5 A Trechcircuit
5 A Trechcircuit
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3273408
CITATIONS READS
39 188
5 authors, including:
M.R. Iravani
University of Toronto
102 PUBLICATIONS 5,175 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by M.R. Iravani on 19 July 2013.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
622 IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 13, No. 2, April 1998
I~E-DO~~IN IENT
BE COUPLING C SFORMER
M.R. Iravani, X. Wang I. Polishchuk, J. Ribeiro A. Sarshar
Department of Electrical and Haefely-Trench Haefely-Trench
Computer Engineering 390 Midwest Road 71 Maybrook Drive
University of Toronto Scarborough, Ontario Scarborough, Ontario
Toronto, Ontario Canada M1P 3B5 Canada M1V 4B6
Canada M5S 364
Abstract-This paper reports a set of digital time-domain systems. The model is developed based on the use of the
simulation studies conducted on TEHMPl61A Coupling EMTP. The objectives of this joint project are:
Capacitor Voltage Transformer (CCVT) of Haefely-Trench. The
Electro-Magnetic Transients Program (EMTP) is used to develop To evaluate, compare and quantify impacts of CCVT
the CCVT model and conduct the transient studies. The accuracy component parameters and protectivelsuppressive
of the CCVT model is verified through comparison of the EMTP devices on its transient response, e.g. the
simulation results with those obtained from test results. The phenomenon of ferroresonance.
investigations demonstrate that the developed model can
accurately predict CCVT transient response, e.g. the phenomenon
of ferroresonance. The model is developed (1) to determine
0 To predict and quantify impact of CCVT transient
impact of transients on CCVT response, (2) to design, optimize behaviour on protection systems.
and compare protective and ferroresonance suppressor devices of
CCVT, and (3) to predict CCVT transient response on power e To investigate impact of power system transients,
system monitoring and protection schemes. e.g. faults and plannedunplanned switching
incidents, on CCVT transient behaviour.
Keywords: CCVT, Ferroresonance, Simulation, EMTP,
Protection, Relaying. Salient feature of the developed model as compared with
the reported models [4,5,6,7,8] is that it represents details
1. INTRODUCTION of (1) CCVT step-down transformer including its
saturation characteristic and tap positions, (2) CCVT series
CCVT is a well known apparatus to transform high- reactor including its tap positions, (3) CCVT protective
voltage (input) to low-voltage levels (output) at which devices, (4) ferroresonance suppressor circuitry, and ( 5 )
monitoring devices and protection relays operate. various burden models. Due to space limitation, this paper
Theoretically, the output waveform should be an exact only reports some of the studies conducted on
replica of the input waveform under all operating TEHMP161A CCVT model of Haefely-Trench and
conditions. Under steady-state conditions, this highlights the conclusions.
requirement can be satisfied based upon proper design and
tuning of the CCVT. However, under transient conditions, The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2
e.g. faults and switching incidents, the CCVT output introduces TEHMP161A CCVT system used for the
waveform may deviate from the input waveform due to the reported studies. Section 3 reports the results of the
impacts of capacitive, inductive and nonlinear components frequency-domain studies carried out on the CCVT system.
of the CCVT [1,2]. Therefore, fidelity of CCVT during Section 4 compares the EMTP simulation results with the
transients must be well known and quantified [3]. The test results and verifies the accuracy of the developed
other concern is thermal overstress and consequently model. Section 5 reports the CCVT response to various
deterioration of CCVT components due to its internal simulated transient scenarios. Conclusions are
transient phenomena, e.g. the phenomenon of summarized in Section 6.
ferroresonance.
2. TEHMP161A CCVT CIRCUITRY
To address the above issues, the Instrument Transformer
Division (ITD)of Haefely-Trench and the University of Figure 1 shows schematic diagram of the CCVT
Toronto have embarked upon development of a circuitry. Switches S1, S2, S3 and S4 are not part of the
comprehensive digital time-domain model of CCVT CCVT circuitry, and included in the EMTP model to
simulate various transient scenarios imposed on the CCVT.
Major CCVT components of Fig. 1 are: voltage divider C1
PE-479-PWRD-0-01-1997 A paper recommended and approved and C2, drain coil Ld, step-down transformer (SDT), series
by the IEEE Transmisslon and Distribution Committee of the IEEE
Power Engineering Society for pubhcatlon in the IEEE Transactions reactor, harmonic suppression filter, protective device, and
on Power Delivery. Manuscript submitted July 31, 1996; made burden. Capacitors Cm, Ct and Cc are lumped
available for printing January 8, 1997. representations of stray capacitances of STD and series
reactor. STD and series reactor have multiple tap positions
which are not identified on Fig. 1, but have been included
in the EMTP model. Various protective devices examined
for the CCVT system of Fig. 1 are: MOV, triac and spark-
gap. The EMTP provides basic functions and component
models to construct required models of the above protective
E -70
-
c
-75
t
1:Lc=38 H
2:Lc=40 H
-I
-5
3:Lc=42H 3i
-80
-90
400 450 500 550 600 650 700
(1) Rotective Device (2) Harmonic Suppression Filter (3) Burden Frequency (Hz)
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of a TEHMP161A Haefely- Fig. 3 Effect of net series reactance 6,) on CCVT
Trench CCVT. frequency response.
r
devices. Typical data for the CCVT of Fig. 1 is given in
Appendix A.
3. FREQUENCY-DOMAIN SENSITIVITY
ANALYSIS
A set of frequency-domain studies [5, 71 are conducted
z-
U
= .
Y
3:Ct=700 pF
is helpful (1) to determine appropriate CCVT component -a0 - 4: ct=i400 PF
characteristics for EMTP studies, and (2) to verify the
EM simulation results, e.g. to correlate simulation and
measurement results. Figures 2 to 7 show a set of
frequency domain study results.
-90
I j
10 1o2 1@ 1o4
Figure 2 shows that the CCVT frequency response (20 Frequency (Hz)
log (uz/u1)) is significantly affected by Ld at frequencies Fig. 4 Effect of Ct on CCVT frequency response.
higher than 600-Hz. Figure 3 shows that the frequency -55 I
response is not very sensitive to changes of the inductance
(Lc) of the series reactor. The studies also show that the -60
frequency response is not sensitive to variations of STD
-65
leakage inductance.
-85
/
400 500 600 700 800
a
o_ Frequency (Hz)
-
C
tu Fig. 5 Effect of Cc on CCVT frequency response.
Sensitivity studies show that variation of mutual stray
2: With Drain Coil capacitance Cm, from 0.0 pF to 220 pF, does not influence
-80 1 the CCVT frequency response. Figure 5 shows that the
notch frequency illustrated in the frequency response is
1 I noticeably affected by the stray capacitance (C,) of the
10 1oz 10 10
series reactor. Figure 6 indicates that VA of burden does
Frequency (Hz)
not have any noticeable influence on the frequency
Fig. 2 Effect of Ld on CCVT frequency response. response. To the contrary, Fig. 7 shows that power-factor
624
-50 1 n s4 C STD SI
pf = 0.8 lagging
n
.c
m
(j- / U '
I \I
1:burden=l200 VA
2:burden=800 VA
3:burden=400 VA
-80 - 4:burden=200 VA
I -.I
IO' 1oz 1o3 10'
Frequency (Hz) Fig. 8 CCVT test set-up.
Figure 10 compares the EMTP simulation and test
Fig. 6 Effect of burden VA on CCVT frequency results corresponding to ferroresonance test (secondary
response.
short-circuit test). Initially S1 (Fig. 8) is open. The STD
n secondary side is subjected to a short-circuit by closing S1
and considering a burden with zero resistance (for the
burden=400 VA
--0
-/-- / '
/
TIME(S)
1'
operating condition. Note that for the sake of clarity, the
simulated response has been enlarged. Figure 9 shows that 0 0.006 ,0.003
the pattern of oscillatory transients and frequency of Fig. 9 CCVT recorded (a) and simulated (b) output
oscillations depicted in the simulation and test results voItage corresponding to transient response test.
closely agree.
625
I
1 A
TIMUS)
I I I 1 I 1 -300 ; I I I I
I
0 0.1 02 03 0.4 05 0 a1 0.2 03 0.4 0.5
Fig. 10 C O T recorded (a) and simulated (b) output Fig. 11 CCVT recorded (a) and simulated (b) output
voltage corresponding to fenoresonance test (S1 voltage corresponding to fenoresonance test (S 1
opens at voltage zero-crossing). opens at peak voltage).
CCVT transient response. voltage component at the CCVT output. These oscillations
are due to energy exchange between capacitive voltage
To determine impact of power system transients divider and Ld. The frequency of this oscillatory mode is
(e.g., faults and capacitor energization) on the
fidelity of CCVT response. defined by the natural frequency of the loop formed by C1,
C2, and Ld (13.956-kHz). In practice, the net resistance
To determine impact of burden characteristics on the associated with C1, C2 and particularly Ld limits the peak
CCVT transient behaviour. value and dampens this oscillatory mode. This indicates
that accurate Q-factor of the drain coil must be represented
To investigate impacts of CCVT transient response in the EMTP model when the impact of system transient
on digital relaying/protection systems. are investigated.
To modifykhange CCVT design to meet particular Figure 12(c) shows the CCVT transient response to the
operating requirements and achieve desirable same switching scenario when the drain coil is not
transient response. included in the CCVT system. The high-frequency mode
in Fig. 12(c) is due to the presence of stray capacitance
5. EMTP STUDY RESULTS Cm. Comparison between Figs. 12(b) and 12(c) illustrates
Due to space limitation, only the simulation results sensitivity of the CCVT transient response to the
corresponding to system fault and secondary-winding inductance of the drain coil.
short-circuit study cases conducted on the TEHMP161A
CCVT of Figure 1 are reported in this paper. We intend to Figure 12(d) shows the CCVT transient response when
report a comprehensive set of results in a subsequent paper. the protective block of the CCVT (Fig. 1) is represented by
a spark gap system. As compared with Figs. 12(b) and
5.1 System Fault 12(c), Fig. 12(d) shows that the maximum encountered
voltage is limited by the spark gap protective level.
T h e CCYT rmponse to a temporary, dose-in, line-to-
ground fault is simulated by a close-open operation of Figure 12(e) shows the CCVT transient response to the
switch S3, Fig. 1 (initially S4 and S1 are closed and S2 is same switching scenario when the drain coil (Ld) and the
open). Figure 12(a) shows the CCVT input voltage. mutual stray capacitance (C,) are not included in the
model. Comparison of Fig. 12(b) and 12(c) with Fig. 12(e)
Figure 12(b) shows the CCVT response (output voltage) reveals that the high-frequency oscillations are due to the
to the fault. Closure of S 3 resuIts i n a high-frequency presence of Ld and c,. Therefore, (1) proper design to
626
x IOS x io5
2
0
,. ....... ... ........ ... . . . . .,
-0
.I\.
, a) ,a)
-3 -2 L 1
0.05 0.1 0.15 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
5000 500
0 0
-500
0
,
0.05
d)
0.1 0.15
-500
0
1
0 0.1
ir Yd)
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
, e)
"
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Time (S) Time (S)
Fig. 12 CCVT transient response to closure and opening Fig. 13 CCVT transient response to closure and opening
of Switch S3 of Fig. 1. of Switch S2 of Fig. 1.
(a) input voltage (a) input voltage
(b) output voltage (with Ld, with c,, without (b) output voltage (no burden (VA=O))
protective device) (c) output voltage (with protective device,
(c) output voltage (without Ld, with c,, without burden: 400-VA, pf=O.S)
(d) output voltage (with kIOV protective device,
protective device) burden: 400-VA, pf=O.8)
(d) output voltage (without Ld, with C, with (e) MOV absorbed energy corresponding to case
protective device) (d) above.
(b) output voltage (without Ld, without c,, effectively damped out.
without protective device)
minimize C, and ( 2 ) proper selection of Q-factor of Ld, Figure 13(d) shows the CCVT response to the same
can practically eliminate the high-frequency component transient when the protective device is represented by an
shown in Fig. 12. MOV element in the CCVT system. Figure 13(d) shows
that presence of MOV can effectively mitigate the
5.2 Secondary W&zd&g XhoTt-C&euk phenomenon of ferroresonance Fig 13(e) shows the
energy absorbed by the MOV element as a result of the
Figure 13 shows the CCVT ferroresonance response to a short-circuit.
temporary short-circuit at the secondary (burden) side of
SDT. The short-circuit is imposed by closing S2 at peak 6. CONCLUSIONS
voltage and then opening S2 after 10 cycles. Figures 13(a)
and 13(b) show the CCVT input voltage and output This paper presents the results of digital time-domain
voltage. Figure 13(b) shows that the switching process and frequency-domain studies conducted on TEHMPl61A
results in subharmonic ferroresonance. CCVT of Haefely-Trench. The Electro-Magnetic
Transients Program (EMTP) is used for digital time-
Figure 13(c) shows the CCVT response to the short- domain simulation of the CCVT transient response.
circuit when the protective device is represented by a spark Comparison of the EMTP results with those of test results
gap and the CCVT burden is 400-VA. Figure 13(c) verifies the accuracy of the EMTP model of the CCVT.
illustrates that the ferroresonance phenomenon is The investigations conclude that:
627
Time-domain and frequency-domain analyses of
CCVT provide complementary information to
accurately predict steady-state and transient
behaviour of CCVT system, and to properly
desigdtune its protective and suppressor devices.
M.R. Iravani (University of Toronto): 5. Configuration of Fig. 1 of the paper was used
The authors would like to thank the discusser for his for transient tests reported in the paper. The
interest in the paper. The following comments are in frequency response provided by the discusser
response to the questions and comments of the indicates that the first notch appears slightly above
discusser. 600 Hz corresponding to CC = 1500 pF. This is
1. We are not aware of any reported case where consistent with our results of Fig. 5. At CC= 1500 pF,
CCVT frequency response has impacted control loops the first notch based on our studies appears at 640 Hz.
of power electronic based apparatus. However, it is Our studies indicate that the first notch exists
required that the CCVT ferroresonance to be damped regardless of the magnitude of CC, Figs. 2 to 6. The
out rapidly (e.g. 2 cycles) when it is used for voltage only case where we can eliminated the first notch is
measurement at SVC terminals. when the burden is adjusted at the rated value (400-
2. The discusser is correct in stating that the unit for VA) and pf = 0.6. There is no particular pattern for
current in the STD saturation data is mA and not A. variation of CCVT parameters as the rated voltage
3. Each frequency-response plot in the paper is increases to 500-kV.
simply the ratio of output voltage to the input voltage 7. Currently we are conducting some studies to
in (db). identify sensitivity of CCVT transient response to
4. The following table provides saturation various parameters. We intend to verify our
characteristic of the suppression filter. conclusions and simulation results based on
comparison with test results.
Current (A) Flux(V S)
0.0494 13 0.27000
Manuscript received October 1, 1997.
0.358222 0.3 1886
0.980298 0.33762
2.538552 0.35637
10.000000 0.40000