[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd
Upload
220 views4 pages

Legal Insights on Debt Imprisonment

1. No person shall be imprisoned for debt or failure to pay a poll tax according to the Philippine Constitution. 2. Debt refers to any civil obligations arising from contracts, whether express or implied. Fraudulently obtained debts may be considered a private matter between the creditor and debtor, with the creditor's remedy being a civil lawsuit rather than criminal prosecution. 3. While no one can be imprisoned for not paying a debt, fraudulent acts can be criminally prosecuted. Making worthless checks with intent to defraud can be prosecuted as a crime against public order.

Uploaded by

codearcher27
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
220 views4 pages

Legal Insights on Debt Imprisonment

1. No person shall be imprisoned for debt or failure to pay a poll tax according to the Philippine Constitution. 2. Debt refers to any civil obligations arising from contracts, whether express or implied. Fraudulently obtained debts may be considered a private matter between the creditor and debtor, with the creditor's remedy being a civil lawsuit rather than criminal prosecution. 3. While no one can be imprisoned for not paying a debt, fraudulent acts can be criminally prosecuted. Making worthless checks with intent to defraud can be prosecuted as a crime against public order.

Uploaded by

codearcher27
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Non-imprisonment for debt

Non-imprisonment for debt..................................................................................................1


Source: Cruz, Constitutional Law, 2007 d., p27!.............................................................1
1.No person s"all be imprisoned for debt or non-pa#ment of a poll ta$ %&rt. ''' Sec 20(...2
2.)ebt...................................................................................................................................2
*.Crime.................................................................................................................................*
+.,oll ta$..............................................................................................................................*
Source: Cruz, Constitutional Law, 2007 Ed., p275
1
1. No person shall be imprisoned for debt or non-payment of a
poll tax [Art. III Sec 20]
2. Debt
2.1. efers to any ci!il obli"ations arisin" from contracts# express or
implied.
2.2. No distinction is made in the $onstit%tion and may th%s incl%de
debts obtained thro%"h fra%d [&ana'ay !s. (%illen]
2.). An obli"ation to pay arisin" from extra contract% is considered a
pri!ate matter bet'een the creditor and the debtor and no criminal action
to enforce the former*s ri"ht to reco!er 'ill lie. +he remedy of the creditor
is a ci!il action for the reco!ery of the %npaid debt.
2.,. It 'as held that a 'arrant of arrest iss%ed based on a criminal
complaint 'here on its face no criminal offense has been committed sa!e
the fail%re to settle an obli"ation despite demand is !iolati!e of the
prohibition a"ainst imprisonment for non-payment of debt -Serafin !s.
.indaya"# /) S$A 1//0
2
2.1. In a ci!il case 'here the defendant 'as arrested for contempt of
co%rt for fail%re to pay the plaintiiff past and f%t%re s%pport 'as held to
be !iolati!e of the constit%tional prohibition -S%ra !s. 2artin0
). $rime
).1. 3hile no person may be imprisoned for nonpayment of debt# an
obli"ation ac4%ired thro%"h fra%d may be criminally prosec%ted. In s%ch
case# the fra%d%lent act of sec%rin" the debt# and not his defa%lt in payin"
it# is p%nishable. +he obli"ation arises from acts ex-delicto and is
therefore not considered a debt %nder the constit%tional pro!ision.
).2. 56 22 p%nishes the act of ma7in" and iss%in" a 'orthless chec7#
and not the nonpayment of an obli"ation. +he la' is not intended or
desi"ned to coerce a debtor to pay his debt. +he thr%st of the la' is to
prohibit# %nder pain of penal sanctions# the ma7in" of 'orthless chec7s
and p%ttin" them in circ%lation bein" an offense a"ainst p%blic order
-.o8ano $ase0
).). An employer circ%m!entin" the la' thro%"h deceit in not payin" the
salaries of his employees 'ithin the prescribed period 'as con!icted
based on said la'. +he S$ %pheld the la' declarin" 99'hat is bein"
p%nished is the fra%d or deceit of the employer# 'ho bein" able to ma7e
payment shall abstain or ref%se to do so 'itho%t :%stification -6eople !s.
2erillo# ;%ne 2<# 1=110
,. 6oll tax
*
,.1. +axes are not considered debts b%t arise from an obli"ation of e!ery
citi8en to contrib%te his share in the maintenance of "o!ernment and
fail%re to comply may be !alidly p%nished 'ith imprisonment.
,.2. +he only exception is non payment of a poll tax 'hich is defined as
a specific fixed s%m le!ied on e!ery indi!id%al belon"in" to a certain
class 'itho%t re"ard to his property or occ%pation.
,.). +he exception 'as adopted p%rs%ant to the social :%stice policy
'hich reflects the tender re"ard of the la' to the impo!erished millions
'ho cannot afford it.
+

You might also like