[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd
Upload
97 views1 page

Reyes Vs Bagatsing

Petitioner sought a permit from Manila to hold a peaceful march near the US Embassy which was denied due to reported plans to disrupt the event. The Supreme Court ruled the permit denial was invalid and that the rights to free speech and assembly outweigh diplomatic concerns, as no clear danger was shown. These rights are constitutionally protected and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Uploaded by

roland deschain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
97 views1 page

Reyes Vs Bagatsing

Petitioner sought a permit from Manila to hold a peaceful march near the US Embassy which was denied due to reported plans to disrupt the event. The Supreme Court ruled the permit denial was invalid and that the rights to free speech and assembly outweigh diplomatic concerns, as no clear danger was shown. These rights are constitutionally protected and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Uploaded by

roland deschain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Reyes vs. Bagatsing G.R.

No L-65366
Facts:
Petitioner on behalf of the Anti-Bases Coalition sought a permit from the City of Manila to hold a
peaceful march and rally which was denied. The reason the permit was denied was due to persistent
intelligence reports affirming plans of subversive/criminal elements to infiltrate and/or disrupt any
assembly or congregations where a large number of people is expected to attend." Respondent
Mayor suggested that "a permit may be issued for the rally if it is to be held at the Rizal Coliseum or
any other enclosed area where the safety of the participants themselves and the general public may
be ensured." Peitioner files a suit for mandamus.

Issue:
W/N the denial of the permit is valid

Ruling:
No. The Supreme Court ruled to allow the rally in front of the US Embassy to protect the exercise of
the rights to free speech and peaceful assembly and on the ground that there was no showing of the
existence of a clear and present danger of a substantive evil that could justify the denial of the
permit. These rights are not only assured by our constitution but also provided for in the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights. Between the two generally accepted principles of diplomatic relations
and human rights, the former takes higher ground. The right of the freedom of expression and
peaceful assembly is highly ranked in the scheme of constitutional values.

You might also like