[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
61 views15 pages

TORTS DAY10 Draft1

- A nuisance is any act, omission, establishment, business, condition or property that injures or endangers health/safety of others, annoys/offends the senses, shocks/defies decency, or obstructs/interferes with free passage of public areas. - Nuisances can be public (affecting the public at large) or private (affecting an individual or small group). Remedies include prosecution, civil action, or abatement. Private persons can abate public nuisances specially injurious to them. - Nuisances can be per se (unquestionably a nuisance regardless of circumstances) or per accidens (becoming a nuisance due to
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
61 views15 pages

TORTS DAY10 Draft1

- A nuisance is any act, omission, establishment, business, condition or property that injures or endangers health/safety of others, annoys/offends the senses, shocks/defies decency, or obstructs/interferes with free passage of public areas. - Nuisances can be public (affecting the public at large) or private (affecting an individual or small group). Remedies include prosecution, civil action, or abatement. Private persons can abate public nuisances specially injurious to them. - Nuisances can be per se (unquestionably a nuisance regardless of circumstances) or per accidens (becoming a nuisance due to
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

(DAY 10) NUISANCE : TORT ARISING FROM PROPERTY USE Art. 694.

A nuisance is any act, omission, esta !is"ment, #siness, con$ition o% &'o&e't(, or anything else which: (1) Injures or endan ers the hea!th or sa"ety o" others# or ($) Annoys or o""ends the senses# or (%) &hoc's, de"ies or disre ards decency or (ora!ity# or (4) )*structs or inter"eres with the "ree +assa e o" any +u*!ic hi hway or street, or any *ody o" water# or (,) -inders or i(+airs the use o" +ro+erty. Art. 69.. The a*ate(ent o" a nuisance does not +rec!ude the ri ht o" any +erson injured to reco/er da(a es "or its +ast e0istence. Art. 699. The re(edies a ainst a +u*!ic nuisance are: (1) A +rosecution under the 1ena! 2ode or any !oca! ordinance: or ($) A ci/i! action# or (%) A*ate(ent, without judicia! +roceedin s. Art. .0%. A +ri/ate +erson (ay "i!e an action on account o" a +u*!ic nuisance, i" it is s+ecia!!y injurious to hi(se!". Art. .04. Any +ri/ate +erson (ay a*ate a +u*!ic nuisance which is s+ecia!!y injurious to hi( *y re(o/in , or i" necessary, *y destroyin the thin which constitutes the sa(e, without co((ittin a *reach o" the +eace, or doin unnecessary injury. 3ut it is necessary: (1) That de(and *e "irst (ade u+on the owner or +ossessor o" the +ro+erty to a*ate the nuisance# ($) That such de(and has *een rejected#
(%) That the a*ate(ent *e a++ro/ed *y the district hea!th o""icer and e0ecuted with the assistance o" the !oca! +o!ice#

(4) That the /a!ue o" the destruction does not e0ceed three thousand +esos. Art. .0,. The re(edies a ainst a +ri/ate nuisance are: (1) A ci/i! action# or ($) A*ate(ent, without judicia! +roceedin s. Art. .06. Any +erson injured *y a +ri/ate nuisance (ay a*ate it *y re(o/in , or i" necessary, *y destroyin the thin which constitutes the nuisance, without co((ittin a *reach o" the +eace or doin unnecessary injury. -owe/er, it is indis+ensa*!e that the +rocedure "or e0trajudicia! a*ate(ent o" a +u*!ic nuisance *y a +ri/ate +erson *e "o!!owed. Art. .0.. A +ri/ate +erson or a +u*!ic o""icia! e0trajudicia!!y a*atin a nuisance sha!! *e !ia*!e "or da(a es: (1) I" he causes unnecessary injury# or ($) I" an a!!e ed nuisance is !ater dec!ared *y the courts to *e not a rea! nuisance. CONCEPT Deri/ed "ro( the 4rench word nuire, which (eans to injure, hurt or har(. 5itera!!y: it (eans annoyance, or anythin that wor's hurt, incon/enience, or injury. 6uisance doctrine o+erates as a restriction u+on the ri ht o" the owner o" +ro+erty to (a'e such use o" it as he +!eases. 67I&A628 is a&&!ie$ to t"at c!ass o% )'on*s which arises from the unreasona*!e, unwarranta*!e, or un!aw"u! use *y a +erson o" his own +ro+erty,

Torts | Day 10 | 1

and which +roduces such (ateria! annoyance, incon/enience, disco("ort, or hurt, that the !aw wi!! +resu(e a conse9uent da(a e. Anythin that wor's an injury, har( or +rejudice to an indi/idua! or the +u*!ic is a nuisance. It e(*races *oth intentiona! har(s and those caused *y ne !i ence or rec'!essness. 5aw o" n#isance is a s# cate*o'( o% to't !a) in that the gravamen of the complaint in nuisance is the allegation of injury to person or property . Injury need not *e +hysica!, and can inc!ude injury to ri hts or +ro+erty enjoy(ent. To *e !ia*!e "or a nuisance, there (ust *e resu!tin enjoy(ent o" his !e a! ri hts. NUISANCE +s, TRESSPASS o A nuisance consists o" a #se o% one-s o)n &'o&e't( in such a manner as to cause injury to the +ro+erty or other ri ht or interest o" another, and enera!!y 'es#!ts %'om t"e commission o% an act e(on$ t"e !imits o% t"e &'o&e't( a%%ecte$, A tres+ass is a direct in"rin e(ent o" anot"e'-s 'i*"t o% &'o&e't(. An encroach(ent u+on the s+ace a*out another:s !and *ut not u+on the !and itse!" is a nuisance and not a tres+ass. (Conestee Mills v. Greenville) injury to another in the

In tres+ass, the injury is direct and i((ediate# in nuisance, it is conse9uentia!.

NUISANCE +s, NEG.IGENCE (1) As to 5ia*i!ity: there (ust *e so(e *reach o" duty. a. !ia*i!ity "or ne !i ence: *ased on a want o" care# *. !ia*i!ity "or nuisance: a +erson who creates or (aintains nuisance is !ia*!e "or the resu!tin injury to others re ard!ess o" the de ree o" care to a/oid the injury. ($) As to ;io!ation: a. 6uisance: /io!ation o" an a so!#te $#t(, the doin o" an act which is wron "u! in itse!"# *. 6e !i ence: /io!ation o" a 'e!ati+e $#t(, the "ai!ure to use the de ree o" care re9uired under +articu!ar circu(stances. (%) As to 2onse9uence: the da(a e is the necessary conse9uence o" what the de"endant is doin , or is incident to the *usiness itse!" a. 6uisance: a++!ies *. 6e !i ence: does not a++!y

It has *een he!d that where the acts or omissions constituting negligence are the identical acts which, it is asserted, give rise to a cause of action for nuisance , the ru!es a++!ica*!e to ne !i ence wi!! *e a++!ied.
Torts | Day 10 | 1

Ex. T"e #i!$in* o% a st'#ct#'e ma( e ne*!i*ence an$ at t"e same a n#isance 'en$e'in* t"e one c'eatin* it !ia !e )it"o#t &'oo% o% ne*!i*ence. <here howe/er, the !ia*i!ity o" the !essor o" a !and or *ui!din in a condition dan erous to the hea!th or sa"ety o" the +u*!ic de+ends u+on whether he 'new, or, with the e0ercise o" due care, ou ht to ha/e

'nown, o" its dan erous condition, an action *y one injured as a resu!t thereo" (ay ta'e the "or( o" one "or nuisance or one "or ne !i ence. o There (ay *e situations where what was !a)%#! in its o'i*in ma( t#'ne$ into a n#isance ( ne*!i*ence in maintenance . e

The coa! ho!e, *ui!t under a !icense, (ay in/o!/e a !ia*i!ity "or nuisance i" there is ne !i ence in co/erin it. The tu(*!edown house a*uttin on a hi hway is trans"or(ed into an un!aw"u! structure i" its ruinous condition is a (enace to the tra/e!er.

NUISANCE based on their nature: PER SE / PER ACCIDENS 67I&A628 PER E! an act, occu+ation, or structure which is un9uestiona*!y a n#isance at a!! times and #n$e' an( ci'c#mstances, regardless of location or surroundings . A nuisance *ecause o" its inherent 9ua!ities, +roducti/e o" injury or dan erous to !i"e or +ro+erty without re ard to circu(stance. A house o" +rostitution is a nuisance per se aside "ro( *ein a +u*!ic nuisance# a(*!in houses. "ouses constructed without o/ern(enta! authority on +u*!ic streets and ri/er *eds "or they o*struct at a!! ti(es the "ree use *y the +u*!ic o" said +!aces. #s such, they may $e summarily removed without judicial proceedings. A!! s9uatters on o/ern(ent resett!e(ent +rojects, they can *e a*ated or ejected without judicia! +roceedin s. (Mendo%a vs. &ational "ousing #uthority , 1012)

67I&A628 PER #CC'(E& : an act, occu+ation, or structure, not a n#isance &e' se, *ut which ma( ecome a n#isance ( 'eason o% ci'c#mstances3 !ocation3 o' s#''o#n$in*s. =aisin and *reedin +i s in a house within city !i(its is a nuisance +er accidens.

The di""erence *etween nuisance per se and nuisance per accidens !ies in t"e &'oo%, not in the remedy. The res+onsi*i!ity "or a nuisance "or either sort is the sa(e. PER E PER #CC'(E& whether it is a nuisance or not is enera!!y a 9uestion o" "act the thin *eco(es a nuisance as de+ends u+on its !ocation and a (atter o" !aw surroundin s, the (anner o" its conduct or other circu(stances e0istence (ay *e +ro/ed +roo" o" the act and its without a showin o" s+eci"ic da(a es conse9uences is necessary. the ri ht to re!ie" is esta*!ished *y a/er(ent and +roo" o" the (ere act a""ects the i((ediate sa"ety o" e/en the (unici+a! authorities, +ersons and +ro+erty wou!d not ha/e the ri ht to co(+e! the a*ate(ent o" a (ay *e su((ari!y a*ated under +articu!ar thin or act as a the unde"ined !aw o" necessity nuisance without reasona*!e notice to the +erson a!!e ed to *e (aintainin or doin the sa(e at the ti(e and +!ace o" hearin *e"ore a tri*una! authori@ed to decide whether such a thin or act does in !aw constitute a nuisance (Monteverde vs. Generoso,

8>I&T862 8 A3AT8?8 6T

Torts | Day 10 | 1

19$A) o NUISANCE according to the extent or scope of their injurious effects : PU4.IC / PRI5ATE 1735I2 67I&A628: the doin o" or the "ai!ure to do so(ethin that injurious!y a""ects sa"ety, hea!th, or (ora!s o" the +u*!ic, or wor's so(e su*stantia! annoyance, incon/enience, or injury to the +u*!ic. It is a nuisance which causes hurt, incon/enience, or da(a e to the +u*!ic enera!!y, or such a +art o" the +u*!ic as necessari!y co(es in contact with it in the e0ercise o" a +u*!ic or co((on ri ht. It is a condition o" thin s which is +rejudicia! to the hea!th, co("ort, sa"ety, +ro+erty, sense o" decency, or (ora!s o" the citi@ens at !ar e, resu!tin either "ro( an act not warranted *y !aw, or ne !ect o" a duty i(+osed *y !aw.

1=I;AT8 67I&A628: one which /io!ates on!y +ri/ate ri hts and +roduces da(a e to *ut one or a "ew +ersons, and cannot *e said to *e +u*!ic. It has *een said to e0ist where one is injured in re!ation to a ri ht which he enjoys *y reason o" his ownershi+ o" an interest in !and, and where an indi/idua! wron arisin "ro( an unreasona*!e, unwarranta*!e, or un!aw"u! use o" one:s +ro+erty +roduces such (ateria! annoyance, incon/enience, disco("ort, or hurt that the !aw wi!! +resu(e a conse9uent da(a e. 1735I2 a""ects the +u*!ic at !ar e or such o" the( as (ay co(e in contact with it 1u*!ic nuisances are indicta*!e, the co(+!ainant need not ha/e +ro+erty or use interest in any +ro+erty a""ected *y the de"endant:s conduct. 1=I;AT8 a""ects the indi/idua! or a !i(ited nu(*er o" indi/idua!s on!y. +ri/ate nuisance are actiona*!e, either "or their a*ate(ent or "or da(a es, or *oth. Injuncti/e re!ie" (ay *e ranted a ainst a +ri/ate nuisance. The co(+!ainant see's to +rotect his own, current interest in the undistur*ed enjoy(ent o" or *ene"it "ro( +ro+erty. The +!ainti"" need not own the +ro+erty C he need on!y *e a !aw"u! occu+ant, or the ho!der o" one or (ore other use ri hts.

&2)18

=8?8DB

TEST OF A PU4.IC NUISANCE


Torts | Day 10 | 1

The distinction *etween a +u*!ic nuisance and a +ri/ate nuisance !ie in the e6tent o' sco&e o% its in7#'io#s e%%ect. The test o" a +u*!ic nuisance is the &ossi i!it( o% in7#'( o' anno(ance not to t"e &# !ic3 #t to a!! )"o come )it"in its s&"e'e,

o o

there is a tendency to the annoyance o" the +u*!ic, *y an in/asion o" its ri hts which a!! are entit!ed to e0ercise i" they see "it. that acts or conditions (ay *e *ene"icia! to the +u*!ic in so(e de ree wi!! not +re/ent the( "ro( *ein a nuisance, i" their e""ects are such as to "a!! within the de"inition o" a nuisance. Example! A +ri/ate *as'et*a!! court *ui!t on o/ern(ent !and de/oted to +u*!ic use, constitutes a +u*!ic nuisance as we!! as nuisance +er se and, there"ore, can *e su((ari!y a*ated. T"e %act t"at it is a!so #se$ as a +en#e %o' &# !ic meetin*s $oes not ma8e it !ess a n#isance,

1u*!ic nuisance a!ways arise out o" un!aw"u! acts, and an act cannot *e a nuisance i" it is !aw"u!, or is authori@ed *y a /a!id statute or ordinance, or is i(+erati/e!y de(anded *y +u*!ic con/enience.

MI9ED NUISANCES A nuisance (ay *e *oth +u*!ic and +ri/ate in character# it (ay *e a +u*!ic nuisance *ecause it /io!ates +u*!ic ri hts to the injury o" (any +ersons, and it (ay a!so *e +ri/ate in character in that it +roduces s+ecia! injury to +ri/ate ri hts to any e0tent *eyond the injury to the +u*!ic. Example! o A house a*uttin on a street rai!way trac' is a +ri/ate nuisance to the rai!way co(+any and a +u*!ic nuisance *ecause it o*structs the street. o =aisin and *reedin ani(a!s (+i s, oats and shee+) "or co((ercia! +ur+oses in a /icinity that is "ast *eco(in a "ashiona*!e residentia! district and where it is shown that the +!ace where the ani(a!s are 'e+t are "ound to *e unsanitary on account o" the o""ensi/e odors, +ernicious to hea!th, co(in "ro( (anure scattered therein, sta nant water, etc. constitutes *oth +u*!ic and +ri/ate nuisance.

The 'ee+in or stora e o" aso!ine (ay constitute a nuisance, either +ri/ate or +u*!ic. <hether or not it *eco(es a nuisance de+ends u+on the !ocation, the 9uantity, and other surroundin circu(stances. <hi!e it wou!d not necessari!y de+end u+on the de ree o" care used in the stora e, the (anner in which the tan's are constructed and o+erated (ay *e considered. ()avier v. *%aeta)

NOISE AS A NUISANCE D868=A55B: e/eryone is *ound to *ear the ha*itua! or custo(ary incon/eniences that resu!t "ro( the +ro0i(ity o" others, and so !on as this !e/e! is not sur+assed, he (ay not co(+!ain a ainst the(. o 37T: i" the +rejudice e0ceeds the incon/eniences that such +ro0i(ity ha*itua!!y *rin s, the nei h*or who causes such distur*ance is he!d res+onsi*!e "or the resu!tin da(a e, *ein ui!ty o" causin nuisance.

<-86 A2TI)6A358 o A noise (ay constitute an actiona*!e nuisance# it (ust *e a noise )"ic" a%%ects in7#'io#s!( t"e "ea!t" o' com%o't o% o'$ina'( &eo&!e in t"e +icinit( to an #n'easona !e e6tent. Injury to a +articu!ar +erson in a +ecu!iar +osition or o" s+ecia!!y sensiti/e characteristics wi!! not render the noise an actiona*!e nuisance.
Torts | Day 10 | 1

T8&T:

<hether ri hts o" +ro+erty, hea!th, or co("ort are so injurious!y a""ected *y the noise in 9uestion that the su""erer is su*jected to a !oss which oes *eyond the reasona*!e !i(it i(+osed u+on hi( *y the condition o" !i/in , or o" ho!din +ro+erty, in a +articu!ar !oca!ity in "act de/oted to uses which in/o!/e the e(ission o" noise a!thou h ordinary care is ta'en to con"ine it within reasona*!y *ounds.

ATTRACTI5E NUISANCE D868=A5 =758 Cthat when +eo+!e co(e to the !ands or +re(ises o" others "or their own +ur+oses, without ri ht or in/itation, they (ust ta'e the !ands or +re(ises as they see the(. I" they are e0+osed to injury "ro( unseen dan ers, the 'es&onsi i!it( t"e'e%o' is #&on t"emse!+es. (%A A(. Eur. $d A04.) 8>281TI)6 C An e0ce+tion to the ru!e a*so!/in "ro( !ia*i!ity owners or occu+ants o" +re(ises, in re"erence to injuries sustained *y +ersons tres+assin u+on their +ro+erty, is the soFca!!ed Gatt'acti+e n#isanceH doctrine. Thus, one )"o maintains on "is &'emises dan erous instru(enta!ities or a++!iances o% a c"a'acte' !i8e!( to att'act c"i!$'en in &!a( , and who "ai!s to e0ercise ordinary care to +re/ent chi!dren "ro( +!ayin therewith or resortin thereto, is !ia !e to a c"i!$ o% ten$e' (ea's )"o is in7#'e$ t"e'e ( , e/en i" the chi!d is technica!!y a tres+asser in the +re(ises. ( "idalgo Enterprises, 'nc. v. +alandan)

3A&I& )4 5IA3I5ITB. C"ound in the enera! ru!es which deter(ine the duty o" an owner or occu+ant to tres+assers and the de ree o" care which (ust *e e0ercised toward chi!dren o" tender years. P'esence o% c"i!$'en to o e antici&ate$ C

D868=A5 =758: an owner or occu+ant (ust e0ercise ordinary care to +re/ent an injury to a tres+asser whose +resence u+on the +re(ises is reasona*!y to *e antici+ated. )ne who (aintains u+on his +re(ises an instru(enta!ity or conditions attracti/e to chi!dren is *ound to antici+ate the +resence o" chi!dren who wi!! *e a!!ured to and u+on the +re(ises *y the attraction, and to e0ercise ordinary care "or the sa"ety o" such chi!dren. The use o" the e0+ression G att'acti+e n#isanceH is to desi nate a c!ass o" cases within the enera! ru!e that one is !ia*!e "or injury resu!tin to another "ro( "ai!ure to e0ercise the de ree o" care co((ensurate with the circu(stances. e ta8en %o' t"ei' sa%et(.

E6t'a &'eca#tions to o

the tender a e o" the chi!d re9uires the owner to ta'e +recautions "or sa"ety that he wou!d not *e *ound to ta'e "or the +rotection o" an adu!t. e e6&ecte$

C"i!$'en actin* #&on t"ei' instincts an$ im&#!ses to o

I" they !ea/e e0+osed to the o*ser/ation o" chi!dren anythin te(+tin to the( which they, in their i((ature jud (ent, (i ht natura!!y su++ose

Torts | Day 10 | 1

2hi!dren, where/er they o, (ust *e e0+ected to act u+on chi!dren:s instincts and i(+u!ses, and others, who are char ea*!e with a duty o" care and caution toward the(, (ust ca!cu!ate accordin !y.

they were at !i*erty to hand!e or +!ay with, it shou!d *e e0+ected that such !i*erty wi!! *e ta'en. A115I2ATI)6 T) 3)DI8& )4 <AT8= enera!!y is not a++!ica*!e to *odies o" water, arti"icia! as we!! as natura!, in the a$sence of some unusual condition or artificial feature other than the mere water and its location. T"#s3 a swi((in +oo! or +ond or reser/oir o" water is not considered an attracti/e nuisance. G6ature has created strea(s, !a'es and +oo!s which attract chi!dren. 5ur'in in their waters is a!ways the dan er o" drownin . A ainst this dan er, chi!dren are ear!ier instructed so that they are su""icient!y +resu(ed to 'now the dan er# and if the owner of private property creates an artificial pool on his own property, merely duplicating the work of nature without adding any new danger, I he is not !ia*!e *ecause o" ha/in created an attracti/e nuisance.H (-ida! o 8nter+rises, Inc. /. 3a!andan)

D8D=88 )4 2A=8 =8J7I=8D. C 6o one is an insurer o" the sa"ety o" chi!dren (ere!y *ecause he is the owner o" +!aces or a++!iances that (ay a++ea! to their youth"u! "ences. O'$ina'( o' 'easona !e ca'e o A !andowner has a ri ht to (aintain a dan erous instru(enta!ity on his +re(ises that are attracti/e to chi!dren, &'o+i$e$ "e e6e'cises o'$ina'( ca'e o' 'easona !e ca'e to +re/ent the( "ro( *ein injured whi!e +!ayin therewith. ta'e such (easures or +recautions: i/in warnin o" dan er, erectin uards, +ro/idin "ences or *arricades, insta!!in sa"ety de/ices, or "urnishin other (eans, as are reasona*!y su""icient to +re/ent tres+assin *y chi!dren It is the failure to take such precautions which authorizes a recovery under the doctrine of attractive nuisance.

Remote o' im&'o a !e in7#'ies o An owner o" !and is not 'e:#i'e$ to &'o+i$e a*ainst 'emote o' im&'o a !e in7#'ies to c"i!$'en who ca(e u+on the +re(ises, *ut on!( a*ainst s#c" in7#'ies as can e 'easona !( antici&ate$ to occur "ro( the o*ject or instru(enta!ity in/o!/ed. Any re9uire(ent m#st not e so one'o#s as to ma,e ownership or possession of property $urdensome instead of $eing profita$le or enjoya$le.

;it"o#t se'io#s incon+enience an$ *'eat e6&ense to o)ne' o There is no duty to ta'e +recautions where to do so wou!d *e i(+ractica*!e, unreasona*!e, or into!era*!e.
Torts | Day 10 | 1

The duty to sa"e uard the dan erous attraction is su*ject to the 9ua!i"ication t"at it can e $one )it"o#t se'io#s incon+enience an$ *'eat e6&ense to t"e o)ne', Example: one of the reasons given for the general rule that a fire escape is not an attractive nuisance is that it is impractica$le to construct fire escapes so that they will serve usefully for the purpose for which they are intended and yet $e inaccessi$le to adventurous children.

A6TI2I1ATI)6 )4 I6E7=8D 2-I5D:& 1=8&8628 The de"endant is not !ia*!e un!ess he 'new, or reasona*!y ou ht to ha/e 'nown, that the structure or instru(enta!ity was a!!urin to chi!dren and endan ered the(. G'o#n$ %o' antici&atin* c"i!$-s &'esence o C )ne o" the essentia! conditions o" !ia*i!ity under the doctrine o" attracti/e nuisance is that there (ust ha/e *een round "or antici+atin the +resence o" the injured chi!d, since, un!ess the +resence o" the injured chi!d is reasona*!y to *e antici+ated, the duty o" ta'in +recautions "or his sa"ety does not arise. The owners o" !and are not re9uired in usin it "or !e iti(ate +ur+oses to uard a ainst e/ery +ossi*!e dan ers to chi!dren. To chi!dren whose +resence u+on the +re(ises cannot *e reasona*!y antici+ated, they owe no duty to 'ee+ their !and "ree "ro( dan erous conditions. The owner:s 'now!ed e o" the chi!d:s +eri! (ay a++ear "ro( the nature and 'ind o" attraction or "ro( the !ocation and accessi*i!ity o" the attraction.

Reason Fo' C"i!$-s P'esence o The reason for an injured child-s presence upon the premises is im&o'tant in $ete'minin* )"et"e' t"e &'o&'ieto' s"o#!$ "a+e antici&ate$ "is &'esence. It (ay *e shown that the chi!d was u+on the +re(ises "or another reason, as where the chi!d was *rou ht u+on the +re(ises *y his +arent when the !atter entered on a +ersona! errand# or where the chi!d was +resent *y in/itation o" one not authori@ed *y the owner or occu+ant to act in this res+ect# or where he was (ere!y usin the +re(ises "or a shortcut, or as a /anta e +oint "or /iewin an inde+endent attraction u+on other +re(ises. C"i!$-s &'esence $#e to t"e att'action It (ust *e shown that the +resence o" the chi!d was due to the attraction. <here a chi!d is in a +!ace where he has a ri ht to *e, there is no reason "or antici+atin its +resence.

Dan*e's to )"ic" $oct'ine a&&!ica !e<not a&&!ica !e . o the dan er to the chi!d *e caused *y the attraction itse!", or *y so(ethin with which the attraction *rin s the chi!d in contact.
Torts | Day 10 | 1

A++!ica*!e "or the +rotection o" e/en a (edd!in chi!d# *ut it does not +rotect a chi!d a ainst the owner o" the +re(ises i" the dan er was not an incident to the +!ace, *ut was created *y the chi!d hi(se!". The character o" the dan er, as o+en and o*/ious, or hidden and !atent, is an i(+ortant consideration. The doctrine is !i(ited in its a++!ication to cases where the dan er is !atent, and a""ords no *asis "or a reco/ery where the injury co(+!ained o" was +roduced *y a +eri! o" an o*/ious or +atent character. A dan er which is not on!y o*/ious *ut natura!, considerin the instru(enta!ity "ro( which it arises, is not within the (eanin o" the attracti/e nuisance doctrine, "or the reason that an owner or occu+ant is entit!ed to assu(e that the +arents or uardian o" a chi!d wi!! ha/e warned hi( to a/oid such a +eri!. Pits an$ e6ca+ations on !an$ em o$( no $an*e's t"at a'e not 'ea$i!( a&&a'ent to e+e'(one, e/en to /ery youn chi!dren. 4or this reason, the +ro+rietor is under no o*!i ation, as a ru!e, to "ence or otherwise uard such +!aces, and he wi!! not *e !ia*!e "or injuries to chi!dren who (ay ha/e "a!!en therein.

o o o

6or is the !andowner !ia*!e "or injuries sustained *y earth "a!!in into e0ca/ations as a resu!t o" the e(*an'(ent *ein under(ined *y chi!dren. Dan*e's o% an o'$ina'( c"a'acte' as t"ose %'om %i'e an$ steam3 ma(3 "o)e+e'3 e so concea!e$ as to a#t"o'i=e a 'eco+e'(, The a*e o% t"e in7#'e$ c"i!$ is mate'ia! consi$e'ation in deter(inin whether the +eri! was one which he shou!d ha/e reco ni@ed. #gain, a child-s ,nowledge of the danger may $e inferred from the fact that he has $een warned thereof.

A4ATEMENT OF NUISANCE AND RECO5ERY OF DAMAGES, The action to a ate and the action to 'eco+e' da(a es are distinct re(edies either or $oth o" which the +!ainti"" (ay +ursue at his e!ection. The a*ate(ent o" a nuisance (ay ha/e ta'en +!ace a"ter injury or da(a e has a!ready *een caused. The injured +erson (ay sti!! reco/er da(a es resu!tin "ro( or rowin out o" the nuisance which has *een a*ated. .he rule is just and serves to discourage and punish anyone who causes a nuisance. The owner o" +ro+erty a*ated as a nuisance is not entit!ed to co(+ensation un!ess he can show that the a*ate(ent is unjusti"ied.

ACTION FOR DAMAGES AGAINST A NUISANCE, The action "or da(a es +er(its the +!ainti"" to reco/er "or a!! da(a es caused u+ to the ti(e o" the suit i" the nuisance was such that the de"endant (ay *e e0+ected to a*ate it. I" the de"endant "ai!s to a*ate the nuisance, its continuance constitutes a new nuisance and i/es rise to another action "or da(a es, as where the de"endant re+eated!y "!oods the +!ainti"":s !ands. 4#t i" the nuisance cannot *e a*ated or is such that the court wi!! not enjoin its continuance, a!! da(a es (ust *e o*tained in one action. The ri ht to successi/e actions ser/es the dou*!e +ur+ose o" co(+ensatin the +!ainti"" and inducin the de"endant to a*ate the nuisance. In addition, it +re/ents one +erson "ro( +ractica!!y co(+e!!in another to se!! a !e a! ri ht.

Torts | Day 10 | 1

.IA4I.ITY FOR DAMAGES IN CASE OF E9TRA> ?UDICIA. A4ATEMENT OF NUISANCE, Artic!e .0. +ro/ides "or two rounds to ho!d a +ri/ate +erson or +u*!ic o""icia! e0trajudicia!!y a*atin a nuisance !ia*!e "or da(a es. It ser/es the $#a! &#'&ose o" +ro/idin a sort o" deterrent a ainst the i(+ro/ident or unreasona*!e resort to the re(edy *y unscru+u!ous +arties A6D at the sa(e ti(e a""ords the /icti( a ci/i! re(edy to reco/er da(a es without +rejudice to such other re(edies ranted *y !aw.

STRICT .IA4I.ITY OF EMP.OYER TO PAY FOR DEAT@ OR IN?URIES TO EMP.OYEES A't, 1A11, O)ne's o% ente'&'ises and ot"e' em&!o(e's are o$liged to pay compensation for the death of or injuries to their la$orers, wor,men, mechanics or other employees , e+en t"o#*" t"e e+ent ma( "a+e een &#'e!( acci$enta! o' enti'e!( $#e to a %o't#ito#s ca#se, i" the death or +ersona! injury arose out o" and in the course o" the e(+!oy(ent . The e(+!oyer is a!so !ia*!e "or co(+ensation i" the e(+!oyee contracts any i!!ness or disease caused *y such e(+!oy(ent or as the 'es#!t o% t"e nat#'e o% t"e em&!o(ment . '/ ."E M' "#P 0# (1E .* ."E EMP2*3EE4 *0& &*.*R'*1 &EG2'GE&CE, *R 5*21&.#R3 #C., *R (R1&6E&&E , ."E EMP2*3ER "#22 &*. +E 2'#+2E /*R C*MPE& #.'*& . <hen the em&!o(eeBs !ac8 o% $#e ca'e cont'i #te$ to "is $eat" o' in7#'( , the co(+ensation sha!! *e e:#ita !( 'e$#ce$. o o The !an ua e o" the +ro/ision indicates that the sa(e is strict !ia*i!ity *ecause !ia*i!ity e0ists e/en i" the cause is +ure!y accidenta!. &ote! i" the death or injury is due to the ne !i ence o" a "e!!owFwor'er, the !atter and the e(+!oyer sha!! *e so!i$a'i!( !ia !e "or co(+ensation. I" a fellow7wor,er-s intentional or malicious act is the on!y cause o" the death or injury, the em&!o(e' s"a!! not e ans)e'a !e , 7658&& it shou!d *e shown that the !atter did not e0ercise due di!i ence in the se!ection or su+er/ision o" the +!ainti"":s "e!!owFwor'er (1$1., 622)

O;NER OF ANIMA.S A't, 211C, The +ossessor o" an ani(a! or whoe/er (ay (a'e use o" the sa(e is 'es&onsi !e %o' t"e $ama*e which it (ay cause, although it may escape or $e lost. This 'es&onsi i!it( s"a!! cease on!y in case the da(a e shou!d co(e "ro( "orce (ajeure or "ro( the "au!t o" the +erson who has su""ered da(a e. (190,) o The !an ua e o" the +ro/ision re/ea!s an e+i$ent intent to ma8e t"e &ossesso' o' )"oe+e' ma8es #se o% t"e anima!3 !ia !e in$e&en$ent o% %a#!t . 8>281TI)6: when the da(a e was caused *y "orce (ajeure or *y the +erson who su""ered the da(a e. (De"iras /. 8scaKo). That the owner or +osssesor o" the ani(a! is sti!! !ia*!e e/en i" da(a e was caused *y the ani(a! throu h the "au!t o" third +ersons. I" the acts o" a third +erson cannot *e "oreseen or +re/ented, then the situation is si(i!ar to that o" "orce (ajeure and the +ossessor is not !ia*!e. The 2i/i! 2ode +ro/ision is a++!ica*!e whether the ani(a! is do(estic, do(esticated or wi!d. (;esti! /s. IA2, 19A9).

Torts | Day 10 | 1

PROPRIETOR OF 4UI.DING<T@ING Art. $191. 1ro+rietors sha!! a!so *e res+onsi*!e "or da(a es caused: (1) 3y the e0+!osion o" (achinery which has not *een ta'en care o" with due di!i ence, and the in"!a((ation o" e0+!osi/e su*stances which ha/e not *een 'e+t in a sa"e and ade9uate +!ace# ($) 3y e0cessi/e s(o'e, which (ay *e har("u! to +ersons or +ro+erty# (%) 3y the "a!!in o" trees situated at or near hi hways or !anes, i" not caused *y "orce (ajeure# (4) 3y e(anations "ro( tu*es, cana!s, sewers or de+osits o" in"ectious (atter, constructed without +recautions suita*!e to the +!ace. (190A) Art. $19$. I% $ama*e re"erred to in the two +recedin artic!es shou!d *e the 'es#!t o% an( $e%ect in t"e const'#ction mentione$ in Artic!e 1.$%, the third +erson su""erin da(a es (ay +roceed on!y a ainst the en ineer or architect or contractor in accordance with said artic!e, within the +eriod therein "i0ed. (1909) Art. $19%. The "ea$ o% a %ami!( that !i/es in a *ui!din or a +art thereo", is 'es&onsi !e %o' $ama*es ca#se$ ( t"in*s t"'o)n o' %a!!in* %'om t"e same. (1910) o %rd +ersons who su""ered da(a es (ay +roceed on!y a ainst the en ineer or architect or contractor i" the da(a e re"erred to in Artic!es $190 and $191 shou!d *e the resu!t o" any de"ect in construction. 6e/erthe!ess, e/en in the a*sence o" the a*o/eF9uoted +ro/isions, actions "or da(a es in the situations s+eci"ied thereunder can sti!! e maintaine$ #n$e' A'tic!e 21AD *ecause any da(a e (ay *e considered as da(a e resu!tin "ro( the +ro+rietor:s "ai!ure to e0ercise due care in the (aintenance o" his *ui!din and that he used his +ro+erty in such a way that he injured the +ro+erty o" another.

$nd +ara ra+h o" Artic!e $191: &2 considered the e0cessi/e s(o'e a nuisance that (i ht *rin a*out de+reciation in the /a!ue o" adjoinin +ro+erties. -owe/er, the 2ourt ru!ed that there is no certain +ecuniary standard *y which such da(a e can *e (easured, and in that sense the threatened injury is irrepara$le and may appropriately $e restrained $y injunction ()!!endor" /. A*raha(son). The "act that the +ro+erty is !eased or in usu"ruct wi!! not e0e(+t the owner "ro( !ia*i!ity "or his duty to (a'e necessary re+airs re(ains a!thou h the +ro+erty is !e a!!y in the +ossession and contro! o" another. The !essee or the usu"ructuary is o*!i ed to noti"y or ad/ise the owner o" the need "or ur ent or e0traordinary re+airs. (Arts. ,9%, 166%.) The "ai!ure o" the !essee or usu"ructuary to i/e this notice wi!! entit!e the owner to rei(*urse(ent, "or the da(a es he (ay ha/e *een re9uired to +ay third +arties injured *y the co!!a+se o" the +ro+erty.

PRODUCT / SER5ICE .IA4I.ITY Art. $1A.. ?anu"acturers and +rocessors o" "oodstu""s, drin's, toi!et artic!es and si(i!ar oods s"a!! *e !ia*!e "or death or injuries caused *y any no0ious or har("u! su*stances used, a!thou h no contractua! re!ation e0ists *etween the( and the consu(ers. (n) o 1=)D72T 5IA3I5ITB 5A<

Torts | Day 10 | 1

o/erns the !ia*i!ity o" (anu"acturers and se!!ers "or da(a es resu!tin "ro( de"ecti/e +roducts. 5ia*i!ity "or de"ecti/e +roducts (ay *e ase$ on "raud, warranty, ne !i ence, or strict !ia*i!ity. (2ocaF2o!a 3ott!er:s 1hi!i++ines /s. 2A, 199%). Cons#me' Act o% t"e P"i!i&&ines F !aw that is (eant to +rotect the consu(ers *y +ro/idin "or certain sa"e uards when they +urchase or use consu(er +roducts. The +o!icy state(ent stated in Art. $ o" the !aw re/ea!s the enera! +!an i(+!e(ented in its s+eci"ic +ro/isions

Dec!a'ation o% 4asic Po!ic(. C It is the +o!icy o" the &tate to +rotect the interests o" the consu(er, +ro(ote his enera! we!"are and to esta*!ish standards o" conduct "or *usiness and industry. Towards this end, the &tate sha!! i(+!e(ent (easures to achie/e the "o!!owin o*jecti/es: a) +rotection a ainst ha@ards to hea!th and sa"ety# *) +rotection a ainst dece+ti/e, un"air and unconsciona*!e sa!es acts and +ractices# c) +ro/ision o" in"or(ation and education to "aci!itate sound choice and the +ro+er e0ercise o" ri hts *y the consu(er# d) +ro/ision o" ade9uate ri hts and (eans o" redress# and e) in/o!/e(ent o" consu(er re+resentati/es in the "or(u!ation o" socia! and econo(ic +o!icies. 1ri/ity o" contract is not re9uired under Artic!e $1A. *ecause it e0+ress!y a!!ows reco/ery a!thou h no contractua! re!ation e0ists. Gsha!!H indicates that the !ia*i!ity o" the (anu"acturer and +rocessor is strict. )udge anco e0+!ained that: GThat Artic!e $1A. is inc!uded in 2ha+ter on JuasiF de!icts is o" no (o(ent *ecause it does not preclude an action $ased on negligence for the same act of using noxious or harmful su$stance in the manufacturer or processing of the foodstuffs, drin,s, toilet articles or similar goods which caused the death or injury co(+!ained o", i% t"e in7#'e$ &a't( o&ts to 'eco+e' on t"at t"eo'(. And e/en under that theory it see(s o*/ious that +roo" o" ne !i ence is !i'ewise unnecessary *ecause it is su*su(ed "ro( the (ere a!!e ation and +roo" o" the essentia! "acts constitutin the cause o" action under this artic!e. In this res+ect strict !ia*i!ity in tort is indistin uisha*!e "ro( !ia*i!ity "or 9uasiFde!ict. T"e $istinction !ies in t"e 8in$ o% 'eco+e'a !e $ama*es an$ $e%enses a+ai!a !e #n$e' eac" ca#se o% action )"ic" )i!! e $isc#sse$ se&a'ate!(.H

RE CONSUMER ACT +is>E>+is STRICT .IA4I.ITY The +ro*!e( that is encountered in justi"yin strict !ia*i!ityunder Artic!e $1A. o" the 2i/i! 2ode is not +resent in the strict !ia*i!ity +ro/isions o" the 2onsu(er Act *ecause t"e !an*#a*e o% t"e a&&!ica !e &'o+ision is c!ea' an$ #nmista8a !e . Artic!e 9. o" the statute e0+ress!y +ro/ides "or !ia*i!ity "or de"ecti/e +roducts Ginde+endent!y o" "au!t.H .he provision is $road enough to cover cases governed $y #rticle 89:; of the Civil Code. A't, 0A, 2ia$ility for the (efective Products. C Any Fi!i&ino o' %o'ei*n (anu"acturer, +roducer, and any i(+orter, sha!! *e !ia !e %o' 'e$'ess, inde+endent!y o" "au!t, "or da(a es caused to consu(ers $y defects resulting from design, manufacture, construction, assem$ly and erection, formulas and handling and ma,ing up, presentation or pac,ing of their products, as well as for the insufficient or inade<uate information on the use and ha%ards thereo". A &'o$#ct is $e%ecti+e when it does not o""er the sa"ety ri ht"u!!y e0+ected o" it, ta'in re!e/ant circu(stances into consideration, inc!udin *ut not !i(ited to:

Torts | Day 10 | 1

a) +resentation o" +roduct# *) use and ha@ards reasona*!y e0+ected o" it# c) the ti(e it was +ut into circu!ation. A +roduct is not consi$e'e$ $e%ecti+e *ecause another *etter 9ua!ity +roduct has *een +!aced in the (ar'et. The (anu"acturer, *ui!der, +roducer or i(+orter sha!! not *e he!d !ia*!e when it e/idences: a) that it did not +!ace the +roduct on the (ar'et# *) that a!thou h it did +!ace the +roduct on the (ar'et such +roduct has no de"ect# &trict !ia*i!ity e/en e0tends to ser/ices under Artic!e 99 o" the 2onsu(er Act which i(+oses !ia*i!ity "or de"ecti/e ser/ice Ginde+endent!y o" "au!t.H &er/ice under Artic!e 99 (eans, Gwith res+ect to re+air and ser/ice "ir(s, ser/ices su++!ied in connection with a contact "or construction, (aintenance, re+air, +rocessin , treat(ent or c!eanin o" oods or o" "i0tures on !and, or distri*ution o" oods, or trans+ortation o" oods.H.

PERSONS .IA4.E I(+osed on the (anu"acturer. any +erson who (anu"actures, asse(*!es or +rocesses consu(er +roducts, e0ce+t that i" the oods are (anu"actured, asse(*!ed or +rocessed "or another +erson who attaches his own *rand na(e to the consu(er +roducts, the !atter sha!! *e dee(ed the (anu"acturer. In case o" I?1)=T8D 1=)D72T&, the (anu"acturer:s re+resentati/es or, in his a*sence, the i(+orter, sha!! *e dee(ed the (anu"acturer. o Thus, a su+er(ar'et that se!!s certain +roducts usin its own trade(ar', is considered the (anu"acturer e/en i", in "act, it was +roduced *y another +erson or entity.

Trades(an (Artic!e 9A, 2onsu(er Act) )rdinari!y is not !ia*!e "or da(a es caused *y de"ecti/e +roducts under the 2onsu(er Act. 5ia*!e on!y when: o o o it is not +ossi*!e to identi"y the (anu"acturer, *ui!der, +roducer or i(+orter# the +roduct is su++!ied, without c!ear identi"ication o" the (anu"acturer, +roducer, *ui!der or i(+orter# and he does not ade9uate!y +reser/e +erisha*!e oods.. Gthe +arty (a'in +ay(ent to the da(a ed +arty (ay e0ercise the ri ht to reco/er a +art o" the who!e o" the +ay(ent (ade a ainst the other res+onsi*!e +arties, in accordance with their +art or res+onsi*i!ity in the cause o" the da(a e e""ected.H

It sha!! inc!ude a su++!ier or distri*utor i": o the se!!er is a su*sidiary or a""i!iate o" the su++!ier or distri*utor#

Torts | Day 10 | 1

&e!!er a +erson en a ed in the *usiness o" se!!in consu(ers.

consu(er +roducts direct!y to

o o

the se!!er interchan es +ersonne! or (aintains co((on or o/er!a++in o""icers or directors with the su++!ier or distri*utor# or the su++!ier or distri*utor +ro/ides or e0ercises su+er/ision, direction or contro! o/er the se!!in +ractices o" the se!!er.H (Artic!e 4L*nM). )n the other hand, a distri*utor and a su++!ier are de"ined as "o!!ows:

REASONS ;@Y .IA4I.ITY IS IMPOSED ON MANUFACTURERS 1. The consu(er "inds it too di""icu!t to +ro/e ne !i ence a ainst the (anu"acturer. 2. &trict !ia*i!ity +ro/ides an e""ecti/e and necessary incenti/e to (anu"acturers to (a'e their +roducts as sa"e as +ossi*!e. 3. Res ipsa loquitur is in "act a++!ied, in so(e case, to i(+ose !ia*i!ity u+on +roducers who ha/e not in "act *een ne !i ent# there"ore ne !i ence shou!d *e dis+ensed with. 4. =e+uta*!e (anu"acturers do in "act stand *ehind their +roducts, re+!acin and re+airin those which +ro/e to *e de"ecti/e# and (any o" the( issue a ree(ents to do so. There"ore, a!! shou!d *e res+onsi*!e when injury resu!ts "ro( a nor(a! use o" a +roduct. 5. The (anu"acturer is in a *etter +osition to +rotect a ainst har(, *y insurin a ainst !ia*i!ity "or it, and, *y addin the costs o" the insurance to the +rice o" the +roduct, to +ass the !oss on to the enera! +u*!ic.

MEANING OF DEFECTI5E PRODUCT A'tic!e 0A of the Consumer #ct conte(+!ates (4) 'inds o" de"ects in +roducts: 1. ?anu"acturin De"ect C de"ects resu!tin "ro( (anu"acture, construction, asse(*!y and erection. 2. Desi n De"ect C de"ects resu!tin "ro( desi n and "or(u!as. 3. 1resentation De"ect C de"ects resu!tin "ro( hand!in , (a'in u+, +resentation or +ac'in o" the +roducts. 4. A*sence o" A++ro+riate <arnin C de"ect resu!tin "ro( the insu""icient or inade9uate in"or(ation on the use and ha@ards o" the +roducts.

.ACF OF ;ARNING: DUTY TO ;ARN A't, AG en%o'ce accurate products o% t"e Cons#me' Act e0+ress!y states as a +o!icy that the State s"a!! com&#!so'( !a e!in*, and %ai' &ac8a*in* to ena$le the consumer to o$tain information as to the nature, <uality and <uantity of the contents of consumer and to facilitate his comparison of the value of such products .

The o*!i ation is +ri(ari!y i(+osed on the (anu"acturer 8>281TI)6: the who!esa!er or retai!er (ay ha/e such o*!i ation i" they: (Artic!e .6). o o o are en a ed in the +ac'a in or !a*e!in o" such +roducts# +rescri*e or s+eci"y *y any (eans the (anner in which such +roducts are +ac'a ed or !a*e!ed# ha/in 'now!ed e, re"use to disc!ose the source o" the (is!a*e!ed or (is+ac'a ed +roducts.

?ini(u( !a*e!in re9uire(ents: whether it is "!a((a*!e or in"!a((a*!e# directions "or use, i" necessary# warnin o" to0icity# watta e, /o!ta e or a(+eres# or +rocess o" (anu"acture used i" necessary.

Torts | Day 10 | 1

Any word, state(ent or other in"or(ation re9uired sha!! a++ear on the !a*e! or !a*e!in with such cons+icuousness as co(+ared with other words, state(ents, desi ns or de/ices therein, and in such ter(s as to render it !i'e!y to *e read and understood *y the ordinary indi/idua! under custo(ary conditions o" +urchase or use. o PROOF OF DEFECT 4re9uent!y the +roduct in dis+ute wi!! ha/e *een destroyed, *eyond any +ossi*i!ity o" ana!ysis, or *e so co(+!e0 that a +!ainti"" wou!d ha/e a reater di""icu!ty in deter(inin the +resence o" de"ect than wou!d the (anu"acturer. In (ost cases, +roo" o" the de"ect (ust necessari!y *e *y circu(stantia! e/idence and in"erence as we!! as o+inion o" e0+erts. 6o enera! ru!e can ade9uate!y a++!y to the wide ran e o" such cases, each in/o!/in a di""erent (i0ture o" "act and in"erence, *ut "unda(enta! to any case is that so(e de"ect (ust *e +ro/ed. St'ict!( s&ea8in*, res ipsa lo<uitur has no a&&!ication to a st'ict !ia i!it( case *ecause determination of negligence is not material. -owe/er, the "act that the +roduct went wron (ay, in +ro+er cases, i/e rise to a +er(issi*!e in"erence that it was de"ecti/e and that the de"ect e0isted when it !e"t the hands o" the de"endant.

DEFENSES Artic!e 9.: +ro/ides that the (anu"acturer, *ui!der, +roducer or i(+orter sha!! not *e he!d !ia*!e when it e/idences: 1. that it did not +!ace the +roduct on the (ar'et# 2. that a!thou h it did +!ace the +roduct on the (ar'et such +roduct has no de"ect# 3. that the consu(er or a third +arty is so!e!y at "au!t. Artic!e 99 +ro/ides that the su++!ier o" the ser/ices sha!! not *e he!d !ia*!e when it is +ro/en: 1. that there is no de"ect in the ser/ice rendered# 2. that the consu(er or third +arty is so!e!y at "au!t.

Torts | Day 10 | 1

You might also like