Agoraphobia
Agoraphobia
Agoraphobia
Agoraphobia
Holly Hazlett-Stevens
W H AT I S A G O R A P H O B I A ?
Agoraphobia literally means fear of the marketplace, based on agora, the word for
the Greek marketplace (Durand & Barlow, 2003). The term agoraphobia was first
introduced by Westphal in 1871 to describe the fear and avoidance of public places,
although this condition was not widely recognized until the late 1970s (Barlow, 2002).
Diagnosis of Agoraphobia first appeared in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders in its third edition (DSM-III; American Psychiatric Association [APA],
1980). Agoraphobia was then considered a primary diagnosis, which may or may not
be accompanied by recurrent panic attacks (Mennin, Heimberg, & Holt, 2000).
However, since publication of the DSM-III-R (APA, 1987), a diagnosis of Panic
Disorder is considered primary and is diagnosed either with or without Agoraphobia.
Under the current DSM-IV (APA, 1994) diagnostic system, individuals exhibiting
symptoms of Agoraphobia but never meeting full diagnostic criteria for Panic
Disorder are given a diagnosis of Agoraphobia Without History of Panic Disorder
(AWHPD).
The DSM-IV (APA, 1994) describes Agoraphobia as anxiety about several different places or situations from which escape would be either difficult or embarrassing if some sort of unexpected or unwanted bodily symptoms occurred
(Criterion A). As a result, such situations are either avoided, require the presence
of a trusted person, or are endured with great distress (Criterion B). This anxiety
and situational avoidance is not better explained by another anxiety disorder, such
as Social Phobia or Specific Phobia (Criterion C). Although panic attacks or paniclike bodily sensations are often feared, other feared symptoms include loss of bladder or bowel control, vomiting, or severe headache. Agoraphobia is not recognized
by DSM-IV as a diagnosis on its own. An individual meeting criteria for
Agoraphobia is then diagnosed with either Panic Disorder With Agoraphobia
(PDA) (if diagnostic criteria for Panic Disorder are also met) or AWHPD. Both
diagnoses require that the symptoms cannot be fully explained by a general medical condition and do not reflect the direct physiological effects of a substance.
Common agoraphobic situations include shopping malls, public transportation,
supermarkets, restaurants, theaters, additional situations involving crowds or waiting
in line, travel far from home, and being alone (Barlow & Craske, 2000). Such agoraphobic situations are avoided because of feared bodily sensations or physical symptoms; therefore it is not surprising that other daily activities causing such
interoceptive sensations are also avoided. Activities involving physical exertion, such
as aerobic exercise, running up flights of stairs, heavy lifting, and dancing, may be
avoided because they induce sensations of physiological arousal. Similar interoceptive activities include hot and stuffy spaces, sexual relations, watching suspenseful
movies or sporting events, expressing anger or engaging in emotionally arousing discussions, and ingesting caffeine or chocolate (Barlow & Craske, 2000). Individuals
with AWHPD who fear sensations other than panic-like symptoms might avoid
Hazlett-Stevens, H. (2006). Agoraphobia. In J. E. Fisher & W. T. ODonohue (Eds.), Practitioners guide to
evidence-based psychotherapy. New York: Springer.
24
AGORAPHOBIA
25
additional activities causing other feared sensations. For example, an individual with
AWHPD stemming from gastrointestinal distress and fear of losing control of his
bowels might avoid eating spicy foods or heavy meals to prevent unwanted gastrointestinal sensations. Nevertheless, the actual agoraphobic situations avoided by individuals with AWHPD do not seem to differ from those avoided by individuals with
Panic Disorder With Agoraphobia (Pollard, Tait, Meldrum, Dubinsky, & Gall, 1996).
DSM-IV conceptualizes Agoraphobia as a condition most often secondary to
Panic Disorder or sub-clinical panic symptoms. This view rests on the assumption
that avoidance of public places and other agoraphobic situations develops as a
behavioral reaction to the unexpected physiological arousal of panic (Barlow, 2002).
Indeed, re-assessment of 26 AWHPD patients revealed that 57% appeared to suffer
from panic attacks containing too few symptoms to meet criteria for Panic Disorder
(Goisman et al., 1995). In a longitudinal naturalistic study of 562 participants suffering from panic and agoraphobia symptoms, only 6% were assigned diagnoses of
AWHPD (Goisman et al., 1994). These researchers proposed that AWHPD might be
best conceptualized as part of a panic syndrome, in which AWHPD lies on a single
continuum with PDA and Panic Disorder Without Agoraphobia (PD). Similarly,
Andrews and Slade (2002) concluded that these three diagnoses represent three
variations of a single disorder after finding strong similarities among AWHPD, PDA,
and PD clinical groups.
Although AWHPD is not often seen in mental health treatment settings
(Pollard, Bronson, & Kenney, 1989), Agoraphobia can develop in response to
somatic conditions other than panic. For example, AWHPD has been associated
with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (Hoffart, Thornes, & Hedley, 1995), Irritable
Bowel Syndrome (IBS; Mennin et al., 2000), headache (Spierings, Reinders, &
Hoogduin, 1989), and fear of vomiting (Pollard et al., 1996). Wittchen, Reed, and
Kessler (1998) found that most agoraphobic individuals in their community sample
reported no history of uncued panic-related symptoms, challenging the predominant view that panic-like experiences are usually responsible for the development
of Agoraphobia. They argued that AWHPD is not often seen in mental health settings because such individuals seldom seek treatment, not because it is a rare condition. Regardless of whether or not panic-related sensations are responsible for the
development of an individuals Agoraphobia, the behavioral avoidance is driven by
a fear of some sort of internal bodily sensation or event.
B A S I C FA C T S A B O U T A G O R A P H O B I A
26
CHAPTER TWO
Robins, Helzer, Croughan, & Ratcliff, 1981) and the NCS assigned DSM-III-R diagnoses after administering the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI;
World Health Organization, 1990).
Researchers have since taken a closer look at AWHPD cases from epidemiological studies. Horwath, Lish, Johnson, Hornig, and Weissman (1993) blindly reinterviewed 22 AWHPD participants from the original ECA study. Only two received
a diagnosis of AWHPD, one of which had sub-clinical panic attacks. The remaining
participants were reclassified with simple (specific) phobias or PDA. In a more recent
study using DSM-IV criteria, Andrews and Slade (2002) reported a 1-year prevalence
rate of 1.3% for PD, 1.6% for AWHPD, and 0.6% for PDA in their Australian community sample. Although AWHPD and PD groups were mutually exclusive, 18% of
those with AWHPD reported recurrent and unexpected panic attacks that did not
meet criteria for PD. Thus, the prevalence of AWHPD and its relationship to panic
attacks and Panic Disorder remains the subject of much debate.
The prevalence of PDA does not seem to differ among ethnic groups (Eaton,
Dryman, & Weissman, 1991; Horwath, Johnson, & Hornig, 1993). However, African
Americans are rarely found in treatment outcome research studies (Paradis, Hatch,
& Friedman, 1994). Early epidemiological research based on DSM-III criteria consistently revealed that Agoraphobia was more common for women than men (see
Pollard & Henderson, 1987). In the later NCS study, women were more than twice
as likely as men to meet diagnostic criteria for Agoraphobia (ratio of 2.2:1.0; Magee,
Eaton, Wittchen, McGonagle, & Kessler, 1996). According to the DSM-IV-TR (APA,
2000), approximately 75% of those suffering from PDA are women. One explanation for this gender difference is that avoidance behavior is more culturally acceptable for women than for men. Agoraphobic individuals tendency to avoid situations
correlated with masculinity scores, such that the lower the score, the greater the
avoidance behavior (Chambless & Mason, 1986). Consistent with this view, men are
more likely than women to cope with unwanted anxiety and panic symptoms by
using alcohol and other psychoactive substances (Kushner, Abrams, & Borchardt,
2000). For a thorough review of gender difference research see Craske (1999, 2003).
Although little is known about the course of AWHPD, the course of PDA is
often quite chronic. One longitudinal investigation reported a 1-year remission rate
of only 17%, and relapse among these individuals was common (Keller et al.,
1994).The onset of Agoraphobia usually occurs in the late-twenties, with a median
age of onset of 29 years (Magee et al., 1996). Panic Disorder begins as early as the
mid-teens (Burke, Burke, Regier, & Rae, 1990), but PDA is rarely found in younger
children (Albano, Chorpita, & Barlow, 1996). More than half the time, individuals
with PDA are diagnosed with additional comorbid conditions. This most often
involves another anxiety disorder such as Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Specific
Phobia, or Social Phobia, or a mood disorder such as Major Depressive Disorder or
Dysthymia. Substance use disorders and Axis II personality disorders are also common (see Barlow, 2002; Craske, 1999 for reviews).
Agoraphobia can become quite disabling. Although the NCS study found that
only 26.5% of those with Agoraphobia reported that their avoidance interfered
a lot with their life (Magee et al., 1996), severe functional impairment across many
life domains is common among clinical samples (Mennin et al., 2000). Interpersonal
problems and marital difficulties have been documented with PDA (Hoffart, 1997;
Marcaurelle, Blanger, & Marchand, 2003), although it is unclear whether these
problems were present before the onset of PDA. Other important costs include medical utilization and work disability. PDA often leads to increased use of nonpsychiatric general medical services and emergency room visits (Markowitz, Weissman,
AGORAPHOBIA
27
Ouellette, Lish, & Klerman, 1989). Unemployment and other forms of work
impairment are also common. Studies of treatment-seeking clinical populations
have documented unemployment rates of 50%, and 33% of individuals suffering
from PDA may be financially dependent on public assistance programs (Edlund &
Swann, 1987; Massion, Warshaw, & Keller, 1993). Although little information about
the social costs of AWHPD is available, severe agoraphobic avoidance associated
with sub-clinical panic or conditions other than panic can also lead to significant
impairment.
W H AT C A U S E S A G O R A P H O B I A ?
28
CHAPTER TWO
innocuous sensations are dangerous. For example, accelerated heart rate might be
interpreted as a sign of heart attack or stroke, shortness of breath could be taken as
a sign of suffocation, and dizziness could be perceived as evidence that the person
will faint (Barlow, 2002). Other feared consequences of unwanted bodily sensations
include losing control over ones body and going crazy. Clark (1988) described these
cognitions as catastrophic misinterpretations, in which normal anxiety sensations
and sometimes other harmless physical sensations are interpreted in a catastrophic
way to signal immediate and impending physical and/or mental disaster.
Along similar lines, Reiss et al. (1986) defined anxiety sensitivity as the tendency to interpret anxiety sensations as harmful. They suggested that anxiety sensitivity represents a specific vulnerability to Panic Disorder and agoraphobic avoidance,
and longitudinal research supports this idea (Ehlers, 1995). Anxiety sensitivity among
treatment-seeking agoraphobic clients reflected fears of heart and breathing symptoms, loss of mental control, gastrointestinal difficulties, and other people detecting
anxiety symptoms (Wardle, Ahmad, & Hayward, 1990). Individuals with PDA appear
more likely to fear physical catastrophes than AWHPD individuals (Hoffart, Friis,
Strand, & Olsen, 1994).
Barlow (2002) proposed a comprehensive etiological model of PDA that integrates these various components. He suggested that an individual may be predisposed to experience anxiety through both biological and psychological
generalized vulnerability factors. When a stressful event triggers an exaggerated
physiological fear response, the individual becomes fearful of the associated interoceptive cues due to a specific tendency to interpret unexplained physical sensations as dangerous. This fear leads to anticipation of future unwanted somatic
sensations, or anxious apprehension. Agoraphobia develops when the individual
responds to feared somatic sensations and anticipation of future interoceptive
cues with behavioral avoidance of certain situations. This avoidance maintains the
fear of unwanted sensations, reinforcing beliefs that such sensations are indeed
harmful and need to be avoided in certain situations. This model might also be
applied to cases of AWHPD. For individuals fearing panic-like sensations, the same
physiological fear response might lead to interoceptive conditioning and the
development of avoidance behavior even though full-blown panic attacks are not
experienced. Individuals with AWHPD in the absence of subclinical panic may also
possess a specific psychological vulnerability to interpret unexplained physical sensations as dangerous. In this case, unwanted bodily sensations other than panic
could lead to the same cycle of anxious apprehension and behavioral avoidance
seen in PDA.
ASSESSMENT
What Should be Ruled Out?
Before PDA or AWHPD is diagnosed, the clinician should rule out any medical conditions that might account for the clients feared bodily sensations. For example,
certain thyroid and vestibular problems can cause panic-like sensations (see Panic
Disorder chapter, this volume). Similarly, the clinician should determine that the
somatic sensations associated with the clients Agoraphobia are not merely due to
the effects of a substance. If the client uses psychoactive substances, careful assessment of when the physiological effects of these substances were experienced is necessary. This allows the clinician to determine whether the direct effects of the
substance can account for the avoidance behavior.
AGORAPHOBIA
29
Clinicians must also determine that a clients avoidance behavior is not better
accounted for by another DSM-IV diagnosis. As reviewed above, epidemiological
survey results may have been confounded by misdiagnosed cases of Agoraphobia.
Specific Phobia and Social Phobia are easily confused with PDA and AWHPD
because all involve behavioral avoidance of in vivo situations. However, the defining
feature of Agoraphobia is that fear and avoidance of certain situations stems from a
fear that escape would be difficult or embarrassing or that help would be unavailable
in the event of a panic attack or other unwanted bodily sensations. If an individuals
avoidance is driven by a fear of negative evaluation or fear that he or she might
behave in a way that other people would scrutinize, an alternative diagnosis of Social
Phobia (Social Anxiety Disorder) should be considered. If the situational avoidance
is confined to specific types of situations or objects, a diagnosis of Specific Phobia
(formerly Simple Phobia) may be more appropriate. An individual might avoid various public places due to contamination fears or other intrusive obsessive thoughts,
but this avoidance behavior would be best conceptualized as a symptom of ObsessiveCompulsive Disorder. Sometimes individuals suffering from Posttraumatic or Acute
Stress Disorder will avoid certain places, people, or activities because these stimuli
remind them of the traumatic event or because they fear additional harm from the
environment. From a diagnostic perspective, this form of behavioral avoidance is
usually subsumed under the avoidance of stimuli criterion required for both stress
disorder diagnoses and does not warrant a separate AWHPD diagnosis.
What is Involved in Effective Assessment?
In clinical settings, Agoraphobia is often detected at the initial diagnostic interview. Structured diagnostic interviews such as the DIS (Robins et al., 1981) and the
CIDI (World Health Organization, 1990) have been developed for administration
by lay interviewers, but this practice may not always yield a valid diagnosis. Ideally,
diagnosis is obtained with a semi-structured clinician administered diagnostic
interview so that differential diagnosis issues can be explored fully. Empirically
supported semi-structured interviews such as the Anxiety Disorders Interview
Schedule for DSM-IV (ADIS-IV; Brown, Di Nardo, & Barlow, 1994) allow the clinician to systematically assess the function of reported anxiety symptoms and avoidance behavior. This information prepares the clinician to conduct a functional
analysis of the individuals ideographic cognitions, interoceptive avoidance, situational avoidance, and subtle avoidance and safety behaviors that maintain the
disorder (see Barlow, 2002).
Additional information regarding specific cognitive and behavioral features of
Agoraphobia can be obtained with self-report questionnaires. Widely used selfreport measures include the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI; Reiss et al., 1986), the
Anxiety Control Questionnaire (AnxCQ; Rapee, Craske, Brown, & Barlow, 1996),
the Body Sensations Questionnaire and the Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire
(BSQ and ACQ; Chambless, Caputo, Bright, & Gallagher, 1984), and the Mobility
Inventory for Agoraphobia (MI; Chambless, Caputo, Jasin, Gracely, & Williams,
1985). Complete descriptions of these and many other measures, along with reviews
of available psychometric data, are available from Antony (2001).
What Assessments are Not Helpful?
30
CHAPTER TWO
inkblot test and the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), nor neuropsychological
tests such as those found in the Luria-Nebraska and Halstead-Reitan batteries are
useful in the diagnosis of Agoraphobia. Medical markers or tests for this condition
are not available.
T R E AT M E N T
What Treatments are Effective?
Pollard, C.A., & Zuercher-White, E. (2003). The agoraphobia workbook: A comprehensive program to end your fear of symptom attacks. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger
Publications, Inc.
Eisenstadt, M. (2003). Freedom from agoraphobia. Anchorage, AK: Mark Eisenstadt,
M.D.
Weekes, C. (1990). Agoraphobia: Simple effective treatment. New York, NY:
HarperCollins Publishers.
One additional self-help resource might be beneficial to friends and family
members of people suffering from Agoraphobia:
Chope, R.C. (2001). Healing options for you and the agoraphobic in your life. Oakland,
CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc.
While much empirical research supports the practice of therapist-administered cognitive-behavioral treatment for Agoraphobia, bibliotherapy approaches
have been studied much less. Ghosh and Marks (1987) administered a self-help
book instruction coupled with only three therapist contacts to treat mild agoraphobic avoidance. Results suggested that this treatment approach was as effective
as therapist-guided treatment in less severe cases of Agoraphobia. However, these
results do not seem to generalize to more severe agoraphobic individuals, possibly
due to difficulties engaging in self-guided exposure exercises (Holden, OBrien,
AGORAPHOBIA
31
http://www.adaa.org/Anxiety DisorderInfor/PanicDisAgor.cfm
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/ HealthInformation/panicmenu.cfm
http://www.anxiety network.com/pdhome.html
http://pages. infinit.net/drnayman/agorapho.htm
Barlow and colleagues (Craske & Barlow, 2001; Craske, Barlow, & Meadows, 2000)
have developed a widely used cognitive-behavioral therapy for PDA known as Panic
Control Treatment (PCT). This therapist-based treatment has received much empirical support (see Craske, 1999 and Barlow, 2002 for reviews). However, recent
research suggests that situational exposure targeting agoraphobic avoidance might
not be necessary for effective treatment of PDA (Craske, DeCola, Sachs, & Pontillo,
2003). See Panic Disorder chapter (this volume) for more information about cognitive-behavioral treatment approaches for PDA. Therapist-guided exposure was
moderately effective for severe Agoraphobia when administered over 48 weeks
(Holden et al., 1983). st and colleagues found that their Applied Relaxation (AR)
approach coupled with self-exposure instructions was also an effective treatment for
PDA agoraphobic avoidance (st et al., 1993).
What is Effective Medical Treatment?
Pharmacotherapy for Agoraphobia has been widely studied in the context of PDA.
Tricyclic antidepressants such as imipramine have effectively treated agoraphobic
avoidance symptoms (Lydiard, Brawman-Mintzer, & Ballenger, 1996). More
recently, several selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have received
empirical support in the treatment of PDA (see White & Barlow, 2002 for a review).
Benzodiazepines were the first approved for PDA treatment, but these medications
have the potential to undermine effective situational exposure when combined
with cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Other Issues in Management
Many theoretical and practical issues remain unresolved. The role of panic attacks
and feared anxiety sensations, while clear in cases of PDA, might not always explain
the development of AWHPD. Some researchers have suggested that the pathway
leading to Panic Disorder differs from the pathway leading to Agoraphobia
(Wittchen et al., 1998). Alternatively, comprehensive PDA models (e.g., Barlow,
2002) might be extended to explain how fears of unexplained bodily sensations
lead to AWHPD clinical presentations involving sensations other than panic.
Nevertheless, careful assessment of any feared sensations associated with agoraphobic avoidance is crucial. The clinical nature and treatment of AWHPD needs to
be further explored, particularly in medical settings where individuals experiencing
IBS, headaches, and other physical conditions that might lead to Agoraphobia
would likely present for treatment.
How Does One Select Among Treatments?
32
CHAPTER TWO
AGORAPHOBIA
33
34
CHAPTER TWO
http://www.springer.com/978-0-387-28369-2