VARIABLE MSA - GAUGE R & R - SETUP

Instructions: Information Entry Key

1) Enter information in Setup worksheet
2) Enter information in Data worksheet
3) Remove any data in cells highlighted yellow
4) Review Results worksheet
5) Review Bias & Consistency charts
6) Review Averages & Ranges charts

SETUP

Date 06 Juli 2019 Units mm Prepared by

Gage Name Caliper Characteristic Critical Point Appraiser A Name

Gage Type Digital Specification Distance Appraiser B Name

Gage Number 11212219 Test Number 2 Appraiser C Name

Sample Size (p) 10 Appraisers (o) 2 Trials (n) 3

Tolerance (Upper Spec Limit - Lower S

Next step: Enter Data

& R - SETUP
nformation Entry Key
> setup information (optional)
> required information
> excess information - clear contents
> results information
> intermediate calculations/results

Prepared by Anggi P

Appraiser A Name Latifan

Appraiser B Name Selamet Fatchur R

Appraiser C Name -

Upper Specification Limit 131.47 mm

Lower Specification Limit 131.32 mm

ce (Upper Spec Limit - Lower Spec Limit) 0.15 mm

 VARIABLE MSA - GAUGE R & R - DATA ENTRY
Appraiser (A): Latifan
Trial\Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Average
1 131.38 131.36 131.37 131.37 131.37 131.37 131.37 131.37 131.37 131.37 131.37
2 131.38 131.37 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.37 131.38
3 131.39 131.38 131.39 131.39 131.38 131.39 131.39 131.38 131.39 131.39 131.39
Average 131.38 131.37 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 Xbar(A) 131.38
Range 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 Rbar(A) 0.02

Appraiser (B): Selamet Fatchur R

Trial\Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Average
1 131.38 131.37 131.37 131.38 131.37 131.38 131.37 131.38 131.37 131.37 131.37
2 131.37 131.37 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.37 131.37 131.38
3 131.40 131.39 131.40 131.39 131.39 131.40 131.39 131.39 131.39 131.40 131.39
Average 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.39 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 Xbar(B) 131.38
Range 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 Rbar(B) 0.02

Appraiser (C):
Trial\Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Average
1 0.00
2 0.00
3 0.00
Average - - - - - - - - - - Xbar(C) 0.00
Range - - - - - - - - - - Rbar(C) 0.00

Part Average 131.38 131.37 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 131.38 Xdoublebar 131.38
Rdoublebar 0.02
Previous step: Setup Part Variance (sp2ave) 0.00 Range of Part Averages Rp 0.01
Next step: View Results Operator Variance (s 2
o ave
) 0.00 Range of Appraiser Averages Ro 0.00
 VARIABLE MSA - GAUGE R & R - RESULTS
Click here for results interpretation
Click here for a key to terms used in the equations
Component
AIAG Meth
MoreSteam Recommended Alternative Variance Method
% of Total Variation % of Total Variation
REPEATABILITY - EQUIPMENT VARIATION (EV)
EV = Rdoublebar / d2*EV %EV = EV2/TV2 %EV =
EV = 0.0112227 mm %EV = 92.5% %EV =

REPRODUCIBILITY - APPRAISER VARIATION (AV)

AV = {[Ro / d2*AV]2 - [EV2 / (n x p)]}0.5 %AV = AV2/TV2 %AV =
AV = 0.0005733 mm %AV = 0.2% %AV =

REPEATABILITY & REPRODUCIBILITY (GRR)

GRR = (EV2 + AV2)0.5 %GRR = GRR2/TV2 %GRR =
GRR = 0.0112373 mm %GRR = 92.7% %GRR =

PRODUCT VARIATION (PV)

PV = Rp / d2*PV %PV = PV2/TV2 %PV =
PV = 0.0031447 mm %PV = 7.3% %PV =

S = 100% S <=> 100%

TOTAL VARIATION (TV)
TV = (EV2 + AV2 + PV2)0.5
Review Bias & Consistency Charts
TV = 0.011669 mm
Component Variance
Method

Interpretation of Results for the Component Variance Method

Relative Utility: Goal - at least 80% of measurement is error attributable to the product
Range of % PV Actual %PV This Means:
>= 80%
50% <= %PV < 80% The measurement system is not acceptable for
measurement and will not be able to quantify
20% <= %PV < 50%
process improvement.
< 20% 7.3%

Bias: Goal - all appraiser averages within Bias Chart control limits
Value Result: This Means:
0
1 or 2* All appraisers averages are within the
There is no appraiser bias present
Bisas Chart control limits
# appraisers

Consistency: Goal - all appraisers ranges within Consistency Chart control limits
Value Result: This Means:
0
1 or 2* All appraisers ranges are within the The results are consistent across
Consistency Chart control limits appraisers
 All appraisers ranges are within the The results are consistent across
Consistency Chart control limits appraisers
# appraisers
* 1 if there are 2 appraisers, 2 if there are 3 appraisers
Back to top

Interpretation of Results for the AIAG Method

Relative Utility: Goal - gauge R&R% is less than 10%

Range of % GRR Actual GRR% This Means:
<= 10%
10% < %GRR <= 30% The measurement system needs improvement.
Make every effort to identify the problems and have
> 30% 96.3%
them corrected.

System Resolution: Goal - all appraisers have at least 50% of average values outside the Averages Chart control limits
Value Result: This Means:
# Appraisers 2 appraisers have less than 50% of the The measurement system may not
averages outside the Averages Chart have adequate resolution to detect
< # Appraisers control limits part-to-part variation

Consistency: Goal - all appraisers have all range values below the Range Chart upper control limit
Value Result: This Means:
0 All appraisers ranges are within the Range The results are consistent across
# appraisers Chart control limits appraisers
* 1 if there are 2 appraisers, 2 if there are 3 appraisers

Back to top
Key to Abbreviations Used in Formulas
Rdoublebar= grand average of all Appraiser ranges
d2* = a constant used to estimate Standard Deviation
Ro = Range of Appraiser averages
Rp = Range of Part averages
p = Sample Size
n = Number of Trials
 RESULTS
Previous step: Enter Data

AIAG Method
% of Total Variation % of Tolerance

EV/TV %EV = EV/Tol

96.2% %EV = 44.9%

AV/TV %AV = AV/Tol

4.9% %AV = 2.3%

GRR/TV %GRR = GRR/Tol

96.3% %GRR = 44.9%

PV/TV %PV = PV/Tol

26.9% %PV = 12.6%

S <=> 100%

Review Averages & Range Charts

AIAG Method

em is not acceptable for

not be able to quantify
mprovement.

Refer To:
AppraiserBiasChart

Refer To:
AppraiserConsistencyChart
 AppraiserConsistencyChart

em needs improvement.
tify the problems and have
0
orrected.

ges Chart control limits

Refer To:

AveragesChart

Refer To:

RangeChart
 VARIABLE MSA - GAUGE R & R - BIAS & CONSISTENCY CHARTS
Click here for the Appraiser Consistency Chart Click here for the Control Limits Calculations

Appraiser Bias

12

10
Average

Xba
2 r
UCL

0
Appraiser

Appraiser Consistency

12

10
Range

Rba
r
2
UCL
 6

Rba
r
2
UCL

0
Appraiser

Back to top
CONTROL LIMIT CALCULATIONS

Appraiser Bias Chart Appraiser Consistency Chart

Xdoublebar + ( Rdoublebar X ANOME) = UCL ( Rdoublebar X
131.3798 + 0.0190 X 0.14 = 131.382 0.0190 X

Xdoublebar - ( Rdoublebar X ANOME) = LCL ( Rdoublebar X

131.3798 - 0.0190 X 0.14 = 131.377 0.0190 X

Appraiser Chart Critical Value Tables

Back to top
STENCY CHARTS
Back to the Results

If all data points are

within the control
limits, there is a
95% probability that
there is no operator
bias present.

If all data points are

within the control
limits, there is a
95% probability that
there is no
inconsistency of
measurement
accross appraisers.
Appraiser Consistency Chart
UMR) = UCL
1.219 = 0.023

LMR) = LCL
0.781 = 0.015
 VARIABLE MSA - GAUGE R & R - AVERAGE AND RANGE CHARTS
Click here for the Range Chart Click here for the Control Limits Calculations

Averages Chart
12

10
Average

UCL
Mean TrialLCL
Number

Range Chart
12

10
Range

4
 8

Ra
6

UCL Trial Number

Mean

Back to top
CONTROL CHART CONTROL LIMIT CALCULATIONS

Range Variation # Trials D4

Rbar(A) 0.0170 2 3.267
Rbar(B) 0.0210 3 2.575
Rbar(C)
Sum 0.0380 # Trials A2 Xdoublebar +
Rdoublebar 0.0190 2 1.880 131.3798 +
3 1.023
Max X Bar 131.3813 Xdoublebar -
Min X Bar 131.3783 131.3798 -
X bar Diff 0.0030

Back to top
NGE CHARTS
Click here to go back to the Results

If 50% or more of the averages

for each appraiser are are
outside the control limits, the
measurement system has
adequate resolution to detect
part-to-part variaion.

UCL

If all data points are within the

control limit, there is no
inconsistency of
measurement accross
appraisers.
ALCULATIONS

Rdoublebar x D4 = UCLR
0.0190 X 2.575 = 0.049
Note: LCL is zero with < 8 trials

( Rdoublebar X A2) = UCLX

0.0190 X 1.023 = 131.399

( Rdoublebar X A2) = LCLX

0.0190 X 1.023 = 131.360
 VARIABLE MSA - GAUGE R & R - BIAS & CONSISTENCY CHART CRITICAL VALUES

Appraiser Bias Appraiser Consistency

Analysis of Mean Effects (ANOME) Analysis of Mean Range (ANOMR)
LMR UMR
n n n
k m 2 3 ANOME.05 k m 2 3 LMR .05 k m 2
6 2 0.610 0.299 0.14 6 2 0.395 0.575 0.781 6 2 1.605
6 3 1.084 0.519 6 3 0.136 0.333 6 3 2.133
8 2 0.501 0.253 8 2 0.475 0.635 8 2 1.525
9 3 0.814 0.408 9 3 0.246 0.442 9 3 1.915
10 2 0.435 0.224 10 2 0.530 0.672 10 2 1.470
12 2 0.389 0.203 12 2 0.569 0.703 12 2 1.431
12 3 0.678 0.346 12 3 0.329 0.511 12 3 1.784
14 2 0.357 0.186 14 2 0.603 0.724 14 2 1.397
15 3 0.592 0.306 15 3 0.388 0.559 15 3 1.701
16 2 0.331 0.172 16 2 0.630 0.743 16 2 1.370
18 2 0.309 0.163 18 2 0.649 0.757 18 2 1.351
18 3 0.531 0.278 18 3 0.436 0.599 18 3 1.637
20 2 0.292 0.140 20 2 0.668 0.781 20 2 1.332
21 3 0.485 0.245 21 3 0.478 0.638 21 3 1.585
24 2 0.264 0.123 24 2 0.696 0.803 24 2 1.304
24 3 0.451 0.226 24 3 0.505 0.658 24 3 1.547
25 3 0.416 0.204 25 3 0.322 0.506 25 3 1.861
27 3 0.406 0.208 27 3 0.530 0.681 27 3 1.515
28 2 0.242 0.102 28 2 0.719 0.827 28 2 1.218
30 2 0.233 0.099 30 2 0.728 0.831 30 2 1.272
30 3 0.400 0.192 30 3 0.556 0.669 30 3 1.485

m - # appraisers, n = number of trials, k = # of measurements per trial (m x n)

In the absence of systematic differences between these m Averages/Ranges, they will all fall within the calculated
control limits 95% of the time.

These tables adopted from EMP III Using Imperfect Data, Donald Wheeler, 2006, SPC Press
CRITICAL VALUES

nsistency
ange (ANOMR)
UMR
n
3 UMR.05
1.425 1.219
1.775
1.365
1.625
1.328
1.297
1.534
1.276
1.476
1.257
1.243
1.436
1.219
1.389
1.197
1.360
1.562
1.333
1.173
1.169
1.315

within the calculated

 VARIABLE MSA - GAUGE R & R - d2* TABLE

m
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.41 1.91 2.24 2.48 2.67 2.83 2.96 3.08
2 1.28 1.81 2.15 2.4 2.6 2.77 2.91 3.02
3 1.23 1.77 2.12 2.38 2.58 2.75 2.89 3.01
4 1.21 1.75 2.11 2.37 2.57 2.74 2.88 3
5 1.19 1.74 2.1 2.36 2.56 2.73 2.87 2.99
6 1.18 1.73 2.09 2.35 2.56 2.73 2.87 2.99
7 1.17 1.73 2.09 2.35 2.55 2.72 2.87 2.99
8 1.17 1.72 2.08 2.35 2.55 2.72 2.87 2.98
g

9 1.16 1.72 2.08 2.34 2.55 2.72 2.86 2.98

10 1.16 1.72 2.08 2.34 2.55 2.72 2.86 2.98
11 1.16 1.71 2.08 2.34 2.55 2.72 2.86 2.98
12 1.15 1.71 2.07 2.34 2.55 2.72 2.85 2.98
13 1.15 1.71 2.07 2.34 2.55 2.71 2.85 2.98
14 1.15 1.71 2.07 2.34 2.54 2.71 2.85 2.98
15 1.15 1.71 2.07 2.34 2.54 2.71 2.85 2.98
> 15 1.128 1.693 2.059 2.326 2.534 2.704 2.847 2.97

d2*EV
Equipment 1.693 for EV --> m =# Trials, g = # Parts x # Appraisers

d2*AV
Appraisers 1.41 for AV --> m = # Appraisers, g = 1 (only 1 range)

d2*PV
Parts 3.18 for PV --> m = # Parts, g = 1 (only 1 range)
 10
3.18
3.13
3.11
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.09
3.09
3.09
3.09
3.09
3.09
3.08
3.08
3.078