US007776811B2
(12) United States Patent
(10) Patent N0.:
(45) Date of Patent:
Dilley et al.
(54)
CLEANER COMPOSITION, ARTICLE AND
(56)
METHOD
References Cited
3,719,613 A *
3,850,853 A *
David L. Balog, Naugatuck, CT (US)
3,888,797 A *
5,009,887 A *
(73) Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.,
5,997,759 A
MorristoWn, NJ (US)
Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
patent is extended or adjusted under 35
Jan. 25, 2007
Provisional application No. 60/701,899, ?led on Jul.
Int. Cl.
C11D
CIID
C11D
C11D
C11D
C11D
B08B
(52)
3/02
3/48
3/00
9/50
17/00
17/08
3/14
(2006.01)
(2006.01)
(2006.01)
(2006.01)
(2006.01)
(2006.01)
(2006.01)
6,020,303 A *
2/2000
6,046,150 A *
4/2000 Choy et a1.
6,730,648 B2 *
5/2004
.................. .. 424/470
Cripe et a1. ............... .. 510/503
510/376
Gorlin et a1. .............. .. 510/295
1/2005 Nieendick et a1.
0363545
PL
151473
4/1990
*
9/1999
* cited by examiner
(57)
ABSTRACT
A cleaner composition comprises a surfactant, a sodium
source, an odor neutraliZer, a fragrance, and a biocide,
Wherein the odor neutraliZer comprises a betaine compound,
aminoalcohol, a polyol, and an ionone, and Wherein the
cleaner composition is stable at a pH of about 9.5 to about
US. Cl. ..................... .. 510/384; 510/108; 510/278;
1 1.5 When stored for 24 months at a temperature of about 250
510/279; 510/319; 510/329; 510/330; 510/382;
510/383; 510/391; 510/406; 510/504; 8/137;
C. A spray dispenser comprises the cleaner composition and
134/42
(58)
IWahashi
Primary ExamineriLorna M Douyon
Assistant ExamineriTanisha Diggs
(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm4Cantor Colburn LLP
22, 2005.
(51)
4/1991
International Search Report for PCT/U S2006/ 028661, International
Filing Date Jul. 24, 2006, dated Nov. 23, 2006.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/
US2006/028661, International Filing Date Jul. 24, 2006, dated Nov.
23, 2006.
Related US. Application Data
(60)
Marumo ................... .. 510/480
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Prior Publication Data
US 2007/0021316 A1
510/427
6/1975
EP
Jul. 24, 2006
(65)
Marumo et a1. ........... .. 510/427
FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
(21) Appl. N0.: 11/492,192
Filed:
3/1973
11/1974 Marumo et a1.
12/1999 Trinh et a1.
2005/0000390 A1
U.S.C. 154(b) by 986 days.
(22)
Aug. 17, 2010
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
(75) Inventors: Colin M. Dilley, Thomaston, CT (US);
Notice:
US 7,776,811 B2
Field of Classi?cation Search ............... ..
510/384,
510/108, 278, 279, 319, 329, 330, 382, 383,
510/391, 406, 504; 8/137; 134/42
See application ?le for complete search history.
a propellant. Also described is a method of cleaning, deodor
iZing, or a combination thereof, automobile interiors by
applying the disclosed cleaner composition to an automobile
interior.
22 Claims, No Drawings
US 7,776,811 B2
1
CLEANER COMPOSITION, ARTICLE AND
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
METHOD
The term contaminant(s) describes most substances that
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED
APPLICATIONS
are not normally found in fabrics in their clean or uncontami
nated state and are generally removed from fabrics during
cleaning processes. Illustrative contaminants include fats,
fatty acids such as triglycerides, fat-like substances, salts,
This application claims the bene?t of US. Provisional
application Ser. No. 60/701,899, ?led Jul. 22, 2005, the con
tents of Which are incorporated herein by reference thereto.
food remnants (e.g., coffee, soda, ketchup, mustard, choco
late and milk), sWeat, blood, urine, smoke, stains, soil, oil and
grease and numerous other synthetic and natural orbiological
contaminants Which are not normally found in clean textiles.
Some common contaminants include urine, sour milk and
smoke.
The terms textile(s) and fabric(s) are used to describe
BACKGROUND
Many different cleaning compositions have been devel
oped for a variety of purposes. Cleaners may include action to
remove grease and/or particulate soil, to deodoriZe, to disin
cloth and related materials comprised of natural and synthetic
?bers Which are used to make garments, clothing, carpeting,
fect (killing both bacterial and viral micro-organisms), to
remove stains, to remove mildeW, to bleach, and to preserve
cloth coverings and related cloth-containing items. Textiles
color of the material being cleaned. Typical fabric cleaning
Which are compatible for use With the present compositions
include textiles made from natural and synthetic ?bers and
methods may remove or mask odors from fabric containing
relatively loW levels of malodors. HoWever, When the fabric
has relatively high levels of malodorants, or When the fabric
contains certain malodors such as those from pet soils, incon
20
hemp, jute, manila, alfa, coconut, broom, kenaf, ramie, sisal,
polyesters, acetates, triacetates, rayon, rayon-acetates, cellu
lose, polypropylene-cellulose, polyole?ns, alginates, cupro
(regenerated cellulose), modal, regenerated protein ?ber,
tinent odors, regurgitated food, general food spills, mold, or
mildeW, there may be a lingering malodor that is not removed
or masked by typical fabric cleaning methods. In such cases
yarns, such as, for example, silks, cottons, Wool, kapok, linen,
25
Where malodorpersists after a typical fabric cleaning process,
consumers may clean the malodor-containing area of carpet a
polyacryl, polychloride, ?uoro?ber, modacryl, polyacryloni
trile, polyamide (including nylon), polyethylene, polypropy
lene, polyurea, polyurethane, vinylal, trivinyl, elastodienes,
second, or even a third time. This creates excessive Wear on
elasthane, and mixtures of these natural and synthetic ?bers,
the fabric, especially in the speci?c area containing the mal
among others.
The inventors herein have discovered a cleaner composi
tion that also has odor neutraliZation properties due to syner
odor, and can result in an uneven appearance in the fabric due
30
to uneven Wear and tear.
gistic interactions betWeen the various components. In one
Cyclodextrin has been used to control odors in deodoriZer
exemplary embodiment, the cleaner composition comprises a
and cleaner compositions. Cyclodextrin, hoWever, may inter
act With perfumes and surfactants When incorporated in deter
gent compositions, and the level required for malodor control
is very high. Odor blockers are used in other compositions.
Some odor blockers, When used at the high levels needed for
malodor control, may block the desirable odors of perfumes
as Well as the malodors. Similarly, some masking compounds
block desirable odors While reactants can destroy desirable
odors.
35
40
is shelf-stable, that is, exhibits substantially no precipitate
formation, phase separation, or chemical degradation such as
hydrolytic cleavage. For example, in a stable formulation
There thus remains a need for neW cleaner and deodoriZer
compositions, particularly those suitable for fabrics.
SUMMARY
In one embodiment, a cleaner composition comprises an
odor neutraliZer Wherein the odor neutraliZer comprises a
betaine compound, an aminoalcohol, a polyol, and an ionone.
In one exemplary embodiment, a cleaner composition
comprises a surfactant, a sodium source, an odor neutraliZer,
a fragrance, and a biocide, Wherein the odor neutraliZer com
prises a betaine compound, an aminoalcohol, a polyol, and an
ionone; and Wherein the cleaner composition is stable at a pH
of about 9.5 to about 11.5 When stored for 24 months at a
surfactant, a sodium source, an odor neutraliZer, a fragrance,
and a biocide, Wherein the odor neutraliZer comprises a
betaine compound, an aminoalcohol, a polyol, and an ionone,
Wherein the cleaner composition is stable at a pH of about 9.5
to about 11.5 When stored for 24 months at a temperature of
about 250 C.
As used herein, the term stable means that the composition
45
there Will be no substantial change in the appearance of the
formulation.
In one exemplary embodiment, the cleaner composition
comprises a surfactant. The surfactant may comprise a non
ionic surfactant, an anionic surfactant, a cationic surfactant,
an amphoteric surfactant, or a combination comprising one or
50
more of the foregoing surfactants. Without being held to
theory, it is believed that the surfactant emulsi?es odiferous
materials such as, for example, oils, dirt, foodstuffs, pet
odors, urine, vomit, and the like. Emulsi?cation can increase
the surface area for odor neutraliZation and/or create an envi
55
ronment for odor neutralization.
Suitable nonionic surfactants include, but are not limited
temperature of about 25 C.
In another embodiment, a spray dispenser comprising the
to, ethoxylated alcohols, ethoxylated phenols, ethoxylated
foregoing cleaner composition and optionally a propellant is
tan fatty acid esters, glycerol fatty acid esters, coconut mono
described.
In yet another embodiment, a method of cleaning, deodor
fatty acid esters, ethoxylated glycerol fatty acid esters, sorbi
60
iZing, or a combination thereof, automobile interiors com
prises applying the foregoing cleaner composition to an auto
mobile interior.
The above-described and other features Will be appreciated
and understood by those skilled in the art from the folloWing
detailed description, and appended claims.
ethanolamide ethoxylates, ethoxylated tall oil, ethoxylated
polypropylene glycol, fatty acid alkanolamides such as coco
nut mono- and diethanolamide, amine oxides, n-alkyl pyrroli
dones, alkyl polysaccharides such as sucrose esters and alkyl
65
polyglycosides, alkyl phenol ethoxylates, ethoxylated castor
oil, fatty acid ethoxylates, fatty amine ethoxylates, polyglyc
erol fatty acid esters, and alkyl adducts of ethylene-oxide
propylene oxide copolymers, as Well as mixtures of tWo or
US 7,776,811 B2
3
more of the foregoing. In one embodiment, the nonionic
surfactant comprises an ethoxylated alcohol such as Toma
commercially available surfactant comprising a suitable alkyl
polyglycoside having an alkyl chain length of from CS-Cl 6 is
Dehypound HSC 5515 from Cognis. In another embodiment,
dol 25-7, a Cl2-Cl5 ethoxylated alcohol available from
Tomah Products, Inc. In another embodiment, the surfactant
comprises an alkyl polyglycoside such as Glucopon 425,
having an alkyl chain length of from CS-C 10. An example of
believed to be a mixture of D-glucopyranoside or a similar
a commercially available surfactant comprising a suitable
the alkyl polyglycoside comprises an alkyl polyglycoside
Clo-Cl6 alkyl oligomer and D-glucose, or Glucopon 215,
alkyl polyglycoside having an alkyl chain length of from
believed to comprise D-glucopyranoside or a similar C lo-C 1 6
CS-C 10 is Dehypound WO7 from Cognis.
In one embodiment, the surfactant comprises 0.0 percent
by Weight (Wt %) to about 2 Wt % of the cleaner composition,
based on the total Weight of the cleaner composition. In
another embodiment, the surfactant Will comprise from about
0.2 percent by Weight to about 1.0 percent by Weight. In one
alkyl oligomer, both available from Cognis. In another
embodiment, the surfactant comprises an alkyl polyglycoside
such as Dehypound WO7 available from Cognis, believed to
comprise a mixture comprising a C lo-C 1 6 alkyl polyglycoside
and a CS-Cl0 alcohol ethyoxylate propoxylate plus decene
epoxide. In another embodiment, the surfactant comprises an
alkyl polyglycoside such as Dehypound HSC 5515 available
from Cognis, believed to comprise a mixture comprising a
exemplary embodiment, the surfactant Will comprise about
0.95 Weight percent of the cleaner composition.
In the embodiment Wherein the surfactant comprises an
Clo-Cl6 alkyl polyglycoside, and reaction products of
alkyl adduct of an ethylene-oxide-propylene oxide copoly
mer, an alkyl polyglycoside, sodium lauryl sulfate, and an
epichlorohydrin and isodecyl alcohol-4E0. In yet another
embodiment, the nonionic surfactant comprises Genapol
EP 1024 (formerly knoWn as Sandoxylate SX-408), an
ethoxylated alcohol, the ethylene-oxide-propylene oxide
20
copolymer comprises about 0.1 Wt % to about 0.3 Wt % of the
iso-ClO-ethylene oxide-propylene oxide copolymer adduct.
cleaner composition, the alkyl polyglycoside comprises
Another suitable nonionic surfactant is an ethoxylated non
ylphenol available as a mixture With another proprietary sur
about 0.05 Wt % to about 0.5 Wt % of the cleaner composition,
the sodium lauryl sulfate comprises about 0.125 Wt % to
factant as Monamulse DLE, available from Uniqema.
Suitable anionic surfactants include, but are not limited to,
about 0.625 Wt % of the cleaner composition, and the ethoxy
25
lated alcohol comprises about 0.05 Wt % to about 0.3 Wt % of
linear and/or branched chain alkylbenZene sulfonates, alkyl
sulfates, ether sulfates, secondary alkyl sulfates, ot-ole?n sul
fonates, phosphate esters, sulfosuccinates, isethionates, car
the cleaner composition, based on the total Weight of the
boxylates, and combinations comprising one or more of the
comprises a sodium source. Without being held to theory, it is
believed that the sodium of the sodium source interacts With
foregoing anionic surfactants. Speci?c anionic surfactants
include, for example, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium lauryl
ether sulfate, triethanolamine lauryl sulfate, magnesium lau
ryl sulfate, sulfosuccinate esters, ammonium lauryl sulfate,
alkyl sulfonates, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium alpha ole?n
sulfonates, alkyl sulfates, sulfated alcohol ethoxylates, sul
fated alkyl phenol ethoxylates, sodium xylene sulfonate,
cleaner composition.
In one exemplary embodiment, the cleaner composition
30
odiferous molecules, replacing, for example, sulfur and/or
organic groups, to produce a less odiferous or non-odiferous
molecule. Suitable sodium sources include, for example,
sodium citrate, sodium salts, and sodium lauryl sulfate.
35
alkylbenZene sulfonates such as triethanolamine dodecylben
Zene sulfonate, sodium dodecylbenZene sulfonate, calcium
used herein, odor neutraliZers are compounds that react With
dodecylbenZene sulfonate, xylene sulfonic acid, dodecylben
Zene sulfonic acid, N-alkoyl sarcosinates such as sodium
The cleaner composition further comprises an odor neu
traliZer. Some odor neutraliZers mask malodors by reducing
the amount of the compounds generating the malodor. As
odiferous molecules to reduce or eliminate odor. The odor
lauroyl sarcosinate, dialkylsulfosuccinates, N-alkoyl sar
neutraliZer comprises a betaine compound, an aminoalcohol,
a polyol, and an ionone. It is believed that the synergistic
cosines such as lauroyl sarcosine, alkyl ether carboxylates,
interaction of the betaine compound, aminoalcohol, polyol,
soaps including sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium,
and ionone along With a surfactant, results in neutraliZation of
a Wide variety of odors.
The odor neutraliZer comprises a betaine compound.
Betaine compounds may be effective for deodoriZation of
alkaline odor gases such as ammonia or trimethylamine
(TMA) as Well as acidic odor gases such as hydrogen sul?de
40
alkanolamine, and amine soaps, and combinations compris
ing one or more of the foregoing anionic surfactants. In one
45
embodiment, the anionic surfactant is sodium lauryl sulfate
available as WITCOLATE WAC LA from AkZo.
Amphoteric surfactants include, but are not limited to,
betaines, n-alkyl pyrrolidones, imidaZolines, and combina
tions comprising one or more of the foregoing surfactants.
Cationic surfactants include, but are not limited to, quater
50
or methylmercaptan (MeSH). Suitable betaine compounds
include, for example, glycine betaines such as ethanaminium
N-(carboxymethyl)-2-hydroxy-N,N,bis(2-hydroxyethyl)
nary ammonium compounds including alkyl dimethyl benZyl
ammonium chloride, dialkyl dimethyl ammonium chloride,
chloride. Compositions containing betaines are available as
alkyl trimethyl ammonium chloride or bromide, salts of
from Epoleon Corporation.
organic or inorganic acids With fatty amines, fatty amine
Epoleon N-NZ and Epoleon-100, for example, available
55
The odor neutraliZer also comprises an aminoalcohol.
Aldehydes such as acetaldehyde, butanal (butylaldehyde),
ethoxylates, and combinations comprising one or more of the
foregoing cationic surfactants.
isobutanal, 2-methylbutanal, 3-methylbutanal, hexanal, and
Mixtures of surfactant types may be used, such as a mixture
of a nonionic and an anionic surfactant. A proprietary mixture
of this type is Monamulse DLE available from Mona Indus
the like, can cause foul odors such as urine odors. Aminoal
60
tries, Inc.
In one embodiment, the surfactant comprises an alkyl
adduct of an ethylene-oxide-propylene oxide copolymer, an
alkyl polyglycoside, sodium lauryl sulfate, and an ethoxy
lated alcohol. In one embodiment, the alkyl polyglycoside
comprises an alkyl polyglycoside having an alkyl chain
length of from C8-Cl6. An illustrative example of a suitable
65
cohols such as, for example, monoethanolamine, diethanola
mine, triethanolamine, and combinations comprising one or
more of the foregoing aminoalcohols can neutraliZe aldehyde
odors.
The odor neutraliZer comprises a polyol Which may com
plex With malodorous components and/or impart a pleasant
fragrance to the cleaner composition. Suitable polyols
include, for example, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, tri
ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, and
US 7,776,811 B2
6
cavertol, exaltolide/cyclopentadecanolide, Zingerone, methyl
cedrylone, sandela, dimethyl benZyl carbinyl butyrate, dim
ethyl benZyl carbinyl isobutyrate, triethyl citrate, cashmeran,
5
combinations comprising one or more of the foregoing gly
cols. In one embodiment, the polyol is triethylene glycol. The
triethylene glycol may be added to the formulations in the
form of T.O.C. Termiticide Odor Counteractant available
phenoxy ethyl isobutyrate, iso eugenol acetate, helional, iso E
super, ionone gamma methyl, pentalide, galaxolide, phenoxy
from Aire-Mate, Inc.
The odor neutraliZer also comprises an ionone. Ionones
ethyl propionate, and combinations comprising one or more
may have odor masking properties. Suitable ionones include,
of the foregoing fragrances. In one embodiment, the fra
for example, alpha ionones, beta ionones, gamma ionones,
grance comprises camphor, camphene, amyl salicylate, ter
and combinations comprising one or more of the foregoing
ionones.
The odor neutraliZer comprises about 0.125 Wt % to about
pineol, or a combination comprising one or more of the fore
going fragrances.
In one embodiment, the fragrance comprises 0.0 Wt % to
about 0.325 Wt % based on the total Weight of the cleaner
0.5 Wt % of the cleaner composition, based on the total Weight
of the cleaner composition. In another embodiment, the odor
neutraliZer comprises about 0.25 Wt % to about 0.5 Wt % of
composition. In another embodiment, the fragrance com
the cleaner composition, based on the total Weight of the
prises about 0.01 Wt % to about 0.125 Wt % of the cleaner
composition, based on the total Weight of the cleaner compo
cleaner composition. In yet another embodiment, the odor
neutraliZer comprises about 0.375 Wt % to about 0.5 Wt % of
sition. In another embodiment, the fragrance comprises about
the cleaner composition, based on the total Weight of the
0.01 Wt % to about 0.25 Wt % of the cleaner composition,
cleaner composition.
In one exemplary embodiment, the cleaner composition
comprises a fragrance. Fragrances may modify a malodor to
a more pleasant character by superimposing a dominant, but
more pleasant odorant. One advantage of fragrances is that
20
% to about 0.325 Wt % of the cleaner composition, based on
the total Weight of the cleaner composition.
In one embodiment, the cleaner composition comprises a
they typically have loWer boiling points than other substances
and so the scents from these materials quickly diffuse into the
air, and compete With the malodors to bind to the nasal recep
25
tor sites. Because the scents form these fragrances are more
volatile and arrive before the malodors at the nasal receptor
sites, When the malodors do ?nally arrive the nasal receptor
sites have already been occupied, thus effectively masking
30
the recognition of the malodors.
35
40
2-methoxy-3-(2-methylpropyl)-pyraZine, methyl octine car
bonate, tridecene-2-nitrile, allyl amyl glycolate, cyclogalba
nate, cyclal C, melonal, gamma nonalactone, cis 1,3-ox
45
50
acetate, citronellal nitrile, dihydro myrcenol, geraniol, gera
lox, ebanol, cis-3-hexenyl salicylate, lilial, gamma undeca
lactone, gamma dodecalactone, gamma decalactone, calone,
cymal, dihydro iso jasmonate, iso eugenol, lyral, methyl beta
naphthyl ketone, beta naphthol methyl ether, para hydroxyl
phenyl butanone, 8-cyclohexadecen-1-one, oxocyclohexade
cen-2-one/habanolide, ?orhydral, intreleven aldehyde, amyl
cinnamic aldehyde, hexyl cinnamic aldehyde, hexyl salicy
late, methyl dihydro jasmonate, sandalore, veloutone, unde
droxymethyl)- 5 ,5 -dimethylhydantoin; hydroxymethyl- 5 ,5 -
2-(4-thiaZolyl)benZimidaZole;
2-n-octyl-4-isothiaZoline-3-one; 2,4,5,6-tetrachloro-isoph
thalonitrile; 3-iodo-2-propynyl butyl carbamate; N-(trichlo
romethyl-thio)phthalimide;
tetrachloroisophthalonitrile;
potassium N-hydroxy-methyl-N-methyl-dithiocarbamate;
sodium 2-pyridinethiol-1 -oxide; butyl parahydroxybenZoate;
ethyl parahydroxybenZoate; methyl parahydroxybenZoate;
propyl parahydroxybenZoate; 2-mercaptobenZo-thiaZole;
5-chloro-2-methyl-3(2H)-isothiaZoline; 2-methyl-3(2H)
isothiaZolone; 4-(2-nitrobutyl)-morpholine; 4,4'-(2-ethylni
trotrimethylene dimorpholine; tetra-hydro-3,5-di-methyl
2H-1 ,3 ,5 -thiadiaZine-2 -thione;
thujone, benZyl alcohol, beta gamma hexenol, dimethyl ben
nyl acetate, geranyl nitrile, hydroquinone dimethyl ether,
hydroxycitronellal, linalyl acetate, phenyl acetaldehyde dim
ethyl acetal, phenyl propyl alcohol, prenyl acetate, triplal,
tetrahydrolinalool, verdox, cis-3 -hexenyl acetate, ethyl
methyl phenyl glycidate, ethyl vanillin, heliotropin, indol,
methyl anthranilate, vanillin, amyl salicylate, coumarin,
ambrox, bacdanol, benZyl salicylate, butyl anthranilate, ceta
2,4-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane; 5 -chloro -2 -methyl-4-isothiaZo
lin-3 -one;
2-methyl-4 -isothiaZolin-3 -one;
1,3 -bis(hy
N-trichloromethyl-thio -4 -cyclohexene-1 ,2-dicarboximide;
scenone, damascone alpha, damascone beta, ?or acetate,
Zyl carbinol, phenyl ethyl dimethyl carbinol, adoxal, allyl
cyclohexane propionate, beta pinene, citral, citronellyl
methyl -1 -propanol; hexyhydro -1 ,3 ,5 -tri -ethyl-5 -triaZine;
1-(3-chloroallyl)-3,5,7-triaZa-1-aZonia-adamantane chlo
dimethylhydantoin;
aldehyde, benZyl acetone, ethyl-2-methyl butyrate, dama
athiane-2-methyl-4-propyl, benZaldehyde, benZyl acetate,
camphor, camphene, carvone, bomeol, bomyl acetate, decyl
alcohol, eucalyptol, linalool, hexyl acetate, iso-amyl acetate,
thymol, carvacrol, limonene, menthol, iso-amyl alcohol, phe
nyl ethyl alcohol, alpha pinene, a terpineol, citronellol, alpha
ylthio-4-tert-butylamino-6-cyclopropylamino-s-triaZine;
4,4-dimethyl-oxaZolidine; 3,4,4-trimethyloxaZolidine; 5-hy
droxy-methyl-1-aZa-3,7-dioxabicylco(3.3.0.)octane; 2-(hy
droxymethyl)-aminoethanol; 2-(hydroxymethyl)-amino-2
p-chloro-m-cresol; an alkylamine hydrochloride; 6-acetoxy
decyl aldehyde, para cresol, methyl phenyl carbinyl acetate,
frutene, fructone, herbavert, iso cyclo citral, methyl isobute
nyl tetrahydro pyran, isopropyl quinoline, 2,6-nonadien-1-ol,
biocide. Suitable biocides include, for example, 2-meth
ride; 1-methyl-3,5,7-triaZa-1-aZonia-adamantane chloride;
Suitable fragrances include, for example, anethol, methyl
heptine carbonate, ethyl aceto acetate, para cymene, nerol,
undecylenic aldehyde, undecyl aldehyde, 2,6-nonadienal,
nonyl aldehyde, octyl aldehyde, phenyl acetaldehyde, anisic
based on the total Weight of the cleaner composition. In yet
another embodiment, the fragrance comprises about 0.01 Wt
benZothioZole;
55
potassium
dimethyldithiocarbamate; diiodomethyl-p-tolysulfone; glut
araldehyde; methylenebis(thiocyanate); 1,2-dibromo-2,4-di
cyanobutane; 1,2-benZisothiaZoline-3-one; 2-(thiocyanom
ethyl-thio)benZothiaZole;
2-(thiocyanomethyl-thio)
methylene
bis(thiocyanate);
and
combinations comprising one or more of the foregoing bio
cides.
In one embodiment, the biocide comprises 0.0 Wt % to
about 0.3 Wt % based on the total Weight of the cleaner
composition. In another embodiment, the biocide comprises
60
about 0.01 Wt % to about 0.3 Wt % of the cleaner composition,
based on the total Weight of the cleaner composition. In
another embodiment, the biocide comprises about 0.01 Wt %
to about 0.15 Wt % of the cleaner composition, based on the
65
total Weight of the cleaner composition.
The cleaner composition optionally comprises a hydro
trope to aid in suspension of the surfactants. One suitable
hydrotrope is DeTrope CA-100, a modi?ed carboxylate avail
US 7,776,811 B2
7
able from DeForest Enterprises. DeTrope CA-100 is advan
1001, gamma-terpinene, tetrahydrolinalool and terpineol,
tageous because it may also have corrosion inhibition prop
erties.
In one embodiment, the hydrotrope comprises 0.0 Wt % to
about 0.5 Wt % of the cleaner composition, based on the total
among others. In one embodiment the terpene compound is
d-limonene.
The terpene compound comprises 0.0 Wt % to about 0.02
Wt % of the cleaner composition, based on the total Weight of
the cleaner composition. In another embodiment, the terpene
Weight of the cleaner composition. In another embodiment,
compound comprises 0.0 Wt % to about 2.0 Wt % of the
cleaner composition, based on the total Weight of the cleaner
the hydrotrope comprises about 0.3 Wt % to about 0.4 Wt % of
the cleaner composition, based on the total Weight of the
composition.
cleaner composition. In yet another embodiment, the hydro
Colorants and dyes may optionally be added to the cleaner
trope comprises about 0.3 Wt % of the cleaner composition,
based on the total Weight of the cleaner composition.
The cleaner composition optionally comprises a corrosion
inhibitor. Suitable corrosion inhibitors include, for example,
When colorants are used, they may be employed at levels
suf?cient to color the cleaner composition, but beloW that
Which may result in coloration of fabric.
triaZoles, nitrites (e.g., sodium nitrite), molybdates (e.g.,
sodium molybdate), benZoates (e.g. 1,2,3-benZotriaZole),
cleaner composition comprises combining a hydrotrope and
compositions for visual appeal and performance impression.
In one embodiment a method of making the disclosed
Water to form a ?rst mixture, adding a surfactant to form a
gluconates, and combinations comprising one or more of the
foregoing corrosion inhibitors. In one embodiment, the cor
rosion inhibitor comprises sodium nitrite.
In one embodiment, the corrosion inhibitor comprises 0.0
20
penser in order to be distributed onto fabric. The spray dis
penser may be a manually activated means for producing a
Wt % to about 0.58 Wt % of the cleaner composition, based on
the total Weight of the cleaner composition. In another
embodiment, the corrosion inhibitor comprises about 0.03 Wt
% to about 0.05 Wt % of the corrosion cleaner composition,
based on the total Weight of the cleaner composition. In
spray of liquid droplets as is knoWn in the art, e.g. trigger
type, pump-type, non-aerosol self-pressurized, aerosol-type
25
another embodiment, the corrosion inhibitor comprises about
0.08 Wt % to about 0.03 Wt % of the cleaner composition,
based on the total Weight of the cleaner composition. In yet
another embodiment, the corrosion inhibitor comprises about
0.03 Wt % to about 0.58 Wt % of the cleaner composition,
second mixture, and adding an odor neutraliZer and a fra
grance to form the cleaner composition.
The cleaner composition may be stored in a spray dis
30
spray means, and the like. The spray dispenser may include
those that Will not substantially foam the cleaner composi
tion. The spray dispenser optionally comprises a brush to
facilitate soil removal.
The spray dispenser can be an aerosol dispenser. The aero
sol dispenser comprises a container Which can be constructed
of a conventional material employed in fabricating aerosol
based on the total Weight of the cleaner composition.
The cleaner composition optionally comprises a Water
containers. The dispenser may be capable of withstanding
soluble alkali sodium carbonate salt as a builder. A builder is
to about 70 p.s.i.g. A spray dispenser is provided With a valve
a compound that loWers the critical micelle concentration
(CMC) of surfactants. The term carbonate as used herein
internal pressure of about 20 to about 110 p.s.i.g., or about 20
35
means a salt that contains either a C032 or a HCO; anion.
Carbonate salts can be provided by one or more sodium
carbonate salts or sodium bicarbonate. Sodium carbonate
salts include, but are not limited to, sodium carbonate per se,
sodium carbonate decahydrate, sodium carbonate heptahy
drate, sodium carbonate monohydrate, sodium sesquicarbon
ate and double salts and mixtures thereof. Mixtures of the
above mentioned sodium carbonate salts and sodium bicar
bonate also are especially useful.
In one embodiment, the sodium carbonate salt comprises
0.0 Wt % to about 1.0 Wt % of the cleaner composition, based
on the total Weight of the cleaner composition. In another
?nely divided, particles or droplets. The aerosol dispenser
utiliZes a pressurized sealed container from Which the cleaner
40
porating therein a gaseous component generally knoWn as a
gaseous hydrocarbons such as isobutane, propane, mixed
halogenated hydrocarbons, compressed air, nitrogen, inert
45
gases, carbon dioxide, and the like, and combinations com
prising one or more of the foregoing propellants. An exem
50
the total Weight of the cleaner composition. In another
embodiment, the sodium carbonate salt comprises about 0.05
plary propellant is Aeron NP-46, a mixture of propane and
n-butane available from Diversi?ed CPC International.
The spray dispenser can be a self-pressurized non-aerosol
container having a convoluted liner and an elastomeric sleeve.
The self-pressurized dispenser may comprise a liner/sleeve
assembly containing a thin, ?exible radially expandable con
voluted plastic liner of, for example, about 0.010 to about
0.020 inch thick, inside an essentially cylindrical elastomeric
Wt % to about 0.5 Wt % of the cleaner composition, based on
the total Weight of the cleaner composition. In yet another
embodiment, the sodium carbonate salt comprises about 0.01
composition is dispensed through an actuator/valve assembly
under pressure. The aerosol dispenser is pressurized by incor
propellant. Suitable aerosol propellants include, for example,
embodiment, the sodium carbonate salt comprises about 0.05
Wt % to about 1.0 Wt % of the cleaner composition, based on
member Which permits the cleaner composition contained in
the dispenser to be dispensed in the form of a spray of ?ne, or
55
sleeve. The liner/sleeve is capable of holding a substantial
Wt % to about 0.05 Wt % of the cleaner composition, based on
quantity of cleaner composition and of causing the product to
the total Weight of the cleaner composition.
The cleaner composition optionally comprises a terpene
compound. As used herein, the term terpene compound
refers to a class of acyclic and cyclic unsaturated compounds
be dispensed. Another type of aerosol spray dispenser is one
Wherein a barrier separates the cleaner composition from the
propellant (for example, compressed air or nitrogen).
60
The spray dispenser may be a non-aerosol, manually acti
derived from natural essential oils and resins having at least
10 carbon atoms. Terpenes include alcohols and aldehydes as
Well as unsaturated hydrocarbons. A number of terpene com
vated, pump-spray dispenser. The pump-spray dispenser may
pounds, including combinations of these terpenes may be
vessel for containing the cleaner composition to be dispensed.
employed. Suitable terpene compounds include, for example,
alpha-terpinene, alpha-pinene, beta-pinene, delta-3 -carene,
citronellal, citronellol, hydroxycitronellal, d-limonene, lina
comprise a container and a pump mechanism Which securely
screWs or snaps onto the container. The container comprises a
65
The pump mechanism comprises a pump chamber of substan
tially ?xed volume, having an opening at the inner end
thereof. Within the pump chamber is located a pump stem
US 7,776,811 B2
10
having a piston on the end thereof disposed for reciprocal
ethylene; polypropylene; polyethyleneterephthalate; and
either trigger spray dispenser acts to open the top outlet check
valve. The top valve alloWs the cleaner composition to be
forced through the sWirl chamber and out the noZZle to form
a discharge pattern. An adjustable noZZle cap can be used to
vary the pattern of the ?uid dispensed. For the piston spray
dispenser, as the trigger is released, the spring acts on the
piston to return it to its original position. For the belloWs spray
dispenser, the belloWs acts as the spring to return to its origi
blends of polyethylene, vinyl acetate, and rubber elastomer.
nal position. This action causes a vacuum in the chamber. The
motion in the pump chamber. The pump stem has a passage
Way there through With a dispensing outlet at the outer end of
the passageway and an axial inlet port located inWardly
thereof. The container and the pump mechanism can be con
structed of a conventional material employed in fabricating
pump-spray dispensers, including, but not limited to: poly
The spray dispenser may be a manually activated trigger- 10 responding ?uid acts to close the outlet valve While opening
spray dispenser. The trigger-spray dispenser comprises a conthe inlet valve draWing product up to the chamber from the
tainer and a trigger both of Which can be constructed of a
reservoir.
conventional material employed in fabricating trigger-spray
dispensers, including, but not limited to: polyethylene;
The cleaner composition can be used by distributing, for
example, by placing the cleaner composition into a dispens
polypropylene; polyacetal; polycarbonate; polyethylene- 15 ing means, such as a spray dispenser, and spraying an effec
terephthalate; polyvinyl chloride; polystyrene; and blends of
tive amount onto the desired surface or article. An effective
polyethylene, vinyl acetate, and rubber elastomer. Other
amount as de?ned herein means an amount su?icient to clean
materials can include stainless steel and glass. The trigger-
and/or absorb malodor to the point that it is not discernible by
spray dispenser does not incorporate a propellant gas into the
the human sense of smell yet not so much as to saturate or
cleaner composition. The trigger-spray dispenser may be one 20 create a pool of liquid on the article or surface and so that
Which acts upon a discrete amount of the cleaner composition
When dry there is no visual deposit readily discernible. Dis
itself, typically by means of a piston or a collapsing belloWs
tribution can be achieved by using a spray device, a roller, a
that displaces the composition through a noZZle to create a
pad, and the like.
spray of thin liquid. The trigger-spray dispenser may comThe present disclosure encompasses the method of spray
prise a pump chamber having either a piston or belloWs Which 25 ing a mist of an effective amount of the cleaner composition
is movable through a limited stroke response to the trigger for
onto fabric and/or fabric articles. The fabric and/or fabric
varying the volume of said pump chamber. This pump chamarticles include, but are not limited to, car interior, e. g., car
ber or belloWs chamber collects and holds the cleaner com-
carpet, fabric car seats, and the like, and combinations com
position for dispensing. The trigger spray dispenser may have
prising one or more of the foregoing articles.
an outlet check valve forblocking communication and ?oW of 30
The invention is further illustrated by the folloWing non
?uid through the noZZle and is responsive to the pressure
limiting examples.
inside the chamber. For the piston type trigger sprayers, as the
trigger is compressed, it acts on the ?uid in the chamber and
Example 1
the spring, increasing the pressure on the ?uid. For the bel
loWs spray dispenser, as the belloWs is compressed, the pres- 35
Cleaner compositions Were formed according to Tables 1
sure increases on the ?uid. The increase in ?uid pressure in
and 2.
TABLE 1
Inventive Formulation 1
Amount,
Component
Tradenalne/ Manufacturer
Wt %
Surfactant-alkyl adduct of an
Genapol  EP 1024
0.8
Surfactant-sodium lauryl
sulfate
Surfactant-ethoxylated alcohol
Wicolate  WAC LA/AkZO Nobel
0.30
Tomodol  25-7/Tomah Products Inc.
0.10
Surfactant-alkyl polyglycoside
Dehypound HSC 5515/Cognis
0.10
Termiticide Odor Counteractant/Aire-
0.125
ethylene-oxide-propylene oxide
copolymer
Odor neutralizerpolyol
Mate Inc.
Odor neutraliZer-betaine
compound, arninoalcohol
Odor neutraliZer-ionone
Epoleon N-NZ/NeW Epoleon Corp.
0.25
Citrus Fresh Neutralizer/Alpha
0.125
Aromatics
Biocide
Suricide P/Surety Laboratories, Inc.
0.15
Hydrotrope-complex carboxylic
acid
DeTrope CA-100/DeForest
Enterprises
0.4
Sodium carbonate
Propellant
Sodium Carbonate/Spectrum
NP-46 propellant/Diversi?ed CPC
0.5
3.0
International
Water
94.9
US 7,776,811 B2
11
12
TABLE2
Inventive Formulation 2
Amount,
Component
Tradename/ Manufacturer
Wt %
Surfactant-alkyl adduct of an
Genapol  EP 1024
0.8
Wicolate  WAC LA/AkZO Nobel
0.30
ethylene-oxide-propylene oxide
copolymer
Surfactant-sodium lauryl
sulfate
Surfactant-ethoxylated alcohol
Tomodol  25-7/Tomah Products Inc.
0.10
Surfactant-alkyl polyglycoside
Dehypound WO7/Cognis
0.10
Termiticide Odor Counteractant/Aire-
0.125
Odor neutraliZerpolyol
Mate Inc.
Odor neutraliZer-betaine
Epoleon N-NZ/NeW Epoleon Corp.
0.25
Citrus Fresh Neutralizer/Alpha
0.125
compound, aminoalcohol
Odor neutraliZer-ionone
Aromatics
Biocide
Suricide P/Surety Laboratories, Inc.
0.15
Hydrotrope-complex carboXylic
DeTrope CA-100/DeForest
0.4
acid
Enterprises
Sodium carbonate
Sodium Carbonate/Spectrum
0.5
Propellant
NP-46 propellant/Diversi?ed CPC
3.0
International
Water
94.9
TABLE3
W
Amount,
Component
Tradename/ Manufacturer
Wt %
Surfactant-mixture ofnonionic
and anionic
Monamulse DLE/Uniqema
0.8
Surfactant-sodium lauryl
Wicolate  WAC LA/AkZO Nobel
0.23
sulfate
Surfactant-ethoxylated alcohol
Tomodol  25-7/Tomah Products Inc.
0.01
Surfactant-alkyl polyglycoside
Dehypound HSC 5515/Cognis
0.10
Termiticide Odor Counteractant/Aire-
0.125
Odor neutraliZerpolyol
Mate Inc.
Odor neutraliZer-betaine
compound, aminoalcohol
Odor neutraliZer-ionone
Epoleon N-NZ/NeW Epoleon Corp.
0.25
Citrus Fresh Neutralizer/Alpha
0.125
Aromatics
Biocide
Suricide P/Surety Laboratories, Inc.
0.15
Hydrotrope-complex carboXylic
acid
DeTrope CA-100/DeForest
Enterprises
0.3
Corrosion inhibitor-sodium
Sodium nitrite/Young Chemical
0.05
Sodium Carbonate/Spectrum
NP-46 propellant/Diversi?ed CPC
0.5
3.0
nitrite
Sodium carbonate
Propellant
International
Water
94.36
US 7,776,811 B2
14
13
evaluation procedure and may make the ANOVA analysis less
To form the cleaner compositions, Water and the hydro
trope Were mixed to form a ?rst mixture. The surfactants Were
then added to the ?rst mixture to form a second mixture. The
sound. HOV is not as crucial as other assumptions for the
remaining ingredients Were then mixed in to form the ?nal
5
cleaner composition. The control formulation given in Table
3 Was not shelf stable at a pH of about 9.5 to about 11.5 When
stored for 24 months at a temperature of about 250 C.
Example 2
Cleaning-Objective Data
ANOVA, or the t-test, for differences in the population mean,
in particular in the case of equal n, and also because the test is
not necessarily very robust itself.
Next an ANOVA Was performed, looking for difference in
the mean, the Tukeys test Was applied to the results to indicate
Where differences in the mean occurred. 2 sample T-tests
Were also performed to highlight differences Where the p
value for the ANOVA Was close to 0.05.
For the cleaner assays, 2 commercial cleaners Were com
The inventive cleaner/odor neutraliZer of example 1 Was
tested in a cleaner assay and an odor removal assay. Samples
pared to inventive formulation 1:
15
of fabric (carpet and head liner) are treated With soils. One
trained technician cleans fabric samples (the technician does
A. Blue Coral Upholstery and Carpet Cleaner (Blue Coral)
B. Turtle Wax PoWer Out Interior Cleaner (Turtle Wax)
TABLE 4
DE values for cleaner compositions on a nylon substrate
Used
Motor
Formulation
oil
Exarnplel
formulation
1.51
0.99
6.16
A
B
1.75
3.26
1.30
2.43
5.20
4.4
Chocolate
Grape
Soda
Syrup
juice
(Cola)
Milk
1.56
2.58
3.62
1.57
2.39
1.15
4.37
2.29
1.56
1.14
3.01
1.5
1.79
1.03
3.98
Coffee Mustard Ketchup
30
cleaning is evaluated by trained raters. The cleaning Was done
The majority of stains cleaned With inventive formulation 1
demonstrated improved results over the competitors but some
mechanically to eliminate differences in results due to clean
performance leads to a Wider distribution of results, and
ing. The subjective testing Was performed by trained raters
therefore does not ?t a normal distribution.
not knoW Which cleaner formulations are being used), and the
stains shoWed only parity after cleaning. This type of cleaning
TABLE 5
DE values for cleaner compositions on a polyester substrate
Used
Motor
Formulation
oil
Exarnplel
formulation
A
B
1.86
2.26
5.55
3.76
3.48
0.62
1.98
4.4
1.35
Chocolate
Grape
Soda
Syrup
juice
(Cola)
Milk
3.19
1.24
2.96
2.52
2.27
2.32
1.91
4.49
4.26
3.15
0.8
4.56
2.88
1.49
1.27
Coffee Mustard Ketchup
The majority of stains cleaned With inventive formulation 1
Who ranked preferred cleaning ability. The soils evaluated 50
demonstrated improved results over the competitors but some
include coffee, used motor oil, mustard, ketchup, chocolate
stains shoWed only parity after cleaning. This type of cleaning
syrup, grape juice, soda (coke) and milk.
performance leads to a Wider distribution of results, and
For the cleaner assay, a colorimeter is employed to deter
mine cleaning objectively using diffuse re?ection. It is an
industry standard test instrument. Stain removal is measured
by changes in fabric color due to cleaning. For each stain, the
total difference from the color of the original fabric to that
measured after the stain is applied, dried, and cleaned is
measured. The closer to the original color the better, and safer,
the cleaner is. Color is measured on 3 axis, L, A and B,
corresponding to blue, yelloW and red, based on ASTM
therefore does not ?t a normal distribution.
55
Example 3
Cleaning-Subj ective Data-Upholstery
60
Lab testing Was based on the AS-345p carpet cleaning
procedure AND Was subjective and double blind. AnANOVA
(P is the value that determines the con?dence limits of the
D4265.
Results Were ?rst checked for homogeneity of variance
(HOV), Which checks that the variances in the tWo groups are
equal. Unequal variance Would suggest possible faults in the
event occurring by chanceithe signi?cance level for this
65
statistical analysis is 95%, Which is a p value of 0.05 or less)
Was performed on the results. The MSE (measurement sys
tem analysis based on an ANOVA analyZed gauge R & R
US 7,776,811 B2
15
16
(repeatability and reproducibility)) determined that the num
ber of distinct categories Was 6 and Was acceptable for the 7
point Likert scale used.
The objective colorimeter testing Was unsuccessful on the
ability of any of the odor neutraliZers. Therefore, samples of
both upholstery and carpet Were used.
TABLE 8
upholstery due to the loose Weave of the fabric. The calorim
Initial Odor Removal
eter Was in?uenced by the background behind the fabric,
resulting in a large measurement standard deviation. The
MSE shoWed that the test method could not distinguish
betWeen samples as the number of distinct categories Was 0
(see MSE calorimeter/upholstery).
Stain
Performance
P value
Milk
Smoke
Example 1 >A > B
p = 0.000
Example 1 =A = B
p = 0.778
Overall
Example 1 >A, B
p = 0.000
TABLE 6
Sub'ective Testing Upholsteg
TABLE 9
Stain
Performance
Chocolate syrup
Coffee
Milk
Motor oil
Example
Example
Example
Example
Grape juice
Ketchup
Example 1 = A = B
Example 1 = A = B
p = 0.440
p = 0.462
Mustard
Cola
All soils
Example 1 = A = B
Example 1 = A = B
Example 1 = A = B
p = 0.340
p = 0.877
p = 0.679
1
1
1
1
=
=
=
=
P value
A
A
A
A
=
=
=
=
B
B
B
B
p
p
p
p
=
=
=
=
Long Term Odor Removal
0.985
0.863
0.302
0.979
Thus, in subjective testing of stains on upholstery, the
20
Performance
P value
Milk
Smoke
Overall
Example 1 >A > B
p = 0.000
Example 1 =A = B
p = 0.459
Example 1 =A
p = 0.000
Example 1 > B
Overall, odor removal performance of the formulation of
Example 1 is improved over commercially available cleaners.
25
All ranges disclosed herein are inclusive and combinable.
The terms ?rst, second, and the like, herein do not denote
any order, quantity, or importance, but rather are used to
distinguish one element from another, and the terms a and
formulation of inventive example 1 Was comparable to com
mercially available cleaners.
Example 4
Stain
30
Cleaning-Subjective Data-Carpet
an herein do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather
denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.
While the invention has been described With reference to a
preferred embodiment, it Will be understood by those skilled
The test protocol used the calorimeter With supporting data
from an in-house subjective lab test using employee raters,
based on the original carpet cleaning procedure. The test Was
35
tions may be made to adapt a particular situation or material
double blind. An ANOVA Was performed on the results. The
MSE determined that the number of distinct categories Was 6
and Was acceptable for the 7 point Likert scale used. See
attached MSE, test procedures, data, and analyZed results.
40
TABLE 7
Sub'ective cleaning data-carpet
Stain
Performance
P value
Chocolate syrup
Example 1 = A
p = 0.016
Coffee
Example
Example
Example
Example
45
Milk
>A
=B
>A
=B
a sodium source,
p = 0.021
50
Example 1 = A = B
p = 0.416
Grape juice
Ketchup
Example 1 = A = B
Example 1 = A = B
p = 0.440
p = 0.462
Mustard
Example 1 = A = B
p = 0.302
Cola
Example 1 =A
p = 0.000
Example 1 > B
Example 1 = A = B
a surfactant,
p = 0.000
Motor oil
All soils
to the teachings of the invention Without departing from
essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the
invention not be limited to the particular embodiment dis
closed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this
invention, but that the invention Will include all embodiments
falling Within the scope of the appended claims.
All cited patents, patent applications, and other references
are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
What is claimed is:
1. A cleaner composition comprising:
Example 1 > B
1
1
1
1
in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents
may be substituted for elements thereof Without departing
from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modi?ca
55
an odor neutraliZer,
a fragrance,
and a biocide,
Wherein the odor neutraliZer comprises a betaine com
pound, an aminoalcohol, a polyol, and an ionone,
Wherein the betaine compound comprises (ethanaminium
N-(carboxymethyl)-2-hydroxy-N,N,bis(2-hydroxy
p = 0.195
ethyl)chloride), and
Wherein the cleaner composition is stable at a pH of about
Thus, in subjective testing of stains on upholstery, the
9.5 to about 11.5 When stored for 24 months at a tem
formulation of inventive example 1 Was comparable to com
perature of about 25 C.
2. The cleaner composition of claim 1, Wherein the surfac
tant comprises an alkyl adduct of an ethylene-oxide-propy
lene oxide copolymer, an alkyl polyglycoside, an alkyl sul
fate, and an ethoxylated alcohol.
mercially available cleaners.
Example 5
Odor Removal Data
65
The test protocol employed Was subjective, and Was double
blind. The material source did not affect the odor removing
3. The cleaner composition of claim 2, Wherein the alkyl
polyglycoside comprises an alkyl carbon chain of at least 8
carbons and no more than 16 carbons.
US 7,776,811 B2
17
18
4. The cleaner composition of claim 2, Wherein the alkyl
polyglycoside comprises an alkyl carbon chain of at least 8
15. The spray dispenser of claim 13, Wherein the surfactant
is an anionic surfactant, a nonionic surfactant, an alkyl sul
fate, an ethoxylated alcohol, an alkyl polyglycoside, or a
combination comprising one or more of the foregoing surfac
carbons and no more than 10 carbons.
5. The cleaner composition of claim 1, Wherein the fra
grance is camphor, camphene, amyl salicylate, a terpineol, or
tants.
16. The spray dispenser of claim 13, Wherein the fragrance
a combination comprising one or more of the foregoing fra
grances.
is camphor, camphene, amyl salicylate, a terpineol, or a com
bination comprising one or more of the foregoing fragrances.
17. The spray dispenser of claim 13, further comprising a
corrosion inhibitor.
18. The spray dispenser of claim 13, further comprising a
Water soluble alkali sodium carbonate.
19. The spray dispenser of claim 13, further comprising a
6. The cleaner composition of claim 1, Wherein the sodium
source is sodium citrate.
7. The cleaner composition of claim 1, Wherein the polyol
comprises triethylene glycol.
8. The cleaner composition of claim 1, Wherein the ami
noalcohol comprises diethanolamine.
9. The cleaner composition of claim 1, further comprising
hydrotrope.
a corrosion inhibitor.
20. A method of cleaning, deodoriZing, or a combination
10. The cleaner composition of claim 1, further comprising
thereof, automobile interiors comprising applying a cleaner
a Water soluble alkali sodium carbonate.
composition to a soiled automobile interior, Wherein the
11. The cleaner composition of claim 1, further comprising
cleaner composition comprises
a hydrotrope.
12. The cleaner composition of claim 1, further comprising
a surfactant,
20
a builder.
13. A spray dispenser comprising a cleaner composition
and optionally a propellant, Wherein the cleaner composition
comprises:
a surfactant,
25
a sodium source,
an odor neutraliZer,
a fragrance,
and a biocide,
Wherein the odor neutraliZer comprises a betaine com
ethyl)chloride), and
30
Wherein the cleaner composition is stable at a pH of about
9.5 to about 11.5 When stored for 24 months at a tem
perature of about 250 C.
21. The method of claim 20, Wherein the surfactant com
prises an alkyl adduct of an ethylene-oXide-propylene oxide
N-(carboxymethyl)-2-hydroxy-N,N,bis(2-hydroxy
ethyl)chloride), and
35
copolymer, an alkyl polyglycoside, sodium lauryl sulfate, and
an ethoxylated alcohol.
9.5 to about 11.5 When stored for 24 months at a tem
22. The method of claim 20, Wherein the fragrance is
camphor, camphene, amyl salicylate, a terpineol, or a com
bination comprising one or more of the foregoing fragrances.
perature of about 25 C.
14. The spray dispenser of claim 13, Wherein the surfactant
comprises an alkyl adduct of an ethylene-oXide-propylene
an ethoxylated alcohol.
pound, aminoalcohol, a polyol, and an ionone,
N-(carboXymethyl)-2-hydroxy-N,N,bis(2-hydroxy
Wherein the betaine compound comprises (ethanaminium
oxide copolymer, an alkyl polyglycoside, an alkyl sulfate, and
an odor neutraliZer,
a fragrance,
and a biocide,
Wherein the odor neutraliZer comprises a betaine com
Wherein the betaine compound comprises (ethanaminium
pound, aminoalcohol, a polyol, and an ionone,
Wherein the cleaner composition is stable at a pH of about
a sodium source,
40
*