[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd
Upload
617 views1 page

Trillana Vs Quezon Colleges

Damasa Crisostomo applied to purchase 200 shares of stock from Quezon Colleges for PHP100 per share. In her application letter, she stated payment would be made after she caught fish. Damasa died without making any payment. Quezon Colleges claimed PHP20,000 from her estate. The court ruled the condition of payment stated by Damasa was not valid because Quezon Colleges did not expressly accept her proposed payment terms, and payment depending solely on her catching fish made the obligation void under the Civil Code.

Uploaded by

mcris101
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
617 views1 page

Trillana Vs Quezon Colleges

Damasa Crisostomo applied to purchase 200 shares of stock from Quezon Colleges for PHP100 per share. In her application letter, she stated payment would be made after she caught fish. Damasa died without making any payment. Quezon Colleges claimed PHP20,000 from her estate. The court ruled the condition of payment stated by Damasa was not valid because Quezon Colleges did not expressly accept her proposed payment terms, and payment depending solely on her catching fish made the obligation void under the Civil Code.

Uploaded by

mcris101
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

TRILLANA VS QUEZON COLLEGES

GR No. L-5003, June 27, 1953


FACTS:
On June 1, 1948, Damasa Crisostomo applied for 200 shares of stock worth PhP100.00 each
at Quezon Colleges, Inc. Within her letter of application, she stipulated, You will find
(Babayaran kong lahat pagkatapos na ako ay makapag-pahuli ng isda) pesos as my initial
payment and the balance payable in accordance with law and the rules and regulations of the
Quezon College. Damasa died on October 26, 1948. Since no payment was rendered on the
subscription made in the foregoing letter, Quezon College presented a claim of PhP20,000.00
on her intestate proceedings. The petitioner administrator of the estate then contests the
validity of said proceedings?
ISSUE:
Is the condition laid down by Damasa Crisostomo valid?
RULING:
There is nothing in the record to show that the Quezon College, Inc. accepted the term of
payment suggested by Damasa Crisostomo, or that if there was any acceptance the same
came to her knowledge during her lifetime. As the application of Damasa Crisostomo is
obviously at variance with the terms evidenced in the form letter issued by the Quezon
College, Inc., there was absolute necessity on the part of the College to express its agreement
to Damasa's offer in order to bind the latter. Conversely, said acceptance was essential,
because it would be unfair to immediately obligate the Quezon College, Inc. under Damasa's
promise to pay the price of the subscription after she had caused fish to be caught. Thus, it
cannot be said that the letter ripened into a contract.
Indeed, the need for express acceptance on the part of the Quezon College, Inc. becomes the
more imperative, in view of the proposal of Damasa Crisostomo to pay the value of the
subscription after she has harvested fish, a condition obviously dependent upon her sole will
and, therefore, facultative in nature, rendering the obligation void. Under the Civil Code it is
provided that if the fulfillment of the condition should depend upon the exclusive will of the
debtor, the conditional obligation shall be void.

You might also like