[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd
Upload
39 views2 pages

Correlation Analysis of The Manufacturing Pharmacy Subject and The Manufacturing Pharmacy Internship Performance Batch 2014 - 2015

This document analyzes the correlation between students' grades in a manufacturing pharmacy course and their performance in a subsequent manufacturing pharmacy internship over two academic years. Regression and correlation analyses found no significant correlation between the course grade and internship performance for either year individually or when combined. The conclusion is that there is insufficient evidence of a correlation.

Uploaded by

April Mergelle Lapuz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
39 views2 pages

Correlation Analysis of The Manufacturing Pharmacy Subject and The Manufacturing Pharmacy Internship Performance Batch 2014 - 2015

This document analyzes the correlation between students' grades in a manufacturing pharmacy course and their performance in a subsequent manufacturing pharmacy internship over two academic years. Regression and correlation analyses found no significant correlation between the course grade and internship performance for either year individually or when combined. The conclusion is that there is insufficient evidence of a correlation.

Uploaded by

April Mergelle Lapuz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Correlation Analysis of the Manufacturing Pharmacy Subject and the Manufacturing Pharmacy

Internship Performance

Batch 2014 - 2015


reg manuf intern

Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 72


-------------+------------------------------ F( 1, 70) = 0.03
Model | .413015609 1 .413015609 Prob > F = 0.8652
Residual | 995.364762 70 14.2194966 R-squared = 0.0004
-------------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = -0.0139
Total | 995.777778 71 14.0250391 Root MSE = 3.7709

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
manuf | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
intern | .0198247 .1163233 0.17 0.865 -.2121747 .2518242
_cons | 73.14122 10.5899 6.91 0.000 52.02033 94.26211
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

pwcorr manuf intern, sig


| manuf intern
-------------+------------------
manuf | 1.0000
|
|
intern | 0.0204 1.0000
| 0.8652

Batch 2015 - 2016


. reg manuf intern

Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 64


-------------+------------------------------ F( 1, 62) = 2.71
Model | 103.658702 1 103.658702 Prob > F = 0.1047
Residual | 2370.70067 62 38.2371076 R-squared = 0.0419
-------------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = 0.0264
Total | 2474.35938 63 39.2755456 Root MSE = 6.1836

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
manuf | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
intern | .2703516 .1641982 1.65 0.105 -.0578761 .5985792
_cons | 55.16531 14.97995 3.68 0.000 25.22081 85.10982
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

. pwcorr manuf intern, sig


| manuf intern
-------------+------------------
manuf | 1.0000
|
|
intern | 0.2047 1.0000
| 0.1047

TOTAL
. reg manuf intern

Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 136


-------------+------------------------------ F( 1, 134) = 2.38
Model | 74.5447302 1 74.5447302 Prob > F = 0.1251
Residual | 4193.38909 134 31.2939485 R-squared = 0.0175
-------------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = 0.0101
Total | 4267.93382 135 31.6143246 Root MSE = 5.5941
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
manuf | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
intern | .1737282 .1125621 1.54 0.125 -.0488999 .3963564
_cons | 61.41356 10.25768 5.99 0.000 41.12566 81.70147
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

. pwcorr manuf intern, sig

| manuf intern
-------------+------------------
manuf | 1.0000
|
|
intern | 0.1322 1.0000
| 0.1251

Statistical Decision: Since the p-values are greater than α=0.05, reject the H0.
Conclusion: There is no sufficient evidence to say that there is a correlation between the students’ grade
on manufacturing pharmacy course and their manufacturing pharmacy internship performance.

You might also like