[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views33 pages

Downtown Investment Plan

The Downtown Investment Plan aims to revitalize downtown Steamboat Springs through public infrastructure projects. The plan outlines goals to make downtown a better place to visit, live, work, invest and do business by completing sidewalks, lighting, parks and other basic infrastructure improvements. It estimates the total cost of proposed projects at over $12.5 million and evaluates financing options like capital funds, certificates of participation, local improvement districts, and general obligation bonds to pay for improvements. The goal is to strengthen the economy by acting when costs are low and property values are rising to spur additional private investment downtown.

Uploaded by

Scott Franz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views33 pages

Downtown Investment Plan

The Downtown Investment Plan aims to revitalize downtown Steamboat Springs through public infrastructure projects. The plan outlines goals to make downtown a better place to visit, live, work, invest and do business by completing sidewalks, lighting, parks and other basic infrastructure improvements. It estimates the total cost of proposed projects at over $12.5 million and evaluates financing options like capital funds, certificates of participation, local improvement districts, and general obligation bonds to pay for improvements. The goal is to strengthen the economy by acting when costs are low and property values are rising to spur additional private investment downtown.

Uploaded by

Scott Franz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 33

Attachment 1

Steamboat Springs Downtown


Investment Plan

Vision Statement
The Downtown Investment Plan is about one
thing:
Making a Great Place Better
x
x
x
x
x
x

Making Downtown More Attractive


Making Downtown Safer
Making Downtown a Great Place to Invest
Making Downtown a Better Place to do Business
Making Downtown an Even Better Place to Visit
Making Downtown a Great Place to Live

Vision Statement
How this is accomplished in the most fiscally
effective manner:
x Acting while interest rates and construction
costs are low
x Acting while property values are low but rising
x Completing efficiently as one coordinated
project
x Completing with consistent design quality and
appearance throughout Downtown

Downtown Projects
OakPedestrianLighting
OakStreetSidewalks(3rd12th)
OakStreetCurb&Gutter
IntersectionsonYampa(Bulbouts)
IntersectionsonYampa(SpeedTables)
SideStreetSidewalks
SideStreetCurb&Gutter
Promenade
PromenadeCurb&Gutter
PromenadeCrusherFines
YampaPedestrianLighting
YampaStreetSidewalks(DTSide)
YampaStreetCurb&Gutter(DTSide)
Trash&Recycling(allareas)
9thStreetPark&RetrofitS&RBldg

375,000
400,155
90,125
1,210,420
689,025
718,725
161,875
271,560
91,980
24,850
370,000
238,227
53,655
316,000
620,000

EaglescoutParkRestroom
WestLincolnParkRestrooms
ProfessionalServices
UtiltyUndergrounding
Contingency
FloodwayandYampaBankImprovements
Asphalt/ConcreteCapitalRepairs
AmphitheaterAlongYampa(StoneTerracing)
RiverBank&FenceEnhancements(10th12th)
Benches/Seating(areawide)
BikeRacks(areawide)
FinancingCostsInterest(4%on9.36M15yrs)
FinancingCostsLoanFees

480,000
320,000
405,000
600,000
800,000
590,000
200,000
195,000
40,000
52,500
46,000
$9,360,097
2,973,747
200,000
12,533,844

Downtown Projects by location


YampaStreet
IntersectionsonYampa(Bulbouts)
IntersectionsonYampa(SpeedTables)
Promenade
PromenadeCurb&Gutter
PromenadeCrusherFines
YampaPedestrianLighting
YampaStreetSidewalks(DTSide)
YampaStreetCurb&Gutter(DTSide)
9thStreetPark&RetrofitS&RBldg
EaglescoutParkRestroom
UtiltyUndergrounding
RiverBank&FenceEnhancements(10th12th)
FloodwayandYampaBankImprovements
Total
OakStreet
OakPedestrianLighting
OakStreetSidewalks(3rd12th)
OakStreetCurb&Gutter
Total

$1,210,420.00
$689,025.00
$271,560.00
$91,980.00
$24,850.00
$370,000.00
$238,227.00
$53,655.00
$620,000.00
$480,000.00
$600,000.00
$40,000.00
$590,000.00
$5,279,717.00

SideStreets
SideStreetSidewalks
SideStreetCurb&Gutter
Total

$718,725.00
$161,875.00
$880,600.00

WestLincolnPark
AmphitheaterAlongYampa(StoneTerracing)
WestLincolnParkRestrooms
Total

$195,000.00
$320,000.00
$515,000.00

AreaWideProjects
Benches/Seating(areawide)
Trash&Recycling(allareas)
BikeRacks(areawide)
Asphalt/ConcreteCapitalRepairs
$375,000.00 Total
$400,155.00
$90,125.00
$865,280.00

$52,500.00
$316,000.00
$46,000.00
$200,000.00
$614,500.00

Goal #1
Make a Great Place Better Economic
Vitality Depends on a Quality Experience
Make Downtown the best possible place to visit,
live, work and invest
Build upon recent public and private investments

Goal #1- Required Investment


Prioritize support for quality public amenities
consistent design throughout downtown
Including gathering places, river access, public
restrooms, way-finding and public art
Be open to public/private partnerships
including parking solutions

Goal #1- Measures of Success


More feet on the street pedestrian counts
Improved business retention, attraction and
private investment; i.e. sales growth

Goal #2
Accelerate private investment:
Bolster private sector confidence in public sector
support for downtown
Remove basic infrastructure costs as a
disincentive to invest

Goal #2 Required Investment


Complete basic public infrastructure

Goal #2 Measures of Success


Increased depth and breadth of private
investment during current real estate cycle
Improved retention, profitability and growth of
existing downtown businesses
Increased use and excise taxes from new
construction

Goal #3
Be fiscally prudent:
Complete capital projects while cost of debt and
construction is low - realize economies of scale
Set tax baseline before property values rise and
non-taxed properties move to tax rolls.

Goal #3 Required Investment


Complete sidewalk and lighting master plan, and
utilities projects in single focused effort.

Goal #3 Measures of Success


Reduced capital project costs
Earlier sales and property tax growth to benefit
all entities
See increased value of City asset

Goal #4
Reduce public safety hazards due to
incomplete sidewalks and poor lighting
on Oak, Yampa and some areas of
cross streets.
Reduce pedestrian, vehicle and bike conflicts
especially in winter.

Goal #4 Required Investment


Complete system of sidewalks and pedestrian
lighting throughout downtown interconnecting
Oak, Lincoln, Yampa and all cross-streets.

Goal #4 Measures of Success


Improved access to and safe use of on-street
parking throughout business district.
Extend more pedestrian activity to underutilized
blocks ped counts

Goal #5
Reduce risks and liabilities
Remove core business locations from flood risk

Goal #5 Required Investment


Upgrade Butcherknife Creek culvert between
Oak Street and the Yampa River

Goal #5 Measure of Success


Reduced flood insurance premiums for private
property
Improve community flood rating

Tools - Pros & Cons

Capital Infrastructure Fund (CIP)


Certificates of Participation (COP)
Local Improvement District (LID)
General Obligation Bond (GO)
General Improvement District or Special
Improvement District (GID,SID)
Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
Continue Temporary Improvements

Use CIP
Pros

Cons

No Financing Costs

Large dollar amount

Broad scope

Compete with other CIP projects for


prioritization

Can complete 100% of projects

Delays other CIP projects


Unlikely to have a project completed
at one time - loss of design continuity
and single project cost savings

COP
Pros

Cons

Broad Scope

Need to locate $9M of Capital for


collateral

No extra cost associated with going to


an election

No new revenue

LID
Pros

Cons

Can complete capital improvements

Assessment of every adjacent property


owner

LocalImprovementDistrict
OakStreetSidewalks(3rd12th)
SideStreetSidewalks
YampaStreetSidewalks(DTSide)
Total

$400,155.00
$718,725.00
$238,227.00
$1,357,107.00

Bond
Pros

Cons

Can finance all or a portion of


redevelopment projects

Property tax would be needed to


service the debt ( property tax would
expire upon full bond repayment)

Debt is currently relatively cheap


Grow economic activity through public
investment
Grow economic activity through public
investment/property value enhanced
Single project cost savings
Requires election

Requires election

GID/SID
Pros

Cons

Can finance all or a portion of


redevelopment projects

Property tax or assessment on a


limited group downtown properties

Scope of project can be flexible

Would require establishing new


district downtown

GID can finance maintenance


Requires vote of downtown electorate

Requires vote of downtown electorate

Seasonal Improvements
Pros

Cons

Affordable

Does not enhance experience

Creates safer pedestrian environment

Sends poor message to visitors


No improvement in infrastructure
One off expenses, not investments

TIF
Pros

Cons

Community Investment (81% of


project cost is City sales tax)

Perception of tax diversion

No new taxes

Estimated growth can be influenced by


multiple factors

Debt is currently relatively cheap


Grow economic activity through public
investment/property value enhanced
Single project cost savings
Can finance all or a portion of
redevelopment projects

This TIF

URA would enter into an agreement with every


taxing district limiting the property tax increment to
$2.4 million
Once $2.4 million is reached, property tax would flow
back to the districts

$10.2M of incremental sales tax would flow to TIF


County and Education Fund Board sales tax would
not flow into TIF
Council has the ability to set parameters on the
projects and dollar amount spent using this tool
URA would enter into an agreement with the RE-2
School District to allow all property tax to flow if
State financing should change

Questions

Examples
Pueblo PURA reports a 4% increase in
property tax base in plan areas
Brighton 2002-2012 $1.8 Million revenue
increase to taxing districts

Examples

GURA Golden

Estimated Impacts

You might also like