Master Plan V2.2 PDF
Master Plan V2.2 PDF
Master Plan V2.2 PDF
-Draft V2.2-
0
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Table of Content
TABLE OF CONTENT....................................................................................................................................... 1
LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................. 3
LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................... 5
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 6
2. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 16
3. VISION AND OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT
STRATEGY ....................................................................................................................................................... 17
4. TRANSPORT ISSUES IN COLOMBO METROPOLITAN AREA ..................................................... 30
5. TRANSPORT SUB-COMMITTEE OF MEGAPOLIS PROJECT ....................................................... 39
6. PROPOSED SUB SECTORS FOR INTERVENTION .......................................................................... 41
I. Public Transport Improvement ................................................................................................................. 41
II. Road Infrastructure Development............................................................................................................ 41
III. Transport Demand Management (TDM) ......................................................................................... 41
IV. Environmental Sustainable Transport .............................................................................................. 42
1
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
2
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
List of Figures
Figure 1: Western Province of Sri Lanka ........................................................................................................... 16
Figure 2: Proposed Mega City Structure Plan .................................................................................................. 20
Figure 3: Planning Areas and Key Project Plan ............................................................................................... 22
Figure 4: Population Forecast for 2020 by TAZ .............................................................................................. 24
Figure 5: Population Forecast for 2025 by TAZ .............................................................................................. 25
Figure 6: Population Forecast for 2035 by TAZ .............................................................................................. 26
Figure 7: Employment Forecast for 2035 by TAZ .......................................................................................... 27
Figure 8: Population Density in 2035 by TAZ .................................................................................................. 28
Figure 9: Employment Density in 2035 by TAZ .............................................................................................. 29
Figure 10: Difference of 2035 population between the Megapolis Plan and ComTrans Plan by
TAZ .................................................................................................................................................................................... 31
Figure 11: Transport Corridors in Western Region ...................................................................................... 33
Figure 12: Bus Origin Destination Patterns in Galle Road .......................................................................... 34
Figure 13: Desire Lines for 2035 Trips between TAZ .................................................................................. 35
Figure 14: Modern Technologies and its Capacities ..................................................................................... 38
Figure 15: Proposed Railway Lines for Railway Electrification and Modernization....................... 51
Figure 16: Proposed RTS network in CBD area .............................................................................................. 58
Figure 17: Proposed RTS network in CBD & suburbs .................................................................................. 59
Figure 18: Proposed Inland Water Transport System ................................................................................. 63
Figure 19: Proposed Public Transport Interventions in Western Region ........................................... 71
Figure 20: Proposed Public Transport Interventions in Core Area ........................................................ 72
Figure 21: Proposed Road Improvements in Western Region ................................................................. 79
Figure 22: Proposed Road Improvements in Core Area.............................................................................. 80
Figure 23: Proposed Interventions in Western Region ............................................................................... 81
Figure 24: Land Availability within Western Region.................................................................................... 86
Figure 25: Land Availability within CMC Region ............................................................................................ 87
Figure 26: Public Transport Passenger Demand by Mode for Year 2020......................................... 117
Figure 27: Public Transport Passenger Demand by Mode for Year 2025......................................... 118
Figure 28: Public Transport Passenger Demand by Mode for Year 2035......................................... 119
Figure 29: Total Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case A) for Year 2020 ............................... 177
Figure 30: Total Passenger Volumes within CMC for Project Case (Case A) for Year 2020 ...... 178
Figure 31: Total Railway Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case A) for Year 2020.............. 179
Figure 32: Total RTS Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case A) for Year 2020 ...................... 180
Figure 33: Total Inland Water Transport Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case A) for Year
2020 ............................................................................................................................................................................... 181
3
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 34: Total Private Vehicle Volumes for Project Case (Case A) for Year 2020 ..................... 182
Figure 35: Total Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case B) for Year 2025 ............................... 183
Figure 36: Total Passenger Volumes within CMC for Project Case (Case B) for Year 2025 ...... 184
Figure 37: Total Railway Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case B) for Year 2025.............. 185
Figure 38: Total RTS Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case B) for Year 2025 ...................... 186
Figure 39: Total Inland Water Transport Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case B) for Year
2025 ............................................................................................................................................................................... 187
Figure 40: Total Private Vehicle Volumes for Project Case (Case B) for Year 2025 ..................... 188
Figure 41: Total Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case D) for Year 2035 ............................... 189
Figure 42: Total Passenger Volumes within CMC for Project Case (Case BD) for Year 2035 ... 190
Figure 43: Total Railway Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case D) for Year 2035 ............. 191
Figure 44: Total RTS Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case D) for Year 2035...................... 192
Figure 45: Total Inland Water Transport Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case D) for Year
2035 ............................................................................................................................................................................... 193
Figure 46: Total Private Vehicle Volumes for Project Case (Case D) for Year 2035 ..................... 194
4
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
List of Tables
Table 1: Planning areas and Population Growth ............................................................................................ 21
Table 2: Daily Passenger Flows at the CMC Boundary Both Directions ............................................ 36
Table 3: Financial Cost of Projects by Sector by Project Commencement Period ........................ 109
Table 4: Project Scenarios for Transport Demand Analysis ................................................................... 112
Table 5: Aggregate Outputs of Demand Model for Project scenarios ................................................. 114
Table 6: Demand Model Outputs for All Scnearios ..................................................................................... 176
5
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
1. Executive Summary
Western Region Megapolis Plan has been developed encompassing all aspects of
transportation to provide a framework for urban transport development in Western Region up
to 2035. The development plan priorities have been prepared based on the urgency of the
developments to resolve the critical urban transport problems, and based on a logical
sequence of implementation in order to maximize the outcomes in achieving the urban
mobility objectives. Megapolis will be implemented as an integrated transport development
project, incorporating all modes of transport as well as ensuring sustainability and ease of
integration to existing operating conditions and infrastructure.
To assist the authorities, implement it in the most effective manner, the development plan is
set out with 4 categories
6
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
7
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Negambo
Gampaha
Ragama
Moratuwa
Meerigama
Awissawella
Railway Electrification of following Immediate CGR, MOT
existing railway lines
Electrification
1. Panadura - Veyangoda -
& Polgahawela (RL-M1)
110km
Modernization
2. Ragama - Negombo with
airport Access (RL-M2)-
26km
3. Kelani Valley (KV) line (RL-
M3) -60km
Medium
Electrification of following new
railway lines Term
4. Kottawa to Horana (RL-NR1)
22km
5. Kelaniya to Kosgama via Long Term
Biyagama, and Dompe (RL-
NR2)- 30km
Upgrading of railway infrastructure. Immediate CGR , MOT
1. Stations
2. Ticketing system
3. Signal system
4. Telecommunication System
5. Track Improvements
Identify the park and Ride demands. Immediate CGR, UDA, Local
Identify the facilities such as drop off Authorities
areas for three wheelers and taxies
Develop feeder bus services for Immediate CGR, WPTA
identified major stations.
Introducing CBD RTS system connecting Short WPMPP, UDA
Term -
new Rapid identified main nodes. This is a
complete elevated system. Medium
Transit System term
1. Green Line (RTS1) -15km Fort
(RTS) Kollupitiya-Bambalapitiya- Borella-
Union Place- Maradana)
2. Yellow Line (RTS2)-11.5km Fort-
Maradana- Mattakkuliya/Peliyagoda
3. Red Line (RTS3) 10km
Dematagoda-Borella-Kirulapone-
Havelock City- Bambalapitiya
Outer core area RTS system Short WPMPP, UDA
Term-
8
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
9
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
10
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
11
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Duration to
Project Action commence Responsibility
the project
Intersection Minor improvements to signalized Immediate RDA, CMC
Control intersections (capacity
improvements) and signal timing
updates
Upgrading signal lights system along Immediate RDA, CMC
with traffic flow detection. Develop
Specifications for all signal lights.
12
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Duration to
Project Action commence Responsibility
the project
Traffic Identify the Camera instalment Immediate RDA, Police, CMC,
Enforcement locations. UDA
through CCTV
monitoring Implement Traffic Enforcement Immediate RDA, Police, CMC,
UDA
Road pricing of Identify toll gates, Corridors needed Long Term UDA, RDA
entry roads to to be controlled,
CBD Develop the Pricing Structure Long Term RDA, UDA, Local
Authorities
13
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
14
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Megapolis will become acentre for comprehensive monitoring of all the sectors that will
manage the Transport and Land use development together in a totally integrated
manner.
15
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
2. INTRODUCTION
Colombo and other cities especially in the Western Region has witnessed a rapid change in the
urban transport in the past decade. The continual degradation of traffic congestion of urban
roads and the deterioration of quality of public transport service has escalated to such an
extent that it has major negative impact on the economic performance of the region, the
environmental quality and liveability.
16
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Western Province(WP) also identified as Western Region (WR) in Sri Lanka is the main
economic hub of the country as its share of the countrys GDP is nearly 42% (3643.2 Billion
Rupees out of 8674.2 Billion Rupees in 2013)2 and nearly 60% attributed to the service sector
and more than 30% to the industry sector. It also has recorded the highest per capita income
of Rs. 372,814 (approx. USD 2,922) in 2012. It has three administrative districts; Colombo,
Gampaha and Kalutara and 33 divisional secretariat divisions. Colombo district accounts for
the highest urban population in Sri Lanka with 54.6% while Gampaha and Kalutara account for
14.6% and 10.6% respectively.
The population of Western Region was 5.8 million in 2012 spread over a 3,684 sq.km of land
area. It is estimated that the total population ofthe Region will increase to 7.8 million by 2025
with the development anticipated under the Megapolis Structure Plan and it is projected to
further increase to 9.1 million in year 2035, with the planned economic growth targets. This
development would further increase the transport demand. As the nations busiest
international seaport and airport are located within the area, and expansion of such facilities
are also in the pipeline, introduction of structural changes to the transport system is of
paramount importance to make the metropolitan area a modern, liveable, environment and
investor friendly area.
The Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) believes that the current policy direction is insufficient to
manage and regulate the mobility needs in Western Region, and therefore a vision that will
progressively take the urban transport development into a new direction is required. The
existing public transport system, which serves as an important mode of travel currently has
serious issues with respect to service quality, capacity and the operating mechanism and is
unable to meet the mobility needs of the population. Strict application of transport demand
management (TDM) measures such as parking restrictions, road pricing and vehicle taxation
policies, to reduce traffic levels are deemed inappropriate without viable alternative ways to
17
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
travel. Any attempt at a strict application of TDM initiatives may cause unwelcome social
issues and adversely burden the economic activities in the area.
The Government has therefore decided to adopt urban mobility solutions as the most
appropriate way forward. This approach will focus on facilitating the mobility needs for
people, not vehicles, by encouraging and maximizing the use of sustainable transport modes,
such as public transport and non-motorized transport (NMT).
A tag line Promoting/inclusive and Sustainable Urban Mobility which agreed by the NPD as a
policy, has therefore been chosen by WRMP as the key policy statement that will drive the
urban mobility development in Colombo. This initiative will promote greater accessibility and
connectivity within Western Region for all modes of transport and in the same time will
transform the capital city into a vibrant and liveable urban environment that supports
inclusive economic growth and environmental sustainability.
The modern concept, as well as the commonly adopted model of Megapolis, is based on the
premise that, if the cities in adjacent region work together can create a new urban form that
will increase economic opportunity and global competitiveness for each individual city and for
the nation as a whole.
The proposed Megapolis plan is aimed at transforming the whole Western Region as the most
vibrant and liveable cosmopolitan Smart City Region in South Asia- creating opportunities for
all its inhabitants and investors, achieving the highest environmental standard and quality of
life, ensuring socio-cultural harmony, and expanding its position as the preferred location for
business and industry, to accommodate about 9.1 million people by 2035 with the Colombo as
the core. To achieve this vision, the Megapolis plan promotes the polycentric & multi centric
spatial structure by directing the developments towards Eastern, Southern and Northern
segments of the Western region and thus spreading the development away from the Colombo
core area. The Megapolis plan proposes new major growth areas such as shown in Figure 2.
18
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
19
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
20
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
These growth areas are located in the Northern, Eastern and Southern parts of the Western
region and will be developed with necessary infrastructure and more land supply to create
new living environment for its people.
In order to support proposed growth pattern, a poly-centric and multi centric spatial structure
will be established connecting the important urban centres such as Kaduwela, Kottawa,
Moratuwa, Panadura, Horana, Matugama, Aluthgama, Avissawella, Gampaha, Ja-Ela, Mirigama,
Pugoda, Diulapitiya, Katunayake and Negombo, to facilitate better living environment for the
residents and the commuting population in the new growth areas.
Twelve (12) planning areas were defined as shown in Figure 3 where the population growth
has been forecasted for year 2020, 2025 and 2030 to achieve the expected growth for the
Megapolis. The forecasted population by each planning areas are shown in Table 1.
The Western Region is divided in to 467 Transport Analysis Zones (TAZ) for transport
planning purposes and Population forecasts for 2020,2025 and 2035 are shown in Figure 4,
Figure 5 and Figure 6. The employment forecast for 2035 is shown in Figure 7. The densities
are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9.
21
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
22
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The Plan will provide efficient connectivity system for its people to have easy access to
facilities and at the same time avoid overcrowding in the Colombo core area. Employment
opportunities in manufacturing and service sectors will be distributed to proposed growth
areas or townships to ensure that there will be jobs available near home. It is anticipated that
well-planned essential facilities such as health, education and basic recreational facilities like
public spaces; parks, public pool and sport facilities will be provided in easily accessible
distances.
In this context, transportation sector plays a key role to support the envisaged rapid
development in the Western Region. The need to take an integrated approach which covers all
modes of transportwhen making planning decisions on road development, public transport
services and rail transport system as a part of the Megapolis planning process have been well
recognized as essential aspect to ensure the efficient connectivity and mobility systems for the
movement of people and goods within the region and the rest of the country.
23
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
24
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
25
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
26
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
27
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
28
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
29
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Department of National Planning has made an initiative by drafting a policy paper on Urban
Transport Strategy in Colombo by 2020/2035 in order to promote inclusive and sustainable
urban mobilityin Colombo. The draft policy paper has recognized that the JICA study has
identified a number of public transport related issues in CMA and forms the basis of the said
report and a basis for the prioritizing the investments. However, both of the above transport
plans have used the 1998 CMRSP structure plan with updates to accommodate potential
growth centres which is contrastingly different from the proposed Megapolis Structure Plan.
The JICA CoMTrans was planned with a population forecast of 7.8 Million people in 2035 with
a CAGR of 1.4% while The Megapolis Structure Plan has a population forecast of 9.1 million by
2035 with CAGR 2.1%.
30
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 10: Difference of 2035 population between the Megapolis Plan and ComTrans Plan by TAZ
31
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Although the future growth percentages in both above studies and Megapolis are not
considerably different, the areas of growth are significantly different. The Figure 10shows the
difference of 2035 population between the Megapolis Plan and CoMTrans Plan at Transport
Analysis Zones (TAZ). The blue coloured areas have a higher population and green coloured
areas have a lower population in Megapolis Structure Plan in contrast to CoMTrans Plan. These
show a forecasted population difference up to 100% in the Megapolis Structure Plan in areas
such as Divulapitiya and Mirigama. A similar variation is forecasted for employment for the
Megapolis Plan. Higher population centres are expected to generate more trips than the
previous studies forecasted, while the higher employment centres are expected to attract the
trips generated from the population centres. These changes in population and employment in
Megapolis Plan is expected to change the trip patterns within the region.
Therefore, it was required to re consider the transportation solutions by the two previous
studies with updated population and employment, taking the scenario under Megapolis
development in to account. The both studies have used the JAICA STRADA travel demand
model to forecast for the future demand of transport needs and the analysis of the options.
The two previous studies discuss in depth the current transportation issues, current demands
and current transport supply in the region. Therefore this study does not intend to replicate
the work but acknowledge the work that has been done and incorporates the information for
development of the master plan for the Megapolis. The above studies have highlighted that 10
million daily passenger trips are generated within CMR, out of which 7.8 million are motorized
trips. Therefore 2.2 million are non-motorized trips such as walking and bicycle trips. The
motorized trips are carried by different modes comprising Car 14%, Rail 3.4 %, Bus 48.1%,
Motor Cycle 17.9%, Three Wheelers 16.3% and Taxis 0.3%, which shows that almost 52% is
still carried by public transport modes. There are 1.9 million daily passenger entering Colombo
Municipality (CMC) limits from 7 main corridors shown in Figure 11. The average trip length
for trips within CMC is 4km while 6 km for trips made outside from CMC which is a
measurement of distance people need to travel for the daily needs. The Average trip length
with CMR is 12km. The average travel speeds within CMR is 17km/h which drops to 12km/h
when within CMC limits which outlines the current problem within the CMR.
The Megapolis master plan was also developed using the same JAICA STRADA model with
necessary improvements and corrections. The modelling was carried out to check the
suitability of proposed transport interventions for planning horizon year 2020, 2025 and
32
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
2035. The technical document outlining the technical and economic analysis is prepared as a
separate document, Technical and Economic Analysis of Megapolis Transport Plan.
The seven transport corridors shown in Figure 7 are radial connections to the CBD from major
urban centres of CMA. The practice had been providing solution for each corridor; however,
people not necessarily travel just on corridors but between corridors as well. This is further
highlighted by Figure 12 showing the origin destination of bus passengers on Galle Road. It
reflects that only around 50% of the passengers originating from Panadura, Moratuwa
Katubedda, Rathmalana and Dehiwela continue beyond the CMC boundary at Wellawatte. This
means that the 50% of the passengers have moved out of the corridor by the time the bus is
reached at Wellawatte. It also reflects that only around 10% of the passengers originating at
above locations are continuing to the Fort as their final destination.
33
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The Origin Destination (OD) desire lines as shown in Figure 13shows the pattern of trips
within region forecasted for 2035. This explains where people would like to travel from their
trip origin. The desire lines further explain that people do not necessarily travel on corridors
and actually travel between corridors as well. Therefore, it is paramount important that the
technology that is selected has to evolve beyond single corridors and connects multiple
corridors and provide mobility for the total trip since people consider the total trip when they
make a choice of selecting the mode of travel and is vital to achieve the mode shift from private
vehicles to public transport.The desire lines further show that a concentration of trips towards
Colombo CBD with a cluster of lines merging to CBD still exists. However, it also shows
patterns of short trips around Mega cities shown in circles in line with the envisaged structure
plan of providing employment and necessary services around the city itself providing shorter
trip lengths within the CMR.
34
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
35
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Table 2shows the number of daily passengers entering the CMC boundary in 2013 and 2035.
The 2013 numbers are based on ComTrans Study while the 2035 projected values are based
on Megapolis Transport Plan forecasted values for do nothing scenario. It shows that current
1.9 million passengers will increase to around 4.4 million by 2035 doubling the current
passenger flows to CMC. It should be noted that the 2035 numbers are based on do nothing
scenario and does change and tends to increase in some corridors with improved mobility
provided.
It was highlighted in both JAICA study and the subsequent master plan review that public
transport improvements are required and should be the priority. The Megapolis Transport
Plan also share the same view of improvement to public transport, however it focus on
providing mobility solution of all sectors as well including the road users. The focus is to use
the scientific approach to determine the demand for transport for the full study period until
2035 and limit only to one new major transport interventions per each corridor to provide the
supply to the demand.
36
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
There are different urban transport technologies available to provide solution for the current
transport problems. As depicted in Figure 14, the identified technologies can be categorized
based on cost of the technology in million US$ per kilometre and the capacity of the technology
based on passengers per hour per direction (PPHPD) for a single lane/track. While the cost
plays a role in economics of the intervention, the capacity plays a role in the sustainability of
the intervention. An intervention with under capacity to cater for the project planning horizon
is detrimental similar to intervention with a high cost. It is vital that technologies that can cater
for the total project duration is selected.
The figure shows the 2013 bus passenger per hour per direction for selected corridors which
shows that some of the technologies are almost at capacity even at current stage and some are
beyond providing a solution for these corridors. Trams shown in light green in the figure
which has about 5,000 PPHPD is beyond providing any solution for the current problem even
at 2013. Convention buses can carry around 10,000 PPHPD while technologies such as BRT
could increase the capacity to about 13,000 PPHP. The BRT is almost at capacity on Galle Road
and Negombo corridor at 2013 if only one lane of BRT is provided per direction and is beyond
its capacities for Kandy and Malabe corridors even at current state .Elevated or underground
Metro have a significant costs associated with the technology although they can provide a high
capacity. A viable solution was to consider Electrified urban rail and Rapid Transit Systems
(LRT, Monorail) which could provide 30,000 PPHPD per line. Another solution might be to
provide two technologies to supply for the demand of each corridor which are over the
capacity for individual technology.However, the potential of providing a solution with one
technology that has enough capacity has to be considered as a priority.
Figure 14 further shows the public transport demand for 2035 based on forecasted values for
each corridor which confirms that technology such as BRT is unable to meet the demand as a
single technology unless supported by another new technology which confirms the findings on
BRT study4 that BRT on Galle Road will meet its capacity by 2025 and that it would be required
to be supported by a system such as LRT at that time. It should be noted that the BRT study
projections are based on lower population growth rates considered and further confirmed
through the Megapolis transport analysis that the capacity will be reached on Galle Road
between 2020 and 2025.
37
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Therefore, the Megapolis transport plan focus on providing a solution with incorporating the
existing buses with bus modernization to provide a bus with high level of service with
necessary institutional and infrastructure development, along with improved and modernized
railway, Rapid Transit Systems (RTS) such as Light Rapid Transit (LRT) and Monorail along
with new transport modes such as inland water transport.
38
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The Western Region Megapolis Project appointed following Transport Sub-Committee consists
of Transport professionals, relevant stakeholders representing various agencies to propose a
transport strategy for Megapolisarea considering recent changes. The committee comprises of
a core team that developed the transport plan with contributions from the resource team with
planned weekly meetings. The WRMPP wishes to acknowledge the contribution of all teams to
preparing the Transport plan for the Megapolis.
Core Team
1. Dr. Dimantha De Silva (WRMPP Consultant, Team Leader, Transport
Planner/Modeller)
2. Prof. J.M.S.J. Bandara, (WRMPP Consultant, Transport Planner, Traffic Engineer)
3. Dr. Namali Sirisoma (WRMPP Consultant, Public Transport Specialist)
4. Mr. Kaushan Devasurendra (WRMPP Transport Engineer)
5. Ms. Wanuji Abewickrema (WRMPP Transport Engineer)
6. Mrs. I.K. Wijeratne (WRMPP Transport System Analyst)
Resource Team
1. Prof. P.K.S. Mahanama (WRMPP Advisor)
2. Eng. Lal Premanath (WRMPP Consultant)
3. Mr.AvanthiJayathilake (WRMPP Consultant)
4. Prof. Amal Kumarage (University of Moratuwa)
5. Eng. NamalieSiyambalapitiya (Road Development Authority)
6. Mr. W.W. Harrison, (Ministry of Transport)
7. Eng. Nihal Wickramarathna, (Colombo Municipal Council)
8. Mr. Amarasiri Senarathna, (DIG Police, Traffic)
9. Mr. T.P. Gamalath (CCTV Division, Police Traffic Department)
10. Mr. G. Wanniarachchi, (Western Province Transport Authority)
11. Mr. H.W. Wipulasena, (National Transport Commission)
12. Mr. Janak Ranaweera (UDA)
13. Mrs. Hemanthi Mapitigama (UDA)
14. Mr. Sanjaya Ranaweera (UDA)
15. Mr. J.M. Thilakarathna Banda (MOT)
16. Eng. R.A. Sudath (RDA)
17. Mr. S.A.L. Subasinghe (Colombo Municipal Council)
39
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The Committee, after a number of deliberations and consultation with the relevant
stakeholders and with due consideration of the previous studies has identified four sub-
sectors under transport sector, with the view to address identified issues.
40
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
It is planned to intervene at the following subsector level with the view to address the
transport issues that are identified under JICA study and the Megapolis Development within
the region. Proposals are identified under the following transport sub sectors.
41
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
42
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
7. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
In formulation of the proposals under the above sub sector, the Committee with due
consideration to the cost factor, has agreed that the lands required for implementation of the
proposals to be made available by the Megapolis Plan. In order to bridge the cost revenue gap
in investment in the transport sector projects, part of the revenue that will be derived from
commercial utilization of land for other than transport projects, should be utilized for
implementation of transport projects or to compensate the revenue gap in operation, as
provision of transport facilities would eventually improve the land utilization. Identification of
lands available for development in Western Region is carried out separately by the project.
Following Interventions are proposed under the 4 sub sectors identified. Also it is identified
when the intervention has to commence along with estimated cost and the project duration.
Some of the existing bus routes do not cover important areas and some areas do not have
adequate bus services. Bus route network has not been revised for about forty years. This will
improve the accessibility to newly developed areas as well as support the Megapolis structure
plan. Provision of bus services along identified important routes, that does not prevail, will
minimize the number of transfers a passenger would undergo. Further, this revision will
enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed transit systems and railway
electrification by increasing the accessibility. Adjustment, extension or creation of bus routes
will ensure the safe destination of a passenger and will reduce competition between bus
operators by reducing overlapping routes. Restructuring of public bus service will promote a
higher level of service for bus commuters while preserving and enhancing the mobility of the
non-driving population. Further, it will minimize number of private vehicles engaging in Para
transit modes especially three wheelers on roads. Moreover, reduction of the travel time and
transfer time of passengers are added benefits while enhancing the connectivity between
major generators and attractors.The restructuring and revision of the Bus service is intended
for the whole western region.
43
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Thedevelopment of institutional reforms for public bus service is a crucial necessity that needs
immediate action. The feasibility is sorted for creating cluster companies for private bus
operators to ensure benchmark revue for all operators is. This will ensure that the all
operators are provided revenue, based on vehicle km travelled rather than revenue earned
from each trip which will eliminate the necessity for competition for peak hour period and
competition on the providing the service. The operators have to be incorporated in to the
cluster companies ensuring that the minimum number of buses required providing the service
aredeployed in the road. It will also ensure that the vehicle is run continuously with change of
operating crew.
The revision of bus routes has to be considered for the whole western region and should come
in to immediate action.This will enhance the connectivity of the system and minimize number
of transfers.It will ensure that the operator can gain adequate revenue at the end of the day
providing a satisfactory service to the commuter. It can commence with identification of new
bus route requirement for Western province to provide a better accessibility.Introducing
Shuttle or feeder bus services connecting railway stations. New routes should be identified
using expressways to connect cities within the province with higher mobility.
Action Plan
44
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Route revisions along with connectivity to main transport nodes such as railway
stations and RTS station to provide smooth transfer between modes.
Revision of time tables with completion of intuitional reforms so that both private and
SLTB bus services run on single time table.
The project is planned to be commenced within 6 months and the duration of the project is
estimated to be one year. The estimated cost is 0.2 million USD. The project will include
restructure of bus route network, revision of time tables and development and implementation
of institutional reforms.
The intervention is intended to provide a bus with higher quality of service for the existing bus
passengers thereby retaining them and also attracting private vehicle users to public
transport. Public transport will be made more attractive through providing modernized bus
service extended to the whole region. Better facilities for children and elderly passengers are
to be provided by providing low floor buses with kneeling feature for easy and safe access
together with facility for differently. Feasibility of converting the whole fleet to AC services
should be considered providing a comfortable environment for passengers. It is intended for a
regional bus system that will operate within a corporative environment that strikes a balance
between service quality and cost. Under this project, less crowded service and more frequent
service will be provided to the commuters with improved mobility and reliability thus
enhancing the safety and security of passengers. It will not only provide better quality
ridership for passengers but improve the driver performance to a higher level.
The specification for buses with Low floor, AC and IT enabled systems with GPS technology
and passenger information systems with cash less technologies have to be identified for
different size categories as to cover the total network coverage. The new specification has to be
formulated as a priori immediately so that new buses can be introduced as part of the 8 year
bus replacement policy that is in function currently. DMT act to be reviewed on passenger
transport vehicles to enable the change in bus specification.IT based Smart Bus Service to be
adopted, with provisions for passengers to access information on bus arrival time, tracking bus
availability on a given route. The necessary subsidies to be identified to keep the bus fare the
same or acceptable level while bridging the gap between the cost of new and older
45
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
specification if the buses. The replacement time from currently at 8 years can be considered to
be increased with the better quality buses that are been proposed. The replacement of buses
for the new specification can be commenced with SLTB within 6 months with private bus fleet
to be replaced within 8 years or earlier.
The provision of adequate terminal facilities and modernized bus shelters parallel to bus
service upgrade has been considered as a separate project therefore not part of the current
project
Feasibility and implementing of providing bus priority at intersections and separate bus lanes
to be identified to improve the ride time of the bus passengers.
Action Plan
Develop new specification for a smart bus service with low floor kneeling, AC, IT
enabled smart bus services for the whole region under different categories with
necessary subsidies to provide the service at the current fare structure.
Implement new specification for private buses with new routes identified under
previous project 7.1.1
Implement the new specification for SLTB buses after 6 months.
The project is planned to be commenced within 6 months and the duration is estimated to be 2
8 years. The project cost is estimated to be 431 million USD. The cost estimation is based on
replacing the SLTB buses and subsidies necessary to bridge the gap of new private buses.
46
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Rail based transport modes are proven around the world to provide the solution for urban
transport problems along with proper access by bus services. Under the Western Region
Megapolis development plan, entire railway system within Western Province will be upgraded,
electrified and modernized to provide a quality and comfortable ride to passengers. The
project will encourage the passengers shift to rail from other modes of transport, thereby
reducing the demand on the congested road space. Passengers and the region in whole will get
many benefits including travel time savings, reduction on road accidents and reduction on
environmental emissions.
Secured Park and a ride facility in selected stations have to be provided as part of station
upgrades to attract more passengers. More focus should be made for motor cycle and bicycle
users along with adequate car parking facilities. Further drop off and pick up areas along with
47
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
taxi parking areas have to be provided for better access to the stations. Relocation of station in
some instances might be required to facilitate better connectivity between modes. One such
instance is relocation of Wellawatte Station toward the Wellwatte Canal so that better transfer
facility can be provided for the Wellawatte Battaramulla Canal service. Other locations will
have to be identified as part of the feasibility study. The 2-3 minute frequencies will require
grade separation by fly overs at major roads to avoid delays for road users and such locations
will have to be identified in the feasibility study.
The following railway lines have been identified for modernization and electrification. The first
three lines are existing lines while the last two lines are new lines to be added to the railway
network. The lines are illustrated in
48
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Kelani Valley (KV) line (RL-M3 -60km) connects major town centres such as Kottawa,
Homagama, Nugegoda Dompe and Avissawella on High Level corridor and also it spans
through Baseline road making it one of the potential connection to the city. The current single
line with slow speeds due to tight curves has already reached its capacity at peak time. The KV
line is proposed to be double tracked and alignment to be as a short term project which
requires the feasibility study to be started immediately.
Electrification of Ragama Negombo line with an airport Access (RL-M2-26km) connecting the
Bandaranayke International airport is to be carried out as a medium term intervention
providing the connectivity to the Negambo corridor.
Action Plan
49
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Feasibility studies of the electrification of Kelani Valley line (RL-M3), RagamaNegambo Line
(RL-M2) and KelaniyaKosgama freight line (RL-NR2) are planned to be commenced after 6
months and before 3 years. Feasibility studies are estimated to be completed within a year
after the commencement and the cost is estimated to be 2.5 million USD. Implementation of
the railway electrification of Kelani Valley line (60km) is planned to be commenced within 3
years and the total duration is estimated to be 3 years where the cost is estimated to be 840
million USD.The KV line is recommended to be completed in two phases with first phase up to
Kottawa to be completed on or before 2020 and the second phase from Kottawa to Avissawella
to be completed on or before 2025. Implementation of the railway electrification of Ragama
Negambo line with airport connection is planned to be commenced after 3 years but before 5
years and the cost is estimated to be 364 million USD. Project duration is estimated as 2 years.
The rail line is phased out to be operational on or before 2025.
The detailed design and implementation of KottawaHorana new rail line (22km) is planned to
be commenced after 6 months and before 3 years to be completed on or before 2020. The
estimated project duration for the whole project is 3 years and the cost is estimated to be 309
million USD.Detailed design and implementation of KelaniyaKosgama line is planned to be
commenced after 5 years where the project duration is estimated to be 3 years to be
completed by 2025. This line can be either be electrified or used as normal line with rolling
stock retired from other lines, which will be decided through the feasibility study. The cost is
estimated to be 420 million USD (if electrified, the cost will be lower if electrification is not
needed).
Responsible Agencies:MOT/CGR/WPTA
50
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 15: Proposed Railway Lines for Railway Electrification and Modernization
51
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The existing road and public transport service has virtually come to a standstill in the peak
time especially within the Colombo CBD area, the existing passenger demand is almost
exceeding the supply of transportation infrastructure. The average travel speeds is around
17km/h in the western region and even lesser at 12km/h in the CMC area. While road
expansions have been the usual practice that has been adopted it has been proven that more
expansion of roads will only attract more and more private vehicles. Further, CBD does not
have the luxury of available land for expansion of the road the improvement of public
transport has been long felt for decades which has been addressed by the Megapolis Transport
Plan which gives the highest priority to public transport improvements. In line with the
transport plan one of the public transport improvements proposed is a new Rapid Transit
System to be introduced in the CBD and extended to the out of the CBD of Western Region. It
will introduce the new transit mode and will provide easy access to the major attractions in
the system. It will ensure a higher quality service for everyone in terms of cost, time and safety.
Introducing a new mode will help the rider to choose most appropriate mode of transport
based on his trip purpose and hence will increase the modal shift towards the public
transportation reducing the traffic congestion significantly. All the major points in the CBD will
be connected by the new system. The RTS has to be elevated within CBD since road space is
not available for dedicated service while there are possibilities of going on ground where it is
extended to the suburbs.
52
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
JAICA study has identified monorail as the suitable system while the MoT study has been based
on more road based system with BRT technology. The transport committee in its consultation
has identified that introduction of a modern urban rail based public transport system gives the
best option for offering the private vehicle users an alternative to consider change the mode of
travel whilst experiencing reasonably high service quality and reliability. This eradicates the
complexities with respect to operating time tables, red tape with the administrative processes,
pressure from unions, political influences, and the general inefficiency, that are part and parcel
of the current public transport options available that is preventing it from becoming a viable
alternative for private vehicle users. Therefore LRT was selected as the most suitable
technology with due consideration given to the previous studies that were conducted.
The transport committee identified that BRT was not sustainable to meet the demands for
design period of next 20 years. BRT requiring at least 3 lanes in each direction with the vehicle
composition in the western regions does not have the capability of evolving as a network
without considerable acquisition and road expansions. With only marginal increase in capacity
from 10,000 PPHPD of a higher level bus service to 13,000 PPHPD for BRT, the increase in
supply is marginal to the investment that has to be made. There were two main BRT lines that
were proposed by the MoT review which were for Galle Road between Fort and Moratuwa and
Fort and Kadawatha. Practical situation is that both cannot be implemented in short term. The
feasibility study on Galle Road has identified that Galle Road BRT would require a 6km
elevated road between Wellawatte and Maliban junction, which raises the question whether
such elevated structure on the existing roadway feasible (not addressed in the study) and also
questions the possibility construction of an elevated road in short term. The Kadawatha
expansion is more a practical problem where the extra lane that is required for BRT would
need additional acquisition from the section that was acquired in 2015. The people who have
demolished their properties and rebuilding will be required to be given acquisition notice that
is practically not possible. The remaining BRT lines have similar acquisition issues while they
are running on expressways which technically do not need a BRT system but rather an express
bus service. Further, It has been identified by the feasibility study itself that Galle Road BRT
will reach capacity by 2025 even when running in parallel with the electrified rail network
thus creating an under supply just after 5-6 of operation of the system. However it should be
noted that the BRT study was conducted based on 1998 CMRSP plan which has lower growth
scenario than the Megapolis plan and the Megapolis demand analysis has identified that the
BRT will reach its capacity even sooner between 2020 and 2025. A detail description on why
the BRT was not selected is given in Annex 2: The Reasons for not including BRT in the
Megapolis Plan.
53
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Main cause for the selection of LRT (Light Rail Transit) over monorail was its popularity
corresponding to its versatility.Light rail can run on all possible types of alignment (elevated,
at-grade, underground), depending on the particular situation in a given area of a given city,
while monorail is limited to elevated only. Since the proposed Rapid Transit system spreads
through suburbs such as Battaramulla, Kottawa, Malabe, Kaduwela and Kadawatha, as
discussed later, approximately 17% can be accommodated at-ground level while blended
facilities such as deports, yards andstations can be located at ground level irrespective to line
been at-grade or elevated, significantly reducing the overall cost.LRT also have the advantage
of lower operations costs and does not pose incurred higher costs on switching as in monorail.
Monorail has been popular in cases of stand along lines connecting two places; however it has
rarely evolved as a network especially with crossing that is limited with monorail. Proposal by
JAICA for monorail can be justified with the two lines that had been considered from Malabe to
Fort and towards Mattakuliya since both of these lines will have to be elevated, however when
considering a network evolving to the suburbs that can have ground operation the LRT is a
better choice. Further the fact that LRT has more providers across the world enables to acquire
a system at a competitive rate with the best technology. The modern LRT system technology
permits slender contemporary structural supports ensuring the aesthetic beauty of the urban
context which could be enhanced with the involvement of an urban design expert.
The RTS route and selection of stations were done according to a comprehensive methodology
using major trip attraction, generation points and minimum spanning tree method. A detail
description of the RTS route formulation methodology is given inAppendix 04.
The RTS lines that were identified are listed below and shown in Figure 16 and Figure 17.
54
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
RTS1, RTS2 and RTS 3 are within CBD and are completely elevated systems. RTS1 supply for
the demand with the inner CBD and is a circular route that connects the Fort MMH and inner
city future high density residential complexes and economic centres. It connects to the railway
lines at Fort, Kolupitiya and Bambalapitiya. RTS2 connects Mattakuliya/Kotahena area with
the city starting beyond Kelani river at Hekitta at one end and at Peliyagoda at the other end.
There are possibilities of having park and ride facilities at both of these locations so that
number of vehicles entering across the river can be limited. RTS3 starting from Bambalapitiya
and going across thunmulla and going down high level road to Kirilopone and coming along
Baseline road to Dematagoda connects residential and institutional land use such as Havelock
city, schools, hospitals and transferability from Rail at Bambalapitiya, Narahenpita and
Dematagoda.
RTS4 from Borella to Malabe could have at ground stations but most likely to be elevated
systems as well. This line connects to the RTS1 at Borella and goes along the centre island of
the Parliament Road/Cotta Road towards Battaramulla. RTS5 starting from Malabe However,
RTS5, RTS6 and RTS7 have potential of a total 12.5 kms of at ground operation where RTS5
with 5kms, RTS6 with 2.5 kms and RTS7 having closer to 5kms of at ground operation.
Efficient transfer facilities between urban rail to RTS is critical that continuous mobility is
ensured for the public transport users first to provide an efficient service to current users plus
attract more passengers from other modes. Urban rail RTS transfers from Coastal line are
provided at Bambalapitiya and Kollupitiya, from main line at Kelaniya, Dematagoda and Fort,
from KV line at Kottawa, Narahenpita, Cotta road and Dematagoda as shown in Figure 17. The
Kaduwela transfer facility is for transfer from Inland water transport mode as discussed in
next section. Secured park and ride facilities for cars, motor cycles and also for non-motorized
transport such a bicycles have to be identified and provided where land is available so that
people are able to access the RTS stations. Further, park and ride facilities at Kadawatha,
Peliyagoda and Kottawa to attract people arriving on expressways are to be provided.
As a result of Rapid Transit System with LRT technology proposed above, faster connectivity to
their final destination for people brought in from urban railway is ensure. Further, it is an
addition of new mode and increase of capacity to the total transit system that will avoid the
overloading of existing transit systems, reduce the number of private vehicles especially motor
cycles and three wheelers on roads, improve the quality of ridership with better travel time,
safety and comfort, attract more investors and tourists to the country and it will reduce land
acquisition problem for road widening.
55
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Action Plan
Feasibility Study of Rapid Transit System with LRT technology for all identified lines in
CBD and Suburbs:
o Green Line (RTS1)
o Yellow Line (RTS2)
o Red Line (RTS3)
o Puple Line (RTS4)
o Pink Line (RTS5)
o Olive Line (RTS6)
o Ash Line (RTS 7)
Detail design and implementation of Rapid Transit System with LRT technology on;
o Green Line (RTS1) -15km Fort Kollupitiya-Bambalapitiya- Borella-Union
Place- Maradana
o Purple Line (RTS4) 10km - Borella Rajagiriya Battramulla-Malabe
Detail design and implementation of Rapid Transit System with LRT technology on;
o Yellow Line (RTS2)-11.5km Fort- Maradana- Mattakkuliya/Peliyagoda
o Pink Line (RTS5) 9.6km - Malabe Kottawa
Detail design and implementation of Rapid Transit System with LRT technology on;
o Red Line (RTS3) 10km Dematagoda-Borella-Narahenpita - Kirulapone-
Havelock City- Bambalapitiya
o Olive Line (RTS6) 6km - Malabe - Kaduwela
Detail design and implementation of Rapid Transit System with LRT technology on;
o Ash Line (RTS7) 13km - Peliyagoda - Kadawatha
Feasibility study of the whole RTS network is planned to be commenced within 6 months. The
duration for the feasibility is estimated as 1 year and the cost is estimated as 1 million USD.
56
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The feasibility of Green Line (RTS1) and Purple Line (RTS4) are to be expedited, so that detail
design and construction could be started immediately.
The detail design and implementation of the RTS lines proposed above are in phases as
described below. The detailed design and implementation of RTS1 and RTS4 are planned to be
commenced after 6 months and within 3 years (as soon as the feasibility study completed) to
be operational in year 2020. The duration of the project is estimated to be 3 years and the cost
of RTS 1 and d RTS 4 are estimated to be 750 and 500 million USD respectively.
Detailed design and implementation of RTS2 and RTS5 are planned to be commenced after 3
years and within 5 years. The duration of the projects is estimated to be 3 years and the cost of
RTS 2 and d RTS 5 are estimated to be 575 and 380 million USD respectively. Detailed design
and implementation of RTS3, RTS6 and RTS7 are planned to be commenced after 5 years. The
duration of the projects is estimated to be 3 years, 2 years and 3 years respectively and the
cost is estimated for RTS3 as 500 million USD, RTS6 as 260 million USD and RTS7 as 550
million USD. The total cost of the RTS network of 75kms is 3.5 billion USD.
57
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
58
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Kelaniya
Fort
MMH
Dematagoda
Kaduwela
Cotta Rd
Kollupitiya
Narahenpita
RTS5
Bambalapitiya
Kottawa MMC
59
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Use of inland waterways has the potential to reduce the travel time drastically on certain travel
corridors. Presently, there is no proper connecting mode in the East-West direction in the
Colombo region unless the prevailing bus services cater that necessity. By using the existing
canal systems, strong east-west transport connectivity can be generated for the commuters
convenience. Comfortable air conditioned boats will ensure a smooth comfortable ride for
passengers At the off peak periods, especially at night time this system can be used to promote
ecotourism around the Colombo city making this city an active and an attractive area during
night time as well.This will add a facet to the citys transport infrastructure. Boat jetties will be
placed at main linking points where the canals cross the main roads and in other places where
necessary improving the accessibility and the inter connectivity between other modes.
Following three inland water transport lines were identified as shown in Figure 18;
The Wellawatta-Battaramulla (IW1) has the most potential to provide an urban transport
solution. It intersects 6 main road including Marine Drive, Galle Road, Highlevel Road, Baseline
Road, Nawala Road and Parliament Road out of which 3 of them are main 7 corridors. This is
one of interventions identified under the Megapolis plan that can come in to action immediately
as a detail feasibility of the project was conducted in 2005 which needs update to current traffic
condition.
The shuttle boat service proposed in the Beire Lake from Fort to Union Place (IW2) will save a
lot of time for passengers who have to use bus service to connect these points especially during
peak time. The feasibility of the line has to be conducted.
60
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Action Plan
Since a prior feasibility study and a detailed design has been carried out for IW1 (Wellawatta
Battaramulla line) in 2005 the commencement of this particular project is planned within 6
months where the duration is estimated to be 6 months and the cost is estimated to be 60
million USD.
61
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Feasibility studies in IW2 and IW3 are also planned to be commenced within 6 months where
the projected duration is 6 months. The estimated cost for the feasibility study is 0.1 million
USD.
Detailed design and implementation of IW2 and IW3 are planned to be commenced after 3
years. The durations of the projects are estimated to be 1 year and 2 years respectively and the
cost of IW2 and d IW3 are estimated to be 5 and 60 million USD respectively.
62
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Development of anintegrated transit system that provides satisfactory service coverage for
people and freight transport,as practically as possible by enhancing the connectivity will be
achieved through construction of multimodal transport hubs and centres. The main trip
63
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
generation zones within the region will be connected by both railway and roads to ensure
seamless travel especially for the public transport users. For this purpose, there needs to be
integration of the modes via multi-modal hubs for smooth transitions for the users from one
mode to the other. Ultimately, transport Hub and centres will provide a better connectivity and
transfer facilities for passengers.
These benefits will not only be confined to passenger transport but would also be derived for
goods transport.Improved logistic facilitiesfor their goods could open up access to previously
unreachable areas as well as link key economic centres to national markets. Such improved
infrastructure facilities will attract more investors to the country improving business
opportunities and also will increase the tourist demand in the country providing comfortable
and safer transport system.
The main Transport Multimodal Hub is being proposed to construct at Fort/Pettah, in Colombo.
Development of the detailed designs for Fort / Pettah transport hub (MMTH) should be done
immediately.
64
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Kottawa
Horana
Kadawatha
Kaduwela
Panadura
Negombo/18th Mile post
Gampaha
Ragama
Moratuwa
Meerigama
Avissawella
Bus re-routing and related development activities have to be identified for each location
separately to cater the passenger demand. Park & Ride facilities should be developed at
respective areas. Develop ICD facilities if required. Need to carry out a feasibility study to
identify the types of developments and land availability in selected locations.
Action Plan
Development of major and minor multi modal centres is planned to be commenced after 3
years. The feasibility study should be completed before that. The estimated project duration is 2
years and the project cost is estimated to be 100 million USD.
7.1.7. Regulate and Improvement of School Bus Services and Office Van Services
The existing school transport service is not enough to meet the demand and not up to the
required standards by upper middle class of the society. As a result, majority of school children
are travelling by private vehicles that consists a significant portion of the morning peak traffic.
65
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Changing this traffic to a few reliable and quality school transport service vehicles which
operates from home to school can relieve the traffic congestion significantly. Attraction to such
service is only possible through providing higher quality service that is comfortable, safe and
reliable. Higher level of service with air conditioning to provide comfortability, regulated so that
the service is limited to seated students and safety to be ensured with monitoring facilities
provided to the parents. The form of private school bus companies that could provide a service
with increased reliability so that in an event of a breakdown the company has to have the ability
to replace the bus by another vehicle in a short time which is lacking at current public school
bus service.
Action Plan
66
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The project is to be commenced within 6 months and the duration of the project is estimated to
be 1 year. A feasibility study and formulation of policy documents are to be carried out
immediately. The estimated project cost is 1.42 million USD.
Taxies are an integral part of any urban transport systems and it provides door to door service
to the users providing the last mile connection. With the increase in number of taxi operators
and the number of taxis on the road,without any formal regulations had led to many social and
traffic issues in the country. An improved and a relatively cheap taxi service will act as
supplementary service to public transport system users which in turn may increase the modal
share of public transport. This especially is relevant in attracting the car users to public
transport. Regularization and maintaining high standards with respect to vehicle condition etc.
is even beneficial to the taxi operators, as evident from the now successful mobile phone based
taxi booking systems such as Pickme, three-wheel drivers are motivated to join such a system
as they have seen it gives them more dividends with respect to getting more hires and
decreasing the percentage time the taxis are idling either parking at a stand or travelling around
without a passenger. Regularized Taxi services can be converted into another public transport
mode in the city limits.This will create employment opportunities to the community, reduce
unnecessary cruising of taxi drivers on roads,reduce traffic accidents, congestion and vehicle
emission.Control the number of taxis entering the system and enhance the job security of taxi
drivers as well.
67
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Introduction of a common identification system for all taxies are proposed immediately. A
regulatory body to be established and policy documents available for taxi services and all the
taxies must get registered under the regulator. Promoting and supplying adequate parking
space for taxies at major transit nodes should come in to action immediately. The charging
regulations associated with taxi services should be reviewed in parallel. Modern technologies
can be incorporated to the taxi services such as to use the internet to find taxi locations, contact
numbers and the usage of GPS tracking systems. Development of such IT based smart taxi
service will make it convenient and more attractive for the commuters.
Action Plan
The project is planned to be commenced after 6 months and before 3 years and the duration of
the project is estimated to be one year. The cost of the project is estimated to be 0.35 million
USD.
68
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Almost all bus terminals where the passengers interchange buses and the bus stands located at
many strategic locations on different routes lack facilities and information useful for users.
Available basic facilities are not maintained properly due to lack of resources and had been
dilapidated most of the terminal buildings located in prime locations in suburbs are eye sores as
the buildings have not been designed to suit its surroundings or user needs in mind. These
places are patronized by large number of passengers daily and are excellent places to develop
many SME services needed by them and have a great commercial value that can not only
provide employment but also good income to those who wish to own and operate them. Hence
it is proposed to develop these bus terminals across the Colombo and its suburbs with all
amenities and services needed by the general users. As these could be built and operated by
local entrepreneurs it is recommended to float local tenders to lease these lands/spaces for
private builders to build and maintain these services. The objectives are to redevelop and
improve the appearance, design and operational qualities of the bus terminals and bus stands to
provide better facilities to passengers and minimize the operational costs of the bus terminals
by the government while the services to bus passengers continue.
As the first step, the required suburban interchange bus terminals and stands will be identified
through a proper study. Then Private sector will be invited to undertake the reconstruction and
improvement of the bus terminals to be equipped with all modern amenities on leased out lands
on a long term lease basis by calling Design build and operate proposals for each site. The
properties will be subleased and construction will be carried out. Public services and the
facilities to be provided by the operators.The National Transport Commission and Western
Megapolis to agree on terms and conditions to be stipulated and monitor the quality of
services.200 strategically located bus stands will be improved to help passengers. The bus
stands will be developed to have a kiosk which will be sub leased by the developers to operators
(SMEs) who will maintain these bus stands while engaged in business of selling goods and
services and provide information to passengers thru modern communication equipment.
Action Plan
69
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The project is planned to be commenced within 3 years and the duration of the project is
estimated to be 2 years. Cost of the project is estimated to be 230 million USD.
The information on transportation is many folds. The public as well as the transport planners
and regulators of the urban services constantly need this information on a daily basis. Regular
surveys on the performance of transport services as well as feedback from public to make
management decision are essential for improvement of transport sector. Currently the
universities carries out some of the research activities related to this. It is recommended a
Transport Information Centre that collects, analysed and disseminate this information on
commercial basis be established. The objective of this project is to improve the transport
services with real time data and facilitate transport management decision making process. An
institutional mechanism will be set up
whereby the NTC will form a joint venture
with a private sector or form a public
company that will provide the services. Then
the company will train the staff and
introduce the GIS based information system
and provide required information thru the
telecom network to the public.
Action Plan
The project is planned to be commenced within 3 years where the duration is projected to be 2
years. The cost of the project is estimated to be 2 million USD.
70
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
71
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
72
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The road expansions have been the common method that has been adopted in the past to
address the traffic congestion. Apart from, certain roads outside of the Colombo city limit, most
of the inner city roads does not have the luxury to expand with considerable acquisition been
required. In general the roads that have been identified by the RDA for capacity improvements
have been incorporated to the WRMPP transport plan. The RDA has identified the required
links within each district to maintaining average speed of 40 km/h and development of the High
Mobility road network connecting districts with an average speed of 60 km/h which has
developed by RDA for next 10 years. In addition following existing roads that RDA has not
selected have been proposed with the new growth plan on Western region.
The existing road link Horana to Meerigama via Padukka and Kirindiwela will be rehabilitated
asa medium term measure. The above road link will facilitate the inter corridor movement of
people easily and will connect down south with Negambo and Meerigama bypassing Colombo
core area. It will facilitate the transport requirements within the new cities such as Horana,
Meerigama and Divulapitiya that are to be developed under the Megapolis plan. Two other new
road links identified are Negombo- Divlapitiya - Mirigama as a 4 lane road and Ja-ela to
Divlapitiya via Ekala and Minuwangoda as a 4 lane road to cater mainly future industrial and
business tourism traffic in the region. These interventions would be Medium term
developments. A feasibility study is in progress to identify most suitable roads to be
rehabilitated under ADB assistance.
The transport plan also identifies following three missing links within Colombo to be improved
as appropriate to the Western region Megapolis plan as medium term interventions.
73
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Action Plan
The RDA will be the main implementing agency for all projects, with the CMC supporting the
initiatives within the Colombo Municipal limits.
The RDA previously identified projects to be commenced within 6 months at a cost of 345
million USD which will take around 3 years to complete. The feasibility studiesof Horana
Meerigama, Baseline extension and Duplication road extension to commence within 6 months
which has a cost of 0.5 million USD and 1.5 million USD.
The road improvements to commence after 6 months and within 3 years are; detail design and
construction of proposed Horana Meerigama road at a cost of 58 million USD, baseline road
extension to Maliban junction at a cost of 40 million USD, Marie drive extensions at a cost of 18
million USD. Further, a policy on right of way to relocate of unauthorized people has to be
completed.
The road projects to commence 3 years and within 5 years are detail design and construction of
Ja-ela Divulapitiya road at a cost of 20 million USD and detail design and construction of
Duplication road extension at a cost of 11 million USD.
74
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
7.2.2. Improve the Capacity of Existing Expressway Network / Improve the Expressway
Network
The existing expressways are mainly utilized for long distance passenger transportation. Yet,
some of the nearby major towns can be connected through a route which runs through the
expressways reducing the time to travel in between. The existing tolls have not been revised as
per the changed demand over the past years and the capacity of the expressway is not fully
utilized due to reduction in capacity at toll gates which has manual toll collection method apart
from Colombo Katunayake Expressway.The efficient and effective use of existing expressways
under the Western Region Megapolis plan, is proposed with increase of regional express bus
services using expressways as discussed under section 7.1.1, reducing delays at toll collection
facilities and revising tolls to attract more users. Implementation of this project willsave time,
fuel and improve the connectivity of long distance nodes, improve regional bus transport
system, induce new land use developments in areas around interchanges, improve the
connectivity to transport hubs and will positively affect the economic development of the
country.
As per the action plan, analysing the new demand on the highways and reviewing the existing
toll will be undertaken as immediate measures.It is essential that due consideration is made to
identify ways to increase the use of expressways by commercial vehicles that currently use the
national highways. Introduction of new electronic toll collection system is a necessity in order to
eliminate the possible traffic congestion at the entrance and exit of expressways and it will come
into effect as a medium term measure. Introduction of a real time information management
system will also proposed as a medium term measure to improve the efficiency of expressway
operations.
Action Plan
Analysing the existing demand on the expressways and reviewing the existing toll
Introduction of new electronic toll collection system
Introduction of a real time information management system
75
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The Study on Expressway Capacity Improvements is expected to commence within the next six
months, and be completed within one year, at an estimated budget of 0.1 million USD. The RDA
will be responsible for the implementation of these projects.
The expressway network provides a high mobility to provide a connection from out of region
while providing connectivity within the region in the perimeter of the urban development. The
proposed expressways in the Megapolis Transport Plan comprise of elevatedas well as at grade
sections connecting the region outwards and provide a connection to the central business
district. It will reduce the travel time significantly between key areas. It also results in enabling
more inland connectivity and the expansion of existing expressway network.
1. Ruwanpura Expressways
2. Central Expressway.
3. Elevated expressway from New Kelani Bridge to Colombo Port (Port Access
Expressway).
4. Elevated expressway from New Kelani Bridge to Pore/OCH
The feasibility studies for Ruwanpura Expressway and Central Expressway have been
concluded with detailed designs and are been evaluated by the RDA. The preliminary feasibility
on New Kelaniya Bridge and elevated expressway from New Kelani Bridge to Colombo Port &
Fort area (CKE extension) is available and is a necessary connection not only for private vehicles
but for commercial vehicles. The connection is vital with the development of port city project.
76
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Elevated urban Expressway from New Kelani Bridge to Pore/OCH via Battaramulla is identified
as a necessary connection to connect the Southern Expressway/Outer Circular Expressway to
the inner city providing a quick connection to vehicles arriving on both of the expressways. A
feasibility study was conducted up to Rajagiriya, therefore extension of the study to include
connection to SE/OCH is required. Due consideration has to be made on the impact by higher
mobility for public transport in this corridor with the introduction of the RTS5 and RTS6
proposed under the Megapolis Transport Master Plan.
Action Plan
The cost of construction of the Central expressways is 992.21 million USD for the section within
western region (total cost 2979 million USD) which is identified to commence within 6 months
and project duration to be 4-5 years. The Ruwanpura Expressways cost is estimated at 529.55
million USD road sections within western region (total cost 1518 million USD) which is
identified to commence within 6 months and take 4-5 years to complete.
The elevated road from New Kelani Bridge to Colombo Port is estimated at 145 million USD is
identified to commence within 6 months anticipated to take 3 years to construct. The elevated
road from New Kelani Bridge to Pore via Battaramulla is estimated to cost 1100 million USD is
identified as required by 2025 that requires commencement after 5 years.
77
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
7.2.4 Policy on use of Road/Rail Right of Way / Policy of use of Road Right of Way
Every Road / Railway line has its demarcated boundaries and over time most of the designated
area are acquired by unauthorized people. It makes inconvenience as well as the congestion
within the cities. Due to poor policies in land acquisition, road projects get delayed
unnecessarily. Under this project, a policy will be developed by professionals in the field to
avoid such circumstances in the future projects. A project of this type is needed in order to allow
necessary future expansion thus by result in a low expenditure on provision of low
compensation. Hence it will result in avoiding social controversy arising due to public property
acquisitions, expediting road improvement projects without unforeseen delays in land
acquisition having a clear Right of Way which will increase road capacity and level of service
and improve pedestrian safety &comfort.
Identification and demarcation of road and rail right of way boundaries need to be done
immediately with enforcing strict legal restrictions to avoid encroachers. Then, the relocation of
unauthorized settlers can be carried out as a short term intervention.
Action Plan
This project will be carried out by the UDA and the RDA within the next 6 months to 3 years,
and will be completed within 2 years of commencement. The estimated cost of the project is
0.07 million USD.
78
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
79
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
80
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
81
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Development of policy plans to promote flexible work hours in selected institutes should initiate
in short term. Study and identify possible areas of application and necessary policy
introductions should come along while acknowledging and promoting systematic schedule
within the institutions. Next, flexi
hours can be introduced in medium
term. In order to cater the spread of
demand, Trains and buses are
needed to be rescheduled to ensure
the convenience of the employees.
Development of policy plans to
promote staggering work hours in
selected institutes should be done
Short to Medium Termly.
Action Plan
82
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Estimated Approximate cost for the above project is 0.05 Million USD that will be mainly
utilized for the preliminary studies to be under taken. This project should be commenced
immediately (within 6 months) and the expected project duration is 6 months from the date of
commencement.
The aim of parking management is to reduce vehicle trips by controlling on street parking, and
charge for currently free service, on the assumption that people will change modes or carpool.
Shifting from free parking to cost-recovery parking will result in automobile commuter trip
reduction. Further, minimize the impacts of parking on impervious surfaces and minimizing the
requirements for parking spaces will equal a significant reduction in public expenditures;
charging for the cost of parking would help reduce parking congestion. It will ultimately result
in on street parking demand reduction by eliminate illegal parking on roads. Provision of off
street parking will help to improve the capacity on roadsand provision of on-street parking for
short time periods at identified locations.
Immediate actions should be taken to develop a Pricing mechanism for Parking. Under this
process, Implementation of parking metering system to Colombo district can be done in the
preliminary stage estimated approximate cost for this immediate action is 0.28 Million USD with
a project duration of 6 months from the date of start. Parallel, Adequate on- street spacing
should be availablerestricting parking on pedestrian walkways. Further, time limited parking
enforced at identified roadside parking lots (e.g. 30 min Maximum) should bring in to action
immediately. Prior to this, pedestrian walkways should be completed up to requirements.
83
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Action Plan
Provision of overflow parking facility for long distance private buses should draw the
immediate attention. A budget of approximately 0.53 Million USD will be allocated in
providing necessary facilities and the projected time duration is 1 year from the date of
commencement.
Provision of necessary facilities to mitigate unauthorized parking on roads.
Outsource the towing of unauthorized parking can come in to action.
Revision of legal procedure relevant with particular subject will smooth the process of
implementation.
Increase awareness of traffic law among public by using social and mass media will
reduce the surveillances related to parking.
In order to mitigate the on street parking, necessary parking areas should be provided
out of the roads. Provision of off-street parking facilities in required locations should
come in to action medium termly to cater the parking demand arising within the
western region. For this, Necessity of identifying the type of parking facilities e.g. Multi
storied car parks, mechanical car parks, roof top car parks etc. is needed through a
study. Estimated cost for this process is 40.38 Million USD and will be commenced short
84
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
termly (between 6 months 3 years). Projected date of completion is 2 years from the
date of commencement.
Parking issue is also prevalent with respect to the three wheelers on roadways. To
mitigate this problem, identification of suitable locations for 3-wheel parking should be
done on immediate time scale. Cost of 0.01 Million USD has been allocated for the study
purposes in identifying suitable locations for the parking slots.
Apart for above, proper assessment should be done on intersection layout, bus stops
location and traffic management measures prior to implementation. Strict compliance of
parking restrictions should come in to action long termly after adequate facilities such
as off street parking slots are provided.
Following map depicts the land availability identified by the UDA with in the Western Region.
85
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
86
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
87
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Intersection control will improve the turning movement capacity and the efficiency. This will
help to initiate signal synchronization of the area as well, which will reduce delays at
intersections, reduce conflict points and make intersections more safe for all road users and
efficient in processing the traffic flow Other measures such as public transit priority can also be
introduced with improved intersection control measures.
traffic lights, fibre optic network can be named as pre-requisites. Apart from above mentioned
costs 50 Million USD is estimated for the process of roadway and intersection widening and
reconstruction works. Projected time period for this action will be 2 years from the date of
commencement.
Action Plan
Traffic flow management will enhance the mobility on corridors, reduction of congestion,
improvement in road safety and reduction of delay on roads. Demarcation of separate bus lane
and other separate lanes for different user groups such as bicycle can improve the traffic flow.
Travel time reductions of road users, reduced energy consumption and improved travel time
reliability can be listed as benefits gained through Traffic Flow Management. This will deliver
rapid, tangible and cost effective improvements targeting travel time variability and the most
extreme congestion incidents.Control traffic behaviour as it approaches the physical capacity of
the road system andcontrol of vehicle entry and circulation and pedestrian activity on roads.
During the process of Traffic Flow Management, converting two-way streets to one-way
operation where technically feasible should be done immediately. Roadway and intersection
widening and reconstructions should be progressed parallel to above to cater the demand and a
smooth flow of traffic. Studies should be carried out to identify the existing volume of traffic,
capacity of existing roads and land acquisition capacity. As another action Priority provision for
HOV (high occupancy vehicles) on separate lanes can be implement long termly.
Constructions of pedestrian walkways, Improvements of intersections, signal synchronization
are pre-requisites before accommodating separate provisions for HOVs. Overtaking facilities
must be provided time to time.Relocation of bus stops/pedestrian crossings to minimize
unnecessary conflicts and delays should come in to action immediately. Carryout safety audits/
89
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
conflict studies to support the implementations is a must. Reductions of Traffic Density closer to
Schools should be done medium termly. This can be accompanied by requesting to submit the
current traffic management plans and form a traffic management committee by city schools.
Estimated Approximate cost for the above project is 20 Million USD that will be mainly utilized
for the preliminary studies to be under taken. This project should be commenced immediately
(within 6 months) and the expected project duration is 1 year from the date of commencement.
Action Plan
90
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Estimated Approximate cost for the above project is 20 Million USD that will be mainly utilized
for the preliminary studies to be under taken. This project should be commenced immediately
(within 6 months) and the expected project duration is 1 year from the date of commencement.
Road pricing discourage traffic entering into CBD and particular roadways during periods of
peak congestion. Tolls are generally fixed amount charged on a single roadway while congestion
pricing involves variable charges based on levels of congestion or time of day & can be charged
over a wide area rather than only a single roadway. Further, road pricing will directly affect the
households & the freight costs of firms and further impacting on volume of travel, consumption,
production of companies and ultimately on GNP (Gross National Product). Revenue generated
through Toll collections can be directed for maintenance of the road network in the particular
area. Road pricing will result in the reduction of unnecessary movements or trips done by
travellers. Moreover, this encourage shift of private vehicle users to alternative transport modes
such as public transport, carpooling etc. Non regular travellers may tend to use off peak hours
or other transit modes in entering to the CBD.
Road pricing strategy is a long term implementation as it requires number of pre requisites to
be met before hand. Identification of toll gates, Corridors needed to be controlled should be
done Long Termly. In order to price the roads, firstly, enhancement of adequate public transport
services and carpooling facilities are to be provided to the passengers. Proceeding actions can
91
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
be listed as electronic toll booths installation are needed in order to minimize the delay and
traffic impacts at toll gates. Parallel to this, Development of a Pricing Structure should be done
long termly. Beforehand, improve the facilities on park and ride for rail and RTS is a pre
requisite to be met.
Action Plan
Estimated Approximate cost for the above project is 19 Million USD that will be mainly utilized
for the preliminary studies to be under taken. This project should be commenced long termly
(after 5 years) and the expected project duration is 2 years from the date of commencement.
CCTV cameras installed at some key intersection points around Colombo CMC area, the fining
process is done manually by the police. Due to this many of the people who disobey the traffic
rules and regulations are hard to recognize and to act upon. Due to this prevailing situation the
introduction of the establishment of law enforcement with automated number plate recognition
and sending the fine to the registered owner of the vehicle will minimize the traffic law violation
in the roads. With time, this will result in a change in the attitudes of the people when using
92
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
roads thus by reduce the accidents enhancing the road discipline and ensuring the passenger
and vehicle safety. Not only for the surveillance purposes but this CCTV monitoring can be used
in the traffic flow management on roads.
Up to date there are 33 locations where CCTV cameras are already installed within CMC area
according to the police (figure 22). The process is to expand this CCTV installation all around the
Western Region immediately (refer appendix 02 for the list of identified location list by police).
Initially, the traffic violation detection through CCTV monitoring should be done both manually
and automatically where long termly manual process will be completely replaced by the
automated system. The paying of fines will be done in the usual way to the post office where in
the future this will be upgraded so that the commuter can see his violation online and the fine
can be paid online. And of the violator will not have a chance to skip paying the fine and because
at the license renewal or at a transfer a person with a due fine will be identified.
Action Plan
Estimated Approximate cost for the above project is 25 Million USD that will be mainly utilized
for the preliminary studies and for the implementation to be under taken. This project should
be commenced immediately (within 6 months) and the expected project duration is 1 year from
the date of commencement.
93
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
94
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 22: CCTV Camera Location for Law enforcement and Traffic Management
95
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Walking is an essential mode of transport. New and improved pedestrian facilities enable
greater access and mobility within our communities. A pedestrian-friendly environment plays
an important role in encouraging walking as a mode of travel, and this has proven health and
environmental benefits. Pedestrian facilities or the lack of it is one of the major impediments
when it comes to promoting public transport uses, since the users are inconvenienced by the
lack of adequate facilities during the first/last mile of the journey. Therefore, under this
project, several projects will be initiated with providing better facilities for pedestrians.
Improvements are intended to enhance pedestrian access to transit service by aiding street
crossings and providing more amenities at bus stops, including landscapes, sidewalks, curb
extensions and ramps and improved street lightings. New and improved pedestrian facilities
promote walking and provide greater access and mobility within our communities. Providing
such facilities will result in increased pedestrian rates, improved pedestrian facilities along with
a list of accompanying factors such as safety, delay and directness. It will reduce carbon foot
print, reduce the road encroachments by vendors, increase the road capacity, enhance the safety
of pedestrians. On the other hand, this is a prerequisite for development of other transit
systems.
Action Plan
96
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
from the road way using suitable buffer, on street parking, by appropriate curb or by
landscaping between the sidewalk and the roadway will be implemented.
Pedestrians safety will be ensured at intersections through clearly marked crosswalks,
overhead bridges /underpass and fences.Pedestrian signals will also be provided to
increase the safety of pedestrians at the crosswalk.
Awareness programmes will be conducted on how to use pedestrian crossings at
signalized intersections. Provision of pedestrian facilities for disable people and
relocation of vendors from pedestrian areas to alternative locations has to be done
immediately to accommodate the above improvements.
The project will commence within the next one year, and will be carried out over a period of 2
years. The estimated cost of the project is 7.09 million USD.
Usage of bicycles as a transport mode is very sustainable option that contributes in reducing
emission; reduce fuel cost and it is a healthy way totravelwhile reducing road congestion. Under
the Megapolis project in Western Region new cycle paths will be constructed to encourage
cycling. These paths will be connected to rail and bus terminals which are equipped with park
and ride facilities.Most people can walk or cycle, although many cannot use these modes for
transportation because they live in automobile-dependent areas. Programs that promote cycling
and walking for transportation can benefit lower-income people by increasing public
acceptance and support of non-motorized travel. This will result in shifts from driving to cycling
or walking which will reduce traffic congestion, road and parking facility costs and
environmental impacts, and increase community liveability and improved public health. Such
action on the other hand will reduce carbon Foot print and save fuel cost for individuals and for
97
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
the country. Upon provision of these facilities it will promote park and ride facilities at railway
stations.
Under this project, it is proposed to provide appropriate vegetation cover or paved area at
either side of the roads and provide separate lane for bicycle/Motor Cycle use. Mostly the canal
banks will be converted Bicycle/Motor cycle lanes.
Action Plan
Provision of appropriate vegetation cover or paved areas at either side of the roads
Provision of separate lane for bicycle/Motor Cycles along the canal banks
98
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
With the increase of air pollution in urban areas the requirement of controlling vehicle emission
has become an important requirement of the country. Since Western Province is highly
congested and polluted it is important to take necessary actions to reduce the vehicle emissions.
Under this project, the Western Region and Megapolis development plan will take the necessary
initiatives to provide solutions to these problems. Upon these interventions, it will result in
reducing transport costs, such as fuel bills and vehicle tax, by choosing vehicles that are more
environmentally friendly and using them more efficiently. Such initiatives will result in reduced
sickness absence, increased staff Retention and improved local air quality. This will improve the
public health especially in school children and help to reduce global warming.
Immediate actions will be taken to introduce higher quality fuel and catalytic convertorsfor
vehicles. The vehicle emission standards will be reviewed yearly.Analysis of past emission test
data is mandatory and hence, steps will be taken to conserve these test data. As another step,
initiatives will be taken to facilitate LNG use for three wheelers and taxies as a medium term
measure. Introduction of a monitoring system will be done immediately to maintain the laid
down standards.
Action Plan
99
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
This project is scheduled to commence within the next 6 months to 3 years, spearheaded by the
Department of Motor Traffic and the Central Environmental Authority. The project is expected
to cost 0.71 million USD. It will be implemented over a period of one year.
Currently a high portion of the countrys foreign exchange isspent on to fuel purchasing (US $
289 Million in 2015, nearly 17% of total imports). There exists the risk related to fuel price
fluctuations and uncertainty surrounding a future environmental policy. Therefore, this project
will encourage people to use more public transport, trip planning and create awareness on
requirements of minimizing of fuel usage. Upon these interventions, it is possible to manage the
risk related to fuel price fluctuations and uncertainty surrounding a future environmental
policy. These interventions will result in economic benefits achieved through less fuel usage,
less environmental impact due to less output of CO2, encourage more users for public transport
systems, gain economic benefits to the country and will reduce air pollution significantly.
Under this project, immediate actions will be taken to reduce taxes for electric and hybrid
vehicles while increase taxes for other cars. Initiatives will be taken immediately to discourage
vehicles having poor emission standards. Analysis of past emission test data will be used for
this. As a medium term measure, a policy will be introduced to remove poor conditioned
vehicles from the roads and measures will be taken to encourage walkways and bicycle users.
Action Plan
Reduce taxes for electric and hybrid vehicles while increase taxes for other cars
Introduction of Policies to remove poor conditioned vehicles
Encouragement of walkways and bicycles
100
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
At present almost all busses and other vehicles in the Western Region Metropolitan area
consume diesel and petrol. This has caused high level of air pollution in the region posing
adverse impacts to the environment and to the human health. Use of CNG and electricity as a
source of fuel will reduce the pollution levels. There is an evidence of finding gas deposits in
Indian ocean within the Sri Lankan territory and can be utilized more effectively by converting
these vehicles in to CNG. This process will create healthy human life in the Western Province.
During the implementation process, first and fore mostly Identification of suitable locations to
store CNG is a prioritized need. Then next suitable locations should be identified for the gas
conversion process to be taken place. Charging centre locations should be identified parallel to
this. Moreover, purchasing necessary equipment and machinery and the technician trainings
should be conducted for a better implementation. In the process of delivering gas, a proper
network should be established and well maintained.
Action Plan
The project is expected to be implemented within the next 3 years. It will be completed within 2
years of commencement.
101
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
8. Implementation Plan
The Western Region Megapolis Planning Project will ensure a sustainable transport system
with higher mobility, connectivity and new transport mode choices for the commuters
enhancing a friendly and peaceful environment. The projects will be implemented in key
different areas namely: Transport Demand Management (TDM), Public Transport
Improvements (PTI), Road Infrastructure Development (RID) and Environment Sustainability
(ES). Improvement of transport policy is also an important requirement which needs to be
considered parallel to the implementation of identified projects.
102
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
103
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Horana-Meerigama
Ja-ela-Meerigama
1.1.11 Feasibility Study of Missing Links 1.5 1 Year
on:
104
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Panadura Polgahawela
Line (RL-M1) 110km (cost
for 85km in Western
Province)
1.1.14 Modernization of Public Transport 431 2 Years Replacement of fleet
System in Western Region to start within 6
months
1.1.30 Improvement of Facilities at 230 2 Years
Suburban Interchange Bus
Terminals and Stands
1.1.32 Establishment of Transport 2 2 Years
Information Analysis and
dissemination Centre
1.1.2 Feasibility, Detailed Design and 309 3 Years Feasibility completed
Implementation of New Rail Lines: for the trace to be
extended for
Kottawa Horana Line (RL- Electrification
NR1) 22km
105
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
106
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
other vehicles
Mattakkuliya Hanwella
Line (IW3)
1.1.8 Development of Multimodal Centres 100 2 years
Kaduwela
Kadawatha
Kottawa
Horana
Panadura
Negombo
Gampaha
Ragama
Awissawella
Moratuwa
Meerigama
107
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
108
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Negombo Divulapitiya-
Meerigama Road
The summary of the above investments identified by each sector for each commencement
period is shown below in Table 4.
The summary costs show that the total project costs for the Megapolis study is 11.5 billion USD
which is similar in total to MoT/UoM total of 11.1 billion USD. The investment of the Megapolis
is spread across all modes with 67% is spent on public transport and 29% on road
infrastructure improvements. Out of the 67% on public transport, 31% is spent on RTS, 27%on
railway, 6% on bus modernization and rest spread across improvements of water transport,
multimodal transport facilities and para transit improvements. The investment proposed
reflects a public transport intensive development and development of multimodal network
development across the CMR along corridors and in between corridors as well.
109
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The analysis of the transport master plan was achieved through a transport demand modelling
exercise. The JAICA STRADA model that was developed for the CoMTrans study was used with
its full capacity. The model is based on a traditional four step model which comprises trip
generation, trip distribution. Mode split and assignment. The same model has been used in the
previous master plan studies by both JAICA in the CoMTrans study and by MoT/UoM in the
masterplan review.
The mode choice component in this exercise is the most critical step, considering the study
been an analysis of people choosing the mode to travel with improvements to condition of
travel for private and public transport modes. While CoMTrans study has used the full model,
MoT/UoM have omitted the mode choice component. MoT/UoM have used fixed diversion
rates, 10% from cars, 30% from motor cycles and 20% from three wheelers to public transport
based when public transport is improved irrespective its speed, capacity of service quality in
the future. It reflects that people who will change in the above percentage when the new mode
is introduced will remain the same even when the speed or quality of service reduces. It is
practically inconsistent, as the delivery of service changes with increase of passengers and
change of speeds and people respond to the changes and make decisions in the future based on
such changes. The reason for using such rigid assumption was given as non-availability of
CUBE Voyager software which UoM claims was required to complete the mode choice
component. However, CUBE model was only required for editing the origin destination
matrices but not for mode choice modelling, therefore the mode choice model omission by
UoM in the analysis is questionable.
The demand forecasting using the STRADA model was completed under several project
scenarios for the analysis years 2020, 2025 and 2035. The key performance indices (KPI) were
developed and compared with a Do-Nothing Scenario (DNS) which included all ongoing
projects. The DNS was considered for each future year as the base case to identify the indirect
benefit for the economic analysis. DNS was also selected as the base case in MoT/UoM study
where it identified that it presents a good starting point to determine the best project although
DNS inflates the benefit since any intervention becomes a solution.It is vital that a master plans
study provides a solution for the entire analysis period. The key difference in the current study
is that selection of projects is based on providing transportation infrastructure supply for the
110
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
demand for travel. This is contrastingly different from MoT/UoM study where the analysis has
been based on economic analysis. The main report and the technical report does not have any
reference to detail demand for the transport network by different modes apart from aggregate
statistics such as passenger kms and passengers hour etc. Therefore demand by each mode by
sections cannot be compared between the two studies. The economic analysis was done to
evaluate the economic indications for the project scenarios selected. However, it should be
noted that the costs that are considered for the projects are based on aggregate costing such as
per km, which can have variations with the detail designs. A detailed economic and financial
analysis will be required at individual project feasibilities to ascertain the true economic
feasibility of the projects. .The completed details of technical and economic analysis are
provided in a separate document titles, Technical and Economic Analysis of Megapolis
Transport Plan. The following scenarios were analysed with different implementation
methodology of projects identified in the masterplan as outlined in Table 4.
111
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The summary of the STRADA modelling outputs for each of the scenarios outlined above is
provided in term of following parameters for measurement of KPI for the entire multimodal
transport system and performance across the CMR which consistent with the analysis of
Mot/UoM study.
112
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Passenger hrs per day the total number of passenger hours spent in transport per
day in CMR.
Average speed- the Average speed by mode within the CMR.
Capital Cost- The capital costs of proposed interventions.
The system cost is the total estimated transport cost per year in the CMR made up
for the cost components.
o Vehicle Operating Costs Speed based operating costs for road based on
National Planning Department (NPD)5, Cost of LRT and railway from
CoMTrans study
o Value of Time Costs values determined by NPD in 1999 and updated and
used in Colombo Metropolitan Region Transport Master Plan (MoT/UoM
Study).
o Accident Costs - values determined by NPD in 1999 and updated and used
in Colombo Metropolitan Region Transport Master Plan (MoT/UoM Study).
o Emission Costs - values determined by NPD and updated and used in
Colombo Metropolitan Region Transport Master Plan (MoT/UoM Study).
Cost per passenger km The total system cost divided by the passenger km
travelled by all motorised modes providing the average cost of transporting one
passenger km.
The following scenarios were considered as project scenarios for future years 2020, 2025 and
2035 and were used for further analysis and detail demand outputs.
The project Case D in year 2035 comprise all of the interventions and Case A in year 2020 and
Case B in year 2025 are intermediate level of completion of the project as outlined in the
master plan. The aggregate outputs of demand model for do nothing and project scenarios
are given in Table 5, while the complete list of outputs for all the scenarios are given in
Appendix 5.
5 National Planning Department (1999), Assessment of Capital Projects in Transport Sector, edited by Kumarage, Gunaruwan et al
113
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
114
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
9.1.1 Model Outputs for Project Case (Case A) for Year 2020
The demand model outputs for the project case A for year 2020 shows that the public
transport share in terms of trips within CMR would increase to 59% with the proposed
interventions. The share would be 61% in terms of passenger kms. The average door to door
public transport speeds will increase to 24 km/h and the private will increase to 37km/h. The
average trip length with reduce to 5.9km for all motorized vehicles, which is due to
distribution of population, employment and other services based on Megapolis structure plan
which shows an effective land use planning exercise.
The public transport passenger volumes by the 4 modes, bus, rail, RTS and water is shown in
Figure 26 while the complete set of maps is attached in Appendix 5.The maximum section
volume for rail with the electrification of Panadura Polgahawela line is estimated as 432,000
passengers per day between Ragama and Dematagoda which comes to around 23,000
passengers per hour per direction (pphpd). The section would have 3 tracks of which 2 tracks
could be used for peak direction. The maximum passenger demand for RTS with RTS 1 and
RTS4 been operational is estimated as 190,000 passengers per day at the section between
Punchi Borella and Hospital Junction which comes to around 8,500 pphpd. A total of 2.1
million passengers are expected to be carried by railway per day within CMR while RTS is to
carry 0.6 million passengers.
9.1.2 Model Outputs for Project Case (Case B) for Year 2025
The demand model outputs for the project case B for year 2025 shows that the public
transport share in terms of trips within CMR would be maintained at 59% with the proposed
interventions. The share would increase to 62% in terms of passenger kms. The average door
to door public transport speeds will increase further to 25 km/h and the private will reduce
slightly to 35 km/h. The average trip length will remain at 5.9km for all motorized vehicles.
The public transport passenger volumes by the 4 modes, bus, rail, RTS and water is shown in
Figure 27 while the complete set of maps is attached in Appendix 5. The maximum section
volume for rail with the all 248 km of railway electrification been completed is estimated as
539,000 passengers per day between Ragama and Dematagoda which comes to around 29,000
passengers per hour per direction (pphpd). The maximum passenger demand for RTS with
RTS 1 to RTS6 been operational is estimated as 333,000 passengers per day at the section
between Borella and Punchi Borella which comes to around 15,000 pphpd. A total of 2.7
115
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
million passengers are expected to be carried by railway per day within CMR while RTS is to
carry 2.1 million passengers.
9.1.3 Model Outputs for Project Case (Case D) for Year 2035
The demand model outputs for the project case B for year 2035 shows that the public
transport share in terms of trips within CMR would be maintained at 59% with the proposed
interventions. The share would also maintain at 62% in terms of passenger kms. The average
door to door public transport speeds will be maintained at 25 km/h and the private will
reduce further to 32 km/h which is still an acceptable service level. The average trip length
will remain at 5.9km for all motorized vehicles.
The public transport passenger volumes by the 4 modes, bus, rail, RTS and water is shown in
Figure 28 while the complete set of maps is attached in Appendix 5. The maximum section
volume for rail with the no additional improvements is estimated as 605,000 passengers per
day between Ragama and Dematagoda which comes to around 32,000 passengers per hour per
direction (pphpd) where a maximum capacity of 60,000 pphpd is available with 2 tracks
available for peak direction. The maximum passenger demand for RTS with additional RTS7
been operational is estimated as 499,000 passengers per day at the section between
Peliyagoda and Maradana with passengers on Kandy corridor been served with the RTS which
comes to around 27,000 pphpd. A total of 3.1 million passengers are expected to be carried by
railway per day within CMR while RTS is to carry 3.2 million passengers.
116
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 26: Public Transport Passenger Demand by Mode for Year 2020
117
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 27: Public Transport Passenger Demand by Mode for Year 2025
118
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 28: Public Transport Passenger Demand by Mode for Year 2035
119
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
An economic analysis was conducted for each phases of projects by taking Do Nothing Scenario
(DNA) as the base case for three different project scenarios comprised of different time
periods and project elements. The framework of the analysis is as follows;
Discount rate
A discount rate of 6% is considered to estimate the present value of benefits.
The report presents only three project cases, namely Project Case A in 2020, Case B in 2025
and Case D in 2035 against their respective DN scenarios. Benefits of the projects are derived
as cost savings from Vehicle Operating Costs (VOC), Value of Time (VOT) (travel time savings),
accident cost (ACC Cost), and Emission cost (EMM cost) in selected project cases against DN
scenarios for the respective time periods, 2020, 2025 and 2035.
The following equations were used to estimate the annual total system costs components both
in DN scenario and each project case.
Total VOC/km = Vehicle KM daily*317 days * VOC per km for each mode
VOT = Passenger hours (daily) * 317 days* VOT of each mode
Accident cost per vehicle km= Vehicle KM (daily) * 317*average accident costs of all modes
Emission costs = Vehicle KM (daily)*317*emission cost for each modes
The unit costs for VOC, VOT, Accident Cost and Emission cost were taken from Colombo
Metropolitan Region Transport Master Plan of Ministry of Internal Transport (2015) and are
shown in Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8.
120
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
6 Colombo Metropolitan Region Transport Master Plan, Technical Appendix, MoT, 2015
121
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The System costs were calculated for each scenario and the cost savings were identified as
shown in Table 9. In the calculation of yearly costs savings, 317 days were considered instead
of 365 days. It is primarily because transport modelling is for a typical weekday and travel
patterns during the weekend are considerably different. By considering reduced number of
days per year costs savings from each DN and Project case is also undervalued.
Capital costs of the projects comprises of three phases for each project year considered given
in Table 10.
122
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Benefit cost analysis is conducted for each project cases by taking the operating period up to
the next project case. For instance, the costs and benefits are discounted up to 2025, which the
benefit and the costs of project Case B in year 2025commence. This is primarily due to the fact
that costs savings (benefits) of project case B are accrued due to the implementation of project
case A. The same applies to project case D in 2035. The vehicle km growth rate and traffic
growth rate for the operating period is disregarded and however a growth factor of 2% for the
year 2020 to 2025 and a growth factor of 1% was applied to the period from 2025 to 2035.
The discount rate of 6% is applied in the calculation of present values of costs and benefits.
The output of the Benefit Cost Analysis is presented in the Table 11 below.
For the Project Case A, considering an operation of 5 year period, the BC ratio is 1.32, however,
indicating a positive net present value of Rs 219 Billion. Economic Internal Rate of Return
(EIRR) is 10.9%, indicating that the project benefits exactly offsets costs (NPV = 0) at a
discount rate of 10.9%.
For the Project Case B for year 2025, considering a combine operation of 15 year period up
2035, the BC ratio is 3.41, however, indicating a positive net present value of 3,410 Billion at
Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) of 17.6%.
123
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
For the all Project Case D for year 2035, considering a combine operation of 20 year period up
to 2040, the BC ratio is 4.49.6, however, indicating a positive net present value of 5,810 Billion
at Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) of 17.9%.
In summary all the project cases are economically feasible and the completion of each project
phases in sequence results in net benefits to the transport system.
124
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
10.APPENDICES
125
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
126
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
127
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
128
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Office
129
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Appendix 02: List of CCTV Camera Location for Law enforcement and Traffic
Management
Camera Type
Location Traffic Automated Total
Management Number Plate Camera
Law Recognition
enforcement (ANPR) / Law
& Surveillance Enforcement
1. HandalaHunupitiya Rd-Hekitta Rd Junction 03 03
2. HandalaHunupitiya Rd-Handala Rd Junction 03 03
3. Kadirana Bridge 03 03
4. Mattakkuliya form Rd.- Mattakkuliya church Rd junction 03 03
(Mattakkuliya)
5. Mattakkuliya form Rd.- Vystwyke Rd Junction ( 02 02
Mattakkuliya)
6. Mattakkuliyacenter Rd- St. Marys Rd junction 04 04
7. Mattakkuliya Church Rd- St. Marys Ln. junction 03 03
8. Mattakkuliya church Rd Fergusons Rd Junction ( 03 03
Mattakkuliya)
9. Modara St. Vystwyke Rd. Dr. S.D. Fernando Mv.Junction 03 03
(Mattakkuliya)
10. MattakkuliyaRassamullakanda 04 04 08
11. ModaraAluthMawatha. Sri PannanandaMv. junction 04 04
12. Modara St. Madampitiya Rd Junction 04 04
13. ModaraAluthMawatha -Madampitiya Rd Junction 04 04 08
14. ModaraMadampitiya Rd K. Cyril C. Perera Mv. Junction 04 04
15. Madampitiya Junction ( Madampitiya Rd.- 02 02
Jayanthamallimarachchi Rd)
16. Thotalaga Junction 04 04 08
17. Sedawatta Ambathale Rd. Nagalam St. Junction 03 03
18. Thotalaga Bridge 04 04
19. Nawaloka Roundabout 03 04 07
20. Negombo Colombo Rd-New Nuge Rd junction 04 03 07
21. Negombo Colombo Rd-Katunayake Expressway Junction 04 03 07
22. Negombo Colombo Rd-AvariwaththaHunupitiya Rd 05 03 08
junction
23. Negombo Colombo Rd-Hekitta Rd Junction 04 03 07
24. Negombo Colombo Rd-Church Rd Junction 03 02 05
25. Negombo Colombo Rd-Old Negombo RD Junction 04 04 08
26. Negombo Colombo Rd-Hunupitiya Railway Station Rd 04 04 08
Junction
27. Negombo Colombo Rd-Handala Rd Junction 03 02 05
28. Negombo Colombo Rd-MuthurajaMv Junction 03 02 05
29. Negombo Colombo Rd-Ragama Rd Junction ( Mahabage 04 04 08
130
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Junction)
30. Kalani Kandy Bridge 07 04 11
31. Colombo Kandy Rd Biyagama Rd Junction 04 03 07
32. Colombo Kandy Rd New Nuge Rd Junction 04 03 07
33. Colombo Kandy Rd Station Rd Junction (Pattiya Junction) 04 03 07
34. Colombo Kandy Rd Wanawasala Rd Waragoda Rd 05 04 09
Junction
35. Colombo Kandy Rd Colombo Katunayake Expressway Junction 04 04 08
( Thorana Junction)
36. Colombo Kandy Rd Bulugaha Junction 04 03 07
37. Colombo Kandy Rd Tyre Corporation Junction ( Tyre 04 03 07
Junction)
38. Colombo Kandy Rd sarasaviMv Junction 03 02 05
39. Colombo Kandy Rd KiribathgodaHunupitiya Rd Junction ( 05 04 09
Hunupitiya Junction)
40. Colombo Kandy Rd Kiribathgoda Junction 04 04 08
41. Colombo Kandy Rd- JinadasaNandasenaMv junction 05 04 09
42. ModaraMuthuwellaMv St. James Street Junction 03 03
43. H. Joe Perera Mv- St James Street Junction 05 02 07
44. Walls Ln K. Cyril C. Perera Mv. Junction (Modara) 01 01
45. Ibbagewatta Junction 02 02
46. SirimavoBandaranayakeMv. 03 02 05
jayanthamallimaarachchiMv. Junction
47. Ingurukade Junction 04 05 09
48. Bandaranayake Roundabout 04 05 09
49. H. Joe Perera Mv. College Street Junction-Kotahena 03 03
50. Kotahena College Street Mayfield Rd Kotahena Street 06 06
Junction
51. KotahenaWasala Rd St Benadicts St. Bloemendhal Ln 03 03
Junction
52. Hettiyawaththa Junction 04 04 08
53. Opposite St. Anthonys Church - kotahena 04 03 07
54. K.B. Christie Perera Mv. New chatty St. Junction ( 02 02
Kotahena)
55. Kotahena roundabout 03 03 06
56. K.B. Christie Perera Mv. Goerge R. De Silva Mv. Junction 03 03 06
57. K.Cyril C. Perera Mv.-Arthur de silva Mv. Junction (Near 03 03
Sugathadasa Stadium )
58. Jethawana Rd. Parackrama Rd. Junction 03 02 05
59. Koswatta Junction ( Stace Rd St.Joseps St.- M. Vincent 04 03 07
pereraMv Junction)
60. Orugodawatta Junction 05 05 10
61. Awissawella Rd-Meetotamulla Rd Junction 04 04 08
62. Awissawella Rd-SangabothiMv Junction 03 02 05
63. Awissawella Rd-Kolonnawa Rd Junction 04 03 07
64. Awissawella Rd-Ambagaha Junction 03 03 06
65. Awissawella Rd-Manigamulla Rd Junction ( 03 02 05
mahabuthgamuwa Junction)
131
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
132
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
133
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
134
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
of NelumPokuna)
182. NelumPokuna Roundabout 05 05 10
183. Independent Ave. Roundabout 04 04 08
184. WijeramaMv. Dudley Senanayake Mv. Junction ( Wijerama 05 04 09
Junction)
185. RajakeeyaMv Philip gunawardanaMv Junction 04 03 07
186. Rosmeand place - WijeramaMv Junction 04 04 08
187. Barnes Place - WijeramaMv Junction 04 04 08
188. DuddleSennayakeMv- Maitland Crescent Mv Junction 04 04 08
189. DuddleSennayakeMv Kynsey Rd Junction 04 04 08
190. Mailland Place Mailland Crescent Junction 04 03 07
191. R A Senanayake Mv WijerathnaMv Junction 05 04 09
192. F R Senanayake Mv - CWW Kannangara Mv Junction 04 03 07
193. BoudhalokaMv.-Jawatta Rd. Junction 04 03 07
194. In front of Arcade Independent square BoudhalokaMv. 01 01
195. Independence Ave VidyaMawatha Junction ( Torrington 04 03 07
Square)
196. CRD colour light Junction 05 04 09
197. MalalasekaraMv Sarana Rd Junction ( Near BMICH) 03 03
198. BoudhalokaMv.- WijeramaMv. Junction 05 04 09
199. D.S. junction - Borella 05 04 09
200. Kanaththa Junction 05 05 10
201. In front Of BMICH ( Bouddhaloka MV.) 01 01
202. Devi Balika Junction ( Modenform) 05 05 10
203. Ayurweda Junction 06 05 11
204. Between RajagiriyaBorella Rd. Railway Crossing and 03 02 05
RuhunukalaMv. (Cotta Rd)
205. Sri Jayawardanapura Rd.- sarana Rd Junction 03 03 06
206. RajagiriyaBorella Rd- sarana Rd Junction 05 03 08
207. Welikada Junction 08 06 14
208. Sri JayawardanaPura Rd-BorrellaRajagiriya Rd-Diyawanna 04 02 06
Rd Junction
209. Sri Jayawardanapura Rd.- Royal Gardens Junction 03 02 05
210. Sri Jayawardanapura Rd.- Kotte Rd. Junction 1 03 02 05
211. Sri Jayawardanapura Rd.- Kotte Rd. Junction 2 03 02 05
212. Parlimant Junction (Polduwa Junction ) 04 04 08
213. Kaduwela Rd Sri subuthi Rd Junction 03 02 05
214. Battaramulla Junction 04 04 08
215. Parliament Rd Parliament Dr Junction 03 03
216. In front of Parliament Ground Junction ( 05 04 09
DenzilkobbekaduwaMv.-Parlimant Rd
217. Pelawatta Junction 05 04 09
218. PalanThunaHandiya 05 04 09
219. Galle Rd Abdul GaffoorMv Junction 04 03 07
220. Galle Rd Makaram Street Junction 04 03 07
221. Marine Drive Retreat Rd. Junction ( In front of holy 03 02 05
family Convent)
135
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
136
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
137
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Introduction
Under the Western Region Megapolis Planning Project it was set the top priority to mitigate
the existing traffic congestion in the region and to provide solutions to the traffic congestion to
be expected in future due to the future developments under Megapolis Planning Project. The
main concern under the project is the CBD (Central Business District) area which was specified
by the project where key developments are coming in. Going through the literature to find out
the possible interventions suggested that an elevated mode of transit is the best due to the
unavailability of lands and the very high costs of lands in this area. The other supporting
reasons for such a system is the aesthetic appearance, comfort, ease of access, not obstructing
the existing on road traffic and hence low travel time. Having these ideas in mind the
Transport Committee of Megapolis Planning Project followed the following methodology to
come up with the best RTS route to serve the existing and future demand.
Selection of Stations
In Colombo CBD map, major trip generation points (Residential areas, apartment buildings and
etc.), major trip attraction points (office complexes, schools, recreational facilities, transport
nodes, super markets and public places like hospitals and etc.) were marked on a map and the
possible major stations were selected within the walking distance (500m) of majority of these
trip attraction and generation points. The feasibility of setting up a station such as land
availability and security reasons were also considered. This way, the points where the new
RTS should go through were selected and marked on a map.
138
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Selection of Routes
The routes where the RTS should follow connecting the identified nodes were selected on a
specific process. As proposed RTS is to go elevated, it is suggested to go along the center
median of the roads since the land acquisition can be minimized. First the possible connections
between the nodes along the existing roads that are possible to connect were identified and
their distances were noted down. Then a distance matrix was formed between the nodes. The
matrix is as follows (distances are in km);
Table Distance Matrix
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
1 2.41 2.8
2 2.41 1.48 1.61 2.42 2.25
3 2.8 1.48 1.81 3.38
4 1.61 1.16 1.63 2 1.15
5 2.42 1.16 0.72 1.75 2.6 1.82 1.44 2.52 1.03
6 2.25 1.81 1.63 0.72 2.33
7 2 1.75 3.74 1.56 0.79 0.79 1.51
8 3.38 2.6 2.3 3.74 2 1.29 2.15
9 2.05 2.18 1.79 2.43 1.58 1.88 0.76
10 1.82 1.56 2 2.05 2.22 1.4 0.68
11 1.29 2.22 1.34 2.19 2.25 2.24
12 1.34 0.81 0.77 1.6 0.53 3.5
13 2.19 0.81 1.05 4.2 3.15 1.43
14 0.77 1.05 2.14 3.86 2.25 2.11 1.2 1.03 2.39
15 2.18 1.4 2.25 1.6 2.14 1.3 2.15 2.05 1.8 1.9 1.4
16 2.24 0.53 1.3
17 1.79 3.5 4.2 3.86 2.15 1.11 1.64 2.16 1.6
18 1.11 1 1.19 1.89
19 2.43 3.15 2.25 2.05 1.64 1 0.63 1.65 1.7
20 2.11 1.8 0.63 1.04 2.09 1.75
21 1.2 1.9 1.04 2.5 2.07 1.28
22 2.16 1.19 2.09 2.5 1.23 3.45 1.7 2.44
23 1.89 1.65 1.75 2.07 1.23 2.31 2.38 1.23 1.92
24 1.03 1.28 3.45 2.31 2.39 0.79
25 1.7 2.38 1.48
26 2.44 1.23 2.39 1.48 1.7 1.25
27 1.43 2.39
28 1.15 1.44 0.79 1.35 1.51
29 2.52 0.79 1.58 1.35 0.54
30 1.88 1.51 0.54
31 1.03 1.51 2.15 0.68
32 1.92 0.79 1.7 1.6
33 1.25 1.6
34 0.76 1.4 1.6 1.7
139
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
The construction cost governs the feasibility of any project. Therefore, different aspects related
to the construction and implementation of the project need to be converted to a cost factor.
Higher the hardships to be undergone and time taken, higher the cost of the project and vice
versa.
Construction of columns for the elevated guideway has to be constructed on the center median
of the road. Not all roads have a center median and hence the widening of certain roads needs
to be carried out where land acquisition is required. This eventually increases the total cost of
guideway construction. On the other hand, certain road sections have sharp bends where again
the cost of construction is comparatively high. Then each of the above road links were assigned
a factor depending on the number of bends on the section, extent of land that needs to be
acquired (depending on the availability of center median) and other similar aspects.
For the project cost to be minimized, the cost of total guideway length has to be a minimum. It
should be pointed out that not always the minimum length gives the minimum cost. If the link
with the minimum length does not have a center median or have many sharp curves, the cost
of next available minimum length link will be less than that of the minimum length link.
Therefore, since we have to select the links with minimum cost, the link lengths were
converted to a cost dependent equivalent length by multiplying the length from a factor which
accounts the aforesaid issues (unavailability of center median, sharp curves) which affects the
cost.
Accordingly, each and every identified link was assigned a factor taking the length of
unavailability of center median and amount of sharp bends available along the link. The factor
matrix is as follows;
Table Factor Matrix
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
1 1.2 1.3
2 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.3
3 1.3 1.3 1 1.2
4 1.2 1 1.4 1.6 1.2
5 1.3 1 1 1.2 1.5 1.1 1.5 1.6 1
6 1.3 1 1.4 1 1.4
7 1.6 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.3 1 1.15
8 1.2 1.5 1.4 1.3 1 1 1.1
9 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2
10 1.1 1.1 1 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.15
11 1 1.4 1 1.5 1.2 1.3
12 1 1 1.1 1.2 1 1.2
13 1.5 1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1
14 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.2
15 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.2
16 1.3 1 1.2
17 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.2
18 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.2
19 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.2 1.3 1.2
20 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.3 1.2
21 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.5
22 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 1 1.5
23 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.3
24 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.2 1
25 1 1.4 1.4
26 1.5 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.35 1.2
27 1 1.2
28 1.2 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.2
29 1.6 1 1.3 1.2 1.2
30 1.3 1.2 1.2 0
31 1 1.15 1.1 1.15
32 1.3 1 1.35 1
33 1.2 1
34 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
140
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Then, the available lengths were multiplied by the related factor and another matrix is formed
where the cells represent the cost equivalent length between any two nodes. The final matrix
is as follows;
Table Final Matrix on factored lengths
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
1 2.892 3.64
2 2.892 1.924 1.932 3.146 2.925
3 3.64 1.924 1.81 4.056
4 1.932 1.16 2.282 3.2 1.38
5 3.146 1.16 0.72 2.1 3.9 2.002 2.16 4.032 1.03
6 2.925 1.81 2.282 0.72 3.262
7 3.2 2.1 4.862 1.716 1.027 0.79 1.737
8 4.056 3.9 3.22 4.862 2 1.29 2.365
9 2.87 2.616 2.148 2.916 2.054 2.444 0.912
10 2.002 1.716 2 2.87 3.108 1.82 0.782
11 1.29 3.108 1.34 3.285 2.7 2.912
12 1.34 0.81 0.847 1.92 0.53 4.2
13 3.285 0.81 1.365 5.46 4.095 1.43
14 0.847 1.365 2.782 5.018 3.15 2.954 1.56 1.133 2.868
15 2.616 1.82 2.7 1.92 2.782 1.56 2.58 2.665 2.34 2.66 1.68
16 2.912 0.53 1.56
17 2.148 4.2 5.46 5.018 2.58 1.332 2.296 2.808 1.92
18 1.332 1.5 1.428 2.268
19 2.916 4.095 3.15 2.665 2.296 1.5 0.756 2.145 2.04
20 2.954 2.34 0.756 1.56 2.717 2.1
21 1.56 2.66 1.56 3.25 2.691 1.92
22 2.808 1.428 2.717 3.25 1.722 5.175 1.7 3.66
23 2.268 2.145 2.1 2.691 1.722 3.003 3.332 1.353 2.496
24 1.133 1.92 5.175 3.003 2.868 0.79
25 1.7 3.332 2.072
26 3.66 1.353 2.868 2.072 2.295 1.5
27 1.43 2.868
28 1.38 2.16 1.027 1.62 1.812
29 4.032 0.79 2.054 1.62 0.648
30 2.444 1.812 0.648
31 1.03 1.737 2.365 0.782
32 2.496 0.79 2.295 1.6
33 1.5 1.6
34 0.912 1.68 1.92 2.04
In order for the cost to be a minimum, these nodes have to be connected with the links with
minimum possible costs. When these nodes are connected through a network through the
links with minimum possible length (cost) between two nodes and avoiding loops within
nodes. This is known as the minimum spanning tree. Using the above matrix, this minimum
spanning tree was developed for the identified possible RTS stations. A rough sketch of the
minimum spanning tree is as follows;
141
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
RTS Network
From the minimum spanning tree, the RTS network was derived while giving due attention to
the construction and operational aspects. Special attention was given to the possibility of
creating loops and connecting links with other available transport modes such as railway and
bus transport. Accordingly, the following network was developed.
142
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
This network was then phased out to three phases and extended to Battaramulla, Malabe,
Kaduwela and Kottawa depending on the requirements of Megapolis structure plan, transport
plan and existing congestion situations. Therefore, the phase out and the extension are as
follows.
143
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure Phased out and extended network to the outer core area
RTS in Suburbs
Line 1 : Borella Malabe
Line 2 : Malabe Kaduwela
Line 3: Peliyagoda - Kadawatha
144
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
TRANSPORT
145
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
146
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
147
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
148
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
149
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
150
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
152
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
153
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
1.1.11 MARINE DRIVE, DUPLICATION ROAD & BASELINE ROAD EXTENTION PROJECT
There are some missing road links, where if provided, a lot of people will be willing to use which in turn can reduce a lot of unnecessary traffic movements reducing the
congestion significantly. Therefore, identification of such missing links and improvement of selected sections of the existing road network as appropriate to the Western
Region Megapolis Plan will address this issue. This will improve the connectivity of existing main corridors.
154
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
155
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
157
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
1.1.15 OVERFLOW PARKING FACILITY FOR LONG DISTANCE BUSSES ENTERING COLOMBO
Due to large number of long distance buses entering the city center daily and keep waiting for long hours for the return trips. At the moment, there is no such proper
place for these busses to wait compelling them to park them at random places. Hence Pettah and surrounding areas get congested during the day time. It is required
to provide parking facilities for buses in Pettah or nearby areas to overcome this issue. Further better facilities must be provided for bus crew in the identified areas.
158
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
159
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Due to the unavailability of real time traffic detection and absence of synchronization of signal lights within the area, a considerable amount of time being wasted on
roads. This project will improve the travel time of riders, energy consumption and quality of ride by reducing the intersection delays for riders. Real time traffic
management measures will be introduced which will control the intersections, incident management and avoid illegal parking near intersection areas.
Summary of t h e P r o j e c td
Objectives Location Central Business District (CBD), Fringe Area
Required Land Area N/A
1. To reduce congestion through real time Present Situation Conceptual stage
traffic management Project Cost SLR 3,000 mn (UD $ 20.7 mn)
Proposed Financing Consolidated funds
2. To improve management of Method
incident/accident at intersections Method of Open competitive
Procurement
3. To Improve the intersection capacities Employment Around 250 direct and indirect employments
Implementation Medium term
Period
Remarks: Intersections and geometries have been identified by KOICA
study and system requirements to be provided
160
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
161
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
162
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
163
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
164
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
165
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
166
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
1.1.24 ENCOURAGEMENT OF BICYCLE USE AND FEASIBILITY STUDY ON CYCLE AND MOTORCYCLE
PATHS
Usage of bicycles as a transport mode is very sustainable, reducing emission; reduce fuel cost and healthy mode of transport and can reduce a lot of traffic
congestion. Under the Megapolis project in Western Region new cycle paths will be constructed to encourage cycling. These paths will be connected to rail and bus
terminals which are equipped with park and ride facilities.
Summary of the Project
Objectives Location CBD area
Required Land Area To be estimated
1. Promote cycling Present Situation Concept stage
Project Cost SLR 200 mn (US $ 1.30 mn)
2. Reduce on road traffic congestion Proposed Financing Local funding Consolidated fund
3. Encourage people to cycle to railway Method
or bus terminal and use park and ride Method of Open competitive
Procurement
facilities.
Employment Around 500 direct and indirect
4. Reduce fuel usage by motorized employment
vehicles Implementation Short term (2016/2020)
Period
167
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
168
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
fuel usage.
Summary of the Project
Objectives Location Western Province
Required Land Area Not required
1. Economic benefits achieving Present Situation
Project Cost
Concept stage
SLR 50 mn (UD $ 0.3mn)
through less fuel usage.
Proposed Financing Local funding Consolidated fund
2. Less environmental impact due to Method
low output of CO2, lead and CO. Method of Open competitive
Procurement
3. Encourage more users for public Employment Around 80 direct and indirect employment
transport systems. will be generated
Implementation Short term (2016/2018)
4. Reduce air pollution
Period
169
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
170
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
171
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
172
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Objectives
Summary of the Project
Location Colombo and suburbs
1. To redevelop and improve
Land Area Need no additional lands
the appearance, design
Present Situation Dilapidating buildings with minimum user facilities
and operational qualities of Project Cost SLR 33,350 mn (US $ 230 mn)
the bus terminals and bus SLR 1300 mn per site. (US $. 9.0mn)
stands to provide better [Bus Terminals SLR 300mn. Per site / Bus Stands SLR 1.5mn. per
facilities to passengers. site]
Proposed Financing Public Private Partnership
2. To minimize the operational Method
costs of the bus terminals by Method of Procurement Open competitive
the government while the Project Period Two years (short term)
services to bus passengers Employment 3000 (Approx.)
Remarks:
continue.
1. Private sector will be invited to undertake the reconstruction and improvement
of the bus terminals to be equipped with all modern amenities on leased out
lands on a long term lease basis.
2. The National Transport Commission and Western Megaplois to agree on terms
Project Components / Activities and conditions to be stipulated and monitor the quality of services
3. Improve 200 strategically located bus stands to help passengers. The bus stands
o Call Design build and operate proposals for each site
to have a kiosk which will be sub leased by the developers to operators (SMEs)
o Construction and operation of the sites and sublease the
who will maintain these bus stands while engaged in business of selling goods
properties 173
and services and provide information to passengers thru modern
o Public services and facilities to be provided by the operators
communication equipment.
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
1.1.31 SUPPLY OF COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS (CNG) AND ESTABLISH ELECTRIC CHARGING FACILITIES
(50 CENTRES) FOR BUSES AND OTHER VEHICLES
At present almost all busses and other vehicles in the WRM area consume diesel and patrol. This has caused high level of air pollution in the region posing adverse
impacts to the environment and to the human health. Use of CNG and electricity as a source of fuel will reduce the pollution levels. There is an evidence of finding gas
deposits in Indian ocean within the Sri Lankan territory and can be utilized more effectively by converting these vehicles in to CNG. Also CNG and electricity cheaper
than other petroleum fuels. This process will create healthy human life in the WP.
174
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
175
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
176
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 29: Total Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case A) for Year 2020
177
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 30: Total Passenger Volumes within CMC for Project Case (Case A) for Year 2020
178
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 31: Total Railway Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case A) for Year 2020
179
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 32: Total RTS Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case A) for Year 2020
180
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 33: Total Inland Water Transport Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case A) for Year 2020
181
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 34: Total Private Vehicle Volumes for Project Case (Case A) for Year 2020
182
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 35: Total Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case B) for Year 2025
183
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 36: Total Passenger Volumes within CMC for Project Case (Case B) for Year 2025
184
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 37: Total Railway Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case B) for Year 2025
185
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 38: Total RTS Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case B) for Year 2025
186
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 39: Total Inland Water Transport Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case B) for Year 2025
187
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 40: Total Private Vehicle Volumes for Project Case (Case B) for Year 2025
188
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 41: Total Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case D) for Year 2035
189
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 42: Total Passenger Volumes within CMC for Project Case (Case BD) for Year 2035
190
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 43: Total Railway Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case D) for Year 2035
191
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 44: Total RTS Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case D) for Year 2035
192
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 45: Total Inland Water Transport Passenger Volumes for Project Case (Case D) for Year 2035
193
MEGAPOLIS TRANSPORT PROPOSAL FINAL REPORT 2016
Figure 46: Total Private Vehicle Volumes for Project Case (Case D) for Year 2035
194