Plasticity Analysis

DESIGN AND PRODUCTION OF STEEL BUILDINGS:
A CASE STUDY IN ANKARA
A THESIS SUBMITTED TO
THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES
OF
MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
BY
ZGE BEGL
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE

OF
MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BUILDING SCIENCE
IN
ARCHITECTURE
NOVEMBER 2006
Approval of the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences
Prof. Dr. Canan zgen

Director
I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the
degree of Master of Science in Building Science, Architecture.
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Selahattin nr

Head of Department
This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully
adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of
Science in Building Science, Architecture.
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Soofia Tahira Elias zkan

Supervisor
Examining Committee Members
Seyfi Gl Part-time Instructor (METU, ARCH)

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Soofia Tahira Elias zkan (METU, ARCH)
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Arda Dzgne (METU, ARCH)
dil Gven Part-time Instructor (METU, ARCH)
Inst. Berrin Zeytun akmakl (BAKENT UNV.)
I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and
presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare
that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all
material and results that are not original to this work.
Name, Last name: zge BEGL

Signature:
iii
ABSTRACT
DESIGN AND PRODUCTION OF STEEL BUILDINGS:

A CASE STUDY IN ANKARA
BEGL, zge
M.Sc. in Building Science, Department of Architecture
Supervisor: Soofia Tahira Elias zkan, Ph. D.,
Assoc. Prof. in the Department of Architecture
November 2006, 121 pages
It is vital that Turkey keep abreast of developments in the world and build up its
technology to become a developed country. Steel construction is one of these areas.
In this context, the main purpose of this study was to define, analyze and evaluate the
general characteristics of structural steel and steel construction with the purpose of
throwing new light on its advantages and disadvantages.
Within this framework, a literature survey was conducted on structural steel

components and structures; and on steel construction in Turkey. Additionally, a case
study was carried out on a steel office building in Ankara. In this, the Trkiye Esnaf
ve Sanatkar Kredi Kefalet Kooperatifleri Merkez Birlii (TESKOMB) Building was
investigated in terms of the design and production criteria for steel structures and to
determine problems faced during these processes. As a result of this study, the
existing condition of the construction sector and the means to improve use of
structural steel in Turkey were discussed more realistically.
Keywords: Steel, Structural Steel, Steel Construction, Steel Structures, Steel

Production, Steel Components, Steel Connections.
iv
ELK BNALARIN TASARIM VE RETM:

ANKARADA RNEK BR ALIMA
BEGL, zge
Yksek Lisans, Yap Bilgisi Anabilim Dal, Mimarlk Blm
Tez Yneticisi: Do. Dr. Soofia Tahira Elias zkan
Kasm 2006, 121 sayfa
Trkiye gelimi bir lke olabilmek iin dnyada olan gelimeleri takip etmeli ve
teknolojisini ona gre dzenlemelidir. Yaplarda elik kullanm da bu alanlardan
biridir. Bu kapsamda, bu almann ana amac strktrel eliin ve elik inasnn
genel zelliklerini tanmlamak, incelemek ve deerlendirmek ve elik inasnn
avantaj ve dezavantajlarn anlatmaktr.
Bu dnceler erevesinde, strktrel elik elemanlar ve yaplar; ve Trkiyede ki

elik inas zerine bir literatr almas yapld. Ek olarak, Ankarada ki elik
strktrl bir ofis binas zerine bir alma yrtld. Bu almada, Trkiye Esnaf
ve Sanatkr Kredi Kefalet Kooperatifleri Merkez Birlii (TESKOMB) Binas, elik
yaplarnn inasnn tasarm ve retim sreleri asndan ve bu srelerde
karlalan problemleri belirleyebilmek iin incelendi. Bu almann sonucunda,
ina sektrnn u anki durumu ve Trkiye de strktrel elik kullanmn
gelitirmek iin alnacak nlemler daha gereki bir biimde tartld.
Anahtar Kelimeler: elik, Strktrel elik, elik naat, elik Yaplar, elik
retimi, elik Elemanlar, elik Balantlar.
To my family
for their support and love
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First of all I would like to express my sincere thanks to Soofia Tahira Elias zkan
for her guidance, supervision, continued interest and encouragement thought out this
study. I am also grateful to all jury members for their valuable ideas.
I would like to thank Feka naat and architects Mete z and Mehmet Soylu for
providing the necessary data and the permission to visit the TESKOMB building for
survey. I also thank civil engineer Cneyt Bilgin for his assistance in every phase of
the study.
Finally, I would like to express my thanks and love to my parents Serpil Begl and
Atilla Begl and to my grandparents for the education they provided me and for their
continuous love, patience and support, which gave me encouragement to complete this
study.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PLAGIARISM........................................................................................................... .iii
ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. .iv
Z ................................................................................................................................ v
DEDICATION ............................................................................................................ vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................... vii
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................... xi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................... xv
CHAPTERS
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1
1.1. Argument ................................................................................................. 1
1.2. Objectives................................................................................................. 2
1.3. Procedure.................................................................................................. 3
1.4. Disposition ............................................................................................... 4
2. LITERATURE SURVEY ................................................................................ 5

2.1. Structural Steel ......................................................................................... 5
2.2. Components of Steel Structures ............................................................... 9
2.2.1. Columns/Stanchions .................................................................... 9
2.2.2. Beams and Girders..................................................................... 11
2.2.3. Joists........................................................................................... 13
2.2.4. Slab Systems .............................................................................. 14
2.2.5. Bracings ..................................................................................... 16
2.2.6. Cables and Ropes....................................................................... 17
viii
2.3. Connections in Steel Structures.............................................................. 17

2.3.1. Bolting, Riveting and Welding .................................................... 18
2.3.2. Commonly-used Connections...................................................... 21
2.3.3. Special Connections .................................................................... 24
2.4. Erection of Steel Structures .................................................................... 27
2.5. Types of Steel Structure.......................................................................... 30
2.5.1. Single-storey Steel Structures...................................................... 30
2.5.2. Multi-storey Structures ................................................................ 36
2.5.3. Special Structures ........................................................................ 38
2.5.4. Lightweight Steel Structures ....................................................... 42
2.6. Advantages of Steel as a Structural Material ......................................... 43
2.6.1. Design Flexibility ........................................................................ 43
2.6.2. Lightness...................................................................................... 43
2.6.3. Speed of Construction ................................................................ 46
2.6.4. Economy...................................................................................... 47
2.6.5. Quality Control ............................................................................ 48
2.6.6. Modifications............................................................................... 49
2.6.7. Renovations ................................................................................. 49
2.6.8. Recyclability................................................................................ 51
2.6.9. Earthquake and Wind Resistance ................................................ 51
2.6.10. Potential for High-rise Construction............................................ 52
2.7. Disadvantages of Steel as a Structural Material ..................................... 53
2.7.1. Strength Reduction in Fire........................................................... 53
2.7.2. Strength Reduction by Corrosion ................................................ 57
2.8. Steel Construction in Turkey .................................................................. 58
2.8.1. Need for Steel Construction in Turkey ........................................ 63
2.8.2. Problems of Steel Construction in Turkey................................... 64
3. MATERIAL AND METHOD........................................................................ 68

3.1. The Survey Material............................................................................... 68
3.2. The Survey Methodology....................................................................... 76
ix
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ...................................................................... 77

4.1. Design Considerations ........................................................................... 77
4.2. Construction Process.............................................................................. 81
4.2.1. Components of the Structure ....................................................... 81
4.2.2. Connections in the Structure........................................................ 87
4.2.3. Erection of the Structure.............................................................. 88
4.2.4. Finishing Techniques................................................................... 91
4.3. Problems Encountered ........................................................................... 97
4.3.1. Design Problems.......................................................................... 98
4.3.2. Production Problems.................................................................. 103
5. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................ 105
LIST OF REFERENCES ......................................................................................... 108

APPENDICES
A. Architectural Drawings ................................................................................ 114
B. Structural Drawings...................................................................................... 120
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURES
2.1
Range of serial sizes for structural sections................................................. 7
2.2
Typical extruded forms................................................................................ 8
2.3
Serial sizes for tubes .................................................................................... 8
2.4
Typical components of a steel frame ........................................................... 9
2.5
Built-up columns; (a) solid wall column, (b) solid wall column with
perforated cover plates and (c) open type column .................................... 10
2.6
Castellated beams ...................................................................................... 12
2.7
Tapered beams ........................................................................................... 12
2.8
Fabricated plate girders ............................................................................. 13
2.9
Steel deck floor system ............................................................................ 14
2.10 Unimpeded routing of services................................................................15

2.11 Lateral zoning ......................................................................................15
2.12 Use of external steel bracings in the John Hancock Center
in Chicago, USA ....................................................................................16
2.13 Typical welds: (a) Fillet weld and (b) butt weld ...................................... 19
2.14 Direct compression in a column joint carried by (a) end plates, (b)
on welds, and (c) on splice plates............................................................... 21
2.15 Beam-to-girder connection using web cleats............................................. 23
2.16 Beam-to-girder connection using a welded end plate ............................. 23
2.17 Beam-to-girder connection using seating and restraining cleats ............... 23
2.18 Beam-to-column moment connection using a gusset ................................ 24
2.19 Diagram of splaying out of wire rope........................................................ 25
2.20 Threaded coupling for wire rope sockets .................................................. 25
2.21 Threaded coupling for bars........................................................................ 26
xi
LIST OF FIGURES, cont.
2.22 Pin joint connection for bar ....................................................................... 26

2.23 Tube-to-tube splice .................................................................................... 27
2.24 Structural systems for single-storey structures .......................................... 31
2.25 Typical steel arches; (a) hingless arch, (b) two-hinged arch and (c)
three-hinged arch ...................................................................................... 32
2.26 Cross-section of the Channel Tunnel Terminal Building in London,
England ..................................................................................................... 33
2.27 Spectrum 7 Building, Milton Keynes, UK; (a) photo, (b) cross-section ... 34
2.28 Pitched roof structure: Princess of Wales Conservatory in London,
England ..................................................................................................... 35
2.29 Comparison of structural systems.............................................................. 38
2.30 Sainsbury Center in Norwich, England ..................................................... 39
2.31 Nagoya Dome in Nagoya, Japan ............................................................... 39
2.32 Raleigh Arena in North Carolina, USA..................................................... 40
2.33 First Exchange House in London, England ............................................... 41
2.34 Burj Al Arab Hotel in Dubai, United Arab Emirates ................................ 44
2.35 Oita Prefecture Sports Park Main Stadium in Oita City, Japan................. 44
2.36 United Airways Terminal in Chicago, USA .............................................. 45
2.37 The Florida Aquarium in Florida, USA ..................................................... 45
2.38 Pie chart showing cost breakdown for steel construction projects ............ 48
2.39 Sather Gate Garage renovation in Berkeley, USA..................................... 50
2.40 Strength reduction at high temperatures .................................................... 54
2.41 Standard fire-curve..................................................................................... 54
2.42 Fire proofing methods used for steel framed structures in England .......... 56
2.43 Building types according to material of structural system in England...... 59
2.44 Building types according to material of structural system in Japan .......... 59
2.45 A view of the steel-framed house in Istanbul, Turkey, during its
construction phase..................................................................................... 60
2.46 A view of the steel-framed house after completion................................... 61
2.47 Chart showing high-rise buildings in Istanbul........................................... 62
xii
2.48 Chart showing high-rise buildings in the world ........................................ 62

3.1
Plan showing location of TESKOMB Building ........................................ 69
3.2
Site plan of TESKOMB Building ............................................................. 70
3.3
Section AA of TESKOMB Building ......................................................... 71
3.4
Entrance floor plan of TESKOMB Building............................................. 72
3.5
Plan of the first basement showing the conference hall ............................ 72
3.6
Third basement floor designed as a garage ............................................... 73
3.7
Second floor plan of TESKOMB Building ............................................... 74
3.8
Top floor plan of TESKOMB Building..................................................... 74
3.9
East faade of TESKOMB Building ......................................................... 75
3.10 West faade of TESKOMB Building ........................................................ 75

4.1
The construction of the bridges and the atrium ......................................... 79
4.2
Bridges inside the building connecting the two blocks ............................. 79
4.3
Section BB of TESKOMB Building ......................................................... 80
4.4
Structural plan showing location and sizes of columns and beams........... 82
4.5
Three types of built up sections produced as columns for the

TESKOMB building ................................................................................. 83
4.6
Beam sections and the various dimensions, used in the structure ............. 84
4.7
Perforated steel beams ............................................................................... 84
4.8
Curved steel beams.................................................................................... 84
4.9
The construction of metal deck floor......................................................... 85
4.10 The elevation and section of the bracings used in the first floor ............... 86
4.11 The bracings used in the vertical direction ................................................ 86
4.12 A free-standing column before connecting the beams .............................. 87
4.13 Column-beam connection with splice (fish) plates ................................... 87
4.14 A plate welded to the beam for the girders................................................ 88
4.15 Connection between beams and girders .................................................... 88
4.16 Anchorage of the columns to the concrete plinth ...................................... 89
4.17 Assembly of the columns by using splice plates ....................................... 89
4.18 Assembly of the columns .......................................................................... 89
xiii
4.19 Assembly of the steel structure.................................................................. 89

4.20 3D drawings showing the structural system prepared by Rona
Mhendislik for the TESKOMB building................................................. 90
4.21 Detail drawing of the building................................................................... 91
4.22 Construction of the curtain wall and its final photo .................................. 92
4.23 A detail showing the installation channel adjacent to the steel column .... 93
4.24 The steel column and the installation channel enclosed within
gypsum board casing ................................................................................. 93
4.25 Circular encasement for columns at the faade ......................................... 93
4.26 Exposed steel elements at the top floor ..................................................... 94
4.27 A view showing the suspended ceiling...................................................... 95
4.28 A detail drawing of the terrace-roof and parapet wall............................... 95
4.29 A detail from terrace showing the insulation materials ............................. 96
4.30 A point detail of the curved steel roof ....................................................... 96
4.31 Incorrect structural bracing...................................................................... 100
4.32 Rectified structural bracing ..................................................................... 100
4.33 The modification made on gussets .......................................................... 101
4.34 The modification made for the roof downleads....................................... 102
4.35 A view showing the conduit installed next to the column....................... 102
4.36 A view showing the hole on the steel deck for the installation channel...103
4.37 Curved beams supporting the roof........................................................... 104
A.1
Section AA of TESKOMB Building ....................................................... 114
A.2
Section BB of TESKOMB Building........................................................ 115
A.3
North elevation of TESKOMB Building ................................................. 116
A.4
East elevation of TESKOMB Building ................................................... 117
A.5
South elevation of TESKOMB Building ................................................. 118
A.6
West elevation of TESKOMB Building .................................................. 119
B.1
Section CC ............................................................................................... 120
B.2
Section GG............................................................................................... 121
xiv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AISC
American Institute of Steel Construction
ASCE
American Society of Civil Engineers
CITIC
China International Trade and Investment Corporation
EAF
Electric Arc Furnace
HSFG
High Strength Friction Grip
ISO
International Standards Organization
IISI
International Iron and Steel Institute
OECD
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development
OSB
Oriented Strand Board
PVC
Polyvinyl Chloride
TESKOMB
Trkiye Esnaf ve Sanatkar Kredi Kefalet Kooperatifleri

Merkez Birlii (Central Union of Retailers and Artisans
Credit-Underwriting Co-operatives of Turkey)
YK
Yksekretim Kurulu (Higher Education Council)
xv
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
In this chapter, in Section 1.1 the framework and the underlying concern of the study
are presented and the scope of the study is discussed. The objectives of the study are
described in the next section. The procedure of the study is explained in Section 1.3,
and the chapter is finalized with a disposition of the topics of research.
.
1.1 Argument
The last quarter of the 19th Century saw a meteoric growth in the total world output
of steel and developed countries were using it as a construction material by the
beginning of the 20th. Currently, steel has become the most common structural
material in developed countries due to its greater potential and flexibility that give it
the ability of creating new structural forms. With new methods of fabrication and
erection, steel frames go up more rapidly, thus reducing financing cost and allowing
the building to generate profits sooner. Also, availability of steel in a variety of
dimensions and forms enables economical framing of both short- and long-span
structures. When compared to other materials, steel has the highest rate of
recyclability and recent research in earthquake regions shows that steel is the most
reliable structural material against seismic loads.
In Turkey, steel became an option for constructing buildings only in the last quarter
of the 20th Century. It has been generally used in the construction of industrial
buildings, whereas in Europe, in the USA and even in its neighbor, Iran different
types of structures are being constructed with steel. Turkey has several mills
producing steel and it has the technology to manufacture the necessary equipment
and components for steel construction. Another reason to opt for steel as a structural
material is that Turkey happens to be located in a high risk seismic zone, and steel
structures perform well against earthquake loads.
Most architects, engineers and contractors in Turkey do not have much experience in
designing
commercial/residential
buildings
with
steel.
Standardization
in
manufactured steel elements also makes architects and engineers stay away from
steel since it is felt that this limits design creativity. Apart from lack of knowledge
and experience in steel construction, another important problem is economy. Again,
it is generally thought that steel is an expensive material that increases construction
costs. To the contrary, steel can cost less than concrete if it is designed and used
appropriately. In this respect, this study focused on the importance of steel as a
construction material in order to abolish prejudice in favor of concrete.
In Turkey the use of steel as a construction material is limited to factory buildings,

hangars, temporary structures and large-span public buildings. Although recently a
few steel buildings are coming up in the larger urban centers of the country, steel
construction is still not as wide spread as it should be, considering the earthquake
resistance requirements for buildings. For this reason, architects need to acquire
knowledge about steel construction in general and steel components and construction
details in particular. This study was initiated with the aim of investigating the various
types of steel-building structures and their erection details from the point of view of
architectural design.
1.2 Objectives
There were three main objectives in conducting this study:
The first objective of this study was to examine and summarize the basic
architectural, structural and constructional design principles of structural steel
and steel-building construction. The aim was also to highlight the advantages and
disadvantages of steel construction, especially in the context of Turkey.
The second objective of this study was to investigate the design and erection
processes of steel buildings in Turkey, by observing the construction of a selected
steel building in Ankara from start to finish.
The last objective was to propose rational strategies for encouraging the use of
steel in the Turkeys construction sector.
1.3 Procedure
Firstly, a literature survey on an overview of the theses and publications found in the
Libraries of the Higher Education Council (YK), Middle East Technical University
(METU), Bilkent University (BU) and Gazi University (GU) was conducted. Web
sites related to the subject were also visited, and information, statistics and photos
were downloaded from these web sites as needed.
Secondly, the Trkiye Esnaf ve Sanatkar Kredi Kefalet Kooperatifleri Merkez

Birlii (TESKOMB) Building in Ankara was chosen as a case study. The
construction work was monitored from the initial to the final stages. The progress
was documented visually and photos of the building were taken at regular intervals
during its construction. Construction details were examined and technical drawings
and other related photos of the building were obtained from the architects.
Additionally, interviews were conducted with the architects and engineers of the
building to understand the construction process and to find out their negative and/or
positive opinions about the use of steel in constructing this building.
1.4 Disposition
This study consists of five chapters. The first one is the introduction chapter which
includes the argument, objectives, procedure of the study; and its disposition in this
thesis.
In Chapter 2, a literature survey was presented about the essential elements of

structural steel and steel construction. Firstly the fabrication process of the structural
steel, its components, structural connection types and characteristics of steel
construction are described. These are followed by a typology of steel buildings and
their examples from around the world. Then the advantages and disadvantages of
steel as a building material are stated in comparison with concrete. Finally, steel
construction in Turkey and problems affecting its use are discussed.
In chapter 3 the case study on a steel building in Ankara is examined by describing

the survey material and survey methodology. In the following chapter, Chapter 4,
results and discussions of the survey are presented. Finally, in Chapter 5 the
conclusions
of
the
research
are
presented.
recommendations are presented.
Results
are
discussed
and
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE SURVEY
This literature review is based on information taken from thirty-three published

sources and fourteen websites. It covers topics related to structural steel, components
of steel structures and structural connections, erection of steel structures, types of
steel structures and advantages and disadvantages of steel construction. Also steel
construction in Turkey is explained regarding the need for steel construction and
problems of it.
2.1 Structural Steel
According to Thomas (2003), the term, structural steel, is generally taken to include
a wide variety of elements or components used in the construction of buildings and
other structures; they include beams, girders, stanchions, trusses, floor plates and
purlins. Many of these elements are made from standard hot rolled sections, cold
formed shapes or made up from plates using welding. These components are joined
at connections using plates, structural components, welding or fasteners. The author
also points out that, a variety of steel types are used to produce these structural
elements, plates and other components, depending on the intended use, cost, weight
of the structure and corrosion resistance.
Watson (1986) asserts that, the making of steel involves the oxidation of the ore,
removal of the impurities and addition of other materials to produce a desirable
composition. Landers (1983) identifies four principal methods of making steel; the
open hearth process, the oxygen process, the electric furnace process, and the
vacuum process. According to Moores (1993), the molten steel thus produced is used
in manufacturing raw steel products, such as structural sections, plates and wire.
There are three basic shaping processes by which the iron ingots are formed into the
final product; namely rolling, forging and extruding. Moores (1993) describes these
processes as follows:
a) Rolling: Rolling is the most common method used for shaping and is particularly
suitable for products of simple, constant cross section such as universal beams and
columns, plate and sheet. Starting in the form of a slab the steel is reheated before
passing through a system of rotating rolls. The reheating process can be either
batch or continuous. The rolls are arranged and shaped to change the rectangular
cross-section of the slab into the required form; both horizontal and vertical rolls are
used simultaneously to modify the profile of the section and hence produce a range
of universal beams and columns, identified by serial size and mass per unit length as
shown in Figure 2.1.
b) Forging: Forging is generally preferred where the end product has a complicated
shape. The technology involves either hammer forging, in which shapes are altered
by blows from a moving weight, or press forging in which a steady squeeze is
applied.
c) Extruding: Extruding implies producing steel close to the final shape, by forcing it
through a die. Products of complicated cross-section can be produced by this
technique. Some seamless tubes, including lighting columns, are produced by this
way. Typical extruded forms can be seen in Figure 2.2.
d) Shaping Tubular Sections: The two principal methods of making structural hollow
sections are the seamless method or by welding. Seamless tubes are produced by the
rotary forge method from circular or tapered fluted ingots. Seamless hollow sections
can be produced in circular form in sizes up to 500 mm and in thicknesses up to 50
mm. welded hollow sections are produced by a range of processes including butt or
continuous weld, electric weld, spiral weld and submerged arc welding. Most hollow
sections used in buildings are required in the shape of circular, square or rectangular
Figure 2.1. Range of serial sizes for structural sections (Source: Moores, 1993)
hollow sections as shown in Figure 2.3.
Figure 2.2. Typical extruded forms

(Source: Moores, 1993)
Figure 2.3. Serial sizes for tubes

(Source: Moores, 1993)
2.2 Components of Steel Structures
Hart (1992) states that, in its simplest terms in steel frames, similar to the other
systems, the vertical load carrying structure comprises a system of vertical load
carrying columns and other elements interconnected by horizontal beam elements
which support slab system. According to the author, the resistance of lateral and
vertical loads is provided by diagonal bracing elements, secondary beams and slab
systems. Figure 2.4 shows the typical components of the steel frame.
Figure 2.4. Typical components of a steel frame

(Source: Hart, 1992)
2.2.1 Columns/Stanchions
Copeland, Glover, Hart, Hayott and Marshall (1983) assert that, usually universal
columns, standard hot rolled sections, are used for the vertical load transferring in the
steel structures since they provide the easiest connection details. According to them,
rectangular and circular hollow columns have better stability as a result of their
higher stiffness to weight ratio but involve the use of complicated connections.
Hart (1992) explains that, in multistory structures the dimensions of the steel
columns can easily be kept constant with changing the thickness and grade. If the
loading requirements exceed the capacity of the required section, additional plates
may be welded to the section to form plated columns. Also, as stated by Keyder
(1993), places where wide flange column sections are not produced, like in Turkey
(see Section 2.8.2 c), built-up columns are used. According to Keyders (1993)
classification, there are three main kinds of built-up columns as shown in Figure 2.5:
Solid wall column; built up from profiles and plates,
Solid wall with perforated cover plates; built up from individual profiles
connected with perforated plates,
Open type columns; built up from individual profiles and connected with
lacing or battens. This is the most common type of built-up columns.
Figure 2.5. Built-up columns; (a) solid wall column, (b) solid wall column with
perforated cover plates and (c) open type column (Source: Keyder, 1993)
10
Akar (1990) points out that, in addition to the columns, load bearing shear walls,
tension elements carrying the slab loads by means of tension, transition beams
transferring the upper column loads to the lower when the column system is changed
in the lower floors and suspension bars used in suspension structures can all be
expected to be an element of vertical load carrying elements.
2.2.2 Beams and Girders
As mentioned by Copeland, Glover, Hart, Hayott and Marshall (1983), members that
carry transverse loads are beams. According to them, the structural steel floor
construction generally consists of secondary floor beams (generally named as joists)
of supporting a thin precast or in-situ concrete slab. The most efficient floor plan in
steel structures is in rectangular shape. The secondary floor beams which are closely
spaced on the longer distance are supported by primary beams (generally named as
girders) which are spanning the shorter distance between columns. They also explain
that, the primary beams are usually of rolled sections but can often take the form of
castellated beams, fabricated plate girders or taper beams because of heavy loading,
deeper construction and the possible need for service penetration.
Berktin (1994) states that, for medium-to-lightly-loaded floors and long spans,
castellated beams fabricated from standard sections are generally used (Figure 2.6).
According to her, conventional universal beams span a maximum of about 15 m. The
author further states that, taper beams are similar to plate girders except that their
depth varies from a maximum in mid-span to a minimum at supports thus achieving
a highly efficient structural configuration (Figure 2.7). Trusses used as floor beams
(floor and roof trusses, open web joists and girders) also give way to span much
longer distances. Today; fabrication techniques allow the economical production of
plate girders (Figure 2.8). Especially non-symmetric ones allow more economic
construction in excess of 15 m.
11
Figure 2.6. Castellated beams

(Source: Taggart, 1993)
Figure 2.7. Tapered beams

(Source: Berktin, 1994)
12
Figure 2.8. Fabricated plate girders (Source: Berktin, 1994)
2.2.3 Joists
Steel joists, frequently placed beams to carry floor loads, have always been popular
for several reasons as summarized in Engineering News Record (1992):
High strength to weight ratio and multi-directional strength,
Lower building cost: As a result of the latter and the low price per pound of joist
contribute significantly to lower building costs. Also the joists lightweight
enables structural supports, such as beams, columns and foundations to be lighter
and less costly,
Cost saving erection: An example of the low cost and flexibility of steel joist is
cantilevering. Cantilevering is an expensive, labor-intensive procedure, when it is
done in concrete. With steel joists, cantilevering can be achieved simply by
specifying an extended end or full-depth cantilever. All the fabrication is done at
the factory,
Ease of inspection,
Design flexibility; because each joist is fabricated to the designers

specifications, there is an infinite flexibility in the design of a steel joist building.
An extensive number of depths, spans and load carrying capacities can be
specified and produced at the factory, avoiding expensive on-site labor.
13
2.2.4 Slab Systems
As stated by Hart (1992), the most widely used construction system for slab systems
is metal decking (Figure 2.9). Composite action provided by studs through the metal
decking onto the beam flange, enables the floor slab to work with the beam
enhancing its strength and reducing deflection. The author also asserts that, there are
many types of metal deck systems depending on the type and section of the metal
sheet, which is controlled by many criteria related to strength, developing adequate
composite action and efficient transfer of forces. According to Akar (1990), in-situ
or precast concrete or ceramic are also used as slab systems in steel structures.
Figure 2.9. Steel deck floor system

(Source: www.nexgenhomes.net, retrieved 2006)
14
Additionally, Copeland, Glover, Hart, Hayott and Marshall (1983) points out that
services distribution is an important factor effecting building structure, mainly slab
system. The greater depth of steel construction does not necessarily result in an
increase in building height if the services are integrated in the building zone occupied
by the structure. The authors define two basic approaches to this problem; integration
or separation. Integration requires either deep, highly perforated structural
components to allow relatively impeded routing of services (either by means of
castellated beams or stub girders) or vertical zoning of structure and services (Figure
2.10). Separation requires the horizontal zoning of structures and services which is
best done in suspended ceiling or raised floor voids (Figure 2.11).
Figure 2.10. Unimpeded routing of services

(Source: Copeland, Glover, Hart, Hayott and Marshall, 1983)
Figure 2.11. Lateral zoning

(Source: Copeland, Glover, Hart, Hayott and Marshall, 1983)
15
2.2.5 Bracings
According to Hart (1992), as the height of the building increase the systems ensuring
lateral stability gains more importance. Arda, (1978) explains that to avoid breaking
and cracking of shear walls and to ensure the serviceability of the building on behalf
of the occupants, the lateral movement of the structural system should be kept in
certain limits. Generally the excepted upper limit is that; the total lateral movement
of building should not be exceed the total height/500 and for individual floors the
movement should be kept smaller than the floorheight/500. Hart (1992) asserts that,
lateral stability in steel structures is generally provided by steel bracings as shown in
Figure 2.12. Rigidly jointed frames or reinforced concrete walls are also used for
lateral stability.
Figure 2.12. Use of external steel bracings in the John Hancock Center
in Chicago, USA (Source: www.hispago.com, retrieved 2006)
16
2.2.6 Cables and Ropes
According to Moores (1993), cables and ropes are produced from wire and their
main use in buildings and structures is in guyed and suspended structures, suspension
bridges and lifting equipment. Moores (1993) states that, cables and wire ropes are
made up of a number of individual steel wires which are spun into a strand. A
number of strands (usually six) are woven around a central core to form a rope, and a
number of ropes (again usually six) form a cable. The author also explains that, the
largest ropes normally produced are approximately 100 mm in diameter and are
made up with six strands each containing 52 wires. The largest cables normally
produced are made up of six ropes of approximately 70 mm diameter. The function
of the core is to provide support to the strands and hold them in the correct position
under working conditions. Cores may be of fibre or steel composition.
Moores (1993) continues that, ropes can be protected by zinc coating/galvanizing

which provides sacrificial protection to underlying wires against corrosion.
Alternatively, synthetic sheathing can be used to provide a barrier between the rope
and the environment. Sheathing can be nylon or PVC, which can be colored. Some
ropes are manufactured using stainless steel wires which are particularly suitable for
many corrosive environments. According to the author, ropes do not have an
indefinite life. Usual visible signs of rope deterioration are corrosion, excessive wear,
broken strands, and distortion. However, the ropes life can be extended considerably
by adequate attention to maintenance, regular inspection and lubrication, correct
handling and prevention of mechanical damage.
2.3 Connections in Steel Structures
MacGinley (1981) describes that, connections are required to join individual

members of the steel structures together to ensure composite action thus to transfer
axial loads, shear, moment and torsion from one component to another. The design
of connections between individual frame components is the most important aspect of
structural steelwork for buildings.
17
As defined by Watson (1988), there are several methods of connecting steel

members. The selection of a particular connection system should be governed not
only by its capability to support the applied load, but also by the ease of connection
to other components. Also other criteria, such as code requirements, fabricators
preference and economical considerations are also effective in the selection. Watson
(1988) asserts that, connections may be realized either by bolting or welding.
2.3.1 Bolting, Riveting and Welding
Lui (2003) states that, steel sections can be fastened together by rivets, bolts, and
welds. Although rivets were used quite extensively in the past, their use in modern
steel construction has become almost obsolete. Bolts have essentially replaced rivets
as the primary means to connect non-welded structural components. As discussed by
Schollar (1993), it is generally cheaper to make a bolted joint than a welded one
(particularly on site) so a designer will usually choose bolted work for both site and
workshop with some shop welding where warranted by engineering design.
According to the author, site welding is utilized where the full strength of a member
must be used at a connection and where tolerance, geometry or aesthetics require
welded connections. In externally exposed work, welding is often preferred to avoid
rainwater penetrating behind splice plates on exposed steel.
a) Bolting and Riveting
Biggs (1993) asserts that, bolting and riveting were the only possible ways of making
joints in cast and wrought iron. Riveting involved the close hammering of a red hot
river into prepared holes: as the rivet contracted upon cooling the plates were locked
together, essentially, by the tensile stress in the rivet. The author continues that, high
strength friction grip (HSFG) bolts work in much the same way. The bolt is tightened
to some predetermined stress and it is this prestress which holds the two components
together by friction. HSFG bolts are made from quenched and tempered alloy steel in
order to obtain a high yield point combined with good ductility. As with all heat
treated steel no heat should be applied or the properties will be affected.
18
b) Welding
According to Thomas (2003), welding is perhaps the most important process used in
the fabrication and erection of structural steelwork. It is used very extensively to join
components to make up members and to join members into assemblies and
structures. Additionally as mentioned by Schollar (1993), welding can save costs and
reduce member sizes by dispensing with the need for brackets and plates at
connections and by allowing the use of the whole cross-section of a member by
eliminating holes for bolts.
According to Schollars (1993) classification, the two basic types of weld are the
fillet weld and the butt weld. Fillet welds are normally used where the connection
does not need to develop the full strength of the connected plates (Figure 2.13 a).
They are relatively cheap because the edges of the plates do not have to be machined
or shaped, the amount of weld metal placed is small, and inspection is easier than for
butt welds. Butt welding (Figure 2.13 b) is used for highly stressed connections, and
the plates are machined and chamfered so that the weld metal is placed across the
whole plate thickness.
Figure 2.13. Typical welds: (a) Fillet weld and (b) butt weld
(Source: Biggs, 1993)
Thomas (2003) states that welding used and done well helps in the production of
very safe and efficient structures because welding consists of essentially joining steel
component to steel component with steel that is intimately united to both. It can lead
19
to very efficient paths for actions and stresses to be transferred from one member or
component to another. Conversely, welding used or done badly or inappropriately
can lead to potentially unsafe or ineffective structures (welds containing defects or
inappropriate types or forms of joints can cause failure or collapse of members or
structures with little or no warning). Thus, care is required in the design of welds, in
the design or specification of welding processes, in the actual process of welding
components one to another, and in the inspection of welding to assure that it is as
specified and fit for purpose. According to the author, as with the production of the
structural steel components, specialist expertise is required for successful welding.
This is built on a foundation of knowledge of the metallurgy of steel but also requires
knowledge of the processes and materials involved in welding.
Thomas (2003) also explains that, welding of structural steel is usually the process of
joining two pieces of similar (not necessarily identical) steel by casting a further
quantity of steel between them and fused to each of them, but it may equally involve
no filler material, simply the melting together of the two pieces to be joined. The
process involves heating and melting the surfaces of the pieces to be joined and,
when required, the steel to make the weld.
According to Biggs (1993), all welding involves essentially the same sequence of
operations, the temperature of the steel is raised, locally, to its melting point when
additional metal may or may not, be supplied. It is then allowed to cool naturally, the
cooling rate being affected by the size and shape of the parent components. Biggs
(1993) claims that, whatever the process, all welds should comply with two
requirements. The author summarizes these requirements as follows:
Ideally there should be complete continuity between the parts to be joined and
every part of the joints should be indistinguishable from the parent material. In
practice, this is rarely achieved, though welds giving satisfactory performance
can be made.
The joint materials should have satisfactory metallurgical properties, though poor
welding practice can affect the end result.
20
2.3.2 Commonly-used Connections
In this section, commonly used connections are discussed, with examples and simple
diagrams to illustrate the points made. By this way, advantages and disadvantages of
these connections are expressed.
a) Column Section in Compression
As mentioned by Schollar (1993), the simplest concept is a welded profile as shown

in Figure 2.14 b, where stress is transferred directly from the column above, through
the weld, to the column below. A connection like this would be made in the factory.
The author continues that, an alternative (Figure 2.14 a) is to use shop-welded
capping plates to each column length. These are bolted on site to locate the plates
together. A considerable advantage is that different cross-sectional sizes can be
accommodated. The end of the column must be accurately cut square to the shaft so
that the upper column will be vertical when it sits on the lower column. Packing
plates between the capping plates can be used to allow adjustment of levels.
According to the author, splice plates (Figure 2.14 c) are another common detail,
which require no welding in the fabrication shop, and allow some directional
tolerance during erection.
Figure 2.14. Direct compression in a column joint carried by (a) end plates, (b) on
welds, and (c) on splice plates (Source: Schollar, 1993)
21
Schollar (1993) further states that, looking at other aspects of these connections, the
profile weld and capping plate can be contained within the net column size, thus
minimizing the size of the clad column. According to the author, splice plates are
unlikely to be acceptable for an exposed connection, and cannot be used for columns
of circular hollow section. Welded joints are very suitable for use in trusses which
are fully fabricated in the shop, and for exposed work are much better than using
splice plates which can trap water and for this reason cause corrosion.
b) Section in Tension
As stated by Schollar (1993), the same connections (Figure 2.14) could be used in
tension as well as compression. However, the capping plate detail shown in Figure
2.14 (a) is unlikely to be suitable because the tension forces would develop tension in
the bolts and bending in the capping plates. Splice plates (Figure 2.14 c) could be
suitable, providing the member is not fully stressed in tension; otherwise the holes
drilled for the bolts could make the net section too small.
c) Beam-to-beam or Beam-to-column Connection
Thomas (2003) claims that, beam-to-beam connections are possibly the most
common type of connection and the most straightforward to construct. The author
continues that, bolted angle cleats are ideal for rectangular grids (Figure 2.15). A
popular variation of this is the welded end plate shown in Figure 2.16 which can be
splayed to suit non-square joints. Shear loads are carried in the webs of I-beams, and
both of these connections take the shear load directly from the web of the secondary
beam and transfer it to the web of the supporting beam. The author further explains
that, an angle is sometimes placed under the end of the supported beam (Figure
2.17). In this case the load is transferred from the web through the bottom flange of
this beam and into the web of the main beam through the angle. The same principles
are used in beam-to-column connections. Where the beam is connected to the web of
the column the load is transferred almost concentrically. However, if the beam is
22
connected to the column flange, the column is loaded with some eccentricity and this
must be allowed for in the design of the column.
Figure 2.15. Beam-to-girder
Figure 2.16. Beam-to-girder
connection using web cleats
connection using a welded end plate
(Source: Thomas, 2003)
Figure 2.17. Beam-to-girder connection using seating and restraining cleats.

Thomas (2003) explains that, beam-to-column moment connections are used in rigid
construction such as portal frames. The moment and shear actions at such a
connection can be balanced by a pair of flange forces; tension in the top flange and
compression in the bottom flange, with the shear staying in the web. Each of these
23
forces must then be carried into the column, where they create shears in the web and
compression in the flange. To reduce the magnitude of these forces, a gusset is often
detailed at the end of the beam. Figure 2.18 shows a beam-to-column connection for
moment connection using a gusset.
Figure 2.18. Beam-to-column moment connection using a gusset

(Source: Schollar, 1993)
2.3.3 Special Connections
As stated by Schollar (1993), wire ropes, which can carry the highest stresses, cannot
be threaded or welded. The author explains that, for low loads the rope can be
clamped, but for large loads the force is transferred by spreading the individual wires
out in a conical shaped steel casting as shown in Figure 2.19, and pouring molten
zinc into the cone to socket the wires. The casting is attached to an anchorage or
another length of rope by means of a pin or threaded coupler as shown in Figure
2.20. According to the author, the working stresses for couplers are lower than those
for the rope itself, and consequently the coupling will be larger. Although the
working stresses are lower for a tension or tie bar, welding is often difficult or
impossible and connections are formed by threading. The thread is not cut for the
highest strength bars, but rolled onto the bar so that no sectional area is lost (Figure
24
2.21). The coupling as shown might be the simplest way to achieve a connection, but
if such a joint is exposed, a more expensive form may be required. In such cases a
pin joint is often used (Figure 2.22). Although these seem to cause great excitement,
in engineering terms a pinned joint is simply an abstraction which allows the
designer to control the distribution of forces in a structure.
Figure 2.19. Diagram of splaying out of wire rope

Figure 2.20. Threaded coupling for wire rope sockets

25
Figure 2.21. Threaded coupling for bars

Figure 2.22. Pin joint connection for bar

Schollar (1993) further explains that, joints in hollow sections also require special
connections. They are fundamentally different from those used in open wall sections,
as tubes have few surfaces on which to fit splice plates and bolts. A number of
straight tube-to-tube joints are shown in Figure 2.23. The connection with end plates
(Figure 2.23 a) is suitable for compression, but less good for tension. If the loads are
large many bolts and thick plates will also be required. A fish plate connection can
be made between tubes with enough bolts to transfer the load through the connection
plates (Figure 2.23 b). The joint in Figure 2.23 (c) is likely to work for any
combination of applied loads, but it gives little scope for tolerance if erection and
fabrication are not absolutely perfect. According to Scholar (1993), joints in tubular
trusses are usually welded, because full profile welded joints not only look better, but
are also cheaper than creating elaborate bolted joints.
26
Figure 2.23. Tube-to-tube splice.

2.4 Erection of Steel Structures
When the decision to use a steel frame has been taken, framing plans which define
the size and type of each member, typical details of connections and full information
about setting out each structural component are produced (Fenton, 1983). The choice
of structural form and method of connection detailing have a significant impact on
speed of both fabrication and erection. In this section the stages making steel
members ready for the erection phase and the erection process are described.
a) Preparation
Taggart (1993) asserts that after completing the fabrication of steel members, the
second step is converting them into structural elements which can be readily
assembled on site according to demands of the architects or engineers. As mentioned
by the author, cutting to length is the first task to be conducted and, for the heavier
27
sections, a circular saw is the principal tool employed. Lighter angle sections are
often sheared on a cropping machine which is not only much quicker but relieves
demand on the saws. Cropping is particularly useful for substantial quantities of
relatively short cut lengths such as small bracings or cleats. The author also states
that, plates and similar flat products are not only more awkward to handle but require
different cutting techniques. Accordingly, a different route is used where cutting to
size is either conducted by shearing on a guillotine or by flame-cutting. Perhaps the
most widely publicized example of flame cutting is the castellated beam (an idea
credited to the Chicago Bridge Co. in 1910).
According to Taggart (1993), another step is holing. The author explains that, in
most cases holes are formed by drilling, although punching, which is extremely
rapid, is widely used for secondary members or thinner components such as gusset
plates. On newer machines punching can also be combined with cropping. Generally
when considerable repetition can be established, holes are increasingly being drilled
in groups on semi-automatic machines. These machines can operate on three separate
axes, which means that holes can be drilled through the web and both flanges of a
universal section at the same time.
Fenton (1983) points out that, together with the production of primary structural
elements, components for fitting and assembly, such as brackets, gusset plates and
stiffeners, also have to be manufactured separately. As this is often labor intensive,
jigs and templates are used to ensure consistency and to save time, particularly where
quantity production is involved. According to Fenton (1983), as a general rule, shop
connections tend to be welded in preference to bolting but, depending upon the
nature of the structure, some shop bolting may be used if only for trial alignment and
fitting. The choice between shop bolting and welding is generally one of cost and
convenience related to the facilities offered by a particular fabricator.
28
b) Erection
Taggart (1993) explains that steelwork erection normally occupies a relatively short
period on the construction program, but during this time considerable activity occurs,
which is instrumental to the performance of the contract as a whole. According to the
author, the steel framework should not be seen in isolation but as an integral link in
the construction chain where the time saved can have considerable impact in
lowering overall costs. Early consideration should be given to erection methods
during design and detailing in order to realize the full benefits of structural steel.
As stated by Biggs (1993), the method of erection selected will depend upon the type
of building and other related factors. If the site presents unusual difficulties, single
storey buildings are not erected quickly and easily. The majority of industrial
buildings are portal frames and it is common practice to bolt-assemble the joints at
ground level and then lift the complete frame upright with the help of a mobile crane.
Biggs (1993) describes that, generally, multi-storey buildings are erected storey by
storey because floors can be completed earlier (offering access, overhead safety and
weather protection). Additionally, where the site is long and narrow access may only
be possible on a limited scale. In this kind of situations, the best solution may be to
erect the steelwork bay by bay. Alternatively, this method and storey by storey
erection can be combined to the best advantage where circumstances allow.
Taggart (1993) asserts that, the speed of steelwork erection is subject to various
factors, some of which are beyond the control of the building designer. Those which
can be controlled include the end connection types, the extent of bolting or welding
and the number of separate elements. In addition, according to Taggart (1993),
decisions at the design stage may have predetermined the size and weight of main
elements and therefore the degree of site assembly required. Naturally, site welding
is expensive and is dependent on suitable weather conditions. Accordingly, site joints
tend to be bolted which also means that only hand tools are required and this is a
considerable advantage when working at heights. However, welding may be more
suitable for alterations. Also particular benefit is gained by standardizing bolt sizes
29
and grades during. By eliminating the need for constant identification and selection,
bolting up is simplified and the hazards to the workers are minimized, especially in
unsafe positions.
2.5 Types of Steel Structure
The classification of steel structures is generally based on the form or system used.
The author purposes four categories for steel structures. These are:
Single-storey structures,
Multi-storey structures,
Special structures,
Lightweight steel structures.
These are described in more detail, following:
2.5.1 Single-storey Steel Structures
The term single-storey structures comprises both single and multi-bay steel
structures. In this section, single and multi-bay steel structures are examined.
Attention is again focused on single storey construction, although some of the
examples used are low-rise buildings of which systems can be considered in the same
way.
a) Single-bay Steel Structures
MacGinley (1981) explains that, these structures require greater distances between
supports that can not be spanned by the simple post and beam frame. To span the
distance between supports than, girders, trusses, arches, rigid frames, or several other
types of framing and systems including special systems (see Section 2.5.3) may be
used.
30
According to Watson (1986), where the depths are limited, a built-up girders and
columns of skeleton framing are used. This consists of plates and shapes built-up to
necessary strength. Either castellated or tapered beams may be provided to suit the
design. The individual parts may be assembled by welding. Where the depth of the
structural member is not the limiting factor, it is usually more economical to use
lattice girders (trusses) to span large areas (Figure 2.24 a). The author further states
that, these systems are both used for flat roof systems and they can also take form of
pitched and sawtooth roof systems (Figure 2.24 b).
As mentioned by Arda and Yardmc (1989), prestressing which can both be applied
to individual structural members, and to single bay frames, whether composed of
truss or solid wall members, to increase the strength of the total structure against
external loading (Figure 2.24 c).
Figure 2.24. Structural systems for single-storey structures

(Source: Watson, 1986)
31
Watson (1986) explains that, when extremely long spans are needed transverse
framing, or bents, may take the form of solid or open-web arches which will support
not only the roof structure, but also the walls (Figure 2.25). According to the author,
a hingless arch may be used if soil conditions are suitable. A two-hinged arch
consists of a trussed arch resting on large pins at foundation. A three-hinged arch
rests on two large pins used to connect the arch to the foundation and a third pin
connecting the two halves at the center. The roof of the Channel Tunnel Terminal
building in London is an example for the three pinch arch system. The cross-section
of the structure can be seen in Figure 2.26.
Figure 2.25. Typical steel arches; (a) hingless arch,

(b) two-hinged arch and (c) three-hinged arch (Source: Watson, 1986)
32
Figure 2.26. Cross-section of the Channel Tunnel Terminal Building in London,

England (Source: Plank, 1993)
b) Multi-bay Steel Structures
Plank (1993) asserts that, multi bays are normally a repetition of single bay
structures. This repetition offers opportunities to reduce the size of some members if
continuity is considered in the design. The traditional behavior for multi-bay roof
construction was to use a series of pitched roof trusses, supported on parallel rows of
columns. This did not allow the possibility of taking advantage of structural
continuity, and the structural behavior is little different from single span buildings of
this type. The author continues that, as for single bay construction, the roof trusses
can take a variety of different forms. For instance, north light trusses were commonly
used for factory roofs, and shallower pitches can be done using a truss with a finite
depth at the eaves. An example for north light form of construction is shown in
Figure 2.27.
Plank (1993) states that pitched roof steel portal frames are the principle structural
form for industrial buildings. This is largely because of economic factors associated
with the efficiency of both their construction and structural behavior. For multi-bay
33
buildings the continuity associated with portal action offers even greater advantages.
According to the author, in many cases the construction is simply in the form of pairs
of rafters with equal pitches as this is probably most efficient from a structural point
of view, but other shapes such as mansard, monitor or north light can also be used
(Figure 2.28).
Figure 2.27. Spectrum 7 Building, Milton Keynes, UK; (a) photo, (b) cross-section
(Source: Plank, 1993)
34
Plank (1993) continues that, another structural system for carrying the roof structures
of multi-bay buildings is a multi-bay flat roof structure. Flat, or nearly flat, roof
structures minimize the enclosed volume and avoid problems of valley gutters but
clearly require very careful consideration with regard to water-proofing. The
structural form could be a series of simply supported beams, which may take the
form of universal beams, castellated beams or lattice girders.
Furthermore, space frames can be utilized for the construction of multi-bay

structures. As mentioned by Plank (1993), space frames are the ultimate expression
of such two-way spanning continuous systems, but suffer from problems associated
with the cost of the specialized joints which are required. Large-scale space frames
offer the most stimulating visual quality, particularly where the forms are expressed
both externally and internally.
Figure 2.28. Pitched roof structure: Princess of Wales Conservatory in London,

England (Source: Plank, 1993)
35
2.5.2
Multi-storey Structures
Watson (1993) asserts that, the term multi-storey building includes a wide range of
building forms that are made possible by the flexibility and adaptability of structural
steel. The basic elements of a multi-storey structure are floor slabs, beams, columns
and bracing. According to Watson (1993: p-197):
The choice of a structural system is governed by what may be called the

three Rs of building design: Rigidity, Robustness and Rapidity. The
designer must first ensure that the structure is rigid enough to sustain
the applied loads. The system chosen on this basis must be sufficiently
robust to prevent the progressive collapse of the building under
accidental loading. Lastly, the structural system must facilitate the fast
and economical construction of the project.
The factors affecting choice of structural system are summarized by Watson (1993)
in three parts as below.
a) Column Layout
Structural steel floor systems consist of prefabricated standard components, and

columns should ideally be laid out on a repetitive grid which establishes a standard
structural bay. Maximum repetition of the floor components reduces fabrication costs
and erection time. The function of the building will frequently determine the column
layout. For example, financial dealing floors require clear, open spaces located on the
lower floors, which would dictate a different structural solution to the rest of the
building. Large, column-free areas at ground floor level may necessitate the use of a
transfer structure at first floor to carry the upper floors on an economical column
grid.
b) Integration of Building Services
The overall depth of the floor construction depends on the type and distribution of
the building services in the ceiling void. The integration of the services with the
36
structure is an important factor in the choice of an economic structural floor system.

The designer may choose to separate the structural and services zones, or
accommodate the services by integrating them with the structure, allowing for the
structural system to occupy the full depth of the floor construction.
c) External Wall Construction
The external skin of a multi-storey building is supported off the structural frame. In
most high quality commercial buildings, the cost of external cladding systems greatly
exceeds the cost of the structure. According to Watson (1993), this influences the
design and construction of the structural system in the following ways:
The perimeter structure must provide a satisfactory platform to support the

cladding system and be sufficiently rigid to limit deflections of the external
wall.
Reducing the floor zone may be more cost-effective than an overall increase
in the area of cladding.
Fixing to the structure should facilitate rapid erection of cladding panels.
Reducing the weight of cladding at the expense of cladding costs will not
necessarily lead to a lower overall construction cost.
Multi-storey structures are also classified within themselves according to their

structural form and the method of the construction. Structures may consist of a
combination of various types (Figure 2.29). Iyengar (1993) explains that, buildings
up to about 20 storeys can be shaped without undue influence of the structure. In the
range of 20-40 storeys, a specific structural system, its composition and efficiency,
and the flexibilities for shaping offered by the system must be identified. Structures
which are 40-60 storeys tall will have more specific restrictions regarding asymmetry
of profile and plan. The ability of the system to resist asymmetrical gravity loads and
resultant torsions determines its effectiveness. Structures beyond 60 storeys are more
decidedly affected by the structure. The primary structural concern is to develop
sufficient lateral stiffness.
37
Iyengar (1993) further states that the systems selection process allows for
considerable latitude in the choice of an appropriate system which is suited to a
particular building. Recognition of the merits of different systems together with
enhanced abilities to perform complex three-dimensional computerized structural
analyses has made it possible to design varieties of symmetric and asymmetric forms.
Figure 2.29. Comparison of structural systems

(Source: Iyengar, 1993)
2.5.3 Special Structures
The construction of special buildings that requires large areas unobstructed by

columns such as auditoria, sport arenas, transportation structures is made possible
with the help of some special structural systems. Some of these systems are
described below.
38
a) Space Frame Structures
MacGinley (1981) states that space frame structures are roof structures covering
column free large areas. There are two main types of space frame structures: twoway spanning roof systems, grids and space decks, and domes which may form the
roof only or the complete structures. According to Berktin (1994), the main
advantage of space frame structures is with very small structural depth large areas
can be spanned, so that with not more than 1.5 m depth 100 m of column free area
can be spanned. The examples for this system are illustrated in Figure 2.30 and 2.31.
Figure 2.30. Sainsbury Center in Norwich, England

(Source: www.people.cornell.edu , retrieved 2006)
Figure 2.31. Nagoya Dome in Nagoya, Japan

(Source: www.takenaka.co, retrieved 2006)
39
b) Cable Supported Structures
As mentioned by Reid (1984), in structures where the roof deck is directly

constructed on cables, by intersecting a grid of horizontal cables running between the
outside walls, a very thin roof can be established, which can only support itself by
tension. In these systems, however, the span has to be sufficiently great to exploit the
potential of the suspension principle, and the structure should be stiff enough for
structural safety. Reid (1984) also explains that, the curvature of the roof deck is the
major consideration in the load carrying capacity of the system, establishing the
necessary stiffness against flutter or flapping of the structure in even moderate winds.
Figure 2.32 shows an example of cable supported structures.
Figure 2.32. Raleigh Arena in North Carolina, USA

(Source: www.ou.edu, retrieved 2006)
40
c) Transfer Structures
According to Bird (1993: p-253), transfer structures take loads where they can
conveniently be collected and transfer them to where they can conveniently be
resisted. At one end of the spectrum, this can mean that a column line has to be
interrupted to get round an obstruction or provide an opening. At the other end of the
spectrum whole buildings might have only minimal areas of the site where
foundations can be put down. In finished buildings they are often hidden. The First
Exchange House building in London had to be constructed over an active rail way. In
order to span the rail way, arches were integrated into the whole building frame
(Figure 2.33). In this example, the architects also used the transfer structure as a
significant part of their design instead of hiding it.
Figure 2.33. First Exchange House in London, England

(Source: moment.mit.edu, retrieved 2006)
41
2.5.4 Lightweight Steel Structures
According to Dudas (2003), utilizing light steel structures in residential house

construction is a new building technology came to the foreground because of the
rapid development in the building industry; surely it has a lot of advantages from the
technological point of view, which meet all the requirements these days. However, it
is more important beside the points of view mentioned above that the construction of
these buildings protects the natural environment and suits the standpoints of
sustainable development and guarantees a healthy environment for the users for the
whole lifespan of the building. Dudas (2003) summarized the building system
characteristics as follows:
The light construction residential houses frame is assembled from cold formed
steel profiles. In the gaps between the elements of the frame heat insulation material
is placed and the frame is supplied with surface layers made of various materials,
forming a layered structure.
Generally, the elements of the frame structure are constructed of C and U profiles
with a dry, assembly style building technology. Numerous steel fasteners, stiffeners
and other complementary profiles are connected to the basic elements of the
structure.
The applied materials filling the gaps between the elements of the frame not only
perform heat insulation, but also meet acoustical requirements and they are an
efficient fire protection tool. With the application of efficient heat insulation
materials a good level of fire protection and an excellent heat and sound insulation
can be achieved.
The inside cover is mostly made by plasterboard. Composite layers by wood as

basic material (e.g. OSB) are preferably used as outside wall board cover and floor
slabs. With this, the advantage of high strength can be utilized, which provides
stiffening function.
42
2.6 Advantages of Steel as a Structural Material
There are various advantages in using steel as a structural material both from the
point of view of architectural and engineering solutions. In this section, the
advantages of structural steel are specified by making comparisons with other
structural materials, especially with concrete, the most popular construction material
in Turkey.
2.6.1 Design Flexibility
Berktin (1994) explains that, steel is a material which is strong both in tension,
bending and compression. Steels great strength is the basis of its uniqueness among
the four basic materials. The form characteristics of linearity and thinness exist
because of this exceptional strength and render it preferable for tall structures (Figure
2.34) and large spans. According to Patterson (1990), this flexibility in design makes
remodeling easy even after the construction is completed. As shown in Figures 2.35,
2.36 and 2.37, the use of steel makes possible the creation of large, column free
internal spaces. As stated by Berktin (1994), these spaces can be divided by
partitions, and by eliminating the external wall as a load-bearing element, allows the
development of large window areas incorporated in prefabricated cladding systems.
2.6.2 Lightness
Copeland, Glover, Hart, Hayott and Marshall (1983) states that, steel is an efficient
material for structural purposes because of its good strength-to-weight ratio
(lightweight construction). If the detailing of cladding and finishes is also geared to
lightness, a steel farmed building is likely to be about 60 to 75% of the weight of a
comparable reinforced concrete building. They claim that, the taller the building the
more benefits offered by lightweight construction; including the size of foundations
and cost criteria. The size of the foundations of a steel structure is almost 20% less
than that of reinforced concrete structure of the same digressions
43
Figure 2.34. Burj Al Arab Hotel in Dubai, United Arab Emirates

(Source: www.burjalarab.dubai-city.de, retrieved 2006)
Figure 2.35. Oita Prefecture Sports Park Main Stadium in Oita City, Japan
(Source: www.takenaka.co, retrieved 2006)
44
Figure 2.36. United Airways Terminal in Chicago, USA

(Source: Akbay, 2006)
Figure 2.37. The Florida Aquarium in Florida, USA

(Source: www.sysk.com, retrieved 2006)
45
According to Akbay (2006), as the weight of structure decreases by utilizing steel,

these results are emerged in parallel:
Size of all structural elements in the building decreases and by spanning

longer spaces, the usable areas increases,
The limits of the architectural flexibility expand and extraordinary structures

can be applied,
Because of the reduced foundation dimensions, amount of excavation

decreases,
The opportunity to build a structure even on bad grounds comes out,
Amount and variety of the material that is going to be transported decrease,
More resistant to earthquake and taller buildings can be built by means of a

decrease in the horizontal loads used in seismic calculations due to the
decrease in the structures weight.
2.6.3 Speed of Construction
As stated by Akbay (2006), steel frames are fast to erect. The author explains that,
this results from the use of factory-produced, interrelated structural parts, prepainted
roof and wall panels, and other elements that can be selected in advance of the
project and quickly assembled on site. For example, the construction of Safeco
Baseball Stadium in Seattle finished in 27 months only (including the production
drawings which took 9 months). It is a baseball stadium with a capacity of 47,000
seats and it can be closed with a roof when required. Additionally, specific measures
were taken against earthquake loads.
According to Hart (1992), the time taken to realize a steel building from concept to
completion (no matter which method of planning and construction is used) is
generally less than that for other alternatives, namely; concrete. This reduces time
related building costs, enables building to be used earlier and produces an earlier
return on the capital invested. In other words, although the initial cost of structural
46
steel frame construction is high, the reduced construction time can also mean large
savings on the overall financing.
2.6.4 Economy
Morreau (1993) states that, most of the arguments in the past about the relative
advantages of steel and concrete buildings have concentrated on the relative costs of
them. Much has been written on this subject and the result is that much depends on
the greater speed of steel construction. The author also states that, a steel frame is
likely to be more expensive to buy and build than a concrete one. However, after
including the cost of the time taken to complete the building (the contractors
overheads, the interest on the money to finance the project) and the benefits of earlier
completion, either in earlier rental income or earlier use of new facilities, the
economic advantage of steel construction can be seen clearly.
Akbay (2006) asserts that, the short construction time and the advantages due to its
lightweight mentioned above make steel framed structures more economical. In
addition to these qualities, as stated by Akbay (2006), steel framed structures;
are prefabricated,
do not require a formwork or a catwalk,
can be constructed in every weather conditions,
can be controlled easily during the construction process.
Ersoy and tptolu (1988) argue that, in steel buildings, different from other
construction materials, the material cost for structural steel members or plates often
exceeds the labor cost (lifting and setting costs). On the other hand the reason for the
choice of an economical structural system will not necessarily be to use the minimum
weight or length of structural steel. Figure 2.38 shows the cost shares of every phase
in the total construction respectively. As can be seen from this figure material costs
represent only 30% of the total cost of structural steelwork. According to Akbay,
47
(2006), calculation of weight of the steel used per square meter causes incorrect
evaluations for the reason that production, assembly and the other costs are not taken
into consideration.
Beyond all these explanations, Turkey being located in a seismic zone, steel framed
structures are safer and in this sense cheaper than reinforced concrete structures
constructed in Turkey.
Design
3%
Steel
27%
Fire prot. 30%
Cor. Prot.10%
Fabrication
23%
Erection
7%
Figure 2.38. Pie chart showing cost breakdown for steel construction projects
(Source: Latter, 1985)
2.6.5 Quality Control
As stated by Engineering News Record (1992), the elements of the framework are
generally computer-designed and are manufactured and fabricated under the
controlled conditions of a factory, establishing quality procedures. Many steel
building system manufacturers participate in a Quality Certification program
developed by the AISC. This recognizes manufacturers displaying the ability to
design and produce high quality metal building systems. The overall objective of the
48
program is to ensure that the metal building system meets stringent requirements for
design, integrity and fabrication quality. As a result, the end user can be more
assured of getting a quality product.
Furthermore, Akbay (2006) asserts that, condition of the structural steel members
and joints that are not covered can be easily controlled at every phase of the building,
according to the regulations. This property is very important to prevent the nonperceivable damages emerging after earthquakes, especially in the reinforced
concrete structures.
2.6.6 Modifications
According to Engineering News Record (1993), steel structures adapt well to

changing needs. In many cases, concrete buildings cannot support the load that
additional stories would impose, but in steel structures this problem can easily be
solved, by means of minor additions like a transfer trusses (bracing). Also, they are
uniquely suited to expansion. In many cases a steel structure can be enlarged simply
by removing the end wall, or walls erecting new framework and then adding
matching wall and roof covers. Often the original end walls can be reused. This
flexibility greatly reduces the time inconvenience typically associated with
expansions or additions to existing traditional construction.
2.6.7 Renovations
As mentioned by Engineering News Record (1993), steel is the material chosen for
restoration and renovation of existing buildings, both when demolition is out of
consideration or a change in function is required. The economy, ease of erection,
lightweight, rigidity and ductility of steel give new life to existing buildings. It is
possible with steel to renew a given building without removing the roof, by just
replacing the main load carrying structure at first and then replacing the rest of the
structure.
49
Akbay (2006) explains that, also by a renovation program traced by the existing
buildings seismic resistance can be improved utilizing the properties of steel. It is
essential to modify a building that undertakes a new function (for this reason it can
require reduction in number of columns or additions such as an elevator or stairs) or
that was damaged in an earthquake and needs reinforcement. The author further
explains that, if this structure is a steel framed structure, the modification can be
done in a short time and economically, and if it is a reinforced concrete structure, it is
hard to achieve this without using steel members as well. Figure 2.39 shows the
Sather Gate Garage renovation. This city owned parking structure was seismically
reinforced with exterior steel braces.
Figure 2.39 Sather Gate Garage renovation in Berkeley, USA

(Source: www.dbarchitect.com, retrieved 2006)
Akbay (2006) also states that after the 1992 Erzincan Earthquake some experiments
were made in the Middle East Technical University (METU) and it is understood that
the steel cross-bracings applied for the reinforcement of the structures damaged in
that earthquake are very effective and economic. However, in the 1999 Glck and
50
Dzce Earthquakes, authorities did not regard these experiments and preferred to
reinforce the damaged buildings with concrete shear walls despite the fact that they
are expensive, heavy and risky.
2.6.8 Recyclability
Undoubtedly, it is one of significant superiorities of steel structures that they can be

reused with very little loss after dismantling. Sometimes, they are used in new
structures after a little maintenance and sometimes (if they can not be reused as their
existent shapes) they are melted and utilized for different purposes once more.
According to IISI (2006), recycled steel (scrap) is a required and essential component
of new steel, making steel a naturally environmentally responsible material. In basic
oxygen steelmaking, scrap represents up to 30 percent of the raw materials charged
into the furnace. It represents between 90 and 100 percent of the charge in electric
arc furnace (EAF) production. Steel is 100 percent recyclable: moreover, it can be
used over and over again with no downgrading to a lower quality product. On the
other hand, as stated by Akbay (2006), the reinforced concrete buildings have to be
demolished if they become uninhabitable due to different reasons such as
earthquakes or damage.
2.6.9 Earthquake and Wind Resistance
According to Engineering News Record (1993), steel is also the material of choice
for harsh environments including limitations of geography, high winds, hard soil and
temperature movements and most importantly risks of hurricanes, typhoons and
earthquakes. With the design flexibility and fast construction ensured by steel, steel
structures become the first choice in hard conditions. Also as the lateral resistance for
wind and seismic loading is provided by combined steel systems and various
bracings, structural safety is well ensured
51
Bouwkamp (1990) explains that, although present specifications stipulate earthquake

resistant design requirements for reinforced concrete, failures continue to occur
mostly because of poor design details (reinforcing steel layout), poor workmanship,
and inadequate in-site quality control and inspection. On the contrary, steel systems
enhance earthquake performance. Bouwkamp (1990) also asserts that, steel has not
only been used successfully in rigid jointed frames, but has also found efficient
application in so called concentrically braced frames. More recently, research
starting in 1977 has resulted in the development of eccentrically braced frames,
combining the basic stiffness characteristic of conventional braced frames with the
ductility and energy dissipating capacity of conventional moment resistant frames.
According to Engineering News Record (1994), steel performs well in earthquakes

because of its high elastic limit (modulus of elasticity), its great plastic deformation
quality and the internal strengthening mechanism of strain hardening. Because elastic
behavior means a steel structure will return to its original position after an
earthquake, designers can predict its deflection during moderate earthquakes. When
earthquake are beyond moderation, when extreme earthquake forces push a structure
beyond its elastic limit, a steel structure can deform plastically and dissipate the
unanticipated energy imposed by the earthquake. It is impossible to assume the time
of an earthquake or to prevent it. On the other hand, we can minimize the loss of life
and money by constructing steel structures in seismic regions.
2.6.10 Potential of High-rise Construction
Akbay (2006) asserts that, by using reinforced concrete core or retaining walls,
reinforced concrete multi-storey structures can be built. However, because of the
limitations in the number of storeys, the difficulties due to producing the load
bearing elements in site and the extension in the construction time, reinforced
concrete is not a preferable material for high-rise structures. The author continues
that, steel framed structures have a great potential in building high-rise structures,
which is why after the developments in the steel construction, number of high-rise
buildings and their heights increased rapidly. In some steel high-rise structures
52
reinforced concrete can be utilized as a core and this provides an increase in the
number of storey whereas it brings difficulty in the construction.
2.7 Disadvantages of Steel as a Structural Material
While steel has several advantages as mentioned above, it has some disadvantages
such as the necessity of fire and corrosion protection. In this section fire and
corrosion problems of steel members are discussed and some measures are presented.
2.7.1 Strength Reduction in Fires
Akbay (2006) explains that, all structural materials are affected by fire to some
extent. Steel, also, loses its load bearing property after a definite temperature and all
of its mechanical properties at very high temperatures during a fire (Figure 2.40).
Experiments on structural steel show that steel will exhibit a loss of strength when
exposed to temperatures in the range of 1,100 F. In spite of this property, steel is
utilized in the construction sector as a structural material confidently, by fireproofing according to the regulations. As mentioned by Patterson (1990), steels
vulnerability to fire also falls between that of wood and masonry. Although steel and
masonry are not combustible like wood, after a certain temperature they melt.
According to Robinson (1993), it is important that in building fires the structure

should not weaken to the extent that collapse occurs prematurely even as the
occupants are seeking to make their way to safety. For this reason it is necessary for
designers to provide a degree of fire resistance to the structures that they build. The
author explains that, fire resistance is expressed in the Building Regulations in units
of time, h, 1 h, 1 h, 2 h and 4 h. It is important to recognize that these times are
not allowable escape times for building occupants or even survival times for the
structure. They are simply a convenient way of grading different categories of
buildings by fire load from those in which a fire is likely to be relatively small (e.g.
low-rise offices) to those in which a fire might result in a major conflagration (e.g. a
multi-storey library). The survival times in a standard fire, defined by BS 476, is
53
illustrated in Figure 2.41. Robinson (1993) argues that, the fire resistance periods
refer to the time for which an element of structure (a column, beam, compartment
wall etc.) should maintain:
Stability (It should not collapse),
Integrity (It should not crack or otherwise allow the passage of flame to an
adjoining compartment.),
Insulation (It should not allow passage of heat by conduction which might
induce explosion). With steel structural members there is normally little
problem in achieving the requirements of integrity and insulation but most
attention and cost is directed at satisfying the stability.
Figure 2.40 Strength reduction at high
Figure 2.41 Standard fire-curve
temperatures (Source: Robinson, 1993)
(Source: Robinson, 1993)
54
In the reinforced concrete or steel structures, the primary measures for fire safety are
planned during the design process. The fire protection methods are explained by
Robinson (1993) as below.
For many years the principal method of achieving fire resistance in steel structures
has been to apply insulation materials. The fire protection is applied after the erection
process and acts as an insulating barrier between the steel and the fire to slow the
heat transfer. The first protective coatings were made from heavyweight materials
such as concrete, brick and plaster and these may still be the optimum solution in
some situations (for instance where there is a risk of impact damage). However, by
the 1920s, various types of asbestos-based sheet and spray coatings had become
available. These were lighter and cheaper than the traditional materials. Asbestos is
no longer used for fire protection because of health hazards, but other asbestos-free
materials have been developed. These materials gain their insulating properties from
rock-fibre or exfoliated vermiculite and they are available either as spray or boards.
Sprays are the cheapest method since application is fast and it is easy to coat
complex shapes or connections. However, they are applied wet, which can create
problems in winter conditions. Their appearance is often poor, so they are most often
used in hidden areas such as on beams above suspended ceilings or in plant rooms
and basements.
Boards tend to be more expensive because they require higher labor content for
fixing. They are fixed by gluing, stapling or screwing, so there is less interference
with other trades on site, and the hollow box appearance is often more suitable for
frame elements, such as freestanding columns. A further advantage is that the casing
work can accommodate vertical services. Rock wool can be used to wrap structural
sections to provide effective insulation. This can be supported by clipping into place
or within a lightweight casing.
Intumescent coatings do insulation in a completely different way. The coating is

applied as a thin layer (perhaps as thin as 1 mm) but it contains a compound in its
55
formulation which releases a gas when heat is applied. The gas turns the coating into
a thick carbonaceous foam, which provides heat insulation to the steel members. The
coatings are available in different colors and can also be used for decorative and
practical reasons.
Additionally, according to Robinson (1993), the fire resistance of tubular members

can be improved by making use of the hollow interior, either for cooling by waterfilling, or for load transference by filling with concrete. However, this method is
expensive. The concept was adopted for the Pompidou Center, Paris (1972-1977)
which has water-filled columns (architects Piano and Rogers; engineers Ove Arup
and Partners) and there are other examples in the world
The progress of fire proofing methods used for steel framed structures in England is
shown in Figure 2.42. It is observed that enclosing with boards have taken the place
of covering with concrete in the fire proofing.
Figure 2.42. Fire proofing methods used for steel framed structures in England
56
2.7.2 Strength Reduction by Corrosion
According to IISI (2006), many elements and materials react chemically with other
elements. When steel comes into contact with water and oxygen there is a chemical
reaction and the steel begins to change into iron oxide. In most modern steel
applications this problem is easily overcome by coating. Many different coating
materials can be applied to steel. As written in Principles of Modern Building
(Vol.1, 1959):
The use of metals in building calls for special care in design, in choice
of materials and in protection, if serious corrosion problems are not,
sooner or later, to arise. Not only is the cost of corrosion alone
extremely high, but what is perhaps even more serious is the consequent
trouble and expense resulting from it. Thus the steel frame of a building
may rust and in so doing crack the external cladding. If the
reinforcement in concrete rusts, the surface spills and disintegration
becomes progressive.
Thomas (2003) asserts that, in certain circumstances, corrosion can get worse by
pollutants or other contaminants in the water. Such materials can include common
salt (sodium chloride) and many industrial chemicals. According to Thomas (2003),
where such materials are present special measures should be taken to protect exposed
steelwork. In the absence of such materials (such as steel members that are not
subjected to periodic wetting by rain or other sources of moisture) requires no
corrosion protection. If steel members need corrosion protection, the usual methods
are paint systems and galvanizing. In considering a protection system it is necessary
to consider the type of building or structure under consideration, its use, its life and
the merits of initial cost against maintenance costs.
Thomas (2003) also explains that paint systems vary between simple barrier systems
that provide a protective film over the steel separating it from oxygen and moisture,
and complex systems that include components that provide additional means of
protection should, for example, the paint system be damaged by small scratches or
holes.
57
Landers (1983) states that steel sheets may be protected against rust and corrosion by
a galvanized aluminum and zinc coating. According to Thomas (2003), galvanizing
consists of coating the steel with zinc (in some cases with significant quantities of
other materials) to provide both barrier protection and cathodic (sacrificial)
protection. Sacrificial protection means that the coating preferentially corrodes
leaving the steelwork intact. The zinc coating is metallurgically bonded to the steel
providing a tough barrier. In addition, in most commonly occurring circumstances
zinc is anodic to steel and thus provides cathodic protection should damage or minor
discontinuities occur to the barrier. An important attribute of all barrier systems is
adhesion to the surface of the element to be protected. Thus careful preparation of the
surface to be protected is required. Thomas (2003) point outs that, all corrosion
systems have a limited life and the system used must be appropriate to the exposure
and the lifetime required.
Moreover, as mentioned by Thomas (2003), weathering steels possess high enough

levels of corrosion resistance that they can be used in certain applications uncoated.
They are most commonly used in highway bridges, but are also used in buildings and
other structures. Although weathering grade steels are more expensive than
equivalent normal grades of steel, they can be cost-effective through the elimination
of painting. Successful use of weathering grade steels requires careful detailing of the
structure. Additionally, according to Patterson (1990), carbon steels falls between
wood and masonry in their ability to resist deterioration.
2.8 Steel Construction in Turkey
Akbay (2006) argues that, structural steel utilization has arrived at big ratios in the
countries that are developed and mostly found in earthquake zone such as the USA,
Japan, Germany, England, Sweden, Spain, France and Finland. Also in Japan, people
can come through big earthquakes with small loss of human and money.
Unfortunately, in Turkey, the use of structural steel is limited with railway bridges
and industrial buildings. Although Turkey holds the 11th position according to the
2005 world steel production figures of International Iron and Steel Institute,
58
buildings are rarely constructed with steel. On the other hand, this material is gaining
wider application in developed countries compared to other materials. This can be
seen from Figures 2.43 and 2.44, where material selections for structural system in
England and in Japan are shown. The consistent increase in the use of steel is
obvious in both these examples.
Figure 2.43. Building types according to material of structural system in England

Figure 2.44. Building types according to material of structural system in Japan

(Source:Akbay, 2006)
59
According to Berktin (1994), if 60% of the industrial buildings and 1% of cultural

buildings construction areas in Turkey (including the probable attic and space truss
constructions) are accepted to be steel construction, it comes out that steel
construction utilization constitutes only 3% to 5% of total constructed area. On the
other hand the same ratio is 85% for reinforced concrete construction. The existing
situation of low-rise and high-rise steel construction in Turkey is described below.
a) Low-rise Steel Structures in Turkey
Berktin (1994) explains that structural steel has a good share in the construction of
industrial buildings and structures where high ceilings and large spans are required,
like big hangars, depots, sport halls and exhibition halls. The other low-rise
structures in Turkey are built mostly in reinforced concrete as mentioned above. On
the other hand, today lightweight steel framing becomes popular in the construction
of residential structures due to the big earthquakes that occurred in 90s. Figure 2.45
shows a steel-framed house construction in Istanbul and Figure 2.46 shows its final
photo.
Figure 2.45. A view of the steel-framed house in Istanbul, Turkey, during its
construction phase (Source: www.zeytinsuyutepesi.com, retrieved 2006)
60
Figure 2.46. A view of the steel-framed house after completion

(Source: www.zeytinsuyutepesi.com, retrieved 2006)
b) High-rise Steel Structures in Turkey
As stated by ke (1989), although steel is widely used in the construction of

industrial buildings in Turkey, the case is not so for multi-storey and high-rise
building construction. After the mid seventies buildings started getting taller and
taller so much so that by the mid eighteen buildings with 30 to 50 storeys could be
seen in major cities. At present, there are 50-60 storey multistory structures in
Turkey (Figure 2.47). Mersin Trade Center and Isbank Towers in Istanbul are the
examples of these structures. These are 52-55 storey reinforced concrete structures
and 150-180 meters high. However, the high structures in the world reach to 500
meters by the utilization of steel, which means they are 3-4 times higher than
structures in Turkey. Figure 2.48 shows the tallest buildings of the world and except
the CITIC Plaza in China, all of them utilized steel and composite systems.
Tabak (2003) explains that, the first building in Figure 2.47, which is called
Diamonds of Istanbul, is under construction now and when it finishes, it will be the
first high-rise steel building and also the tallest building of Turkey with a height of
61
270 meters. Nevertheless, if the examples of high-rise buildings in the world are
considered as shown in Figure 2.48, this height becomes inconsequential.
Figure 2.47. Chart showing high-rise buildings in Istanbul

(Source: http://www.istanbul.com, retrieved 2006)
Figure 2.48. Chart showing high-rise buildings in the world

(Source: http://skyscraperpage.com, retrieved 2006)
62
It is an accepted fact that steel is more advantageous than concrete in building highrise structures, which is why almost all high structures in the world have been
constructed in steel. However, in Turkey reinforced concrete is still preferred for
almost all kinds of structures including multi-storied structures. As stated by zen
and Yamantrk (1989), such a development is quite dangerous for both Istanbul and
other developing cities located in the earthquake region.
In order to understand how important it is to utilize steel construction in such cases it

is better to study the world applications. According to zen and Yamantrk (1989),
when the 73 buildings lower than 55 floors, through the world, are examined, it is
seen that 67% utilize steel and composite construction. Additionally, in countries
where high-rise buildings have been constructed in earthquake zones, it is seen that
nearly 95% utilized steel and composite systems. Also when the table showing the
100 tallest buildings of the world, prepared by ke (1989), is examined, it will be
seen that only 13 utilize reinforced concrete construction while 22 were built with
composite system and 65 utilize steel construction.
2.8.1 Need for Steel Construction in Turkey
Berktin (1994) claims that Turkeys geographical location and sociological

conditions (including earthquake risks, climatic conditions, high rate of population
increase and fast urban development) both requires an improvement in structural
steel construction. This improvement is also required due to the structural steels
success in bringing historical buildings back to life.
As stated by Arda (1994), Turkey is located on one of the worlds main earthquake
regions. Additionally, in Turkeys earthquake map it is seen that all the big cities
(80% of the built up area thus 70% of the total population) are faced with earthquake
risk. This is one of the main reasons why it is necessary to develop the existing
conditions and improve the utilization of steel construction.
63
In addition to these, according to Berktin (1994), in some regions of Turkey (such as

in East and Southeast Anatolia) the construction time is restrained to two or three
months due to the cold weather conditions. Steel construction should be more
favored than concrete at these conditions since the construction process is mainly
independent of climatic conditions and fast.
Berktin (1994) asserts that, the last example, demonstrating the advantages of the use
of structural steel, shows the reason why the use of structural steel construction can
bring freshness to the cities, besides the natural necessities. With giving way to fast
and effective renovation and rehabilitation of historical buildings, the big possibility
of bringing these buildings back to life, with both protecting and utilizing them arises
(see Section 2.6.6 and 2.6.7).
2.8.2 Problems of Steel Construction in Turkey
According to Berktin (1994), in order to break down the continuing resistance

towards the use of structural steel, it is important to put forward and evaluate well the
main reasons behind the rare use of structural steel architecturally in Turkey. Only
after improving these derived points it will be possible to achieve the necessary
increase in the use.
Onat (1988) asserts that, steel utilization in construction field has not been developed
yet, in Turkey. According to the author, the main reason why steel is not favored by
the contractors, disregarding the natural necessities, in Turkey is explained in terms
of economical reasons. Except in projects where it is inevitable to use structural steel,
such as; railway bridges, large span highway bridges, industrial buildings, large span
roofs, use of structural steel construction is negligible. Lack of knowledge and
experience, lack of technology, workmanship and quality control and variety in
production are the other factors that effect the steel utilization in Turkey.
64
a) Lack of Knowledge and Experience
As mentioned by Copeland, Glover, Hart, Hayott and Marshall (1983), the first
statement in the German steel construction standards is; Steel projects and steel
constructions can only be done by the capable and experienced contractors/
engineers. They explain that, as a flexible material, to make the best use of
structural steel, a particular approach to design and construction is required. Such an
approach must recognize the need for strong design discipline, where all the items
must be developed in parallel and brought to a particular level of detail before
finalizing the steel structure design. Also it must appreciate the properties of the
structural material and how it is assembled and combined with the rest of the fabric.
Such a design process requires a continuous interaction between architect, structural
engineer, service engineer and quantity surveyor.
However, as stated by Berktin (1994), most architects, engineers or quantity

surveyors have no experience of designing with steel in Turkey. Additionally, the
resistance towards change and learning new techniques are bound to be powerful
forces against the adoption of steel frame construction.
Moreover, tptolu and Keyder (1990) state that in Turkey, project offices that
are able to design steel structures can be found only in big cities. Except a few big
firms which have experience in the construction and erection of steel structures in big
cities, there is almost no architectural/engineering office making structural steel
design. On the other hand the architects, engineers and workers who have experience
in building with concrete, are found in every part of the country.
b) Lack of Technology, Workmanship and Quality Control
Berktin (1994) explains that, using developed machinery both in the fabrication and
the erection phases increase the quality of the construction with more precision in the
work done, and also decreases both labor and construction time. Moreover, utilizing
computers and robots in necessary stages, like both in the design and fabrication,
65
decreases costs since less scrap brings out. According to the author, although such
modernization requires high initial capital, it is worth for such results, since the
investment will be paid back with high profits in a very short period of time.
Therefore, experienced and qualified work force is important for economical
fabrication and erection; except for a few companies such a work force is unavailable
in Turkey.
Additionally, as stated by tptolu and Keyder (1990), lack of quality control is

an important factor that effects the steel utilization in Turkey. As in Turkey quality
control organizations do not have personnel to make control quality during the
fabrication phase, in the workshop this control is left to the producer. At site since
the elements are not subjected to quality control the situation reflects an irregularity.
c) Lack of Variety in Production
According to OECD (1989), growth of steel demand may be considered to be on a

scale that requires improvement in the production technology; alternatively, the
introduction of new technologies increases the scale of demand with more economic
and good quality production.
tptolu and Keyder (1990) argue that, in Turkey, wide flange sections are not
produced although they are most commonly used in steel construction. In Europe,
220 different types of wide flange sections are being manufactured, while in the USA
this number reaches 300. According to Tabak (2003), these different types of
sections are not produced randomly. They are designed after several studies to find
the right and economical shapes. Wide flange sections are in great demand for the
construction of high-rise steel structures.
Unfortunately, according to tptolu and Keyder (1990), in Turkey, designers and

the construction sector are forced to use imported steel sections, uneconomical Ibeams, channels or built-up sections which increase the initial cost and construction
time. Odaba (1990) explains that, absence of intermediary profiles, result in
66
material losses between 11%-18% and these percentages increase in extreme

examples. Accordingly, as they are more advantageous and economical, reinforced
profiles are used instead of using an upper grade profile. Besides, since the profiles
larger than I-380 do not exist in the market, generally from plates I-section is built,
which is called built-up section. Both using the reinforced profiles and the built-up
sections require extra time and labor.
d) Economic Considerations
There is a common belief that steel construction is expensive, since it requires

equipment for assembly and qualified workforce. As mentioned by Tabak (2003), it
can not be generalized that steel is more expensive than concrete or vice versa.
Firstly, the design and purpose of the building must be examined to find out which
material is more suitable. Tabak (2003) argues that, steel can be more economic
when we think about the simplicity of erection or time savings, if these criteria are
important for the contractor/owner. Necessity of fire and corrosion protection also
causes designers or contractor not to prefer steel because of economic considerations.
According to Berktin (1994), in order to be able to make steel construction, the

owner or the contracting firm in Turkey must invest high initial capital, although it
will be paid back in very short period of time. Because today, due to economical
conditions, no one wants to make investments with such high initial costs, except for
very big projects, steel construction can not achieve its rightful place in the
construction market.
67
CHAPTER 3
MATERIAL AND METHOD
In this chapter the material and the method of the study on steel construction in
Turkey are presented. A case study was carried out on the TESKOMB Office
Building in Ankara; this building is presented as The Survey Material. The method
of the study and analysis are presented as The Survey Methodology in the
following section.
3.1.
The Survey Material
A survey was performed on designing and producing a steel building in Turkey and
the TESKOMB Office Building, which was a steel office building under construction
in Ankara was chosen as the case study. In this regard, information about the
TESKOMB Office Building and general characteristics of the steel construction
process are described in the following pages.
The TESKOMB Office Building is located on Cinnah Avenue, which is one of the
most important roads of the city, in ankaya district of Ankara (Figure 3.1). The
project of the building was designed by architects Mehmet Soylu and Mete z in the
year 2000 and it won the first prize in a national competition, which had 163
projects.
The construction company which built the TESKOMB building is Feka naat and
its structural consultant firm belongs to civil engineer Kenan zbek. This was the
first steel project of Uz Mimarlk, not including some industrial buildings, and the
68
construction firm did not have much experience in steel construction as well.
Therefore, Rona Mhendislik, which is specialized in steel construction, fabricated
and erected the steel structure.
Figure 3.1. Plan showing location of TESKOMB Building
The building had been designed as an office building and a guest house for the
competition but it was converted into an office building on the request of the owner,
after the competition. Accordingly, some changes were done in the design and the
production drawings were completed in 2002. After taking the approval of the
ankaya Municipality, the construction of the building started in 2003 and finished
after two years, in 2005, when the building was opened to use.
According to the architects, the main idea of the project is transparency. The aim
was to connect the main street with the offices and the green area at the back street
69
visually (Figure 3.2). Therefore, the architects split up the building into two parts and
created a void between them, which functions as a passage area. The office rooms
were placed on these two sides and were connected with each other with small
bridges.
Figure 3.2. Site plan of TESKOMB Building
The building is located on a site which is approximately 1040 m. It is 21 meters

high and there are ten storeys in the building as shown in Figure 3.3. Reinforced
concrete was used for the construction of the four floors below the ground level and
the other six floors were supported by steel structure. Accordingly, the area of the
reinforced concrete floors is nearly equal to the area of the floors supported by steel.
Total construction area is 5100 m.
70
Figure 3.3. Section AA of TESKOMB Building
There are two entrances to the building. The main entrance is at the west faade
which looks on to the Cinnah Avenue and it opens to a big entrance hall and an
exhibition hall near it. The other entrance is on the east faade, which opens out on
Greme Street at the back of the building and serves for the staff of the building.
There is a reception and a few office rooms on the entrance floor as shown in Figure
3.4.
On the first basement floor of the building, a conference hall with a capacity of 250
people is located. The reason for placing the conference hall on the ground floor is
that the owner wanted it to open directly to the outside, so there is also an entrance
and a small foyer on the north faade of the building that works independently from
the building. In Figure 3.5 the plan of the first basement floor showing the
conference hall and other public facilities, accessible from the outside is seen.
71
Figure 3.4. Entrance floor plan of TESKOMB Building
Figure 3.5. Plan of the first basement showing the conference hall
72
The three of the four basement floors under the ground were planned as garages and
the total car parking capacity of the building is 70, as required by the municipality. In
order to achieve this capacity, architects had to design two more floors under the
ground in order to provide parking areas for 70 cars and that increased the total cost
and time of the construction (Figure 3.6).
Figure 3.6. Third basement floor designed as a garage
The other four floors of the building are designed to accommodate office rooms.
There is also a small library and a meeting room for the staff of the building on one
of these floors. Two elevators, the main stairs in the gallery and the fire escape stairs
provide vertical access. The second floor plan showing the office rooms is seen in
Figure 3.7.
On the top floor, there is a restaurant with large terraces as shown in Figure 3.8.
The roof of the restaurant is supported by steel arches and there is a sun roof on
it. Additionally, there are toilets and a kitchen serving the restaurant on that floor.
73
External views of the two accesses, from Cinnah Avenue and from Greme
Street, can be seen in Figures 3.9 and 3.10.
Figure 3.7. Second floor plan of TESKOMB Building
Figure 3.8. Top floor plan of TESKOMB Building
74
Figure 3.9. East faade of TESKOMB Building
Figure 3.10. West faade of TESKOMB Building
75
3.2 The Survey Methodology
The TESKOMB Office Building in Ankara was chosen as the subject of the survey.
The reason for the selection of this building was that it was one of a few steel
structures of Ankara and its construction had just begun at the decision phase of the
author, which gave the author the chance to monitor the building right from the
beginning of the project to its finish.
The study also focused on the general characteristics of steel construction.

Construction details, the structural system, connection details and finishing method
selected for the project were therefore studied by examining production drawings and
details of the project and periodic observations on sites
All technical data, architectural designs, construction and technical drawings and
some photos of the TESKOMB Office Building were obtained from Feka naat and
Uz Mimarlk. Additionally, the photos of the building were taken by the author from
the beginning of the construction to the end.
Interviews were conducted with the architects and engineers of the building to obtain
information about the design and construction processes and also to elicit their
opinions, negative or positive, about steel construction. Moreover, related web sites
were visited to gather more information about the project.
While carrying out this study, AutoCAD 2006 software was utilized for drawing the
plans and sections of the building. In addition, Adobe Photoshop 7.0 was used for
organizing the photographs and drawings.
At some stages of the study, comparisons were made between steel construction and
reinforced concrete construction according to design and production processes. The
results of the evaluation are presented in Chapter 4.
76
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this chapter, the results and discussions of the study on the TESKOMB Building
are presented. The building is evaluated in terms of its design considerations and the
construction process; and also problems faced during the design and production
processes are explained.
4.1 Design Considerations
The TESKOMB Building was chosen the case study within the scope of this
research. The construction of this building had just begun, therefore, the whole
process could be observed easily from the beginning to the end. This also provided a
chance to observe the advantages, disadvantages and problems in constructing a steel
building in Ankara.
As noted earlier, the design of this building was commissioned after a competition.
The architectural consultant firm of the building is Uz Architecture Ltd. and the
architects are Mete z and Mehmet Soylu. Since the site of the project was located
in a dense urban area, it was difficult to create urban spaces and the design was
limited within the boundaries of town-planning codes and the neighboring buildings.
As stated by the architect Mehmet Soylu, they aimed to create a visual connection
between the Cinnah Road and the green area across the back street by their design.
They provide this by separating the building into two parts and forming an atrium
between them. The allocation of the office rooms and the other units were described
in detail in the previous chapter.
77
This was the first steel building designed by Uz Mimarlk excepting a few
industrial steel buildings. Therefore, they did an exhaustive literature survey during
the design process. According to the architects, the structure of the project was
thought as steel from the beginning of the design. The reasons for that are listed
below.
The main reason of choosing steel as a structural system is the idea of keeping
the atrium that was designed for architectural purposes. The architects confirmed
that if they had decided to make this project from reinforced concrete, they would
have lost the main idea of the design, which made them get the first prize in the
competition. Architect Soylu said that when they completed the cost analyses,
they saw that steel was 30% more expensive than reinforced concrete, which
caused them to think about the structural system once more because of financial
concerns. However, when they checked up the earthquake regulations, it was
understood that they could not create the atrium they want by using reinforced
concrete since it does not provide the necessary strength in the single bay
systems. Additionally, steel would be a good choice for the construction of
bridges providing the access between two parts as seen in Figures 4.1 and 4.2.
Another important reason is the matter of height which was limited by the
building regulations. This directed the designers to choose steel. For instance, the
conference hall in the ground floor was designed for 250 people and 12 meterswidth had to be spanned. According to architects calculations, beam depth
would be 80-90 cm, if reinforced concrete was used, which meant an increase in
the height of the ground floor and accordingly an increase in the amount of
excavation.
Also, there was a problem of installation. An additional height was necessary for
the raised floor required by the owner to place the computer cables and for the
air-conditioning and ventilation-system. If the building was a reinforced concrete
structure, the number of storeys would decrease or the floor height would be less
than 3 meters. Utilizing steel decreased the beam depth and provided the required
78
height without decreasing the number of storeys or the floor height. However,
installation of cables and pipes was still a problem, so designers decided to place
them into the columns. The details are given in the following section. According
to the designers, this is an important advantage of steel construction.
The roof structure spans 15.5 meters and there is a sun roof on it. As stated by
Soylu, steel was the best choice for supporting the roof because of its ability to
span long distances and lightness. According to Soylu, the lightness of steel also
provided a chance to design a glass floor. The part of the floor that is above the
gallery of the building is covered with glass on the top floor, so it is possible to
view the gallery below while sitting in the restaurant.
Figure 4.1. The construction of the
Figure 4.2. Bridges inside the building
bridges and the atrium
connecting the two blocks
79
Figure 4.3. Section BB of TESKOMB Building
According to the town-planning codes, a 70-cars-capacity garage was required

because of the conference hall on the ground floor; even though the number of
occupants was 40. An extra basement floor was designed (Figure 4.3) and
accordingly, the building had to be dug 14.90 deep into the ground to fulfill this
requirement which gave rise to the problem of safety of the neighborhood. Also,
80
since the distances were not proper for a ramp, the access to the garages was
provided by car elevators. Consequently, this increased the cost of the building by
852 000 (in 2003).
4.2 Construction Process
The main contractor for the building was Feka naat Ltd. and the manufacturers of
the steel structure was Rona Mhendislik ve Danmanlk Ltd. which developed the
design and details as well as fabricated the steel members and erected the steel
structure of the building. The structural calculations of the building (both for the
reinforced concrete and steel) were done by civil engineer Kenan zbek.
Shop drawings were prepared by Rona since structural steel design requires
specialized knowledge and practice, as compared to concrete design. After shop
drawings of the structure were completed, the fabrication process of the sections
began. Figure 4.4 below shows the layout of the steel columns and beams for a
typical floor of the steel structure.
Additionally, since reinforced concrete structures are not built up as precisely as steel
structures, Rona had to take measurements at the construction site at regular intervals
during the fabrication process, in order to adjust the steel members according to the
actual concrete foundations. On account of these measurements, they changed the
dimensions of some of the members. The components used in the structure, their
connections and erection of the whole structure are described in the following
sections.
4.2.1 Components of the Structure
Similar to the other systems, this structure has a system composite of columns and
beams which support slab system. Additionally, the resistance of lateral and vertical
loads was provided by bracing elements, stiffeners, gussets and girders. Components
of this structure are described in four parts below.
81
82
Figure 4.4. Structural plan showing location and sizes of columns and beams (Source: Rona Mhendislik)
a) Columns/Stanchions:
In order to produce the columns of the structure, industrial type of steel sections were
used since the sections fabricated for buildings, such as dwellings, offices, etc., are
not produced in Turkey. Accordingly, Rona had to design and produce built-up
sections for the structure. Three kinds of open type built up sections were used as
shown in Figure 4.5. Two built-up sections were connected to each other in order to
form one column. The heights of these sections are 11, 10.5 and 7.4 meters (see
Appendix B). Also, many stiffeners were welded to the sections at the factory to
strengthen the columns.
Figure 4.5. Three types of built up sections produced as columns

for the TESKOMB Building
b) Beams and Girders:
Typical I-sections were used as beams and girders in the structure. Four kinds of Isections were produced as shown in Figure 4.6. The depths of these sections are 25,
30, 50 and 54 cm; and they span minimum 4.3 and maximum 10.8 meters. Girders
were connected to the beams with 60 cm intervals.
83
Figure 4.6. Beam sections and the various dimensions, used in the structure
On the other hand, the exposed beams at the west faade were designed differently
from these sections, for decorative purposes. Perforated steel sections were chosen
for the faade (Figure 4.7). Additionally, beams at the south faade and beams
carrying the roof were designed in curvilinear shape. Rona produced curved steel
beams by welding short steel sections to each other. The curved beams supporting
the roof structure spans 15.5 meters and they are connected to each other by steel
cables as tension members as shown in Figure 4.8.
Figure 4.7. Perforated steel beams
Figure 4.8. Curved steel beams
84
c) Slab Systems:
Metal deck floor system was chosen as a slab system. Galvanized corrugated sheets
were placed on the steel girders and wire-mesh reinforcement was put over these
sheets in order to bind the sheet with concrete as shown in Figure 4.9. After pouring
concrete in 8 cm depth, the floor deck was paved with boards.
Figure 4.9. The construction of metal deck floor
d) Bracings:
Lateral stability of the structures was provided by using diagonal steel bracings. In
the first floor, bracings were constructed in the horizontal direction (see Appendix
B). Steel channel sections, which have 20 cm depth, were bolted to each other and
used as bracing elements. They were bolted to the beams by the help of shop-welded
steel plates as shown in Figure 4.10. Additionally, larger steel bracings were
constructed in the vertical direction (see Appendix B). Steel I-sections, with 24 cm
depth, were used and they were bolted to each other and to the structure by using
shop-welded plates as shown in Figure 4.11.
85
Figure 4.10. The section and elevation of the bracings used on the first floor
Figure 4.11. The bracings used in the vertical direction
86
4.2.2 Connections in the Structure
Built up sections were bolted to each other to form columns by the help of steel
splice (fish) plates. Triangular gussets were welded to the built-up columns at the
column-beam connection points, in the factory, in order to consolidate the
connection. Short pieces of I-sections were also welded on gussets to make the
assembly process easier (Figure 4.12). One of the engineers of Feka stated that
another reason for adding these pieces was idea of avoiding from the problems that
could emerged because of inappropriateness in the lengths. I-beams were bolted to
these pieces. Also steel splice plates were used at these points to stiffen the
connection as shown in Figure 4.13.
Figure 4.12. A free-standing column
Figure 4.13. Column-beam connection
before connecting the beams
with splice (fish) plates
After connecting the beams with columns, girders were attached to the beams with
bolted connections. Steel plates with bolt-holes on them were welded at two sides of
the beams and girders at the manufacturing plant to make the assembly process easier
on site (Figure 4.14). Girders were bolted at these points with 60 cm intervals as
87
Figure 4.14. A plate welded to
Figure 4.15. Connection between
the beam for the girders
beams and girders
4.2.3 Erection of the Structure
As stated in Chapter 3, reinforced concrete was used for the construction of the first
four floors (ground floor and three basement floors) and the other six floors are of
steel. The foundation of the structure is reinforced concrete strip foundation.
Mushroom slab system is used for the first two basement floors and beam-column
system is used for the third basement floor.
After completing construction of the foundation and the basement floors, erection of
the steel structure began. Rona executed the erection and the civil engineers of the
construction firm and building control firm monitored this process. Firstly, columns
were anchored to the concrete plinth as shown in Figure 4.16. Subsequent to the
anchorage process, the column sections were bolted to each other by using splice
plates (Figure 4.17).
88
Figure 4.16. Anchorage of the columns
Figure 4.17. Assembly of the columns
to the concrete plinth
by using splice plates
Once the columns were erected (Figure 18), horizontal members (beams and girders)
were assembled. Since every part of the structural system was designed carefully
before the construction, workers only assembled the members on site by the help of a
crane as seen in Figure 4.19. After the assembly of these beams, steel curved beams
were assembled for supporting the roof.
Figure 4.18. Assembly of the columns
Figure 4.19. Assembly of the steel structure
89
90
Figure 4.20. 3D drawings showing the structural system prepared by Rona Mhendislik for the TESKOMB building
4.2.4 Finishing Techniques
Feka naat moved in to complete the other works on the building, after the steel
structure was erected by Rona. First of all, metal supporting system of the curtain
wall was constructed, and then building was clad with OSB, thermal insulation,
acoustic boards, and brick facing respectively (Figure 4.21 and 4.22). Metal finishing
was used on the faade at the entrance floor instead of brick finishing. Double
glazing (low-e glass with 9mm interval) and insulated metal framing were used for
the windows.
Figure 4.21. Detail drawing of the building
91
Figure 4.22. Construction of the curtain wall and its final photo
There were no installation channels in the horizontal direction; the vertical channels
are integrated into the T-shaped steel columns, which are encased within gypsum
board panels as shown in Figure 4.23. These channels are accessible in the rooms
under the doors.
Painting was not preferred as a fire protection method because of financial concerns
and the preference of the client. Therefore, steel structural members were covered
with gypsum boards and rock wool for fire protection. All columns were covered in a
rectangular shape (Figure 4.24) except the ones at the corner of the building, which
were covered with circular boards for decorative purposes as shown in Figure 4.25.
Some of the steel components were left uncovered and they were painted with
special dyes in order to provide fire proofing. The exposed steel elements at the top
floor are seen in Figure 4.26.
92
Figure 4.23. A detail showing the installation channel adjacent to the steel column
Figure 4.24. The steel column and the
Figure 4.25. Circular encasement
installation channel enclosed within
for columns at the faade
gypsum board casing
93
Figure 4.26. Exposed steel elements at the top floor
The suspended ceiling was constructed to conceal the steel structure from below.
Perforated boards were assembled to the beams and girders by utilizing steel box
sections as shown in Figure 4.27.
As mentioned in the previous chapter, there are large terraces on the top floor. To
assemble the roof, on top of the galvanized corrugated sheets; concrete, bituminous
primer, water insulation, heat insulation, felt, PVC cleat and granite were placed in
layers as shown in Figure 4.28 and 4.29. The steel arch beams forming the roof are
covered with chipboard, vapor barrier, heat insulation, water insulation and steel
sheet. The detail drawings of the roof and also the concealed gutter used on the roof
can be seen in Figure 4.30.
94
Figure 4.27. A view showing the suspended ceiling
Figure 4.28. A detail drawing of the terrace-roof and parapet wall
95
Figure 4.29. A detail from terrace showing the insulation materials
Figure 4.30. A point detail of the curved steel roof
96
4.2 Problems Encountered
The construction did not finish on the due date. It took two years and according to
Soylu, this duration is almost same as that for a typical reinforced concrete
construction in Turkey. This meant that they could not benefit from one of the main
advantages of steel construction, which is short duration for construction works.
The main reason for this delay was economic. The required equipment and material
flow was interrupted because of financial problems. The final bill of material for
steel components had exceeded the initial estimate, which increased the cost of
construction and the budget was not sufficient to cover this extra cost.
The second reason was the lack of knowledge of the client, who did not know much
about the construction process and did not have a project manager either. At the
request of the architects, a project management firm was appointed to represent the
client. However, mid-way through the construction, the client changed this firm and
a new project manager was appointed who wanted to go through the steel cost
analyses all over again; this caused a further delay of 3 to 4 months.
The absence of a project manager had caused a delay in the design process also. The
client had no idea about the bureaucracy of authorization and approval procedures in
the Municipality and therefore there was a 6 months delay into starting the
construction even after production drawings were ready.
Another reason that delayed the construction was the difficulty of the design.
According to Soylu, it was not easy to adapt the design of the building to the codes
of the Municipality. The capacity of the parking area, the boundary wall between the
neighboring buildings, and the number of stairs and the level of the surrounding all
caused problems which extended the process.
97
Many problems were encountered during the design as well as the production stages;
these are described in more detail in the following sections.
4.3.1 Design Problems
Some problems occurred during the design process of the structure due to the safety
problems, including fire proofing and earthquake safety, the discrepancy between
architectural and structural drawings and the lack of precision in the design. These
problems were explained below.
a) Fire Proofing
Architects wanted to leave the steel members with a brutalist approach. However
they met with two problems: The first one was the opposition of the owner who did
not like the idea of seeing the steel structure inside the building. The second one was
the fire proofing problem.
Steel members must be painted if they will be left uncovered as discussed in Chapter
2 and painting the members with special dyes costs more than covering them.
Therefore, it was decided to clad the steel elements with gypsum board and rock
wool but except for the stairs, small beams at the faade and beams supporting the
roof so as to keep the character of a steel building. Additionally, fire stairs were of
reinforced concrete as opposite to the main stair case which was steel because of
safety issue. Architects also point out that, there was not a sufficient fire regulation
during the design process of the building and the fire regulation matching with the
new European standards and answering for the requirements of Turkey was made in
2002. As a result, they performed a research in order to find the right solutions for
fire proofing of the steel structure.
98
b) Seismic Safety
Kenan zbek who, according to Soylu, calculated the safety factor to be 30% more
than that in developed countries. The reason for this over cautiousness being that
zbek wanted to be on the safe side, since the labor force does not have much
experience in steel construction in Turkey (as mentioned in Chapter 2); also he was
not sure about the quality of steel. In the TESKOMB building 130-150 kg steel was
used for each meter square. According to Soylu, this amount is 100-120 kg per meter
square in the world, especially in America and Europe. Rona Engineering and
Consultancy Ltd. did not dispute the calculations of zbek, since the responsibility
of the structure belong to him, and fabricated the members as he designed. An extra
70 to 80 tons of steel were used as a result of this over cautiousness. Similarly, the
architects of Feka claimed that, thickness of the sections used in the building is also
over designed, which can carry the load of another 4 floors.
Moreover, many stiffeners were welded to the columns and beams, especially to the
columns, during the manufacturing process to stiffen the structure. In addition to
stiffeners cross bracing beams were placed at some parts of the structure for lateral
loads, as planned during the design process and according to the calculations of the
civil engineer. Also gussets and fish plates were used at the connection points.
According to the engineers, adding too many stiffeners and gussets is unnecessary.
c) Discrepancy between Architectural and Structural Drawings:
The production drawings were not accompanied with the detail drawings. Therefore
many problems emerged during the production and construction periods.
Workers assembled the steel cross braces on a wrong frame because of the
discrepancy between
architectural
and
structural
drawings
(Figure 4.31).
Consequently, the specified door could not be opened on that wall and this problem
was rectified by the engineers as seen in Figure 4.32.
99
Figure 4.31. Incorrect structural bracing
Figure 4.32. Rectified structural bracing
100
Another mistake was made in the dimensions of the gussets. Engineers did not
consider the height of the suspended ceiling while designing the gussets; and
accordingly, suspending ceiling could not be assembled. Therefore, triangular pieces
were cut out from most of the gussets in order to place the suspended ceilings as
Figure 4.33. The modification made on gussets
d) Lack of Precision:
Some points in the structure were not designed by the architects in detail and some
elements were forgotten in the architectural drawings. Consequently, engineers faced
several problems during the construction process.
101
Lack of detailing caused water insulation problems in the structure. There were
mistakes in the production of the sunroof at the top floor; hence water leaks in from
the connection points. There is water leakage from the connection point of steel and
concrete core, too.
Another problem occurred during the installation of the pipes and channels. Pieces
were cut out from the stiffeners to place the rain drainage pipe as seen in Figure 4.34
since the designers did not think about the drainage pipe initially and give its detail
drawings. Moreover, installation channels were placed at the two sides of the Tshape columns as mentioned in the previous section. The stiffeners were also cut and
deck was perforated for this reason (Figures 4.35 and 4.36).
Figure 4.34. Modification made
Figure 4.35. A view showing the
for the roof downleads
conduit installed next to the column
102
Figure 4.36. A view showing the hole on the steel deck for the installation channel
4.3.2 Production Problems
Industrial types of steel sections were used in the structure due to the absence of
different types of steel sections in Turkey. Therefore, Rona had to produce built-up
sections, which means extra time and labor.
Production of the curvilinear beams also became a problem. The architects claimed
that, one of the reasons for choosing steel was the curvilinear beams in the structure
(beams at the south faade and beams carrying the roof), since curved reinforced
concrete beams would be difficult to pour. They thought that curved steel beams
produced at the factory would make this process more effortless. However, these
curved steel beams were not produced at the factory, as planned, because of
economic reasons and, instead, they were made by welding short steel sections to
each other on the site (Figure 4.37).
103
Figure 4.37. Curved beams supporting the roof
104
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
There is a need to increase architectural utilization of structural steel in Turkey due

to its location within the earthquake zones. In spite of the structural integrity of steel
buildings and despite the amount of steel being produced in this country there is a
marked lack of using steel in the construction industry. In order to promote its use
architects and architectural education should focus on its advantages.
The TESKOMB building in Ankara was studied to investigate the design and
erection processes of steel buildings in Turkey. The whole process was monitored
from the beginning to the end and the problems encountered were examined.
It was observed that the lack of an experience of project team can prove to be an
important drawback. Therefore, project owners should work with consulting teams
that consist of architects and engineers who have experience in steel construction.
The lack of a qualified team causes delays and difficulties both during the design and
the construction stages.
The owner and/or the contractor must ensure high initial capital in order construct
steel structures. According to the architects interviewed, due to economical
conditions in Turkey people do not want to make investments with such high initial
costs, except for very big projects; although they can recover their investment in a
short period of time.
105
Additionally, problems emerged due to the design and production processes also; the
reasons for which can be summarized as follows:
a) Design:
Steel requires more precision both in the design and construction processes.
However, in Turkey, architects do not have to submit detail drawings (in 1/1, 1/2,
1/5 or 1/10 scale) and contractors do not demand this drawings either. This lack
of detailing increases the number problems in the structure.
The design of a building involves the integration of not only architectural

requirements but also engineering (structural, mechanical, electrical etc.)
services. If the architectural and engineering drawings do not match, problems
emerge during the construction stage due to discrepancies in the drawings.
b) Production:
As explained in Section 2.8.2, steel sections/elements produced in Turkey are

very limited in variety, therefore, designers are forced to use either imported steel
sections or locally produced I-beams, channels or built-up sections, etc, which
increase both the initial cost and construction time.
Current production technology needs updating. After modernization of the

production technology, different steel sections, such as wide flange sections
which are not available in Turkey, can be produced in order to save on costs, time
and manpower; and to meet the demands of the construction sector.
Companies involved in fabrication and erection of steel structures also must

utilize current technologies, in each phase, to facilitate the production of steel
structures.
106
There is an absence of qualified and experienced workers in steel construction in

Turkey. Therefore, the time losses and the workmanship costs increase whereas
the quality of the steel structures decreases.
Based on the above conclusion, following recommendations are made to improve the
current state-of-art of producing steel buildings:
1) Production drawings must be provided with all the relevant detailed drawings
in scale of 1/10, 1/5, 1/2 and 1/1.
2) The architectural, structural and mechanical projects must match in their

entirety. Care should be taken to check them against each other to remove
any discrepancies before production is started.
3) Steel components and sections selected for the design of the structure should
be available in the market or easily manufactured to specification.
4) Companies must conduct training programs for their workers (welders, bolt
erectors etc.) to ensure a nucleus workforce comprised of qualified and
experienced workers. Consequently, both material and time losses and
workmanship costs can be decreased significantly.
More research is necessary to examine the problems of steel construction in Turkey
since this study is concerning only the basic characteristics of structural steel and
steel construction. In addition, similar surveys can be performed on high rise steel
structures in Turkey.
107
LIST OF REFERENCES
Arda, T. S. (1994). Deprem Blgelerinde Yaplar elik skeletli Olmaldr, Dept. of

Civil Eng., unpublished research paper, T, stanbul.
Arda, T. S. and Yardmc, N. (1989). elik Yapda ngerme, 4. elik Yaplar

Semineri, Nov.27-Dec.2, T Vakf ve naat Fakltesi, stanbul.
Akar, G. (1990). Yksek Yap Sistemleri ve Genel Bir Deerlendirme, elik

Konstrksiyon Yaplarn Dnyadaki Uygulamas ve Trkiyede Yaygnlatrlmas
Sempozyumu, TD Genel Mdrl, Ankara.
Berktin, Y. (1994). Architectural Utilization of Structural Steel, M.S. in Building

Science, Architecture.
Biggs, W. D. (1993). Chapter 3: Properties of steel, Architecture and Construction in

Steel, ed. Blanc A., McEvoy M., Plank R., pub. E & FN Spon, London.
Bird, B. (1993). Chapter 17: Transfer Structures, Architecture and Construction in

Bouwkamp, J. G. (1990). The Use of Structural Steel in Earthquake Resistant

Design, elik Konstrksiyon Yaplarn Dnyadaki Uygulamas ve Trkiyede
Yaygnlatrlmas Sempozyumu, TD Genel Mdrl, Ankara.
Copeland, B., Glover, M., Hart, A., Hayott, R. and Marshall, S. (1983). Building in
Steel: Designing for Steel, Architects Journal, Special issue, Vol.178, No. 34-35.
108
tptolu, E.and Keyder, E. (1990). Trkiyede Yaplarda elik Kullanm, elik

Dudas, A. (2003). Light Steel Structures in Residential House Construction,

Department of Building Construction, Budapest University of Technology and
Economics, Hungary.
Engineering News Record, (1992). Innovations in Steel: A New Generation of Metal

Buildings is Tough but Beautiful, Special advertising section, Vol.229, No.10.
Engineering News Record, (1993). Why Steel: New Life for a 125-Year-Old Brick
Building, Special advertising section, September, Vol.231.
Engineering News Record, (1993). Why Steel: Retrofit Metal Roofing Saves Money
and the Environment, Special advertising section, September, Vol.231.
Engineering News Record, (1993). Why Steel: Steel Brings a Concrete Building up
to Seismic Standards, Special advertising section, September, Vol.231.
Engineering News Record, (1994). Steel the Material of Choice: Steel, the Material
of Choice for Seismic Zones, Special advertising section, Vol.223, No.10.
Ersoy, E. and tptolu, E. (1988). Yksek Yaplarn Tasarm ve Yapmnda

zlenecek Temel lkeler, ok Katl Yaplar Sempozyumu, TMMOB naat
Mhendisleri Odas zmir ubesi, zmir.
Fenton, R. (1983). Building in Steel: Contracts and Economics, Architects Journal,

Special Issue, Vol.178, No.34-35.
Fitzmaurice, R. (1959). Principles of Modern Building, HMSO, Vol.1.
109
Hart, A. (1992). Multi-storey Buildings, Steel Designers Manual, ed. G. W. Owens

and P. R. Knowles, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
Hindhaugh, E. (1993). Chapter 5: Sheet and Strip, Architecture and Construction in

Iyengar, H. (1993). Chapter 15: Tall Structures, Architecture and Construction in

Keyder, E. (1993). Unpublished lecture notes, Department of Civil Engineering,

Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
Landers, J. M. (1983). Construction Materials, Methods and Careers, The

Goodhearth Willcox Company, Inc., Boston.
Latter, R. (1985). The Increasing Market for Steel in U.K. Multi-storey Building,
IABSE-ECCS Symposium on Steel in Buildings, Luxemburg.
Lui, E. M. (2003). Chapter 48: Design of Steel Structures, The Civil Engineering
Handbook, Second Edition, CRC Press LLC.
MacGinley, T. J. (1981). Steel Structures: Practical Design Studies, E. & F. N. Spon

Ltd., London.
Moores, K. (1993). Chapter 4: Structural Steel Components for Buildings,

Architecture and Construction in Steel, ed. Blanc A., McEvoy M., Plank R., pub. E
& FN Spon, London.
Morreau, P. (1993). Chapter 10: The Architecture of Steel, Architecture and

Construction in Steel, ed. Blanc A., McEvoy M., Plank R., pub. E & FN Spon,
London.
110
Odaba, Y. (1990). lkemizde elik Yap Uygulamalarna Genel Bir Bak, elik
OECD, (1989). The Role of Technology in Iron and Steel Developments,

Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), Paris.
Onat, I. (1988). ok Katl elik Yaplar: Tayc Sistemleri ve Trkiye Koullarna

Uygun Modellerin Aratrlmas, Dept. of Architecture, Master Thesis, Yldz
University, stanbul.
ke, A. (1989). Dnyada Ve Trkiyede Yksek Binlarn Gelimesi, Yap, Vol.89,

p.35-42.
zen, E.G. and Yamantrk, F.E. (1989). Yksek Yap Tasarmnda elik, ok Katl
Yaplar Sempozyumu, Sep.21-23, TMMOB naat Mh. zmir ubesi, P.241-251.
Patterson, T. L. (1990). Construction Materials for Architects and Designers,

University of Oklahoma Press, Oklahoma.
Plank, R. (1993). Chapter 12: Multiple Bay Single Storey Buildings, Architecture
and Construction in Steel, ed. Blanc A., McEvoy M., Plank R., pub. E & FN Spon,
London.
Reid, E. (1984). Understanding Buildings: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach,

Construction Press, London.
Robinson, J., T. (1993). Chapter 9: Fire Protection, Architecture and Construction in

111
Schollar, T. (1993). Chapter 21: Structural Connections for Steelwork, Architecture

and Construction in Steel, ed. Blanc A., McEvoy M., Plank R., pub. E & FN Spon,
London.
Tabak, H. (2003). elik ve elik Yaplar, Meslek ii Eitim Merkezi Seminerleri,

TMMOB naat Mhendisleri Odas Ankara ubesi, Ankara.
Taggart, R. (1993). Chapter 22: Fabrication and Erection, Architecture and

Construction in Steel, ed. Blanc A., McEvoy M., Plank R., pub. E & FN Spon,
London.
Thomas, I. (2003). Chapter 44: Structural Steel, The Civil Engineering Handbook,
second ed., CRC Press LLC.
Watson, D.A. (1986). Construction Materials and Processes, McGraw Hill Inc., New
York.
Web sites:
A website that includes skyscraper diagrams, Retrieved July, 2006, Address:

http://skyscraperpage.com.
A web site that presents the city of stanbul, Retrieved July, 2006, Address:
http://www.istanbul.com.
CU People web site, Retrieved June, 2006, Address: www.people.cornell.edu.
International Iron and Steel Institute (IISI) web site, Retrieved July, 2006, Address:
http://www.worldsteel.org.
112
International Iron and Steel Institute (IISI) web site, Retrieved February, 2005,
Address: http://www.worldsteel.org/steelmaking/intro/index.html.
Guide of Chicago, Retrieved August, 2006, Address: www.hispago.com.
Web site of Fatih Akbay, civil engineer (BSc & MBA), Neden elik Yap?,
Retrieved July, 2006, Address: http://fatihakbay.tripod.com.
Web site of NexGen Homes LLC, Structural Steel Panel Systems, Retrieved June,
2006, Address: www.nexgenhomes.net.
Web site of Thai Takenaka International Ltd., Retrieved July, 2006, Address:
www.takenaka.co.
Web
site
of
Burj
Al
Arab
Hotel,
Retrieved
August,
2006,
Address:
www.burjalarab.dubai-city.de.
Web site of architect David Baker and his partners, Retrieved August, 2006,
Address: www.dbarchitect.com.
Web site of the University of Oklahoma, Retrieved June, 2006, Address:

www.ou.edu.
Web site of Massachusetts Institutes of Technology, Retrieved March, 2006,

Address: moment.mit.edu.
Web site of Saros naat Ticaret Ltd., Retrieved June, 2006, Address:
www.zeytinsuyutepesi.com.
113
APPENDIX A
ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS OF TESKOMB BUILDING
Figure A.1. Section AA of TESKOMB Building

(Source: Uz Mimarlk)
114
Figure A.2. Section BB of TESKOMB Building

115
Figure A.3. North elevation of TESKOMB Building

116
Figure A.4. East elevation of TESKOMB Building

117
Figure A.5. South elevation of TESKOMB Building

118
Figure A.6. West elevation of TESKOMB Building

119
APPENDIX B
STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS OF TESKOMB BUILDING
Figure B.1. Section CC (Source: Rona Mhendislik)
120
Figure B.2. Section GG (Source: Rona Mhendislik)
121

Plasticity Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

Plasticity Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Plasticity Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DESIGN AND PRODUCTION OF STEEL BUILDINGS:

A CASE STUDY IN ANKARA

IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE

Approval of the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences

Prof. Dr. Canan zgen

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Selahattin nr

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Soofia Tahira Elias zkan

Examining Committee Members

Seyfi Gl Part-time Instructor (METU, ARCH)

Name, Last name: zge BEGL

DESIGN AND PRODUCTION OF STEEL BUILDINGS:

November 2006, 121 pages

Within this framework, a literature survey was conducted on structural steel

Keywords: Steel, Structural Steel, Steel Construction, Steel Structures, Steel

ELK BNALARIN TASARIM VE RETM:

Kasm 2006, 121 sayfa

Bu dnceler erevesinde, strktrel elik elemanlar ve yaplar; ve Trkiyede ki

2. LITERATURE SURVEY ................................................................................ 5

2.3. Connections in Steel Structures.............................................................. 17

3. MATERIAL AND METHOD........................................................................ 68

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ...................................................................... 77

5. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................ 105

LIST OF REFERENCES ......................................................................................... 108

Range of serial sizes for structural sections................................................. 7

Typical extruded forms................................................................................ 8

Serial sizes for tubes .................................................................................... 8

Typical components of a steel frame ........................................................... 9

Castellated beams ...................................................................................... 12

Tapered beams ........................................................................................... 12

Fabricated plate girders ............................................................................. 13

Steel deck floor system ............................................................................ 14

2.10 Unimpeded routing of services................................................................15

LIST OF FIGURES, cont.

2.22 Pin joint connection for bar ....................................................................... 26

LIST OF FIGURES, cont.

2.48 Chart showing high-rise buildings in the world ........................................ 62

Plan showing location of TESKOMB Building ........................................ 69

Site plan of TESKOMB Building ............................................................. 70

Section AA of TESKOMB Building ......................................................... 71

Entrance floor plan of TESKOMB Building............................................. 72

Plan of the first basement showing the conference hall ............................ 72

Third basement floor designed as a garage ............................................... 73

Second floor plan of TESKOMB Building ............................................... 74

Top floor plan of TESKOMB Building..................................................... 74

East faade of TESKOMB Building ......................................................... 75

3.10 West faade of TESKOMB Building ........................................................ 75

The construction of the bridges and the atrium ......................................... 79

Bridges inside the building connecting the two blocks ............................. 79

Section BB of TESKOMB Building ......................................................... 80

Structural plan showing location and sizes of columns and beams........... 82

Three types of built up sections produced as columns for the

Perforated steel beams ............................................................................... 84

Curved steel beams.................................................................................... 84

The construction of metal deck floor......................................................... 85

LIST OF FIGURES, cont.

4.19 Assembly of the steel structure.................................................................. 89

Section AA of TESKOMB Building ....................................................... 114