0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 492 views 20 pages ECCS - Examples To Eurocode
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save ECCS - Examples to Eurocode For Later EccS MLM curoecan convention FOR CONSTRUCTIONAL STEELWORK
CECM GONVENTION EUROPEENNE DELA CONSTRUCTION METALLIQUE
eKs MNP curRopAiscHE KONVENTION FUR STAHLBAU
ECCS - Advisory Committee 5
Application of Eurocode 3
Examples to Eurocode 3
FIRST EDITION
1993 N°71ECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
ECCS EUROPEAN CONVENTION FOR CONSTRUCTIONAL STEELWORK
CECM CONVENTION EUROPEENNE DE LA CONSTRUCTION METALLIQUE
EKS EUROPAISCHE KONVENTION FUR STAHLBAU
ECCS - Advisory Committee 5
Application of Eurocode 3
Examples to Eurocode 3
FIRST EDITION
1993 N°71
FREE Download Publications www.ecespublications.euECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
All rights reserved. No past of this publicationmay be reproduced, stored in a retriaval system, or transmitted in any form
cor by any means, electronic, machanical, protocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the
Copyright owner
ECCS General Secretariat
CECM Avenue des Ombrages, 32/96 ble 20,
EKS _B-1200 BRUSSEL (Belgium)
Tel. $2/2-762 04 29
Fax 32/2-762 09 35
ECCS assumes no liabilty with respect to the use for any application of the material and information contained in this
publication.
FREE Download PublicationsECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
Introduction
‘The European Convention for Structural Steelwork (ECCS) has as one of its primary objectives the
promotion of the safe and economical use of steel in structures. ECCS believes that the introduction of
the harmonized Eurocodes has a great value in achieving this objective; accordingly ECCS has set up an
Advisory Committee, AC 5, charged with the task of promoting the introduction and adoption of the
Eurocodes,
‘The AC § Committee have considered how this process could be best achieved and concluded that a
three stage approach was desirable. The first stage was to produce a concise version of the Eurocodes
which can be used for normal every day design; this part has already been issued as ECCS Publication
No. 65.
The second stage is the production of this document which gives design examples to EC 3/1 and E-EC
3 and has been prepared as a design aid to facilitate the use of EC 3/1 for the design of steel buildings
during the ENV period. These examples concentrate on those aspects which are likely to be needed for
dally practical design work
The third and final stage will be the production of a series of “Design Aids” which will enable the design
process to be made more quickly by using tabulated or graphical values for the various design formula
contained in EC 3/1
‘The combination of these three documents will enable practising engineers to more easily adopt to the
use of the new Eurocodes and should rave a beneficial heip in their speedy introduction.
FREE Download Publications www.ecespublications.euECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
Scope
These Design Examples to EC 3/1 and E-EC 3 have been prepared by the ECCS - Advisory Committee
AC 5 as a design aid in supplement to the complete EC 3/1 to facilitate the use of EC 3/1 for the design
of steel buildings in the ENV-period.
‘The Design Examples only contains examples to EC 3/1 and E-EC3 that are likely to be needed for daily
practical design work.
‘The y values used in this document are the values recommended in EC 3 main document. These values
may deviate from the values recommended in the National Application Documents (NAD) of the member
states.
‘The ECCS - Advisory Committee § is at present composed of the following members:
Norway
Turkey
United Kingdom
Italy
United Kingdom
Germany
Gemperle, C. Switzeriand
Gettins, HJ. (Chairman) United Kingdom
Lequien, Ph. France
Lutteroth, A. Germany
Schleich, J.B. Luxemiourg
Sediacek, G. Germany
Lundin, K. ‘Sweden
‘The Committee gratefully obtained contributions from:
Braham, M. Luxemsourg
Gerardy. J.C. Luxem2ourg
Grotmann, D. Germany
Taylor, J.C. United Kingdom
AAiso particular thanks are given to the ECCS Technical Committees TC 8 and TC 10 who have contributed
to the work.
References.
(1) EC.3/1: ENV 1999-1-1 Eurocode 3: Part 1.1
(2) EEC 3: Essentials of Eurocode 3 - Design Manual for Stee! Structures in Buildings. ECCS-
Publication No. 65
(3) References to EC 3/1 are given in brackets (...]
(4) References to E-EC 3 are given without brackets
FREE Download Publications www.ecespublications.euECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
Contents
Introduction
Scope
Part voce sarees
wd Load combination
Example 1.1.1 Example 1.1.2
Braced portal frame Purlin treated as a continuous beam
ee
“Xe Zz ,
me é cha one
we OS
Example 1.1.3 page Example 1.1.4
Single storey frame Crane girder
eS 4
PE
Example
Single storey frame including a crane
aye |,
1.2 Methods of analysis 14
Example 1.2.1 page
Continuous beam (plastic - plastic) Continuous beam (elastic - plastic)
with limited redistribution
yes 15 SS re 16
sss
z z Ss
Example 1.2.3 Example 1.2.4 page
Continuous beam (elastic - elastic)
17 Se | ag
—= Ss
Continuous beam (elastic - plastic)
without limited redistribution
www.ecespublications.eu
FREE Download PublicationsECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
1.3. Frame analysis : “ 19
Example 1.3.1 page Example 1.3.2 page
Calculation of a sway frame Determination of frame imperfections
] 20 23
3
Bracing system analysis 25
Example 1.4.1 page Example 1.4.2 page
A frame is braced by a bracing A frame is braced by a frame
system
26 27
Example 1.4.3 page Example 1.4.4 page
A frame is braced by a bracing Bracing system imperfections for a
system wind bracing
FEN 7 28 4 29
wolf neki | was | 7 ge AN
a a
—_ —— ent
FREE Download Publications
www.ecespublications.euECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
Part 2 _— _ ae . 30
24 Members: in compression + oe = “ 5 ae
Example 2.1.1 |_ page Example 2.1.2 page
Circular hollow section as a column HEB profile as column
|
2 3
Example 2.1.3 page Example 2.1.4 page
Cold formed RHS as a strut of a Angle as a may of a lattice ea
lattice girder
34 GER ss
S ~ Sf
aay =
YY fe
Example 24.5 pave
"=: Cold formed RHS-
v__ (class 4 cross-section)
*
a?
ve: id
[Dot
22 Members in bending . 7
Example 2.24 mae Example 2.22 ae
Single span beam Single span beam with lateral torsional
ucklng
Ze neem LA 38 a 40
ac = = Sa
rl
Example 2.2.3 page Example 2.2.4 page
‘Single span beam with shear buckling Class 4 cross-section loaded in
veriigaton
co. «| “
—- TL .
SS
FREE Download Publications
www.ecespublications.euECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
2.3 Combined loading - Bending and compression 47
Example 2.3.1 page | Example 2.3.2 page
RHS column loaded in bending and HEA profile loaded in bending and
1} 2 axial compression ‘axial compression
eis “ so
Example 2.3.3 page Example 2.3.4 page
Column of a frame Rafter of a frame
2.4 Local stresses .
: ‘ e ‘ 6
Example 2.4.1 page Example 2.4.2 page
Design of transverse stiffeners Design of intermediate transverse
r stiffeners
—_— a - zine w
me
a= ==
Example 2.4.3 page Example 2.4.4 page
Axially loaded column supported by a Load introduction of wheel toads from
beam cranes
The 65 pas _, 67
a ————
Example 2.4.5, page
Beam supported by a beam
(class 4 cross-section)
@ jaw 69
fa
o \
FREE Download Publications
www.ecespublications.euECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
PATIO) ceuemnomeaieines ; n
3.1 Bolted connections ........-.- 55. e eee eee cece nee eee eee 72
Example 3.1.1 page Example 3.1.2 page
Bolted connection of a tension Erection splice at mid span of a lattice
‘member to @ gusset plate girder
i, nm | meeeesenetaes |
- ee
Example 3.1.3 page Example 3.1.4 page
‘Angle connected to a gusset plate Fin plate connection to H section
column
+ _ oe
“|| aie Ge 7 — 7
— © — ice
+ ne "
Example 3.1.5 page Example 3.1.6 page
Fin plate connection to RHS column Flexible end plate connection
£ { at 83
Example 3.1.7 page Example 3.1.8 page
Beam to beam connection with cleats Splice of an unsymmetrical I-section
85 28
Example 3.1.9 page
Bolted end plate connection
s1
FREE Download PublicationsECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
3.2 Welded connections . 96
Example 3.2.1 page page
Double angle welded to a gusset plate
7 38
page Example 9.2.4 page
Welded beam to column connection Welded beam to column connection
without stiffeners with stiffeners,
100 103
Example 3.2.5 page
Hollow section lattice girder joint
- 107
Example 3.3.1 page
108
Annex A ..... a 109
Tabled reduction factors for buckling curves a,, a, b, ¢, d
FREE Download Publications www.ecespublications.euECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
Part 1
Load combination
Methods of analysis
Frame analysis
Bracing system analysis
FREE Download PublicationsECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
4.1 Load combination
‘These examples demonstrate how the design values of action effects (Near Vas Mss: etc) are
determined from the load assumptions. The further steps of design are not treated in this part
‘An action is @ force (load) applied to the structure or an imposed deformation (e.g. temperature
effects or settlements). Characteristic (unfactored) values of these actions are specified in ENV
1991 Eurocode 1 or other relevant loadings codes. These values of actions shall be multiplied by
relevant safety factors and combination factors, see chapter “Combinations of actions” in ENV
1993 Eurocode 3 or Table 2.1 in the Essentials of Eurocode 3 to determine the design values of
the effects of actions. The following examples show the method of determination of the maximum
‘effects of actions. Not all possible combinations of actions are presented nor are relevant
‘combinations worked out. In practice, one wil collect experience to easily find out which load
combination is decisive for verification of the structures.
‘The following examples are included in this chapter:
Example 1.1.1: Braced portal frame
Example 1.1.2: Purlin treated as continuous beam
Example 1.1. Single s.orey frame without crane girder
Example 1.1.4: Crane grder
Example 1.1. Single storey frame with a crane girder
FREE Download PublicationsECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
Problem, Sketch, Calculation Reference
‘Chavactaiste untactored) values of actions are
‘specified in ENV 1991 Eurocode 1 or oter relevant
lending codes.
“Tho etiects of impertections shall always be taken
Inte accouat in both fst and second order theory.
Here: Frame imperfections are considered
Example lan eae ees
1 i
sh
1, Systom and foad contiguration
Table 56
= 106610" mun?
Span 9
Diarbuton of iterna frees Internal forces and moments {atects of actions)
uo 10 6 uo 10 W {6010 impertecons ‘xe responses of te stucture tothe loading fac
‘equivalent horizontal nit lovee Fy = tions). Design values of the intra forces and
‘moments are determined trom the design facto
{0g} values of fondling Using elastic or pleste glo
‘al analysis
Here: Using elastic global analysis, ts or theo-
Fy with untactoed loading by separating in single
‘tons. This simplifies the decision of which load
‘comblnation gves the wort elec.
TH WOW,
3, Relevant fond combinations
3.1 Relevant load combination for max compression fore in the cohimn {permanent + imposed load (1,286 + 1,5P))
“Te efit of fousing Is orantes In he same
tection
‘he ettec of loading is oiented in we same
‘he etlect af dead losd counteracts the effect ot
wind loading ta colar 1)
FREE Download PublicationsECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
Problem, Sketch, Calculation Reference Commentary
{4 Relevant load combination for max compression force inthe beam (petmaneat + wind load (1,356 + 1,54) Table 21 ‘Tho ett of loading is oienta inthe sare di
[2331.09 and (6)) | reeton
Inpertocton: = 2e(1,95e480)/200 » 648 kN
‘maximum compression force In beam (3; Nay = 15300 ¢ 640408 = 482KN
FREE Download PublicationsECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
Problem, Sketch, Calculation Reference
Example 1.1.2: Partin tremted as n contlauous beam
[ae otal 1: Pua
Puslins aro latory resaned by cladding
+ sulent resistance to provent miner axis
No impartaction eftects
This load combination leads tothe tollowleg
foots:
rn M,, (tong,
“max Vas (hear)
‘max Fy, (enction)
Tobie 2.1
233.11) and Bo
a otsional buckling)
‘in vow of erection an IPE 140s chosen,
Thi load cornbination loads tothe tolowing of
fects:
3 torsional buckling)
For tools In generat les svingent values may be
ved 4.21.2)
FREE Download PublicationsECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
Problem, Sketch, Calculation
xample 1.1.3: Single storey frame
System
i
beam (2)
wl ‘cour (6:
q beam
ae. ‘Stoo grade
Load contiguaiion and distribution of moments
peimaneat 9 = 30kN/m
5 = 45kN/m
Conor
Lo Tl
st tome
eee ee
coercion
a oT
FREE Download Publications
Commentary
Using ist order tory for deteriing the intemal
ferces and moments with 7, = 1,0 for finding out
the relevant joad combinationECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
Problem, Sketch, Calculation
waa om hte
” we
eo Rartio
Imperectons (equivalent heizontal unit fore)
‘ It £ Tl
3. Relovant load combinations for ultimate init state vertication tate 21 ‘hi toad combination ieacs to tovowing etter:
3.1 permanent + snow 23318) max Na, at columa (4) and (6)
taso+ 15s mex Mart 2, 3,4 and 8
max Raat § and 9
R wis needed for base plate desig. For founda
tion design character values ave needs
aaa
way lmpertectons
523
fs2a3
abe 55,
Fque 52.4)
FREE Download PublicationsECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
Problem, Sketch, Calculation
Maximum effects due to the load combi manent +
max Nat column (3 May 20 + 0,361.8 = I736KN
fax Nat column (8 Nos
‘max Mat 2 and 4: Ma
max M at 3 Me
‘max M at 6: Me
permanent + snow ¢ wind
$135 (9 + 3 | w) wind is considced for the right cde with wand w, = 10KN/m
on ofthe Intl sway Imperfections
Calurn (2) dows not contibute to the resistance
1/200 (as demonstrated in 3.1.1)
‘due to load combination permanent + snow + wind
10 + SA) 4 OS+16 = 8298
FREE Download Publications
Reference
Commentary
ax Rat Sand Se equal N, at coluen (4)
and (6.
‘This load comnbination loads to the fllowing effect:
= mix Rss (feacton horizonta).
Rails naaded for baseplate design.ECCS Publication - Examples to Eurocode 3
Problem, Sketch, Calculation Reference
‘No fatigue is incuded nore
erat:
/ Ge a
a6
‘whet loads must be nesses bya dynamic coeicen y= 12 (puely fr calito)
att tore nora ces due fo eran, suing, ot)
Lateral forces and whee! loads can act together
Braking torces are dependent om Interal forces
FREE Download Publications