PRIMER EJERCICIO SEGUNDA PARTE
Forma de acceso AyR
IDIOMA INGLÉS
Agencia Tributaria
TRIBUNAL PRUEBAS SELECTIVAS
CUERPO TECNICO DE HACIENDA
PROMOCION INTERNA
Convocatoria 27 de junio de 2011
Inserte las palabras que correspondan, de entre las que se facilitan en la siguiente lista, en los
huecos que aparecen en el texto que figura a continuación. Tenga en cuenta que el número de
palabras es mayor que el de huecos:
acquis legislative
areas necessary
borders principle
business remedy
citizens rules
consistent safeguarding
cooperation securing
deterrent seek
feared shortcomings
fundamentals strengthening
goods suits
governance threats
guidelines trust
intergovernmental unfortunately
jumps visits
EXTRACT OF THE COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE
AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
Schengen governance – strengthening the area without internal border control
Introduction
An area without internal border control
Free movement is a defining of the European Union and the ability to
move within the European Union (EU) without facing border checks at internal borders is one
of its most successful achievements. Many people use this freedom, making more than a
billion journeys within the EU every year, and public opinion consistently ranks freedom to
travel amongst the most important benefits brought about by the Union. Moreover, an area
without internal border controls is central to the success of the single market, including the free
movement of workers, and services, and Europe’s continued efforts to
boost economic growth.
No firme ni consigne ningún otro dato Escriba la respuesta en los espacios
identificativo en las hojas de respuesta previstos al efecto
PRIMER EJERCICIO SEGUNDA PARTE
Forma de acceso AyR
IDIOMA INGLÉS
Agencia Tributaria
TRIBUNAL PRUEBAS SELECTIVAS
CUERPO TECNICO DE HACIENDA
PROMOCION INTERNA
Convocatoria 27 de junio de 2011
The Schengen area is based on a body of rules (the Schengen ) which
encompasses not only the abolition of border control at internal borders and common rules on
the control of external borders but also a common visa policy, police and judicial cooperation,
common rules on the return of irregular migrants and the establishment of common data-bases
such as the Schengen Information System (SIS).
The of Schengen cooperation are sound but recent developments have
highlighted the need to ensure that the Schengen area can cope effectively with strains which
may be placed on it by weaknesses at its external borders or by external factors beyond its
control. The Union response must address these diverse challenges while
the citizen’s right to free movement.
Accordingly, in its May Communication on Migration, the Commission pointed the need for a
coordinated Union-level response to such situations and indicated that it might propose an
appropriate mechanism as well as other means to ensure a coherent implementation and
interpretation of the Schengen .
In like manner, the European Council of 23-24 June 2011 called for a mechanism to be
'introduced in order to respond to exceptional circumstances putting the overall functioning of
Schengen at risk, without jeopardising the principle of free movement of
persons. The Commission was invited to submit a proposal to this end in September 2011.
This Communication and the accompanying proposals respond to that
request as well as to the call from the Justice and Home Affairs Council in June for enhanced
political guidance on Schengen cooperation and to the European Parliament’s resolution in
July which required that any new mechanism should focus on enhancing the freedom of
movement and reinforcing EU of the Schengen area.
EU expect to be able to enjoy the right of freedom of movement and to
travel freely in a safe, border-free Europe. Criminal, terrorist or other threats should not be
allowed to put this in jeopardy. At the same time, the Union and its Member States must be
able to react rapidly and effectively to serious to public policy and internal
security. With this comprehensive package of inter-linked measures, the Commission seeks to
establish a coordinated, EU-based response which ensures that the fundamental principles of
No firme ni consigne ningún otro dato Escriba la respuesta en los espacios
identificativo en las hojas de respuesta previstos al efecto
PRIMER EJERCICIO SEGUNDA PARTE
Forma de acceso AyR
IDIOMA INGLÉS
Agencia Tributaria
TRIBUNAL PRUEBAS SELECTIVAS
CUERPO TECNICO DE HACIENDA
PROMOCION INTERNA
Convocatoria 27 de junio de 2011
Union law and in particular the right of free movement are safeguarded, which would allow all
European interests to be taken into account in the Schengen area, while
setting limits to unilateral national initiatives which, in isolation, can never be an effective
response to common threats. Ensuring that the exceptional and temporary reintroduction of
border controls at internal borders is decided upon in accordance with the Community method,
and taking into account the Commission's general accountability towards the European
Parliament, is an essential and indispensable element of this package of measures.
the management of the Schengen area
The free movement of citizens within the area without internal border controls is based on a
system which relies on mutual that each participating State will be ready
and able to implement the various legislative instruments comprising the Schengen acquis.
The European Union has already put in place tools to support Member States to help them
meet their obligations and to react to critical circumstances which might put Schengen at risk
For example, Member States can financial and practical support from the
Commission via the EU Funds. Frontex can organise joint operations or deploy Rapid Border
Intervention Teams. Member States can also address other Member States, Europol or the
European Asylum Support Office (EASO) for further assistance.
In addition, as stated in its May Communication on migration, the Commission, together with
the Member States, will continue its work on to ensure a coherent
implementation of the Schengen rules. The process was launched with an expert meeting in
July 2011. The experts will identify shortcomings and where there might be
need for further clarification on the Schengen acquis, for example on the issuing of travel
documents and residence permits.
However, these tools themselves cannot ensure that the Schengen rules are applied in a
manner by each Member State. The means to check this is the Schengen
evaluation mechanism, used to monitor the application of the Schengen acquis and issue
recommendations on any shortcomings. The current mechanism, relying on an
system of peer review, is not strong enough to effectively remedy all
weaknesses. That is why the Commission proposed a Union-led approach last year.
No firme ni consigne ningún otro dato Escriba la respuesta en los espacios
identificativo en las hojas de respuesta previstos al efecto
PRIMER EJERCICIO SEGUNDA PARTE
Forma de acceso AyR
IDIOMA INGLÉS
Agencia Tributaria
TRIBUNAL PRUEBAS SELECTIVAS
CUERPO TECNICO DE HACIENDA
PROMOCION INTERNA
Convocatoria 27 de junio de 2011
At the heart of this new approach is the possibility of announced or unannounced visits to a
given Member State by Commission-led teams to take place, with experts from other Member
States and Frontex, to verify the application of the Schengen acquis. A report drawn up
following each visit would identify any with clear recommendations for
remedial action and deadlines for implementing them. The evaluated Member State would
then have to establish an action plan setting out how it intends to address these
recommendations. Union-level checks on the action plan’s implementation could include
further .
These changes will improve the evaluation and monitoring system but they do not address
situations where these steps, are insufficient to a Member State's
deficiencies in implementing the acquis and, in particular, in controlling its external borders.
Therefore, were measures taken at the Union or national level not improving the situation, it
might be to reintroduce border control at internal with
the failing Member State, where the situation is such that can constitute a serious threat to
public policy or to internal security at the Union or national level. Such an action would only be
taken as a measure of last resort, and only to the extent and for the duration necessary to
mitigate in a proportionate manner the adverse consequences of the exceptional
circumstances. The inclusion of such a possibility in the Schengen governance system can
also be used as a preventive measure, with effect.
For this reason, the Commission is amending its 2010 proposal to address this situation.
No firme ni consigne ningún otro dato Escriba la respuesta en los espacios
identificativo en las hojas de respuesta previstos al efecto
