Locke's Political Philosophy: Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527)
Locke's Political Philosophy: Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527)
Locke's Political Philosophy: Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527)
First published Wed Nov 9, 2005; substantive revision Mon Jan 11, 2016
John Locke (1632–1704) is among the most influential political philosophers of the
modern period. In the Two Treatises of Government, he defended the claim that men
are by nature free and equal against claims that God had made all people naturally
subject to a monarch. He argued that people have rights, such as the right to life,
liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular
society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the
justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social
contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights
to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their
lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in
order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments
that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments. Locke is thus
also important for his defense of the right of revolution. Locke also defends the
principle of majority rule and the separation of legislative and executive powers. In
the Letter Concerning Toleration, Locke denied that coercion should be used to bring
people to (what the ruler believes is) the true religion and also denied that churches
should have any coercive power over their members. Locke elaborated on these
themes in his later political writings, such as the Second Letter on Toleration and Third
Letter on Toleration.
What did Locke believe the role of government should be?
Everyone gains the security of knowing that their rights to life, liberty, and property are
protected. According to Locke, the main purpose of government is to protect those
natural rights that the individual cannot effectively protect in a state of nature.