[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
69 views4 pages

Ultra-Low Power Phase-Locked Loop

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 4

An Ultra-low Power Charge-Pump PLL with High

Temperature Stability in 130 nm CMOS


Anh Chu, Navneeta Deo, Waqas Ahmad, Markus Trmnen and Henrik Sjland
Department of Electrical and Information Technology (EIT), Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Email: soc13ac1@student.lu.se, soc13nna@student.lu.se

AbstractAn ultra-low power fully-integrated frequency synthesizer was designed and implemented in 130 nm CMOS technology. Based on integer-N phase locked loop architecture, the
frequency synthesizer operates from 13.8 to 61 MHz. Current
consumption has been minimized by the use of a mix of analog
and digital blocks and a prior planning of current distribution
amongst each blocks. The measured phase noise is -89.6 dBc/Hz
@ 500 kHz offset and the current consumption is 77 A from
1.2 V supply at 32 MHz output. The reference frequency of 1 MHz
is generated from an on-chip RC based oscillator whose output
frequency varies by only 0.025% when temperature varies
between -10 C to 110 C.

I. I NTRODUCTION
Phase locked loops have been described in literature ever
since 1923 [1]. But it was only in late 1970s that PLLs
were used in modern communication systems due to the rapid
development of integrated circuits. Since then the use of PLLs
has been shifted from high precision instruments to more
reliable consumer electronic products. A PLL is a circuit
synchronizing an output signal (generated by an oscillator)
with a reference or input signal in frequency as well as in
phase. In the synchronized (locked) state, the phase error
between the oscillators output signal and the reference signal
is zero, or it remains constant [2].
PLLs have wide applications such as frequency selective
demodulation, signal conditioning, reference signal source,
grid utility [3], [4]. From luxury items to indispensable tools,
wireless systems have quickly penetrated into all aspects of
our lives. All these devices have common requirements of
a preferred monolithic implementation, low power, reduced
physical size and high accuracy [5], [6].
This paper presents the design of a fully integrated low
power phase locked loop system in 130 nm CMOS technology
to be used as a clock generator for ultra-low power applications. To achieve full integration, reference signal is generated
by an on-chip temperature independent RC oscillator thus
avoiding an external reference source like crystal oscillator.
The phase of reference signal is compared with output signal
coming from the frequency divider in the phase frequency
detector. Depending on the phase error, the charge pump in
next stage pumps current into or out of the loop filter. In the
next stage is a voltage controlled oscillator whose frequency
keeps changing until lock is obtained, that is, until there is
no phase error between reference and output signal. Once in
locked state, VCO frequency becomes N times the reference
frequency, where N is the division value of the divider. The
c
978-1-4799-8893-8/15/$31.00 2015
IEEE

complete design including the RC oscillator occupies 0.8 mm2


excluding pads. The operating frequency is 13.861 MHz,
hence it has potential for use in implantable medical devices.
II. C IRCUIT I MPLEMENTATION
The circuit consists of six main blocks: RC oscillator, phase
frequency detector, charge pump, loop filter, voltage controlled
oscillator and a frequency divider. A multiplexer which is used
to select between the internal clock provided by RC oscillator
or external clock serves as an auxiliary block. The complete
block diagram is shown in Fig. 1.
Charge pump

0.7-1.5 MHz RCO


step=25 kHz
1
0

VCO
(13.8-61 MHz)

UP

fout=32fin

DOWN

ext_clk

Mux
Loop filter
f/32

Fig. 1. PLL block diagram

A. RC Oscillator (RCO)
The RC relaxation oscillator works by continuously charging and discharging a capacitor [7] and is shown in Fig. 2a.
The oscillation frequency is calculated as f = 0.722/(RC).
The importance of the reference clock is that it must be robust
to process, voltage and temperature variation (PVT) to keep
the PLL output frequency stable. A design procedure including
2 steps was adopted: (1) Temperature compensation: Choosing
values for R and C so that 1 MHz output is obtained, and R is
large enough to compensate for temperature variation of the
inverter resistance, which has a negative temperature coefficient. This step is done assuming typical corner. (2) Process
compensation: Measure the maximal and minimal frequencies
over process corners, break R into a base resistor connected
in series with an array of 5 binary-weighted resistors. The
resistance of the binary-weighted resistor array is activated by
switches, so that an exact frequency of 1 MHz can be tuned in
a post production step regardless of the process corner. 3.3 V
NMOS transistors are used as switches as the 1.2 V NMOS
is easily pushed into cut-off due to the full swing oscillating
voltages at its drain and source terminals. Since the switch

control pins use 01.2 V, level shifter is used to convert this


range into 03.3 V.
From step 1, component values of 210 k and 2 pF were
selected. From step 2, R was found to be in range of 130 k
300 k to compensate for process corners. Since 5 switches
were used, the base resistor is 130 k and the resistor array
includes 5.5 k, 11 k, 22 k, 44 k and 88 k resistors.
These values translate into a resolution of 25 kHz for trimming
the frequency.
130-300Mk
M
0.16/0.13

Ref

DOWN

Clk
D

VDD

iout
M2
0.75/0.5

0.16/0.13
P5

50nsM

Fbk

0.16/0.13

600mV

Clk

DOWN
UP

P1
0.84/0.5
P2
5.3/0.5

P4

/a8

VDD
D

P3

UP

2pF

VbP

/c8

0.16/
0.13

M3 VbN

M1
1/2.7

/b8

Fig. 2. Loop components: (a) RC oscillator, (b) Phase-frequency detector, (c)


Charge pump.

D. Voltage-Controlled Oscillator
The VCO is a ring oscillator including 4 delay cells biased
by a replica bias circuit. A CML to CMOS converter is used
to convert the differential signal from the VCO to rail-to-rail
square wave. The complete schematic is depicted by Fig. 3.
The delay cells consist of two symmetric load blocks made
up from a diode-connected PMOS in parallel with an equally
sized PMOS. This load structure demonstrates a symmetric IV characteristic around the DC operating point and is capable
of cancelling first-order coupling dynamic supply noise and
improving the VCO phase noise [9] [10]. The small-signal
gain of 1.7 V/V is chosen for delay cells, as a higher gain
degrades phase noise due to broad range noise amplification,
and a lower gain makes the oscillation process less robust to
PVT [11].
The replica bias circuit generates bias voltages for the
symmetric load and tail current source inside the delay cell, so
that the symmetric load is biased at exactly its symmetric point
[9] [10]. The circuit consists of an amplifier, a half-replica
buffer and an output buffer. The amplifier is designed for high
gain at dc to null its differential input, then the symmetric load
of the half-replica buffer is biased at dc current doubled that
of the symmetric loads inside the delay cell. As there are two
load branches inside the delay cell, the delay cells are biased
at their symmetric dc point. The output buffer is to isolate the
control voltage from the delay cell, which may contribute lots
of parasitic capacitance.

B. Phase-Frequency Detector
The PFD circuit is shown in Fig. 2b. Two static D flipflops are used to detect rising edges of reference clock and
feedback signal. The Q outputs are combined by an AND
gate to reset the flip-flop states. Whenever there is a phase
difference between the reference and feedback signals, a short
pulse is generated at either UP or DOWN pins to charge or
discharge the loop filter to minimize the phase error. The pulse
duration is lengthened by a 50 ns RC delay block to eliminate
the dead zone problem, which can put a lower limit on the
PFD phase error in locked condition [8].

Vctrl

VbP

VbP

VbN

VbN

VbP

VbN

VbN

V
Replica) bP
VbN
Bias

2a5
Symmetric
Load

Vctrl

1/0.63

1/0.63

1/0.63

1/0.63
VbP

1/0.63

1/0.63
VbP

inM
3/5.4

2/2.6

2/2.6

in-

3/5.4
VbN

Amplifier

1/0.63

out- outM

4/2.6

4/2.6

C. Charge Pump
A charge pump circuit is used to convert the logical state
of phase frequency detector to voltage related information.
This is done by generating charging or discharging current of
2 A depending on the output coming from phase frequency
detector. The output from the charge pump enters the loop
filter which controls the VCO. A topology which provides
equal delay on both PMOS and NMOS current mirror is
chosen as shown in Fig. 2c. Vbias of 600 mV is selected
to put the switch transistors P2 and M2 in saturation. Then,
P1-P2 and M1-M2 are in cascode configuration to increases
the output impedance of the current sources. This reduces
variations in charging/discharging currents which in turn help
in maintaining VCO control voltage constant which results in
reduction of spurs.

CML)to)CMOS)
converter

VbP

Half-replica)
Buffer

VbN

3/5.4

Output)Buffer
2b5

2c5

Fig. 3. VCO structure: (a) Topology, (b) replica bias, (c) delay cell

E. Frequency Divider
The circuit includes five divide-by-two blocks in cascade to
obtain a division of 32. The divide-by-two block consists of
two cascaded static complementary D latches [12] connected
within a negative feedback loop.

F. Loop Filter
A second order passive loop filter was realized. The loop
bandwidth and phase margin were selected to be 100 kHz (i.e.
1/10 of the reference frequency) and 50 degree, respectively.
The component values are calculated from linear model [13]
with VCO gain obtained from schematic simulations. Values
of (21 k + 207 pF)//31.7 pF were selected. The simulated loop
gain and phase margin are shown in Fig. 4.

instead of the designed 100 kHz. We suspect this due to the


process variation of the VCO, which affects the VCO gain.
Phase noise is measured to be -78.3 dBc/Hz at 250 kHz offset
and -89.6 dBc/Hz at 500 kHz offset. The reference spur is 29.7 dBc.

MagnitudeH(dB)

80

40

-40

-80
-120

PhaseHmarginH=H50

PhaseH(deg)

-130

-150

Fig. 6. Phase noise at 32 MHz output (internal clock selected)


-180
10 3

10

10

10

10

FrequencyHH(Hz)

Fig. 4. Simulated phase margin and loop bandwidth in Matlab

6.2 dBm x

III. M EASUREMENT R ESULTS


The PLL chip was fabricated in a 130 nm CMOS process.
Chip micrograph is shown by Fig. 5. Die area is 0.8 mm2
excluding pads.

29.7 dBc

1.28 mm

0.62 mm

Loop Filter

PFD
RCO

VCO

Fig. 5. Chip micrograph. Die area = 0.8 mm2 (excl. pads)

The PLL output spectrum was measured using an FSEA20


Rhode&Schwarz Spectrum Analyzer. By using internal oscillator the output range is 21.447.5 MHz, indicating a range
of 0.71.5 MHz of the internal oscillator. When driven by an
external clock from a DG1000Z Rigol Waveform Generator
the output range is 13.861 MHz.
Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 show phase noise and reference spur
at 32 MHz output when using the internal oscillator as the
reference. The observed loop bandwidth is about 250 kHz

Fig. 7. Peak power and reference spur at 32 MHz output (internal clock
selected)

Phase noise variation with output frequency is shown in


Fig. 8. Phase noise is stable when either internal or external
clock is selected. This behavior is different from LC oscillator
in which phase noise is improved with lower oscillation
frequency [14]. The reason is the fundamental signal power
is increased with frequency to compensate, as confirmed from
VCO simulation.
The measured current consumption of different blocks and
whole PLL are as shown in Table I at 32 MHz output. The total
current is 77 A, which is equivalent to 92.4 W from 1.2V
supply. The total current dependence on output frequency is
depicted in Fig. 8, which shows a linear increase of 3 A/MHz.

PFD

CP

VCO

Freq.D

Total

7.6

4.4

1.7

56.2

77

Parameter

Performance

CMOS Process

130 nm

Supply Voltage

Internal Oscillator Range

1.2 V
13.8 61 MHz (ext. clk.)
21.4 47.5 MHz (int. clk.)
0.7 1.5 MHz, 31 steps, 25 kHz/step

Current Consumption (32 MHz)

77 A (excl. output buffer)

Output Power (32 MHz)

6 dBm (int. clk.), 6.2 dBm (ext. clk.)

Reference Spur (32 MHz)

-29.7 dBc

RCO

TABLE II
P ERFORMANCE S UMMARY

Phase Noise (32 MHz)

-89.6 dBc/Hz (500 kHz offset)

I_total (

Phase Noise @500kHz offset (dBc/Hz)

TABLE I
C URRENT C ONSUMPTION @ 32MH Z OUTPUT. U NIT: A

Temperature Stability

0.025% (-10 110 C)

Die area

0.8 mm2 (excl. pads)

Output Frequency Range

200
-86

Phase Noise (ext. clk.)


Phase Noise (int. clk.)

-88
150
-90

-92

100

-94

-96

50

-98

-100

0
10

20

30

40

50

60

70

f_out (MHz)

Fig. 8. Current consumption and phase noise (500 kHz offset) versus
frequency

The PLL performance variation with temperature is shown


in Fig. 9. Here the PLL is driven by the internal oscillator at
1 MHz. The output frequency is highly stable, with change
of 0.025% over range of -10110 C. A peak frequency is
observed at around 50 C and decreases with lower and higher
temperature. This high stability shows the effectiveness of
temperature stability technique used in the circuit. The phase
noise and spur level are improved at higher temperature.
The summary of PLL measured parameters is presented in
Table II.
-28
fmax

32.225
-85

32.220
-90

32.215

fmin

-95
-10

10

30

50

70

90

-30

-32

-34

-36

Reference Spur (dBc)

-80
Phase Noise (dBc/Hz)

f_out (MHz)

32.230

-38

110

Temperature (C)

Fig. 9. Variation with temperature of output frequency, phase noise (500 kHz
offset from 32 MHz output) and reference spur (from on-chip oscillator)

IV. C ONCLUSION
We have demonstrated a low frequency PLL for ultra-low
power applications. The PLL multiplies a reference frequency
provided by an on-chip RC oscillator or by an external clock
source by 32 times. The VCO frequency range is 13.8
61 MHz. A low power of 92.4 W from 1.2 V supply is

measured for 32 MHz output. The RC oscillator shows good


temperature stability with 0.025% frequency variation over
range -10110 C.
The PLL was implemented in a 130 nm CMOS process
by master students in the course analog IC-project at Lund
University. Chip verification was done in RF Lab at the same
university.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Thanks to Gran Jnsson at EIT, Lund University for
support in chip measurements.
R EFERENCES
[1] E. V. Appleton, "Automatic synchronization of triode oscillators" in Proc.
Cambridge Phil. Society, vol. 21, pt. III, p. 231, 1922-23.
[2] Floyd M. Gardner, "Charge-Pump Phase-Lock Loops," IEEE Trans. On
Commun., pp. 18491858, Nov. 1980.
[3] G. C. Hsieh and J. C. Hung, "Phase-locked loop techniquesA survey,"
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 609615, Dec. 1996.
[4] L. R. Limongi, R. Bojoi, C. Pica, F. Profumo, and A. Tenconi, "Analysis
and comparison of phase locked loop techniques for grid utility applications," in Proc. IEEE Power Convers. Conf., pp. 674681, 2007.
[5] Ippolito, C. M. , Italia A. , Palmisano G. , "An ultra low-power CMOS
frequency synthesizer for low data-rate sub-GHz applications," in Ph.D.
Research in Microelectronics and Electronics (PRIME) Conf., pp. 14,
2010.
[6] B. Razavi, "Challenges in the design of frequency synthesizers for
wireless applications," in Proc. IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conf.,
Santa Clara, CA, USA, pp. 395402, May 1997.
[7] Paul Horowitz and Winfielf Hill, The Art of Electronics, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994.
[8] Behzad Razavi, Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits, McGrawHill, 2001.
[9] John G. Maneatis and Mark Horowitz, "Precise Delay Generation Using
Coupled Oscillators," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 28, no. 12, pp.
12731282, Dec. 1993.
[10] John G. Maneatis, "Low-Jitter Process-Independent DLL and PLL Based
on Self-Biased Techniques," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 31, no. 11,
pp. 17231732, Nov. 1996.
[11] Todd Charles Weigandt, "Low-Phase-Noise, Low-Timing-Jitter Design
Techniques for Delay Cell Based VCOs and Frequency Synthesizers,"
University of California, Berkeley, PhD dissertation, 1998.
[12] J. Rabaey, Digital Integrated Circuits - A Design Perspective, 2nd ed.
Eagle Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2003.
[13] Dean Banerjee, PLL Performance Simulation and Design Handbook,
2nd ed.: National Semiconductor Technical Documents, 2001.
[14] T. H. Lee, The Design of CMOS Radio-Frequency Integrated Circuits.
Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

You might also like