Mosquito Report Parent’s Information

Report
In the interest of public integrity of the judicial branch of the United States of America

mosquitoreport@yahoo.com

Mosquito Report Updated: August 10, 2010

Wise Old American Indian saying: Be like the mosquito small, fast, annoying, persistent, inflects pain, and
swarms. Join us in building a swarm to bring back integrity and accountability to our justice system. Forward this
report to everybody you know. Pick up your phone and pen and call your legislators. Please unite your efforts
under the cause to STOP CHILD ABUSE FOR PROFIT. Send us your information to include in this report. Expose the
TRUTH!

James Madison Quote President of the United States (1809–1817)

"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or
many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny"
(James Madison, Federalist No. 48, Feb. 1, 1788).
What this means: Stop voting for attorneys entering legislative service. Our constitution clearly state a separation
of power must be maintained with the executive, legislative and judicial branches. It is professional misconduct for
practicing judicial members to seek legislative office. The public has no enforcement of these laws to protect the
public interest. Look at the campaign funding and you will find a large portion coming from other legal
professionals, this is called self promotion. To stop corruption of our laws by profit seeking self interests of judicial
members the public must enforce the separation of power laws and impeach or have judicial members resign from
the judicial branch. (This is the root cause of corruption.)

Public officials sworn to uphold the United States Constitution and our laws are neglecting
their responsibility to the public. It is the duty and responsibility of concerned patriots to
protect liberty and the rights of the people. It is our right to demand accountability and if
necessary pickup arms to overthrow a corrupt government.

We have public outcry and this is one example uniting under the tea party movement:
Thomas Paine video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA 9,545,216 views (Aug. 10,
2010)
We have public outcry in the form of militia being formed by patriots to demand accountability this is one
example:
Armed Rally: http://www.rtcwesternrally.org/Home_Page.php

“The probability that we may fail in the struggle ought not to deter us from the
support of a cause we believe to be just.” (Abraham Lincoln, 16th President)
Our Children deserve your united efforts to protect the future of our children’s rights. Children are our greatest
asset.

Acknowledgements

The Mosquito report represents the struggle and achievements of thousands of parents (patriots) and
organizations that have paved the way for changes in our family law system across the United States. Sadly many
parents have taken their own lives for having no place to turn for help. We want to express our deepest regret to
their families and friends for their loss. These losses are a direct result of our family law system exposing children
and parents to two known issue. These public servants are knowingly and willfully placing children and parents at
risk of mental disorders. We intend to correct this wrong and hold public servants accountable for placing their
funding needs above human life. United we can stop this loss of human life.

In addition our country has turned its back on our armed service personnel and their special needs at a
stressful time. We want everybody to know how our government is allowing military personnel to return from
deployment with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) without providing treatment. Our government knowingly
exposes our troops to many risks that create long term health and mental health issues. 50% of the homeless in the
United States are veterans. Our veterans have served our country with honor and many are returning to face family
law issues. In 2009 6000 veterans took their own life. Studies are showing a high rate of suicides with our returning
military personnel we seek to correct this wrong. We have victims of Agent Orange that our government turns its
back on. It is time to put our troop’s needs first over money and profit. No child benefits when a parent takes their
own life. No community benefits when it turns its back on a homeless veteran. United we can take care of the
people that have protected us. It is our duty to our veterans in their time of need.

We acknowledge the negative impact litigation has or will have on your family’s assets. Patriots are victims
of a very complex organized system of funding social programs. This system will or has knowingly and willfully
suppressed you. We ask that you stand up and expose the truth. Build your energy level back up and do what you
can in a positive way to hold these public servants accountable. Your rights have and will be violated to aid the
family law system to obtain funding.

We pray that this report will aid in preventing this from happening in the future. The Mosquito report has
been assembled to provide the resources needed to provide hope and support and gain access to children. United
we can protect the public interest against corruption that places funding above human life and our veterans needs.
Get involved.

We thank each and every patriot and organization for their input to this public effort. We thank everyone
for the fight and sacrifices they have made. We want to show our armed service personal that we hear them. We
want to give them our highest praise for protecting our way of life and our children’s rights to access both parents.
We want to thank all parents for exposing Judicial Misconduct and Professional Misconduct of attorneys profiting
and preying on parents struggle to access their children. We want to thank every citizen for taking the time to help
make legislative changes that parents need. We want to thank each and every person who will join us making calls
and writing letters for legislative change, you are not alone with your struggle, and here is the information patriots
need. Let us protect the future of our children and the American Family and STOP CHILD ABUSE FOR PROFIT. We
seek to correct these wrongs against the public interest. A vote to remove a lawyer out of our legislation is a good
start.

Remember the effort of Senator (Georgia) Nancy Schaefer

Children’s Rights lost one of our strongest supporters. Nancy and her Husband’s death is surrounded with questions
some call it murder and we ask that you demand investigations into Nancy’s death. Nancy had the guts all
Americans can be proud of. Nancy exposed wide spread corruption in our Child Protective Services (CPS) honor her
effort please take the time to watch her speech. http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F
%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D_TcDTJlPWbE%26feature%3Drelated&h=de928g8A0WjEBoORrsU-
NC2Tc5w Please continue the efforts that Nancy exposed about our family law systems corruption.
 Table of Contents (Do not use not updated)

Table of Contents ……………………………………………………………………..………………………………………………………………..

1
Mosquito Report Objective …………………………….………………….……………………………………………………………………
3
Separation of Power “The Problem” and how it relates to family law ……………….……………………………………….
4
Your Children’s Rights and Presumption of Shared Parenting ….………………………………………………….…………….
5
Parental access to children (Your constitutional rights).…………….…..………………..…….………………………………...
6
Economic Impact of joint custody ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
7
COURT TIMEFRAMES AND SUA SPONTE MOTIONS…………………………………………………………………………………..
7
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) “Flight or Fight” ………………………………………………………………..
8
Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) and Frye test ……………………….…………………………………………….
9
Violence Against Woman Act (VAWA)………………………………………............................................................................
12
Bradley Amendment……………………......………………..…………………………………………………………………………..……………
12
Federal Racketeering Violations being covered up………………….……………………………………………………………………
13
Demand a Trial by Jury……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………..
13
Tape or Record All Hearings………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
13
SAMPLE MOTION TO RECORD ALL HEARINGS (Modify to fit your case and if you use an attorney remove #1.)……
14
Access to Justice……………………………….………………………………..……………………………………………………………………………….
15
Family Court Abuses of the Public ….............................................................................................................................
15
Know the “Enemy”……………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
16
Document Racketeering…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
16
Sample Affidavit………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………....
17
The Bigger Issue ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
17
Domestic Violence and Escalation of your conflict……………………………………………………………………………………………….
18
Divorce information and Internet Links……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
19
Supporting Reference Statutes Presumption of Shared Parenting…(Section break at page 21 number reset)……..
20
Parental rights a fundamental right……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
2?
Case law ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
2?
Reference Studies……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
2?

Stop Child Abuse For Profit

The Cause Stop Child Abuse for Profit is an effort to unite patriot groups with a common cause. We seek
to share information in a productive way. Groups are located at http://www.causes.com/causes/456380 please
look at member groups for further information. Each group has valuable resources and insight to help expose and
regain control of our family law system. In honor of Nancy Schaefer’s efforts to expose this corruption we intend to
carry on the fight to expose and hold the guilty accountable. We are fighting less than 1% of our total population of
the USA. These predators put their greed for profit and funding over the lives of children and parents “Funding
verse Human life”. We intend to correct this wrong. Join us to expose the truth and end the abuse.
Mosquito Report Objective
The objective of this report is to educate the public about peaceful alternatives to litigation and the traps
set by profit seeking legal professionals. We seek to make fundamental legislative changes to our family law system
across the United States. We seek both parties to control their anger towards the other parent and come to a
reasonable settlement and preserve assets to benefit their children. The information in this report will help to
avoid escalation of your issues by the legal profession. Remember the legal profession is a business and seeks to
profit from your conflict. Let us state this again the legal profession is a business and seeks to profit from your
conflict. Did you get the point they want your assets (money). We have assembled important information, case
laws, and statutes and provided legal forms within this report. Our objective is to take the profit out of conflicts and
aid the cost effective resolution of your dispute. We seek to preserve family assets for the benefit of your children.
The Best Interest of your children is not to pay attorneys and experts seeking to profit from your conflict. We seek
to expose the organized pattern of child abuse for profit with parental alienation tactics. Unite with us and join
the cause Stop Child Abuse For Profit.
The negative economic (loss of money) impact to yourself and family assets will be great if you enter
litigation. Avoid this at all costs your children need your assets not the legal profession. One of the largest causes
for foreclosure and bankruptcy is divorce. You will be told by attorneys that you can sell everything you own to pay
legal expenses to continue the conflict. Remember you have a choice to escalate the conflict or find a cost effective
settlement path. Think of the needs of your children. How would your paying attorneys, court appointed experts,
social workers benefit your children. We want to make this clear IT DOES NOT IN ANY WAY BENEFIT YOUR
CHILDREN. Science has proven absent neglect, abuse, abandonment children need both parents. Do not allow
attorneys to twist normal conflicts into domestic violence or abuse. We seek to expose these attorneys and
organizations extortion of the public, bring witnesses to meetings. Together we cannot be suppressed. Unite
with other parents’ groups.
An attorney or organization might “suggest” the use of domestic violence as a tactic. Do not fall into this
trap. They are creating a self servicing need for their services a “high conflict divorce or High conflict child custody
battle” is the result. Abraham Lincoln Quoted: “Never stir up litigation. A worse man can scarcely be found than
one who does this.” (Abraham Lincoln, 16th President from 1861 until his assassination in April 1865) Attorneys will
routinely not tell you that this tactic blocks mediation. Attorneys will not inform you that the use of this tactic will
affect the earning potential of the accused for the rest of their lives. This tactic stops parties from talking creating a
need for the additional services from the legal profession. This is a form of extortion under US Code. Make no
mistake attorneys routinely plan to extort your assets with this tactic. The routine miss use of domestic violence
funding by this tactic reduces resources needed for true victims of violence. Remember if you use this tactic for a
divorce you are taking these resources away from these victims. Attorney’s business objective is to create a conflict
from “custody battles”. Your focus must be to resolve your conflict with your opponent and not involve the
children. Keep the children out of the conflict and provide the best possible solution you can that meets the needs
of both parties. We seek to expose these organized extortion tactics to the United States Senate Judiciary
Oversight committee for large scale investigation of abuses of the public interests. We seek to have Federal
legislation past to Stop Child Abuse for Profit with a rebuttable presumption of shared parenting.
Child abuse comes in many forms and what the legal profession is fighting to conceal is Parental Alienation
Syndrome (PAS). This form of child abuse exposes the legal system to huge liabilities. The simple fact is the legal
profession routinely uses this tactic to start a child custody battle between parents to serve the self interest of the
legal profession for profit. Fact the legal system’s pattern to prey on the basic instincts of parents to protect their
children is exploited for profit. The legal system is preying on the parent child relationship to serve their interest of
profit. Remember this you and your children are the prey of the legal profession. Without your conflict they make
no money or have a job. We seek to expose how the legal profession singles out and suppresses Parental
Alienation Syndrome target parents with the use of Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP). We
seek to expose how attorneys routinely make it too expensive to fight this tactic. We seek to establish a
rebuttable presumption of shared parenting in the best interest of the children’s right to access both parents.
Expose the truth with PAS.
Stress and the child custody battle, the loss of a child is the most traumatic event any parent can
experience. When judges routinely strip access of parents to children without due cause, it causes Post Traumatic
Stress Disorder (PTSD). Judges and lawyers that knowingly and willfully do this to promote the self interest of the
legal profession are directly responsible for countless suicides and violent acts. Human basic instincts kick in when
parents are denied access to their children. On one hand some people become violent and misplace their anger
toward the other parent or children these acts serves the interest of the legal system. The fact is the judge and the
lawyers are responsible. On the other hand The Center for Disease Control (CDC) studies has shown that parents
and military service personnel are committing suicides at an increasing rate. These suicides do not serve the
purpose of the court and create a huge liability to the courts for the neglect of the public interests. The best
interest of the child is not served with the loss of a parent. We seek to require stress management counseling
during family law matters and return of deployed troops.
Remember someone always gets hurt in a divorce or custody battle. Know if you are hurt or mad and seek revenge
against your opponent do not involve the children. Do not drain financial resources to the legal profession that
could be used to benefit yourself and your children. Think of the children and remember you once loved your
opponent to the point of having a child in the first place. Any issues can be resolved without the involvement of
litigation. Seek to preserve your assets from profit seeking legal professionals and protect your children’s rights to
both parents. Know if you are fighting or fleeing (fight or flight). Calm down and take a breath. We seek to demand
state provide mediation services outside the predatory practices of the legal profession.
Campaign Tactics 101 to Stop Child Abuse for Profit
By: David M. Carlin
Please share this with everybody you can. Unite campaign efforts to protect our children.
Definitions:
Political Campaign: (As defined by Wikipedia) “Organize and Unify effort”
A political campaign is an organized effort which seeks to influence the decision making process within a
specific group. In democracies, political campaigns often refer to electoral campaigns, wherein
representatives are chosen or referendums are decided. Political campaigns also include organized efforts
to alter policy within any institution or organization.
Politics is as old as humankind and is not limited to democratic or governmental institutions.
Some examples of political campaigns are: the effort to execute or banish Socrates from Athens in the 5th
century BC, the uprising of petty nobility against John of England in the 13th century, or the 2005 push to
remove Michael Eisner from the helm of The Walt Disney Company.
Lobbying: (As define by Wikipedia) “Intention of influencing” Make points on issues do not vent and make it personal.
Lobbying (also Lobby) is a form of advocacy with the intention of influencing decisions made by legislators
and officials in the government by individuals, other legislators, constituents, or advocacy groups. A
lobbyist is a person who tries to influence legislation on behalf of a special interest or a member of a
lobby. Governments often define and regulate organized group lobbying that has become influential on
policy.
Political Objective:
Political Campaigns to implement change/introduce legislation must be clearly defined. Have
Amendment/Bill text worded in such a way to provide the maximum protection to the public interest.
Wording must be clear and remove elements that can be manipulated by judicial members. Keep it Simple
Solution (KISS) tactics remove legal interpretation and loop holes. Identify voting records of past efforts of
legislators. Remove opposition support by lobbying with truthful facts. Organize lobbying with truthful
facts to discredit opposition’s misinformation on issues. Campaigns must use tactics to identify and
remove “gatekeepers” that prevent the decision maker from obtaining the information on the issues.
Identify legislators that have a clear conflict of interest and remove them from votes. Remove special
interest groups with public testimony on issues. Issues must create public outcry to demand change.
Motivate your teams to make legislative change show how they can make a difference.
Campaign goals:
A campaign must be unified in its efforts. Efforts must be taken to achieve the goals in a cost effective
manner. Tactics to set obtainable goals must be used. Public awareness must be increased on the issues.
Educate public servants on the issues with truthful facts. Public support for pro issue legislators must be
provided. Funding for campaign efforts must be raised. Many campaigns are won with public support and
volunteer efforts. Long term public education on issues must be implemented. Information is power in a
campaign. Information will create public outcry. Educate the public on issues and they will help. Motivate
 your teams to educate others.
Overview:
The purpose of this report is to help tactics to become unified. This report outlines the basics of campaign
tactics. These efforts have been proven to get results. The outline is a guide on the steps to use in an
effective campaign. Volunteers willing to do any stage of the campaign must be provided information and
support in a timely manner. Freedom to help is a key issue. Provide the tools volunteers need to get the
job done. Do not place barriers in front of volunteers. Listen to volunteer feedback on tactics that get
results. Remember every person willing to help makes a difference. Some will help with the placement of a
bumper sticker. Some will hit the streets. Some will hit the phones. Many will do what it takes to win. The
objective is to allow them to do what they are willing to do. Your task is to recruit volunteers and be ready
for their help. Get your information ready for distribution and provide support. Motivate those that have
been suppressed by failure. Show how they can make a difference.
The success of your campaign efforts depends on others remember this. You are not alone. So
communicate with everybody willing to help. A solution for an issue can be broken down into steps.
Address simple and straight forward steps so everybody can run with the solution. Even the most complex
issues can be addressed with small set goals to achieve the overall goal. Outline the steps needed and
execute the plan. Campaigns are organic in nature and compromises can be made to obtain the objective so
keep an open mind. Always look for good solutions with sound tactics. Learn effective ways to motivate
your teams. Motivate your teams with success.
Tactic Outline: (Motivating teams will be a challenge to overcome. Use simple tactics to show small results.)
Before you get overwhelmed with these tactics remember each step can be broken down to many levels.
The objective is to find someone at each level willing to take on a task. Communication is a key factor to
successful campaign tactics. Remember which level you are working on District, State, Federal, and United
Nations. Always make a choice to be effective. Fragmentation of efforts can result with campaign failure.
There is no place for egos in a successful campaign. We must succeed. We must make change. The word
“We” is the key word. Never use the word ‘I’ build your team with “WE”. Remember even if you make the
choice to just do one task it is part of the bigger picture. You are not alone in your efforts. Communicate
share information and build teams.
Tactics: (Motivate your teams to do something positive every day. Show how small tasks matter to succeed.)
 Fund raising: Public funding support comes in many forms each is needed: money i.e. donations and
grants are just one form of funding. Other forms of funding include: volunteer efforts, volunteer
contributions i.e. printing, mailing, emails, Social networking, etc. seek all forms of funding. Be open-
minded to the savings when people step forward to give time and efforts. Make it easy for them to help
money is not always the answer.
 Political fans: Research lawmakers voting record on their stand. Know if they support your issues and
support Pro-lawmakers. Help them stay in office and support their campaign efforts. Place key information
on social networks by cutting and pasting videos and truthful information. Publicly bring your issues to
other fans of the pro lawmaker. Most will keep your information on their networks.
 Contact lawmakers: Goggle your State General assembly and learn how to use their web sites. Build
General assembly lists with phone numbers and emails. Use email lists to distribute information to all
legislators. Know your districts legislators and provide information to other citizens of your district with
form letters and sample testimony. Make it easy for others to send letters and make calls to your
lawmakers. Give citizens the information they need in one email. This creates public outcry on your issue.
 Calls to law makers: Obtain phone numbers from your General Assembly. Find people willing to make calls
and remind them to follow up. Inform your network to make statements like: I support the presumption of
equal custody Bill number. Inform the lawmaker of your support on specific issues.
Make sure information is collect as a survey by aids. Make follow-up calls a day or two latter.
 Letters emails to lawmakers: Create mailing lists of people that support your issues. Provide form
letters/contact information on your issues to your networks. Help your networks be effective in contacting
lawmakers. A simple tactic is to provide all contact information for key lawmakers on your “Call to Action”
request letter. Provide an attachment and sample text in your email that they can modify and send. Ask
your network to place their name and information in the form letter and print it make copies and mail it.
We also ask that they email it by providing key lawmakers emails. Save them time take huddles out of
 your requests. This way they are more likely to take action and spend a few stamps. Make this task easy
for anybody to do.
 Personal visits to lawmakers: This is always a challenge due to the lawmaker’s session schedule and off
season schedule. The best thing to do is find out what day they are in the office and make a scheduled
visit. Make sure you have a set appointment and confirm it a day or two before you go. A good tactic is
to provide some information to the lawmaker in the form of emails or letters before you arrive. Always
bring copies of key information you want to make a point with on your issue. Support you issues with facts
the lawmaker can use. Be polite and respect their time make your points and provide your facts. Ask for
their support. Ask if they could provide names of other lawmakers they think will provide support. DO
NOT VENT, communicate facts on issues.
 Town hall meeting: These meeting provide an open forum to either expose issues or discredit
misinformation in a public setting. Properly framed questions can spark a public debate on issues. Frame
questions around economic impact to the community or loss of freedoms or life. The key is to be truthful
and expose deceptions that are against the public interest. Motivate others to attend meeting so they can
be heard.
 Electing pro-lawmakers: Sometimes you will find it is better to support a new candidate and get rid of a
gatekeeper as a lawmaker. Some lawmakers that have held office for many terms become problems when
it comes to changes. Promote and support campaign efforts for those who support your issues.
 Getting out the vote effort: One of the most important factors is to get the vote out. Recruit campaign
volunteers, yard signs, bumper stickers, provide canvas help to lawmakers and issues. The vote is
important when it comes to issues the citizens must hold lawmakers accountable to properly represent
their public outcry. If the lawmaker does not receive public outcry they will vote for special interest groups
needs. This has become a huge problem for this public because judicial members are taking control of our
legislative process. They are a special interest group protecting the needs of the courts. So one of the most
important aspects to preserve our form of government is to educate your volunteers about separation of
power. The right of the people to make laws not special interest groups. Educate them on how to identify
conflicts of interest with practicing attorneys running for public office. Expose how attorneys self promote
members of their profession into positions of power. Do not vote for lawyers is a simple tactic to take back
control of the votes.
 Yard signs: Good placement of a yard sign can make or break a campaign. Get supports of your issue to
place signs in their yards. Each yard sign accounts for 3-4 votes. Go to local printers and have yard signs
made for your issues. See if they can donate some of the expense to help expose your issue. Ask for
discounts don’t be shy.
 Using Social networks: Warning the judicial branch members are trying to scare people from using these
forums. They have become very powerful tools with little to no expense to rally people behind an issue.
Keep your campaign efforts separate from personal profiles. Build Face book, Tweeter, Linked In, etc.
networks to share/educate with information. Learn how to share data quickly with cut and paste
operations with form document. This tactic allows you to paste information quickly on friends’ links. Share
links with tab functions and use information spaces to spread information at a glance. It is best to set your
page with information the grabs people’s attention within seconds. Do not make them hunt for
information. Listen to their needs.
 School newspapers: One of the fastest growing voter segments is young voters 18-29 year olds. Get them
evolved in your efforts. Have volunteers submit prepared articles for their school newspapers. Ask for
more volunteers in your article and place contact info with social networks and email address for students
to use. If funding permit help student make a few extra bucks by paying them for some tasks. Have young
voters activate their voting networks. Young voters are very strong with internet and multi-media
technologies. Request their help to expand your effectiveness. Get writers involved to write stories etc.
Keep an open mind. Listen to their needs.
 Letters to editors: This is a form of free press on key issues with little to no expense. The tactic is to simply
write letters about the issues, not venting letters. Create clean to the point letters on your issues and
provide them to editors of newspapers and magazines. Also send these letters to newsletters that address
 your topics. Seek every outlet to have your “letters to the editor” published. Be persistent in your
publishing efforts. Have other members of your social networks prepare and submit “letter to the Editor”
 Media networks: Prepare press releases on issues and send them to media clearing houses in the form of
press releases. You can also build your own media networks by creating mailing lists. Your media list
should contain contact information on reporters that do stories on your issues. Release video and news
issues to all forms of media such as internet boards, Radio, TV, newspapers, News Letters, civic groups, etc.
Build you media networks to expose your issues to build a much larger support base. Reporters that do
stories on your issues have a following a fan base. Help reporters do the stories if they seek your help. Get
on camera whenever you can to explain the issues. Stay calm and support your issues with facts. Find a
story need and fill it.
 Utilizing resources: This can be tricky because you need to find place where people gather with similar
interests. For example if your issue involves the health care profession you would want to seek the help of
hospital worker. Another example would be if the issue promotes guns you would seek the help of gun
shop owners. The tactic is to find where people hang out that share the issues and seek the help of that
place or business. You could ask a store owner to have a sign in a window or have a petition for interested
parties to sign. Many business owners are willing to help you just need to educate them and get them
involved. Remember make it easy for them with no cost. Provide what they need to help. A good item to
provide is a point of sale display with handouts. This way the business owner will be more willing to
educate others on the issue. Remember to follow-up and provide support to the business owners. Always
ask if they can have people sign a petition with their contact information. Collect the contact information
and follow-up with thank you emails. Always thank people that signed your petitions.
 Bumper sticker: Each bumper sticker accounts for 3-300 votes. Bumper stickers are an inexpensive way to
get free long term exposure on issues. Keep them simple with the biggest message possible. Pass them
out at Rallies and events. Provide them to your social networks. Share the artwork with groups willing to
print and distribute the issues. Always have an online store for your items. Use PayPal to make it easy for
purchases and donations.
 Stickers and buttons: The political button has a long history. They have been used to raise money and
promote candidates and expose issues. Buttons need to be distributed every chance you get. Sell them to
raise money and give them away at events and rallies. The same applies to stickers which are much
cheaper to product than bumper stickers. Always have online sales for your items. Make it easy for
interested parties to buy your items.
 Flyers and postcards: Flyers are great for handouts when you need to furnish more information on an
issue or candidate. However a more cost effective approach is to produce postcard. The economics are
simple for ever ream of paper you get four times the exposure. Simply create a postcard layout to address
your issues use both front and back for hand outs. Use one side for mailing campaigns. You can keep the
cost to a minimum by printing in one color on color stock paper. Once printed just cut the paper into
fourths. We suggest using a heavy weight paper. Create your artwork and share it so anybody with a
printer can product the postcards for distribution. Keep your message simple and unified though out your
network. Remember fragmentation of efforts leads to failure of campaigns. Have your material ready for
the public pass it out. Distribute it in a productive way.
 Research sources: Know your facts. Do your due diligence on the issues. Proper research and truthful
statements wins support. Dirty tactics of misinformation has become the norm of operation for some
campaign managers. Take the high road and expose the truth. There are main sources for facts try to find
information that has no t been biased by funding. Some reports are commissioned for an organization to
meet the need of that organization funding requirements. Keep this in mind. Look for facts generated to
protect the public interest and independent of funding needs. This will remove the biased opinions. Start
your research on the internet with searches on organizations like the Congressional Research Service,
Federal agencies like CDC, etc. Simple Google searches can lead you to much useful information. We must
warn you not to become focused on one source of information. Change up your search engines to find
more information. Above all check your facts. Expose failures of due diligence and false representation of
facts. Representing facts in a deceptive manner is a crime.
 Identify gatekeepers: Gatekeepers are aids and office workers who block information to the Lawmaker.
They impose their own political views on the lawmaker receipt of information. A simple tactic to expose
them is to send letters to the lawmaker and follow up with calls to see if the lawmaker received them. If
the aid or office worker says no you have a gatekeeper problem. Lawmakers can be gatekeepers on issues
also. An example would be if a lawyer is a legislator and practices family law. They might become a
gatekeeper on family law issues in a general assembly. They establish themselves as an expert on family
law within the general assembly and become the “go to” person other legislators lean on for information.
This is how fundamental corruption takes place. A single person is able to block issues they do not agree
with. A conflict of interest exists when a practicing lawyer promotes and or influences legislation they will
profit from. Lawyers (judicial members) are a special interest group within our legislations and you must
develop tactics to defeat them. We have separation of power laws and professional misconduct rules your
can research to disbar and or impeach legislators. Demand enforcement of our laws in these cases.
 Celebrity support: Recruit public figures to support the issues, they are triggers for public support. When
celebrity figures support an issue many people will join in. Any type of celebrity can add momentum to
your efforts so keep an open mind. Expose them to your issues with social networks letters etc. Find
management companies that promote the celebrities. Educate the managers on the issue and ask if they
know anybody that would support your issues. Invite interested celebrities to your events and rallies. Ask
them to do public service announcements on your issues. Ask the management companies to help with
public awareness and funding ideas.
 Events and Rallies: First get the proper permits to hold an event and rally. With permit in hand you can
organize your activities around your resources. Be prepared and organized have clear signs and schedules
for location.
 Entertainment: Get the entertainment industry involve in your campaign. Educate them on the issue and
provide facts they can use. Cable TV networks and public TV stations are always looking for new ideas on
shows and topics to cover. Give them one.
 Documentaries: Help anybody that wants to make a documentary on your issue. These can get the
message out very quickly if done right. Even home film techniques posted to social networks can have a
huge impact on issues.
 Film production: Get involved by sending your ideas and topics to writers and studios. Educate the writers
on the issues with facts and support your facts with sources make it easy for them to research the issue.
 TV Shows: Contact writers and educate them on the issues. The tactic is to get them to write the issue into
a show. Many writers are willing to help they just need facts and information to allow their imaginations to
work the issue into a story. Help them learn the issues.
Message from the Face book cause: STOP CHILD ABUSE FOR PROFIT (Share information to unite efforts and educate
legislators)
Organized Judicial abuse exposes our children and parents to two known DSM listed issues “PTSD and
Depression” that are known to increase the risk of suicides. CDC violent death reports (30k/year) confirm U.S.
death ratios with 3 male deaths to 1 female death. Our children deserve our organized legislative efforts. Sample:
“Absent abuse neglect and abandonment there shall be a rebuttable presumption of equal custody and equal legal
custody. Abuse is defined by the State’s criminal code. Any person found to abuse the children’s right to access
both parent will be subject to felony child abuse.”
Unite, Recruit, Educate and Expose corruption, Hold the corrupt
accountable.
Funding and Grants:
A prepared fundraising report is below. Please use this report as a guideline to develop fundraising
objectives for your organization. Remember this is the beginning of a good fundraising program. Your must have a
defined plan broken down to objectives. Seek funding partners that support your issues. Do not become part of the
problem and create a need for the parent conflicts to use children as weapons. Seek funding sources that remove
conflict this way your organization can be a true child advocacy group.
Neglect of the public’s responsibility to protect human life is becoming a real issue. We must identify
programs that abuse public funding and terminate their funding with public exposure. Stop funding that exploits
the child parent relationship. Demand grand jury investigations by submitting statement of charges directly to the
grand jury. Do not submit your allegations to Police Commissioners or States Attorney’s offices they are
gatekeepers on these issues.
The below fundraising report should be used to create a fair unbiased organization that protects your
children’s rights to see both parent. We suggest your efforts focus to stop the organized abuse of the child parent
relationship, Promote non violence, and public accountability. This is the first step in a proper fundraising effort. Do
your due diligence and good luck.

Radar’s Fundraising Program Outline Report

Prepared by: David M. Carlin
Executive outline:
Respecting Accuracy in domestic Abuse Reporting (RADAR) a 501c organization established as a leader of
distinction for statistical information on tracking domestic violence. RADAR is positioned to obtain private,
institutional, corporate, State, Federal contributions by a well defined fundraising plan. Time and effort to
undertake a very deliberate and thoughtful planning process to guide the future of the organization’s fundraising.
The objective of this plan is to outline the organizations fundraising plan for the next 5 years. The organization’s
Fundraising Priorities will serve as a blueprint to help RADAR focus its vision and achieve its goals. This report is to
identify possible sources of funding and define organizational needs of raising $25million.
http://www.mediaradar.org/index.php
RADAR’S Background:
RADAR is a non-profit (501c), non-partisan organization of women and men working to improve the effectiveness
of our nations approach to solving domestic violence.
RADAR’S Mission Statement:
Despite the best intentions, our nation’s effort to curb domestic violence is not working. Current solutions not only
fail to reduce domestic violence, but also create other severe problems. Families are being undermined and
children harmed. Innocent Americans are penalized based on false accusations. Victims of violence are re-
victimized by a rigid system that ignores their wishes, or excludes them altogether.
Emphasis for Fundraising:
RADAR’s Board of Trustees outlined several major areas of emphasis for fundraising. Accomplishing progress on
these priorities will require heightened levels of teamwork, collaboration and an army of dedicated fundraising and
professionals working in concert to demonstrated philanthropic success of the organization:
1. Statistical research with database maintenance and ongoing website updates
2. Public awareness (outreach to other organizations, white paper material, placement)
3. Public reporting (Inclusion on government reporting forms, evaluation, crisis, CPS)
4. Legislative awareness link(Lobby to stop disinformation by individuals with a bias)
5. Public support services (Data base of resource per state)
6. Collaboration with other non-profit organizations (Link placed on websites and printed material)
(Breakdown islands of information, distribute, target “report creation”)

Identify funding sources:

1. Identify generous private contributors. “Friends and donors”
 Target wealthy individuals with mailings or events
 Provide donation area on website (“Dollar for Dad”) National Campaign
 Booths at area events (Washington D.C. Mall events)
 Trade shows (Low cost public awareness)
2. Identify State programs (What need do they have can we fill a need? Time frames.)
 Family support programs (Low income, At risk, Mediation, crisis centers)
 Child support (Child Protective Services, Dead Beat DADs, Dead Beat Mothers)
 Education of public School programs (Prevention, awareness, support)
 Police Departments State and County (Education, outreach, prevention)
 3. Identify State funds available (What programs, funding criteria, and point of contact?)
 Department of Economic Development ( inner city, enterprise zones)
 Crisis Centers “awareness”(intervention, mediation, mental health)
 Youth programs (Education, prevention)
 Low income families (support, prevention, mediation)
 At Risk Programs (Children, teen parents, victims)
 Sheriff’s departments (outreach, prevention)
 Justice System (legal clinics, pro bono, Family departments, Family Evaluators)
4. Identify State matching fund programs and criteria for private contributors.
 Locate matching programs (Fill a need)
 Obtain requirements (Forms, timeframes, signer)
 Limits
5. Identify Federal programs administered at state level (Can we fill a need?)
 Social Security
 Health and Human Services
 Centers for Disease Control
 National Security
 National Institutes of Health
 Department of Justice
6. Identify Sources of Federal funds. (Can we fill a need?)
 Small Business Innovative Research Grants ( HHS, NIH, DOD, CDC, S.S., )
 Large Institutional Grant programs (Piggy back services)
 Large Educational Grant programs (Piggy back services, education)
 Prime Contractor (Small business contracts, Blanket purchase Agreements)
 Established Federal Social programs (What need do they have can we fill a need?
7. Social groups to aid fundraising (Lions, Moose, Knights of Columbus, VFW, Shiners, etc)
 Provide material for donations and support at meeting.
 Request help on issues (Activate membership for legislative support phone calls, letters, emails
make it simple and easy for members to help)
 Newsletters articles (Whitepapers, Email articles)
8. Religious groups (all religions provide social support at some level)
 Weekly Flyer ads (public service, Free)
 Request help on issues (Activate membership for legislative support phone calls, letters, emails
make it simple and easy for members to help)
 Workshops and support groups.
9. Large support institutions (United Way, Salvation Army, Purple Heart, Red Cross)
 United Way listed Organization
 Support services to other larger Institutions
 Response services
10. Foundations (Private, Public (Corporations), Institutional (Banks, Insurance Companies)
11. Insurance Industry (Prevention needs, Program Cost reduction)
12. Media (Television, Internet, Radio, Newspapers)

Funding Background and Facts:

Fundraisers must keep an open mind and be willing to adapt to the needs of the source of funding. Many needs are
close to services and products provided by the organization seeking funding. It is important to listen closely to the
specifications of the needs and decide if funding goals can be meet with adaptations of services and products.
As fundraising activity starts it is important to keep in mind that Government funded programs rarely place all
money allocated. These programs have a desire to spend these funds to maintain annual funding levels. It is the
objective of the fundraiser to find unspent money and proposed sources of money. Fundraisers must find needs of
the source of money and timeframes to obtain the funds. Many programs have strict proposal guidelines and
timeframes. As these guidelines are meet funding criteria must be complete and meet the specifications of the
organization providing funds.
Insurance organizations like to save money and if you can show how they can save money by funding your
programs they will provide funds. Insurance organizations are providing more prevention resources and any way
you can reduce higher cost claims will justify funding. Co-op programs provided by Workmen’s Compensation
Insurance can provide low cost employees and equipment for retraining of injured people. These programs reach
out to communities and require placement and information.
Organizations have needs for information and if these needs can be meet by selling reports or providing services at
costs it is a source of funds. Costs are established to conform to 501c requirements. The need for information is an
open door to many sources of funding by providing reports, white papers, weekly and monthly newsletter.
Identification of the need for information for government agencies and legislation branches can provide grants as
sources of funding.
Grants provide funds at many levels and small organizations can piggyback on large organizations if they provide
services as a subcontractor. Many large organizations place smaller grants for specific research issues. Small
business Innovative Research (SBIR) programs exist with many government agencies for research issues. These
programs provide basic guidelines on topics but are generally looking outside the box. Research departments get to
close to a subject and can become stale and require fresh ideas on topics this is one function of SBIR. Fresh
research becomes a good source of funding and requires papers to be submitted for review. Timing is a big issue
with grant programs and deadlines are linked to funding cycles of allocated funds.
Allocated funds can come in many forms and depending on the organization require a formal proposal process. This
proposal process can be expedited by creating boilerplate responses. Boilerplates are general aspects of your
organization that can be modified to conform to various requests for proposals (RFP). Boilerplate information
should be saved and built upon as your organization gains more capabilities. Key employees and researchers with
the proper background are needed to expand an organization fundraising.
Research grants require key personnel resumes so it is in the best interest of the organization to assemble updated
resumes of the staff of the organization. Organization should hire individuals that meet many demands of funding
sources. Education levels and employment history of staff become important measures for competing for funding.
Organizations that have the personnel with the proper required background and expertise will secure more
funding.
Don’t be shy ask for what you need and want. Projections of the annual operational costs of your organization
should be prepared and updated on a regular basis. Funding requires budgets and a prepared financial statement
with operational cost should be prepared and submitted when required. Larger funding amounts can be easier to
obtain than small amounts. Key amounts for seeking funding on an annual basis are $5million and $25million.
Dollar for Dad:
To create a funding source for all Father’s right groups and to start cohesion among efforts an umbrella organization
on a national scale could be created. This organization could have a pilot study in the local area around Washington
D. C. The program would place collection boxes in men’s organizations, nightclubs, churches etc. with support
documentation. The cost would be boxes and collection of boxes. Best placement objectives would be
accomplished by broad pilot program locations. A data base of clubs such as Lions, Moose, Shrines, etc would need
to be created with meeting times. With permission a guest speaker could explain the campaign to the members
and ask for help

Conclusion:
Set the goals for fundraising and secure resources to achieve the funding. Use many sources of recruitment for
fundraising and provide easy to use forms and links to receive funds. Have a clear defined plan for fundraising with
many tiers and sources to stabilize income.
Separation of power “ The Problem” and how it relates to family law
Stop voting for Attorneys to enter public office. Take a look at their campaign funding and you will find the
legal profession self promote each other into office. The campaign funding trail demonstrates how this takes place
it is available to the public (online) ask where in your state. Key committees on the state and federal level are
controlled by judicial members (lawyers) effectively placing one class of Americans in control of our society. As of
this date the Unite States Senate Judiciary oversight committee is made up of 19 members 13 are lawyers. Our
form of government (federal and state levels) has three branches each service a control purpose. They are the
executive branch (president’s and governor’s veto power), the legislative branch (Senate, House creates laws),
judicial branch (enforcement of laws). Fact the Constitution of the United States clearly demands a separation of
power. Many state’s Constitutions also demand a separation of power. The purpose was to provide a balance to the
people. As we elect more members of the Judicial branch into the legislative branch the basic balance of our
society becomes imbalanced. With no balances, corruption expands for lack of controls and oversight. It is common
knowledge that attorneys do not prosecute each other for misconduct. Remember it is misconduct for an attorney
not to report misconduct. As misconduct rules become overlooked and the duty of the legal profession for self
enforcement is neglected corruption expands. No self enforcement of judicial members truly exists to protect the
public’s interests. Today there are approximately 1.3 million attorneys (potential gatekeepers) in the United States
and this is less than 1/3rd of 1%percent of our total population. Such a small amount of people has seized control of
our form of government. The public must demand public oversight of the Judicial Branch and hold them
accountable to our laws.
The above might sound like no big deal on the first glance but think about how it affects every aspect of
our lives. We will focus on family laws and protection of our children. As an example in the state of Maryland we
have a “gatekeeper” she is a delegate that practices family law and has become the “go to” person with family law
matters in the general assembly. She also sat on the attorney grievance commission and has sat on listening events
for the access to justice hearing events. She has presented Bills for the determination of child custody in Maryland.
What she doesn’t want the public to know is that her co-counsel on a case has defended a child pornography
defendant. This is a true conflict of interests first she makes her living from laws she is creating, second she
associates with defenders of child pornography, third she accepted input to her Bill from the defender of child
pornography, forth the Bill presented are not in the best interest of the public, fifth she is promoting the profit
seeking interests of her profession over the public’s. During the access to justice hearings she listens to public
outcry for mediation and to remove children from custody issues.
The impact of a single “gatekeeper” can block the interest of the public. As the example above shows a
gatekeeper can also be anybody who “trashes” important information and prevents the decision maker from
making a proper judgment on the issue. A simple way to test for gatekeepers is to send letters to your legislators,
after a few days call the legislator to see if the letters have been received and presented to your legislator. If no
letters have been received, you have a gatekeeper problem.
The enforcement of professional misconduct is the duty of the judicial branch. However it is a known fact
that attorneys will not report misconduct on another attorney. The way to expose this is to simply bring two
collaborating witnesses to an attorney’s office and inform the attorney of misconduct or a criminal act of another
attorney. You must meet the threshold of “Probable Cause” with your information and documents. Remember it is
the responsibility of the profession to enforce the rules of professional misconduct. Read your states rules of
professional misconduct and document and expose it in the public’s interests. We are seeking public oversight of
the Attorney Grievance process for the neglect of the professions responsibility to enforce misconduct. Educate
your legislators and file legislative grievances and demand public oversight of the judicial branch in your state.
Attorneys verses Pro Se
Learn about free legal clinics, pro se projects and you law libraries in your state. Learn how to represent
yourself in order to avoid litigation. Always interview attorneys for free do not pay a fee for the interview. The
“right to counsel” is your right under the sixth and fourteenth amendment. If you cannot afford an attorney ask for
accommodations and have one appointed. What you need to know is that you have the right to timely hearings (To
be heard) so get to know the assignment office of the court. Attorneys will delay and schedule hearings so you have
to pay additional fees. Keep your hearings within your needs not the needs of the attorney or courts profit seeking
objective. Known bias exists for represented litigants. The courts abuse the unrepresented (Pro Se) litigant and
deny access to justice with the courts abuse of discretion.
If you enter litigation demand a trial by jury first thing and remember attorneys provide a service to you
they work for you. Yes they have to make a living but do not sign retainers that allow them to charge for large
blocks of time. Review the fee structure be carefully and negotiate items to make them reasonable. Most attorneys
charge their hourly rate when they make copies; travel time, phone calls and research etc. document your dealings
with them to protect yourself. Always provide a 1099 to them for tax purposes and get receipts for each payment
you make. Read the rules of professional misconduct and expose any violations. A common tactic used to protect
the legal profession is to discredit parents and suppress opposition with expensive litigation. Their objective is to
get a list of assets quickly so they know how much they can strip with legal fees and associated experts. The pattern
is to single out a parent and discredit them the main tool they use is your children. What I mean by this is the legal
profession does not produce a product they provide a service. They provide a service that in many cases for
something they have created. This is the very definition of extortion used to create a conflict for the increased fees
for their services. We need to have more public oversight of the judiciary branch and its members. CREATE public
outcry with your General Assembly and Congress for public oversight.

Your Children’s Rights and Presumption of Shared Parenting

The most important issue is the Children. The children have a fundamental right to see both parents. The
court uses the term “in the best interest of the children” as a smoke screen to promote parental alienation tactics
to strip parents access to children. Protect your children from the legal system. Parental alienation will damage the
children for the rest of their lives. We need every parent to keep the children out of their fight. What is said and
what is practiced by the legal system are two separate things. It is becoming routine for facts about normal
parental relationships to be twisted into domestic violence, spousal abuse, and child abuse these false accusations
must be documented. Early statistics are showing that 80% of accusations are unfounded, or worse, planned and
executed. The country of India has taken measures to remove domestic violence due to the fact of high level of
abuses. “Never stir up litigation. A worse man can scarcely be found than one who does this.” (Abraham Lincoln,
16th President) When a false accusation plan is executed the sole purpose is to circumvent due process of law
and gain control of custody of children and assets. This creates an unfair advantage, a violation of Rules of
professional misconduct by the party that executed the plan. Courts will routinely overlook this misconduct due to
the “political nature” of these cases. What happens in these cases is a parent is stripped of their access to their
children (Parental Alienation Syndrome and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). Please seek to modify the
determination of child custody and support a presumption of shared parenting in your state. Let’s keep our
children away from the lawyers and legal system. Stop Child Abuse for Profit. President Abraham Lincoln warned
of this in his quote:
"Discourage litigation.  Persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can.  Point out to them how the
nominal winner is often a real loser -- in fees, expenses and waste of time.  As a peacemaker, the lawyer has a
superior opportunity of being a good man.  There will still be business enough." (Abraham Lincoln, 16th President)
Reasons for Support a Presumption of Shared Parenting
1. A custody decision should focus upon the U.S. constitutional custody rights and responsibilities of parents first
and the unfitness of parents afterwards. The "Best interests of children" are typically served by encouraging and
facilitating maximum involvement among both parents and children. Absent abuse neglect and abandonment
the children deserve access to both parents.

2. Since courts currently award joint custody as it relates to the decision-making abilities of parents, the courts are
rarely presented with a true and accurate picture due the contentiousness of divorces, the adversarial climate of
family courts, and their historically biased custody rulings favoring a single parent (mothers) in 88% of
cases.

3. Current law requires trial courts to make findings on requests for joint custody. Instead there should be a
statutory presumption of joint physical custody. Trial courts should make findings on reasons for not
awarding joint physical custody.

4. Where trial courts must determine custody under existing child custody factors, mothers receive sole physical
 custody in the overwhelming majority of cases. Fathers are required to separate motion separately for visitation
(parenting time) in order to exercise their parental responsibilities.

5. Joint custody awards should not necessarily reflect the voluntary distribution of parental involvement in an
intact household prior to divorce. The environment of a two-household, non-intact family will place new
demands upon parents and children alike.

6. A joint physical custody award will practically guarantee a greater involvement of both parents in the lives and
activities of their children. Typical visitation (parenting time) awards hamper the involvement of both parents in
their child's development post divorce. Custody awards to unmarried mothers seldom involve adequate child
visitation of fathers.

7. The definition of an unfit parent is easily defined by the U.S. constitution and upheld by the U.S. Supreme
Court. This definition is limited to physical, psychological, or child abuse. If parental unfitness were to be
defined by current Maryland domestic violence statutes, it would be so broad that few parents (married or
otherwise) would be deemed fit to parent.

8. There are indeed times when joint physical/legal custody is not in the best interest of the children, but these
times are the exceptions and involve actual physical, psychological, or child abuse.

9. These changes will dramatically reduce the documented bias of custody awards by state trial courts. Further it
will reduce litigation and its associated costs. Further it will preserve the marital assets for the minor children.

10. These changes will encourage both parents to remain accessible to their children. Court discretion can be
utilized to determine specific physical custody durations based upon circumstances. Presumption of 50/50 for
physical custody.

11. MARYLAND CASE LAW: In Maryland there is case law already established Kimberly Boswell v. Robert G.
Boswell (Boswell v. Boswell, 352 Md. 204, 721 A.2d 662(1998)) quoted from court clarifying the best interest
standard:(b) in making a determination of legal and physical custody under this subtitle, the court shall give
primary consideration to the best interest of the child. Reasonable maximum exposure to each parent is
presumed to be in the best interest of the child. The Maryland Court of Appeals overruled this decision and
stated as part of their decision, “We seek to clarify that only one standard is used in determining whether to
restrict parental visitation in the presence of non-marital partners, bests interests of the child, but we also
want to emphasize that when a court is engaging in a best interests analysis, reasonable maximum exposure
to each parent is presumed to be in the best interests of the child.” (352 Md. 204, at 214.) This language was
important as it was the first time a Maryland state court has mentioned any presumption towards both
parents, at least in any published opinion.

Some have claimed that Boswell was really a case about gay rights, and only nominally discussed this issue of a
presumption towards maximum reasonable exposure. For a time, it seemed that the courts were also treating
Boswell in such a manner. However, we have recently found a 2007 Court of Special Appeals case applying
Boswell. In Gordon v. Gordon (174 Md.App. 583, 923 A.2d 149 (Md.App., 2007).), the Court of Special
Appeals took up the case of a father who was attempting to modify a custody order to have the time split 50-
50. While the court ruled that 50-50 was not the meaning of maximum reasonable exposure, the court did
report favorably on the presumption first articulated is Boswell and did not rule that this presumption was just
dicta. Furthermore, the court noted that the custody arrangement currently in place for the Gordons afforded
Mr. Gordon every other weekend from Thursday night through Monday morning and Wednesday morning
through Thursday morning on alternate weeks. It should not go without noting that the one published case
citing Boswell’s presumption language had a custody arrangement that was much more equitable than most.

Parental Access to Children

 Listed below is a section of case law that has been established in support of constitutional right to have
access to your children. These cases have established parental rights from a constitutional stand point. However be
aware that state appointed judges will violate your rights to add expense to your conflict and meet their funding
requirements. The family court system is basically a divorce industry that preys on one parent’s anger for profit.
The objective of the court is to strip one parent’s access to their children. Remember this fact a system has been
developed to exploit your parental instincts and take your money.
Do not fall into the trap of allowing legal professionals to exploit your parental instincts to protect and
nurture your children. Both parties have these instincts. The best way for both parties to win is to allow equal
access to children when possible. Absent abuse neglect and abandonment this should be in the form of joint
physical and joint legal custody. It has been proven that parents that pay child support that have access continue
to pay. Use mediators to establish fair child support payments for both parents using you state’s child support
guidelines. Again do not allow legal professionals to exploit your parental instincts to protect and nurture your
children. Fight for the presumption of shared parenting and seek the best interest of your children is to have
access to both parents and preserve family assets. Expose how the courts use PTSD and depression to obtain the
courts funding.
We seek to expose how the legal profession uses parental access to promote the need for their services.
When a judge demonstrates their prejudice and strips a parent of access with no cause, it is judicial misconduct.
When a judge abuses their discretion and strips a parent of access to their children, it is judicial misconduct. What
these court actions do is promote the need for legal services. The judges are aiding attorneys to collect fees for
their services. What needs to be proven is simply that two or more judges or attorneys are involved and you have a
racketeering charge which is a US Code violation. To establish this show how the courts striped you of your access
to your children without any proof being presented. Demonstrate how you informed your attorney. Lastly
demonstrate how the courts routinely have ex parti communications with attorneys without your presence.
The simple fact is judges will abuse their discretion and demonstrate prejudice to obtain their objectives.
Their first objective is to extract the maximum assets from the at risk family. The second objective is to obtain child
support enforcement funding. This latter objective requires that one party is subjected to child support. This is
accomplished by creating a conflict over your children. The conflict as outlined earlier creates a need for legal
services. What happens is one parent is given control of the assets and the sense that they are in control. The fact
is the courts have control and are aiding lawyers to extort funds from your family. The other parent is at a
disadvantage because they need access to assets to obtain adequate legal representation. This tactic is the routine
pattern. The system will isolate and suppress one parent that does not have the means to obtain legal
representation. Do not make this mistake this is vengeful and in no way benefits your children. Remember this
simple fact you loved the person to the point of having a child with them they deserve to see the child. The
support they can provide to you and aid the child cannot be measured in dollars. Do not make this mistake.
Attorneys and judges will tell you we can get this or that but in the end it is your children that have lost. Your
children need the support of both loving parents willing to protect them from the legal system.
Senator Nancy Schaefer’s life was taken. She exposed the corruption of our courts and the child
protective services (CPS). Honor Nancy’s efforts and view her video at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=_TcDTJlPWbE&feature=related allowing the courts access to your children can be deadly to them. Children in the
care of CPS are 5 times more likely to be sexually abused or killed. You must protect your children but not by dead
bolting the support from a caring loving parent (your opposition loves your children). Remember Nancy Schaefer
and join the fight to expose the corruption that preys on the parent child relationship.

Economic Impact of joint custody

Many Studies have been conducted on the positive economic benefits to the child of joint custody and we
ask you to research this subject on the World Wide Web and not depend on individuals who make their living from
Family law. We ask that you review the United States Department of Health and Human Services and the
Fatherhood Initiative programs and the various foundations that are now funding and promoting the strong
positive impact of both parents in the best interest of the children of America. We need to stress that both
parents are needed to help the children develop. These programs express the need to help low income families
and parents to obtain the training they need to be the best parents they can be. We have attached two reprinted
articles that outline the truth about economic impact of custody. THE WALL STREET JOURNAL article included
below “The Myth of Deadbeat Dads” outlines percentages of mothers and fathers payments of child support. The
Washington Times article “Child-support-law amendment comes to attention of Hill” outlines how custody
becomes an incentive to pay child support. This article also shows the negative economic impact of driving child
support payers into the underground economy. Reports of statistics of parents with joint custody pay their child
support obligations at a much higher rate providing a reduction in Child-support enforcement. Child –support
enforcement has created the return of the debtor’s prisons in the United States.
Keep in mind that both parents should provide for the children. However the legal system destroys the
earning potential with the systematic abuse of domestic violence laws. This abuse of domestic violence laws is
called “abuse excuse” this is a legal trap to create high conflict child custody and divorce cases. The minute one
party accuses the other party the long term earning potentials will be damages to the accused party. In no way can
this be “in the best interest of the children”. Long term income damage will have long term impact on your family.
Do not allow abused person programs or attorneys to suggest the use of the “abuse excuse” tactic for a divorce
absent abuse, neglect and abandonment. Keep your divorce simple and low conflict to save money for your
children. Keep your hurt and anger under control to keep the assets in the family.
To expand on the negative economic impact you just need to look deeply at how the justice system of the
United States has removed resource from our productive citizens. The negative economic impact to the
dysfunctional family with child custody and divorce conflicts is common knowledge. Everybody has heard the
stories how the attorneys strip all the assets including housing from parents. Remember your attorney has NO
financial obligation to you. They just want to make profit from your conflict. We call any service industry that
doesn’t produce anything a parasitic industry. Any service industry that creates a demand for their services is in
violation of federal racketeering laws defined under US. Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 96§ 1961. Do not allow
attorneys off the record suggestions to increase their fees. Document their off record suggestions with videos,
collaborating witnesses or detailed letters. As these parasitic industries grow our society will not be able to support
their greed and abuses of our laws.

COURT TIMEFRAMES AND SUA SPONTE MOTIONS

The most important thing to know is the timeframe for filing court documents. The court will hold to these
technical timeframes to meet the needs of the courts business. KNOW THE TIMEFRAMES REQUIRED BY COURT
RULES. The bad news is the court will allow lawyer’s to violate time frames with Sua Sponte motions to meet the
needs of the courts business. These motions are used to protect the interest of the courts over the interest of the
public. The courts have the power to conceal information with sealed records as a tactic to protect the business of
the courts. So remember just because you filed something in a timely manner does not mean the court will accept
it or act on it they might even seal it. You need to get you side on court record in a timely manner is the bottom
line. What the courts do with the information is another issue. Objecting to information entered into record is very
important and you attorney must do this in a timely manner. Expose the candor and lies quickly.
Timeframes and delays the court will impose delays to increase profits to its members. Make sure you
demand quick time frames that keep the hours charged to a minimum. The court will set timeframes that provide
the maximum profit to attorneys and social programs. Expose this tactic and demand proper timely schedules from
the court scheduling office. Attorneys will create delays based on the golf schedules so do not let them. Remember
delays mean more fees 90% of the time. Always demand proof of schedule conflicts.
If your attorney claims he must quit because you cannot afford them remember this is a tactic to increase
your fee. What happens is you will need to search and find another attorney to handle your case. The new attorney
will charge much more because they “have to get up to speed with your case”. This is a tactic that falls under
organized crimes and make it clear that you intend to file these charges if your attorney does not properly
represent you. Your attorney must provide proper legal services make them prove to the court why they cannot
defend you. Make it clear on record that you cannot afford another attorney. Some courts will always promote the
business of the courts by allowing attorneys to withdraw. If this happens file US Code title 18 statements of charges
and file a grievance against the judge for impeachment for aiding and abiding the increase need for services on
your case. This one action by two or more legal professionals establishes probable cause for criminal action and
denies you access to justice. This is also a Strategic Litigation against Public Participation (SLAPP) violation. SLAPP
tactics increase the cost of litigation to suppress litigants with undue financial burden (more fees). Less than 1% of
attorney grievances are prosecuted and a recent study shows that if a citizen files a law suit against a state or the
government most are not even heard a violation of the victims civil rights.

Court control of expert witness out come to meet needs of Court

The expert trap: What the public needs to know is the associated experts that work with attorney are
deceiving the public. How, simple you hire an expert your opponent hires an expert. These experts are paid to
present your case for a fee. Now if the court can’t make a finding they appoint a third expert that will meet the
needs of the court. The appointment of the third expert (tie breaker) is the control the court uses to get the
outcome that best serves the needs of the courts. Remember conflict is how the courts make money. The family
court system provides contracts to many support services with public funding. The courts then order children and
parents to enter a program that the parents must pay additional fees for.
The support services come in many forms one is supervised visitation centers which provide a place to
share time with your children. Why? The courts knowingly and willfully increase the needs for services that they
fund. These support facilities can be another form of child abuse. Children like being with caring and loving parents
in familiar surroundings; however the courts have one parent drag their children to a strange place and then leave
them with strangers until the other parent is allowed to visit. This type of abuse can also take place when parents
drag their children to many experts until they find one that will prove their point.
Experts can be shopped until you find one that will say what you want for a price you can afford. These
expert opinions are biased to the person who writes the check. Experts routinely use closed ended questions that
get the results they wish. This fact creates the need for the tie breaker expert. The court will make both parties split
the fees here; however the courts control the outcome with ex parti communications with the expert. This is an
example used with occupational experts to show how the courts achieve the funding for enforcement of child
support. They will force the parent that does not have a job to get one in order to pay child support. This required
child support enforcement provides more funding to the state. The courts will allow this deception to take place
with many experts on various subjects to extract income from both parties. This tactic will drain all assets that
could have been used for the best interest of the children.
The word milling that takes place in the courts when experts are used is controlled make no mistake.
Experts are hired guns that make their living from conflicts escalated by the courts. The courts will allow or disallow
experts testimony based on merits. These merits are another form of how the court controls the outcome of
experts and exposes the courts abuses of discretion. In most cases it will also expose the courts bias towards a
victim. Expose the courts bias.
Expose the use of experts as an organized deceptive tactic. Lawyers are to seek resolution of disputes not
escalate them by draining the financial resources of families. The negative economic impact of experts on the
family can devastate the financial resources that could have been used for the child’s best interest. We must make
this clear the attorney do not care about the best interest of the child if they drain all the assets from the family
with extensive litigation that uses expert witnesses.

Depression is child abuse

Depression is a mental disorder and is listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM) is a manual published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA). This manual list mental disorders and
has extensive information on the various types of depression. The CDC also has information located at
http://www.cdc.gov/features/dsBRFSSDepressionAnxiety/ our family law courts knowingly and willfully expose
children and parents to the major causes of many forms of this disorder. The courts use it to create profit and
obtain public funding for social programs. The courts abuse your children with it. The courts abuse parents with it.
The courts are responsible for countless violent deaths and violent acts because of the courts orders. Children and
parents are committing suicides because of the courts orders. Instead of finding a better solution the legal
profession lobbies against a presumption of shared parenting not to protect the best interest of the child but to
protect the best interest of the legal profession.
This is a true conflict of interest that is costing lives of our children and caring loving parents and for what
reason. We argue that it is to promote the self interest of the family court system. This self interest conceals the
fact that it is costing lives of children and parents. With an estimated 50,000 violent deaths per year take place in
the United States the majority being suicides we must hold judicial members accountable when court orders are
involved with a victim. This requires the public to investigate approximately 27,500 suicides per year. Presently the
family court system makes the choice to cover up their wrongs. The family court system uses various social
programs to label victims as “mentally unstable”. We argue that no child or parent needs to be exposed to this
disorder. We argue that children and parents would not have this disorder if the court orders did not create the
triggers that cause depression. The courts routinely order children not to see one parent except on a limited
visitation schedule. Sometimes the court denies complete access or allows parental alienation to take place.
Absent abuse neglect and abandonment why would a court order anything other than a rebuttable
presumption of joint custody and joint legal custody, funding. The family court system places funding objectives
above human life. We intend to expose this wrong and demand legislation to correct this wrong against the public
interest. The long term negative impact created by depression can be measured in loss of life and many economic
factors. The issue is simply can the courts orders reduce the number of cases of depression we argue it can. We
argue that family court orders allowing children to access their parents would reduce losses associated with
depression. We argue that by protecting the fundamental rights of children and parents in the pursuit of happiness
there would be less cases of depression. The problem is it would reduce funding to social programs and the family
law system. We intend to expose and correct this wrong against the public interest.

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) “Flight or Fight”

Our friend Jim Duty would like you to view his video before you read this section. It honors the sacrifice
made for this country and your freedom. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTyoBBGubuQ Land of the free
because of the Brave
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is an anxiety disorder that can be triggered by the loss of access to
your children. It is a listed disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) it is a know
disorder that the courts knowingly and willfully expose children and parents too. The publicly funded National
Center for PTSD outlines criteria for PTSD at this link: http://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/pages/dsm-iv-tr-
ptsd.asp Please learn about this disorder at http://www.ptsdalliance.org. This can be a life threatening disorder
and can affect people in various ways. Our friends created this video to expose a fact
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_StCzStBy0 please get pissed and demand better treatment for our service
personnel.
The legal system has developed a scheme that preys on your basic parenting instincts. What they do is
exploit a parent’s anger toward the other parent. This takes the form of a custody battle over the children. No
consideration is given to the rights of the children to see both parents. Absent abuse, neglect and abandonment
every child deserves both parents. As a parent we have all heard the stories of parents going “nuts” and killing
their children and families. These are the stories that the media love to report on and are relatively very few.
These cases serve the interest of the court to create a bias. These violent cases with media exposure create the
fear and ultimately the bias the courts exploit for profit. This is one form of the “fight” we ask that if you intend to
fight expose the injustice of the predatory practices of the judicial system. Hold the judges and lawyers
accountable for their criminal actions by documenting the tactics and filing proper criminal charges. Always have
good quality witnesses to expose the truth.
It is normal to get angry or depressed when you are removed from your children. Parental Alienation is
one of the most traumatic experiences any child or parent can endure. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
affects many children and parents at this point. As parents become depressed several things can happen. First
when good parents are backed up against a wall some fight back with force. There is a book called “Kill the
Attorneys” and a sad fact is many people are turning their anger towards biased judges. This has become a
problem for this movement because judges are being targeted and killed. What seems to be happening is people
are starting to take the time to plan military style assaults with diversions and escape routes to execute their
violent plans. These tactics take time to plan and this level of anger is a direct result of parents having no place to
turn for justice. Depressed parents are finding judges and attorneys via land tax records and holding them
accountable with violent actions. Some use this as a form of suicide killing the judges and attorney then
themselves or waiting for police to kill them. Sadly these violent acts service the interest of the courts with
negative media coverage. These violent acts are due to legal professionals ignoring civil rights of parents in the first
place. Parents do have the legal right to expose and overthrow a corrupt government body.
As harsh legislation against parent’s rights is starting to be passed into law many parents are holding
attorneys and judges accountable. The attorneys and judges motive is simple protect their profit making industry
and cover up their wrong doing. These sworn legal professionals strip families of resources and place financial
burdens on parents to meet federal funding requirements. We need to get to the root of the problem and use the
pen and change legislation to hold attorneys and judges accountable for exposing children and parents to PTSD. If
someone commits a violent act after a court order there must be an investigation into if the court exposed the
victim to PTSD.
The Second PTSD issue that doesn’t get the media’s attention is how many parents use “flight” to escape
these legal attacks for profit. These are silent victims that go home and quietly commit suicide. These are listed as
a form of violent death by the CDC National Violent Death Reporting system the last public report was 2007 which
clearly shows misinformation has become the norm from the judicial department and abused person programs.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5904a1.htm The CDC studies show how parents are
committing suicide at an alarming rate. The studies show men have a higher success rate at committing suicide.
These suicides are a direct result of predatory practices of our family court system and place a negative economic
impact on our society. The justice system has built in controls to protect them from being accused. These controls
take the form of publicly funded social programs or crisis centers. PTSD and Depression is a very powerful emotion
and victims sometimes seek help from these programs. The truth is parents seeking help from social programs for
their depression are labeled. They later find the very organization they went for help from are used against them in
a court of law. This sometimes triggers a negative response and the person now feels they have no place to turn
and they commit suicide. The legal system always terms their victims as unstable or mentally unstable for the
media. However children and parents are now committing suicides in a public way some are setting themselves on
fire on court steps some are using internet media to expose the truth.
The simple fact the courts knowingly and willfully remove children from parents demonstrates criminal
abuse by exposure to criteria of PTSD and or depression. It is every child’s and parent’s right to access each other
and the U.S. Supreme Court have ruled it a fundamental right in the pursuit of happiness. The parent and child
relationship is abused by state courts for profit of legal professionals and associated experts. The predatory
professionals that do this are responsible for countless suicides and violent acts. We seek public oversight of our
judicial branch and enforcement to hold professionals accountable. Remember flight or fight responses are basic
human in instincts. Please seek the truth and demand legislative grievances for public oversight of the judicial
branch to stop these abuses. Deceptions that are responsible for suicides and violent acts must be stopped with
legislative change and criminal prosecutions of those that knowingly and willfully violate our laws. Parents are
uniting to expose the truth. Join the fight.

Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) and Frye test

Avoid this behavior the long term damage to your children cannot be repaired. The basic trust between
child and parents should remain intact for both parents. It is the child’s right to have this trust of both parents.
Remember it is not in the interest of the courts and its associated experts to acknowledge this issue. So the debate
will continue until we make legislative change. The courts routinely use these tactics to promote the business of
the courts over the public interest. The courts are fighting by claiming PAS is not listed in DSM therefore cannot be
used in court. However many states have moved forward and accepted the parental Alienation as a tactic for
visitation interference. Use the Frye test information below to get your state to establish case law for PAS. Use
visitation interference and PTSD and depression exposure as issues to Stop this form of child abuse.
What is Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS)? This is the definition of PAS as described by R.A. Gardner:
http://www.paskids.com/ "The parental alienation syndrome (PAS) is a disorder that arises primarily in the context
of child-custody disputes. Its primary manifestation is the child's campaign of denigration against a parent, a
campaign that has no justification. It results from the combination of a programming (brainwashing) parent's
indoctrinations and the child's own contributions to the vilification of the target parent." (Excerpted from: Gardner,
R.A. (1998) The Parental Alienation Syndrome, Second Edition, Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics, Inc.)
Be aware that the legal profession is trying to discredit this syndrome so they can continue to profit from
your children. The best interest of your children is to have access to both parents. The courts and associated
experts and social workers are defending their interests of profiting from your conflict. Their past actions expose
them to huge liabilities for this form of child abuse. Make no mistake the judicial system will retaliate to defend
against this liability. Get involved and use the Frye test to defeat the legal profession to protect your children and
future children. In Maryland our Maryland law has only marginally addressed the issue in the case of Barton v.
Hirshberg 137 Md.App. 1, 767 A.2d 874 Md.App., 2001. Courts outside of Maryland have reviewed the issue in
greater detail and case law established listed below. The following websites will provide some insight to this
complex issue:
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2117396/the_gregory_mantell_show_parental_alienation_part_2/
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8nfdc_the-gregory-mantell-show-parental-a_shortfilms
http://www.hostile-aggressive-parenting.com/
http://www.paawareness.org/
http://www.stopparentalalienation.org/
Frye v Gardner in the Family Courts (Part 1)
http://expertpages.com/news/parental_alienation_syndrome.htm
Frye v Gardner in the Family Courts (Part 2)
http://expertpages.com/news/parental_alienation_syndrome2.htm
www.stopparentalalienation.org
www.breakthroughparentingservices.org
Experts on PAS:
Jayne A. Major, Ph.D., Executive Director Telephone: (310) 823-7846
Stop Parental Alienation of Children Fax: (310) 388-0700
Breakthrough Parenting Services, Inc. Email: jaynemajor@gmail.com
12405 Venice Boulevard, #172, Los Angeles, CA 90066 (Map) 

Court Frye test Rulings Relevant to Parental Alienation for the UNITED STATES (2 States)
The Frye Test is the standard by which a court can determine whether a scientific contribution has gained enough
general acceptances in the scientific community to be admissible in a court of law. The Frye Test criteria for
admissibility were applied to The Parental Alienation Syndrome in the following cases:
 Kilgore v. Boyd, 13th Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, FL., Case No. 94-7573, 733 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA
2000) Jan 30, 2001.
o Boyd v. Kilgore, 773 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (Prohibition Denied)
o Court ruling that the Parental Alienation Syndrome has gained general acceptance in the scientific
community and thereby satisfies Frye Test criteria for admissibility.
 Bates v. Bates 18th Judicial Circuit, Dupage County, IL Case No. 99D958, Jan 17, 2002.
o Court ruling that the Parental Alienation Syndrome has gained general acceptance in the scientific
community and thereby satisfies Frye Test criteria for admissibility.[excerpt]
Court Rulings relevant to Parental Alienation (22 States)
Alabama
 Berry v. Berry, Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa County, AL, Case No. DR-96-761.01. Jan 06, 2001
Alaska
 Pearson v. Pearson, Sup Ct. of AK., No. S-8973, No. 5297, 5 P.3d 239; 2000 Alas. Lexis 69. July 7, 2000.
Arkansas
 Chambers v. Chambers, Ct of App of AR, Div 2; 2000 Ark App. LEXIS 476, June 21, 2000.
California
 Coursey v. Superior Court (Coursey), 194 Cal.App.3d 147,239 Cal.Rptr. 365 (Cal.App. 3 Dist., Aug 18, 1987.
 John W. v. Phillip W., 41 Cal.App.4th 961, 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 899; 1996.
 Valerie Edlund v. Gregory Hales, 66 Cal. App 4th 1454; 78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 671.
Colorado
 Oosterhaus v. Short, District Court, County of Boulder (CO), Case No. 85DR1737-Div III.
Connecticut
 Case v. Richardson, 1996 WL 434281 (Conn. Super.,Jul 16, 1996).
 Metza v. Metza, Sup. Court of Connecticut, Jud. Dist. of Fairfield, at Bridgeport,
1998 Conn. Super. Lexis 2727 (1998).
Florida
 Schutz v. Schutz, 522 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 3rd Dist. Ct. App. 1988).
  Blosser v. Blosser, 707 So. 2d 778; 1998 Fla. App. Case No. 96-03534.
 Tucker v. Greenberg, 674 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).
 Berg-Perlow v. Perlow, 15th Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Fl.,Case no. CD98-1285-FC. Mar 15, 2000.
o An exceptionally strong family court decision in which five experts testified to the diagnosis of PAS.
 Loten v. Ryan, 15th Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, FL., Case No. CD 93-6567 FA. Dec 11,2000. 
 Kilgore v. Boyd, 13th Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, FL., Case No. 94-7573, 733 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA
2000) Jan 30, 2001.
o Boyd v. Kilgore, 773 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (Prohibition Denied)
o Court ruling that the Parental Alienation Syndrome has gained general acceptance in the scientific
community and thereby satisfies Frye Test criteria for admissibility.
 McDonald v. McDonald, 9th Judicial Circuit Court, Orange County, FL. Case No. D-R90-11079, Feb 20, 1001.
 Blackshear v. Blackshear, Hillsborough County, FL 13th Jud. Circuit: 95-08436.
Illinois
 In re Violetta 210 III.App.3d 521, 568 N.E2d 1345, 154 III.Dec. 896(Ill.App. I Dist Mar 07, 1991).
 In re Marriage of Divelbiss v. Divelbiss, No. 2-98-0999 2nd District, Ill.(Appeal from Circ Crt of Du Page Cty No.
93-D-559) Oct 22, 1999.
 Tetzlaff v. Tetzlaff, Civil Court of Cook County, Il., Domestic Relations Division, Cause No. 97D 2127, Mar 20,
2000.
 Bates v. Bates 18th Judicial Circuit, Dupage County, IL Case No. 99D958, Jan 17, 2002.
o Court ruling that the Parental Alienation Syndrome has gained general acceptance in the scientific
community and thereby satisfies Frye Test criteria for admissibility.[excerpt]
Indiana
 White v. White, 1995 (Indiana Court of Appeals) 655 N.E.2d 523. (Ind. App., Aug 31, 1995).
Iowa
 In re Marriage of Rosenfeld, 524 NW 2d 212, 214 (Iowa app, 1994).
Louisiana
 Wilkins v Wilkins, Family Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, La., Civ. No. 90792. Nov. 2, 2000.
 White v Kimrey, Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, LA, No. 37,408-CA. May 14, 2003.Click here for the Court's
decision.
Michigan
 Spencley v. Spencley, 2000 WL 33519710 (Mich App).
Nevada
 Truax v. Truax, 110 Nev. 437, 874 P. 2d 10 (Nev., May 19, 1994).
New Hampshire
 Lubkin v. Lubkin, 92-M-46LD Hillsborough County, NH. (Southern District, Sept. 5, 1996).
New Jersey
 Lemarie v. Oliphant, Docket No. FM-15-397-94, (Sup Crt NJ, Ocean Cty:Fam Part-Chancery Div) Dec. 11, 2002.
New York
 Rosen v. Edwards (1990) Tolbert, J. (1990), AR v. SE. New York Law Journal, December 11:27-28.
The December 11, 1990 issue of The New York Law Journal [pages 27-28] reprinted, in toto, the ruling of Hon.
J. Tolbert of the Westchester Family Court in Westchester Co.
 Karen B v. Clyde M., Family Court of New York, Fulton County, 151 Misc. 2d 794; 574 N.Y. 2d 267, 1991.
 Krebsbach v. Gallagher, Supreme Court, App. Div., 181 A.D.2d 363; 587 N.Y.S. 2d 346, (1992).
 Karen PP. v. Clyde QC. Sup Ct of NY, App Div, 3rd Dept. 197 A.D. 2d 753; 602 N.Y.s. 2d 709; 1993 N.Y. App. Div.
LEXIS 9845.
 In the matter of J.F. v. L.F., Fam. Ct. of NY, Westchester Cty, 181 Misc 2d 722; 694 N.Y.S. 2d 592; 1999 N.Y. Misc.
LEXIS 357.
 Oliver V. v. Kelly V., NY Sup. Ct. Part 12. New York Law Journal Nov. 27, 2000.
 Sidman v. Zager, Family Court, Tompkins County, NY: V-1467-8-9-94.
Ohio
 Sims v. Hornsby, 1992 WL 193682 (Ohio App. 12 Dist., Butler County, Aug 10 1992).
 Zigmont v. Toto, 1992 WL 6034 (Ohio App. 8 Dist Cuyahoga County, Jan 16, 1992).
  Pisani v. Pisani,  Court of Appeals of Ohio, 8th App. Dist. Cuyahoga Cty. 1998 Ohio App. Lexis 4421 (1998).
 Pathan v. Pathan, Case No. 96-OS-1. Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County, OH, Div. of Dom Rel.
o Pathan v. Pathan, C.A. Case No. 17729. Ct. of App. of OH, 2d Dist., Montgomery County; 2000 Ohio
App. Lexis 119. Jan. 21, 2000
 Conner v. Renz, 1995 WL 23365 (Ohio App. 4 Dist., Athens County, Jan 19, 1995).
 State v. Koelling, 1995 WL 125933 (Ohio App. 10 Dist., Franklin County, Mar 21, 1995).
Pennsylvania
 Popovice v. Popovice, Court of Common Pleas, Northampton Cty, PA. Aug 11, 1999, No. 1996-C-2009.
Texas
 Ochs et al. v. Myers, App. No. 04-89-00007-CV. Ct. of App. of TX, 4th Dist., San Antonio; 789 S.W. 2d 949;
1990 Tex App. Lexis 1652, May 16, 1990.
Virginia
 Ange, Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1998 Va. App. Lexis 59 (1998).
 Waldrop v. Waldrop, in Chancery No. 138517. Fairfax County Circuit Court,(Va., April 26, 1999).
Washington
 Rich v. Rich, Sup Ct, 5th Dist. Case No. 91-3-00074-4 (Douglas County) June 11, 1993.
Wisconsin
 Janelle S. v. J.R.S., Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 4. 1997 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1124 (1997).
 Fischer v. Fischer, Ct. of App. of WI, Dist. Two, No. 97-2067; 221 Wis. 2d 221; 584 N.W.2d 233; 1998 Wisc. App.
Lexis 1534.
Wyoming
 In re Marriage of Rosenfeld, 524 N.W. 2d 212 (Iowa App., Aug 25 1994) McCoy v. State 886 P.2d 252
(Wyo.,Nov 30, 1994).
 McCoy v State of Wyoming, 886 P.2d 252, 1994.

Violence Against Woman Act (VAWA)

Absent abuse, neglect and abandonment avoid these programs at all costs in a normal divorce. The
resources provided under this act are truly needed for abuse victims of both sexes. Social service workers, law
enforcement and attorneys routinely recommend these programs. Do not fall into this “abuse excuse” trap to
increase your conflict. We need to protect both sexes and this act is fundamentally unfair and flawed and creates a
bias against accused parties. Any accused party will have their income potential severely damaged forever. In true
abuse cases the Center for Disease Controls (CDC) has conducted studies that clearly show men and woman are
just about equal when it comes to violence against a domestic partner. Health and Human Services (HHS) and the
Fathers Initiative programs have conducted numerous studies that also prove the positive value to have both
parents involved with the raising of children. You need to protect the earning potential of both parents.

The problem with this act is it is being misused and promoted by woman groups (woman caucuses) to
establish unfair advantages in child custody domestic situations. The tactic used is to circumvent child custody and
use and position of marital assets creating a fundamentally unfair advantage against the accused. Misinformation is
routinely used to conceal the truth. The problem is this is a very profitable industry that extends deep into many
aspects of our society. What we need is a simple change to Stop Child Abuse for Profit. Absent abuse neglect and
abandonment no court should be allowed to strip the rights of the children to see both parents. We need several
issues addressed 1) Anger management for both adult parties 2) Mediation 3) Presumption of shared parenting
requiring courts to justify why they strip one parent or the other. 4) Judicial oversight by the public 5) Stiffer
Misconduct penalties for abuse of domestic violence statutes 6) Public reporting of Misconduct abuses

Miss appropriation of public funding has become routine with this act and a large percentage of funding is
used in a biased discriminatory fashion in violation of the first amendment. Funding is also misused to pay high
priced executives that routinely lobby against the American family on the state and federal level. We need changes
made to this act to protect both sexes. Deceptions with this act fund low cost attorneys for the victims or false
accusers we need statistical information on true acts of violence verses false accusations used to create high
conflict disputes. Public defenders will represent many accused parties both represent negative economic impact
to our communities for the profit of a few. The long term negative impact out weights these profits.

Bradley Amendment
The enforcement of child support clause ties the hands of judges to suspend payments. This has
effectively created a new debtors prison system here in the United States of parents. Their only crime was having a
child with the wrong life partner. What happens is the court imposes child support payments and interest and fees
that can never be repaid. The debtor’s debt continues to go up even when they are imprisoned for non-payment.
There are many stories of good parents being stripped of everything they own to see their children only to end up
in prison. When a child is removed from the parents instincts kick in and the judicial fraud takes place. This
document clearly shows the case laws and the crimes being committed on a routine bases against the public
interest and American family. So what was the problem with the Bradley amendment?
In United States law, , the Bradley Amendment is the common name given to any of a number of
amendments offered by Senator Bill Bradley the most notable of which is the amendment to 42 U.S.C. § 666(a)(9)
(c) which requires state courts to prohibit retroactive reduction of child support obligations. The Amendment was
passed in 1986 to automatically trigger a non expiring lien whenever child support becomes past-due.
 The law overrides any state's statute of limitations.
 The law disallows any judicial discretion, even from bankruptcy judges.
 The law requires that the payment amounts be maintained without regard for the physical capability of
the person owing child support (the obligor) to make the notification or regard for their awareness of the
need to make the notification.
The amendment was intended to correct a perceived imbalance between the power of the obligee (usually the
mother) and the obligor (usually the father) during subsequent child support disputes.
It had been alleged that a significant number of men were running up large child support debts and then
finding a sympathetic judge, often in another state, to erase them. Recent studies have shown that most woman
do not pay their obligations. Often a woman of means simply claims abuse and deadbolts the father away from the
child or children. This is starting to become the norm or status quo many law enforcement officers and abused
person programs are now suggesting the misuse of domestic violence statutes for this purpose. This alarming
trend is creating a systematic way to increase funding for enforcement merely by prosecuting a party. Many
parties are stripped of marital assets and resources to defend themselves properly or worst denied their right to
representation all together.
The issue is how do we correct the problem created with the Bradley Amendment. Simply make an
amendment to allow a judge to suspend the debt. The argument of increased collections of child support
payments has failed and is offset by the negative economic impact of enforcement based on debts that cannot be
collected from a growing prison population in the new Debtor Prisons.

Federal Racketeering Violations being covered up

A simple fact is when an attorney or judge does not report misconduct it is MISCONDUCT. It is a simple
fact that when an attorney or judges conceals a crime it is a CRIMINAL ACT against the public. WE THE PEOPLE
have laws in place that are meant to protect the public’s interests. What takes place in the family law system is
criminal racketeering by legal professionals. Definitions of these activity are located at US Code title 18 part I
Chapter 96 § 1961. What the public needs to document to make changes with this threat to our National Security
is to expose the following tactics. YES, national security the American family is the basic foundation of our society
and it is under a systematic attack as outlined in the following tactic. Social workers, law enforcement and
attorneys simply escalate a domestic situation with their “off the record” advice. By escalation of a domestic
situation to high conflict it justifies federal funding and increases the need for their services. Think about that.
At this point the party will pay for additional services that the social workers, law enforcement and
attorneys have created. Their advice created a “high conflict” therefore bigger fees that can be extracted from at
risk families. Each family can have all assets stripped to pay attorney fees. How can this be “in the best interest of
the child”. The justice department has gone as far to recommend the abuse of domestic violence statutes to
increase enforcement and other funding in violation of Federal accounting regulations (FAR). The outline of
 federal crimes being committed is pursuant to: US Code: Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 96 §1962 and other sections.
These criminal acts impact federal funding and will be expanded upon later in this report.
We seek to correct this wrong by exposing these tactics. If you or friends have been extorted of fees that
attorneys have coached to create you have a limited time frame to sue them. Talk with your opponent and see if
they have been coached. If you or the opponent has been coached document it and file a law suit. Seek damages
for the losses caused by fees and damages to your family. We ask that you expose the truth and file legislative
grievances exposing judges and attorneys misconduct.

Demand a Trial by Jury

It is your right to have a trial by jury and limit and remove the bias of a single judge. The family court
system has routinely violated these rights to help promote a system to strip family assets to the legal profession.
Remember this and demand a trial by Jury quickly most state rules require this within a few days of the start of a
proceeding. Do not waste time.
The Constitution of the United States has Amendment VII “In Suits of common law, where the value in
controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall
be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States than according to the rules of the common law.
The Constitution of each state contains variations and may modify this. As an example in the Constitution
of Maryland “Declaration of Rights Art. 5. (a) (1) That the Inhabitants of Maryland are entitled to the Common Law
of England, and the trial by Jury, according to the course of Law, and to the benefit of such of the English statutes
as existed on the Fourth day of July, seventeen hundred and seventy-six; and which, by experience, have been
found applicable to their local and other circumstances, and have been introduced, used and practiced by the
Courts of Law or Equity; and also of all Acts of Assembly in force on the first day of June, eighteen hundred and
sixty-seven; except such as may have since expired, or may be inconsistent with the provisions of this Constitution;
subject, nevertheless, to the revision of, and amendment or repeal by, the Legislature of this State. And the
Inhabitants of Maryland are also entitled to all property derived to them from, or under the Charter granted by His
Majesty Charles the First to Caecilius Calvert, Baron of Baltimore.
(2) Legislation may be enacted that limits the right to trial by jury in civil proceedings to those proceedings in which
the amount in controversy exceeds $10,000 (added by Chapter 422, Acts of 2006, ratified Nov. 7, 2006).

Tape or record all Hearings

If you have to go to court, the MOST important thing to do is file a WRITTEN motion to video or audio
record all hearings to insure you have an accurate ELECTRONIC record of your hearings. This helps keep everyone
honest, therefore decreases the need for appeals and expensive court reporters and transcripts. Court transcripts
and audio recordings have been altered or “lost” to protect a corrupt family law system. Watch the videos:
"Deconstructing America" to learn from disbarred attorneys about altered court records and transcripts. These
attorneys got disbarred for speaking out against the system.
Deconstructing America, Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBzUywM2ENo
Deconstructing America, Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vB2msm4Sex8&feature=related
Protect yourself from misconduct and file a motion to have in the record. The point is to get your motion in the
record file. Courts wish to avoid the APPEARANCE of being unfair. But if they do deny your motion, you want any
denial in the record file of your case. Make sure you file the WRITTEN motion well ahead of time. Don't wait until
you get before the judge to motion orally or let your attorney do the same.
SAMPLE MOTION TO RECORD ALL HEARINGS (Modify to fit your case and if you use an attorney remove #1.)
Remember each state and court has rules on court document formats and motions the number needed
and the certificate of service required. Line spacing can be issues so check local rules. In general you need three
copies: The original to summit to the court, one copy for your records stamped received by the court, one copy to
send to the opposition.
YOUR STATE:
IN THE (District or CIRCUIT) COURT OF (WHATEVER) COUNTY

JANE DOE, Plaintiff

JOHN DOE , Defendant

Case No. $$$$$$$$

MOTION TO VIDEO RECORD, OR ALTERNATIVELY, AUDIO RECORD ALL HEARINGS

COMES NOW JOHN DOE to make this motion to be allowed to video record, or alternatively, audio record all
hearings in this matter for the following reasons:

1. I am a pro se litigant and cannot afford an attorney.

2. I cannot afford a court reporter and cannot make accurate notes while attempting to represent myself in court.

3. I need accurate notes in the event of an appeal from this proceeding.

4. I need the court’s authorization to bring a recording device into the court house past the security screeners.

WHEREFORE, Mr. DOE requests the court allow him to video or audio record all hearings in this matter.

Respectfully submitted,

John/Jane Doe, pro se

____________________________
John Doe
1234 Bankrupt Lane
Upthecreek, SlaveState 00000

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the __XX_______ day of ___Month___, Year a copy of the foregoing
was mailed, postage prepaid, to (name of attorney), Esq., counsel for (name of opposition), at (address of
attorney).
______________________________
(your name)
Access to Justice
“The probability that we may fail in the struggle ought not to deter us from the support of a cause we
believe to be just.” (Abraham Lincoln, 16th President)
The public interests have been denied far too long by the predatory practices of the judicial branch of our
government. As the population of legal professionals grows our society cannot support practices that undermine
the very fabric of our society. The productive American Family is prey for these predatory practices. As productive
families are under stress from the economy they do not need to support a parasitic layer of our society with more
rules and regulations. Special interest groups lobby for rules and laws to be used for “orderly control” of the public
and competition. The objective is to extract from the public license fees, fines and legal costs to members of the
judicial branch. Think about how many aspects of our lives are being affected. It is common knowledge we have
corruption. What can be done if the very branch we trust to enforce the public’s interests has a conflict to protect
us? (They need to make more money.) Judicial members do not belong in the legislative branch and the
constitution demands separation.
One tactic used against the public is simply to make access to justice to expensive. It is common
knowledge attorneys charge high fees for their services. In many cases legal professionals charge more than
productive members of our society such as doctors, etc. Now add the fees of transcripts, court copies and experts
and very few members of the public have the resources to succeed. Ex parti communication between judges and
attorneys have become the norms of operation excluding members of the public from these conversations.
Protection tactics include court records are lost and tampered with inside our courts! Pro bono or low cost
attorneys routinely “sand bag” clients to meet the agenda of the courts. Many members of the public walk away
from the courts with a feeling of injustice but have no cost effective place to turn. Many members of the public
have tried to expose corruption only to meet prosecution. We have US citizens in exile to other countries because
of this. Please take the time to look into these suppression tactics. Judicial retaliation is a crime under US
racketeering laws defined under TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 95 § 1513
We believe the judicial branch needs more public oversight. This branch of our government does not
enforce rules and laws in place to protect the public if it requires prosecution of one of its members. As a self
governing body judges and attorneys are rarely reprimanded for misconduct or criminal acts. Attorneys are sworn
officers of the court and this status places them above our laws. They need to be held accountable for their actions.
We need an organization that protects the public by aiding to complete proper complaints and truly prosecute
allegations. We need public oversight of the judicial branch that truly protects the interest of the public. The
problem is the committees that provide this protection are now controlled by attorneys.

Family Court Abuses of Public Funding

What the court system doesn’t want the public to know is that it is an entire industry that has developed a
system to escalate conflict to strip families of resources. This is a pattern of racketeering that has been repeated across
the country. The tactic is to use children as the primary weapon between parents. What takes place is attorneys
“suggest” a tactic that one party executes the domestic violence allegations is the most effective way to escalate a
divorce into “high conflict”. The attorney is protected because they hide behind the anger of one party’s actions and
have created a plausible deniability. They play on the executing party’s fear of being exposed for false allegations which
is a criminal offence. By the way the attorney is guilty of furtherance of a criminal act. We need to stop the promotion
of this tactic by the judicial branch and publicly funded abused person programs. When publicly funded abused person
programs promote the use of domestic violence they are also aiding the commission of criminal acts. What needs to be
investigated is how much public funding is being misused to promote domestic violence. How much public funding is
being used to Lobby against parent’s right. How much of the federal accounting regulations are being violated by social
programs misappropriation of funding. The misappropriation can be based on sex discrimination of judicial bias and civil
rights violations. Each of the following sights can provide insight into this complex issue.

http://www.exiledfathers.org/
http://www.liamsdad.org/
www.parentingandpolitics.org
www.acfc.org
www.crispe.org
www.ancpr.com
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=314667245456 (Veterans for Child support reform- FACEBOOK)
http://www.freewebs.com/vacriminaljustice/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VaEQUALParents/
Know the “Enemy”
1. Your anger and being hurt by your opponent can be your biggest enemy. Do not allow yourself to destroy years
of assets over a conflict. Look to preserve your assets to benefit your children. If both parties have assets the
children win. When assets are drained by the legal profession the children lose. It is that simple.
2. In litigation your ex will lie. Their attorney will lie. The facts will be twisted. False accusations will be made. Your
civil rights will be violated. Judges will use their discretion against facts. Your marital assets will be drained by
the system. Make no mistake your ex and the system is your family’s enemy. Your objective should be to seek a
mediation channel outside the court system before entering the system. Only involve attorneys at the last
possible minute to review agreements before signing. Look at sample agreement and forms available on
internet. Use third party mediators like clergy, rabbi, etc. find the common platform to save marital assets from
the legal profession.
3. The Judicial system has created an entrenched system that is structured to take funds from at risk families. The
system results in a huge negative economic impact based on predatory practices of the legal profession. The
fees charged by attorneys, courts, copies, experts and paid public social workers are funded by your conflict. It
is common knowledge that the Family Court system is biased toward woman and represented clients. Judicial
misconduct and professional misconduct are rarely enforced with less than 1% prosecution. Expect dishonesty
by your opposition to go unpunished by a corrupt system. Expose attorney grievances in public record before
filing them.
4. The abused person program is funded by the Federal government (2009 $1.8 billion). This funding is misused
by various shelters and nonprofit organizations to pay for studies and lobby efforts against children’s rights and
equal rights. These organizations promote the misuse of domestic violence as a tactic to gain control in a
divorce. These organizations discriminate against the under privileged, men and provide useless information
for men demonstrating their bias and discriminations. These groups are actively on a misinformation
campaign. Expose and document it. Lobby against these groups funding by sending letters to your delegates.
5. The United States and various state constitutions grant every person the right to participate in government and
civic affairs, speak freely on public issues, and petition government officials for redress of grievances. A
retaliatory tactic used by the legal profession is called SLAPP = Strategic Lawsuit against Public Participation
intended to intimidate and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of legal defense until they abandon
their opposition.  These issues must have public interest or social significance.
6. Exposing organized racketeering violations in the interest of the integrity of the legal profession should be the
focus and civic duty of the public. The need for more public over site of the judicial branch exists. The public
must have clear defined enforcement and audit abilities to control corruption and misconduct in the judiciary.
US CODE TITLE 18 PART 1 CHAPTER 96§1951 is a great place to start your research. Protect your family assets
and expose these actions.
7. Know your Delegates and Senators position on shared parenting and do not vote for representatives that are
against this issue. Do not vote for members of the judicial branch (Lawyers, Judges) for state or federal offices.
They do not belong in the legislative branch. This creates corruption at the highest level of our government.
Lawyer campaigns are funded by other lawyers and law firms to obtain power and influence. “James Madison”
hit the nail on the head for this issue. "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in
the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly
be pronounced the very definition of tyranny" (James Madison, Federalist No. 48, Feb. 1, 1788).
8. Collect and document all information about your enemy.

Document Racketeering
We need to stop predatory practices and the way to start is to prepare an affidavit of the facts of your cases
exposing how attorneys and legal professionals escalated your domestic conflict. We need facts from all states to
present to the Senate judiciary committee for a judicial oversight investigation. Wide spread corruption has
extended into all levels of our government. We simply want to keep the children away from these adult actions.
Keep in mind that when legal professionals make “off record recommendations” that increase the need for their
services it is a form of racketeering. When legal professionals increase their fees for a custody dispute with tactics
of alienation of a parent it is child abuse. Please take the time to tell your story and use the following example
affidavit format and have it notarized. To make it even stronger you can add a witness or several to the document
by having them sign and print their names if you wish. Our objective is to present thousands of affidavits to the
Senate Judiciary Committee
Sample Affidavit

State of Maryland
County of Montgomery
BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary, ____________________________________________  [name of Notary
before whom affidavit is sworn], on this ____  [day of month] day of ____________  [month], 2009, personally
appeared ___________________________________  [name of affiant], known to me to be a credible person and of
lawful age, who being by me first duly sworn, on _____ [his or her] oath, deposes and says: [set forth affiant's
statement of facts] ___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
I hearby swear or affirm under penalties of perjury that the forgoing factual statements are true to the best of my
knowledge, information, and belief.

__________________________________ 
[signature of affiant]
__________________________________ 
[typed name of affiant]
__________________________________ 
[address of affiant, line 1]
__________________________________ 
[address of affiant, line 2]
Subscribed and sworn to before me, this _________________  [day of month] day of
_________________  [month], 20____.

  [Notary Seal:]
__________________________________ 
[signature of Notary]  
           
__________________________________ 
[typed name of Notary]

        NOTARY PUBLIC

        My commission expires: ________________, 20____.

The Bigger Issue
What the public opinion of domestic violence is simply you’re a criminal. The courts will not take any risks
to expose themselves. This creates the courts fundamental bias towards the accused. The court will act on the
accuser’s petition for two reasons one it promotes the business of the court to create a high conflict dispute.
Second it will reduce the exposure risks to the court for failing to protect the petitioner. One other reason is it
prevents mediation between the parties forcing the services of the legal profession. Finally it will aid in the
enforcement funding provided to states by the federal government.
If you are accused of domestic violence you have been labeled an enemy of the state on the federal level.
Domestic violence at the federal level is riots and civil unrest. You are a patriot falsely accused at the federal level.
On the state level true abuse must be called spousal abuse not domestic violence. We need legislative change to
correct this wrong.

Domestic Violence and Escalation of your conflict

1. If you are falsely accused of Domestic Violence read below information and act quickly to build your defense.
Make sure the court does not award custody of children to opposition. Avoid bad agreements with this action
they will effect a divorce. Any agreement with a domestic violence case will have impact on mediation of a
divorce avoid them. The court will enforce them for the victim but not for the respondent “Known Bias”.
Expose and document false accusations to the Court. The court knows the political nature of these cases and
rules on their risks of exposure.

2. If you have been accused of Domestic violence your life has been changed forever even if not convicted.
Welcome to the “Domestic Violence Registry”. Your name has been entered and it is maintained by the FBI
and other States. You character has been damaged forever by your accuser. This information will impact your
ability to get jobs etc. We have been informed you must prove fraud to be removed but it is very difficult and
made costly. Your income potential has been damaged forever.
http://www.thebostonchannel.com/video/18047516/index.html

3. You must file counter-complaints of any accusation or file false accusation charges quickly. Know that the court
has strict timeframes and you must seek legal assistance quickly. Do not wait on any subject get on the
offensive go on the attack. Get the proof and witnesses you need. Expose any civil rights violations by the
judicial system.

4. Attorneys will not tell you that a simple defense of obtaining a risk assessment report and various other tests
from a licensed psychologist will aid with your defense. There are experts in defense against false accusations.
Dean Tong is one such expert and has been successful for many years. www.deantong.com/ or
http://www.abuse-excuse.com/

5. Seek any means of resolution other than entering the judicial system which will drain family assets. Seek
mediation with third parties to resolve the issues to protect the family’s assets. Protect your assets from the
legal profession. They will escalate issues for their profit and job justification.

6. The Department of Justice “DOJ” promotes and disseminates misinformation about studies to law
enforcement, social works and Judges. Question everything they supply and look for the true facts and science.
The DOJ has created a penal colony of parents that cannot meet their debts. Even if a person is place in jail for
failure to pay child support the debt continues to grow making it in possible to pay. This drives many good
parents into the underground economy. The US outlawed debtor prisons in the 18 th century (1833 President
John Quincy Adams) and yet our largest prison population is for failure to pay child support.

7. Mediate everything you can to lower costs to both parties. So you don’t exhaust family assets in the form of
legal fees. Only hire attorney’s that support Parent’s Rights and practice family law. Provide direction in writing
to avoid conflict with what you want your attorney to accomplish.
8. Interview your perspective attorney. Don’t go for initial consultation if it cost you money. You’re looking to hire
them only if they meet your needs. Otherwise move to the next one. Do not pay them for a job interview.
Remember they will be working for you. Know that attorneys are in business and look for ways to make more
money with your conflict.

9. Know that the justice systems objective is to place a financial burden on a parent for “child support” this can
be abused and used to create debts that never can be erased or paid. When a judge uses a heavy hand and
assesses child support payments retroactive to the filling date. The results is a good parent is place in the new
“debtor prison system”. The only benefit is obtained by the justice system funding objective. The justice system
contracts prisoner workers to various companies at nearly slave wages? This has become a big business and
the justice system is building more prisons in remote locations only accessible by train. Does this remind you of
anything like how NAZI Germany handled prisoners? A change is needed to the Bradley Amendment a 1986
federal law that prohibits retroactive reduction of alleged “child support”. The change that is needed to this
Amendment is to allow the courts judges to use their discretion to suspend in the arrears obligations of
parents. The financial burden the current Bradley amendment places on our society drives good parents into
the underground economy or worst places them in prison. How can this be in the best interest of the children
of America?

10. Know your State Representatives Delegates (3) and Senator (1) and do not vote for them if they do not support
Children’s Rights to both parents and or Parent’s Rights. Call and ask how they stand on these issues. In
Maryland General Assembly (301) 858-3000 Maryland:
http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/07leg/html/ga.html#senate

11. Know your Federal Representatives, 1 Congressman and 2 Senator:

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/

12. Do not vote for any member of the Judiciary, Lawyers, and judges etc. that seeks to be a member of the
legislative branch. (Delegate or Senator, etc.) "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and
judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or
elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny" (James Madison, Federalist No. 48, Feb. 1,
1788).

13. Study the rules for Judicial Misconduct and Professional Misconduct for your state:
http://michie.lexisnexis.com/ http://www.courts.state.md.us/attygrievance/index.html
http://www.mdcourts.gov/mdatjc/about.html

Divorce information and Internet Links

Note: This information is provided as a starting point for reference to public resources there is much more on the
Web.
Books: Divorce Poison by: Richard A. Warshak Parental Alienation Syndrome by: Richard A. Gardner
Children’s Rights Council: www.crckids.org (301)459-1220 promotes the proposed Bill “Children’s Rights” to
“presumption of shared parenting” for the children of Maryland get active and help with this issue. Mothers for
Shared Parenting for Children: supports this Bill and functions as collection point for names please send to: Erica
Sansbury, 1001 Fairview Ave., Takoma Park, MD 20912. (301)891-3849
The Women’s Law Center lobbies against presumption of shared parenting but publishes a free informative
reference guide on Legal Rights of Marriage & Divorce in Maryland
http://www.wlcmd.org/pdf/LegalRightsMarriageDivorce.pdf
Maryland Judiciary Case Search: Track your case docket (Court documents filed make a notebook!) Check to make
sure no errors are entered. Get certified copies of important docket entries in your case they could get “Lost”. Get
copies of Transcripts also. http://casesearch.c ourts.state.md.us/inquiry/inquiry-index.jsp
Michies’s Legal Resources: List by State Rules and Codes of law. Read about family law and professional rules of
conduct to keep attorneys from escalating issues. http://michie.lexisnexis.com/
Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting (RADAR): Third party studies & statistics
http://www.mediaradar.org/
The National Fathers Resource Center: http://www.fathers4kids.com/html/DomesticViolence.htm Domestic
violence facts and information.
Fathers United for Equal Rights Foundation: “Father Support group that provides free attorney at meetings”.
(Meetings 1st and 3rd Tuesdays of each month Rockville, MD) Has a list of suggested local father’s rights attorneys.
http://www.marylandfathers.orgFathers Rights: “Father’s Rights Survival Guide” Provides low cost Advocate plans
to guide you on divorce issues a great low cost second opinion on your legal issues.
http://www.fathersrightsinc.com
Fathers and Dads for equal custody rights: Pro Se books and guides that can be used to guide your attorney.
Litigate a divorce yourself on a Pro Se basis. http://www.fathersrights.org
Fathers4 justice: National event calendar “Stop the War on Fathers” http://www.f4j.com
American Coalition for Fathers and Children (ACFC): Shared parenting. http://www.acfc.org
Dadsdivorce.com: Information and forums. http://www.dadsdivorce.com
Alliance for Non-Custodial Parents Rights: Books and Downloads. http://www.ancpr.org
Baby Center: Information on babies Books and Downloads. http://www.babycenter.com
https://www.fatherhood.org/fathers.asp
Men and Father Resource Center: http://www.fathers.org/
http://fatherhood.hhs.gov/regions/region06.shtml
http://www.kofc.org/un/eb/en/convention_2008/newsroom/fathers.html
http://www.nhsa.org/program/fathers/index.htm
http://www.memory-of.com/Public/article9.aspx
http://www.truefatherhood.org/
http://www.glennsacks.com/national_fatherhood_initiative_ads.htm
http://www.fatherhood.gov
http://www.fatherhood.com Travel packages
HHS Agencies that provide Funding. (Fatherhood Initiatives) https://www.fatherhood.org/fathers.asp
HHS Improving Research and Data collection on Fathers
SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration)
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
OPA (Office of Population Affairs)
OMH (Office of Minority Health)
NIH (National Institutes of Health) Institutes: NICHD, NIMH, NIDA, NIAAA
HRSA (Health Resources and Services Administration)
ASPE (Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation)
ACF (Administration for Children and Families)
 Supporting Reference Statutes Presumption of Shared Parenting
Maryland is one of the last 13 States that do not have a presumption or strong preference for joint custody. Thirty-
seven states plus the District of Columbia have statutes that explicitly authorize joint custody as a presumption or
strong preference. The following are some of the best relevant statues from States that provide a presumption .
 DELAWARE
 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
 FLORIDA
 IDAHO
 LOUISIANA
 MONTANA
 NEW MEXICO
 TEXAS
 The following are some of the best relevant statutes from states which provide a strong preference for
joint custody:
 ALASKA
 CALIFORNIA
 KANSAS
 MICHIGAN
 MINNESOTA
 MISSISSIPPI
 NEW HAMPSHIRE
The following two states have case law which makes joint custody a preference:
 GEORGIA
 KENTUCKY
Statutes Supporting Shared Custody
DELAWARE:
Title 13, Chapter 7, Subchapter I, 701. Rights and responsibilities of parents; guardian appointment.
(a) The father and mother are the joint natural custodians of their minor child and are equally charged with the
child’s support, care, nurture, welfare and education. Each has equal powers and duties with respect to such child,
and neither has any right, or presumption of right or fitness, superior to the right of the other concerning such
child’s custody or any other matter affecting the child. If either parent should die, or abandon his or her family, or is
incapable, for any reason, to act as guardian of such child, then the custody or such child devolves upon the other
parent. Where the parents live apart, the Court may award the custody of their minor child to either of them and
neither shall benefit from any presumption of being better suited for such award.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA:
D.C. Code 16-911. Alimony pendente lite; suit money; enforcement; custody of children. (a)(5) and 16-914.
Retention of jurisdiction as to alimony and custody of children. (a)(2) … Unless the court determines that it is not
in the best interest of the child, the court may issue an order that provides for frequent and continuing contact
between each parent and the minor child or children and for the sharing of responsibilities of child-rearing and
encouraging the love, affection, and contact between the minor child or children and the parents regardless of
marital status. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that joint custody is in the best interest of the child or
children, except in instances where a judicial officer has found by a preponderance of the evidence that an
intrafamily offense as defined in D.C. Code section 16-1001(5), an instance of child abuse as defined in section 102
of the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Act of 1977, effective September 23, 1977 (D.C. Law 2-22; D.C. Code 6
(2101), an instance of child neglect as defined in section 2 of the Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention Children’s
Trust Fund Act of 1993, effective October 5, 1993 (D.C. Law 10-56; D.C. Code 6-2131), or where parental kidnapping
as defined in D.C. Code section 16-1021 through section 16-1026 has occurred… To determine the best interest of
the child, for the purpose of making a joint or sole custody determination, the court shall consider all relevant
factors, including but not limited to:
  the willingness of the parents to share custody;
 the sincerity of each parent's request;
 the parent's ability to financially support a custody arrangement;
 the impact on Aid to Families with Dependent Children and medical assistance;
 the benefit to the parents;
D.C. Code 16-911(2)(A) In any custody proceeding under this chapter, the court may order each parent to submit a
detailed
parenting plan which shall delineate each parent's position with respect to the scheduling and allocation of rights
and responsibilities that will best serve the interest of the minor child or children....
(D) The court may also order either or both parents to attend parenting classes.
(3) Joint custody shall not eliminate the responsibility for child support in accordance with the applicable child
support guideline as set forth in section 16-916.1.

FLORIDA:
Title VI, Chapter 61, 61.13. Custody and support of children; visitation rights; power of court in making orders.
5(2)(b)...It is the public policy of this state to assure that each minor child has frequent and continuing contact with
both parents after the parents separate or the marriage of the parties is dissolved and to encourage parents to
share the rights and responsibilities of childrearing....
2. The court shall order that the parental responsibility for a minor child be shared by both parents unless the court
finds that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child....
3.(3) For purposes of shared parental responsibility and primary residence, the best interests of the child shall
include an evaluation of all factors affecting the welfare and interests of the child, including but not limited to:
(a) The parent who is more likely to allow the child frequent and continuing contact with the nonresidential parent.
(c) The capacity and disposition of the parents to provide the child with food, clothing, medical care or other
remedial care recognized and permitted under the laws of this state in lieu of medical care, and other material
needs.
(j) The willingness and ability of each parent to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing parent-child
relationship between the child and the other parent.
(4)(c) When a custodial parent refuses to honor a noncustodial parent's visitation rights without proper cause, the
court may:
1. After calculating the amount of visitation improperly denied, award the noncustodial parent a sufficient amount
of extra visitation to compensate the noncustodial parent, which visitation shall be taken as expeditiously as
possible in a manner which does not interfere with the best interests of the child: or
2. Award the custody or primary residence to the noncustodial parent, upon the request of the noncustodial
parent, if the award in the best interests of the child.
IDAHO: Title 32, Chapter 7, 32-717B. Joint custody.
(1) "Joint custody" means an order awarding custody of the minor child or children to both parents and providing
that physical custody shall be shared by the parents in such a way as to assure the child or children of frequent and
continuing contact with both parents... If the court declines to enter an order awarding joint custody, the court
shall state in its decision the reason for denial of an award of joint custody.
(2) "joint physical custody" means an order awarding each of the parents significant periods of time in which a child
resides with or is under the care and supervision of each of the parents or parties.
(4) Except as provided in subsection (5), of the section, absent a preponderance of the evidence to the contrary,
there shall be a presumption that joint custody is in the best interest of a minor child or children.
(5) There shall be a presumption that joint custody is not in the best interests of a minor child if one (1) of the
parents is found by the court to be a habitual perpetrator of domestic violence as defined in section 39-6303, Idaho
Code.
Section 1 of S.L. 1982. ch. 311 read: "Policy statement. It is the policy of this state that joint custody is a mechanism
to assure children of continuing and frequent care and contact with both parents provided joint custody is in the
best interest of said children."
LOUISIANA: Civil Code, Section 3,
Article 131. Court to determine custody. A. If there are children of the marriage whose provisional custody is
claimed by both husband and wife, the suit being yet pending and undecided, custody shall be awarded in the
following order of preference, according to the best interest of the children:
(1) To both parents jointly. The court shall, unless waived by the court for good cause shown, require the parents to
submit a plan for implementation of the custody order, or the parents acting individually or in concert may submit
a custody implementation plan to the court prior to issuance of a custody decree. A plan of implementation shall
allocate the time periods each parent shall enjoy physical custody of the children and the legal authority, privileges
and responsibilities of the parents....
(2) To either parent. In making an order for custody to either parent, the court shall consider, among other factors,
which parent is more likely to allow the child or children frequent and continuing contact with the noncustodial
parent, and shall not prefer a parent as custodian because of that parent's sex or race. The burden of proof that
joint custody would not be in a child's best interest shall be upon the parent requesting sole custody.
D. For purposes of this Article, "joint custody" shall mean the parents shall, to the extent feasible, share the
physical custody of children of the marriage... Physical care and custody shall be shared by the parents in such a
way as to assure a child of frequent and continuing contact, with both parents. An award of joint custody obligates
the parties to exchange information concerning the health, education, and welfare of the minor child; and, unless
allocated, apportioned, or decreed, the parents or parties shall confer with one another in the exercise of decision-
making rights, responsibilities, and authority.
E. The court shall state in its decision the reasons for modification or termination of the joint custody order if either
parent opposes the modification or termination order.
ARTICLE 132. AWARD OF CUSTODY TO PARENTS
In the absence of agreement, or if the agreement is not in the best interest of the child, the court shall award
custody to the parents jointly; however, if custody in one parent is shown by clear and convincing evidence to serve
the best interest of the child, the court shall award custody to that parent.
SUBPART B. JOINT CUSTODY
335 Joint custody decree and implementation order. A. (1) In a proceeding in which joint custody is decreed, the
court shall render a joint custody implementation order except for good cause shown.
(2)(a) The implementation order shall allocate the time periods during which each parent shall have physical
custody of the child so that the child is assured of frequent and continuing contact with both parents.
(b) To the extent it is feasible and in the best interest of the child, physical custody of the children should be shared
equally... B. (1) In a decree of joint custody the court shall designate a domiciliary parent....
(2) The domiciliary parent is the parent with whom the child shall primarily reside….
(3) The domiciliary parent shall have authority to make all decisions affecting the child unless an implementation
order provides otherwise....
C. If a domiciliary parent is not designated in the joint custody decree and an implementation order does not
provide otherwise, joint custody confers upon the parents the same rights and responsibilities as are conferred on
them by the provisions of Title VII of Book I of the Civil Code.

MONTANA: Title 40, Chapter 4, Part 2. Support, Custody, Visitation, and Related Provisions
40-4-224. Joint custody -- modification -- consultation with professionals
(1) Upon application of either parent or both parents for joint custody, the court shall presume joint custody is in
the best interest of a minor child unless the court finds, under the factors set forth in 40-4-212, that joint custody is
not in the best interest of the minor child. If the court declines to enter an order awarding joint custody, the court
shall state in its decision the reasons for denial of an award of joint custody. Objection to joint custody by a parent
seeking sole custody is not a sufficient basis for a finding that joint custody is not in the best interest of a child, nor
is a finding that the parents are hostile to each other. However, a finding that one parent physically abused the
other parent or the child is a sufficient basis for finding that joint custody is not in the best interest of the child.
(2) For the purposes of this section, "joint custody" means an order awarding custody of the minor child to both
parents and providing that the physical custody and residency of the child shall be allotted between the parents in
such a way as to assure the child frequent and continuing contact with both parents. The allotment of time
between the parents must be as equal as possible; however;
(a) each case shall be determined according to its own practicalities, with the best interest of the child as the
primary consideration; and
(b) when allotting time between the parents, the court shall consider the effect of the time allotment on the
stability and continuity of the child's education.
NEW MEXICO:
Chapter 40, 40-4-9.1 Joint custody; standards for determination; parenting plan.
A. There shall be a presumption that joint custody is in the best interest of a child in an initial custody
determination....
F. When joint custody is awarded, the court shall approve a parenting plan for the implementation of the
prospective custody arrangement prior to the award of joint custody. The parenting plan shall include a division of
a child's time and care into periods of responsibility for each parent....
G. Where custody is contested, the court shall refer that issue to mediation if feasible.
I. Whenever a request for joint custody is granted or denied, the court shall state in its decision its basis for granting
or denying the request for joint custody. A statement that joint custody is or is not in the best interest of the child is
not sufficient to meet the requirements of this subsection.
J. An award of joint custody means that:
(1) each parent shall have significant, well-defined periods of responsibility for the child;
(2) each parent shall have, and be allowed and expected to responsibility for the child's financial, physical,
emotional and developmental needs during that parent's periods of responsibility;
(3) the parents shall consult with each other on major decisions involving the child before implementing those
decisions; that is, neither parent shall make a decision or take an action which results in a major change in a child's
life until the matter has been discussed with the other parent and the parents agree. If the parents, after
discussion, cannot agree and if one parent wishes to effect a major change while the other does not wish the major
change to occur, then no change shall occur until the issue has been resolved as provided in this subsection.
TEXAS: 153.131 Presumption that Parent to be Appointed Managing Conservator
(a) Unless the court finds that appointment of the parent or parents would not be in the best interest of the child
because the appointment would significantly impair the child's physical health or emotional development, a parent
shall be appointed sole managing conservator or both parents shall be appointed as joint managing conservators of
the child.
(b) It is a rebuttable presumption that the appointment of the parents of a child as joint managing conservators is
in the best interest of the child.
The following are some of the best relevant statues from States which prove a strong preference for joint
custody:
ALASKA: Title 25, Chapter 20
Sec. 25.20.100 Reasons for denial to be set out.
If a parent or the guardian ad litem requests shared custody of a child and the court denies the request, the
reasons for the denial shall be stated on the record.

CALIFORNIA: Family Code Section

3040. Order of preference.
(a) Custody should be granted in the following order of preference according to the best interest of the child as
provided in 3911: (1) To both parents jointly pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with 3080) or to either parent. In
making an order granting custody to either parent, the court shall consider, among other factors, which parent is
more likely to allow the child frequent and continuing contact with the noncustodial parent, subject to 3011, and
shall not prefer a parent as custodian because of that parent's sex.
3080. Presumption of joint custody.
There is a presumption, affecting the burden of proof, that joint custody is in the best interest of a minor child,
subject to 3011, where the parents have agreed to joint custody or so agree in open court at a hearing for the
purpose of determining the custody of the minor child.
3082. Statement of reasons for grant or denial.
When a request for joint custody is granted or denied, the court, upon the request of any party, shall state in its
decision the reasons for granting or denying the request. A statement that joint physical custody is, or is not, in the
best interest of the child is not sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this section. IOWA: Title XV, Subtitle 1,
Chapter 598
598.41 Custody of children
1.a. The court, insofar as is reasonable and in the best interest of the child, shall order the custody award, including
liberal visitation rights where appropriate, which will assure the child the opportunity for the maximum continuing
physical and emotional contact with both parents after the parents have separated or dissolved the marriage, and
which will encourage parents to share the rights and responsibilities of raising the child unless direct physical harm
or significant emotional harm to the child, other children, or a parent is likely to result from such contact with one
parent.
c. The court shall consider the denial by one parent of the child's opportunity for maximum continuing contact with
the other parent, without just cause, a significant factor in determining the proper custody arrangement.
2.b. If the court does not grant joint custody under this subsection, the court shall cite clear and convincing
evidence, pursuant to the factors in subsection 3, that joint custody is unreasonable and not in the best interest of
the child to the extent that the legal custodial relationship between the child and the parent should be severed.

KANSAS: Chapter 60, Article 16

60-1610. Decree; authorized orders. Neither parent shall be considered to have a vested interest in the custody or
residency of any child as against the other parent, regardless of the age of the child, and there shall be no
presumption that it is in the best interests of any infant or young child to give custody or residency to the mother.
(4) Types of custodial arrangements. Subject to the provisions of this article, the court may make any order relating
to custodial arrangements which is in the best interests of the child. The order shall include but not be limited to,
one of the following, in the order of preference:
(A) Joint custody. The court may place the custody of a child with both parties on a shared or joint-custody basis. In
that event, the parties shall have equal rights to make decisions in the best interests of the child under their
custody. When a child is placed in the joint custody of the child's parents, the court may further determine that the
residency of the child shall be divided either in an equal manner with regard to time of residency or on the basis of
a primary residency arrangement for the child. The court, in its discretion, may require the parents to submit a plan
for implementation of a joint custody order upon finding that both parents are suitable parents or the parents,
acting individually or in concert, may submit a custody implementation plan to the court prior to issuance of a
custody decree. If the court does not order joint custody, it shall include in the record the specific findings of fact
upon which the order for custody other than joint custody is based.
(B) Sole custody....
(C) Divided custody.... (two or more children)
(D) Nonparental custody....

MICHIGAN:
Chapter 722 Sec. 6a. (1) In custody disputes between parents, the parents shall be advised of joint custody. At
the request of either parent, the court shall consider an award of joint custody, and shall on the record the
reasons for granting or denying a request. 

MINNESOTA: Chapter 518

518.17 Custody and support of children on judgment
The court must make detailed findings on each of the factors and explain how the factors led to its conclusions and
to the determination of the best interests of the child.
The court shall use a rebuttable presumption that upon request of either or both parties, joint legal custody is in
the best interests of the child.

MISSISSIPPI: Title 93, Chapter 5

93-5-24. Types of custody awarded by court; joint custody; access to information pertaining to child by
noncustodial parent.
(1)Custody may be awarded as follows according to the best interests of the child:
(a)Physical and legal custody to both parents jointly pursuant to subsections 2 through 7.
(b) Physical custody to both parents jointly pursuant to subsections 2 through 7 and legal custody to either parent.
(c) Legal custody to both parents jointly pursuant to subsections 2 through 7 and physical custody to either parent.
(d) Physical and legal custody to either parent.

NEW HAMPSHIRE: Title XLIII, Chapter 458

458:17 Support and Custody of Children
II. Except as provided in subparagraph (c), in the making of any order relative to such custody there shall be a
presumption, affecting the burden of proof, that joint legal custody is in the best interest of minor children:
(a) Where the parents have agreed.... If the court declines to enter an order awarding joint legal custody, the court
shall state in its decision the reasons for denial of an award of joint legal custody.
(b) Upon the application of either parent....
The following two states have case law which make joint custody a preference:

GEORGIA: Court of Appeals of Georgia, Case No. A93A0698, 7/2/93 IN the INTEREST of A.R.B., a child
In a unanimous opinion, presiding Judge Dorothy T. Beasley stated: Although the dispute is symbolized by a 'versus'
which signifies two adverse parties at opposite poles of a line, there is in fact a third party whose interests and
rights make of the line a triangle. That person, the child who is not an official party to the lawsuit but whose
wellbeing is in the eye of the controversy, has a right to shared parenting when both are equally suited to provide
it. Inherent in the express public policy is a recognition of the child's right to equal access and opportunity with
both parents, the right to be guided and nurtured by both parents, the right to have major decisions made by the
application of both parents' wisdom, judgment and experience. The child does not forfeit these rights when the
parents divorce.
The A.R.B. case was subsequently heard by the Supreme Court of Georgia, which upheld the Court of Appeals'
finding that, according to public policy of Georgia, joint custody was in the best interests of children when both
parents are fit.

KENTUCKY: Chalupa v. Chalupa, Kentucky Court of Appeals, No. 90-CA-001145-MR; (May 1, 1992).
Judge Schroder, writing for the majority:
A divorce from a spouse is not a divorce from their children, nor should custody decisions be used as a punishment.
Joint custody can benefit the children, the divorced parents, and society in general by having both parents involved
in the children's upbringing.... The difficult and delicate nature of deciding what is in the best interest of the child
leads this Court to interpret the child's best interest as requiring a trial court to consider joint custody first, before
the more traumatic sole custody. In finding a preference for joint custody is in the best interest of the child, even in
a bitter divorce, the court is encouraging the parents to cooperate with each other and to stay on their best
behavior. Joint custody can be modified if a party is acting in bad faith or is uncooperative. The trial court at any
time can review joint custody and if a party is being unreasonable, modify the custody to sole custody in favor of
the reasonable parent. Surely, with the stakes so high, there would be more cooperation which leads to the child's
best interest, the parents' best interest, fewer court appearances and judicial economy. Starting out with sole
custody would deprive one parent of the vital input.

Parental rights a fundamental right

Each parent has a right to access their children. If one parent denies the other parent access to visit the
children that parent can be held in contempt of court. Some states have case law that now permits one parent to
sue the other for interfering with visitation. The Constitution of the United States grants these rights along with all
State Constitutions.

Studies:
Anything other than shared parenting is economically inadvisable from a child support perspective for the children
and for the State.
1. “90.2% of fathers with joint custody {shared parenting} pay the child support due." ( pg. 7, col. 1, ¶ 2,
lines 1 - 2) U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1988
 2. Child Support & Alimony: 1989 Series P-60, No.173, 1989 Census - Current Population Report, Issued
September 1991
Case Law
The rights of parents to the care, custody and nurture of their children is of such character that it cannot be denied
without violating those fundamental principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all our civil and political
institutions, and such right is a fundamental right protected by this amendment (First) and Amendments 5, 9, and 14.
Doe v. Irwin, 441 F Supp 1247; U.S. D.C. of Michigan, (1985).
 
The several states has no greater power to restrain individual freedoms protected by the First Amendment than does
the Congress of the United States. Wallace v. Jaffree, 105 S Ct 2479; 472 US 38, (1985).

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (California) held that the parent-child relationship is a constitutionally
protected liberty interest. (See; Declaration of Independence --life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and the 14th
Amendment of the United States Constitution -- No state can deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due
process of law nor deny any person the equal protection of the laws.) Kelson v. Springfield, 767 F 2d 651; US Ct App 9th
Cir, (1985).
 
The parent-child relationship is a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. Bell v.
City of Milwaukee, 746 f 2d 1205, 1242-45; US Ct App 7th Cir WI, (1985).

 The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that severance in the parent-child relationship caused
by the state occur only with rigorous protections for individual liberty interests at stake. Bell v. City of Milwaukee, 746 F
2d 1205; US Ct App 7th Cir WI, (1984).

 A parent's right to the preservation of his relationship with his child derives from the fact that the parent's achievement
of a rich and rewarding life is likely to depend significantly on his ability to participate in the rearing of his children. A
child's corresponding right to protection from interference in the relationship derives from the psychic importance to
him of being raised by a loving, responsible, reliable adult. Franz v. U.S., 707 F 2d 582, 595-599; US Ct App (1983).
 
A parent's right to the custody of his or her children is an element of "liberty" guaranteed by the 5th Amendment and
the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution. Matter of Gentry, 369 NW 2d 889, MI App Div (1983). 

Even when blood relationships are strained, parents retain vital interest in preventing irretrievable destruction of their
family life; if anything, persons faced with forced dissolution of their parental rights have more critical need for
procedural protections than do those resisting state intervention into ongoing family affairs. Santosky v. Kramer, 102 S
Ct 1388; 455 US 745, (1982).

The right of a parent not to be deprived of parental rights without a showing of fitness, abandonment or substantial
neglect is so fundamental and basic as to rank among the rights contained in this Amendment (Ninth) and Utah's
Constitution, Article 1 § 1. In re U.P., 648 P 2d 1364; Utah, (1982).
     
The liberty interest of the family encompasses an interest in retaining custody of one's children and, thus, a state may
not interfere with a parent's custodial rights absent due process protections. Langton v. Maloney, 527 F Supp 538, D.C.
Conn. (1981).

Parents have a fundamental constitutionally protected interest in continuity of legal bond with their children. Matter of
Delaney, 617 P 2d 886, Oklahoma (1980). <Verify citation>.

Parent's interest in custody of her children is a liberty interest which has received considerable constitutional
protection; a parent, who is deprived of custody of his or her child, even though temporarily, suffers thereby grievous
loss and such loss deserves extensive due process protection. In the Interest of Cooper, 621 P 2d 437; 5 Kansas App Div
2d 584, (1980).
Legislative classifications which distributes benefits and burdens on the basis of gender carry the inherent risk of
reinforcing stereotypes about the proper place of women and their need for special protection; thus, even statutes
purportedly designed to compensate for and ameliorate the effects of past discrimination against women must be
carefully tailored. The state cannot be permitted to classify on the basis of sex. Orr v. Orr, 99 S Ct 1102; 4340 US 268
<check cite>, (1979).

The U.S. Supreme Court implied that "a (once) married father who is separated or divorced from a mother and is no
longer living with his child" could not constitutionally be treated differently from a currently married father living with
his child. Quilloin v. Walcott, 98 S Ct 549; 434 US 246, 255-56, (1978).

Parent's right to custody of child is a right encompassed within protection of this amendment which may not be
interfered with under guise of protecting public interest by legislative action which is arbitrary or without reasonable
relation to some purpose within competency of state to effect. Reynold v. Baby Fold, Inc., 369 NE 2d 858; 68 Ill 2d 419,
appeal dismissed 98 S Ct 1598, 435 US 963, IL, (1977).

Loss of First Amendment Freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.
Though First Amendment rights are not absolute, they may be curtailed only by interests of vital importance, the
burden of proving which rests on their government. Elrod v. Burns, 96 S Ct 2673; 427 US 347, (1976).

No bond is more precious and none should be more zealously protected by the law as the bond between parent and
child." Carson v. Elrod, 411 F Supp 645, 649; DC E.D. VA (1976).

The United States Supreme Court held that the "old notion" that "generally it is the man's primary responsibility to
provide a home and its essentials" can no longer justify a statute that discriminates on the basis of gender. No longer is
the female destined solely for the home and the rearing of the family, and only the male for the marketplace and the
world of ideas. Stanton v. Stanton, 421 US 7, 10; 95 S Ct 1373, 1376, (1975).
 
 Father enjoys the right to associate with his children which is guaranteed by this amendment (First) as incorporated in
Amendment 14, or which is embodied in the concept of "liberty" as that word is used in the Due Process Clause of the
14th Amendment and Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Mabra v. Schmidt, 356 F Supp 620; DC, WI
(1973).

The Court stressed, "the parent-child relationship is an important interest that undeniably warrants deference and,
absent a powerful countervailing interest, protection." A parent's interest in the companionship, care, custody and
management of his or her children rises to a constitutionally secured right, given the centrality of family life as the focus
for personal meaning and responsibility. Stanley v. Illinois, 405 US 645, 651; 92 S Ct 1208, (1972).

Judges must maintain a high standard of judicial performance with particular emphasis upon conducting litigation with
scrupulous fairness and impartiality. 28 USCA § 2411; Pfizer v. Lord, 456 F 2d 532; cert denied 92 S Ct 2411; US Ct App
MN, (1972).

A parent's right to care and companionship of his or her children are so fundamental, as to be guaranteed protection
under the First, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. In re: J.S. and C., 324 A 2d 90;
supra 129 NJ Super, at 489.

The Constitution also protects "the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters." Federal Courts (and
State Courts), under Griswold can protect, under the "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" phrase of the Declaration of
Independence, the right of a man to enjoy the mutual care, company, love and affection of his children, and this cannot
be taken away from him without due process of law. There is a family right to privacy which the state cannot invade or it
becomes actionable for civil rights damages. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 US 479, (1965).

State Judges, as well as federal, have the responsibility to respect and protect persons from violations of federal
constitutional rights. Gross v. State of Illinois, 312 F 2d 257; (1963).
      
Reality of private biases and possible injury they might inflict were impermissible considerations under the Equal
Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Palmore v. Sidoti, 104 S Ct 1879; 466 US 429.
 
The rights of parents to parent-child relationships are recognized and upheld. Fantony v. Fantony, 122 A 2d 593, (1956);
Brennan v. Brennan, 454 A 2d 901, (1982). State's power to legislate, adjudicate and administer all aspects of family law,
including determinations of custodial; and visitation rights, is subject to scrutiny by federal judiciary within reach of due
process and/or equal protection clauses of 14th Amendment...Fourteenth Amendment applied to states through
specific rights contained in the first eight amendments of the Constitution which declares fundamental personal
rights...Fourteenth Amendment encompasses and applied to states those preexisting fundamental rights recognized by
the Ninth Amendment. The Ninth Amendment acknowledged the prior existence of fundamental rights with it: "The
enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the
people." The United States Supreme Court in a long line of decisions has recognized that matters involving marriage,
procreation, and the parent-child relationship are among those fundamental "liberty" interests protected by the
Constitution. Thus, the decision in Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113; 93 S Ct 705; 35 L Ed 2d 147, (1973), was recently described
by the Supreme Court as founded on the "Constitutional underpinning of ... a recognition that the "liberty" protected
by the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment includes not only the freedoms explicitly mentioned in the Bill of
Rights, but also a freedom of personal choice in certain matters of marriage and family life." The non-custodial divorced
parent has no way to implement the constitutionally protected right to maintain a parental relationship with his child
except through visitation. To acknowledge the protected status of the relationship as the majority does, and yet deny
protection under Title 42 USC § 1983, to visitation, which is the exclusive means of effecting that right, is to negate the
right completely. Wise v. Bravo, 666 F 2d 1328, (1981).

The United States Supreme Court noted that a parent's right to "the companionship, care, custody and management of
his or her children" is an interest "far more precious" than any property right. May v. Anderson, 345 US 528, 533; 73 S
Ct 840, 843, (1952).

Parent's rights have been recognized as being "essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free man." Meyer v.
Nebraska, 262 or 426 US 390 <check cite>; 43 S Ct 625, (1923).

Law and court procedures that are "fair on their faces" but administered "with an evil eye or a heavy hand" was
discriminatory and violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 US 356,
(1886).
Reference Studies
Note: The following studies are public on the web and this list is to aid your search as a starting point. Studies can
be biased depending on the funding. Look for studies that are not funded by any program which requires the study
for their funding objectives. The abused person program funds many studies.
Support Studies:
In 1999, the Harvard Injury Control Center launched the National Violent Injury Statistics System (NVISS) In 2000,
CDC started planning for the implementation of the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) NVDRS
began operation in 2003 with seven states (Alaska, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Oregon, South Carolina,
and Virginia) participating; six states (Colorado, Georgia, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin)
joined in 2004 and four more (California, Kentucky, New Mexico, and Utah) in 2005, for a total of 17 states
(Figure). Funding for state participation is provided by CDC. CDC anticipates that NVDRS will expand to include all
50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories.
http://www.cdc.gov/Women/pubs/violence.htm

The One Hundred Billion Dollar Man: The Annual Public Costs of Father Absence
https://www.fatherhood.org/research.asp
National Fatherhood Initiative research
Summary:
  The federal government spends $99.8 billion dollars every year on programs - such as child support
enforcement and anti-poverty efforts - that support father-absent homes.

The Father Factor: Facts of Fatherhood

https://www.fatherhood.org/father_factor.asp
Summary:
 Many facts to support father’s involvement with children. Data on the Consequences of Fathers Absence.
 According to a U.S. Census Bureau report, over 25 million children live apart from their biological fathers.
That is 1 out of every 3 (34.5%) children in America. Nearly 2 in 3 (65%) African American children live in
father-absent homes. Nearly 4 in 10 (36%) Hispanic children, and nearly 3 in 10 (27%) white children live
in father-absent homes.
 Employment, Economic Stability & Father Involvement
https://www.fatherhood.org/doclibrary/NRFC_EconomicStability_FatherInvolvement.pdf
 Fathers and Domestic Violence
https://www.fatherhood.org/doclibrary/NRFC_FathersDomesticViolence.pdf

Understanding Intimate Partner Violence Fact sheet 2006

http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/IPV-FactSheet.pdf
Summary:
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is abuse that occurs between two people in a close relationship. The term “intimate
partner” includes current and former spouses and dating partners. IPV exists along a continuum from a single
episode of violence to ongoing battering. IPV includes four types of behavior:
 Physical abuse is when a person hurts or tries to hurt a partner by hitting, kicking, burning, or other
physical force.
 Sexual abuse is forcing a partner to take part in a sex act when the partner does not consent.
 Threats of physical or sexual abuse include the use of words, gestures, weapons, or other means to
communicate the intent to cause harm.
 Emotional abuse is threatening a partner or his or her possessions or loved ones, or harming a partner’s
sense of self-worth. Examples are stalking, name calling, intimidation, or not letting a partner see friends
and family.
Often, IPV starts with emotional abuse. This behavior can progress to physical or sexual assault. Several types of IPV
may occur together.

Restoring Fathers to Families and Communities, Social Policy Action Network, Kathleen Sylvester and Kathy
Reich, 2000, ph 202-434-4770.
http://www.aecf.org/upload/publicationfiles/restoring%20fathers.pdf
Summary:
Across the country, states and communities are mobilizing to increase fathers’ involvement in the lives of their
children. The strategies they are choosing vary widely, reflecting the philosophical differences about the definition
of “responsible fatherhood." Some efforts focus on teaching men the skills they need to be good fathers; others
concentrate on child support enforcement; still others promote marriage and two-parent family formation. But other
states are still doing less than they could to promote father involvement. Map and Track, a 1999 survey of state
responsible fatherhood efforts, reported that few states had begun new efforts to help fathers in the previous two
years. One reason: There isn’t enough specific information available for state and local officials about what they can
do, legislatively or administratively, to help fathers help their children. This guide tries to fill that gap. It lays out a
detailed six-step strategy for promoting father involvement, especially among low-income, unwed men. The guide
will be most useful for state legislators, governors, and agency officials looking for ways to better serve fathers. But
local government officials, businesses, community-based organizations, and the faith community will find ideas they
can use as well. Each of the six steps includes a menu of policy options from which policymakers can choose. Each
step also includes detailed examples of what states, communities, and non-profits nationwide are doing to promote
responsible fatherhood, along with contacts and resources for policymakers who want to learn more.

The Importance of Fathers in the Healthy Development of Children

Jeffrey Rosenberg and W. Bradford Wilcox , 2006
http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/fatherhood/fatherhood.pdf

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on
Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau Office on Child Abuse and Neglect
Summary:
OVERVIEW OF THE SCOPE OF CHILD MALTREATMENT AND CHILD PROTECTION:
Prior to delving into the discussion of fathers and their role in both preventing and perpetrating child
maltreatment, it is useful to understand the scope of the problem. The following findings from the National Child
Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) for 2003 provide a snapshot of reported child victimization:
 During 2003, an estimated 906,000 children were victims of abuse or neglect.
 An estimated 2.9 million referrals of abuse or neglect concerning approximately 5.5 million children were
received by CPS agencies. More than two-thirds of those referrals were accepted for investigation or
assessment.
 Nationally, 60.9 percent of child victims experienced neglect (including medical neglect), 18.9 percent
were physically abused, 9.9 percent were sexually abused, and 4.9 percent were emotionally or
psychologically maltreated. Approximately two-fifths (40.8 percent) of child victims were maltreated by
their mothers acting alone; another 18.8 percent were maltreated by their fathers acting alone; and 16.9
percent were abused by both parents.
In most jurisdictions, CPS is the agency mandated to conduct an investigation into reports of child abuse or neglect
and to offer services to families and children where maltreatment has occurred or is likely to occur. Of course, any
intervention into family life on behalf of children must be guided by State laws, sound professional standards for
practice, and strong philosophical underpinnings. The key principles guiding State laws on child protection are
based largely on Federal statutes, primarily the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) as amended by
the Keeping Children and Families Safe Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-36) and the Adoption

RESEARCH ON THE ROLE OF FATHERS:

In the last decade, the social sciences have begun recognizing and examining the crucial role that fathers play in
child development and family dynamics. Nevertheless, relatively little attention has been paid to the role fathers
play in the dynamics of child maltreatment. A 1997 review of research on child abuse and neglect concluded that
this research was characterized by a “conspicuous absence of information from and about fathers in violent
families. The research that does exist on the link between fathers and maltreatment suggests that:
 Fathers are directly involved in 36.8 percent (acting alone in 18.8 percent and with others in 18.0 percent
of the cases) of maltreatment cases;
 The presence of fathers in the home is tied to lower rates of maltreatment;
 Unrelated male figures and stepfathers in households tend to be more abusive than biological, married
fathers;
 The quality of the relationship between the mother and father has an important indirect effect on the
odds of maltreatment.
Not much is known, however, about the specific role that fathers play in preventing, causing, or contributing to
child maltreatment. In addition, relatively little energy has been invested in training CPS caseworkers to work with
fathers in cases of maltreatment. A number of studies indicate that caseworkers may overlook fathers in
connection with their investigations and interventions regarding child maltreatment. This is not surprising since
working with fathers in social services is relatively new—the first national meeting dedicated solely to issues
concerning fathers did not occur until 1994. In addition, American families today represent a range of fatherhood
models, some of which lend themselves to productive involvement with the caseworker and others which may not.
While research and training directly related to fathers and child maltreatment have been limited, there have been
significant efforts over recent years devoted to research on the role of fathers in child development and the
creation of programs to strengthen the capacity of fathers. This manual highlights both the findings from the
available research and examples of fatherhood programs. By equipping CPS caseworkers with a solid introduction
to the fatherhood research, the manual should foster a sense of empathy and knowledge that will enable them to
work effectively with fathers. Further, the exploration of each stage of the child protection process—from
investigation to case closure—will help caseworkers work with fathers in a way that increases the likelihood of
achieving the ultimate goal: safety and permanency for the child .

The Parenting of Adolescents and Adolescents as Parents: A Developmental Contextual Perspective

http://parenthood.library.wisc.edu/Lerner/Lerner-bib.html

Richard Lerner, PhD, Anita L. Brennan Professor of Education Director, Center for Child, Family and Community
Partnerships Boston College, E. Ree Noh, Clancie Wilson
Summary:
 This report contains a huge list of reference material and cases to support parenting by both parents.

"Surveillance for Violent Deaths -- National Violent Death Reporting System, 16 States, 2005" (SVD) An April
2008 report by the CDC
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5703a1.htm
Summary:
 The report provides revealing data collected by the NVDRS. While approximately twice as many females as
males attempt suicide, the rate of completed suicide in the SVD report is nearly 4 times greater for males
than females. In 2005, 32,637 suicides were reported. The SVD reports 30% of the suicides are
precipitated by intimate partner problems.
 Hence, it is possible that approximately 7,832 male and 1,958 female suicides were precipitated by
intimate partner problems. These intimate partner problem suicides far exceed the number of intimate
partner homicides. The online literature review Domestic Violence-Related Deaths exams how many of
these intimate partner problem deaths may have a direct or indirect association with domestic violence.
 Results: For 2005, a total of 15,495 fatal incidents involving 15,962 violent deaths occurred in the 16
NVDRS states included in this report. The majority (56.1%) of deaths were suicides, followed by
homicides and deaths involving legal interventions (29.6%), violent deaths of undetermined intent (13.3%),
and unintentional firearm deaths (0.7%). Fatal injury rates varied by sex, race/ethnicity, age group, and
method of injury. Rates were substantially higher for males than for females and for American
Indians/Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) and blacks than for whites and Hispanics. Rates were highest for persons
aged 20--24 years. For method of injury, the three highest rates were reported for firearms, poisonings, and
hanging/strangulation/suffocation.

REFERENCES EXAMINING ASSAULTS BY WOMEN ON THEIR SPOUSES OR MALE PARTNERS: AN ANNOTATED

BIBLIOGRAPHY  
Martin S. Fiebert, Department of Psychology, California State University, Long Beach 
Last updated: February 2009 http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm
Summary:
 This bibliography examines 247 scholarly investigations: 188 empirical studies and 59 reviews and/or
analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in
 
their relationships with their spouses or male partners.  The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies
exceeds 240,200. 

WASHINGTON STATE CENTER FOR COURT RESEARCH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, July, 2008
Residential Time Summary Reports Filed in Washington from July 2007 – March 2008
Summary:
 This report analyzed 4,354 Residential Time Summary Reports filed in Washington courts from July 2007
through March 2008. Overall, 93% of all Parenting Plans were by agreement of the parties and 86%
involved no risk factors on the part of the parents that limited residential time of children. The most
common residential schedule for children was for the mother to have 66-99% of the residential time and the
father to have 1-34% of residential time. This schedule occurred for approximately half of all cases and was
more than three times more likely than any other arrangement.
 Residential time, however, was impacted by a number of factors. First, when it was established that one
parent had a risk factor that could limit his or her residential time (e.g., abused or neglected a child, had
 chemical dependency, committed domestic violence), the other parent received all, or almost all, of the
residential time (provided he or she had no risk factors). Second, the combination of representation statuses
had a significant impact on residential time. When both parties had the same type of representation (either
self or attorney), the outcomes were similar. However, when one party had an attorney and the other party
was self represented, the attorney-represented party received more residential time in comparison to cases
which had the same type of representation for both parties. Finally, although the vast majority of cases were
agreed, when a case was contested, fathers tended to receive more residential time in comparison to other
types of decisions (provided the father had an attorney).

Father Facts, 3rd ed., The National Fatherhood Initiative, Wade F. Horn, Ph.D, 1999, ph 301-948-0599

Parenting Our Children, Department of Health and Human Services, 1996

Opposition Studies:
National Network to End Domestic Violence, Domestic Violence Counts
http://nnedv.org/resources/census/67-census-domestic-violence-counts/232-census2008.html
Summary:
 The National Census of Domestic Violence Services (Census) is an annual non invasive, unduplicated
count of adults and children who seek services from U.S. domestic violence shelter programs during a
single 24-hour survey period. Conducted annually by NNEDV since 2006, this Census takes into account
the dangerous nature of domestic violence by using a survey designed to protect the confidentiality and
safety of victims.
 This is a commissioned report (paid for) that demonstrates the bias generated by women groups around the
country. Upon examination of the numbers in the reports every man woman and child in the United States
based on total population annualized has gone to a shelter in the last 2 years and or received services.
 Our current efforts are to expose how Federal funding is being used to promote the miss use of domestic
violence statutes to circumvent due process and equal protection of parties of a divorce.
 A study of the organizations outlined in this report will reveal that some funding provided for abused
persons is being used to lobby and promote the miss use of domestic violence statutes. A miss use of
Federal funding.

Conclusion
We want to thank everybody that has aided in the creation of this report. This is an organic public
document and we look for input from anybody. If you have information that should be added to the report send it
to: mosquitoreport@yahoo.com we will try our best to add it.

If you have found this report useful we have done our public service. We ask that you do your part every letter
helps; every phone call helps remember the mosquito. Help build a swarm and take back the American children
and families.

STOP CHILD ABUSE FOR PROFIT