0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 2K views 12 pages Welding Duplex and Superduplex Stainless Steel
The 1992 guide for welding duplex and superduplex stainless steel has been updated. The growth in the application of duplex.stainless, steel has been substantjicH. New w,elding procedures suet, 'IS the,GMAW-STT process have, been descrjbed.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save Welding Duplex and Superduplex Stainless Steel For Later Welding duplex and superduplex stainless steel
An update of the guide for industry
by L. van Nassau, (Lincoln Smitweld, the Netherlands), H. Meelker, F. Neessen en J. Hikes
Keywords: duplex stainless steel, super duplex stainless steel, welding, properties, applications
Abstract
The 1992 guide for welding duplex stain-
ess steel has been updated. The growth
in the application of duplex stainless
steel has been substantial. The current
status of engineering aspects of the
mostly used base material has been re-
viewed. New welding processes such as
the GMAW-STT process have been di
scribed, The new AWS and EN standards
for welding consumable standards with
their requirements for the chemical com-
position have been listed.
Extensive mechanical testing of weld-
ments in DSS and SDSS has been per-
formed and show that the modern weld-
ing consumables meet enhanced
requirements such as CVN 40 J at 46°C.
In addition CTOD tests and even wide
plate tests have been reported in the lit-
erature. Those tests demonstrated the
liability of various welding procedures.
Engineers express their confidence in ap-
plying DSS grades.
1 Introduction
In 1993, in the IIW journal Welding in the
World a paper was published with the
“Welding of duplex and superduplex stain-
less steel’, which was to be used as a guide
for industry (IW document, agreed upon in
1992, ref. 1). After that the 4th duplex con-
ference has been held (Glasgow 1994). The
material engineers in the petrochemical in-
dustry and chemical tanker shipbuilding be-
came convinced that the combination of the
higher strength and increased corrosion
properties, compared to the common auste-
nitic stainless steel grades offers a real and
reliable advantage. The use of both, duplex
(DSS) and superduplex (SDSS) stainless
steel, increased significantly. A growth in
sales of 22%Cr duplex stainless steel in
particular, has been spectacular and is still
increasing with over 20% per year. The cur-
rent world wide consumption has been esti-
mated to be within 100,000-150,000 ton.
Many projects have been completed and
new projects with 22%Cr duplex and
25%Cr superduplex (approx. 5-10% of the
duplex stainless steel volume) are in the de-
sign or already in the fabrication phase. The
grade UNS $31803 has now reached the
third place in stainless steel consumption.
The progress in material technology includ
ing base material manufacture and handling
as well as welding technology has been evi-
dent over the last four years.
Rather than expanding the number of spe-
cific grades one can observe a certain con-
centration on those grades with proven
records. Generic grades are standardised in
UNS and EN 10088 specifications. These
materials have become re available in
most product forms. No specific attention
has been given to the Mo-free 23% Cr DSS
and to 25% DSS with its PREN below 38.
Their use is rather limited.
With the growing application also the in-
crease in severity of properties is notice-
able. Only 4 years ago most of the authori-
ties and oil companies limited the allowable
design temperature to -20°C and a material
thickness of 25mm. Application research
work in various countries showed the relia~
bility of welded joints, also at lower temper-
atures and heavier thicknesses. Recent re-
quirements in the oil and gas industry refer
to ~46°C for impact toughness. In some
cases CTOD properties at -20°C or 40°C
have been required for information.
With reference to the 1992 guide this paper
reviews the subjects where the develop-
ments in welding technology provided the
basis for the compliance with the increased
requirements, in some cases even com-
bined with an increased productivity.
Regarding the corrosion properties, refer-
ence is limited to the pitting corrosion test-
ing which should be considered as suitable
for ranking and QC purposes only.
2 Base materials
21 Material grades
The combination of properties such as high
proof strength and high resistance to pitting
and crevice corrosion makes the DSS and
SDSS most attractive for installations in the
il & gas industry. In particular the pittingcorrosion resistance is determined by the Standard 22%Cr DSS has been applied
chemical composition. Two pitting resis- mainly in the transport and handling of nat-
tance indices are in use: ural gas with condensates. Examples of im-
portant applications are certainly the Dutch
PREy = %Cr +3,3x %Mo+16x 9%6N and NAM underground natural gas storage proj-
ects, the ARCO transport pipe line:
PREw = %Cr +3,3x (%Mo+0,5x %W) Alaska, the process equipment of the Statoil
+16x %N (ref. 2) platform Sleipner West, and under prepara-
tion the piping and fiowlines of the Oman
Under the common 2296Gr duplex stainless LNG project. Additionally, numerous appli-
steel grade with the classifications UNS cations in the pulp and paper industry, in
$31803 stee! manufacturers present their chemical tankers and flue gas desulphurisa-
steels in compliance with a pitting index tion projects have been recorded.
PREy > 82 up to PREy > 35. The modern ‘Specifying bodies in the oil & gas industry
steel grades typically contain 22.5%Cr, tend to ‘enhance’ the material requirements
5.5%Ni and Mo varying between such as impact toughness CVN ~46°C of
3,0-3,5%. The nitrogen content N=0,14- average 35 to 45J, depending on the opera~
0.20% with the average being 0,169. The tor, and a proof strength Rp0,2 min. 500
PREx value is controlled mainly by the Mo- N/mm?, These requirements have been ful-
content. Table 1 shows the best known filled with generic UNS $31803 products.
commercial 22%Cr duplex stainless steel Three standard 25%Cr superduplex stain-
grades. less steel grades (wrought products) are on
The stabilisation of the duplex microstruc- the market, One grade typically contains
ture with the austenite (}-promoting ele- 25%Cr, 6,5- 7,59%6NI, 3,5-4,09%6Mo and
ment N proved to assure good properties, N=0,22-0,26% (UNS $32750). The other
particularly in the HAZ. grades are additionally alloyed with 1.5%
Cu (UNS $32550) or with 0,6%Cu and 0,69
Manufacturer Gnée Cr Ni Mo ON Cu other PRE, PRE, product forms
22%Cr Duplex Stainless Steel
‘UNSS31803 EN X2 CrNiMoN 22.5-3
Avesta 2205
‘Creusot Loire Ind. UR ASN & 45N+ 1
PREN >32/34 I
Fabr. de Fer. Fafer 4462 I
PREN >33/35
‘Thyssen Krupp Nirosta Fale 223 220 55 28 O15. - 3237 all product forms,
Sandvik SAF 2205 28 34 "018 depending on
‘Nippon Kokan NKcr22 i manufacturer
Sumitomo SM22Cr i
25%Cr Super-Duplex Stainless Steel
Pressner 9ae2s 2673S 02S. 06 a castings
CreusotLoieIniustie URS2N@S2NY2S 60-32. 022 16 peal plat, forgings,
bars,
Langley Alloys Fert255/SD 40 63 37 028 castings
IMS S32750 EN X2 CrNOMON 28-7-4
‘Avesta / Sandvik SAF207 25740027 2s (late, forgings,
{ tes,
Creusot Loire Industrie URAIN+ 25738028 iting, castings
UNS $22760 EN 2 CeNiMoCHWN 25.
293380 teas
Weir Materials 2eron 100 plate, forgings,
{ tubes,
2S 78 36022 07 WOT >40 41S ( itings, casings
abr. de Fer UNS 32760 plate
last
Sumitomo Dpsw, 25730027 wee 3922S pipes
C max 0.03 oF 0.04%
‘Table 1. Well known trade names and products in 2296Cr DSS and 25%Cr SDSS; typical chemical compositions,W (UNS $32760) with PREy/=40-41 and
PREy=41,5-42,5, Table 1 lists the main
commercial grades of this type.
The increase crevice, pitting and stress cor-
rosion of the superduplex grades (viz. UNS
32760) showed substantial benefits in se-
vere conditions such as:
Gas/condensate transport pipe lines (viz.
King Fisher...), platform process equipment
(Maersk, Phillips Petroleum), swivel stack
buoyings on vessels (SBM) and reactors in
the chemical industry (Hoechst).
22 Surface condition
The surface condition of the plates and
pipes have been improved. For 22%Cr du-
plex stainless steel is standardised as an-
healed, blasted & pickled, sufficient for most
engineering conditions (ref. 3). Nevertheless
the fabricators occasionally come across
surface problems which can be traced back
to hot rolling conditions.
It is stated that duplex material manufacture
requires special rolling and heat treatment
procedures which make the products gener-
ic, despite a common classification accord-
ing UNS and EN standards.
2.3 Forming and straightening
In the further processing of plate material
cold forming is applied for products such as
vessel heads, bends and longitudinal weld-
ed pipes. The understanding today is that
sound plate material can accommodate a
substantial amount of plastic deformation
(max. 15%) before an unacceptable loss of
toughness occurs. When weldments are in-
cluded in the plate a limit of 10% should be
respected (ref. 3).
Hot forming always requires an annealing
solution heat treatment.
Flame straightening is a subject of discus-
sion and research (ref. 4). In practice it is al-
most impossible to weld complex plate
structures without the need to correct flat-
ness or dimensions. Flame straightening
should not be applied but is often the only
way. Knowing the detrimental effects to the
material when exposed to temperatures in
the range of 700-1000°C, limitation to short
but effective heating and fast cooling is re-
quired. A rule could be to allow the flame
straightening only once on a specific spot
by heating the non corrosion side of the
base material, with a high energy oxidising
burner to a red hot temperature for max 1-2
minutes, immediately followed by quench-
ing with water. Flame straightening of weld-
ments must be avoided completely.
3 Weld metal metallurgy
3.1 Transformation and precipitation reactions
Review of physical properties including ba-
sic metallurgic transformation processes in
general is beyond the scope of this paper.
‘The past years further extensive fundamen-
tal research has been executed on then var-
ious base materials. For the transformation
of structures in the weld metal an extensive
review of the literature has been executed
by Karison (ref. 5, plenary conference pa-
per).
The formation and the effects of deleterious
phases in DSS and SDSS and the associat-
ed weld metals have been reviewed. The
erature indicates that the precipitation of
termetallic phases such as (Mo rich
Fe-Cr-Mo) and (Fe-Cr-Mo) effect significant-
ly the toughness of the base and weld met-
al. 25% Cr SDSS is more prone than DSS to
form these phases when cooling down from
temperatures > 100°C. In the austenite-fer-
rite structure a level of intermetallic phases
of 0% at the surface and 1-2% in the mid
thickness zone of plate material and weld
metal has been considered as acceptable.
32. Ferrite
The balance of the phase components fer-
rite and austenite, also in the weld metal, re-
mains basic issue. No major changes in the
acceptance limits have been observed. It is
now a common understanding that the base
material as delivered contains 40-60% aus-
tenite in an originally ferric matrix whereas
the as welded weld metal may show varia~
tions between 25 to 70%, or in measurable
terms: 35 to 100 FN (Ferrite Number ac-
cording draft ISO 8249;1997 or AWS A 4.2-
92).
The international standardisation for the de-
termination of ferrite has made progress.
The ISO and AWS standard incorporated
the need to cover the high ferrite contents
occurring in DSS and SDSS.
4 Welding processes and procedures
4.1 Arc welding processes
Over the last number of years developments
in the arc welding processes for DSS and
‘SDSS have been reported. These develop-
ments are in particular regarding the GMAW
process,
With recently invented controls of the weld-
ing arc characteristics, it is possible to pro-
gram the current supply and metal transfer.Figure 1. GMAW-STT wire electrode current and volt-
‘age wave forms for a typical welding cycle.
‘Table 2. Critical pitting corrosion temperature for root
welds; GMAW-STT versus GTAW.
Lincoln Smitweld
Procedure Specification
lease materia!
Welding processes
Manual or machine
Duplex SS Grade 1.4462
ACGMAW-STT B:SAW
‘Manual and machine
Weicing position
Fier metal (race)
Fix
Fie meta caesie
‘5G down and 1G (PG/ PA)
YLuMaes2 2: LNS 4462
2000 EN 760: AF 263 DC
EN 12072:G 293NL
Welding Procedure
Approval Record
|Radiographic Examination: Accoptable
Visual Examination: ‘Goos
[Reduced-section tr
[Tensile strength MP) Fracture cation
ports 77 ‘Base material
lairwere-metal tension teat
ZEN taore 62203NL a pore nao} ;
Shading gas iin) @8A's2% CO: Flow 15 __[Tenatesrengh (MPs] —
cing (ons) STT-AroEo0% Flow 12-18. [Clongton Aa fe
|Purging gas SAW = N2 ry |Reduction, Z_
Ta SHISET
eure platy 0c + rot 0x18 No remane
Prnestione. (°C). RT face 0x15 tonne
ntepans te). ax 140 fsae__oxis Normans
podrastvearmert WA mpc Vaio] Toor Fon BO
TWaltrsname” "0, Ftseme end J. Terseep [See ofepeciner: 10x 0xS5mm Required 40 Joule
we = “
latory Test No, DM32
Ronan Speccaton cose swelo m2
‘Stoormaran 20/7210; EN 208.
NAWNSS-806 7-02
|waaing Process IsvODiesing
Pass| Consumable | Weiding Current jee HL [Notch Temp. ‘CTOD valve Fracture
‘No. index © [mm}| Ampere | Votts [mm/min] sim fecation roy een} mode
TAT] 12 fbcces
e200
2] a] 24 | a0
a |e] 24 | 30
a fea | 24 | a0
t |e | 24 | so
om baat
festype: Veter Lond: 204g Rag < 325
— 45°~— BM HAZ WM
“ *
ace | asr-243 | 250-257-2n0-250 [245-2012
leenre | | 358-200- ass-are_[as2-240 254
7 ® |Root 248-236 277 - 288 - 264-274 278-260
é | oo
: 2) Mode ASTW G48
3 > 2ehowre
i & Gere sore
= ¢ |We the undersigned, certify that the statements in this record
Brecon
4 BX ittutscurer or Contactor Uncatn Seiwa bv Neen
—+ 44 S [assent by en nase
fesued by Fred Neeton
bate 23 Sepionber 1095
Figure 2. Welding Procedure Approval Recored: GMAW-STT and SAW.Pulsed open arc welding is not new but the
application of GMAW in practice was limit-
ed, A new generation of power sources,
with a programmed full control of the wave
form, provides a high productivity in all posi-
tion welding.
‘Amost advanced process in this category is
the 'GMAW-STT" process (ref. 7, 8) with
wave form control®. In this process a sen-
‘sor monitors the are current and voltage. A
specific sequence of fast current switching,
at moments where overheating of the weld
droplet at the wire end would otherwise
cause spatter, has been build-in in the
process (figure 1). The process enables in
particular the welding of root runs in pipes.
The energy efficiency, in terms of heat sup-
ply to the wire and the base metal, is better
{than known for other arc welding processes.
‘At low heat input the welding speed in root
runs is 3-4 times as fast as regular GTAW.
At the same time the root weld thickness al-
lows to continue with other processes like
SAW (figure 2 and figure 3). The weld metal
pitting corrosion properties are significantly
better than obtained with regular GTAW
(table 2).
4.2 Welding consumables
‘The revised AWS standards such as AWS
AS.4-92 , A5.9-93 and A5.22-95 as well as
the new European Standards EN 1600, EN
12072 and EN 12073 contain the specifica
tion limits for the chemical composition and
mechanical properties of the welding con-
Process/Standard Chemical composition w% Mechanical properties
© Mn Si Cr Ni Mo =N Cu other Rp0.2 Rm ASIA
Nimm? Nim? %
SMAW (covered electrodes)
AWS 5.4.92
E2200-XX min. Os 25 85 25 0,08
max. 0,04 20 0,90 235 105 35 0,20 0,75
E2553 in 05 240 65 29 0,10 155
mx. 0,06 15 10 270 85 39 025 25
EN 1600
E2293NL min 20 75 2,5 0,08 450 550 20
max, 004 25 1.2 240 105 40 0,20 0,75
E2572N min 240 6,0 10 500-700 15
max, 0,08 2.0 12 020 0,75
E2593 CuNL min O10 15 590 6018
max. 0,04 25 12 0.25 3,5
E2594NL_ min 0,20 $50 620 18
max. 0,04 25 © 12 270 0330 1,5 W:10
GTAWIGMAW/SAW welding wire
AWS A5.9.93,
ER 2209 min 0.50 21,5 0,08
max. 0,03 2,0 0.90 23'S 0,20. 0,75
ER 2553. min 240 ono 15
max, 0,04 18 10 270 0.25 25
EN 12072
CWS min 210 0,10 450 550 20
2293NL max 0,03 25 10 240 0.20 0,75
GAS min. 240 500 700 15
2S72NL mx 003 25 10 270 - 0,75
CWS min 240 010 15 550 620 18
2593CuNLmax. 0,03 25 1,0 270 0.25 2,5
GW min 240 0:20 550 620 18
2594CuNLmax. 0,03 25 1,2 27,0 030 18 W109
FCAW (tubular cored wire electrodes)
AWS A5.22-95
E2209TO-X min os 210 75 25 0008
mx. 0,04 20 10 240 100 40 0,20 0,5
E2553TO-X min os 240 8S 29 O10 15
mx. 0,04 15 0,75 270 105 39 0.20 215
EN 12073
T293NL min 210 75 25 008 450 550 20
max, 004 25 1,2 240 105 40 020 03
‘Table 3. Chemical composition and mechanical properties, specified for all-weld-metal samples,sumables for SMAW, GMAW & GTAW and
FCAW (table 3)
‘The SMAW process conditions have not
been changed since 1992. Some electrode
manufacturers, however, extended the
range of covered electrodes. Details such as
the typical impact toughness and chemical
composition may show substantial differ-
ences between the manufacturers. The min-
imum and maximum ferrite content in the
weld metal is not specified in the above-
mentioned standards. In practice a range of
FN 30-70 is usually obtained in the all weld
metal and in the actual weldments.
Rutile/basic electrodes have been in use for
all position pipe welding. Today the welding
characteristics of a new DSS fully basic
electrode (Jungo 4462, see also table 4 and
5) receive a welders preference, mainly due
to the low defect rate, the perfect weld pool
control and the higher mechanical proper-
ties.
For the downhand position, filling joints as
well as welding fillets, a high recovery elec-
trode proved to be economically attractive.
Both deposition rate and the properties
made it possible to combine productivity
and reliability
Welding procedures, qualified for Maersk
and Occidental projects respectively, are
shown in figure 4 and 5
GTAW pipe welding in the field has a low
productivity. Most specifications require full
Penetration root GTAW welds. Due to the
generally respected minimum N-level
(0,149) in the filler rod and the associated
HAZ, lack of austenite is no longer a prob-
lem. Good toughness and corrosion proper-
ties in DSS have been obtained. For highest
pitting corrosion resistance, SDSS root weld
metal has been recommended (ref. 8). This
recommendation has been followed in many
projects where a CPT min. 24°C must be
achieved. At least for the filling and capping
layers the use of the SMAW process is more
appropriate.
Another trend in welding DSS is the applica-
tion of tubular cored wire. n practice the
wires had porosity problems. New wires dis-
criminate between welding downhand (PA,
PB) and out of position (PC, PF, PD) and
provide user benefits as productivity for the
Walding procest
Stedende __SMAW. ‘GTAW ‘GMAW FCAW. SAW
‘Arosta 4462 LNT 4462 1LNM 4462 ‘Cor-A-Rosta 4462 LNS 4462/
2MCrDSSE2293NLR32 W2293NL = G2293NL T293NLRCM P2000
‘Arosta 4462-145 (Cor-A-Rosta P4462
E293NLRS3 T2293NLM2
Junge 4462
ER93NLB2
28MCrSDSS Jungo Zeron LOOX LNT Zeron 100K LNM Zeron 100K LLNS Zoro 100X/
E2593NLB32__W2593NL_G2593NL. P2000
Table 4. A commercial range of DSS and SDSS welding consumables with their EN classification,
Figure 3. GMAW-STT root weld in X2 CrNiMo 22-5-3Lincoln Smitweld
2 EN 1600 £2293L.NR53
[shitting gas Win) Ar 09.00% Flow 12
fesoero (can ume wy @BaPH RF) Pow 25
method NA,
Jourent/ poiaty
[Preneat tem. (°C)
lterpass temp. [°C]
IPostnea: treatment
Welders name
GTAW= DC - and SMAW= DC +
man 15
Max 130
NA
| svortory Test No,
[Remarks Specticaton - Code
Stoomwezen TO2t0 , NEN EN 286-3
ASME
ig Procedure
Consumable | Welding Current | Speed
index] @ vn] | Ampare | Vos
Welding Procedure
Approval Record eri dcaay
Procedure Specification {| Test Resuts
[base materia! Duplex SS Grade 1.4462 [Radiographic, Penetrant Examination; Accepiatle
|weldng processes A: GTAW (141) B: SMAW (114)
IMenval or machine Manuah [Reguced-secton tension teat
[Tensile strength IMPs} Fractre location
Welding position 3G upand 1G (PF /PA) [2s x 11 sm 753 ‘Base mater
Jia mote (race) 1: LNT Zeron 100X 2: Aroats 446214825 x11 Sin 788 Bono material
ux NA
filer metalctssifc. t: EN 12072: W25 94 NL {Wieroscopical investigation
WeAR Ar-146.01
Rov. No. 1
‘The microstructure shows 2 goed ferefaustenite
distbation and ne hart precpations
[Bend Test ‘ine m1
JRoot ax 180" ‘Accepted
Face 2x 180" ‘Accepied
[inpacttests 150-7 Tatra Po) aoe aoe
size of specimen: 10 x10 x55mm
20°C ow | -sre wy,
lew | 72 a3 a1 78 | soa est
lA ata ta 41845 | 83 300 tor to
l+2 |s62 205 204 ©1900 fxs 10a 147 58
5 y
i 2
z ™
= 2
Z g
3
=F
5, 3 &
3-5. =
=e ®
Hesitype: Vickers Load: 109
Jom | __ Haz. ww. Haz jou
[Face —J24s|3ee- 246 252] 255 250 250] 772 274 265] 282]
243] 258 205 2e2|255 283 259] 260 256 260) 248
Root }2se|277 285 283] 298 311 303] 290 259 263|256|
250) 287 283 262] 2r4 278 274) 248|
23 September 1005
Figure 4. SMAW Welding Procedure Approval Record of a high recovery electrode for the downhand position.
{ill of butt welds and fillets. The typical im-
pact toughness of the weld, due to its oxy-
gen level of S00-700ppm, is limited to CVN
=20°C >40 J. For SDSS some consumable
manufacturers have products still in the ex-
perimental stage. The incentive to make a
‘SDSS tubular wire is high due to the difficult
manufacturing conditions of bare welding
wire,
The GMAW wires and GTAW rods for
22%Cr DSS have all a simitar composition
with 23%6Cr, 8,59%Ni, 3%Mo and 0,1596N.
‘Trace elements, however, determine the
welding characteristics. in particular the
wetting action and weld bead appearance
may therefore vary.
For smooth pulsed GMAW and GMAW-STT
welding specific wire compositions have
been selected.
The availability of filler materials for welding
25%Cr SDSS has shown a supply problem.
Rolling and drawing of overalloyed SDSSProcess ‘SMAW-fil SMAW-fil SAW.
Consumables classification EN F 2293 NLB32. E22931R53, ‘wire:$ 2293NLiflux:BABS 64
AWS E 2209-15 2209-16
SUNGO 4462 AROSTA 4462-145 LLNS 4462 / P 2000
GTAW-ro0t
2593 NL Cuw: 259 3NL Cow:
LNT Zeron 100% LNT Zeron 100X
type of weld / dimensions ieth weld U-prep. girth weld U-prep, plate butt weld
t=15mm C= 127mm 1/2V-prep.;t = $0 mm
‘chem.composition w%
c 0,022 0,015 0,025
cr 24,1 2s 2,7
Ni 86 a4 7.9
Mo 3.0 3.0 33
N 015 0,12 0.1
PRES) 36,4 343. 35,5
ferrite EN 40:50 55-65 % 36-38
‘mech properties
condition as welded as welded as welded
Nimm2 686, 626
Nimm2 852 ‘Transy. 753-766 base mat. 77
% 24,7 6
uv 46°C 60 20°C 79 -40 °C 73-103
-60*C 53, 50°C 65
cTOD mm/ 40°C 0,280.37 ad.
60°C 0,21-0,31
HVS/0 HVS 265-294 HV10 250-303 nd.
HRe 24.30,5
corrosion properties ASTM G48A
cpr *c test ongoing | 225
Table 5. Weld metal properties; weldments in 22%Cr duplex stainless steel type; Typical values (ef. 15, 16, 17)
Process
‘Consumables classification EN
‘SMAW
E2594 CuWLB
GTAW
W2594CuWL,
JUNGO ZERON 100X_LNM ZERON 100X_LNS ZERON 100X/ P2000
‘ype of weld / dimensions plate butt weld plate butt weld plate butt weld
Veprep.it = 16mm V20-prep.;t = 20 mm U-prep.;t = 35 mm
‘chem.composition w%
Cc 0,03 0,026 0,016
cr 25 24.8 25,4
Ni 92 91 856
Mo 37, 3,65 3,70
N 0,22 0,23, 0,19
PRE,*) 40.8 40,5 40.65,
ferrite FN 35-45 35-40 67-73,
‘mech.properties
condition as welded as welded as welded
Rp0.2 N/mm? 629 691 m3
Rm Nim? 827 846, 873
as % 26 2B 18
cvN I -20°C 60 -20°C 57 40°C 58
40°C 44 40°C 48 60°C 46
cTOD =m 40 °C 0,32.0,42
-60 °C 0,34-0,56
‘Wide plate test; strain at fracture % n.d. ad. 1,60
HVI0 290-330 300-330 HVS 283-317
HRe 3-25 24-26
‘corrosion properties ASTM G48A ®
crr °c >a0 >40 >40
Table 6. Weld metal properties: weldments in 2594Cr super-duplex stainless steel; Typical values (re. 3, 16).wire compositions require extra-ordinary
skills.
The established material manufacturers are
now confident with their production proce-
dures so that these consumables became
readily available.
The use of SDSS rods for GTAW of pipe
root runs and the ‘cold pass’ welding tech-
nique (ref. 1), assuring increased pitting cor-
rosion resistance, has become a common
practice.
For submerged arc welding the welding
wires have the same composition as the
GMAW wires. The flux can be of the fused
or the agglomerated type. Only basic fluxes
are used. SAW welding procedures require
precise voltage, current and travel speed
control, this to avoid hot cracking due to the
weld geometry.
4.3. Shielding and purging gases
The composition of shielding gases for
GMAW have been further developed. The
most commonly used shielding gas is lightly
oxidising with 2-2,5% CO, added to the
main component argon. Linde (ref. 9) claims
that as low as 0,05% CO; is already sutfi-
cient to stabilise the arc. Addition of He
from 20-50% increases the heat conductivi-
ty and heat transfer to the base material.
This increases the wetting action of the
weld pool and the welding speed.
Adding 2-2,5% No to the shielding gas is
applied for GTAW of root welds. In particular
in welding SDSS the N-emission is compen-
sated. More Np in the shielding gas and use
for the filling and capping layers is not rec-
ommended. It may cause uncontrolled N
Pick-up and result in porosity.
Purging in pipe welding (GTAW, GMAW) is
mostly done with pure argon or with an
Ar/59@N, mixture. Industrial clean Np is ap-
plied as well but this gas may have a prob-
lem with its moisture content which can
cause excessive oxidation, The gas is much
cheaper and N-emission may be limited
slightly. The use of H, containing purging
gases is often wished for by the fabricator,
Risks to mixing hydrogen with the shielding
gas and consequently the risk of hydrogen
induced cracking cannot be avoided and
make the method unacceptable for most
specifying companies.
‘The need to do the purging effectively re-
mains a problem. The use of devices to io-
calise the purging helps in decreasing the
required purging time. Avoiding turbulence
is recommended as well (ref. 10). A stan-
dard for the allowance of weld and HAZ oxi-
dation for DSS, supported by the NAM is
Published (ref. 11). The allowable discol-
oration can be obtained with maximum
500ppm ©; in the pipe during root and sub-
sequent second and third layer welding, In
welding SDSS a higher O; level has been
tolerated (ref. 12), with the objective to limit
the N-emission,
Open joints have been recommended for
manual GTAW, this to assure sufficient sup-
ply of filler material. In field welding open
joints do cause problems, for instance when
wind and traffic cause pressure waves.
44 Hydrogen
Following the discussion on the effects of
hydrogen (ref. 13), a group sponsored proj-
ect at The Welding Institute has been
arranged and recently completed.
‘Consensus has been reached about the ef-
fect of hydrogen, entrapped in the specific
DSS structure. Weld metal with a hydrogen
‘content Hom up to 25 mi/100g did not show
H-induced cracking, provided that the ferrite
content does not exceed FN=90. The deter-
mination methods are under dispute. TWI
claims that only the vacuum hot extraction
method determines the correct H-level.
Welding consumables may show a hydro-
gen content of 5 to 20 m/100g.
45 Welding dissimilar joints
Frequently DSS has to be welded to a ferrit-
ic mild or low alloyed steal. In chemical
tankers the internal containers have to be
connected to the hull sections, in process
equipment only the critical area is some-
times made of DSS (or SDSS). Furthermore,
related to preferences or restrictions in pro-
‘curement, various grades of SDSS or DSS
to SDSS have to be welded.
For butt welds between CMn-steel grades
and DSS, the standard duplex welding con-
sumables proved to be very suitable. The
WRC 1992 Constitution Diagram provides
the limits of dilution in various cases (figure
6). The resulting weld metal structure shall
be a ferrite containing austenitic matrix
which is resistant to hot cracking, providing
that the weld geometry (height/width ratio
< 1)is correct.
‘A welding procedure record for the qualifi-
cation of dissimilar butt welds in pipe weld-
ing is shown as figure 7.
The butt weld between SDSS grades has
been investigated and has not found to be
detrimental to pitting resistance (ref. 14).5 Properties of weldments
In particular the use of welded structures
with wall thicknesses over 25mm and at low
design temperatures required the availability
of mechanical test data.
A sophisticated mechanical testing pro-
gramme, in which The Genth University,
fabricators and consumable manufacturers
participated under supervision of the
Belgium Institute of Welding, provided im-
portant information (ref. 15). The work is
continuing. Other sources have been the
work of Weir Materials fora ASME Code
Case, a DSM project (ref. 16), authority ap-
provals and various procedure qualifica-
tions.
Some recent typical test results in various
thicknesses have been compiled in table 5
and 6.
6 Conclusions
The use of duplex stainless steel! has grown
to big volumes in the world. This applies in
particular for the UNS 31803 base material
and the associated welding consumables.
Superduplex stainless steel welding con-
sumables are in use for welding regular DSS
and also 13% Cr soft martensitic steel for
its strength properties.
New GMAW welding processes have been
invented. GMAW-STT provides benefits in
root pipe welding. Productivity (3-4 times
faster) and pitting corrosion resistance,
compared to GTAW, improved substantially.
Mechanical properties have been deter-
mined in heavy wall pipe and plate material.
‘The CVN, CTOD and wide plate testing
proved that DSS and SDSS weldments can
be applied down to -40°Cin most cases.
References
1 Lvan Nassau e.2. Welding duplex and superduplex
stainless steel, Weld. In the World, Volt, pp 323-
343, 1998,
2H. Okamoto, Proc. of Stainless'92, Stockholm 1992,
pp90-369.
3. JJ. Dutrane Fabrique de Fer, private communica
tons.
4 BIL Research Project: Weldability, corrosion resis-
tance and fracture behaviour of duplex and su-
perduplex stainless steels, doc. ED 60003.W61,
1996,
5. L Karlson, Review on intermetallic phase precipita
tion in duplex stainless steels and weld metals, IW
doc. [X-H-881/87.
6. Stava, Welding Ja! , pp , 1993.
7 L van Nassau e.a., Paper at 1st ttalian Welding
‘Symposium, Genova 1996.
8 TWI Group Sponsored Project.
9. Linde brochure 8998/9, 1994.
10 H.Geipl, Applications technology in the imelignt,
Linde publication no.7, 1984.
11 L. Smith, M. Klein: Acceptance criteria for oxidation
of stainless stee! weldments, Stainless Stee! World,
44,45 1996,
12 Weir Materials Ltd.: Guidelines for welding Zeron
100 super duplex stainless stee! (1966).
18 TWI Group Sponsiored Project, Hydrogen cracking
of duplex stainless multinass weldments, doc.
8669/7a/9714,
14 S-A Fagen, L. Odegérd: Welding of superdupplex
stainless stee! Sandvik SAF 2507™ (UNS 32750),
Stainless Stee! Europe Dec. pp 40-45 1993,
15 DSM project Investigations of weldments in 5mm
DSS, proj.no. 511040001, 1996.
16 Lincoln Smitweld WPAR 2100X.01, 2100X.02.
17 BIL Research Project: Weldabilty, corrosion resis-
tance and fracture behaviour of duplex and su-
perduplex stainless steels, doc, ED 70090.W61,
1997,Lincoln Smitweld
Procedure Specification
lBase material Duplex SS Grade 1.4482
IMarwal or machine Manual
Welding positon 6G up (H.L048)
Fux NA.
Filer metal classifi. 1: AWS AS.9: ER 2209
2: AWS AS4: E 2200-15
Shielding ges [min] Argon 98.998 Flow
Backing (ges) [Vmin] Argon 99.998 Flow
Jcouge method NA.
Preheat temp. [°C] RT
Interpass temp. [°C] max. 150
Posthest treatment NA
Weider's name
Laboratory Test No,
‘Stoommwezen T 0210
Welding Procedure
ieaearicc| ‘Welding Current | Speed
‘No. |index| 2 jmm)| Ampere | Votts
mimi
Welding processes A: GTAW (141) B: SMAW(111)
Filler metal (rade) 1: LNT 4482 2: Jungo 4482
10
15-20
[Current poterity GTA = DC- / SMAW= DC +
[Remarks : Welding and testing in accordance with
Welding Procedure
Approval Record
Rav, No. 0
Ret WG, 95.083
Test Results,
Visual and Radiographic Examination: Acceptable
|Reduced-sechion tension test
[Tensiie strength [MPa} Fracture location
12,37 x 24,58 mm 830 base metal
[Allweld-metai tension test
Yield point IMPa}
[Tensie strength [APa}
Elongation, AS [%)
Reduction, Z
Bend tests Fomver diameter 4x1
Root 3x 125x283 > 150" ‘acceptable
Face © tx 128x23 > 180° ‘acceptable
impact tests Charpy V—[uoule] —Teatlemp. TOF
Size of specimen: 10 x 10x55 mm
Joint Dewan
[Testtype: Vickers Load: 109
—-—— 60° Weld meta 258-254-275
Heat Affected Zone 274-274-285 270-284-285
Base metal 254-251-251 -259-236 - 253,
a |
3 5) per
2 =
= 2/7 S x x
FN 2 =
ma |_| te uncorigned, cory Wat the statements WBS ooo
4 3 B— awcorest
Z| Manutacturer or Contractor Occidental (Pci)
[authorized by ‘Stoomwazen
issued by Fred Neessen
Date Tsay 1986
Figure 5. SMAW Welding Procedure Approval Record of basic covered electrode.Tyg? Wr 35S ON O25 Ge
wee suteeoaag
|
iS
a
Gteg ® Gr Me * 0.
Nb
ee EE)
z
Figure 6. WRC-1992 diagram with an expanded scale for dilution calculations,
Weiding Procedure
Approval Record
lure platy
Pase| Conaumadie
Ne. [sen rm] Ampere | Vans
DS 14482 A333 Grade
AGTAW (141) BESMAW (311)
1048 op)
SUNT ate?” 2 sunpouase
na
412072 W209 NL
2 Biteoo £2203MB42
‘aonsact Pow 35:17
‘Aeneas Flow 20.25
Nk
craw 0¢-/sMaw=pe+
rt
‘2uang SHAWN, 70 Un A backing
‘losing andtntrgin ace wh
‘Toate NSS socr ove EN 2083
Wel ure
0273 x 28
svat, Radiographic and Dye penetrant Examination:
tamer el
lense
[as e278 nm a
fos) 26.2 mm ae
[aiameal weston
[fenaie srenen Dual: ND),
|aonosten 6)
|necooon.2 ps)
fRect ae 4720 > 50" wecaptle
jase AT a3) 3 HOY emapatle
In” |son soo s23
Jav2 [126 470 170
lass [266 261 206
74 bes 248 297
21a das 28 2
‘4,274 274 254
‘70 so 100 387
Figure 7. Weiding
Procedure
Approval Record of
dissimilar butt
welds in pipe weld-
ing.