UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6613
ROGELIO ALONSO CASTELLON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
SHERWOOD R. MCCABE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-03-30)
Submitted:
November 29, 2004
Decided:
January 18, 2005
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rogelio Alonso Castellon, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Rogelio Alonso Castellon, a state prisoner, seeks to
appeal the district courts order denying relief on his petition
filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (2000).
An appeal may not be taken
from the final order in a 2254 proceeding unless a circuit
justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.
28 U.S.C.
2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue
for claims addressed by a district court absent a substantial
showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
2253(c)(2)
(2000).
prisoner
satisfies
this
28 U.S.C.
standard
by
demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the
district
courts
assessment
of
his
constitutional
claims
is
debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by
the district court are also debatable or wrong.
See Miller-El v.
Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 338 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.
473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).
We
have
independently
reviewed
the
record
and
conclude
that
Castellon has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -