[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
65 views14 pages

Linearity, Linear Range, Sensi - Vity: Methods Ability To Obtain Signals

The document discusses key concepts related to evaluating the linearity of analytical methods, including linearity, linear range, and sensitivity. It provides details on experiment planning such as recommended concentration ranges and number of calibration levels. Guidelines are given for visual evaluation of linearity using plots of signals versus concentration and residuals. The correlation coefficient r2 is also discussed as a metric for linearity evaluation, though it does not solely determine linearity. Proper evaluation of linearity is important for validating analytical methods.

Uploaded by

Chira Maria
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
65 views14 pages

Linearity, Linear Range, Sensi - Vity: Methods Ability To Obtain Signals

The document discusses key concepts related to evaluating the linearity of analytical methods, including linearity, linear range, and sensitivity. It provides details on experiment planning such as recommended concentration ranges and number of calibration levels. Guidelines are given for visual evaluation of linearity using plots of signals versus concentration and residuals. The correlation coefficient r2 is also discussed as a metric for linearity evaluation, though it does not solely determine linearity. Proper evaluation of linearity is important for validating analytical methods.

Uploaded by

Chira Maria
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

Linearity,

linear range, sensi.vity

Linearity

Methods ability to obtain signals


which are directly propor.onal to the
concentra1on of analyte in the sample.

1
Linear range
Range of concentra.ons where the
signals are directly propor1onal to the
concentra1on of the analyte
in the sample.

Sensi.vity
The change in instrument response
which corresponds to a change in
the measured quan1ty.

The gradient of the response curve.


2
Experiment planning
for evalua.on of linearity
•  Type of calibra1on samples
•  Concentra1on range
•  Number of concentra1on levels
•  Measurement protocol

Type of calibra.on samples


•  Standard solu1ons
–  matrix-free

•  Matrix-containing samples
–  Matrix-matched calibra1on
–  Blank matrix extract (preferably the same type as the sample)

3
Concentra.on range
•  Appropriate for the method
•  Expected working range ± 10%…20%
•  70%…130% of expected analyte concentra1on
•  Blank sample

Number of concentra.on levels


•  Minimum 6 concentra1on levels are acceptable
–  Suggested 10
–  Evenly placed
–  Prepared from independent dilu1ons

4
Measurement protocol
•  As similar as possible to the real life situa1on
–  Random order
–  Between the samples

•  Analysed at least twice

Evalua.on of linearity
•  Visual evalua.on

•  Residuals

5
Visual evalua.on
120000000 80000000
LINEAR 70000000 NOT LINEAR
100000000
60000000
80000000
50000000
Signal (au)

Signal (au)
60000000 40000000

30000000
40000000
20000000
20000000
10000000

0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
c (mg/kg) c (mg/kg)

Residual
•  Difference between experimental signal and calculated signal
yi ŷi
120000000

100000000
yi
80000000
Signal (au)

60000000

40000000 ŷi = slope ⋅ xi + intercept


20000000

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 εi = yi − ŷi
c (mg/kg)

6
Visual evalua.on
120000000 140000000
80000000
LINEAR 70000000
120000000
NOT LINEAR
LINEAR ?
100000000
60000000
100000000
80000000

Signal (au)
Signal (au)

50000000
80000000

Signal
60000000 40000000
60000000
30000000
40000000
40000000
20000000
20000000 20000000
10000000

0 0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 0 1 2 2 4 6
3 8
4 10
5 12
6
c (mg/kg) c (mg/kg)
c (mg/kg)

Plot of residuals

7
Linear, homoscedas.c
10000000

8000000

6000000
Residual (au)

4000000

2000000

0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
-2000000

-4000000

-6000000
c (mg/kg)

Linear, heteroscedas.c
30000000

20000000

10000000
Residual (au)

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
-10000000

-20000000

-30000000
c (mg/kg)

8
Not linear, heteroscedas.c
30000000

20000000

10000000
Residual (au)

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
-10000000

-20000000

-30000000

-40000000
c (mg/kg)

Rela.ve residuals

•  ±20% is acceptable
yi − ŷi
Yi =
ŷi

9
Correla.on coefficient r
Coefficient of determina.on r2
•  Total variability in the response that is
accounted for by the model

•  Not a measure of linearity!

Linear range

10
“range”

Dynamic range, Analy.cal range


120000000

100000000
Signal (au)

80000000

60000000

40000000

20000000

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
c (mg/kg)

11
Dynamic range, Analy1cal range

Working range, Calibra.on range
120000000

100000000
Signal (au)

80000000

60000000

40000000
*LOQ
20000000

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
c (mg/kg)

Dynamic range, Analy1cal range



Working range, Calibra1on range
120000000

Linear range,
100000000 Linear dynamic range

Signal (au)

80000000

60000000

40000000
*LOQ
20000000

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
c (mg/kg)

12
Sensi.vity
•  gradient of the calibra1on graph

Sensi.vity
120,000,000 ΔSignal
Slope =
100,000,000 Signal = 7610033⋅ c + 32270418 Δc
80,000,000
Signal (au)

ΔSignal
60,000,000

40,000,000

20,000,000 Δc
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
c (mg/kg)

13
Sensi.vity
•  Method op1miza1on

•  Quality assurance

•  Rou1ne monitoring of the instrument

Connected to other parameters


•  Calcula1ng matrix effect Slopematrix−matched
%ME = ⋅100%
calibra1on graph method Slopesolvent

•  Calcula1ng LoD and LoQ Sy. x
LoD = 3.3×
Slope

Sy. x
LoQ = 10 ×
Slope

14

You might also like