vv

Life Sciences Group

International Journal of Agricultural

Science and Food Technology
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17352/ijasft ISSN: 2455-815X CC By

Adegbola Adetayo Jacob1*, Wegh

Francis Shagbaor2, Ikwuba Agnes Research Article
Agbanugo3 and Nwafor Solomon
Chimela4
Assessment of socio-economic factors
1
Extension Department, Nigerian Stored Product
Research Institute, Nigeria
affecting the utilization of manual
Department of Sociology, Benue State University,
screw press for gari production in
2

Nigeria
3
Department of Sociology, Benue State University,
Nigeria Kwara state, Nigeria
4
Extension Department, National Root Crops
Research Institute, Nigeria

Received: 28 January, 2019

Accepted: 13 February, 2019 Abstract
Published: 14 February, 2019
This study investigated socio-economic determinants of utilization of manual screw press for
*Corresponding author: Adegbola Adetayo Jacob, cassava mash dehydration for gari production in four local government areas across the ADP zones in
Extension Department, Nigerian Stored Product Kwara state, Nigeria. Using random sampling technique and a semi-structured questionnaire as research
Research Institute, Nigeria, instrument, data for the study were collected from a sample of three hundred and eighty four (384) gari
E-mail: processors who use the screw press in the state. Multiple regression analysis show that a correlation
Keywords: Improved technology; Manual screw (R=0.678) exist between utilization of the screw press and the independent variables which include age,
press; Socio-economic factors; Utilization household size, level of education, years of processing experience, extension visits, and income from
gari processing. R2 value of 0.460 indicates that about 46% of the variation in utilization was explained by
https://www.peertechz.com socio-economic variables included in the regression model. Three variables significantly influenced the
decision of the respondents to utilize the manual screw press: age, level of experience, and income; the
most important predicator being income with a Beta value of 0.699. Conclusively, it was recommended
among others that research, extension, and policy makers consider the significant determinants identified
in the study seriously if increased utilization is to be achieved by gari processors and others similar to
them in the study area and the region.

Introduction national scale. Particularly, [5] maintained that the utilization

of agricultural innovation has been inadequate in most parts
Innovative agricultural technologies exist in all facets and of Africa. Nevertheless, facts from Zimbabwe reveal a post-
stages of agriculture; be it at production or at postharvest independent Green Revolution amongst smallholder farmers
stages, and have played a major role in developing the which have had a significant influence on poverty alleviation
agricultural industry [1]. Agricultural innovations are through the introduction of hybrid maize, expanded access to
important parts of any agricultural production system and are credit, guaranteed prices and marketing subsidies [6].
vital in all circumstances, whether there is surplus or deficit
[2]. However, increasing the efficiency of agriculture both at The implications of understanding the factors that
production and at the postharvest stage through improved influence farmer’s decisions to utilize improved technology are
agricultural technologies depends on the extent to which colossal. Understanding these factors is essential in planning
farmers and processors incorporate these technologies into and executing technology-related programmes for meeting the
their operations [3]. challenges of food security in developing countries. To enhance
technology utilization by rural agro processors, it is important
Most of the evidence about the effect of improved
technologies in agriculture comes from South-East Asia (Japan, to understand the factors that influence their decision to utilize
Taiwan, and South Korea etc). In South-East Asia, growth in technology in order to come up with technology that will suit
agricultural productivity has been rapid, largely as a result of them. Simply put, understanding some of the dynamics in
the extensive utilization of modern agricultural technologies, improved post harvest technology utilization decision can
and for millions of poor people the technological advances help researchers working in the cassava processing sector to
of the Green Revolution provided a route out of poverty design innovations. Consequently, the variables that would be
[4]. In Africa however, there are far few examples of where identified as key indicators towards explaining utilization of
agricultural technology has benefited smallholder farmers on a the manual screw press can be utilized within this context.

013

Citation: Jacob AA, Shagbaor WF, Agbanugo IA, Chimela NS (2019) Assessment of socio-economic factors affecting the utilization of manual screw press for gari
production in Kwara state, Nigeria. Int J Agric Sc Food Technol 5(1): 013-018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000036
 The main objective of the study is to investigate socio- correlation analysis. The Coefficient of reliability (r) was 0.7
economic factors influencing utilization of manual screw press and implied that the instrument was reliable. Afterwards our
for dehydrating cassava mash for gari production in Kwara instrument was adapted and administered on gari processors
state, Nigeria. Gari is pale color granular flour with slightly sour selected for our study.
taste made from fermented, gelatinized fresh cassava roots.
Gari is available to low income rural and urban households in The combine population figure for the four local
Nigeria; it is significantly cheaper than grains. It is commonly Government Areas based on figures from National Bureau of
consumed either by soaking in cold water or as a paste made Statistics (2012) is 655300:
with hot water. Processing gari using the screw press most
Kaiama LGA = 124015
importantly reduces processing time, increases output, leads
to better quality product and extends shelf life of gari. What Edu =201642
is more, understanding the factors that influence screw press
utilization by gari processors is indispensible to planning and Asa = 124668
executing technology related programmes for meeting food
Ifelodun = 204975
security challenges in the country.
A simple proportion formula was used to calculate the
Material and Methods
number of gari processors who were interviewed in each local
The study was conducted in Kwara State, Nigeria, located government area and ward where the study was conducted:
between Latitude 80 05’ and 100 05’ North and Longitude 20 50’
Kaiama LGA = 124015/655300 X 100 = 19
and 60 05’ East of Greenwich Meridian [7]. According to National
Bureau of Statistics [8], Kwara state has a land mass of 35,705 19/100 X 384 = 73, 73/3 = 24 respondents each for Kaiama I,
square kilometres (km2). The 2006 population census by the Kaiama II, and Adana wards
National Population Commission put the population of the
state at 2,371,089 [9]. Agriculture and agro-processing is the Edu LGA = 20164/655300 X 100 = 31
main source of the economy of the state. This study evolved a
cross-sectional survey research design. Multi-stage sampling 31/100 X 384 = 119, 119/3 = 40 respondents each for Tsaragi
technique was used to select respondents for the study. For I, Tsaragi II, and Lafiagi I wards
this study, a necessary sample size of 384 was calculated and
Asa LGA = 124668/655300 X 100 = 19,
adopted using the formula by Smith [10], for determining
necessary sample size when the population is unknown or 19/100 X 384 = 73, 73/3 = 24 respondents each for
approximated. Ogbondoroko/Reke, Afon, and Ago-oja/Osin/Sapa/Laduba
wards
One local government area (LGA) each from the four
agricultural zones of the state namely Kaima, Edu, Asa, and Ifelodun LGA =204975/655300 X 100 = 31,
Ifelodun was purposively selected to ensure that the study
cuts across the ADP zones in the state. Three (3) wards from 31/100 X 384= 119, 119/3 =40 respondents each for Omupo,
each selected local government area (LGA) were selected at Idofian I, and Idofian II wards.
random. Consequent upon the fact that it is difficult, if not
In order to avoid ambiguity and a weak evaluation of the
impossible to come up with a sample frame for the study by the
phenomenon under study, this study limited itself to the
researcher or from secondary sources; because of the nature
assessment of socioeconomic factors namely: age, household
of the population itself, it was imperative that Gari processors
size, level of education, years of processing experience,
who utilize the manual screw press who have been previously
extension visit(s), and income from gari processing. Multiple
identified through the assistance of local resource persons from
regression was applied for analysis of collected field data. The
each ward were selected through a simple random sampling.
regression equation is used is shown below:
Data was collected by the researcher through face to face
Y = a+b1x1+b2x2+b3x3+b4x4+b5x5+b6x6+e.
interviews technique. To ensure that our instrument possesses
both face and content validity in accordance with objective Where: Y= Utilization of the manual screw press for gari
of the study, our research instrument was validated by the processing
project supervisors and seasoned extension officials from
the department of Extension and Outreach Services, Nigerian a = constant term
Stored Products Research Institute, Ilorin, Kwara state.
b1 – b6 = Regression Coefficients of x1 – x6 to be estimated.
Thereafter, necessary modifications were made; ambiguous
items were made precise while irrelevant items were
x1 to x6 = Independent variables as defined in the general
jettisoned. Afterwards, the test for reliability for the research
equation
instrument was conducted (using a test-retest method) in
Ilorin, Kwara state with 20 randomly selected gari processors X1 = Age
within an interval of two weeks. The score for each exercise
was computed and subjected to Pearson product moment X2 = Household size

014

Citation: Jacob AA, Shagbaor WF, Agbanugo IA, Chimela NS (2019) Assessment of socio-economic factors affecting the utilization of manual screw press for gari
production in Kwara state, Nigeria. Int J Agric Sc Food Technol 5(1): 013-018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000036
 X3 = Level of Educational Qualification model. The remaining 54% could be attributed to the variables
not included in the regression model i.e. sex, and marital
X4 = Level of experience status. The adjusted R2 gives some idea of how well the model
generalizes, and ideally the value should be close to the value
X5 = Contact with extension agents
of R2. The difference in R2 and adjusted R2 for the model is a
X6 = Level of income from gari processing fair bit (0.460 – 0.452 = 0.008 or 0.8%). This means that if the

e= error term
Table 1a: Demographic attributes of respondents.

A priori expectation of the explanatory variables Demographic characteristics Frequency Percentage% Mean

Sex
Age is the chronological age of the respondents; age
Male 41 10.9
is expected to have a negative sign [11]. Household size is
Female 343 89.1
measured in terms of people in the household living under the
care of the respondent as at the time of this study; household Total 384 100

size is expected to have a positive or negative sign [11]. Level Age

of education is the highest level of education attained in years; Less than 30years 6 1.6
level of education is expected to have a positive sign [12]. This 30-39 years 26 6.8
is the number of years respondents have been involved in gari
40-49 years 134 34.8 51.2
production; level of experience is expected to have a positive
50-59 years 139 36.1
sign [12]. Extension contacts are the total number of visits from
extension agents in the past year; extension contact is expected 60years and above 79 20.5

to have a positive sign [11]. Level of income refers to sum total Total 384 100
of earnings of respondents from gari processing in the past Marital Status
year; level of income from gari processing is expected to have Single 14 3.9
a positive sign [13]. A positive sign on a parameter would
Married 196 50.9
indicate that the higher the value of the variable, the higher the
Divorced/separated 59 15.3
utilization level. Simply put, if the value is positive we can tell
Widowed 115 29.9
that there is a positive relationship between the predicator and
manual screw press utilization; whereas a negative coefficient Total 384 100

represents a negative relationship. House Hold Size

1-3 95 25
The dependent variable (Y) is utilization of manual screw
4-6 102 26.5
press can be viewed from two varied points; as a dichotomous
dependent variable, that is to say, merely if respondents use 7-9 95 24.6 6.4

innovation or not. Alternatively, it can be seen as extent of 10 and above 92 23.9

regularity of use of innovation and this creates a continuous Total 384 100
dependent variable. This study used utilization as a continuous Level of Education
dependent variable. In other words, utilization was measured
No formal education (0 years) 141 36.6
by frequency/regularity of use of the manual screw press in
Primary education (6 years) 129 33.5
gari production by respondents.
Secondary education (12 years) 106 27.5
Results and Discussion Tertiary education (14 years) 7 1.8

Total 384 100

NS Not significant
Years of Experience
The model is fitted as: Y = 6.235 + -.106(-.126) + .045(0.44) Less than 6yrs 8 2.4
+ -.024(-.031) + .116(.090) + -.051(-.212) + .699(.627) + 0.309
6-10yrs 17 4.4
(Table 1a,b).
10-15yrs 23 6.0

The result of the multiple regression analysis as shown 16-20yrs 107 27.8 22.3
in table 2 indicates that a correlation (R= 0.68) exist between 21-25yrs 104 27.0
utilization of the manual screw press for cassava pulp 26-30yrs 66 17.1
dehydration and the independent variables. The R is the
31 and above 59 15.3
simple correlation between the socioeconomic variables and
Extension Visit
utilization of the manual screw press. The table also shows
that R2 (coefficient of multiple determination: R2 measures the No visit 358 93.0

proportion of variation in Y explained by X) value are 0.460; 1-2 times 24 6.4

indicating that about 46% of the variation in utilization of the 3 times and above 2 0.6
manual screw press was explained by variables included in the Source: Field survey 2018
015

Citation: Jacob AA, Shagbaor WF, Agbanugo IA, Chimela NS (2019) Assessment of socio-economic factors affecting the utilization of manual screw press for gari
production in Kwara state, Nigeria. Int J Agric Sc Food Technol 5(1): 013-018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000036
Table 1b: Demographic attributes of respondents. negatively related with manual screw press utilization confirms
Demographic characteristics Frequency Percentage% Mean the risk aversion component in the diffusion theory; older
Income farmers are more risk averse, and are less likely to experiment
Less than N 200000 1 .3
with new technology.

N 400000- N 599000 4 1.0 The finding suggests that when age increases, there would
N 600000- N799000 16 4.4 be a decline in screw press utilization among the gari processors.
N 800000- N 999000 77 20.0 N 1172417 A possible explanation for this is that older processors have
less need for extra income and do not see the need to try new
N 1000000- N 1199000 99 25.7
methods or utilize improve methods that could increase their
N 1200000 - N 1390000 108 28.1
productivity and income. Again, as processors grow old, there
N 1400000 and above 79 20.5 is a tendency to reduce the level of adoption as their ability to
Total 384 100 cope with various processing operations diminishes.
Other major Activity engaged in
The finding of this study corroborates with that of Wasula
YES 384 100
[14], where he found that age had a significant influence on the
No 0 0 utilization of contour vegetative strips farming. Suleman [15],
Total 384 100 also found out in his study that age of farmers is significantly
Specific major Activity engaged in related to utilization; non-adopters were older than adopters.
Kinuthia & Mbaya [16], study on determinant of technology
Handicraft 139 36.2
utilization and how it affects farmers’ standard of living in
Sales of agri. Products 197 51.3
Tanzania and Uganda show that in both Tanzania and Uganda
Paid employment 48 12.5 farmers who plant new seed varieties are relatively younger
Total 384 100 than those who do not, suggesting that as farmers age they are
Income from Specific major Activity less open to adopting improved technologies.
Less than N 200000 8 2.1
Results as shown in table 2, further arbitrate that the
N 200000- N 399000 10 2.8 regression coefficient of household size (0.044) is positive, but
N 400000- N 599000 178 46.2 not significantly related to utilization of manual screw press
N 600000- N 799000 124 32.2 N 623955 for dehydration of cassava mash for gari production in the
study area (P>0.5). That is, a household size of respondents
N 800000- N 999000 53 13.8
is not a significant factor in the utilization of the screw press.
N 1000000 - N 1199000 9 2.3
However, that regression coefficient for household size (x2)
N 1200000- N1390000 2 .5 was positively signed, agrees with the a priori expectation of
Total 384 100 the explanatory variable as earlier stated.
Source: Field survey 2018.
This result fully agrees with Tijjani [17], who also found
the household size to be insignificant in the adoption of
model were derived from the population rather than from the recommended cowpea production practices. However, our
sample it will account for approximately 0.8% less variance in finding contradicts Bonabana- Wabbi [18] who maintains that
the outcome. Furthermore, because, the predictors identified household size influences utilization of agricultural technology
in the study were only able to explain 46% of the variation in in that, a larger household have the capacity to relax the
the utilization of the manual screw press indicates that there is labour constraints required during the introduction of new
a need to mobilize new factors. agricultural technology.

From the result of the regression analysis as shown in From the result of the regression analysis, as shown in
table 2, the regression coefficient of age (-0.126) is statistically table 2, the regression coefficient of the level of education
significant at 5% level (P< .05). This implies that the age of (-.031) is not significantly related to utilization of screw press
respondents is significantly related to utilization of screw press for dehydration of cassava mash for gari production (P>.05).
for dehydration of cassava mash for gari production in the The implication is that level of education of respondents is
study area. Or simply put, age composition of respondents for not a significant factor in the utilization of the screw press;
the study is a significant factor in utilization the of the screw education or lack of education does not affect utilization level
press; however it was negatively significant. The negative sign of the screw press by gari producers in Kwara state. However,
of the regression coefficient of age(x1) is in agreement with a the regression coefficient for educational level(x3) revealed a
priori expectation of the explanatory variable as stated earlier. negative sign which does not agree with the a priori expectation
That age was negative signifies an inverse relationship. In order of the explanatory variable as stated earlier.
words, the increase in age reduces the level of utilization of the
manual screw press among respondents. This means that, as The results are in agreement to those of Anaglo et al [19],
gari processors ages on, he/she will use the screw press less in where they found no significant relationship between the level
gari processing. That is to say, age has a negative influence on of education and farmers level of adoption. The reason for
utilization among the respondents. That age of respondents is this according to them may be that information on improved

016

Citation: Jacob AA, Shagbaor WF, Agbanugo IA, Chimela NS (2019) Assessment of socio-economic factors affecting the utilization of manual screw press for gari
production in Kwara state, Nigeria. Int J Agric Sc Food Technol 5(1): 013-018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000036
 livestock production practices disseminated by extension dehydration of cassava mash for gari production in the study
service providers were not done using materials that require area (P> .05). That is, extension contacts of respondents are
high level education to use, thus all farmers having both not a significant factor in the utilization of the screw press in
low or high education are equally able to apply the improved the study area. What this means is that whether processors
technologies. This is contrary to findings of Adam & Boateng are visited by extension agents or not does not determine if
[20], who observed that education significantly influences they would use the screw press or not use it. Furthermore, the
the adoption of technological innovation in small ruminant regression coefficient for extension contact(x5) was found to be
production. negatively signed which contradicts the a priori expectation of
the explanatory variable as previously stated.
From the result of the regression analysis as shown in
table 2, the regression coefficient of processing experience Our finding is consistent with that of Olaniyan [23], who
(0.090) is significantly related to utilization of screw press for found extension contact not to be significantly related to the
dehydration of cassava mash for gari production in the study adoption of improved cassava processing technologies. This
area (P< .05). That is, processing experience of respondents is result also corroborates the finding of the study of Suleman
a significant factor in the utilization of the screw press. This is [15], on factors influencing the adoption and utilization
possibly because as gari processors acquire more experience, of improved cassava processing technologies in Edo state,
they would have full information and better knowledge hence Nigeria. In his study Suleman found that extension contact of
able to evaluate the advantage of the technology and utilize cassava processors does not have a significant influence on the
it. Furthermore, the regression coefficient for the level of adoption and utilization of improved technologies.
experience(x4) was positively signed in agreement with the
From the result of the regression analysis as shown in
a priori expectation of the explanatory variable as previously
table 2, the regression coefficient of household income from
stated.
gari processing (0.627) is significantly related to utilization of
screw press for dehydration of cassava mash for gari production
Our result is in agreement with the study of Mulaudzi &
in the study area at 5% level (P< .05). That is, the income of
Oyeleke [21], who found significant relationship between the
respondents from gari processing is a significant factor in the
experience of farmers and level of adoption, although negatively
utilization of the screw press. Our result shows that for every
related. Mulaudzi & Oyeleke explained that more experienced
unit increase in household income from gari processing, a
farmers were unlikely to adopt improved technologies,
0.627 point increase in utilization is predicted. This makes
possibly because they are close to retirement, leaving less time
income from gari processing the most important predictor
to increase their benefit from proceeds that investment may
for utilization of the screw press for gari processing among
bring. Again, our finding is in agreement with Ainembabzi
the respondents. Furthermore, that regression coefficient of
& Mugisha [22], who investigated the relationship between
household income from gari processing (x6) was positively
adoption and experience with agricultural technologies and
signed agrees with the a priori expectation of the explanatory
found out that there was a significant relationship between the
variable as stated earlier.
experience of farmers and adoption of agricultural technologies
in banana, coffee and maize in Uganda. The result implies that the increase in income will lead to an
increase in utilization of the manual screw press. This result is
From the result of the regression analysis as shown in table
in consonance with the findings of Unamma [13] and Chinaka,
2, the regression coefficient of extension contacts (-0.212)
Ogbuokiri, & Chinaka [24], who found a positive relationship
is not significantly related to utilization of screw press for
between farm income and adoption; higher incomes enable
farmers to acquire new or improved technologies that could be
financially inaccessible to others. The result also affirms the
Table 2: Multiple regression showing the relationship between utilization and
socio-economic variables and their contribution in explaining the variability in the positions of Mittal, Gandhi, & Tripathi [25] and Zhang, Fan &
utilization of the manual screw press. Cai [26,27], that there is a significant and positive relationship
Unstandardized Standardized between income and utilization of agricultural innovations.
Variables Coefficients Coefficients t sig
B Std. Error Beta
Conclusion
(Constant) 6.235 .309 20.159 .000 Factors that significantly affect the utilization of the manual
AGE (X1) -.126 * ** .051 -.106 -2.459 .014 screw press among respondents are limited to age, years of
HOUSEHLDSIZE (X2) .044 NS .038 .045 1.148 .252 experience, and level of income. In other words, age, years
LEVOFEDU (X3) -.031NS .050 -.024 -.607 .544 of experience, and household income from gari processing
YEARSOF EXP (X4) .090 *** .035 .116 2.536 .012 were important predicators and are factors to consider in
EXT. VISIT (X5) -.212 NS .157 -.051 -1.353 .177 the utilization of similar technologies in the study area and
INCOME (X6) .627 *** .038 .699 16.439 .000 comparable regions. To that end, any extension strategy
for gari processors aimed at high level improved technology
R=0.68
utilization should critically consider the roles of these factors
R2 = 0.46
because they have a bearing on utilization decision of the
Adjusted R2 = 0.45
respondents. Again, majority of the gari processors are women,
** Coefficient statistically significant at 5%
017

Citation: Jacob AA, Shagbaor WF, Agbanugo IA, Chimela NS (2019) Assessment of socio-economic factors affecting the utilization of manual screw press for gari
production in Kwara state, Nigeria. Int J Agric Sc Food Technol 5(1): 013-018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000036
hence it is important to ensure that the promotion and focus and Extension Farmers Input Linkage Systems (REFILS) Workshop South
from traditional to improved processing technology for gari and South/South Zone of Nigeria 12-13 November.

production does not put them in a disadvantaged position in 14. Wasula SL (2000) Influence of Socio-economic Factors on Adoption of Agro-
terms of employment and income earning opportunities. It is forestry Related Technology. The Case of Njoro and Rongai Districts, Kenya.
recommend that the following amongst others would lead to (Unpublished M. Sc. Thesis). Njoro, Kenya: Egerton University.
increased utilization of improved agricultural technologies:
15. Suleman A (2012) Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Cassava
creation of awareness about the technologies (no awareness Processing Technologies by Women Processors in Akoko-Edo Local
no utilization), make improved technologies affordable and Government Area, Edo state, Nigeria. Unpublished thesis, Ahmadu Bello
accessible, educate farmers/processors about the advantages Universitity, Zaria, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award
improved technologies have over traditional technologies. of Msc degree in Agricultural Extension and Rural sociology. Link:
https://tinyurl.com/y2r82her

References 16. Kinuthia BK, Mbaya E (2017) The Impact of Agriculture Technology Adoption
on Farmers’ Welfare in Uganda and Tanzania. Partnership for Economic
1. Solomon A (2010) Estimating Welfare Effect of Modern Agricultural
Policy, number 163. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y44fnyqo
Technologies: A Micro-Perspective from Tanzania and Ethiopia. International
Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Nairobi. Link:
17. Tijjani AR (2010) Factors Influencing Adoption of Recommended Cowpea
https://bit.ly/2N1mChC Production Practices in Rimi L.G.A. Katsina state. M.Sc. Agric. Ext. Thesis,
ABU, Zaria.
2. Vilane BRT, Shongwe,MI, Motsa NM, Shongwe VD (2012) Adoption
of Postharvest Technologies Used by Smallholder Farmers in 18. Bonabana-Wabbi J (2002) Assessing Factors Affecting Adoption of
Swaziland. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7: 4983-4995. Link: Agricultural Technologies. The Case of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in
https://bit.ly/2RVrXIp Kumi District, Eastern Uganda. Unpublished Msc Thesis Virgina Polytechnic
Institute and State University USA. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y2hc7u7m
3. Sasore GM (2005) Nigerian’s Export Trade of Agricultural Commodities;
Quality Control and Standards. A Paper presented at Nigeria National Crop 19. Anaglo JW, Asare CJ, Manteaw SA, Boateng SD (2017) Influence of Improved
Outlook Conference held at Durbar Hotel. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y37hoz4o Technology Adoption on Livelihoods of Small Ruminant Farmers in Ghana.
American-Eurasia Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences 17: 78-
4. Ravallion M, Chen S (2004) How have the World’s Poorest Fared since 84. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y5534c4x
the early 1980s? World Bank research Observer, 19: 141-170. Link:
https://bit.ly/2N2gCVR 20. Adam H, Boateng S (2012) Adoption of Innovation by Small Ruminant
Farmers in Northern Ghana: the Case of Tolon-Kunbunga Districts. Journal of
5. Doward A, Kydd J, Morrison J, Urey L (2003) A Policy Agenda for Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 2: 10-20. Link: https://bit.ly/2tlUlt7
Pro-poor Agriculture Growth. World Development 32: 73-89. Link:
https://tinyurl.com/y355ymsy 21. Mulaudzi SV, Oyeleke SA (2015) Smallholder Farmers Adoption Intensity of
Genetically Modified maize Varieties in Thulamela Municipallity, Limpopo
6. Eicher C (1995) Zimbabwe’s Maize-based Green Revolution: Preconditions Province, South Africa. Environmental Economics 6: 104-112. Link:
for Replication’ World Development 23: 805-818. Link: https://bit.ly/2Nauspz https://tinyurl.com/y3fmkttb

7. Oyebanji JO, Mamman AB, Oyebanji JO, Petters SW (2000) A People United, 22. Ainembabazi JH, Mugisha J (2014) The Role of Farming Experience on
A Future Assured, Survey of States. Kwara State. In Federal Ministry of the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies: Evidence from Smallholder
Information, Abuja. Nigeria: 2. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y2k9oehb Farmers in Uganda. The Journal of Development Studies 50: 666-679. Link:
https://tinyurl.com/y2bsp35n
8. National Bureau of Statistics (2012) Annual Abstract of statistics. Federal
republic of Nigeria. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y5gcnpjt 23. Olaniyan OF (1998) Adoption of Improved Cassava Varieties by Women
Farmers in Rural Areas of Oke-Ogun, Oyo State, Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis,
9. Federal Government of Nigeria (2007) Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Department of Agricultural Extension, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife,
Gazette. Printed and Published by The Federal Government Printer, Lagos, Osun State, Nigeria.
Nigeria. 94: 190-191.
24. Chinaka CC, Ogbuokiri LC, Chinaka EC (2007) Adoption of Improved
10. Smith C (2013) Determining sample size: How to Ensure you get the Correct Agricultural Technologies by Farmers in Aba Agricultural zone of Abia
Sample Size. qualtrics.com/experience-management/research/determine- State. Proceedings of the 41st Conference Held at Institute for Agricultural
sample-size. Research, Samaru, ABU Zaria 22-26 October. 531-534.

11. Omonona BT, Amao JO, Onoja RI (2005) Adoption of Improved Cassava 25. Mittal S, Gandhi G, Tripathi G (2010) Socio Economic Impact of Mobile
Varieties and its Impact on Rural Farming Households in Edo State, Phones on Indian Agriculture. ICRIER Working Paper 246. New Delhi:
Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Food Information 7: 39-55. Link: International Council for Research on International Economic Relations. Link:
https://tinyurl.com/y6dsuhnc https://tinyurl.com/yyb5thv3

12. Chilot Y, Shampiro BI, Demeke M (1996) Factors Influencing Adoption of New 26. Zhang X, Fan S, Cai X (2002) The Path of Technology Diffusion: Which
Wheat Technologies in Wolmera and Addis Alem Areas of Ethiopia”. Ethiopian Neighbours to Learn From? Contemporary Economic Policy 20: 470–478.
Journal of Agricultural Economics 1: 63-84. Link: https://bit.ly/2GHh2zN Link: https://tinyurl.com/yy7qg339

13. Unamma RPA (2004) Agricultural Technology Generation and Transfer 27. Lanjouw P, Stern N (1998) Economic Development in Palanpur over Five
Strategies for Food Security. Proceedings of the 6th Annual Zonal Research Decades. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y36uv7lv

Copyright: © 2019 Jacob AA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

018

Citation: Jacob AA, Shagbaor WF, Agbanugo IA, Chimela NS (2019) Assessment of socio-economic factors affecting the utilization of manual screw press for gari
production in Kwara state, Nigeria. Int J Agric Sc Food Technol 5(1): 013-018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000036