[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
116 views6 pages

Simplicity of An

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 6

Milnor K-Theory

Mohammed Al-Thagafi

Simplicity of An
Throughout this talk, group will mean finite group.

Recall :
G is simple if no non-trivial normal subgroups . (simple does NOT mean easy).
Sn Symmetric Group = Symmetric Group on n letters

{ Bijection maps from {1, 2,..., n} {1, 2,..., n}.

Sn n !

An Alternating Group = {even permutations}.

An

is even ( )( )( ).....( )

n!
2

even #

Sn

Example :
S3 is not simple since A3

S3

Even perm. An

Note

Odd perm.

Consider S5 . It is known that in S n for any n,


the conjugacy class of an element is the set of
all elements of the same cycle structure.
Not Group

This table shows the possible cycle structures


of elements of S5
Cycle structure

Not closed

Representative
element

number of
elements

5-cycle

(12345)

24

4-cycle

(1234)

30

We are interested in
the conjugacy classes
of A 5 . If x A 5 , then the

3-cycle

(123)

20

conjugacy class of x is

2-cycle

(12)

10

{gxg 1: g A 5 } while the

1-cycle

conjugacy class of x in S5

3-cycle . 2-cycle

(123) (45)

20

is {gxg 1: g S5 } . So, the

2-cycle . 2-cycle

(12) (34)

15

conjugacy class of x in A 5
could conceivably be smaller
than its conjugacy class in S5 .

Also recall:
A group G is solvable if there exist normal subgroups
1 G0 G1 G2 ......Gn G , such that for
i = 1, 2, . . . , n, the quotient group

Gi

Gi 1

is abelian.

The goal of this talk is to proof simplicity of A n (n 5) and conclude


the non-solvability of Sn (n 5).

Which means that there exist non-solvable groups that are not simple.
When we talk about simple groups and their role, one could think of them in a similar point of
view that the prime numbers basic building blocks of the natural numbers.
The existence of simple groups is rare. To convince our self of that, it is suffice to know that
among non-abelian groups of order less than 168 there is only one group, which is An . Among
non-abelian groups of order less than 1000 there are only 5 groups. Among non-abelian groups
of order less than 1000000 there are only 56 groups. As a result for difficulty of find simple
groups, mathematicians have developed tools (criterions) to find non-simple groups rather than
simple one. It is useful at this moment to take a look to the Classification of the Finite Simple
Groups.

The Classification of the Finite Simple Groups

There is no a precise date in which the Classification of the Finite Simple Groups (shortly, the
CFSG) began. Despite this, some highlighting facts happened (especially around 1955-1958).
However, In February 1981 the classification of finite simple groups was completed.
Here is the statement of this theorem
Let G be a finite simple group. Then G is isomorphic to one group of
the following:
(1) A cyclic group of prime order.
(2) An alternating group of degree at least five.
(3) A twisted Lie-type group.
(4) An untwisted Lie-type group
(5) A sporadic group.

Cyclic Groups C p

Alternating Groups
An (n 5)
Simple group
of Lie types

26 Sporadic
simple groups

Danger
Area
Groups
of huge
orders

The important consequence of the CFSG theorem is worth to be mentioned ,the cyclic groups of
prime order are the only abelian simple groups and There are no non-abelian simple groups of odd
order.

Theorem: The alternating group A5 is simple.


Proof:
Suppose {e} H

A 5 . We will prove that H = A5 . Our First goal

is to prove the following:


H must contain a 3-cycle.

Let A 5 . When we write in disjoint cycle notation it is either


a 5-ycle, a 3-cycle or a product of two 2-cycles. (since the other possible
cycle types are odd permutations.)
Suppose H contains a 5-cycle = (abcde). Since (ace) A 5 and H A 5
we have:
(ace) (ace) 1 = (acbed) H
But H is a subgroup so (abcde)(acbed) = (adb) H.
Now suppose H contains a product of two disjoint transpositions:
= (ab)(cd) H. Then (ae)(cd) A5
so (ae)(cd) (ae)(cd) 1 = (be)(cd) H
since H A 5 . Thus (ab)(cd)(be)(cd) = (abe) H.
Thus H {e} implies H contains a 3-cycle.
Now pick a 3-cycle (abc) H. Consider the following two permutations:
a b c d
x y z s

e
a b c d e
'
,

t
x y z t s
Notice that (abc) 1 ( xyz ) and ' (abc) '1 ( xyz ).

Exactly one of or ' is in A 5 since they differ by a transposition (s t). Thus (xyz) H. But
(xyz) was arbitrary so H contains all possible 3-cycles.
Finally notice that:
(ab)(cd) = (dac)(abd)and (ab)(bc) = (abc):
Thus any even permutation can be written as a product of 3-cycles. But
all possible 3-cycles are in H, so H must be all of A 5 , and A 5 is simple.

Theorem:
If n 5 then An is a simple group.
Proof.
We prove this by induction on n; the case n = 5 is already done. So, suppose
that n 6, and that A n 1 is simple. For each i n, let G i = { An : (i) i}. Then
G i is a subgroup of A n isomorphic to A n 1. So, G i is simple by induction. Moreover, if

i A n is any element with i ( j ) i (possible since A n is a transitive subgroup of Sn ), then


G i i G i i 1. Thus, any two of the G i are conjugate in A n . Let N be a normal subgroup of
A n . Then N G i = {e} or N G i = G i . If N G i = G i for some i, then in fact N G i = G j
for all , since G i is conjugate to G i for each j. So since N is normal, if N contains G i for
some i, it contains all of them. But, since n 6, any product of two transpositions is in G i
for some i, and any element of A n is a product of such permutations. So, N = A n .
On the other hand, if N Gi = {e} for each i, then each element of N fixes no integer.
Consequently, if , N with (i) = (i) for some i, then 1 (i ) = i , so 1 N Gi ={e}.
This forces . So, distinct elements of N never agree at any integer. Consider some
N, and write as a product of disjoint cycles, say = c1...ct with ci an ri -cycle (and
r1 r2 .... rt ). if r1 3, say c1 = (i1....ir ). Let = (i3 jk ), with j , k ={i1 ,i2 ,i3}; i2; it is
possible to do this since n 6. Let = 1 N. Both and send i1 to i2 but
since ( i2 ) = i3 and ( i2 ) = j, a contradiction. So, any N is a product of transpositions.
Now suppose = (ij )(kl ).... N. Let = (lpq ) with p, q { f , j , k}, again, this is possible
since n 6. Then if = 1 , both and send i to j , but (k ) = l while ( k ) p,
a contradiction. So, in this case we must have N = {e}. Thus, we have proven that either
N = A n or N = {e}. That is, A n is simple.

You might also like