[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
80 views11 pages

Problem 1 005

This document summarizes an example that verifies the SAP2000 software. The example uses a portal frame model with different load cases and support conditions to test SAP2000's ability to model: 1) settlement and rotation of normal supports, 2) skewed supports, 3) spring supports, and 4) bending deformations. Six models are analyzed and the results are compared to independent hand calculations, showing an exact match in all cases.

Uploaded by

andrew_hm925635
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
80 views11 pages

Problem 1 005

This document summarizes an example that verifies the SAP2000 software. The example uses a portal frame model with different load cases and support conditions to test SAP2000's ability to model: 1) settlement and rotation of normal supports, 2) skewed supports, 3) spring supports, and 4) bending deformations. Six models are analyzed and the results are compared to independent hand calculations, showing an exact match in all cases.

Uploaded by

andrew_hm925635
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Software Verification

PROGRAM NAME:
REVISION NO.:

SAP2000
0

EXAMPLE 1-005
FRAME - DISPLACEMENT LOADING
EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION
Using a portal frame, this example verifies SAP2000 for settlement and rotation
of normal supports, skewed supports (settlement only) and spring supports. Note
that for spring supports, the grounded end of the spring is displaced or rotated.
Six different models are created. The models are identical, except for the loading
and the support condition at joint 4 as shown in the figure below. The results for
various support reactions in each model are compared with independent hand
calculations.
Important Note: Only bending deformations are considered in the analysis.
Shear and axial deformations are ignored. In SAP2000 this is achieved by setting
the property modification factor for area to 100,000 and setting the property
modification factor for shear area to 0.
GEOMETRY AND PROPERTIES
144"
2

Y
X

144"

Material Properties
E = 29,000 k/in2
Section Properties
b = 12 in
d = 12 in
A = 144 in2
I = 1,728 in4

4
Support condition at joint 4
varies for each model

EXAMPLE 1-005 - 1

Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME:
REVISION NO.:

SAP2000
0

Model A

0.01 rad

Uz = -0.2"

Uz = -0.5"

SUPPORT CONDITION AT JOINT 4 AND LOADING

Model C

Model B
10 k

Model D

Model

Model E

Support Condition at Joint 4

"
= -1

U3

0.01 rad

Joint local
axes for
skewed
supports

1
cos = 0.8
sin = 0.6

Model F

Loading

Roller

-0.5" Z displacement at joint 4

Z direction translational spring,


k = 10 kip/in

-0.2" Z displacement at joint 4

Roller

0.01 radian rotation about joint 1

Rotational spring about Y axis,


k = 80,000 kip-in/rad

0.01 radian rotation about joint 4

Skewed roller

10 kip Z direction force at


midpoint of frame element 2

Skewed roller

-1" joint local 3 direction


displacement at joint 4

EXAMPLE 1-005 - 2

Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME:
REVISION NO.:

SAP2000
0

TECHNICAL FEATURES OF SAP2000 TESTED


Settlement of support in frame structures
Rotation of support in frame structures
Settlement of support with linear (translational) spring
Rotation of support with rotational spring
Skewed supports
Skewed support settlement
RESULTS COMPARISON
Independent results are hand calculated using the unit load method described on
page 244 in Cook and Young 1985.
Output
Parameter

SAP2000

Independent

Percent
Difference

Fz (jt. 1) kip

6.293

6.293

0%

My (jt. 1) kip-in

-906.250

-906.250

0%

Fz (jt. 1) kip

1.115

1.115

0%

My (jt. 1) kip-in

-160.492

-160.492

0%

Fz (jt. 1) kip

-18.125

-18.125

0%

My (jt. 1) kip-in

2,610.000

2,610.000

0%

D. Spring
Support
Rotation

My (jt. 1 ) kip

-473.469

-473.469

0%

Ry (jt. 4) rad.

0.00408

0.00408

0%

E. Skewed
Support

Fz (jt. 1) kip

5.811

5.811

0%

F3 (jt. 4) kip

5.236

5.236

0%

Fz (jt. 1) kip

27.215

27.215

0%

My (jt. 1) kip-in

-3,918.919

-3,918.919

0%

Model
A. Support
Settlement
B. Spring
Support
Settlement
C. Support
Rotation

F. Skewed
Support
Settlement

EXAMPLE 1-005 - 3

Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME:
REVISION NO.:

SAP2000
0

COMPUTER FILES: Example 1-005a, Example 1-005b, Example 1-005c, Example 1-005d,
Example 1-005e, Example 1-005f
CONCLUSION
The SAP2000 results show an exact match with the independent results.

EXAMPLE 1-005 - 4

Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME:
REVISION NO.:

SAP2000
0

HAND CALCULATION

EXAMPLE 1-005 - 5

Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME:
REVISION NO.:

SAP2000
0

EXAMPLE 1-005 - 6

Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME:
REVISION NO.:

SAP2000
0

EXAMPLE 1-005 - 7

Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME:
REVISION NO.:

SAP2000
0

EXAMPLE 1-005 - 8

Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME:
REVISION NO.:

SAP2000
0

EXAMPLE 1-005 - 9

Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME:
REVISION NO.:

SAP2000
0

EXAMPLE 1-005 - 10

Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME:
REVISION NO.:

SAP2000
0

EXAMPLE 1-005 - 11

You might also like