FX and Interest Rates - 1996
FX and Interest Rates - 1996
FX and Interest Rates - 1996
10/7/96
3 mo
12 mo
3.3
3.6
3.4
3.7
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.6
3.7
0.4
0.7
0.6
1.1
1.0
1.5
1.8
1.6
2.2
2.2
5.9
5.9
5.9
6.8
6.7
5.0
5.3
5.1
5.4
na
6.9
6.6
7.2
3.6
3.9
4.4
5.6
5.8
6.1
Consensus
Futures
3.5
Germany
3mo EuroDM Dep.
Consensus
Futures
Consensus
Futures
Switzerland
3mo EuroSFR Dep.
Consensus
Futures
United Kingdom
3mo Interbank
Consensus
Futures
3mo Treasury Bills
Consensus
Futures
Others
Australia
90-Day Bank Bills
Consensus
Canada
3mo Treasury Bills
Consensus
Since the environment is changing
rapidly it is therefore important not to
rely on information obtained anywhere
but from sources on the ground, in
country.
3mo Interbank
Consensus
Italy
8.1
7.3
6.5
2.8
3.0
3.6
3.2
3.3
3.3
6.8
6.7
6.7
4.8
4.9
5.2
Netherlands
3mo EuroGuilder Dep.
Consensus
Singapore
3mo Interbank
Consensus
Spain
3mo EuroPeseta Dep.
Consensus
Sweden
3mo EuroKrona Dep.
Consensus
Hong Kong
Consensus
Japan
United States
Keeping up to date
Professional development
Currency Management
book explanation, will ensure that
exchange rates adjust to equalize real
returns across currencies. For example,
high rates of interest relative to the dollar would tend to be offset by a devaluation of the high interest currency relative to the dollar (or vice
versa)though the immediate impact
may be to support the currency.
Thus, under parity conditions, the currency with a lower interest rate should
be at an equivalent forward premium in
terms of a currency with a higher interest rate.
Over time, arbitrage will drive the
markets to equilibrium. This is part of
the same conceptual basis suggesting
that forward rates are the best predictor
of future spot rates.
The trick is to determine the change
in the real rate differential, and not that
in nominal rates. It is typically the former that drives the corrective currency
rate adjustments. As Consensus
Economics notes, in many cases, higher
interest rates are a necessary offset to
expected inflation or other economic
risks. In these cases, it is important to
adjust nominal rates for these factors to
determine their bearing on FX. Note
that the consensus view for short-term
rates often deviates slightly from futures
(see table on p. 4)
Further clouding the issue, is the fact
that while rising rates can support a currency, falling rates may do so also. For
instance, if the rate reduction improves
the countrys deficit financing burden,
where interest rates have been historically high, a reduction can be equally
good news for the currency.
This is all a way of saying that the
relationship between interest rate and
currency moves is not entirely straightforward. FX markets may place greater
weight on other influences, such as
trade balances, which can overshadow
the interest rate impact. Consensus
Economics shows how this has been
the case with Japan (see chart 2).
Another factor is that markets tend to
discount expected changes in advance,
so exchange rates can respond as much
to changing expectations as they can to
the rate movements themselves.
International Treasurer/October 28, 1996
Chart 1
Chart 2
No easy answer
These examples show the difficulties
Chart 3
inherent in using changing interest
rate differentials to guide FX management; and by the same token,
indicate the complexities of attempts Source: Consensus Economics Inc.
to integrate FX and interest rate
exposure into a single net position or Monte Carlo simulation, and what-if
value-at-risk number. Parity rules and analysis should be used as insurance for
historical correlations are useful, but your risk management efforts, as well as
cannot be relied upon to hold in every to round out your FX forecast.
instanceeven in the Euromarkets,
which serve as the paragon example of For information on Consensus Economics,
interest parity at work. Stress testing, contact Michael Sykes at +44-171-491-3211.
5