Training Acceptance Levels for Plate, Pipe and Macro D=depth L=length H=height t= thickness 3 . ‘Acceptance § & Acceptance levels plate and pipe levels | 3 macro only Z 3 Remarks Maximum allowance Remarks ‘Aino point shall the excess weld 5 zl Excess weld metal fall below the outside Ieper ieee epee esoced H — Sat 1 ‘any area on the parent material, showing As for plate and pipe metal | surface of the parent material. All eon theirs cd meters ofc LNbgR ALA Weld runs shail blend smoothly. ‘Slag inclusions are defined as Stagisica | P2t-ealilc inclusions rapped in | The length of he slag incision shal not 2 | Rlealellica | the weld metal or between the | exceed 20mm continuous or intermittent. | Slag not permitted weld metal and the parent | Accumulative totals shall not exceed SOmm material = No sharp indations Smooth blend required. Uncereatis defined as are | “Th langth of any undorei hal no exceed 3 | undercut | cratedinte the parent metal, | oornm continuous or intermitent. Accumulative | _No shayp indications a the toes ofthe weld excess | “ofals shal not exceed 50mm, Max ‘Smooth blend required - unr for the cap weld metal. Root undercut not permitted. Trapped gas, n weld metal, indvidual pores 2 1 max. ‘Custer porosily not a Porosity or elongated, individual pores, ‘Cluster porosity maximum 20°mm total area. permitted, Individual Gas Cavities | cluster porosiy, piping or Elongated, pining or wormholes pores acceptable, wormhole porosity. ‘15mm mex. L continuous oF intermitent ‘max 3 inacations Cracks or | Transverse, longitudinal, star or 5 | Laminations crater cracks, Ne parined pou pecies! Tncomplete fusion between Surlace breaking lack of side wall usion, the weld metal and base lack of iner-run fusion continuous or 6 | Lack offusion | material incomplete fusion | intermittent not to exceed 36mm, Accumustve | Not permitted botwaon weld metal totals not to exceed 35mm (lack of inter-run fusion) cover a 300mm lenath of weld. Damage tothe parent materal or ‘wold metal, from an Unintentional ouch down of the 7 | Arcstikes | \ptentonal ouch down ot ONLY 1 permitied ‘Not permitted connections in the welding circu Z , Damage to the parent material or | Parent material must be smoothly blended Mechanical | weld metal, intemal or extemal Max. D = 2mm 9) damage fesulting from. Only 1 location allowed sie aoe any actvitos No stray tack welds permited ‘ Wismatch between the 9 | misatignment | odor unnelaod fat Max H = 2mm. ‘As forplate and pipe Excess wold metal, above the 10 | Penetration | fase material inthe root ofthe Max Hs 2mm ‘As for plate and pipe join Lack of root | The absence of weld metal in the Ww penetration it ae Not permitted Not permitted Lack of root | inadequate cross penetration of | Lack of root fusion, not to exceed 30mm total iB fusion both root faces. continuous or accumulative. Naren Excessive penetration, calapse 19 | Burn through re pecrratony Not permitted Not permited ‘Angular Distorion due to weld ue distortion contraction mare at ay fees Root Irroguarites in the root profile Shrinkage or ; 36mm_maximum length 18 Root eet Sere adoermec a ‘2mm maximum depth pocert. concavity : Training Acceptance standard Rev 0 July 2008Training Macro 1 Welding process used MMA (SMAW) ° © 5These questions to be used with training macro 1 1, What is the indication at position 1 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? a, Slag inclusions b. Porosity c. Excessive grain size 4d. Tungsten inclusions e. Accept f, Reject 2. The area identified at position 2 is referred to as the? a, Fusion zone b. Fusion boundary ©, Toe of the weld d. Under cut 3. The area identified at position 3 is referred to as the? Fusion boundary Acid marks Polished area Heat affected zone eo ee 4, What is the indication at position 4 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Jack of inter run fusion fusion boundary Jack of side wall fusion linear crack Accept Reject Pe eo se 5. What is the indication at position 5 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Gas cavity Lack of side wall fusion Slag trapped at the toes of the weld Lack of inter run fusion and slag Accept Reject Pepege6. Whatis the indication at position 6 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Slag inclusion Lack of root fusion Lack of root penetration Burn through Accept Reject reaoge 7. What is the indication at position 7 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? a. Lack of inter run fusion b. Lack of side wall fusion ©. Crack d. Porosity in the root e. Accept f. Reject 8. What is the indication at position 8 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Jamellar tearing Hydrogen cracks Laminations Stress cracks Accept £. Reject peose 9. What is the indication at position 9 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Overlap Toe of the weld with good transition Toe of the weld with poor transition Undercut at the toe of the weld Accept Reject Peepoe 10. Which term best describes this welded joint? a, Square edge butt joint b. Double v butt joint ¢. Single v butt joint 4d, T but fillet weldTraining Macro 2 Welding process used MMA (SMAW)These questions to be used with training macro 2 |. What is the indication at position 1 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given Acceptance levels? Poor toe blend Undereut Lack of fusion Underfll Accept Reject Pepe oe ‘What is the indication at posit acceptance levels? Undercut Poor toe blend Underfill Lack of side wall fusion Accept Reject Pepe ge What is the indication at pos acceptance levels? n 3 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given Lamellar tearing Corrosion crack Hydrogen crack Lamination Accept Reject meso ge |. What is the indication at position 4 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? a. Lack of inter fusion b. Lack of side wall fusion and slag ¢, Weld boundary 4. Lack of side wall fusion and silicon e, Accept f Reject 3. What is the indication at position 5 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Toe crack Hydrogen crack ‘Over lap Lamellar tear Accept Reject peecge6. What is the indication at position 6 and would you accept or reject the indication o the given acceptance levels? a. Spatter b. Lap . Overlap a. Hydrogen crack fe. Accept f Reject 7. What is the indication at position 7 and would you accept or reject the indicatian to the given acceptance levels? Gas cavity Silicon inclusion Slag inclusion Copper inclusion Accept Reject Pepoop 8. The area identified at position 8 is referred as ? a, The heat affected zone b, Fusion boundary c. Fusion zone d. Polished area 9. The area identified at position 9 is referred as 7 a. The heat affected zone b. Fusion boundary ©. Fusion zone d. Polished area 10, What is the indication at position 10 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? a. Slag line b. Over lap ¢. Lamination d, Lamellar tear e. Accept f. rejectTraining Macro 3 Welding process used MIG/MAG (GMAW) FN CG) cyThese questions to be used with training macro 3 4. What is the indication at position 1 and would you accept or reject the indication 10 the given acceptance levels? Linear crack Over spill Over lap Lamination Accept Reject Pe Bore 2. Whatis the indication at position 2 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Saw marks Lamellar tear ‘Segregation bands Laminations Accept Reject Peace 3. What is the indication at position 3 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? a, Mechanical damage b. Lap Arc strike d. Lamellar tear e. Accept f. Reject 4, What is the indication at position 4 and would you a¢cept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? a. Lack of side wall fusion and slag b, Hydrogen crack ¢. Lack of side wall fusion and gas cavity 4. Linear side wall crack e. Accept f. Reject 5, What is the indication at position 5 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? a. Slag b. Silicon . Spatter d. Copper e. Accept £ Reject6. What is the indication at position 6 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? a Over lap b. Crack c, Incomplete root penetration d. Incomplete root fusion e. Accept L. Reject 7. What is the indication at position 7 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? a. Transverse crack b, ‘Transverse hydrogen crack ¢. Lack of inter run fusion 4d. Shrinkage crack fe. Accept f. Reject 8, Whatis the indication at position 8 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? a. Lack of inter run fusion b. Crack Linear slag line d. Lack of side wall fusion e. Accept f Reject 9. What is the indication at position 9 and would you accept or reject the indication. to the given acceptance levels? a, Slag inclusion b. Silicon inclusion & Gas cavity d. Shrinkage defect e. Accept £ Reject 10. What is the indication at position 10 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Porosity Slag inclusion in weld metal Silicon inclusions in weld metal ‘Tungsten inclusions in weld metal Accept Reject PeporeTraining Macro 4 Welding process used MMA (SMAW) a)These questions to be used with training macro 4 1. Which term best describes this welded joint? ‘a, Square edge butt joint b. Double v butt joint ¢. Single v butt joint a. Tut fillet weld ‘What is the indication at position 2 and would you accept or reject the indication to the n acceptance levels? Overlap Toe of the weld with good transition Toe of the weld with poor transition Undercut at the toe of the weld Accept Reject Pe aoge 3. What is the indication at position 3 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Undercut Poor toe blend Underfill Lack of side wall fusion Accept Reject Peep re 4, What is the indication at position 4 and would you aecept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Lack of inter fusion Lack of side wall fusion and slag Weld boundary Lack of side wall fusion and silicon Accept Reject reaper 5, Whats the indication at position 5 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels Silicon inclusion Slag inclusion, lack of side wall fusion and lack of inter run fusion Gas cavity Gas cavity, lack of side wall penetration Accept Reject pPepoere6. th % 10. ‘Which term best describes the area indicated at position 6 Shrinkage Linear distortion Short transverse distortion Angular distortion Accept Reject Pepose ‘What is the indication at position 7 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Silicon inclusion Slag inclusion , Slag inclusion, lack of inter run fusion and lack of side wall fusion Elongated gas pore Accept Reject pPepege ‘What is the indication at position 8 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Crack Lack of inter run fusion Lack of side wall fusion Fusion boundary line Accept Reject re pers ‘The area identified at position 9 is referred as ? ‘a, The heat affected zone b. Fusion boundary c, Fusion zone d, Polished area What is the indication at position 10 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? lamellar tearing Hydrogen cracks Laminations Stress cracks Accept Reject reaogsTraining Macro 5 Welding process used MMA (SMAW)4, These questions to be used with training macro 5 ‘What is the indication at position 1 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? , Mechanical damage b. Lap ec. Are strike d, Lamellar tear e. Accept £. Reject ‘What is the indication at position 2 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? lamellar tearing ‘Hydrogen cracks Laminations Stress cfacks Accept Reject Preeose ‘What is the indication at position 3 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? a. Undercut b. Poor toe blend c. Underfill d. Lack of side wall fusion Accept £. Reject ‘What is the indication at position 4 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Undercut Poor toe blend Underfill Lack of side wall fusion Accept Reject Pepe spwe 5. What is the indication at position 5 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? Jack of inter run fusion fusion boundary lack of side wall fusion |. linear crack Accept, . Reject epee rp 6. What is the indication at position 6 and would you accept or reject the indication to the given acceptance levels? a, Lack of side wall fusion and slag b, Hydrogen crack ¢, Lack of side wall fusion and gas cavity d Linear side wall crack e. Accept f. Reject aad 7. Which term best describes the area indicated at position 7 Shrinkage Linear misalignment Short transverse distortion Transition weld set up Accept Reject pepo ge 8. The area identified at position 8 is referred to as the? a. Fusion boundary b. Acid marks ¢. Polished area 4d, Heat affected zone 9. The area identified at position 9 is referred as? a, The heat affected zone b. Fusion boundary _ c. Fusion zone 4, Polished area ). Which term best describes this welded joint? a, Square edge butt joint b, Double v butt joint ¢. Single v butt joint . T but fillet weldTraining Macro Answer Sheet be >< >< x x! < > << ee PS Pl cle § g x. 2 [= lesloo ee e| |r [oo o» x 3 x be] bs bx px 8 B | leuleo ee 2 a a