[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6K views1 page

United States Court of Appeals: Circuit Judges

United States Court of Appeals grants defendant Jesse C. Litvak's motion for release pending appeal. The Court finds that Litvak has raised a substantial legal or factual question that could result in reversal of his conviction. The conditions of release previously set by the district court will remain in place during the pendency of Litvak's appeal.

Uploaded by

DealBook
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6K views1 page

United States Court of Appeals: Circuit Judges

United States Court of Appeals grants defendant Jesse C. Litvak's motion for release pending appeal. The Court finds that Litvak has raised a substantial legal or factual question that could result in reversal of his conviction. The conditions of release previously set by the district court will remain in place during the pendency of Litvak's appeal.

Uploaded by

DealBook
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
_____________________

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at
the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New
York, on the 3
rd
day of October, two thousand fourteen.

Present: RALPH K. WINTER,
REENA RAGGI,
PETER W. HALL,
Circuit Judges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
ORDER
v. No. 14-2902-cr

J ESSE C. LITVAK,
Defendant-Appellant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Defendant J esse C. Litvak, through counsel, moves for release pending appeal. Upon due
consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED because Litvak has
raised a substantial question of law or fact likely to result in . . . reversal. 18 U.S.C.
3143(b)(1). The conditions of release established by the district court shall remain in
full force and effect during the pendency of this appeal.

FOR THE COURT:
Catherine OHagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court

CERTIFIED COPY ISSUED ON 10/03/2014
Case: 14-2902 Document: 42 Page: 1 10/03/2014 1335695 1

You might also like