Chemical Kinetics: Simple Enzyme Reactions
Chemical Kinetics: Simple Enzyme Reactions
Chemical Kinetics: Simple Enzyme Reactions
tex
C(0) = 0,
P (0) = 0,
with
E(t) = E0 C(t),
E0 = E(0).
with
S0 = S(0),
or
for t > t0 .
Thus, from the equation for dP/dt, we have the so-called MichealisMenten equation:
dP/dt(t) K3 E0 S(t)/((K2 + K3 )/K1 + S(t)),
1
for t > t0 .
Now the slope dP/dt(t) is measurable by fitting a straight-line to a segment of the kinetic curve for P (t) with t0 < t te , where te is the time
such that S(te ) 0, e.g., when almost all the substrate material has been
consumed. Note S(t) S0 for t0 < t te if S0 is large enough, so one can
fit the Michealis-Menten equation to the single data point (S0 , dP/dt) to
try to obtain K3 and Km = (K2 + K3 )/K1 , the so-called Michealis-Menten
constant.
The parameter K3 may be independently resolved by observing that
when S0 is very large we have S(t)/(Km + S(t)) 1 for t0 < t te , so
dP/dt(t) K3 E0 . Thus the maximum rate of formation of P for a fixed E0
value is K3 E0 . Let K3 E0 = Vm . Vm can be determined by measuring the
slope, dP/dt(t), of the linear region of the kinetic curve obtained when S 0
is very large. Now, the Michealis-Menten equation becomes:
dP/dt(t)/Vm S(t)/(Km + S(t))
for t0 < t te .
Note dP/dt(t)/Vm is the relative rate of formation of P , i.e., the proportion of the maximum rate which is achieved. Hence, having measured Vm ,
one can then measure dP/dt(t) for a relatively-large amount of S, and then
obtain Km from the Michealis-Menten equation as S0 Vm /(dP/dt(t)) S0 .
The Michealis-Menten constant is the amount of substrate which will
yield a product formation rate of Vm /2. It thus is the point at which the
formation of product becomes increasingly sensitive to a decreasing amount
of substrate. The activity of the enzyme for a given amount of substrate
is determined directly as dP/dt(t) computed from the Michealis-Menten
equation for a given Km .
The Lineweaver-Burke form of the Michealis-Menten equation is often
used because of its linear form. It is:
1/(dP/dt(t)) (Km /Vm )(1/S(t)) + (1/Vm ).
The Eadie and Dixon form is also often used. It is:
S(t)/(dP/dt(t)) S(t)/Vm + Km /Vm .
Actually, as noted above, the reaction S + E *
) C P + E is a fiction.
It is commonly used to approximate the situation:
K1
K3
K5
K2
K4
K6
S+E*
)C *
)D*
)P +F
U +F *
)B*
)A*
)V +E
2
.025
S+E *
) C P +E
.025
The first column of Q is time, t, the second is P (t), the third is dP/dt(t),
the fourth is C(t), and the fifth is dC/dt(t). We can look at the graph of P
vs. t by typing:
* M COL 2 = (M COL 2) + E
* DRAW M, POINTTYPE triangle LINETYPE none
* view
4
*
*
*
*
The control variables METHOD and ERRFAC are set based on prior experience; this problem is stiff and runs slowly! Our curve-fit predicts that
K1 , K2 , and K3 are 2.4295, .7975, and .025296 respectively, and resets them
accordingly. Note K1 and K2 are not even close to .2 and .025, but K3 is
approximately correct. We may observe the graph of this fit by typing:
* DELETE W
Now, let us analyze the same reaction using the Michaelis-Menten model.
Type:
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
K1 = .2; K2 = .025; K3 = K2
FUNCTION MM(S)=VM*S/(KM+S)
KM = (K2+K3)/K1; VM = K3*E0
DRAW Q COL (1,3)
SM = S0-(Q COL 2)-(Q COL 4)
DRAW (Q COL 1)&(MM ON SM), LINETYPE dashed
view
6
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
DELETE W
S0 = 500
Z = INTEGRATE (P DIFF T, C DIFF T, 100:300:10) COL 1:2
DRAW Z
Z COL 2 = (Z COL 2)+(NORMRAN ON 0^^NROWS(Z))/4
DRAW Z, LINETYPE none, POINTTYPE crosspt
FUNCTION Y(T)=A*T+B
CONSTRAINTS QS = {A > 0, B > 0}
A = 1; B = 1
FIT(A,B), Y TO Z, CONSTRAINTS QS
VM =A
DRAW POINTS (Y, 50:350!2), LINETYPE dashed
VIEW
7
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
DELETE W
S0 = 10
Z = INTEGRATE(P DIFF T, C DIFF T,100:300:10) COL 1:2
Z COL 2 = (Z COL 2)+(NORMRAN ON 0^^NROWS(Z))/4
FIT(A,B),Y TO Z, CONSTRAINTS QS
KM = VM*S0/A-S0\
TYPE VM,KM
*
*
*
*
Note the dP/dt curve predicted from the kinetic differential equation
model is much better than the consistent underestimate predicted by the
Michaelis-Menten model.
There is another approach to estimating the Michaelis-Menten constants,
Vm and Km , based on the intersections of various linear plots. This scheme is
due to R. Eisenthal and A. Cornish-Bowden (Biochemistry Journal, Vol. 139,
pp. 715:730). It is robust and, at the cost of more experiments, allows a confidence region for Vm and Km to be obtained, without the usual restrictive
assumptions. Unfortunately, it often produces poor extimates of Vm and
Km .
Given observations (S0i , Hi ) of substrate concentrations and corresponding product-formation velocities (obtained by linear-regression), we can construct lines defined by Vm /Hi + Km /S0i = 1, which may be plotted in Km ,
Vm space. The line { (Km , Vm ) | Vm /Hi + Km /S0i = 1 } is the locus of
all (Km , Vm ) pairs which could produce the observation (S0i , Hi ). Each
of the (Km , Vm ) points obtained by the intersections of all pairs of these
lines is an estimate of the true Km , Vm values. The arithmetic median
of the Km -estimates is the Eisenthal-Cornish-Bowden estimate of Km , and
the arithmetic median of the Vm -estimates is the Eisenthal-Cornish-Bowden
estimate of Vm .
We shall simulate ten experiments for S0 = 50 : 500 : 50 and compute
the Michaelis-Menten velocity curve based on Km and Vm as estimated by
the Eisenthal-Cornish-Bowden procedure.
* FUNCTION VMF(I,J) = (SV[I]-SV[J])/(SV[I]/VV[I]-SV[J]/VV[J])
* FUNCTION KMF(I,J) = (VV[J]-VV[I])/(VV[I]/SV[I]-VV[J]/SV[J])
* FOR I = 1:10 DO \
{S0 = 50*I;
9
10