[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd
Upload
32 views1 page

Société Nationale D'électricité: Democratic Republic of The Congo V FG Hemisphere Associates (2011)

The Democratic Republic of the Congo and its state-owned electricity company SNEL defaulted on debt payments to an energy company called Energoinvest. Energoinvest was awarded damages in arbitration that were later assigned to FG Hemisphere Associates. FG Hemisphere learned the Congolese government entered a joint venture to be paid $221 million and tried to enforce the arbitration award by collecting these fees. The Congolese government claimed sovereign immunity. The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal ultimately ruled that Hong Kong must follow China's absolute sovereign immunity doctrine, meaning sovereign states have total immunity from legal action in Hong Kong courts unless immunity is explicitly waived.

Uploaded by

Laeh Saclag
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
32 views1 page

Société Nationale D'électricité: Democratic Republic of The Congo V FG Hemisphere Associates (2011)

The Democratic Republic of the Congo and its state-owned electricity company SNEL defaulted on debt payments to an energy company called Energoinvest. Energoinvest was awarded damages in arbitration that were later assigned to FG Hemisphere Associates. FG Hemisphere learned the Congolese government entered a joint venture to be paid $221 million and tried to enforce the arbitration award by collecting these fees. The Congolese government claimed sovereign immunity. The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal ultimately ruled that Hong Kong must follow China's absolute sovereign immunity doctrine, meaning sovereign states have total immunity from legal action in Hong Kong courts unless immunity is explicitly waived.

Uploaded by

Laeh Saclag
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Democratic Republic of the Congo v FG Hemisphere Associates (2011)[edit]

The Democratic Republic of the Congo and its state-owned electricity company Société nationale
d'électricité (SNEL) defaulted on payments of a debt owed to an energy company, Energoinvest. During
arbitration, Energoinvest was awarded damages against the Congolese government and SNEL. This was
reassigned by Energoinvest to FG Hemisphere Associates LLC.
FG Hemisphere subsequently learned that the Congolese government entered into a separate joint venture
with Chinese companies later, in which the Congolese government would be paid US$221 million in mining
entry fees. As a result, FG Hemisphere applied to collect these fees in order to enforce the earlier arbital
award. The Congolese government asserted sovereign immunity in the legal proceedings. This was
eventually brought to the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal, when the Congolese government fought to
overturn an earlier Court of Appeal decision which had ruled that:

 as restrictive sovereign immunity applied in Hong Kong, the Congolese government had no immunity in
commercial proceedings.
 if absolute sovereign immunity had applied in Hong Kong, the Congolese government had waived their
sovereign immunity rights in this case.
The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal ruled 3:2 that the Congolese government had not waived its immunity
in the Hong Kong courts, and that as a Special Administrative Region of China, Hong Kong could not have
policies on state immunity that was inconsistent with China's. Therefore, the doctrine of sovereign immunity
applied in Hong Kong should be absolute, and may be invoked when jurisdiction is sought in the foreign
court in relation to an application to enforce a foreign judgment or arbitral award, or when execution is
sought against assets in the foreign state. This means that sovereign states are absolutely immune to the
jurisdiction in Hong Kong courts, including in commercial claims, unless the state waives its immunity. In
order to waive immunity, there must be express, unequivocal submission to the jurisdiction of the Hong
Kong courts "in the face of the court". Claimants should establish that the state party has waived their
entitlement to immunity at the relevant stage, before proceedings can occur in court.

You might also like