upon by LAWA, LADOT, FAA, and the respective outside agency. Depending on the outcome of
the negotiations to determine LAWA’s appropriate level and types of transit improvement or
“fair-share” contribution, this phasing plan may be altered at the discretion of LADOT. FAA
approval may still be required for substitute mitigations. Mitigation measures are applicable only
to the extent that airport revenue to fund such measures is permissible under federal law and
policies.
Note 6 In the event the applicant is unable to obtain necessary construction permits from the concerned
agencies in a timely fashion, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be granted by the City
provided the applicant has demonstrated reasonable efforts to complete the necessary designs and
improvements to the satisfaction of LADOT. Should any improvement not receive required
approval, the City may substitute an alternative measure of an equivalent effectiveness.

Los Angeles International Airport T7 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Transportation Improvements Phasing Plan

Associated
Phase Master Plan Project Traffic Mitigation Measure or Project Component
Mitigation Measure

Note 7 LAWA will strive for completion of both the direct freeway connections from the I-405 Freeway
at Lennox Boulevard and from the I-105 Freeway onto the airport roadways east of the ITC. If
these freeway improvements are not completed in time for the opening of the Ground
Transportation Center (GTC), LAWA will implement substitute mitigation improvements prior to
opening the GTC, including, but not limited to Changeable Message Signs to direct traffic and/or
Closed Circuit Television Cameras to monitor its flow, to the satisfaction of LADOT.

Note 8 For proposed LAX Master Plan facilities not listed, such as the CTA Landside Terminals, South
CTA Concourse Rework, Satellite Concourse, Tom Bradley International Terminal Rework,
North CTA Concourse, or LAX Northside, there are no traffic mitigations or project components
to be specifically phased with the construction of those components.

Note 9 Prior to the issuance of any final certificate of occupancy in the final phase of the Off-Airport
Traffic Improvements Phasing Plan, all required improvements in the entire phasing plan shall be
funded, completed, or resolved to the satisfaction of LADOT.

Los Angeles International Airport T8 LAX Master Plan Alternative D

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Zero Emission Transportation Vehicles, Cargo Handling Equipment

& Construction Equipment Commercial Availability Survey
Jesse N. Marquez - Author

2.1.2019

New Monthly Additions Are Highlighted

Electric Trucks Class 8

1. BYD Motors - 8TT Battery-Electric Truck

2. EMOSS - 16 Serie Electric Truck
3. EMOSS - 18 Serie Electric Truck
4. Kenworth - ZECT-Zero Emissions Cargo Transit T680 Hydrogen Fuel Cell
5. Nikola - Nikola One
6. Toyota - Electric Class 8 Truck - Hydrogen Fuel Cell
7. TransPower - ElecTruck
8. US Hybrid - Electric Class 8 Truck - eTruck
9. US Hybrid - Electric Class 8 Truck - H2Truck

Electric Yard Tractors Class 8

1. BYD Motors - 8Y Tractor

2. BYD Motors - T9 Battery-Electric Tractor
3. BYD Motors - Q1M Battery Electric Tractor
4. Hoist Liftruck - TE Series Electric-Powered Terminal Tractor
5. Kalmar Ottawa - T2E Electric Terminal Tractor
6. Orange EV - T-Series 4x2 Terminal Truck
7. Orange EV - T-Series 4x2 Terminal Truck Conversion of Kalmar Ottawa Truck
8. Orange EV - T-Series Reman (Conversion/Repower)
9. Terberg - YT202EV
10. Transpower - Elec Truck Yard Tractor

Electric Class 7 Truck

1.EMOSS - 12 Serie

Electric Trucks Class 6

1. Alkane/evLabs - Electric Class 6 Truck

2. BYD Motors - T7 Battery Electric Truck
3. EMOSS – 10 Serie
4. Lightning Systems - LEV100 All Electric Low Cab

Electric Trucks Class 5

 1. BYD Motors - 5F/T5 Battery-Electric Box Truck
2. ADOMANI - Class 5 Truck Cab & Chassis

Electric Trucks Class 4

1. ADOMANI - Class 4 Truck

Electric Trucks Class 3

1. ADOMANI - Class 3 Truck

Electric Pickup Trucks

1. Atlis Motor Vehicles - XT Electric Pickup Truck

2. Bollinger Motors - All-Electric B2 Pickup Truck
3. Havelaar Canada - Bison Electric Pickup Truck
4. Rivian - Electric Pickup Truck R1T
5. Workhorse Group - W15 All Wheel Drive Electric Truck

Electric SUV

1. Rivian - Electric Pickup Truck R1S

Electric Ship-to-Shore (STS) Rail-Mounted Gantry Cranes

1. Konecranes Electric Ship-to-Shore (STS) Gantry Cranes

2. Liebherr Rail Mounted Electric Gantry Crane
3. Shanghai Zhenua Heavy Industries Co. Electric Ship-to-Shore Cranes

Electric Rubber-Tired Gantry (RTG) Cranes

1. ANUPAM-MHI - E-RTG Electric Rubber Tired Gantry Crane

2. Konecranes - Electric Cable Reel Rubber-Tired Gantry (RTG) Cranes
3. Konecranes - Electric Busbar Rubber-Tired Gantry (RTG) Cranes
4. Kalmar - E-One2 Zero Emission RTG
5. Liebherr Container Cranes - e-RTG
6. Terex Port Solutions - E-RTGs

Electric Rail-Mounted Gantry Cranes

1. HY Crane Co. Electric RMG Rail Mounted Container Gantry Crane

Electric Bulk Handling Crane

1. Liebherr - LPS 420 E

Carry Deck Crane

1. Zero Emissions Equipment - ZEECRANE 4500 4.5 Ton Carry Deck Crane
2. Zero Emissions Equipment - ZEECRANE 9000 9-Ton Carry Deck Crane

Reach Stackers

1. Transpower - Electric Forklift Reach Stacker

2. Konecranes Hybrid Reach Stacker
Shuttle Carrier

1. Kalmar Electric Shuttle Carrier

Straddle Carrier
`
1. Konecranes Electric Straddle Carrier DE53
2. Konecranes Electric Straddle Carrier DE54
3. Konecranes Electric Boxrunner
4. Kalmar ESC440 Electric Straddle Carrier

Trailer Spreader

1. TEC Electric Trailer Spreader BA-030

Electric Forklifts

1. Bendi - Electric Narrow Aisle B-30

2. Bendi - Electric Narrow Aisle B-40
3. BYD Motors - ECB 16 Electric Forklift
4. BYD Motors - ECB 18 Electric Forklift
5. BYD Motors - ECB 20 Electric Forklift
6. BYD Motors - ECB 25 Electric Forklift
7. BYD Motors - ECB 27 Electric Forklift
8. BYD Motors - ECB 30 Electric Forklift
9. BYD Motors - ECB 35 Electric Forklift
10. CAT - EP16-20(C)N Electric Forklifts
11. CAT - EP10-15KRT PASC Electric Forklifts
12. CAT - EP10-16-20(C)PNT Electric Forklifts
13. Clark - GEX 40/45/50 Series Electric Forklifts
14. Clark - GEX ECX 20/25/30/32 Series Electric Forklifts
15. Clark - GEX 20/25/30 Series Electric Forklifts
16. Clark - GEX 16/18/20S Series Electric Forklifts
17. Clark - GTX 16/18/20S Series Electric Forklifts
18. Clark - TMX 12/15S/15/17/20/25 Series Electric Forklifts
19. Clark - ESX 12/15S/15/17/20/25 Series Electric Forklifts
20. Crown - RC 5500 Series Stand Up 3-Wheeled Electric Forklift
21. Crown - SC 5200 Series 3-Wheeled Electric Forklift
22. Crown - FC 4500 Series Four Wheeled Electric Forklift
23. Doosan - B40/45/50X-5 Series Electric 4-Wheel Forklift
24. Doosan - B45X-7 Electric 4-Wheel Forklift
25. Doosan - B22/25/30/35X-5 Series Electric 4-Wheel Forklift
26. Doosan - B20/25/25SE-7/30/32S-7 Series Electric 4-Wheel Cushion Forklift
27. Doosan - B15/18S/20SC-5 Series Electric 4-Wheel Cushion Forklift
28. Doosan - B15T/18TL/20T/20TL Electric 7 Series 3-Wheel Forklift
29. Doosan - B16/18/20X-7 Electric 7 Series 4-Wheel Forklift
30. Doosan - B13/15/16R-5 Series Rear Drive 3-Wheeled Forklift
31. Drexel - Electric Narrow Aisle SLT 30
32. Drexel - Electric Narrow Aisle SL-40
33. Hangcha - A Series 3 Wheeled Forklift
34. Hangcha - J Series 3 Wheeled Forklift
35. Hangcha - A Series 4 Wheeled Forklift
36. Hangcha - J Series 4 Wheeled Forklift
37. Hoist Liftruck - PE Series Heavy-Duty Pneumatic Lift Trucks
38. Hoist Liftruck - Lazer Series Cushion Tire Lift Truck
39. Hoist Liftruck - Neptune Electric Series Lift Truck
40. Hyster - E30-40XN Series Electric Lift 4 Wheel Truck
41. Hyster - J45-70XN Series Electric Pneumatic Tire
42. Hyster - J80-100XN Series Electric Pneumatic Tire
43. Hyster - Class 1 With Nuvera Hydrogen Fuel Cell
44. Hyster - Class 2 With Nuvera Hydrogen Fuel Cell
45. Hyster - Class 3 With Nuvera Hydrogen Fuel Cell
46. Hyundai Construction - Series 9 40B-9 Four Wheeled Forklift
47. Hyundai Construction - Series 9 45B-9 Four Wheeled Forklift
48. Hyundai Construction - Series 9 50B-9 Four Wheeled Forklift
49. Kalmar - EC50-90
50. Komatsu - FB10-FB18 Series Electric Forklifts
51. Komatsu - FB20 A Electric Forklift
52. Komatsu - FB15M-FB20M Series Electric Forklifts
53. Komatsu - FB25-FB30 Series Electric Forklifts
54. Komatsu - FB13RL-FB18RL Series Electric Forklifts
55. Konecranes - TX AC Electric Rider Lift Trucks
56. Konecranes - SRX AC Electric Reach Trucks
57. Linde Material Handling - Linde Roadster Fuel Cell Drive
58. Linde Material Handling - E20
59. Linde Material Handling - E20/600H
60. Linde Material Handling - E25
61. Linde Material Handling - E25/600H
62. Linde Material Handling - E25/600HL
63. Linde Material Handling - E25/600HL_’5Pz/625Ah’
64. Linde Material Handling - E25L
65. Linde Material Handling - E30
66. Linde Material Handling - E30/600H
67. Linde Material Handling - E30/600HL
68. Linde Material Handling - E30/600HL_’5Pz/625Ah’
69. Linde Material Handling - E30/600HL Beverage
70. Linde Material Handling - E30L
71. Linde Material Handling - E35HL
72. Mariotti - Electric AC
73. Raymond Corp. - 4150 Stand Up Forklift
74. Raymond Corp. - 4250 Stand Up Forklift
75. Raymond Corp. - 4460 Sit Down Forklift
76. Raymond Corp. - 4750 Stand Up Forklift
77. Raymond Corp. - 7200 Reach-Fork Truck
78. Raymond Corp. - 7300 Reach-Fork Truck
79. Raymond Corp. - 7500 Universal Stance Reach Truck
80. Raymond Corp. - 7500 Dockstance reach Forklift
81. Raymond Corp. - 7000 Series Deep-Reach Forklift Truck
82. Raymond Corp. - 7700 Reach-Fork Truck
83. Raymond Corp. - 7310 4-Directional Reach Truck
84. Raymond Corp. - 9600 Sw8ing Reach Turret Truck
85. Raymond Corp. - 9700 Sing Reach Truck
86. Raymond Corp. - 9800 Swing Reach Truck
87. Raymond Corp. - TRT Transtacker Truck
88. Raymond Corp. - 9300 Sideloader Long Load Forklift
 89. Raymond Corp. - 9400 Sideloader Forklift
90. Still - RX 50 1.0-1.6T Three-Wheeled Electric Forklift
91. Still - RX 20 1.4-2.0T Three-Wheeled Electric Forklift
92. Still - RX 20 1.4-2.0T Li-Ion Three-Wheeled Electric Forklift
93. Still - RX 60 1.6-2.0T Four Wheeled Electric Forklift
94. Still - RX 60 2.5-3.5T Four Wheeled Electric Forklift
95. Still - RX 60 3.5-5.0T Four Wheeled Electric Forklift
96. Still - RX 60 6.0-8.0T Four Wheeled Electric Forklift
97. Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - FB16PNT-FB20PNT Series Three-Wheeled Electric
98. Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - FBC15N-FBC18N Series Small Electric Cushion
99. Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - FBC22N2-FBC30LN3 Series Mid-Size Electric Cushion
100. Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - FBC15NS-FBC20NS Series Stand-Up End Control
101. Toyota - Core Electric Forklift
102. Toyota - Large Electric Forklift
103. Toyota - 3-Wheel Electric Forklift
104. Toyota - Stand-Up Rider Forklift
105. Toyota - Electric Pneumatic Forklift
106. Toyota - High-Capacity Electric Cushion Forklift
107. Yale - ESC 30 Three-Wheeled Forklift
108. Yale - ERC Four Wheeled Forklift
109. Yale - ERP30 Four Wheeled Forklift

Electric Pallet Truck

1. BYD - P20JW All-Electric Walkie Pallet Truck

Electric Dredger

1. Custom Dredge Works, Inc.

2. DSC Dredge
3. IMS Dredges
4. Ellicott Dredges. LLC
5. TV Dredging

Electric Tow Tractor

1. Clark - CTX 40/70 Series Electric Tow Tractor

2. Konecranes - TGX AC Electric Tow Tractor
3. Raymond - 8610 Tow Tractor

Tracked Dozer (Tractor)

1. Catepillar - D7E Hybrid Bulldozer

Excavators

1. Bobcat - E10 Electric Micro-Excavator

2. Kato - 9VXE- 3 Electric Mini Excavator
3. Kato - 17VXE Electric Mini Excavator
4. Wacker Neuson Group - Zero Tail EZ17e Mini Excavator

Top Front End Payloader

1. BYD Motors - Zero Emission Top Front Payloader

Skid Steer

1. Giant - E-Skid Steer Remote Control Skid-Steer Loader

2. Kovaco - eLise 900 Electric Skid Ster Loader
3. Schibeci - 32PE Electric Mini Skid Steer Loader
4. Sherpa - 100 ECO Electric Mini Skid-Steer

Wheeled Loader

1. Catepillar - 988K XE Electric Drive Wheel Loader

2. Hitachi - ZW220HYB-5 Hybrid Wheel Loader
3. John Deer - 944K Hybrid Wheel Loader
4. Kramer - KL25.5e Electric Wheeled Loader
5. Kramer - 5055e Electric Wheel Loader

Rope Shovels

1. Catepillar - Model 7295 Electric Rope Shovels

2. Catepillar - Model 7395 Electric Rope Shovels
3. Catepillar - Model 7495 HD Electric Rope Shovels

Wheel Dumper

1. Wacker Neuman Group - DW15e Electric Wheel Dumper

Concrete Mixers

1. BYD - J9C Concrete Mixer

Dump Trucks

1. BYD - T5 Dump Truck

2. California Truck Equipment Co. - All-Eectric Powertrain With Ford E450 Dump Truck
3. California Truck Equipment Co. - All-Eectric Powertrain With Ford F59 Dump Truck

Delivery Truck

1. AMP - E-100 V.2 All-Electric Step Van With Workhorse Chassis

2. BYD Motors - T7 Battery Electric Delivery Truck - Class 7
3. BYD Motors - T5 Battery Electric Delivery Truck - Class 5
4. Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Bus Corp. - Fuso eCanter Light Class 4 Delivery Truck
5. Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Bus Corp./E-Fuso Vision One Heavy Duty Class 5 Delivery Truck
6. Motive Power Systems - All-Electric Powertrain For Ford E450 Box Truck/Flat Bed
7. Motive Power Systems - All-Electric Powertrain For Ford F59 Walk In Van
8. UPS - Hydrogen Fuel Cell Class 6 Delivery Truck

Cab Chassis Delivery Truck

1. ADOMANI - Class 3 All-Electric Cutaway

2. ADOMANI - Class 5 Truck Cab & Chassis
3. Daimler - Freightliner eM2
4. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 4 Series
5. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 5 Series
6. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 6 Series
 7. Zenith - Electric Chassis Cab
8. Zenith - Electric Cutaway Cab

Flat Bed Truck

1. Motive Power Systems - All-Electric Powertrain For Ford E450 Box Truck/Flat Bed
2. Phoenix Motorcars - ZEUS Electric Flatbed Ford E350
3. Phoenix Motorcars - ZEUS Electric Flatbed Ford E450

Cargo Panel Van

1. ADOMANI - All-Electric Logistic Van

2. Chanje Energy Inc. - Class 5 - V8070 Electric Panel Van
3. Chanje Energy Inc. - V8100 Electric Panel Van
4. EMOSS – EMS 508 Electric Delivery Van
5. Morgan Olson Route Star - Motiv All-Electric Powertrain Ford F59 Walk-In-Van
6. Renault - SL31 i ZE Business Panel Van
7. Renault - SM31 i ZE Business Panel Van
8. Renault - MM31 i ZE Business Panel Van
9. Renault - LM31 i ZE Business Panel Van
10. Rockport Commercial Vehicles Cargoport - Motiv All-Electric Powertrain
11. Zenith Motors - Electric Step/Walk-In Van

Cargo Van

1. Green4U Technologies - Cargo Van

2. Lighting Systems - Electric Transit Cargo Van
3. Merceds-Benz – eSprinter
4. Nisssan - Electric E-NV200 Van
5. VIA - Cargo Van
6. Volkswagon - I.D. Buzz Cargo Van
7. Workhorse - NGen Electric Delivery Van
8. Zenith Motors - Electric Cargo Van

Utility/Electric Trucks

1. California Truck Equipment Co. - Motiv All-Eectric Powertrain With Ford E450 Utility Truck
2. California Truck Equipment Co. - Motiv All-Eectric Powertrain With Ford F59 Utility Truck
3. Phoenix Motorcars - ZEUS Electric Utility Service Vehicle Ford E350/E450 *

Aerial Boom Truck

1. Altec - Aerial Boom Vehicle with JEMS: 16-20 kWh Lithium-Ion Battery *
2. Hyster - Ascender AWP
3. JLG - Aerial Lift
4. Yale - AEREO AWP

Electric Refuse Trucks

1. BYD/Wayne Engineering - Class 8 Electric Refuse Truck

2. BYD - Class 6 Electric Refuse Truck
3. Motiv Power - ERV Battery-Electric Class 8 Refuse Truck
4. Petebuilt - Model 520 Battery-Electric Class 8 Refuse Truck
5. Wrightspeed - Electric Powertrain Refuse Truck
Street Sweeper

1. Dulevo International - D.Zero Electric Street Sweeper

2. Tenex International - Electra 1.0 Compact Street Sweeper
3. Tennant - Green Machines 500ze Electric Street Sweeper
4. Tropos - ABLE Sweep eCUV
5. U.S. Hybrid - Hydrogen Fuel Cell Street Sweeper

Fire Trucks

1. Suzhou Eagle Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Co.

2. Citecareelectricvehilces.com - CitEcar Fire Buddy Deluxe

Agricultural Tractors

1. Fendt - e100 Vario Electric Tractor

2. Solectrac - eFarmer Tractor
3. Solectrac - eUtility Tractor

Livestock/Equestrian Tractors

1. Solectrac - eUtility Tractor

Compact Utility Vehicles

1. Alke - Electric Cargo Van

2. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Payloader/Welding
3. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Payloader/Van Body
4. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Payloader/Metal Cage
5. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Payloader/Folding Side Rails
6. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Payloader/Steel Cab
7. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Payloader/Refuse Unit
8. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Utility MVP
9. Columbia ParCar Corp. - Utilitruck
10. GEM - GEM e2
11. GEM - GEM e4
12. GEM - GEM e6
13. GEM - GEM eL XD
14. GEM - GEM eM 1400 LSV
15. Tropos Motors - ABLE FRV - Electric Fire Response Vehicle
16. Tropos Motors - ABLE EMSo - Electric Medical Service Vehicle, Open Platform
17. Tropos Motors - ABLE EMSc - Electric Medical Service Vehicle, Closed Platform
18. Tropos Motors - ABLE Trades
19. Tropos Motors - ABLE Pickup
20. Tropos Motors - ABLE Cargo

Passenger Trains

1. ALWEG Rapid Transit Company – Monorail Passenger Train

2. Altrom - Prima M4 - AZ4A Passenger Locomotives
3. Altrom - Citadis Dualis Tram-Train
4. Altrom - Citadis Spirit Light Rail Vehicle
5. Altrom - Fuel Cell Coradia iLint
6. Altrom - Metropolis Metro
7. Altrom - Translohr Tramway On Tyres
8. Altrom - X’Trapolis Suburban Train
9. Bombardier Transportation
10. Bombardier - Innovia APM 100
11. Bombardier - Innovia APM 200 Automated People Mover System
12. Bombardier - Innovia APM 256
13. Bombadier - Innovia APM 300 Automated People Mover System
14. Bombardier - Innovia Monorail
15. Bombardier - Flexibility Trams
16. Bombardier - Flexibility 2 Trams
17. Bombardier - Flexibility Freedom
18. Bombardier - Flexibility Light Rail Vehicles
19. Bombardier - Single Deck Electric Multiple Units
20. Bombardier - Double-Deck Electric Multiple Units
21. BYD - Skyrail Monorail System
22. CAF - Electric Locomotive BB A 3000V
23. CAF - Electric Locomotive BBB A 3000V
24. CAF - Electric Locomotive C’C’ 3.000V
25. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - HX1D AC Rapid Electric Passenger Locomotive
26. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - ERP Passenger
27. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - Maglev Passenger Train
28. Hitachi - AT 100 Metro Dual Voltage
29. Hitachi - AT 200 Commuter Dual Voltage
30. Hitachi - AT 300 Intercity High Speed
31. Hitachi - Monorail Passenger Train
32. Hyundai Rotem - Manned Electric Passenger Trains
33. Hyundai Rotem - Unmanned Electric Passenger Trains
34. Inekon - Trio Low Floor Tram
35. Inekon - 04 Superior Low Floor Tram
36. Inekon - 11 Pento Low Floor Tram
37. JSC Kolomensky Zavoc - EP2K Passenger Electric Locomotive
38. Kawasaki - SWIMO Ultra Low Floor Tramway
39. Kawasaki - JR East 200 Electric Passenger Extreme Cold Weather Train
40. Kawasaki - 05 Series Electric Subway Train
41. Kawasaki - 22 Series Electric Subway Train
42. Kawasaki - 66 Series Electric Subway Train
43. Kawasaki - 70-000 High Speed Electric Rail Train
44. Kawasaki - 2000 Series High Speed Electric Rail Train
45. Kawasaki - 1000 Series Electric Subway Train
46. Kawasaki - 3000 Series Electric Subway Train
47. Kawasaki - 5000 Series Electric Subway Train
48. Kawasaki - 6300 Series Electric Subway Train
49. Kawasaki - 8000 Series Electric Subway Train
50. Kawasaki - 16000 Series Electric Subway Train
51. Kawasaki - R143 Series Electric Subway Train
52. Kawasaki - PA-5 Commuter Electric Train
53. Kawasaki - 30000 Series Electric Railway Train
54. Kawasaki - 1000 Series Monorail Vehicle
55. Kawasaki - efSET Electric High Speed Railway Vehicle
56. Nippon Sharyo - Light Rail Electric Vehicles (LACMTA)
57. Nippon Sharyo - Model 800 Low Floor Light Rail Electric Vehicles
 58. Nippon Sharyo - Gallery Type Bi-Level EMU
59. Nippon Sharyo - Highliner Gallery Type Bi-Level EMU
60. Nippon Sharyo - Commuter EMU
61. Nippon Sharyo - AE100 Express EMU
62. Nippon Sharyo - Series 215 EMU
63. Nippon Sharyo - Series 371 Express EMU
64. Nippon Sharyo - Series 683 Express EMU
65. Nippon Sharyo - Series 1700 Express EMU
66. Nippon Sharyo - Series 2000 Electric EMU
67. Nippon Sharyo - Series 2200 Electric EMU
68. Nippon Sharyo - Series 50000 Express EMU
69. Nippon Sharyo - Series 60000 Express EMU
70. Nippon Sharyo - Series 7000 Driverless Tram With Rubber tires
71. Nippon Sharyo - Model HSST-100 Linimo Maglev Train Fully Auitomated
72. Nippon Sharyo - Model 40 Suspended Monorail
73. Nippon Sharyo - Light Rail Vehicle
74. Patentes Taolgo Sl - Electric Locomotive
75. Scoda Electric - Emil Zatopek Electric Passenger Locomotive
76. Scoda Electric - Single Deck Electric Unit Passenger Train
77. Scoda Electric - Double Single Deck Electric Unit Passenger Train
78. Scoda Electric - Monorail Passenger Train
79. Siemens - Avenio Single Articulated Tram Low Floor
80. Siemens - Avenio Single Articulated Tram Low Floor
81. Siemens - Streetcar S70 Light Rail Passenger Train
82. Swiss Stadler Rail Group FLIRT High Speed Low Floor Multi Unit Passenger Rail
83. Swiss Stadler Rail Group FLIRT 160 High Speed Low Floor Single Decker Passenger Train
84. Swiss Stadler Rail Group - KISS200 long Distance Double Decker Passenger Train
85. Swiss Stadler Rail Group - TANGO City Train High or Low Floor
86. Swiss Stadler Rail Group - TRAMLINK Multi Link Low Floor Train
87. Titagarh - TSR Lenord Double Deck EMU
88. Titagarh - TAF Double Deck EMU
89. Titagarh - ETR500 High Speed Trainset
90. Titagarh - E403 Electric Loco
91. Titagarh - E404.600 High Speed Electric Loco
92. Titagarh - EMUCVS Articulated Single Deck EMU Metrostar
93. Toshiba - 15E Electric Locomotives
94. Toshiba - 19E Electric Locomotives Dual-Voltage
95. Toshiba - SciB Battery Light Rail Transit
96. Toshiba - HSR High Speed Rail
97. Tulomsas - E68000 Electric Outline Engine Passenger Train
98. WINDHOFF Bahn- und Anlagentechnik GmbH

Note: All electric trains in the Netherlands are now 100% Wind Powered

Freight Train

1. Alstrom - 800 Prima T8 (WAG12)

2. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - HX1F Electric Locomotive
3. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - HX 1B Electric Locomotive
4. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - HX 1C Electric Locomotive
5. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - HX 1 Electric Locomotive
6. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - SS Electric Locomotive
7. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - 22E Dual-Voltage
 8. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - 21E Dual-Voltage Narrow
9. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - 20E Dual-Voltage Narrow
10. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - KZ4AC
11. CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co. LTD - O’Z-Y
12. Kawasaki - JR Cargo EF 210 Electric Locomotive
13. Kawasaki - JR Cargo EF 510 Electric Locomotive
14. Kawasaki - JR Freight M 250 Super Rail Cargo Electric Locomotive
15. Kawasaki - 6K Freight Electric Locomotive
16. Schoma Lokomotiven - Electric Tunnel Locomotives
17. Siemens - eHighway Freight System
18. Swiss Stadler Rail Group - NG Shunting Locomotive
19. Swiss Stadler Rail Group - Tailor Made Locomotives
20. Tulomsas - E43000 Electric Locomotive
21. Tulomsas - E1000 Electric Maneuvering Engine
22. Tulomsas - E68000 Electric Outline Engine Freight Train

Passenger Van

1. Green4U Technologies - Passenger Cargo Van

2. Lightning Systems - Ford Transit EV 350HD Passenger Wagon
3. Mercedes-Benz - eVito Passenger Van
4. VIA - Passenger Van
5. Zenith Motors - Electric Passenger Van

Passenger/Shuttle Buses

1. Altrom – Aptis Electric Bus

2. Ameritrans Bus - All-Electric Motiv ePCS On Ford E450 Chassis 25 Passenger Shuttle Bus
3. Advanced Vehicle Manufacturing (AVM) - All Electric Mid-Size Shuttle Bus EV21
4. Advanced Vehicle Manufacturing (AVM) - All Electric Mid-Size Shuttle Bus EV27
5. Advanced Vehicle Manufacturing (AVM) - All Electric Mid-Size Shuttle Bus EV33
6. BYD Motors - C6 23-Ft Zero-Emission Electric Motor Coach
7. BYD Motors - K7M 30-Ft All Electric Zero-Emission Transit Bus
8. BYD Motors - K9s 35-Ft Zero-Emission Transit Bus
9. BYD Motors - K9M 40-Ft All Electric Zero-Emission Transit Bus
10. BYD Motors - K9S 40-Ft All Electric Zero-Emission Transit Bus
11. BYD Motors - C9 40-Foot Zero-Emission Electric Motor Coach
12. BYD Motors - C10M 45-Ft Articulated All Electric Coach
13. BYD Motors - K11M 60-Ft Articulated All Electric Zero-Emission Transit Bus
14. Green4U Technologies - Shuttle Bus
15. Green4U Technologies - Touring Bus
16. GreenPower - EV350 40-Foot All Electric
17. GreenPower - EV550 40-Foot All Electric Double Decker Bus
18. GreenPower - SYNAPSE 72 All Electric Shuttle Bus
19. International IC Bus - IC charge All-Electric Bus
20. Mercedes-Benz - eCitaro
21. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 4 Passenger Bus
22. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 6 Passenger Bus
23. New Flyer - Xcelior XE 35 Bus With Lithion-Ion Battery Pack
24. New Flyer - Xcelior XE 40 Bus With Lithion-Ion Battery Pack
25. Phoenix Motorcars - ZEUS-Zero Emissions Utility Shuttles
26. Proterra - Catalyst FC 35-Foot Urban Transit Bus
27. Proterra - Catalyst XR 35-Foot Urban Transit Bus
28. Proterra - Catalyst E2 35-Foot Urban Transit Bus
29. Proterra - Catalyst FC 40-Foot Urban Transit Bus
30. Proterra - Catalyst XR 40-Foot Urban Transit Bus
31. Proterra - Catalyst E2 40-Foot Urban Transit Bus
 32. Solaris - Urbino 8 LE Electric Bus
33. Solaris - Urbino 9 LE Electric Bus
34. Solaris - Urbino 12 LE Electric Bus
35. Solaris - Urbino 18 LE Electric Bus
36. Toshiba - Sora FC EV Bus
37. VDL Bus & Coach - Citea SLF-120 Electric Bus
38. VDL Bus & Coach - Citea SLF-121 Electric Bus
39. VDL Bus & Coach - Citea SLFA-180 Electric Bus
40. VDL Bus & Coach - Citea SLFA-181 Electric Bus
41. VDL Bus & Coach - Citea SLFA-187 Electric Bus
42. VDL Bus & Coach - Citea LLE - 99 Electric Bus
43. Zenith Motors - Electric Mini Bus

Compact Shuttle/MiniBus

1. Columbia - 6 Passenger Shuttle

2. Columbia - MVP 14 Passenger Shuttle
3. EMOSS - MB4 - 7 Passenger Electric Minibus
4. EMOSS - MB14 - 15 Passenger Electric Minibus
5. EMOSS - MB15 - 15 Passenger Electric Minibus
6. EMOSS - MB16 - 16 Passenger Electric Minibus

School Buses

1. ADOMANI - Electric School Bus

2. Blue Bird - Type D RE Electric School Bus
3. Blue Bird - Type A Micro Bird G5 Electric School Bus
4. Creative Bus Sales Inc. - Type C Motiv All-Eectric Powertrain With Ford F59 Starcraft School Bus
5. GreenPower - SYNAPSE 72 All Electric School Bus
6. LION Electric - eLion Type C School Bus
7. Motiv Power Systems - eQuest XL All-Eectric Powertrain With Ford F59 Starcraft School Bus
8. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 4 Type A School Bus
9. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 5
10. Motiv Power Systems - EPIC 6 Type C School Bus
11. Thomas Built Buses – Saf-T-Liner C2 Jouley Electric School Bus
12. Transpower - Type C Transit School Bus
13. Trans Tech Bus - SSTe - Motiv ePCS On Ford E450 Chassis School Bus

Taxi

1. BYD - E6 Electric Taxi

2. Electric Cab North America - Micro Transit Shuttles
3. Nissan LEAF Electric Taxi

Underground Mining Equipment

1. Epiroc - Scooptram ST7 Battery Electric Loader

2. Epiroc - Scooptram EST1030 Electric Loader
3. Epiroc - Scooptram EST2D Electric Loader
4. Epiroc - Scooptram EST3.5 Electric Loader
5. Epiroc - Minetruck MT2010
6. Epiroc - Minetruck MT42
7. Epiroc - Boomer E2 Battery Face Drill Rig
Note: 1. CFASE conducts periodic searches for all vehicles and equipment that are zero emissions. Our survey
is the most comprehensive document of zero emission technologies.
2. CFASE contacted the manufacturer directly to obtain information or information was available on
the manufacturer website.
3. Commercially Available means that the manufacturer is accepting orders for delivery to customer
in less than one year. Time of delivery can vary due to the type and number of vehicles ordered.
4. Vehicles and Equipment can be new or used and be retrofitted to be zero emission.

Coalition For A Safe Environment

1601 N. Wilmington Blvd., Ste. B, Wilmington, CA 90744
www.cfasecares.org     jesse@cfasecares.org jnm4ej@yahoo.com 310-590-0177 424-264-5959
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Cumulative Impact
Bibliography

2.23.2013
54 Citations

1. Atkinson SF, Canter L. W., and Ravan M. D., “The Influence of Incomplete or Unavailable Information on
Environmental Impact Assessment in the USA”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol.26, Issue 5,
2006, pp. 448-467.

2. Bell ML, O'Neill MS, Cifuentes LA, Braga ALF, Green C, Nweke A, Rogat J, Sibold K, “Challenges and
recommendations for the study of socioeconomic factors and air pollution health effects.” Environmental Science
Policy (2005) Volume: 8, Issue: 5, Pages: 525-533

3. Burris RK., and Canter LW, "Cumulative Impacts are not Properly Addressed in Environmental
Assessments," EIA Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, January, 1997, pp. 5-18.

4. Burris RK, and Canter LW, "A Practitioner Survey of Cumulative Impact Assessment," Impact Assessment, Vol.
15, No. 2, June, 1997, pp. 181-194.

5. Burris RK, and Canter LW, “Facilitating Cumulative Impact Assessment in the EIA Process”, International Journal
of Environmental Studies, Vol. 53, 1997, pp. 11-29.

6. Caldwell JC, Woodruff TJ, Frosch RM, Axelrad DA, “Application of Health Information to Hazardous Air Pollutants
Modeled in EPA’s Cumulative Exposure Project.” Toxicology & Industrial Health, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.429-454, 1998

7. CAL EPA, “Environmental Justice Plan.” 11 pgs., October 2004 Sacramento, CA.,

8. CAL EPA, “EJ Action Plan Pilot Projects: Addressing Cumulative Impacts and Precautionary Approach.” Available
at: http://www.calepa.ca.gov/envjustice/ActionPlan/PhaseI/March2005/CI_PA.pdf. March 25, 2005 Sacramento,
CA.

9. CAL EPA, California Air Resources Board, “Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health
Perspective.”
http://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. April 2005, Sacramento, CA.

10. CAL EPA/OEHHA, “California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool.” 116pgs. April 2013
Sacramento, CA.

11. CAL EPA/OEHHA, “Cumulative Impacts: Building A Scientific Foundation.” 69 pgs., December 2010,
Sacramento, CA.

12. Caltrans (with FHWA and EPA), “Guidance for Preparers of Cumulative Impact Analysis”, June 30, 2005,
Sacramento, California. http://www.dot.ca.gov/ser/cumulative_guidance/purpose.htm

13. Canter LW, "Cumulative Effects and Other Analytical Challenges of NEPA," Ch. 8 in Environmental Policy and
NEPA: Past, Present, and Future, Clark, E.R., and Canter, L.W., Editors, St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida,
1997, pp. 115-137.

14. Canter L W, “Economics in Cumulative Effects Assessment”, Economics and Environmental Conference, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, New Orleans, Louisiana, July 16-18, 2002

15. Canter LW, "Environmental Impact Assessment," Ch. 2 in Environmental Engineers Handbook, Liu, D.H., and
Liptak, B.G., editors, Second Edition, Lewis Publishers/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1997, pp. 41-72.
16. Canter LW, "Cumulative Effects Assessment," Ch. 18 in Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, Vol. I,
Petts, J., Editor, Blackwell Science, Ltd., Oxford, England, 1999, pp. 405-440.

17. Canter LW, " Scientific Uncertainty and the Environmental Impact Assessment Process in the United States," Ch.
10 in Scientific Uncertainty and Environmental Problem-Solving, Lemons, J., editor, Blackwell Scientific
Publications, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996, pp. 298-326.

18. Canter, LW “Sources, Effects, and Fate of Pollutants," Section 1.1 (in Ch. 1) in Air Pollution, Liu, D.H., and Liptak,
B.G., Editors, Lewis Publishers/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2000, pp.3-20.

19. Canter, L.W., and Kamath, J., "Questionnaire Checklist for Cumulative Impacts," Environmental Impact
Assessment Review, Vol. 15, No. 4, July, 1995, pp. 311-339

20. CDC National Association of Local Boards of Health, “Land Use Planning for Public Health: The Role of Local
Boards of Health in Community Design and Development.”
http://www.cdc.gov/HEALTHYPLACES/publications/landuseNALBOH.pdf. 2006.

21. Corburn J, “Environmental Justice, Local Knowledge, and Risk: The Discourse of a Community-Based
Cumulative Exposure Assessment. Environmental Management.” Vol. 29, pages 451-466. 2002.

22. Council on Environmental Quality, “Forty Most Asked Questions Concerning CEQ's National Environmental Policy
Act Regulations.” Memorandum to Agencies. 46 Fed. Reg. 18026 (March 23, 1981).

23. Council on Environmental Quality, “Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act.” 40 CFR Parts 1500 - 1508. 1987

24. Council on Environmental Quality. 1997. Considering Cumulative Effects Under the National Environmental Policy
Act. Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC. January.

25. Crookes DJ, DeWit MP, “An Evaluation Of Tools For An Assessment Of Cumulative Effects In Socioeconomic
Impact Studies.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, Vol. 11, 311-329 pp March 2009.

26. Delfino RJ, “Epidemiologic evidence for asthma and exposure to air toxics: linkages between occupational,
indoor, and community air pollution research.” Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Aug;110 Suppl 4:573-89.

27. Diez-Roux A. 1997. Neighborhood environments and coronary heart disease: a multilevel analysis. Am J
Epidemiol 146:48–63.

28. Diez-Roux A. 1998. Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. Am J
Public Health 88:216–222.

29. EPA, “Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents,” U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Federal Activities (2252A) EPA 315-R-99-002/May 1999.

30. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “Community Impact Assessment: A Quick Reference for
Transportation.” FHWA, Office of Environment and Planning, Washington, DC. FHWA-PD-96, HEP-30. 1996.

31. Green RS, Smorodinsky,S, Kim, JJ, McLaughlin, R, Ostro,B, “Proximity of California Public Schools to Busy
Roads.” Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 112. No. 1, January 2004.

32. Gwynn RC, Thurston GD, “The burden of air pollution: impacts among racial minorities.” Environ Health Perspect.
2001 Aug;109 Suppl 4:501-6.

33. Herson AI, and Bogdan KM. 1991. “Cumulative impact analysis under NEPA: recent legal developments.” The
Environmental Professional 13:100-106.

34. Kamaras G, 1993. “Cumulative impact assessment: a comparison of federal and state environmental review
provisions.” Albany Law Review 57(1):113-143.

35. Lewtas, J, “Air pollution combustion emissions: characterization of causative agents and mechanisms associated
with cancer, reproductive, and cardiovascular effects.” Mutat Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;636(1-3):95-133. Epub 2007
Aug 17.
36. Makri, A, Stilianaskis, NI, “Vulnerability to air pollution health effects.” Int J Hyg Environ Health, 2008 Jul;211(3-
4):326-36. Epub 2007 Aug 24.

37. McCold, L.N. and J.W. Saulsbury, “Including Past and Present Impacts in Cumulative Impact Assessments.”
Environmental Management. Vol. 20 no.5 pp. 767-776, 1996.

38. Morello-Frosch R. 2002. The political economy of environmental discrimination. Environ Plann C Gov Policy
20:477–496.

39. Morello-Frosch R, Jesdale BM. 2006. Separate and unequal: residential segregation and estimated cancer risks
associated with ambient air toxics in U.S. metropolitan areas. Environ Health Perspect 114:386–393.

40. Morello-Frosch R, Pastor M, Sadd J. 2001. Environmental justice and southern California’s “Riskscape”: the
distribution
of air toxics exposures and health risks among diverse communities. Urban Affairs Rev 36:551–578.

41. Morello-Frosch, R, Shenassa, ED, “The Environmental Riskscape and Social Inequity: Implications for Explaining
Maternal and Child Health Disparities.” Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 114, No. 8, August 2006.

42. National Academy of Sciences. 2003. Cumulative Environmental Effects of Oil and Gas Activities on Alaska's
North Slope. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

43. NEJAC. 2004. Ensuring Risk Reduction in Communities with Multiple Stressors: Environmental Justice and
Cumulative Risks/Impacts—Draft Report. New Orleans: National Environmental Justice Advisory Council.

44. Ozkaynak H, Palma T, Touma JS, Thurman J, “Modeling population exposures to outdoor sources of hazardous
air pollutants.” J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008 Jan; 18(1):45-58. Epub 2007 Sep 19

45. Pratt, Gregory C, “Cumulative Impact. Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 108, page 162.”
http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2000/108-4/correspondence.html. 2002

46. Rosenbaum, AS, Ligocki, MP, Wei, Y, “Modeling cumulative outdoor concentrations of hazardous air pollutants.”
Technical report, San Rafael: Systems Applications International, Inc. 1998.

47. Rumrill JN, and Canter LW, "Addressing Future Actions in Cumulative Effects Assessment," Project Appraisal,
Vol. 12, No. 4, December, 1997, pp. 207-218.

48. Rumrill JN, and Canter LW, “Cumulative Air Quality Effects Assessment”, Federal Facilities Environmental
Journal, Autumn, 2000, pp. 19-38.

49. Smith, MD, “Recent Trends In Cumulative Impact Case,” National Association of Environmental Professionals
Annual Conference, Alexandria, VA, April 16-19, 2005.

50. Stanley M, “Indirect and Cumulative Impact Analysis”, NCHRP 25-25, Task 11, January, 2006, American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C.

51. Tricker RC, “Assessing cumulative environmental effects from major public transport projects,” Transport Policy,
Vol. 14, 293-305 pp, July, 2007.

52. Weisel CP, “Assessing exposure to air toxics relative to asthma,” Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Aug;110 Suppl 4:527-37.”

53. Woodruff TJ, Axelrad DA, Frosch RM, Rosenbuam A, “Assessing hazardous air pollutants: The need for a new
approach.” Epidemiol, January 1997.

54. Woodruff TJ, Axelrad DA, Caldwell JC, Frosch RM, Rosenbuam A, “Public health implications of air toxics
concentrations across the United States.” Environ. Health Perspectives, 1998.
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Environmental Justice

Bibliography
118 Citations
4.17. 2013

1. Allen, D. W. “Social class, race, and toxic releases in American counties, 1995.” Social Science Journal 38
(2001): 13-25.

2. Austin, Regina & Schill, Michael. "Black, brown, poor & poisoned: Minority grassroots environmentalism and the
quest for eco-justice:" Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy v1, n1 (1991): 69-82.

3. Baugh, John H,"African Americans and the Environment: A Review Essay." Policy Studies Journal 19 (2): 182-
191.1991

4. Bennet, James. "Hispanic voters and the Politics of Sludge." New York Times, 5 March 1993, B1.

5. Been, Vicki, What’s fairness got to do with it? Environmental justice and siting of locally undesirable land uses.
Cornell Law Review 78, 1001. 1993.

6. Been, Vicki, "Locally Undesirable Land Uses in Minority Neighborhoods: Disproportionate Siting or Market
Dynamics?" Yale Law Journal 103:1383-1422. 1994.

7. Been, Vicki, “Essays on environmental justice: Market dynamics and the siting of LULUs: Questions to raise in the
classroom about existing research.” West Virginia Law Review 96, 1069. 1994.

8. Been, Vicki, “Analyzing evidence of environmental justice. Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law,” 11(1): 1-
36.1995

9. Been, Vicki and Francis Gupta, “Coming to the nuisance or going to the barrios? A longitudinal analysis of
environmental justice claims.” Ecology Law Quarterly 24(1): 1-56. 1997.

10. Bell, J., and M. Standish. “Communities and health policy: a pathway for change.” Health affairs 24.3 (2005 Mar-
Apr): 339-42.

11. Bevc, Christine A., Brent K. Marshall and J. Steven Picou. 2006. “Toxic Exposure and Environmental Justice:
Toward A Spatial Model of Physical Health and Psychological Well-Being.” Social Science Research 35:

12. Binder, Denis. Index of environmental justice cases. The Urban Lawyer v27, n1 (1995): 163-167.

13. Blank, Linda D. Seeking solutions to environmental inequity: The Environmental Justice Act. Environmental Law v
24, n3 (1994): 1109-1136.

14. Booth, Annie L. and Harvey M. Jacobs. 1990. "Ties That Bind: Native American Beliefs as a Foundation for
Environmental Consciousness." Environmental Ethics 12 (1): 27-43.

15. Bowen, WM, Comments on Every Breath You take…, The demographics of toxic air releases in Southern
California, Economic Development Quarterly, v13,n2 May 1999: 124-134

16. Brajer, V. & J. Hall. “Recent evidence on the distribution of air pollution effects.” Contemporary Policy Issues, v2,
n5, April 1992: 63-70.

17. Brown, Alice L. "Environmental justice: New civil rights frontier." Trial v29, n7 (July 1993): 48.
18. Brown, Phil, Brian Mayer, Stephen Zavestoski, Theo Luebke, Joshua Mandelbaum and Sabrina McCormik. 2003.
“The Health Politics of Asthma: Environmental Justice and Collective Illness Experience in the United States.”
Social Science and Medicine 57(3): 453-464.

19. Brown, Phil, Stephen Zavestoski, Brian Mayer, Sabrina McCormick and Pamela Webster. 2002. "Policy Issues in
Environmental Health Disputes.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 584:175-202

20. Brulle, R. J., and D. N. Pellow. “Environmental justice: human health and environmental inequalities.” Annual
review of public health 27 (2006): 103-24.

21. Bryant, Bunyan and Paul Mohai, editors.,”Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards : A Time for
Discourse. Boulder,” CO: 251pp Westview Press. 1992.

22. Bryant, Bunyan and Paul Mohai,"The Michigan Conference: A Turning Point." EPA Journal 18 (1): 9-10. 1992

23. Bullard, Robert, and Glenn S. Johnson. “Environmental and Economic Justice: Implications for Public Policy.”
Journal of Public Management and Social Policy, v4, n4, 1998: 137-148.

24. Bullard, Robert, and Beverly H. Wright. “Environmental justice for all: Community perspectives on health and
research needs.” Toxicology and Industrial Health, v9, n5, September/October, 1993: 821-842.

25. Bullard, Robert D., ed.,”onfronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots.” Boston: South End
Press.1993.

26. Bullard, Robert D.,"The Threat of Environmental Racism." Natural Resources and Environment” 7 (3): 23- 26, 55-
56.1993.

27. Bullard, Robert D. “Race, justice, and the environment.” Who Cares, Spring 1995: 34-41.

28. Burke, Lauretta M. “Race & environmental equity: A geographic analysis in Los Angeles.” Geo Info Systems,
October 1993: 44, 46-47, 50.

29. Camacho, David E. (Ed.), “Environmental Injustices, Political Struggles: Race, Class, and the Environment.”
Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 1998.

30. Capek, Stella M. "The 'environmental justice' frame: a conceptual discussion and an application. (Special Issue on
Environmental Justice) Social Problems v40, n1 (February 1993): 5-25.

31. Carlin, B.P., and H. Xia. “Assessing environmental justice using Bayesian hierarchical models: two case studies.”
Journal Expo Anal Environmental Epidemiology, v9, n1, January/February 1999: 66-78.

32. Caron, Judi Anne. 1989. "Environmental Perspectives of Blacks: Acceptance of the `New Environmental
Paradigm'." Journal of Environmental Education 20 (3): 21-26.

33. Center, T. J., W. Kriesel, and A. G. Keeler. “Environmental justice and toxic releases: Establishing evidence of
discriminatory effect based on race and not income.” Wisconsin Environmental Law Journal 3 (1996): 119.

34. Chakraborty, J., and M. P. Armstrong. “Assessing the impact of airborne toxic releases on populations with
special needs.”Professional Geographer 53.1 (2001): 119-131.

35. Claudio, L., T. Torres, E. Sanjurjo, L.R Sherman, and P.J. Landrigan. “Environmental health sciences education
— a tool for achieving environmental equity and protecting children.” Environmental Health Perspectives, v106,
Suppl 3, June 1998: 849-855.

36. Cohen, M. J. “The spatial distribution of toxic chemical emissions: Implications for non-metropolitan
areas.” Society and Natural Resources 10 (1997): 17-41.

37. Cole, Luke and Sheila Foster, ‘From the Ground UP: Environmental Racism and the rise of the EJ Movement,’
New York University Press, 2001

38. Cole, D. C., J. Eyles, B. L. Gibson, et al. “Links between humans and ecosystems: the implications of framing for
health promotion strategies.” Health Promotion International 14 (1999): 65-72.

39. Collin, RW, "Environmental equity and the need for government intervention." Environment, v35, n9 (November
1993): 41-43.
40. Collin, RW, ““Environmental Equity: Law and Planning Approach Environmental Racism.” Virginia Environmental
Law Journal, 11, pp. 495-564. 1992.

41. Colopy, James H. "The road less traveled: Pursuing environmental justice through Title VI of the Civil Rights Act
1964." Stanford Environmental Law Journal v13, n1 (January 1994): 125-189.

42. Colquette, Kelly Michele, and Elizabeth A. Henry Robertson. "Environmental Racism: The Causes,
Consequences, and Commendations." Tulane Environmental Law Journal 5 (1): 153- 207, December 1, 1991.

43. Commission for Racial Justice. United Church of Christ. 1987. Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A
National Report on the Racial and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites.
New York: Public Data Access. xiii-xvi.

44. Committee on Environmental Justice, Institute of Medicine. Toward environmental justice : research, education,
and health policy needs. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999. readable
online:http://fermat.nap.edu/books/0309064074/html

45. De La Pena, Nonny, "Fighting for the Environment." Hispanic, 18-23. March 1991

46. DiBartolomeis, MJ, “Environmental Justice as a Component of Decision Making,” Environmental Toxicology and
human Health Vol. II, CAL EPA OEHHA 2003.

47. Dowie, Mark. "The New Environmentalism." Utne Reader, no. 52:104-111, July/August, 1992.

48. Edwards, Mencer Donahue. “Sustainability and people of color.” EPA Journal, v18, n4, September-October 1992:
50.

49. EPA, “A Citizen’s Guide to Using Federal Environmental Laws to Secure Environmental Justice,” Environmental
Law Institute, Washington, DC 202

50. EPA “Models gauge pollution in environmental justice disputes.” Environmental Science & Technology, v32,
n21, Nov. 1, 1998: 488A-489A

51. EPA Science Advisory Board. 1990. Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental
Protection. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.

52. EPA Office of Environmental Justice, “Toolkit for Assessing Potential Allegations of Environmental Injustice,” EPA
300-R-04-002, November 2004.

53. Executive Order 12898 - "Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-
Income Populations," February 11, 1994.

54. Executive Order 12948 – “Nondiscrimination, Environmental Justice, and Community Impact Assessment in
Planning and Project Development,” July 27, 1995, Amendment to Executive Order No. 12898.

55. Forknbrock, DJ, Schweitzer, LA, “Environmental Justice in Transportation Planning,” APA Journal. Winter 1999.

56. Garcia, AP, Walerstein, N, Hricko, A, Marquez, JN, Logan, A, Nasser, EG, Minkler, M, THE Impact Project: a
Community Based Participatory Research Environmental Justice Case Study, Environmental Justice, Vol. 6, No.
1, 2013.

57. Garcia, Stephanie J. “Environmentalism and Economic Justice.” Social Science Quarterly, v80, n2, June 1999:
426.

58. Gerrard, MB, “Environmental Justice and Local Land Use Decision Making,” American Bar Association 2001.

59. Gerrard, MB, Foster, SR, “The Law of Environmental Justice.” American Bar Association, 2008.

60. Godsil, Rachel D. "Remedying Environmental Racism." Michigan Law Review 90 (2): 394-427, November, 1991.

61. Goldman, Benjamin A. (1994). Not Just Prosperity: Achieving Sustainability with Environmental Justice.
Washington, D.C.: National Wildlife Federation.

62. Goldman, Lynn R. and Sudha Koduru. 2000. "Chemicals in the Environment and Developmental Toxicity to
Children: A Public Health and Policy Perspective." Environmental Health Perspectives 108: 443-448.
63. Gottlieb, Robert. “A question of class: The workplace experience.” Socialist Review, v22, n4, October-December
1992: 131-166.

64. Grossman, Karl, "Environmental Racism." Crisis 98 (4): 14-17, 31-32. 1991

65. Hammer, NM, “Title VI as a Means of Achieving Environmental Justice,” 16 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 693 (Summer 1996).

66. Institute of medicine, “Toward Environmental Justice: Research, Education and Health Policy Needs,” 137pp,
Washington, DC, National Academy Press 1999

67. Jones, Stephen C. "EPA targets environmental racism." (part 1) National Law Journal v15, n49 (August 9, 1993):
28.

68. Jones, Stephen C, “Inequities of industrial siting addressed. ”National Law Journal, v15, n50, Aug. 16, 1993: 20.

69. Jordan, Charles and Donald Snow, "Diversification, Minorities, and the Mainstream Environmental Movement." In:
Voices from the Environmental Movement: Perspectives for a New Era, edited by Donald Snow, 71- 109.
Washington, DC, Island Press. 1992

70. Jordan, Charles. "From toxic racism to environmental justice." E: The Environmental Magazine v3, n3 (June
1992): 28-35.

71. Kriebel, David et. al., "The Precautionary Principle in Environmental Science." Environmental Health Perspectives
109: 871-876. 2001

72. Kuzmiak, D.T., "The American Environmental Movement." Geographical Journal 157 (3): 265-278. 1991

73. Lampe, David. "The politics of environmental equity." National Civic Review v81, n1 (Winter/Spring 1992): 27.

74. Lee, Charles, "The Integrity of Justice: Evidence of Environmental Racism." Sojourners 19 (2): 22-25. 1990

75. Lee, Charles, "Beyond Toxic Wastes and Race." In: Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the
Grassroots, edited by Robert D. Bullard. Boston: South End Press, 41-52. 1993

76. Lee, Charles. “Developing working definitions of urban environmental justice. “Earth Island Journal, v8, n4, Fall
1993: 41.

77. Lewis, Sanford. “The corporate right to cover up: the environmental audit privilege and the public interest.”
Multinational Monitor, v19, May 1998: 9-11.

78. Link, Terry, "Environmental Racism/Environmental Equity: A Bibliography." Green Library Journal: Environmental
Topics in the Information World 2 (1): 17-22. 1993

79. Lyskowski, Kevin. "Environmental justice: A research guide." Our Earth Matters. NAACP Legal Defense and
Educational Fund (Spring 1994).

80. Maantay, J, “Zoning law, health, and environmental justice: what’s the connection?,” 4 J. of Law, Medicine and
Ethics 572 (December 2002).

81. Mank, Bradford C. Environmental justice and discriminatory siting: Risk-based representation and equitable
compensation. Ohio State Law Journal v56, n2 (1995): 329-425.

82. Mann, Eric. L.A.'s Lethal Air: New Strategies for Policy, Organizing and Action. Los Angeles Labor/Community
Strategy Center, 1991. 80 p.

83. Mazmanian, Daniel A. and Michael E. Kraft (eds.). (1999). Toward Sustainable Communities: Transition and
Transformations in Environmental Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

84. Merchant, Carol, Radical Ecology: The Search for a Livable World. New York: Routledge. 181 p. 1992

85. Meyer, Eugene L. "Environmental racism: Why is it always dumped in our backyard? Minority groups take a
stand." Audubon v94, n1 (Jan/Feb. 1992): 30-32.

86. Mohai, Paul, "Black Environmentalism." Social Science Quarterly 71 (4): 744-765. 1990

87. Mohai, Paul and Bunyan Bryant. "Race, Poverty, and the Environment." EPA Journal 18 (1): 6-8. 1992
88. Mohai, Paul, “Environmental Justice or Analytic Justice?” Social Science Quarterly 77:500-507. 1996

89. Mohai, Paul and Bunyan Bryant. “Environmental Racism: Reviewing the Evidence.” Pp. 163-176 in Race and the
Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time for Discourse, edited by Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai. Boulder,
CO: Westview. 1992

90. Morello-Frosch R, Pastor M, Porras C, Sadd J. 2002. “Environmental Justice and Regional Inequality in Southern
California: Implications for Future Research. Environmental Health Perspectives 110(2): 149-154.

91. Morello-Frosch R, Pastor M, Sadd L. 2002. "Integrating Environmental Justice and the Precautionary Principle in
Research and Policy Making: The Case of Ambient Air Toxics Exposures and Health Risks among Schoolchildren
in Los Angeles." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 584: 47-68.

92. Morello-Frosch R, Lopez R, “The Riskscape and the Color Line: Examining the Role of Segregation in
Environment Health Disparities.” US EPA, Environmental research 102.2 (2006 Oct): 181-96.

93. NAACP, "Environmental racism." Crisis v 98, n4 (April 1991): 14-17, 31-32.

94. Newton, DE, “Environmental Justice A Reference Handbook, Second Edition” ABC-CLIO, July 2009

95. Noe, Francis P. and Rob Snow, "Hispanic Cultural Influence on Environmental Concern." Journal of
Environmental Education 21 (2): 27-34. 1989

96. Ostheimer, John M. and Leonard G. Ritt. 1976. Environment, Energy, and Black Americans. Sage Research
Papers in the Social Sciences (Human Ecology subseries, no. 90- 025). Beverly Hills and London: Sage
Publications. p. 38.

97. Pastor, Manuel Jr. James L. Sadd and Rachel Morello-Frosch. 2004. “Waiting to Inhale: The Demographics of
Toxic Air Release Facilities in 21st Century California.” Social Science Quarterly 85: 420-440.

98. Pastor, M., J. Sadd, and J. Hipp.,” Which came first? Toxic facilities, minority move-in, and environmental justice”. Journal of
Urban Affairs 23 (1):1-21, 2001.

99. Perfecto, Ivette and Baldemar, Velasquez, "Farm workers: Among the Least Protected." EPA Journal 18 (1): 13-
14. 1992.

100.Pinderhughes, R. 1996. “The Impact of Race on Environmental Quality: An Empirical and Theoretical Discussion.”
Sociological Perspectives 39(2): 231-248.

101.Rechtschaffen, Clifford and Eileen Foster, “Environmental Justice: Law, Policy and Regulation,” Carolina
Academic Press, 2002

102.Rosen, Ruth. “Who gets polluted?” Dissent, v41, n2, Spring 1994: 223-230.

103.Russell, Dick. "Environmental Racism: Minority Communities and their Battle Against Toxic." Amicus Journal 11
(2): 22-32, Spring 1989.

104.Sadd, James L., Manuel Pastor Jr., J. Thomas Boer, and Lori D. Snyder. “Response to comments by William M.
Bowen.” Economic Development Quarterly, v13, n2, May 1999: 135-140.

105.Salkin, PE, “Environmental Justice and Land Use Planning and Zoning,”

106.Satchell, Mitchell, "A Whiff of Discrimination?" U.S. News & World Report 112 (17): 34-35. May 4,1992.

107.Schwartz, D, “Environmental Racism: Using Legal and Social Means to Achieve Environmental Justice, 12 J.
Envtl. L. & Litig. 409 (1997).

108.Sexton, K., Marcus, AA, Easter, KW, Burkhardy, TD, “Better Environmental Decisions: Strategies for
Governments, Business and Communities,” 475pp Wsahington, DC Island Press, 1999.

109.Sexton, K., and J.L. Adgate. “Looking at environmental justice from an environmental health perspective.”
Journal Expo Anal Environmental Epidemiology, v9, n1, January/February 1999: 3-8.

110.Sheppard E., H. Leitner, R.B. McMaster, and H. Tian. “GIS-based measures of environmental equity: exploring
their sensitivity and significance.” Journal Expo Anal Environmental Epidemiology, v9, n1, January/February
1999:18-28.
 111.Snow, Donald. “Inside the Environmental Movement: Meeting the Leadership Challenge.” Washington, DC: Island
Press. p. 213-214. 1992

112.Taylor, Dorceta E. 1989. "Blacks and the Environment: Towards an Explanation of the Concern and Action Gap
Between Blacks and Whites." Environment and Behavior 21 (2): 175-205.

113.Taylor, Dorceta E. 1992. "The Environmental Justice Movement: No Shortage of Environmental Volunteers."
EPA Journal 18 (1): 23-25.

114.United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Environmental Equity: Reducing Risk For All
Communities. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Planning and Evaluation.

115.Waller, L.A., T.A. Louis, and B.P. Carlin. “Environmental justice and statistical summaries of differences in
exposure distributions.” Journal Expo Anal Environmental Epidemiology, v9, n1, January/February 1999: 56-65.

116.Weinberg, Adam S. “The Environmental Justice Debate: A Commentary on Methodological Issues and Practical
Concerns.” Sociological Forum, v13, n1, March 1, 1998: 25-32.

117.Weinstock, Matthew P. “Tired of being dumped on.” Occupational Hazard, v56, n4, April 1994: 48-52.

118.Wernette, D.R., and L.A. Nieves. “Breathing Polluted Air.” EPA Journal, v18, March/April 1992: 16-17.

 
 
 
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Mental Health
Bibliography
1.2.2012

30 Citations
 

1.. Agin DP. 2010. “More than genes: what science can tell us about toxic chemicals, development, and the risk to
our children.” Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

2. "Air Pollution, Health Effects of." Encyclopedia of Energy. Oxford: Elsevier Science & Technology, 2004. Credo
Reference. 19 Mar. 2010. Web. 31 Mar. 2011.

3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington,
DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

4. Ashton J. 1994. “The Epidemiological imagination.” Buckingham; Philadelphia: Open University Press.

5. Barrett GW, Rosenberg R. 1981. “Stress effects on natural ecosystems.” Chichester; New York: Wwiley.

6. "Environmental Stress." Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. Oxford: Elsevier Science & Technology, 2004.
Credo Reference. 2 Sept. 2009. Web. 31 Mar. 2011

7. Evans GW. “The Interaction of Stressful Life Events and Chronic Strains on Community Mental Health.”
American Journal of Community Psychology. 15:1 (1987:Feb.) p.23.

8. Gallagher AG, Tierney K. 1996. “The Impact of the Environment of Physical and Mental Health”. The Irish
Journal of Psychology. 17:4: 361-372.

9. Ghadirian, Abdu’l- Missagh A, Lehmann HE. 1993. “Environment and psychopathology.” New York: Springer
Pub Co.

10. "Good Mental Health." The Hutchinson Unabridged Encyclopedia with Atlas and Weather Guide. Abington:
Helicon, 2010. Credo Reference. 4 Jan. 2011. Web. 31 Mar. 2011.

11. Gordon C, “Role of environmental stress in the physiological response to chemical toxins.” Environ Res 92:1-
7, 2003.

12. Greenberg MR, Schneider D. 1996. ”Environmentally devastated neighborhoods: perceptions, policies,
and realities.” New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.

13. Gurjar BR, Molina LT, Ojha CSP. 2010. “Air pollution: health and environmental impacts.” Boca
Raton, FL: CRC Press.

14. Guest AM, Hussey AG, JM, “The ecology of race and socioeconomic distress: infant and working age
Mortality in Chicago.” Demography 35:23-34, 1998.

15. Harris RG, Moore DP. 2009. “Indoor work and living environments: health, safety and performance.”
New York: Nova Science Publishers

16. "Health Care." World of Sociology, Gale. Farmington: Gale, 2001. Credo Reference. 20 Aug. 2004. Web.
31 Mar. 2011.

17. “Health and Environment Blog”. 2011. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal. 183:2.

18. Jacobs SV, “Air Pollution and Depressive Symptomatology: Exploratory Analyses of Intervening Psychosocial
Factors, Population and Environment,” 7:4 (1984:Winter) p.260.
19. McQuaid EL, “Latina mothers with symptoms of depression and children with persistent asthma.” Rhode
Island Hospital, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Ckinical Trails.Gov NCT01326182,
9-2011.

20. Miodovnik A. "Environmental Neurotoxicants and Developing Brain."Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 78.1
(2011): 58-77. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 31 Mar. 2011.

21. Paarlberg KM, Vingerhoets AJ, Passchier J, Dekker GA, Van Geijin HP, “Psychosocial factors and pregnancy
outcome: a revciew with emphasis on methodology issues.” J Psycosom Rews 39:563-595, 1995.

22. "Radiation, Risks and Health Impacts of." Encyclopedia of Energy. Oxford: Elsevier Science & Technology,
2004. Credo Reference. 19 Mar. 2010. Web. 31 Mar. 2011.

23. Rich-Edwards JW, Grizzard T, “Psychosocial stress and neuroendocrine mechanisms in preterm delivery.”
Am J Obster Gynecol 192: S30-S35, 2005.

24. Rotton J, “Psychological Costs of Air Pollution: Atmospheric Conditions, Seasonal Trends, and Psychiatric
Emergencies, Population and Environment,” 7:1 (1984:Spring) p.3.

25. Shankardass K, McConnell R, Jerrett M, Milam J, Richardson J, Berhane K. 2009. Parental stress increases
the effect of air pollution on childhood asthma incidence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12406–12411.

26. Sherry P, “The Health and Safety Effects of Accidents on Intermodal Transportation Workers: A Study of
Psychological Health Concerns and Depression of Operating Employees Involved in Critical Incidents.”
University of Denver May 2009.

27. “Social and environmental stressors in the home and childhood asthma”. 2010. Journal Of Epidemiology and
Community Health. 64:7: 636-642.

28. Stephens C. “The urban environment, poverty and health in developing countries”. Health Policy and
Planning, 10:2 (1995:June) p.109.

29. "Stress and Health." Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge UP,
2007. Credo Reference. 4 Dec. 2009. Web. 31 Mar. 2011.

30. Turner BS. 1995. “Medical power and social knowledge.” London; Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Noise
Bibliography
1.2.2014

61 Citations

1. Abel K, “Noise Pollution in the Classroom.“ Family Education.

2. Ando Y, “Effects of daily noise on fetuses and cerebral hemisphere speicialization in children.“ Journal of
Sound & Vibration, Dec.1988

3. Arnberg PW, Bennerhult O, et al. (1990). "Sleep disturbances caused by vibrations from heavy road traffic." "
J Acoust Soc Am 88(3): 1486-93. Also see abstract from: Griefahn, B. and M. Spreng (2004). "Disturbed
sleep patterns and limitation of noise." Noise Health 6(22): 27-33.

4. Attitudes to Noise From Aviation Sources in England, MVA Consultancy, October 2007.

5. Babisch W (2005). "Noise and Health." Environmental Health Perspectives 113(1): A14-5.

6. Babisch W, Beule B, et al. (2005). "Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infarction." Epidemiology 16(1): 33-40.

7. Berglund B, Lindvall T, Schwela DH, “Guidelines for Community Noise,” World Health Organization April,
1999.

8. Bronzaft A, (2003). “United States aviation transportation policies ignore health hazards of airport-related
noise.” World Transport Policy & Practice Vol 9, Number 1

9. Cohen S, Krantz DS, Evans GW, Stokols D, ”Cardiovascular and Behavioral Effects of Community Noise.”
American Scientist, , Vol.69,No.5 Sep.1981 pp528-535.

10. Cohen S, Evans GW, Krantz DS, Stokols D, ”Physiological, Motivational and Cognitive Effects of Aircraft
Noise on Children.” American Psychologist, March 1980, Vol.35, No. 3, 231-243.

11. De Jongh et al., 2003 R.F. De Jongh, K.C. Vissers, T.F. Meert, L.H. Booij, C.S. De Deyne and R.J. Heylen,
“Sustained sleep restriction reduces emotional and physical well-being. Pain, Volume 119, Issue 1-3, Pages
56-64.

12. Dugan E, “Children suffer in classrooms with poor acoustics.” The Independent.May2011.

13. Dunne DW, “New Standards Should Help Children in Noisy Classrooms.” Education World April 2000

14. Ehrlich G, “New classroom acoustic standard-ANSI S12.60-2002,” Wyle Laboratories, Oct. 2003

15. Evans GW, Hygge S, Bullinger M, “Chronic Noise and Psychological Stress.” American Psychological
Society: Vol.6, No.6 (Nov., 1995),pp333-338.

16. Federal Highway Administration (Apr 2000). “Highway Traffic Noise in the United States.”

17. Franssen E A, Van Wiechen CM, et al. (2004). "Aircraft noise around a large international airport and its
impact on
general health and medication use." Occupational Environmental Medicine 61(5): 405-13.
18. Gan, WQ, Davies HW, Koehoorn M, Brauer M, ”Association of Long-term exposure to community noise and
traffic related air pollution with coronary heart disease mortality.” Am J Epidmiol 2012 May 1;175(9):898-906.
Epub 2012
Apr 5.

19. Gukelberger D, “A new standard for Acoustics in the Classroom.” Engineers Newsletter, 2003, Vol. 32, No.1.

20. Haack M, Sanchez E, Mullington JM, “Elevated inflammatory markers in response to prolonged sleep
restriction are associated with increased pain experience in healthy volunteers.” Beth Isreal Deaconess
Medical Centre and Harvard Medical School, Boston. Sleep 2007;30(9):1145-52.

21. Haines MM, Stansfeld SA, Job RFS, Berglund B, Head J. (2001a). “Chronic aircraft noise exposure,, stress
responses mental health and cognitive performance in school children.” Psychological Medicine, 31, 265-277.

22. Haines MM, Stansfeld SA, Job RFS, Berglund B, Head J, (2001b). “A follow-up study of the effects of chronic
aircraft noise exposure on child stress responses and cognition.” International Journal of Epidemiology, 30,
839-845.

23. Haines MM, Brebtnall SL, Stansfield SA, Lineberg EK., ”Qualitative responses of children to environmental
noise.” Noise & Health 2003:5;19-30.

24. Haines MM, Stansfeld SA, Brentnall S, Head J, Berry B, Jiggins M, Hygge S, (2001). “West London Schools:
Study the effect of chronic aircraft noise exposure on child health.” Psychological Medicine, 31, 1385-1396.

25. Haines MM, Stansfield S A, et al. “Aircraft and road traffic noise and children's cognition and health: a cross-
national study.” The Lancet, Vol 365, June 4th, 2005.

26. Harbor Community Benefit Foundation, Landrum & Brown, “Noise Measurement Report # 1 – Wilmington
School & Residence Sound Attenuation Program.” September 2012, 46 pgs.

27. Harbor Community Benefit Foundation, Landrum & Brown, “Criteria & Prioritization Recommendations Report
# 2 - Wilmington School & Residence Sound Attenuation Program.” June 2013, 77 pgs.

28. Harbor Community Benefit Foundation, Landrum Brown, “Noise Contour Development Methodology Report #
3 - Wilmington School & Residence Sound Attenuation Program.“ December 2013, 25 pgs.

29. Harbor Community Benefit Foundation, Landrum & Brown, “Property Inventory & Mitigation
Recommendations Report # 4 - Wilmington School & Residence Sound Attenuation Program.” October 2013,
105 pgs.

30. Hygge S, “Classroom experiments on the effects of different noise sources and sound levels on long-term
recall and
recognition in children.” Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol.17, Issue 8, pp 895-914 Dec. 2003.

31. Integrated Working Group Letter to EPA; BTH; CARB re: “Impacts in Goods Movement Action Plan,” Feb 28,
2006.

32. Jakovljevic B, Paunovic K, Belojevic G, ”Road-traffic noise and factors influencing noise annoyance in an
urban population,” Environment International. 2009; 35(3): 552-556

33. Jarup L, Dudley ML, et al. (2005). "Hypertension and Exposure to Noise near Airports (HYENA): study design
and noise exposure assessment." Environmental Health Perspectives 113(11): 1473-8.

34. Kawada T, (2004). "The effect of noise on the health of children." J Nippon Medical School 71(1): 5-10.

35. Krähe D, “Why can low-frequency noise be extremely unpleasant?” Warum kann tieffrequenter Lärm
außergewöhnlich unangenehm sein?, Larmbekampfung. 2008; 3(2): 71-78

36. Landon P, Breysse P, et al. (2005). "Noise exposures of rail workers at a North American chemical facility."
American Journal Ind Medicine 47(4): 364-9.
37. Lercher P, Evans GW, Meis M, Kofler WW, “Ambient neighborhood noise and children’s mental health,”
Occupational Environmental Medicine, 2002:59:380-386.

38. Leventhall G, “Low frequency noise. What we know, what we do not know, and what we would like to know.”
Journal of Low Frequency Noise Vibration and Active Control. 2009; 28(2): 79-104

39. Lundquist P, Holmberg K, Landstrom U, ”Annoyance and effects on work from environmental noise at
school.” Noise & Health, Jan.2000., BVol. 2, Issue 8, pp39-46

40. Miedema HM, Oudshoorn CG, (2001). "Annoyance from Transportation Noise: Relationships with Exposure
Metrics DNL and DENL and Their Confidence Intervals." Environmental Health Perspectives 109(4): 409-416.

41. Miller NP, (2005). "Addressing the Noise from U.S. Transportation Systems, Measures and
Countermeasures." TR
News(240):4-16.

42. Nelson P, Kohnert K, Sabor S, ”Classroom Noise and Children Learning Through a Second
Language.”Schools, vol.36, 219-229, July 2005

43. Norlander T, Moas L, Archer T, ”Noise and Stress in Primary and Secondary School Children:Noise
Reduction and Increased Concentration Ability Through a Sort but Regular Exercise and Relaxation
Program.”WebofScienceVol.16, Issue 1, 2005, pp91-99.

44. Ollerhead JB et al. “Report of a field study of aircraft noise and sleep disturbance.” DFT for the UK
Department of Safety, Environment and Engineering, CAA, December 1992.

45. Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M, Dudarewicz A, Szymczak W, Sliwinska-Kowalska M, “Evaluation of annoyance

from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions,” Noise and Health. 2010; 12(48): 166-181.

46. Porter DN, Berry B F, Flindell IH, “Health Effect Based Noise Assessment Methods: A Review and Feasibility
Study. National Physical Laboratory,” NPL Report CMAM 16, Sept. 1998.

47. Prudence A, Allen C, Baker M,”Impact of Classroom Noise on Reading and Vocabulary Skills in Elementary
School-Aged Children.”147th ASSA Meeting, NY,NY May,2004.

48. Remington P J, Knight JS, et al. (2005). "A hybrid active/passive exhaust noise control system for
locomotives." J Acoust Soc Am 117(1): 68-78.

49. Sanz SA,“Road traffic noise around schools: a risk for pupil’s performance,“ Intl. Archives of Occupational &
Environmental Health, Vol.65, No.3, 2005-2007

50. Shield BM, Dockwell JE,“The effects of environment and classroom noise on the academic atttainment of
primary school children.“J Acoust Soc AM 2008 Jan:12391):133-44.

51. Shield BM, Dockwell JE,“The effects of noise on children at school:A review.“, Journal Building Acoustics,
2003, Vol.10(2):97-106.

52. Skanberg A, Ohrstrom E, (2002). "Adverse Health Effects in Relation to Urban Residential Soundscapes."
Journal of Sound and Vibration 250(1): 151-155.

53. Spreng M. “Noise induced nocturnal cortisol secretion and tolerable overhead flights.” Dept. Physiology,
University of Erlangen, Germany. Noise Health 2004;6(22):35-47.

54. Slater BR, “Effects of Noise on Pupil Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.59(4), Aug. 1968,
239-243.

55. Sohn E, “Background Noise Hurts Test Schools.” Discovery News Nov. 2011.

56. Standled SA, Berlund B, Clark C, Lopez-Barrio I, Fisher P, Ohrstrom E, Haines HH, Head J., Hygge S, Van
Kemp I, “Aircraft and road traffic noise and children’s cognition and health: a cross-national study.” The
Lancet, Vol. 365, 1942-49, June 2005.
57. Transportation Research Board, (2005) “Noise & Vibration Committee Conference.” Terminal 5 Rebuttal by
Professor Holland which included a critique by Dr. B. Berglund (see refs. 1, 2 and 3 above). Brigitta Berglund
is a joint author of the WHO Community Noise Report.

58. Transportation Research Board, “Transportation Noise: Measures and Countermeasures” TR NEWS Number
240, Sep-Oct 2005.

59. Van Kempen E, Fischer P, Janssen N, Houthuijs D, Van Kamp I, Stanfeld S, Cassee F, “Neurobehavioral
effects of exposure to traffic-related air pollution and transportation noise in primary school children.” Environ
Res 2012 May:115:18-25, Epub 2012 Apr 6.

60. Wilson Committee on the Problem of Noise, “Noise: Final Report,” Cmnd 2056, London, HMSO, 1963

61. Van Kempen EE, Van Kamp MM, Stellato L, Lopez-Barrio RK, Haines I, Nilsson MM, ”Children’s annoyance
reaction to aircraft and road noise.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2009;125(2):895-904.
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Public Health Care Costs

Bibliography

1.2.2012

65 Citations
 

1. Alberini, Anna and Alan Krupnick, 2000. “Cost-of-Illness and WTP Estimates of the Benefits of Improved Air
Quality: Evidence from Taiwan,” Land Economics 76(1), February 2000

2. Aunan, K et al., 1998. “Health and Environmental Benefits from Air Pollution Reductions in Hungary,” The
Science of the Total Environment, 212: 245-268.

3. American Lung Association of Oklahoma, “Dollars and Cents: The Economic and Health Benefits of Potential
Particulate Matter Reduction in the United States.” 7-12-1995.

4. Barnett, SB, Tursynbek, A, ”Costs of Asthma in the United States 2002-2007.” (2011): The Journal of Allergy
and Clinical Immuniology Immunology 127: 145-152.

5. Bernow, S, “Full Cost Economic Dispatch: Recognizing Environmental Externalities.”

6.. Brandt SJ, Perez L, Kunzli N, Lurmann F, McConnell R, “Costs of childhood asthma due to traffic-related
pollution in two California communities.” Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 363–370

7.. Burtraw, Dallas and Alan Krupnik, 1999.”Measuring the Value of Health Improvements from Great Lakes
Cleanup,” RFF, Discussion Paper 99-34 http://www.rff.org.

8.. Chen, Allen and Edward L. Vine, 1999, “A Scoping Study on the Costs of Indoor Air Quality Illnesses: An
Insurance Loss Reduction Perspective,” Environmental Science and Policy, 2, 457-464.

9..Cropper, Maureen, et al., 1997. “The Health Benefits of Air Pollution Control in Delhî,” American Journal of
Agricultural Economics, 79, 1625-1629.

10..Cropper, Maureen, et al., 1997. “Valuing Health Effects of Air Pollution in Developing Countries: The Case of
Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 34, 107-126.

11. Delucchi MA, Murphy JJ, McCubbin DR,”The health and Visibility Cost of Air Pollution: A Comparison of
Estimation Methods.” J Environ Manage 2002 Feb; 64(2):139-52.

12. Department of Health (1999), “Economic Appraisal of the Health Effects of Air Pollution, Ad-Hoc Group on
Economic Appraisal of the Health Effects of Air Pollution,” The Stationery Office, London.

13. Deschenes O, Greenstone Michael, Shapiro JS, “Defensive Investments and the Demand for Air Quality:
Evidence from the NOx Budget Program and Ozone Reductions.” MIT Department of Economics, July 2012.

14. Dixon, John A., “The Economic Valuation of Health Impactsî, World Bank Report.”
http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/environment/EEI.nsf/3dc00e2e4624023585256713005a1d4a/c2b8735dfad817
f085671c007d28a0/$FILE/HEALTH.pdf
15. DSS Management Consultants Inc, 2000. “Estimating Health and Economic Damages: Illness Costs of Air
Pollution.” Report submitted to Ontario Medical Association, July 26, 2000.
http://www.oma.org/phealth/report/techrep.pdf

16. Environmental Defense Fund, “Saving Lives and Reducing Health Care Costs: How Clean Air Rules Benefit
the Nation.” November 2011.

17. Gilliland FD, Berhane K, Rappaport EB, Thomas DC, Avol E, Gauderman WJ, et al. 2001. The effects of
ambient air pollution on school absenteeism due to respiratory illnesses. Epidemiology 12(1):43–54.

18. Graff-Zivin JS, Nediell MJ. “ The Impact of Pollution on Worker Productivity.’ National Bureau of Economic
Research, April 2011.

19. Grupp-Phelan J, Lozano P, Fishman P. Health care utilization and cost in children with asthma and selected
comorbidities. J Asthma 2001; 38: 363–373.

20. Hagnon, Nicolas (2007), “Unsafe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: Associated Health Impacts and the Costs
and Benefits of Policy Interventions at the Global Level.” background report for Costs of Policy Inaction,
forthcoming, 2008, OECD.

21. Hedley AJ, McGhee SM, Wong CH, Barron B, Chau P, Chau J, Thach TQ, Wong TW, Loh C, “Air Pollution:
Costs and Paths to a Solution.” Department of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, University of
Hong Kong. Institute for the Environment, University of Science & Technology, Department of Community and
Family Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Civic Exchange. June 2006.

22. Health Care Without Harm, The National Association of School Nurses, The Alliance of Nurses for Healthy
Environments, “The Economic Afflliction of Asthma and Risks of Blocking Air Pollution Standards.” April2001.

23. Janes H, Sheppard L, Lumley T. “Case-crossover analyses of air pollution exposure data: referent selection
strategies and their implications for bias.” Epidemiology. 2005;16:717–726. doi:
10.1097/01.ede.0000181315.18836.9d

24. Kattan M, Stearns S, Crain E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a homebased environmental intervention for inner-
city children with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 116: 1058–1063.

25. Künzli N, Schindler C. “A call for reporting the relevant exposure term in air pollution case-crossover
studies.” J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:527–530. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.027391.

26. Lamare, J, “Air Quality is a National Problem – Sacramento is a Prime Example.” Sierra Health Foundation 8-
15-2000.

27. Levy D, Lumley T, Sheppard L, Kaufman J, Checkoway H. “Referent selection in case-crossover analyses of
acute health effects of air pollution.” Epidemiology. 2001;12:186–192. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200103000-
00010

28. Levy, JI, Buonocore, JJ, Stackelberg, KV, “The Public Health Costs of Air Pollution from Traffic in U.S. Cities.”
Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health, May 2011, Environ Health 2010, 9:65

29. Li Y, Wang W, Kan H, et al. “Air Quality and outpatient visits for asthma in adults during the 2009 Summer
Olympic Games in Beijing.” Sci Total Environ2010: 408: 1226–1227.

30. Lin S, Luo M, Walker RJ, Liu X, Hwang SA, Chinery R, “Extreme high temperatures and hospital admissions
for respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.” Epidemiology 2009: 20(5): 738–746

31. Lvovsky, K., G. Hughes, D. Maddison, B. Ostro, D. Pearce. (2000). ”Environmental Costs of Fossil Fuel: A
rapid Assesment Method with Application to Six Cities.” Environment Department Paper No. 89.(World Bank,
Washington, DC.
32. Maclure M. The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute
events. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133:144–153

33. Matus K, Nam KM, Seklin NE, Lamsal LK, Reilly JM, Paltsev S, “Health damages from air pollution in China.”
Global Environmental Change 22 (2012) 55-66.

34. McCubbin, DR, Delucchi MA, 1999. “The Health Costs of Motor-VehicleRelated Air Pollutionî, Journal of
Transport Economics and Policy,” 33(3), 253-286.

35. McGhee SM, Yeung RYT, Wong LC, Chau J, Wong CM, Ho LM, Fielding R, “The health benefits of reduced
air pollution: value and trade-offs. Health Care and Promotion Fund.” Health, Welfare and Food Bureau, Hong
Kong SAR Government April 2005. Final report reference number 213018
http://hwfbgrants.netsoft.net/english/funded_search/funded_search.php

36. Moore K, Neugebauer R, Lurmann F, Hall J, Brajer V, Alcorn S, Tager I. “Ambient ozone concentrations
cause increased hospitalizations for asthma in children: an 18-year study in Southern California.” Environ
Health Perspect. 2008;116:1063–1070. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10497.

37. Muller, Nicolas. Z., and Robert Mendelsohn (2007), “Measuring the Damages of Air Pollution in the United
States.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 54, July.

38. Navrud, Stale, “THE COSTS OF INACTION WITH RESPECT TO HUMAN HEALTH IMPACTS FROM
POLLUTION.” Dept. of Economics and Resource Management Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 14 Ap.

39. NSW Department of Environment and Conservation, Australia, “Air Pollution Economics Health Costs of Air
Pollution in the Greater Sydney Metropolitan Region, November 2005.

40. O’Ryan R E, 1996, “Cost ñEffective Policies to Improve Urban Air Quality in Santiago,” Chile Journal of
Environmental Economics and Management, vol 31, Number 1996.

41. Ostro B, 1994, “Estimating the Health Effects of Air Pollutants: A Method with an Application to Jakarta,"
World Bank, Policy Research Department Working Paper, No. 1301.(http://econ.worldbank.org/resource.php)

42. Ostro BD, Tran H, Levy JI. 2006. The health benefits of reduced tropospheric ozone in California. J Air Waste
Manag Assoc 56(7):1007–1021.

43. Pearce, David, 1996. “Economic Valuation and Health Damage from Air Pollution in the Developing World.”
Energy Policy. 24(7): 627-630.

44. Pearce D, Maddison D, (1999), “Estimating the Health Damage Costs of Air Pollution', in Holgate, S., Koren
Pierce, D. and Maddison, D. (1999), ', H., Samet, J. and Maynard, R. (Eds), (Eds), Air Pollution and Health
Academic Press, , London, pp917-928.

45. Pervin T, Gerdtham UG, Lyttkens CH, “Societal costs of air pollution-related health hazards: A review of
methods and results.” Cost Eff Resour Alloc. September 2008; 6:19.

46. P, JA, Hackbarth A, Goldman DP, “The Impact of Air Quality on Hospital Spending.” Rand Health, Rand
Corporation, 2010.

47. Romley, JA, Hackbarth A, Goldman DP, “Impact of Air Quality on Hospital Spending.” Rand Corporation
2010.

48. Rosan A, 2001. “How to Measure Health Costs Induced by Air Pollution?” Schweizerische-Zeitschrift-fur
Volkswirtschaft-undStatistik/Swiss-Journal-of-Economics-and-Statistics, 137(1), 103-116.

49. Sangkapichai M, Saphores JD, Ogunseitan O, Ritchie S, You S, Lee G, “An Analysis of the health impacts
from PM and NOx emissions resulting from train operations in the Alameda Corridor, CA.” University of
California Transportation Center, University of Californa Berkeley, 3-1-2010.
50. Saroa da Motta, Ronaldo and Ana-Paula Fernades-Mendes, 1996. “Health Costs Associated with Air
Pollution in Brazil.” Peter M, edited Pricing the planet: Economic analysis for sustainable development. New
York: Columbia University, Press pp 101-122.

51. Scapecchi, Pascale (2007), “The Health Costs of Inaction with Respect to Air Pollution”, background report
for Costs of Policy Inaction, forthcoming, 2008, OECD.

52. Sommer H, Seethaler R, Chanel O, Herry M, Masson S, Vergnaud J Ch. “Economic Evaluation: Technical
Report on Economy. Health Costs due to Road Traffic-related Air Pollution: An impact assessment project of
Austria, France and Switzerland.” Bern: Federal Department of Environment, Transport, Energy and
Communications Bureau for Transport Stduies, June 1999.
http://www.euro.who.int/Document/Trt/Health_costs.pdf.

53. Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D: “Lost productive work time costs from health conditions in the
United States: results from the American Productivity Audit.” J Occup Environ Med 2003, 45:1234–1246.

54. Stieb DM, Szyszkowicz M, Rowe BH, Leech JA. “Air pollution and emergency department visits for cardiac
and respiratory conditions: a multi-city time-series analysis.” Environ Health.2009;8:25. doi: 10.1186/1476-
069X-8-25.

55. US EPA, “Final Regulatory Analysis: Control of Emissions from Nonroad Diesel Engines.” Office of
Transportation
and Air Quality, EPA420-R-04-007 May 2004

56. US EPA, “The benfits and costs of the clean Air Act from 1990-2020.” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Air and Radiation, March 2011.

57. Villeneuve PJ, Chen L, Rowe BH, Coates F. “Outdoor air pollution and emergency department visits for
asthma among children and adults: a case-crossover study in northern Alberta, Canada.” Environ
Health. 2007;6:40. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-6-40

58. Wang LY, Zhong Y, Wheeler L. 2005. Direct and indirect costs of asthma in school-age children [Abstract].
Prev Chronic Dis 2(1):A11.

59. Wang H, Wheeler D, 1996. “Pricing Industrial pollution control in China: An Econometric Analysis of the Levy
System”World Bank Policy Research Department Working Paper, No. 1644

60. Wan G J, Xu XP, Johnson TM, 1994, “Valuing the Health Effects of Air Pollution: Application to Industrial
Energy Efficiency Projects in Chinaî World Bank.”

61. Windham E, “The Economic Cost of Air Pollution in the U.S. & Florida.” http://www.flcv.com/cap.html

62. Wong CM, McGhee SM, Yeung RYT, Thach TQ, Wong TW, Hedley AJ. “Short term health impact and costs
due to road traffic-related air pollution. Final Report submitted to Environmental Protection Department. Hong
Kong Air Pollution and Health Joint Research Group, 2002.
http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/environmentinhk/air/studyrpts/files/ap_health_impact_02.pdf (accessed
20May2006)

63. World Bank (2007), “Costs of Pollution in China: Economic Estimates of Physical Damages.”
http://go.worldbank.org/FFCJVBTP40.

64. Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. Air pollution and emergency admissions in Boston, MA.” J Epidemiol Community
Health. 2006;60:890–895. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.039834

65. Zmirou DA, Balducci F, Boudet C, Dechenaux J,” Health effects costs of particulate air pollution.” J Occup
Environ Med. 1999 Oct;41(10):847-56.
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Public Health

Bibliography
 
10.1.2014

APPENDIX A:

Appendix A-1: Respiratory & Children’s Health Study

Appendix A-2: Traffic Proximity

Appendix A-3: Particulate Matter

Appendix A-4: Cardiovascular & Neurologic

Appendix A-5: Reproductive & Developmental

Appendix A-6: Cancer

Appendix A-7: Health Assessment & Monitoring     

 

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Note: 1. A-1 Throught A-6 Primary Public Health Studies Research Conducted By: USC Southern
California Environmental Health Sciences Center-Children’s Environmental Health Ctr.
2. A-7 Public Health Studies Research Conducted By: Coalition For A Safe
Environment
3. List is periodically updated by the Coalition For A Safe Environment
 Appendix A-1: Respiratory and Children’s Health Study

119 Citations

1… Al-Daghri, NM, Alokail, MS, Abd-Alrahman, SH, Draz, HM, Yakout, SM, Clerici, M, “Polycyclic aromatic
Hydrocarbon exposure and pediatric asthma in children: a case–control study.” Environmental Health 2013,
12:1.

2. Al-Daghri NM:” Serum polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons among children with and without asthma: correlation
to environmental and dietary factors.” Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2008, 21:211–217.

3. Amigou A, Sermage-Faure C, Orsi L, Leverger G, Baruchel A, Bertrand Y, Nelken B, Robert A, Michel G,

Margueritte G, Perel Y, Mechinaud F, Bordigoni P, Hemon D, Clavel J. “Road traffic and childhood leukemia:
the ESCALE study.” (SFCE) Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:566–572. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002429

4. Andersen ZJ, Loft S, Ketzel M, et al. Ambient air pollution triggers wheezing symptoms in infants. Thorax.
2008;63:710-716.

5. Ball TM, Castro-Rodriguez JA, Griffith KA, Holberg CJ, Martinez FD, Wright AL. 2000. “Siblings, day-care
attendance, and the risk of asthma and wheezing during childhood.” N Engl J Med 343:538–43.

6. Barck C, Lundahl J, et al. (2005). "Brief exposures to NO2 augment the allergic inflammation in asthmatics."
Environ Res 97(1): 58-66.

7. Barr DB, Wang RY, Needham LL. Biologic monitoring of exposure to environmental chemicals throughout the
life stages: requirements and issues for consideration for the National Children’s Study. Environ Health
Perspect 005;113:1083–91.

8. Borrego, M. Lopes, J. Valente, J. Santos, T. Nunes, H. Martins, A. I. Miranda & N. Neuparth, “Air pollution and
child respiratory diseases: the Viseu case study, Portugal.” WIT Transactions on Ecology and the
Environment, Vol 101, 2007 WIT Press.

9. Braun-Fahrländer C, Ackermann-Liebrich U, Schwartz J, Gnehm HP, Rutishauser M, Wanner HU. “Air

pollution and respiratory symptoms in preschool children.” Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Jan;145(1):42–47

10. Brunekreef B, Janssen NA, deHartog J, Harssema H, Knape M, van Vliet P. 1997. “Air pollution from truck
traffic and lung function in children living near motorways.” Epidemiology 8:298–303.

11. Castro-Rodriguez JA, Holberg CJ, Wright AL, Martinez FD. A clinical index to define risk of asthma in young
children with recurrent wheezing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:1403–1406.

12. Chay K.Y., and Greenstone M. Air Quality, Infant Mortality, and the Clean Air Act of 1970. National Bureau of
Economic Research Working Paper No. 10053, October 2003.

13. Ciccone G, Forastiere E, Agabiti N, Biggeri A, Bisanti L, Chellini E, et al. 1998. “Road traffic and adverse
respiratory effects in children.” SIDRIA Collaborative Group. Occup Environ Med 55:771-778.

14. Currie J, Neidell M, Schmieder JF. Air pollution and infant health: lessons from New Jersey. J Health Econ.
2009;28(3):688-703.

15. Dassen W, Brunekreef B, Hoek G, Hofschreuder P, Staatsen B, de Groot H, Schouten E, Biersteker K.

“Decline in children's pulmonary function during an air pollution episode.” J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1986
Nov;36(11):1223–1227

16. Delfino RJ, Quintana PJE, Floro J, et al. Association of FEV1 in asthmatic children with personal and
Microenvironmental exposure to airborne particulate matter. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:932–941.
17. Delfino RJ (2002). "Epidemiologic evidence for asthma and exposure to air toxics: linkages between
occupational, indoor, and community air pollution research." Environ Health Perspect 110 Suppl 4: 573-89.

18. Delfino RJ, Staimer N, Gillen D, et al. Personal and ambient air pollu tion is associated with increased
exhaled NO in children with asthma.Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1736 –1743.

19. Delfino RJ, Staimer N, Tjoa T, et al. Personal and ambient air pollution exposures and lung function
decrements in children with asthma. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:550 –555.

20. Delfino RJ, Chang J, Wu J, Ren C, Tjoa T, Nickerson B,Cooper C, Gillen DL, “Repeated hospital encounters
for asthma in children and exposure to traffic-related air pollution near the home.” Ann Allergy Asthma
Immunol. 2009;102:138–144.

21. Delfino RJ. Think globally, breath locally: why the worldwide health impact of air pollution on young children
begins in our neighborhoods. Thorax. 2006;61:184 –185.

22. Dey AN, Schiller JS, Tai DA. 2004. “Summary health statistics for US children: National Health Interview
Survey, 2002.” Vital Health Stat 10 (221)1–78.

23. Dockery DW, Ware JH, Ferris BG, Jr, Speizer FE, Cook NR, Herman SM. “Change in pulmonary function in
children associated with air pollution episodes.” J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1982 Sep;32(9):937–942

24. Dockery DW, Speizer FE, Stram DO, Ware JH, Spengler JD, Ferris BG Jr. 1989. “Effects of inhalable
particles on expiratory health of children.” Am Rev Respir Dis 139:587–94.

25. Dockery DW, Cunningham J, Damokosh AI, Neas LM, Spengler JD, Koutrakis P, Ware JH, Raizenne M,
Speizer FE. “Health effects of acid aerosols on North American children: respiratory symptoms.” Environ
Health Perspect. 1996 May;104(5):500–505.

26. Etzel RA. 2003. “How environmental exposures influence the development and exacerbation of asthma.”
Pediatrics 112(1 Pt 2):233–9.

27. Etzel RA, “Indoor Air Pollution and Childhood Asthma: Effective Environmental Interventions.” Health
Perspect. 1995;
103(Suppl 6): 55-58.

28. Evans D, Mellins R, Lobach K, Ramos-Bonoan C, Pinkett-Heller M, Wiessemann S, Klein I, Donahue C,

Burke D, Levison M, Levin B, Zimmerman B, Clark N. “Improving Care for Minority Children with Asthma:
Professional Education in Public Health Clinic.” Pediatrics. 99(2), 1997: 157-164.

29. Feychting M, Svensson D, Ahlbom A. “Exposure to motor vehicle exhaust and childhood cancer.” Scand J
Work Environ Health. 1998;24:8–11. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.272.

30. Gauderman WJ, McConnell R, et al. (2000). "Association between air pollution and lung function growth in
southern California children." Am J Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 162(4 Pt 1): 1383-90.

31. Gauderman WJ, Avol E, et al. (2004). "The effect of air pollution on lung development from 10 to 18 years of
age." New England Journal Medicine 351(11): 1057-67.

32. Gauderman WJ, Avol E, et al. (2005). "Childhood asthma and exposure to traffic and nitrogen dioxide."
Epidemiology 16(6): 737-43.

33. Gauderman W J, (2006). “Air Pollution and Children – An Unhealthy Mix.” New England Journal Medicine
355(1): 78-79.

34. Gilliland FD, Berhane K, et al. (2001). "The effects of ambient air pollution on school absenteeism due to
respiratory illnesses." Epidemiology 12(1): 43-54.
35. Gilliland FD, Berhane K, Islam T, McConnell R, Gauderman WJ, Gilliland SS, et al. 2003. Obesity and the risk
of newly diagnosed asthma in school-age children. Am J Epidemiol 158(5):406–415.

36. Hall JV, Brajer V, et al. (2003). "Economic valuation of ozone-related school absences in the South Coast Air
Basin of California." Contemporary Economic Policy 21: 407-417.

37. Henderson J, Granell R, Heron J, et al. Associations of wheezing phenotypes in the first 6 years of life with
atopy, lung function and airway responsiveness in mid-childhood. Thorax. 2008;63:974 –980.

38. Hoek G, Brunekreef B. “Effect of photochemical air pollution on acute respiratory symptoms in children.” Am J
Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jan;151(1):27–32.

39. Hoek G, Brunekreef B. “Acute effects of a winter air pollution episode on pulmonary function and respiratory
Symptoms of children.” Arch Environ Health. 1993 Sep-Oct;48(5):328–335.

40. Hoek G, Dockery DW, Pope A, Neas L, Roemer W, Brunekreef B. “Association between PM10 and
decrements in peak expiratory flow rates in children: reanalysis of data from five panel studies.” Eur Respir
J. 1998 Jun;11(6):1307–1311

41. Jedrychowski W, Galas A, Pac A, Flak E, Camman D, Rauh V, Perera F, “Prenatal ambient air exposure to
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and the occurrence of respiratory symptoms over the first year of life.” Eur J
Epidemiol 2005, 20:775–782.

42. Jerrett M, Shankardass K, Berhane K, Gauderman WJ, Künzli N, Avol E, et al. 2008. Traffic-related air
pollution and asthma onset in children: a prospective cohort study with individual exposure measurement.
Environ Health Perspect 116:1433–1438.

43. Johnson KG, Loftsgaarden DO, Gideon RA. “The effects of Mount St. Helens volcanic ash on the pulmonary
function of
120 elementary school children.” Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Dec;126(6):1066–1069

44. Juhn YJ, Sauver JS, Katusic S, Vargas D, Weaver A, Yunginger J. 2005. The influence of neighborhood
environment on the incidence of childhood asthma: a multilevel approach. Soc Sci Med 60(11):2453–2464.

45. Kalkbrenner AE, Daniels JL, Chen JC, Poole C, Emch M, Morrissey J. Perinatal exposure to hazardous air
pollutants and autism spectrum disorders at age 8. Epidemiology. 2010;21(5):631-641.

46. Kehrl HR, Peden DB, Ball B, Folinsbee LJ, Horstman D. 1999. Increased specific airway reactivity of persons
with mild allergic asthma after 7.6 hours of exposure to 0.16 ppm ozone. J Allergy Clin Immunol 104(6):1198–
1204.

47. Kim JJ; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Environmental Health. Ambient air pollution: health
hazards to children. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1699 –1707.

48. Knox EG. “Childhood cancers and atmospheric carcinogens.” J Epidemiol Community Health.2005;59:101–
105. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.021675.

49. Kramer U, Koch T, Ranft U, Ring J, Behrendt H. 2000. Traffic-related air pollution is associated with atopy in
children living in urban areas. Epidemiology 11(1):64–70.

50. Künzli, N., R. McConnell, et al. (2003). "Breathless in Los Angeles: the exhausting search for clean air." Am J
Public Health 93(9): 1494-9.

51. Langholz B, Ebi KL, Thomas DC, Peters JM, London SJ. “Traffic density and the risk of childhood leukemia in
a Los Angeles case-control study.” Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12:482–487. doi: 10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00317-9
52. Le TG, Ngo L, Mehta S. Do VD, Thach TQ, Vu XD, Nguyen DT, Cohen A, “Effects of short-term exposure to
air pollution on hospital admissions of young children for acute lower respiratory infections in Ho Chi Minh
City, Vietnam.” Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Jun;(169):5-72; discussion 73-83.

53. Lewis, T, “A Community-based Participatory Research (CBPR) Intervention for Childhood Asthma Using Air
Filters and Air Conditioners (CAAA).” Clinical Trials.Gov NCT00839046, University of Michigan, NIEHS, 8-
2011.

54. Lin S., Munsie J.P., Hwang S., Fitzgerald E., and Cayo M.R. Childhood asthma hospitalization and
residential exposure to state route traffic.Environ Res 2002: A(88): 73–81.

55. Lombardi E, Morgan WJ, Wright AL, Stein RT, Holberg CJ, Martinez FD. 1997. Cold air challenge at age
6 and subsequent incidence of asthma. A longitudinal study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156(6):1863–1869.

56. Magas OK, Gunter JT, Regens JL, “Ambient air pollution and daily pediatric hospitalizations for asthma.”
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2007 Jan;14(1):19-23.

57. Manchester-Neesvig JB, Schauer JJ, Cass GR. The distribution of particle-phase organic compounds in the
Atmosphere and their use for source apportionment during the Southern California Children’s Health Study.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2003;53:1065–79.

58. Martinez FD. 2003. “Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis and the pathogenesis of childhood asthma.”
Pediatr Infec Dis J 22(2 Suppl):76–82.

59. McCarthy MC, Ludwig JF, Brown SG, Vaughn D, Roberts PT, “Filtration Effectiveness of HVAC Systems at
Near
Roadway Schools.” Indoor Air, January 2013, doi: 10.1111/ina.12015.

60. McConnell R, Berhane K, Gilliland FD, London SJ, Vora H, Avol E. (1999) “Air Pollution and Bronchitic
Symptoms in Southern California Children with Asthma.” Environmental Health Perspectives 107(9):757-760

61. McConnell, R., K. Berhane, et al. (2002). "Asthma in exercising children exposed to ozone: a cohort study."
Lancet 359(9304): 386-91.

62. McConnel R, Talat Islam, Ketan Shankardass, Michael Jerrett, Fred Lurmann, Frank Gilliland, Jim
Gauderman, Ed Avol, Nino Künzli, Ling Yao, John Peters, and Kiros Berhane, “Childhood Incident Asthma
and Traffic-Related Air Pollution at Home and School.” Environ Health Perspect 118:1021–1026 (2010).

63. McConnell R, Berhane K, Gilliland F, Islam T, Gauderman WJ, London SJ, et al. 2002a. Indoor risk factors for
asthma in a prospective study of adolescents. Epidemiology 13(3):288–295.

64. McConnell R, Berhane K, et al. (2003). "Prospective Study of Air Pollution and Bronchitic Symptoms in
Children with Asthma." American Journal Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 168(7): 790-797.

65. McConnell R, et al. (2006). “Traffic, Susceptibility, and Childhood Asthma.” Environmental Health
Perspectives 114(5): 766–772.

66. Migliaretti G, Cavallo F. 2004. Urban air pollution and asthma in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 38(3):198–203.

67. Morgenstern V, Zutavern A, Cyrys J, Brockow I, Koletzko S, Kramer U, Behrendt H, Herbarth O, von Berg A,
Bauer CP, Wichmann HE, Heinrich J, “Atopic diseases, allergic sensitization, and exposure to trafficrelated air
pollution in children.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008, 177:1331–1337.

68. Natural Resources Defense Council. 2001. “No breathing in the aisles: diesel exhaust inside school buses.”
San Francisco, CA: National Resources Defense Council.
69. Nordling E, Berglind N, Melen E, Emenius G, Hallberg J, Nyberg F, et al. 2008. Traffic-related air pollution and
childhood respiratory symptoms, function and allergies. Epidemiology 19(3):401–408.

70. Oftedal B, Brunekreef B, Nystad W, et al. Residential outdoor air pollution and lung function in schoolchildren.
Epidemiology. 2008;19:129–137.

71. Pandya RJ, G. Solomon, et al. (2002). "Diesel exhaust and asthma: hypotheses and molecular mechanisms
of action." Environ Health Perspectives 110 Suppl 1: 103-12.

72. Peat JK, Salome CM, Toelle BG, Bauman A, Woolcock AJ. 1992. Reliability of a respiratory history
questionnaire and effect of mode of administration on classification of asthma in children. Chest 102(1):
153–157.

73. Peden DB, (2002). "Pollutants and asthma: role of air toxics." Environ Health Perspectives 110 Suppl 4:
565-8.

74. Pietropaoli, A. P., M. W. Frampton, et al. (2004). "Pulmonary function, diffusing capacity, and inflammation in
Healthy and asthmatic subjects exposed to ultrafine particles." Inhalation Toxicol 16 Suppl 1: 59-72.

75. Pekkanen J, Timonen KL, Ruuskanen J, Reponen A, Mirme A, “Effects of ultrafine and fine particles in urban
air on peak expiratory flow among children with asthmatic symptoms.” Environ Res. 1997;74(1):24-33.

76. Perera FP, Rauh V, Tsai WY, Kinney P, Camann D, Barr D, Bernert T, Garfinkel R, Tu YH, Diaz D, Dietrich J,
Whyatt RM: “Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental pollutants on birth outcomes in a multiethnic
population.” Environ Health Perspect 2003, 111:201–205.

77. Perera FP, Tang D, Wang S, Vishnevetsky J, Zhang B, Diaz D, Camann D, Rauh V, ”Prental Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Exposure and Child Behavior at Age 6-7.” Environmental Health
Perspectives, March 2012. doi:10.1289/ehp.1104315.

78. Peters A, Dockery DW, Heinrich J, Wichmann HE. Short-term effects of particulate air pollution on respiratory
morbidity in asthmatic children. Eur Respir J. 1997 Apr;10(4):872–879

79. Prescott SL, Macubus C, Holt BJ, Sly PD, Holt PG, “Development of allergen specific cell memopry in atopic
and normal children.” Lancet 1999;353:196-200.

80. Raaschou-Nielsen O, Hertel O, Thomsen BL, Olsen JH. “Air pollution from traffic at the residence of children
with cancer.” Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:433–443. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.5.433.

81. Rand, Cynthia, “Reducing Asthma Morbidity in High Risk Minority Preschool Children.” New study. Johns
Hopkins University, Clinical trial.Gov. NCT01519453, 1-2012.

82. Ransom MR, Pope CA., “3rd Elementary school absences and PM10 pollution in Utah Valley.” Environ
Res. 1992 Aug;58(2):204–219

83. Reynolds P, Behren J, Gunier RB, Goldberg DE, Hertz A. “Residential exposure to traffic in California and
childhood cancer.” Epidemiology. 2004;15:6–12. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000101749.28283.de.

84. Rolfsjord, LB, “Air Cleaners for Children and Adolescents With Asthma and Dog Allergy.” Sykehuset Innlandet
HF, Incen AG, Norway, Clinical Trails.Gov, NCT 00220753, 7-2009.

85. Roemer W, Hoek G, Brunekreef B. “Effect of ambient winter air pollution on respiratory health of children with
Chronic respiratory symptoms.” Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Jan;147(1):118–124.

86. Roemer W, Hoek G, Brunekreef B, Haluszka J, Kalandidi A, Pekkanen J.” Daily variations in air pollution and
 Respiratory health in a multicentre study: the PEACE project. Pollution Effects on Asthmatic Children in
Europe.” Eur Respir J. 1998 Dec;12(6):1354–1361.

87. Romieu I, Meneses F, Ruiz S, Sienra JJ, Huerta J, White MC, Etzel RA. Effects of air pollution on the
respiratory health of asthmatic children living in Mexico City. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Aug;154(2 Pt
1):300–307

88. Ronmark E, Jonsson E, Platts-Mills T, Lundback B. 2001. Incidence and remission of asthma in
schoolchildren: report from the obstructive lung disease in northern Sweden studies. Pediatrics 107(3):e37.

89. Savitz DA, Feingold L. “Association of childhood cancer with residential traffic density.” Scand J Work Environ
Health. 1989;15:360–363. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1848

90. Schwartz J, Dockery DW, Neas LM, Wypij D, Ware JH, Spengler JD, Koutrakis P, Speizer FE, Ferris BG., Jr ,
“Acute effects of summer air pollution on respiratory symptom reporting in children.” Am J Respir Crit Care
Med. 1994 Nov;150(5 Pt 1):1234–1242.

91. Schwartz J, Neas LM. 2000. “Fine particles are more strongly associated than coarse particles with acute
respiratory health effects in school children.” Epidemiology 11:6–10.

92. Selevan SG, Kimmel CA, Mendola P. Identifying critical windows of exposure for children’s health. Environ
Health Perspect 2000;108(Suppl 3):451–5.

93. Shima M, Nitta Y, Ando M, Adachi M. 2002. Effects of air pollution on the prevalence and incidence of asthma
In children. Arch Environ Health 57(6):529–535.

94. Shima M, Adachi M. 2000. “Effect of outdoor and indoor nitrogen dioxide on respiratory symptoms in
schoolchildren.” Int J Epidemiol 29:862–70.

95. Sidora-Arcoleo, Kimberly, “Asthma Disparities in Latino Children: Acculturation, Illness Representations &
CAM.” Arizona State University, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Scottsdale Healthcare, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University,
NY, Clinical Trials.gov NCT 0199800 6-22-2011.

96. Spektor DM, Thurston GD, Mao J, He D, Hayes C, Lippmann M. 1991. “Effects of single- and multiday ozone
exposures on respiratory function in active normal children.” Environ Res 55:107–22.

97. Steffen C, Auclerc MF, Auvrignon A, Baruchel A, Kebaili K, Lambilliotte A, Leverger G, Sommelet D, Vilmer E,
Hemon D, Clavel J. “Acute childhood leukaemia and environmental exposure to potential sources of benzene
and other hydrocarbons: a case-control study.” Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:773–778. doi:
10.1136/oem.2003.010868

98. Stelmach, Iwona, “Valuation of quality of Life in Children with Asthma.” Medical University of Lodz, Poland,
Ministry of Health, Clinical Trials.Gov NCT00491101, 9-10-2010.

99. Stern DA, Morgan WJ, Halonen M, Wright AL, Martinez FD. Wheezing and bronchial hyper-responsiveness in
Early childhood as predictors of newly diagnosed asthma in early adulthood: a longitudinal birth-cohort study.
Lancet. 2008;372:1058 –1064.

100. Tager, IB, “Effect of Air Pollution on Long Term Asthma Severity and Lung Function in Children (FACES)-
Fresno Asthmatic Children’s Environmental Study.” National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Mickey Leland
National Urban Air Toxics Research Center, Clinical Trials.Gov NCT 00336050, 2-2009.

101. Timonen KL, Pekkanen J. “Air pollution and respiratory health among children with asthmatic or cough
symptoms.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;156(2 Pt 1):546–552.

102. Talbert PE, Mulholland JA, MacIntosh DL, Xu F, Daniels D, Devine OJ, et al. 2000. “Air quality and pediatric
 emergency room visits for asthma in Atlanta, Georgia, USA.” Am J Epidemiol 151(8):798–810.

103. University of Southern California - Health Science News. (2005). "Air Pollution Found to Pose Greater
Danger to Health than Earlier Thought."

104. University of Southern California - Health Science News. (2005). "Researchers Link Childhood Asthma to
Exposure to Traffic-related Pollution."

105. Vedal S, Petkau J, White R, Blair J. “Acute effects of ambient inhalable particles in asthmatic and
nonasthmatic children.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Apr;157(4 Pt 1):1034–1043

106. Vedal S, Schenker MB, Munoz A, Samet JM, Batterman S, Speizer FE. “Daily air pollution effects on
children's Respiratory symptoms and peak expiratory flow.” Am J Public Health. 1987 Jun;77(6):694–698.

107. Vyskocil A, Fiala Z, Chenier VV, Krajak L, Ettlerova E, Bukac J, Viau C, Emminger S: “Assessment of
multipathway exposure of small children to PAH.” Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2000, 8:111–118.

108. Ware JH, Ferris BG Jr, Dockery DW, Spengler JD, Stram DO, Speizer FE. 1986. “Effects of ambient sulfur
oxides and suspended particles on respiratory health of preadolescent children.” Am Rev Respir Dis
133:834–42.

109. Weiland SK, Husing A, Strachan DP, Rzehak P, Pearce N. 2004. Climate and the prevalence of symptoms
of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic eczema in children. Occup Environ Med 61(7):609–615.

110. Weiland SK, Mundt KA, Ruckmann A, Keil U. 1994. Self-reported wheezing and allergic rhinitis in children
and traffic Density on street of residence. Ann Epidemiol 4:243–247.

111. Weiss KB, Wagener DK,”Changing Patterns of Asthma Mortality: Identifying Target Populations at High
Risk.” JAMA. 264(13), 1990: 1683-1687.

112. Weitzman M, Gortmaker SL, Sobol AM, Perrin M, ”Recent Trends in the Prevalence and Severity of
Childhood Asthma.” JAMA. 1992, 268: 267-271.

113. Whitworth KW, Symanski E, Coker AL. “Childhood lymphohematopoietic cancer incidence and hazardous
air pollutants in southeast Texas, 1995–2004.” Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:1576–1580. doi:
10.1289/ehp.11593

114. Wilkinson P, Elliott P, Grundy C, Shaddick G, Thakrar B, Walls P, et al. 1999. Case-control study of hospital
admission with asthma in children aged 5–14 years: relation with road traffic in north west London. Thorax
54:1070–1074.

115. Assow LS, Gittelsohn AM, Szklo M, Starfield B, Mussman M. 1988. Poverty, race, and hospitalization for
Childhood asthma. Am J Public Health 78(7):777–782.

116. Wjst M, Reitmeir P, Dold S, Wulff A, Nicolai T, von Loeffelholz-Colberg EF, et al. 1993. Road traffic and
adverse effects On respiratory health in children. BMJ 307(6904):596–600.

117. World Health Organization 1999, “Air Quality Guidelines,” http://www.who.int/environmental

information/Air/Guidelines

118. WHO. “Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide.” Global
update 2005. Summary of risk assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.

119. Zmirou D, Gauvin S, Pin I, Momas I, Sahraoui F, Just J, et al. 2004. Traffic related air pollution and
incidence of Childhood asthma: results of the vesta case-control study. J Epidemiol Community Health
58(1):18–23.
 Appendix A-2: Traffic Proximity

118 Citations

1..Adar SD, Kaufman JD. 2007. Cardiovascular disease and air pollutants: evaluating and improving
epidemiological data implicating traffic exposure. Inhal Toxicol 19(suppl 1):135–149..

2. Appatova AS, Ryan PH, Lemasters GK, Gruinshpun SA. 2008. Proximal exposure of public schools and
students to major roadways: a nationwide US survey. J Environ Plann Manage 51:631–646.

3. Baldauf R, Thoma E, Hays M, Shores R, Kinsey J, Gullett B, Kimbrough S, Isakov V, Long T, Snow R, Khlystov
A, Weinstein J, Chen FL, Seila R, Olson D, Gilmour I, Cho SH, Watkins N, Rowley P, Bang J. “Traffic and
meteorological impacts on near-road air quality: summary of methods and trends from the Raleigh near-road
study.” J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008;58:865–878. Doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.58.7.865

4. Batterman SA, Zhang K, and Kononowech R. 2010. “Prediction and analysis of near-road concentrations
using a reduced-form emission/dispersion model.” Environ Health 9, 29.

5. Benson P. 1989. Caline4—A Dispersion Model for Predicting Air Pollution Concentration Near Roadways.
Sacramento:California Department of Transportation, Office of Transportation Laboratory.

6. Brauer M, Lencar C, Tamburic L, Koehoorn M, Demers P, and Karr C. 2008. “A cohort study of traffic-related
air pollution impacts on birth outcomes.” Environ Health Perspect 116, 680-686

7. Brauer M, Hoek G, Smit HA, de Jongste JC, Gerritsen J, Postma DS, et al. 2007. Air pollution and
development of asthma, allergy and infections in a birth cohort. Eur Respir J 29(5):879–888.

8. Brauer M, Hoek G, et al. (2002). “Air pollution from traffic and the development of respiratory infections and
asthmatic and allergic symptoms in children.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166(8): 1092-8.

9. Briggs DJ, de Hoogh C, Gulliver J, Wills J, Elliott P, Kingham S, et al. 2000. “A regression based method for
mapping traffic-related air pollution: application and testing in four contrasting urban environments.” Sci Total
Environ 253, 151-167.

10. Broder I, Higgins MW, Mathews KP, Keller JP. 1974. Epidemiology of asthma and allergic rhinitis in a total
community, Tecumseh, Michigan. IV. Natural history. J Allergy Clin Immunol 54(2):100–110.

11. Brugge D, Durant JL, Rioux C. (2007) “Near highway pollutants in motor vehicle exhaust: A review of
epidemiologic evidence of cardiac and pulmonary health risks.” Environmental health 2007,6:23

12. Brunekreef B, Janssen NA, de Hartog J, Harssema H, Knape M, van Vliet P. 1997. “Air pollution from truck
traffic and lung function in children living near motorways.” Epidemiology 8:298-303.

13. Brunkreef, B. and J. Sunyer (2003). “Asthma, rhinitis and air pollution: is traffic to blame?” Eur Respir J 21(6):
913-5.

14. Brunekreef B, Beelen R, Hoek G, Schouten L, Bausch-Goldohm S, Fischer P, Armstrong B, Hughes E, Jerrett
M, Van Den Brandt P, “Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and
cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.” Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar;(139):5-
71; discussion 73-89.

15. Burr ML. 1992. Diagnosing asthma by questionnaire in epidemiological surveys. Clin Exp Allergy 22(5):
509–510.

16. Castro-Giner F, Kunzli N, Jacquemin B, Forsberg B, de Cid R, Sunyer J, et al, “Traffic-related air pollution,
Oxidative stress genes, and asthma (echrs).” Environmental health perspectives 117:1919-1924, 2009.
17. Chang J, Delfino RJ, Gillen D, Tjoa T, Nickerson B, Cooper D. Repeated respiratory hospital encounters
among children with asthma and residential proximity to traffic. Occup Environ Med.

18. Ciccone G, Forastiere E, Agabiti N, Biggeri A, Bisanti L, Chellini E, et al. 1998. “Road traffic and adverse
respiratory effects in children.” SIDRIA Collaborative Group. Occup Environ Med 55:771-778.

19. Clougherty JE, Wright RJ, Baxter LK, and Levy JI. 2008. “Land use regression modeling of intra-urban
residential
variability in multiple traffic-related air pollutants.” Environ Health 7, 17.

20. Clougherty JE, Levy JI, Kubzansky LD, et al. Synergistic effects of traffic-related air pollution and exposure to
violence on urban asthma etiology. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1140 –1146.

21. Crosignani P, Tittarelli A, Borgini A, Codazzi T, Rovelli A, Porro E, Contiero P, Bianchi N, Tagliabue G, Fissi
R, Rossitto F.,
”Childhood leukemia and road traffic: A population-based case-control study.” Int J Cancer. 2004 Feb
10:108(4):596-9.

22. Crouse DL, Goldberg MS, Ross NA, Chen H, LaLbreche F, ”Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Is Associated
with Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution in Montreal, Canada: A Case-Control Study.” Environ Health
Perspect, 2010; 118:1578-1583, Epub Oct 6.

23. Cyrys J, Heinrich J, et al. (2003). “Comparison between different traffic-related particle indicators: elemental
carbon (EC), PM2.5 mass, and absorbance.” J Expo Anal Environmental Epidemiology 13(2): 134-43.

24. Davis ME, Smith TJ, Laden F, Hart JE, Blicharz AP, Reaser P, Garshick E, “Driver exposure to combustion
particles in the U.S. Trucking industry.” J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007;4(11):848–854

25. De Kok TMCM, Driece HAL, Hogervorst JGF, Briede JJ, 2006. Toxicological assessment of ambient and
traffic-related particulate matter: a review of recent studies. Mutat Res 613(2-3):103–122.

26. Delfino RJ, Chang J, Wu J, Ren C, Tjoa T, Nickerson B,Cooper C, Gillen DL, “Repeated hospital encounters
for asthma in children and exposure to traffic-related air pollution near the home.” Ann Allergy Asthma
Immunol. 2009;102:138–144.

27. Delfino RJ. 2002. Epidemiologic evidence for asthma and exposure to air toxics: Linkages between
occupational, indoor, and community air pollution research. Environ Health Perspect 110(suppl 4):573–589.

28. Donaldson K, Gilmour MI, MacNee W. 2000. “Asthma and PM10.” Respir Res 1(1):12–5.

29. Duhme H, Weiland SK, Keil U, Kraemer B, Schmid M, Stender M, et al. 1996. “The association between self-
reported symptoms of asthma and allergic rhinitis and self-reported traffic density on street of residence in
adolescents.” Epidemiology 7:578-582.

30. Edwards J, Waiters S, Griffiths RK. 1994. “Hospital admissions for asthma in preschool children: relationship
to major roads in Birmingham.” United Kingdom. Arch Environ Health 49:223-227.

31. English P, Neutra R, Scalf R, Sullivan M, Waller L, Zhu k. 1999. “Examining associations between childhood
asthma and traffic flow using a geographic information system.” Environ Health Perspect 107:701-767.

32. Environmental Protection Agency (2004). “Study of Health Effects of Toxic Air Pollutants on Asthmatic
Children in Huntington Park.”

33. Gan WQ, Davies HW, Koehoorn M, Brauer M,”Association of Long-term exposure to community noise and
traffic related air pollution with coronary heart disease mortality.” Am J Epidmiol 2012 May 1;175(9):898-906.
Epub 2012
Apr 5.
34. Gauderman WJ, Avol E, Lurmann F, Kuenzli N, Gilliland F, Peters J, McConnell R, “Childhood Asthma and
Exposure to Traffic and Nitrogen Dioxide.” Epidemiology 2005;16: 737-743)

35. Gauderman, W.J. et al. (2007) “Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from 10 to 18years of age: a
cohort study.” Lancet 369(9561):571-7.

36. Gehring U, Cyrys J, Sedlmeir G, Brunekreef B, Bellander T, Fischer P, et al. 2002. Traffic-related air pollution
and respiratory health during the first 2 yrs of life. Eur Respir J 19(4):690–698.

37. Gehring U, Wijga AH, Brauer M, Fischer P, de Jongste JC, Kerkhof M, et al. 2009. Traffic-related air pollution
and the development of asthma and allergies during the first 8 years of life. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
181(6):596–603.

38. Gilbert NL, Woodhouse S, Stieb DM, Brook JR. 2003. Ambient nitrogen dioxide and distance from a major
highway. Sci Total Environ 312(1–3):43–46.

39. Gilliland FL, Saxon A; Diaz-Sanchez D; (2004). “Effect of glutathione-S-transferase M1 and P1 genotypes on
xenobiotic enhancement of allergic responses: 11ancer11zed, placebo-controlled crossover study.” Lancet
363:119.

40. Green RS, Smorodinsky S, et al. (2004). “Proximity of California public schools to busy roads.” Environmental
Health Perspectives 112(1): 61-6.

41. Guo YL, Lin YC, Sung FC, Huang SL, Ko YC, Lai JS, et al. 1999.”Climate, traffic-related air pollutants, and
asthma prevalence in middle-school children in Taiwan.” Environ Health Perspect 107:1001-1006.

42. Gunier RB, Hertz A, Von Behren J, Reynolds P. 2003 “Traffic density in California: socioeconomic and ethnic
differences among potentially exposed children.” J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 13:240-246.

43. Hitchins J, Morawsaka L, Wolff R, Gilbert D. 2000, “Concentrations of submicrometre particles from vehicle
emissions near a major road.”Atmos Environ 34:51-59.

44. Heck JE, Wu J, Meyers TJ, Wilhelm M, Cockburn M, Ritz , B, “Childhood cancer and traffic-related air
pollution exposure in pregnancy and early life.” American Association for Cancer Research, April 6-10, 2013
Abstract No. 2531

45. Heinrich J, Wichmann HE. 2004. Traffic related pollutants in Europe and their effect on allergic disease.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 4(5):341–348.

46. Hitchins J, Morawska L, Wolff R, Gilbert D. 2000. Concentrations of submicrometre particles from vehicle
emissions near a major road. Atmos Environ 34(1):51–59.

47. Hoek G, Beelen R, de Hoogh K, Vienneau D, Gulliver J, Fischer P, et al. 2008. A review of land-use
regression models to assess spatial variation of outdoor air pollution. Atmos Environ 42(33):7561–7578.

48. Jerret M, Shankardass K, Berhane K, Gauderman WJ, Künzli N, Avol E, Gilliland F, Lurmann F, Molitor JN,
Molitor JT, Thomas DC, Peters J, McConnell R, “Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Asthma Onset in Children:A
Prospective Cohort Study with Individual Exposure Measurement.” Environ Health Perspect 116:1433–1438
(2008).

49. Kim JJ, Huen K, Adams S, Smorodinsky S, Hoats A, Malig B, et al. 2008. Residential traffic and children’s
Respiratory health. Environ Health Perspect 116:1274–1279.

50. Kim S, Shen S, Sioutas C. 2002. Size distribution and diurnal and seasonal trends of ultrafine particles in
source and receptor sites of the Los Angeles basin. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 52(3):297–307.

51. Kim JJ, Smorodinsky S, Lipsett M, Singer BC, Hodgson AT, Ostro B. 2004. Traffic-related air pollution near
busy roads: the East Bay Children’s Respiratory Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 170(5):520–526.
52. Kramer U, Koch T, Ranft U, Ring J, Behrendt H. 2000. Traffic-related air pollution is associated with atopy in
children living in urban areas. Epidemiology 11(1):64–70.

53. Langholz B, Ebi KL, Thomas DC, Peters JM, London SJ, “Traffic density and the risk of childhood leukemia in
a Los Angeles case-control study.” Ann Epidemiol 12:482-487, 2002.

54. Lee YL, Shaw CK, et al. (2003). “Climate, traffic-related air pollutants and allergic rhinitis prevalence in
middle-school children in Taiwan.” Eur Respir J 21(6): 964-70.

55. Leikauf GD, Kline S, Albert RE, Baxter CS, Bernstein DI, Buncher CR. 1995. “Evaluation of a possible
association of urban air toxics and asthma.” Environ Health Perspect 103(Suppl 6):253–71.

56. Livingstone AE, Shaddick G, Grundy C, Elliott P. 1996. Do people living near inner city main roads have more
asthma needing treatment? Case control study. BMJ 312(7032):676–677.

57. McConnel R, Talat Islam, Ketan Shankardass, Michael Jerrett, Fred Lurmann, Frank Gilliland, Jim
Gauderman, Ed Avol, Nino Künzli, Ling Yao, John Peters, and Kiros Berhane, “ Childhood Incident Asthma
and Traffic-Related Air Pollution at Home and School.” Environ Health Perspect 118:1021–1026 (2010)

58. McConnell, R, Berhane, K, Yao, L, Jerrett M, Lurmann, F, Gilliland, F, Kunzli, N, Gauderman, J, Avol, E,
Thomas, D and Peters J, “Traffic, Susceptibility and Childhood Asthma,” Environmental Health Perspectives,
Volume 114, Number 5, May 2006.

59. McCreanor J, Cullinan P, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Stewart-Evans J, Malliarou E, Jarup L, et al, “Respiratory effects
of exposure to diesel traffic in persons with asthma.” N Engl J Med 357:2348-2358, 2007.

60. McDonald E, Cook D, Newman T, Griffith L, Cox G, Guyatt G. 2002. “Effect of air filtration systems on
asthma: a systematic review of randomized trials.” Chest 122(5):1535–42.

61. Morgan, TE, et al, ”Air Pollutants from Automotive Traffic Act on Glutamatergic Neurons.” Environmental
Health
Perspectives, July 2011, 1003-1009. Doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002973.

62. Morgenstern V, Zutavern A, Cyrys J, Brockow I, Koletzko S, Kramer U, et al. 2008. Atopic diseases, allergic
sensitization, and exposure to traffic-related air pollution in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
177(12):1331–1337.

63. Natural Resources Defense Council. 2001. “No breathing in the aisles: diesel exhaust inside school buses.”
San Francisco, CA: National Resources Defense Council.

64. Nel AE, Diaz-Sanchez D, Ng D, Hiura T, Saxon A, “Enhancement of allergic inflammation by the interaction
between diesel exhaust particles and the immune system.” J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998, 102:539–554.

65. Nel AE, Diaz-Sanchez D, Li N. The role of particulate pollutants in pulmonary inflammation and asthma:
evidence for the involvement of organic chemicals and oxidative stress. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2001;7:20–26.

66. Nicolai T, Carr D, et al. (2003). “Urban traffic and pollutant exposure related to respiratory outcomes and
atopy in a large sample of children.” Eur Respir J 21(6): 956-63.

67. Nielsen, OR, Hertel, O, Thomsen, BL, Olsen, JH, “Air Pollution from Traffic at the Residence of Chidlren with
12ancer.” Am
Joun of Epid. Vol. 153, Issue 5, 433-443.March 8, 2000.

68. Nitta H, Sato T, Nakai S, Maeda K, Aoki S, Ono M. 1993. Respiratory health associated with exposure to
Automobile exhaust. I. Results of cross-sectional studies in 1979, 1982, and 1983. Arch Environ Health
48(1):53–58.

69. Nordling E, Berglind N, Melen E, Emenius G, Hallberg J, Nyberg F, et al. 2008. Traffic-related air pollution and
 Childhood respiratory symptoms, function and allergies. Epidemiology 19(3):401–408.

70. Ntziachristos L, Ning Z, Geller MD, Sioutas C. Particle concentration and characteristics near a major freeway
wWith heavy-duty diesel traffic. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41(7):2223-2230.

71. Oosterlee A, Drijver M, Lebret E, Brunekreef B. 1996. Chronic respiratory symptoms in children and adults
living along streets with high traffic density.” Occup Environ Med 53(4):241–247

72. Panko, Julie M.; Chu, Jennifer; Kreider, Marisa L.; Unice, Ken M., “Measurement of Airborne Concentrations
of Tire and Road Wear Particles in Urban and Rural Areas of France, Japan and the United States.”
Atmospheric Environment, June 2013, Vol. 72.

73. Patel MM, Quinn JW, Jung KH, Hoepner L, Diaz D, Perzanowski M, Rundle A, Kinney PL, Perera FP, Miller
RL. “Traffic density and stationary sources of air pollution associated with wheeze, asthma, and
immunoglobulin E from birth to age 5 years among New York City children.” Environ Res. 2011
Nov;111(8):1222-9. Doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

74. Pearson RL, Wachtel H, Ebi KL. 2000. “Distance-weighted traffic density in proximity to a home is a risk factor
for leukemia and other childhood cancers. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 50:175-180.

75. Perez L, Lurmann, Wilson FJ, Pastor M, Brandt SJ, Künzli N, McConnell R, “Near-Roadway Pollution and
Childhood Asthma: Implications for Developing “Win–Win” Compact Urban Development and Clean Vehicle
Strategies.” Environ Health Perspect 120:1619–1626 (2012).

76. Pierse N, Rushton L, Harris RS, Kuehni CE, Silverman M, Grigg J.Locally generated particulate pollution and
respiratory symptoms in young children. Thorax. 2006;61:216 –220.

77. Ponce NA, Hoggatt KJ, Wilhelm M, Ritz B. 2005. Preterm birth: the interaction of traffic-related air pollution
with economic hardship in Los Angeles neighborhoods. Am J Epidemiol 162(2):140–148.

78. Power, MC, Weisskpf, MG, Alexeeff, SE, Coull, BA, Siro, A, Schwartz, J,”Trafffic-Related Air Pollution and
Congnitive Function in a Cohort of Older Men.” Environ Health Perspect, 2011; 119:682-687, Epub Dec 20.

79. Raaschou-Nielsen O, Hertel O, Thomsen BL, Bison JH. 2001. “Air pollution from traffic at the residence of
children with cancer.” Am J Epidemiol 153:433-443

80. Raaschou-Nielson, O. et al. “Air pollution from traffic and risk for lung cancer in three Danish cohorts. Cancer
Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2010. 19(5):1284-91.

81. Raaschou-Nielsen, O. et al. “Lung Cancer Incidence and Long-Term Exposure to Air Pollution from Traffic.”
Environmental Health Perspectives. 2011 Jan 12. (Epub ahead of print).

82. Reynolds P, Von Behren J, Gunier RB, Goldberg DE, Hertz A, Smith D. 2002. “Traffic patterns and childhood
cancer incidence rates in California, United States.” Cancer Causes Control 13:665-673.

83. Ryan PH, LeMasters G, Biagini J, Bernstein D, Grinshpun SA, Shukla R, et al. 2005. Is it traffic type, volume,
or distance? Wheezing in infants living near truck and bus traffic. J Allergy Clin Immunol 116(2):279–284.

84. Salam MT, Islam T, Gilliland FD. 2008. Recent evidence for adverse effects of residential proximity to traffic
sources on asthma. Curr Opin Pulm Med 14(1):3–8.

85. Salam MT, Lin PC, Avol EL, Gauderman WJ, Gilliland FD. 2007b. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase, glutathione
S-transferase P1, traffic and childhood asthma. Thorax 62(12):1050–1057.

86. Savitz DA, Feingold L. 1989. “Association of childhood cancer with residential traffic density.” Stand J Work
Environ Health 15:360-363.
87. Singer BC, Hodgson AT, Hotchi T, Kim JJ. 2004. Passive measurement of nitrogen oxides to assess traffic-
related pollutant exposure for the East Bay Children’s Respiratory Health Study. Atmos Environ 38(3):393–
403.

88. Slama R, Morgenstern V, Cyrys J, Zutavern A, Herbarth O, Wichmann HE, et al. 2007. Traffic-related
atmospheric pollutants levels during pregnancy and offspring’s term birth weight: a study relying on a land-
use regression exposure model. Environ Health Perspect 115:1283–1292.

89. Steenland K, Silverman DT, Hornung DW, “Case-control study of lung cancer and truck driving in the
Teamsters Union.” Am J Public Health.1990;80:670–674.

90. Steenland K, Deddens J, Stayner L.”Diesel exhaust and lung cancer in the trucking industry: exposure-
response
analyses and risk assessment.” Am J Ind Med. 1998;34:220–228.

91. Steenland K, Silverman DT, Zaebst D. “Exposure to diesel exhaust in the trucking industry and possible
relationships with lung cancer.” Am J Ind Med.1992;21:887–890.

92. Thiering E, Cyrys J, Kratzsch J, Meisinger C, Hoffmann B, Berdel D, Von Berg A, Koletzko S, Bauer CP,
Heinrich J. “Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and insulin resistance in children: results from
the GINIplus and LISAplus birth cohorts.” Diabetologia, April12, 2013DOI 10.1007/s00125-013-2925-x

93. Van Kempen E, Fischer, Jansssen P, Houthuijs N, Van Kamp D, Stanfeld IS, Cassee F, “Neurobehavioral
effects of exposure to traffic-realted air pollution and transportation noise in primary school children.” Environ
Res 2012 May:115:18-25, Epub 2012 Apr 6.

94. Van Vliet P, Knape M, et al. (1997), “Motor vehicle exhaust and chronic respiratory symptoms in children
living near freeways.” Environ Res 74(2): 122-32.

95. Vardoulakis S, Chalabi Z, Fletcher T, Grundy C, Leonardi GS, “Impact and uncertainty of a traffic
management intervention: Population exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.” Sci Total Environ 2008,
394:244–251.

96. Venn A, Lewis S, Cooper M, Hubbard R, Hill I, Boddy R, et al. 2000.” Local road traffic activity and the
prevalence, severity, and persistence of wheeze in school children: combined cross sectional and longitudinal
study.” Occup Environ Med 57:152-158.

97. Vinceti M, Rothman KJ, Crespi CM, Sterni A, Cherubini A, Guerra L, Maffeis G, Ferretti E, Fabbi S, Teggi
S, Consonni D, de Girolamo G, Meggiato A, Palazzi G,Paolucci P, Malagoli C,”Leukemia risk in children
exposed to benzene and PM10 from vehicular traffic: a case-control study in an Italian population.” Eur J
Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;27(10):781-90. Doi:10.1007/s10654-012-9727-1. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

98. Venn AJ, Lewis SA, Cooper M, Hubbard R, Britton J. 2001. “Living near a main road and the risk of wheezing
illness in children.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:2177-2180.

99. Venn A, Lewis S, Cooper M, Hubbard R, Hill I, Boddy R, et al. 2000. Local road traffic activity and the
prevalence, severity, and persistence of wheeze in school children: combined cross sectional and longitudinal
study. Occup Environ Med 57(3):152–158.

100. Volk HE, Hertz-Picciotto I, Delwiche L, Lurman F, McConnel R, “Residential Proximity to Freeways and
Autism in the CHARGE Study.” Environ Heal Perspect, 2011:119:873-877, Epub Dec16.

101. Volk HE, Lurmann F, Penfold B, Piccciotto IH, McConnel R, “Traffic-Related Air Pollution Particulate Matter
and Autism.” JAMA Psychiatry 2013;70(1):71-77.

102. Wang S, Zhang J, Zeng X, Zeng Y, Wang S, Chen S, ”Association of Traffic-Related Air Pollution with
Children with Neurobehavioral Functions in Quanzhou China.” Environ Heal Perspect, 2009:117:1612-
 1618,Epub May11.

103. Weichenthal S, Kulka R, Dubeau A, Martin C, Wang D, Dales R, “Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Heart
Rate Variability and Respiratory Function in Urban Cyclist.” Environmental Health Perspectives, October
2011. doi 10.1289/ehp.1003321.

104. Weiland SK, Mundt KA, Ruckmann A, Keg U. 1994 “Self-reported wheezing and allergic rhinitis in children
and traffic density on street of residence.” Ann Epidemiol 4:243-247.

105. White RH, Spengler JD, Kumkum MD, Barry BE, Samet JM, “Report of Workshop on Traffic, Health, and
Infrastructure Planning.” Arch Environ Occup Health. 2005; 60(2): 70–76.

106. Wilhelm M, Ritz B 2003. “Residential proximity to traffic and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles
County, California, 1994-1996.” Environ Health Perspect 111:207-216.

107. Wjst M, Reitmeir P, Dold S, Wulff A, Nicolai T, von Loeffelholz-Colberg EF, et al. 1993. “Road traffic and
adverse effects on respiratory health in children.” Br Med J 307:596-600.

108. Wu J, Ren C, Delfino RJ, Chung J, Wilhelm M, and Ritz B. 2009. “Association between local traffic-
generated air pollution and preeclampsia and preterm delivery in the south coast air basin of California.”
Environ Health Perspect 117, 1773-1779

109. Yamamoto M, Singh A, Sava F, Pui M, Tebbutt ST, Carlsten C, “MicroRNA Expression in Response to
Controlled Exposure to Diesel Exhaust: Attenuation by the Antioxidant n-Acetylcysteine in a Randomized
Crossover Study.” Environ Health Perspective April 12,2013

110. Volk HE, Fred Lurmann; Bryan Penfold;\Irva Hertz-Picciotto, PhD; Rob McConnell, “Traffic-Related Air
Pollution, Particulate Matter,and Autism.” JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(1):71-77.

111. Wu J, Houston D, Lurmann F, Ong P, Winer A. 2009. Exposure of PM2.5 and EC from diesel and gasoline
vehicles in communities near the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, California. Atmos Environ
43(12):1962–1971.

112. Yorifuji T, et al. “Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and mortality in Shizuoka, Japan.”
Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2010. 67(2):111-7.

113. Yorifuji T, Naruse H, Kashima S, Ohki S, Murakoshi T, Takao S, et al. 2011. “Residential proximity to major
Roads and preterm births.” Epidemiology 22, 74-80.

114. Zaebst D, Stern F, Heitbrink W, Cooper T. “Evaluation of techniques for reducing diesel forklift
emissions.‘ Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1992;7(1):17–18.

115. Zaebst DD, Clapp DE, Blade LM, Marlow DA, Steenland K, Hornung RW, Scheutzle D, Butler J.
“Quantitative determination of trucking industry workers’ exposures to diesel exhaust particles.”
AIHAJ. 1991;52(12):529–541

116. Zhu Y, Hinds WC, et al. (2002). “Study of ultrafine particles near a major highway with heavy-duty diesel
traffic.” Atmospheric Environment 36: 4323-4335.

117. Zhu Y, Hinds WC, et al. (2002)(2). “Concentration and Size Distribution of Ultrafine Particles Near a Major
Highway.” J Air & Waste Manage Assoc 52:1032-1042.

118. Zmirou D, Gauvin S, Pin I, Momas I, Sahraoui F, Just J, et al. 2004. Traffic related air pollution and incidence
Of Childhood Asthma: results of the vesta case-control study. J Epidemiol Community Health 58(1):18–23.
 Appendix A-3: Particulate Matter

73 Citations

1.. Atkinson RW, Anderson HR, Sunyer J, Ayres J, Baccini M, Vonk JM, et al. Acute effects of particulate air
pollution on respiratory admissions: Results from aphea 2 project. Air pollution and health: A European
approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:1860-1866, 2001.

2. Avol EL, Linn WS, Shamoo DA, Valencia LM, Anzar UT, Venet TG, et al. 1985. Respiratory effects of
photochemical oxidant air pollution in exercising adolescents. Am Rev Respir Dis 132(3):619–22.

3. Behndig AF, Mudway IS, Brown JL, Stenfors N, Helleday R, Duggan ST, et al. Airway antioxidant and
inflammatory responses to diesel exhaust exposure in healthy humans. The European respiratory journal :
official journal of the European Society for Clinical Respiratory Physiology 27:359-365, 2006.

4. Birger N, Gould T, Stewart J, Miller MR, Larson T, Carlsten C. The air pollution exposure laboratory (apel) for
controlled human exposure to diesel exhaust and other inhalants: Characterization and comparison to
existing facilities.Inhal Toxicol 23:219-225, 2011.

5. Bollati V, Marinelli B, Apostoli P, Bonzini M, Nordio F, Hoxha M, et al. Exposure to metal-rich particulate
matter modifies the expression of candidate micrornas in peripheral blood leukocytes. Environmental health
perspectives 118:763-768, 2010.

6. Brook RD, Rajagopalan S, Pope CA, 3rd, Brook JR, Bhatnagar A, Diez-Roux AV, et al. Particulate matter air
pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement from the american heart
association. Circulation 121:2331-237, 2010.

7. Campbell A, Araujo JA, Li H, Sioutas C, Kleinman M. Particulate matter induced enhancement of

inflammatory markers in the brains of apolipoprotein E knockout mice. J Nanosci Nanotechnol.
2009;9(8):5099-5104.

8. Castro-Giner F, Kunzli N, Jacquemin B, Forsberg B, de Cid R, Sunyer J, et al. Traffic-related air pollution,
oxidative stress genes, and asthma (ECHRS). Environmental health perspectives 117:1919-1924, 2009.

9. Chalupa, D. C., P. E. Morrow, et al. "Ultrafine particle deposition in subjects with asthma." Environmental
Health Perspectives 112(8): 879-82, 2004.

10. Charron, A. and R. M. Harrison "Primary particle formation from vehicle emissions during exhaust dilution in
the roadside atmosphere." Atmos Environ. 2003.

11. Cooper JA, Currie LA, Klouda GA [1981]. Assessment of contemporary carbon combustion source
contributions to urban air particulate levels using carbon-14 measurements. Environ Sci Techno 15(9):1045-
1050.

12. Crüts B, van Etten L, Törnqvist H, Blomberg A, Sandström T, Mills NL, et al. 2008. Exposure to diesel exhaust
induces changes in EEG in human volunteers. Part Fibre Toxicol 5:4.

13. Cuddihy RG, Griffith WC, McClellan RO [1984]. Health risks from light-duty diesel vehicles. Environ Sci
Technol 18(l):14A-21A.

14. Delfino RJ, Sioutas C, et al. "Potential role of ultrafine particles in associations between airborne particle
mass and cardiovascular health." Environmental Health Perspectives 113(8): 934-46, 2005.

15. Edling C, Anjou C-G, Axelson 0, Kling H [1987]. Mortality among personnel exposed to diesel exhaust. Int
Arch Occup Environ Health 59:559-565.

16. Environmental Protection Agency. "Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter Providing the Scientific
 Foundation for EPA Decision Making." Volumes 1 and 2, 2004.

17. Fann N, Lamson AD, Anenberg SC, Wesson K, Risley D, Hubbell BJ, “Estimating the National
Public Health Burden Associated with Exposure to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 32, No. 1,
2012.

18. Forbes LJ, Patel MD, Rudnicka AR, et al. Chronic exposure to outdoor air pollution and markers of systemic
inflammation. Epidemiology. 2009;20:245–253.

19. Fruin SA, Winera AM, et al. (2004). "Black carbon concentrations in California vehicles and estimation of in-
vehicle diesel exhaust particulate matter exposures." Atmos Environ 38:4123–4133.

20. Garshick E, Laden F, et al. (2004). "Lung cancer in railroad workers exposed to diesel exhaust."
Environmental
Health Perspectives 112(15): 1539-43.

21. Gan, WQ, Davies HW, Koehoorn M, Brauer M,”Association of Long-term exposure to community noise and
traffic related air pollution with coronary heart disease mortality.” Am J Epidmiol 2012 May 1;175(9):898-906.
Epub 2012
Apr 5.

22. Geiser M, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Kapp N, Schu¨rch S, Kreyling W, Schulz H, Semmler M, Im Hof V, Heyder
J, Gehr P Ultrafine particles cross cellular membranes by nonphagocytic mechanisms in lungs and in cultured
cells. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(11):1555-1560.

23. Gottipolu, RR, Wallenbron, JG, Karoly, ED, Schladweiler, MC, “One Month Disel Exhaust Inhalation Produces
Hypertension Gene Expression Pattern in Healthy Rats,” NIEHS, Environmental Health perspectives,
ehp.11647 September 12, 2008

24. Hauck H, Berner A, et al. (2003). "AUPHEP -Austrian Project on Health Effects of Particulates - general
overview." Atmos Environ .

25. Hauck H, Berner A, et al. (2003). "AUPHEP- Austrian Project on Health Effects of Particulates- general
overview." Atmos Environ .

26. Health Effects Institute (HEI) (2003). "Research on Diesel Exhaust and Other Particles."

27. Hoffmann B, Moebus S, Dragano N, et al. Chronic residential exposure to particulate matter air pollution and
Systemic inflammatory markers. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:1302–1308.

28. Holloway JW, Savarimuthu Francis S, Fong KM, Yang IA. 2012. “Genomics and the respiratory effects of air
pollution
exposure.” Respirology 17:590-600.

29. Hussain S, Laumbach R, Coleman J, Youssef H, Kelly-McNeil K, Ohman-Strickland P, et al. 2012. “Controlled
exposure to diesel exhaust causes increased nitrite in exhaled breath condensate among subjects with
asthma.” J Occup Environ Med 54:1186-1191.

30. Kim S, Shen S, Sioutas C. 2002. Size distribution and diurnal and seasonal trends of ultrafine particles in
source and receptor sites of the Los Angeles basin. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 52(3):297–307.

31. Ku¨nzli N, Jerrett M, Garcia-Esteban R, Basagan˜a X, Beckermann B, Gilliland F, Medina M, Peters J, Hodis
HN, Mack WJ. Ambient air pollution and the progression of atherosclerosis in adults. PLoS One.
2010;5(2):e9096.

32. Lepeule, Johanna; Laden, Francine; Dockery, Douglas; Schwartz, Joel, “Chronic Expoure to fine Particulates
 and Mortality: An Extended Follow-Up of the Harvard Six Cities Study from 1974-2008.” Environmental
Health Perspectives, March 2012. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104660.

33. Li N, Hao M, Phalen RF, Hinds WC, Nel AE. 2003. Particulate air pollutants and asthma. A paradigm for the
role of oxidative stress in PM-induced adverse health effects. Clin Immunol 109(3):250–265.

34. Lippmann, M., M. Frampton, et al. (2003). "The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Particulate Matter
Health Effects Research Centers Program: a midcourse report of status, progress, and plans." Environmental
Health Perspectives 111(8): 1074-92.

35. Lodovici M, Bigagli E. 2011. “Oxidative stress and air pollution exposure.” J Toxicol 2011:487074.

36. McCreanor J, Cullinan P, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Stewart-Evans J, Malliarou E, Jarup L, et al. “Respiratory effects
of exposure to diesel traffic in persons with asthma.” N Engl J Med 357:2348-2358, 2007.

37. Mills NL, Tornqvist H, Gonzalez MC, Vink E, Robinson SD, Soderberg S, et al. “Ischemic and thrombotic
effects of dilute diesel-exhaust inhalation in men with coronary heart disease.” N Engl J Med 357:1075-1082,
2007.

38. Montnémery P, Bengtsson P, Elliot A, Lindholm L-H, Nyberg P, Lofdahl C-G. (2000) Prevalence of obstructive
lung diseases and respiratory symptoms in relation to living environment and socio-economic group.
Respiratory Medicine, 95: 744-752

39. Mudway IS, Stenfors N, et al. (2004). "An in vitro and in vivo investigation of the effects of diesel exhaust on
human airway lining fluid antioxidants." Arch Biochem Biophys 423(1): 200-12.

40. Nikasinovic L, Momas L, et al. (2004). "A review of experimental studies on diesel exhaust particles and nasal
epithelium alterations." J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 7(2): 81-104.

41. Ning Z, Geller MD, Moore KF, Sheesley R, Schauer JJ, Sioutas C. 2007. Daily variation in chemical
characteristics of urban ultrafine aerosols and inference of their sources. Environ Sci Technol 41(17):6000–
6006.

42. Ntziachristos L, Ning Z, Geller MD, Sioutas C. Particle concentration and characteristics near a major freeway
with heavy-duty diesel traffic. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41(7):2223-2230.

43. Salmon LG, Mayo PR, et al. (2004). "Determination of Elemental Carbon and Organic Carbon Concentrations
During the Southern California Children’s Health Study, 1999-2001."

44. Saxon A, Diaz-Sanchez D, (2000). "Diesel exhaust as a model xenobiotic in allergic inflammation."
Immunopharmacology 48(3): 325-7.

45. Saxon A, Diaz-Sanchez D, (2005). "Air pollution and allergy: you are what you breathe." Nat Immunology
6(3): 223-6.

46. Froines J R, (2006). “Health Effects of Airborne Particulate Matter.” Presentation to the Southern California
Association of Governments May 17, 2006.

47. Pope CA, 3rd. “Mortality and air pollution: associations persist with continued advances in research
methodology.” Environ Health Perspect 107, 613-614, 1999.

48. Pope CA, 3rd. 2000. “Epidemiology of fine particulate air pollution and human health: biologic mechanisms
and who's at risk?” Environ Health Perspect 108 Suppl 4, 713-723.

49. Pope CA, 3rd, Dockery DW, Spengler JD, and Raizenne ME. 1991. “Respiratory health and PM10 pollution. A
daily time series analysis.” Am Rev Respir Dis 144, 668-674.
50. Pronk A, Coble J, Stewart P, “Occupational exposure to diesel engine exhaust: A literature.” J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol. 2009 July ; 19(5): 443–457. doi:10.1038/jes.2009.21.

51. Sava F, Carlsten C. “Respiratory health effects of ambient air pollution: An update. “ Clin Chest Med
33:759-769, 2012.

52.. Saxon A, Diaz-Sanchez D. “Air pollution and allergy: You are what you breathe.” Nat Immunol 6:223-226,
2005.

53. Scheepers PT, Bos RP, “Combustion of diesel fuel from a toxiological perspective.”Origin of incomplete
Combustion products.” Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1992;64:149-161.

54. Seaton A, Soutar A, Crawford V, et al. Particulate air pollution and the blood. Thorax. 1999;54:1027–1032.

55. Shoenfelt J, Mitkus RJ, Zeisler R, Spatz RO, Powell J, Fenton MJ, et al. “Involvement of tlr2 and tlr4 in
inflammatory immune responses induced by fine and coarse ambient air particulate matter.” J Leukoc Biol
86:303-312, 2009.

56. Siegel PD, Saxena RK, et al. (2004). "Effect of diesel exhaust particulate (DEP) on immune responses:
contributions of particulate versus organic soluble components." J Toxicol Environ Health A 67(3): 221-31.

57. Singh M, Phuleria HC, et al. (2005). "Seasonal and spatial trends in particle number concentrations and size
distributions at the children's health study sites in Southern California." J Expo Anal Environmental
Epidemiology.

58. Sioutas C. (2003). "Results from the Research of the Southern California Particle Center and Supersite
(SCPCS)."

59. Sioutas C, Delfino RJ, et al. (2005). "Exposure assessment for atmospheric ultrafine particles (UFPs) and
implications in epidemiologic research." Environmental Health Perspectives 113(8): 947-55.

60. Sydbom A, Blomberg A, Parnia S, Stefors N, Sandstrom T, Dahlen SE, “Health effects of diesel exhaust
emissions.” EUR Respir J 2001;17:733-746.

61. Takano H, Yoshikawa T, Ichinose T, Miyabara Y, Imaoka K, Sagai M: “Diesel exhaust particles enhance
antigen-induced airway inflammation and local cytokine expression in mice.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1997, 156:36–42.

62. Takeda K, Tsukue N, and Yoshida S. 2004. “Endocrine-disrupting activity of chemicals in diesel exhaust and
diesel exhaust particles.” Environ Sci 11, 33-45.

63. Takenaka H, Zhang K, Diaz-Sanchez D, Tsien A, Saxon A: “Enhanced human IgE production results from
exposure to the aromatic hydrocarbons from diesel exhaust: direct effects on B-cell IgE production. “J Allergy
Clin Immunol 1995, 95:103–115

64. Thompson AM, Zanobetti A, Silverman F, et al. Baseline repeated measures from controlled human exposure
Studies associations between ambient air pollution exposure and the systemic inflammatory biomarkers IL-6
and fibrinogen. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:120 –124.

65. Vostal JJ, [1986]. Factors limiting the evidence for chemical carcinogenicity of diesel emissions in long-term
inhalation experiments. In: lshinishi N, Koizumi A, McClellan RO, Stober W, eds. Carcinogenic and
mutagenic effects of diesel engine exhaust. Proceedings of the Symposium on Toxicological Effects of
Emissions from Diesel Engines, Tsukuba City, Japan, July 26-28, 1986. New York, NY: Elsevier Science
Publishers, pp. 381-396.

66. Wallace LA, Mitchell H, et al. (2003). "Particle concentrations in inner-city homes of children with asthma: the
effect of smoking, cooking, and outdoor pollution." Environmental Health Perspectives 111(9): 1265-72.
67. World Health Organization, “Review of Evidence on Health Aspects of Air Pollution.” REVIHAAP 2013

68. Zanobetti A, Schwartz J, Dockery DW.”Airborne particles are a risk factor for hospital admissions for heart
and lung disease.” Environ Health Perspect 108:1071-1077, 2000.

69. Zanobetti A, Schwartz J, and Gold D. 2000. “Are there sensitive subgroups for the effects of airborne
particles?” Environ Health Perspect 108, 841-845.

70. Zeka A, Zanobetti A, and Schwartz J. 2006.”Individual-level modifiers of the effects of particulate matter on
daily mortality.” Am J Epidemiol 163, 849-859.

71. Zeka A, Sullivan JR, Vokonas PS, Sparrow D, Schwartz J. Inflammatory markers and particulate air pollution:
characterizing the pathway to disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:1347–1354.

72. Zhu Y, Hinds WC, Kim S, Sioutas C. 2002. Concentration and size distribution of ultrafine particles near a
major highway. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 52(9):1032–1042.

73. Zhu Y, Hinds WC, Kim S, Shen S, Sioutas C. Study of ultrafine particles near a major highway with heavy-
duty diesel traffic. Atmos Environ. 2002;36(27):4323-4335. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00354-0.
 Appendix A-4: Cardiovascular and Neurologic

37 Citations

1…American Heart Association, “Particulate Matter, Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease.” Journal of the
AHA 121:2331-2378, May 10, 2010.

2. Brautbar, N., J. J.A. Williams II, M.P. Wu. Chapter 12. Cardiotoxicity of industrial chemicals and
environmental pollution. Cardiovascular Toxicology, Fourth Edition. D. Acosta Jr. (Ed). Informa Healthcare
USA, Inc. 2008:429-545.

3. Brunekreef B, Beelen R, Hoek G, Schouten L, Bausch-Goldohm S, Fischer P, Armstrong B, Hughes E,

Jerrett M, Van Den
Brandt P, “Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular
mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.” Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar;(139):5-71; discussion
73-89.

4. Delfino RJ, Staimer N, Tjoa T, et al. Circulating biomarkers of inflam mation, antioxidant activity, and platelet
Activation are associated with primary combustion aerosols in subjects with coronary artery disease. Environ
Health Perspect. 2008;116:898 –906.

5. Delfino R, , R. J., C. Sioutas, et al. "Potential role of ultrafine particles in associations between airborne
particle mass and cardiovascular health." Environmental Health Perspectives 113(8): 934-46, 2005.

6. Dockery, DW. (2001) Epidemiologic Evidence of Cardiovascular Effects of Particulate Air Pollution.
Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(Suppl 4): 483-486.

7. Doyle LW. 2008. Cardiopulmonary outcomes of extreme prematurity. Semin Perinatol 32(1):28–34.

8. Finkelstein MM, Verma DK, Sahai D, Stefov E. “Ischemic heart disease mortality among heavy equipment
operators.” J Ind Med. 2004;46(1):16–22

9. Hong YC, Lee JT, et al. (2002). "Effects of air pollutants on acute stroke mortality." Environmental Health
Perspectives 110(2): 187-91.

10. Ibald-Mulli, A., et al., 2004. Effects of particulate air pollution on blood pressure and heart rate in subjects with
cardiovascular disease: a multicenter approach. Environ. Health Perspect. 112, 369–377.

11 Jerrett M, Burnett RT, et al. (2005). "Spatial analysis of air pollution and mortality in Los Angeles."
Epidemiology 16(6): 727-36.

12. Jerrett M, Burnett RT, et al. (2005). "Spatial analysis of air pollution and mortality in Los Angeles."
Epidemiology 16(6): 727-36.

13. Johnson RL, Jr. (2004). "Relative effects of air pollution on lungs and heart." Circulation 109(1): 5-7.

14. Krewski D, Burnett R, et al. (2005). "Mortality and long-term exposure to ambient air pollution: ongoing
analyses
based on the American Cancer Society cohort." J Toxicology Environmental Health A 68(13-14): 1093-109.

15. Künzli N, Jerrett M, et al. (2005). "Ambient air pollution and atherosclerosis in Los Angeles."
Environmental Health Perspectives 113(2): 201-6.

16. Liao D, Creason J, Shy C, Williams R, Watts R, Zweidinger R, “Daily variation of partuclate air pollution and
poor cardiac autonomic control in the elderly.” Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:521-525.

17. Maheswaran, R. and P. Elliott (2003). "Stroke mortality associated with living near main roads in England and
 Wales: a geographical study." Stroke 34(12): 2776-80.

18. Middleton N, Yiallouros P, Kleanthous S, Kolokotroni O, Schwartz J, Dockery DW, et al. 2008. A 10-year time-
series analysis of respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity in Nicosia, Cyprus:the effect of short-term changes
in air pollution and dust storms. Environ Health 7, 39.

19. Miller KA, Siscovick DS, Sheppard L, Sullivan JH, Anderson GL, Kaufman JD,”Long term Exposure to Air
Pollution and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in Women.” The New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 356
No. 5 February 1, 2007.

20. Mills NL, Tornqvist H, Gonzalez MC, Vink E, Robinson SD, Soderberg S, et al. “Ischemic and thrombotic
effects of dilute diesel-exhaust inhalation in men with coronary heart disease.” N Engl J Med 357:1075-1082,
2007.

21. Mone SM, Gillman MW, Miller TL, Herman EH, Lipshultz SE. 2004. Effects of environmental exposures on
the cardiovascular system: prenatal period through adolescence. Pediatrics 113(4 suppl):1058–1069.

22. Oberdorster, G. and M. J. Utell (2002). "Ultrafine particles in the urban air: to the respiratory tract--and
beyond?" Environmental Health Perspectives 110(8): A440-1.

23. Oberdorster G, Sharp Z, et al. (2004). "Translocation of inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain." Inhalation
Toxicology 16(6-7): 437-45.

24. Peng RD, Bell ML, Geyh AS, McDermott A, Zeger SL, Samet JM, et al. “Emergency admissions for
cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and the chemical composition of fine particle air pollution.”
Environmental health perspectives 117:957-963.

25. Peters A, Pope CA,(2002). "Cardiopulmonary mortality and air pollution." Lancet 360(9341): 1184-5.

26. Pope CA, 3rd, Thun MJ, et al. (1995). "Particulate air pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective
study of U.S. adults." Am J Respiratory Critical Care Med 151(3 Pt 1): 669-74.

27. Pope CA, Burnett RT, et al. (2004). "Cardiovascular mortality and long-term exposure to particulate air
pollution: epidemiological evidence of general pathophysiological pathways of disease." Circulation 109(1):
71-7.

28. Pope C. Arden, Ezzati M, Dockey DW (2009). “Fine-Particulate Air Pollution and Life expectancy in the United
States.” The New England Journal of Medicine Jan 22; 360(4):376-386...

29. Riediker M, Williams R, et al. (2003). "Exposure to particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, and other
air pollutants inside patrol cars." Environmental Science Technology 37(10): 2084-93.

30. Riediker M, Cascio WE, et al. (2004). "Particulate matter exposure in cars is associated with cardiovascular
effects in healthy young men." Am J Respiratory Critical Care Med 169(8):934-40.

31. Ruckerl R, Ibald-Mulli A, Koenig W, et al. Air pollution and markers of inflammation and coagulation in patients
with coronary heart disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:432– 441.

32. Saldiva PH, Clarke RW, Coull BA, et al. Lung inflammation induced by concentrated ambient air particles is
related to particle composition. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:1610 –1617.

33. Saber AT, Bornholdt J, Dybdahl M, et al. Tumor necrosis factor is not required for particle-induced
genotoxicity and pulmonary inflammation. Arch Toxicol. 2005;79:177–182.

34. University of Rochester - Particulate Matter Center (2004). "Ultrafine Particles: Characterization, Health
Effects and Pathophysiological Mechanisms."
35. Utell MJ, Frampton MW. (2000) “Acute Health Effects of Ambient Air Pollution: the Ultrafine Particle
Hypothesis.” Journal of Aerosol Medicine, 13(4): 355-59.

36. Weinhold B. (2004). "Environmental cardiology: getting to the heart of the matter." Environmental Health
Perspectives 112(15): A880-7.

37. WHO. “Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide.” Global update
2005. Summary of risk assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
 Appendix A-5: Reproductive and Developmental

200 Citations

1..Arnould JP, Verhoest P, Bach V, Libert JP, Belegaud J. Detection of benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts in human
Placenta and umbilical cord blood. Hum Exp Toxicol 1997;16:716–21.

2..Banks WA, Farr SA, Morley JE. Entry of blood-borne cytokines into the central nervous system: effects on
Cognitive processes. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2002-2003;10(6):319-327.

3. Becerra TA, Wilhelm M, Olsen J, Cockburn M, Ritz B, “Ambient Air Pollution and Autism in Los Angeles
County, California.” Environ Health Perspect 121:380–386 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205827

4. Bell ML, Ebisu K, Belanger K. Ambient air pollution and low birth weight in Connecticut and Massachusetts.
Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1118 –1124.

5. Bobak M, Leon DA. “Air pollution and infant mortality in the Czech Republic,” 1986-1988.Lancet 340:1010-
1014 (1992).

6. Bobak M. Outdoor air pollution, low birth weight, and prematurity.Environ Health Perspect 2000;108:173–6.

7. Bosetti C, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Gallus S, Cipriani S, La Vecchia C, and Parazzini F. 2010. “Ambient particulate
matter and preterm birth or birth weight: a review of the literature.” Arch Toxicol 84, 447-460.

8. Bouayed J, Desor F, Rammal H, Kiemer AK, Tybl E, Schroeder H, et al. 2009. Effects of lactational exposure
to benzo[alpha]pyrene (B[alpha]P) on postnatal neurodevelopment, neuronal receptor gene expression and
behavior in mice. Toxicology 259(3):97–106.

9. Braunschweig D, Ashwood P, Krakowiak P, Hertz-Picciotto I, Hansen R, Croen LA, et al. 2008. Autism:
maternally derived antibodies specific for fetal brains. Neurotoxicology 29(2):226–231.

10. Brauer M, Lencar C, Tamburic L, Koehoorn M, Demers P, Karr C. 2008. A cohort study of traffic-related air
pollution impacts on birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect 116:680–686.

11. Brown LA, Khousbouei H, Goodwin JS, Irvin-Wilson CV, Ramesh A, Sheng L, McCallister MM, Jiang GC,
Aschner M, Hood DB. Down-regulation of early ionotrophic glutamate receptor subunit developmental
expression as a mechanism for observed plasticity deficits following gestational exposure to benzo(a)pyrene.
Neurotoxicology. 2007;28(5):965-978.

12. Buck L, “Persistant Environmental Pollutants and Couple Feciundity.” Germaine M.; et al. Environmental
Health Perspectives, November 2012. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205301.

13. Bukowski R, Smith GC, Malone FD, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, et al. 2007. “Fetal growth in early
pregnancy and risk of delivering low birth weight infant: prospective cohort study.” Bmj 334, 836.

14. Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Mora-Tiscareño A, Ontiveros E, Gómez-Garza G, Barragán-Mejía G, Broadway J,

et al. 2008. Air pollution, cognitive deficits and brain abnormalities: a pilot study with children and dogs. Brain
Cogn 68(2):117–127.

15. California Air Resources Board (2004). “Particulate Air Pollution and Infant Mortality.” Presentation May 20-
21, 2004.

16. Campbell DB, D’Oronzio R, Garbett K, Ebert PJ, Mirnics K, Levitt P, Persico AM. Disruption of cerebral cortex
MET signaling in autism spectrum disorder. Ann Neurol. 2007;62(3):243-250.

17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2007a. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders-autism and
developmental disabilities monitoring network, 14 sites, United States, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ 56(1):
12–28.
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2007b. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders-autism and

developmental disabilities monitoring network, six sites, United States, 2000. MMWR Surveill Summ 56(1):
1–11.

19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2009. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders-autism and
developmental disabilities monitoring network, United States, 2006. MMWR Surveill Summ 58(10):1–20.

20. Chauhan A, Chauhan V. 2006. Oxidative stress in autism. Pathophysiology 13(3):171–181.

21. Chen L, Bell EM, Caton AR, Druschel CM, Lin S. Residential mobility during pregnancy and the potential for
ambient air pollution exposure misclassification. Environ Res. 2010;110:162–168.

22. Choi H, Jedrychowski W, Spengler J et al. “International studies of prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic
Hydrocarbons and fetal growth.” Environ Health Perspect 2006;114:1744–50.

23. Choi H, Rauh V, Garfinkel R, Tu Y, Perera FP. 2008. Prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons and risk of intrauterine growth restriction. Environ Health Perspect 116:658–665.

24. Clark N, Demers P, Karr C, et al. Effect of early life exposure to air pollution on development of childhood
asthma. Environ Health Perspect 2010; 118: 284–290.

25. Currie J, Neidell M, Schmieder JF. 2009. Air pollution and infant health: lessons from New Jersey. J Health
Econ 28(3):688–703.

26. Darrow LA, Klein M, Flanders WD, Waller LA, Correa A, Marcus M, et al. 2009. “Ambient Air Pollution and
Preterm Birth”: A Time-series Analysis. Epidemiology.

27. De Medeiros AP, Gouveia N, Machado RP, et al. Traffic-related air pollution and perinatal mortality: a case-
control tudy. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:127–132.

28. Dejmek J, Selevan SG, Solansky I, Benes I, Lenicek J, Sram RJ. “Exposure to carcinogenic PAHs in utero
and fetal growth.” Epidemiology 10:S126 (1999).

29. Dejmek J, Selevan SG, Benes I, Solansky I, and Sram RJ. 1999. “Fetal growth and maternal exposure to
particulate matter during pregnancy.” Environ Health Perspect 107, 475-480

30. Dejmek J, Solansky I, Benes I, Lenicek J, Sram RJ. The impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fine
particles on pregnancy outcome. Environ Health Perspect 2000;108:1159–64.

31. Dietz PM, England LJ, Callaghan WM, Pearl M, Wier ML, Kharrazi M. 2007. A comparison of LMP-based and
ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21(suppl 2):62–71.

32. Doyle LW. 1995. Outcome to five years of age of children born at 24–26 weeks’ gestational age in Victoria.
The Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Med J Aust 163(1):11–14.

33. Dubowsky SD, Suh H, Schwartz J, Coull BA, and Gold DR. 2006. “Diabetes, obesity, and hypertension may
enhance associations between air pollution and markers of systemic inflammation.” Environ Health Perspect
114, 992-998.

34. Dugandzic R, Dodds L, Stieb D, and Smith-Doiron M. 2006. “The association between low level exposures to
ambient air pollution and term low birth weight: a retrospective cohort study.” Environ Health 5, 3.

35. Durkin MS, Maenner MJ, Meaney FJ, Levy SE, DiGuiseppi, C, Nicholas JS, et al. 2010. Socioeconomic
inequality in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder: Evidence from a U.S. cross-sectional study. PLoS
One; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011551 [Online 12 July 2010].

36. Edwards SC, Jedrychowski W, Butscher M, Camann D, Kieltyka A, Mroz E, et al. 2010. Prenatal exposure to
airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and children’s intelligence at 5 years of age in a prospective cohort
study in Poland. Environ Health Perspect 118:1326–1331.
37. Engel SA, Erichsen HC, Savitz DA, Thorp J, Chanock SJ, Olshan AF. Risk of spontaneous preterm birth is
Associated with common proinflammatory cytokine polymorphisms. Epidemiology 2005;16:469–77.

38. Enstrom A, Krakowiak P, Onore C, Pessah IN, Hertz-Picciotto I, Hansen RL, et al. 2009a. Increased IgG4
levels in children with autism disorder. Brain Behav Immun 23(3):389–395.

39. Enstrom AM, Lit L, Onore CE, Gregg JP, Hansen RL, Pessah IN, et al. 2009b. Altered gene expression and
function of peripheral blood natural killer cells in children with autism. Brain Behav Immun 23(1):124–133.

40. Filipek PA, Juranek J, Nguyen MT, Cummings C, Gargus JJ. 2004. Relative carnitine deficiency in autism. J
Autism Dev Disord 34(6):615–623.

41. Gardener H, Spiegelman D, Buka SL. 2009. Prenatal risk factors for autism: comprehensive meta-analysis. Br
J Psychiatry 195(1):7–14.

42. Gardener H, Spiegelman D, Buka SL. 2011. Perinatal and neonatal risk factors for autism: a comprehensive
meta-analysis. Pediatrics 128(2):344–355.

43. Gehring U, Wijga AH, Fischer P, de Jongste JC, Kerkhof M, Koppelman GH, et al. 2010. “Traffic-related air
pollution, preterm birth and term birth weight in the PIAMA birth cohort study.” Environ Res 111, 125-135.

44. Gehring U, Wijga AH, Fischer P, de Jongste JC, Kerkhof M, Koppelman GH, et al. 2011. “Traffic-related air
pollution, preterm birth and term birth weight in the PIAMA birth cohort study.” Environ Res 111, 125-135.

45. Ghosh JKC, Wilhelm M, Su J, Goldberg D, Cockburn M, Jerrett M, et al. 2012. Assessing the influence of
traffic-related air pollution on risk of term low birth weight on the basis of land-use-based regression models
and measures of air toxics. Am J Epidemiol 175(12):1262–1274.

46. Ghosh R, Rankin J, Pless-Mulloli T, and Glinianaia S. 2007. “Does the effect of air pollution on pregnancy
outcomes differ by gender? A systematic review.” Environ Res 105, 400-408.

47. Gilboa SM, Mendola P, Olshan AF, Langlois PH, Savitz DA, Loomis D, et al. 2005. “Relation between
ambient air
quality and selected birth defects, seven county study, Texas, 1997-2000. Am J Epidemiol 162, 238-252.

48. Glasson EJ, Bower C, Petterson B, de Klerk N, Chaney G, Hallmayer JF. 2004. Perinatal factors and the
development of autism: a population study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61(6):618–627.

49. Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Bell R, Pless-Mulloli T, and Howel D. 2004. “Particulate air pollution and fetal health:
a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence.” Epidemiology 15, 36-45.

50. Gold DR, Damokosh AI, Pope CA, 3rd, Dockery DW, McDonnell WF, Serrano P, et al. 1999. “Particulate and
ozone pollutant effects on the respiratory function of children in southwest Mexico City.” Epidemiology 10, 8-
16.

51. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. 2008. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet
371(9606):75–84.

52. Gonzalez-Pina R, Escalante-Membrillo C, Alfaro-Rodriguez A, Gonzalez-Maciel A. 2008. Prenatal exposure to

ozone disrupts cerebellar monoamine contents in newborn rats. Neurochem Res 33(5):912–918.

53. Ha EH, Hong YC, Lee BE, Woo BH, Schwartz J, and Christiani DC. 2001. “Is air pollution a risk factor for low
birth weight in Seoul?” Epidemiology 12, 643-648.

54. Hansen C, Neller A, Williams G, and Simpson R. 2006. “Maternal exposure to low levels of ambient air
pollution and preterm birth in Brisbane, Australia.” Bjog 113, 935-941.
55. Hansen CA, Barnett AG, Jalaludin BB, and Morgan GG. 2009. “Ambient air pollution and birth defects in
Brisbane, Australia”. PLoS One 4, e5408.

56. Hansen CA, Barnett AG, Pritchard G. 2008. The effect of ambient air pollution during early pregnancy on fetal
ultrasonic measurements during mid-pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect 116:362–369.

57. Heck JE, Wu J, Meyers TJ, Wilhelm M, Cockburn M, Ritz B,” Childhood cancer and traffic-related air pollution
exposure in pregnancy and early life.” Poster # 29 Abstract # 2531,

58. Herr CEW, Dostal M, Ghosh R, Ashwood P, Lipsett M, Pinkerton KE, et al. 2010b. Air pollution exposure dur
ing critical time periods in gestation and alterations in cord blood lymphocyte distribution: a cohort of livebirths.
Environ Health 9:46; doi:10.1186/1476-069X-9-46 [Online 2 August 2010].

59. Herr CEW, Ghosh R, Dostal M, Skokanova V, Ashwood P, Lipsett M, et al. 2010a. Exposure to air pollution in
critical prenatal time windows and IgE levels in newborns. Pediatr Allergy Immunol; doi: 10.1111/j.1399-
3038.2010.01074.x [Online 1 July 2010].

60. Hertz-Picciotto I, Delwiche L. 2009. The rise in autism and the role of age at diagnosis. Epidemiology
20(1):84–90.

61. Hertz-Picciotto I, Herr CEW, Yap P-S, Dostál M, Shumway RH, Ashwood P, et al. 2005. Air pollution and
lymphocyte phenotype proportions in cord blood. Environ Health Perspect 113:1391–1398.

62. Hertz-Picciotto I, Park H-Y, Dostal M, Kocan A, Trnovec T, Sram R. 2008. Prenatal exposures to persistent
and non-persistent organic compounds and effects on immune system development. Basic Clin Pharmacol
Toxicol 102(2):146–154.

63. Hertz-Picciotto I, Croen LA, Hansen R, Jones CR, van de Water J, Pessah IN. 2006. The CHARGE study: an
epidemiologic investigation of genetic and environmental factors contributing to autism. Environ Health
Perspect 114:1119–1125.

64. Hertz-Picciotto I, Delwiche L. 2009. The rise in autism and the role of age at diagnosis. Epidemiology
20(1):84–90.

65. Hougaard KS, Jensen KA, Nordly P, Taxvig C, Vogel U, Saber AT, et al. 2008. Effects of prenatal exposure
to diesel exhaust particles on postnatal development, behavior, genotoxicity and inflammation in mice. Part
Fibre Toxicol 5:3; doi:10.1186/1743-8977-5-3 [Online 11 March 2008].

66. Huynh M, Woodruff TJ, Parker JD, and Schoendorf KC. 2006. “Relationships between air pollution and
preterm birth in California.“Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 20, 454-461.

67. Ihrig MM, Shalat SL, and Baynes C. 1998. “A hospital-based case-control study of stillbirths and
environmental exposure to arsenic using an atmospheric dispersion model linked to a geographical
information system.” Epidemiology 9, 290-294.

68. Jafarabadi M. 2007. “Episodic air pollution is associated with increased DNA fragmentation in human sperm
without other changes in semen quality.” Hum Reprod 22, 3263; author reply 3264.

69. Jalaludin B, Mannes T, Morgan G, Lincoln D, Sheppeard V, and Corbett S. 2007. “Impact of ambient air
pollution on gestational age is modified by season in Sydney, Australia.” Environ Health 6, 16.

70. James SJ, Cutler P, Melnyk S, Jernigan S, Janak L, Gaylor DW, et al. 2004. Metabolic biomarkers of
increased oxidative stress and impaired methylation capacity in children with autism. Am J Clin Nutr
80(6):1611–1617.

71. James SJ, Melnyk S, Jernigan S, Cleves MA, Halsted CH, Wong DH, et al. 2006. Metabolic endophenotype
and related genotypes are associated with oxidative stress in children with autism. Am J Med Genet B
Neuropsychiatr Genet
141B(8):947–956.
72. James SJ, Rose S, Melnyk S, Jernigan S, Blossom S, Pavliv O, et al. 2009. Cellular and mitochondrial
glutathione redox imbalance in lymphoblastoid cells derived from children with autism. FASEB J 23(8):2374–
2383.

73. Jedrychowski W, Masters E, Choi H, Sochacka E, Flak E, Mroz E, et al. 2007. “Pre-pregnancy dietary vitamin
A intake may alleviate the adverse birth outcomes associated with prenatal pollutant exposure: epidemiologic
cohort study in Poland.” Int J Occup Environ Health 13, 175-180.

74. Jedrychowski W, Perera F, Mrozek-Budzyn D, Mroz E, Flak E, Spengler JD, et al. 2009. “Gender differences
in fetal growth of newborns exposed prenatally to airborne fine particulate matter.” Environ Res 109, 447-456

75. Kalkbrenner AE, Daniels JL, Chen JC, Poole C, Emch M, Morrissey J. 2010. Perinatal exposure to hazardous
air pollutants and autism spectrum disorders at age 8. Epidemiology 21(5):631–641.

76. Kanaka-Gantenbein C, Mastorakos G, and Chrousos GP. 2003. “Endocrine-related causes and
consequences of intrauterine growth retardation.” Ann N Y Acad Sci 997, 150-157.

77. Kannan S, Misra DP, Dvonch JT, and Krishnakumar A. 2006. “Exposures to airborne particulate matter and
adverse perinatal outcomes: a biologically plausible mechanistic framework for exploring potential effect
modification by nutrition.” Environ Health Perspect 114, 1636-1642.

78. Kashima S, Naruse H, Yorifuji T, Ohki S, Murakoshi T, Takao S, et al. 2011. “Residential proximity to heavy
traffic and birth weight in Shizuoka, Japan.” Environ Res.

79. Kavlock RJ, Meyer E, Grabowski CT. 1980. Studies on the developmental toxicity of ozone: Postnatal effects.
Toxicol Lett 5(1):3–9.

80. King M, Bearman P. 2009. Diagnostic change and the increased prevalence of autism. Int J Epidemiol
38(5):1224–1234.

81. Kim OJ, Ha EH, Kim BM, Seo JH, Park HS, Jung WJ, et al. 2007. “PM10 and pregnancy outcomes: a
hospital-based cohort study of pregnant women in Seoul.” J Occup Environ Med 49, 1394-1402.

82. Lacasana M, Esplugues A, Ballester F. Exposure to ambient air pollution and prenatal and early childhood
health effects. Eur J Epidemiol 2005;20:183–99.

83. Landgren O. 1996. “Environmental pollution and delivery outcome in southern Sweden: a study with central
registries.” Acta Paediatr 85, 1361-1364.

84. Lee BE, Ha EH, Park HS, Kim YJ, Hong YC, Kim H, et al. 2003. “Exposure to air pollution during different
gestational phases contributes to risks of low birth weight.” Hum Reprod 18, 638-643.

85. Lee PC, Talbott EO, Roberts JM, Catov Jm, Bilonick RA, Stone RA, Sharma RK, Ritz B, “Ambient air
pollution exposure and blood pressure changes during pregnancy.” Environmental research 117(2012) 46-53.

86. Lee PC, Evelyn O. Talbott,a James M. Roberts,a,b Janet M. Catov,a,b Ravi K. Sharma,c and Beate Ritzd,
“Particulate Air Pollution Exposure and C-reactive Protein During Early Pregnancy.” Epidemiology • Volume
22, Number 4, July 2011

87. Lee SJ, Hajat S, Steer PJ, and Filippi V. 2008. “A time-series analysis of any short-term effects of
meteorological and air pollution factors on preterm births in London, UK.” Environ Res 106, 185-194.

88. Leem JH, Kaplan BM, Shim YK, Pohl HR, Gotway CA, Bullard SM, et al. 2006. “Exposures to air pollutants
during pregnancy and preterm delivery.” Environ Health Perspect 114, 905-910.

89. Levitt P, Campbell DB. The genetic and neurobiologic compass points toward common signaling dysfunctions
in autism spectrum disorders. J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(4):747-754.
90. Li N, Sioutas C, Cho A, Schmitz D, Misra C, Sempf J, et al. 2003. Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce
oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Environ Health Perspect 111:455–460.

91. Li X, Chauhan A, Sheikh AM, Patil S, Chauhan V, Li XM, et al. 2009. Elevated immune response in the brain
of autistic patients. J Neuroimmunol 207(1–2):111–116.

92. Liu S, Krewski D, Shi Y, Chen Y, and Burnett RT. 2003. “Association between gaseous ambient air pollutants
and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vancouver, Canada.” Environ Health Perspect 111, 1773-1778.

93. Liu S, Krewski D, Shi Y, Chen Y, and Burnett RT. 2007. “Association between maternal exposure to ambient
air pollutants during pregnancy and fetal growth restriction.” J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 17, 426-432.

94. Llop S, Ballester F, Estarlich M, Esplugues A, Rebagliato M, and Iniguez C. 2010. “Preterm birth and
exposure to air pollutants during pregnancy.” Environ Res 110, 778-785.

95. Longo LD. The biological effects of carbon monoxide on the pregnant woman, fetus, and newborn infant. Am
J Obstet Gynecol 1977;129:69–103.

96. Madsen C, Gehring U, Walker SE, Brunekreef B, Stigum H, Naess O, et al. 2010.”Ambient air pollution
exposure residential mobility and term birth weight in Oslo, Norway. Environ Res 110, 363-371.

97. Maisonet M, Bush TJ, Correa A, and Jaakkola JJ. 2001. “Relation between ambient air pollution and low birth
weight in the Northeastern United States.” Environ Health Perspect 109 Suppl 3, 351-356.

98. Maisonet M, Correa A, Misra D, and Jaakkola JJ. 2004.”A review of the literature on the effects of ambient air
pollution on fetal growth.” Environ Res 95, 106-115.

99. Mannes T, Jalaludin B, Morgan G, Lincoln D, Sheppeard V, and Corbett S. 2005. “Impact of ambient air
pollution on birth weight in Sydney, Australia.” Occup Environ Med 62, 524-530.

100. Maroziene L, and Grazuleviciene R. 2002. “Maternal exposure to low-level air pollution and pregnancy
outcomes:a population-based study.” Environ Health 1, 6.

101. Marshall EG, Harris G, and Wartenberg D. 2010. “Oral cleft defects and maternal exposure to ambient air
pollutants in New Jersey.” Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 88, 205-215.

102. Ming X, Johnson WG, Stenroos ES, Mars A, Lambert GH, Buyske S. 2009. Genetic variant of glutathione
peroxidase 1 in autism. Brain Dev 32(2):105–109.

103. Ming X, Stein TP, Brimacombe M, Johnson WG, Lambert GH, Wagner GC. 2005. Increased excretion of a
lipid peroxidation biomarker in autism. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 73(5):379–384.

104. Mone SM, Gillman MW, Miller TL, Herman EH, Lipshultz SE. 2004. Effects of environmental exposures on
the cardiovascular system: prenatal period through adolescence. Pediatrics 113(4 suppl):1058–1069.

105. Muhle R, Trentacoste SV, Rapin I. 2004. The genetics of autism. Pediatrics 113(5):e472–e486.

106. Oberdo¨rster G, Elder A, Rinderknecht A. Nanoparticles and the brain: cause for concern? J Nanosci
Nanotechnol. 2009;9(8):4996-5007.

107. Olusanya BO, and Solanke OA. 2011. “Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Maternal Hypertensive
Disorders of Pregnancy in a Developing Country.” Hypertens Pregnancy.

108. Osmond C, and Barker DJ. 2000. “Fetal, infant, and childhood growth are predictors of coronary heart
disease, diabetes, and hypertension in adult men and women.” Environ Health Perspect 108 Suppl 3,
545-553.
109. On IJ, Daniels JL, Goldman BD, Herring AH, Siega-Riz AM, Rogan WJ. 2009. Lactational exposure to

polychlorinated biphenyls, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene and infant

neurodevelopment: an analysis of the pregnancy, infection, and nutrition babies study. Environ Health
Perspect 117:488–494.

110. Parker JD, Woodruff TJ, Basu R, and Schoendorf KC. 2005. “Air pollution and birth weight among term
infants in California.” Pediatrics 115, 121-128.

111. Patel J, Landers K, Li H, Mortimer RH, and Richard K. 2011.”Thyroid hormones and fetal neurological
development.” J Endocrinol 2011. Peters A, Doring A, Wichmann HE, and Koenig W. 1997

112. Perera FP, Rauh V, Tsai WY et al. Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental pollutants on birth
outcomes in a multiethnic population. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111:201–5.

113. Perera FP, Rauh V, Whyatt RM, Tsai WY, Tang D, Diaz D, et al. 2006. Effect of prenatal exposure to
airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on neurodevelopment in the first 3 years of life among inner-city
children. Environ Health Perspect 114:1287–1292.

114. Perera FP, Tang D, Rauh V, Tu YH, Tsai WY, Becker M, et al. 2007. Relationship between polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbon–DNA adducts, environmental tobacco smoke, and child development in the World
Trade Center cohort. Environ Health Perspect 115:1497–1502.

115. Perera FP, Hemminki K, Grzybowska E, Motykiewicz G, Michalska J, Santella RM, Young TL Dickey C,
Brandt-Rauf P, DeVivo I, et al. “Molecular and genetic damage from environmental pollution in Poland.”
Nature 360:256-258 (1992).

116. Perera FP, Jedrychowski W, Rauh V, Whyatt RM. Molecular epidemiologic research on the effects of
environmental pollutants on the fetus. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107 (Suppl 3):451–60.

117. Perera FP, Whyatt RM, Jedrychowski W, Raugh V, Manchester D, Santella RM, Ottman R. “Recent
Developments in molecular epidemiology. A study of the effects of environmental polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons on birth outcomes in Poland.” Am J Epidemiol 147:309-314(1998).

118. Peters A, Veronesi B, Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Gehr P, Chen LC, Geiser M, et al. 2006. Translocation and
potential neurological effects of fine and ultrafine particles a critical update. Part Fibre Toxicol 3:13;
doi:10.1186/1743-8977-3-13 Online 8 September 2006].

119. Petruzzi S, Fiore M, Dell’Omo G, Bignami G, Alleva E. 1995. Medium and long-term behavioral effects in
mice of extended gestational exposure to ozone. Neurotoxicol Teratol 17(4):463–470.

120. Pinkerton KE, Joad JP. 2006. Influence of air pollution on respiratory health during perinatal development.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 33(3):269–272.

121. Pitiphat W, Gillman MW, Joshipura KJ, Williams PL, Douglass CW, Rich-Edwards JW. Plasma C-reactive
protein in early pregnancy and preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:1108 –1113.

122. Ponce NA, Hoggatt KJ, Wilhelm M, Ritz B. 2005. Preterm birth: the interaction of traffic-related air pollution
with economic hardship in Los Angeles neighborhoods. Am J Epidemiol 162(2):140–148.

123. Rich DQ, Demissie K, Lu SE, Kamat L, Wartenberg D, and Rhoads G. 2009. “Ambient air pollutant
concentrations during pregnancy and the risk of fetal growth restriction.” J Epidemiol Community Health
63, 488-496.

124. Rinaudo PF, and Lamb J. 2008. “Fetal origins of perinatal morbidity and/or adult disease.” Semin Reprod
Med 26, 436-445.

125. Risom L, Moller P, and Loft S. 2005.”Oxidative stress-induced DNA damage by particulate air pollution.”
Mutat Res 592, 119-137.
126. Ritz, B, Wilhelm, M, “Air Pollution Impacts on Infants and Children,” UCLA Institute of the Environmental &
Sustainability.

127. Ritz B, Wilhelm M, and Zhao Y. “Air Pollution and infant death in Southern California, 1989-2000.”
Pediatrics 2006. 118:493-502.

128. Ritz B, Wilhelm M. “Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: Methodologic issues in an emerging
field.” Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2008;102:182-190.

129. Ritz B, Wilhelm M, Hoggatt KJ, and Ghosh JK. 2007. “Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the
environment and pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles.” Am J Epidemiol
166, 1045-1052.

130. Ritz B, Wilhelm M, Hoggatt KJ, Ghosh JK. Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the environment and
pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:1045–
1052.

131. Ritz B, Yu F, Chapa G, Fruin S. Effect of air pollution on preterm birth among children born in Southern
California between 1989 and 1993. Epidemiology 2000;11:502–11.

132. Ritz B, and Yu F. 1999. “The effect of ambient carbon monoxide on low birth weight among children born in
southern California between 1989 and 1993.” Environ Health Perspect 107, 17-25.

133. Ritz B, Yu F, Fruin S, Chapa G, Shaw GM, and Harris JA. 2002. “Ambient air pollution and risk of birth
defects in Southern California.” Am J Epidemiol 155, 17-25.

134. Robbins WA, Rubes J, Selevan SG, Perrault SD. “Air pollution and sperm aneuploidy in healthy young
men.” Environ Epidemiol Toxicol 1:125-131 (1999).

135. Rogers JF, Thompson SJ, Addy CL, McKeown RE, Cowen DJ, and Decoufle P. 2000. “Association of very
low birth weight with exposures to environmental sulfur dioxide and total suspended particulates” Am J
Epidemiol 151, 602-613.

136. Rubes J, Selevan SG, Evenson DP, Zudova D, Vozdova M, Zudova Z, et al. 2005. “Episodic air pollution is
associated with increased DNA fragmentation in human sperm without other changes in semen quality.”
Hum Reprod 20, 2776-2783.

137. Rudra C, Williams M. A prospective study of periconceptional ambient air pollutant exposures and
preeclampsia risk. Epidemiology 2006;17:S104.

138. Rudra CB, Williams MA, Sheppard L, Koenig JQ, and Schiff MA. 2011. “Ambient Carbon Monoxide and Fine
Particulate Matter in Relation to Preeclampsia and Preterm Delivery in Western Washington State.” Environ
Health Perspect.

139. Sagiv SK, Mendola P, Loomis D, Herring AH, Neas LM, Savitz DA, et al. 2005. “A time-series analysis of air
pollution and preterm birth in Pennsylvania, 1997-2001.” Environ Health Perspect 113, 602-606.

140. Salam M T, Millstein J, et al. (2005). "Birth outcomes and prenatal exposure to ozone, carbon monoxide,
and particulate matter: results from the Children's Health Study." Environmental Health Perspectives
113(11):1638-44.

141. Schwartz J, Dockery DW, Neas LM, Wypij D, Ware JH, Spengler JD, et al. 1994. “Acute effects of summer
air pollution on respiratory symptom reporting in children.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med 150, 1234-1242.

142. Seo JH, Leem JH, Ha EH, Kim OJ, Kim BM, Lee JY, et al. 2010. “Population-attributable risk of low
birthweight related to PM10 pollution in seven Korean cities. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 24, 140-148.
143. Selevan SG, Borkovec L, Zudova Z, Slott V, Hajnova R, Rubes J, Perrault SD. “Semen quality in young
men and air pollution in two Czech communities.” Epidemiology 6(suppl):S85 (1995)

144. Selevan SG, Lemasters GK. The dose-response fallacy in human reproductive studies of toxic exposures. J
Occup Med 1987;29:451–4.

145. Shah PS, and Balkhair T. 2011. “Air pollution and birth outcomes: a systematic review.” Environ Int 37, 498-
516.

146. Slama R, Darrow L, Parker J, Woodruff TJ, Strickland M, Nieuwenhuijsen M, et al. 2008. “Meeting report:
atmospheric pollution and human reproduction.” Environ Health Perspect 116, 791-798.

147. Slama R, Sinno-Tellier S, Thiebaugeorges O et al. Relation between atmospheric pollutants and head
Circumference in utero and at birth: a cohort study relying on ultrasound imaging during pregnancy.
Epidemiology 2006;17:S129.

148. Slama R, Morgenstern V, Cyrys J, Zutavern A, Herbarth O, Wichmann HE, et al. 2007. Traffic-related
atmospheric pollutants levels during pregnancy and offspring’s term birth weight: a study relying on a land-
use regression exposure model. Environ Health Perspect 115:1283–1292.

149. Smith GC, Crossley JA, Aitken DA et al. First-trimester placentation and the risk of antepartum stillbirth.
JAMA 2004;292:2249–54.

150. Sogut S, Zoroglu SS, Ozyurt H, Yilmaz HR, Ozugurlu F, Sivasli E, et al. 2003. Changes in nitric oxide levels
and antioxidant enzyme activities may have a role in the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in autism.
Clin Chim Acta 331(1–2):111–117.

151. Sokol R Z, Kraft P, et al. (2005). "Exposure To Environmental Ozone Alters Semen Quality." Environmental
Health Perspectives.

152. Somers CM, and Cooper DN. 2009. “Air pollution and mutations in the germline: are humans at risk?’ Hum
Genet 125, 119-130.

153. Somers CM, Yauk CL, White PA, Parfett CL, and Quinn JS. 2002. “Air pollution induces heritable DNA
mutations.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 15904-15907.

154. Sram RJ, Binkova B, Rossner P, Rubes J, Topinka J, Dejmek J.Adverse reproductive outcomes from
exposure to environmental mutagens. Mutat Res 1999;428:203–15.

155. Sram RJ, Binkova B, Dejmek J, Bobak M. Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the
literature. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:375–82.

156. Sram RJ, “Impact of Air Pollution on Reproductive Health,” Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 107,
No. 11, November 1999.

157. Strickland MJ, Klein M, Darrow LA, Flanders WD, Correa A, Marcus M, et al. 2009. “The issue of
confounding in epidemiological studies of ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes.” J Epidemiol
Community Health 63, 500- 504.

158. Suglia SF, Gryparis A, Wright RO, Schwartz J, Wright RJ. 2008. Association of black carbon with cognition
among children in a prospective birth cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 167(3):280–286.

159. Tabacova S, Nikiforov B, Balabaeva L. 1985. Postnatal effects of maternal exposure to nitrogen dioxide.
Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7:785–789.

160. Takeda K, Tsukue N, and Yoshida S. 2004. “Endocrine-disrupting activity of chemicals in diesel exhaust and
 diesel exhaust particles.” Environ Sci 11, 33-45

161. Thompson JN. 2007. “Fetal nutrition and adult hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and coronary artery
disease.” Neonatal Netw 26, 235-240.

162. Thompson MR, Boekelheide Kim. “Mutliple Environmental Chemcical Exposures to Lead, Mercury and
PCBs Among Childbearing-Aged Women.” Environmental Research, February 2013, doi:
10.1016/j.envres.2012.10.005.

163. Tong S and Colditz P. “Air pollution and sudden infant death syndrome: a literature review.” Paediatr
Perinat Epidemiol 2004; 18:327-35.

164. Toppari J, Larsen JC, Christiansen P, Giwercman A, Grandjean P, Guillette LI Jr, Jegou B, Jensen TK,
Jouannet P, Keiding N, et al. “Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens.” Environ Health
Perspect 104(suppl 4):741-803 (1996).

175. Topinka J, Binkova B, Mrackova G, Stavkova Z, Peterka V, Benes I, Dejmek J, Lenicek J, Pilcik T, Sram
RJ. “Influence of GSTM1 and NAT2 genotypes on placental DNA adducts in an environmentally exposed
population.” Environ Mol Mutagen 30:184-195 (1997).

176. Tran DQ, Ide CF, McLachlan JA, and Arnold SF. 1996. “The anti-estrogenic activity of selected polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons in yeast expressing human estrogen receptor.” Biochem Biophys Res Commun 229,
101-108.

177. Van Meter KC, Christiansen LE, Delwiche LD, Azari R, Carpenter TE, Hertz-Picciotto I. 2010. Geographic
distribution of autism in California: a retrospective birth cohort analysis. Autism Res 3(1):19–29.

178. Vassilev ZP, Robson MG, Klotz JB. 2001. Outdoor exposure to airborne polycyclic organic matter and
adverse reproductive outcomes: a pilot study. Am J Ind Med 40(3):255–262.

179. Volk HW, Fred Lurmann; Bryan Penfold;Irva Hertz-Picciotto, PhD; Rob McConnell, MD, “Traffic-Related Air
Pollution, Particulate Matter, and Autism.” JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(1):71-77.

180. Vorherr H. Factors influencing fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:577–88.

181. Wang X, Ding H, Ryan L, Xu X. “Association between air pollution and low birth weight a community-based
study.” Environ Health Perspect 105:514-520 (1997).

182. Wang K, Zhang H, Ma D, Bucan M, Glessner JT, Abrahams BS, et al. 2009. Common genetic variants on
5p14.1 associate with autism spectrum disorders. Nature 459(7246):528–533.

183. Watanabe N, Kurita M. 2001. The masculinization of the fetus during pregnancy due to inhalation of diesel
exhaust. Environ Health Perspect 109:111–119.

184. Wilhelm M. and Ritz B, (2005). "Local variations in CO and particulate air pollution and adverse birth
outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, USA." Environmental Health Perspectives 113(9): 1212-21.

185. Wilhelm M, Ritz B. Residential proximity to traffic and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles County,
California 1996. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:207–216.

186. Williams TA, Mars AE, Buyske SG, Stenroos ES, Wang R, Factura-Santiago MF, et al. 2007. Risk of autistic
disorder in affected offspring of mothers with a glutathione S-transferase P1 haplotype. Arch Pediatr
Adolesc Med 161(4):356–361.

187. Windham GC, Zhang L, Gunier R, Croen LA, Grether JK. 2006. Autism spectrum disorders in relation to
distribution of hazardous air pollutants in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environ Health Perspect 114:1438–
1444.
188. Woodruff T, Morello-Frosch R, Jesdale B. 2008. Air pollution and preeclampsia among pregnant women in
California, 1996–2004 [Abstract]. Epidemiology 19(6):S310.

189. Woodruff TJ, Parker JD, Darrow LA, Slama R, Bell ML, Choi H, et al. 2009. “Methodological issues in
studies of air pollution and reproductive health.” Environ Res 109, 311-320.

190. Woodruff TJ, Grillo J, Schoendorf KC. “The relationship between selected causes of postneonatal infant
mortality and particulate air pollution in the United States.” Environ Health Perspect 05:608-612 (1997).

191. Wyrobek AJ. “Methods and concepts in detecting abnormal reproductive outcomes of paternal origin. In:
Male-Mediated Developmental Toxicity.” (Olsen AF, Mattisson DR, eds.).NewYork:Plenum Press 1994;
1-21.

192. Wu J, Ren C, Delfino RJ, Chung J, Wilhelm M, Ritz B. Association between local traffic-generated air
pollution and preeclampsia and preterm delivery in the south coast air basin of California. Environ Health
Perspect. 2009;117:1773–1779.

193. Xiong, X., Fraser, W.D., 2004. Impact of pregnancy-induced hypertension on birthweight by gestational age.
Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 18, 186–191.

194. Xiong, X., et al., 1999. Impact of pregnancy-induced hypertension on fetal growth. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
180, 207–213.

195. Xu X, Ding H, and Wang X. 1995. “Acute effects of total suspended particles and sulfur dioxides on preterm
delivery: a community-based cohort study.” Arch Environ Health 50, 407-415.

196. Xu X, Sharma RK, Talbott EO, Zborowski JV, Rager J, Arena VC, et al. 2010.”PM10 air pollution exposure
during pregnancy and term low birth weight in Allegheny County,” PA, 1994-2000. Int Arch Occup Environ
Health 84, 251-257.

197. Xu, X, Kan, H, Ha, S, “Ambient Air Pollution and Reproductive Health,” Dept. of Epidemiology,College of
Public Health & Health Professions, University of Florida, Dept. of Environmental Health, School of Public
health, Fudan University, China

198. Yao Y, Walsh WJ, McGinnis WR, Pratico D. 2006. Altered vascular phenotype in autism: correlation with
oxidative stress. Arch Neurol 63(8):1161–1164.

199. Zhang, J., et al., 2007. Blood pressure dynamics during pregnancy and spontaneous preterm birth. Am. J.
Obstet. Gynecol. 197, 162 e1-6.

200. Zhao Q, Liang Z, Tao S, Zhu J, and Du Y. 2011. “Effects of air pollution on neonatal prematurity in
Guangzhou of China: a time-series study.” Environ Health 10, 2.
 Appendix A-6: Cancer

18 Citations

1. Boffetta P. “Human cancer from environmental pollutants: the epidemiological evidence.” Mutation Research.
2006. 608(2):157-62.

2. Boffetta P, Dosemeci M, et al. (2001). "Occupational exposure to diesel engine emissions and risk of cancer
in Swedish men and women." Cancer Causes Control 12(4): 365-74.

3. Cohen AJ. (2003). "Air pollution and lung cancer: what more do we need to know?" Thorax 58(12): 1010-2.

4. EPA,” Health Effects Information Used In Cancer and Noncancer Risk Characterization for the 2005 National-
Scale Assessment.”

5. Grant W, ”Air pollution in relation to U.S. cancer mortality rates: an ecological study; likely role of
carbonaceous aerosols and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.” Anticancer Research. 2009. 29(9):3537-45.

6. Guo J, Kauppinen T, et al. (2004). "Risk of esophageal, ovarian, testicular, kidney and bladder cancers and
leukemia among Finnish workers exposed to diesel or gasoline engine exhaust." Int J Cancer 111(2): 286-92.

7. Mack T. (2006). "Cancers in the Urban Environment." Presentation to the Southern California Association of
Governments, January 18, 2006. Book published by Elsevier Academic Press.

8. Mack T. (2005). "Cancers in the Urban Environment." Presentation at NIEHS Town Meeting February 2005.
Book published by Elsevier Academic Press.

9. Nafstad P, Haheim LL, et al. (2003). "Lung cancer and air pollution: a 27 year follow up of 16 209 Norwegian
men." Thorax 58(12): 1071-6.

10. Nicolich MJ, Gamble JF, (2001). "Urban air pollution and lung cancer in Stockholm." Epidemiology 12(5): 590-
2.

11. Pope CA, 3rd, Burnett RT, et al. (2002). "Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to
fine particulate air pollution." Jama 287(9): 1132-41

12. Raaschou-Nielson, O. et al. “Air pollution from traffic and risk for lung cancer in three Danish cohorts.” Cancer
Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2010. 19(5):1284-91.

13. Raaschou-Nielsen, O. et al.” Lung Cancer Incidence and Long-Term Exposure to Air Pollution from Traffic.”
Environmental Health Perspectives. 2011 Jan 12.

14. Roosli M, Kunzli N, et al. (2003). "Single pollutant versus surrogate measure approaches: do single pollutant
risk assessments underestimate the impact of air pollution on lung cancer risk?" J Occup Environ Med 45(7):
715-23.

15. South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) (1999). "Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES-
II)."

16. South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) (2008). "Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES-
III)."

17. Turner M, et al. “Long-Term Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Lung Cancer in a Large Cohort
of Never Smokers.” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. Published ahead of print on
October 6, 2011.
18. Vineis P, Forastiere F, et al. (2004). "Outdoor air pollution and lung cancer: recent epidemiologic evidence."
Int J Cancer 111(5): 647-52.
 Appedndix A-7: Health Assessment & Monitoring

86 Citations

1…Anderson HR, Spix C, Medina S, Schouten JP, Castellsague J, Rossi G, Zmirou D, Touloumi G, Wojtyniak B,
Ponka A, et al, “Air pollution and daily admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 6 European
cities: results from the APHEA project.” Eur Respir J. 1997 May;10(5):1064–1071.

2. Bates DV, Baker-Anderson M, Sizto R. “Asthma attack periodicity: a study of hospital emergency visits in
Vancouver.” Environ Res. 1990 Feb;51(1):51–70.

3. Bates DV, Sizto R. “Hospital admissions and air pollutants in southern Ontario: the summer acid haze effects.”
Environ Res 43:317-331 (1987).

4. Burnett RT, Brook JR, Yung WT, Dales RE, Krewski D. “Association between ozone and hospitalization for
respiratory diseases in 16 Canadian cities.” Environ Res. 1997 Jan;72(1):24–31

5. Burnett RT, Cakmak S, Brook JR, and Krewski D. “The role of particulate size and chemistry in the association
between summertime ambient air pollution and hospitalization for cardiorespiratory diseases.” Environ Health
Perspect 1997: 105(6): 614–620.

6. Burnett RT, Dales RE, Raizenne ME, Krewski D, Summers PW, Roberts GR, Raad-Young M, Dann T, Brook
J. “Effects of low ambient levels of ozone and sulfates on the frequency of respiratory admissions to Ontario
hospitals.” Environ Res. 1994 May;65(2):172–194.

7. Burnett RT, Dales R, Krewski D, Vincent R, Dann T, Brook JR. “Associations between ambient particulate
sulfate and admissions to Ontario hospitals for cardiac and respiratory diseases.” Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Jul
1;142(1):15–22.

8. Burnett RT, Smith-Doiron M, Stieb D, Cakmak S, Brook JR. “Effects of particulate and gaseous air pollution
on cardiorespiratory hospitalizations. Arch Environ Health.” 1999 Mar-Apr;54(2):130–139.

9. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2010b. National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR).
Registry Plus, a suite of publicly available software programs for collecting and processing cancer registry
data. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/ [accessed 8 December 2012].

10. Cohen AJ, Anderson HR, Ostro B, Pandey KD, Krzyzanowski M, Kunzli N, Gutschmidt K, Pope CA, Romieu
I, Samet J M, Smith KR, “Mortality impacts of urban air pollution. In Comparative Quantification of Health
Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Due To Selected Major Risk Factors,” Ezzati M, Lopez AD,
Rodgers A, Murray CJL, Eds.; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2004; Vol. 2, pp 1353–1394.

11. Dean B, Calimlim B, Kinderman S, et al. The impact of uncontrolled asthma on absenteeism and health
related quality of life. J Asthma 2009; 46: 861–866.

12. Delfino RJ, Becklake MR, Hanley JA, Singh B. “Estimation of unmeasured particulate air pollution data for an
epidemiological study of daily respiratory morbidity.” Environ Res. 1994 Oct;67(1):20–38.

13. Delfino RJ, Murphy-Moulton AM, Burnett RT, Brook JR, Becklake MR. “Effects of air pollution on emergency
 room visits for respiratory illnesses in Montreal, Quebec.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Feb;155(2):

568–576

14. Dockery DW, Schwartz J, Spengler JD, “Ir pollution and daily mortality: associations with particulates and
acid aerosols.” Environ Res. 1992 Dec;59(2):362-73.

15. Dockery DW, Pope CA, 3rd, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, Ferris BG, Jr, Speizer FE. “An
association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities.” N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 9;329(24):1753–
1759.

16. Galan I, Tobías A, Banegas JR, Aránguez E, “Short-term effects of air pollution on daily asthma emergency
Room Admissions. “ Eur Respir J. 2003 Nov;22(5):802-8.

17. Goldberg MS, Burnett RT, Bailar JC 3rd, Tamblyn R, Ernst P, Flegel K, Brook J, “Identification of persons
With cardiorespiratory conditions who are at risk of dying from the acute effects of ambient air particles. “
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Aug;109 Suppl 4:487-94.

18. Goldsmith JR, Griffith HL, Detels R, Beeser S, Neumann L, “Emergency room admissions, meteorologic
variables, and air pollutants: a path analysis.” Am J Epidemiol 118:759-778(1983).

19. Gouveia N, Fletcher T, “Time series analysis of air pollution and mortality: effects by cause, age and
socioeconomic status Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Oct;54(10):750-5.

20. Grineski S, Bolin B, Boone C. 2007. Criteria air pollution and marginalized populations: environmental
inequity in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. Soc Sci Q 88(2);535–554.

21. Hoggatt K, Flores M, Solorio R, Wilhelm M, Ritz B. 2012. The “Latina Epidemiologic Paradox” revisited: The
role of birthplace and acculturation in predicting infant low birth weight for Latinas in Los Angeles, CA. J
Immigr Minor Health 4(5):875–884.

22. Hubbell BJ, Hallberg A, McCubbin DR, and Post E. “Health-related benefits of attaining the 8-hr ozone
standard.” Environ Health Perspect 2005:113(1): 73–82.

23. Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR et al, “Disease Control in Develping Countries.” The Disease Control
Priorities Project, http://www.dcp2.org.

24. Laurent O, Pedrono G, Segala C, et al. Air pollution, asthma attacks, and socioeconomic deprivation: a small-
area case-crossover study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:58–65.

25. Lin S, Bell EM, Liu W, Walker RJ, Kim NK, and Hwang SA. “Ambient ozone concentration and hospital
admissions due to childhood respiratory diseases in New York State,” 1991–2001. Environ Res 2008:
108(1): 42–47

26. Lin S, Jones R, Pantea C, Ozkaynak H, Rao ST, Hwang S, Garcia VC, “Impact of NOx emissions reductions
policy on hospitalizations for respiratory disease in New York. “ Journal of Exposure Science and
Environmental Epidemiology (2013) 23, 73–80.

27. Lipfert FW, Hammerstrom T. “Temporal patterns in air pollution and hospital admissions.” Environ Res. 1992
Dec;9(2):374–399.

28. Lippmann M, Ito K, Nádas A, Burnett RT, “Association of particulate matter components with daily mortality
and mortality in urban populations.” Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2000 Aug;(95):5-72, discussion 73-82.

29. Lipsett M, Hurley S, Ostro B. Air pollution and emergency room visits for asthma in Santa Clara County,
California. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Feb;105(2):216–222.
30. Lipsett MJ, Tsai FC, Roger L, Woo M, Ostro BD, “Coarse particles and heart rate variability among older with
Coronary artery disease in the Coachella Valley, California.” Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Aug;114(8):1215-
20.

31. Lipsett MJ, Ostro BD, Reynolds P, Goldberg D, Hertz A, Jerrett M, Smith DF, Garcia C, Chang ET, Bernstein
L. “Long term exposure to air pollution and cardiorespiratory disease in the California teachers study cohort.”
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct 1;184(7):828-35. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201012-2082OC.

32. Lobdell DT, Isakov V, Baxter L, Touma JS, Smuts MB, and Özkaynak H. “Feasibility of assessing public
health impacts of air pollution reduction programs on a local scale: New Haven case study.” Environ Health
Perspect2011: 119(4): 487–493.

33. Lutz LJ, “Health effects of air pollution measured by outpatient visits.” J Fam Pract. 1983 Feb;16(2):307-13.

34. Malig BJ, Ostro BD, “Coarse particles and mortality: evidence from a multi-city study in California..” Occup
Environ Med. 2009 Dec;66(12):832-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.045393. Epub 2009 Jul 30.

35. Moolgavkar SH, Luebeck EG, Anderson EL. “Air pollution and hospital admissions for respiratory causes in
Minneapolis-St. Paul and Birmingham.” Epidemiology. 1997 Jul;8(4):364–370.

36. Moolqavkar SH, Luebeck EG, “A critical review of the evidence on particulate air pollution and mortality.”
Epidemiology. 1996 Jul;7(4):420-8.

37. Moore C, Uyeda K, Cuevas Y, et al. Los Angeles Unified School District’s comprehensive asthma program:
results show decreased asthma symptoms and missed school days among students with asthma. NASN Sch
Nurse 2010; 25: 210–212.

38. Morgan G, Corbett S, Wlodarczyk J. “Air pollution and hospital admissions in Sydney, Australia, 1990 to
1994.” Am J Public Health. 1998 Dec;88(12):1761–1766.

39. Nevalainen J, Pekkanen J. “The effect of particulate air pollution on life expectancy.” Sci Total Environ. 1998
Jun 30;217(1-2):137–141.

40. Ostro BD. “Associations between morbidity and alternative measures of particulate matter.” Risk Anal. 1990
Sep;10(3):421–427.

41. Ostro BD, Rothschild S. “Air pollution and acute respiratory morbidity: an observational study of multiple
pollutants.” Environ Res. 1989 Dec;50(2):238–247.

42. Ostro BD, Hurley S, Lipsett MJ, “Air pollution and daily mortality in the Coachella Valley, California: a study of
PM10 dominated by coarse particles> “Environ Res. 1999 Oct;81(3):231-8.

43. Ostro BD, “Air pollution and morbidity: a sensitivity analysis of alternative monitors, pollutants, and averaging
times.” Sci Total Environ. 1984 Oct;39(1-2):111-24.

44. Ostro BD, Lipsett MJ, Wiener MB, Selner JC. “Asthmatic responses to airborne acid aerosols.” Am J Public
Health. 1991 Jun;81(6):694–702.

45. Ostro BD, Lipsett MJ, Mann JK, Krupnick A, Harrington W. “Air pollution and respiratory morbidity among
adults in southern California.” Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Apr 1;137(7):691–700.

46. Ostro BD, Broadwin R, Lipsett MJ, “Coarse and fine particles and daily mortality in the Coachella Valley,
California: a follow-up study.” J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2000 Sep-Oct;10(5):412-9.
47. Ostro BD, Roth LA, Green RS, Basu R, “Estimating the mortality effect of the July 2006 California heat wave.
Environ Res 2009. Jul;109(5):614-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 Apr 25.

48. Ostro BD, “Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in two Southern California counties.” Emviron Res. 1995
Aug:70(2):98-104.

49. Ostro BD, Feng WY, Broadwin R, Green S, Lipsett M, “The effects of components of fine particulate air
pollution on Mortality in California: results from CALFINE.” Environ Health Perspect . 2007 Jan;115(1):13-9.

50. Ostro BD, Tran H, Levy JI, “The health benefits of reduced tropospheric ozone in California.” J Air Waste
Manag Assoc 2008 Ju ;56(7):1007-21.

51. Peel J.L., Metzger K.B., Klein M., et al. “Ambient air pollution and cardiovascular emergency department
visits in potentially sensitive groups.” Am J Epidemiol 2007: 165(6): 625–633

52. Peters A, Döring A, Wichmann HE, Koenig W. “Increased plasma viscosity during an air pollution episode:
a link to mortality?” Lancet. 1997 May 31;349(9065):1582–158

53. Peters JM, Avol E, Navidi W, London SJ, Gauderman WJ, Lurmann F, Linn WS, Margolis H, Rappaport E,
Gong H, et al. “A study of twelve Southern California communities with differing levels and types of air
pollution. Prevalence of respiratory morbidity.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Mar;159(3):760–767.

54. Pope CA, 3rd, Schwartz J, Ransom MR. “Daily mortality and PM10 pollution in Utah Valley.Arch Environ
Health.” 1992 May-Jun;47(3):211–217

55. Pope CA, 3rd, Thun MJ, Namboodiri MM, Dockery DW, Evans JS, Speizer FE, Heath CW, “Particulate air
pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective study of U.S. adults.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995
Mar;151(3 Pt 1):669–674

56. Pope CA, “Respiratory hospital admissions associated with PM1O pollution in Utah, Salt Lake, and Cache
Valleys.” Arch Environ Health 46:90-97 (1991).

57. Pope CA, 3rd, Kalkstein LS. “Synoptic weather modeling and estimates of the exposure-response
relationship between daily mortality and particulate air pollution.” Environ Health Perspect. 1996
Apr;104(4):414–420.

58. Ransom MR, Pope CA 3rd, “Elementary school absences and PM10 pollution in Utah Valle” Environ Res.
1992 Aug;58(2):204-19.

59. Romieu I, Lugo MC, Velasco SR, Sanchez S, Meneses F, Hernandez M, “Air pollution and school
absenteeism among children in Mexico City, “ Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Dec 15;136(12):1524-31.

60. Samet JM, Speizer FE, Bishop Y, Spengler JD, Ferris BG Jr., “The relationship between air pollution and
emergency room visits in an industrial community.” J Air Pollut Control Assoc 31:236-240 (1981).

61. Schwartz J, Slater D, Larson TV, Pierson WE, Koenig JQ, “Particulate air pollution and hospital emergency
visits for asthma in Seattle.” Am Rev Respir Dis 147:826-831 (1993).

62. Schwartz J. “Particulate air pollution and daily mortality in Detroit.” Environ Res. 1991 Dec;56(2):204–213.

63. Schwartz J. “Air pollution and daily mortality in Birmingham, Alabama.” Am J Epidemiol. 1993 May
15;137(10):1136–1147. [PubMed]
64. Schwartz J, “Air pollution and hospital admissions for respiratory disease.” Epidemiology. 1996 Jan;7(1):20-8.

65. Schwartz J. “Total suspended particulate matter and daily mortality in Cincinnati, Ohio.” Environ Health
Perspect. 1994 Feb;102(2):186–189.

66. Schwartz J, Dockery DW. “Particulate air pollution and daily mortality in Steubenville, Ohio.” Am J
Epidemiol. 1992 Jan 1;135(1):12–25.

67. Schwartz J, Dockery DW. “Increased mortality in Philadelphia associated with daily air pollution
concentrations.” Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Mar;145(3):600–604.

68. Schwartz J, Dockery DW, Neas LM. “Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles?” J Air Waste
Manag Assoc. 1996 Oct;46(10):927–939.

69. Schwartz J, Marcus A. “Mortality and air pollution in London: a time series analysis.” Am J Epidemiol. 1990
Jan;131(1):185–194

70. Sunyer J, Anto JM, Murillo C, Saez M, “Effects of urban air pollution on emergency room admissions for
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.” AmJ Epidemiol 134:277-286 (1991).

71. Thurston GD, Ito K, Kinney PL, Lippmann M. “A multi-year study of air pollution and respiratory hospital
admissions in three New York State metropolitan areas: results for 1988 and 1989 summers.” J Expo Anal
Environ Epidemiol. 1992 Oct-Dec;2(4):429–450.

72. Thurston GD, Ito K, Hayes CG, Bates DV, Lippmann M. “Respiratory hospital admissions and summertime
haze air pollution in Toronto, Ontario: consideration of the role of acid aerosols.” Environ Res. 1994
May;65(2):271–290

73. Tinkelman D, Khandker R, Calimlim B, et al. Absenteeism from school or work among uncontrolled asthma
patients. Pediatric Asthma 2007; 132: 484a.

74. Wilhelm M, Meng YY, Rull RP, English P, Balmes J, Ritz B. Environmental public health tracking of childhood
asthma using California Health Interview Survey, traffic, and outdoor air pollution data. Environ Health
Perspect. 2008;116:1254–1260.

75. Wolstein J, Meng YY, Babey S. Income disparities in asthma burden and care in California. UCLA Center for
Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, CA, 2010 www.healthpolicy.ucla.edu/pubs/files/asthma-burden-report-
1210.pdf Date last accessed: April 23, 2012.

76. Woodruff TJ, Grillo J, Schoendorf KC. “The relationship between selected causes of postneonatal infant
mortality and particulate air pollution in the United States.” Environ Health Perspect.1997 Jun;105(6):608–612

77. Wordley J, Walters S, Ayres JG. “Short term variations in hospital admissions and mortality and particulate air
pollution.” Occup Environ Med. 1997 Feb;54(2):108–116.

78. World Health Organization. “Global environmental monitoring system-urban air pollution, 1973-80.” London:
University of London, 1984.
79. Xu X, Li B, Huang H, “Air pollution and unscheduled hospital outpatient and emergency room visits.” Environ
Health Perspect. 1995 Mar;103(3):286-9.

80. Xu X, Gao J, Dockery DW, Chen YD, “Air pollution and daily mortality in residential areas of Beijing, China.
Arch Environ Health 49:216-222 (1994).

81. Xu X, Dockery DW, Christiani DC, Li BL, Huang HY. “Association of air pollution with hospital outpatient
visits in Beijing.” Arch Environ Health.

83. Yang W, Jennison BL, Omaye ST. Cardiovascular disease hospitalization and ambient levels of carbon
monoxide. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 1998 Oct 9;55(3):185–196.

84. Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. “Air pollution and emergency admissions in Boston, MA.” J Epidemiol Community
Health 2006: 60(10): 890–895.

85. Zeger SL, Dominici F, Samet J. “Harvesting-resistant estimates of air pollution effects on
mortality.” Epidemiology. 1999 Mar;10(2):171–175.

86. Zeka A, Zanobetti A, Schwartz J, “Short term effects of particulate matter on cause specific mortality: effects
of lags and modification by city characteristics.” Occup Environ Med. 2005 Oct;62(10):718-25.

 
 
 
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Women’s Breast Cancer

Bibliography

1.2.2014

37 Citations
 

1..Argo J, “Chronic diseases and early exposure to airborne mixtures: Part III. Potential origin of pre-menopausal
breast cancers, chronic diseases and early exposure to airborne mixtures.” Journal of Exposure Science and
Environmental Epidemiology 20, 147-159 (March/April 2010) doi:10.1038/jes.2009.12

2. Belpomme D, Irigaray P, Hardell L, Clapp R, Montagnier L, Epstein S, Sasco AJ, “The multitude and diversity
of environmental carcinogens.” Environmental Research Volume 105, Issue 3, November 2007, Pages 414–
429.

3. Bidgoli SA, Eftekhari T, Sadeghipour R, “Role of xenoestrogens and endogenous sources of estrogens on the
Occurrence of premenopausal breast cancer in iran.” Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(9):2425-30.

4. Boeglin ML, Wessels D, Henshel D, “An investigation of the relationship between air emissions of volatile
organic compounds and the incidence of cancer in Indiana counties,” Environ Res 2006, 100:242-254

5. Bonner MR, Han D, Nie J, Rogerson P, Vena JE, Muti P, Trevisan M, Edge SB, Freudenheim JL, “Breast
cancer risk and exposure in early life to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using total suspended particulates
as a proxy measure.” Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jan;14(1):53-60.

6. Brody JG, Moysich KB, Humblet O, Attfield KR, Beehler GP, Rudel RA, “Environmental pollutants and breast
cancer:epidemiologic studies.” Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;109(12 Suppl):2667-711.

7. Brody JG, Moysich KB, Humblet O, Attfield KR, Beehler GP, Rudel RA, “Environmental pollutants and breast
cancer:epidemiological studies.” Rev Environ Health 2010 Jan-Mar;25(1):1-7.

8. Brody JG, “Everyday Exposures and Breast Cancer,” Rev Environ Health 2010 Jan-Mar;25(1):1-7.

9. Bryant K, “Impact of Air Pollution on Women's Health,” SAGE Journals, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck
Surgery October 2, 1995.

10. Coyle YM, “The effect of environment on breast cancer risk,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 84:273-
288, 2004.

11. Crouse DL, Goldberg MS, Ross NA, Chen H, LaLbreche F, ”Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Is Associated
with Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution in Montreal, Canada: A Case-Control Study.” Environ Health
Perspect, 2010; 118:1578-1583, Epub Oct 6.

11. Das A, Banerjee S, De A, Haque I, Maity G, McEwen M, Banerjee SK, ”The green tea polyphenol EGCG
Induces mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET) and tumor regression in triple negative breast cancer
(TNBC) cells and mouse xenograft model: Involvement of CCN5.” Poster # 8, Abstract # 4385

12. Freudenheim, Jo L, “Environmental Exposures at Birth and at Menarche and Risk of Breast Cancer,” State
Univ of New York at Buffalo Amherst Annual rept. 1 Jun 2001-31 May 2002.

13. Frumkin H, Hess J, Vindigni S, “Energy and Public Health: The Challenge of Peak Petroleum,” Public Health
 Rep. 2009
Jan-Feb; 124(1): 5–19.
14. Gammon MD, Sagiv SK, Eng SM, Shantakumar S, Gaudet MM, Teitelbaum SL, Britton JA, Terry MB,
Wang LW, Wang Q, Stellman SD, Beyea J, Hatch M, Kabat GC, Wolff MS, Levin B, Neugut AI, Santella RM,
“Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts and breast cancer: a pooled analysis.”
Arch Environ Health. 2004 Dec;59(12):640-9.

15. Graham A, Colditz D, Hunter J, “Cancer prevention: the causes and prevention of cancer.” Cancer Causes
and Control, 1996;7(Suppl 1) and 1997; 8(Suppl 2).

16. Grant WB, “Air Pollution in Relation to U.S. Cancer Mortality Rates: An Ecological Study; Likely Role of
Carbonaceous Aerosols and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons,”International Institute of Anticancer
Research April 2, 2009.

17. Gray J, “State of the Evidence: the Connection Between Breast Cancer and the Environment.” Breast Cancer
Fund, 5th Report 2008.

18. Hang B, “Benzene-derived N2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-deoxyguanosine adduct: UvrABC incision and its

conformation in DNA,” LBNL Paper LBNL-3840E, 8-31-2010

19. Hester RE, Harrison RM, “Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals.” Issues in Environmental Science and Technology

20. Hombach-Klonisch S, Pocar P, Kietz S, Klonisch T, “Molecular Actions of Polyhalogenated Arylhydrocarbons

(PAHs) in Female Reproduction.” Current Medicinal Chemistry, Volume 12, Number 5, March 2005, pp. 599-
616(18).

21. Interagency Breast Cancer and Environmental Research Coordinating Committee (IBCERCC), ”Breast
Cancer and the Environment: Prioritizing Prevention.”

22. Just J, Kobuszewska-Faryna M, Gajl-Peczalska K, Kopczyński J, Kruś S, Maziarka S, Wyszyńska H., PMID:,
“Studies on the composition and carcinogenic properties of substances contained in dust suspended in
atmospheric air. II. Studies on carcinogenic properties of benzene extracts from the atmospheric dust
collected in 10 towns in Poland,“PMID:Rocz Panstow, 1970;21(3):221-39.

23. Lewis EL, JM Melieu, Kallenbach LE, Ju CL, Talbot JO, Orr MF, “Breast Cancer Risk and Residence near
Industry or Traffic in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, Long Island, New York,” Archives of Environmental Health:
An International Journal Volume 51, Issue 4, 1996 pages 255-265.

24. Smith MT, Jones RM, Smith AH, “Benzene Exposure and Risk of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.” Center for
Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.

25. Mordukhovich I, Rossner P, Terry MB, Santella R, Zhang YJ, Hibshoosh H, Memeo L, Mansukhani M, Long
CM, Garbowski G, Agrawal M, Gaudet MM, Steck SE, Sagiv SK, Eng SM, Teitelbaum SL, Neugut AI,
Conway-Dorsey K, Gammon MD, “Associations between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-related
exposures and p53 mutations in breast tumors.” Environ Health Perspect 2010.

26. Morris JJ, Seifter E, “The role of aromatic hydrocarbons in the genesis of breast cancer.”
Med Hypothesis 1992 Jul;38(3):177-84.

27. Musafia-Jeknic T, Mahadevan B, Pereira C, Baird WM, “Long-term effects of a standardized complex mixture
of urban dust particulate on the metabolic activation of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in
human cells in culture.” Toxicol Sci. 2005 Dec;88(2):358-66. Epub 2005 Sep 14.

28. Nie J, Beyea J, Bonner MR, Han D, Vena JE, Rogerson P, Vito D, Muti P, Trevisan M,
Edge SB, Freudenheim JL, “Exposure to traffic emissions throughout life and risk of breast cancer: the

29. Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) study,” Cancer Causes Control. 2007
Nov;18(9):947-55. Epub 2007 Jul 14.
30. Nudelman J, Brynn T, Evans E, Rizzo J, Gray J, Engel C, Walke M, “Policy and Research Recommendations
Emerging from the Scientific Evidence Connecting Environmental Factors and Breast Cancer,” INT JO CCUP
ENVIRON HEALTH 2009;15:79-10.

31. Rorie CH, Richardson SL, Lucas AC, Thomas PA, Gurley, KM, Franks MA, “Styrene compounds induce
apoptosis in triple negative breast cancer cell lines. ”Cell Death & Cancer Therapy, Poster Board # 24
Abstract # 604, AACR Annual Meeting 2013, Washington DC, April6-10, 2013.

32. Sadikovic B, Rodenhiser DI, “Benzopyrene exposure disrupts DNA methylation and growth dynamics
in breast cancer cells,“ Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2006 Nov 1;216(3):458-68. Epub 2006 Jun 30.

33. Sagiv SK, Gaudet MM, Eng SM, Abrahamson PE, Shantakumar S, Teitelbaum SL, Bell P,
Thomas JA, Neugut AI, Santella RM, Gammon MD, “Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts
and survival among women with breast cancer,” Environ Res. 2009 Apr;109(3):287-91. Epub 2009 Jan 31.

34. Saleh F, Abdallah Behbehani, Sami Asfar, Islam Khan and Ghada Ibrahim, “Abnormal Blood Levels of Trace
Elements and Metals, DNA Damage, and Breast Cancer in the State of Kuwait.”

35. Shen M, Lan Q, Zhang L, Li S, Ermeulen R, Rappaport SM, Guo W, Hayes RB, Linet M, Yin S, Yeager
M, Welch R, Forrest MS, “Polymorphisms in genes involved in DNA double-strand break repair pathway and
susceptibility to benzene-induced hematotoxicity,” Oxford Journals Life Sciences & Medicine Carcinogenesis,
Volume 27, Issue 10 Pp. 2083-2089

36. Vrabie CM, Candido A, Van den Berg H, Murk AJ, Van Duursen MBM, Jonker MTO, “Specific in vitro toxicity
of crude and refined petroleum products: 3. Estrogenic responses in mammalian assays.” Environmental
Toxicology and Chemistry, Volume 30, Issue 4, pages 973–980, April 2011.

37. Yilmaz B, Sempebwa J, Mackerer CR, Arcaro KF, Carpenter DO, “Effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-
Containing oil mixtures on generation of reactive oxygen species and cell viability in MCF-7 breast
cancer cells, “ J Toxicol Environ Health 007 Jul;70(13):1108-15.

38. Zheng T, Holford TR, Mayne ST, Owens PH, Ward B, Carter D, Dubrow R, Zahm SH, Boyle P, Tessari J,
“Beta-benzene hexachloride in breast adipose tissue and risk of breast carcinoma,“ Cancer. 1999 May
15;85(10):2212-8.
 
 
 Coalition For A Safe Environment

Pregnant Women & Prenatal Air Pollution Health Impacts 
 
Bibliography 
 
10.24.2014 
 
178 Citations 
 
 
1. Abbas I, Garçon G, Saint‐Georges F, Andre V, Gosset P, Billet S, Goff JL, Verdin A, Mulliez P, Sichel F, Shirali P.  
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons within airborne particulate matter (PM(2.5) ) produced DNA bulky stable adducts 
in a human lung cell coculture model.  J Appl Toxicol. 2011 Sep 13. doi: 10.1002/jat.1722.  
 
2. Aguilera I, Garcia‐Esteban R, Iñiguez C, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Rodriguez A, Paez M, et al. Prenatal exposure to traffic‐
related air pollution and ultrasound measures of fetal growth in the INMA Sabadell cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 
2010;118:705–711.  
 
3. Aguilera I, Sunyer J, Fernández‐Patier R, et al . Estimation of outdoor NO(x), NO(2), and BTEX exposure in a cohort of 
pregnant women using land use regression modeling. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42:815–21 
 
4. Alexander FE, Patheal SL, Biondi A, Brandalise S, Cabrera ME, Chan LC, Chen Z, Cimino G, Cordoba JC, Gu LJ, Hussein 
H, Ishii E, Kamel AM, Labra S, Magalhaes IQ, Mizutani S, Petridou E, de Oliveira MP, Yuen P, Wiemels JL, Greaves MF 
(2001). “Transplacental chemical exposure and risk of infant leukemia with MLL gene fusion.” Cancer Res 
61(6):2542‐2546. 
 
5. Archibong AE, Inyang F, Ramesh A, Greenwood M, Nayyar T, Kopsombut P, et al. Alteration of pregnancy related 
hormones and fetal survival in F‐344 rats exposed by inhalation to benzo(a)pyrene. Reprod Toxicol. 2002;16:801–
808.  
 
6. ATSDR (1997) “Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.  Toxicological Profile for Benzene.”  U.S. 
Department of Health and Human Services, September, 1997, Atlanta, GA. 
 
7. Baccarelli A.  Breathe deeply into your genes!: genetic variants and air pollution effects.., Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 
2009 Mar 15;179(6):431‐2. 
  
8. Baccarelli A, Wright RO, Bollati V, Tarantini L, Litonjua AA, Suh HH, Zanobetti A, Sparrow D, Vokonas PS, Schwartz J. 
Rapid DNA methylation changes after exposure to traffic particles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr 
1;179(7):523‐4.  
 
9. Badham HJ, LeBrun DP, Rutter A, Winn LM, “Transplacental benzene exposure increases tumor incidence in mouse 
offspring: possible role of fetal benzene metabolism.” (Children) Carcinogenesis vol.31 no.6 pp.1142–1148, 2010 
 
10. Ballester F, Estarlich M, Iñiguez C, Llop S, Ramón R, Esplugues A, et al. 2010. Air pollution exposure during pregnancy 
and reduced birth size: a prospective birth cohort study in Valencia, Spain. Environ Health 96; doi:[Online 29 January 
2010]10.1186/1476‐069X‐9‐6  
 
11. Barker DJ. Fetal programming of coronary heart disease. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2002;13:364–368.  
 
12. Barker DJ, Martyn CN. 1992. The maternal and fetal origins of cardiovascular disease. J Epidemiol Community Health 
46:8–11[ 
  
13. Bass V, Gordon CJ, Jarema KA, Macphail RC, Cascio WE, Phillips PM, Ledbetter AD, Schladweiler MC, Andrews D, 
Miller D, Doerfler DL, Kodavanti UP.  Ozone Induces Glucose Intolerance and Systemic Metabolic Effects in Young 
and Aged Brown Norway Rats.  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013 Oct 5. pii: S0041‐008X(13)00429‐8. doi: 
10.1016/j.taap.2013.09.029.  
 
14. Bobak M. Outdoor air pollution, low birth weight, and prematurity. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Feb;108(2):173–
176. 
 
15. Bocskay K, Tang D, Orjuela M, et al.  Chromosomal Aberrations in Cord Blood Are Associated with Prenatal Exposure 
to Carcinogenic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons.  Cancer Epidem Biomarkers and  Prev.  Vol. 14, 506‐511, Feb 
2005 
 
16. Bonzini M, Carugno M, Grillo P, Mensi C, Bertazzi PA, Pesatori AC. Impact of ambient air pollution on birth outcomes: 
systematic review of the current evidences. Med Lav. 2010;101:341–363.  
 
17. Boström Carl‐Elis, Gerde Per, Hanberg Annika, Jernström Bengt, Johansson Christer, Kyrklund Titus, Rannug Agneta, 
Törnqvist Margareta, Victorin Katarina, Westerholm Roger. Cancer risk assessment, indicators, and guidelines for 
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Jun;110 (Suppl 3):451–488.  
 
18. Bourc’his D, Proudhon C. Sexual dimorphism in parental imprint ontogeny and contribution to embryonic 
development. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008;282:87–94.  
 
19. Breton MC, Beauchesne MF, Lemiere C, Rey E, Forget A, Blais L. Risk of perinatal mortality associated with asthma 
during pregnancy. Thorax. 2009;64:101–6.  
 
20. Bruner‐Tran KL, Osteen KG. Developmental exposure to TCDD reduces fertility and negatively affects pregnancy 
outcomes across multiple generations. Reprod Toxicol. 2010 
 
21. Buffett P, Jourenkova N, Gustavsson P. 1997. Cancer risk from occupational and environmental exposure to olycyclic 
aromatic hydrocarbons. Cancer Causes Control 8:444–472  
 
22. Calderon‐Garciduenas L, Reed W, Maronpot RR, Henriquez‐Roldan C, Delgado‐Chavez R, Calderon‐Garciduenas A, et 
al. Brain inflammation and Alzheimer’s‐like pathology in individuals exposed to severe air pollution. Toxicol Pathol. 
2004;32:650–8.  
 
23. Castillo P, Ibanez F, Guajardo A, Llanos MN, Ronco AM. Impact of cadmium exposure during pregnancy on hepatic 
glucocorticoid receptor methylation and expression in rat fetus. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44139. doi: 
10.1371/journal.pone.0044139.  
 
24. Chaikind S, Corman H. The impact of low birthweight on special education costs. J Health Econ. 1991 Oct;10(3):291–
311.  
 
25. Choi H, Jedrychowski W, Spengler J, Camann DE, Whyatt RM, Rauh V, et al. International studies of prenatal 
exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fetal growth. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1744–1750.  
 
26. Choi H, Rauh V, Garfinkel R, Tu Y, Perera FP. Prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk 
of intrauterine growth restriction. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:658–65.  
 
27. Ciranni R, Barale R, Marrazzini A, Loprieno N (1988). “Benzene and the genotoxicity of its metabolites I. 
“Transplacental activity in mouse fetuses and in their dams”. Mutat Res 208:61‐67. 
 
28. Corti M, Snyder CA (1996). “Influences of gender, development, pregnancy and ethanol consumption on the 
hematotoxicity of inhaled 10 ppm benzene.” Arch Toxicology 70(3‐4):2009‐2017. 
 
29. Davis DA, Bortolato M, Godar SC, Sander TK, Iwata N, Pakbin P, Shih JC, Berhane K, McConnell R, Sioutas C, Finch CE, 
Morgan TE.  PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e64128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064128. Print 2013.  Prenatal 
exposure to urban air nanoparticles in mice causes altered neuronal differentiation and depression‐like responses. 
 
30. Dejmek J, Selevan SG, Beneš I, Solansky I, Šrám RJ. Fetal growth and maternal exposure to particulate matter during 
pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107:475–480.  
 
31. Dejmek J, Solansky I, Beneš I, Lenicek J, Šrám RJ. The impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fine particles 
on pregnancy outcome. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:1159–1164. 
 
32. Devlin TF, Weeks BJ. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 646–651; 1986. Spline Functions for Logistic Regression Modeling. 
Proceedings of the 11th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. 
 
33. Demarini DM.  Genotoxicity biomarkers associated with exposure to traffic and near‐road atmospheres: a review.  
Mutagenesis. 2013 Sep;28(5):485‐505. doi: 10.1093/mutage/get042. 
34. Edwards TM, Myers JP. Environmental exposures and gene regulation in disease etiology. Environ Health Perspect. 
2007;115:1264–70. 
 
35. Edwards SC, Jedrychowski W, Li Z, Wang Q, Rauh V, Camann D, et al. Prenatal exposure to PAHs and child 
intelligence at age 5. ISEE‐ISEA joint conference; Pasadena, CA. 2008. 
 
36. Estarlich M, Ballester F, Aguilera I, et al. Residential exposure to outdoor air pollution during pregnancy and 
anthropometric measures at birth in a multicenter cohort in Spain. Environ Health Perspect 2011;119:1333–38. 
 
37. European Commission. Directive 2002/49/EC, Relating to The Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise. 
2002. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/noise/directive.htm [accessed 8 May 2011] 
 
38. Fell DB, Dodds L, King WD. Residential mobility during pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2004;18:408–414.  
 
39. Ferguson KK, O'Neill MS,  Meeker JD. Environmental Contaminant Exposures and Preterm Birth: A Comprehensive 
Review. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B: Critical Reviews 
 
40. Fleming JL, Huang TH, Toland AE. The role of parental and grand‐parental epigenetic alterations in familial cancer 
risk. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9116–21.  
 
41. Fredrik’s AM, van Buuren S, Burgmeijer RJ, Meulmeester JF, Beuker RJ, Brugman E, et al. Continuing positive secular 
growth change in the Netherlands 1955–1997. Pediatr Res. 2000;47:316–323.  
 
42. Fustinoni S, Rossella F, Polledri E, Bollati V, Campo L, Byun HM, Agnello L, Consonni D, Pesatori AC, Baccarelli A, 
Bertazzi PA.  Global DNA methylation and low‐level exposure to benzene.  Med Lav. 2012 Mar‐Apr;103(2):84‐95. 
 
43. Gehring U, Wijga AH, Fischer P, de Jongste JC, Kerkhof M, Koppelman GH, et al. Traffic‐related air pollution, preterm 
birth and term birth weight in the PIAMA birth cohort study. Environ Res. 2011;111(1):125–135.  
 
44. Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Bell R, Pless‐Mulloli T, Howel D. Particulate air pollution and fetal health: a systematic review 
of the epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiology. 2004;15:36–45.  
 
45. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, Thornburg KL. 2008. Effect of in utero and early‐life conditions on adult health 
and disease. N Engl J Med 359:61–73 
 
46. Godfrey KM, Barker DJ. 2001. Fetal programming and adult health. Public Health Nutr 4:611–624  
 
47. Gonzalez‐Pina, R. et al. (2008) Prenatal exposure to ozone disrupts cerebellar monoamine contents in newborn rats. 
Neurochem. Res. 33, 912–918 
 
48. Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. Lancet. 2006;368:2167–2178.  
 
49. Groom A, Elliott HR, Embleton ND, Relton CL. Epigenetics and child health: basic principles. Arch Dis Child. 2010  
 
50. Guo L, Byun HM, Zhong J, Motta V, Barupal J, Zheng Y, Dou C, Zhang F, McCracken JP, Diaz A, Marco SG, Colicino S, 
Schwartz J, Wang S, Hou L, Baccarelli AA.  Effects of short‐term exposure to inhalable particulate matter on DNA 
methylation of tandem repeats.  Environ Mol Mutagen. 2014 Jan 17. doi: 10.1002/em.21838.  
 
51. Guxens M, Aguilera I, Ballester F, Estarlich M, Fernández‐Somoano A, Lertxundi A, Lertxundi N, Mendez MA, Tardón 
A, Vrijheid M, Sunyer J; INMA (INfancia y Medio Ambiente) Project. Prenatal exposure to residential air pollution and 
infant mental development: modulation by antioxidants and detoxification factors. Environ Health Perspect. 2012 
Jan;120(1):144‐9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103469. Epub 2011 Aug 25. 
 
52. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and 
femur measurements – a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:333–337.  
 
53. Hairston IS, Waxler E, Seng JS, Fezzey AG, Rosenblum KL, Muzik M. The role of infant sleep in intergenerational 
transmission of trauma. Sleep. 2011;34(10):1373–1383. doi: 10.5665/SLEEP.1282.]  
 
54. Hansen CA, Barnett AG, Pritchard G. The effect of ambient air pollution during early pregnancy on fetal ultrasonic 
measurements during mid‐pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:362–369.  
 
55. Hansen C, Neller A, Williams G, Simpson R. Low levels of ambient air pollution during pregnancy and fetal growth 
among term neonates in Brisbane, Australia. Environ Res. 2007;103:383–389.  
 
56. Harper BL, Sadagopa Ramanujam VM, Legator MS (1989). “Micronucleus formation by benzene, cyclophosphamide, 
Benzo(a)pyrene, and benzidine in male, female, pregnant female, and fetal mice.” Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 9:239‐
252. 
 
57. Herbstman JB, Tang D, Zhu D, Perera FP. Prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and CpG 
methylation. International society for environmental epidemiology. 21st ISEE conference: food, environment and 
global health; 2009. 
 
58. Herbstman JB, Tang D, Zhu D, Qu L, Sjödin A, Li Z, et al. 2012. Prenatal Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic 
Hydrocarbons, Benzo[a]pyrene–DNA Adducts, and Genomic DNA Methylation in Cord Blood. Environ Health 
Perspect 120:733‐738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104056 
 
59. Herr CE, Dostal M, Ghosh R, Ashwood P, Lipsett M, Pinkerton KE, Sram R, Hertz‐Picciotto I.  Air pollution exposure 
during critical time periods in gestation and alterations in cord blood lymphocyte distribution: a cohort of livebirths.  
Environ Health. 2010 Aug 2;9(1):46. 
 
60. Hood DB, Nayyar T, Ramesh A, Greenwood M, Inyang F. Modulation in the developmental expression profile of Sp1 
subsequent to transplacental exposure of fetal rats to desorbed benzo[a]pyrene following maternal inhalation. Inhal 
Toxicol. 2000;12:511–35.  

61. Ho SM, Johnson A, Tarapore P, Janakiram V, Zhang X, Leung YK. Environmental epigenetics and its implication on 
disease risk and health outcomes. ILAR J. 2012;53(3‐4):289‐305. doi: 10.1093/ilar.53.3‐4.289. 
 
62. Hou L, Zhang X, Dioni L, Barretta F, Dou C, Zheng Y, Hoxha M, Bertazzi PA, Schwartz J, Wu S, Wang S, Baccarelli AA.  
Inhalable particulate matter and mitochondrial DNA copy number in highly exposed individuals in Beijing, China: a 
repeated‐measure study.  Part Fibre Toxicol. 2013 Apr 29;10(1):17.  
 
63. Huang YC, Schmitt M, Yang Z, Que LG, Stewart JC, Frampton MW, Devlin RB.  Gene expression profile in circulating 
mononuclear cells after exposure to ultrafine carbon particles.  Inhal Toxicol. 2010 May 27.  
 
64. Hutt AM, Kalf GF (1996). “Inhibition of human DNA topoisomerase II by hydroquinone and pbenzoquinone, reactive 
metabolites of benzene.” Environmental Health Perspectives 104(Suppl 6): 1265‐1269. 
 
65. Iñiguez C, Ballester F, Estarlich M, et al . Estimation of personal NO2 exposure in a cohort of pregnant women. Sci 
Total Environ 2009;407:6093–99. 
 
66. Jaddoe V, van Duijn C, van der Heijden A, Mackenbach J, Moll H, Steegers E, et al. The Generation R Study: design 
and cohort update 2010. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:823–841.  
 
67. Janssen BG, Godderis L, Pieters N, Poels K, Kici Ski M, Cuypers A, Fierens F, Penders J, Plusquin M, Gyselaers W, 
Nawrot TS.  Placental DNA hypomethylation in association with particulate air pollution in early life.  Part Fibre 
Toxicol. 2013 Jun 7;10(1):22.  
 
68. Janssen BG, Munters E, Pieters N, Smeets K, Cox B, Cuypers A, et al. 2012. Placental Mitochondrial DNA Content and 
Particulate Air Pollution During in Utero Life. Environ Health Perspect :‐. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104458 
 
69. Jedrychowski W1, Whyatt RM, Camann DE, Bawle UV, Peki K, Spengler JD, Dumyahn TS, Penar A, Perera FF. Effect of 
prenatal PAH exposure on birth outcomes and neurocognitive development in a cohort of newborns in Poland. 
Study design and preliminary ambient data. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2003;16(1):21‐9. 
 
70. Jedrychowski WA, Perera FP, Maugeri U, Mroz E, Klimaszewska‐Rembiasz M, Flak E, Edwards S, Spengler JD.  Effect 
of prenatal exposure to fine particulate matter on ventilatory lung function of preschool children of non‐smoking 
mothers.  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;24(5):492‐501. 
 
71. Jedrychowski W, Bendkowska I, Flak E, Penar A, Jacek R, Kaim I, et al. Estimated risk for altered fetal growth resulting 
from exposure to fine particles during pregnancy: an epidemiologic prospective cohort study in Poland. Environ 
Health Perspect. 2004;112:1398–1402.  
 
72. Jedrychowskia W,  et al.  Gender differences in fetal growth of newborns exposed prenatally to airborne fine 
particulate matter.  DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.01.009 
 
73. Jedrychowski WA, Perera FP, Spengler JD, Mroz E, Stigter L, Flak E, Majewska R, Klimaszewska‐Rembiasz M, Jacek R.  
Intrauterine exposure to fine particulate matter as a risk factor for increased susceptibility to acute broncho‐
pulmonary infections in early childhood.  Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2013 Jan 16. pii: S1438‐4639(12)00150‐2. doi: 
10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.12.014.  
 
74. Kanaka‐Gantenbein C. Fetal origins of adult diabetes. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2010;1205:99–105.  
 
75. Kannan S, Misra DP, Dvonch JT, Krishnakumar A. Exposures to airborne particulate matter and adverse perinatal 
outcomes: a biologically plausible mechanistic framework for exploring potential effect modification by nutrition. 
Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1636–1642. 
 
76. Keller KA, Snyder CA (1986). “Mice exposed in utero to low concentrations of benzene exhibit enduring changes in 
their colony forming hematopoietic cells.” Toxicology 42:171‐181. 
 
77. Keller KA, Snyder CA (1988). “Mice exposed in utero to 20 ppm benzene exhibit altered numbers of recognizable 
hematoppietic cells up to seven weeks after exposure.” Fundamental Appl Toxicology 10(2):224‐232. 
 
78. Kim E, Park H, Hong YC, Ha M, Kim Y, Kim BN, Kim Y, Roh YM, Lee BE, Ryu JM, Kim BM, Ha EH. Prenatal exposure to 
PM₁₀ and NO₂ and children's neurodevelopment from birth to 24 months of age: mothers and Children's 
Environmental Health (MOCEH) study. Sci Total Environ. 2014 May 15;481:439‐45. doi: 
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.107. Epub 2014 Mar 12. 
 
79. Kim OJ, Ha EH, Kim BM, Seo JH, Park HS, Jung WJ, et al. PM10 and pregnancy outcomes: a hospital‐based cohort 
study of pregnant women in Seoul. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49:1394–402.  
 
80. Koehler C, Thielen S, Ginzkey C, Hackenberg S, Scherzed A, Burghartz M, Paulus M, Hagen R, Kleinsasser NH.  
Nitrogen dioxide is genotoxic in urban concentrations.  Inhal Toxicol. 2013 May 23.  
81. Lacasaña M, Esplugues A, Ballester F. Exposure to ambient air pollution and prenatal and early childhood health 
effects. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20:183–199.  
 
82. Latini G, De Lelice C, Presta G, Vecchio AD, Paris I, Ruggieri F, et al. In utero exposure to di‐(2‐ethylhexyl)phthalate 
and duration of human pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1783–5.  
 
83. Lin CM, Li CY, and Mao IF. 2004.” “Increased risks of term low‐birth‐weight infants in a petrochemical industrial city 
with high air pollution levels.” Arch Environ Health 59, 663‐668. 
 
84. Liu S, Krewski D, Shi Y, Chen Y, Burnett RT. Association between maternal exposure to ambient air pollutants during 
pregnancy and fetal growth restriction. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007;17:426–32.  
 
85. Ljubimova JY, Kleinman MT, Karabalin NM, Inoue S, Konda B, Gangalum P, Markman JL, Ljubimov AV, Black KL.  Gene 
expression changes in rat brain after short and long exposures to particulate matter in Los Angeles basin air: 
Comparison with human brain tumors.  Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2013 May 17. pii: S0940‐2993(13)00054‐7. doi: 
10.1016/j.etp.2013.04.002.  
 
86. Lo CL1, Zhou FC2. Environmental alterations of epigenetics prior to the birth. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2014;115:1‐49. doi: 
10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐801311‐3.00001‐9. 
 
87. Lowengart RA, Peters JM, Cicioni C, Buckley J, Bernstein L, Preston‐Martin S, Rappaport E (1987). “Childhood 
leukemia and occupational and home exposures.” JNCI 79:39‐46. 
 
88. Lucas A, Fewtrell MS, Cole TJ. 1999. Fetal origins of adult disease—The hypothesis revisited. BMJ 319:245–249 
 
89. Madrigano J,  Baccarelli A,  Mittleman MA,  Wright RO,  Sparrow D,  Vokonas PS,  Tarantini  L, and  Schwartz J.  
Prolonged exposure to particulate pollution, genes associated with glutathione pathways, and DNA methylation in a 
cohort of older men. Environmental Health Perspectives http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002773. 
 
90. Maisonet M, Correa A, Misra D, Jaakkola JJ. A review of the literature on the effects of ambient air pollution on fetal 
growth. Environ Res. 2004;95:106–115.  
 
91. Maltoni C, Cotti G, Valgimigli L, Mandrioli A, ”Hepatocarcinomas in Sprague‐Dawley rats, following exposure to 
benzene by inhalation. First experimental demonstration.” Med Lav. 1982;73:446–50. 
 
92. Manchester DK, Gordon SK, Golas CL, Roberts EA, Okey AB. Ah receptor in human placenta: stabilization by 
molybdate and characterization of binding of 2,3,7,8‐tetrachlorodibenzo‐p‐dioxin, 3‐methylcholanthrene, and 
benzo(a)pyrene. Cancer Res. 1987 Sep 15;47(18):4861–4868. 
 
93. Manikkam M, Guerrero‐Bosagna C, Tracey R, Haque MM, Skinner MK. 2012. Transgenerational actions of 
environmental compounds on reproductive disease and identification of epigenetic biomarkers of ancestral 
exposures. PLoS One 7:e3190  
 
94. Martinez‐Zamudio R, Ha HC. 2011. Environmental epigenetics in metal exposure. Epigenetics 6:820–827] [PubMed] 
 
95. Metzger R, Delgado JL, Herrell R. Environmental health and Hispanic children. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Sep;103 
(Suppl 6):25–32 
 
96. Mook‐Kanamori DO, Steegers EA, Eilers PH, Raat H, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW. Risk factors and outcomes associated  Commented [Ma1]:  
with first‐trimester fetal growth restriction. JAMA. 2010;303:527–534.    
 
97. Morales E1, Garcia‐Esteban R1, Asensio de la Cruz O2, Basterrechea M3, Lertxundi A4, Martinez López de Dicastillo 
MD5, Zabaleta C6, Sunyer J. Intrauterine and early postnatal exposure to outdoor air pollution and lung function at 
preschool age. Thorax. 2014 Oct 20. pii: thoraxjnl‐2014‐205413. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl‐2014‐205413.  
 
98. Morello‐Frosch RA, Woodruff TJ, Axelrad DA, Caldwell JC. ”Air toxics and health risks in California: the public health 
implications of outdoor concentrations.” Risk Anal. 2000 Apr;20(2):273‐91. 
 
99. Mortimer K, Neugebauer R, Lurmann F, et al Air pollution and pulmonary function in asthmatic children: effects of 
prenatal and lifetime exposures. Epidemiology 2008;19:550–7 
 
100.Neophytou AM, Hart JE, Chang Y, Zhang JJ, Smith TJ, Garshick E, Laden F.  Short‐term traffic related exposures and  
       biomarkers of nitro‐PAH exposure and oxidative DNA damage.  Toxics. 2014 Sep;2(3):377‐390. 
 
101.Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment. Air Quality Decree (Regeling beoordeling Luchtkwaliteit  
        2007). 2007. Available: http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0022817 [accessed 12 September 2010] 
 
102.Nethery E, Leckie SE, Teschke K, et al From measures to models: an evaluation of air pollution exposure assessment  
        for epidemiological studies of pregnant women. Occup Environ Med 2008;65:579–86. 
 
103.Niklasson A, Ericson A, Fryer JG, Karlberg J, Lawrence C, Karlberg P. An update of the Swedish reference standards 
        for weight, length and head circumference at birth for given gestational age (1977–1981). Acta Paediatr Scand.  
        1991;80:756–762.  
 
104.Ning H, Kado NY, Kuzmicky PA, Hsieh DPH (1991). “Benzene‐induced micronuclei formation in mouse fetal liver  
        blood, peripheral blood, and maternal bone marrow cells.” Environ Mol Mutagen 18(1):1‐5. 
 
105.OEHHA (1997). “Hazard Identification of the Developmental and Reproductive Toxic Effects of Benzene.” Office of  
        Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, California.  
        Draft, September 1997, located at www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/pdf/benzene.pdf. 
 
106.Oh SM, Park YR, Kim HR, Park YJ, Kim MJ, Son BH, Lee MJ, Lee SY, Chung KH.  Organic extracts of urban air pollution 
        particulate matter (PM2.5)‐induced genotoxicity and oxidative stress in human lung bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS‐ 
        2B cells).  Mutat Res. 2011 Apr 16.  
 
107.Pedersen M, Wichmann J, Autrup H, Dang DA, Decordier I, Hvidberg M, Bossi R, Jakobsen J, Loft S, Knudsen  
        LE.  Increased micronuclei and bulky DNA adducts in cord blood after maternal exposures to traffic‐related air 
        pollution.  Environ Res. 2009 Nov;109(8):1012‐20. Epub 2009 Sep 23. 
 
108.Perera F, Tang D, Tu Y, Biomarkers in Maternal and Newborn Blood Indicate Heightened Fetal Susceptibility to 
        Procarcinogenic DNA Damage.  Environ Health Persp Vol 112 Number 10 July 2004 
 
109.Perera FP 2008. Children Are Likely to Suffer Most from Our Fossil Fuel Addiction. Environ Health Perspect 116:987‐ 
        990. doi:10.1289/ehp.11173 
 
110.Pereira FP, Rauh V, Whyatt RM, Tsai WY, Tang D, Diaz D, et al. Effect of prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic 
        aromatic hydrocarbons on neurodevelopment in the first 3 years of life among inner‐city children. Environ Health  
        Perspect. 2006;114:1287–92.  
 
111.Perera FP, Rauh V, Tsai WY, Kinney P, Camann D, Barr D, et al. Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental 
        pollutants on birth outcomes in a multiethnic population. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:201–205.  
 
112.Perera FP1, Rauh V, Whyatt RM, Tsai WY, Bernert JT, Tu YH, Andrews H, Ramirez J, Qu L, Tang D. Molecular evidence  
        of an interaction between prenatal environmental exposures and birth outcomes in a multiethnic population.  
        Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Apr;112(5):626‐30 
 
113.Perera FP, Herbstman J. Prenatal environmental exposures, epigenetics, and disease. Reprod Toxicol. 2011  
        Apr;31(3):363‐73. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.12.055. Epub 2011 Jan 20. 
 
114.Perera F, et al. Prenatal Exposure to Air Pollution, Maternal Psychological Distress, and Child Behavior. Pediatrics, 
        October 2013 
 
115.Perera FP, Li Z, Whyatt R, Hoepner L, Wang S, Camann D, et al. Prenatal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure 
        and child intelligence at age 5. Pediatrics. 2009;124:e195–202. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 
 
116.Perera FP, Whyatt RM, Jedrychowski W, Rauh V, Manchester D, Santella RM, et al. Recent developments in  
        molecular epidemiology: a study of the effects of environmental poly‐cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on birth  
        outcomes in Poland. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:309–314.  
 
117.Perera F, Tang WY, Herbstman J, Tang D, Levin L, Miller R, Ho SM. 2009. Relation of DNA methylation of 5′‐CpG 
        island of ACSL3 to transplacental exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and childhood asthma. 
        PLoS One 4:e4488.  
 
118.Perera FP, Wang S, Vishnevetsky J, Zhang B, Cole KJ, Tang D, Rauh V, Phillips DH. 2011. Polycyclic aromatic  
        hydrocarbons‐aromatic DNA adducts in cord blood and behavior scores in New York City children. Environ Health 
        Perspect 119:1176–1181  
 
119.Pratt MM, John K, MacLean AB, Afework S, Phillips DH, Poirier MC. 2011. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) 
        exposure and DNA adduct semi‐quantitation in archived human tissues. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8:2675–2691  
 
120.Protano C, Scalise, Orsi GB, Vitali M. A systematic review of benzene exposure during pregnancy and adverse  
        outcomes on intrauterine development and birth: still far from scientific evidence. Ann Ig. 2012 Nov‐Dec;24(6):451‐ 
        63. 
 
121.Ramírez N, Cuadras A, Rovira E, Marcé RM, Borrull F. “Risk assessment related to atmospheric polycyclic aromatic 
        hydrocarbons in gas and particle phases near industrial sites.” Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Aug;119(8):1110‐ 
        6.doi:10.1289/ ehp.1002855. Epub 2011 Apr 8. 
 
122.Reddy P, Naidoo RN, Robins TG, Mentz G, Li H, London SJ, Batterman S.  GSTM1 and GSTP1 gene variants and the 
        effect of air pollutants on lung function measures in South African children.  Am J Ind Med. 2012 Jan 6. doi:  
        10.1002/ajim.22012. 
 
123.Ritz B, Wilhelm M. Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: methodologic issues in an emerging field. 
        Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;102:182–190. 
 
124.Rocha ESIR, Lichtenfels AJ, Amador Pereira LA, Saldiva PH. Effects of ambient levels of air pollution generated by 
        traffic on birth and placental weights in mice. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1921–1924.  
 
125.Rodríguez‐Trigo G, Zock J‐P, Pozo‐Rodríguez F, Gómez, F, et al.  Health Effects in Fishermen 2 Years After Assisting 
        With Oil Spill Clean‐up Ann Intern Med October 19, 2010 153:I‐28; published ahead of print August 23, 2010. 
 
126.Ross JA, Potter JD, Reaman GH, Pendergrass TW, Robison LL (1996). “Maternal exposure to potential inhibitors of 
        DNA topoisomerase II and infant leukemia (United States): a report from the Children's Cancer Group Control  
        7(6):581‐590. 
 
127.Rubesa J,  Rybara R, Prinosilovaa P, Veznika Z, et al.  Genetic polymorphisms influence the susceptibility of men to  
        sperm DNA damage associated with exposure to air pollution.  Mutation Research 683 (2010) 9–15. 
 
128.Ruden DM, Xiao L, Garfinkel MD, Lu X. 2005. Hsp90 and environmental impacts on epigenetic states: A model for 
        the trans‐generational effects of diethylstibesterol on uterine development and cancer. Hum Mol Genet 14 Spec No  
        1:R149–R155  
 
129.Salam MT, Millstein J, Li YF, Lurmann FW, Margolis HG, Gilliland FD. Birth outcomes and prenatal exposure to ozone,  
       carbon monoxide, and particulate matter: results from the Children’s Health Study. Environ Health Perspect.  
       2005;113:1638–1644. [PMC free article]  
 
130.Salma R, Darrow L, Parker J, Woodruff TJ, Strickland M, Nieuwenhuijsen M, et al. Meeting report: atmospheric  
        pollution and human reproduction. Environ Health Perspect. 2008a;116:791–798.  
 
131.Sánchez‐Guerra M, Pelallo‐Martínez N, Díaz‐Barriga F, Rothenberg SJ, Hernández‐Cadena L, Faugeron S, Oropeza‐ 
         Hernández LF, Guaderrama‐Díaz M, Quintanilla‐Vega B.  Environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) 
         exposure and DNA damage in Mexican children.  Mutat Res. 2011 Dec 17.  
 
132.Sancini G, Farina F, Battaglia C, Cifola I, Mangano E, Mantecca P, Camatini M, Palestini P.  Health Risk Assessment for 
        Air Pollutants: Alterations in Lung and Cardiac Gene Expression in Mice Exposed to Milano Winter Fine Particulate  
        Matter (PM2.5).  PLoS One. 2014 Oct 8;9(10):e109685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109685. eCollection 2014.n 
 
133.Sexton K Adgate JL, Church TR. et al (2005). “Children's exposure to volatile organic compounds as determined by  
       longitudinal measurements in blood.” Environmental Health Perspectives, March 1, 2005. 
 
134.Shah PS, Balkhair T.; Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm and LBW births. 2011. Air  
pollution and birth outcomes: a systematic review. Environ Int 37498–516.516  
 
135.1.Shang Y1, Zhang L1, Jiang Y1, Li Y2, Lu P3.  Airborne quinones induce cytotoxicity and DNA damage in human  
lung epithelial A549 cells: The role of reactive oxygen species.  Chemosphere. 2014 Jan 27. pii:S0045‐ 
6535(14)00016‐2. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.079.  
 
136.Skinner MK, Guerrero‐Bosagna C. Environmental signals and transgenerational epigenetics. Epigenomics. 
2009;1:111–7.  
 
137.Slama R, Khoshnood B, Kaminski M. How to control for gestational age in studies involving environmental effects on 
fetal growth. Environ Health Perspect. 2008b;116:A284–A285.  
 
138.Slama R, Thiebaugeorges O, Goua V, Aussel L, Sacco P, Bohet A, et al. Maternal personal exposure to airborne 
benzene and intrauterine growth. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:1313–1321 
 
139.Slama R, Bottagisi S, Solansky I, Lepeule J, Giorgis‐Allemand L, Sram R.Short‐Term Impact of Atmospheric Pollution  
        on Fecundability.  Epidemiology. 2013 Sep 18.  
 
140.Smith MT, Zhang L (1998). “Biomarkers of leukemia risk: benzene as a model” Environ Health Perspect 106(Suppl  
        4):937‐946. 
 
141.Šrám RJ, Binková B, Dejmek J, Bobak M. Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature.  
        Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:375–382.  
 
142.Stephanou P, Konstandi M, Pappas P, Marselos M. Alterations in central monoaminergic neurotransmission induced 
by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in rats. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1998;23:475–81.  
 
143.Steffen C, Auclerc MF, Auvrignon A, Baruchel A, Kebaili K, Lambilliotte A, Leverger G, Sommelet D, Vilmer E, Hemon 
         D, Clavel J. “Acute childhood leukaemia and environmental exposure to potential sources of benzene and other  
        hydrocarbons: a case‐control study.” Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:773–778. doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.010868 
 
144.Takeda K, Tsukue N, Yoshida S. Endocrine‐disrupting activity of chemicals in diesel exhaust and diesel exhaust  
        particles. Environ Sci. 2004;11:33–45. 
 
145.Tang WY, Levine L, Cheung YY, Talaska G, Herbstman J, Miller RL, Perera F, Ho SM. 2012. Maternal exposure to  
        polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons is associated with methylation at a 5′‐CpG island of interferon‐gamma in cord  
        white blood cells. Environ Health Perspect 120:1195–1200 
 
146.Terry MB, Ferris JS, Pilsner R, Flom JD, Tehranifar P, Santella RM, et al. Genomic DNA methylation among women in 
         a multiethnic New York City birth cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:2306–10. 
 
147.Thomson E, Kumarathasn P, Calderon‐garcidueas L, Vincent R.  Air pollution alters brain and pituitary endothelin‐1 
        and inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expressions  Environmental Research   2007, vol. 105, no2, pp. 224‐233 [10  
        page(s) (article)] (1 p.1/2) 
 
148.Tillett T 2012. Potential Mechanism for PM10 Effects on Birth Outcomes: In Utero Exposure Linked to Mitochondrial  
        DNA Damage. Environ Health Perspect 120:a363‐a363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.120‐a363b 
 
149.Timmermans S, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Steegers‐Theunissen RP, Steegers EA. Periconception folic acid  
        supplementation, fetal growth and the risks of low birth weight and preterm birth: the Generation R Study. Br J  
        Nutr. 2009;102:777–785. 
 
150.Tonne C, Whyatt RM, Camann DE, Perera FP, Kinney PL. Predictors of personal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon  
        exposures among pregnant minority women in New York City. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:754– 
         759  
 
151.Topinka J, Rossner P Jr, Milcova A, Schmuczerova J, Svecova V, Sram RJ.  DNA  Adducts and Oxidative DNA Damage 
         Induced by Organic Extracts From PM2.5 in an Acellular Assay.  Toxicol Lett. 2011 Feb 14.  
  
152.Tsukue N, Tsubone H, Suzuki AK. Diesel exhaust affects the abnormal delivery in pregnant mice and the growth of 
        their young. Inhal Toxicol. 2002;14:635–651.  
 
153.Tunon K, Eik‐Nes SH, Grottum P. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as  
        predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8:178–185.  
 
154.van Buuren S. Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Stat Methods 
        Med Res. 2007;16:219–242.  
 
155.Van den Hooven EH, de Kluizenaar Y, Pierik FH, Hofman A, van Ratingen SW, Zandveld PY, et al. 2012. Chronic Air  
        Pollution Exposure during Pregnancy and Maternal and Fetal C‐reactive Protein Levels. The Generation R Study.  
        Environ Health Perspect :‐. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104345 
 
156.Van den Hooven EH, Jaddoe VW, de Kluizenaar Y, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Steegers EA, et al. 2009. Residential  
        traffic exposure and pregnancy‐related outcomes: a prospective birth cohort study. Environ Health 859; doi:[Online  
22 ecember 2009]10.1186/1476‐069X‐8‐59  
 
157.Vassilev ZP, Robson MG, Klotz JB. Associations of poly‐cyclic organic matter in outdoor air with decreased birth 
        weight: a pilot cross‐sectional analysis. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A. 2001;64:595–605.  
 
158.Verburg BO, Mulder PG, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW, Witteman JC, Steegers EA. Intra‐ and interobserver reproducibility  
        study of early fetal growth parameters. Prenat Diagn. 2008a;28:323–331.  
 
159.Verburg BO, Steegers EA, De Ridder M, Snijders RJ, Smith E, Hofman A, et al. New charts for ultrasound dating of 
        pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population‐based cohort study.  
 
160.Verhulst SL, Nelen V, Hond ED, Koppen G, Beunckens C, Vael C, et al. Intrauterine exposure to environmental  
        pollutants and body mass index during the first 3 years of life. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:122–6. 
 
161.Vrijheid M, Martinez D, Aguilera I, Ballester F, Basterrechea M, Esplugues A, et al. 2010. Socioeconomic status and 
        exposure to multiple environmental pollutants during pregnancy: evidence for environmental inequity? J Epidemiol  
        Community Health; doi:[Online 25 October 2010]10.1136/jech.2010.117408  
 
162.Weldy CS, Y Liu, YC Chang, IO Medvedev, JR Fox, TV Larson, WM Chien, MT Chin. In utero and early life exposure to 
        diesel exhaust air pollution increases adult susceptibility to heart failure in mice. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. 2013.  
        http://bit.ly/18znRIR 
 
163.Wen SW, Kee Fung KF, Huang L, Demissie K, Joseph KS, Allen A, et al. Fetal and neonatal mortality among twin  
        gestations in a Canadian population: the effect of intrapair birth‐weight discordance. Am J Perinatol. 2005;5:279– 
         286.  
 
164.Whysner J, Reddy MV, Ross PM, Mohan M, Lax EA. “Genotoxicity of benzene and its metabolites.” Mutat  
        Res. 2004;(566):99–130 
 
165. Whyatt RM, Perera FP. Application of biologic markers to studies of environmental risks in children and the 
         developing fetus. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Sep;103 (Suppl 6):105–110. 

166.Wigle DT, Arbuckle TE, Turner MC, Bérubé A, Yang Q, Liu S, Krewski D. Epidemiologic evidence of relationships 
        between reproductive and child health outcomes and environmental chemical contaminants. J Toxicol Environ   
        Health B Crit Rev. 2008 May;11(5‐6):373‐517. doi: 10.1080/10937400801921320. 
 
167.Wigle DT, Arbuckle TE, Walker M, Wade MG, Liu S, Krewski D. Environmental Hazards: Evidence for Effects on Child 
       Health. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B: Critical Reviews Volume 10, Issue 1‐2, 2007 

168.Wilhelm M1, Wittsiepe J, Lemm F, Ranft U, Krämer U, Fürst P, Röseler SC, Greshake M, Imöhl M, Eberwein G,  
      Rauchfuss K, Kraft M, Winneke G. The Duisburg birth cohort study: influence of the prenatal exposure to PCDD/Fs  
        and dioxin‐like PCBs on thyroid hormone status in newborns and neurodevelopment of infants until the age of 24  
        months. Mutat Res. 2008 Jul‐Aug;659(1‐2):83‐92. Epub 2007 Nov 12. 
 
169.Windham G, Fenster L. Environmental contaminants and pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:e111–6.  
        discussion e7. 
 
170.Wong EY, Gohlke J, Griffith WC, Farrow S, Faustman EM. Assessing the health benefits of air pollution reduction for  
        children. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:226–232.  
 
171.World Health Organization. Air Quality Guidelines. Global Update 2005. Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide 
        and Sulfur Dioxide. 2006. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2006/WHO_SDE_PHE_OEH_06.02_eng.pdf  
         
172.Wu J, Ramesh A, Nayyar T, Hood DB. Assessment of metabolites and AhR and CYP1A1 mRNA expression subsequent  
        to prenatal exposure to inhaled benzo(a)pyrene. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2003;21:333–46.  
 
173.Yokota S, Mizuo K, Moriya N, Oshio S, Sugawara I, Takeda K. Effect of prenatal exposure to diesel exhaust on  
       dopaminergic system in mice. Neurosci Lett. 2009;449:38–41.  
 
174.Yu Ting L, Yungling L, Chau‐Ren J, et al.  Air pollution and limb defects: A matched‐pairs case‐control study in 
        Taiwan.  Environmental Research.  Volume 132, July 2014, Pages 273–280 
 
175.Xing SG, Shi X, Wu ZL, Chen JK, Wallace W, Whong WZ, Ong T (1992). “Transplacental genotoxicity of 
        triethylenemelamine, benzene, and vinblastine in mice.” Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 12(5):23‐30. 
 
176.Xu DQ,   ZHANG W.  Monitoring of Pollution of Air Fine Particles (PM2.5) and Study on Their Genetic Toxicity 
        BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 17, 452‐458(2004)   
 
177.Zhang A, Hu H, Sánchez BN, Ettinger AS, Park SK, Cantonwine D, et al. 2011. Association between Prenatal Lead 
Exposure and Blood Pressure in Female Offspring. Environ Health Perspect :‐  
.http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103736 
 
178.Zhang L, McHale CM, Rothman N, Li G, Ji Z, Vermeulen R, et al. Systems biology of human benzene exposure. Chem 
        Biol Interact. 2010;184:86–93.  
 
Lopez, Maria [COB]

From: EIR627 <eir627@ocair.com>

Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 8:19 AM
To: COB_Response
Subject: FW: Agenda No. 45. John Wayne Airport - OC Board of Supervisors June 25, 2019
Meeting John Wayne Airport – General Aviation Improvement Program
Attachments: CFASE et al Public Comments - Final Program Environmental Impact Report John
Wayne Airport 6-25-2019.docx

Good Morning,  
 
This email was received this morning in the DEIR627 email box. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
From: Jesse Marquez <jnm4ej@yahoo.com>  
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 7:23 AM 
To: EIR627 <eir627@ocair.com> 
Cc: Jesse Marquez <jnm4ej@yahoo.com>; Ricardo Pulido <mr.rpulido@gmail.com>; Jane Williams 
<dcapjane@aol.com>; Magali Sanchez‐Hall <mssanchezhall7@gmail.com>; Anabell Romero Chavez 
<anab3ll310@yahoo.com>; Flavio Mercado <fdj26@aol.com>; Joe R. Gatlin <joergatlin45k@gmail.com>; Cynthia Babich 
<delamoactioncommittee@gmail.com>; Robina Suwol <robinasuwol@earthlink.net>; John G. Miller MD 
<igornla@cox.net>; Mitzi Shpak <msmshpak@gmail.com>; Modesta Pulido <vdepulido@gmail.com>; 
ocneighborscare@yahoo.com; Drew Wood <californiakidsiaq@gmail.com> 
Subject: Agenda No. 45. John Wayne Airport ‐ OC Board of Supervisors June 25, 2019 Meeting John Wayne Airport – 
General Aviation Improvement Program 

Email # 1 Public Comments

Respectfully Submitted,

On Behalf of all undersigned Community Organizations.

Jesse N. Marquez
Executive Director
Coalition For A Safe Environment
310-590-0177

FYI

These Public Comments are being sent in 2 emails because it was rejected last night by your email because the file size
was too large.

1
 OC Neighbors Care 
Coalition For A Safe Environment 
California Kids IAQ 
Community Dreams 
EMERGE 
American Legion Post # 6 
Wilmington Improvement Network 
San Pedro & Peninsula Homeowners Coalition 
NAACP‐ San Pedro‐Wilmington Branch # 1069 
California Communities Against Toxics 
California Safe Schools 
Del Amo Action Committee 
Action Now 
St. Philomena Social Justice Ministry 
 
 
June 25, 2019 
 
County of Orange 
Board of Supervisors  
Robin Stieler 
Clerk of the Board 
714‐834‐2206 
response@ocgov.com 
 
John Wayne Airport 
C/O Ms. Lea Choum 
Executive Officer 
3160 Airway Avenue 
Costa Mesa, CA 92929 
949‐252‐5123 
949‐252‐5170 
949‐252‐5276 
EIR627@ocair.com 
 
 
Su:  Agenda No. 45. John Wayne Airport ‐ OC Board of Supervisors June 25, 2019 Meeting 
John Wayne Airport – General Aviation Improvement Program 
 
Re:  Final Program Environmental Impact Report 627 Public Comments 
  IP# 16‐432  SCH No. 2017031072 
 
 
Honorable Board Members: 
 
We the undersigned community organizations who have members, family, friends, colleagues and/or who   
provide services in many Orange County Cities who will be significantly and negatively impacted by this 
airport  expansion  project  submit  our  joint  public  comments  in  opposition  to  the  Final  Program 
Environmental Impact Report 627 for the John Wayne Airport – General Aviation Improvement Program.    
We have reviewed the Final Program EIR to the best of our ability and have documented the numerous 
deficiencies which are the basis of our request to not approve the Final Program EIR. 
 
1. The  public  was  allowed  insufficient  time  to  read,  assess,  research,  consult,  verify  and  prepare 
public  comments.    The  Final  Program  EIR  was  2,811  pages  and  other  supporting  project 
information was over 6,000 pages.    
 
Although  some  extensions  were  granted,  all  impacted  neighboring  cities,  ethnic  community 
populations,  foreign  language  speaking  community  population,  environmental  justice 
communities, sensitive receptors, Native American, Federal and State protected classes of people: 
Race,  Color,  Religion,  Creed,  National  Origin,  Ancestry,  Sex,  Age,  Physical  Disability,  Mental 
Disability, Veteran Status and Citizenship (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), the 
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) etc.) were not notified, saw no Public Notice, had no access 
to the Draft or Final Program EIR nor were they aware of any extensions.   This action violates the 
public rights to public participation in the CEQA process. 
 
We request a delay of the vote for the Final Program EIR 627 approval a minimum of 60 days and 
we request an extension of the public comment period for a minimum of 60 days. 
 
2. The  County  of  Orange  and  John  Wayne  Airport  failed  to  provide  Public  Notice  to  all  impacted 
neighboring  cities,  ethnic  community  populations,  foreign  language  speaking  community 
population, environmental justice communities, sensitive receptors, Native American, Federal and 
State protected classes of people: Race, Color, Religion, Creed, National Origin, Ancestry, Sex, Age, 
Physical Disability, Mental Disability, Veteran Status and Citizenship (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 
of 1964 (Title VII), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) etc.).     
 
There was no foreign language Public Notice, Draft Program EIR Public Notice or Final Program EIR 
Public  Notice  distributed  in  any  ethnic  community  population  or  foreign  language  community 
population.    There  was  no  statement  in  Spanish  that  Spanish  Translation  Services  would  be 
available in the Public Notice.     This action violates the public rights to public participation in the 
CEQA process, are acts of discrimination and environmental racism. 
 
The  County  of  Orange  and  John  Wayne  Airport  failed  to  provide  evidence  that  their  mailed  or 
delivered Public Notices were “Posted Visibly” at the location so that the public can see a new 
posting from others.   There are no instruction on the Public Notice as to how and where to publicly 
display to the Public. 
 
The County of Orange and John Wayne Airport state and certify thy they complied with CEQA law 
and all Public Notice requirements.  We went to the Santa Ana Public Library on June 24, 2019 to 
verify that they had received and posted a Public Notice and that they had received a copy of the 
Draft  Program  EIR  and  Final  Program  EIR  for  public  review  and  consideration.      Two  Librarians 
searched and could find No Public Notice for the John Wayne Airport GAIP Draft Program EIR or 
the  Final  Program  EIR.        They  also  could  find  no  copies  of  the  John  Wayne  Airport  GAIP  Draft 
Program EIR or the Final Program EIR.     
 
Senior Librarian Milly C. Lugo‐Rios also checked the library computer data base where they register 
receipt of all EIRs, Public Notices and related documents and could find no record of receipt of 
either the Public Notices, Draft Program EIR or the Final Program EIR.   The last John Wayne Airport 
document received was the John Wayne Airport Settlement Amendment Implementation Plan. 
 
We took photos of the Library Outdoor Public Notice Wall and the Inside Public Notice Walla and 
the EIR Book Shelves.  We have a copy printout of the Library Database Record and the Librarian’s 
Business Card.  
 
We now question whether any Public Library received any Public Notices or EIR documents. 
 
We were unable to find a Public Notice – Notice of a Final Program Environmental Impact Report 
and Announcement of Public Meeting on‐line or anywhere.    We were only to find a Public Notice 
– Notice of a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report and Announcement of Public Meeting. 
 
There  was  no  analysis  performed  to  determine  what  ethnic  community  populations,  foreign 
language  speaking  community  populations  and  ethnic  language  news  media  should  have  been 
included in the Public Notice distribution.   As four OC City examples, 2010 US Census data discloses 
the following: 
 
Santa Ana 
 
     Population          324, 528 
     Foreign Born Population      151,311  46.6 % 
     Hispanic          258,449  79.6 % 
     Asian             38,651  11.9 % 
     Black               3,453     1.0 % 
     American Indian/Alaska Native         1,941     .05 % 
 
  Orange  
 
     Population          136,416   
     Foreign Born Population        33,538  24.5 %     
     Hispanic            55,293   40.5 % 
     Asian             16,286  11.9 % 
     Black               2,145    1.5 % 
            American Indian/Alaska Native            728    .05 % 
 
Costa Mesa 
 
     Population          109,960 
     Foreign Born Population         27,948  25.4 % 
     Hispanic             41,201  37.4 % 
     Asian               9,754    8.0 % 
     Black               1,835    1.6 % 
     American Indian/Alaska Native            481                .4 % 
 
Tustin 
 
     Population             75,540    
     Foreign Born Population         27,391  36.2 % 
     Hispanic             32,982  43.6 % 
     Asian             17,463  23.1 % 
     Black               2,080        2.7 % 
             American Indian/Alaska Native            492    .06 % 
 
This sample survey of a few cities census data discloses that there are significant Hispanic and 
Asian ethnic community and foreign language populations. 
 
There was no published Spanish Language Newspaper Public Notice in any Hispanic country ethnic 
community  population,  Spanish  foreign  language  speaking  community  population  and  Hispanic 
environmental justice communities. 
 
The  Spanish  language  newspaper  Excelsior  as  one  example  is  published  in  Santa  Ana  and 
distributed in Orange County has a distribution of 392,000. 
 
The largest Chinese newspaper is the Chinses Daily News and the largest Vietnamese newspaper 
is the Nguoi Viet Daly News which originated in the city of Orange. 
 
We request disclosure of the individuals and agencies who are on all distribution lists. 
 
We request that County of Orange and John Wayne Airport provide evidence that they delivered 
Public Notices, the Draft Program EIR and Final Program EIR to all libraries. 
 
We request a delay of the vote for Final Program EIR 627 approval a minimum of 60 days and we 
request that Public Notice be made in every impacted city local newspapers, all ethnic 
community populations, foreign language speaking community populations and environmental 
justice communities.     
 
We request that the Final Program EIR be Re‐Public Noticed, Recirculated and the Public 
Comment Period opened for an additional 60 days. 
  
3. The County of Orange and John Wayne Airport failed to reasonably conduct public meetings in all 
impacted  cities,  ethnic  community  populations,  foreign  language  speaking  community 
populations,  environmental  justice  communities,  sensitive  receptors,  Native  American,  Federal 
and State protected classes of people: Race, Color, Religion, Creed, National Origin, Ancestry, Sex, 
Age, Physical Disability, Mental Disability, Veteran Status and Citizenship who could be significantly 
and negatively impacted.    This action violates the public rights to public participation in the CEQA 
process, are acts of discrimination and environmental racism. 
 
Only two Public Meetings were held, one on September 26, 2018 at the JWA Administrative Office 
in Costa Mesa and one at the John Wayne Airport – General Aviation Improvement Program Town 
Hall Meeting was held in Newport Beach on April 6, 2019 from 10:00am to 12:00pm and No Public 
or Town Hall Meeting held in any of the other 5 impacted cities.   There was No Evening Meetings 
for  people  to  attend  who  work  during  the  day  which  is  approximately  90%  of  the  general 
population and No Weekend Meeting held so that the majority of the public could attend.    There 
are  6  other  cities  impacted  by  this  project:  Santa  Ana,  Costa  Mesa,  Tustin,  Irvine,  Orange  and 
Laguna Beach.   Four of the cities have larger population than Newport Beach which is 85,316 and 
the population of all six combined is 952,007 which is more than 10x the population of Newport 
Beach. 
 
  City Populations 
 
1. Santa Ana      324, 528 
 2. Irvine        282,572 
3. Orange       136,416 
4. Costa Mesa      109,960 
5. Newport Beach      85,316 
6. Tustin          75,540   
7. Laguna Beach         22,991 
 
We request a delay of the vote for Final Program EIR 627 approval a minimum of 60 days and we 
request that Public Meetings be held in every impacted city, all ethnic community populations, 
foreign language speaking community populations, environmental justice communities, sensitive 
receptor, Federal and State protected classes of people: Race, Color, Religion, Creed, National 
Origin, Ancestry, Sex, Age, Physical Disability, Mental Disability, Veteran Status and Citizenship.     
 
4. The GAIP and Final Program EIR did not discuss whether any of the anticipated future 
construction project will be requesting and using Federal funds from the Federal Aviation 
Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, U.S. Dept. of Energy or USEPA.  This important to 
know public information because there is a Federal Executive Order on Environmental Justice 
that requires environmental justice community impact assessments and mitigation requirements 
that will apply. 
 
We request that The GAIP and Final Program EIR disclose whether any of the anticipated future 
construction  project  will  be  requesting  and  using  Federal  funds  from  the  Federal  Aviation 
Administration,  U.S.  Dept.  of  Transportation,  U.S.  Dept.  of  Energy  or  USEPA  and  how  it  will  be 
implemented in future JWA projects.   
 
5. The County of Orange and John Wayne Airport failed to reasonably identify and contact potential 
impacted neighboring cities, ethnic community populations, foreign language speaking community 
populations, environmental justice communities, sensitive receptor, Native American, Federal and 
State protected classes of people: Race, Color, Religion, Creed, National Origin, Ancestry, Sex, Age, 
Physical Disability, Mental Disability, Veteran Status and Citizenship who could be significantly and 
negatively impacted.    This action violates the public rights to public participation in the CEQA 
process, are acts of discrimination and environmental racism. 
 
We request a delay of the vote for Final Program EIR 627 approval a minimum of 60 days and we 
request that Public Meetings be held in every impacted city, all ethnic community populations, 
foreign language speaking community populations, environmental justice communities, sensitive 
receptor, Federal and State protected classes of people: Race, Color, Religion, Creed, National 
Origin, Ancestry, Sex, Age, Physical Disability, Mental Disability, Veteran Status and Citizenship.     
 
We challenge the legality of John Wayne Airport staff in asking the County of Orange Board of 
Supervisors to approve the General Aviation Improvement Program and certify the Final Program 
EIR without a formal vote and recommendation by the Orange County Airport Commission.   We 
see this as an intent to bypass the public’s right to public participation in the Draft Program EIR 
and Final Program EIR.   The Commission District Members also represent the various cities in 
Orange County. 
  
OC Airport Commission  https://www.ocair.com/Commissions/OCAirportCommission/ 
 
About the Airport Commission: 
 
 The Orange County Airport Commission makes recommendations to the Orange County Board of 
Supervisors for development, maintenance and operation of John Wayne Airport and other 
airports which may be operated by the County of Orange. It advises the Board of Supervisors and 
makes recommendations on any matter pertaining to airports or air transportation. It also 
conducts investigations as it may deem necessary in the exercise of the powers enumerated 
above.  The OC Airport Commission consists of five members who are appointed by the Board of 
Supervisors. 
 
Commission Members: 
 
Mr. John Clarey, Chair, Fifth District 
Mr. Lee M. Lowrey, Vice Chair, Second District 
Ms. Angie R. Cano, First District 
Mr. Bruce B. Junor, Third District  
Mr. David Bailey, Fourth District  
 
Meetings: 
 
5:00 p.m., 1st and 3rd Wednesday of the month 
 
Meeting Location: 
 
John Wayne Airport  
Eddie Martin Administration Building 
Airport Commission Hearing Room 
3160 Airway Avenue 
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 
 
John Wayne Airport is committed to ensuring an equal opportunity for individuals with 
disabilities to participate in Airport Commission meetings. Requests specifying appropriate 
auxiliary aids or services necessary to ensure effective communication during public meetings 
should be made as early as possible, but no later than three (3) business days in advance of the 
meeting date. 
 
We request a legal determination that John Wayne Airport has the authority to request an 
approval of the County of Orange Board of Supervisors to approve General Aviation 
Improvement Program and certify the Final Program EIR without a formal vote and 
recommendation by the Orange County Airport Commission. 
 
6. It has come to our attention that the John Wayne Airport has been involved in discussions with  
the organization Still Protecting Our Newport (SPON) and possibly others, since 2017 regarding 
past Settlement Agreements and Settlement Agreement Extensions which may constitute CEQA 
Public Participation, Public Disclosure and Brown Act Violations if they are related and occurred 
during the Draft Program EIR and Final Program EIR process. 
 
Ethnic community populations, foreign language speaking community populations, 
environmental justice communities, sensitive receptor, Federal and State protected classes of 
people: Race, Color, Religion, Creed, National Origin, Ancestry, Sex, Age, Physical Disability, 
Mental Disability, Veteran Status and Citizenship were not afforded this opportunity and were 
denied this opportunity.     
 
 We request full disclosure of any and all discussions, documentation, email, information, 
negotiations and agreements related to the Draft Program EIR and Final Program EIR. 
 
We request a delay of the vote for Final Program EIR 627 approval a minimum of 60 days until 
there has been Public Notice of the availability of this information. 
 
7. We disagree with the Final Program EIR determination that there are no Aesthetic impacts. The 
County of Orange and John Wayne Airport took a narrow interpretation and restricted their 
assessment to ground aesthetic impacts and failed to assess the aesthetic aerial visual and 
quality of life impacts.    
 
There are impacted neighboring cities, ethnic community populations, foreign language speaking 
community population, environmental justice communities, sensitive receptors, Native 
American, Federal and State protected classes of people: Race, Color, Religion, Creed, National 
Origin, Ancestry, Sex, Age, Physical Disability, Mental Disability, Veteran Status and Citizenship 
who residential homes, townhouses, apartments, senior living faculties, public schools and parks 
which are under the flight paths of John Wayne Airport and have a view of the flight paths. 
 
There is never an hour of a beautiful clear blue sky or starry night, where residents and visitors 
can enjoy an Outside Backyard BBQ, Birthday Party, Mexican & Central American Quinciniera, 
Asian Tea Ceremony or the view of clear blue skies, white clouds in the sky, a flock of local green 
parrots flying by or migratory birds without planes in the scenery.    This negative environmental 
impact also affects property values causing them to be lower than in other areas which have no 
view of planes or helicopters.  
  
We request that County of Orange and John Wayne Airport conduct an assessment of the visual 
aesthetic impacts and property value economic impacts of this Final Program EIR and 
appropriate mitigation. 
 
We request that County of Orange and John Wayne Airport conduct an assessment of the visual 
aesthetic impacts and property value economic impacts of this Final Program EIR and determine 
appropriate mitigation with community organizations which could be included in a Community 
Benefits Agreement. 
 
8. We disagree with the Final Program EIR determination and discussion that 5.2 Air Quality 
Findings and Facts In Support of Findings.     
 
Threshold 4.2‐1   
 
The General Aviation Improvement Program (GAIP) does conflict with or obstruct 
implementation of the applicable air quality plan.    
 
The GAIP and Final Program EIR failed to discuss that a JWA net increase of Criteria Pollutants, 
Toxic Pollutants or Greenhouse Gases would cause California and the South Coast AQMD State 
Implementation Plans to not comply with Federal National Ambient Air Quality Standard 
(NAAQS). 
 
The GAIP and Final Program EIR contain no assurances or capacity caps that there will be no 
increase number of commercial air carrier operations, fleet mix, runway use, flight tracks, or 
terminal area.  It also fails to assure that there will be no increase in JWA passengers, passenger 
transportation, cargo and cargo transportation, including visitors and supplies being delivered to 
the adjacent business and industrial parks.  
 
It has come to our attention that John Wayne Airport is under court orders, court stipulations or 
settlement agreements which may have a sunset clause or date of expiration.  The expiration 
could allow JWA expansion in the future which will increase air pollution and greenhouse gas 
emissions. 
 
It has also come to our attention that although there may be a limitation on flights and JWA has 
proved information on their existing fleet, we are aware that the loop‐hole that exist is that JWA 
can allow larger jet planes which will release more air pollution, allow a significant increase in 
passengers therefor increased traffic congestion, increased passenger vehicle air pollution and 
greenhouse gas emissions. 
 
We request full disclosure of all court orders, court stipulations or settlement agreements which 
may have a sunset clause or date of expiration in the next 10 years. 
 
We request that an assessment be conducted that would identify the maximum capacities of 
JWA in all categories so that appropriate Mitigation Measures could be adopted in the future. 
 
We request that the GAIP and Final Program EIR contain assurances of no violation of the State 
SIP or South Coast SIP/AQMP (Air Quality Management Plan), a capacity cap for John Wayne 
Airport which includes passengers and plane size and contain fines, penalties and sanctions if 
JWA has an increase in Ozone any category.   
 
Threshold 4.2‐2 
 
The General Aviation Improvement Program (GAIP) may violate air quality standard or  
contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation as proposed. 
 
It has come to our attention that John Wayne Airport is under court orders, court stipulations or 
settlement agreements which may have a sunset clause or date of expiration.  The expiration 
could allow JWA expansion in the future which will increase air pollution and greenhouse gas 
emissions. 
 
It has also come to our attention that although there may be a limitation on flights and JWA has 
proved information on their existing fleet, we are aware that the loop‐hole that exist is that JWA 
can allow larger jet planes which will release more air pollution, allow a significant increase in 
passengers therefor increased traffic congestion, increased passenger vehicle air pollution and 
greenhouse gas emissions. 
 
The GAIP and Final Program EIR contain no assurances or capacity caps that there will be no 
increase number of commercial air carrier operations, fleet mix, runway use, flight tracks, or 
terminal area.  It also fails to assure that there will be no increase in JWA passengers, passenger 
transportation, cargo and cargo transportation, including visitors and supplies being delivered to 
the adjacent business and industrial parks.  
 
We request that an assessment be conducted that would identify the maximum emissions of 
JWA based on its maximum capacity in all categories, a capacity cap for John Wayne Airport 
which includes passengers and plane size and to include visitors and supplies being delivered to 
the adjacent business and industrial parks so that appropriate Mitigation Measures could be 
adopted in the future. 
 
We request that the GAIP and Final Program EIR contain assurances and caps on all categories of 
emissions and contain fines, penalties and sanctions if JWA has an increase in any category of 
emissions.   
 
Threshold 4.2‐3 
 
The General Aviation Improvement Program (GAIP) would result in a cumulatively considerable 
net increase of criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non‐attainment under an 
applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which 
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? 
 
It has come to our attention that John Wayne Airport is under court orders, court stipulations or 
settlement agreements which may have a sunset clause or date of expiration.  The expiration 
could allow JWA expansion in the future which will increase air pollution and greenhouse gas 
emissions. 
 
It has also come to our attention that although there may be a limitation on flights and JWA has 
proved information on their existing fleet, we are aware that the loop‐hole that exist is that JWA 
can allow larger jet planes which will release more air pollution, allow a significant increase in 
passengers therefor increased traffic congestion, increased passenger vehicle air pollution and 
greenhouse gas emissions. 
 
The GAIP and Final Program EIR discussion on the cumulative air quality impacts analysis 
references the South Coast AQMD giving the impression that it is also in compliance with CEQA 
requirements and guidelines when it is not. 
 
The GAIP and Final Program EIR failed to discuss that a JWA net increase of Criteria Pollutants, 
Toxic Pollutants or Greenhouse Gases would cause California and the South Coast AQMD State 
Implementation Plans to not comply with Federal National Ambient Air Quality Standard 
(NAAQS). 
 
The Final Program EIR and Findings of Fact discussion failed to address that the State of 
California‐South Coast Air Quality Management District is in Federal Non‐Attainment of the 1‐
hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).    The GAIP cannot contribute to 
Federal Nonattainment of Ozone or California and all regions will lose hundreds‐of‐millions of 
dollars in Federal Transportation Funds. 
 
The GAIP and Final Program EIR contain no assurances or capacity caps that there will be no 
increase number of commercial air carrier operations, fleet mix, runway use, flight tracks, or 
terminal area.  It also fails to assure that there will be no increase in JWA passengers, passenger 
transportation, cargo and cargo transportation, including visitors and supplies being delivered to 
the adjacent business and industrial parks.  
 
The GAIP and Final Program EIR misrepresented information because the GAIP construction 
Project alone will increase Ozone, other Greenhouse Gases, Criteria Pollutants and Toxic 
Pollutants. 
 
The General Aviation Improvement Program cannot have any net increase in Ozone an identified 
Greenhouse Gas or any other type of pollutant. 
 
We request that an assessment be conducted that would identify the maximum capacities of 
JWA in all categories so that appropriate Mitigation Measures could be adopted in the future. 
 
We request that the GAIP and Final Program EIR contain assurances of no violation of the State 
SIP or South Coast SIP/AQMP (Air Quality Management Plan), a capacity cap for John Wayne 
Airport), a capacity cap for which includes passengers and plane size and contain fines, penalties 
and sanctions if JWA has an increase in Ozone any category.   
 
Threshold 4.2‐4 
 
The General Aviation Improvement Program (GAIP) may expose sensitive receptors to substantial 
pollutant concentrations. 
 
It has come to our attention that John Wayne Airport is under court orders, court stipulations or 
settlement agreements which may have a sunset clause or date of expiration.  The expiration 
could allow JWA expansion in the future which will increase air pollution and greenhouse gas 
emissions. 
 
It has also come to our attention that although there may be a limitation on flights and JWA has 
proved information on their existing fleet, we are aware that the loop‐hole that exist is that JWA 
can allow larger jet planes which will release more air pollution, allow a significant increase in 
passengers therefor increased traffic congestion, increased passenger vehicle air pollution and 
greenhouse gas emissions. 
 
The GAIP, Draft Program EIR and Final Program EIR based their decision solely on a GAIP specific 
Health Risk Assessment (HRA) which provides limited public health data and no current public 
health status.  The GAIP, Draft and Final Program EIR does not include a current Public Health 
Baseline of the 6 cities that are impacted by the GAIP.   The GAIP, Draft and Final Program EIR 
should have included a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) and a Public Health Survey to establish a 
Public Health Baseline. 
 
An HIA and a comprehensive Public Health Baseline can include data on the number of people 
with existing and past health problems, the number of children and sensitive receptors for each 
health problem, the seriousness of each category of problem, the length of time with a health 
problem and even the costs of health care.  A small increase in air pollution can send a chronic 
and acute asthma child or adult with COPD immediately to emergency hospital.   
 
We have attached an expert opinion letter, expert CV, HIA Guide, HIA Bibliography and Public 
Health Bibliographies as supporting information and validation of our concerns and comments. 
 
The GAIP HRA cannot tell you how many people have any health problem nor can it tell you how 
many are sensitive receptors or how many people may be exposed to pollutant concentrations. 
 
The HRA was based on the assumption that there would never be any JWA expansion in any 
category which is not realistic since every airport expands its capacities in all categories.  The  
GAIP, Draft and Final Program EIR contain no assurances or capacity caps that there will be no 
increase number of commercial air carrier operations, fleet mix, runway use, flight tracks, or 
terminal area.  It also fails to assure that there will be no increase in JWA passengers, passenger 
transportation, cargo and cargo transportation, including visitors and supplies being delivered to 
the adjacent business and industrial parks.  
 
The HRA was limited in scope to the area around the airport and did not include the cities and 
communities under the flight paths of planes, helicopters nor the increased traffic congestion 
from freeways, highways, streets, roads and bridges that provide public and freight 
transportation support. 
  
We request that the GAIP and Final Program EIR contain a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) and a 
Comprehensive Public Health Survey to establish a Public Health Baseline, to include all cities and 
communities under the flight paths of planes, helicopters and exposure to the increased traffic 
congestion from freeways, highways, streets, roads and bridges that provide public and freight 
transportation support. 
  
We have attached an expert opinion letter by Dr. Jonathan Heller and two supporting document 
on  Health Impact Assessments that were prepared for the Coalition For A Safe Environment 
which can be used at JWA. 
 
9. We disagree with the Final Program EIR determination and discussion of the 5.4 Greenhouse Gas 
Emissions Findings and Facts In Support of Findings.     
 
Threshold 4.4‐1 
 
The General Aviation Improvement Program (GAIP) will generate greenhouse gas emissions, both 
directly and indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment 
 
Although the Final Program EIR 627 identifies the total net annual GHG emissions associated with 
the Project Proposed for Approval are substantially below the 10,000 MTCO2e/year threshold 
established by the SCAQMD for industrial projects it is based on an assumption that there will 
never in the future be an increase in capacity in any category which is not realistic since every 
airport expands its capacities in all categories.   
 
The Greenhouse Gas Analysis was based only on Direct Project Sources and does not include 
Indirect Sources as required by CEQA.   Indirect sources would as a minimum include:  visitors 
and supplies being delivered to the adjacent business and industrial parks, increased traffic 
congestion from freeways, highways, streets, roads and bridges that provide public and freight 
transportation support to JWA and transportation infrastructure maintenance, repair and 
replacement. 
 
What the Final Program EIR 627 failed to clearly disclose and discuss is that the current 
Greenhouse Gas inventories and future estimates are in fact high and unacceptable:  
 

 
 
The GAIP and Final Program EIR contain no assurances or capacity caps that there will be no 
increase number of commercial air carrier operations, fleet mix, runway use, flight tracks, or 
terminal area.  It also fails to assure that there will be no increase in JWA passengers, passenger 
transportation, cargo and cargo transportation, including visitors and supplies being delivered to 
the adjacent business and industrial parks.  It additionally fails to assure that there will be no 
 increased traffic congestion from freeways, highways, streets, roads and bridges that provide 
public and freight transportation support in the future. 
 
The GAIP and Final Program EIR misrepresented information because the GAIP Construction 
Project alone will increase Ozone, other Greenhouse Gases, Criteria Pollutants and Toxic 
Pollutants. 
 
We request that an assessment be conducted that would identify the maximum capacities of 
JWA in all categories so that appropriate Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures could be adopted 
in the future. 
 
We request that the GAIP and Final Program EIR contain assurances and caps on all categories of 
emissions, a capacity cap for which includes passengers and plane size and contain fines, 
penalties and sanctions if JWA has an increase in any category of emissions.   
 
Threshold 4.4‐2 
 
The General Aviation Improvement Program (GAIP) would conflict with an applicable plan, policy 
or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases 
 
The referenced John Wayne Airport Climate Action Plan (“CAP”), which establishes a framework 
to minimize airport‐related GHG emissions and establishes emission reduction goals and a 
process for implementation, monitoring, and reporting is not contained in the Draft or Final 
Program EIR for public review and we were unable to find it on the JWA website.    
 
Executive Order S‐3‐05, AB 32, and SB 32 are the primary State policies adopted for the purpose 
of reducing GHG emissions.   Statewide regulations adopted in furtherance of those State 
policies, including GHG emissions standards for vehicles, are being implemented at the statewide 
level.     
 
The GAIP and Final Program EIR are in conflict because the GAIP will cause a net‐increase in 
Greenhouse Gases and they fail to mandate GHG reductions wherever possible.    JWA will 
continue to use diesel and natural gas fossil fuel engine vehicles and equipment when zero 
emission technologies exist for almost every category of vehicle and equipment or can be 
retrofitted with Zero Emissions Technologies.   There is no Zero Emissions Phase‐In Plan to 
replace diesel fuel vehicles and equipment 
 
The California Hydrogen Business Council and its manufacturing members are an excellent 
resource for zero emissions non‐polluting Hydrogen Gas as a fuel and supports the use of 
renewable energy sources that can generate Hydrogen Gas and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric 
Battery Technologies which can replace over 90% of all types of vehicles and equipment that use 
diesel and other fossil fuels. 
 
We have attached the Coalition For A Safe Environment’s Zero Emissions Vehicle and Equipment 
Survey which identifies by manufacturer, item name or part number available Zero Emissions 
Technologies which can be used at JWA. 
 
We request that the GAIP and Final Program EIR be updated to contain Best Available Control 
Technologies, Green Construction Technologies and Zero Emissions Vehicles and Equipment 
Technologies Mitigation which can be included in Mitigation Measures, a Settlement and 
Community Benefits Agreement. 
 
10. We request information regarding if John Wayne Airport has requested from the California 
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) a variance for John Wayne Airport GAIP from the Noise 
 Standards contained in California Code of Regulations (CCR) Tile 21, subchapter 6 and if JWA has 
entered into a past or proposed Variance Stipulation.  
 
11. The GAIP and Final Program EIR contain an unacceptable, limited discussion and limited 
assessment of available Best Available Control Technologies, Green Construction Technologies 
and Zero Emissions Vehicles and Equipment Technologies Mitigation that can be adopted.  
 
We have attached the Coalition For A Safe Environment’s Zero Emissions Vehicle and Equipment 
Survey which identifies by manufacturer, item name or part number available Zero Emissions 
Technologies which can be used at JWA. 
 
We have attached as reference documents which contain information that JWA can incorporate 
into the GAIP and Final Program EIR: 
 
LAWA LAX Community Benefits Agreement 
LAWA LAX Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program 
CARB Air Pollution Mitigation Measures For Airports & Associated Activities 
 
We request that the GAIP and Final Program EIR be updated to contain Best Available Control 
Technologies, Green Construction Technologies and Zero Emissions Vehicles and Equipment 
Technologies Mitigation which can be included in Mitigation Measures, a Settlement and 
Community Benefits Agreement. 
 
 
The principal contact for any questions regarding these public comments is the undersigned Jesse N. 
Marquez.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Respectfully Submitted, 

 
Jesse N. Marquez 
 
 
 
Jesse N. Marquez          Alejandro N. Marquez      
Executive Director          Chairman 
Coalition For A Safe Environment      OC Neighbors Care   
1601 N. Wilmington Blvd., Ste. B      PO Box 6073 
Wilmington, CA 90744        Santa Ana, CA 92706 
jnm4ej@yahoo.com          ocneighborscare@yahoo.com 
424‐264‐5959     310‐590‐0177      714‐478‐7945 
 
Ricardo Pulido           Drew Wood     
Executive Director          Executive Director 
Community Dreams          California Kids IAQ 
1601 N. Wilmington Blvd., Ste. B2      1601 N. Wilmington Blvd., Ste. B4 
Wilmington, CA 90744        Wilmington, CA 90744   
mr.rpulido@gmail.com        californiakidsiaq@gmail.com 
310‐567‐0748           916‐616‐5913 
 
Magali Sanchez‐Hall, MPH        Chaplain Anthony Quezada         
Executive Director           American Legion Post 6 
EMERGE            1927 E. Plymouth St.       
913 East O Street           Long Beach, CA 90810 
Wilmington, CA 90744        quezadaanthony85@yahoo.com       
mssanchezhall7@gmail.com        310‐466‐2724  
646‐436‐0306            
 
Anabell Romero Chavez        Dr. John G. Miller, MD 
Wilmington Improvement Network       San Pedro & Peninsula Homeowners Coalition 
Board Member          President 
1239 Ronan Ave.          1479 Paseo Del Mar 
Wilmington, CA 90744        San Pedro, CA 90731 
anab3ll310@yahoo.com        igornla@cox.net 
310‐940‐4515           310‐548‐4420 
 
Joe R. Gatlin            Modesta Pulido 
Vice President           Chairperson 
NAACP             St. Philomena Social Justice Ministry 
San Pedro‐Wilmington Branch # 1069    22106 Gulf Ave. 
225 S. Cabrillo Ave.          Carson, CA 90745 
San Pedro, CA 90731          vdepulido@gmail.com 
joergatlin45k@gmail.com        310‐513‐1178 
310‐766‐5399 
 
Robina Suwol            Jane Williams 
Executive Director          Executive Director 
California Safe Schools        California Communities Against Toxics 
P.O. Box 2756            P.O. Box 845 
Toluca Lake, CA 91610        Rosamond, CA 93560 
robinasuwol@earthlink.net        dcapjane@aol.com   
818‐261‐7965           661‐256‐2101 
 
Cynthia Babich          Mitzi Shpak 
Executive Director          Executive Director 
Del Amo Action Committee        Action Now 
4542 Irone Ave.          2062 Lewis Ave. 
Rosamond, CA 93560          Altadena, CA 91001 
delamoactioncommittee@gmail.com     msmshpak@gmail.com 
310‐769‐4813           626‐825‐9795 
Lopez, Maria [COB]

From: Lopez, Aida [JWA]

Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 8:09 AM
To: COB_Response
Subject: Item #45 for today's Board Meeting

Good morning,  
 
The comment below was received last night.   
 
Aida 
 
From: cavaland <cavaland@ix.netcom.com>  
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 7:56 PM 
To: Lopez, Aida [JWA] <ALopez@ocair.com> 
Subject: SNA Airport Expansion 

I watched the last BOS meeting that tried to address the problems those of us under the flight path are having.
My understanding from the "airport" math is that if we build and allow the private jets the accommodations they
are asking for, we could potentially cut down on possibly half the depatures and landings. The reasoning behind
this math was that right now these private jets have to fly all the way from Long Beach or Chino because
corporate passengers do not want to drive to either airport where the planes are stationed so they fly in, pick up
OC private jet people, depart then fly in again, drop people off then depart to the home base down the road. It
seems that apparently the airport cannot disallow these planes from coming in and out numerous times a day
due to FAA regs. We are being told if we go with Alt. 1 and allow the expansion for full time private jet storage
we can possibly cut down on half of the departures/landings since these private jets will be stored on airport
premises cutting down on trips to home base.

My question is if we do this and allow permanent places for these 65 private jets what stops the exisiting
practice to continue??? 65 jets are home safe but many more can continue to come in and out 4 times a day?
They say we cannot stop these jets coming in/out so with expansion we would add what we already have plus
top it off with more. I could be completely off the mark. Just wondering how this works.

At this point I'm against ANY Alternative without further investigation. Please, do your job which is to look out
for the people who live and invest in our area. the BOS needs to take time before making a decision that forever
impacts our lives. The Board knows, and I and everyone else knows it will continue to get worse. If you want to
spend a day in my yard you are more than welcome to do so.

Alexis Cavanaugh
2520 Fairway Drive
Costa Mesa, CA. 92627
949 547 2349
949 645 3903

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S8, an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone

1
Lopez, Maria [COB]

From: Sheri L. W. Horn <shorn@newportfg.com>

Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 8:11 AM
To: COB_Response
Subject: Meeting at 9:30 am on 6/25/19

Dear Board, 
I am so very frustrated and unhappy that I received noticed through the mail yesterday afternoon at 4:30 PM that there 
was to be meeting this morning at 9:30 AM. That hardly constitutes the idea of advance notice. Should be given less 
than 24 hours awareness of meetings that will impact our lives is childish and gameplaying. We do not want any more 
expansion of the airport and due to business circumstances I cannot rearrange my schedule to be there to voice My 
opinion in person. Everyone in my household once no more planes no more pollution no more noise than we already are 
sustaining. Please feel free to contact me directly my name is Sheri Horn I live at 1423 Mariners Dr., Newport Beach. My 
cell phone is 949‐887‐2776. 
 
Sent from my iPhone