[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
100 views3 pages

1.1.1 in Praise of Amateurs

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 3

In Praise of Amateurs

Despite the specialization of scientific research, amateurs still have an


important role to play.
During the scientific revolution of the 17th century, scientists were
largely men of private means who pursued their interest in natural
philosophy for their own edification. Only in the past century or two has it
become possible to make a living from investigating the workings of
nature. Modern science was, in other words, built on the work of
amateurs. Today, science is an increasingly specialized and
compartmentalized subject, the domain of experts who know more and
more about less and less. Perhaps surprisingly, however, amateurs
even those without private means are still important.

A recent poll carried out at a meeting of the American Association for the
Advancement of Science by astronomer Dr Richard Fienberg found that,
in addition to his field of astronomy, amateurs are actively involved in
such field as acoustics, horticulture, ornithology, meteorology, hydrology
and palaeontology. Far from being crackpots, amateur scientists are
often in close touch with professionals, some of whom rely heavily on
their co-operation.

Admittedly, some fields are more open to amateurs than others.


Anything that requires expensive equipment is clearly a no-go area. And
some kinds of research can be dangerous; most amateur chemists,
jokes Dr Fienberg, are either locked up or have blown themselves to
bits. But amateurs can make valuable contributions in fields from
rocketry to palaeontology and the rise of the Internet has made it easier
than before to collect data and distribute results.

Exactly which field of study has benefited most from the contributions of
amateurs is a matter of some dispute. Dr Fienberg makes a strong case
for astronomy. There is, he points out, a long tradition of collaboration
between amateur and professional sky watchers. Numerous comets,
asteroids and even the planet Uranus were discovered by amateurs.
Today, in addition to comet and asteroid spotting, amateurs continue to
do valuable work observing the brightness of variable stars and
detecting novae- new stars in the Milky Way and supernovae in other
galaxies. Amateur observers are helpful, says Dr Fienberg, because
there are so many of them (they far outnumber professionals) and
because they are distributed all over the world. This makes special kinds
of observations possible: if several observers around the world
accurately record the time when a star is eclipsed by an asteroid, for
example, it is possible to derive useful information about the asteroids
shape.

Another field in which amateurs have traditionally played an important


role is palaeontology. Adrian Hunt, a palaeontologist at Mesa Technical
College in New Mexico, insists that his is the field in which amateurs
have made the biggest contribution. Despite the development of high-
tech equipment, he says, the best sensors for finding fossils are human
eyes lots of them.

Finding volunteers to look for fossils is not difficult, he says, because of


the near universal interest in anything to do with dinosaurs. As well as
helping with this research, volunteers learn about science, a process he
calls recreational education.

Rick Bonney of the Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology in Ithaca, New


York, contends that amateurs have contributed the most in his field.
There are, he notes, thought to be as many as 60 million birdwatchers in
America alone. Given their huge numbers and the wide geographical
coverage they provide, Mr Bonney has enlisted thousands of amateurs
in a number of research projects. Over the past few years their
observations have uncovered previously unknown trends and cycles in
bird migrations and revealed declines in the breeding populations of
several species of migratory birds, prompting a habitat conservation
programme.

Despite the successes and whatever the field of study, collaboration


between amateurs and professionals is not without its difficulties. Not
everyone, for example is happy with the term amateur. Mr Bonney has
coined the term citizen scientist because he felt that other words, such
as volunteer sounded disparaging. A more serious problem is the
question of how professionals can best acknowledge the contributions
made by amateurs. Dr Fienberg says that some amateur astronomers
are happy to provide their observations but grumble about not being
reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses. Others feel let down when their
observations are used in scientific papers, but they are not listed as co-
authors. Dr Hunt says some amateur palaeontologists are disappointed
when told that they cannot take finds home with them.

These are legitimate concerns but none seems insurmountable.


Provided amateurs and professionals agree the terms on which they will
work together beforehand, there is no reason why co-operation between
the two groups should not flourish. Last year Dr S. Carlson, founder of
the Society for Amateur Scientists won an award worth $290,000 for his
work in promoting such co-operation. He says that one of the main
benefits of the prize is the endorsement it has given to the contributions
of amateur scientists, which has done much to silence critics among
those professionals who believe science should remain their exclusive
preserve.

At the moment, says Dr Carlson, the society is involved in several


schemes including an innovative rocket-design project and the setting up
of a network of observers who will search for evidence of a link between
low- frequency radiation and earthquakes. The amateurs, he says,
provide enthusiasm and talent, while the professionals provide guidance
so that anything they do discover will be taken seriously. Having laid
the foundations of science, amateurs will have much to contribute to its
ever expanding edifice.

You might also like