[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
132 views24 pages

X4613093E - Lte - Ngurah - Rai - Relocation: Installation OK Coverage OK Quality OK

This document provides a report on the site quality and performance acceptance testing for the relocation of the LTE_NGURAH_RAI site in Bali, Indonesia. Key performance indicators such as coverage, throughput, signal strength and interference met acceptance criteria. The site audit found the new cell and first tier neighbors were properly configured with no issues. Overall the performance testing showed the site met requirements.

Uploaded by

vanzelzhar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
132 views24 pages

X4613093E - Lte - Ngurah - Rai - Relocation: Installation OK Coverage OK Quality OK

This document provides a report on the site quality and performance acceptance testing for the relocation of the LTE_NGURAH_RAI site in Bali, Indonesia. Key performance indicators such as coverage, throughput, signal strength and interference met acceptance criteria. The site audit found the new cell and first tier neighbors were properly configured with no issues. Overall the performance testing showed the site met requirements.

Uploaded by

vanzelzhar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

1 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

X4613093E_LTE_NGURAH_RAI_RELOCATION
Abstract

This document is to provide report for XL Axiata on Site Quality & Performance Acceptance, as part 2 of Single Site
Acceptance on LTE Turnkey Project. Part 1 would be described on Installation Acceptance Report.

Non Staging Report is applicable for newly deployed eNB that is on air after LTE cluster has already established, e.g. for PICO
site, Augmented Site or Late On Air site due to commcase etc. The staging report KPI’s target follows the one agreed in
official LTE eRAN contract.

Staging report is applicable for newly deployed eNB that is on air together within a cluster whereby the cluster tuning shall
be further implemented to achieve final KPI’s. The KPI is slightly below the final KPI stated in LTE eRAN contract.

Installation OK
Coverage OK
Quality OK

PT.HUAWEI SOM
TECH INVESTMENT PT. XL AXIATA Tbk

$(level2)

Name : Herlinda Kusumawati Name :


Date : Date :
2 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

Contents
1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 General Site Information .................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Site Location ...................................................................................................................... 4
1.3 Summary of Important Key Performance Indicator on Drive Test Measurement:................ 5
1.4 Drive Test Plot ................................................................................................................... 7
1.4.1 RSRP (Reference Signal Received Power) ........................................................................ 7
1.4.2 SINR (Signal to Noise & Interference Ratio) ....................................................................... 7
1.4.3 PCI Plot .............................................................................................................................. 8
1.4.4 Handover (Intra Frequency) ............................................................................................... 8
1.4.5 Transmission Mode ............................................................................................................ 9
1.5 Stationary Test ................................................................................................................. 10
1.5.1 Downlink (FTP) Throughput ............................................................................................. 10
1.5.2 Uplink (FTP) Throughput .................................................................................................. 10
1.5.3 Speed Test (Using OOKLA & OpenSignal) ...................................................................... 11
1.6 Performance Result ......................................................................................................... 12
1.6.1 Statistical NMS KPI Measurement ................................................................................... 12
1.6.2 ASM Chart ....................................................................................................................... 14
1.7 Service Impacted Alarms ................................................................................................. 14
1.8 VSWR Test ...................................................................................................................... 15
2 Surrounding Sites Assessment .................................................................................... 16
2.1 Geographical Location ..................................................................................................... 16
2.2 New Cell & Neighbors First Tier ....................................................................................... 16
3 Site Audit database ........................................................................................................ 17
4 IPPM DROP ............................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
5 Justification .................................................................................................................... 18
6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 19
3 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

1 Introduction
Basic KPI report is provided to XL Axiata as part of LTE Project deliverables on cell level.

1.1 General Site Information

General Site Information


Site ID 4613093E
Site Name LTE_NGURAH_RAI_RELOCATION
Jl. Raya Senapahan, Banjar Anyar, Kediri, Kabupaten
Site Address
Tabanan, Bali 82121
Long Lat 115.1630472; -8.743708333
Design Scenario Add System on Existing
Transmission Mode: Existing / Plan MIMO 2T2R / MIMO 2T2R
Antenna Type Plan 2174662-TRIPLE BAND
Antenna Band: Existing / Plan 2174662-TRIPLE BAND / 2174662-TRIPLE BAND
Azimuth 20 / 110 / 210
Tilt (M/E) : Existing / Plan (0/7) (0/7) (0/7)
Antenna Height 14.5m/14.5m/14.5m
RU Type: Existing / Plan/Implemented 3x RRU5909 3x RRU5909
SoWBoQ: Plan/Implemented
Configured Radio Bandwidth 15 MHz
Configured Frequency Bandwidth L1800
PCI information Sect1/Sect2/Sect3 399 / 400 / 401
TAC (4G) / RAC (3G) configuration 611167/-

Co-located Information
4G Site ID 3G Site ID Mixed Mode 2G Site ID Band 1800 2G Site ID Band 900 3G U900
4612385E - - - -
4 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

1.2 Site Location


Site map + 1st tier neighbour per sector:

Land used
5 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

1.3 Summary of Important Key Performance Indicator on Drive Test Measurement:

Functionality Stationary Test Sec 1 Sec 2 Sec 3 Ref Status

PCI Plot (Cross Feeder Check) 270 271 272 No cross feeder Pass
DL Single User Throughput (Max – Best Spot) >15 Mbps (3 MHz)
15.22 10.98 15.14 > 50 Mbps (10 MHz) Pass with
Method:
Mbps Mbps Mbps Justification
Find best spot on each cell with single user. Use FTP server to download 1 > 75 Mbps (15 MHz)
big file. Observe the speed using TEMS Project.

UL Single User Throughput (Max – Best Spot) > 4 Mbps (3 MHz)


15.44 14.53 14.89 Pass
Method:
> 15 Mbps (10 MHz)
Mbps Mbps Mbps
Find best spot on each cell with single user. Use FTP server to download 1 > 25 Mbps (15 MHz)
big file. Observe the speed using TEMS Project.

CS Fallback (Outgoing) OK OK OK OK/NOK Pass


CS Fallback (Incoming) OK OK OK OK/NOK Pass
Session Setup Success Rate 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% ≥ 98% Pass
Intra-Frequency Handover OK OK OK OK/NOK Pass
IRAT HO 100% 100% 100% 85% Pass

RTT Ping 32 50.55 ms 49.85 ms 32.65 ms 70ms Info

Alarm Clear Clear Clear Clear Pass


6 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

Google Street View

DT Route
7 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

1.4 Drive Test Plot

1.4.1 RSRP (Reference Signal Received Power)

Sec 1 – ISD 417 m


Sec 2 – ISD 232 m

Sec 3 – ISD-

1.4.2 SINR (Signal to Noise & Interference Ratio)


8 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

1.4.3 PCI Plot

Summary: No cross feeder is detected.

1.4.4 Handover (Intra Frequency)


9 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

1.4.5 Transmission Mode

MIMO Check Result


Sector 1 Sector 2 Sector 3
Antenna System
MIMO MIMO MIMO
TM1 YES YES YES
TM2 YES YES YES
TM3 NO NO NO
TM4 YES YES YES

Grand
TM1 TM2 TM3 TM4 Total
28.71% 64.78% 0.00% 6.51% 100%
NEW SITE TM4 64.78%
10 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

1.5 Stationary Test

1.5.1 Downlink (FTP) Throughput

*Pick one cell as a snapshot result, with DU meter (info only)

1.5.2 Uplink (FTP) Throughput

* Pick one cell as a snapshot result, with DU meter (info only)


11 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

1.5.3 Speed Test (Using OOKLA & OpenSignal)

*Pick one cell as a snapshot result


* For information only
(need switch on GPS and check the coordinate)
12 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

1.6 Performance Result

1.6.1 Statistical NMS KPI Measurement

Cell level KPI aggregate into 1 day, taken at Cell Busy Hour except availability.
Date (Start - End) 5 Nov 2018 to 5 Nov 2018
Availability
Sector
No Name Reference Measured On Sector 1 Sector 2 Status
3
1 Cell Availability Rate > 98% Cell Daily 100% 100% 100% PASS

Accessibility
Measured
No Name Ref
On
EnodeB Status
Cell Busy
1 Session Setup Success Rate > 98% 98.38% PASS
Hour
Cell Busy
2 CSFB Call Setup Success Rate (CSFB SR) > 95% 100% PASS
Hour
Voice - Incoming Call Setup Success Rate Cell Busy
3 > 95% 100% PASS
(Merge with Outgoing and Incoming) Hour

Retain ability
No Name Ref Measured On EnodeB Status
0.97%
1 Session Abnormal Release Rate (SARR) < 1.4 % Cell Busy Hour Pass

Integrity
No Name Reference Measured On Value Status
> 21.2 Mbps (3 MHz)
1 Downlink Peak PDCP User > 70.3 Mbps (10 MHz) Cell Daily 14.83 Mbps Info only*
Throughput > 105.4 Mbps (15 MHz)
* Depend on user behaviour

Mobility
No Name Ref Measured On EnodeB Status
HO Success Rate - Intra Frequency
1 > 98% Cell Busy Hour 99.88% Pass
(IN & OUT)

Traffic (for information only)


Name Ref Sec 1 Sec 2 Sec 3
UL Payload (GB) Info only* 1.742% 8.41% 3.6%
DL Payload (GB) Info only* 14.2197% 55.95% 23.61%
*Traffic data provided for information only

Interference (for information only)


Name Ref Sec 1 Sec 2 Sec 3
UL RSSI (dBm) Info only* -116.6667% -114% -117.17%
TxRank2 (for information only)
Name Ref Sec 1 Sec 2 Sec 3
TxRank2 (%) Info only* 53.2857% 65.42% 56.33%
13 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

Timing Advance
No Name Ref Sector 1 Sector 2 Sector 3 Status
1 Timing Advance (Inter Site Distance) > 80% 100% 85.38% 93.79% Pass

Date 5-Nov-18
Object DP4G18_4613093E_4
DP4G18_4613093E_5
DP4G18_4613093E_6

SECTOR 1 ISD 417 m

TA
30000 45.00
40.00
25000
35.00
USER NUMBER

USER RATIO
20000 30.00
25.00
15000
20.00
10000 15.00
10.00
5000
5.00
0 0.00

User Number User Ratio

SECTOR 2  ISD 232 m

TA
100000 70.00
90000 60.00
80000
USER NUMBER

70000 50.00
USER RATIO

60000 40.00
50000
40000 30.00
30000 20.00
20000
10000 10.00
0 0.00

User Number User Ratio


14 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

SECTOR 3 ISD - m

TA
60000 50.00
45.00
50000 40.00
USER NUMBER

35.00

USER RATIO
40000
30.00
30000 25.00
20.00
20000 15.00
10000 10.00
5.00
0 0.00

User Number User Ratio

1.6.2 ASM Chart

*This feature not available in HW

1.7 Service Impacted Alarms

*No Impacted alarms found


15 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

1.8 VSWR Test

No VSWR Issue
16 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

2 Surrounding Sites Assessment

2.1 Geographical Location

2.2 New Cell & Neighbors First Tier


NO LTE Site ID LTE Site Name Cell Name REMARK Status
4612385E NYAMBU KEDIRI UTARA DP4G18_4612385E_4 NEW CELL New Site
1 4612385E NYAMBU KEDIRI UTARA DP4G18_4612385E_5 NEW CELL New Site
4612385E NYAMBU KEDIRI UTARA DP4G18_4612385E_6 NEW CELL New Site
4612971E KONI MENGWI DP4G18_4612971E_4 NEIGHBOUR 1st TIER Existing
2 4612971E KONI MENGWI DP4G18_4612971E_5 NEIGHBOUR 1st TIER Existing
4612971E KONI MENGWI DP4G18_4612971E_6 NEIGHBOUR 1st TIER Existing
4612445E NYAMBU KEDIRI SELATAN DP4G18_4612445E_4 NEIGHBOUR 1st TIER Existing
3 4612445E NYAMBU KEDIRI SELATAN DP4G18_4612445E_5 NEIGHBOUR 1st TIER Existing
4612445E NYAMBU KEDIRI SELATAN DP4G18_4612445E_6 NEIGHBOUR 1st TIER Existing
4611314E KEDIRI DP4G18_4611314E_4 NEIGHBOUR 1st TIER Existing
4 4611314E KEDIRI DP4G18_4611314E_5 NEIGHBOUR 1st TIER Existing
4611314E KEDIRI DP4G18_4611314E_6 NEIGHBOUR 1st TIER Existing
17 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

3 Site Audit database


Radio Information -> database
Antenna Type Plan
Antenna Band: Existing / Plan
Azimuth 60 / 200
Tilt (M/E): Existing / Plan (4/4) (4/6)
Antenna Height 42m/42m

ITEM SECTOR 1 SECTOR 2 SECTOR 3

SECTORAL
ANTENNA VIEW

MECHANICAL
TILT

ELECTRICAL TILT

ATENNA TYPE
18 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

4 Justification
4.1 Long Ping latency & RTT Justification

t1 t2 t3 t4

t1' t2' t3' t4'


UE eNodeB SGW PGW FTP
t1 ≈ t1’ 、t2 ≈ t2’、t3 ≈ t3’、t4 ≈ t4’
RTT = t1

4.1.1 PING 32

Ping Latency (UE to FTP) = t1 + t2 + t3 + t4 + t4’ + t3’ + t2’ + t1’ = 114.44 ms (UE ping Huawei FTP)

Ping Latency (eNodeB to SGW) = t2 + t2’ = 24ms

Ping Latency(UE to FTP) − Ping Latency(eNodeB to SGW) 74.00−21


t1 +t3 +t4 = = = 27 ms
2 2
19 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

4.2 Justification FTP DL UL


Sec. 1

Max of Downlink Peak PDCP User Throughput


16

14

12

10

6
DP4G18_4613093E_4
4

0
00:00
10:00
20:00
06:00
16:00
02:00
12:00
22:00
08:00
18:00
04:00
14:00
00:00
10:00
20:00
06:00
16:00
02:00
12:00
22:00
08:00
18:00
04:00
14:00
00:00
10:00
20:00
06:00
16:00
02:00
12:00
2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018-
11-03 11-04 11-05 11-06 11-07 11-08 11-09 11-10 11-11 11-12 11-13 11-14 11-15

Max of Downlink Peak PDCP User Throughput


90
80
70
60
50
40
30 DP4G18_4613093E_4

20
10
0
00:00
10:00
20:00
06:00
16:00
02:00
12:00
22:00
08:00
18:00
04:00
14:00
00:00
10:00
20:00
06:00
16:00
02:00
12:00
22:00
08:00
18:00
04:00
14:00
00:00
10:00
20:00
06:00
16:00
02:00
12:00

2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018- 2018-
11-03 11-04 11-05 11-06 11-07 11-08 11-09 11-10 11-11 11-12 11-13 11-14 11-15
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
40

35

0
20
40
60
80
100
120
00:00
Prepared

2018-10-24 00:00

Sec.2
Approved

10:00
2018-10-24 13:00
20:00
2018-10-25 02:00

2018-11-03
06:00
2018-10-25 15:00
16:00
2018-10-26 04:00

2018-11-04
02:00
2018-10-26 17:00
12:00
2018-10-27 06:00
22:00

2018-11-05
2018-10-27 19:00
08:00
2018-10-28 08:00
18:00
2018-10-28 21:00

2018-11-06
04:00
2018-10-29 10:00
Checked

14:00
2018-10-29 23:00
00:00

2018-11-07
2018-10-30 12:00
10:00

to high RB Utilization and high user.


2018-10-31 01:00
20:00

2018-11-08
2018-10-31 14:00
06:00
2018-11-01 03:00
16:00
2018-11-01 16:00
No.

2018-11-09
02:00
Date

2018-11-02 05:00
12:00
2018-11-02 18:00
22:00

2018-11-10
2018-11-03 07:00
08:00
2018-10-31

2018-11-03 20:00 18:00


2018-11-04 09:00
2018-11-11
04:00
2018-11-04 22:00 14:00
2018-11-05 11:00 00:00
2018-11-12

2018-11-06 00:00 10:00


2018-11-06 13:00
Max of L-PRB Utilization DL

20:00
2018-11-13

2018-11-07 02:00
A

06:00
Rev

2018-11-07 15:00

Downlink Peak PDCP User Throughput


16:00
2018-11-08 04:00
2018-11-14

02:00
12:00
2018-11-15
Reference

DP4G18_4612385E_5
20 (24)

Sec 1 site 4613093E_LTE_NGURAH_RAI_RELOCATION downlink peak only reach 15.20Mbps due


DP4G18_4613093E_4
0
10
20
40
50
60

30

0
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100

10
2018-10-24 00:00
Prepared

2018-10-24 00:00

Sec.3
Approved

2018-10-24 13:00 2018-10-24 13:00


2018-10-25 02:00

high user.
2018-10-25 02:00
2018-10-25 15:00 2018-10-25 15:00
2018-10-26 04:00 2018-10-26 04:00
2018-10-26 17:00 2018-10-26 17:00
2018-10-27 06:00 2018-10-27 06:00
2018-10-27 19:00 2018-10-27 19:00
2018-10-28 08:00 2018-10-28 08:00
2018-10-28 21:00 2018-10-28 21:00
2018-10-29 10:00 2018-10-29 10:00
Checked

2018-10-29 23:00 2018-10-29 23:00


2018-10-30 12:00 2018-10-30 12:00
2018-10-31 01:00 2018-10-31 01:00
2018-10-31 14:00 2018-10-31 14:00
2018-11-01 03:00
2018-11-01 03:00
2018-11-01 16:00
No.

2018-11-01 16:00
Date

2018-11-02 05:00
2018-11-02 05:00
2018-11-02 18:00
2018-11-02 18:00
2018-11-03 07:00
2018-11-03 20:00 2018-11-03 07:00
2018-10-31

2018-11-04 09:00 2018-11-03 20:00


2018-11-04 22:00 2018-11-04 09:00
2018-11-05 11:00 2018-11-04 22:00
2018-11-06 00:00 2018-11-05 11:00
L.Traffic.ActiveUser.Max

2018-11-06 13:00 2018-11-06 00:00


2018-11-07 02:00 2018-11-06 13:00
A

2018-11-07 15:00 2018-11-07 02:00


Rev

Downlink Peak PDCP User Throughput


2018-11-08 04:00 2018-11-07 15:00
2018-11-08 04:00
Reference

Sec 2 site 4612385E_LTE_Nyambu_Kediri_Utara downlink peak only reach 101.86 Mbps due to

DP4G18_4612385E_6
DP4G18_4612385E_5
21 (24)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
10
20
40
50
60

30
2018-10-24 00:00 2018-10-24 00:00
Prepared

Approved

2018-10-24 13:00 2018-10-24 13:00


2018-10-25 02:00 2018-10-25 02:00

high user.

Sec. 3 UL
2018-10-25 15:00 2018-10-25 15:00
2018-10-26 04:00 2018-10-26 04:00
2018-10-26 17:00 2018-10-26 17:00
2018-10-27 06:00 2018-10-27 06:00
2018-10-27 19:00 2018-10-27 19:00
2018-10-28 08:00 2018-10-28 08:00
2018-10-28 21:00 2018-10-28 21:00
2018-10-29 10:00 2018-10-29 10:00
Checked

2018-10-29 23:00
2018-10-29 23:00
2018-10-30 12:00
2018-10-30 12:00
2018-10-31 01:00
2018-10-31 01:00
2018-10-31 14:00
2018-10-31 14:00
2018-11-01 03:00
2018-11-01 03:00
2018-11-01 16:00
2018-11-01 16:00
2018-11-02 05:00
No.

2018-11-02 05:00
Date

2018-11-02 18:00
2018-11-03 07:00 2018-11-02 18:00
2018-11-03 20:00 2018-11-03 07:00
2018-11-03 20:00
2018-10-31

2018-11-04 09:00
2018-11-04 22:00 2018-11-04 09:00
2018-11-05 11:00 2018-11-04 22:00
2018-11-06 00:00 2018-11-05 11:00
L.Traffic.ActiveUser.Max

2018-11-06 13:00 2018-11-06 00:00


2018-11-07 02:00 2018-11-06 13:00
2018-11-07 15:00 2018-11-07 02:00

Uplink Peak PDCP User Throughput


A

2018-11-08 04:00 2018-11-07 15:00


Rev

2018-11-08 04:00
Reference

DP4G18_4612385E_6
DP4G18_4612385E_6

Sec 3 site 4612385E_LTE_Nyambu_Kediri_Utara downlink peak only reach 90.23 Mbps due to high
22 (24)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2018-10-24 00:00

user.
Prepared

Approved

2018-10-24 13:00
2018-10-25 02:00
2018-10-25 15:00

DT KPI
2018-10-26 04:00

NMS KPI
2018-10-26 17:00

5 Conclusion
2018-10-27 06:00
2018-10-27 19:00
2018-10-28 08:00
2018-10-28 21:00

KPI Category
2018-10-29 10:00
Checked

2018-10-29 23:00

With remark as follows:


2018-10-30 12:00
2018-10-31 01:00
2018-10-31 14:00
2018-11-01 03:00

Not pass
2018-11-01 16:00
No.

6
9
All
Date

2018-11-02 05:00
2018-11-02 18:00

Pass, with note


2018-11-03 07:00

Pass, without note


2018-10-31

2018-11-03 20:00
2018-11-04 09:00

6
9
Pass
2018-11-04 22:00
2018-11-05 11:00
L.Traffic.ActiveUser.Max

2018-11-06 00:00

*please tick one appropriate result


2018-11-06 13:00




0
0
2018-11-07 02:00

Fail
A
Rev

2018-11-07 15:00
2018-11-08 04:00

We summarize that 4612385E_LTE_Nyambu_Kediri_Utara meets below KPI score:


Reference

100%
100%
Percentage
DP4G18_4612385E_6

Sec 3 site 4612385E_LTE_Nyambu_Kediri_Utara downlink peak only reach 30.39 Mbps due to high
23 (24)
24 (24)

Prepared No.

Approved Checked Date Rev Reference


2018-10-31 A

You might also like