Example1: The sum of the TPMs the MPM
Sold in: HKG
Journey:
Fare basis:
TPM
HKG
1049 EH
754 EH
BKK
KUL
Manual ticketing:
FROM/TO
HKG
CARR
FARE CALC.
BKK
CI
KUL
MH
571.93
HKG
BKK
4.22
ROE
7.81557
TOTAL FARE CALC.
NUC 576.15
HKD 4510
FARE
RATE USED 1HKD-4.27600001TWD
Fare construction:
I. FCP
HKGKUL
NUC
OW Y 571.93
SR
NIL
MPM
EH 1887
TPM
EMA
EMS
HIP
AF
Check
1049+754 = 1803
NIL
M
TPM MPM (Within mileage)
NIL
So, the O-D (HKG-KUL) through EH fare can
571.93+4.22= 576.15
be charged.
TOTAL NUC 576.15
IROE
7.81557 (Up to 10)
LCF
HKD 4,510
EQUIV FARE PAID TWD 19,285
Automated ticketing:
HKG CI BKK Q4.22 MH KUL M571.93Y NUC576.15END ROE7.81557
Example2: The sum of the TPMs the MPM
Sold in: HKG
Journey:
Fare basis:
TPM
TPE
1555 EH
889 EH
BKK
SIN
557 EH
JKT
Manual ticketing:
FROM/TO
TPE
CARR
FARE CALC.
BKK
CI
SIN
TG
10M
JKT
GA
800.41
ROE
32.938
-----
NUC 880.45
TOTAL FARE CALC.
TWD 29001
FARE
Fare construction:
I. FCP
TPEJKT
NUC
OW Y 800.41
SR
NIL
MPM
TPM
EMA
EMS
HIP
AF
Check
EH 2848
1555+889+557 = 3001
NIL
10M
NIL
880.45
TPM MPM (TPMs exceeds MPM)
TPMs 3001 MPM 2848 = 1.05372
10% surcharge apply
TOTAL NUC 880.45
IROE
32.938 (Up to 1)
LCF
TWD 29,001
Automated ticketing:
TPE CI BKK TG SIN GA JKT 10M880.45Y NUC880.45END ROE32.938
Example3: EMA via a mandatory routing point(s)
Sold in: HKG
Journey:
Fare basis:
TPM
TPE
5053 PA
2553 PA
HNL
LAX
330 PA
SFO
Manual ticketing:
FROM/TO
TPE
CARR
FARE CALC.
HNL
CI
E/HNL
LAX
AA
SFO
US
888.85
----ROE
TOTAL FARE CALC.
32.938
NUC 888.85
TWD 29277
FARE
Fare construction:
I. FCP
TPESFO
NUC
OW Y 888.85
SR
NIL
MPM
TPM
EMA
EMS
HIP
AF
Check
The ticketing code to illustrate the
use of the EMAs is E/ followed by
the city code(s) of the mandatory
routing points(s). This EMA code
always appears on the box
immediately above the M.
PA 7740
5053+2553+330-800 = 7136
-800 E/HNL
M
TPM MPM (Within mileage)
NIL
So, the O-D (TPE-SFO) through PA fare can
888.85
be charged.
TOTAL NUC 888.85
IROE
32.938 (Up to 1)
LCF
TWD 29,277
Automated ticketing:
TPE CI E/HNL AA LAX US SFO M888.85Y NUC888.85END ROE32.938
Example 4 :EMA via two mandatory routing point(s)
Sold in: KWI
Journey:
Fare basis:
TPM
KWI
520
1290
EH
EH
X/AUH
ISB
701
2309
EH
EH
X/KHI
BKK
Manual ticketing:
FROM/TO
KWI
CARR
FARE CALC.
X/AUH
KU
ISB
PK
E/ISBKHI
X/KHI
PK
BKK
TG
851.62
ROE
0.29473
----
TOTAL FARE CALC.
FARE
NUC 851.62
KWD 251
Fare construction:
I. FCP
KWIBKK
NUC
OW Y 851.62
SR
NIL
MPM
EH 4224
TPM
(520+1290+701+2309) -700 =4120
EMA
-700 E/ISBKHI
The total TPMs (4820) is greater than the
EMS
Exceed 15M M
MPM (4224) and this would result a 15%
HIP
NIL
surcharge. However, this is a journey within
AF
851.62
Middle East and Area 3 via both ISB and KHI
Check
which allows a deduction of 700 miles form the
total TPMs.
TOTAL NUC 851.62
The adjusted TPM (4120) is lower than the
IROE
0.29473 (Up to 1)
MPM (4224). The new total TPMs compared
LCF
KWD 251
to the MPM now is within the mileage as
denoted the code M.
Automated ticketing:
KWI KU X/AUH PK E/ISB PK X/E/KHI TG BKK M851.62NUC851.62END
ROE0.29473
Example 5: EMA via a non-mandatory routing point(s)
Sold in: BUD
Journey:
Fare basis:
TPM
BUD
134
1268
EH
EH
X/VIE
LCA
128
EH
BEY
Manual ticketing:
FROM/TO
BUD
CARR
FARE CALC.
X/VIE
MA
E/XXX
LCA
CY
BEY
ME
1229.31
---ROE
TOTAL FARE CALC.
214.684
NUC 1229.31
HUF 264000
FARE
Fare construction:
I. FCP
BUDBEY
NUC
OW Y 1229.31
SR
NIL
The ticketing code to illustrate the
use of the EMAs is E/ followed by
the city code(s) of the mandatory
routing points(s). However, in the
example shown, there is no
mandatory via point, in this case,
XXX represents any via point.
MPM
TPM
EMA
EMS
HIP
AF
Check
EH 1516
(134+1268+128) 100 = 1430
-100 E/XXX
The total TPMs (1530) is greater than the MPM
5M M
(1516) and this would result a 5% surcharge.
NIL
However, this is a journey between BUD and
1229.31
Middle East via Europe which allows a deduction of
100 miles from the total TPMs.
The new total TPMs (1430) compared to the MPM
now is within the mileage as denoted the code M.
TOTAL NUC 1229.31
IROE
214.684 (Up to 100)
LCF
HUF 264000
Automated ticketing:
BUD MA X/VIE CY LCA ME BEY E/XXX M1229.31NUC1229.31END ROE214.684
Example 6: HIP using primary normal fare
Sold in: TAS
Journey:
Fare basis:
TPM
TAS
416
3162
EH
EH
ALA
FRA
396
EH
LON
Manual ticketing:
FROM/TO
TAS
CARR
FARE CALC.
ALA
9Y
FRA
HY
ALALON
LON
BA
3455.79
---ROE
TOTAL FARE CALC.
1.00
NUC 3455.79
USD 3456.00
FARE
Fare construction:
I. FCP
TASLON
NUC
OW Y 2910.00
SR
MPM
TPM
EMA
EMS
HIP
AF
Check
NIL
EH 4710
(416+3162+396) = 3974
NIL
M
ALALON
3455.79
Based on the fares listed below, the
highest is ALALON NUC 3455.79
which is deemed to be the higher
intermediate fare.
OW / Y / NUC
MPM
TAS-ALA
-FRA
-LON
213.00
2749.00
2910.00 EH 4710
ALA-FRA
-LON
3265.46
3455.79
FRA-LON
590.70
TOTAL NUC 3455.79
IROE
1.00 (Nearest 1)
LCF
USD 3456.00
Automated ticketing:
TAS 9Y ALA HY FRA BA LON M ALALON3455.79NUC3455.79END ROE1.00
Example 7: HIP with different global indicator
Sold in: BKK
Journey:
Fare basis:
TPM
BKK
897
5234
EH
FE
SIN
MOW
1091
EH
IST
Manual ticketing:
FROM/TO
BKK
CARR
FARE CALC.
SIN
TG
15M
MOW
SQ
SINMOW
IST
TK
3108.28
The routing from BKK to IST is
calculated as an Eastern Hemisphere
route with l higher intermediate fare
ROE
39.429
from SIN to MOW based on a
nonstop service via Far East route.
----
TOTAL FARE CALC.
NUC 3108.28
THB 122560
FARE
Fare construction:
I. FCP
BKKIST
NUC
OW Y 1508.28
SR
MPM
TPM
EMA
EMS
HIP
AF
Check
NIL
EH 6295
(897+5234+1091) = 7222
NIL
15M
SINMOW
2702.86*1.15=3108.28
OW / Y / NUC
MPM
BKK-SIN
-MOW
-IST
264.90
2297.54
1508.28 EH 6295
SIN-MOW
-IST
3286.48 EH
2337.49
SIN-MOW
-IST
2702.86 FE
2337.49
MOW-IST
490.70
TOTAL NUC 3108.28
IROE
39.429 (Up to next 5)
LCF
THB 122,560
Automated ticketing:
BKK TG SIN SQ MOW TK IST15M SINMOW3108.28NUC3108.28END ROE 39.429
