...
- -
ARCHITECTURAL  DESIGN  5 
COURSE#:  3230.0388 
SEMESTER:  Fall.  2010 
Introduction 
COURSE SYLLABUS 
SCHEDULE:  MWF,  periods 4-6 
LOCATION:  Fine  Arts C  (FAC)  210 
As  an introduction to the Architecture curriculum  proper, this  course will explore perhaps the most fundamental part 
of the design  process: understanding of, and sympathy with the "natural" site.  As  such it will  build upon the issues 
and discussions of the desert project of Design  4.  This  will be the foundation  upon which to respond to actual sites 
in  both their perceptual directness and physical constraints and opportunities.  You will  be expected to develop 
your design  process and technical skills  with greater self-assurance and individuality, as  well as  articulate your ideas 
with greater clarity and conviction.  The  key objectives this stUdio will address: 
  Investigate the qualities and complexities of the Florida landscape as  experienced through sensory 
experience, and in  turn  developing a  system  of notation or representation of these sensory conditions. 
  Exploring the ecological and spatial characteristics that define the site  and larger context and the 
opportunities they present for space-making and architectural intervention. 
  Establishing  a  critical design approach through analysis  and research  that informs a  response to site that 
both respects and challenges the perceptions of architecture and its  interaction with landscape. 
  Developing a tectonic language consistent with the defined conceptual approach and developing this in 
detail and material clarity. 
Methodology 
Design 5 is  intended to build upon, not discard and replace the technique and skills  learned over the last two years. 
As  such  an emphasis will  be maintained on thinking through making (not in  place of it).  An  emphasis will  be placed 
upon the production and development of drawings and models in  the process of designing in  order to test ideas 
and compositional strategies.  Students are encouraged to explore a wide range of drawing techniques and 
media throughout the semester.  While  no particular emphasis or weight is  given between hand or digital 
techniques, students should understand the appropriateness of the technique they choose to the task at hand and 
the time available. 
Both  projects are presented to take inspiration and conceptual direction from the phenomenological and physical 
understanding of the specific site.  As  such they will  entail an analysis through site visit/observation, mapping, and 
research.  However, in  the interest of broadening the framework and scope of architectural inquiry, you are 
encouraged to connect your investigations to larger ideas and cultural themes in  areas such as  art, literature and 
popular culture.  These  lines  of inquiry may challenge assumptions of the site  presented, the conventions  of 
architecture, and of your own beliefs. 
Schedule 
The  semester is  divided into two principle projects and attendant exercises.  The  first  project will address the idea of 
the construct as  an addit ion or extraction of the "natural" site.  This  project will  run  five weeks and therefore require 
a  dedicated and energetic effort.  The  second project will  address a  larger framework of concept and 
consequence in  exploring and addressing the interface of culture,  architecture and site.  A more complete 
schedule will  be provided with each project, but a  rough outline is  as  follows: 
CRiTIC:  Stephen Belton 
OFFICE:  Architecture Bldg. 238 
T'  392.0205 x21  1 
E:  sbelton
a
, ufl.edu 
ARCHITECTURAL  DESIGN  5 
COURSE#:  3230.0388 
SEMESTER:  Fall.  2010 
Week  1-5: 
Week  6-15: 
Week 9: 
Project  1:  analysis and small spatial construct 
Project 2:  compound 
midterm jury,  estimated Oct. 29  (to be confirmed) 
COU RSE  SYLLABUS 
SCHEDULE:  MWF.  periods 4-6 
LOCATION:  Fine  Arts C  (FAC)  210 
Week  16:  final review- all-day jury, estimated Dec. 6 (to be confirmed) 
studio Culture 
Creative design is  best achieved through collaboration, participation and discussions within the studio.  I strongly 
encourage students to work together and discuss  and exchange ideas about the coursework throughout the 
semester.  Also  in  light  of the shared work environment, it is  expected that while the environment should be 
creative, enjoyable, and fun, it  should also reflect a  respect for fellow students and their desire to work with regard 
to noise  levels,  noxious fumes, etc.  The  physical space is  a  further component of this  environment that should be 
treated with respect.  A specific point to this is  a  new official school-wide policy regarding the use  of aerosol sprays: 
Spray  Painting  Policy,  College of Design, Construction and Planning 
Spray painting, or the use  of any other sort  of aerosol spray,  is  not allowed in  the Architecture Building, Rinker 
Hall and in  Fine  Arts  C, except within the spray booth found in  Room  211  of Fine  Arts  C.  Students found in 
vi olation of this  policy will  be referred to the Dean of Students for disciplinary action. 
Attendance 
Studio sessions  are organized around a  mixture of pre#entations, group discussions,  pin-ups,  and individual desk crits, 
and information accumulated, disseminated, and developed through this time is  vital to the student's 
understanding of the design projects.  Attendance is  therefore mandatory, and absence or tardiness does not 
excuse a  student from the work expected of them that day.  Three  unexcused absences will  adversely affect your 
final  grade and four unexcused absences will  be grounds for failing the class.  Tardiness  of more than 20  minutes will 
be counted as  an absence.  It  is  the student's responsibility to obtain information missed  during that day from  fellow 
students.  In  the case of an illness  or family emergency, the student must  present a  valid excuse, such as  a  doctor's 
note.  In  the case of any unavoidable conflicts such as  class  trips, please see me in  advance so we can make 
proper accommodations with the schedule.  This  studio will make several, if infrequent trips  for which all  attempts 
will  be made to notify you in  advance for scheduling and coordination. 
Evaluation  + Grading 
Grading will follow the course structure with the following weight:  project  1, 30%  and project 2, 60%.  The  remaining 
10% will  be assessed  according to participation, progress,  effort  and attitude.  Please note that attendance will 
adversely affect one's grade, both in  direct grade reduction and in  missing work in  the development of a  project . 
Following  Project  1 students will  be given a  letter grade and evaluation.  The  final grade will  be based on the 
following guidelines: 
A  Outstanding work.  Execution of work is  thoroughly complete and demonstrates a  superior level of 
achievement overall with a  clear attention to detail in  the production of drawings, models and other forms 
of representation.  The  student is  able to synthesize  the course material with new concepts and ideas in  a 
thoughtful manner, and is  able to communicate and articulate those ideas in  an exemplary fashion  in. 
CRITIC:  Stephen Belton 
OFFICE:  Architecture Bldg. 238 
T:  392.0205 x211 
E:  sbeltonrgufl.edu 
ARCHI TECTURAL  DESIGN  5 
COURSE#:  3230.0388 
SEMESTER:  Fall.  2010 
COURSE  SYLLABUS 
SCHEDULE:  MWF  periods 4-6 
LOCATION:  Fine  Arts C  (FAC)  210 
B  High  quality work.  Student work demonstrates a  high level of craft. consistency.  and thoroughness 
throughout drawing and modeling work.  The  student demonstrates a  level of thoughtfulness in  addressing 
concepts and ideas. and participates in  group discussions. Work may demonstrate excellence but less 
consistently than an A  student. 
C  Satisfactory work.  Student work addresses all  of the project and assignment objectives with few minor or 
major problems.  Graphics and models are complete and satisfactory. exhibiting minor problems in  craft 
and detail. 
D  Less  than satisfactory work.  Graphic and modeling work is  substandard. incomplete in  significant ways. 
and lacks craft and attention to detail. 
E  Unsatisfactory work.  Work exhibits several major and minor problems with basic conceptual premise. 
lacking both intention and resolution.  Physical  representation in  drawing and models is  severely lacking. 
and is  weak in  clarity.  craft.  and completeness. 
Grading Scale 
Letter 
A  A- B+  B  B- C+  C 
Grade 
Numeric 
93-100  90-92  87-89  83-86  80-82  77-79  73-76 
Grade 
Quality 
4.0  3.67  3.33  3.0  2.67  2.33  2.0 
Points 
UF  Grading Policy 
Information on UF's  grading policy can be found at the following location: 
http://www.registrar.ufl.edu/catalog/policies/regulationgrades.html 
Students with Special Needs 
C- D+  D  D- E 
70-72  67-69  63-66  60-62  0-59 
1.67  1.33  1.0  0.67  0.0 
Students with  special  physical needs and requesting  classroom  accommodation  must  first  register with  the  Dean of 
Students Office. The  Dean  of Students  Office will  provide documentation to the student  who must then  provide this 
documentation  to  the  Instructor  when  requesting  accommodation.  All  attempts  to  provide  an  equal  learning 
environment for all will  be made. 
Readings  and Reference Materials 
While  there are no required texts.  each studio project will include several readings related toward the design 
problem students  are engaged in.  Additionally.  as this studio will cover the issues  of site  and the Florida landscape. 
the following  are reference materials that will  be useful in exploring these concepts: 
The  Poetics of Space.  Gaston Bachelard 
Eyes  of the Skin.  Juhani Pailassma 
Genius Loci.  Christian  Norberg Schultz 
Ecosystems of Florida.  Ronald Myers and John Ewel. eds. 
Recovering Landscape: Essays  in  Contemporary Landscape Architecture.  James Corner. ed. 
Florida Atlas and Gazetteer 
CRITIC:  Stephen Belton 
OFFICE'  Arcllitecture Bldg. 238 
T:  392.0205 x211 
E:  sbeltonil.ufl.edu