Sand Mining
Sand Mining
Sand Mining
DOI 10.1007/s00254-007-0870-z
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Received: 26 December 2006 / Revised: 30 May 2007 / Accepted: 11 June 2007 / Published online: 30 June 2007
Springer-Verlag 2007
123
880 Environ Geol (2008) 54:879–889
Here we report the environmental effects of river Recent sediments. The Precambrian crystallines cover
sand mining from the small rivers (catchment area about 85% of the study area and composed mainly of
< 10,000 km2; Milliman and Syvitski 1992) debouching charnockites, khondalites, garnet-biotite gneisses and
into the largest marginal lagoon, in the southwest coast of hornblende gneisses (GSI 1995). The Tertiary sedimen-
India, the Vembanad lake. These rivers are being subjected taries are represented by Quilon and Warkalli Formations.
to indiscriminate sand extraction over the past 3–4 decades While the former (i.e. the Quilon Formation) is composed
consequent to economic development, rise in foreign of limestones, sandstones and claystones, the latter is
remittance and liberalised housing schemes from banking formed of sandstones and claystones with intercalations of
sector for building constructions since early 1970s. Studies lignite seams. The Precambrian crystallines and the Ter-
(Padmalal and Arun 1998; Padmalal et al. 2006) reveal that tiary sedimentaries are lateritised at many places in the
sand mining is taking place many folds higher than natural midlands. Recent to Sub-Recent sediments of Late Qua-
replenishments, which, in turn, led to severe environmental ternary age, represented by coastal sands and alluvium, are
degradation and ecological disorders. Reduction in sedi- confined to the lowlands and parts of midlands (Padmalal
ment supply from upstream reaches and erosion of its own et al. 1997). The area experiences a tropical humid climate
channel during high flow regimes of monsoon season are with an average annual rainfall of about 3,300 mm. Of the
common in many rivers in the southwest coast. This has led total rainfall, southwest monsoon (June–September) con-
to channel incision and undermining of engineering struc- tributes about 75% and the remaining by northeast mon-
tures like bridges, side protection walls, water intake soon (October–December) and summer showers. The
structures constructed for rural water supplies, etc. Lack of temperature varies from 20 to 39C. Humidity is high
sufficient information regarding the negative effects of (>80%) during monsoon period.
sand mining is a major set back for laying strategies for the
conservation and management of the small catchment
rivers of the region. Considering the importance of scien- Rivers in the Vembanad lake catchments
tific assessments on the extent of environmental degrada-
tion consequent to indiscriminate sand mining, an attempt Table 1 shows the characteristic features of the Ach-
has been made in this paper to address a few aspects about ankovil, Pamba, Manimala, Meenachil, Muvattupuzha,
the impacts of sand mining on the physical and biological Periyar and Chalakudy rivers draining the Vembanad lake
environments of Kerala rivers in the southwest coast of catchments. The headwater elevation of these rivers var-
India, taking the river catchments of Vembanad lake as an ies between 700 and 1,830 m with respect to mean sea
example. level. These small, mountainous rivers (Milliman and
Syvitski 1992), except the Achankovil, which is an up-
land river, enfold alluvial deposits rich in construction
Geology and environmental setting grade sand and gravel in its lowlands and midlands. The
highlands, which act as the main production zone for
The Vembanad lake, the largest coastal lagoon (~250 km2) sediments, are generally under dense forests and/or forest
in the west coast of India, and its catchments cover an area plantations. A substantial proportion of the sediments
of about 14,500 km2. The entire area lies between North derived from the uplands is being trapped in the reser-
latitudes 90¢–1035¢ and East longitudes 7605¢–7725¢ voirs constructed for irrigation and hydroelectric power
(Fig. 1). The lake catchment is drained by seven small generation. The channel width of the mainstream that
rivers (i.e. rivers with catchment area <10,000 km2; Mil- holds thick sand beds in the active channel ranges from
liman and Syvitski 1992) viz., Chalakudy, Periyar, Mu- 100 to 500 m. These rivers generally exhibit higher
vattupuzha, Meenachil, Manimala, Pamba and Achankovil meandering index in the midlands than the other two
rivers. These rivers originate from the Western Ghat physiographic zones. The alluvial reaches exhibit a vari-
mountains and flow generally westwards before debou- ety of roughness configurations that vary with slope and
ching into the Vembanad lake. position within the channel network. The entire alluvial
Physiographically, the study area can be divided into 3 reaches of these rivers can be categorised into three dis-
distinct zones—the highlands (>75 m above msl), mid- tinct morphological classes towards downstream—plane
lands (8–75 m) and the lowlands (<8 m); (CESS 1984). bed reach, pool riffle reach and dune ripple reach. The
The total population of the area as per 2001 census is about content of gravel and sand exhibits marked changes over
10 million and population density about 690 inh km–2. The these morphological classes—the former (i.e. gravel) de-
major rock types in the area are: (1) Precambrian crystal- creases in percent contents, while the latter exhibits a
lines, (2) Tertiary sedimentaries and (3) Recent to Sub- marked increase downstream.
123
Environ Geol (2008) 54:879–889 881
123
882
123
Table 1 Salient features of the rivers draining the Vembanad lake catchments
River River length (km)/ Headwater elevation Features of alluvial reach Remarks
Basin area (km2) (m)/River typea
Length (km)/ Sinuosity
Width (m) index
Achankovil 128/1,484 700/upland 108/100 1.50 Major tributaries of the river are Kallar, Chittar, Pallikondan Ar and Tuval thodu. The
river hosts a 16 m waterfalls in the Tuval thodu at Palakappara
Pamba 176/2,235 1,650/mountainous 140 /150 1.44 Kakki Ar and Kakkad Ar are the major tributaries. The two reservoirs in the basin are
the Kakki and Pamba reservoirs. The basin hosts many water falls and the important
one being falls at Perunthenaruvi. The sandy riverbed at Cherukol and Maramon are
used for holding annual religious congregations
Manimala 90/847 1,156/mountainous 77/100 1.51 Kokkayar, Para thodu, Kanjirapally thodu, Pullaga Ar, Chemban thodu, Elakkal thodu,
Papan thodu and Kuvani thodu are the major tributaries. River hosts a 60 m and 8 m
waterfalls in its tributaries. The riverbed at several places is used for holding annual
religious congregations
Meenachil 78/1,272 1,097/mountainous 49/110 1.38 Important tributaries are Kalathukadavu Ar, Tikovil Ar, Chittar Ar and Kala Ar. The
river hosts three waterfalls in its tributaries
Muvattupuzha 121/1,554 1,094/mountainous 46/165 1.71 Thodupuzha Ar, Kothamangalam Ar and Kaliyar are the major tributaries of the river.
The river hosts a reservoir at Malankara. The tail race water of the Idukki hydro-
electric project of Periyar river is diverted through the Thodupuzha tributary
Periyar 244/5,398 1,830/mountainous 148/500 1.47 Major tributaries of Periyar river are Pooyamkutty Ar, Idamala Ar, Muthirapuzha Ar,
Perinjankutty Ar and Mangalapuzha Ar. The basin hosts ten reservoirs in its
upstream. Important waterfall is at Kokkaranipara. The river bed at Kalady and
Aluva are used for holding annual religious congregations
Chalakudy 130/1,704 1,250/mountainous 78/140 1.47 Parambikulam Ar, Sholayar, Kuriarkutty Ar, Karappara Ar and Anakkayam Ar are the
tributaries. The river basin hosts 5 reservoirs. Several waterfalls are in the upstream
area of the river of which Athirapalli falls of 45 m is a major attraction
a
Headwater elevation is measured from mean sea level; River type is identified following the scheme of Milliman and Syvitsky (1992)
Environ Geol (2008) 54:879–889
Environ Geol (2008) 54:879–889 883
Although river flows and sediment loads are variable higher in numbers in midlands (523) than highlands (309)
within and among years, sediment balance and channel and lowlands (171). A total of about 22,300 registered
stability occur over long term. Instabilities introduced by labourers are employed in instream mining sector and the
human activities like deforestation, sand and gravel mining number of indirect workers depending on the quarried
and other activities, and by natural processes like extreme sand, especially in the construction sector, would be over a
precipitation, forest fires and other events can cause lakh. In some places, sand mining is even clubbed with
channel bed and banks to become net sources of sediment. extraction of subfossil logs embedded within alluvial sand
River sand and gravel are mined extensively from the deposits (Fig. 2). These subfossil logs that are segregated
drainage networks of the Vembanad lake catchments, in the Early Holocene higher sea levels (Kumaran and Nair
irrespective of the physiographic zones, river orders and 2005) are used as firewood in the brick kilns of the nearby
ecological significance. However, the intensity of mining is areas. An apparent assessment of the quantity of sand
high in the alluvial reaches of the main channels. In extraction with respect to the available sand input data
addition to mining of sand and gravel from active channels reveals that sand mining in the river reaches down to the
(instream mining), a substantial amount of sand is also gauging stations is of the order of 40 times higher than the
being extracted from the overbank areas (floodplain min- sand input recorded at the gauging stations of the respec-
ing) of the river as well. Generally, two types of instream tive rivers (Table 3). The natural replenishment is very
mining are in practice in the area—pit excavation and bar meagre as the river catchments are occupied mainly by
skimming. Pit excavation is extraction of sand and gravel Precambrian crystallines. Further, a substantial part of sand
from the riverbed or floodplain areas by uncontrolled dig- originated from natural crustal weathering will be detained
ging. In some cases, diesel powered suction pumps are within the reservoirs constructed in the uplands for irriga-
used to extract sand rich sediments from wet pits in the tion and hydropower generation (see Fig. 1). According to
active channels and floodplains. Bar skimming, on the Nair and Padmalal (2006) whatever sand reaches in the
other hand, is the controlled extraction of sand from alluvial zones are derived from erosion/slumping of early–
the exposed sand bars (instream bars and point bars) in the middle Holocene sand layers interbedded within the river
channel environment. Usually, bar skimming would be banks of the midlands and lowlands.
done above the water table and within a minimum width River degradation, damage to agricultural lands close to
buffer that separates the excavation site from the low flow river channel, etc., led to agitation among the local people
channel and the adjacent active channel bank. Of the two who directly depend on rivers for various purposes. Peo-
types, pit excavation is the widespread sand mining method ple’s opposition and strict regulation of instream sand
adopted in the alluvial reaches of the rivers in the Vem- mining often lead to mining of sand from floodplains and/
banad lake catchments. or river terraces. Floodplain mining is severe in the low-
Table 2 shows the estimated quantity of sand extraction lands of Muvattupuzha river basin compared to the others.
from various rivers of the study area. It is revealed that an It is estimated that an amount of 0.414 million ty–1 of sand
amount of 11.73 million tonnes of sand and gravel are and gravel is being mined annually from the floodplain
being extracted annually from the active channels of these areas of the seven rivers subjected to the present study
rivers. Out of the total quantity of sand extraction, nearly (Table 4). The number of pits and labour force in the
half the amount (i.e. 5.64 million tonnes) is from the floodplain-mining sector are 137 and 600, respectively.
Periyar river, which flows through the most urbanized and
industrialized areas of the Vembanad lake basin, the Kochi
city. Although small in river length and catchment area Effects of instream sand mining
compared to Periyar river (244 km/5,398 km2), the river
Muvattupuzha (121 km/1,554 km2) is also affected se- River basins have long been exploited as sources of fine
verely by sand extraction (2.00 million ty–1), owing to its aggregates for building constructions. Depending on the
proximity to the development centre, the Kochi city and its geologic and geomorphic setting, river sand mining can
satellite townships. The sand extraction in the other rivers impose serious environmental consequences in the long run
are of the order Manimala > Achankovil > Chal- (UNEP 1990). The cumulative effects of uncontrolled sand
akudy > Pamba > Meenachil (see Table 2). Spatial analy- mining have substantially altered the physical, chemical
sis reveals that about 75% of the extracted sand is from the and biological environments of the small southwest Indian
midlands, which cover only 30% of the entire study area. rivers. Table 5 shows some of the general impacts of river
The highlands and lowlands account for almost equal sand mining noticed in the river catchments of Vembanad
amount of sand extraction (Table 2), although the former lake. Degradation of rivers is severe in the alluvial reaches
covers a greater portion of the study area (60%) than the of the midlands and lowlands compared to the production
latter (10%). The sand harvesting (mining) centres are also zones in the highlands. In some cases, the riverbank itself is
123
884 Environ Geol (2008) 54:879–889
Table 2 Sand mining and other relevant details of the rivers draining the Vembanad lake catchments with respect to different physiographic
zones
Physiographic Rivers/River Sand extraction No. of sand No. of local bodies Labour
zone/unit total (·106 ty–1) mining locations engaged in sand mining force
being scooped out first for brick earths and then the Collins and Dunne 1989; Kondolf 1994). This process
intervening sand layers for fine aggregates. could mobilize a substantial quantity of streambed sedi-
It is now well understood that indiscriminate sand ments that are then transported downstream and ultimately
mining well above the natural replenishments could lead to deposited in the excavated area. In some cases, the head-
serious environmental problems in the river basins. Of the cuts moves long distances upstream and often spreads into
two types of sand mining from the active channels de- even the tributary channels (Hartfield 1993; Kondolf 1997).
scribed earlier, pit excavation is the most dangerous than Merging of the adjacent pits during monsoon season could
bar skimming. Excavation of mining pits in the active lower the streambed faster imposing instability to the riv-
channel of the alluvial reaches lowers the streambed, cre- erbanks and riparian vegetation. The sediment-laden water
ating knick points. The knick point could locally steepen passing downstream leaves coarser sediments like gravel
the channel slope, which in turn increases the flow energy. and sand in these pits and thereby carries only sediments
During high flows of the monsoon season, knick point much less than its capacity. Thus, the hungry water leaving
becomes a location of bed erosion and gradually moves the pit may erode the downstream reaches with aggression,
upstream through head cutting (Garde and Raju 1985; ultimately ending up in the degradation of the entire river
123
Environ Geol (2008) 54:879–889 885
Table 3 Quantity of river sand mining with respect to the sand discharge estimate of the gauging station
River Location of River length down the Total sediment Total sand discharge Sand mining below the
gauging station gauging station (km) discharge (·106ty–1) (·106ty–1) gauging station (·106ty–1)
123
886 Environ Geol (2008) 54:879–889
Table 5 Impact of river sand and gravel mining on various environmental components of rivers draining the Vembanad lake
Sl. no. System/components Impact(s) of mining
1. River channel Erosion of river banks; river bank slumping; lowering of river channels; changes in river bed
configuration; undermining of engineering structures like bridges, water intake structures, side
protection walls, spillways, etc.; loss of placer mineral resources associated with alluvial sand and
gravel
2. Surface water Rise in suspended particulate level, turbidity and other pollutants like oil, grease, etc., from vehicles used
for the removal of sands; ponding of water and reduction in natural cleansing capacity of river water;
aggravated salt water ingression
3. Ground water Lowering of ground water table in areas adjacent to mining sites; damage to the fresh water aquifer
system in areas close to the river mouth zones
4. Flora and fauna Dwindling of floral and faunal diversity within river basin; decline in terrestrial insects like mayfly,
dragon fly, stone fly etc., whose larval stages are in the shallow water sandy fluvial systems; habitat
damage/loss and changes in breeding and spawning grounds; reduction in inland fishery resources
5. Culture Damage to culturally significant places; places of annual religious congregations, etc
6. Coast/near shore Lack of replenishment of coastal beaches leading to coastal erosion and reduction in the supply of
nutrient elements from terrestrial source
another study in the Achankovil river, Sunilkumar (2002) banks (Fig. 6), river bed lowering and also clearing of
reveals that the benthic fauna in the river has severely af- vegetation for brick earth and sand mining for the devel-
fected by indiscriminate river sand mining. Number counts opment of roads (Fig. 7), sand harvesting centres, etc. ad-
of benthic animals were very low or even absent in some versely affected the ecosystem functioning of the river
cases, in the sampling stations affected severely by sand reaches in midlands and lowlands. Loss of instream vege-
mining (Fig. 5). Scooping of sand along with the larval tation, sand and gravel in the river bed, etc., not only affect
forms of many insects like mayfly, dragonfly, caddisfly and the feeding and hiding grounds of fishes and other fresh-
other insects of the order Diptera has imposed marked water animals but also induce spawning disorders to
decrease in population of these beneficial insects which phytophilic and psammophilic fishes in the aquatic envi-
form food to other higher order animals like fishes and ronment (FAO 1998). This may, of course, end up in the
amphibians. Loss of riparian habitats due to caving of river decline of inland fishery resources, which ultimately affect
123
Environ Geol (2008) 54:879–889 887
123
888 Environ Geol (2008) 54:879–889
References
123
Environ Geol (2008) 54:879–889 889
Collins B, Dunne T (1990) Fluvial geomorphology and river gravel Kurup BM, Radhakrishnan KV, Manojkumar TG (2005) Biodiversity
mining: a guide for planners. California Division of Mines and status of fishes inhabiting rivers of Kerala (S. India) with special
Geology, Special Publication 98, Sacramento, California reference to endemism, threats and conservation measures.
FAO (1998) Rehabilitation of rivers for fish. Food and Agriculture Biodiversity Status 2:163–182. http://www.lars2.org/Proc
Organisation of the United Nations, Finishing News Books, Lane EW (1955) Importance of fluvial morphology in hydraulic
London engineering. In: Proc. ASCE, paper 745
Gaillot S, Piegay H (1999) Impact of gravel mining on stream channel Macfarlane M, Mitchell P (2003) Scoping and assessment of the
and coastal sediment supply, example of the Calvi Bay in environmental and social impacts of river mining in Jamaica.
Corsica (France). J Coastal Res 15:774–788 Warwick Business School, University of Warwick
Garde RJ, Raju KGR (1985) Mechanics of sediment transportation Milliman JD, Syvitski JPM (1992) Geomorphic/Tectonic control of
and alluvial stream problems. Wiley, New York sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance of small
Gilpin A (1995) Environmental impact assessment (EIA): cutting edge mountainous rivers. J Geol 100:525–544
for the 21st century. Cambridge University press, Cambridge Naiman RJ (1992) Watershed management. Springer, New York
GSI (1995) Geological and mineralogical map of Kerala. Geological Naiman RJ, Bilby RE (1998) River ecology and management in the
Survey of India, Calcutta Pacific coastal ecoregion. In: Naiman RJ, Bilby RE (eds) River
Hartfield P (1993) Headcuts and their effects on freshwater mussels. ecology and management: lessons from the Pacific Coastal
Paper presented at the UMRCC symposium on conservation and Ecoregion. Springer, New York, pp 1–22
management of freshwater mussels, Rock Island, Illinois, pp Nair KM, Padmalal D (2006) Sand deposit and extraction in the rivers
131–141 of Kerala: an assessment based on river conservation. XVI
Harvey MD, Smith TW (1998) Gravel mining impacts on San Benito Swadeshi Science Congress Abstracts 41
River, California. In: Proceedings of 1998 International Water Norman DK, Cederholm CF, Lingley WS (1998) Floodplains, salmon
Resources Engineering Conference, Hydraulics Division, ASCE, habitat, and sand and gravel mining. Wash Geol 26:3–20
Memphis Padmalal D, Arun PR (1998) Sand mining from Periyar river. Report
Haslam SM (1990) River pollution: an ecological perspective. Wiley, submitted to the State Committee on Science, Technology and
New York Environment, Government of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram
Heede BH (1986) Designing for dynamic equilibrium in streams. Padmalal D, Maya K, Seralathan P (1997) Geochemistry of Cu, Co,
Water Resources Bull 22:351–357 Ni, Zn Cd and Cr in the surficial sediments of a tropical estuary,
Ittekkot V, Lanne RWPM (1991) Fate of riverine particulate organic southwest coast of India: a granulometric approach. Environ
matter. In: Degens ET, Kempe S, Richey JE (eds) Biogeochem- Geol 31:85–93
istry of major world rivers. SCOPE, Wiley, New York, pp 233– Padmalal D, Maya K, Sreebha S, Sandhya V (2006) River sand
243 mining and management. Report submitted to the Kerala State
Jenkins SA, Inman DL, Skelly DW (1988) Impact of dam building on Council for Science, Technology and Environment, Centre for
the California coastal zone. California Waterfront Age Earth Science Studies, Thiruvananthapuram
Kitetu J, Rowan J (1997) Integrated environmental assessment Poulin R, Pakalnis RC, Sinding K (1994) Aggregate resources:
applied to river sand harvesting in Kenya. In: Patric CK, Lee production and environmental constraints. Environ Geol 23:221–
N (eds) Sustainable development in a developing world—inte- 227
grated socio-economic appraisal and environmental assessment. Rivier B, Seguier J (1985) Physical and biological effects of gravel
Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (U.K.), pp 189–199 extraction in river beds. In: Alabaster JS (ed) Habitat modifica-
Kondolf GM (1994) Geomorphic and environmental effects of tion and freshwater fisheries. Food and Agric. Organ. U.N.,
instream gravel mining. Landsc Urban Plan 28:225–243 Rome, pp 131–146
Kondolf GM (1997) Hungry water: effects of dams and gravel mining Sandecki M (1989) Aggregate mining in river systems. Calif Geol
on river channels. Environ Manage 21:533–551 42:88–94
Kondolf GM (2006) River restoration and meanders. Ecol Soc Starnes LB (1983) Effects of surface mining on aquatic resources in
11(2):42. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art42/ North America. Fisheries 8:2–4
Kondolf GM, Larson M (1995) Historical channel analysis and its Sunilkumar R (2002) Impact of sand mining on benthic fauna: A case
application to riparian and aquatic habitat restoration. Aquat study from Achankovil river in Kerala. Report submitted to
conserv 5:109–126 Centre for Earth Science Studies, Thiruvananthapuram
Kondolf GM, Swanson ML (1993) Channel adjustments to reservoir Thomas RB (1985) Estimating total suspended sediment yield with
construction and instream gravel mining, Stony Creek, Califor- probability sampling. Water Resources Res 21:1381–1388
nia. Environ Geol Water Sci 21:256–269 Tompkins MR, Kondolf GM (2003) Integrating geomorphic process
Kondolf GM, Smeltzer M, Kimball L (2002) Freshwater gravel approach in riparian and stream restoration: past experience and
mining and dredging issues. Center for Environmental Design future opportunities. In: Faber PM (ed) California riparian
and Research, University of California, Berkeley systems: processes and floodplain management, ecology and
Kondolf GM, Boulton AJ, O’Daniel S, Poole GC, Rahel FJ, Stanley restoration. Proceedings of the Riparian Habitat and Floodplains
EH, Wohl E, Bang A, Carlstrom J, Cristoni C, Huber H, Conference (Sacramento, 2001), Sacramento, California, pp
Koljonen S, Louhi P, Nakamura K (2006) Process-based 230–238
ecological river restoration: Visualizing three dimensional UNEP (1990) Environmental guidelines for sand and gravel extrac-
connectivity and dynamic vectors to recover lost linkages. Ecol tion projects. Environmental guidelines, No.20, United Nations
Soc 11(2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art5/ Environment Programme, Nairobi
Kumaran KP, Nair KM (2005) Tracing palaeoclimatic signatures in Weeks JM, Sims I, Lawson C, Harrison DJ (2003) River mining:
fossil woods and subfossil logs of Kerala, Southwestern India. Assessment of ecological effects of river mining in the Rio
Pages News 13:15–17 Minho and Yallahs rivers, Jamaica
123