[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
108 views2 pages

Sample 2 Report

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2

Guilmard Eau Sublime Hair Dye Bottle with Iron Cap

University of West Florida


Artifact: 86D 8 011 076
8E534 Panton Leslie

Analyst: Amanda Vu
April 8, 2016

Appearance of Artifact
The artifact was a square glass bottle (Fig. 1) of dark brown
color with an iron cap. On one side it had raised lettering saying
Guilmard Eau Sublime, as shown in Fig. 2. On the inside
surface there were remnants of what was believed to be dried
hair dye. The iron cap was extensively rusted. The bottle was
about 4 inches tall and the square part was about 1 inch wide.
Fig. 1 Artifact

Procedure and Results


The solid material inside the bottle was scraped off for analysis. Pieces of patina that also came off were removed as they
were a product of glass decomposition, rather than part of the
original contents of the bottle.
A 0.05 gram sample of the black material was placed in a muffle furnace at
850o C for 8 h. None of the sample
remained after this treatment.
Separation of the sample by thin-layer
chromatography was attempted using
a silica plate and ethanol, cyclohexane, and pyridine as eluents but no
separation was achieved with any of
these. A fluorescence emission spectrum of the sample was also obtained
(not shown).

Fig. 3 Infrared spectrum of unknown material

Fig. 2 Side of bottle, showing raised


lettering

Discussion and Conclusions


An early report on hair dyes such as Mrs. Potters Walnut Tint Hair Stain and Eau Sublime noted
that these products produced a dark color by reaction of para-phenylenediamine (PPDA) with
hy-drogen peroxide. A dire warning was given about a marked lassitude and an obscure general
eruption resulting from the use of such hair dyes.1 Earlier work in our laboratory identified PPDA
as a component of a Mrs. Potters hair dye sample recovered from an excavation at Sandpoint,
Idaho.

The contents of the present Eau Sublime bottle retained none of the original constituents, as
they had polymerized through long exposure to oxidative and hydrolytic conditions.
Consequently, the simple PPDA test described in ref. 1, namely:

addition of an acetic acid solution of the unknown to a ferric chloride solution producing a violet color;

addition of a few drops of a 1% potassium permanganate solution to the


unknown leading to decolorization and the production of and ammonia
smell.

did not produce positive results.


Likewise, when a small amount of the sample was added to acetic acid and the solution was
mixed with a drop of aqueous aniline (one drop of aniline per 50 mL of water), and potassium
persulfate was added, a blue color (a positive result) did not appear.2
However, infrared spectroscopy (Fig. 3) did reveal the presence of aromatic moieties, CN, and
NH bonds in the material: aromatic C=C at 1580-1600 cm1; CN at 1250-1370 cm1; and NH
at 34003500 cm1. These are strong indications of the presence of materials that arose from
long-term chemical modification of PPDA. It must be concluded that this was the principal ingredient of the dye. The other component, hydrogen peroxide, would have been contained in a separate bottle that was not part of this consignment.
1

Nostrums and Quackery, first edition, vol. 1, Press of the American Medical Association, Chicago, pp.
354ff, ca. 1912 (undated).
2
Feigl, Fritz, Vinzenz Anger, and Ralph Oesper. Spot Tests in Organic Analysis. 7th ed. Amsterdam, London, New York:
Elsevier, 1966.

You might also like