Case Study: RJR Nabisco LBO Prescia 1
Case Study: RJR Nabisco LBO
Matt Prescia
RJR Nabisco LBO Prescia 2
The RJR Nabisco leveraged buyout was considered the largest LBO of all time, up until
2006. RJR Nabisco was formed in 1985 when Nabsico merged with RJ Reynolds (“Take a Look at
a Classic Private Equity Deal: RJR Nabisco Goes Private and the Street Goes Wild,” n.d.). RJR
Nabisco was appealing to other companies as a potential LBO, and there were many bidders
that were trying to pursue taking over this company because of the attractiveness RJR Nabisco
looked. In 1988, which is when the LBO took place, the CEO was F. Ross Johnson.
Johnson originally started to think about a LBO after RJR Nabisco took a big hit in the
1987 crash, which brought its stock from around $70, to the low $40s (Beattie, n.d.). He felt
that the bad publicity of tobacco was holding back from the foods division. In 1988, he
proposed a $17 billion LBO, in partnership with Shearson Lehman Hutton, in an effort to take
the company private (“History of the RJR Nabisco Takeover,” 1988). This bid was low to the
company, and it attracted other bidders. The players in this consisted of Drexel Burnham,
Merrill Lynch, Morgen Stanley, Wasserstein Perella, Salomon Brothers, First Boston, and
Goldman Sachs (Gaughan, 2015). When RJR Nabisco’s price continued to decrease, Johnson
started realizing that the low price of stock, will start to attract “corporate raiders.” (Beattie,
n.d.). This got Johnson to start talking to Shearson Lehman Hutton to try to complete a LBO,
which would avoid bringing Nabisco into play, where the company would be auctioned to the
highest bidder. However, as said before, he offered a buyout to the board of directors for
$17.6 billion, which actually the board of directors felt embarrassed by the low ball offer. After
this initial offer, other bidders were attracted, which then companies such as KKR (Kohlberg,
Kravis, Roberts & Company), First Boston, and Forstmann Little started to make offers.
RJR Nabisco LBO Prescia 3
This was an attractive company to take over in the eyes of other bidders because RJR
Nabisco was a good candidate for an LBO. The companies cash flows were steady and
predictable. Both divisions, tobacco and food, did not vary with the ups and downs of the
business cycles of the economy. Also, neither of the divisions required major capital
expenditures. RJR Nabisco also had a low debt level, which means that it had unused debt
capacity (Gaughan, 2015). With these positives to the company, RJR Nabisco had a decline in
ROA from 15.5% to 11.5% from 1985 to 1988, as well as its inventory turnover going from 10 to
3.9 over the same period (Michel & Shaked, 1991). With that being said, management viewed
these problems as “fixable,” which means that when it comes to outside bidders, these
problems to not make or break a deal, however this is potential for value creation.
Prior to the LBO, “the salaries and perks of the management quickly grew to outsized
proportions,” (Beattie, n.d.). With the growing expenses, Johnson ran into trouble with the
board chairman. So, Johnson was able to get the chairman switched, and started appointing
friends of his to key positions. This was a way for Johnson to keep his perks, which he obviously
did not want to give up. According to Andrew Beattie, when a leveraged buyout was suggested,
Johnson did not like this idea. By Johnson taking Nabisco private, would mean there would be
money owed to a bank, ultimately forcing Johnson to cut back on his spending habits. After
meeting with KKR about a LBO, Johnson started to “warm up” to the idea. The reason he
started to think about it more, is because there would be benefits of an LBO, which what stuck
out to him was the increase of money. Johnson’s greed could be seen by his proposed terms
for the LBO, when Johnson offered $17.6 billion. His terms were that he would have control of
the board and 20% of the stock for himself (Beattie, n.d.). After KKR took over RJR Nabisco,
RJR Nabisco LBO Prescia 4
they got ride of Johnson, however, still giving him a $30 million golden parachute. After the
deal was complete, RJR was still shaky. There were jobs that were cut, as well as divisions. The
international tobacco business went to Japan Tobacco. The domestic tobacco and food
divisions were separated and than later recombined. So even after the deal, the structure of
the company was being changed around a lot. Just prior to the initial buyout offer, RJR Nabisco
stock was as $56, and was sold to KKR for $109 a share. After the buyout, the company had a
lot of debt, and continued threat of lawsuits. This overall hurt the company, and the value of
the stock was decreasing. In 1991, KKR sold stock in the company back to the public, and in an
article written in 1999, “the company’s stock price has traded in a $10 range since 1993…’It’s
been dead money for six years,” (Mufson, 1999).
There are a couple reasons that this LBO was not successful for KKR. When the LBO was
complete, the deal was financed with very high interest rates. This left KKR with a great deal of
debt, (Hays, 1999). There were also lawsuits that were going against the tobacco industry,
which was constant, and was bringing the tobacco division down. Also, in 1999, the chairman
and chief executive of RJR Nabisco admitted that mixing the food and tobacco did not work out.
He said that they are two complete different businesses and should not be mixed. To add to
that, people should have the opportunity to invest in a tobacco or food company, not investing
in one company that has both. With this being said, the bad rap that tobacco has, hindered the
company’s stock.
RJR Nabisco was broken up, with the selling of the foreign tobacco business, the food
business became owned by Kraft, and the tobacco business renamed RJ Reynolds Tobacco
Holdings. When R.J Reynolds Tobacco was sold to stockholders, the parent company became
RJR Nabisco LBO Prescia 5
Nabisco Group Holdings. After Nabisco Holdings was bought by Phillip Morris, RJ Reynolds
Tobacco Holdings acquired Nabisco Group Holdings again, and the deal was completed in 2000.
RJ Reynolds tobacco is currently the manufacturer of Newport (RJ Reynolds, 2015).
RJR Nabisco LBO Prescia 6
References
Beattie, A. (n.d.). “Corporate Kleptocracy at RJR Nabisco.” Retrieved from
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/stocks/09/corporate-kleptocracy-rjr-nabisco.asp.
Gaughan, P.A. (2015). Mergers, Acquisitions, and Corporate Restructurings. (6th). Hoboken,
NJ: John Wily & Songs, Inc.
Hays, C. (1999). “End of an Empire: The Overview; RJR Nabisco Splits Tobacco Ventures and
Food Business.” Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1999/03/10/business/end-
empire-overview-rjr-nabisco-splits-tobacco-ventures-food-business.html
“History of the RJ Nabisco Takeover.” (1988). The New York Times. Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/1988/12/02/business/history-of-the-rjr-nabisco-
takeover.html.
Michel, A & Shaked, I. (1991). RJR Nabisco: A Case Study of a Complex Leveraged Buyout.
Financial Analysts Journal, September-October 1991,15-26. Retrieved from
http://staff.bath.ac.uk/mnsrf/Teaching%202011/RJR%20case%20study.pdf
Mufson, S. (1999). “For R.J. Reynolds, a Topsy-Truvy History.” Retrieved from
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/business/1999/03/10/for-rj-reynolds-a-
topsy-turvy-history/1c78c094-a345-429e-a627-95024dcfe55b/.
“RJ Reynolds.” (2015). A Look Into Our Past. Retrieved from
http://www.rjrt.com/transforming-tobacco/history/
“Take a Look at a Classic Private Equity Deal: RJR Nabisco Goes Private and the Street Goes
Wild.” (n.d.). Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/rjr-
RJR Nabisco LBO Prescia 7
nabisco-lbo-private-equity-deal-2012-1#rjr-nabisco-was-formed-in-1985-when-nabisco-
merged-with-rj-reynolds-tobacco-1.