Islamic Jurisprudence                                                  1                                     By: Ayyaz Ahmed Khan Sial
Theory of Naskh. 
Introduction 
The revelations from Allah as found in the Qur'an touch on a variety of subjects, among them beliefs, history, tales 
of the prophets, day of judgement, Paradise and Hell, and many others. Particularly important are the ahkam (legal 
rulings),  because  they  prescribe  the  manner  of  legal  relationships  between  people,  as  Allah  wishes  them  to  be 
observed. 
While the basic message of Islam remains always the same, the legal rulings have varied throughout the ages, and 
many prophets before Muhammad brought particular codes of law (shari'a) for their respective communities. 
There  are  some texts of  the  Quran  and  the  traditions  which  have  either  been  totally  abrogated  or 
their application limited or modified by subsequent texts. Many jurists hold that the abrogating and amending laws 
belong to the category of interpretive laws. All the four sunni school unanimously accept the doctrine of abrogation, 
though they may disagree on the details. 
 
Meaning of abrogation or naskh 
(I) Literal meaning 
The Arabic words 'nasikh' and mansukh' are both derived from the same root word 'nasakha' which carries meanings 
such as 'to abolish, to replace, to withdraw, to abrogate, canceling or transferring. 
 
(II) Technical meaning 
The  word  nasikh  (an  active  participle)  means  'the  abrogating',  while  mansukh  (passive)  means  'the  abrogated'.  In 
technical  language  these  terms  refer  to  certain  parts  of  the  Qur'anic  revelation,  which  have  been  'abrogated'  by 
others. 
Naturally the abrogated passage is the one called 'mansukh' while the abrogating one is called 'nasikh', or 
In its technical sense, it means the lifting of a legal rule through a legal evidence of a later date. 
 
Theory of naskh in holy Quran 
The concept of naskh is a necessity in a legal system and Islamic law acknowledge it.  
 
Qurans says: 
Whatever message (verse) we abrogate or causes to be forgotten we bring one better than it or like it. (2: 106) 
And when we put a revelation in place of another revelation. (16: 101) 
Wisdom in Theory of Nasikh wal Mansukh 
How  it  came  about  when  the  message  of  Islam  was  presented  to the Arabs  as something  new,  and  different  from 
their way of life, it was introduced in stages. The Qur'an brought important changes gradually, to allow the people 
to adjust to the new prescriptions. Example: There are three verses in the Qur'an concerning the drinking of wine. 
Wine  drinking  was  very  widespread  in  pre-Islamic  times  and,  although  a  social  evil,  highly  esteemed.  The  three 
verses which finally led to the prohibition of intoxicating substances were revealed in stages (4: 43, 2: 219; 5: 93-4). 
Al-nasikh wa al-mansukh is important because it concerns the correct and exact application of the laws of Allah. It 
is specifically concerned with legal revelations: 
 
Reason for its Importance: 
 
It is one of the important pre-conditions for explanation (tafsir) of the Qur'an.  
   It  is  one  of  the  important  pre-conditions  for  understanding  and  application  of  the  Islamic  law 
(hukm, shari'a). 
  It sheds light on the historical development of the Islamic legal code.  
 
Islamic Jurisprudence                                                  2                                     By: Ayyaz Ahmed Khan Sial 
  It helps to understand the immediate meaning of the ayat concerned. 
  Tafsir (explanation of the Qur'an) or legal ruling is not acceptable from a person, who does not have such 
knowledge. 
 
Theory of naskh according to Sunnah 
It  is  narrated  by  Hazrat  Abdullah  bin  Massod  that  a  verse  revealed  on  Holy  Prophet  (Peace  Be  Upon  Him)  was 
ordered to be recorded the companion wrote it on a rock table, next morning the companion saw it rubbed/cleaned, 
when matter takes to prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) he replied it was repealed. 
 
Classical theory of abrogation 
The doctrine of naskh has three fold meanings in Islamic jurisprudence. 
 
(i) Abrogation of all previous divine books by the holy Quran. 
 
(ii)  The  doctrine  applied  to  repeal  the  Quranic  verses  which  were  said  to  be  blotted  out  of  extinction,  the 
verses repealed. Example could be: 
For abrogation of the recited (verse) together with its legal ruling: 
'Hazrat  A'isha  (Allah  be  pleased  with  her)  reported  that  it  had  been  revealed  in  the  Holy  Qur'an  that  ten  clear 
sucklings make the marriage unlawful, then it was abrogated (and substituted) by five sucklings and Allah's apostle 
(may peace be upon him) died and it was before that time (found) in the Holy Qur'an (and recited by the Muslims). 
[34 Muslim, II, No. 3421] 
 
(a) Whose text and laws are both repealed.  
Example of the same could be: 
For abrogation of a legal ruling without the recited (verse): 
' 
O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou has paid their dowers; and those whom thy right 
hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom God has assigned to thee; and daughters of thy paternal uncles and 
aunts  and  daughters  of  thy  maternal  uncles  and  aunts,  who  migrated  (from  Makka)  with  thee;  and  any  believing 
woman who dedicates her soul to the Prophet if the Prophet wishes to wed her; - this only for thee and not for the 
believers (at large);We know what we have appointed for them as to their wives and the captives whom their right 
hands possess; - in order that there should be no difficulty for thee and God is oft-forgiving, most merciful' (33: 50).  
 
'It is not lawful for thee (to marry more) women after this, nor to change them for (other) wives, even though their 
beauty attract thee, except any thy right hand should possess (as handmaidens); and God doth watch over all things' 
(33: 52). 
 
This  is  one  of  the  few  very  clear  examples  of  naskh,  though  only  concerning  the  Prophet  specifically,  since  for 
Muslims in general the number of wives has been restricted to four. (Sura 4:3). 
 
(b) Where only text was repealed but the law it gave remained in existence. Example of the same could be: 
For abrogation of the recited (verse) without the legal ruling: 
'Abdullah  bin  'Abbas  reported  that  'Umar  bin  Khattab  sat  on  the  pulpit  of  Allah's  messenger  (may  peace  be  upon 
him) and said: Verily Allah sent Muhammad (may peace be upon him) with truth and he sent down the book upon 
him, and the verse of stoning was included in what was sent down to him. We recited it, retained it in our memory 
and understood it. Allah's messenger (may peace be upon him) awarded the punishment of stoning to death (to the 
married  adulterer and adulteress) and after him,  we also awarded the punishment of stoning.  I am afraid that with 
the lapse of time, the people (may forget it) and may say: We do not find the punishment of stoning in the book of 
Allah, and thus go astray by abandoning this duty prescribed by Allah. Stoning is a duty laid down in Allah's book 
for  married  men  and  women  who  commit  adultery  when  proof  is  established,  or  if  there  is  pregnancy  or  a 
confession. [Muslim, III, No. 4194; Bukhari, VIII, No. 816.] 
 
The punishment of stoning for adultery by married people has been retained in the sunna, while it is not included in 
the Qur'an 
Islamic Jurisprudence                                                  3                                     By: Ayyaz Ahmed Khan Sial 
 
 
 
 
(iii) Abrogation of earlier laws of the holy Quran with latter revelation. 
Abrogated Verses: 
According to Suyuti's Itqan there are 21 instances in the Qur'an, where a revelation has been abrogated by another. 
 
He also indicates that there is a difference of opinion about some of these: e.g. 4: 8, 24: 58, etc, while some scholars 
have  attempted  to  reduce  the  number  of  abrogations  in  the  Qur'an  even  further,  by  explaining  the  relationships 
between the verses in some special ways, e.g. by pointing out that no legal abrogation is involved, or that for certain 
reasons the naskh is not genuine 
 
Shah Waliullah (d. 1759) the great Muslim scholar from India only retained the following 5 out of Suyuti's 21 cases 
as genuine, reproduced hereunder:  
 
Mansukh 2: 180 nasikh 4: 11, 12 
Mansukh 2:240 nasikh 2: 234. 
Mansukh 8:65 nasikh 8: 62. 
Mansukh 30:50 nasikh 33: 52. 
Mansukh 58: 12 nasikh 58: 13. 
Kinds or types of naskh 
There are two types of naskh: 
(i) Explicit 
(ii) Implied 
(I) Explicit abrogation 
(I) When the law giver has explicitly stated that a rule is abrogate such abrogation is called as explicit abrogation. 
Example: 
 The abrogation of a law based on a particular circumstance that subsequently disappears. This is the case with the 
call  to patience and  forgiveness  during times of  weakness or numerical disadvantages, during  the Makkah period. 
This was abrogated when fighting became obligatory, Madani period. In actual fact, this is not a case of abrogation 
but  a  case  of  "being  made to  forget",  as Allah  Almighty  Himself  says  in  the  case  of  war:  "...or  We  cause it to be 
forgotten", that is, the duty to do battle, until Muslims become stronger. 
Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) said I had forbidden you from storing away the sacrificial meat because of the 
large crowds, you may now store it, as you wish. 
 
(II) Implicit abrogation 
When the law giver has not expressly pointed out the abrogation, but has laid down a new rule that conflicts with 
an earlier rule and there is no chance of reconciling, it is called implicit abrogation. 
 
Example: 
Quran says: 
Those of you die and leave widows should bequeath for their widows a years maintenance without expulsion. 
It means  that the woman whose husband had died has to wait for a whole  year, but  another verse  was revealed in 
this context which says. 
If any of you die and leave widows behind, they shall wait concerning themselves four months and ten days. 
This verse abrogates the earlier verse. 
Types of implicit abrogation 
Implicit abrogation is of two types. 
(i) Total abrogation (Naskh Kulli) 
Naskh is total, where it may lift the entire law and substitute another one for it. 
 (ii) Partial abrogation (Naskh Juzi) 
Islamic Jurisprudence                                                  4                                     By: Ayyaz Ahmed Khan Sial 
When the law is repealed for a certain class alone, it is called partial abrogation. This is also called the overriding of 
a general law by a special law. 
Example 
A general law in the Quran provides penalties for all those who falsely accuse chaste woman of sexual intercourse. 
It then provides a special law in the case of spouses accusing each other of unchastity. The provisions of the general 
law are not applicable to spouses because the special law overrides that provision. 
Abrogation and Specification 
There  is  of  course  difference  between  abrogation  and  specification.  By  the  latter  is  meant  that  one  revelation 
explains in more detail or according to specific circumstances how another revelation should be understood. 
Example: 
Sura 2:183 says 'O you who believe, fasting is prescribed to you ...' 
Narrated 'Ata' that he heard Ibn 'Abbas reciting the Divine verse 'for those who can do it is a ransom, the feeding of 
one that is indigent' (2:184). 
Ibn 'Abbas said 'This verse is not abrogated but it is meant for old men and old women who have no strength to fast, 
so they should feed one poor person for each day of fasting (instead of fasting). [Bukhari, VI, No. 32.] 
It is quite  clear that the second verse (2:184) does not abrogate the rule of  fasting from  the first verse (2:183) but 
explains that in a specific case, that of weak old people, there is a way of making up for the loss of fast. 
In  the  same  way  the  verses  concerning  intoxicating  drinks  can  be  understood  as  specifications  rather  than 
abrogations (see 4:43; 2:219; 5:93-4). 
Conditions for abrogation 
Following are the conditions for abrogation. 
(i) It must have been done during the lifetime of the holy Quran (Peace Be Upon Him). 
(ii) The abrogation text should be later in time. 
(iii) Both text should be equivalent in authencity and meanings. 
(iv) The next itself should not preclude the possibility of naskh. 
(v) Both texts should be in conflict and there should be no possibility of reconciliation. 
(vi) Both text must not revealed together. 
 
Methods or rules of abrogation 
(i) One text of Quran can abrogate another text. 
(ii) One Sunnah can abrogate another Sunnah. 
The mutawatir Sunnah can abrogate the rule in the Quran and vice verse. 
A khabar wahid can abrogate another khabir wahid. 
Examples of naskh from Quran and Sunnah 
(I) Examples from holy Quran 
One of the earlier cases of repeal of an earlier command was the directive to change the direction of the Qiblah 
Bayt al Muqdas to Masjid al Haram. 
We see the turning of the face (for guidance) to the heavens now shall we turn thee to a Qiblah that shall please 
thee. Turn then thy face in the direction of the sacred mosque. Wherever ye are turn your faces in that direction. (2: 
144) 
 
Islamic Jurisprudence                                                  5                                     By: Ayyaz Ahmed Khan Sial 
 
(II ) Example from hadith 
I have forbidden you from visiting the graves nay visit them for they remind you of the day of resurrection. 
 
 Limitation on the doctrine of naskh. 
Following are the limitation on the doctrine of naskh. 
(i) Divine attributes cannot be repealed e. g. tawhid, Prophets books of Allah etc. 
(ii) Moral trust sanctioned in Quran cant be abrogated.  
(iii) A provision related with the circumstances which negate the possibility of time limitation cant be abrogate e. 
g. Islamic shariah in its entirety cant be repealed. 
Conclusion: 
The Qur'an, in 2:106, refers to the concept of naskh. However, there is a difference of opinion about the extent to 
which al-nasikh wa-al mansukh  does in  fact occur in the text of the Qur'an. The information  concerning al-nasikh 
wa-al  mansukh  must  be  treated  with  great  caution  as,  for  all  reports  concerning  the  text  of  the  Qur'an,  two 
independent  witnesses  are  required.  Many  of  the  examples  which  the  scholars  have  drawn  upon  to  illustrate  this 
question (and have quoted here for the same purpose) are based on one witness only. 'A'isha (R.A) alone reported 
that  10  or  5  sucklings  had  been  part  of  the  Qur'anic  recitation,  and  only  'Umar  (R.A)  reported  that  the  'verse  of 
stoning' had been included in the Qur'anic text. These legal rulings are not included in the Qur'an precisely because 
they were not considered reliable, being based on one witness only. Similarly, other examples about naskh, based on 
the words of Ibn 'Abbas or Mujahid alone, are to be judged by the same measure. 
However, as mentioned there remain a small number of verses which, as far as can be ascertained from the internal 
evidence of the Qur'an, have been superseded by other verses in the Qur'an.