[go: up one dir, main page]

t1 t3 MT Automated Ipcrf

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 58

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON
Division of Quezon
Name of School

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM


Name of Employee:
Position: TEACHER III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA
Very Unsatisfactory
QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed
Education Knowledge and of content within and to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of
Services Pedagogy across curriculum 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across and across and across and
subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1


4 lessons using lessons using lessons using of the given MOV
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any supported by any supported by any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed
Education teaching strategies to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of
Services that enhance learner 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its
achievement in integration within integration within integration within integration within
literacy and and across and across and across and
numeracy skills. subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4

Efficiency Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using


different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote
writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or reading, writing
numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills and/or numeracy
as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV skills as shown in
1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of MOV 1 with a
7 6 5 rating of 4

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)

Basic 3. Applied a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different
Education teaching strategies to to March teaching teaching teaching teaching
Services develop critical and 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
creative thinking, as develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
well as other higher- and creative and creative and creative and creative
order thinking skills. thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating
of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1


4 lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by any
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1of the given
supported by supported by supported by any MOV
any1ofthe other any1 of the other 1of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed June 2018 7.50% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
Education Environment classroom to March management management management management
Services and Diversity structure to engage 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
of Learners learners, engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners
individually or in in in in in
groups, in activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
meaningful as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
exploration, MOV 1 with a MOV1witha MOV 1 with a MOV 1with a
discovery and rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1
environments. least 4 lessons lessons lessons as lesson
supported by supported by evidenced by supported by
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any of the
1 of the other 1 of the other supported by acceptable
acceptable acceptable any 1of the MOV
MOV MOV other given
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 5. Managed June 2018 7.50% Quality Applied teacher Used classroom Applied teacher Applied teacher
Education learner behavior to March management management management management
Services constructively by 2019 strategies of strategies that strategies of strategies of
applying positive learner behavior engage learners learner behavior learner behavior
and non-violent that promote in that promote that promote
discipline to ensure positive and activities/tasks positive and positive and
learning- focused non-violent as shown in non-violent non-violent
environments. discipline as MOV1witha discipline as discipline as
shown in MOV rating of 6 shown in MOV shown in MOV
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1


least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the of the given
given strategies given strategies given strategies strategies as
as observed in as observed in as observed in observed in only
at least 4 3 lessons 2 lessons 1 lesson
lessons

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 6. Used June 2018 7.50% Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied
Education differentiated, to March differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated
Services developmentally 2019 teaching teaching teaching teaching
appropriate strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
learning address learner address learner address learner address learner
experiences to diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as
address learners’ shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
gender, needs, 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
strengths, interests of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
and experiences.
and experiences.

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1


least 4 differentiated differentiated at least 4
differentiated teaching teaching lessons as
teaching strategies in at strategies in 2 observed in 3
strategies in at least 2 lessons lessons as lessons as
least 2 lessons as evidenced by evidenced by observed in 2
as evidenced by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and lessons
MOV 1 and supported by supported by observed in only
supported by any1ofthe other any1ofthe other 1 lesson
any 1 of the acceptable acceptable differentiated
other MOV MOV teaching
acceptable strategy in only
MOV 1 lesson as
evidently shown
in any 1 of the
acceptable
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June 2018 7.50% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and
Education and Planning managed and to March implemented implemented implemented implemented
Services implemented 2019 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning learning learning learning
learning processes process as process as process as process as
to meet curriculum shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
requirements and 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
varied teaching of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
contexts.

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1


least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning learning learning
learning process as process as process as
process as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
evidently shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any 1 of the
in MOV 1 and supported by supported by given MOV
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the other given other given
other given MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 8. Participated in June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely
Education collegial to March participated in participated in participated in participated in
Services discussions that 2019 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/
use teacher and meetings to meetings to meetings to meeting to
learner feedback to discuss discuss discuss discuss
enrich teaching teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
practice. feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
enrich enrich enrich enrich
instruction as instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Participated in Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1


at least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ in
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meetings as any 1 of the
meetings as evidently shown evidently shown given MOV
evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
in any 1 of the given MOV given MOV
given MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 9. Selected, June 2018 7.50% Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and
Education developed, to March used varied used varied used varied used varied
Services organized and 2019 teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
used appropriate learning learning learning learning
teaching and resources, resources, resources, resources,
learning resources, including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
including ICT, to address address address address
address learning learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals
goals. as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV1witha MOV1witha MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any


least 4 varied varied teaching varied teaching teaching and
teaching and and learning and learning learning
learning resources, resources, resource,
resources, including ICT, including ICT, including ICT,
including ICT, as evidently as evidently as evidently
as evidently shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in any of
shown in MOV 1 and supported 1 and supported the acceptable
1 and supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV
by any 1 of the acceptable acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 4. 10. Designed, June 2018 7.50% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed,
Education Assessment selected, to March selected, selected, selected, selected,
Services and Reporting organized and 2019 organized and organized and organized and organized and
used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic,
formative and formative and formative and formative and formative and
summative summative summative summative summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment
strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements. requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1


least 4 varied varied varied assessment tool
assessment assessment assessment as evidently
tools as tools as tools as shown in any of
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown the acceptable
inany1ofthe inany1ofthe in any1ofthe MOV
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 11. Monitored and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely
Education evaluated learner to March monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and
Services progress and 2019 evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated
achievement using learner progress learner progress learner progress learner progress
learner attainment and and and and
data. achievement achievement achievement achievement
using learner using learner using learner using learner
attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1


combination of combination of combination of acceptable
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the MOV
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted any 1
were distributed were distributed were distributed of the given
across 4 across 3 across 2 MOV
quarters quarters quarters

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 12. Communicated June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed
Education promptly and to March showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and
Services clearly the learners’ 2019 and clear and clear and clear clear
needs, progress communication communication communication communication
and achievement of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’
to key needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
stakeholders, and and and and
including achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to
parents/guardians. key key key key
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including including including including
parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1


combination of combination of combination of of the given
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the MOV
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted any 1
were distributed were distributed were distributed of the given
across 4 across 3 across 2 MOV
quarters quarters quarters

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely
Education various related to March performed performed performed performed
Services works/activities that 2019 various related various related various related various related
contribute to the work/activities work/activities work/activities work/activities
teaching-learning that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute
process. to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching
learning learning learning learning
process as process as process as process as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1


least 4 different different kinds different kinds of the
kinds of of acceptable of acceptable acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 -5.000 Outstanding
3.500- 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

Rater Ratee
VIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Rater:
Position: PRINCIPAL I
Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Rating
Actual
Score
Results
Poor
Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable
evidence was
4 5 4.5 0.3375
shown

No
acceptable
evidence was
shown

5
Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable
evidence was
4 4 4 0.3
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)

No acceptable
evidence was
4 3 3.5 0.2625
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
3

Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
evidence was
shown

4
No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
4

Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
evidence was
shown

3
No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 5 5 5 0.375
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Rating
Actual
Score
Results
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 3 3.5 0.2625
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 4 4 4 0.3
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown 4

No acceptable
evidence was
shown 4

Rating
Actual
Score
Results
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 4 4 4 0.3
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown 4

Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 5 5 5 0.5
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown 5

RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS 4.0625


ADJECTIVAL RATING Very Satisfactory
Approving Authority
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Your School Here
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat

ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV Pres
1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating
sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about knowledge of content within
and across curriculum teaching areas

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed


highlighting integration of content
knowledge within and across subject areas

1. Applied knowledge of
content within and across 3. Instructional materials highlighting
curriculum teaching areas. mastery of content and its integration in
other subject areas

4. Performance tasks/test material(s)


highlighting integration of content
knowledge within and across subject areas

5. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about teaching strategies that
enhance learner achievement in literacy
and numeracy skills

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in


teaching highlighting learner-centered
2. Used a range of teaching strategies that promote literacy and/or
strategies that enhance numeracy skills
learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy skills. 3. Instructional materials highlighting
learner-centered strategies that promote
literacy and/or numeracy skills
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used
in teaching
5. Results of assessment used in teaching

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about teaching strategies to develop
critical and creative thinking, as well as
other higher-order thinking skills

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in


3. Applied a range of teaching highlighting different teaching
teaching strategies to strategies that develop critical and
develop critical and creative creative thinking and/or other HOTS
thinking, as well as other
higher- order thinking skills. 3. Instructional materials highlighting
different teaching strategies that develop
critical and creative thinking and/or other
HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used
in demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used in teaching

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


4. Managed classroom sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
structure to engage learners, form about managing classroom structure
individually or in groups, in that engages learners in various activities
meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on
activities within a range of 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
physical learning various classroom management strategies
environments. that engage learners in activities/tasks in
different physical learning environments
3. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about teacher management of
learner behavior using the following
strategies:
1. Providing motivation d provide
annotations)

5. Managed learner behavior


constructively by applying
positive and non-violent
2. Praising the learners/Giving
5. Managed learner behavior positive feedback
constructively by applying
positive and non-violent 3. Setting house rules/guidelines
discipline to ensure learning- 4. Ensuring learners’ active
focused environments. participation
5. Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities to
learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions
8. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about using differentiated,
developmentally appropriate learning
experiences

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed


6. Used differentiated, highlighting differentiation in content,
product, process, learning environment or
developmentally appropriate others according to learners’ gender,
learning experiences to needs, strengths, interests and
address learners’ gender, experiences
needs, strengths, interests
and experiences.
3. Instructional materials developed
highlighting differentiation in content,
product, process, learning environment or
others according to learners’ gender,
needs, strengths, interests and
experiences

4. Others (Please specify and provide annota

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about using developmentally
sequenced teaching and learning process
7. Planned, managed and
implemented 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developmentally sequenced highlighting developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning instruction that meet curriculum goals and
processes to meet varied teaching contexts
curriculum requirements and
varied teaching contexts.
implemented
developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning
processes to meet
curriculum requirements and 3. Instructional materials used to
varied teaching contexts. implement developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning process to meet
curriculum requirements and varied
teaching contexts.
4. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. Personal notes of teachers on


LACs/FGDs/meetings with proof of
attendance
8. Participated in collegial
discussions that use teacher
and learner feedback to 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of
enrich teaching practice. teacher and learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice with proof of attendance

3. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about using appropriate teaching
and learning resources, including ICT
Examples:
 Activity sheets/task
sheets/work sheets
9. Selected, developed,  PowerPoint presentations
organized and used
 Video clips
appropriate teaching and
learning resources, including  Module
ICT, to address learning
goals.  SIMs-Strategic Intervention
Materials

 Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with
appropriate instructional materials
appended

3. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about using diagnostic, formative
and summative assessment strategies
2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs
highlighting appropriate use of formative
assessment strategies

10. Designed, selected,


3. Developed diagnostic tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
10. Designed, selected, superior;
organized and used (b) with sample accomplished
diagnostic, formative and questionnaire/answer sheets
summative assessment
strategies consistent with 4. Developed summative tests:
curriculum requirements. (a) with TOS reviewed by
superior;
(b) with sample accomplished
questionnaire/answer sheets
5. Developed performance tasks:
(a) with rubrics reviewed by
superior;
(b) with sample accomplished
rubrics

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Compilation of a learner’s written work


with summary of results and with
signature of parents

2. Formative/summative assessment tools


11. Monitored and evaluated with TOS and frequency of errors with
learner progress and identified least mastered skills
achievement using learner
attainment data. 3. Class records/grading sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs showing
index of mastery
5. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. At least 3 samples of corrected test


papers of the same 3 learners in the same
learning area with parents’ or guardians’
signature and date of receipt

2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent-


Teacher conferences in all quarters with
12. Communicated promptly proof of parents’/guardians’ attendance
and clearly the learners’
needs, progress and 3. Report cards with parent’s or guardian’s
achievement to key signature in all quarters supported by
stakeholders, including minutes of meeting
parents/guardians. 4. Communication with parents/
guardians using various modalities
5. Anecdotal record showing entries per
quarter
6. Other documents showing learners’
needs, progress and achievement
submitted to other stakeholders
1. Certificate of Recognition or
Participation

2. Certificate of Training

3. Certificate of Speakership

4. Committee involvement

13. Performed various 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities


related works/activities that
contribute to the teaching- 6. Book or Journal Authorship/
learning process. Coauthorship/Contributorship

7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersons hip

8. Coaching and mentoring learners in


competitions

9. Mentoring pre-service/inservice
teachers

10. Others (Please specify and provide anno


ines Appendix M
tion

arat
Here
Kudarat

EMPLATE
n of the MOV Presented Annotations
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV-A
Division of QUEZON
Your School Here
Your District Here

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)


Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
per KRA Results
Very Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective June 2018 7.50% Quality Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective No acceptable
Education Knowledge and application of content to March application of application of application of application of evidence was
4 4 4 0.3
Services Pedagogy knowledge within and 2019 content content content content shown
across curriculum knowledge within knowledge within knowledge within knowledge within
teaching areas. and across and across and across and across
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
teaching areas as teaching areas as teaching areas as teaching areas as
shown in MOV1 shown in MOV1 shown in MOV1 shown in MOV1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No


4 lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as acceptable
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence was
MOV 1 and MOV 1 from MOV 1 from MOV 1 from shown
supported by any colleagues and colleagues and colleagues and
1 of the other supported by any supported by any supported by any
given MOV 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
per KRA Results
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Collaborated with June 2018 7.50% Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposed-action No acceptable
Education colleagues in the to March completed and completed action research with research with evidence was
4 4 4 4 0.3
Services conduct and 2019 disseminated research with colleagues. colleagues shown
application of action research colleagues.
research to enrich with colleagues.
knowledge of content
and pedagogy. Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
4 of the given of the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was
MOV MOV shown
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown
period period period period
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)

Basic 3. Developed and June 2018 7.50% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable
Education applied effective to March effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
4 4 4 0.3
Services teaching strategies to 2019 strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical
creative thinking, as and creative and creative and creative and creative
well as other higher- thinking as well as thinking as well as thinking as well as thinking as well as
order thinking skills. other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 or No acceptable


more lessons as lessons as lessons as more lessons as evidence was
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any supported by any supported by any supported by any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Work with June 2018 7.50% Quality Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education Environment colleagues to to March shared effective shared effective shared effective shared effective evidence was
Services and Diversity model and share 2019 classroom classroom classroom classroom shown
of Learners effective management management management management
techniques in the strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
management of the engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners
classroom in in in in
structure to engage activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
learners, done in different done in different done in different done in different
individually or in physical physical physical physical
groups, in learning learning learning learning
meaningful environments environments environments environments
exploration, as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
discovery and MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
hands-on activities rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
within a range of
physical learning
environments.

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable


least 4 lessons lessons lessons as lesson evidence was
supported by supported by evidenced by supported by shown
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any of the
1 of the other 1 of the other supported by acceptable
acceptable acceptable any 1of the MOV
MOV MOV other given
MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Exibited effective June 2018 7.50% Quality Exibited Exibited Exibited Exibited No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education and constructive to March effective and effective and effective and effective and evidence was
Services behavior 2019 constructive constructive constructive constructive shown
management skills behavior behavior behavior behavior
by applying management management management management
positive and non- skills by skills by skills by skills by
violent discipline to applying applying applying applying
ensure learning- positive and positive and positive and positive and
focused non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
environments. discipline to discipline to discipline to discipline to
ensure learning- ensure learning- ensure learning- ensure learning-
focused focused focused focused
environments. environments. environments. environments.
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of
8 7 6 5
Efficiency Applied atleast Applied atleast Applied atleast Applied atleast No acceptable
7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as shown
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in 1
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson
Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
per KRA Results
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 6. Worked with June 2018 7.50% Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education colleagues to to March colleagues colleagues colleagues colleagues but evidence was
Services share 2019 atleast in the atleast in the atleast in the no evidence of shown
differentiated, district/cluster school level to department/gra sharing with
developmentally level to share share lesson de level to others
appropriate lesson share lesson
learning
experiences to Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable
address learners’ least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson evidence was
gender, needs, as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidenced by shown
strengths, interests shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV either MOV 2 or
and experiences. 1 and supported 1 and supported 1 and supported 3 but no
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the evidence of
other other other sharing with
acceptable acceptable acceptable others
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
per KRA Results
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Develop and June 2018 7.50% Quality Develop and Develop and Develop and Develop and No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education and Planning applied effective to March applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was
Services strategies in the 2019 strategies in the strategies in the strategies in the strategies in the shown
planning and planning and planning and planning and planning and
management of management management management management
developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning processes learning learning learning learning
to meet curriculum process as process as process as process as
requirements and shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
varied teaching 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
contexts. of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 Submitted 1 No acceptable


least 4 lessons lessons as lesson as lesson as evidence was
as evidence by evidence by evidence by evidence by shown
MOV 1 and 2 MOV 1 and 2 MOV 1 and 2 any 1 of the
and supported and supported and supported acceptable
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV
acceptable other other
MOV acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 8. Review with June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently led Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education colleagues, to March collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
Services teacher and 2019 reviews of reviews of reviews of reviews of shown
learner feedback to teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
plan, facilitate and feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
enrich teaching evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by
practice. the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable


collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
reviews of reviews of reviews of review of shown
teacher and teacher and teacher and teacher and
learner learner learner learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any of the
supported by supported by supported by acceptable
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the MOV
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 9. Advised and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education guided colleagues to March advised advised advised colleagues in evidence was
Services in the selection, 2019 colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in the selection, shown
organization, the selection, the selection, the selection, organization,
development and organization, organization, organization, development
use of appropriate development development development and appropriate
teaching and and appropriate and appropriate and appropriate use of teaching
learning resources, use of teaching use of teaching use of teaching and learning
including ICT, to and learning and learning and learning resources as
address specific resources as resources as resources as shown in the
learning goals. shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable


least 4 teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
and learning learning learning learning shown
resources as resources as resources as resource as
evidenced by at evidenced by at evidenced by at evidenced by
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 4. 10. Worked June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education Assessment collaboratively with to March reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was
Services and Reporting colleagues to 2019 collaboratively collaboratively collaborativel y assessment shown
review the design, assessment assessment assessment tools with
selection, tools with tools with tools with colleagues as
organization and colleagues as colleagues as colleagues as shown in the
use of a range of shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
effective MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
diagnostic,
formative and
summative Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment least 4 assessment assessment assessment tool evidence was
strategies assessment tools as tools as as evidently shown
consistent with tools as evidently shown evidently shown shown in any of
curriculum evidently shown in any of the in any of the the acceptable
requirements. in any of the acceptable acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 11. Interpreted June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education collaboratively to March collaborated collaborated collaborated collaborated evidence was
Services monitoring and 2019 with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues shown
evaluation in the in the in the in the
strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment assessment assessment assessment
support learner data as shown data as shown data as shown data as shown
progress and in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
achievement. submitted submitted submitted submitted
support learner
progress and
achievement.

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No acceptable


least 2 different least 3 of the least 2 of the of the MOV evidence was
types of MOV same kind of same kind of shown
MOV MO
Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 12. Applied skills in June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely applied No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education the effective to March applied skills in applied skills in applied skills in skills in the evidence was
Services communication of 2019 the effective the effective the effective effective shown
learner needs, communication communicatio n communicatio n communicatio n
progress and of learner needs of learner needs of learner needs of learner needs
achievement to key and progress to and progress to and progress to and progress to
stakeholders, parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
including guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
parents/guardians. shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 of Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable


the acceptable MOV MOV MOV evidence was
MOV shown
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 5 5 5 0.5
Education various to March performed performed performed performed evidence was
Services related 2019 special tasks special tasks special tasks special tasks shown
works/activities and/or and/or and/or and/or
that contribute to assignments assignments assignments assignments
the as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
teaching-learning the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
process. submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted only Submitted only Submitted any 1 No acceptable


least 4 3 different kinds 2 different kinds of the evidence was
different kinds of acceptable of acceptable acceptable shown
of acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS 3.8
ADJECTIVAL RATING VERY SATISFACTORY
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING

4.500 -5.000 Outstanding


3.500- 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

Rater Ratee Approving Authority


Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Your School Here
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat

ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV Pres

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about effective applications of content

knowledge within and across curriculum
teaching areas

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in


demonstration teaching highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas

3. Instructional materials developed


1. Modeled effective highlighting effective application of content
application of content knowledge within and across subject areas
knowledge within and
across curriculum 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used
teaching areas. in demonstration teaching highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas

5. Results of assessment used in


demonstration teaching highlighting mastery
of lessons learned

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Copy of the research proposal focused on


enriching knowledge of content and
pedagogy

2. Proof of participation and/or contribution


to a collaborative research (e.g. e-mail,
actual output submitted, terms of reference,
etc.)
2. Collaborated with
colleagues in the conduct
and application of
2. Collaborated with
colleagues in the conduct 3. Certified completed collaborative research
and application of focused on enriching knowledge of content
and pedagogy
research to enrich
knowledge of content and
pedagogy. 4. Proof of dissemination of research
findings with colleagues

5. Proof of utilization of research findings

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about using effective teaching strategies to
promote critical and creative teaching, as
well as other higher-order thinking skills

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in


demonstration teaching highlighting
different teaching strategies that develop
3. Developed and applied critical and creative thinking and/or other
HOTS
effective teaching
strategies to promote
critical and creative 3. Instructional materials highlighting
thinking, as well as other different teaching strategies that develop
higher- order thinking critical and creative thinking, and/or other
skills. HOTS

4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used


in demonstration teaching

5. Results of assessment used in the


demonstration teaching

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about sharing effective techniques in the
management of classroom structure
4. Work with colleagues
to model and share
effective techniques in the
management of the
classroom structure to
4. Work with colleagues
to model and share
effective techniques in the 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
management of the demonstration teaching highlighting
effective classroom management strategies
classroom structure to that engage learners in activities/tasks in
engage learners, different physical learning environments
individually or in groups,
in meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on 3. Minutes of LAC highlighting the sharing
activities within a range of on effective classroom management
physical learning techniques
environments.
4. Instructional materials used in
demonstration teaching

5. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about effective teacher management of
learner behavior using the following
strategies:

1. Providing motivation

2. Praising the learners/Giving


positive feedback
5. Exibited effective and
constructive behavior
management skills by 3. Setting house rules/guidelines
applying positive and
non-violent discipline to
ensure learning- focused 4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation
environments.
5. Allowing learners to express their
ideas/opinions

6. Giving equal opportunities to


learners

7. Encouraging learners to ask


questions

8. Others (Please specify and


provide annotations)
1. Minutes of LAC session/s, highlighting
one’s sharing of strategies on differentiated
and developmentally appropriate
opportunities to address learners’
differences

6. Worked with
colleagues to share 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
differentiated, strategies on differentiated and
developmentally-appropriate opportunities
developmentally to address learners’ differences
appropriate learning
experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and 3. Corresponding instructional materials
experiences. showing differentiated and developmentally-

appropriate opportunities to address
learners’ differences

4. Others (e.g. testimonial, write-up from


colleagues of the lessons/insights gained
from the Master Teacher's sharing)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about using effective strategies in
implementing developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning process

2. Results of learners’ assessment during


7. Develop and applied the actual teaching
effective strategies in the
planning and 3. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
management of demonstration teaching highlighting
developmentally developmentally sequenced teaching-
learning process
sequenced teaching and
learning processes to
meet curriculum
4. Instructional materials showing effective
requirements and varied strategies in developmentally sequenced
teaching contexts. teaching and learning process

5. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in


demonstration teaching

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)
1. Implemented LAC/FGD Plan
8. Review with
colleagues, teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of
learner feedback to plan, teacher and learner feedback to enrich
facilitate and enrich teaching practice with proof of attendance
teaching practice.
3. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. Teaching and learning resources


developed by colleagues and critiqued on
their alignment to learning goals
9. Advised and guided
colleagues in the
selection, organization, 2. Lesson plans by colleagues critiqued in
development and use of terms of the alignment of the teaching and
appropriate teaching and ✘ learning resources to the indicated learning
goals and appropriateness to the target
learning resources, learners
including ICT, to address
specific learning goals.
3. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. Any proof of collaborative review if the


test is designed based on its purpose (e.g.
diagnostic, formative and summative)

2. Any proof of collaborative review of the


10. Worked alignment of the test with the curriculum
collaboratively with
colleagues to review the
design, selection,
organization and use of a 2.1. formative test attached to a
range of effective lesson plan
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment
strategies consistent with 2.2. summative assessment with
curriculum requirements. TOS

2.3. diagnostic test with its TOS

3. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)
1. Collaborative interpretation of the index
of mastery obtained from 1 class
11. Interpreted
collaboratively monitoring
and evaluation strategies
of attainment data to
support learner progress
11. Interpreted 2. Collaborative interpretation of item
collaboratively monitoring analysis of quarterly examinations
and evaluation strategies
of attainment data to 3. Collaborative interpretation of results of
support learner progress performance assessment
and achievement.
4. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. Sample agreement for learners at risk


signed by parents and corresponding
evidence of improvement

2. Record of dialogue and/or parent-teacher


conferences and corresponding evidence of
improvement

3. Anecdotal record communicated to and


signed by the learners and/or parents with
corresponding evidence of improvement

4. Sample of learners' test results signed by


parents and corresponding evidence of
improvement
12. Applied skills in the
effective communication
of learner needs, 5. Sample of accomplished rubrics given for
progress and performance task and corresponding
evidence of improvement
achievement to key
stakeholders, including
parents/guardians. 6. Attendance sheet/minutes of parent-
teacher conference

7. Signed report cards of students at risk


with corresponding evidence of
improvement

8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof
of communication using other modalities
(e.g. email, SMS, etc.) and corresponding
evidence of improvement

9. Learners’ performance record

10. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Served as reliever of classes in the


absence of teachers
2. Served as OIC in the absence of the
principal

3. Represented the principal in meetings and


conferences

4. Observed classes of Teachers I-III

5. Assisted the school selection committee in


the evaluation of credentials when hiring or
promoting teachers

6. Certificate of Recognition or Participation

7. Certificate of Training
13. Performed various
related works/activities
that contribute to the 8. Certificate of Speakership
teaching-learning
process.
9. Committee involvement

10. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities

11. Book or Journal


Authorship/Coauthorship/Contributorship

12. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship

13. Coaching and mentoring learners in


competitions

14. Mentoring pre-service/in-service


teachers

15. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)
ppines Appendix M
cation

udarat
Here
an Kudarat

EMPLATE
n of the MOV Presented Annotations
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Salaman Central Elementary Scho
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS OF THE IPCRF (IP


Action Plan (Recommended Devel
Strengths Development Needs
Intervention)
A. Teaching Competencies (PPST)

B. Core Behavioral Competencies (DepEd)

Feedback:

RATEE
ublic of the Philippines
partment of Education
Region XII
sion of Sultan Kudarat
tral Elementary School
n I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat

T PLANS OF THE IPCRF (IPCRF-DP)


Action Plan (Recommended Developmental
Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention)

RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY


Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Salaman Central Elementary Sc
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat

PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING


DATE CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT

RATEE RATER
ippines
ucation

Kudarat
mentary School
tan Kudarat

AND COACHING FORM


SIGNATURE
T IMPACT ON JOB/ACTION PLAN
(RATER/RATEE)

RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY

You might also like