t1 t3 MT Automated Ipcrf
t1 t3 MT Automated Ipcrf
t1 t3 MT Automated Ipcrf
Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON
Division of Quezon
Name of School
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA
Very Unsatisfactory
QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed
Education Knowledge and of content within and to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of
Services Pedagogy across curriculum 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across and across and across and
subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed
Education teaching strategies to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of
Services that enhance learner 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its
achievement in integration within integration within integration within integration within
literacy and and across and across and across and
numeracy skills. subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 3. Applied a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different
Education teaching strategies to to March teaching teaching teaching teaching
Services develop critical and 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
creative thinking, as develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
well as other higher- and creative and creative and creative and creative
order thinking skills. thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating
of 4
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed June 2018 7.50% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
Education Environment classroom to March management management management management
Services and Diversity structure to engage 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
of Learners learners, engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners
individually or in in in in in
groups, in activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
meaningful as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
exploration, MOV 1 with a MOV1witha MOV 1 with a MOV 1with a
discovery and rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1
environments. least 4 lessons lessons lessons as lesson
supported by supported by evidenced by supported by
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any of the
1 of the other 1 of the other supported by acceptable
acceptable acceptable any 1of the MOV
MOV MOV other given
MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 5. Managed June 2018 7.50% Quality Applied teacher Used classroom Applied teacher Applied teacher
Education learner behavior to March management management management management
Services constructively by 2019 strategies of strategies that strategies of strategies of
applying positive learner behavior engage learners learner behavior learner behavior
and non-violent that promote in that promote that promote
discipline to ensure positive and activities/tasks positive and positive and
learning- focused non-violent as shown in non-violent non-violent
environments. discipline as MOV1witha discipline as discipline as
shown in MOV rating of 6 shown in MOV shown in MOV
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 6. Used June 2018 7.50% Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied
Education differentiated, to March differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated
Services developmentally 2019 teaching teaching teaching teaching
appropriate strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
learning address learner address learner address learner address learner
experiences to diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as
address learners’ shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
gender, needs, 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
strengths, interests of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
and experiences.
and experiences.
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June 2018 7.50% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and
Education and Planning managed and to March implemented implemented implemented implemented
Services implemented 2019 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning learning learning learning
learning processes process as process as process as process as
to meet curriculum shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
requirements and 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
varied teaching of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
contexts.
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 8. Participated in June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely
Education collegial to March participated in participated in participated in participated in
Services discussions that 2019 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/
use teacher and meetings to meetings to meetings to meeting to
learner feedback to discuss discuss discuss discuss
enrich teaching teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
practice. feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
enrich enrich enrich enrich
instruction as instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 9. Selected, June 2018 7.50% Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and
Education developed, to March used varied used varied used varied used varied
Services organized and 2019 teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
used appropriate learning learning learning learning
teaching and resources, resources, resources, resources,
learning resources, including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
including ICT, to address address address address
address learning learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals
goals. as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV1witha MOV1witha MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 4. 10. Designed, June 2018 7.50% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed,
Education Assessment selected, to March selected, selected, selected, selected,
Services and Reporting organized and 2019 organized and organized and organized and organized and
used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic,
formative and formative and formative and formative and formative and
summative summative summative summative summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment
strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements. requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 11. Monitored and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely
Education evaluated learner to March monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and
Services progress and 2019 evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated
achievement using learner progress learner progress learner progress learner progress
learner attainment and and and and
data. achievement achievement achievement achievement
using learner using learner using learner using learner
attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 12. Communicated June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed
Education promptly and to March showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and
Services clearly the learners’ 2019 and clear and clear and clear clear
needs, progress communication communication communication communication
and achievement of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’
to key needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
stakeholders, and and and and
including achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to
parents/guardians. key key key key
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including including including including
parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely
Education various related to March performed performed performed performed
Services works/activities that 2019 various related various related various related various related
contribute to the work/activities work/activities work/activities work/activities
teaching-learning that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute
process. to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching
learning learning learning learning
process as process as process as process as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Rater Ratee
VIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Rater:
Position: PRINCIPAL I
Date of Review:
Rating
Actual
Score
Results
Poor
Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable
evidence was
4 5 4.5 0.3375
shown
No
acceptable
evidence was
shown
5
Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable
evidence was
4 4 4 0.3
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable
evidence was
4 3 3.5 0.2625
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
3
Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
evidence was
shown
4
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
evidence was
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
4
Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
evidence was
shown
3
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
evidence was
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
evidence was
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 5 5 5 0.375
evidence was
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Rating
Actual
Score
Results
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 3 3.5 0.2625
evidence was
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 4 4 4 0.3
evidence was
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown 4
No acceptable
evidence was
shown 4
Rating
Actual
Score
Results
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 4 4 4 4 0.3
evidence was
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown 4
Rating
Actual
Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(1)
No acceptable 5 5 5 0.5
evidence was
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown 5
ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV Pres
1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating
sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about knowledge of content within
and across curriculum teaching areas
Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with
appropriate instructional materials
appended
2. Certificate of Training
3. Certificate of Speakership
4. Committee involvement
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersons hip
9. Mentoring pre-service/inservice
teachers
arat
Here
Kudarat
EMPLATE
n of the MOV Presented Annotations
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV-A
Division of QUEZON
Your School Here
Your District Here
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
per KRA Results
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Collaborated with June 2018 7.50% Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposed-action No acceptable
Education colleagues in the to March completed and completed action research with research with evidence was
4 4 4 4 0.3
Services conduct and 2019 disseminated research with colleagues. colleagues shown
application of action research colleagues.
research to enrich with colleagues.
knowledge of content
and pedagogy. Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
4 of the given of the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was
MOV MOV shown
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown
period period period period
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 3. Developed and June 2018 7.50% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable
Education applied effective to March effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
4 4 4 0.3
Services teaching strategies to 2019 strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical
creative thinking, as and creative and creative and creative and creative
well as other higher- thinking as well as thinking as well as thinking as well as thinking as well as
order thinking skills. other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
Timeliness
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Exibited effective June 2018 7.50% Quality Exibited Exibited Exibited Exibited No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education and constructive to March effective and effective and effective and effective and evidence was
Services behavior 2019 constructive constructive constructive constructive shown
management skills behavior behavior behavior behavior
by applying management management management management
positive and non- skills by skills by skills by skills by
violent discipline to applying applying applying applying
ensure learning- positive and positive and positive and positive and
focused non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
environments. discipline to discipline to discipline to discipline to
ensure learning- ensure learning- ensure learning- ensure learning-
focused focused focused focused
environments. environments. environments. environments.
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of
8 7 6 5
Efficiency Applied atleast Applied atleast Applied atleast Applied atleast No acceptable
7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as shown
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in 1
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 8. Review with June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently led Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education colleagues, to March collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
Services teacher and 2019 reviews of reviews of reviews of reviews of shown
learner feedback to teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
plan, facilitate and feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
enrich teaching evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by
practice. the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
submitted submitted submitted submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 9. Advised and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education guided colleagues to March advised advised advised colleagues in evidence was
Services in the selection, 2019 colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in the selection, shown
organization, the selection, the selection, the selection, organization,
development and organization, organization, organization, development
use of appropriate development development development and appropriate
teaching and and appropriate and appropriate and appropriate use of teaching
learning resources, use of teaching use of teaching use of teaching and learning
including ICT, to and learning and learning and learning resources as
address specific resources as resources as resources as shown in the
learning goals. shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 4. 10. Worked June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education Assessment collaboratively with to March reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was
Services and Reporting colleagues to 2019 collaboratively collaboratively collaborativel y assessment shown
review the design, assessment assessment assessment tools with
selection, tools with tools with tools with colleagues as
organization and colleagues as colleagues as colleagues as shown in the
use of a range of shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
effective MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
diagnostic,
formative and
summative Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment least 4 assessment assessment assessment tool evidence was
strategies assessment tools as tools as as evidently shown
consistent with tools as evidently shown evidently shown shown in any of
curriculum evidently shown in any of the in any of the the acceptable
requirements. in any of the acceptable acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 11. Interpreted June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education collaboratively to March collaborated collaborated collaborated collaborated evidence was
Services monitoring and 2019 with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues shown
evaluation in the in the in the in the
strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment assessment assessment assessment
support learner data as shown data as shown data as shown data as shown
progress and in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
achievement. submitted submitted submitted submitted
support learner
progress and
achievement.
ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV Pres
1. Providing motivation
6. Worked with
colleagues to share 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
differentiated, strategies on differentiated and
developmentally-appropriate opportunities
developmentally to address learners’ differences
appropriate learning
experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and 3. Corresponding instructional materials
experiences. showing differentiated and developmentally-
✘
appropriate opportunities to address
learners’ differences
8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof
of communication using other modalities
(e.g. email, SMS, etc.) and corresponding
evidence of improvement
7. Certificate of Training
13. Performed various
related works/activities
that contribute to the 8. Certificate of Speakership
teaching-learning
process.
9. Committee involvement
12. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
udarat
Here
an Kudarat
EMPLATE
n of the MOV Presented Annotations
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Salaman Central Elementary Scho
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat
Feedback:
RATEE
ublic of the Philippines
partment of Education
Region XII
sion of Sultan Kudarat
tral Elementary School
n I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat
RATEE RATER
ippines
ucation
Kudarat
mentary School
tan Kudarat