Microbial Biofilms: From Ecology To Molecular Genetics
Microbial Biofilms: From Ecology To Molecular Genetics
Microbial Biofilms: From Ecology To Molecular Genetics
847867
1092-2172/00/$04.000
Copyright 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
AND
GEORGE A. OTOOLE*
INTRODUCTION
Our perception of bacteria as unicellular life forms is deeply
rooted in the pure-culture paradigm. Since bacteria can, in a
strict sense, be diluted to a single cell and studied in liquid
culture, this mode of operation has been exploited and used to
study many bacterial activities. Although this traditional way of
culturing bacteria in liquid medium has been instrumental in
the study of microbial pathogenesis and enlightening as to
some of the amazing facets of microbial physiology, pureculture planktonic growth is rarely how bacteria exist in nature.
For example, environmental microbiologists have long recognized that complex bacterial communities are responsible for
driving the biogeochemical cycling that maintains the biosphere (153). Until recently, the lack of methods for exploring
these communities in situ has hampered detailed analyses.
Fortunately, recent advances in microscopy and molecular
technologies have made it possible to examine such communities in situ in great detail and without the bias of liquid culture.
Direct observation of a wide variety of natural habitats has
established that the majority of microbes persist attached to
surfaces within a structured biofilm ecosystem and not as freefloating organisms (47). Moreover, it is becoming clear that
these natural assemblages of bacteria within the biofilm matrix
function as a cooperative consortium, in a relatively complex
and coordinated manner (22, 47). Hence, although microorganisms can have an independent planktonic existence, an
interdependent lifestyle in which they function as an integral
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Room 202, Vail Building, N. College St., Hanover, NH 03755. Phone: (603) 650-1248. Fax: (603) 6501318. E-mail: georgeo@Dartmouth.edu.
847
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................847
Complex Attached and Aggregated Communities ..............................................................................................847
Collective Behavior .................................................................................................................................................847
SURFACE-ATTACHED COMMUNITIES IN THE REAL WORLD ..................................................................848
Biofilm Structure ....................................................................................................................................................849
Structure and Function Studies............................................................................................................................850
Plant-Associated Biofilms ......................................................................................................................................852
ECOLOGICAL ADVANTAGES: WHY MAKE A BIOFILM? ..............................................................................853
Protection from the Environment.........................................................................................................................853
Nutrient Availability and Metabolic Cooperativity ............................................................................................854
Acquisition of New Genetic Traits........................................................................................................................855
ROLE OF SURFACE-ATTACHED BACTERIA IN DISEASE ............................................................................856
Bacterial Biofilm Infections...................................................................................................................................856
Implant-Based Infections.......................................................................................................................................856
Biofilms and Pathogenesis.....................................................................................................................................856
GENETIC DISSECTION OF BIOFILM FORMATION.......................................................................................857
Role of Environmental Signals .............................................................................................................................857
Initiation of Biofilm Formation ............................................................................................................................858
Maturation of the Biofilm .....................................................................................................................................859
Molecular Genetics of Oral Biofilms ...................................................................................................................860
CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................................................862
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...........................................................................................................................................862
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................862
848
SURFACE-ATTACHED COMMUNITIES
IN THE REAL WORLD
The natural habitats of prokaryotes are remarkably diverse
(188, 268). Prokaryotes can inhabit any environment that is
suitable for higher life forms, as well as a variety of inhospitable settings that the majority of higher life forms would find
extremely objectionable (152). Their ability to persist throughout the biosphere is due, in part, to their unequaled metabolic
versatility and phenotypic plasticity. One key element of their
adaptability is their ability to position themselves in a niche
where they can propagate. Numerous positioning mechanisms
have been discovered in bacteria. The most common mechanism is flagellar motility and different methods of surface
translocation, including twitching, gliding, darting, and sliding
(102). However, there are other mechanisms utilized by bacteria to position themselves in response to their environment.
Some species are able to affect their position by synthesizing
cellulose, thereby forming a fibrous pellicle that places cells
near the air-water interface. In addition, cellulose synthesis
aids in attachment to surfaces such as plant cells (216). Other
bacteria, such as the purple sulfur bacterium Amoebobacter
purpureus, modulate their density in order to position themselves. These photosynthetic bacteria position themselves at
different levels in the water column in response to light intensity by producing gas vesicles for bouyancy or synthesizing
carbohydrates or forming aggregates in order to sink (187). In
addition, some species have magnetosomes (intracellular
structures consisting of a crystal of a magnetic mineral surrounded by a membrane) that cause the cells to passively align
with the Earths geomagnetic field, thereby restricting lateral
excursions (11, 227). One of the most important positioning
mechanisms is aggregation or attachment. Aggregation enhances cell-cell interaction as well as the sedimentation rate of
cells. Through attachment, the bacteria not only position themselves on a surface; they can form communities and obtain the
additional benefit of the phenotypic versatility of their neighbors. Since a surface-attached lifestyle is ubiquitous, it is likely
that this type of sessile community-based existence is a critical
characteristic for persistence of the bacteria. Organisms can
exist in an environment independently, but in many cases they
proliferate more effectively by interacting and forming communities (23). Some of the concepts discussed in the following
sections are illustrated in Fig. 1.
Bacterial communities in nature play a key role in the production and degradation of organic matter, the degradation of
many environmental pollutants, and the cycling of nitrogen,
sulfur, and many metals. Most of these natural processes require the concerted effort of bacteria with different metabolic
capabilities, and it is likely that bacteria residing within biofilm
communities carry out many of these complex processes. Studies in bioreactors and enrichment cultures have shown that
biofilms are involved in the processing of sewage (see below),
in the treatment of groundwater contaminated with petroleum
products (155), and in nitrification (58). Biofilms also form in
many extreme environments, such as in acid mine drainage (at
a pH of 0), where they contribute to the cycling of sulfur (67).
Cyanobacterial mat biofilms have been intensively studied in
thermal springs (204, 261), and recently, researchers have
started to investigate biofilms in the desert-like lake ice cover
in Antarctica (190). Complex structured communities in these
extreme environments have been found to conduct a variety of
biological processes, such as photosynthesis, nitrogen fixation,
and fermentation.
Another type of biofilm community that is being investigated
is the bacterial assemblages associated with suspended particles of organic and inorganic material in the marine environment. Researchers have shown that these macroscopic particles, often referred to as marine snow, are enriched in
microbial biomass, nutrients, and trace metals and are involved
in biogeochemical transformation of particulate organic carbon in the pelagic environment (28, 189). Although the
importance of microbial communities associated with these
macroscopic particles has not been thoroughly investigated,
methanogenesis (121), nitrogen fixation (191), and sulfide production (228) have been detected in these particles, indicating
microbial activity. Moreover, microbial production of methane
or sulfide as well as nitrogen fixation only occurs under anoxic
conditions; therefore, the data indicate that anaerobic metabolism is being performed in an otherwise oxygenated environment. Also, these aggregates have been examined with oxygen
microelectrodes, and steep redox gradients were found in these
biofilms, providing additional evidence of anaerobic metabolism (191). In a study by Rath et al., the phylogenetic diversity
of the bacterial community associated with marine snow was
assessed by amplifying and classifying small-subunit ribosomal
DNA (rDNA) fragments from nucleic acids extracted from
samples of marine snow collected in the northern Adriatic Sea
(208). These experiments showed that bacterial colonization of
marine snow can result in diverse and complex assemblages,
MICROBIAL BIOFILMS
849
with specific phyla being associated with the particles. Also, the
nature of the associated phylogenetic groups was found to be
similar to that of other assemblages found in marine sediments
and terrestrial soils.
Biofilm Structure
The application of confocal scanning laser microscopes
(CSLM) to biofilm research radically altered our perception of
biofilm structure and function (140). Before the use of CSLM,
electron microscopy was the method of choice to examine
microbial biofilms under high resolution. Unfortunately, sample preparation for electron microscopy results in dehydrated
samples. Consequently, this approach provided a deceivingly
simplistic view of biofilms, since the biofilm collapsed when
water was removed. On the other hand, CSLM, which allows
the visualization of fully hydrated samples, has revealed the
elaborate three-dimensional structure of biofilms (47, 56, 57).
CSLM has been used very effectively to monitor biofilm development in flow cells. Flow cells are small continuous-flow systems with a viewing port that allows direct observation of the
biofilm without disrupting the community. These systems are
often once-flow, meaning that fresh medium enters the system,
passes through the cell, and is collected as wastethe medium
is not recycled through the flow cell. A number of descriptions
of flow cell and related techniques have been reported (64a).
Interestingly, biofilms formed from single species in vitro
and those produced in nature by mixed species consortia exhibit similar overall structural features (47, 52, 264). Most
biofilms have been found to exhibit some level of heterogeneity
in that patches of cell aggregates, not monolayers, are interspersed throughout an exopolysaccharide matrix that varies in
density, creating open areas where water channels are formed.
An example of a mature single-species biofilm of Vibrio cholerae is shown in Fig. 2.
The microcolonies that constitute the biofilm can be composed of single-species populations or multimember communities of bacteria, depending on the environmental parameters
under which they are formed. Numerous conditions, such as
surface and interface properties, nutrient availability, the composition of the microbial community, and hydrodynamics, can
affect biofilm structure (240). For example, under high shear
stresses, such as on the surface of teeth during chewing, the
biofilm (dental plaque) is typically stratified and compacted
(15, 274). Biofilms have also been examined under various
hydrodynamic conditions such as laminar and turbulent flows,
and it was shown that biofilm structures are altered in response
to flow conditions (241). Biofilms grown under laminar flow
were found to be patchy and consisted of rough round cell
aggregates separated by interstitial voids. Biofilms grown in the
turbulent flow cells were also patchy, but elongated streamers that oscillated in the bulk fluid were observed. Moreover,
by observing biofilm development under continuous flow, this
group was able to evaluate the effect of perturbations on established biofilms. They showed that the biofilm was polymorphic and structurally adapted to changes in nutrient availability.
In biofilms formed in upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactors
(continuous-flow systems comprising multiple microbial species, where the flow occurs from bottom to top of the vessel),
FIG. 1. Ecology of microbial communities. Top-down view of an idealized surface-attached microbial community, illustrating some of the major concepts pertaining
to the ecology of biofilms discussed in the text. The four microcolonies at the center of the figure represent organisms that both generate and consume hydrogen and
comprise two organisms that participate in syntrophism (see text). Fermenting organisms produce organic acids used by the hydrogen producers, and these fermenting
organisms gain their carbon and energy by utilizing various sugars. In addition to potential metabolic interactions between organisms, signaling molecules may aid in
inter- and intraspecies communication. The factors described above (as well as environmental influences) may all contribute to the spatial organization of the biofilm.
As shown here, microcolonies in natural communities can comprise either a single or multiple bacterial species. The proximity of different microbes allows the possibility
of physical interactions in addition to communication via diffusible factors.
850
aggregates consisting of complex bacterial communities (referred to as flocs or sludge granules) predominate (151). This
is primarily due to the fact that the degradation of organic
materials to methane and carbon dioxide is a community-level
process that is driven by the close contact of multiple guilds
interacting in a food web (159, 224). In addition, through
aggregation, the bacteria are advantageously positioned in
these reactors. Since there is no surface area for attachment in
this type of reactor except for the walls, the formation of
granular sludge is a mechanism by which the biofilm communities settle to the bottom of the reactor, which prevents their
being washed out of the system. Furthermore, through granular sedimentation, the biomass is more readily exposed to the
continuous supply of nutrients being pumped into the bottom
of the reactor. Hence, biofilm structure is affected by both the
microbial biology and environmental parameters. Structural
organization is clearly a hallmark of biofilm communities that
The identification and quantification of members of particular microbial communities, as well as a clear understanding of
the functional relationship between members, are required
before we can fully appreciate and possibly manage the complex processes that these communities perform. Recent technological advances have aided in attaining this goal. The remarkable breakthrough in rRNA-based phylogenetic analysis
(276) has provided a means of developing tools with which to
investigate microbial communities. The development of fluorescently labeled rRNA-targeted oligonucleotides, a variety of
microsensors, real-time image analysis, and confocal microscopy has provided researchers with noninvasive means to monitor populations in situ (5, 24, 25, 260). In addition, one of the
key advances in the study of microbial communities has been
the development of various tools for cultivating communities,
such as chemostats, continuous-flow slide cultures, microstats,
and colonization tracks (22). These techniques have been used
to identify and quantify specific populations within a variety of
complex microbial mixtures.
As discussed above, the anaerobic degradation of complex
organic material to methane and carbon dioxide is a community-level process carried out by multiple microbial populations
interacting in a food web (159). This process is one of the most
complex interactions between bacterial populations known to
exist. Although anaerobic food chains have been studied extensively, our understanding of community-level processes in
anaerobic food webs is still limited. Due to the important role
of microbes in wastewater treatment, an extensive amount of
research and method development has been performed in order to increase our understanding of the processes involved in
the degradation of organic materials. Here we will describe
some of the research in this area in order to illustrate one of
the primary goals of biofilm research, that is, connecting structure and function.
It has been discovered that surface-attached biofilms as well
as sludge granules readily form in anaerobic reactors (151,
281). Moreover, the development of these biofilm communities
results in more efficient processing of contaminants in wastewater. rRNA probes have been used to identify and quantify
phylogenetically defined populations of organisms in sludge
granules (120, 206, 207, 256, 257). In a recent study by Raskin
et al. (207), changes in the composition of two metabolically
competitive populations (methanogens and sulfate-reducing
851
FIG. 3. Syntrophism in a sludge granule. Photomicrograph of in situ hybridization of a sludge granule obtained from a methanogenic reactor to illustrate
biofilm organisms participating in a metabolic interaction. Fluorescein-labeled
fluorescent probes were used to identify organisms specific to the order Methanomicrobiales (green and green arrow), and rhodamine-labeled probes were used
to localize syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria related to the genus Syntrophus (red and red arrow). The double (red and green) labeling results in yellow
fluorescence. The results indicate that the syntrophic microcolonies are intertwined with chains of methanogens (yellow and yellow arrow). The metabolic
interactions between these two organisms speed the anaerobic degradation of
certain compounds (see text for details). Bar, 20 m. This figure was modified
from Harmsen et al. (92a), with permission to use this image kindly provided by
Willem de Vos.
natural microbial community without the selective bias of cultivation, extraction, or amplification. Evidence for high diversity was shown, indicating that high diversity within a relatively
narrow phylogenetic group (in this case beta-1 Proteobacteria)
is present in this environment.
Studies combining fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
with microelectrode analysis for determining pH, oxygen, or
sulfide profiles have been performed in order to evaluate the
distribution of different populations in relationship to chemical
profiles (92a, 93, 205, 225, 226). In a study by Harmsen et al.
(92a), FISH was used to localize organisms belonging to the
bacterial domain (two syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria) and various types of methanogens in sludge granules (Fig.
3). It was shown that the outer layers of the granules were
populated with a variety of bacterial colonies most likely involved in hydrolyzing complex organic matter, while the interior of the granule contained methanogenic microcolonies.
Moreover, the syntrophic strains, which require low hydrogen
partial pressures in order to oxidize propionate, were found to
be tightly associated with the methanogens in microcolonies.
Consequently, these experiments provided convincing evidence of a layered microbial architecture in sludge granules
where the bacteria on the surface of the granule hydrolyze
complex organic materials, thereby providing the anaerobic
bacteria in the interior of the biofilm with an energy source.
In a recent comprehensive study by Schramn et al., multiple
methods were used to investigate the occurrence of anaerobic
processes, such as denitrification and sulfate reduction, in wellaerated activated-sludge samples (226). In this set of experiments, microsensors were used to measure oxygen, nitrite,
MICROBIAL BIOFILMS
852
vobacteria group are involved in the release of inorganic phosphate during wastewater treatment. Previously it had been
reported that this group of microorganisms was not involved in
the removal of phosphate (14), but the combined use of FISH
with the phosphatase localization probe method clearly illustrated the colocalization of phosphatase activity and the cytophaga-flavobacteria probe. Moreover, a significant amount (35
to 45%) of the total phosphatase activity was detected associated with the cytophaga and flavobacteria, indicating that this
group not only has activity but is responsible for a significant
portion of the total phosphatase activity in the sludge. In addition, the authors point out that the synthesis of other precipitating, fluorogenic substrates for various enzymatic activities should be possible, and therefore this approach should
prove useful in addressing a variety of biological questions.
Plant-Associated Biofilms
Soils constitute a heterogeneous environment with numerous fluctuating parameters that can affect microbial growth
and survival (193). Like many natural environments, soil is
nutrient poor (272). Soil organic matter varies in concentration
from 0.8 to 2.0%, with the bulk of the carbon in recalcitrant
forms, such as humic acids. Therefore, bacteria indigenous to
soil must constantly contend with nutrient deprivation (252).
The rhizosphere (the root surface and the region immediately
surrounding a root, typically 2 mm) constitutes an ecological
niche in soil where nutrients are more readily available, and
certain bacteria have developed mechanisms to take advantage
of this niche. Rhizodeposition (the release of organic material
from the roots as they grow through the soil) enhances microbial growth and drives the structuring of the microbial communities in the rhizosphere (27). Rhizodeposition consists of a
variety of compounds, including (i) exudates, such as amino
acids, simple sugars, and organic acids that are passively released from the roots; (ii) actively secreted compounds such as
carbohydrates and enzymes; (iii) mucilage (sloughed-off cells
and cell lysates); and (iv) gases, such as carbon dioxide and
ethylene (267). This deposition accounts for a significant
amount of the plants photosynthate, estimated to be 20% of
the carbon allocated to the root system. Thus, numerous bacteria are attracted to the rhizosphere and compete in order to
colonize this oasis in soil (266). Moreover, the interactions
between the plant and the surrounding microorganisms select
for the establishment of only certain microbial populations
(rhizobacteria). Therefore, structured microbial communities
attached to the roots and the surrounding soil particles could
be viewed as a biofilm community. This suggests that a highly
evolved association may exist between the nutritionally rich
photosynthesizing plants and the nutrient-deprived bacteria
residing in soil. An example of a biofilm on a plant root is
shown in Fig. 4. There are many indications of biofilm communities in the rhizosphere. First of all, it is evident that
bacteria attach to roots, and various mechanisms have been
described for attachment that involve a variety of cell components, such as outer membrane proteins, wall polysaccharides
(capsules), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and cell surface agglutinin (164). Second, exopolysaccharide (EPS) is produced by
bacteria in the rhizosphere (7). This not only provides many
advantages to bacterial cells (as described below), it also enhances soil aggregation, which in turn improves water stability,
which is critical to the survival of the plant. Hence, there is a
strong selective advantage for the production of EPS in the
rhizosphere. Third, microcolonies have been observed in the
root system (231) along with an increase in the frequency of
conjugation between certain bacteria (Pseudomonas species) in
MICROBIAL BIOFILMS
853
the role they play in this unique environment have not yet been
determined.
ECOLOGICAL ADVANTAGES: WHY MAKE A BIOFILM?
There has been some speculation about the advantages of
forming a biofilm versus living as individual cells. Although it
is difficult to test these speculations experimentally, in the
section below we offer some reasons why the biofilm strategy
has been adopted by so many microbes.
Protection from the Environment
Bacteria experience a certain degree of shelter and homeostasis when residing within a biofilm, and one of the key
components of this microniche is the surrounding extrapolymeric substance matrix. This matrix is composed of a mixture
of components, such as EPS, protein, nucleic acids, and other
substances. The best studied of these components is EPS. Most
bacteria are able to produce polysaccharides, either as wall
polysaccharides (capsules) or as extracellular excretions into
the surrounding environment (EPS). Some bacterial species,
such as Klebsiella aerogenes, appear to be limited in the types of
polymers that they can synthesize, but members of some gen-
FIG. 4. Biofilm on a plant root. Biofilm of GFP-labeled Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 on the root of a tomato plant. A large microcolony of bacteria is apparent
on the root surface and is indicated by the yellow arrow. The white arrows highlight three smaller colonies that have formed at plant root cell boundaries, which may
be the site of release of root exudates used by bacteria as nutrient sources. The diffuse appearance of some bacterial cells in the large microcolonies suggests that these
bacteria are covered by an EPS. EPS may play a role in formation of these microcolonies (see text), suggesting that these communities have many of the characteristics
of typical bacterial biofilms. This image is kindly provided by Guido Bloemberg.
854
MICROBIAL BIOFILMS
used in genetic engineering are usually devoid of transfer functions so as to limit their dispersal, transfer may still occur via
mobilization by either trans interactions (mobilization by donation) or formation of a cointegrate with a self-transmissible
plasmid that is already present in organisms in the environment (36). In order to examine the potential for this type of
gene transfer, a variety of different model microcosms, including biofilms, were examined. In the biofilm experiments, recipient cells were allowed to attach to glass beads in a fixed-bed
reactor. These biofilms were then exposed to donor cells harboring all three of the following plasmids: pCE325 (oriT),
pUB2380 (mob), and R388 (tra). The numbers of transconjugants containing the different plasmids were determined, and
it was shown that all three plasmids carried by planktonic
organisms were transferred into the biofilm population. In
addition, the analysis of transconjugants carrying R388 showed
that mobilization by donation was the likely mechanism used
for transfer, since no cointegrates were formed.
Another research group has investigated the transfer of the
TOL plasmid, carrying genes for the degradation of toluene
and benzyl alcohol, into a biofilm community growing on benzyl alcohol as the sole carbon and energy source (33). In this
study, the biofilm community consisted of three different organisms, P. putida, Acinetobacter, and an unidentified isolate.
All three isolates are able to mineralize benzyl alcohol, but
only P. putida is able to propagate the TOL plasmid. To monitor the occurrence and growth of P. putida transconjugants, a
gfp-tagged TOL plasmid was created. In addition, the lacI gene
was inserted into the chromosome of the donor strain, also a P.
putida strain, resulting in repression of gfp expression from the
plasmid in this strain. Consequently, expression of the gfp gene
was induced only if the plasmid was transferred to the recipient
P. putida strain that does not contain the lacI gene encoding
the repressor (zygotic induction of fluorescence). CSLM was
used to identify the specific starting strains and transconjugants
in the community by using 16S rRNA hybridization probes and
expression of green fluorescence. Using these tools, this group
was able to monitor conjugation in the biofilm. Data from
these experiments indicated that the frequency of horizontal
plasmid transfer was low; instead, growth of an occasional
recipient bacterium into a microcolony (known as vertical
transfer) accounted for the establishment of the plasmid in the
biofilm. Another recent study examining the kinetics of gene
transfer by conjugation in the mouse intestine showed transfer
kinetics similar to that of a biofilm (144).
Virus-mediated transduction is another mode of gene transfer. In the late 1980s, it was discovered that there is a very high
abundance of viruses (as high as 108 per ml) in both limnetic
(fresh water) and marine systems and that the majority of these
viruses are bacteriophages (13, 202). Various procedures have
been used to evaluate the impact of viruses on microbial mortality and gene transfer. The data indicate that viral lysis is a
major contributor to bacterial mortality (as reviewed in reference 279). As much as 10 to 20% of the bacterial population is
lysed daily by phages (244). Hence, phages can have a significant impact on the microbial food web by increasing death
rates and/or by decreasing growth rates at all trophic levels
(248). For example, an intriguing study recently reported by
van Hannen et al. supported the idea that phage can structure
or restructure microbial communities (253). In these studies,
almost complete lysis of a cyanobaterial population was observed in two laboratory-scale enclosures filled with lake water
(130 liters each). They concluded that phage-like particles
were responsible for the lysis. The group then used denaturing
gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S rDNA fragments (171) to
qualitatively monitor the prokaryotic as well as the eukaryotic
855
856
Organism(s) found
Reference(s)
Prosthetic valve
Contact lenses
Intravascular catheters
Total artificial heart
Urinary catheters
Joint replacement
Endotracheal tube
Voice prostheses
S. epidermidis, S. sanguis
P. aeruginosa, S. epidermidis
S. epidermidis, S. aureus
P. aeruginosa, S. epidermidis, S. aureus
E. coli, P. aeruginosa, E. faecalis, Proteus mirabilis
S. epidermidis, S. aureus
P. aeruginosa, E. coli, S. epidermidis, S. aureus
Streptococci staphylococci
857
study into whether if and how biofilms play a role in pathogenesis. The examples mentioned above highlight just a few
examples of possible roles for surface-attached communities in
pathogenesis. A great deal of additional work is necessary to
establish a direct link between functions required for biofilm
development and those factors required to cause disease in a
human host.
GENETIC DISSECTION OF BIOFILM FORMATION
Although mixed-population biofilms are more prevalent in
nature, single-species biofilms are of particular interest due to
their clinical importance. Single-species biofilms develop on
medical implants as well as dead and living tissue, contributing
to a variety of persistent infections (49). The formation of
biofilms by single species is a well-regulated developmental
process that results in a complex population of cell types.
Although many species-specific behaviors exist that reflect the
unique requirement of each microorganism, some general concepts hold true in the formation of most bacterial biofilms
(reviewed in reference 184). Four organisms, P. aeruginosa, P.
fluorescens, E. coli, and V. cholerae, have become prominent
model organisms for biofilm research. In order to illustrate the
complexity involved in patterns of development even when
only a single species is involved, we will compare and contrast
several stages in biofilm formation by these gram-negative organisms.
Role of Environmental Signals
Many species have shown distinct developmental steps in
biofilm formation, which include (i) initial attachment to a
surface, followed by (ii) the formation of microcolonies, and
finally (iii) maturation of microcolonies into an EPS-encased
mature biofilm. These basic steps leading to the formation of a
single-species biofilm are outlined in Fig. 5. The process is
believed to begin when bacteria sense certain environmental
parameters that trigger the transition from planktonic growth
to life on a surface (75, 180, 183, 186, 200, 237, 259). The
environmental cues that control this transition vary greatly
among organisms. P. aeruginosa will form biofilms under most
conditions that allow growth (185), but some strains of E. coli
K-12 will not form biofilms in minimal medium unless supplemented with amino acids (201), and E. coli O157:H7 has been
reported to make a biofilm only under low-nutrient conditions
(60).
P. fluorescens can also form a biofilm under every condition
tested (186). Interestingly, a genetic analysis of biofilm formation by this organism revealed that it utilizes multiple genetic
pathways to initiate biofilm development. For example, mutants unable to form a biofilm when grown on glucose were
rescued for this defect by growth on citrate, suggesting an
alternative citrate-dependent pathway for biofilm formation
(186). V. cholerae also appears to utilize different pathways for
initial attachment depending on the surface to which the organism attaches. For example, in vivo the Tcp pilus is required
for colonization of the intestine (104). However, Tcp appears
to play no role in attachment to abiotic surfaces, which is
probably one environment exploited by V. cholerae when not in
its human host. Here, it is the pilus encoded by the msh locus
(having no role in pathogenesis [246]) that is required for
attachment to abiotic surfaces. Abiotic surfaces can be further
subdivided into nonnutritive (plastic, glass, metal, etc.) and
nutritive (e.g., chitin). While mshA is required for colonization
of nonnutritive abiotic surfaces, an mshA mutant colonizes
cellulose as well as the wild-type strain (263), suggesting the
MICROBIAL BIOFILMS
858
presence of a third set of functions required for the colonization of nutritive surfaces. Other environmental signals that can
also influence initial attachment are osmolarity, pH, iron availability, oxygen tension, and temperature (74, 180, 185, 186,
201). Although the details of the environmental signals triggering biofilm development may vary from organism to organism, it is clear that environmental parameters have a profound
impact on the transition between planktonic and biofilm
growth.
Initiation of Biofilm Formation
The use of well-characterized mutant strains studied with
phase contrast microscopy has proven instrumental in determining the mechanisms by which bacteria can initiate biofilm
formation. A simple genetic screen has been implemented
utilizing plastic 96-well microtiter dishes as a substrate for
biofilm development, allowing the large-scale isolation of mutants defective in biofilm formation among a wide variety of
organisms (83, 97, 98, 150, 180, 185, 186, 201). These biofilm-
FIG. 5. Biofilm development in gram-negative organisms. This figure outlines the current models for the early stages in biofilm formation in three of the best-studied
model organisms, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and V. cholerae. (A) In P. aeruginosa, flagella are required to bring the bacterium into proximity with the surface, and LPS
mediates early interactions, with an additional possible role for outer membrane proteins (OMPs). Once bacteria are on the surface in a monolayer, type IV
pilus-mediated twitching motility is required for the cells to aggregate into microcolonies. The production of pili is regulated at least in part by nutritional signals via
Crc. Documented changes in gene expression at this early stage include upregulation of the alginate biosynthesis genes and downregulation of flagellar synthesis. The
production of cell-to-cell signaling molecules (acyl-HSLs) is required for formation of the mature biofilm. Alginate may also play a structural role in this process. (B.)
In E. coli, flagellum-mediated swimming is required for both approaching and moving across the surface. Organism-surface interactions require type I pili and the outer
membrane protein Ag43. Finally, the EPS known as colanic acid is required for development of the normal E. coli biofilm architecture. (C) V. cholerae, like E. coli,
utilizes the flagella to approach and spread across the surface. The MshA pili, and possibly one or more unidentified outer membrane proteins, are required for
attachment to the surface. This initial surface attachment appears to be stabilized by EPS. Formation of the mature biofilm, with its associated three-dimensional
structure, also requires production of EPS. Vps refers to the EPS produced by V. cholerae.
859
required for the repression of sugar metabolism in the presence of organic acids, the preferred carbon and energy source
for Pseudomonas. Recently, Crc was also shown to regulate
pilA and pilB, encoding the main structural protein of type IV
pili and an accessory factor required for pilus assembly, respectively (183). Although the mechanism by which Crc regulates
carbon metabolism and pilus biosynthesis is unknown, these
data draw a link between nutrient availability and biofilm formation as well as identify the first component of a signal
transduction pathway required for biofilm development in P.
aeruginosa. LPS, an important component of the bacterial
outer membrane, also plays a role in initial surface attachment.
Of the two major species of LPS produced, the loss of the
B-band LPS (but not A-band LPS) reduced the cells ability to
interact with hydrophilic surfaces (153). No phase contrast
microscopy was performed in this study, so the exact nature of
the defect in attachment is not clear. Alterations in LPS have
also been shown to alter attachment in the related organism P.
fluorescens (273).
E. coli has also been found to require flagella and pili to
initiate the early attachment processes (83, 201). Type I pili are
absolutely essential for the initial attachment event to proceed
but do not appear to play a role in moving the bacteria across
the surface. The major phase-variable outer membrane protein
of E. coli, known as Ag43, is also required for biofilm formation and may play a direct role in the interaction of the bacterial cell with a surface (51). Furthermore, as in P. aeruginosa,
loss of LPS in E. coli results in a decreased ability to attach
(82). However, because these LPS mutants are also defective
in flagellum-mediated motility and type I pilus production, it is
difficult to determine if the loss of LPS has a direct or indirect
role in biofilm development. Finally, the proteinaceous cell
surface structures known as curli have also been implicated in
early attachment events (255).
The biofilm phenotype of E. coli flagellum mutants is distinctly different from that of the P. aeruginosa mutants described above. Attachment is not completely eliminated in E.
coli flagellar mutants (although it is severely defective), and the
biofilm that forms consists of isolated microcolonies (201).
These data were interpreted to mean that once the E. coli cells
are in close proximity to the surface, flagellum-mediated motility is required for movement parallel to the surface (in addition to bringing the bacteria into proximity to the surface).
Therefore, the roles that flagella play in the formation of biofilms of P. aeruginosa and E. coli are quite different (201).
Furthermore, although a number of cell surface structures
have been shown to be important in early attachment events,
their exact role in biofilm development may differ greatly from
organism to organism.
The role of surface structures in V. cholerae appears to be
similar to what has been observed for E. coli. Flagella are
important for bringing bacteria into close proximity with a
surface and for bacterial spread across the surface. The MshA
pilus also appears to speed the attachment of bacteria to the
surface. The analysis of mature biofilms formed by flagellar
and mshA mutants using CSLM revealed that, although they
are slightly delayed in biofilm formation, the mature biofilm
formed by mutants lacking these surface structures is indistinguishable from that formed by the wild-type strain. Although
these three organisms use flagella and pili in the early stages of
biofilm development, each organism has adapted the use of
these surface structures to its own particular needs.
MICROBIAL BIOFILMS
860
MICROBIAL BIOFILMS
861
Both spontaneous and transposon-generated mutants defective in coaggregation have been isolated (8, 17, 124, 219, 271).
These mutants have helped define functions required for intrageneric and intergeneric coaggregation. For example, S. gordonii mutants that were defective for coaggregating with other
streptococci were identified, but these mutants were fully proficient for coaggregating with organisms of other genera (37,
269). These data strongly suggest that oral bacteria have multiple adhesins for interaction with different bacteria. Examples
of adhesins isolated include FimA (181), ScaA (8, 130), ScbA
(44), PsaA (218), and SsaB (79, 80). Recent studies have shown
that many of these adhesins are lipoproteins and, interestingly,
are part of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter systems.
ScaA is predicted to be a surface-localized lipoprotein that is
part of a manganese uptake ABC transporter system required
for growth on low Mn concentrations (127). ScbA from Streptococcus crista is also an ABC transporter, and although the
substrate transported by this system has not yet been deter-
FIG. 6. Mixed-species oral biofilm. Confocal image using live-dead stain (Molecular Probes, Inc.) of a mixed-species dental biofilm formed overnight in a flow cell.
The inoculum used was saliva, and the chamber was incubated at 37C with a flow of saliva at 0.2 ml/min. This image is a 0.5-m slice through the 20-m biofilm; the
slice is between 1.0 and 1.5 m from the substratum (saliva-coated glass). The green staining indicates live cells, while red bacteria either are dead or have a
compromised membrane. The inset in the upper left corner of the figure is a higher magnification of the boxed area in the center of the image. The red arrow points
to individual dead or damaged cells, and the green arrow points to a microcolony of live cells. This biofilm comprises a variety of oral microbes that have been
reconstituted in an in vitro system. The image is kindly provided by Paul Kolenbrander and Rob Palmer.
862
CONCLUSIONS
Although researchers such as Henrici and Zobell recognized
and studied surface-attached bacteria almost 70 years ago (103,
285287), we are only just beginning to fully realize the significance of biofilm communities. Moreover, viewing bacteria
from the perspective of multicellular behavior is, in essence,
altering our view of microbiology. It is evident that bacterial
cells have the ability to aggregate into particular three-dimensional assemblages, differentiate and hence divide labor within
these assemblages, and then disperse as part of their life cycle.
Moreover, whether single-species or mixed-species biofilms,
intercellular interactions and communication are undoubtedly
required for biofilm development and persistence. Dissecting
these interactions provides one of the future challenges in
biofilm research. Particularly challenging is the attempt to understand the complexity of the interactions within the biofilm
community. Communication between species may include extracellular compounds whose sole role is to influence gene
expression, metabolic cooperativity and competition (possibly
encompassing global changes in gene expression and metabo-
863
44. Correia, F. F., J. M. DiRienzo, T. L. McKay, and B. Rosan. 1996. scbA from
Streptococcus crista CC5A: an atypical member of the IraI gene family.
Infect. Immun. 64:21142121.
45. Costerton, J. W. 1995. Overview of microbial biofilms. J. Ind. Microbiol.
15:137140.
46. Costerton, J. W., K.-J. Cheng, G. G. Geesey, T. I. Ladd, J. G. Nickel, M.
Dasgupta, and T. J. Marrie. 1987. Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 41:435464.
47. Costerton, J. W., Z. Lewandowski, D. E. Caldwell, D. R. Korber, and H. M.
Lappin-Scott. 1995. Microbial biofilms. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 49:711745.
48. Costerton, J. W., Z. Lewandowski, D. De Beer, D. Caldwell, D. Korber, and
G. James. 1994. Biofilms, the customized microniche. J. Bacteriol. 176:
21372142.
49. Costerton, J. W., P. S. Stewart, and E. P. Greenberg. 1999. Bacterial
biofilms: a common cause of persistant infections. Science 284:318322.
50. Dahlberg, C., C. Linberg, V. L. Torsvik, and M. Hermansson. 1997. Conjugative plasmids isolated from bacteria in marine environments show various degrees of homology to each other and are not closely related to
well-characterized plasmids. Appl. Envirn. Microbiol. 63:46924697.
51. Danese, P. N., L. A. Pratt, S. Dove, and R. Kolter. 2000. The outermembrane protein, Ag43, mediates cell-to-cell interactions in E. coli biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 37:424432.
52. Danese, P. N., L. A. Pratt, and R. Kolter. 2000. Exopolysaccharide production is required for development of Escherichia coli K-12 biofilm architecture. J. Bacteriol. 182:35933596.
53. Davies, D. G., and G. G. Geesey. 1995. Regulation of the alginate biosynthesis gene algC in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during biofilm development in
continuous culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:860867.
54. Davies, D. G., M. R. Parsek, J. P. Pearson, B. H. Iglewski, J. W. Costerton,
and E. P. Greenberg. 1998. The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the
development of a bacterial biofilm. Science 280:295298.
55. Davies, J. 1994. Inactivation of antibiotics and the dissemination of resistance genes. Science 264:375382.
56. de Beer, D., and P. Stoodley. 1995. Relation between the structure of an
aerobic biofilm and mass transport phenomena. Water Sci. Technol. 32:11
18.
57. de Beer, D., P. Stoodley, and Z. Lewandowski. 1994. Effects of biofilm
structures on oxygen distribution and mass transport. Biotechnol. Bioeng.
43:11311138.
58. de Boer, W., R. J. A. Klein Gunnewick, M. Veenhuis, E. Bock, and H. J.
Laanbroeck. 1991. Nitrification at low pH by aggregated chemolithotrophic
bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:36003604.
59. Decho, A. W. 1990. Microbial exopolymer secretions in ocean environments: their role(s) in food webs and marine processes. Oceanogr. Mar.
Biol. Annu. Rev. 28:73 153.
60. Dewanti, R., and A. C. L. Wong. 1995. Influence of culture conditions on
biofilm formation by Escherichia coli O157:H7. Int. J. Food Microbiol.
26:147164.
61. Dibdin, G., and J. Wimpenny. 1999. Steady-state biofilm: practical and
theoretical models. Methods Enzymol. 310:296322.
62. Dingman, J. R., M. G. Rayner, S. Mishra, Y. Zhang, M. D. Ehrlich, J. C.
Post, and G. D. Ehrlich. 1998. Correlation between presence of viable
bacteria and presence of endotoxin in middle-ear effusions. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3417 3419.
63. Doolittle, M. M., J. J. Cooney, and D. E. Caldwell. 1995. Lytic infection of
Escherichia coli biofilms by bacteriophage T4. Can. J. Microbiol. 41:1218.
64. Dougherty, S. H. 1988. Pathobiology of infection in prosthetic devices. Rev.
Infect. Dis. 10:11021117.
64a.Doyle, R. J. (ed.). 1999. Methods in enzymology. Academic Press, New
York, N.Y.
65. Duan, Y., E. Fisher, D. Malamud, E. Golub, and D. Demuth. 1994. Calcium-binding properties of SSP-5, the Streptococcus gordonii M5 receptor for
salivary agglutinin. Infect. Immun. 62:52205226.
66. Dworkin, M. 1996. Recent advances in the social and developmental biology of the myxobacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 60:70102.
67. Edwards, K. J., P. L. Bond, T. M. Gihring, and J. Banfield. 2000. An
archaeal iron-oxidizing extreme acidophile important in acid mine drainage. Science 287:17961799.
68. Elasir, M. O., and R. V. Miller. 1999. Study of the response of a biofilm
bacterial community to UV radiation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:2025
2031.
69. Elder, M. J., F. Stapleton, E. Evans, and J. K. G. Dart. 1995. Biofilmrelated infections in ophtalmology. Eye 9:102109.
70. Farag, A. M., D. F. Woodward, J. N. Goldstein, W. Brumbaugh, and J. S.
Meyer. 1998. Concentrations of metals associated with mining waste in
sediments, biofilm, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish from the Coeur
dAlene River Basin, Idaho. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 34:119127.
71. Fenno, J. C., A. Shaikh, G. Spatafora, and P. Fives-Taylor. 1995. The fimA
locus of Streptococcus parasanguis encodes an ATP-binding membrane
transport system. Mol. Microbiol. 15:849863.
72. Flemming, H.-C. 1993. Biofilms and environmental protection. Water Sci.
Technol. 27: 110.
MICROBIAL BIOFILMS
864
73. Fletcher, J., S. Nair, S. Poole, B. Henderson, and M. Wilson. 1998. Cytokine
degradation by biofilms of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Curr. Microbiol. 36:
216 219.
74. Fletcher, M. 1996. Bacterial attachment in aquatic environments: a diversity
of surfaces and adhesion strategies, p. 124. In M. Fletcher (ed.), Bacterial
adhesion: molecular and ecological diversity. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New
York, N.Y.
75. Fletcher, M., and J. H. Pringle. 1986. Influence of substratum hydration
and absorbed macromolecules on bacterial attachment to surfaces. Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 51:13211325.
76. Fossing, H., and B. B. Jrgensen. 1996. Measurement of bacterial sulfate
reduction in sediments: evaluation of a single-step chromium reduction
method. Biogeochemistry 8:205222.
77. Fry, J. C., and M. J. Day. 1990. Bacterial genetics in natural environments,
1st ed. Chapman & Hall, Ltd., London, United Kingdom.
78. Gacesa, P. 1998. Bacterial alginate biosynthesisrecent progress and future prospects. Microbiology 144:11331143.
79. Ganeshkumar, N., P. M. Hannam, P. E. Kolenrander, and B. C. McBride.
1991. Nucleotide sequence of a gene coding for a saliva-binding protein
(SsaB) from Streptococcus sanguis 12 and possible role of the protein in
coaggregation with actinomyces. Infect. Immun. 59:10931099.
80. Ganeshkumar, N., M. Song, and B. C. McBride. 1988. Cloning of a Streptococcus sanguis adhesin which mediates binding to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite. Infect. Immun. 56:11501157.
81. Garrett, E. S., D. Perlegas, and D. J. Wozniak. 1999. Negative control of
flagellum synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is modulated by the alternative sigma factor AlgT (AlgU). J. Bacteriol. 181:74017404.
82. Genevaux, P., P. Bauda, M. S. DuBow, and B. Oudega. 1999. Identification
of Tn10 insertions in the rfaG, rfaP, and galU genes involved in lipopolysaccharide core biosynthesis that affect Escerichia coli adhesion. Arch. Microbiol. 172:18.
83. Genevaux, P., S. Muller, and P. Bauda. 1996. A rapid screening procedure
to identify mini-Tn10 insertion mutants of Escherichia coli K-12 with altered
adhesion properties. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 142:2730.
84. Gibbons, R. J., D. I. Hay, and D. H. Schlesinger. 1991. Delineation of a
segment of adsorbed salivary acidic proline-rich proteins which promotes
adhesion of Streptococcus gordonii to apatitic surfaces. Infect. Immun. 59:
29482954.
85. Gibbons, R. J., and M. Nygaard. 1970. Interbacterial aggregation of plaque
bacteria. Arch. Oral Biol. 15:13971400.
86. Gibbons, R. J., and J. van Houte. 1980. Bacterial adherence and the formation of dental plaques, p. 63104. In E. H. Beachey (ed.), Bacterial
adherence. Chapman and Hall, London, U.K.
87. Gilbert, P., J. Das, and I. Foley. 1997. Biofilms susceptibility to antimicrobials. Adv. Dent. Res. 11:160167.
88. Gorlin, A. I., M. M. Gabriel, L. A. Wilson, and D. G. Ahearn. 1996. Effect
of adhered bacteria on the binding of Acanthamoeba to hydrogel lenses.
Arch. Ophthalmol. 114:576580.
89. Govan, J. R. W., and V. Deretic. 1996. Microbial pathogenesis in cystic
fibrosis: mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia. Microbiol. Rev. 60:539574.
90. Gristina, A. G., J. J. Dobbins, B. Giammara, J. C. Lewis, and W. C.
DeVreies. 1988. Biomaterial-centered sepsis and the total artificial heart.
JAMA 259:870 874.
91. Hansen, T. A. 1993. Carbon metabolism of sulfate-reducing bacteria, p.
2140. In J. M. Odom and J. R. Singleton (ed.), The sulfate-reducing
bacteria: contemporary perspectives. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.
92. Harley, J. L., and S. E. Smith. 1983. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic
Press, New York, N.Y.
92a.Harmsen, H. J. M., A. D. L. Akkermans, A. J. M. Stams, and W. M. de Vos.
1996. Population dynamics of propionate-oxidizing bacteria under methanogenic and sulfidogenic conditions in anaerobic granular sludge. Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 62:21632168.
93. Harmsen, H. J., H. M. Kengen, A. D. Akkermans, A. J. Stams, and W. M.
de Vos. 1996. Detection and localization of syntrophic propionate-oxidizing
bacteria in granular sludge by in situ hybridization using 16S rRNA-based
oligonucleotide probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:16561663.
94. Harrison, M. J. 1997. The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: and underground association. Trends. Plant Sci. 2:5460.
95. Hasty, D. L., I. Ofek, H. S. Courtney, and R. J. Doyle. 1992. Multiple
adhesins of streptococci. Infect. Immun. 60:21472152.
96. Havarstein, L. S., P. Gaustad, I. F. Nes, and D. A. Morrison. 1996. Identification of the streptococcal competence-pheromone receptor. Mol. Microbiol. 21:863869.
97. Heilmann, C., C. Gerke, F. Perdreau-Remington, and F. Gotz. 1996. Characterization of Tn917 insertion mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis affected in biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 64:277282.
98. Heilmann, C., and C. Gotz. 1998. Further characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis transposon mutants deficient in primary attachment or
intercellular adhesion. Zentvalbl. Bakteriol. 287:6983.
99. Heilmann, C., M. Hussain, G. Peters, and F. Gotz. 1997. Evidence for
autolysin mediated primary attachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis to a
130.
131.
132.
133.
134.
136.
137.
138.
139.
140.
141.
142.
143.
144.
145.
146.
147.
148.
149.
150.
151.
152.
153.
154.
155.
865
135.
between Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas (Bacteroides) gingivalis by lactose and related sugars. Infect. Immun. 57:32043209.
Kolenbrander, P. E., and R. N. Anderson. 1990. Characterization of Streptococcus gordonii (S. sanguis) PK488 adhesion-mediated coaggregation with
Actinomyces naeslundii PK606. Infect. Immun. 58:30643072.
Kolenbrander, P. E., and R. N. Anderson. 1986. Multigenic aggregations
among oral bacteria: a network of independent cell-to-cell interactions. J.
Bacteriol. 168:851859.
Kolenbrander, P. E., R. N. Anderson, and L. V. Holdemna. 1985. Coaggregation of oral Bacteroides species with other bacteria: central role in coaggregation bridges and competitions. Infect. Immun. 48:741746.
Kolenbrander, P. E., R. N. Anderson, and L. V. Moore. 1989. Coaggregation of Fusobacterium nucleatum, Selenomonas flueggei, Selenomonas inflix,
Selenomonas noxia, and Selenomonas sputigena with strains from 11 genera
of oral bacteria. Infect. Immun. 57:31943203.
Kolenbrander, P. E., R. N. Anderson, and L. V. H. Moore. 1990. Intragenic
coaggregation among strains of the human oral bacteria: potential role in
primary colonization of tooth surface. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:3890
3894.
Kolenbrander, P. E., N. Ganeshkumar, F. J. Cassels, and C. V. Hughes.
1993. Coaggregation: specific adherence among human oral plaque bacteria. FASEB J. 7:406413.
Kolenbrander, P. E., and J. London. 1993. Adhere today, here tomorrow:
oral bacterial adherence. J. Bacteriol. 175:32473252.
Kolenbrander, P. E., and J. London. 1992. Ecological significance of coaggregation among oral bacteria. Adv. Microb. Ecol. 12:183217.
Kunin, C. M., J. J. Dobbins, J. C. Melo, M. M. Levinson, K. Love, L. D.
Joyce, and W. DeVries. 1988. Infectious complications in four long-term
recipients of the Jarvik-7 artificial heart. JAMA 259:860864.
Lamont, R. J., and H. F. Jenkinson. 1998. Life below the gum line: pathogenic mechanisms of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62:12441263.
Lawrence, J. R., D. R. Korber, B. D. Hoyle, J. W. Costerton, and D. E.
Caldwell. 1991. Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 173:
65586567.
Lebaron, P., P. Bauda, M. C. Lett, Y. Duval-Iflah, P. Simonet, E. Jacq, N.
Frank, B. Roux, B. Baleux, G. Faurie, J. C. Hubert, P. Normand, D. Prieur,
S. Schmitt, and J. C. Block. 1997. Recombinant plasmid mobilization between E. coli strains in seven sterile microcosms. Can. J. Microbiol. 43:534
540.
Lee, J. Y., H. T. Sojar, G. S. Bedi, and R. J. Genco. 1992. Synthetic peptides
analogous to the fimbrillin sequence inhibit adherence of Porphyromonas
gingivalis. Infect. Immun. 60:16621670.
Lewansowski, Z., S. A. Altobelli, and E. Fukushima. 1993. NMR and microelectrode studies of hydrodynamics and kinetics in biofilms. Biotechnol
Prog. 9:4045.
Licht, T. R., B. B. Christensen, K. A. Krogfelt, and S. Molin. 1999. Plasmid
transfer in the animal intestine and the other dynamic populations: the role
of community structure and environment. Microbiology 145:26152622.
Littler, W. A. 1998. Antimicrobial therapy for bacterial endocarditis on
native valves. J. Infect. 36:137139.
Loo, C. Y., D. A. Corliss, and N. Ganeshkumar. 2000. Streptococcus gordonii
biofilm formation: identification of genes that code for biofilm phenotypes.
J. Bacteriol. 182:13741382.
Losick, R., P. Youngman, and P. J. Piggot. 1986. Genetics of endospore
formation in Bacillus subtilis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 20:625669.
Lunsford, R. D., and J. London. 1996. Natural genetic transformation in
Streptococcus gordonii: comX imparts spontaneous competence on strain
Wicky. J. Bacteriol. 178:58315835.
Mack, D., W. Fischer, A. Krokotsch, K. Leopold, R. Hartmann, H. Egge,
and R. Laufs. 1996. The intracellular adhesin involved in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis is a linear -1,6-linked glucosaminoglycan: purification and structural analysis. J. Bacteriol. 178:175183.
Mack, D., M. Nedelmann, A. Krokotsch, A. Schwarzkopf, J. Heesemann,
and R. Laufs. 1994. Characterization of transposon mutants of biofilmproducing Staphylococcus epidermidis impaired in the accumulative phase
of biofilm production: genetic identification of a hexosamine-containing
polysaccharide intracellular adhesin. Infect. Immun. 62:32443253.
MacLeod, F. A., S. R. Guiot, and J. W. Costerton. 1990. Layered structure
of bacterial aggregates produced in an upflow anaerobic sludge bed and
filter reactor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:15981607.
Madigan, M. T., J. M. Martinko, and J. Parker. 1997. Microbial ecology, p.
532605. In Brock biology of microorganisms, 8th ed. Prentice Hall, Inc.,
Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Makin, S. A., and T. J. Beveridge. 1996. The influence of A-band and
B-band lipopolysaccharide on the surface characteristics and adhesion of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa to surfaces. Microbiology 142:299307.
Marsh, P. D. 1999. Microbiologic aspects of dental plaque and dental
caries. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 43:599614, vvi.
Massol-Deya, A. A., J. Whallon, R. F. Hickey, and J. M. Tiedje. 1995.
Channel structure in aerobic biofilms of fixed film reactors treating contaminated groundwater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:769777.
MICROBIAL BIOFILMS
866
183.
184.
185.
186.
187.
188.
190.
191.
192.
193.
194.
195.
196.
197.
198.
199.
200.
201.
202.
203.
204.
205.
206.
207.
208.
209.
210.
211.
212.
213.
214.
215.
216.
217.
218.
219.
220.
221.
222.
223.
224.
225.
226.
227.
228.
229.
230.
231.
232.
233.
234.
235.
236.
237.
189.
867
MICROBIAL BIOFILMS