[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views3 pages

US Department of Justice Antitrust Case Brief - 00924-201230

The document describes a criminal case against Larry E. Bennett for wire fraud and theft of honest services. Bennett was president of a video duplication company and paid a bribe to an executive of an audio-visual company to gain contract support and prevent business issues. The payment crossed state lines by wire transfer, establishing federal jurisdiction for wire fraud charges.

Uploaded by

legalmatters
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views3 pages

US Department of Justice Antitrust Case Brief - 00924-201230

The document describes a criminal case against Larry E. Bennett for wire fraud and theft of honest services. Bennett was president of a video duplication company and paid a bribe to an executive of an audio-visual company to gain contract support and prevent business issues. The payment crossed state lines by wire transfer, establishing federal jurisdiction for wire fraud charges.

Uploaded by

legalmatters
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN


SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CRIMINAL NO. 03-80660

v. HONORABLE NANCY G. EDMUNDS

VIOLATION: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343


D-1 LARRY E. BENNETT, 1346
OFFENSE: Wire Fraud/Theft of
Honest Services
FILED: JULY 10, 2003
Defendant.
/

INFORMATION

The United States of America, acting through its attorneys, charges:

I.
DESCRIPTION OF THE OFFENSE

1. Larry E. Bennett is made a defendant on the charge stated below.

2. Defendant, at all times relevant, lived in Plymouth, Michigan, which is

located within the Eastern District of Michigan, and was president of

Premiere Video, Inc., a company located in Livonia, Michigan that duplicated

and distributed videotapes.

3. Defendant and an executive ("executive") of an audio-visual company located

in Troy, Michigan (“company”), which buys licensing rights from television

and movie programers, then packages these properties for retail sale as

videotapes and DVDs, willfully devised a scheme to commit wire fraud by

depriving the company of the honest services of one of its executives and
permitted the executive to obtain money by means of false or fraudulent

pretenses in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1346.

4. The executive and the defendant willfully entered into a scheme to defraud in

which the defendant agreed in a series of meetings and telephone calls to pay

the executive monies in exchange for his continued support in contract

negotiations, and to prevent Premiere’s business with the company from

being jeopardized. In so doing, the defendant willfully entered into a scheme

to defraud. The scheme to defraud deprived the company of the honest

services of its executive and permitted the executive to obtain monies by

means of false or fraudulent pretenses.

II.
USE OF WIRES

5. As part of the scheme, and for the purpose of executing the scheme to

defraud, on or about January 8, 2001, defendant willfully directed the

transmission over interstate wires of a $29,667 payment for the benefit of the

executive. The defendant caused the wire transfer to cross from the Eastern

District of Michigan, where the defendant was located, to Pennsylvania and

ultimately to Arkansas for the purpose of furthering or executing the scheme

to defraud, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343,

1346.

III.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

6. The scheme charged in this Information was devised and carried out, in part,
in the Eastern District of Michigan, within the five years preceding the filing

of this Information.

IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1343 AND


1346.

“/s/” “/s/”
R. HEWITT PATE SCOTT M. WATSON
Acting Assistant Attorney General Chief, Cleveland Field Office

“/s/” “/s/”
JAMES M. GRIFFIN KEVIN C. CULUM
Deputy Assistant Attorney General [3460--MT]

BRIAN J. STACK
[069796--OH]
“/s/” ANTOINETTE E. THOMAS
SCOTT D. HAMMOND [474696-DC], [MD]
Director of Criminal Enforcement Attorneys
Antitrust Division
Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice Plaza 9 Building
55 Erieview Plaza, Suite 700
Cleveland, OH 44114-1816
Telephone: (216) 522-4014
Fax: (216) 522-8332
JEFFREY G. COLLINS
United States Attorney
Eastern District of Michigan

“/s/”
ALAN GERSHEL
Criminal Chief, E.D. Michigan

Dated: July 10, 2003

You might also like