En 24

ERA L O F QUA
N LIT
GE Y
TE A
A
SS
OR
UR
CT
A NC
DIRE
GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE E

OF ENGINEERING & HULL EQUIPMENT
FOR INDIAN NAVAL WARSHIPS
Directorate of Quality Assurance (Warship Project)

DGQA, H Block, DHQ Post
New Delhi 110 011
ERAL OF QUA
EN LIT
G Y
TE A
A
SS
OR
UR
CT
A NC
DIRE
E
q
GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE

OF ENGINEERING & HULL EQUIPMENT
Directorate of Quality Assurance (Warship Project)

DGQA, H Block, DHQ Post
New Delhi 110 011
GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE OF ENGINEERING & HULL EQUIPMENT
Copyright :
Directorate of Quality Assurance (Warship Project), DGQA, New Delhi
All Rights Reserved
Edition: 2013
Issued by: Directorate of Quality Assurance (Warship Project), DGQA, New Delhi
iii
FOREWORD
1. The Directorate of Quality Assurance (Warship Project) [DQA(WP)] is one of

the 13 Directorates functioning under the Director General of Quality Assurance
(DGQA) in the Department of Defence Production, Ministry of Defence, Government
of India. The Quality Assurance responsibility of Mission Critical Equipment of
Indian Naval Warships such as Main Propulsion, Power Generation & Distribution,
Shafting Line, Steering Gear & Stabilizer, Controls & Instruments, Water Generation,
Compressors, Pumps, HV Air Conditioning & Refrigeration, STPs, Aviation
equipment, Winch, Underwater Valves etc. has been vested with DQA(WP) by the
Indian Navy. This onerous task is carried out by DQA(WP) through its 16 field
establishments across the country, which provide Quality Assurance cover for all
types of Marine Engineering & Hull Machinery (including associated electrical/
electronic equipment/ control systems) and spares being procured against Purchase
Orders placed by Defence Shipyards, Naval Procurement Agencies, Coast Guard
and DRDO, both for warships under construction and in commission.
2. This document is aimed at providing Guidelines for Inspection by Field

Units of DQA(WP), as well as, for the Industry supplying equipment to the Navy
and encompasses a formalised set of processes designed to ensure that all
equipment being procured for use on Indian Naval warships meet the
performance requirements under the environmental and operating conditions
experienced onboard a warship. The process has been evolved based on
internationally followed norms, experience gained by the Indian Navy over six
decades of operation and the infrastructure available within the country. It is
envisaged that adherence to the guidelines will enable the Industry to
manufacture equipment that conform to the requirements of warship applications
which are inherently more exacting than those found in commercial or land based
applications.
3. With the technological advancements making inroads rapidly, it would be

the endeavor of HQ DQA(WP) to keep abreast of future developments in Quality
Assurance methodology and practices which may bring about changes to the
concepts and procedures envisaged and revise these guidelines from time to
time.
New Delhi (Dinkar Sharma)

Rear Admiral
Mar 13 Addl Director General Quality Assurance
(Warship Project)
iv
CONTENTS
Chapter Title Page No.

Foreword iii
Abbreviations vi
Record Of Amendments vii
1. Guidelines for Quality Assurance An Overview 1
2. Classification Of Naval Equipment 6
3. Quality Assurance Of Warship Equipment 8
4. Manufacturing Processes A Conspectus 12
5. Drawings and QAP 14
6. Raw Material Inspection 20
7. In Process Inspection 26
8. Final Inspection 30
9. Tests And Trials 32
10. Painting, Coating, Preservation, Packing & Shipment 37
11. Documentation 42
12. Inspection Note 51
13. Concessions And Deviations 55
List of Appendices
Appendix A List of Equipment Covered Under Guidelines for QA 59

Appendix B1 Organisation of HQ DQA(WP) 61
Appendix B2 Organisation of Field Units Under DQA(WP) 62
Appendix C Format of Standard Forms of DQA(WP) ) 63
Appendix D Format of QAP 72
Appendix E Guidelines for Quality Assurance of Castings 73
Appendix F Guidelines for Quality Assurance of Forgings 79
Appendix G List of Approved Brand Names for BOIs 87
Appendix H Guidelines for Quality Assurance of Welds 88
Appendix J Guidelines for Performance / Validation Tests 112
Appendix K Guidelines for Type Tests 178
v
List of Annexures
Annexure to Indian Standards on Welding Processes 109

Appendix H
Annexure I to Applicable Standards for Chemical & Mechanical 117
Appendix J Tests for Raw Materials
Annexure II to Guidelines for Ultrasonic Tests 122
Appendix J
Annexure III to Guidelines for Radiography Test 138
Appendix J
Annexure IV to Guidelines for Liquid Penetrant Test 153
Appendix J
Annexure V to Guidelines for Magnetic Particle Test 157
Appendix J
Annexure VI to Guidelines for Eddy Current Test 170
Appendix J
vi
ABBREVIATIONS
QAP Quality Assurance Plan

IAY Inspecting Authority DQA(WP)
IAG Inspecting Agency
OPA Order Placing Agency
PEA Project Executing Agency
PDs Professional Directorates (namely DME/DEE/DNA)
IHQ Integrated Headquarters of Min of Defence
SOTR Statement of Technical Requirements
PO Purchase Order
TNC Technical Negotiations Committee
GC Guarantee Certificate
MTC Manufacturers Test Certificate
UT Ultrasonic Test
RT Radiography Test
AWS American Welding Society
CWI Certified Welding Inspector
C&M Chemical & Mechanical Tests
vii
RECORD OF AMENDMENTS
SL.NO DATE TYPE OF AMENDMENT AUTHORITY

viii
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

CHAPTER 1
GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE - AN OVERVIEW
General
1. The Guidelines for Inspection by Field Units of DQA(WP) encompass a

formalised set of processes designed to ensure that all equipment being procured for
use on Indian Naval warships meet the performance requirements under the
environmental and operating conditions experienced onboard a warship. The
process has been evolved based on internationally followed norms, experience
gained by the Indian Navy over six decades of operation and the infrastructure
available within the country.
2. The list of marine engineering equipment for warships, covered under the
ambit of these guidelines is given at Appendix A. It is envisaged that adherence to
the guidelines will enable the industry to manufacture equipment that conform to the
requirements of warship applications which are inherently more exacting than those
found in commercial or land based applications.
3. The guidelines are not an alternative to the Quality Management System of

the firm. It is taken as a premise that all products manufactured by a firm meet the
international standards of quality for non military applications. The guidelines specify
additional QA requirements that are essential to meet the quality standards and
performance criteria required for making the equipment Warship Compliant.
Therefore, these guidelines essentially add a dimension to the existing QA process
and cannot be considered as a quality standard in isolation.
4. The document is applicable across the industry for the entire spectrum of
equipment intended for Indian Naval warships catering inter alia for new inductions.
The document also has a provision for accommodating and factoring the maturity of
technology and confidence gained with firms pertaining to its products.
Terminology of Inspection Heirarchy and Equipment Classification
5. Inspecting Authority & Inspecting Agency. Before proceeding further, it

is important to understand the hierarchy of Inspection Organisation which can be
categorised into two levels as explained below:-
(a) Inspecting Authority (IAY). The Directorate of Quality

Assurance (Warship Project) - [DQA (WP)] is designated as the Inspecting
Authority for all Engineering and Hull equipment including associated
Controls, motors, control panels and instrumentation, contracted by the Indian
Navy. The powers, charter and responsibilities have been mandated in DGQA
Standing Orders. The organisation chart of HQ DQA(WP) is at Appendix B1.
2
(b) Inspecting Agencies (IAG). DQA (WP) has 16 field units covering
industrial zones across India. Each field unit is designated as Inspecting
Agency (IAG). A list of field units under DQA (WP) is placed at Appendix B2.
6. Classification of Equipment / Components. The next terminology that

needs to be understood is the various classes of equipment. Based on the criticality,
the items can be categorised into five classes as mentioned below:-
(a) Class QA 1 Equipment. Equipment subjected to completely

invasive inspection. No major deviations or concessions are permitted.
(b) Class QA 2 Equipment. These equipment are basically of Class

QA 1 but for which deviations / concessions are permitted.
(c) Class QA 3 Equipment. These are the equipment for which the
QA cover is reduced. However there are no major deviations / concessions.
(d) Class QA 4 Equipment. The QA cover in this case is generally

restricted to physical verification and performance checks. Quality of internal
components is accepted on Guarantee Certificate rendered by the firm.
(e) Class QA 5 Equipment. The QA cover for this class is only for
physical verification. The complete equipment is accepted on Guarantee /
Warranty Certificate or import documents produced by the firm.
7. As can be seen from the definitions above, the stringency conditions and
intensity of inspections vary from class to class.
Main Stages of Quality Assurance Process
8. The mandatory Quality Assurance (QA) requirements for all warship

equipment shall include but not be limited to the following processes:-
(a) Manufacturing Plan and Processes.
(b) Drawings and Quality Assurance Plan.
(c) Raw Material Inspection.
(d) In Process Inspection.
(e) Final / Assembly Inspection.
(f) Tests & Trials under specified conditions.
(g) Inspection of Painting, Packing, Preservation & Shipment.

3
(h) Inspection of Documentation for Operation, Maintenance & Repair.
(j) Issue of Inspection Note (Form 4 / DGS&D 84 Formats).
9. Each of these stages has been elaborated upon in the subsequent chapters.
However, the essence of each has been briefly explained in the paragraphs that
follow.
Manufacturing Processes Understanding and Finalising
10. The Manufacturing Plan is the seed from which the Quality Assurance Plan
germinates. Hence, it is vital for all concerned that every aspect of Manufacturing
Plan is comprehended unambiguously. This is the first and most critical stage in the
process. The formulation of QA Plan is a complex activity that requires detailed
analysis both on part of the Firm and QA personnel to arrive at a plan which is
optimal and can be implemented. Therefore, it is vital that the Manufacturing
Plan is discussed bilaterally between the firm and IAG.
Drawings and Quality Assurance Plan
11. The next logical step is the preparation of drawings and draft QAP by the firm
which is subsequently approved by the designated Naval Authorities. The following
should be taken into account at this stage:-
(a) Requirements stated in SOTR.
(b) Relevant Specifications and Standards.
(c) Type of Equipment or Component.
Raw Material Inspection
12. Once the drawings and QAP are approved, the firm is given the clearance to
commence production. Consequently, the first step of manufacture is procurement
and acceptance of Raw Material. This would entail inter alia conducting requisite
tests for determining the chemical composition and mechanical properties. Factors
that influence the extent and quantum of raw material inspection are as follows:-
(a) Specifications and Standards.
(b) Intended application.
(c) Type and Source of raw material.
(d) Approved Drawings.

4
In Process Inspection
13. Once the raw materials have been cleared for use, the manufacturing can
commence. Inprocess inspection is carried out with the aim of ensuring that the
final product meets the required standards of quality. The governing considerations
are:-
(b) Criticality of the components in the operation of equipment.
(c) Peculiarities of manufacturing problems.
Final / Assembly Inspection
14. Once the item or equipment is ready, it is subjected to final inspection. The
extent and quantum is decided based on: -
(a) Applicable Specifications and Standards.
(b) Requirements stated in SOTR.
(c) Validating integrity of assembly.
(d) Requirements of recording:-
(i) Assembly parameters such as surface finish, clearances and

torque values.
(ii) Assembly / disassembly procedures.
(e) Approved Drawings.
Testing and Trials
15. Tests and Trials of the final assembled equipment shall be undertaken based
on Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP). ATP essentially includes performance trials
offered by the firm prior dispatch which are termed as Factory Acceptance Trials
(FATs). FATs may be supplemented by trials onboard after the equipment has been
installed or on any other test bed as specified in the terms of the Contract and in
ATP. The ATP is to be prepared based on: -
(b) Performance parameters stated in SOTR.

5
(c) Any other requirements emerging subsequent to placement of order.
(d) Validation of parameters meeting specified functional performance.
(e) Validation of parameters meeting specified environmental

specifications.
(f) Type Tests if applicable.
Painting, Preservation, Packing and Shipment
16. After the equipment or product has been cleared for dispatch, it has to be
suitably painted, adequately preserved and appropriately packed. Factors that
influence painting, preservation, packing and shipment are as follows:-
(a) Requirements stated in SOTR.
(b) Requirements of Specifications and Standards.
(c) Storage period before commission.
Documentation
17. The preparation of documentation should be a concurrent activity after the

drawings have been finalized. The documentation should be comprehensive and
comprehensible. It should be replete with Technical Description, Operating
Instructions, Album of Illustrations, Maintenance Procedures, Trouble shooting and
list of spares, both depot as well as onboard. These aspects need to be
unambiguously included in the Tender Enquiries and Purchase Orders.
Inspection Note (DGS & D 84) / (Form 4 )
18. This is the last and final stage of the QA process. The Inspection Note (I
Note) is issued for items contracted by Naval procurement agencies. The format of
INote is specified in form DGS & D 84. For equipment ordered by shipyards,
Form 4 is issued. Form 4 is also issued by inspecting agencies for a suborder.
Sample formats of various forms are placed at Appendix C.
CHAPTER 2
CLASSIFICATION OF NAVAL EQUIPMENT
Introduction
1. Equipment inspected by field units of DQA(WP) are classified into five

categories depending on the criticality of equipment which in turn dictates the
quantum of QA coverage to be provided by DQA (WP) and its field units. The various
classes and associated QA activities are discussed in this chapter.
2. Class - 1 QA Equipment. Equipment of extreme criticality which when

unavailable or non operational can result in compromise of mission or can result in
situation which is dangerous to ship and personnel fall in this category. The scope
of QA cover for these equipment should include, but not be restricted to:-
(a) Raw Material tests 100% Witness.
(b) In Process inspection Pressure testing in all cases as applicable and

100% witnessing is to be undertaken for following cases:-
(i) Castings Radiography Level I.
(ii) Welds Radiography Level I. The Weld Joint Efficiency should

not be less than 0.9.
(iii) Forgings Without any flaw or defect.
(c) Environmental specifications.
3. Class - 2 QA Equipment. These are basically Class-1 QA equipment,

wherein concessions and deviations can be issued at various stages of the QA
process.
4. Class - 3 QA Equipment. These are equipment for which the QA cover is

either on the lower scale or certain provisions of the QA process have not
been applied. It is important to note that there are no major concessions or
deviations. The reduction in QA cover does not necessarily mean that the
equipment is non critical. It can even be applied to mission critical equipment of
imported nature. Typical examples of reduction in QA cover are:-
(a) Sample raw material inspection.
(b) Components being accepted on Firms guarantee.
(c) Environment specifications are not as stringent as Class1 QA

equipment but can be restricted to the extremities of operating conditions.
7
5. Class - 4 QA Equipment. These are equipment where the QA cover has

been substantially reduced. QA activities pertaining to manufacturing stages can be
waived off. Guarantee provided by the firm is acceptable in lieu.
6. Class - 5 QA Equipment. These are equipment which can be accepted

based solely on physical identification. Functional checks need not be carried
out. These equipment can be accepted against firms guarantee / warranty certificate
or against import documents.
CHAPTER 3
QUALITY ASSURANCE OF WARSHIP EQUIPMENT
Quality Assurance Process and Quality Assurance Plan
1. Quality Assurance of equipment intended for use on warships is achieved by

adopting an approach that has two distinct yet interwoven paths:-
(a) Quality Assurance Process that defines the requirements of quality

as well as performance.
(b) Quality Assurance Plan that specifies the means of achieving these
requirements.
2. The Quality Assurance Process comprises nine stages starting from

Manufacturing Plan to issue of Inspection Note. Synthesis of all these stages
specifies the requirements of quality and standards.
3. Once the Quality Assurance Process is finalized, the Quality Assurance

Plan is prepared that specifies the quantum of checks and methods of verification.
Quality Assurance Process
4. Five basic factors influence QA process. These are:-
(a) Expectations of the Customer.
(b) Type of equipment.
(c) Parameters critical to quality.
(d) Safeguards against failure.
(e) Process variation safeguards.
Expectations of the Customer
5. The term customer refers to the user onboard the warship. The
Expectations of Customer are based on the conditions and exploitation pattern
onboard a warship. These are reflected in the material, manufacturing process and
performance parameters specified. The expectations can be categorized as:-
9
(a) Ruggedness and Robustness. Equipment should be adequately

rugged as well as robust to withstand the exploitation under harsh conditions
across the entire range of operation.
(b) Reliability. Equipment should be able to operate reliably under all

envisaged conditions of exploitation.
(c) MTBO & MTBF. The Mean Time Between Overhauls (MTBO) and
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) should be high.
Type of Equipment
6. The types of equipment onboard a warship will fall into one of the following
three categories:-
(a) Mission Critical Equipment. Equipment which directly or indirectly

affect the mission of the ship are termed as Mission Critical Equipment. Main
propulsion machinery, HVAC, STP, stabiliser and steering gear are some
examples of Mission Critical Equipment.
(b) Safety Equipment. All such equipment, the performance of which,

directly or indirectly influences the ships safety are called Safety Equipment.
Some examples of safety equipment are underwater valves, firemain pumps,
salvage pumps, firefighting equipment and Damage Control appliances.
(c) Non Critical Equipment. Equipment which do not directly

jeopardize either the ships mission or its safety can be termed as non
critical.
Parameters Critical to Quality
7. Once the expectations of the Customer and type of equipment are known, the
next logical step is to derive all critical parameters at each stage of manufacture that
affect the final quality of the equipment. In case of warship equipment, the critical
parameters extend to the entire Life Cycle of the equipment which includes stages
beyond manufacture such as documentation, maintenance and repair. The common
parameters applicable across all types of equipment are:-
(a) Type of materials, specifications and grade.
(b) Manufacturing methods.
(c) Constraints in manufacture Limits, Fits, Tolerances etc..
(d) Maintenance Intervals and Repair Methodologies including Testing,

Tuning and STW procedures.
10
Safeguards Against Failure
8. It is imperative to eliminate possibilities of failure. This can be done at the

design and drawing stage by considering following factors:-
(a) Stage of failure Manufacturing or Exploitation.
(b) Type of failures and their past history.
(c) Probability of occurrence of the failure, its severity and probability of

detection.
(d) Replacement /repair criterion.
Process Variation Safeguards
9. The harsh operating conditions onboard a warship mandate that the

manufacturing processes need to be subjected to more stringent control than that in
case of COTS items. The safeguards can be achieved by adequate control on raw
material and the manufacturing processes involved as also the trials of the finished
product.
Factors Influencing the Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
10. The implementation of QA process is achieved by Quality Assurance Plan

(QAP). The QAP is prepared based on following considerations:-
(a) Quantum of QA check required.
(b) Method of Verification necessary.
11. Quantum of QA Check. The quantum of QA check to be carried out at

various stages is specified as follows:-
(a) Sample size based on relevant standards such as IS 2500 (Part I & II).
(b) 100% inspection which means that the entire batch is subjected to
specified checks.
12. Method of Verification. The standard methods are: -
(a) Witness.
(b) Review of Records from NABL accredited laboratories/ Inspection

sheets.
(c) Manufactures Test Certificates.

11
Formulating the QA Plan
13. Various factors influencing both the QA processes and plans have been
discussed in the preceding paragraphs with an aim to help in formulating a QAP,
based on these factors. The draft QAP submitted by the firm needs to be vetted by
the Inspection Agency prior to final approval by the Inspection Authority. Draft QAP
is expected to be in conformance with the latest manufacturing processes and QA
procedures.
CHAPTER 4
MANUFACTURING PROCESSES A CONSPECTUS
1. The choice of manufacturing process is dependent on various factors such as

type of equipment, raw materials used, manufacturing process, the expected service
conditions, reliability expected, etc.. Understanding the Manufacturing Plan and
stages is crucial for formulating the Quality Assurance Plan.
2. Raw Materials. The raw material is specified in the SOTR, as well as, in
the Purchase Order and reflected in the approved drawings. These when selected,
often dictate the manufacturing process and the extent of control that needs to be
exercised during the process.
3. Process Selection. The selection of the manufacturing process is vital for

ensuring that the equipment meets the operating and reliability criteria on board the
warship. Some of the options are briefly elicited below. Primarily, the decision for
selecting the manufacturing process lies with the firm. However, inputs can be
taken from the Indian Navy at developmental stage of the item (only for order placed
by DMDE) and subsequently as feedback for improvements.
4. Castings. There are various types of castings and the selection has to be
done considering the type of job involved:-
(a) Gravity Casting. This is used for general purpose and is the most
common type of casting.
(b) Centrifugal Casting. This is adopted in case of axi-symmetrical

parts such as bushes and cylinders.
(c) Pressure Die Casting. It is used when surface finish is critical and
dimensional consistency vital.
(d) Investment Casting. This is used for complicated shapes and

high accuracy.
5. Joining Process. This is a generic term used for a process that fuses two
similar or dissimilar materials. Joining process commonly used are:-
(a) Welding. It is a process in which two materials, usually metals, are

permanently joined together through localised coalescence, resulting from a
suitable combination of temperature, process and metallurgical conditions.
This is achieved by gas welding, arc welding, resistance welding, and inert
gas welding.
13
(b) Brazing. In this process, the base metal is heated to below its
recrystallisation temperature. This generally used when working with copper
and copper alloys.
(c) Soldering. This is generally used in electrical and electronic

applications wherein only the filler material is melted and deposited on the
base metal.
6. Metal Forming Processes. The objective of metal forming process is to

alter the shape of metal to meet the required form, size and strength. The various
types of Metal Forming Processes are rolling, drawing, embossing, extruding and
bending. These can be broadly classified as:-
(a) Cold Working. Plastic deformation of metals below the re

crystallization temperature is known as cold working.
(b) Hot Working. It involves plastic deformation of metals above the re-
crystallization temperatures.
7. Metal Cutting Process. It is the process in which unwanted metal is

removed from work piece in the form of chips so as to obtain the final product of
desired size, shape and finish. This includes shaping, turning, boring, drilling,
reaming, milling, abrasive machining process, broaching, sawing, filing and punching
process.
8. Jigs and Fixtures. Proper jigs and fixtures are designed to minimise faults
and increase productivity whilst achieving the required shape and dimensions.
9. Surface Finish. Surface finish requirements are indicated in drawings.

Surface finish of various jobs is maintained by machining, honing, broaching and
lapping.
10. Paint Application. All painting is done by either dipping, spraying or

electrocoating. It is used primarily to ensure adhesion, provide an even surface by
filling in minor porosity and protect the equipment from corrosion.
CHAPTER 5
DRAWINGS AND QAP
Drawings
1. Need for Details. The drawings of equipment installed onboard warships

are to include inter alia, manufacturing particulars, material specifications, surface
finish and tolerances. Incorporating these details does not in any way dilute the
OEM status.
2. Stages. Drawings are to be submitted in the following sequence :-
(a) Preliminary GA/ SA/ Component Drawings. These should

include:-
(i) Schematic drawing of the equipment.
(ii) General Arrangement (GA) drawing indicating overall

dimensions.
(iii) Component drawings with material specifications,

manufacturing process, surface finish, fits, tolerances and other
relevant details.
(b) As Built Drawings. These will be the final drawings of equipment

containing design and performance data, modifications or changes
incorporated during the preliminary approval stage and all other requisite
information. These should faithfully reflect the final product on paper and vice
versa.
3. Mandatory Contents. These are listed below:-
(a) Title Block. This should include Customer Name, Purchase Order
number, title of drawing, revision number, tolerances, other reference
drawings, date of drawing, drafting/ checking/ approving particulars and any
other details sought by the customer.
(b) The General Arrangement Drawings should depict:-
(i) General description of the equipment and components giving

technical features.
(ii) Foot print details.
(iii) Maintenance envelope.

15
(c) Bill of material with material specifications, weight and quantities.
(d) Performance details and special features of the equipment.
(e) The Centre of Gravity with X, Y & Z co-ordinates.
(f) Circuit diagrams for all electrical, mechanical, control and

instrumentation as applicable.
(g) Operation details such as direction of rotation and direction of flow

should be clearly marked.
(h) Details of interconnections, endconnections, counter couplings and

sockets as applicable for both mechanical as well as electrical components.
(j) Shock specifications.
(k) Lifting arrangements as required.
(l) Instrumentation and control details if applicable.
(m) Special coating procedures and precautions if any.
4. Additional Information. Apart from these details, any other details,

necessary for the specific case in point, are to be incorporated.
5. Sizes & Scales.
(a) Size. The drawings should be prepared in paper sizes ranging from
A1 to A4. In extreme cases A0 can be used but under no condition should the
size be below A4.
(b) Scale. The scale used should be clearly mentioned in the drawings.
6. Views. All three views shall be displayed in third angle projection.
7. The procedure for Vetting and Approval of Drawings should be in accordance

with policies and orders in vouge.
Documents for Approval of Drawings
8. The following documents are required for approval of drawings:-
(a) Purchase Order.
(b) SOTR as approved and agreed upon during TNC/ PNC meetings.
(c) Final Minutes of TNC/ PNC meeting.
(d) Complete set of drawings.

16
9. Authority for Approval of Drawings. The drawings are to be forwarded to

the Inspection Agency who will forward the same to appropriate authority for
approval in conformance with the policy directives in force. The drawings are to be
approved by the Professional Dte/ Production Dte/ Inspecting Authority from the
SOTR/ Binding Data/ QA angles respectively.
Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
10. QAP should incorporate all aspects related to the qualification, condition
assignment and acceptance needs. The Quality Assurance Plan can be broadly
divided into following parts:-
(a) Raw Material Inspection.
(b) In-process Inspection.
(c) Inspection of Assembled Components.
(d) Tests and Trials.
(e) Documentation.
(f) Painting, Preservation and Packing.
11. Essentially, inspection of every equipment or spare will entail the first three
stages. Where specified, the balance three stages will be applicable.
12. Format. The format of QAP is placed at Appendix D. The quantum of

inspection and type of checks for various stages of inspection are to be finalized
based on the requirements of the case and orders in force.
Documents for Approval of QAP
13. The following documents are required for approval of QAP:-
(a) Copy of Purchase Order.
(b) SOTR as approved and agreed upon during TNC/ PNC meetings.
(c) Final Minutes of TNC/ PNC meetings.
(d) Complete set of approved drawings.
(e) Draft QAP.
(f) Acceptance Test Plan (ATP).

17
14. While the information contained in Purchase Order and Drawings may suffice,
inputs from minutes of TNC/ PNC meetings and SOTRs also contribute significantly
in finalising the QAP.
Procedure for Approval of QAP
15. Responsibility of Firm. The contracted firm is to submit the complete set
of Approved Drawings to concerned QAOs along with draft QAP and SOTRs as a
set. Where applicable, draft ATP is also to be submitted.
16. Responsibility of QAO/ IAG. The concerned QAO is to scrutinise the

draft QAP with reference to the Approved Drawings and SOTRs. The actions to be
taken are as follows:-
(a) QAP Conforming to SOTR and QA Rules/ Norms. The draft QAP
is to be dispatched to the Inspecting Authority with comments/
recommendations without delay.
(b) QAP Deviating from SOTR and QA Rules/ Norms. There can be
two situations:-
(i) Primordial Deviations. Observations which can be resolved

at the level of QAO should be done expeditiously through bilateral
meetings and working level discussions. Visits if required should be
made to site, test labs or any other organisations for obtaining
clarifications or solutions. Master QAP is the reference for resolving
such issues.
(ii) Complex Issues. Deviations that require intervention of IAY/

Professional Directorates at IHQ (MoD)/ Navy are to be forwarded to
Inspecting Authority giving full details of the case for decision.
Recommendations of the QAO are invariably to be included, when
forwarding the case to HQ DQA(WP)
17. Responsibility of DQA(WP). The authority for approval of the QAP rests
with DQA(WP) being the Inspection Authority. Upon receipt of QAP from the
Inspection Agency, the same is to be scrutinized against the updated Master QAP
held and either of the following decisions is to be communicated to the Inspection
Agency :-
(a) Approval. If QAP is in consonance with Approved Drawings/ SOTR/

QA Rules/ Norms without any deviations, the same should be approved
expeditiously to facilitate commencement of manufacturing process.
(b) Provisional Approval. QAPs deviating from Approved Drawings

SOTR/ QA Rules are to be scrutinized and provisional approval for initiation of
certain QA process can be granted by DQA(WP) to enable progressing with
initial stages of the order such as raw material procurement and in some
18
cases the basic manufacturing, provided that the deviations observed do not
affect these stages. The relevant clarifications/ issues are to be
simultaneously processed with the Professional Directorates at IHQ MoD
(Navy) for final recommendation, keeping the Order Placement Authority or
the Project Executing Agency informed.
(c) Approved as Amended. If the QAP is deemed unacceptable in

part or completely, the same is to be amended suitably. Prior promulgating,
discussions may be held with the firm and any other agency involved so that it
is acceptable to all concerned.
Exemptions for Submission of Drawings and QAP
18. Submission of approved Drawings and QAP is exempted in the following

circumstances:-
(a) Repeat Orders for equipment without change of specifications. In this

case firm is to submit a certificate to this effect with a reference to the
complete set of Drawings and QAP already approved by respective
competent authority. The inspection can thereafter progress against the
earlier original approved drawings and QAPs made available by the firm
(copies of the drawings and QAPs are not repeat not to be accepted).
(b) Spares for Equipment, that are ordered separately are also exempted
submission of approved Drawings and QAP provided the firm is able to
produce evidence/ traceability of the spares to the original equipment for
which they have been ordered.
(c) Imported stores.
Exceptions to Submission of Drawings & QAP
19. Circumstances. Though it is mandatory to submit complete set of

Drawings & QAP, they can be submitted in part quantities to facilitate initiation of QA
process in case of the following circumstances:-
(a) Large equipment being developed for first time.
(b) Unresolved issues at the time of finalization of contract which affect

the finalization of QAP. Typical examples of such issues are:-
(i) Unresolved dimensions due to restrictions of installation/

maintenance envelope.
(ii) Doubts over availability of raw material to specifications sought.

19
(iii) Doubts over ability to conduct tests/ trials or availability of

facilities for same as sought in the specification.
20. Mandatory Requirements.
(a) Part submission of Drawings and QAPs will be restricted to the

following:-
(i) Drawings Maximum of three parts.
(ii) QAP Maximum of two parts.
(b) The drawings when processed in parts are to be submitted in the

following manner:-
(i) Part 1. Individual parts/components for which manufacture

can be initiated without any effect on overall equipment dimensions/
performance.
(ii) Part 2. Main/ sub assemblies which have no effect on overall

equipment dimensions/ performance. The assemblies /parts chosen
should be complete in themselves in all manner with no effect of the
unresolved assemblies/ part on their manufacture. All drawings should
carry a linking reference to the components/ parts.
(iii) Part 3 (Final set). All components/ parts left out from earlier
two parts. Declaration/ evidence to submission of drawings of all
components/ parts is to be submitted by the firm along with final set.
(c) The two parts of QAP are to be submitted in the following manner:-
(i) Part 1. Raw material and In-process Inspection of all

components/ parts for which drawings can be frozen to facilitate
commencement of manufacture initiated without affecting the final
assembly / performance.
(ii) Part 2. Final/ Assembly Inspection, Tests, Trials,

Documentation, Preservation & Packing.
Approval of Drawings and QAPs Submitted under Exception
21. Drawings and QAPs submitted in parts invoking the Exception criteria will be
subject to provisional approval only. Final approval shall be given only after
submission of complete set of drawings & QAP.
22. For QAO/IAG. Final Inspection, Tests & Trials shall be witnessed by
QAO/IAG only after the final stamp of approval on a consolidated set of Drawings
and QAPs is endorsed by IAY. Final Inspection Note (Form 4) in such cases is to be
issued post satisfactory inspection in all respects.
20
CHAPTER 6
RAW MATERIAL INSPECTION
Purpose
1. All raw materials that are used in manufacture of equipment or spares should
be tested to ascertain that the chemical and mechanical properties conform to those
specified in the standards mentioned in the SOTRs, the Purchase Order and the
Approved Drawings.
Extent and Quantum of Tests
2. The range and scale of Chemical as well as Mechanical tests is decided on

the following factors:-
(a) Requirements of specifications/ standards.
(b) Intended application.
(c) Type of raw material.
(d) Source of procurement.
Requirements of Standards / Specifications
3. Standards. All raw materials used onboard warships shall conform to

established standards. The most commonly used material standards onboard Indian
Naval ships are IS, ASTM, DIN, GOST, BS and NES. This list is indicative and not
exhaustive. The standards to be followed are reflected in SOTRs as well as the
Purchase Order and shall be the primary guiding factor for deciding the scope of
inspection.
4. Contents. All the material standards, apart from specifying the Chemical
and Mechanical properties for various grades, also specify the tests to be carried out
on the raw material. The procedures for conducting these tests are also mentioned
and elaborated. These tests have to be conducted at NABL accredited laboratories.
The values given in the standard have to be strictly adhered to.
5. Use of Equivalent Standards. In case the firm requests for use of material
conforming to any other equivalent standard eg. IS in lieu of ASTM, then the same
should be approved by Professional Directorates at IHQ MoD (Navy)/ local
Headquarters through respective order placing authority.
21
6. Source of Procurement. All the raw material is to be sourced in a manner

that traceability can be established.
Inspection Criteria
7. Parameters. Inspection of Raw Material is a multidimensional activity

which depends on a set of factors which may be mutually exclusive or may be inter
related. Some of these considerations are examined below and amplified in
succeeding paragraphs:-
(a) The application and redundancy.
(b) Form and selection of Raw Material.
(c) Type of the item or component for which the raw material is being
inspected.
(d) Source of raw material.
Application
8. Although standards do exist to decide the sampling size, the application of

equipment for which the raw material is being inspected can be an additional factor
deciding the quantum. The categories mentioned below can be treated as guidelines
and not statutory. If considered necessary, the entire lot can be inspected
irrespective of the application, particularly if non conformity has been observed in the
selected samples.
TYPE
Sl.
QUANTUM VERIFICATION
No. CATEGORY DESCRIPTION
(a) Mission Equipment whose
Critical failure can impair
the mission, cause
flooding, affect
water and gas tight
100%
integrity or can
compromise the
safety of the ship As per
and personnel applicable rules
(b) Components or As per IS

parts whose failure 2500 (Part
does not I & II)
compromise ship
safety and
mission.
22
(c) Noncritical As per IS As per

2500 (Part applicable rules
I & II) or Firms
Guarantee/
Warranty
certificates
Type of Raw Material
9. Unique Grades. In some cases, to meet the technological requirements,

the materials specified in the SOTR or the Purchase Order may be Non
Commercial. These materials are specifically manufactured to Standards/ Process
Specified in the SOTR. Considering the novelty of the item, as well as the process, it
is required that the inspection involved is intensive. In such cases following broad
rules will apply:-
(a) Quantum. There should be no sampling. The entire quantity ordered

(100 %) is to be checked.
(b) Verification. As the use of such grade is nascent, it is important to

witness the activities rather than review the results as follows:-
(i) Castings. The pouring should be witnessed to ascertain use

of virgin metal so that the cast product is in accordance with the grade
specified. Stamping and marking of heat number for ensuring
traceability is essential. The Chemical, Mechanical and Metallurgical
properties should be checked at NABL accredited laboratories. Any
additional checks required should also be carried out. The test coupon
drawn should be an integral part of casting. General guidelines for
manufacture, inspection and quality assurance of castings are given at
Appendix E.
(ii) Forgings. The forging should be witnessed to guarantee that

the process chosen is apt, stock selected proper, heating appropriate
and forging direction correct. These checks shall contribute towards
ensuring that flow lines and grain flow are commensurate with the load
or stress conditions of intended application. The conformance to
standards and specifications, Chemical, Mechanical and Metallurgical
properties should be checked at NABL accredited metallurgical test
laboratory. The heat number should be marked for subsequent
traceability. General guidelines for manufacture, inspection and quality
assurance of forgings are given at Appendix F.
(iii) Bars/ Strips/ Sheets/ Plates/ Pipes/ Tubes. The samples

should be sealed in the presence of Inspection Agency for despatch to
NABL accredited metallurgical test laboratory for Chemical, Mechanical
and Metallurgical properties tests. If considered necessary and if
possible, the tests also should be witnessed.
23
10. Common Commercial Grades. These grades follow internationally

accepted standards. It may be appreciated that the market as well as the industry
have gained enough experience and hence the confidence in producing raw material
to these specifications. In such cases the inspection can be as follows:-
(a) Quantum. As per IS 2500 (Part I & II) or 100% depending on

criticality or defects observed in samples.
(b) Verification.
(i) Witnessing Castings and Forgings may be decided depending

on criticality and considering the experience gained.
(ii) Review of Material Test Certificate (MTC) for tests at NABL

Accredited Laboratories.
(iii) The tests carried out at the firms premises also can be
reviewed. However if considered essential, these should be witnessed.
Castings
11. Classification of Castings. Castings are classified into categories

ranging from Class I to III, with Class I being of highest order. These have been
adopted by various standards. The classes are briefly described below:-
(a) Class I. A casting whose failure would lead to uncontrollable

flooding or the total immobilization of the vessel, or serious hazard to
personnel.
(b) Class II. A casting whose failure would lead to severe but
controllable flooding, the serious disruption of weapon systems, main
propulsion machinery, or its associated auxiliaries including generators.
(c) Class III. All other castings.
12. It is obvious that the inspection requirements for Class I will be most stringent
of the three and that for Class III shall be the least.
Non Destructive Tests
13. Types. Nondestructive testing (NDT) is a wide group of analysis techniques

used in science and industry to evaluate the properties of a material, component or
system without causing damage. Since NDT does not permanently alter the article
being inspected, it is a highly valuable technique that can save both money and
time in product evaluation, troubleshooting, and research. While the field of NDT is
vast and has myriad varieties, the common NDT methods are Ultrasonic
Testing, Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI), Liquid Dye Penetrant Test, Positive
24
Material Identification (PMI), Radiography, Remote Visual Inspection

(RVI), Eddy Current Testing and Low Coherence Interferometry. For further
reference and details recommended website to be explored is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondestructive_testing - cite_note-Cartz-0
14. The conditions or situations that warrant NDT are decided by factors such as
type of raw material, application and production technology adopted.
15. Forms of Raw Material. It is recommended that raw materials be inspected

by suitable NDT methods to ensure that there are no defects. These checks are in
addition to Chemical, Mechanical and Metallurgical tests. NDT methods are to
be used for:-
(a) Castings.
(b) Forgings.
(c) Plates / Bars.
(d) Pipes.
(e) Compressed Air/ Fluid storage Bottles and other pressure vessels.
(f) Sheets.
16. Application. The types of equipment/ components/ parts to be subjected to

NDT are:-
(a) Main load and stress bearing structural members of mission critical
equipment. Crankshafts, gear blanks, propulsion shaft, rudder bushes, stern
tube bushes and foundation frames fall in this category.
(b) Underwater equipment/ components/ parts such as pump casings,

Kingston valve body.
(c) Equipment used in fire fighting and necessary for ensuring safety of the
ship.
(d) Any other item if considered necessary.
17. Classification for Ultrasonic Testing (UT) / Radiography Testing (RT).

The grades for deciding the quality have been elaborated in concerned
standards which are different for ferrous and nonferrous items. The size and
severity of defects acceptable for each level are specified therein. For example,
ASME specifies following:-
(a) Level I. No/ very minor defects.

25
(b) Level II. Minor defects.
(c) Level III. Moderate number of defects.
(d) Level IV. Large number of defects.
(e) Level V. Unacceptably high number of defects.
18. Inspection and Acceptance Criteria of UT / RT Results. The decision to

witness the NDT will be based on criticality of item as well as discussions between
Inspection Agency and the firm. The acceptance criteria will be based on the
standards applicable. It is important that radiographs are compared with reference
plates prior to certifying acceptance.
Commercially Off the Shelf (COTS) Items and Bought Out Items
19. Branded and Commercially Off the Shelf (COTS) Items. Branded
products and COTS items should be accepted as per procurement procedures in
force. However, confirmation that the item is COTS should be obtained from
Professional Directorates. A list of some approved Brand names is placed at
Appendix G. The list, though not comprehensive, is intended to be a general
purpose guide for reference.
20. List. The list of Bought Out items should be submitted by the firm along with
the drawings. Once ratified, these items should be reflected in the Bill of Material.
21. Items Not Acceptable as Bought Out Items (BOIs). The following items
do not classify as Bought Out Items:-
(a) Ready made castings/ forgings purchased from any source. The
reputation or standing in the industry of the source should not be
considered for any concessions.
(b) Major equipment/ self contained self assemblies such as Journal

Bearings, Motors, Gear boxes and Superchargers.
22. Inspection of Bought Out Items (BOIs). The extent of inspection will be
based on the severity and the relevant standards. Accordingly, following guidelines
are to be followed:-
(a) Quantum. If the item is critical, there need not be any sampling and
the entire lot (100%) should be inspected. Alternately size of sample can be
based on IS 2500 (Part I & II). It can be more than the quantities mentioned in
this standard but not less.
(b) Verification. Based on the situation and criticality, it can be either

witnessed or review of Certificate of purchase from authorized vendor for the
item can be carried out.
CHAPTER 7
INPROCESS INSPECTION
Purpose
1. All components and parts that undergo manufacturing process or a set of

processes are to be subjected to InProcess Inspection for ascertaining
conformance to standards at every stage of manufacture as specified in the
Approved QAP. Thus, the objective of InProcess inspection is to verify and
document that all applicable specifications and requirements pertaining to the
product are stable and continue to meet specification a as well as requirement.
Need
2. The role of equipment fitted onboard warships necessitates that the design
caters for longevity and shock besides being able to withstand ambient conditions of
roll, pitch, high temperature and humidity. Propulsion Shafts, Gear Boxes and Boilers
are some examples of equipment which are not changed during the life of the ship.
3. It may be noted that in most cases, an equipment or machinery will be the

same across the same class of ships or even beyond. Even on the same platform,
the equipment will have multiple entities. Turbines, air conditioning plants, pumps,
motors and blowers are few such examples. Such proliferation is desirable in order
to exploit economies of scale and attaining commonality for ease of maintenance.
Hence, interchangeabiltiy of components is inescapable so that it can be used in any
of the machinery of which it is a part, irrespective of batch or serial number. This
demands a high level of dimensional accuracy and proportionate degree of quality
checks.
4. This stage inspection also provides scope for recording the procedure for
assembly and dismantling. Any modifications carried out to improve upon the design
or to overcome problems envisaged during assembly are documented and ratified.
5. For these reasons, InProcess Inspection is important. The byproduct of this

stage is to arrest any flaw or mistake so that necessary corrective action is taken at
an early stage which saves time, besides mitigating cost implications.
6. The extent and quantum of InProcess inspection is decided on the following

factors:-
(a) Requirements of Specifications / Standards.

27
(b) Criticality of components in operation of equipment.
(c) Raw materials warranting special conditions and considerations for

processing.
(d) Source of manufacture.
Requirements of Specifications/ Standards
7. The extent of inspection and the batch size will be decided based on the
established manufacturing standards specified in the SOTR or Purchase Order or
followed by the industry. However, if SOTR specifies a more stringent requirement,
the same should be met. Quantum of Check and Type of Verification would be
strictly as per the specification in the Standard. No deviations from the
specifications or standards shall be permitted.
8. Use of Equivalent Standards. Transition from the promulgated standard to

its equivalents has to be approved by the professional directorates at IHQ MoD(N) or
Command Headquarters depending upon the case.
Criticality
9. The application or use and implication of its failure are an important

consideration for deciding the scope of inspection. As a guide, the following is
recommended:-
(a) Mission Critical. For equipment or components having direct impact

on the mission, safety and survivability, the scope should be:-
(i) Quantum. There should be no sampling. The entire lot is to

be inspected.
(ii) Verification. It is preferable that the process should be

inspected. This is to be decided while preparing the QAP and
promulgated.
(b) Other Components. For items whose failure does not

compromise the safety of ship and personnel, the involvement can be as
follows:-
(i) Quantum. The batch size can be calculated in accordance

with IS 2500 (Part I & II) or equivalent standards. However, if
necessary, the entire lot can be inspected.
(ii) Verification. If warranted, the process should be witnessed.

Such requirements should be clearly reflected in the QAP.
Alternatively, certificates submitted by the firm can be reviewed.
28
Special Processes for Raw Material
10. Certain raw materials need additional precautions, special environment and
separate considerations because of intrinsic properties and inherent reactivity.
Some examples are:-
(a) Inert atmosphere for Titanium welding.
(b) Fixtures to arrest shrinkage while welding steels like HY80 and U3.
(c) Controlled temperature during NAB welding.
11. Considering the fact these situations are not common, it is recommended that
the inspection should be for the entire lot and the process should be witnessed. In
addition, qualification standard of workers may be also specified. However, after
repeated orders, case for resorting to sampling and review may be considered.
Source of Manufacture
12. Very few firms have a captive facility for undertaking production of every
component being used in the equipment ordered. To overcome this limitation, firms
resort to out sourcing certain items from subvendors. In order to ensure the same
quality standards are maintained homogenously, following is to be adhered to:-
(a) The firm contracted by the Procurement Authority should submit a list
of probable subvendors along with the manufacturing process.
(b) The Inspecting Agency should assess the list for capability and check if
there have been any adverse reports for naval orders executed in the past.
(c) If any subvendor is found not acceptable due to past record or based
on assessment carried out, the same should be communicated to the firm
keeping the Inspecting/ Procurement Authorities informed.
(d) In such cases the onus of finding another subvendor is on the

main contractor only.
13. The inspection criteria will remain the same as in other cases mentioned in
aforesaid paragraphs.
Example of InProcess Inspection
14. Welding. Welding is an important in-process stage that needs to be

inspected diligently and conscientiously adhering to promulgated procedures and
standards in force. General guidelines for inspection and quality assurance of welds
are given at Appendix H.
29
15. The following guidelines are to be followed for inspection of welds:-
(a) The dimensions of the weld are to be as per established standards,

which is to be indicated in the Approved Drawings and QAP.
(b) The firm is to submit Weld Procedure Specification (WPS) and

Process Qualification Record (PQR) to the Inspection Agencies for
approval as per the applicable standards.
(c) The Inspection agencies should ask for the PQR certificate prior
commencement of welding.
(d) Whenever, welding is to be carried out for critical equipment, the firm
shall tack weld the structure/ component and call the Inspecting Agency for
inspection. The Inspecting Agency is to ascertain that the preparation has
been done in accordance with the specifications and only then approve
complete welding.
16. Dimensional Checks. While the overall dimensions are measured and
recorded, the emphasis during InProcess Inspection would be on Fits, Clearances
and Tolerances. The following in-depth details are to be documented to ensure that
the information serves as a reference for repairs, dismantling and reassembly:-
(a) Fits. ANSI has categorised fits into eight classes. These have to be
reflected in the drawings. The component or item should conform to the
specified dimensions given in the approved drawings.
(b) Tolerance. It is termed as a permissible deviation from the specified

value. The range of this tolerance is specified in the approved drawings.
These are either bilateral or unilateral. The checks are required to ensure that
the dimensions are within the given limits so that the designated class of fits is
achieved.
(c) Clearances. Value of clearances for various assemblies.
(d) Movements. The limits of travel or degree of movement wherever

applicable.
CHAPTER 8
FINAL INSPECTION
Purpose
1. For any part, component or equipment, this is the third stage of QAP, with
Raw Material Inspection and InProcess Inspection brought out in Chapters 6
and 7 respectively being the former two.
2. Raw Material Inspection and InProcess Inspection are necessary to primarily

ensure use of correct material, adherence to appropriate processes, identify defects
if any in early stages and take corrective action to rectify the same. During these
stages, dimensional details of every component including fits and clearances are
recorded. In case of subassemblies, the functional checks are also carried out and
checked for compliance with stated requirements.
3. The Final Inspection is aimed at assessing completeness of the assembly (or

aggregate), the condition of the final product and dimensional conformance. Thus
the purpose of final inspection is vastly different from that of component level
inspections.
4. The scope of Final Inspection depends on:-
(a) Requirements of Specifications and Standards.
(b) Constructional features of assembly.
Requirements of Specifications and Standards
5. The extent of checks is governed by the Standards and Specifications given

in the Terms of Contract. The torque values to be used for tightening during
assembly should be in accordance with the applicable standards.
6. In addition to industrial standards, it is required to refer specifications

published by Professional Directorates at IHQ MoD(Navy). These specifications
amplify the applicable standards in force.
Constructional Features of Assembly
7. The integrity of the final assembly needs to be validated and is a vital part of
final inspection and should be done by the Inspecting Agency. It should be confirmed
31
that modifications approved by authorities based on results of type test including

EMI/ EMC or other tests have been incorporated. Besides dimensional
measurements, where applicable, following aspects also need to be assessed for
acceptance:
(a) All exposed parts of the equipment that can prove hazardous to
operating personnel are properly covered.
(b) All sensitive and breakable components are adequately protected.
(c) Vulnerability of equipment or component to corrosion, humidity, heat

or fire.
(d) Ease of watchkeeping.
(e) Protection against toxicity of effluents and exhaust.
(f) The equipment is amenable to easy maintenance or repair. If not, this

has to be brought to the notice of Professional Directorates through the
Inspection Authority.
8. As a rule, Final Inspection has to be witnessed by the Inspecting Agency.

In extreme cases, Inspecting Authority may also be present. In case of
components, the final inspection of a bulk order can be carried out based on
sampling lots dictated by IS 2500.
Records
9. Some of the details that are required to be recorded during Final Inspection
are:-
(a) Torques used for tightening various assemblies and subassemblies.
(b) Special tools, jigs and fixtures used during assembly and required for
dismantling.
(c) Alignment values.
(d) Values of Static and Dynamic Imbalance.

CHAPTER 9
TESTS AND TRIALS
General
1. Purpose. While the equipment has undergone inspection and scrutiny at

every stage of manufacture, it is the Tests and Trials that provide the proof as well
as the confidence that the equipment will function in conformance to the parameters
and under the conditions specified in the contract. Hence, tests and trials are
conducted to validate the operation of the equipment under rated conditions. A list of
commonly conducted performance/ validation tests is given at Appendix J.
2. Terminology. In parlance of Quality Assurance, the two terms though

cognate, have distinguishing nuances as follows:-
(a) Tests. Essentially, these are akin to Go No Go gauges to either

pass or reject the material or component. Tests are intended to check the
properties. Type tests which are conducted for prototypes do entail
performance trials but basically to either clear the prototype for bulk
production or return it for redesigning and modifications.
(b) Trials. These are conducted to ascertain the functional and

operational aspects of the machinery or component. Thus, trials are meant to
evaluate the performance.
3. Realm and Scope. These are explained below:-
(a) Realm. All equipment and components are to be subjected to tests

and trials. The extent to which the testing is carried out depends on the scope.
(b) Scope. The scope varies depending on the equipment or the

component. Further, Tests and Trials for prototypes are more expansive
than those for bulk production.
Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP)
4. While there are standards in force for various machinery and components, the
actual mechanism of testing and conducting the trials is elaborated in minutest detail
in a document known as Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP). The ATP should
encompass the requirements given in the relevant standards as well take into
consideration the various guidelines and policies in force. Normally, ATP is not
applicable for spares. However, subassemblies such as fuel pumps and
superchargers would warrant an ATP to be formulated.
33
Witnessing
5. As a standard practice, all trials are to be witnessed. Though even tests are to
be witnessed, the condition is not mandatory for those conducted at NABL
accredited and government laboratories.
Type Tests
6. Aim. Type Tests are a group of tests which are conducted to validate the
designed characteristics of the equipment/ component.
7. Applicability. Type tests are carried out when:-
(a) New Induction. The equipment is being developed for the first
time.
(b) Firm. The firm or the manufacturer is producing the equipment for
the first time.
(c) Design. The design of existing equipment has been changed or

modified.
8. Scope. There are various forms of Type Tests. The selection of Type Tests
is governed by pertinent standards and promulgated policies. The common Type
Tests applicable to warship equipment are given in Appendix K. Some of these
tests are discussed below:-
(a) Shock Test. This test is to certify that the equipment can withstand
the forces likely to be experienced in case of explosions and impact. The
shock values that the equipment is to withstand depend on the weight and its
location within the ship. These values are indicated for all the three axis in
every SOTR and the Purchase Order. Shock Testing machines are available
in select places within the country, each having its own limit on the weight of
the test piece. Equipment being tested on these machines are to be mounted
in the same way as the likely installation onboard. Special jigs and fixtures
may be required for arranging this mounting. The impacts are to be given
along all the three axis. For equipment beyond the capacity of the
machines, the shock calculations have to be submitted by the firm along
with results of Finite Element Analysis.
(b) Vibration Test. The vibrations experienced by the equipment

during transportation and in use are complex resulting from cumulative effect
of the excitation force, mounting, impedance and inherent characteristics of
the equipment itself. These vibrations are generally not amenable to
simulation. Hence the equipment is subjected to induced vibrations of
specified frequency and amplitude while running to check that the equipment
does not malfunction.
34
(c) Tilt Tests. The ship as a platform undergoes rolling and pitching
during which all equipment is tilted either longitudinally or athwart ships. It is
vital that the equipment continues to perform under these conditions. The
angle and direction of tilt along with the duration is specified in the Purchase
Order.
(d) Endurance Tests. The endurance life is mentioned in Purchase

Order. This can be confirmed by running the equipment under rated
conditions for the indicated period based on the relevant standards or for the
duration given in the Purchase Order.
(e) Fatigue Test. In case the equipment is subjected to cyclic loading, the
fatigue life is important. The equipment like bellows are subjected to specified
cycles of operation to confirm that the equipment does not fail under fatigue.
(f) Creep Test. Where the temperatures encountered are to be high,

the equipment is subjected to Creep Test to ensure that the loading under
conditions of high temperature for prolonged duration does not affect the
performance.
(g) Tests to Establish Characteristics. Type tests are also carried out
to generate the performance curves for a family of equipment. This is done
as part of type tests. Some parameters like NPSHR of pumps can be
determined experimentally only. This too forms part of type tests.
(h) Environment Tests. These tests are conducted in an

environment created in the laboratory to give confidence that the equipment
will survive the conditions in the field. These tests are specified in JSS 55555
and other standards. Some of these are:-
(i) High Temperature. The temperature and the duration of the

test are specified in the Purchase Order.
(ii) Damp Heat. Along with temperature and duration, the

relative humidity is also specified for the test.
(iii) Ingress Protection (IP). It is carried out to ensure that the

equipment is impermeable to water and dust under specified conditions
given in the Purchase Order. The IP protection level is denoted by a
two digit number wherein the first digit ranging from 1 to 6 is for dust
and the second ranging from 1 to 8 is for water. Higher the number
better is the protection.
(iv) Mould Growth Test. This test is carried out to confirm that
the equipment is not susceptible to mould growth during storage and
operation.
(v) EMI / EMC. The equipment should not emit radiation that
affects other equipment. This is termed as Electromagnetic
35
Interference (EMI). At the same time the equipment should not be

affected by the radiations being emanated by other equipment. This is
termed as Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC). The plan for EMI/
EMC test is to be approved by the concerned authority. These
tests are conducted in accordance with MILSTD 461 E.
(j) Noise Measurement. Ideally, the noise levels being generated by

the equipment are to be measured in accordance with ISO 3644 at a distance
of 1m from the equipment. To eliminate the background or ambient noise, it is
preferable that these tests are carried out in Anechoic Chambers. Such
tests can be considered as type tests because anechoic chambers are not
available everywhere.
Trials
9. Trials are conducted to evaluate the performance under rated conditions to

confirm that all parameters are within limits. Broadly, trials can be divided into three
categories:-
(a) Factory Acceptance Trials (FATs). These are conducted prior

despatch within the precincts of the firm or at any other designated test bed.
(b) Harbour Acceptance Trials (HATs). After the equipment is

installed, trials which are conducted along side are called Harbour
Acceptance Trials.
(c) Sea Acceptance Trials (SATs). Equipment such as shafting and

main propulsion machinery can only be proved for the complete range of
operations only at sea. These are subjected to Sea Acceptance Trials.
10. Factory Acceptance Trials (FATs). These trials are conducted for
assessing the performance of the equipment. The plan for conducting these trials is
to be prepared which after ratification should be promulgated as Acceptance Test
Procedure (ATP). The ATP should be replete with:-
(a) Test Setup. The specifics of test bed, the mounting

arrangement and lay out of equipment including that of instrumentation and
control is to be described in detail along with supporting drawings.
(b) Ambient Conditions. If applicable, the ambient conditions under

which the trials are to be conducted should be specified. Though these
generally pertain to atmospheric conditions such as temperature and
humidity, at times the ambient noise may also need to be mentioned.
(c) Parameters. All parameters to be recorded and the frequency of

recording should be mentioned in the ATP. This includes the inlet conditions
to equipment such as air conditioning plants and heat exchangers or the
36
power supply to motors. The parameter chart should also give the limiting
conditions given in Purchase Order.
(d) Air Borne Noise (ABN) and Structure Borne Noise (SBN). The noise
levels generated by the equipment are termed as ABN and are to be
measured during operation. The methodology of measurement is given in ISO
3744. Promulgated standards are also available for factoring the background
noise. Similarly, the vibrations generated termed as SBN have to be
measured to be treated as Base Line Signature. The measurements are
generally to be done in 1/3 octave. For both ABN as well SBN, the regime of
operation as well as the method of recording the signatures should be
described in the ATP.
(e) Regime and Duration. The regimes at which the equipment should
be operated and the duration for each regime should be unambiguously
mentioned in the ATP.
11. Harbour Acceptance Trials Schedule (HATS). In some cases, the

equipment will have to undergo trials after installation on board. Some of these trials
can be conducted alongside when the ship is in harbour. Such trials are called
Harbour Acceptance Trials Schedule (HATS). An ATP is to be prepared for HATS
which would cover peculiarities of ship conditions as well.
12. Sea Acceptance Trials Schedule (SATS). Essentially, the Sea

Acceptance Trials Schedule (SATS) are conducted to exploit the equipment for the
full range of operation. For this the regimes and duration are to be clearly brought
out in the ATP as also the requirements of measuring noise and vibrations.
CHAPTER 10
PAINTING, COATING, PRESERVATION, PACKING & SHIPMENT
Need
1. Equipment and spares for marine applications, in most cases, need to be

stored for prolonged durations prior to installation or use. During the time spent in
transit, on shelf or in storage, it is necessary to protect the equipment and items
against corrosion, environment and damage.
Types
2. The protection for marine equipment and spares can be divided into three
categories:-
(a) Painting. External protection is provided by adopting an

appropriate paint scheme and application of suitable paints. This is generally
applicable to complete equipment or subassembly such as turbo chargers.
Spares and components are normally not painted.
(b) Electroplating. Components not amenable to painting may be

electroplated with zinc, chromium or any other corrosion resistant material, if
acceptable.
(c) Preservation. Preservation is done to inhibit corrosion of internal

and external surfaces by eliminating contact with oxygen and/ or moisture.
Oils and grease are some of the compounds used for this purpose.
(d) Packing. Equipment and spares are to be suitably packed both for
transportation as well as storage. The packing should be so designed that it
facilitates lifting, protects the contents from weather and offers sufficient
padding to absorb shocks and vibrations during transportation. If required, the
consignment should be supported correctly to eliminate structural deformation
and to ensure that no stresses are induced. In specific cases, provision
should be made to control the atmospheric conditions within the container.
Painting
3. Special Properties. Due to peculiarities of environment, the paints

used for marine applications need to have attributes that are different from paints
used elsewhere. The paints should have a high flash point and should be nontoxic.
Moreover, the paints should be heat resistant, fire retardant, should not produce
poisonous gases even at high temperatures. The life of applied coat should be such
that it should not need renewal during the operational cycle of the ship or equipment
38
which translates to about five years for capital equipment and about 18 months for
smaller machinery.
4. Painting Process Liquid Paint. In generic terms, there are three

steps as follows:-
(a) Surface Preparation. It is the first step of painting process. It is

necessary to achieve uniformity of coating thickness, proper adhesion of paint
and durability. The methodology used will depend on the type of paint and the
surface to be painted. If applicable, relevant standards on the subject are to
be followed.
(b) Application of Primer. Primer is a paint product that improves the

adhesiveness of the paint being used. For this purpose, primer is designed to
adhere to surfaces and to form a binding layer that is better prepared to
receive the paint. Because primers do not need to be engineered to have
durable, finished surfaces, they can instead be engineered to have improved
filling and binding properties with the material underneath.
(c) Application of Paint. After the above steps have been completed,
actual paint is applied. The colour will depend on the specifications given in
the contract. Number of coats, the dry film thickness and the procedure of
application will depend on the paint selected and the requirements of the
contract.
5. Painting Process Powder Coating. Powder coating is a type of coating

that is applied as a free flowing, dry powder. The main difference between a
conventional liquid paint and a powder coating is that the powder coating does not
require a solvent to keep the binder and filler parts in liquid suspension form. The
coating is typically applied by an electrostatic process and is then cured under heat
to allow it to polymerise, flow and form a "skin". The powder may be a thermoplastic
or a (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoset) thermoset polymer. It creates a hard
finish that is tougher than conventional paint. The process involves:-
(a) Surface Preparation. Chemical pretreatments involve the use of

phosphates or chromates in submersion or spray application. These often
occur in multiple stages and consist of degreasing, etching, desmutting,
various rinses and the final phosphating or chrome plating. of the substrate.
The pretreatment process both cleans and improves bonding of the powder
to the metal. In some cases, abrasive techniques such as sandblasting or
shot blasting are also used.
(b) Powder Coating. After the component or the part is prepared,

powder is applied using an electrostatic gun.
(c) Curing. When a thermoset powder is exposed to elevated

temperature, it begins to melt, flows out, and then chemically reacts to form a
higher molecular weight polymer in a network-like structure. This process,
called crosslinking, requires a certain temperature for a certain length of time
39
in order to reach full cure and establish the full film properties for which the
material was designed. Normally the powders cure at 200C (390F) for 10
minutes. The curing schedule could vary according to the manufacturer's
specifications. Curing process can be done in convection or infrared ovens.
Electrochemical Processes
6. Application. For components which cannot be painted the external

surfaces can be covered by resorting to Electroplating or Anodizing for providing
the necessary protection.
7. Electroplating. Electroplating is a plating process in which metal ions in a

solution are moved by an electric field to coat an electrode. The process uses
electrical current to reduce cations of a desired material from a solution and coat a
conductive object with a thin layer of the material, such as a metal. Electroplating is
primarily used for depositing a layer of material to bestow a desired property like
abrasion and wear resistance, corrosion protection, and lubricity to a surface that
otherwise lacks that property.
8. Anodizing. This is an electrolytic passivation process wherein it produces a

coating made from the oxide of the base metal. It is used to increase the thickness of
the natural oxide layer on the surface of metal parts. The process is called
"anodizing" because the part to be treated forms the anode electrode of an electrical
circuit. Anodizing increases corrosion resistance and wear resistance. In some
cases this surfaces are anodized prior painting for better adhesion.
Preservation
9. Preservation. Equipment and spares manufactured for naval

applications may have to be stored for long periods before these are installed or
commissioned. Hence it is crucial to devise a preservation procedure that would
protect the equipment or component from atmospheric conditions of temperatures
and humidity. Preservation can be internal as in case of Gas Turbines and Diesel
Engines as well as external. The type of preservation to be carried out depends on
the machinery, spare and item. The plan has to be discussed during the Technical
Negotiations and elaborated in the contract.
10. Internal Preservation. This is done to protect the inner surfaces of the
equipment or component from corrosion and/ or wear. Typically, it is carried out by
flushing the system with appropriate medium to remove the impurities and then filling
it with preservative oils.
11. External Preservation. This is done by introducing an insulating medium

or film between the surface and the environment. This can be done by applying
grease, oil or paint.
40
12. Procedure for Preservation and De-preservation. The procedure to be

adopted for preserving and subsequently depreserving the equipment should be
elaborated in the documentation. Often equipment such as diesel engines have
failed because the depreservation procedures had not been followed.
Packing, Shipment and Storage
13. Packing. The preservation that has been carried out can be retained by
proper packing. The packing of the machinery or component or item should be
capable of withstand any means of transportation.
14. Eliminating Moisture. The various techniques available are:-
(a) Silica Gel. By placing packets of silica gel or any other moisture
absorbing compound will protect the item against humidity.
(b) Vapour Corrosion Inhibitor (VCI) Paper. Small components can

be wrapped in VCI papers to eschew contact with moisture.
(c) Heaters. Electrical heaters are provided in some cases for

eliminating moisture during storage and transportation.
(d) Vacuum Packing. This is for very sensitive equipment or equipment

having complicated contour where normal methods of packing are not
satisfactory. A vacuum gauge is to be placed on the packing box at a
convenient location with adequate protection and frequency of check clearly
painted.
(e) Nitrogen Filling. Being dry, nitrogen when filled will drive the
moisture out. This method is adopted for equipment such as heat exchangers
and compressors.
15. Avoiding Ingress. It is vital that no foreign particle enters the equipment
during transportation and storage. This can be achieved by sealing all orifices and
openings. Threaded openings can be capped while flanged openings can be
covered with gasket and blanks.
16. Protective Covers. Threaded portions or other sensitive parts can be

covered with a shield to avoid physical damage as well as atmospheric corrosion.
17. Other Features. It is not sufficient to protect the items but also handle the
consignment with due care. Hence, additional attributes are:-
(a) Lifting Arrangements. Where applicable, lifting hooks should be

provided and indicated.
41
(b) Special Markings. The position in which the equipment is to be kept

should be indicated with arrows. Further, precautions for handling sensitive
equipment should be depicted on the packing.
(c) Identification Tags. All components are to have a label giving the
part number.
18. Packing List. A copy of scope of supply and packing note is to be

laminated and put into a box (preferably 6 x 4) outside the packing in addition to a
similar copy inside the packing.
19. Shipment. This is very vital aspect and has to be done with due care. While
the firm generally may be careful about the shipment from their factory, it should be
appreciated that there may be further shipments from the consignee. This
necessitates that adequate provisions and instructions are in place for shipment by
any agency.
20. Storage. While majority of the equipment or spares may not require any
special arrangements, it may not be the case with all. Items such as crankshafts and
main propulsion shafts would require supports at correct intervals to avoid distortion
and building up of stresses. Likewise, the rubber components and control equipment
would require controlled conditions of temperature and humidity. Hence, the storage
requirement should be indicated by the manufacturer.
Specifications
21. Standards. While there are a plethora of standards on the subject, the
contract should specify the ones to be followed in consonance with the current
policies in force.
CHAPTER 11
DOCUMENTATION
General
1. Need. Every equipment fitted onboard warships needs to be understood

consummately by the user for correct running, proper upkeep and appropriate
maintenance. Since the crew is ever changing, it is necessary to retain on board all
information related to the equipment. This can only be done through
documentation.
2. Purpose. It may be appreciated that documentation is the connection

between the man and machine. Hence requirement of comprehensive
documentation cannot be over emphasized.
3. Scope. Exploitation of equipment in any warship is multifaceted. It

includes operating under exacting environmental conditions, often sustaining rated
performance for prolonged duration and carrying out first line of maintenance. This
implies that the documentation should have exhaustive and detailed information on
all these aspects.
4. Features. Essentially, any set of technical documentation of warship

equipment should have at least the following manuals or sections:-
(a) Technical Description.
(b) Album of Drawings.
(c) Operating Instructions.
(d) Maintenance Instructions and Schedule.
(e) Repair Technical Documentation.
(f) Catalogue of Spare Parts, Tools, Test Equipment and Accessories.
(g) Passports, Log Books and Service Logs.
5. Specifications and Policies. The guidelines for preparation of

documentation should be in accordance standards and orders in force. However,
in case other standards are being followed, the same should be mentioned in the
contract. It is preferable that for engineering equipment, the documentation should
be in accordance with DME 452.
6. Format. In order to achieve uniformity in documentation across all

platforms and for all equipment, it is recommended that a standard format be
43
adopted. This needs to be promulgated as a policy by an appropriate authority for

implementation by all Order Placement Authorities. The format should detail the
design of Cover, First Page, Provision for recording Amendments and List of
Associated Documents.
Technical Description
7. Spectrum. This manual should contain complete technical data,

parameters, characteristics and performance curves. If required, sketches or
schematic drawings are to be included for better clarity.
8. Introduction. Usually, the first chapter should be giving an introduction

about the equipment, its purpose and standard configuration. The working principle
should be explained in this chapter as it forms the basis for rest of the document.
9. Technical Specifications. The complete technical specifications, including

the list of materials with specifications and their standards are to be indicated. If
essential, the manufacturing standards are also to be mentioned.
10. Constructional Details. It is recommended that a TopDown approach is

adopted in giving the description of the equipment. A narrative should be given
about the entire equipment listing out the main assemblies and components.
Thereafter, each item in the list is to be described bringing out the subassemblies
and parts followed by the description of these till the smallest component. This
document should also include instrumentation and controls. Wherever possible,
crossreferencing should be done with Album of Drawings so that the text and
drawings are corelated.
11. Installation, Setting to Work, Testing and Tuning. This chapter should
contain all instructions for installation for first time, setting to work, testing and tuning
for both new equipment as well as after repairs I overhauls. It should also detail the
procedure for removal for major overhauls and subsequent installation/ setting to
work.
12. Packing, Transportation and Instructions for Preservation/ De-

preservation. This chapter should contain instructions for stages before first
Installation, during storage and after the equipment is brought into use for the first
time.
13. Album of Drawings. The hard copy of General Arrangement, Sectional

Arrangement, Layout, Control circuits and component drawings should be supplied
in a folder duly bound. The GA, SA and component diagrams for all assemblies and
its subassemblies could be laminated to ensure longevity.
44
Operating Instructions
14. Introduction. This chapter serves to explain the layout of the

document.
15. Commissioning of Equipment Initial and Post Repairs. This chapter

should give the procedure to be followed for commissioning of the equipment for first
use and also after a major repair and overhaul.
16. Starting and Stopping Procedure. This chapter should detail the steps
involved in Starting and Stopping the equipment. As this will be the guiding and
governing document for personnel onboard, no detail should be missed. It should
also include:-
(a) Starting and stopping under normal conditions of operation.
(b) Starting and stopping under emergency conditions.
(c) Use of normal and alternate supplies if applicable.
(d) Status of annunciators and indicators during starting and stopping.
(e) Any auxiliaries to be operating prior starting or after shut down.
17. Operation. The purpose of this chapter is to enumerate detailed

procedures for trouble free operation and exploitation of the equipment. The
instructions should be clear and unambiguous and the language should be pegged
at a level which can be understood by a literate operator. As far as possible, the
instructions should be assertive statements and not discretionary.
18. Limits of Exploitation and Operation During Service. This chapter

should bring out in detail the following:-
(a) The regimes of operation.
(b) The parameters to be recorded.
(c) Frequency of recording or the intervals at which the parameters are to

be recorded.
(d) The range and limits of these parameters at various regimes.
(e) Various safety, control features, trips and threshold values. The re
setting procedures should be elaborated in detail.
19. Interlocks and Safety Trips. This chapter should elaborate the various
safety interlocks that are provided for safe starting as well as stopping of the
equipment and inhibiting operation in prohibited regimes. The precautions to be
taken and the safety trips are to be described in detail.
45
20. Operation of the Equipment Under Special Conditions. This chapter

may not be applicable for all equipment. However, if pertinent, it should elucidate the
various situations other than normal operating conditions, under which the
equipment can be operated and the procedure for doing so.
21. Monitoring of Performance and Recording of Parameters. This chapter

should give the various parameters to be logged and monitored for trouble free
operation of the equipment. A format of the log sheet should also be given. Any other
information which is necessary for safe, reliable and sustained operation of the
equipment should also be included.
22. Trouble Shooting. Restoration of equipment after breakdown or failure is

as crucial as correct exploitation of machinery. Hence every conceivable failure
should be listed and explained along with symptoms, checks and repair action.
Preferably a Fault Diagnosis Chart should be given for easy assimilation and
implementation.
Maintenance Schedule and Maintenance Instructions
23. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to enumerate a systematic

procedure for Planned Preventive Maintenance (PPM) of the equipment to ensure
trouble-free operation for sustained periods. However, the time and periodicity of the
maintenance should be in consonance with the overall PPM philosophy followed by
the Navy.
24. Maintenance Instructions. This section should contain the following

chapters:-
(a) Preventive Maintenance Plan. This can be formulated either based

on Running Hours or on Calendar (i.e daily routines, weekly routines,
monthly routines, quarterly routine, six monthly routines, yearly routines and
so on). While some activities are strictly based on running hours, others can
be scheduled based on calendar. Hence a judicious combination can be used
for practical implementation.
(b) Preventive Maintenance Procedure. The following procedural

aspects should be covered in this section:-
(i) Routine checks and maintenance on board.
(ii) Overhaul schedule and detailed procedure for assembly and

dismantling.
(iii) Requirement of spares and special tools.
(iv) Cleaning devices and solvents.

46
(v) Allowable wear of parts and components.
(vi) Torque tightening values.
(vii) Alignment values if necessary.
(viii) Performance criteria for acceptance after repairs or overhaul.
(ix) Any other information or instruction relevant.
(c) Corrective Maintenance. This chapter should give instructions for

maintenance to correct an observed abnormality or degradation of
performance. It is, therefore, not periodic. The contents should essentially
cover the following :-
(i) Steps to identify the problem.
(ii) Procedure for carrying out maintenance defect rectification.
(iii) Probable cause.
(iv) Requirement of spares and special tools.
(v) Type of facility or infrastructure required to carry out the repairs.
(vi) Safety Precautions.
(vii) Types of tests along with methodology.
(viii) Tuning procedures.
(d) Maintenance During Long Layoff. This chapter should enumerate

instructions for preservation and depreservation when the equipment is not
likely to be used for extensive periods.
(e) Setting to Work, Testing and Tuning. This is also an important

chapter to be given in adequate detail.
25. Maintenance Schedule. The maintenance plan ranging from daily routines
to overhaul involving capital repairs is to be drawn up. Some of the features are
elaborated below :-
(a) Table of Routines. It is recommended that the schedule be

presented in a tabular form wherein the Activity, Maintenance Levels,
Frequency and Requirement of Special Tools or Accessories are
juxtaposed for easy comprehension. A possible format is given below:-
47
Maintenance
Frequency Special Tools
Maintenance Levels
`
Activity
1 2 3 4
(b) Maintenance Levels. These are denoted by numbers ranging

from 1 to 4 depending on the complexity of work. The levels are applicable for
routines as well as repairs.
(i) Levels 1 and 2 activities are those that can be done onboard ship
without dismantling the equipment or with minimal dismantling. Mostly,
these routines are carried out insitu. Each maintenance activity is to
be amplified and presented in a tabulated manner as recommended
below:-
Cross
Details of
Reference
Maintenance Frequency Remarks
with Main
Work
Table
(ii) Level 3 activities are those which can be undertaken insitu but,
shore support is necessary. It generally involves extensive dismantling.
(iii) Level 4 are those activities which require the equipment to be

taken to a base repair workshop for overhaul or repairs.
26. Service Log and Certificate. It must be understood that while Log Books
continue to be held on the ship, the Service Logs and certificates go along
with the equipment. Hence, the former are shipcentric while Service Logs and
Certificates (Passports) are equipmentcentric. Service Logs and Certificates
are to be given as separate documents. The aim of this document is to have a
complete history of the equipment since its commissioning, through overhauls and
repairs to final decommissioning. The following sections must form a part of this
document (as applicable to the equipment):-
(a) Brief Introduction and Purpose of the Equipment.
(b) Make, Model, Serial Number, Year of Manufacture of complete

equipment and its subassemblies.
(c) Complete Name and Address along with contact details of the
Manufacturer of the equipment. In case certain subassemblies components
are outsourced from sub vendors, above details are also to be mentioned for
the sub vendors.
48
(d) Service and Stowage Life Guarantee.
(e) Instructions on Preservation and Storage.
(f) Compendium of Lubricants and their international equivalents.
(g) Certificate of Packing and Acceptance.
(h) Certificate of Tests and Trials done during Factory Acceptance.
(j) Report of Noise and Vibration Trials (for recording baseline signature
and after major overhaul/ refit).
(k) Instructions for transportation of equipment.
(l) Record of monthly and cumulative running hours.
(m) Record of Repair and Maintenance giving details of activity carried out
and spares used.
(n) Record of Changes, Upgradations and Modifications carried out.
(p) Record of Post repair Inspection and Sea Worthiness Certificate.
(q) Record of Critical Parameters during Operation and trials conducted

after maintenance or repairs.
(r) Record of Defects and Remedial Action Taken.
(s) Special Observations on Performance during Operation.
Repair Technical Documents
27. Purpose. Typically, these documents are meant for capital repairs of the
equipment that are carried out in any of the designated workshops, naval or
otherwise. The equipment in most conditions is removed from the ship. The contents
should encompass the following:-
(a) Dismantling and Assembly Procedure. The procedure for shipping

and unshipping as well as assembly and dismantling should be explained in
detail.
(b) Requirement of special tools, slings, lifting appliances and other

accessories.
(c) Wear Limits, alignment and tightening Torque Values.

49
(d) Noise and Vibration Limits.
(e) Shop Floor Performance trial procedure.
(f) Special Jigs and Fixtures for repairs and overhaul.
(g) Test bed and infrastructure required for trials, testing and tuning.
(h) Any other Information necessary for major repairs/ overhauls.
28. Inspection and Test Records. All Records of Inspections and Trials
carried out during manufacture of the equipment are to be submitted as a bound
document and should include the following:-
(a) Guarantee/ Warranty Certificate duly signed by appropriate authority.
(b) General data of equipment and specifications.
(c) Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP).
(d) Record and Results of acceptance trials.
(e) Report of Noise and Vibration Trials as applicable.
(f) All records of Material Test Certificates, Lab Reports, InProcess

Inspection, Acceptance Certificate, Inspection Note.
(g) Record of deviations and concessions.
(h) Certificate of Painting, Preservation and Packing.
(j) Materials of Major components.
(k) Details of instrumentation with specifications.
(l) Details of welds and weld procedures.
(m) Loading Data and its distribution.
(n) Packing list of equipment and documentation supplied.
Spare Parts, Tools, Test Equipment and Accessories
29. Contents. This will be a separate document. The document should consist
of the following main sections:-
(a) Section 1 - Part Identification List.

50
(b) Section 2 - List of spares along with quantities.
(c) Section 3 - List of Accessories.
(d) Section 4 - List of Special Tools, Test Equipment, Jigs and Gauges.
30. Part Identification List. This section should contain a 3D exploded view of
the equipment with a number for each part placed on the left side of the book. On the
right side the detailed parts list is to be given along with the description and part
number.
31. Ranging and Scaling of Spares. This section should indicate the spares
along with quantities required to be stocked for the equipment. These are to be
categorized into three types as explained below:-
(a) Onboard (SPTA). These are spares to be stored essentially onboard

ship for maintenance and repairs. The factors deciding the list would depend
on the size of equipment and type of repairs or overhaul.
(b) Base (B). These spares are stored at the base depots for second
line maintenance. Consequently, these will be bigger and heavier than those
forming part of onboard spares and would be required for repairs or routine
replacements.
(c) Depot (D). These are spares which required for major repairs and
overhauls. These may include complete assemblies, subassemblies or in
some cases complete equipment.
32. List of Accessories. This section is to contain the list of accessories

required for installation, maintenance and operation of the equipment.
33. List of Special tools, Test Equipment and Gauges. This section gives
the list of tools, test equipment, gauges and other implements specific to the
equipment which are required for tuning, setting to work, alignment, repair and
maintenance of the equipment.
Electronic Manual
34. IETM Class III. In accordance with orders in force issued to keep pace
with current trends, the documentation for Engineering Equipment should be in IETM
Class III format.
CHAPTER 12
INSPECTION NOTE
Significance
1. The programme of Quality Assurance culminates in issuing a document that

clears the item or equipment for acceptance and dispatch. The generic term for this
document is Inspection Note (I-Note).
2. Two formats have been promulgated for Inspection Note as mentioned

below:-
(a) DGS & D (S) 84 Form. Inspection Note is issued in this format for
orders placed by any agency or organisation except shipyards and for sub
orders. This form is entirely filled by the Inspecting Agency. Sample format is
placed at Appendix C1.
(b) Form 4. Form 4 is issued when an item is inspected for which the
order was placed by a shipyard or in case the item is a part of a suborder. In
this case, the firm fills up the form and submits the same to Inspecting
Agency for approval and issue. Sample format is placed at Appendix C2.
3. The issue of Inspection Note (Form 4 / DGS & D (S) 84 Form) by Inspection
Agency primarily certifies that:-
(a) The component or equipment has been inspected in accordance with

approved QAP and drawings
(b) The requirements stated in the Purchase Order have been met with
approved concessions or deviations if any.
4. The Inspection Note reflects the acceptability of the ordered goods at

the point of despatch. In case the equipment or part is damaged during transit, the
applicable clauses of insurance, guarantee and warranty will be invoked.
Issue of Inspection Note
5. The Inspection Note is a document having financial implications. Hence

all regulations and orders in force should be strictly adhered to. The salient features
are:-
(a) The Inspection Note is to be issued only after all inspections have been
completed, including that of preservation and packing.
52
(b) The number of Inspection Notes in each order should match with the
Part Supply Part Payment (PSPP) clauses mentioned in the Purchase
Order.
(c) During issue of I-Note for part quantities, the rules for painting,
preservation, packing & shipment will be applicable at par with the complete
equipment and there shall be no concessions.
(d) The Inspection Note is to be issued only if the delivery period is valid.
(e) The Inspection Note can be signed by authorised officers only.
6. No Certified True Copy of the Inspection note is to be issued as a routine. If

specifically sought by the firm or Order Placement Authority, a certificate from
Purchasing Agency stating No payment has been made against the lost
Inspection Note and no payment will be made against the original document if
retrieved, has to be obtained prior to issue of a duplicate Inspection Note. The
extant rules are to be rigidly adhered to.
7. In case of any eventuality, if the Inspection Note needs to be withdrawn for

amendment or cancellation, the same should be done under intimation to Inspecting
Authority and Order Placement Authority.
Responsibility of Firm
8. The firm has to submit the following documents to enable the Inspection
Agency to process the Inspection Note:-
(a) Copy of all the inspection certificates and test reports pertaining to the
equipment or components for which the Inspection Note is being sought.
(b) Certificate of preservation, warranty and guarantee as applicable.
(c) Copy of relevant extract of Purchase order indicating the items of

delivery, any amendments to Purchase Order and Delivery Period extension if
granted.
(d) Packing List, Delivery Challan and Transit Insurance documents.
(e) In case of shipyard orders or suborders, the firm is required to submit

inspection and test certificates (Form 4) duly filled. The reports of FATs and
other trials are also to be attached.
(f) The firm is required to complete all documentation including Technical

Description, Operation Instructions, Part Identification List and any other
documentation in accordance with the terms of Purchase Order. The
documentation has to be approved by the Professional Directorates at IHQ
MoD (Navy).
53
9. The firm is to enclose special instructions for preservation, handling and such
other relevant instructions for safety of the equipment along with the Inspection Note.
Responsibility of Inspecting Agency
10. The issue of Inspection Note marks the conclusion of QA process. Therefore
it is essential to ensure that all the records necessary for traceability of QA activities
are compiled for future reference. Towards this, following documents are to be
compiled into a single dossier:-
(a) Copy of Purchase order with all amendments.
(b) Copy of AsFitted Drawings and Approved Drawings in the format

specified.
(c) Copy of approved QAP and ATP along with all amendments.
(d) Copy of all concessions, deviations and any other correspondence

relevant to the QA process.
(e) Copy of all inspection certificates for every stage of the QA process.
(f) Copy of all INotes.
(g) Copy of Tests and Trial reports including type tests.
(h) Copy of special instructions for preservation and handling.
(j) Copy of Guarantee/ Warranty certificates.
Distribution
11. Number of Copies. The Inspection Note irrespective of the format, are to
be issued in septuplicate. Each of the seven copies is to be numbered and
accounted for.
12. Addressees. The distribution of seven copies has been specified in the
DGQA Standing Orders and the same is reproduced below:-
(a) Copy Nos. 1, 2 and 5 are to be forwarded to Order Placement

Authority.
(b) Copy No. 3 is for the firm or supplier.
(c) Copy No. 4 is to be given to the firm for attaching along with the
consignment.
54
(d) Copy No. 6 is sent to the consignee directly by the Quality Assurance
Agency.
(e) Copy No. 7 is to be retained by QA agency as office copy.

CHAPTER 13
CONCESSIONS AND DEVIATIONS
General Principles
1. Need. In order to retain the practicality of contract, it is necessary to

incorporate the requisite flexibility in the system of Quality Assurance so that the
equipment or component is manufactured on time despite the constraints, whilst
maintaining the quality standards and performance criteria.
2. Caveat. Essentially, the Purchase Order and the SOTRs have to be

complied with in totality. However, changes to these documents, if inevitable, may be
carried out only if approved by the Order Placing Authority or the Professional
Directorates.
3. Quality Assurance and acceptance of equipment/ stores is to be done solely

on the basis of terms specified in the Contract and particulars governing the supply.
While the primary responsibility of compliance with approved SOTRs and issued
Purchase Order rests with the manufacturer, the adherence is to be ensured by the
Inspection Agencies. In case dispensation is inevitable, then it has to be ratified
adopting a promulgated procedure.
Definitions
4. Deviation. When the firm seeks approval in advance to use material

different from that specified or to manufacture components that differ from the
specifications, then the permission if given, is termed as Deviation. Deviation is
issued prior to commencement of manufacture and is limited to a definite quantity or
period.
5. Concession. It is defined as permission granted by the Inspection Authority

to the firm when:-
(a) To accept the errors arising during manufacture.
(b) Supply a component or an item which is at variance from contractual

requirements.
Consideration Factors and Classification
6. Factors. It is reiterated that the specifications given in the Contract are to

be faithfully reproduced by the manufacturer or the supplier. However, due to
extenuating circumstances, if the specifications are deemed unachievable, the firms
ought to seek deviations which have to be approved by the Professional Directorates
56
and subsequently incorporated as amendments in the Purchase Order by the Order

Placement Authorities. The factors to be considered before according approval for
either deviations or concessions are:-
(a) Serviceability.
(b) Interchangeability.
(c) Reliability.
(d) Durability.
(e) Safety of equipment/ personnel.
7. Classification of Deviations and Concessions. Based on the severity

of implications, Deviations and Concessions can be divided into five categories.
These are tabulated below:-
Class Nature of Deviations/ Concessions

A Major deviations in design and materials affecting serviceability/
functions, interchangeability and durability
B Major deviations in design and materials affecting durability but not
affecting functions including safety of equipment and personnel or
interchangeability
C Deviations in design and materials causing minor changes in
durability but not affecting functions including safety of equipment
and personnel or interchangeability
D Minor deviations in design and materials but not affecting durability,
functions including safety of equipment and personnel or
interchangeability
E Minor deviations in manufacturing details not affecting design or
materials, functions including safety of equipment and personnel or
interchangeability
Procedure
8. Grant of Deviations/ Concessions. Circumstances may arise when a

manufacturer of equipment requests permission to depart from a particular standard
guiding production prior to the commencement of manufacturing or to grant a
concession and accept errors made during manufacture. In all such cases, a
'Deviation Permit' is to be issued for an intentional departure from item's
specification in order to facilitate production. Similarly a 'Concession Permit' is to
be issued for acceptance of errors in manufacturing, which does not necessitate its
rejection or when there is dissimilitude in the item being supplied and the
specifications of Purchase Order.
57
9. Deviation Permit. A Deviation Permit constitutes permission in advance

to use material or to manufacture components, which differ from design or
specification and is limited in its application to cover a definite quantity or period.
10. Concession Permit. A Concession Permit constitutes permission to

accept a limited quantity of materials/ components/ stores which have already been
manufactured but do not conform strictly to the specifications. However, any work
done in anticipation of the decision on a request for a concession would be the
Supplier's liability.
11. Authority for Approval of Deviations and Concessions. The deviations

at Class A, B, C and D above will be referred to HQ DQA(WP) for detailed
examination and acceptance. However, the acceptance of the said concessions
would only be examined after approval of the concerned professional Directorate.
After scrutiny, in case it emerges that the acceptance of the concession would not in
any way compromise the main parameters and performance of the equipment, the
said concession would be deemed as acceptable with an appropriate proviso
depending on the nature of the concession. The approving authority for Class E
cases is the concerned Inspecting Agency.
12. Application for Deviations/ Concessions. Manufacturers or Suppliers

are to submit an application by filling Form 8 (Format placed at Appendix C) for
seeking Deviations/ Concessions as the case may be. The main vendor is to
submit the application in quintuplicate while in case of subvendor, the application
has to be in sextuplicate. The concerned Inspecting Agency is to scrutinize the
application, check for veracity and applicability for Classes A, B, C, and D; forward
the case to HQ DQA (WP) along with remarks and recommendations. For Class E,
approval if considered warranted, is to be accorded by the Inspecting Agency and
details reported to Inspecting Authority.
13. Procedurally, the request for Deviations/ Concessions has to be made in

Form 8 and approval is to be granted in form of relevant Permit. It should be noted
that this is the only procedure for seeking and according approvals for
Deviations or Concessions. Any other form of correspondence, though official
is not valid for this purpose.
14. Due Diligence. Each case, irrespective of class and level, is to be analyzed
in totality. Inputs should be sought from the User or the Purchaser as well as the
Professional Directorates. Any additional tests required to be carried out
should be undertaken prior sentencing the case.
15. Validity. The permit granted is valid for only one occasion and only for the
indicated component. Even if the case is repeated in the next order, a fresh
application is to be submitted and processed. No Deviation or Concession can be
treated as a precedent.
16. Nomenclature. Since the permit is for solitary usage, it is obvious that
every deviation or concession has a unique identity. In order to facilitate traceability,
a common nomenclature as given below is to be adopted:-
58
Unit / Serial No. / Year / Deviation or Concession / Classification / Ordering

Authority / Purchase Order Reference / Firms name
17. Record of Deviations and Concessions. A register is to be maintained by

the concerned Inspecting Agency of all Deviations and Concessions recommended
and given. Similarly, a master record is to be maintained by the Inspection Authority
for all deviations and concessions granted based on the recommendations of field
units.
18. Notification. The approved Deviations and Concessions are to be notified

by the Inspection Authority to all concerned in accordance with format given in
Appendix F. The concerned Inspecting Agency is to record the details in the
Inspection note.
19. Number of Copies and Disposal. If the Deviation or Concession is being

sought by the main contractor, Form 8 is to be filled in quintuplicate. An additional
copy is required if the applicant is a subcontractor. The distribution is tabulated
below:-
COPY
ORGANISATION
No.
1 Headquarters, DQA (WP)
2 Design Authority / Professional Directorate
3 Order Placement Authority
4 Inspecting Agency
5 Main contractor / Firm
6 Subcontractor
20. Rejection. In case the application is not approved by the Permit Granting
authority, a communication to this effect is to be made to the concerned Inspecting
Agency for onward transmission to the firm.
59
Appendix A
(Refers to Para 2 of Chapter 1)
LIST OF EQUIPMENT COVERED UNDER GUIDELINES
Mission Critical Main Equipment
1. Main Propulsion Equipment. Main & Auxiliary Boilers & associated Boiler
Fittings, Steam Turbines, Gas Turbines & Diesel Engines & Main Reduction Gear.
2. PGD Equipment. Turbo Alternator, Diesel Alternators, Gas Turbine

Alternators. Emergency Diesel Gensets > 50 kw.
3. Shafting Line Equipment. Propellers (Fixed Pitch & CPP), Main Shaft,
Intermediate Shaft, A Bracket / P Bracket, CPP OD Box & Hub Assembly,
Plummer Block / Bearing, Bulkhead Gland, Stern Tube & A Bracket Bushes /
Bearings, Cutlass Rubber Segments for A Bracket Bearings, Sound absorption
couplings, shaft lock / brake, Thrust / Torsion Meters.
4. Steering Gear & Stabilizer Equipment. Hydraulic Rams / Actuators,

Hydraulic Power Pack, Servo-controlled Valves / Manoeuvering Valves, Stabilizer
Fin & Fin Stock, Rudder & Rudder Stock with Support Bearings & Associated
Controls.
5. Control & Instrumentation. All Control System components &

Instrumentation for Propulsion, PGD & Steering that are specially designed &
developed (excluding COTS components).
Mission Critical Auxiliary Equipment
6. Water Generation Equipment. Distilling Plants / Fresh Water Generators /

Reverse Osmosis Plants.
7. Compressors. L.P, HP, Servo, Salvage & Diving Air Compressors.
8. Pumps. Turbo Driven pumps & Motor Driven pumps for critical / special
applications only & AVCAT pumps, Hull & Fire Pumps, Fire & Bilge Pumps.
9. A/C & Refrigeration Equipment. Compressors, Condensers, Evaporators,

Heat Exchangers, ATUs & Associated Control Equipment.
10. Helo Equipment. Helo Traversing & Handling system, Helo Landing Grid,
Helo Hanger & general purpose Rolling shutters. Helo Fuelling / De-fuelling System.
11. Winch. Winch for Helicopter Handling / Towing / Minesweeping Boat

Davit, Ammunition Loading and any special purpose.
60
Mission Critical Common Equipment
12. Motors. Only those motors for special applications and not yet type tested.
13. Starters. Starters & Control Panels for only DQA(WP) inspected. equipment.
14. Valves. All Underwater valves & ship system valves > 100 mm NB.
15. Shock Mounts. All categories of shock mounts.
16. Doors & Hatches. Gas / Water Tight / Fire Proof Doors & Hatches.
17. Miscellaneous Eqpt. Steam Sirens, Air Whistle & Electric Hooter.
61
Appendix B1
(refers to Para 5(a) of Chapter 1)
HQ DQA(WP) ORGANISATION
62
Appendix B2
(Refers to Para 5(b) of Chapter 1)
ORGANISATION OF FIELD UNITS

UNDER DQA(WP)
63
Appendix C
FORMAT OF STANDARD FORMS
FORM 1
ORDER PROGRESS REVIEW FORM
Order No Date of Order Delivery Date
1. Date of submission of drawings

2. Date by which approval is required
3. Date by which inspection & Test Schedule will be submitted
4. Date by which approval required for (3)
5. Expected date of ordering of raw materials/castings/forgings
6. Expected date of delivery of other bought out items
7. Expected date of delivery of other bought out items
8. Forwarding of components environmental tests (if applicable)
9. Machining to commence by
10. Machining to complete by
11. Assembly to commence by
12. Assembly to complete by
13. Forwarding of prototype sub-assembly/assembly/equipment for type tests
14. Final shop test or final inspection to commence by
15. Final shop test or final inspection to complete by
16. Delivery by
Date : Signature of responsible Officer of firm

Place :
Note 1: The QAO, on receipt of PO, should forward this form to the firm for
completing details. For each separate order (item if considered necessary) in
quadruplicate.
64
Note 2: In case first of the type is required to be tested to determine whether or

not the product meets environmental and performance requirements and design
criteria delineated in applicable specifications the form duly completed should
immediately be forwarded to IAY in respect of the prototype separately.
FORM 4
INSPECTION AND TEST CERTIFICATE
Firms Ref____________________________ Date_______
1. Inspection Authority _______________________________
2. Date of Inspection ________________________________
3. Firms Name _________________________________
4. Ordering Authority _________________________________
5. Order No and Date _________________________________
6. Full description, quantity and registration Nos. of any of items of which this
Certificate refers. (If this consignment represents only part supply, this column
should be endorsed `PART SUPPLY
7. Drawing & specification Numbers ______________________
8. Dispatch details ___________________________________________
9. Firms Certificate
I/We hereby certify that:
(a) The articles described hereon have been inspected and tested at our
works in accordance with the relevant specifications and drawings, with which
they comply except as detailed at (c) below.
(b) Any other requirements of the relevant order including those referring
to identification and packing of the articles have been met or will be met.
(c) This certificate does not relieve us from any guarantee regarding
performance on board stipulated in the order.
65
(d) There has been no departure from these drawings and specifications
except as authorized by the Agent Inspecting Authority. The authorized
departure are stated in Para 10 below.
(e) Records of the relevant inspection and test certificates and reports
have been retained by us with copies provided to the Inspector. The records
retained by us will not be destroyed without his written authority.
10. Concessions granted as per para 9(d) above.
Concession Ref. of affected Brief details Authority for

Number Items of Concession Concession
Signature on behalf of the firm ______________________________
Signature _______________________________
Position held _______________________________
Date _______________________________
11. Remarks of CQAE(WE)/QAE(WE):
12. Class Accorded : The Equipment has been accorded CLASS _____.
13. Inspector's Certificate No ____________________________
Certified that inspection and tests have been carried out to my satisfaction.
Signature _____________________ Signature__________________

Name ____________________ Name____________________
Representing _________________ Representing _______________
Date __________________ Date_________________
*(To be signed by Engineering and Electrical Inspector separately as required).

66
FORM 7
67
68
FORM 8
Supplier's Ref No:..

Sub-Contractor's Ref No:.
(If applicable)
APPLICATION TO PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR

DEVIATION / CONCESSION PERMIT
Notes:
(a) The granting of this deviation is strictly limited to this specific application and
is not to be regarded as a precedent. IT IS NOT AN AMENDMENT TO THE
CONTRACT AND IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ANY OF THE MINISTRY RIGHTS
THEREUNDER.
(b) Main Contractor (Supplier) is only authorized to sign and submit the
application even if prepared by a sub-contractor for his sub order.
(c) If any variation in cost due to the concession / deviation is to be charged or

credited to the state full allowance is to be made for the disposal of any scrap or
redundant material arising. The estimate of charge / credit is given without prejudice
to the final settlement.
(d) Only one item is to be shown on each form.
PART I (To be completed by the Main Contactor)
1. Main Contractor (Name and Address)
2. Main Contract No.
3. Sub-contractor (Name & Address):
4. Sub-Contract No.
5. Description of Material Component or Store
6. Specification/Drawing No.
Stores reference etc.
7. (a) Quantity / period

(b) Batch / Lot No.
8. Description of Deviation/Concession.
(Including proposals for recovery)
69
These must accompany sketches/

Drawings)/relevant mechanical or (Continue overleaf if
Performance Tests, Radiographs, U/S necessary)
Tests, N&V test results if applicable
9. Reference numbers of deviations /

concessions previously granted for
any other Indenting Authority
(a) of a similar nature
(b) for the quantity/period
of item 7 above.
10. REASONS FOR 11. EFFECT ON COST 12. If deviation is

DEVIATION/ (See Note 3) granted, are any of the
CONCESSION following adversely
Cost will be increased affected?
To reduce production
costs Cost will be decreased (State `YES', `NO' or `N.
K.' (Not Known). If
Error in manufacture data Cost will be unchanged answer is `YES'
particulars are to be
Material specified not Deviation costs: attached.
available
Will be charged to the Functioning
Manufacturer's error Govt.
To accommodate local Will not be charged to the Serviceability /

manufacturing methods Govt. Maintainability
Any other reasons: Will be credited to the

Govt. Interchangeability
Will not be credited to the

Govt. Reliability (Strength)
(Item affected to be Estimated amount of

ticked) Charge Rs. Durability (Life of item)
OR
Estimated amount of Safety of Equipment &
Credit Rs. Personnel
13. Effect on agreed delivery date.
(a) If deviation granted:
(b) If not granted:

70
14. Design vetting where the Supplier is also the design authority:
AGREED: - ** Condition attached.
Signature (Design Department) Date
15. Submitted by:
Signature On behalf of
Date Position held

(Seal of the Main Contractor)
PART-II
(INSPECTING AGENCY)
16. Reference Number/ Control Number: _____________________________
17. Nature of Deviation: ____________________________________
18. Class of Deviation: ___________________
19. Confirm if any affect on safety, service life, functioning, interchangeability or

durability.
20. Give reference no. of previously granted deviation of similar nature.
21. Recommendations.
Signature (QAO)
22. Reference to Design Authority/IHQ MoD(N) for approval.
Date Signature and Stamp of Signing Authority

71
23. Acceptance by Inspection Authority/DQA(WP).
Date Signature and Stamp of Signing Authority
Note
Distribution : Five copies of Form are to be prepared. However, in case of

Contractor, six copies of Form are to be prepared and submitted to CQAE/QAE
for processing.
Main Contractor - One copy

Sub-Contractor - One copy
CQAO/QAO - One copy
HQ DQA(WP) - One copy
Design Authority - One copy
Order Placing Authority - One copy
72
Appendix D
FORMAT OF QAP
Sl. Component name & Qty Characteristic/ Quantum Reference Accep- Record Verific-
No. part no. in Ref Drg Type of Check of Check Document tance Format ation
Method
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1/HEAT,
SOTR,
RAW MATERIAL STAGE CHEMICAL & 1/LOT,100%,
Ref. Stds
(ALL COMPONENTS) MECHANICAL (10-25%),
RANDOM
IN PROCESS / V/D, MP, CO,

100%, 10-25% SOTR,
FABRICATION STAGE ( ALL BA. DP, RT,
RANDOM Ref. Stds IR,
COMPONENTS) UT
CHP,
TC,
RD
ASSEMBLY V/D, T, SOTR, W,
100% MTC,
STAGE ADF Ref Stds
FGC,
RW
HT, LPT, NPSH
TEST & TRIALS STAGES 100% ATP
ETC.
SOTR,
DOCUMENTATION One Set
Ref Stds
PAINTING, PRESERVATION, SOTR,

100%
PACKING & SHIPMENT Ref Stds
RT Radiography Test HT Hydro Test

UT Ultrasonic Test LPT Liquid Penetration Test
DP Dye Penetrant Test NPSH Net Positive Suction Head Test
(for pumps)
MP Magnetic Particle Test TC Test Certificate
V/D Visual/ Dimensional MTC Manufactures Test Certificate
T Tolerance FGC Firms Guarantee Certificate
BA Balancing IR Inspection Record (Evidence of
Inspection by QAO)
CO Concentricity RD Record (Evidence of Firms
Internal QA Record)
CHP Customer Hold Point W Witness by Customer (Same as
CHP)
RW Review of Firms Internal QA ADF Assembly Demerit Factor
Documents
SOTR Statement of Technical Ref Reference Standards ASTM,
Requirements Stds ASME, GOST, DIN, BS, NES, IS
73
Appendix E
(Refers to Para 9 b(i) of Chapter 6)
GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE OF CASTINGS
General
1. All classes of castings shall be subjected to visual & dimensional inspection

including wall thickness measurement. Test of external surfaces is mandatory
whereas internal surfaces are to be examined as per requirements stated in SOTR.
In any case, the decision of the IAY/ IAG shall be binding and final on the type and
extent of tests.
2. The visual inspection shall be augmented with Liquid Penetrant Test (LPT)/
Magnetic Particle Induction (MPI) Test/ Ultrasonic test (UT) or Radiography Test (RT)
test as appropriate to the material or as specified in the SOTR .
3. The complete casting shall be examined 100% for sub surface defects with
special emphasis on critical/ specified test regions, the Contractor should submit a
detailed written procedure of the stipulated tests to the QAO/IAG and shall satisfy the
QAO/IAG on the competency of the technique and operators before commencement
of the tests.
4. In case of RT, the test regions can be examined by Single or Double Wall
technique (SWT or DWT) . For critical/ specified test regions, only SWT is to be
used as a matter of policy unless there is adequate evidence to prove that it is
impractical. In all other cases, DWT can be used. It should be noted that defects
observed by DWT should be further examined by SWT for the designated area to
establish the extent of severity of the defect.
5. In case of UT, for critical applications, the results shall be reconciled by RT of

the selected areas to a minimum coverage of 10% of the total area being examined.
6. Exceptions. Requirement of 100% NDT test of castings is waived off for

the non critical categories (if specified in the SOTR). The NDT in the following cases
may be undertaken on sample basis:-
(a) Low stress Class II castings.
(b) Sample positions on large Class II/ III castings.
(c) Batch supply of Class III castings.
Assessment of Severity of Defects & Acceptance Standards
7. The severity of defect other than cracks, hot tears etc. is to be assessed in
74
terms of reductions of wall thickness and area as observed visually or by NDT

methods. The following guidelines are to be followed for assessment of severity of
defects.
8. Assessment by Radiography. Reduction in wall thickness in the way of

sub surface defects is to be assessed by visual comparison with appropriate density
check films showing the approximate %ge change for the particular RT technique,
material & thickness range. The density check films should belong to the same
standard i.e. a film generated by ASTM standard cannot be used for comparison of a
film generated by BS standard.
9. Assessment by Ultrasonic Method. The assessment by UT shall be by a

mutually agreed procedure between Contractor and IAY/ IAG.
10. Acceptance Standards Dimensional.
(a) A tolerance of 10% of the designed wall thickness or 6 mm whichever is

less may be accepted on all casting dimensions.
(b) Where the wall thickness fails to meet the designed wall thickness, a
reduction may be accepted upto 10% of designed wall thickness or 6 mm
whichever is less. The reduced wall thickness shall be free from sub surface
defects in critical/ specified test regions. The total area of reduced thickness
including that which may arise through blending out of surface defects shall
not exceed 10% of critical test regions and designated test regions containing
the defects.
11. Acceptance Standards Surface Defects
(a) On visual examination in the finished condition, all surfaces shall be

clean and free from cracks, tears, laps, burrs, scams, cold shuts, shrinks,
folds, laminations, slivers, scale rust, sand, flux and dross.
(b) Round forms of surface defects including visible porosity are

unacceptable in critical/ specified test regions but, may be accepted in non
specified areas at the discretion of the IAY/ IAG. Whilst checking the surface
defects, account should also be taken of the subsequent finishing procedures
to be applied for the surfaces. Blending out of unacceptable surface defects is
permitted in accordance with clauses given under the heading Rectification
of Defects in subsequent paragraphs.
(c) After examination of all defects which are apparent by visual

examination, critical/ specified test regions are to be examined by MPI or LPT
tests. For the test, the surfaces are to be free of all cracks and crack like
defects and similar indications.
(d) Defects like porosity etc. shall be accepted provided that the immediate
areas of the casting are acceptable when examined for sub surface defects or
after repairs to the sub surface defects.
75
12. Acceptance Standards Sub Surface Defects.
(a) Cracks, hot tears, and cold shuts are not acceptable except where the
defect can be shown, to the satisfaction of the QAO/ IAG, to be wholly within
the middle third of the thickness of the casting and its maximum dimension
does not exceed:-
(i) One half of the designed wall thickness of the casting in length; and
(ii) 10% of the designed wall thickness of the casting in depth.
(b) Filamentary shrinkage, sponginess and porosity shall only be accepted

where local reduction in wall thickness resulting from these defects does not
exceed 5% of designed wall thickness in critical test regions and 10% in
specified test regions, subject to the total defective area not exceeding 10% of
each critical test regions or 20% of the specified test region containing the
defect.
(c) In thick walled castings i.e. 50 mm and above, where reduction in wall
thickness exceeds the limits in clause 12(b) above, but nowhere exceeds 20%
of the defective areas, the same may be accepted provided that the maximum
dimension does not exceed the thickness of the casting at that point and it can
be shown that the defect lies wholly within the middle third of the thickness.
(d) Shrinkage cavities, gas holes, airlocks and rounded inclusions shall be
accepted provided that the local reduction in wall thickness resulting from
these defects together with other sub surface defects does not exceed 10% of
the designed wall thickness in Critical test regions and 20% in Specified test
regions.
13. Acceptance Standards for Sample Inspection Sub Surface Defects.

Where sample inspection is being carried out in accordance with SOTR /QAP
provisions, the cumulative local reduction in wall thickness resulting from sub surface
defects at any position shall not exceed 20% of the designed wall thickness. The total
defective area shall not exceed 20% of the total area of the casting.
14. Proximity of Individual Sub Surface Defects.
(a) The defective areas as defined at paragraphs 12 & 13 above, are to be

separated by at least:-
(i) 2.25 x thickness of the material in the way of defect; or
(ii) 1.25 x length of the large adjacent defect.
(b) However, if the distance between the ends of two defects/ defective
areas is less than either of the above two values, they shall be considered as
a single defect having an overall length equal to the distance measured
between the two extremities of the two defects/ defective areas.
76
Rectification of Defects
15. General. Rectification of defects on casting is by welding. The section

gives the various methods and the acceptable standards for repair by welding.
However, it should be noted that the guidelines below are not all encompassing and
are to be read in conjunction with relevant applicable standards.
16. Rectification of Dimensions. Correction of casting dimensions, machining

errors and repair of surface defects may be made by weld deposition using approved
procedures for the material concerned and shall be within the following limits:-
(a) 5 mm maximum build up for wall thickness <= 25 mm.
(b) 20% of wall thickness (max) build up for wall thickness > 25 mm but not
exceeding 10 mm.
(c) Areas of build up on Class I and II castings to be restricted to 10% of

the inner/ outer surface area of the casting, not including flange thickness and
webs, subject to any limitations indicated at paragraph 20 below.
(d) Areas of build up on Class III castings are to be restricted to 20% of

the inner/ outer surface area of the casting, not including flange thicknesses
and webs.
(e) All the above mentioned thicknesses are applicable to finished

condition. Weld build-up exceeding the dimensions shall either entail rejection
or be referred to IAY for acceptance.
17. Rectification of Surface Defects.
(a) Unacceptable surface defects may be blended out by an approved

process provided the resulting depression does not reduce the designed wall
thickness by more than 6 mm or 10% which ever is less. The depression shall
be flared out with a minimum radius equal to 3 x Max depth and the remaining
wall thickness in the way of the depression shall be free from sub surface
defects in Critical/ Specified test regions.
(b) The total area subjected to blending, including the area affected by the
flaring shall not exceed 10% of the critical test region and 20% of the specified
test region in which the defect is observed.
(c) Surface defects which cannot be blended out within the limits indicated
at paragraphs 17 (a) & (b) may be repaired by welding by an approved
procedure for the material concerned within the overall limitation mentioned at
paragraph 16.
18. Rectification of Sub Surface Defects. Unacceptable sub surface defects

may be repaired by welding using an approved procedure for the material concerned
and shall be within the following limits:-
77
(a) Total weld repairs in Class I and II castings shall not exceed 10% of the
inner or outer surface area of the casting, not including flange thickness and
webs subject to limitations indicated at paragraph below.
(b) Total weld repair in Class III castings shall not exceed 20% of the inner
or outer surface area of the casting not including flange thicknesses & webs.
Limits on Individual Sub Surface Defects
19. Any individual repair in Critical test region shall not exceed 5% of the test area
containing the defect. In Specified test regions any individual repair shall not exceed
10% of the test area containing the defect.
Limits on Combined Weld Repairs
20. The total combined area of weld repairs from all causes i.e. dimensional
correction, surface & sub surface defects shall not exceed 10% of the Critical test
region and 20% of the Specified test regions. Non designated areas of Class III
castings are to be examined in accordance with provisions stipulated at paragraph 6
above.
21. The extent of weld repair undertaken should be only that necessary to bring
the casting within the appropriate standards indicated at paragraphs 10 to 13 above.
The defects repaired are to be decided in consultation with the IAY.
Non Destructive Examination of Repairs
22. All castings which have been repaired shall be inspected as detailed in the
succeeding paragraphs. Non destructive examination method requirements shall be
in accordance with procedures/ requirements indicated at Appendix K.
23. Visual Inspection. Each casting shall be inspected after repair for
conformance to dimensions, surface condition and identification of markings.
24. Magnetic Particle (MPI) & Liquid Penetrant Test (LPT) Inspection. The
MPI/ LPT inspections are to be carried out on all weld build up areas after grinding or
machining the weld surface flush with the casting surface. The area inspected should
extend upto 50 mm from the weld boundaries in all directions.
25. RT & UT Inspection.
(a) All weld repairs shall be ultrasonically examined or radio-graphed

except for surface repairs (effected accordance with guidelines indicated at
paragraph 16 above) on Class III castings and non designated areas of Class I
& II castings.
78
(b) UT can be used in lieu of RT, for examination of weld repair, subject
that the firm is to forward the UT methodology for approval to IAY.
Acceptance Standards for Cold Repairs
26. The acceptance standard for both ferrous & non ferrous castings in both
Critical & Specified test regions shall be as follows:-
(a) Cracks & Lack of Fusion. These are not accountable.
(b) Linear Inclusions. The max length of any single linear inclusion shall
not exceed 0.5 x designed wall thickness in the way of inclusion. Such
inclusions should be separated in accordance with guidelines given at
paragraph 14 above. The total length of inclusions shall not exceed 20% of
max dimensions of the area affected by the repair.
(c) Porosity & Rounded Inclusion. Porosity & Rounded inclusion

revealed by RT shall be assessed by assuming the repair area to be a series
of strips of width approximately equal to mean depth of repair. The strips
should be aligned to the direction which gives the worst total defect indication.
For circular indications revealed by LPT on non ferrous welds.
79
Appendix F
(Refers to Para 9 b(ii) of Chapter 6)
GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE OF FORGINGS
Performance Specification
1. The materials, chemical composition, carbon equivalent values, product

analysis variations, manufacture, heat treatment, testing and quality assurance of
forgings for use in IN Ships and Submarines shall be in accordance with these
guidelines.
Materials
2. Requirements. The material shall strictly conform to the requirements of the

grades specified in the SOTR/ PO to meet the specific environment for which it is
intended.
3. Ladle Analysis. The material, on ladle analysis, shall conform to the

limitations of chemical composition given in the relevant standard.
4. Carbon Equivalent Values (Steel Forgings). The Carbon Equivalent

Values (CEV) shall not exceed the values given in the relevant standards.
5. Product Analysis Variations. A check analysis is required, using broken

test pieces or adjacent material. The percentages of the elements shall not exceed
the variations specified in the relevant standards. Where no check analysis variation
is specified, the limits for check analysis and ladle analysis are the same.
Manufacture
6. Methodology. The basic ingot is to be manufactured by internationally

recognized methods of manufacture or as specified in the relevant applicable
standard or as specified in the SOTR/PO.
For example : Low alloy or carbon-manganese steels are to be produced by

the basic electric or basic oxygen furnace route, to be vacuum degassed/
refined and fully killed using the Aluminium fine-grained practice.
7. Discard. Sufficient discard shall be removed from the top and bottom of
ingots to ensure freedom from piping and harmful segregation in the finished forging.
The bottom discard shall not be less than 3% of the body of the ingot above the well.
80
8. Dimensions. Forgings shall be brought as near to final dimensions as

feasible by hot working. Grain flow in the forging shall be in accordance with the
requirements of the SOTR/ PO/ Standard or, if not specified, shall be consistent with
established good forging practices.
9. Hot-working Temperatures. The initial & subsequent hot working on ingot

feedstock is to be done as per the specifications given in the relevant applicable
standard/ SOTR. The selected forging temperature range shall be such that no
detrimental effects are imparted to the forgings. Final dimensions shall only be
achieved by the minimum of machining and/or grinding.
10. Forging Ratio. The ratio of the mean cross sectional area of the ingot to that
of the main body of the forging shall be as specified in the relevant applicable
standard or SOTR or as per internationally accepted practices. For example in case
of steel forgings, the ratio should not be not less than 2:1. Where an upsetting
operation is used, this criteria relates to the cross sectional area of the upset bloom
and not the ingot. In such as case, this ratio shall not be greater than 10:1 on the
thinnest section as forged.
Heat Treatment.
11. Heat treatment of the forgings at all stages of manufacture shall be conducted
in a manner that shall preclude the formation of detrimental metallurgical structure or
physical defects. Heat treatment shall be performed in suitably designed furnaces
with an adequate level of temperature monitoring. Monitoring equipment shall
produce a hard copy permanent record of temperature and time.
12. Finish forged products shall be normalized and tempered or quenched and
tempered unless specified otherwise. To achieve the specified properties, the
normalizing and tempering temperatures shall be within the ranges specified in the
SOTR / applicable relevant standard.
Testing
13. NonDestructive Testing, Acceptance Standards and Recording of

Defects.
(a) After final heat treatment and machining each forging shall be visually
examined for surface defects and shall be subjected to MPI and/ or
Radiogrpahy and/or Ultrasonic examinations. Dye Penetrant Testing may be
used as an alternative to MPI test. All Non-Destructive Testing (NDT)
methods shall be in accordance with the requirements of relevant applicable
standards, guidelines for which are given at Annexure 2 to 4.
(b) The size and location of all defect indications shall be recorded and
marked on the item as the examination progresses. Records shall be
81
sufficiently detailed to permit application of the quality acceptance standard

required by the customer as defined in the contract documents.
(c) With the agreement of the customer and provided the final component
dimensions can still be achieved, surface defects may be removed by
grinding.
14. Sampling for Mechanical Testing.
(a) All samples for mechanical testing shall be taken from the forging
prolongations as shown in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 after all heat
treatment has been completed. Provision shall be made for retests as
considered necessary.
(b) Test pieces shall be taken as follows:-
(i) For forgings weighing 200 kg or more, specimens shall be taken

from every forging prolongation in accordance with Figure 1, Figure 2
or Figure 3 as appropriate.
(ii) For forgings weighing less than 200 kg, individual forgings
specimens shall be taken from every forging in accordance with Figure
1, Figure 2 or Figure 3 as appropriate. For batches of forgings,
specimens shall be taken from 25% of the forgings in accordance with
Figure 1, Figure 2 or Figure 3 as appropriate. Duplicate specimens
from the bottom end are not required regardless of length to width ratio.
A batch is defined as a group of forgings produced from one heat or
melt and heat treated in the same heat treatment charge.
(iii) For multiple forgings, the composite forging weight governs

whether the procedure at Clause 6.3.2(b)(1) or Clause 6.3.2(b)(2)
above applies.
(iv) For bars in the finally heat treated condition, specimens shall be
cut from the heat treated bars and shall not be further heat treated or
mechanically worked after their removal. One longitudinal tensile and
three transverse Charpy V notch impact tests shall be made on any
batch of bars of similar size from the same cast and heat treated
together.
(c) Certain components of complex shape, e.g. closed die forgings, where
all the parameters are not fully defined, shall be subject to approval by the
equipment sponsor at the design stage. Approval submissions for such items
shall include the following:-
(i) Sufficient sketches to define shape, size and grain flow.
(ii) Details of the production route.

82
(iii) Proposals for the locations and number of test pieces.
Figure 1 Location of Specimens for Rectangular & Cross Sections
When L = 2 x w or greater, tests shall be repeated on this end also
LONGITUDINAL
TENSILE TEST
L
LONGITUDINAL
CHARPY TEST
25 MM
T/4 = 60 MM
TOP END WRT AS CAST INGOT
25 MM
T
T/2
W/4
83
Figure 2 Location of Test Specimens for Solid Circular Cross Section
When L = 2 x d or greater, tests shall be repeated on this end also
W 25 MM
L
W/2
25 MM
W/2 + 60 MM
LONGITUDINAL TENSILE TEST

25 MM
LONGITUDINAL CHARPY TEST

84
Figure 3 Location of Test Specimens for Bored Circular Cross Section
When L = 2 x d or greater, tests shall be repeated on this end also
W/2
L
W/2 + 60 MM
LONGITUDINAL TENSILE TEST 25 MM

LONGITUDINAL CHARPY TEST
Mechanical Test and Properties
15. Tensile tests shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of BS

EN 10002-1 / eqv. ASTM or IS standards. The dimensions of the test pieces shall be
in accordance with the requirements of BS EN 10002-1 Annex C / eqv. ASTM or IS
standards.
16. When required for the grades specified or required by the contract
documents, tensile testing at elevated temperature shall be in accordance with the
requirements of BS EN 10002-5 / eqv. ASTM or IS standards.
17. Charpy Vnotch impact tests shall be in accordance with the requirements of
BS EN 10045-1 / eqv. ASTM or IS standards. Full size specimens shall be used
where practicable. Energy requirements for sub-size specimens shall be as per
relevant applicable standard.
18. The Yield Strength or 0.2% Proof Stress, Tensile Strength, %ge Elongation,
Impact Test Temperature and Impact Energy requirements for the forgings shall be
in accordance with the requirements stated in the relevant applicable standards or as
indicated in the SOTR.
85
19. When hardness testing is required by the applicable standard or the contract
documents, this shall be either Rockwell, Vickers or Brinell hardness values
specified in the relevant applicable standards or as specified in the SOTR.
Acceptance criteria for the hardness test results shall also be as stated in the
applicable standard or the contract documents.
20. Portable hardness testing methods may be employed for large forgings when
agreed in the contract document.
21. When specified in the contract documents, the mechanical properties for large
section forgings shall be determined in the through thickness direction with an
agreed specimen location and test frequency.
22. The mechanical properties of the forgings shall be in accordance with the
requirements stated in the applicable standard or the contract documents. It should
be noted that the mechanical properties quoted are consistent with the Maximum
Ruling Sections quoted. However, the following shall apply:-
(a) For components with ruling sections below the maximum quoted it may
be possible to heat treat to the Tensile Strength and Yield/0.2% Proof Stress
figures in excess of those quoted. Provided the higher properties are
consistent with those quoted in the material specification for the ruling section
prevailing, then the higher release properties may be as defined in the
contract document.
(b) For components with ruling section above the maximum quoted, the
minimum release properties shall be agreed between the Forge Master and
the Purchaser and stated in the contract document.
(c) If there is provision within the material specification regarding 0.2%

Proof Stress compliance at elevated temperature, then the test temperature(s)
for same is to be stated in the SOTR and the requirements of the material
specification are to be met.
23. Retests.
(a) Should any test pieces fail to meet the mechanical property
requirements, two further test pieces may be selected from the same sample
for retest. If these are acceptable, then the item shall be deemed to meet the
specification.
(b) The manufacturer has the right, provided appropriate test material is
available, to re-heat/ re-treat the forgings, in which case the tests and
examination shall be repeated in full as if it were a new item.
(c) The item shall be rejected if the requirements are not achieved after
two re-heat/ re-treat cycles.
86
Quality Assurance
24. General. The manufacturer shall maintain QA systems and procedures in

accordance with internationally recognized procedures & practices which, shall
ensure full material traceability.
25. Quality Assurance Documentation. Documents and certificates detailing

material source, chemical analyses, heat treatment records, results of mechanical
tests and Non Destructive Tests shall be supplied in accordance with the
requirements of relevant standards. All documents/ certificates shall be uniquely
referenced to the items to which they refer.
26. Identification. All items shall be clearly marked by an approved method in

accordance with the contract documents. Marking shall, as a minimum, include but
not be limited to the following:-
(a) Manufacturers Works Code.
(b) Unique Identification Number.
(c) Cast/Heat Number.
27. Check List for Forgings. The under mentioned check list is to be used
whilst checking forgings:-
(a) Is the Material Grade been correctly specified?
(b) Is the grain flow & grain size defined?
(c) Is the heat treatment standard or non-standard, If non standard, are the
temperatures, duration & cooling medium specified unambiguously?
(d) Are the acceptance standards clearly indicated?
(e) Are approval submissions required?
(f) Is elevated temperature testing required and at what temperatures?
(g) Do mechanical property variations need to be specified?
(h) Is hardness testing required and if so what test methods are

acceptable?
(j) Are properties to be determined in the through thickness direction?
(k) Release properties to be specified for large ruling section forgings.
(l) Are elevated temperature 0.2% Proof Stress tests required? If so than
0.2% Proof Stress Acceptance Standards are to be quoted.
87
Appendix G
LIST OF APPROVED BRAND NAMES FOR BOUGHT OUT ITEMS
Seals / Packing Etc.
John Crane, Genseals
Fasteners
TVS, LPS Bossard
Electrical Items
L&T Switchgear, Siemens, Phillips, Bhartia Cutler Hammer, Anchor, Molex
Instrumentation
H Guru, Waree, Pricol, Danfoss / Indfoss

88
Appendix H
GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE OF WELDS
Introduction
1. In production welding, the term "weld quality" is relative. The application

determines what is good or bad. Generally, any weld is a good weld if it meets
appearance requirements and will continue indefinitely to do the job for which it is
intended. But a weld can be "too good". This is the case when a high degree of
quality has been obtained at excessive production cost and the customer is getting
no discernible value from the added expenditure. Insisting on any method of
inspection, x-ray for example, if it serves no function is illogical as well as wasteful.
2. The first step, then, in assuring weld quality is to ascertain the degree
required by the application. A standard should be established based on service
needs. Engineering performance will be the main consideration in arriving at the
standard, but appearance may also be important. A safety factor must, of necessity,
be built into the standard, but it should be reasonable. Once the standard has been
set, it is the responsibility of everyone concerned with the job to see that it is
followed.
3. On the low side, the predetermined standard of quality should never be

compromised. On the high side, there is no objection to extra quality, providing it has
been obtained at no penalty in cost. If tests repeatedly show that the welds are
exhibiting a degree of quality far greater than required by the standard, a cost
reduction through modification of weldment design or procedures may be possible.
4. Frequently, the standards are preset by prevailing specifications or

engineering and legal codes. Sometimes such standards are ultraconservative, but
when they apply, they must be honored. The engineer can do his company or the
customer a service by pointing out unrealistic specifications and the opportunities for
cost savings, but the specifications must be adhered to rigidly until revised.
The Five Ps
5. After the quality standard has been established, the most important step
toward its achievement is the selection of the best process and procedures. By
giving attention to the five Ps, weld quality will come about almost automatically,
reducing subsequent inspection to a routine checking and policing activity. The five
Ps are: -
(a) Process Selection. The process must be right for the job.
89
(b) Preparation. The joint configuration must be right and compatible

with the welding process.
(c) Procedures. To assure uniform results the procedures must be

spelled out in detail and followed religiously during welding.
(d) Pre-testing. By full-scale mockups or simulated specimens the

process and procedures are proved to give the desired standard of quality.
(e) Personnel. Qualified people must be assigned to the job.
Process Selection
6. In view of the various automatic and semiautomatic processes available,

process selection imposes a challenging decision. Of all the processes, manual
welding is the most versatile, but economic considerations necessitate its being ruled
out in favor of a partially or fully mechanized process wherever such is applicable.
7. Process selection is tied up integrally with the need of the joint. Some joints
require Fast-fill predominantly; others, Fast-follow. The most important needs in still
others may be deep penetration or Fast-freeze. Each process has its advantages
and limitations, and each introduces problems affecting joint preparation, welding
procedures, and operator training.
8. The process that gives the correct balance between the needs of the joint in
terms of fill, follow, freeze, and penetration is likely to be the one that gives optimum
weld quality.
9. Manual, submerged arc, flux-cored arc and gas-metal arc welding, except
short-circuiting transfer, enjoy a prequalified status on certain specific joint
configurations. Most are subject to specific thickness limitations as discussed in the
AWS Structural Welding Code D1.1.
10. Deviations from these prequalified joints may be accomplished by running

qualification tests since practically all codes state that "other welding processes and
procedures may be used, provided the contractor qualified them in accordance with
the prescribed requirements."
Preparation
11. Joint preparations are standardized and specified by applicable codes. The
decision of the joint preparation is made by the designer rather than the fabricator,
with the latter usually given the choice of what process and procedure to use to
make the weld with the prescribed preparation.
12. Acceptable butt-joint preparations are nothing more than a compromise

between the included angle of bevel and the root spacing dimension. A large
90
included angle will permit a smaller root spacing and, conversely, a small included
angle requires a larger root spacing.
13. These and other factors are taken into consideration in prequalified joints. The
joint detail influences process selection, electrode size, and welding position. The
joint preparation must be correct before welding is started, not only to meet
specifications, but to give assurance of weld quality.
Procedures
14. Reliable welding procedures are developed through first-hand experience.

They should be completely detailed in advance of production work. A full-scale
mockup of the joint, using the same type steel sizes, and shapes that will be used on
the job, should be made to test the procedures if such is possible. If a full-scale
mockup is not feasible, a simulated setup should be used to produce specimens that
can be destructively and nondestructively tested. By trial and error, all the procedure
details for making an acceptable weld can be determined.
Pre-testing
15. Pre-testing production-size or simulated production specimens also tests the

process as well as the procedures. Once it has been ascertained that the procedures
and the process give the desired quality, such test specimens can also be used as a
final check on the qualifications of the operator.
16. The closer the conditions of test approach conditions of service, the more
meaningful will be the results. The ideal would be service life tests under slightly
exaggerated conditions. Since this is usually impractical, simulated service tests are
the next best choice. Specimen assemblies may be subjected to radiographic,
ultrasonic, or other nondestructive inspection procedures to evaluate the weld
quality. Or they may be proof-tested or submitted to destructive tests to determine
ultimate limits.
17. By proper use of process-procedure qualification, backed up by convincing

test evidence, final inspection takes on the nature of a quality control activity. This is
desirable; the intent should be to make the welding so deadly precise in giving the
desired quality that all subsequent inspection is for the detection of the unexpected
and unexplained, rather than the explainable defects.
Personnel Qualification
18. Personnel qualification - the last of the five Ps, can be evaluated in a
preliminary way by the AWS Operator Qualification Test and the contractor's
judgement. If a semiautomatic process is to be used, some experience with it is
desirable, or the welder may require training. As mentioned previously, the welding
91
of test specimens with the selected process and procedures will affirm the operator's
capability.
The Role of Inspection
19. Inspection determines whether the prescribed standard of quality has been
met. This function may be the responsibility of the welding supervisor or foreman, a
special employee of the company doing the welding, or a representative of the
purchasing organization. The formal welding inspector may have a variety of duties.
These may begin with interpretation of drawings and specifications and follow each
step to the analysis of test results. His operations are both productive and
nonproductive, depending on where they are applied.
20. Inspection after the job is finished is a policing action, rather than a productive
function. Important as it is to assure quality, it is a burden added to the overall
production cost. No amount of after-the-job inspection will improve the weld; it
merely tells what is acceptable and what must be reworked or rejected.
21. Inspection as the job progresses is a different matter. It detects errors in

practice and defects while correction is feasible. It prevents minor defects from piling
up into major defects and leading to ultimate rejection. Inspection while weld quality
is in the making and can be controlled may justifiably be looked upon as a productive
phase of cost, rather than an overburden.
22. Any program for assuring weld quality should, therefore, emphasize
productive inspection and attempt to minimize the nonproductive type. This should
be the guiding philosophy, even though its implementation may fall short. In most
cases, such a philosophy means that visual inspection will be the main method of
ascertaining quality, since it is the one method that can be applied routinely while the
job is in progress.
In Process Visual Inspection
23. In a sense, everyone connected with the job, as well as the formal inspector,
participates in visual inspection. A conscientious worker does not knowingly pass on
work in which he recognizes defects of his making. Nevertheless, it is usually
desirable that someone be assigned responsibility for checking quality of each
operation.
24. In addition to good eyesight and good lighting, the tools for visual inspection
are simple, such as a pocket rule, a weld-size gauge, a magnifying glass, and
sometimes a straight edge and square for determining straightness, alignment and
perpendicularity.
92
25. Visual inspection should begin before the first arc is struck. The following is to
be noted:-
(a) The materials should be examined to see if they meet specifications for
quality, type, size, cleanliness, and freedom from defects.
(b) Foreign matter, such as grease, paint, oil, oxide film, heavy scale that
could be detrimental to the weld should be removed.
(c) The pieces to be joined should be checked for straightness, flatness,

and dimensions. Warped, bent, improperly cut or damaged pieces should be
ordered for repair or rejected.
(d) Alignment and fit of parts and the fixture should be scrutinized. Joint
preparation should be checked.
(e) Often, little more than a passing glance is required in this preliminary
inspection, but despite its almost casual nature such inspection can be a
significant factor in weld quality.
26. Inspection prior to welding also includes verification that the correct process
and procedures are to be employed, that the electrode type and size and the
equipment settings for voltage and amperage are as specified, and that provisions
are made for the required preheat or post heat.
27. Assuming the preliminary requirements are in good order, the most productive
inspection will take place while the weldment is being fabricated. Examination of a
weld bend and the end crater may reveal quality deficiencies such as cracks,
inadequate penetration, and gas and slag inclusions to a competent inspector.
Several types of weld defects can be recognized visually.
28. On simple welds, inspection of a specimen at the beginning of the operation

and periodically as the work progresses may be adequate. When more than one
layer of filler metal is deposited, it may be desirable to inspect each layer before a
subsequent layer is placed.
29. The root pass in a multi-pass weld is the most critical one from the standpoint
of weld soundness. It is especially susceptible to cracking, and because it tends to
solidify quickly, is prone to trap gas and slag. Subsequent passes are subject to a
variety of weld defect creating conditions which result from the shape of the weld
bead or change the configuration of the joint. These can be visually detected by the
welder and repair cost minimized if the problem is corrected before welding
progresses.
30. A workmanship standard, constructed for the specific purpose, can be helpful
both to the welder and the inspector in visually appraising the production weld during
the stages of its formation.
93
31. Under-welding & Over-welding. Under-welding is in violation of

specifications and cannot be tolerated. Over-welding should be of as much concern
to the purchaser's inspector as to those members of the shop responsible for
monitoring costs, since it is a major cause of distortion. Usually the designer has
specified a weld size approaching the limit possible in good practice. The welder
(perhaps wanting to make certain that the joint is strong enough, or having been
criticized for making undersize welds) takes it upon himself to add, say, 1/16 inch to
a 1/4 inch fillet. Since the weld metal deposited increases as the square of the size,
the 1/16 inch increase in leg size increases the amount of weld metal deposited 60
percent, and has the same effect on shrinkage stress and cost.
Post Welding Visual Inspection
32. Visual inspection after the weldment has been completed is also useful in
evaluating quality, even if ultrasonic, radiographic, or other methods are to be
employed. Here, as with visual inspection as welding progresses, surface flaws,
such as cracks, porosity, and unfilled craters can be detected, and may be of such
consequence that repairs are required or the work is rejected without use of
subsequent inspection procedures. There is no point in submitting an obviously bad
weld to sophisticated inspection methods.
33. Dimensional variations from tolerances, warpage, and faults in appearance

are detected visually at this stage. The extent and continuity of the weld, its size, and
the length of segments in intermittent welds can be readily measured or noted.
34. Welds must be cleaned of slag to make inspection for surface flaws possible.
A glass with magnification of up to 10 diameters is helpful in detecting fine cracks
and other defects. Shotblasting should not be used in preparing the weld for
examination, since the peening action may seal fine cracks and make them invisible.
35. The objective of visual inspection here is not only to seek defects not
permissible under the quality standard, but also to give clues to what may be amiss
in the entire fabrication process. If the inspector has a sound knowledge of the
welding, he can read much from what he sees. Thus, the presence of excessive
porosity and slag inclusions may be a tip-off to the fact that the current is not
adequate, no matter what the dial readings may be. Subsequent tests will also give
clues to faults in equipment or procedures, but the information acquired through
visual examination permits corrections to be made before the results from
complicated tests are available.
Determining Weld Quality
36. Weld quality acceptance criteria can originate from a number of sources. The
welding fabrication drawing or blueprint provides weld sizes and other welding
dimensional requirements such as length and location. These dimensional
requirements are established through design calculations or are taken from proven
designs that meet the performance requirements of the welded connection.
94
37. The number of acceptable and unacceptable weld discontinuities for welding
inspection usually is obtained from welding codes and standards. Welding codes and
standards have been developed for many types of welding fabrication applications. It
is important to choose a welding standard intended for use within the particular
industry or application in which you are involved.
Weld Inspector Responsibilities
38. Imperfections within or adjacent the weld may prevent the weld from meeting
its intended function. Welding inspection requires knowledge of weld drawings,
symbols, joint design, procedures, code and standard requirements, and inspection
and testing techniques. For this reason, many welding codes and standards require
that the welding inspector be formally qualified, or have the necessary knowledge
and experience to conduct the inspection.
39. Weld inspection is only as good as the person running the tests. Here are a
few things that a welding inspector should know and tasks he should be able to
perform.
40. Welder Performance & Welding Procedure Qualification.
(a) Specific procedures must be followed to qualify welders and welding

procedures. The qualification process is an integral part of the overall welding
quality system, and the welding inspector often is required to coordinate and
verify these types of qualification tests.
(b) These qualifications typically involve producing welded samples

representative of the welds that will be used in production welding. These
welded samples usually are required to be tested after completion. The test
results must meet or exceed the minimum requirements as stipulated in the
welding code or standard before the procedure can be qualified.
(c) Details of Weld Procedure Specification (WPS) and Procedure

Qualification Record (PQR) are given at the end of this Appendix.
41. Visual Inspection. This is often the easiest, least expensive, and most
effective method of welding inspection for many applications if performed correctly.
The welding inspector must be capable of identifying all of the different welding
discontinuities during visual inspection. He also must be able to evaluate, in terms of
the relevant welding code or standard, the significance of identified discontinuities to
determine whether to accept or reject them during testing and production. A welding
inspector with good eyesight can be trained relatively quickly by a competent
instructor and can prove to be a major asset to the welding quality system (good
vision is obviously essential for visual inspection).
42. Surface Crack Detection. A welding inspector sometimes is required to

conduct weld testing by surface crack detection methods. He also may have to
evaluate the test results of these testing methods. The inspector should understand
95
testing methods, such as liquid penetrant and magnetic particle inspection.

Additionally, he must know how the tests are used and what they will find.
43. Radiographic and Ultrasonic Weld Inspection.
(a) These two inspection methods are in a group known as nondestructive

testing (NDT). These inspection methods are used to examine the internal
structure of the weld to establish the weld's integrity, without destroying the
welded component. The welding inspector may be required to understand this
type of testing and be competent in the interpretation of the results.
(b) Radio-graphic and ultrasonic weld inspection are the two most
common methods of NDT used to detect discontinuities within the internal
structure of welds. The obvious advantage of both methods is their ability to
help establish the weld's internal integrity without destroying the welded
component.
44. Destructive Weld Testing. Destructive methods to establish weld integrity

or performance include sectioning, bending, or breaking the welded component and
evaluating various mechanical or physical characteristics. These tests are used
during welding procedure or welder performance qualification testing. The welding
inspector often is required to conduct, supervise, or evaluate these testing methods.
45. Interpretation of Welding Details and Weld Symbols. The welding

inspector should be competent in the ability to read engineering and manufacturing
drawings, and be able to interpret all details and symbols that provide information
about the welding requirements. The weld edge preparations differ for different types
of weld joints and also on the material/ welding methodology. The weld inspector is
to study the requirements in detail before qualifying the welds.
Typical Defects in Welds
46. Incomplete Penetration. This term is used to describe the failure of the
filler and base metal to fuse together at the root of the joint. Bridging occurs in
groove welds when the deposited metal and base metal are not fused at the root of
the joint. The frequent cause of incomplete penetration is a joint design which is not
suitable for the welding process or the conditions of construction. When the groove is
welded from one side only, incomplete penetration is likely to result under the
following conditions:-
(a) The root face dimension is too big even though the root opening is
adequate.
(b) The root opening is too small.
(c) The included angle of a V-groove is too small.
(d) The electrode is too large.

96
(e) The rate of travel is too high.
(f) The welding current is too low.
47. Lack of Fusion. Lack of fusion is the failure of a welding process to fuse
together layers of weld metal or weld metal and base metal. The weld metal just rolls
over the plate surfaces. This is generally referred to as overlap. Lack of fusion is
caused by the following conditions:-
(a) Failure to raise to the melting point the temperature of the base metal
or the previously deposited weld metal.
(b) Improper fluxing, which fails to dissolve the oxide and other foreign
material from the surfaces to which the deposited metal must fuse.
(c) Dirty plate surfaces.
(d) Improper electrode size or type.
(e) Wrong current adjustment.
48. Undercutting. Undercutting is the burning away of the base metal at the
toe of the weld. Undercutting may be caused by the following conditions:-
(a) Current adjustment that is too high.
(b) Arc gap that is too long.
(c) Failure to fill up the crater completely with weld metal.
49. Slag Inclusions. Slag inclusions are elongated or globular pockets of

metallic oxides and other solids compounds. They produce porosity in the weld
metal. In arc welding, slag inclusions are generally made up of electrode coating
materials or fluxes. In multilayer welding operations, failure to remove the slag
between the layers causes slag inclusions. Most slag inclusion can be prevented by:-
(a) Preparing the groove and weld properly before each bead is deposited.
(b) Removing all slag.
(c) Making sure that the slag rises to the surface of the weld pool.
(d) Taking care to avoid leaving any contours which will be difficult to
penetrate fully with the arc.
97
50. Porosity.
(a) Porosity is the presence of pockets which do not contain any solid
material. They differ from slag inclusions in that the pockets contain gas rather
than a solid. The gases forming the voids are derived from:-
(i) Gas released by cooling weld because of its reduced solubility

as temperature drops.
(ii) Gases formed by the chemical reactions in the weld.
(b) Porosity is best prevented by avoiding:-
(i) Overheating and undercutting of the weld metal.
(ii) Too high a current setting.
(iii) Too long an arc.
51. Excessive Penetration. Excessive penetration usually causes burn through.

It is the result of too much heat in the weld area. This can be corrected by: -
(a) Reducing the wire-feed speed and increasing the speed of travel.
(b) Making sure that the root opening and root face are correct.
(c) Increasing the stick out distance during welding and weaving the gun.
52. Whiskers. Whiskers are short lengths of electrode wire sticking through the
weld on the root side of the joint. They are caused by pushing the electrode wire past
the leading edge of the weld pool. Whiskers can be prevented by:-
(a) Reducing the wire-feed speed and the speed of travel.
(b) Increasing the stick out distance and weaving the gun.
53. Voids. Voids are sometimes referred to as wagon tracks because of their
resemblance to ruts in a dirt road. They may be continued along both sides of the
weld deposit. They are found in multi pass welding. Voids can be prevented by:-
(a) Avoiding a large contoured crown and undercut.
(b) Making sure that all edges are filled in.
(c) On succeeding passes, using slightly higher arc voltage and increasing
travel speed.
98
54. Spatter. Spatter is made up of very fine particles of metal on the plate
surface adjoining the weld area. It is usually caused by high current, a long arc, an
irregular and unstable arc, improper shielding gas, or a clogged nozzle.
55. Irregular Weld Shape. Irregular welds include those that are too wide or
too narrow, those that have an excessively convex or concave surface, and those
that have coarse, irregular ripples. Such characteristics may be caused by poor torch
manipulation, a speed of travel that is too slow, current that is too high or low,
improper arc voltage, improper stickout, or improper shielding gas.
56. Burn-Through. Burn-through may be caused by the following:-
(a) Current too high.
(b) Excessive gap between plates.
(c) Travel speed too slow.
(d) Bevel angle too large.
(e) Nose too small.
(f) Wire size too small.
(g) Insufficient metal hold-down or clamping.
57. Weld Crown Too High or Too Low. The crown of the weld may be
incorrect due to the following:-
(a) Current too high or low.
(b) Voltage too high or low.
(c) Travel speed too high.
(d) Improper weld backing.
(e) Improper spacing in welds with backing.
(f) Workpiece not level.
58. Penetration Too Deep or Too Shallow. Incorrect penetration may be

caused by any of the following:-
(a) Current too high or low.
(b) Voltage too high or low.
(c) Improper gap between plates.

99
(d) Improper wire size.
(e) Travel speed too slow or fast.
59. Reinforcement Narrow and Steep-Sloped (Pointed). Narrow and pointed

reinforcements may be caused by the following:-
(a) Insufficient width of flux.
(b) Voltage too low.
60. Mountain Range Reinforcement. If the reinforcement is ragged, the flux

was too deep.
Testing of Welds (As per ASME Section IX)
61. General.
(a) The tests described in this section have been developed to check the
skill of the welding operator as well as the quality of the weld metal and the
strength of the welded joint for each type of metal used in ordnance materiel.
(b) Some of these tests, such as tensile and bending tests, are destructive,
in that the test specimens are loaded until they fail, so the desired information
can be gained. Other testing methods, such as the X-ray and hydrostatic
tests, are not destructive.
62. Acid Etch Test.
(a) This test is used to determine the soundness of a weld. The acid
attacks or reacts with the edges of cracks in the base or weld metal and
discloses weld defects, if present. It also accentuates the boundary between
the base and weld metal and, in this manner, shows the size of the weld
which may otherwise be indistinct. This test is usually performed on a cross
section of the joint.
(b) Solutions of hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, ammonium per sulfate, or

iodine and potassium iodide are commonly used for etching carbon and low
alloy steels.
63. Guided Bend Test.
(a) The quality of the weld metal at the face and root of the welded joint,
as well as the degree of penetration and fusion to the base metal, are
determined by means of guided bend tests. These tests are made in a jig.
100
(b) These test specimens are machined from welded plates, the thickness
of which must be within the capacity of the bending jig. The test specimen is
placed across the supports of the die which is the lower portion of the jig. The
plunger, operated from above by a hydraulic jack or other device, causes the
specimen to be forced into and to assure the shape of the die.
(c) To fulfill the requirements of this test, the specimens must bend 180
degrees and, to be accepted as passable, no cracks greater than 1/8 inch (3.2
mm) in any dimension should appear on the surface. The face bend tests are
made in the jig with the face of the weld in tension (i.e., on the outside of the
bend). The root bend tests are made with the root of the weld in tension (i.e.,
on outside of the bend).
64. Free Bend Test.
(a) The free bend test has been devised to measure the ductility of the
weld metal deposited in a weld joint. A test specimen is machined from the
welded plate with the weld located.
(b) Each corner lengthwise of the specimen shall be rounded in a radius

not exceeding one-tenth of the thickness of the specimen. Tool marks, if any,
shall be lengthwise of the specimen. Two scribed lines are placed on the face
1/16 inch (1.6 mm) from the edge of the weld. The distance between these
lines is measured in inch and recorded as the initial distance X.
(c) The ends of the test specimen are then bent through angles of about
30 degrees, these bends being approximately one-third of the length from
each end. The weld is thus located centrally to ensure that all of the bending
occurs in the weld.
(d) The specimen bent initially is then placed in a machine capable of

exerting a large compressive force and bent until a crack greater than 1/16
inch (1.6 mm) in any dimension appears on the face of the weld. If no cracks
appear, bending is continued until the specimens 1/4 inch (6.4 mm) thick or
under can be tested in vise.
(e) Heavier plate is usually tested in a press or bending jig. Whether a vise
or other type of compression device is used when making the free bend test, it
is advisable to machine the upper and lower contact plates of the bending
equipment to present surfaces parallel to the ends of the specimen. This will
prevent the specimen from slipping and snapping out of the testing machine
as it is bent.
(f) After bending the specimen to the point where the test bend is
concluded, the distance between the scribed lines on the specimen is again
measured and recorded as the distance Y. To find the percentage of
elongation, subtract the initial from the final distance, divide by the initial
distance, and multiply by 100.
101
(g) The usual requirements for passing this test are that the minimum
elongation be 15% and that no cracks greater than 1/16 inch (1.6 mm) in any
dimension exist on the face of the weld.
(h) The free bend test is being largely replaced by the guided bend test
where the required testing equipment is available.
65. Back Bend Test. The back bend test is used to determine the quality of the
weld metal and the degree of penetration into the root of the Y of the welded butt
joint. The specimens used are similar to those required for the free bend test, except
they are bent with the root of the weld on the tension side, or outside. The
specimens tested are required to bend 90 degrees without breaking apart. This test
is being largely replaced by the guided bend test.
66. Nick Break Test.
(a) The nick break test has been devised to determine if the weld metal of
a welded butt joint has any internal defects, such as slag inclusions, gas
pockets, poor fusion, and/ or oxidized or burnt metal. The specimen is
obtained from a welded butt joint either by machining or by cutting with an
oxyacetylene torch.
(b) Each edge of the weld at the joint is slotted by means of a saw cut
through the center. The piece thus prepared is bridged across two steel
blocks and stuck with a heavy hammer until the section of the weld between
the slots fractures.
(c) The metal thus exposed should be completely fused and free from slag
inclusions. The size of any gas pocket must not be greater than 1/16 in. (1.6
mm) across the greater dimension and the number of gas pockets or pores
per square inch (64.5 sq mm) should not exceed 6.
(d) Another break test method is used to determine the soundness of fillet
welds. This is the fillet weld break test. A force, by means of a press, a testing
machine, or blows of a hammer, is applied to the apex of the V shaped
specimen until the fillet weld ruptures. The surfaces of the fracture will then be
examined for soundness.
67. Tensile Strength Test.
(a) This test is used to measure the strength of a welded joint.
(b) The width thickness of the test specimen are measured before testing,
and the area in square inch or mm is calculated by multiplying these before
testing , and the area in square inch or mm is calculated by multiplying these
two figures.
(c) The tensile test specimen is then mounted on a machine that will exert
enough pull on the piece to break the specimen. The testing machine may be
either stationary or portable type. A machine of the portable type, operating on
102
the hydraulic principle and capable of pulling as well as bending test

specimens is to be used.
(d) As the specimen is being tested in this machine, the load in pounds/
kgf is registered on the gauge. In the stationary types, the load applied may
be registered on a balancing beam. In either case, the load at the point of
breaking is recorded.
(e) The tensile strength, which is defined as stress in psi or kgf/sq. mm, is
calculated by dividing the breaking load of the test piece by the original cross
section area of the specimen. The usual requirement for the tensile strength
of welds is that the specimen shall pull not less than 90 percent of the base
metal tensile strength.
(f) The shearing strength of transverse and longitudinal fillet welds is

determined by tensile stress on the test specimens. The width of the
specimen is measured in inch or mm. The specimen is ruptured under tensile
load, and the maximum load in pounds is determined.
(g) The shearing strength of the weld in pounds/inch or kg/mm is

determined by dividing the maximum load by the length of fillet weld that
ruptured. The shearing strength in psi or kg/sq.mm is obtained by dividing the
shearing strength in pounds/inch or kgf/mm by the average throat dimension
of the weld in inch or mm. The test specimens are made wider than required
and machined down to size.
68. Hydrostatic Test. This is a nondestructive test used to check the quality of
welds on closed containers such as pressure vessels and tanks. The test usually
consists of filling the vessel with water and applying a pressure greater than the
working pressure of the vessel. Sometimes, large tanks are filled with water which is
not under pressure to detect possible leakage through defective welds. Another
method is to test with oil and then steam out the vessel. Back seepage of oil from
behind the liner shows up visibly.
69. Magnetic Particle Test. This is a test or inspection method used on welds
and parts made of magnetic alloy steels. It is applicable only to ferromagnetic
materials in which the deposited weld is also ferromagnetic. A strong magnetic field
is set up in the piece being inspected by means of high amperage electric currents.
A leakage field will be set up by any discontinuity that intercepts this field in the part.
Local poles are produced by the leakage field. These poles attract and hold
magnetic particles that are placed on the surface for this purpose. The particle
pattern produced on the surface indicates the presence of a discontinuity or defect
on or close to the surface of the part.
70. Radiography Test. This test method is used to reveal the presence and
nature of internal defects in a weld, such as cracks, slag, blowholes, and zones
where proper fusion is lacking. The radiographic film, when developed, the defects in
the metal show up as dark spots and bands, which can be interpreted by an operator
experienced in this inspection method.
103
71. Fluorescent Dye Penetrant Test. Fluorescent dye penetrant inspection is

a nondestructive test method by means of which cracks, pores, leaks, and other
discontinuities can be located in solid materials. It is particularly useful for locating
surface defects in nonmagnetic materials such as aluminum, magnesium, and
austenitic steel welds and for locating leaks in all types of welds. This method makes
use of a water washable, highly fluorescent material that has exceptional penetration
qualities. This material is applied to the clean dry surface of the metal to be
inspected by brushing, spraying, or dipping. The excess material is removed by
rinsing, wiping with clean water-soaked cloths, or by sandblasting. A wet or dry type
developer is then applied. Discontinuities in surfaces which have been properly
cleaned, treated with the penetrant, rinsed, and treated with developer show brilliant
fluorescent indications under black light.
72. Hardness Tests.
(a) Hardness may be defined as the ability of a substance to resist

indentation or localized displacement. The hardness test usually applied is a
nondestructive test, used primarily in the laboratory and not to any great
extent in the field. Hardness tests are used as a means of controlling the
properties of materials used for specific purposes after the desired hardness
has been established for the particular application.
(b) A hardness test is also used to determine the hardness of weld metal.
By careful testing of a welded joint, the hard areas can be isolated and the
extent of the effect of the welding heat on the properties of the base metal
determined.
(c) File Test. The simplest method for determining comparative hardness
is the file test. It is performed by running a file under manual pressure over the
piece being tested. Information may be obtained as to whether the metal
tested is harder or softer than the file or other materials that have been given
the same treatment.
(d) Brinell Hardness Test.
(i) In the Brinell tests, the specimen is mounted on the anvil of the
machine and a load of 6620 lb (3003 kg) is applied against a hardened
steel ball which is in contact with the surface of the specimen being
tested. The steel ball is 0.4 in. (10.2 mm) in diameter. The load is
allowed to remain 1/2 minute and is then released, and the depth of
the depression made by the ball on the specimen is measured. The
resultant Brinell hardness number is obtained by a formula.
(ii) It should be noted that, in order to facilitate the determination of

Brinell hardness, the diameter of the depression rather than the depth
is actually measured. Charts of Brinell hardness numbers have been
prepared for a range of impression diameters. These charts are
commonly used to determine Brinell numbers.
104
(e) Rockwell Hardness Test. The principle of the Rockwell tester is

essentially the same as the Brinell tester. It differs from the Brinell tester in
that a lesser load is impressed on a smaller ball or cone shaped diamond.
The depth of the indentation is measured and indicated on a dial attached to
the machine. The hardness is expressed in arbitrary figures called "Rockwell
numbers." These are prefixed with a letter notation such as "B" or "C" to
indicate the size of the ball used, the impressed load, and the scale used in
the test.
73. Magnaflux Test.
(a) General. This is a rapid, non-destructive method of locating defects at

or near the surface of steel and its magnetic alloys by means of correct
magnetization and the application of ferromagnetic particles.
(b) Basic Principles. For all practical purposes, magnaflux inspection

may be likened to the use of a magnifying glass. Instead of using a glass,
however, a magnetic field and ferromagnetic powders are employed. The
method of magnetic particle inspection is based upon two principles: one, that
a magnetic field is produced in a piece of metal when an electric current is
flowed through or around it; two, that minute poles are set up on the surface
of the metal wherever this magnetic field is broken or distorted.
(c) When ferromagnetic particles are brought into the vicinity of a

magnetized part, they are strongly attracted by these poles and are held more
firmly to them than to the rest of the surface of the part, thereby forming a
visible indication.
74. Eddy Current (Electromagnetic) Testing. Eddy currents are induced into
the conducting test specimen by alternating electromagnetic induction or transformer
action. The path of the eddy current is distorted by the presence of a discontinuity.
A crack both diverts and crowds eddy currents. In this manner, the apparent
impedance of the coil is changed by the presence of the defect. This change can be
measured and is used to give an indication of defects or differences in physical,
chemical, and metallurgical structure. Subsurface discontinuities may also be
detected, but the current falls off with depth.
75. Acoustic Emission Testing. Acoustic emission testing consists of the

detection of acoustic signals produced by plastic deformation or crack formation
during loading. These signals are present in a wide frequency spectrum along with
ambient noise from many other sources. Transducers, strategically placed on a
structure, are activated by arriving signals. By suitable filtering methods, ambient
noise in the composite signal is notably reduced. Any source of significant signals is
plotted by triangulation based on the arrival times of these signals at the different
transducers.
105
76. Ferrite Testing.
(a) Fully austenitic stainless steel weld deposits have a tendency to

develop small fissures even under conditions of minimal restraint. These small
fissures tend to be located transverse to the weld fusion line in weld passes
and base metal that were reheated to near the melting point of the material by
subsequent weld passes. Cracks are clearly injurious defects and cannot be
tolerated.
(b) On the other hand, the effect of fissures on weldment performance is

less clear, since these micro-fissures are quickly blurted by the very tough
austenitic matrix. Fissured weld deposits have performed satisfactorily under
very severe conditions. However, a tendency to form fissures generally goes
hand-in-hand with a tendency for larger cracking, so it is often desirable to
avoid fissure-sensitive weld metals.
(c) The presence of a small fraction of the magnetic delta ferrite phase in
an otherwise austenitic (nonmagnetic) weld deposit has an influence in the
prevention of both centerline cracking and fissuring. The amount of delta
ferrite in as-welded material is largely controlled by a balance in the weld
metal composition between the ferrite-promoting elements (chromium, silicon,
molybdenum, and columbium are the most common) and the austenite-
promoting elements (nickel, manganese, carbon, and nitrogen are the most
common).
(d) Excessive delta ferrite, however, can have adverse effects on weld
metal properties. The greater the amount of delta ferrite, the lower will be the
weld metal ductility and toughness. Delta ferrite is also preferentially attacked
in a few corrosive environments, such as urea. In extended exposure to
temperatures in the range of 900 to 1700F (482 to 927C), ferrite tends to
transform in part to a brittle inter-metallic compound that severely embrittles
the weldment.
(e) Portable ferrite indicators are designed for on-site use. Ferrite content
of the weld deposit may be indicated in percent ferrite and may be bracketed
between two values. This provides sufficient control in most applications
where minimum ferrite content or a ferrite range is specified.
Weld Procedure Specification (WPS) & Procedure Qualification Record (PQR)
77. Welding requires skill. Determining "how to weld" requires knowledge

regarding the materials being welded and welding process, among numerous other
factors. Because of huge number of variables involved, the knowledge of the welding
engineer and the skill of the welder need to be validated by a series of tests. All this
information is documented on Welding Procedure Specification (WPS), Procedure
Qualification Record (PQR), Welding Procedure Qualification Record (WPQR), and
associated Test Reports.
106
78. Welding Procedure Specification (WPS). A WPS is a document that

describes how welding is to be carried out in production. Its purpose is to aid the
planning and quality control of the welding operation. They are recommended for all
welding operations and most application codes and standards make them
mandatory.
79. Procedure Qualification Record (PQR). A PQR is required when it is

necessary to demonstrate that your company has the ability to produce welds
possessing the correct mechanical and metallurgical properties.
80. Qualification Procedure. A welding procedure must be qualified in

accordance with the requirements of an appropriate welding procedure standard,
such as ASME Sec IX, as follows:-
(a) Produce a welding procedure specification (WPS) as stated above.
(b) Weld a test piece in accordance with the requirements of your

specification. The joint set up, welding and visual examination of the
completed weld should be witnessed by a certified welding inspector such as
an AWS certified CWI or an Inspection Body. The details of the test such as
the welding current, pre-heat etc., must be recorded during the test.
(c) Once the welding is complete the test piece must be subject to
destructive and non destructive examination as defined by the welding
procedure standard. This work must be carried out in a qualified laboratory
but the Inspection Body may require witnessing the tests and viewing any
radiographs.
(d) If the test is successful the appropriate documents are endorsed by the
test bodys surveyor.
81. Information to be Contained in WPS/ PQR
(a) Sufficient details to enable any competent person to apply the

information and produce a weld of acceptable quality. The amount of detail
and level of controls specified in a WPS is dependant on the application and
criticality of the joint to be welded.
(b) For most applications the information required is generally similar to

that recorded on a Procedure Qualification Record (PQR), except that ranges
are usually permitted on thicknesses, diameters, welding current, materials,
joint types etc..
(c) If a WPS is used in conjunction with an approved procedure

qualification record (PQR) then the ranges stated should be in accordance
with the approval ranges permitted by the PQR. However careful
consideration should be given to the ranges specified to ensure they are
achievable, so that these ranges represent good welding practice.
107
82. Prequalified WPS. Some codes, such as AWS D1.1, allow Prequalified
WPS, whereby it is established that the WPS written as per the code will produce
welds with correct mechanical and metallurgical properties. It is not necessary to
prepare a PQR in such cases. However, the pre-qualified WPS have a specified
range of parameters under which the weld must be produced. When welding
variables fall outside these ranges, a WPS with supporting PQR must be prepared.
83. Standard WPS (SWPS). In an effort to standardize and harmonize the

process of WPS approvals, AWS started writing Standard Welding Procedure
Specifications (SWPSs) with input from the pioneers and experts in the welding
industry. An extensive testing program was undertaken, whereby, these SWPSs
were then supported by numerous PQRs. When the use of SWPSs is permitted by
referencing code section, the firm does not have to perform one or more procedure
qualification tests.
84. Welder Performance Qualification Record (WPQR). Once the procedure

is approved it is necessary to demonstrate that all welders working to it have the
required knowledge and skill to put down a clean sound weld. If the welder has
satisfactorily completed the procedure test then he is automatically approved but
each additional welder must be approved by completing an approval test to an
appropriate standard such as ASME Sec IX as follows:-
(a) Complete a weld test as stated above. The test should simulate
production conditions and the welding position should be the position that the
production welds are to be made in or one more severe.
(b) For maximum positional approval a pipe inclined at 45 degrees

(referred to as the 6G position) approves all positions except vertical down.
(c) Test the completed weld in accordance with the relevant standard to
ensure that the weld is clean and fully fused. For a butt weld this is normally a
visual examination followed by radiography or bend tests.
(d) Once the test is completed the necessary forms have to be completed
by you or the test body and signed by the test bodys surveyor. Note that any
changes that require a new WPS may also apply to the welders approval,
refer to the referencing code/ standard for precise details
85. AWS Accredited Test Facility (ATF). An AWS ATF is a facility which
has been accredited by the American Welding Society to perform Welder Tests.
Under this program the Welder Performance Qualification Test is witnessed by an
authorized CWI of the Accredited Test facility, which then conducts the necessary
tests and sends the results to the AWS. If a candidate welder passes the test, a CW
(Certified Welder) certificate is then issued directly by the American Welding Society.
This program has no prerequisite courses or certifications requirement. This
certification will provide the firm and the welders with international recognition.
86. Acceptance Standards. In general welds must show a neat workman like
appearance. The root must be fully fused along the entire length of the weld, the
108
profile of the cap should blend in smoothly with the parent material and the weld
should be significantly free from imperfections. Reference should be made to the
acceptance standard for precise details.
87. Documentation. The necessary documents for a successful Welding

Program are as follows:-
(a) Welding Procedure Specification (WPS), Procedure Qualification

Record (PQR), Independent Laboratory Test Report for the PQR, Welder
Performance Qualification Record (WPQR), and Independent Laboratory Test
Report for the WPQR; or
(b) Pre-qualified Welding Procedure Specification (Applicable to some

Codes only), Welder Performance Qualification Record (WPQR), and
Independent Laboratory Test Report for the WPQR; or
(c) Code adopted Standard Welding Procedure Specification (SWPS),

Welder Performance Qualification Record (WPQR), and Independent
Laboratory Test Report for the WPQR.
88. Tests for PQR/ WPQR. The following tests by Independent Test
Laboratory may be required on your PQR and WPQR Coupons:-
(a) Weld Visual Examination by a AWS Certified Welding Inspector.
(b) Bend/ Hardness/ Transverse Tensile Test.
(c) All Weld Metal Tensile Test/ Charpy Impact Test.
(d) Weld Metal Chemical Analysis/ Macroetch Test.
(e) Torque Test/ Peel Test/ Nick Break Test.
(f) Radiography/ Ultrasonic/ MPI/ LP Test by at least Level II inspector.
89. Indian Standards. Various Indian Standards on welding processes are

placed at Annexure.
109
Annexure to Appendix H
(Refers to Para 89)
110
111
112
Appendix J
GUIDELINES FOR PERFORMANCE / VALIDATION TESTS
General
1. The performance and or validation tests conducted on various categories of

equipment are significantly exhaustive. Further, a number of tests depend on the
intended function of the equipment and therefore will need to be specially derived.
2. Notwithstanding, there are certain tests which will be commonly applicable

across all categories of equipment. This chapter aims to enumerate guidelines for
such commonly conducted performance / validation tests.
Raw Material Tests
3. Tests for raw material mainly comprises of Chemical and Mechanical Tests.
However, the type and extent of test depends on the end use of material. For
example, forgings and castings may require microstructure test in addition to routine
mechanical tests.
4. All tests are to be conducted as per established international standards.

Details of tests and applicable standards are given at Annexure I.
NDT Tests
5. NDT tests such as Ultrasonic Examination, Radiography Test, Liquid

Penetrant Test, Magnetic Particle Impregnation and Eddy Current test are commonly
conducted for Castings, Forgings, Welds and fabricated structures. The guidelines for
such tests are given at Annexure II to VI.
6. The guidelines only give a broad framework. However the acceptance norms
will be as per established international standards such as ASTM, IS etc..
Tests for Fasteners
7. Fasteners form an important part of any equipment. With particular reference

to Naval shipbuilding, fasteners form an important shipbuilding component. Therefore
there is a requirement to subject the fasteners for various performance tests. Tests
for fasteners will be done as per provisions of IS 1367 Parts 1 to 19. Some commonly
113
conducted tests for fasteners are:-
(a) Wedge Test. The wedge tensile strength of a hex or square-head

fastener, socket-head cap screw, or stud is the tensile load that the product is
capable of sustaining when stressed with a wedge under the head. The
purpose of this test is to obtain the tensile strength and to demonstrate the
head quality and ductility of the product.
(b) Axial Load Test. Axial tension of fasteners are tested in a holder
with a load axially applied between the head and a nut or in a suitable fixture.
(c) Proof Load Test. Proof Load testing of a nut is assembled on a

hardened threaded mandrel or a test bolt using the tension or compression
method. A specified proof load is applied for the nut against the nut. The nut
should resist this load without stripping or rupture and should be removable
form the test bolt or mandrel by hand after the load is released.
(d) Torque-Tension Tests. Determination of the torque-tension

relationship for a threaded fastener allowing the appropriate tightening torque
is to be determined. Such tests will allow the nut factor (sometimes referred to
as the torque coefficient or k factor) to be determined and the overall
coefficient of friction. By completing several similar tests, the variation in the
torque-tension relationship, due to friction variation, can be established for an
application.
(e) Friction Determination Tests. Test fasteners can be mounted in a

test rig to allow the thread and head friction torques to be determined. From
these results the thread and nut face friction coefficients can be determined.
These values are of importance to allow an assessment of what effect various
joint surfaces can have on the bolt torque-preload relationship. Such tests can
be completed, for example, to assess the effect the introduction of new
fastener finishes will have on a joint's performance.
(f) Torque/Preload to Failure Tests. Tests can be performed by

tightening the fastener to failure. This can be completed on actual assemblies
and/or test fixtures to allow torque-angle-force characteristics to be
established. From this information torque-angle tightening specifications can
be derived allowing accurate controlled tightening to be completed. Such tests
can also be used to determine the maximum preload that an assembly will
sustain.
(g) Torque to Yield Tests. Tests can be performed on actual assemblies

to obtain torque-angle graphs that can be used to establish the torque to
reach the yield strength of the bolt. Such graphs can be used to establish the
appropriate torque-angle specification. They can also be used, with analysis
software such as our BOLTCALC program, to assist in assessing the
structural integrity of an assembly. The advantage of measuring the applied
torque and angle of rotation of the fastener is that tests on the actual joint can
114
be completed without having to change the joint stiffness by introducing a load

cell.
(h) Vibration Loosening Characteristics of Fasteners. Fasteners

coming loose is a common problem across many industries. We can complete
an assessment of a fasteners self loosening characteristics using a
transverse vibration test machine (often referred to as a Junker machine). The
fastener preload decay graphs produced can allow an assessment to be
made of a fasteners resistance to self-loosening.
(j) Coating Thickness Test. This is to determine the thickness of the

coating phosphating, chromating, electroplating etc..
(k) Salt Spray Test. This test is done to determine the effectiveness of
the coating. It is specified in terms of hours varying between 48 -72 hours.
(l) Stress Durability (Hydrogen Embrittlement) Test.
Environmental Tests
8. Environmental tests is another important aspect of Naval equipment.

Environmental tests are mandatory for all equipment both engineering and
electrical.
9. Marine Engineering Equipment. Commonly conducted environmental tests

for marine engineering equipment are Shock, Noise, Vibration and Tilt tests.
10. Shock, Noise & Vibration Tests. Details on these tests are given at
Appendix K.
11. Tilt Test. This test is done to ascertain that the equipment performs
satisfactorily when subjected to a permanent tilt of 45 degrees from the horizontal. A
test rig is to be setup wherein the equipment is mounted on a base frame tiled at 45
deg from the horizontal and the equipment run at its rated capacity for the duration as
specified in the SOTR.
12. Electrical Equipment. Environmental tests for electrical equipment are

conducted as per the provision contained in Joint Services Specification No 55555
JSS Penta Five). These tests generally cover provisions required for protection
against environment variations. The tests to be conducted for each equipment shall
be specified in the SOTR. The various types of tests generally conducted on
electrical equipment are given below:-
(a) Steady State Acceleration Test.
(b) Acoustic Noise, Shock or Impact, Vibrations.
(c) Altitude, Bounce, Bump, Drop.

115
(d) Contamination, Acid, Alkaline and Salt Corrosion.
(e) Damp Heat, Drip Proof, Driving Rain, Fine Mist, Dust.
(f) Explosion, High Temperature, Rapid temperature cycling.
(g) Icing, Low Temperature, Immersion, Tropical Exposure.
(h) Mould Growth, Sealing, Solar Radiation, Toppling.
13. Ingress Protection Test. All electrical equipment are specified for certain
type of Ingress Protection (IP). Conformity of the equipment to IP test is to be
ascertained by tests. An IP specification is given in terms of two numerals. The first
numeral indicates the size of solid particle the equipment to be insulated against. The
second numeral indicates the insulation against various types of fluids. The details of
the two numerals are given below:-
(a) First IP Numeral.
(i) 0 - Non-protected No special protection
(ii) 1- Protected against solid objects > than 50 mm (2 in.) A

large surface of the body, such as a hand (but no protection against
deliberate access). Solid object exceeding 50 mm (2 in.) in diameter.
(iii) 2- Protected against solid objects greater than 12 mm (0.5

in.) Fingers or similar objects not exceeding 80 mm (3.15 in.) in length.
Solid objects exceeding 12 mm (0.5 in.) in diameter.
(iv) 3- Protected against solid objects greater than 2.5 mm (0.1

in.). Tools, wires, etc. of diameter or thickness greater than 2.5 mm
(0.1 in.). Solid objects exceeding 2.5 mm (0.1 in.) in diameter
(v) 4- Protected against solid objects greater than 1 mm (0.04

in.) Wires or strips of thickness greater than 1 mm (0.04 in.). Solid
objects exceeding 1 mm (0.04 in.) in diameter.
(vi) 5- Dust protected Ingress of dust is not totally prevented, but

dust does not enter in sufficient quantity to interfere with satisfactory
operation of the equipment.
(vii) 6- Dust-tight. No ingress of dust.
(b) Second IP Numeral.
(i) 0- Non-protected No special protection.

116
(ii) 1- Protected against dripping water. Dripping water

(vertically falling drops) is to have no harmful effect.
(iii) 2- Protected against dripping water when tilted up to 15.

Vertically dripping water is to have no harmful effect when the
enclosure is tilted at any angle up to 15 from its normal position.
(iv) 3- Protected against spraying water. Water falling as spray

at an angle up to 60 from the vertical is to have no harmful effect.
(v) 4- Protected against splashing water. Water splashed

against the enclosure from any direction is to have no harmful effect.
(vi) 5- Protected against water jets. Water projected by a nozzle

against the enclosure from any direction is to have no harmful effect.
(vii) 6 - Protected against heavy seas. Water from heavy seas or

water projected in powerful jets is not to enter the enclosure in harmful
quantities.
(viii) 7 - Protected against the effects of immersion. Ingress of

water in a harmful quantity is not to be possible when the enclosure is
immersed in water under defined conditions of pressure and time.
(ix) 8- Protected against submersion. The equipment is suitable

for continuous submersion in water under conditions which are to be
specified by the manufacturer. Note that normally this will mean that
the equipment is hermetically sealed. However, with certain types of
equipment, it can mean that water can enter but only in such a manner
that it produces no harmful effects.
117
Annexure I
(Refers to Para 4 of Appendix J)
APPROVED TEST METHODS FOR CHEMICAL & MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
Metallographic Tests
1. Examination of Macro Structure.
(a) Ferrous Alloys.
(i) IS: 13015 -1991.
(ii) ASTM Part 31, E 381.
(iii) ASME Vol. 8.
(b) Metal & Alloys.
(i) ASME Vol. 7 and 8.
(ii) ASTM, Part 31, E 340.
(c) Reference Book on Practical Microscopic Metallography by Richard

Henry Greaves & Harold Wrighton.
2. Examination of Macrostructure.
(a) ASTM Part 31, E -3 Preparation of Specimens.
(b) ASME Vol 7.
(c) Reference Book on Practical Microscopic Metallography by Richard

Henry Greaves & Harold Wrighton.
3. Estimation of Average Grain Size of Metals.
(a) IS: 4748-1988 Reaffirmed 2003.
(b) ASTM Part 31, E-112.
4. Determination of Inclusion Rating in Steel By Microscopic Method.
(a) IS: 4163-1982.
(b) ASTM Part 31 E-45.

118
5. Determination of De-Carburized Depth of steel By Microscopic Method.
(a) IS: 6396.
6. Determination of Case Depth of Steel By Microscopic Method.
(a) IS: 6416, Reaffirmed 2003.
7. Evaluation of Graphite Flakes (Distribution & Size).
(b) ASTM Part 31 A -247.
8. Measurement of Coating Thickness by Microscopic Method.
9. Mercurous Nitrate Test.
Mechanical Properties
10. Tensile Test.
(a) Metallic Materials - Tensile Testing at Ambient Temp (III Revision).
(i) IS: 1608- 2005.
(ii) BS: 18-1987.
(iii) Instruction manual of testing machine.
(b) Benchmark Test for Metallic Materials.
(i) IS: 1599-1985, Reaffirmed 1996.
11. Wrapping Test ( Metallic Wires). IS: 1755, Reaffirmed 2001.
12. Flattening Test on Metallic Tubes. IS: 23281983, Reaffirmed 2001.
13. Drifting Expansion Test -Metallic Tubes. IS: 2335, Reaffirmed 2001.
14. Hardness Test - Metallic material (Third Revision).
(a) Brinell Hardness. IS: 1500-2005 (Third Revision).

119
(b) Vickers Hardness. IS: 1501-2002.
(c) Rockwell Hardness. IS: 1586-1988 for scales B & C.
15. Impact Test (at Ambient Temperature).
(a) Izod Test . IS: 1598 , Reaffirmed 2003.
(b) Charpy Test (V-Notch). IS: 1757, Reaffirmed 2003.
(c) Charpy Test (U-Notch). IS: 1499, Reaffirmed 2003.
16. Cupping Test (Metal Sheets /Strips). IS: 10175, Part I, Reaffirmed 2003.
17. Twist Test. IS:3063-94 & IS: 6735-94 (Not covered under NABL
Accreditation)
18. Permanent Set Test. IS: 3063-94 & IS: 6735-94 (Not covered under NABL
Accreditation)
Chemical Analysis
19. Iron and Steel.
(a) Steel.
(i) IS 228 Parts 1,2 3,5 & 6, Reaffirmed 2002, Part 7, Reaffirmed
2001, Part 8 & 9, Reaffirmed 2004 and Part 15, Reaffirmed 2004
(ii) Standard Methods of Analysis of Iron., Steel & Ferro Alloys. By

Sheffield
(iii) ASTM Part 32
(iv) C & S by LECO - CS 400
(v) Complete Chemical Analysis by Optical Emission Spectrometer.
(b) Cast Iron.
(i) IS 228 Parts 1,2 3,5 & 6, Reaffirmed 2002, Part 7, Reaffirmed
2001, Part 8 & 9 , Reaffirmed 2004 and Part 15, Reaffirmed 2004.
(ii) IS 12308 Part 4, Reaffirmed 1999, Parts 5,6,7,10,11 Reaffirmed

2001.
(iii) C & S by LECO - CS 400.

120
(iv) Complete Chemical Analysis by Optical Emission Spectrometer.
20. Copper and Copper Based Alloys.
(a) Copper.
(i) IS : 7212, Re-affirmed 2005.
(ii) lS : 440, Re-affirmed 2000.
(b) Brass.
(i) IS 3885, Reaffirmed 2000.
(ii) ASTM Part 32.
(iii) Indigenous method help from BS 3630 Part 6 1965.
(c) Bronze.
(i) IS 4027, Reaffirmed 2000.
(ii) Relevant parts of IS 7212, Reaffirmed 2005.
(iii) IS 440, Reaffirmed 2000.
(iv) ASTM Part 32.
(v) Indigenous method help from BS 3630 Part 6 1965.
(vi) IS 3685, Reffirmed 2000.
(d) Copper- Nickel Alloys.
(i) IS: 6517 Part I.
(ii) IS: 7212, Reaffirmed 2005.
(e) Complete Chemical Analysis of Cu based materials by Optical

Emission Spectrometer.
(f) Analysis of Copper based alloys by Optical Emission Spectrograph

ASTM part 32, E 115. Comparison with standards of International Traceability.
21. Aluminium Alloys.
(a) IS: 504 Part 1 to 12 2002 and Part 13 to 16 2003.
(b) ASTM Part 32.

121
(c) Complete chemical analysis of Aluminium base by Optical Emission

Spectrometer.
(d) Analysis of Aluminium based alloys by Optical Emission Spectrograph

ASTM Part 32, E 101 and E 115., IS:11035 and IS 7658. Comparison with
standards of International Traceability.
22. Zinc Based Alloys.
(a) BS 3630 Part 6 / BS EN12441-1:2002.
(b) ASTM Part 32.
(c) Complete chemical analysis of Aluminium base by Optical Emission

Spectrometer.
(d) Analysis of Zinc based alloys by Optical Emission Spectrograph

ASTM Part 32, E 115, IS:2599. Comparison with standards of International
Traceability.
23. Mild Steel Tin Coated Plates. IS:1327, Reaffirmed 2001. Determination of
mass coating of Tin coating in gm/ sq. m.
24. Lead & Tin Based Alloys. Not covered under NABL accreditation.
122
Annexure II
GUIDELINES FOR ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION
Purpose
1. Ultrasonic examination is used to detect surface and sub-surface

imperfections in welds, cast and wrought materials, brazed pipe joints, and for wall
thickness measurement.
2. The effective application of ultrasonic examination may be restricted in

materials with inherently high or variable attenuation or which produce severe
scattering of the ultrasonic beam. Complex shapes may also limit satisfactory
application and the examination should be applied at stages during manufacture
when the geometry of the component is relatively simple.
Applicable Standards
3. Relevant sections of BS 3683, Part 4 shall apply.
General Inspection Requirements
4. Methods. The methods covered by this specification are basically manual

but automatic and mechanically assisted methods should be applied wherever the
extent of the examination justifies the initial equipment cost.
5. Test Procedure. Examination shall only be performed by qualified

personnel in accordance with a IAY/ IAG approved written test procedure.
6. Qualification Requirements. Personnel shall be considered qualified

when they have demonstrated their ability to meet the requirements of the approved
procedure. Personnel shall be conversant with the effects of variations in:-
(a) Surface condition.
(b) Material Structure (grain size, attenuation etc.).
(c) Transducer size and type (compression, shear and surface wave).
(d) Test frequency.
(e) Acoustic couplant.
(f) Method of calibration.

123
(g) Use of Attenuator.
(h) Display characteristics.
(j) Indication measurement.
7. Equipment Requirements. Ultrasonic equipment shall consist of the

following:-
(a) Electronic apparatus capable of producing, receiving and displaying

high frequency electrical pulses at the required frequencies and energy levels.
The display shall include a well defined and permanently marked graticule.
NOTE: For certain applications, a calibrated attenuator is essential.
(b) Probes (Single and Double) capable of transforming electrical impulses

into mechanical vibrations at specific frequencies.
(c) Couplant liquid having good wetting properties for the transference of
mechanical energy to and from the test surface.
(d) Calibration blocks for the assessment of probe and electronic

apparatus characteristics and performance.
(e) Test blocks as aids to interpretation and reproducibility of results.
8. Equipment Calibration. Prior to use for production inspection; after

maintenance, or at intervals not exceeding one month, the following calibration shall
be carried out and the results recorded:-
(a) Using calibration block A2 (BS 2704), check for:-
(i) Time base linearity over the full working range required.
(ii) Probe(s)/ angle(s) of refraction and transmission point(s).
(iii) Beam characteristics, dead zone and resolution.
(b) Using a calibrated attenuator and compression wave probe adjust the
equipment sensitivity to display a 20% FSD (Full Screen Deflection) signal
from the back wall of the plastic insert with at least 30dB reserve attenuation.
Reduce attenuation by 6dB and l2dB and record signal amplitude at each
step.
NOTE: For a linear amplifier, the signal amplitudes should be 40% and 80%
FSD respectively.
124
(c) With equipment as sub para (b) above, adjust sensitivity to display a
50% FSD signal from the plastic insert with at least 30 dBs reserve
attenuation. This signal shall remain clearly identifiable (approx 5% FSD for
linear amplifier) after inserting 20dB attenuation.
(d) When the equipment is not fitted with a calibrated attenuator, checks at
sub para (b) and (c) above may be carried out using the calibration block and
a compression wave probe 20 to 30 mm dia (or equivalent) as follows:-
(i) Adjust gain to display a 20% FSD peak signal from the 1/32 inch
wide slot.
(ii) Record the peak signal amplitudes received from the 1/16 inch
and 1/8 inch wide slots without adjusting gain (for a linear amplifier
these should be 40% and 80% FSD respectively).
(iii) Adjust gain to display a 50% FSD peak Signal from the 5/16
inch wide slot. Record peak signal amplitude obtained from the 1/32
inch wide slot without adjusting gain (for a linear amplifier this should
be approx 5% FSD).
9. Equipment Qualification. Equipment shall be considered qualified when

records of the calibration in accordance with Para 8 above shows:-
(a) Time base linearity measured between at least 5 multiple echoes is

within + 1%.
(b) Probe indices are accurately marked.
(c) Probe angle of refraction is within + 1 degree of stipulated angle.
(d) Minimum resolution of compression wave probes complies with BS

2704.
10. For linear amplifiers the signal amplitudes resulting from sub para 8(b) or 8(d)
above are within + 5% of the amplitudes quoted.
NOTE: In the case of non-linear amplifiers the result of calibration shall be referred
to IAY/ IAG for approval.
11. The above equipment checks inherently qualify both the probe and electronic
equipment. It is essential, therefore, that calibration is carried out for each probe to
be used. In addition, any change of the rejection level may very seriously affect the
amplifier response and adjustment of the rejection control shall involve re-calibration.
12. Method of Testing. The equipment shall always be calibrated to the

appropriate reference standards before testing begins. Probe characteristics and
movement, as well as signal amplitude, shall be taken into consideration when the
significance of defect indications is being assessed. The movement or rotation of
125
probes shall be maintained at a fairly uniform speed consistent with the repetition
rate of the equipment in use; speed during the test shall not exceed that used during
calibration. Indications of defects revealed during ultrasonic examination shall be
checked, if possible, by the use of another ultrasonic method or by, another non-
destructive test method.
13. Surface Finish. The surface of the item to be tested shall be clean and free
from dirt, loose scale and loose paint. It shall be sufficiently smooth to ensure
effective acoustic coupling.
Plate & Sheets
14. Scope. The methods described shall be used only for the inspection of
plate and sheet of thickness 0.25 inch and greater.
15. Surface Preparation. The plate shall be in the pickled, shot or

sandblasted condition and the test surface free from loose dirt or any foreign matter
which. may interfere with the test. The test surface may have one coat of primer. If
necessary the surface shall be smoothed by any suitable mechanical means such as
grinding or belt sanding. A thin sheet of varnish impregnated cloth e.g. Empire cloth,
between the transducer and plate surface is advantageous in reducing wear on the
transducer face and. improving coupling on rough surfaces.
16. Compression Wave Inspection.
(a) Test Frequency. 2-5 Mc/s transducer size 20-30 mm dia or

equivalent.
(b) Calibration. Test block(s) shall be prepared from sound material of

the same material group (i.e. low alloy steel, austenitic stainless steel, copper
nickel, monel etc.) and within + 10% of the thickness to be inspected as per
following details :-
(i) For plate material up to and including 1 inch thick a 0.25 inch dia
flat bottom hole shall be drilled from one plate surface to a depth of half
the test block thickness.
(ii) For thickness over 1 inch, two or more similar 0.25 inch dia
holes shall be drilled to depths of 0.5 inch from each surface and not
greater than 1 inch difference in hole depths i.e.:-
(aa) 2 holes minimum at 2 inch thick, 0.5 inch and 1.5 inch
deep respectively.
(ab) 3 holes minimum at 3 inch thick, 2.5 inch, 1.5 inch and
0.5 inch deep respectively.
126
(iii) The equipment shall be calibrated and the graticule marked to

show the nominal plate thickness.
(iv) Using a calibrated attenuator, adjust the instrument sensitivity to

display a 20% FSD echo from the least detectable hole in the test block
maintaining the same gain and a 20% FSD echo. Record the
attenuator settings for the first back wall echo from the test block, the
plate to be inspected and the remaining holes in the test block. For
example, assuming the least detectable hole is 2 inch below the test
surface:-
Attenuator reading for this Hole > A dB

-do- Hole 1.5 in below surface > B dB
-do- Test block back wall > C dB
-do- Plate > D dB
Minimum search sensitivity = D - (C-A) dB.
(v) Assessment of defect significance shall be made relative to the

depth of the indication below the test surface.
NOTE: Where the amplitude of the first back wall echo is reduced to
20% FSD or less unaccompanied by evidence of laminar inclusions the
plate surfaces must be checked and dressed if necessary to ensure
adequate acoustic coupling.
(c) Method of Examination. Each plate shall be marked on one major

surface with grid lines normal to the direction of rolling. and separated by not
more than 5% of the plate width OR 90% of the transducer diameter which-
ever is greater. Each grid line shall be scanned and the length of any
interception which indicates a lamination or causes complete attenuation of
the third bottom echo shall be recorded and marked on the plate. Any such
areas shall be scanned in width to determine the full extent of the cause of the
attenuation. In addition each edge of the plate shall be similarly scanned
along a parallel track not exceeding 2 inch from the edge unless included in
the grid pattern.
Shear Wave Inspection (Where Specified)
17. Calibration. Shear wave inspection shall be performed to a 3% of plate

thickness or 0.004 inch notch sensitivity whichever is the greater. Using any suitable
means, a calibration reference notch as shown in the Table given below shall be
formed in the surface of the plate being inspected. The choice between a ' V ' or a
Square notch shall be at the discretion of the testing organization. The notch shall be
located so that reflections from it cannot be confused with those from the plate
boundaries. Any upset metal adjacent to the notch shall be removed. Instrument
calibration shall be carried out using a .shear wave probe of suitable angle and
frequency. The time base of the cathode ray tube shall be calibrated by obtaining
127
peak amplitude reflections from the notch both from the opposing surface and from
the surface containing the notch (1st bounce). The instrument sensitivity for testing
shall be such that the minimum signal amplitude from the reference notch is 20% full
screen deflection.
Parameter V or V-NOTCH SQUARE NOTCH

Depth
(%ge of plate thickness 3% or 0.004 inch 3% or 0.004 inch
or inch)
Width 300 included angle 2 x depth
Length Approximately 1.5 inch Approximately 1.5 inch
18. Method of Examination. Shear wave testing shall be performed by

scanning one major surface in two directions, causing the sound beam to travel both
parallel to and perpendicular to the longitudinal axis or to the direction of rolling of
the plate. The probe unit shall be moved in parallel paths. If a defect indication is
obtained which approaches in amplitude that, of the reference notch, the adjacent
area shall be scanned by the continuous scanning method, indexing approximately
90% of the width of the transducer, sufficiently to establish the size and location of
the discontinuity.
19. Recording. The following information shall be recorded in addition to the test
procedure:-
(a) Location and size of any lamination.
(b) Location and size of any area where the 1st back wall echo is
attenuated to 20% FSD or less after plate surface preparation.
(c) Location and size (signal amplitude and probe movement) of laminar
inclusions having a reflectivity in excess of the equivalent depth 0.25 inch dia
hole.
(d) When using shear waves, the location and signal amplitude of any
indication above the reference level as indicated at paragraph 17 above.
20. Extension of Test. Detection of a lamination or area of attenuation wholly

contained within a 3 inch diameter circle shall require 100% check on the adjacent
plate within 24 inch of the defect and recording as above. Detection of a laminar
inclusion shall require 100% check on the adjacent plate within 12 inch of the defect
and recording as above.
Plate Thickness Measurement
21. Calibration. Using a test block containing the permitted thickness

tolerances allowed by the relevant material specification adjust the time base to
show at least two multiple echoes from the full plate thickness and mark the
128
permitted limits on the graticule. Where a specially designed ultrasonic thickness

gauge is used, the meter read out shall be similarly marked. Where no meter read
out is available, the thickness limits derived from the test block shall be recorded.
22. Method of Examination. Plate thickness measurements shall be taken in

accordance with DG Ships 137. Where plate is also examined in accordance with
paragraph 16 above, plate thickness measurements shall be made on the grid lines
at not greater than 24 inch intervals.
Butt Welds
23. Scope. The application of ultrasonic methods to the inspection of butt welds
is influenced by the types of materials in use, their thickness and geometry and the
required flaw sensitivity. The influence of the structure in the weld and in the heat
affected zone may restrict application, and modified probes may be essential where
testing is carried out on materials which have different velocities from those for which
commercially available probes are normally designed.
24. Probes. The following shear wave probes in Table below are
recommended for the initial inspection:-
Angle of Material
Probe Type
Refraction Thickness (T)
70 80 deg 0.2 inch to 0.6 inch Single or combined double

60 70 deg 0.5 inch to 1.5 inch
45 60 deg 1.5 inch to 2.5 inch
Single and separate transmitter and
45 deg Over 2.5 inch receiver for welds over 2 inch thick
NOTE: In selecting a probe angle, it must be remembered that a beam incident on

a reflecting surface at 300 deg will result in mode conversion and in a loss of shear
wave energy up to 20 dB. Assessment of defect severity and type can be frequently
assisted by using alternate probe angles after the initial detection or alternative
methods of NDT.
25. Surface Preparation. Test surfaces shall be free from loose scale, weld
spatter and other foreign matter which could interfere with the ultrasonic inspection.
Preparation of the weld surfaces is usually unnecessary when the surface condition
(overfill, undercut etc.) complies with established industry practices. Where
excessive noise is reflected from the welded surface, local preparation shall be
carried out to reduce the noise to a level consistent with accurate interpretation.
26. Calibration. Mark the graticule to show 20% FSD and 20% FSD minus 12
dB in accordance with paragraph 8(b) or (d). Where U/T equipment is fitted with a
calibrated attenuator, test sensitivities may be pre-determined from machined test
129
pieces. Provision shall be made for frequently checking the sensitivity during
inspection, e.g. by relating plate response with a vertical probe to the shear wave
test sensitivity. Positive probe identification shall be included in procedure
submissions. Where U/T equipment is not fitted with a calibrated attenuator the
following procedure shall apply:-
(a) For welds up to and including 1.5 inch thick, a test block consisting of a
plate at least 3 inch wide and of similar material thickness contour and surface
condition to the material to be tested, shall be used. A reference hole shall be
drilled situated on the centre line at least 4 inch from one end. The hole
diameter shall be as follows:-
Thickness Hole Diameter

Up to and including 0.75 inch 1/16 inch
Over 0.75 inch up to and including 1.5 inch 1/8 inch
(b) The instrument shall be calibrated to show a minimum corner reflection

from the holes of 20% full-scale deflection from each surface of the plate.
(c) For welds over 1.5 inch thick, reference notches in accordance with the
dimensions given in paragraph 17 above shall be used for instrument
calibration.
27. Method of Examination. Plate material adjacent to the, weld through

which the shear wave must pass shall be inspected in accordance with paragraph 15
& 16 above and any defective areas recorded. Scanning shall be carried out from
both sides of the weld on one plate surface. Signal amplitude, location in the weld
and probe movement and position shall be taken into consideration in assessing
defects as follows :-
(a) Welds <= 1.5 inch Thick. Shear wave inspection shall be carried out
in a series of scanning movements parallel with the weld at intervals not
exceeding 60% of the transducer diameter or length. Alternatively the probe
may be oscillated to and from the weld and progressed along the weld at
intervals not exceeding the diameter or width of the transducer. The probe
system shall be directed normal to the weld centre line, preferably by
mechanical means.
(b) Welds > 2 inch Thick. Scanning shall be carried out in two stages,
first using a single or combined transducer as for thinner materials and then
using separate transmitter and receiver probes in tandem, preferably in a
mechanically linked system so that the receiver moves towards the welds at
the same rate as the transmitter moved away from it.
(c) Transverse Defects. For transverse defects, irrespective of

thickness, direct inspection from the weld surface is preferred. Where
necessary surface preparation cannot be achieved, separation transmitter and
receiver probes shall be employed in a mechanical guided straddle scan.
130
(d) Operators shall at all times be capable of demonstrating that the

inspection is in accordance with the approved procedure.
28. Recording. Records of indications should be sufficiently detailed.
Tee & Butt Welds
29. Scope. Ultrasonic inspection is applied to tee-butt welds for the

detection of weld defects, plate defects in the vicinity of the weld etc.. The latter may
include defects of laminar form and cracks orientated at an angle with the plate
surface. Thus both compression and shear wave techniques are necessary for a
complete inspection.
30. Definitions. To adequately cover Navy requirements, two types of

inspections are defined as follows:-
(a) Type A - Complete examination using compression and shear waves.
(b) Type B - Partial examination using compression waves only. (This

application is usually adequate for table-web connections of fabricated
frames).
Reference is made to signal amplitudes DL and SL defined as follows:-
DL = 20% FSD signal from the relevant test block target.

SL = DL minus 6 dB in accordance with paragraph 8 (b) or (d) above as
applicable.
31. Surface Preparation. The test surface shall be free from loose scale and
any loose foreign matter which could interfere with the test. Shot blasted surfaces
covered with a thin coating of spray primer are usually satisfactory, but any
successive layers of paint must be removed and the test surface lightly disc or belt
sanded for reproducible results.
32. Test Blocks. Two test blocks are required for calibration. The test block
thickness shall be within + 20% of the thickness of the continuous member of the tee
butt joint. Suitable test blocks are to be used for both Type A & B examinations.
33. Probes.
(a) Compression Wave. Test frequency 4 to 6 Mc/s combined double

probe. Transducer size should not be less than 50 sq. mm.
Note: This type of probe is subject to varying response with probe orientation
for certain types of defect. To obviate this feature all measurements shall be
made with the acoustic baffle of the probe at 90 deg to the line of the slots in
test block and the weld during inspection.
131
(b) Shear Wave. Test frequency 2 to 4 Mc/s, single or combined double

and Transducer size not less than 70 sq. mm. Angle of refraction should be
45 + 1 deg.
Note: Angles of refraction greater than 45 deg may be necessary when the
continuous member of the joint is less than 1 inch thick.
34. Calibration.
(a) Vertical Probe (All Equipment). From test block, obtain a 15 to 20

% full screen deflection signal (hereinafter to as DL) from the flat bottom hole.
Using this sensitivity (DL) record the maximum signal amplitude from slots in
the test block.
NOTE: Signal amplitudes must not exceed 80% full screen deflection. The
number of slots measurable within this limit will depend on the dynamic range
of equipment being calibrated.
(b) Equipment with Attenuator. From DL sensitivity reduce attenuation

by 6 dB's record and mark the new signal amplitude (hereinafter referred to as
SL) i.e - 6 dB line.
(c) Equipment Without Attenuator. From DL sensitivity add the

difference in signal amplitude previously recorded from the 1/32 inch and 1/16
inch slots to obtain SL (- 6 dB line).
35. Time Base Calibration (Using Test Blocks).
(a) Vertical Probe. Accurately adjust time base to include the continuous
members and weld with the probe contact face at zero.
(b) Shear Wave Probes. Similar to vertical probe, record horizontal

displacement of probe index from the hole.
36. Search Sensitivities.
(a) Vertical Probe (With Attenuator).
(i) Using test block, obtain DL first bottom echo from an un-drilled
part of test block, attenuation = A.
(ii) Adjust attenuation to obtain DL from the flat bottom hole,

attenuation = B.
(iii) Obtain DL first bottom echo from hull plate, attenuation = C.
(iv) Search sensitivity = C - (A - B).

132
(b) Shear Wave Probe (With Attenuator).
(i) Using test block obtain DL from appropriate corner reflection

(direct or first bounce depending on technique) from the reference hole,
attenuation = D.
(ii) Search sensitivity = D - (A - C).
(c) Shear Wave Probe (Without Attenuator). Difference in couplant

and plate surface cannot be accurately measured. Using the procedure as
given at paragraph 8 (a) above and adjusting gain control for the difference
between DL plate echo, and DL test block echo, a satisfactory test can be
carried out.
37. Plotting Weld Width. Using vertical probe, adjust first bottom echo from
adjacent hull plate to SL. Plot weld edge at probe datum position when echo is
reduced to DL; at intervals not exceeding 2 x T, where T is thickness of the joining
member.
38. Search Scanning - Compression and Shear Wave. A rectilinear scanning

pattern shall be employed, with sufficient traverse to ensure complete examination of
the weld, and associated parent plate. Forward progression shall not exceed one
transducer width or diameter per traverse.
39. Defect Indication Measurement.
(a) Vertical Probe. For signals between DL and 80% full screen
deflection assess flaw width relative to previously marked amplitude from test
block slots (paragraph 8(b) or (d)) For signals in excess of 80% full screen
deflection, reduce peak signal amplitude to SL and record widths when
signals reduce to DL as for weld edges (paragraph 37 above).
(b) Shear Wave Probes. Record signal amplitude of indications above DL.
40. Recording. Disregard indications below DL. Records of indications should

be sufficiently detailed.
Overlay Cladding
41. Scope. The following requirements apply to the ultrasonic inspection of the
bond between weld deposited overlay cladding and the base material. Specific
requirements due to special shapes or manufacturing processes will be given in the
appropriate specifications or weld procedures.
42. Surface Preparation. The test surface and the reflecting surface shall be
free from loose scale, machining and grinding particles and other loose foreign
matter. Surfaces up to 250 micro-inch and free from burrs shall be acceptable
provided that the required sensitivity levels can be achieved. Surfaces shall be
133
sufficiently free from waviness to permit a uniform test over the required area. When
inadequate sound transmission is experienced, the test surface or reflecting surface
shall be considered suspect until determined otherwise.
43. Calibration.
(a) The calibration block shall be prepared by weld depositing cladding

metal, using the same welding procedure to obtain cladding of the same
approximate thickness and surface finish as the cladding to be inspected, on
to a block of the same material as the base material.
(b) A 1/8 inch diameter flat bottomed hole shall be drilled through the base
material so that the bottom of the hole lies in the junction of the cladding and
base material. The base material should be approximately 1 inch thick. The
instrument shall be calibrated to show a 20% FSD signal from the 1/8 inch
diameter target.
44. Method of Examination.
(a) General. Scanning shall be performed manually or automatically by

moving the probe in a directed path or by moving the material in a directed
path with the probe stationary. Scanning shall be performed at a uniform
speed determined during calibration. Where a parallel back wall can be used
to obtain a back reflection, the instrument gain shall be increased if necessary
to show the back reflection and thus ensure adequate coupling. Defect
indications in the cladding shall be compared with the reference standards for
assessment.
(b) Procedure Tests & Hand Deposited Cladding. Hand deposited

cladding shall be examined over the entire surface area. Adjacent scans shall
be separated by approximately 80% of the crystal width to ensure adequate
overlap.
(c) Machine Deposited Cladding. Machine deposited cladding shall be

examined along grid lines spaced at 2 inch intervals and normal to the
direction of the welding. In addition to grid scanning, continuous scanning
shall be applied to penetrations, including edges, to ensure that there are no
defects within 2 inch of the edge of the penetrations, and to an area with a
minimum radius of 6 inch around any significant defect.
45. Recording. When indications in excess of reference standards occur, the

material shall be appropriately marked and each defect shall be explored ultra-
sonically to determine its size.
Brazed Pipe Joints
46. Scope. Ultrasonic inspection is applied to assess the area of bond

between the pipe wall and fitting.
134
47. Surface Preparation. Fittings should preferably be machined to provide

a concentric uniform surface finish in way of the joint socket. Where machining is
impracticable, filing, disc sanding etc. may be essential to provide a satisfactory
surface for the ultrasonic inspection.
48. Calibration. Using sample joints (brazed/ un-brazed) or a test piece

prepared from similar materials adjust the time base and mark the graticule to show:-
(a) The combined pipe and fitting thickness.
(b) The fitting thickness in way of the joint.
(c) The spelter ring groove depth (if fitted).
(d) Adjust sensitivity to obtain a FSD signal from the pipe bore as sub para
(a) above.
49. Method of Inspection. Apply a band of removable adhesive tape to the

pipe adjacent to the fitting. Mark off equal increments not exceeding 1 inch in length
in a clockwise direction as viewed facing the fitting from the pipe. Permanently mark
the 12 o'clock position on fitting and tape and mark the latter with the number of
scans. For fittings with insert groovesI scan each land separately with sufficient
scans to ensure complete coverage. Fittings without insert grooves shall be scanned
as for a single land. .
50. Recording. Mark on the tape:-
(a) The extent and percentage of bond for each scan on each land.
(b) Any part-of the joint where lack of access or fitting material prevents
satisfactory examination.
Pipes & Tubes
51. Scope. Pipe and tube shall be tested for transverse and longitudinal
discontinuities.
52. Calibration.
(a) As a calibration standard, a convenient length of pipe or tube of same

dimensions and type of material to be tested shall be selected. For transverse
type defects an internal and external notch shall be cut in accordance with the
dimensions given in paragraph 17 above except that the notch may extend
wholly around one circumference. The position of the 3% or 0.004 inch depth
shall be marked on the reference standard. The notches shall be separated
by at least 1.5 inch and shall be located to permit calibration when the probe
is situated between the pipe end and the nearest notch.
135
(b) For longitudinal type defects an internal and external notch shall be cut
in accordance with the dimensions given in paragraph 17 above parallel with
the pipe axis. The notches shall be separated by at least 1 inch along the
length of the pipe. Each notch shall be clearly identifiable on the cathode ray
tube display.
53. Method of Examination. The shear waves shall be directed into the pipe
wall and the pipe scanned longitudinally by advancing the probe assembly as the
pipe is rotated. The longitudinal movement of the probe shall be such that the entire
area of the pipe wall is examined. Scanning may also be performed by rotating the
part and automatically indexing the probe assembly so that a. crystal overlap of at
least 10% is obtained on each successive pass. When performing the test by the
immersion method, care shall be taken to maintain accurate alignment of the probe
assembly with respect to the tube.
54. Recording. The location extent and signal amplitude shall be recorded for all
indications in excess of the appropriate sensitivity level.
Pipe Thickness Measurement
55. Calibration. (see also paragraph 21 above). The instrument shall be

calibrated on a section of pipe of the same material and diameter as that being
inspected. An area of the pipe wall shall be ground to the minimum acceptable wall
thickness.
56. Method of Examination. Variations in pipe wall dimensions shall be

inspected by a longitudinal wave technique. The frequency and transducer size used
shall be compatible with the material and thickness inspected. Each pipe shall be
placed on suitable rollers and rotated as the search is conducted. Each end shall be
examined by turning the pipe through full revolution with the transducer at the end.
Additional scans shall then be made at intervals not exceeding 3 feet along the entire
length of the pipe. Areas where the wall thickness approaches minimum tolerances
shall be subjected to a more complete search.
Forgings Including Forged, Extruded and Wrought Bars
57. Scope. The wide variety of forgings in respect of materials, sizes and
geometry required by Navy precludes laying down rigid ultrasonic inspection
procedure for general application. Specific procedures must take into account the
method of manufacture, type, location and probable distribution of defects likely to be
present. Diagnosis of ultrasonic indications in thick sections demands an accurate
knowledge of probe characteristics.
58. Test Procedure. BS 4124 Part I shall apply for steel forgings (excluding
austenitic). For forgings to which BS 4124 Part 1 cannot be applied and extruded/
wrought bars, the Surface Finish will be as per provisions contained in BS 4124 Part
1 clause 6.
136
59. Calibration. Sensitivity of the instrument shall be adjusted until the

indication from the least apparent flat bottomed hole in the reference standard
occupies at least 20% screen height and not more than 75% screen height.
Sensitivity shall then be adjusted to give the same number of back reflections from
the forging as are obtained from the reference standard.
60. Method of Examination. Whenever possible, forgings shall be examined

from surfaces so arranged that three major planes are covered. Suspect areas
disclosed under these conditions shall be further evaluated from the side opposite to
that from which the original inspection was carried out. Unless otherwise specified
the search unit shall be moved in parallel paths so that each path shall overlap the
previous and adjacent paths by 10% of the width of the transducer. The size and
location of all indications equal to or greater than those obtained from the reference
standard holes during calibration shall be marked as the test progresses. This
procedure shall be repeated for all surfaces inspected.
61. Marking Defects. The location of all defects causing reflectivity which
exceeds that of the holes in the reference standard shall be marked as the test
progresses.
Castings
62. Scope.
(a) Ultrasonic inspection can be applied for the examination of ferrite steel
and certain non-ferrous castings. Techniques must be capable of assessing
defects to the requirements of stated in Appendix G and not result in a
lowering of the acceptance standard nor lead to substantial increase in the
number of repairs.
(b) The requirement, therefore, to discriminate between defect types and

varying degrees of defect severity demands a most exacting ultrasonic
technique. In addition, casting geometry, surface .condition and type of
material may preclude the useful and economical use of ultrasonic inspection.
(c) In view of the above, Navy will require radiographic confirmation of the
validity of ultrasonic test procedures in selected areas of castings where both
inspection methods can be usefully employed.
63. Recommendations.
(a) The use of shear and compression waves will assist defect
assessment.
(b) The best near zone resolution is obtained using 'combined double' type
compression wave probes. This is particularly valuable in areas for sub-
sequent machining.
137
(c) Search sensitivities should be as high as possible before the material

grain reflection becomes unacceptable. The procedure should relate sensiti-
vity to the number and amplitude of reflection from the plastic insert or 100
mm radius of the BS 2704 A2 calibration block.
(d) Flaw assessment may necessarily combine amplitude and attenuation

methods for different flaw types. Both methods require the use of a calibrated
attenuator.
138
Annexure III
RADIOGRAPHY TEST
Definitions
1. BS 3683, Part 3 shall apply, together with the following additional definitions:-
(a) Material Thickness. The thickness of material shall not exceed the
finished dimensions for the part by more than 20% or 0.25 inch whichever is
the greater subject to no change of type of radiation source.
NOTE: Thickness of welded joints shall conform with the requirements of

DG SHIPS/G/I0000, Section 2.
(b) Multiple Film Technique. A procedure in which two or more films of

the same or different speed with the relevant intensifying screens are used in
the same film holder.
(c) Maximum Effective Radiation Source Dimension. The maximum

source of focal dimension projected on the centre of the radiographic film. For
example, a cylindrical isotope source whose length is greater than its
diameter will have a greater effective radiation source dimension when
orientated coaxially in the centre of a pipe for a panoramic exposure than
when the axis of the source is positioned at right angles to the pipe. Similarly,
for a focal spot projected as a square image, the diagonal of the square shall
be used for calculation.
2. Applicability & Methods. The requirements of this specification shall apply

to all items for which the specifications, drawings, or refit/repair instructions call for
radiographic inspection and shall include the use of the following radiation sources:-
(a) X-ray equipment.
(b) Thulium 170.
(c) Iridium 192.
(d) Cesium 137.
(e) Cobalt 60.
Use of any other source shall be with written approval of IAY only.
139
3. Extent of Radiographic Inspection. The requirements shall include the

number of areas and items to be radiographed, the point in fabrication when
radiography shall be performed, the quality level of inspection and the acceptance
standard to be applied.
4. Radiographic Procedure Approval. IAY/IAG approval of radiographic

procedures, including film processing procedures, shall be obtained before the
testing agency is permitted to perform radiographic inspection of production
components. Radiographic and film processing procedures form a part of the
standard procedure approval.
5. Information Required for Radiographic Procedure Approval. The testing

agency shall submit to the IAY/ IAG production radiographs of items of material and
thickness equivalent to that for which approval is sought. Butt welds shall qualify the
radiographic procedure for all butt welds within the thickness range shown in Table 1
(given at end of this Annexure). The following information shall be forwarded with
sample radiographs:-
(a) The type and thickness range(s) of material to be qualified.
(b) The radiation sources to be qualified (i.e. types of Isotopes & X-ray
kilo-voltage rating).
(c) All variables of the proposed radiographic procedure shall be recorded

and shall include at least the following information:-
(i) X-ray Equipment Information.
(aa) Model and type.
(ab) Manufacturer.
(ac) Focal spot size.
(ad) Focusing current.
(ii) Isotope source information.
(aa) Type of Isotope.
(ab) Source Strength.
(ac) Source dimensions.
(iii) Film type.
(iv) Source-to-film distance.
(v) Thickness and type of material radiographed.

140
(vi) Kilo-voltage and tube current.
(vii) Number of films in cassette.
(viii) Type and thickness of intensifying screens.
(ix) Blocking or masking techniques.
(x) Time of exposure.
(xi) Processing technique.
(xii) Radiographer credentials.
6. Re-qualification of Radiographic Procedure. The radiographic procedure

shall be re-qualified as follows:-
(a) When the IAY/ IAG has reason to believe that the testing agency
cannot meet the required radiographic quality levels in production radiography
using a previously approved procedure, the testing agency shall undergo
fresh qualification of the affected procedure.
(b) When an isotope source of larger physical size, or X-ray tube with a
focal spot size, larger than that used in the approved procedure will affect the
final intended purpose. However, a larger radiation source may be used if the
source distance is increased as shown in Table 4.
(c) When there is a change in the type of isotope source used.
(d) When there is a change in the type of X-ray equipment used.
(e) When the X-ray equipment voltage is greater than that used during
initial qualification. However if the voltage used during initial qualification lies
within the acceptable region any voltage up to the maximum permissible
voltage line may be employed without re-qualifying.
(f) When there is a change in type of film.
(g) When there is a reduction of source-to-film distance beyond the

minimum distance used in the approved procedure. However re-qualification
is not required if the source-to-film distance is maintained within the limits
shown in Table 4; nor is re-qualification required even though inaccessibility
prevents compliance with Table 4 or the qualified procedure provided that the
IAG representative verifies that the greatest possible source-to-film distance is
used and that the radiographic record shows that accessibility limits the
source-to-film distance and indicates the actual source-to-film distance used.
141
(h) When there is an increase in the thickness of intensifying screens

beyond the thickness qualified. However, re-qualification is not required if the
thickness of intensifying screens is in accordance with Table 2.
(j) When there is a change in the type of intensifying screen material

used.
(k) Copies of radiographic procedures shall be made available to the IAY/

IAG.
7. Radiographic Equipment Qualification. The adequacy of radiographic

test equipment and materials is determined by the successful completion of the
procedure approval tests. However all radiographic test equipment previously used
for the procedure approval tests shall, in the hands of qualified operator, be capable
of consistently, obtaining results of the specified quality levels.
Technique Requirements for Radiography
8. Direction of Radiation. Unless otherwise specified the radiation beam

shall be directed perpendicular towards the centre of the effective area.
9. Radiographic Quality Level. Radiography shall be performed with a

technique which will distinguish the applicable Image Quality Indicators (IQI).
Radiography quality level shall be determined by using one or more of the IQI's.
Unless otherwise specified, 2% IQI sensitivity shall be used as a standard for
evaluating radiograph quality for materials up to and including 2 inch thick, and 1%
for greater than 2 inch thickness.
10. Screens, Filters and Masking. All radiographs produced, with a source of
120 kV or greater shall employ front and back lead .screens in accordance with
Table 2.
11. Films. Radiographs shall be made on fine grain or extra-fine grain, high
contrast, safety base film whenever radio-isotopes are used.
12. Film Quality. Radiographs presented for interpretation shall be free from
blemishes or film defects which might mask, or be confused with, defects in the
material being examined. If doubt exists concerning the true nature of an indication
on the film, the radiograph shall be rejected. Typical blemishes are as follows: -
(a) Fogging caused by light leaks in the processing room or cassettes or

by defective safelights. Exposure marks caused by improper processing or old
film.
(b) Mechanical processing defects such as streaking, air bells or water

marks, or chemical stains.
142
(c) Pressure or lead marks, scratches, gouges, finger marks, crimp marks
or static electricity marks.
(d) Loss of detail caused by poor film-to-screen contact in localized areas.
13. Film Density. The density of individual films shall be between 2.0 and 3.0
in the area being examined. When the thickness of the part varies considerably in
the area under examination, the two films, either of equal or of different speed as
employed during procedure qualification, may be exposed simultaneously in the
same film holder and the resultant radiographs mat be submitted for interpretation as
single film.
NOTE: Densities in excess of 3.0 may be used where adequate viewing conditions
are available.
14. Image Quality.
(a) All radiographs used as the basis of acceptance shall be of the

specified radiographic quality level. The image quality level of radiographs
shall not be determined by the image of the wires in the IQI alone, but shall
include control of the essential elements of the radiographic procedure within
the limitations established by the testing agency at the time it obtains
radiographic procedure approval.
(b) If any radiograph presented for interpretation indicates that the

procedure used was not in accordance with the above, IAY/ IAG may require
that an additional trial radiograph be exposed using a procedure, selected by
the testing agency, which meets the minimum requirements of its radiographic
procedure approval.
(c) If a significant improvement in image quality is noted, the IAY/IAG may

require that other radiographs, which were produced by the same procedure
as the questionable film, be re-radiographed using a procedure which is within
the limits established during qualification.
15. Multiple Film Technique. Film techniques with two or more films of the
same or different speeds in the same film holder shall be permitted provided that the
applicable radiographic quality level for a specific area is demonstrated.
16. Film-less Techniques. The use of film-less techniques shall be limited to

In-process Inspection and shall be subject to the approval of the IAY/IAG .
Radiation Sources
17. X-ray and Gamma-ray sources to be used in accordance with established/

stipulated specimen thicknesses as per international standards for optimum
radiographic results. Deviations from the recommended values will be permitted as
indicated in the notes referring to Table 1.
143
Source to Film Distance
18. Recommended minimum source-to-film distances are shown in Table 4. The

film shall be located as close to the object being examined as possible.
Radiographic Location Markers
19. The image of the location markers used to co-ordinate the part with the film
shall appear on the film so that it is evident that complete coverage was obtained
without interfering with the interpretation. These marker positions shall be marked on
the part and maintained on the part during radiography. When radiographing a weld
whenever possible the edge of the image of the location marker shall be 1 inch from
the edge of the weld.
Film Identification
20. A system of positive identification of the film and IQI should be provided. The
following information shall appear on each radiograph or in the records
accompanying each radiograph:-
(a) Identification of the testing agency making the radiograph.
(b) Date of exposure.
(c) Identification of the part, component or system and, where applicable,

the weld joint in the part, component or system.
(d) Whether the radiograph is of the original area or a repair area.
Storage of Radiographs and Radiographic Records
21. Radiographs shall be retained for seven years after completion of the
contract. Where work is performed under continuing contracts, or on other than
contractual basis, these records shall be retained for seven years from the date the
work was performed. At the end of the seven years period the testing agency shall
request instructions from the IAY/IAG as to whether the records shall be destroyed,
forwarded to the IAY/IAG or retained by the testing agency for a longer period
agreed upon by the testing agency and the IAY/IAG. Complete records of the
technique details, including radiographic inspection location sketches, evaluation and
disposition sheet shall be retained for the same period as the radiographs to which
they apply.
22. When the firm subcontracts work which requires radiography to be performed
by the subcontractor, the subcontractor shall make available to the installing
Shipbuilder or private contractor the necessary radiographic records so that they
may be retained for the specific period.
144
Dark Room Facilities
23. Darkroom facilities, including equipment and materials, shall be capable of

producing uniform, blemish-free radiographs. Processing logs shall be maintained for
the purpose of assuring control of the life and quality of the photographic solutions.
Film Viewing Facilities
24. Viewing facilities shall be constructed to afford the exclusion of objectionable

background lighting of an intensity that may cause reflection on the radiographs.
25. Equipment used for radiographic interpretation shall provide the following
minimum features:-
(a) A suitably controlled light source of sufficient intensity to allow the

selection of optimum intensities for viewing film densities specified in
paragraph 13 above. The required intensity range may be provided by use of
a separate high intensity viewing port. The light enclosure shall be designed
to provide a uniform level of illumination over the entire viewing surface.
(b) Masking facilities to suit the sizes of radiographs to be viewed.
(c) Densitometers shall be provided to ensure compliance with film density

requirements.
Surface Preparation
26. Castings may be inspected without surface preparation or conditioning,

except as required to remove scale, slag, adhering, or embedded sand or other
surface conditions which may interfere with proper interpretation of radiographs.
27. Accessible surfaces of welds to be radiographed shall be prepared as,

necessary so that the valleys between beads, weld ripples and other surface
irregularities are blended to such a degree that the resulting radiographic contrast
due to surface condition cannot mask or be confused with that of any defect.
Safety
28. Radiographic exposures shall be made under protected conditions in

accordance with statutory requirements.
Interpretation of Radiographs
29. Mandatory Information. To assist in the proper interpretation of

radiographs, a sketch drawing and written procedure or equivalent record shall
145
be prepared to show the arrangement used to make each radiograph. The

information shall accompany each radiograph, or group of radiographs if the same
information applies. Reference to a standard arrangement shall be acceptable if
descriptions of the standard arrangements are made available. The information shall
include:-
(a) Number of films.
(b) Location of each film on the radiographed item.
(c) Orientation of location markers.
(d) Location of radiation source, including source-to-film distance and

angle of beam.
(e) The Kilovoltage and focal spot size.
(f) The isotope type, intensity in curies, and physical dimensions.
(g) Type of material and material thickness.
(h) Type of weld.
(j) Whether original or repair.
(k) Part and drawing number.
(l) Film type.
(m) Details of visible surface imperfections.
30. Before the IAY/ IAG review for acceptance is requested, radiographs shall be
examined and interpreted by each testing agency to assure compliance with the
requirements stated in this Annexure.
Image Quality Indicators (IQIs)
31. Types.
(a) Wire type DIN 54109 IQIs shall be used to assist in determining the
quality level of all radiographs.
(b) For welds between dissimilar metals, IQIs shall be used to correspond
with each group of base materials. The correct series of IQI for each material
group, as laid down in Table 1, is given below:-
146
Material Group IQI Series
1 FE
2 CU
3 AL
(c) Each series of 16 wire numbers covering a material group is contained

in three IQIs, each of which contains 7 wires, numbered 1 to 7, 6 to 12 and 10
to 16.
32. IQI Identification. IQIs are identified by a combination of the following

symbols which appear on the radiograph:-
(a) DIN 62 FE or CU or AL.
(b) 1 ISO 7, 6 ISO 12 or 10 ISO 16.
IQI Location General
33. One IQI shall represent an area within which radiographic densities do not
vary more than from +30% to -15% from the density measured adjacent to the IQI. At
least one IQI per radiograph shall be used except. as specified in section on IQI
Location Pipe Welds. When the film density varies more than from -15 to + 30 %,
two IQIs used as follows will be satisfactory:-
(a) If one IQI shows an acceptable sensitivity at the most dense portion of
the radiograph and the second IQI, placed in accordance with the other
requirements of this standard, shows an acceptable sensitivity at the least
dense portion of the radiograph, these two IQIs shall serve to qualify the
radiograph within these density limits.
34. The IQI shall be located on the source side of the section being examined
wherever possible.
35. For weld examination the IQI shall be placed at one or both ends of each
section to be radiographed. The wires shall lie transversely across the weld with the
thinnest wire towards the central beam.
36. For double-wall, double-image exposures such as pipe welds the IQI shall,
where practicable, be placed on the outside of the pipe across the weld nearest to
the source of radiation. The selected wire may be placed over the centre line of the
pipe.
37. For double-wall, single-image exposures in which only the portion of the
specimen next to the film is viewed, the radiographic technique shall be
demonstrated on a similar specimen section with the applicable IQI placed on the
inside compared with an IQI placed on the film side.
147
38. Where a gap necessarily exists between specimen and film, the IQI shall be
placed on the part of the object furthest from the film.
IQI Location Pipe Welds
39. Circumferential Welds. The number and location of IQIs shall be in

accordance with Table 3.
40. Longitudinal Welds. One IQI shall be placed at each extremity of each film
along the weld; only the weld image between the thinnest wire of the IQIs shall be
viewed for acceptance.
41. Double Wall Radiography (where both walls are viewed for acceptance).
If both walls are inspected, the IQIs shall be .based on the double wall thickness.
The minimum source-to-film distance shall be calculated using the outside diameter
of the pipe or section as the specimen thickness as shown on Table 4. Double-wall
radiography shall be used only for pipe welds and non-critical regions of castings
unless otherwise specifically approved by the IAY/ IAG. For double-wall radiography,
the source may be offset from the plane passing through the weld, so that the weld
images are not superimposed, but the offset should be kept at a minimum. Offset
shall not be employed in the radiography of consumable root inserts.
Welds With Overlay Cladding
42. Radiography shall be performed on the completed base metal weld prior to
cladding.
Radiography by Simultaneous Exposures
43. When a single film or series of films is exposed in a 360 degree radiation
beam on a single component, a minimum of one IQI shall be located in each
quadrant. If multiple components or parts are exposed simultaneously, at least one
IQI shall be required on each film plus additional IQIs as required in Section on IQIs
for Pipe Joints.
Radiography of Small Parts
44. At the discretion of the IAY/IAG, IQIs may not be required on each film when
radiographing small parts, or limited areas of larger parts, when location of the IQI on
the part would obscure part or all of the area of interest and where it would not be
practicable to place the IQI on a block adjacent to the part. However, an initial
technique shot, with the applicable IQI on the parts, shall demonstrate the specified
IQI sensitivity. Subsequent exposure without an IQI shall be made only if exposed in
the same manner as the technique shot. Whenever the arrangement is changed,
additional technique slots shall be made in proper sequence to assure that. the
148
process is being properly controlled. The technique shots shall accompany the
subsequently exposed film when presented for interpretation.
Radiography of Repair Welds
45. When repairs to castings or forgings have been made by welding, weld repair
details shall accompany the radiographs when offered for review. The original
radiographs of the previously defective area shall also be available for review upon
request.
Radiography of Castings
46. Radiographic Standard Shooting Sketch. Each testing agency shall

demonstrate the adequacy of its procedure by submitting a radiographic standard
shooting sketch for each casting design to the IAY/ IAG. Wherever possible a single
wall technique shall be used for the examination of critical regions. A suitable sketch
or drawing shall be prepared which contains the following:-
(a) Number of films and type.
(b) Location of each film on the casting.
(c) Location of markers.
(d) Location of radiation source including angle and source-to-film

distances.
(e) Voltage or isotope type and intensity.
(f) Focal spot size or physical dimensions of source.
(g) Type and thickness of intensifying screens.
(h) Material and thickness of area to be radiographed.
(j) Details of visible surface imperfections.
47. Technique Shot Films. The production films on the first casting shall be
employed to demonstrate the adequacy of the radiographic procedure. The IAY/ IAG
shall approve the procedure when satisfactory quality is obtained on all films and the
extent of coverage required by the applicable specification or drawings has been
obtained.
48. Techniques. Radiography of critical test regions should be limited to

single wall techniques. Double wall-single image and double wall-double image
techniques may be employed for Class II castings and Class I castings excluding
149
critical test regions. Defects shown by double wall exposures may require additional
radiography to establish the severity of the defects relative to single wall thickness.
TABLE 1
THICKNESS RANGES FOR QUALIFICATION
Groups 1 and 2 Group 3
Up to & including 0.25 inch Up to & including 0.25 inch
Over 0.25 inch up to & including 0.75 inch Over 0.25 inch up to & including 0.75 inch
Over 4.0 inch up to & including 6.0 inch
Over 6.0 inch up to & including 10.0 inch
Over 10 inch
Materials are grouped as follows:-
Carbon Steel, Chromium Molybdenum Steel, Nickel Chrome Iron Alloy,

Group 1 Manganese Molybdenum Steel, Manganese Nickel Molybdenum Steel,
Nickel Chrome Molybdenum Steel, Nickel Aluminium Bronze, etc.
Group 2 Nickel Copper, Copper Nickel, Copper, Gunmetal, Stainless Steel etc.
Group 3 Light Metals, Aluminium, Magnesium etc.
Notes:
(a) Where the thickness range specified in Table 1 extends above and below the,
specified thickness range as per the standard, the upper and lower limit of the
150
material thickness qualified shall be the actual thicknesses used for the sample
radiographs.
(b) For materials having substantially different radiographic absorption

characteristics from those in Group 1, 2 and 3, procedure approval shall be related to
reference samples simulating production' requirements.
TABLE 2
SCREENS, FILTERS. AND MASKING
Thickness of Lead Screen

Radiation
Front Back
X-rays generated from 120 to 250 kV 0.001 in to 0.005 in 0.005 in min
X-rays generated above 250 kV to 6meV 0.004 in to 0.006 in 0.005 in min
X-rays generated above 6meV 0.030 in to 0.060 in 0.010 in
Gamma Rays excluding Thulium 170 0.004 in to 0.010 in 0.005 in min
NOTES:
(a) Intensifying Screens. Intimate contact between the screens and the films
shall be maintained during exposure. The use of fluorescent screens requires
specific approval of the IAY/ IAG.
(b) Back Filters. Lead filters shall be used behind the film holder to prevent
scattered radiation from the floor, walls, air or surrounding objects from fogging the
film. Each film holder shall have a lead letter B, a minimum of 0.5 inch high and a
minimum of 1/16 inch thick, fastened to the back of the film holder, within the area of
the film to be read. If the image of the lead letter appears on the film, additional back
filter thickness shall be required. The image of this letter B showing as a light image
on a darker background shall be cause for rejection of any radiographic film.
151
TABLE 3
IQI LOCATION FOR CIRCUMFERENTIAL WELDS
Radiation passes through one wall only

Number of walls
Pipe diameter viewed for Number and location of IQIs
acceptance
4- inch up to but One IQI on the outside surface of

not including 1 the pipe on the source side along
10 inch the centre line of the pipe.
If the length to be inspected is

less than 5 inch, one IQI.
If over 5 inch, two IQIs, one at

10 inch and over 1 each extremity of the area to be
inspected or one at the centre of
the radiation beam and one at an
extremity of the area to be
inspected.
Radiation passes through two walls
One IQI on the outside surface of

1 or 2
Under 4 inch the pipe on the source side along
the. centre line of the pipe
4 inch up to but See paragraph 36 above. The IQI shall

1
not including lie along the centre line of the
10 inch pipe.
Two IQIs, one at each extremity

of the area to be inspected or
10 inch and over 1 one at the centre of the radiation
beam and one at an extremity of
the area to be inspected.
152
TABLE 4
MINIMUM VALUES OF
FOCUS-TO-FILM DISTANCE & SOURCE-TO-FILM DISTANCE
Material Calculated per mm of

Calculated per mm of focal spot
Thickness source size
Minimum
Minimum
focus-to-film Minimum
focus-to-film
distance using Source-to-Film
distance using fine
medium speed distance
grain film
film
0.5 inch 3 inch 2.5 inch 3 inch
1 inch 5 inch 4 inch 5 inch
NOTES:
(a) All calculations shall be based on the maximum effective source dimensions.
(b) For focal spot or source projected as a rectangle with sides of N and Y
millimetres, the effective dimension will be:-
N 2
Y 2
(c) For a focal spot projection consisting of divided images, the effective
dimension shall be the diameter of the smallest circumscribing circle.
(d) Where a gap unavoidably exists between the film and specimen, the
maximum gap width shall be added to the specimen thickness for calculation of
focus to film distance.
(e) For double wall-double image radiography, the material thickness to be used
for calculation of minimum source to film distance is the maximum dimension
between the specimen surface and the film, e.g. the OD of pipe irrespective of wall
thickness.
(f) For thicknesses of steel greater than 3 inch reference should also be made to
BS 2600.
153
Annexure IV
LIQUID PENETRANT TESTING
Purpose
1. This process is used to detect surface discontinuities in ferrous and non-

ferrous materials.
2. Methods. For the purpose of this specification, penetrants fall into one of
the following groups:-
(a) GROUP 1 - Solvent removable.
(b) GROUP 2 - Water washable.
(c) GROUP 3 - Post emulsified.
Note: Penetrants in the above groups may be Dye, Fluorescent or Dual Purpose
(eg. Ardrox 9 VFI).
3. Test Procedure. Liquid penetrant inspection should be performed in

accordance with a written test procedure. Firms are to forward the procedure in
accordance with this specification to the IAY/ IAG for written approval.
4. Personnel Requirements. Personnel performing & interpreting liquid

penetrant tests should be able to perform an operational type test, using the test
method or technique which will be used in production. In addition, the QAO/ IAG
personnel should be able to interpret the results and be thoroughly familiar with the
standards to which they are working.
5. Equipment Requirements. The test equipment, in the hands of qualified

non-destructive test personnel should be capable of consistently obtaining results of
specified quality level.
Method of Testing
6. Applicability. Areas to be tested should be specified in the drawings,

specifications, contracts or repair/ refit instructions.
7. Surface Preparation. Surfaces to be inspected should be free from scale,

slag and adhering or imbedded sand or other extraneous materials. Welded surfaces
154
from which slag has been removed should be considered suitable without grinding if
satisfactory interpretation of the test results is possible and if the weld contour blends
into the base metal without undercutting. Surfaces should not be shot, grit, milled or
vapour blasted unless specifically approved by IAY/ IAG.
8. Finished Surfaces. Surfaces on which a specific finish is required should

be given this surface finish before the final liquid penetrant inspection prescribed by
the applicable specifications.
9. Pre-Test Cleanliness. All surfaces being tested should be thoroughly

cleaned of extraneous material. If a non-volatile liquid is used for cleaning, the
surface should be heated or dried with hot air to ensure complete removal of the
cleaner. As a final cleaning operation each surface should be dipped, sprayed,
wiped or brushed with acetone and dried thoroughly be removing the excess with a
clean, dry cloth or absorbent paper and allowing the remainder to evaporate for at
least five minutes. Before liquid penetrant inspection, the surface to be tested and
any adjacent area within one inch of the surface to be tested , should be dry and free
from dirt, grease, lint, scale and salts, coatings and other extraneous matter that
would obscure surface openings or otherwise with the test.
10. Temperature. Maximum penetration into extremely small openings requires

that the penetrant and the test surface be maintained at the temperature recom-
mended by the penetrant manufacturer, i.e. never less than 10 deg C nor more than
40 deg C. Because of the flammability of most liquid penetrant inspection materials,
the use of an open flame for heating purposes should be prohibited.
11. Application of Penetrant. The surface to be tested should be thoroughly

and uniformly coated with penetrant by flooding/ brushing/ immersion/ spraying and
should be kept wetted for the time recommended by the penetrant manufacturer or
15 minutes whichever is longer.
12. Application of Emulsifiers - Group 3 Penetrants. The emulsifiers should

be applied either by immersion, flooding or spraying.
13. Removal of Penetrants and Emulsifier (if used).
(a) Group 1 Penetrants. To extent possible, excess penetrant should be

removed by wiping the surface thoroughly with a clean dry cloth or absorbent
paper. The remaining penetrant should be removed by wiping the surface
with a clean cloth or absorbent paper dampened with a penetrant remover.
Acetone should not be used to remove excess penetrant. Other methods of
removal viz. air/ water spray gun are not precluded for use under controlled
conditions, but in all cases care should be taken to avoid over washing.
(b) Group 2 Penetrants. The penetrant should be removed from all

surfaces by swabbing with a clean, lint-free cloth saturated with clean water or
by spraying with hot water at a temperature not exceeding 500 deg C and a
pressure not exceeding 40 Ib/sq in. Alternatively, the penetrant should be
removed by wiping the excess penetrant from the test surface with a clean,
155
dry, lint-free cloth followed by wiping the partially cleaned surface with a clean
cloth dampened with a suitable solvent, until all traces of penetrant have been
removed.
(c) Group 3 Penetrants. After a suitable emulsification period, the

surface film of penetrant and emulsifier should be removed by washing with
water at a temperature not exceeding 500 deg C.
14. Surface Drying.
(a) Group 1. The drying of test surfaces after removal' of the excess
penetrant should be accomplished only by normal evaporation, or by blotting
with absorbent paper or clean, lint-free cloth. Forced air circulation in excess
of normal ventilation in the inspection area should not be used. The time for
surface drying after removal of excess penetrant and before application of the
developer should be limited to a minimum of 10 minutes.
(b) Groups 2 & 3. The drying of test surfaces should be accomplished by

using circulating air, blotting with paper towels or clean, lint-free cloth, or by
normal evaporation. It is important that during the drying operation no
contaminating material be introduced on to the surface which may lead to
misinterpretation during the inspection operation.
15. Application of Developer.
(a) Group 1. A non-aqueous wet developer recommended by the

penetrant manufacturer should be used. Immediately prior to application the
developing liquid should be kept agitated in order to prevent settling of solid
particles dispersed in the liquid. The developer should be applied in a thin
coating to the test surfaces by spraying. If the geometry of the item being
inspected precludes the use of a spray, brush or similar applicator should be
used provided it results in a thin coating of developer. Pools of wet developer
in cavities on the inspection surface should not be permitted since these pools
will dry to an excessively heavy coating in such areas resulting in the masking
of indications. Inspection should be conducted after a minimum of 7 minutes
but no later than 10 minutes after the developer has dried for the assessment
of relevant indications.
(b) Dry Developer. Dry developing powder should be applied only on

dry surfaces so that matting will be prevented. The powder should be thinly
applied to provide a dusty appearance immediately after drying of the test
surface. Time for development of indications after the developing powder has
been applied should be controlled and kept to a minimum.
(c) Wet Developer. This type of developer should be applied to surfaces

by dipping or spraying as soon as possible and never more than 15 minutes
after removal of all excess penetrant. When liquid type developers are used it
is necessary that they be continually agitated in order to prevent settling of
solid particles dispersed in the liquid. Concentrations of wet developer in
156
cavities on the inspection surface should not be permitted since these pools
will dry to an excessively heavy coating in such areas, resulting in the
masking of indications.
16. Final Cleaning. When the inspection is concluded, the penetrant materials
should be removed as soon as possible using water or solvents in accordance with
applicable specifications.
CAUTION: Highly volatile solvents should be used cautiously. Their vapours are
relatively toxic and the liquid is a primary skin irritant. Extreme care should be
exercised in handling the volatile solvents as many of them are highly flammable
liquids.
Lighting in Test Area
17. When dye penetrants are in use the test area should be adequately
illuminated for proper evaluation of indications revealed on the test surface. When
fluorescent penetrant is used, the inspection should be accomplished in a darkened
area using an ultra-violet lamp with a minimum brilliance of 90. candles, measured in
third center of the beam at a distance of 15 inch from the lamp, using an unfiltered
Light Meter - model Weston 703 or equivalent. A suitable period should be allowed
for the lamp to obtain full brilliance before beginning the inspection. Equipment
should be maintained and calibrated in a manner to ensure reliable and uniform
operation and fluorescent lamps should be checked at least once a week.
Non-Relevant / False Indications
18. All indications revealed by liquid penetrant inspection do not necessarily

represent defects since non-relevant indications are sometimes encountered.
However, all indications in weld craters or the line of fusion between base, material
and weld metal should be considered relevant and should be evaluated in
accordance with applicable acceptance standards. If other indications are believed to
be non-relevant, at least 10% of each type of indication should be explored by
removing the surface roughness, or other condition believed to have caused the type
of indication, to determine if defects are present. The absence of indications upon
re-inspection by liquid penetrant inspection after removal of the surface roughness
should be considered to prove that the indications were non-relevant with respect to
actual defects. If re-inspection reveals any indications, these indications and all of
the original indications should be considered relevant and should be evaluated in
accordance with applicable acceptance standards.
19. Unless the surface has been thoroughly cleaned, fluorescent penetrant should
not be used for re-testing an area previously subjected to dye penetrant since
residual dye may react with the fluorescent penetrant resulting in complete or partial
quenching of the fluorescent.
157
Annexure V
GUIDELINES FOR MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING
Scope
1. These guidelines specify the minimum requirements for methods of detection

of surface and near-surface discontinuities in ferromagnetic materials using magnetic
particle examination techniques. BS 6072/ equivalent ASTM/ IS standards shall be
the guiding document unless specifically stated otherwise.
2. These guidelines apply to all items for which specifications, standards,

drawings or refit/ repair instructions require magnetic particle examination. These are
also applicable to the Quality Assessment of Examining Authorities who perform
magnetic particle examination. These guidelines do not cover the following:-
(a) The extent to which magnetic particle examination is required as this is

to be stated in the SOTR/PO.
(b) Acceptance criteria for defects to be stated in the SOTR/PO.
(c) Examination of nuclear plant and machinery.
Acceptance Standards
3. The standards for acceptance of defect indications detected by magnetic

particle examination are to comply with Def Stan 02-773 or Def Stan 02-745 Part 2
as appropriate unless otherwise specified in the Contract Document.
Examination Procedure Requirements
4. General. Magnetic particle examination is to be performed in accordance

with a written examination procedure. The IAY/IAG is to certify that the procedure is
in accordance with the applicable standards and provide a written approval.
5. Personnel Requirements. The IAG is to ensure that all personnel associated

with the magnetic crack detection have been trained and certified to the levels
appropriate to their responsibilities. This certification is to relate to a national or
international accreditation scheme. The firm is to submit a list of qualified personnel
prior undertaking the testing.
6. Procedures.
(a) Separate procedures, or a comprehensive detailed procedure, to be

produced to cover the requirements for the magnetic particle inspection of
158
structural welds, castings, forgings, and pipe welds. The relevant contract is to
define the extent of the magnetic crack detection examination and the
appropriate acceptance standards to apply.
(b) Inspections to the magnetic particle crack detection procedure(s) are to

be carried out by approved personnel qualified in accordance with paragraph
5 above.
(c) The magnetic particle crack detection procedure(s) are to be recorded

and maintained by the examining authority for audit purposes.
7. Technical Prerequisites. The magnetic particle crack detection

procedure(s) must cover the prerequisites, technical requirements and give general
guidance associated with the inspection method(s). Separate technique sheets may
be produced for specific applications and contain specific guidance information
including the following parameters as applicable:-
(a) Details of component(s) to be examined - material, shape, size etc..
(b) Magnetising equipment details, i.e. make and type of equipment to be

used.
(c) Type and direction of magnetisation.
(d) Surface preparation, finishing and cleaning before and after test.
(e) Method used, i.e. wet or dry, make and type of detecting medium.
(f) Details of contrast coating, if used.
(g) Magnetising current values.
(h) Demagnetising method.
(j) Controls of concentration of particle suspension.
(k) Controls during test to check continuing efficiency of the examination.
(l) Details and sketches of the inspection pattern to be used.
(m) Type and strength of viewing illumination.
8. Production Examination Techniques and Reporting. Details on techniques

for magnetic particle examination may be found in BS EN ISO 9934-1/ Eqv. ASTM
standard. All magnetic crack detection is to be recorded in a Magnetic Crack
Detection Report in which the information below is to be recorded:-
(a) Relevant magnetic detection procedure

159
(b) Names of Qualified Operator(s).
(c) Contractual details.
(d) Details of the component, weld, etc..
(e) Magnetic crack detection techniques.
(f) Examination coverage.
(g) Date and time of the examination.
(h) Results of the examination.
Equipment
9. Functioning Test. Prior to the commencement of testing, the correct

functioning of the testing equipment and magnetic ink is to be verified.
10. Magnetising Equipment.
(a) The magnetising equipment should be capable of inducing in the item

under test a magnetic flux of suitable intensity and in the required direction(s),
e.g. longitudinal, transverse or circumferential.
(b) For longitudinal or transverse magnetisation, the equipment is to

provide for the use of a solenoid or coil, to induce magnetic flux in the item to
be examined.
(c) For circumferential magnetisation the equipment is to provide for the

use of low voltage high amperage current passed either through the item, or
through a conductor which passes through the item. The latter is used to
induce the required magnetic flux in terms of cylindrical form such as pipes.
(d) Provision for measuring the applied current is to be included in the

equipment employed for current flow techniques.
(e) Magnetising apparatus and ancillary equipment is to be checked for

accuracy and efficiency, at regular intervals not exceeding three months, by
suitably qualified personnel.
11. Demagnetising Equipment. Demagnetising equipment is to be of one of

the following types, depending on the size and portability of the item, assembly or
structure under examination:-
(a) Aperture type coil; constant AC; component passed through.
(b) Aperture type coil; diminishing AC; component stationary.

160
(c) Reversing DC magnetisation; stepwise magnetic field reduction.
(d) AC yoke; fixed structures; stroking action.
(e) Diminishing AC flow; stepwise current reduction.
12. Value of Residual Magnetic Field. If demagnetisation is a requirement

specified in SOTR/PO or Magnetic Inspection Procedure, the magnitude of the
residual magnetic field, unless otherwise agreed, is not to exceed 3 gauss (1 gauss
= 10-4 T, where T = tesla, the SI unit of magnetic flux density).
Detecting Media
13. Magnetic Ink.
(a) Magnetic ink, consisting of finely divided magnetic particles suspended

in a carrier fluid, is to comply with BS EN ISO 9934-2/ Eqv. ASTM or IS
standard. The ink may be fluorescent or non-fluorescent. It is to be non-toxic
and is to exhibit good visual contrast. Fluorescent particles are to be readily
visible when exposed to a filtered UV-A source.
(b) Thorough mixing of fluid and solids in magnetic ink is to be maintained

at all times and its efficiency is to be verified prior to the commencement of
working periods. Magnetic inks are to be checked for total solids content
immediately prior to use and at least once a week if in continuous use, to
determine that the suspension complies with BS EN ISO 9934-2/ Eqv. ASTM
or IS standard.
(c) The ink is to be discarded and replaced if it becomes discoloured or

contaminated with foreign substances that interfere with the proper
distribution and concentration of the suspension.
14. Magnetic Powder. Magnetic powders used in dry testing are to comply
with BS EN ISO 9934-2 and to be of a non-toxic, finely divided ferromagnetic
material of high permeability and low retention. They are to be free from rust, grease,
paint, dirt and other material which might interfere with their proper functioning.
Particle size, shape and colour are to provide adequate sensitivity and contrast.
Application of Detecting Media
15. Wet Technique. Magnetic ink is to be applied to the item by spraying or by

immersion to ensure thorough coverage of all areas to be tested. Application is to be
immediately prior to and continued during magnetization unless residual
magnetisation techniques are used. The application is to cease before magnetisation
is terminated.
161
16. Dry Powder Technique. Dry magnetic particles are to be applied in such a
manner that a light, uniform, dust-like coating settles upon the surface under test.
Excess powder is to be removed using a current of air of sufficient force to remove
the excess particles without disturbing those particles which are indicative of
discontinuities.
Preparation for Examination
17. Surface Condition. Unless otherwise specified in the SOTR/PO, magnetic

particle examination for final acceptance is to be performed on an item in the final
surface condition and after all heat treatment has been completed.
18. Demagnetisation. Items containing residual magnetic fields are to be

demagnetised before magnetic particle examination is commenced.
Surface Preparation
19. Surfaces are to be dry and free from loose rust, scale, grease and any
contamination which might interfere with the proper interpretation of the magnetic
particle patterns. Surfaces are not to be peened, abrasive or vapour blasted without
specific approval of IAY/ IAG.
20. Where wire brushing or grinding is applied to remove imperfections that would
interfere with the examination, the material thickness is not to be reduced below the
minimum thickness permitted by the design specification and the dressed areas are
to be faired with the surrounding surface.
21. Welded surfaces from which the slag has been removed and with weld
contours that blend smoothly into the base material without undercutting, are to be
considered acceptable for examination without grinding, provided interpretation of
the test results is possible.
22. Protective coatings that would interfere with the magnetisation are to be
removed at the areas of contact and repaired when the examination is complete.
Surface coatings or plating may remain on the surface to be examined provided that
it has first been established that the examination sensitivity will not be impaired.
23. All openings are to be plugged wherever necessary to prevent accumulation

of magnetic particles or other material which cannot be subsequently removed by
washing or air blasting. On machined items, the inability to post-clean restricted
passageways effectively may limit the application of magnetic particle examination.
Holes in items that have been in service are not to be plugged if there is a possibility
of cracking in the internal surfaces. Plugs are not to be materially affected by the
magnetic fluid and are not to obstruct examination of adjacent external surfaces.
162
Contrast Aid Coatings
24. For weld examination a strippable contrast aid coating is to be applied as a

thin uniform layer to test surfaces except in the electrode/product contact areas. It is
to be established that the strippable contrast aid coating does not produce a loss of
sensitivity. Contrast coatings are to be compatible with the test media to be used.
For contrast aid paints, BS EN ISO 9934-2 / Eqv ASTM /IS standard is to apply.
Magnetisation Technique
25. Magnetic Fields. Magnetic fields may be generated by any of the following
techniques:-
(a) Magnetic Flow.
(b) Current flow.
(c) Threading bar.
(d) Coil.
(e) Induced current flow.
26. Continuous Magnetisation Method. The item is to be magnetised before

the stream of suspension is diverted, or just before removal from the suspension if
testing is by immersion, and the magnetising current maintained for a further 0.2 -
0.5 seconds.
27. Residual Magnetisation Method. The item is to be magnetised by the

application of current for at least 0.5 seconds, after which the magnetising current is
to be turned off and the suspension is to be applied, either by spraying or by
immersing the item in the suspension, care being taken to ensure that the indications
are not washed off. When a fluorescent medium is used, carefully rinsing off the item
in the carrier used for preparing the suspension may be necessary to obtain an
acceptable pattern of indications.
28. Direction of Magnetisation. To ensure detection of discontinuities whose

axes may lie in random directions at least two separate examinations are to be
carried out in each test area. The direction of the magnetic flux in the second
examination is to be at right angles to that in the first examination. A different means
of magnetising may be employed for the second examination.
29. Current Values. The peak current value is the relevant Quantity which
determines magnetic field strength. The current values quoted in the following
clauses are AC RMS values and to obtain peak values, if required these are to be
multiplied by the appropriate factor in Table 1 below.
163
Table 1 - Factor by which indicated current values are multiplied to obtain peak
values
VALUES
WAVEFORM TYPE OF AMMETER
A B
PERMANENT MOVING IRON.
MAGNET, MOVING INDUCTION,
COIL OR OTHERS ELECTRODYNAMIC
MEASURING MEAN OR OTHERS
VALUES MEASURING RMS
VALUES
1.00
Direct Current 1.00
1.41
Alternating Current Not applicable
1.41
Full-wave rectified, 1 current 1.57
2.00
Half-wave rectified, 1 current 3.14
1.05
Full-wave rectified, 3 current 1.05
1.19
Half-wave rectified, 3 current 1.21
30. Magnetic Flow Technique.
(a) Magnetisation is to be produced in the item by means of an

electromagnet or permanent magnet, the pole pieces of which are to be in
close contact with the item under test.
(b) Defects are most effectively detected when their major axes are
transverse to the direction of the flux that flows from one contact to the other.
(c) Magnetic particle flaw detection is to be carried out at levels of

magnetic flux density equal to or greater than 0.7 T.
(d) The optimum strength of the magnetic field induced by an

electromagnet may be obtained by applying a current sufficient to produce
saturation of the item, shown by furring of the magnetic particles and then
reducing the applied current by 40 - 50%.
(e) To ensure that magnetisation conditions are effective, a magnetic field

strength meter or a portable flux indicator may be used.
164
31. Permanent Magnets.
(a) Generally the use of permanent magnets is to be limited to inspections

for surface-breaking defects except as agreed by IAY/ IAG where conditions
preclude the use of other magnetising techniques or their use may cause
damage to the item.
(b) To induce the required magnetic field strength into specimens with
irregular geometry eg Tee Butt welds, it is recommended that permanent
magnets of the flexi-type be employed.
(c) Prior to the use of a permanent magnet, its suitability for purpose is to
be assessed by its ability to lift a piece of ferritic steel by magnetic attraction
alone, in accordance with the following:-
(i) For pole spacing up to 75 mm the lifting force is to be not less

than 0.24 kgf per mm pole spacing.
(ii) For pole spacing greater than 75 mm and up to a maximum of

150 mm, the minimum pull-off force (1 pole) is to be 9 kgf and minimum
lifting force (2 pole) is to be 18 kgf.
(d) The effective area covered by each application of a permanent magnet

(and DC or AC yoke magnets) is to be considered as the area of the circle
inscribed between the pole pieces or yokes. Full coverage of all defect
orientations is to be achieved by two applications at 90 to each other
centered around the inscribed circle.
32. Portable DC Magnets. The lifting requirements of DC portable magnets

are the same as those detailed for permanent magnets in paragraph 31 above. The
use of DC portable magnets is not recommended, however, owing to the low surface
flux densities induced in the item under test.
33. Portable AC Magnets. This type of magnet is preferred to either

permanent or DC electro-magnets owing to its superior sensitivity in detection of
surface breaking defects and is to be used wherever possible. The effective area
covered is defined in para 31(d) above. The lifting force requirements of portable AC
magnets whose pole spacing is not to exceed 300 mm are as follows:-
(a) Pull-off force (1 pole) not to be less than 2.25 kgf.
(b) Lifting force (2 poles) not to be less than 4.5 kgf.
34. Current Flow Techniques.
(a) These techniques require the passage of current from a low voltage
external source between two contact areas on the surface of the item and
include prod and through-component techniques.
165
(b) When using direct magnetisation by current flow, the part being tested,
the size and type of contacts used and the time of application of the current
are to be such that overheating of the item under test does not occur either
locally or generally.
(c) For the detection of longitudinal defects, the magnetic field is to be

induced with the electrode contact points on a line parallel to the longitudinal
axis of the item and at right angles to the longitudinal axis for the detection of
transverse defects.
35. Through - Component Techniques.
(a) The through-component technique is the preferred technique for

detecting longitudinal flaws.
(b) The magnetising current is to be not less than 20A per mm of diameter
for basically round items and not less than 6.5A per mm of section perimeter
for non-round items.
(c) All contact areas are to be clean. Items are to be mounted horizontally,
and large and heavy items are to be mounted in suitable fixtures to ensure
suitable head pressure and uniform magnetism. Where it is necessary to pass
current through cylindrically shaped items, contact-balls are to be used.
36. Prod Technique.
(a) When using the prod technique, full coverage is to be achieved by

adopting the scanning pattern shown in BS 6072 / Eqv ASTM or IS standard.
(b) Prod contact areas are to be sufficiently large to reduce the possibility
of overheating or arcing which may cause local damage. Contact pads may
be employed to minimise the risk of damaging the surface by arc strikes. The
materials of prods or contact pads are to have no adverse effect on the
material of the item under examination. Zinc contact pads are not to be used.
Copper is to be used only where no metallurgical damage can result.
(c) In the prod technique, magnetising current is to be calculated on the

basis of 4 to 5 amperes per mm of spacing between the prod contact areas.
(d) The magnetising current is not to be turned on until the prods have
been properly positioned in contact with the material surface and is to be
turned off before the prods are removed. Current is to be applied for at least
0.5 seconds unless otherwise stated in the Contract. The current application
time is to be limited in order to prevent overheating of the test item.
37. Threading Bar Technique.
(a) In this technique, current is passed through a conductor placed within a

bore or aperture in the item. The technique is appropriate for testing the
166
internal and external surfaces of enclosed or cylindrically shaped items of

small diameter. A central conductor may also be used for circular
magnetisation of other shapes. The size of the conductor is to be as near the
size of the opening as practicable.
(b) When multiple small items are to be simultaneously magnetised on a

central conductor, they are to be spaced to avoid contact and, if the quantity
of work involved warrants their use, suitable fixtures are to be used for proper
orientation.
(c) The threading bar technique favours the detection of flaws where the
major axes lie parallel to, or within 45 of the direction of the current flow. In a
tubular specimen longitudinal flaws on both inner and outer surfaces and
radial flaws on the end faces may be revealed.
(d) When using the threading bar technique, minimum values of current
given for through component techniques at sub para 35(b) above are to apply.
Outside diameter or periphery of the item is to be the criterion for selecting
current value. Where the threading bar is not concentric with the centre of the
item, the item is to be turned and test repeated for effective coverage.
(e) Though some departure from the ideal flux direction may be
experienced the technique can also be applied to the examination of bores or
lugs on complex components.
(f) When the shape of the bore in the item precludes the insertion of a
rigid conductor, use may be made of heavy flexible cable.
38. Coil Technique.
(a) Magnetisation is to be produced by placing the item within a current

carrying coil so that the item becomes the core of a solenoid. Magnetisation is
in the direction parallel to the axis of the coil and hence favours the detection
of defects that are transverse to the axis of the coil.
(b) Flaw detection sensitivity depends upon the shape and size of the item,
the coil dimensions and the ampere-turns produced. The coil is to be no larger
than is necessary to accommodate the item. Items are to be orientated within
the coil to ensure uniform distribution of flux. For long items, the test is to be
repeated at coil length intervals over the full length of the item.
(c) Magnetising coil is to produce a maximum level of flux below saturation

level for the material at the relevant section, but not less than a third of
saturation (see para 30(d) above). Saturation will be made evident by furring.
39. Induced Current Flow Technique.
(a) Indirect magnetisation is to be accomplished by passing magnetisation

current through an auxiliary conductor, for a minimum period of 0.2 seconds.
167
The magnetising current is induced into the item under examination by means
of a detachable laminated iron transformer coil, threaded through the item in
such a way that the item in effect becomes the secondary of the transformer.
(b) The current induction technique may be used for the detection of
circumferential flaws in ring type components. The magnetising current
induced is to be not less than 6.5 amperes per mm of the section perimeter of
the item.
Magnetic Field Strength Indicators
40. Where it is necessary to establish the path of the magnetic flux in an item, a
tangential field strength meter or a portable flux indicator may be used.
41. Portable magnetic flux indicators are to be used only to confirm the field
direction or to provide a rough guide to field and flux levels. It is essential that they
are placed in intimate contact with the item under test to show that magnetising
conditions are effective.
42. Magnetic field strength meters and portable magnetic flux indicators may be
used in conjunction with permanent magnets or with DC electromagnets but only to
establish the magnetic field direction.
Viewing
43. General. The test area is to be adequately illuminated to permit proper

evaluation of the indications revealed on the test surfaces.
44. Non-Fluorescent Media. Illumination for non-fluorescent media is to be

even i.e. without highlights or shadows, and at a level of at least 500 lux daylight or
artificial light.
NOTE: As a guide, the above illumination level can be achieved using either a
fluorescent tube of 80W at a distance of approximately 1 m or a tungsten filament
pearl lamp of 100W at a distance of approximately 0.2 m.
45. Fluorescent Media.
(a) A darkened area or booth, with ambient white light level not greater
than 10 lux and a properly filtered UV-A (black light) source, is to be provided
for examination using fluorescent inks. A suitable period not less than 15
minutes is to be allowed for the UV-A lamp(s) to achieve full intensity prior to
use and for the eyes to adjust to the low ambient lighting.
(b) The UV-A irradiance level at the surface being examined is to be not
less than 0.8 mW/cm when checked in accordance with BS EN ISO 3059.
168
(c) The intensity of UV-A lamps may decrease due to age, variations of
line voltage, tarnishing of the reflector and dirt on the filter. Lamps are to be
regularly maintained in a manner that will ensure reliable and uniform
operation.
(d) Protective goggles are to be worn if the UV-A source is not filtered. For
the assessment of UV-A lamps BS EN IS 3059 is to apply.
(e) Photochromic lenses react to ultraviolet light by darkening. Viewing

through photochromic spectacles when examining by fluorescent magnetic
particle methods is therefore prohibited.
Evaluation
46. Magnetic particle patterns are not to be disturbed after magnetisation has
ceased until they have been examined and recorded. Relevant indications are those
caused by discontinuities and may be classified as, for example, cracks and crack-
like flaws, inclusions, rounded indications and linear indications.
47. Non-relevant or false indications are spurious effects not caused by

discontinuities. Examples of such indications are:-
(a) Magnetic writing i.e. spurious indications arising from random local
magnetisation.
(b) Changes in section.
(c) Furring i.e. local build-up of magnetic particles due to excessive

magnetisation of the component under examination.
(d) Changes in permeability.
48. All indications in weld metal, or in the fusion line between base material and
weld metal, are to be considered relevant and are to be evaluated in accordance
with applicable acceptance standards.
De-magnetisation
49. Items containing residual fields which may interfere with subsequent magnetic
particle examination or prevent post-cleaning are to be demagnetised.
Demagnetisation may also be required between tests when the flux direction is
changed, and on completion of magnetic particle examination. After de-
magnetisation, components are to be removed from the vicinity of the de-
magnetising coil or machine to avoid re-magnetisation by local magnetic fields.
169
Post-Examination Cleaning
50. After test and demagnetisation, items are to be cleaned to remove all
magnetic ink, powders and contrast coatings. All temporary plugs are to be removed
from holes and cavities.
Records
51. All records of magnetic particle examination are to be sufficiently detailed, in

compliance with the agreed procedure, for the proper application of the standard of
acceptance as specified.
170
Annexure VI
GUIDELINES FOR EDDY CURRENT TEST
Scope
1. These guidelines give the minimum requirements for methods of detection of

surface and near-surface discontinuities in electronically conductive materials, which
may be ferromagnetic or non-ferromagnetic, using eddy current examination
techniques.
2. The requirements for the use of manually operated portable eddy current
instruments designed specifically for the detection of surface-breaking cracks in
welds are included.
3. The requirements of these guidelines are applicable to all items for which
specifications, standards, drawings, refit or repair instructions require eddy current
examination. These guidelines are also applicable to the Quality Assessment of
Examining Authorities who perform eddy current examination.
4. These guidelines do not cover:-
(a) The extent to which eddy current examination is required. This

requirement is to be stated in relevant SOTR/PO.
(b) Acceptance criteria for defects.
(c) The examination of nuclear plant and machinery.
Normative References
5. BS EN 1330-5 Non-Destructive Testing. Terminology. Terms used in Eddy

Current Testing.
6. BS EN 1971: 1999 Copper & Copper Alloys. Eddy Current Test for Tubes.
7. BS EN 10246-2: 2000 Non-Destructive Testing of Steel Tubes. Automatic

Eddy Current Testing of Seamless & Welded (Except Submerged Arc Welded)
Austenitic and Austentitic-Ferritic Steel Tubes for Verification of Hydraulic Leak-
Tightness.
171
Definitions
8. Calibration Test Piece. A conveniently sized sample of material of similar

electromagnetic properties to the item to be tested and in which reference standards
are located.
9. Reference Standard. An artificially produced imperfection of predetermined

dimensions, usually a notch or a hole, used for the sole purpose of establishing the
test sensitivity of the eddy current equipment.
10. Trigger/Alarm Level. The level at which the electronic equipment is

required to differentiate between acceptable and suspect items.
11. Terms. BS EN 1330-5 is to apply to the terms used in this Part. The
standards for acceptance of defect indications detected by eddy current examination
are to be as specified in the SOTR/PO.
General
12. Eddy current effects are susceptible to physical and chemical changes in
materials. Eddy current methods used for flaw detection are therefore most effective
for the examination of materials which have a homogenous structure, low
permeability and precisely controlled sectional dimensions. Slight variations in these
parameters, which in themselves are within the permitted tolerances, may influence
the results of this method of examination.
13. Unless specified otherwise herein, mandatory requirements of BS EN 1971

and BS EN 10246-2 are to apply to eddy current testing of ferrous and non-ferrous
pipes and tubes. These standards may be also used for guidance, wherever
applicable, in the eddy current testing of other forms of material.
14. It is not the intented to exclude proven eddy current inspection procedures
which can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the IAY/IAG to meet the quality
requirements. Prior approval is to be obtained before such procedures are used.
Examination Procedure Requirements
15. Personnel Requirements. The Examining Authority is to ensure that all

personnel associated with eddy current examination have been adequately trained to
the levels appropriate to their responsibilities, personnel should have a certificate
from a nationally or internationally accredited scheme. Personnel performing and
interpreting eddy current examination are to be able to perform an operational type
test using the test method of the technique that will be used in production. In addition
the IAY/IAG is to be able to interpret the results and be familiar with the standards to
which it is working.
172
Procedures and Inspections
16. Eddy current examination is to be performed in accordance with a written

examination procedure. The firm is to certify that the procedure is in accordance with
these guidelines and is to submit each procedure to the IAY/AIG for written approval.
Separate procedures are to be written to cover the requirements of the eddy current
inspection of welding or wrought products.
17. The relevant SOTR/PO is to define the extent of eddy current examination
and the appropriate acceptance standard.
18. Inspection to eddy current procedures is to be carried out by approved

personnel certified in accordance with para 15 above. Procedures are to reference
all relevant documents, specifications and acceptance standards. The procedures
are to be recorded and maintained by examining authorities for audit purposes.
19. Eddy current procedures are to cover all prerequisites and technical
requirements associated with the application and are to contain specific guidance
information including the following, as applicable:-
(a) Material type and descriptive details of the item to be tested including
size and shape. In case of weldments, the type of weld, location and surface
condition.
(b) Equipment description:-
(i) Make/Model.
(ii) Details of monitoring and recording method.
(iii) Type of test coils or probes, size and current frequency.
(c) Details of the technique to be used:-
(i) Coil or probe arrangement.
(ii) System used, e.g. absolute, differential or combined mode.
(iii) Saturation (if used).
(iv) Speed of test.
(v) Probe scanning method or grid to be used.
(d) Description of the calibration procedure and sensitivity checks

including:-
(i) Full details of the calibration test pieces.

173
(ii) Method and frequency of production sensitivity checks.
(e) Method of recording the results of tests.
Production Eddy Current Testing, Techniques and Reporting
20. Eddy current inspections are to be recorded in an eddy current report. The
report is to include the following information:-
(a) Relevant eddy current inspection procedure.
(b) Name(s) of operator(s).
(c) Description of component or weld, material and location.
(d) Contract number and details.
(e) Eddy current inspection technique.
(f) Inspection coverage.
(g) Date and time of the examination.
(h) Results of the examination.
Equipment
21. Depending upon the application, eddy current examination is to be performed

using approved automated or manually operated equipment and methods. Manually
operated equipment that has been designed specifically for the detection of surface-
breaking cracks in ferromagnetic and non-ferromagnetic welds is to be used only for
the intended purpose.
22. Preferably the required coverage is to be achieved by automatic methods with

positive control of:-
(a) Coil/ material configuration.
(b) Speed of scanning.
(c) Scanning helix, where applicable.
23. Test Coils.
(a) The equipment is to be capable of energising test coils with alternating

currents of suitable frequencies and of sensing the changes in the electrical
characteristics of the test coils.
174
(b) The test coils are to be capable of inducing current in the item under
test and of sensing changes in the electrical characteristics of the item. Coils
may be encircling types or probe types depending upon the application.
24. Driving Mechanism. In automated or semi-automated systems, means are

to be provided for passing the item through the test coil system or for traversing the
test coil system across the item, at a uniform speed with minimum vibration of the
coil system and of the item under test and for maintaining the item substantially
concentric with the test coil system. The equipment is to be capable of imparting
relative movement which is rotational and or translational, thereby permitting a
helical test pitch to be obtained.
Calibration Standards
25. Test pieces are to be prepared from suitable lengths of material which
simulate the item to be tested with regard to sectional dimensions, material type,
metallurgical condition and surface finish. Reference standards are to be
incorporated in the test pieces, in the form of holes, notches or slits. When using
manually operated equipment, a flaw-free calibration test piece of the same material
type as that under examination is to be additionally provided for reference.
26. For tubing, the reference standards are to be either of the following:-
(a) Internal and/or external notches aligned either longitudinally or

transversely as appropriate and whose dimensions are:-
(i) Length: 25 mm nominal.
(ii) Depth: t / 20 or 0.1 mm whichever is greater. t is the nominal

wall thickness of the tube being examined.
(iii) Width: 1.6 mm maximum

.
Note: The notches in the material surfaces are to be separated in such a
way that they can be clearly and individually resolved under production
conditions.
(b) Three holes of the same nominal diameter drilled through the tube wall
perpendicular to the surface and displaced circumferentially 120 degrees from
each other. Axial separation from each other and the ends of the calibration
test piece is to be such that the holes can be resolved clearly and individually
under production conditions; the hole diameter is to be in accordance with
Table 1.
Tube Nominal OD mm Hole Nominal Diameter mm
Over 6.3 up to and including 19 mm 0.65 max

175
Over 19 up to and including 25 mm 0.80 max
27. Calibration test pieces for welded tubing are to contain reference standards in
the weld method and additionally in the parent metal when both materials are to be
examined.
28. For bar material, notches or slits are to be cut in the material surface and
spaced as for tubes.
29. The reference standard disposition, dimensions, orientation and numbers for
components other than tubes or bars are to be as agreed between the Design
Authority and the Examining Authority. The reference standards are to be spaced
such that they can be clearly and individually resolved under production conditions.
30. The introduction of the reference standards into the calibration test piece
whether by drilling, spark erosion or other methods, is to be carried out under
controlled conditions in order to minimize disturbance in adjacent material.
31. The preferred methods of introducing the reference targets are respectively:-
(a) Holes drilling.
(b) Notches - spark erosion or by thin cutting wheel.
32. The accuracy of the calibration test piece, and reference standard dimensions
and positions, is to be verified to the satisfaction of IAY/ IAG.
33. Calibration test pieces are to be frequently examined for signs of damage
which may impair performance and are to be renewed accordingly.
Equipment Calibration
34. The equipment is to be calibrated immediately prior to any test or series of

tests to ensure that sensitivity is adequate and that the equipment is functioning in a
consistent and stable manner. The calibration is to be in accordance with
manufacturers recommendations.
176
35. A test piece containing reference standard(s) is used to calibrate the

equipment, to establish the test sensitivity and to execute routine calibration checks
and re-calibration.
36. The calibration test piece is to be passed through the test unit or the test unit
is to traverse the test piece at the same relative speed and in the same direction and
manner as that to be used in the production examination.
37. The selected current frequency for production examination is to produce clear
and distinctive indications in the test unit by all the reference standards in the
calibration test piece.
38. Where specified, a battery check is to be carried out prior to the calibration of
portable manually operated test units used for the examination of weldments. If a low
battery condition is indicated, the batteries are to be replaced or recharged.
39. Acceptance Level. To set the equipment to the agreed acceptance level,
the appropriate calibration test piece is to be subjected to the procedure at para 36
above. The trigger alarm or monitor level is then to be adjusted until the acceptance
standard will just indicate rejection.
Extent of Examination
40. Items to be examined are to be completely examined wherever practicable so

that all significant defects are detected irrespective of their orientation. When
complete coverage cannot be obtained, actual extent of that achieved is to be stated
on the record of test. Examination of weldments is to be as specified in SOTR/PO.
Surface Condition
41. Unless otherwise specified in the Contract, acceptance inspection is to be

performed on an item in the final surface condition and final heat-treated condition.
42. All surfaces to be examined are to be free from metallic particles, loose scales
and other foreign matter. Methods used for surface preparation are not to be
detrimental to the material or the surface finish.
43. Surface preparation of weldments to be examined by instruments designed

for the purpose, is to be limited to the removal of loose scale, paint and corrosion
products from the areas to be traversed by the search probe.
Performance Specification
44. Surface coatings of a conductive nature, eg. electroplating, metal spraying or

aluminising, may give misleading results and make balancing of certain instruments
impossible and consequently prevent detection of defects in the base metal. In such
177
cases, it is first to be verified by examination of a similarly coated test sample, with

due consideration of the equipment manufacturer's recommendations, that
meaningful results can be obtained.
Production Examination Techniques
45. Testing Speed. The relative speed between the item and the test coil is
not to vary from that used during the calibration procedure by more than 10%. The
speed of test as applied to the examination of weldments using equipment with
meter indication and hand held probes is not to exceed 1 metre per minute. Where
LED indication and gate circuits are provided, probe speed may be increased to 3
metres per minute.
46. Manual Testing. The probe is to be held at a constant attitude to the contact
surface and moved in a path parallel to the weld and adjacent to it. Rocking of the
probe and placing of the probe near to the edge of the work piece are to be avoided
as both may cause spurious indications which may be misinterpreted as defects.
47. Sensitivity Level.
(a) Specified sensitivity level is to be assured and maintained under all

prevailing examination conditions for full duration of examination of the
complete area. A sensitivity check system is to be applied before production
examination begins, at intervals of approximately 2 hours as examination
proceeds and again on conclusion, using appropriate calibration test piece.
(b) Manually operated equipment is to be checked frequently throughout

the examination of the welds to ensure the correct sensitivity is being
maintained and to take account of any local variations in response to eddy
currents in the material. An indicated sensitivity reduction of more than 2dB
will necessitate both re-calibration and the re-examination of all the material
examined since the most recent satisfactory check.
48. Defect Indications. All defect indications are to be evaluated in

accordance with the specified acceptance standard.
49. Additional Tests. Areas containing defect indications observed during the
examination of ferromagnetic weldments are to be additionally tested by magnetic
particle examination in accordance with guidelines given at Annexure 5 in order to
verify the relevance of these indications and extent of confirmed defect.
Records
50. All records of eddy current examinations are to be sufficiently detailed and in
compliance with the agreed procedure in order to permit proper application of the
specified standard of acceptance. Details of retest and additional tests, as specified
above, are to be included with the records.
178
Appendix K
GUIDELINES FOR TYPE TESTS
1. Ambient Air Temperature.
(a) Main & Auxiliary Machinery Spaces.
(i) Temperature: +35 to + 40 deg C.
(ii) Relative Humidity: 95 + 3%.
(b) The temperature of the compartment would be +15 to + 45 deg C

during refit and laid up conditions. A maximum of + 50 C for a short duration
is envisaged.
2. Ambient Pressure. Between 900 to 1330 mbar.
3. Ship Motion. Satisfactory and reliable operation of equipment is to be

ensured at rated power under following conditions:-
(a) Constant heel : + 15 deg ; Constant trim: +15 deg.
(b) Temporary heel : + 30 deg (3 minutes).
(c) Roll : Upto + 45 def (Period of 6 - 9 seconds).
(d) Pitch: Upto +15 deg (Period not less than 5 seconds).
Note: Conditions at sub para (a) and (b) above will generally not occur concurrently.
Shock Test by Shock Test Machine
4. The applicability of this method will be specified in the SOTR. However, it is

generally applied for equipment weighing less than or equal to 500 kgs. The strength
of the equipment under shock is to be verified by shock testing in an impact test
machine. The equipment will be considered passed shock requirement if tested
successfully in the machine.
5. The mounting of equipment is onto the shock test stand will require special
fixtures, which are to be arranged by the firm. IAG is to ensure that firms are given
adequate information/ notice in this regard.
6. The shock is given in the form of an impact onto the table of the test machine.
179
The equipment is never directly subjected to any impact. The shock value given
depends on the weight of the equipment. The impact can be given in any wave form.
Design for Shock by Analysis
7. The applicability of this method will be specified in the SOTR. However the
method is generally applied to equipment of complicated contours or weighting more
than 500 kg.
8. Shock analysis of the equipment is to carried out to ensure the proper

functioning of the equipment under the shock loading specified in the statement of
requirement. The shock analysis may be performed either by equivalent static load
method or transient dynamic analysis method. The requirement of the above two
methods varies from equipment to equipment and therefore the methods are to be
applied as applicable.
9. The shock analysis is to be undertaken in the most appropriate software for

the purpose. Commonly approved software are ANSYS, LS-DYNA, PRO E & I-
DEAS.
10. In case of small equipments, manual calculation may be permitted. However,

the designer/ manufacturer shall obtain prior approval from IAY to undertake manual
calculation. In such case, the designer/ manufacturer shall justify that the manual
calculation will cover all aspects of the analysis to ensure proper functioning of the
equipment under shock loading.
11. Apart from the above analysis, the designer / manufacturer shall carry out the
normal mode dynamic analysis of the equipment to estimate the natural frequency of
the equipment. The normal mode analysis is to be carried out by Block-Lanczos
method.
12. The shock mount need not be modelled in the analysis as the shock
amplitude specified in the SOTR is above the shock mount. Therefore, the fixed
points of the equipment (the shock mount locations) is to be modelled as
translational restraint which means that all three translational degrees of freedom will
be fixed and all three rotational degrees of freedom will be free.
13. For equivalent static load approach, maximum shock amplitude is to be

applied as inertia load and the response of the equipment is to be obtained. The
stresses and deflections under the shock loading should not exceed the allowable
limit.
14. For the transient dynamic analysis, the shock pulse indicated in the statement
of requirement is to be carried out if there is no nonlinearity involved in the model.
However, if the model has got inherent non-linearity, non-linear transient analysis
has to be carried out.
180
15. Generation of solid/ surface model of the equipment and consequent

development of finite element model will vary from equipment to equipment
depending on the shape, size, dimension and functioning of the equipment.
Therefore, it is not possible to generalize the method of preparing the finite element
model. The designer/ manufacturer shall discuss with IAY/ IAG before undertaking
the analysis regarding above aspects. The shock analysis report is to be submitted
in hard and soft copy. The manufacturer should submit the shock analysis in CD to
IAY/ IAG including model file.
Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) Analysis
16. In general, CFD analysis should be carried out to establish that the various
fluid flow parameters like pressure drop, flow velocities, mass flow rate, heat transfer
rate, temperature distribution etc., are adequate and optimum to meet the designed
performance of the equipment. This requirement is in addition to the conventional
thermal hydraulics design practices followed for basic design.
17. The objective of CFD analysis will be different for different types of equipment.
For example, in pump design, the objective is to ensure that optimum design of the
blade profile and volute casing etc., is achieved to generate the required head and
discharge. Similarly, in case of a heat exchanger, the objective is to ensure that
desired heat exchange is achieved for the designed flow rate. For other equipment,
the objective could be to optimize process design of the equipment. In all cases
objective of CFD analysis is to establish optimum design to achieve performance
parameters. Wherever heat transfer of different kinds like conduction and convection
are involved along-with fluid flow, the firm should carry out conjugate analysis.
18. CFD analysis is required to be carried out using a competent software. It is

not possible to indicate the detailed methodologies for CFD analysis as it will vary
from equipment to equipment depending on the design requirement, fluid flow and
heat transfer etc. Therefore, the vendor should discuss the detailed methodology
with IAY/ IAG before finalization of their offer.
19. In all cases, the firm should follow the basic norms of CFD analysis and
selection of elements and boundary conditions. However, it is desirable that the firm
should discuss this with IAY/IAG before undertaking the analysis so that any
difference of technical opinion can be resolved in advance. The firm should submit
the full report of CFD analysis along with heat transfer calculations to IAY/ AIG in
hard and soft copies including model file.
Finite Element Stress Analysis
20. Stress analysis by finite element method can be carried out in IDEAS or
ANSYS software. In certain cases NASTRAN software can also be used with prior
approval of IAY/IAG. The firm should discuss with IAY/ IAG in advance, regarding
the type of model and meshing required to be developed and the various boundary
conditions to be used.
181
21. The basic procedure of modelling, meshing and FEM analysis are required to
be followed. The stress analysis should be undertaken for normal operating
condition. The boundary condition should simulate all the operating condition
parameters like various forces, temperatures, restraints etc..
22. It is not possible to specify the detailed procedure of analysis as it will vary
from equipment to equipment. However, the objective of the analysis is to ensure
that the equipment will meet the design requirement under operating condition and
stresses and deflections are within the acceptable limits. The firm should submit full
report of stress analysis in hard and soft copies including the model file.
Structure & Airborne Noise (SBN / ABN)
23. Air borne noise test is to be conducted at anechoic conditions to the extent
possible. Test in reverberation chambers is to be conducted if essential as per
SOTR. The permissible level of noise is specified in the SOTR for various types of
equipment. The maximum levels of sound pressure in the test bed according to ISO
3744 in dB(A) at a distance of 1.0 meter from the equipment should not exceed the
values as specified in the SOTR.
24. Since, conduct of test at anechoic conditions may not be practically feasible,
noise levels are to be measured using Sound Intensity Meter (SIM) and not Sound
Power Meter (SPM). This is because the SPM does not cancel the background
noise. The SIM on the other hand, measures noise as a vector quantity, wherein it is
possible to separate the background noise.
25. Noise and vibration, being related aspects, the analysis for meeting the
specifications of SOTR for noise and vibration has to be done together and not in
isolation.
Vibration
26. Vibration is a phenomenon inherent to any moving machinery. All rotating/

reciprocating equipment shall be subjected to vibration test to ascertain conformance
to values mentioned in the SOTR.
27. Vibration test at factory premises to be conducted on a test bed that is

adequately rigid to avoid influence of test bed vibrations on the equipment. The
equipment is to be mounted on the S&V mounts as specified in the SOTR. It is
preferable to hire an expert agency for measurement of vibrations. The measuring
points, type of sensors for measurement and such other issues are to be resolved
between the QAO, firm and measurement agency before start of trials. QAO is to
ascertain validity of calibration before trials.
28. Vibration analysis is done in both 1/3 Octave and Narrow band. The 1/3
Octave band is an approximate indicator of the vibration levels. The values given for
1/3 Octave band can be at least taken as the limiting value around a given centre
182
frequency. Narrow band analysis is to be done to analyse abnormalities observed in

the 1/3 Octave.
29. To the extent possible, the IAG should resolve all issues related to noise and
vibrations before clearing the equipment. Necessary help from IAY, MTU,
professional agencies should be solicited to resolve all issues. Unresolved issues
should be clearly indicated in the I-Note.
Analysis of Vibration Resistance
30. Analysis of Vibration resistance is essential to ensure that the equipment will
perform its duties under either propeller/ hull induced vibrations or sympathetic
vibrations from other equipment. The frequency and the amplitude of the propeller
induced vibration are indicated in the SOTR.
31. Vibration resistance analysis should be carried out by finite element method.
Most preferable software would be LS-DYNA or ANSYS software. The objective is
basically frequency response analysis. The FEM model generated for stress analysis
or shock analysis can also be used for vibration resistance analysis. The objective of
the analysis is to establish the response of the equipment, under external vibration
spectrum.
32. It will not be possible to describe the details of analysis as it will vary from
equipment to equipment. Therefore, the firm's rep should discuss the detailed
methodology of the analysis with IAY/ IAG in advance so as to ensure proper
modelling and analysis. The firm should submit full report of vibration analysis in
hard and soft copies including the model file.

En 24

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

En 24

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

En 24

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ERA L O F QUA

GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE E

Directorate of Quality Assurance (Warship Project)

GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE

Directorate of Quality Assurance (Warship Project)

All Rights Reserved

1. The Directorate of Quality Assurance (Warship Project) [DQA(WP)] is one of

2. This document is aimed at providing Guidelines for Inspection by Field

3. With the technological advancements making inroads rapidly, it would be

New Delhi (Dinkar Sharma)

Chapter Title Page No.

Appendix A List of Equipment Covered Under Guidelines for QA 59

Annexure to Indian Standards on Welding Processes 109

QAP Quality Assurance Plan

SL.NO DATE TYPE OF AMENDMENT AUTHORITY

PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE - AN OVERVIEW

1. The Guidelines for Inspection by Field Units of DQA(WP) encompass a

3. The guidelines are not an alternative to the Quality Management System of

Terminology of Inspection Heirarchy and Equipment Classification

5. Inspecting Authority & Inspecting Agency. Before proceeding further, it

(a) Inspecting Authority (IAY). The Directorate of Quality

6. Classification of Equipment / Components. The next terminology that

(a) Class QA 1 Equipment. Equipment subjected to completely

(b) Class QA 2 Equipment. These equipment are basically of Class

(d) Class QA 4 Equipment. The QA cover in this case is generally

Main Stages of Quality Assurance Process

8. The mandatory Quality Assurance (QA) requirements for all warship

(a) Manufacturing Plan and Processes.

(b) Drawings and Quality Assurance Plan.

(c) Raw Material Inspection.

(d) In Process Inspection.

(e) Final / Assembly Inspection.

(f) Tests & Trials under specified conditions.

(g) Inspection of Painting, Packing, Preservation & Shipment.

(h) Inspection of Documentation for Operation, Maintenance & Repair.

(j) Issue of Inspection Note (Form 4 / DGS&D 84 Formats).

Manufacturing Processes Understanding and Finalising

Drawings and Quality Assurance Plan

(a) Requirements stated in SOTR.

(b) Relevant Specifications and Standards.

(c) Type of Equipment or Component.

Raw Material Inspection

(a) Specifications and Standards.

(b) Intended application.

(c) Type and Source of raw material.

(d) Approved Drawings.

(a) Specifications and Standards.

(b) Criticality of the components in the operation of equipment.

(c) Peculiarities of manufacturing problems.

(d) Approved Drawings.

Final / Assembly Inspection

(a) Applicable Specifications and Standards.

(b) Requirements stated in SOTR.

(c) Validating integrity of assembly.

(d) Requirements of recording:-

(i) Assembly parameters such as surface finish, clearances and

(ii) Assembly / disassembly procedures.

(e) Approved Drawings.