Survey On Clean Slate Cellular-Iot Standard Proposals
Survey On Clean Slate Cellular-Iot Standard Proposals
Survey On Clean Slate Cellular-Iot Standard Proposals
1597
Introducing a new UE category for MTC operations
supporting:
Reduced UE bandwidth to 1.4 MHz in both Uplink
and Downlink
Reduced maximum transmit power with an inte-
grated PA implementation at the level of the UE
Reduced support for DL transmission modes
Relaxation of the UE processing capabilities (re- Fig. 3. Semtech CSS DL/UL Frame
duced support of CSI/CQI, restricted modulation
schemes...)
(Chirp Spread Spectrum) modulation for both uplink and
Provide power consumption reduction for the UE cate- downlink. This modulation allows data communication and
gory/type dened above, both in normal coverage and positioning from deep indoor to fast moving outdoor devices,
enhanced coverage, to target ultra-long battery life at the cost of a lower spectral efciency compared to the
Opt for half duplex (FDD/TDD) as they are particularly narrow band alternative with tunable datarates.
benecial from device complexity and power consump-
tion point of view
B. Nokias Narrow-band LTE-M Proposal
Inspired from the 3GPP recommendations, Nokia derived
its LTE-M [6]proposal for C-IoT. Nokias proposal focused
on the subGHz licensed spectrum, by designing LTE-M to t
in refarming only one GSM channel, or make it deployable
on a guard band of an existing LTE networks.
In LTE-M, each channel is comprised of 12 subcarriers with
subcarrier spacing of 15 kHz, so a total of 180 KHz occupied
bandwidth using either existing or modied LTE channels.
Some of the channels such as data channels already t into
180 kHz (equivalent to 1 physical resource block, or PRB, in
LTE). Other channels will need some modications to t into Fig. 4. Localization Principle based on DToA
180 kHz.
The narrow-band communication is using less than 180 KHz
bandwidth for UL and DL. These 200 KHz or spectrum can
be either a decommissioned GSM channel or any unoccupied
licensed band owned by the operator in the subGHz spectrum.
The proposed narrow band approach achieves 20dB improve-
ment in link budget compared to GSM using only 17dBm
(50mW) RF output power from the UE (device) at 122bits/sec
Fig. 2. LTE-M DL/UL Frames
and can be in increased up to 7.8kbits/sec.
Fig 2) illustrates the UL and DL frames in the 180 KHz
D. Neul/Huawei Narrow-band Proposal
LTE-M proposal. In the DL frame, Channels are TDM to-
gether where M-subframe combines multiple 1ms subframes. Neuls proposal is also based on 180 KHz UL/DL channels
New PBCH and synchronization signals are introduced and bandwidth for C-IoT and targets deployment in GSM or LTE
scheduling resolution is in subframes instead of PRB. LTE-M guard bands [8]
is designed to support QPSK and 16-QAM. In the DL channel, each 180 kHz resource block is divided
LTE-M operates in half-duplex mode with a maximum into 12 channels, spaced by 15 kHz. This modulation allows
datarate of 200 kbps in both UL and DL with no multiband both TDMA and FDMA access schemes and is conceptually
support of fallback modes. si;ilar to OFDM. Each Channel is individually modulated
(BPSK, QPSK, 16QAM) and pulse-shaped to minimize spec-
C. Semtechs Combined Narrow-band and CSS Proposal tral side-lobes. The PHY data-rate is between 375 bps and 36
Semtechs PHY layer for C-IoT combines the LoRa mod- kbps.
ulation, already used in the unlicensed subGHz ISM bands, a For the UP channels, each 180 kHz resource block is split
chirp spread spectrum modulation (CSS), and an ultra narrow- into 36 UL channels distant by 5 kHz allowing also FDMA
band [7]. and TDMA multiple access schemes. Each UL channel is
Semtechs CSS PHY proposal allows both communication individually modulated in (D)QPSK, (D)BPSK or GMSK and
and ranging (localization). Ranging is achieved using a CSS pulseshaped to minimize inter-user interference.
1598
We clearly see that if LTE inspired proposals (Rel 13
and LTE-M) inherit OFDMA access schemes in TDD/FDD
half/full duplex modes, the other proprietary PHY proposals
tend to be full duplex.
The table shows also see that all clean slate proposals meet
the requirements in terms of occupied BW so they can all t
in a GSM channel and/or an LTE guard band.
The achievable data-rates with these proposals vary from
few Bps to few Kbps in adaptive systems and 200Kbps for
LTE-M but with a xed data-rate.
V. C ONCLUSIONS AND F UTURE D IRECTIONS
Fig. 5. Neul-Huawei DL/UL Channelization
In this paper, we compared the different clean slate pro-
posals for C-IoT. Many improvement and features are brought
E. SigFox UNB Proposal by these proposals compared to the already proposed LPWA
SigFox further enhanced its UNB solution for ISM bands technologies such as localization based on differential time
in C-IoT by introducing the cooperative ultra narrow band (C- of arrival. The different proposals seem to be respecting the
UNB) technology as a PHY layer for its proposal [9]. constraints on BW and low power consumption and thus can
The UL channel modulation is D-BPSK and devices trans- replace the already existing LPWA technologies.
mit at 24 dBm. The UL channel ts on 200 KHz GSM, Some improvements are yet to be expected as these tech-
where the 200 KHz are divided in 160 Hz micro-channels. nologies serve only few bits to kbits per second, which
The achievable datarate with such modulation is 160 bps. can be a real disadvantage especially for several network
As far as the DL is concerned the data-rate is xed to 600bps monitoring operations or rmware update over the air. A
with a 2GFSK modulation with BT=1.0 and a F=+/-800 Hz good compromise is to have proposals capable to achieve
bits to hundreds of kbits per seconds data-rates allowing bi-
directional, energy efcient and low power operations as well
as capable to serving high volume of connected devices.
R EFERENCES
[1] L. Atzori, A. Iera, and G. Morabito, The Internet of Things: A survey,
Computer Networks, vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 27872805, 2010..
[2] C. Perera, A. Zaslavsky, P. Christen, and D. Georgakopoulos, Con-
textaware computing for the internet of things: A survey, IEEE Com-
munications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 414454, 2014..
[3] 3GPP GERAN Documentation [online]
http://www.3gpp.org/DynaReport/TDocExMtgGP-6531298.htm
[4] Ericsson White paper : LTE release 13 Uen 284 23-8267, April 2015
[5] 3GPP, Standardization of Machine-type Communications V0.2.4
(2014-06)
[6] Ratasuk, R., Mangalvedhe, N., Ghosh, A., Vejlgaard, B. (2014,
Fig. 6. SigFox DL/UL Proposal September). Narrowband LTE-M System for M2M Communication.
In Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), 2014 IEEE 80th (pp.
1-5). IEEE. Chicago
[7] 3GPP TSG GERAN 65, GP-150075, Combined narrow-band and
IV. C OMPARISON OF C-I OT P ROPOSALS Spread Spectrum physical layer coverage and capacity simulations,
Table I is summarizing main characteristics of the different Semtech, Mar. 2015.
[8] 3GPP TSG GERAN 65, GP-150075, New Study Item on Cellular
clean slate C-IoT proposals. System Support for Ultra Low Complexity and Low Throughput Internet
The different proposals are compared in terms of used BW, of Things, Neul, April. 2014.
uplink and downlink data-rates and full/half duplex operating [9] 3GPP TSG GERAN 65, GP-150057, C-UNB technology for Cellular
IoT - Physical Layer, SigFox Wireless, Mar. 2015.
mode.
1599