The Self in Western and
Eastern Thought
CULTURE: SOME DEFINITIONS
• It refers to the cumulative deposit of knowledge,
  experience, beliefs, values, attitudes, meanings,
  hierarchies, religion, notions of time, roles, spatial
  relations, concepts of the universe, and material
  objects and possessions acquired by group of people
  in the course of generations through individual and
  group striving.
CULTURE: SOME DEFINITIONS
• Consists of patterns, explicit and implicit, of and for behavior
  acquired and transmitted by symbols, constituting the
  distinctive achievement of human groups, including their
  embodiments in artifacts; the essential core of culture
  consists of traditional ideas and especially their attached
  values; culture systems may, on the one hand, be considered
  as products of action, on the other hand, as conditioning
  influences upon further action.
CULTURE: SOME DEFINITIONS
•It is the sum total of the learned behavior of a
 group of people that are generally considered to
 be the tradition of that people and are
 transmitted from generation to generation
CULTURE: SOME DEFINITIONS
•In its broadest sense, it is cultivated behavior;
 that is the totality of a person’s learned,
 accumulated experience which is socially
 transmitted, or more briefly, behavior through
 social learning.
CULTURE: SOME DEFINITIONS
•It is symbolic communication. Ome of its
 symbols include a group’s skills, knowledge,
 attitudes, values and motives. The meanings of
 the symbols are learned and deliberately
 perpetuated in a society through its institutions.
 CULTURE: SOME DEFINITIONS
  •.
• Defined broadly, culture includes all the things
 individuals learn while growing up among
 particular group: attitudes, standards of
 morality, rules of etiquette, perceptions of reality,
 language, notions about the proper way to live,
 beliefs about how females and males interact,
 ideas about how the world works and so forth.
 This is cultural knowledge.
INTRODUCTION:
 •Different cultures and varying
  environments tend to create
   different perceptions of the
              “self”
INTRODUCTION:
• Classic case is the Eastern vs Western dichotomy wherein eastern
  represents Asia and western represents Europe and North America
• While countries that that are closer to each other geographically may
  share commonalities, there are also a lot of factors that create
  differences
• In the Philippines, each region may have similar or varying perception
  regarding the “self”
     There are actually a lot of sources in which one can
analyze the perspective of each culture and country about the
concept of “self”.
     It can be seen in their literature like how one culture
depicts a hero or a villain in their stories.
      It can also be in their social organization like how they see
their boss or their subordinate. Art works, dances, even
clothing may also show the clues about the “self”.
     For the purposes of this lesson
however, we will look at religious
beliefs and political philosophies that
greatly influenced the mindset of each
nation or culture.
  First is Confucianism
• Can be seen as a code of ethical conduct, of how one should
  properly act according to their relationship with other people.
• Also focused on having a harmonious social life.
• Identity and self-concept therefore of the individual is
  interwoven with the identity and status of his/her community or
  culture, sharing its pride as well as its failures.
• Self-cultivation is seen as the ultimate purpose of life but the
  characteristics of chun-tzu, a man of virtue or noble character, is
  still embedded in his/ her social relationships
Cultivated Self
 - Also called by the scholars as the “SUBDUED
   SELF”
 - Personal needs are repressed (subdued) for
   the good of many
 - Making Confucian society as hierarchal for
   the purpose of maintaining order and
   balance in society
Second is Taoism
  • Is living in the way of the Tao or the universe.
  • Taoism rejects the hierarchy and strictness brought by Confucianism
    and would prefer a simple. Thus, its teachings aim to describe how to
    attain that life.
  • The ideal self is selflessness but this is not forgetting about the self, it
    is living a balanced-life with society and nature, being open and
    accepting to change, forgetting about the prejudices and egocentric
    ideas and thinking about equality as well as complementarity among
    humans as well as other beings.
Third is Buddhism
  • The self is seen as an illusion, born out of ignorance, of trying to hold
    and control things, or human-centered needs, thus the self is also the
    source of all these suffering.
  • Forget about the self, forget the cravings of the self, break the
    attachments you have with the world.
  • To renounce the self which is the cause of all suffering and in doing so
    attain the state of Nirvana.
  • The self, with all its connections and selfish ideas, is totally taken, not
    just out of the center of the picture, but out of the whole picture as a
    whole.
        The self or the individual is not the focus of the mentioned
Asian or Eastern philosophies or belief. Even with extended
discussions about how the self should work, Confucianism and
Taoism still situates the self within a bigger context.
        The person, in striving to a better person, does not create a
self above other people or nature but a self that is beneficial to
his/her community as well as in order and in harmony with
everything else.
Western perspective
    • “Individualistic culture” since their focus is on the person.
    • Does not discount the role of environment and society in the formation of
      the self but the focus is always looking towards the self.
    • You compare yourself in order to be better; you create associations and
      bask in the glory of that group for your self-esteem; you put primacy in
      developing yourself.
    • Looks at the world in dualities wherein you are distinct from the other
      person, the creator is separate from the object s/he created, in which the
      self is distinguished and acknowledge.
Western perspective
    • Westerners may seem to have loose associations or even loyalty to their
      groups.
    • Also emphasize more on the value of equality even if they see that the
      individual can rise above everything else. Because everyone is on their own
      in the competition, one can say that they also promote ideals that create a
      “fair” competition and protect the individual.
Eastern perspective
    • “Collectivistic culture” as the group and social relations is given more
      importance than individual needs and wants.
    • Sees the other person as part of yourself as well as the things you may
      create, a drama in which everyone is interconnected with their specific
      roles.
    • Look after the welfare of their groups and values cooperation. Also be more
      compromising and they tend to go around the bush in explaining things,
      hoping that the other person would “feel” what they really want to say.
Eastern perspective
     • Asians, with their collective regard, puts more emphasis on hierarchy – as
       the culture wants to keep things in harmony and in order.
        Example:
            Westerners would most likely call their boss, parents, or other seniors
        by their first name. The boss can also be approached head-on when
        conflicts or problems about him/her arises.
           Easterners we have respectful terms for our seniors and a lot of
        workers would not dare go against the high ranking officials.
Several studies showed that Americans, for example, talk more
about their personal attributes when describing themselves while
Asians in general would talk about their social roles or the social
situations that invoked certain traits that they deem positive for
their self (Gleitman, Gross, and Reisberg 2011, 618).
Evaluation of the self also differs as Americans would highlight
their personal achievements while Asians would rather keep a low
profile as promoting the self can be seen as boastfulness that
disrupts social relationships (Gleitman, Gross, and Reisberg 2011,
618).