Wrinkling of Membrane Structure: Sarvesh Kumar
Wrinkling of Membrane Structure: Sarvesh Kumar
Wrinkling of Membrane Structure: Sarvesh Kumar
A Report submitted in partial fulllment for the Degree of BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY in Aerospace Engineering by
SARVESH KUMAR
pursued in Department of Aerospace Engineering IIST To
SARVESH KUMAR
pursued in Department of Aerospace Engineering IIST To
ii
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the report titled WRINKLING OF MEMBRANE STRUCTURE , submitted by SARVESH KUMAR, to the Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, towards partial fulllment of the degree of B.Tech. in Aerospace Engineering, is a record of the research work done by him under my/our supervision. The contents of this report, in full or in parts, have not been submitted to any other Institute or University for the award of any degree or diploma.
iii
iv
DECLARATION
I declare that this project report titled WRINKLING OF MEMBRANE STRUCTURE submitted in partial fullment of the degree of B. Tech in Aerospace Engineering is a record of original work carried out by me under the supervision of PRAVEEN KRISHNA, and has not formed the basis for the award of any other degree or diploma, in this or any other Institution or University. In keeping with the ethical practice in reporting scientic information, due acknowledgements have been made wherever the ndings of others have been cited.
vi
ABSTRACT
Membrane structures are being increasingly used for space applications. The major problem with the realisation of membrane structures is the difculty in obtaining perfectly smooth surfaces. But in some applications a slightly wavy surface may be acceptable, and hence engineers are now more concerned about estimating the extent and amount of waviness or wrinkles. Numerical analysis done using ABAQUS nite element package.
vii
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CERTIFICATE DECLARATION ABSTRACT LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 1.2 Eigen Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonlinear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii v vii xi xiii 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 4 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8
2 HOLLOW CANTILEVER BEAM ANALYSIS 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Aim: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Model description: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Load, Boundary Condition and Analysis: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 HOLLOW CYLINDER ANALYSIS 3.1 3.2 3.3 Aim: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Model Description: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eigenvalue Analysis: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.4 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3 3.5 Load and Boundary condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Analysis: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Result: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Load and Boundary condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Analysis: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Result: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-linear Analysis: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Conclusion: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
4 RECTANGULAR MEMBRANE IN SIMPLE SHEAR 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Aim: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Assumption of analysis: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Material property: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Load,Boundary Condition and Analysis: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 4.5 4.5.1 4.5.2 4.6 5 Step 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Step 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Step 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Using S4R element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Using S8R5 element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9 9 9 9 9 10 11 11 12 12 14 15 16 16 16 17
Results: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Conclusion: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FUTURE WORK 5.1 5.2 Rectangular Membrane under Shear: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Square Membrane under Corner Load: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
REFERENCES
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1 Eigenvalues of Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 2.2 Eigen value comparison between Fine Mesh and Coarse Mesh Table 3.1 Eigenvalues of Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 3.2 Eigen value comparison between Fine Mesh and Coarse Mesh Table 4.1 Eigen values S4R elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 4.2 Eigen values S8R5 elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5 7 7 13 15
xi
xii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1 Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2 Figure 2.3 Figure 2.4 Figure 3.1 Figure 4.1 Figure 4.2 Figure 4.3 Figure 4.4 Figure 4.5 Figure 4.6 Figure 4.7 Figure 4.8 Figure 4.9 Critical Load for Eigenvalue and Non-linear Analysis . . . . Hollow Cantilever Beam Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mode 2 and Eigen Value is equal to 202.08 . . . . . . . . . . Mode 3 and Eigen Value is equal to 202.43 . . . . . . . . . . Mode 9 and Eigen Value is equal to 202.99 . . . . . . . . . . Deformed Shape of cylinder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 4 4 5 8 10 10 11 12 13 13 13 14 14 14 15
Model of Membrane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Upper edge of Membrane is moved by 0.5 mm . . . . . . . . Upper edge of Membrane is moved by 3 mm . . . . . . . . . Mode 1 of membrane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mode 2 of membrane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mode 3 of membrane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mode 4 of membrane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mode 1 of membrane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mode 2 of membrane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
xiii
xiv
1 INTRODUCTION
Thin membranes are increasingly being used as a key element in the next generation of space structures like spacecrafts, deployable mirror surfaces, solar collectors, sunshields and solar sails. The major advantage of membrane structures are that they are light in weight and require less storage space. Some of their applications like deployable antenna reectors require very smooth surfaces or high surface accuracy and in applications like solar sails slightly non-smooth membranes are acceptable, provided that the size and shape of the deviation from the nominal shape are sufciently small. It is often much simpler and cheaper to realise wrinkled or partially wrinkled membrane structures compared to structures with completely smooth surfaces. Hence for those applications in which a slightly wavy surface may be acceptable, engineers are now more concerned about estimating the extent and amount of waviness or wrinkles. Wrinkling is local buckling effect which reduces desire shape and performance or even break system function. Thin sections are having lower value of exure stiffness in comparison to the in-plane stiffness. So when external load is applied it give rise to compressive deformations in a membrane structure, so due to lower value of exural stiffness wrinkles are generated. There are two primary means to perform a buckling analysis.
method cannot be used for accurate measurement of buckling load. An estimate of critical load is generated (which induce buckling) using eigenvalue analysis.
1.2 Nonlinear
For accurate buckling analysis nonlinear analysis is better as compare to Eigen value analysis; because nonlinear buckling analysis, accounts for geometric imperfection, load perturbations, material nonlinearities etc. Nonlinear buckling analysis is a static analysis. In this analysis gradually increasing load is applied till the point which small change in load create large deection changes.
2.1 Aim:
It is a basic analysis for familiarization with ABAQUS software and to learn eigenvalue analysis.
mesh. Eigenvalues are calculated using linear bucking analysis and convergence study is carried out to insure that results are conversed by doubling the number of elements.
2.4 Results
Linear buckling analysis for rst eight mode of Eigenvalues which are shown in Table 2.1. Mode shape are shown in Figure 2.2- Figure 2.4 Table 2.1: Eigenvalues of Analysis Eigen Mode Greater than 200 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eigen value 202.08 202.08 202.10 202.14 202.14 202.25 202.32 202.49
Figure 2.3: Mode 3 and Eigen Value is equal to 202.43 For convergence study mesh is made ne and same analysis is carried out. Comparison of results are shown as Table2.2. 4
Figure 2.4: Mode 9 and Eigen Value is equal to 202.99 Table 2.2: Eigen value comparison between Fine Mesh and Coarse Mesh Eigen Mode Eigen Value Coarse Mesh Greater than 200 (1260 elements) 1 202.08 2 202.08 2 202.10 4 202.14 5 202.14 6 202.25 7 202.32 8 202.49 Eigen Value Fine Mesh (7693 elements) 202.00 202.08 202.43 202.47 202.49 202.49 202.73 202.90 change in Eigen Value Percent Change 0.04 0.00 -0.15 -0.16 -0.17 -0.12 -0.20 -0.20
2.5 Conclusion
Eigen mode are too closer in shell model (Figure 2.2- Figure 2.4). It is very difcult to differentiate among them. Result are properly converged and difference between the values are less than 0.2 percent. Figure 2.4 shows that in higher modes wrinkles are clearly seen.
3.1 Aim:
Non linear analysis of cylinder using Riks method. The essence of the method is that the solution is viewed as the discovery of a single equilibrium path in a space dened by the nodal variables and the loading parameter.
3.3.2 Analysis:
Meshing is done using S4R elements. Linear buckling analysis is done using ABAQUS software package. 6
3.3.3 Result:
Linear buckling analysis results are shown in Table3.1. Eigenvalues are order of 106 . Table 3.1: Eigenvalues of Analysis Eigen Mode 1 2 3 4 Eigen value 1.0596E+6 1.0622E+6 1.0622E+6 1.0704E+6
Convergence test is conducted using more number of elements in analysis and same analysis is carried out. Results are found to be in good agreement and shown in Table 3.2. Table 3.2: Eigen value comparison between Fine Mesh and Coarse Mesh Eigen Mode . . 1 2 2 4 Eigenvalue Coarse Mesh (12172 elements) 1.0596E+6 1.0622E+6 1.0622E+6 1.0704E+6 Eigenvalue Fine Mesh (31086 elements) 1.0572E+6 1.0574E+6 1.0574E+6 1.0583E+6
3.4.2 Analysis:
Meshing is created using S4R elements and number of element should be equal to same as in Eigenvalue calculation. Riks buckling analysis is carried out to evaluate non-linear buckling load. 7
3.4.3 Result:
Load is equal to 1.05 106 N . For that solution is not converged. Deformed shape of cylinder is shown in Figure 3.1
3.5 Conclusion:
Eigenvalues are too close as mentioned in last chapter. Non linear Analysis is not converged due to large deformation in cylinder shape.
4.1 Aim:
To study wrinkles in membrane under shear stress.
4.4.1 Step 1
This step provide pre-stressing in perpendicular direction of membrane.
Boundary condition: Bottom edge is made xed. Side edges of membrane can move only load direction and shown in Figure4.2
4.4.2 Step 2
Boundary condition: Bottom edge is made xed. Side edges of membrane is made free by modifying boundary condition.
4.4.3 Step 3
This step is carried out in two sub-steps. First is pre-stressing part and other is Eigenvalue analysis
Boundary condition: For rst sub-step bottom edge is made xed. Side edges of membrane can move only load direction. For second sub step bottom edge is kept xed. Side edges move only 11
translation but all rotational degree of freedom are restricted. Upper edge is restricted all degree of freedom expect x direction
Load In rst sub-step Upper edge is moved by 0.05 mm in y direction. Lower value because pre-stressing is not required that is done in step 1 and if more displacement is given then it effect results in step 2. Second sub-step upper edge is moved by 3 mm in x direction
Analysis: In rst step static analysis is carried out using non-linear geometry. Second sub-step Eigenvalue value analysis is carried out. All step are repeated for two type kind of element rst S4R and second S8R5
4.5 Results:
Linear Buckling Analysis give Eigen values. It is done for S4R and S8R5 elements. Eigenvalues are too close.
12
Table 4.1: Eigen values S4R elements Eigen Mode Greater than 0.2042 1 2 3 4 Eigen value 0.20425 0.20427 0.20437 0.20447
13
14
Figure 4.11: Mode 4 of membrane Table 4.2: Eigen values S8R5 elements Eigen Mode Greater than 0.2042 1 2 3 4 Eigen value 0.20424 0.20428 0.20433 0.20447
4.6 Conclusion:
Convergence test is carried out then more number of modes are generated. So it is difcult to tell solution is converged and difference mode values of values is very less for avoiding convergence problem more number of element is taken in analysis it self. Initially Analysis gives lower value of Eigen mode value. These are local mode value.so that avoid that problem minimum value asked for solution is equal to 0.2042. Results from S4R element mesh and S8R5 mesh are almost same. So S4R element mesh is more effective in this case which takes lower time and resource to solve the problem.
15
5 FUTURE WORK
16