41220113-Persons and Family Relations
41220113-Persons and Family Relations
41220113-Persons and Family Relations
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
EXCEPTIONS:
1. When the law itself authorized
its validity
(ex. lotto,
sweepstakes)
2. When the law makes the act only
voidable and not void (ex.
voidable
contracts
where
consent is vitiated)
3. When the law makes the act
valid but punishes the violator
(ex. marriage solemnized by a
person without legal authority)
Waiver of rights
Requisites: (EKI)
1. Existence of a right
2. Knowledge of the existence of a right
3. Intention to relinquish the right
GENERAL RULE: Rights can be waived.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. If the waiver is contrary to law,
public order, public policy,
morals or good customs (LPPMG)
2. If the waiver is prejudicial to a
third party with a right
recognized by law.
NOTE: A stipulation requiring the
recipient of a scholarship grant to waive
his right to transfer to another school,
unless he refunds the equivalent of his
scholarship in cash is null and void. The
school concerned obviously understands
scholarship awards as a business scheme
designed to increase the business
potential of an educational institution.
Thus, conceived, it is not only
inconsistent with sound policy, but also
with good morals. (Cui vs. Arellano
University)
Laws applicable
1. Penal laws and laws of public
security
territoriality rule governs
laws of the Philippines will
govern upon ALL those who live
or sojourn in it
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
basis
for
determining
personal law of an
individual
is
his
citizenship
LEX
NATIONALII
LEX REI
SITAE
LEX LOCI
CELEBRATIONIS
Art.
15,
CC
Citizenshi
p is the
basis for
determini
ng the
personal
law
applicable
Art. 16, CC
Art. 17, CC
Law of the
place
where the
property is
situated is
the basis
for
determinin
g law
applicable
Law of the
place where
the contract
was executed
is the basis for
determining
law applicable
Covers
family
rights &
duties,
status,
condition
& legal
capacity
Exception
:
Art. 26,
par. 2 of
Family
Code
Covers both
real &
personal
property
Covers only
the forms &
solemnities
(extrinsic
validity)
Exceptions:
(CIAO)
1. Capacity
to succeed
2. Intrinsic
validity of
the will
3. Amount
of
successiona
l rights
4. Order of
succession
Exceptions:
1. Art. 26, par.
1 of Family
Code
(marriage
involving
Filipinos
solemnized
abroad, when
such are void
in the
Philippines)
2. Intrinsic
validity of
contracts
Renvoi Doctrine
Where the conflict rules of the
forum refer to a foreign law, and
the latter refers it back to the
internal law, the latter (law of
the forum) shall apply.
NOTE: If the foreign law refers it to a
third country, the said countrys laws
shall govern, and is referred to as the
transmission theory.
Doctrine of Processual Presumption
The foreign law, whenever
applicable, should be proved by
the
proponent
thereof;
otherwise, such law shall be
presumed to be exactly the same
as the law of the forum.
Rule on Prohibitive Laws
GENERAL RULE: Prohibitive laws
concerning persons, their acts or
property and laws which have for their
object public order, public policy or good
customs are not rendered
ineffective
by
laws,
judgments
promulgated or conventions agreed upon
in foreign country.
EXCEPTION: Art. 26, par. 2 Family
Code
Example: Divorce law
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
Human Relations
Every person must, in the
exercise of his rights and in the
performance of his duties, act
with justice, give everyone his
due, and observe honesty and
good faith. (Art. 19 of NCC)
NOTE: The elements of an abuse of right
under Art. 19 are:
1. There is a legal right;
2. Which is exercised in bad faith;
3. For the sole intent of prejudicing
or injuring another. (Albenson
Ent. Corp. vs. CA)
The SC in Velayo vs. Shell held the
defendant liable under Art. 19 for
disposing of its property (a perfectly
legal act) in order to escape the reach of
a creditor. Likewise, in Globe Mackay
Cable
and
Radio
Corp.
vs. CA, the employer corporation was
held liable for damages for an abusive
manner in dismissing an employee, as
well as for the inhuman treatment the
latter got from them.
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
PERSONS
CIVIL PERSONALITY
aptitude of being the subject,
active or passive, of rights and
obligations
JURIDICAL
CAPACITY
Fitness to be the
subject of legal
relations
Passive
Inherent
Lost only through
death
Can exist without
capacity to act
Cannot be
limited or
restricted
CAPACITY TO ACT
Power to do act with
legal effects
Active
Merely acquired
Lost through death
and other causes
Cannot exist without
juridical capacity
Can be restricted,
modified or limited
Applies to juridical
persons
This limits the power
of juridical persons
only to those that are
expressly conferred
upon them or those
which can be implied
therefrom or
incidental thereto
Natural persons
GENERAL RULE: Birth determines
personality.
EXCEPTION: The law considers the
conceived child as born for all purposes
favorable to it if born alive. Therefore,
the child has a presumed personality,
which has two characteristics:
1. limited; and
2. provisional/conditional
(Quimiguing vs. Icao)
NOTES:
The presumption as to the childs
personality applies only in cases
beneficial to the child.
The
concept
of
provisional
personality CANNOT be invoked to
obtain damages for and in behalf of
an aborted child. (Geluz vs. CA)
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
GENERAL RULE: For civil purposes, the
fetus is considered born if it is alive at
the time it is completely delivered from
the mothers womb.
EXCEPTION: If the fetus had an
intrauterine life of less than 7 months, it
is not deemed born if it dies within 24
hours after its complete delivery from
the maternal womb.
Presumption of survivorship
Two or more persons, called to
succeed each other, shall be
presumed to have died at the
same time, subject to the
following conditions:
1. parties are heirs to one another
2. no proof as to who died first
3. with doubt as to who died first
NOTE: Article 43 applies when the
parties are called to succeed each other.
But if the parties are not called to
succeed each other, Rule 131, Sec. 3 (jj)
of the Rules of Court applies. Both are
to be applied only in the absence of
facts.
IN
CIVIL LAW
denotes a FIXED
PERMANENT
RESIDENCE, which
when absent, one
has the intention of
returning
There can only be
ONE place of
domicile
Juridical persons
WHO:
a. State
and
its
political
subdivisions
b. Corporations, institutions and
entities for public purpose or
interest
c. Corporations, partnership and
associations for private interest
HOW CREATED: For (a) and (b), by the
laws creating or recognizing them;
private corporations are governed by BP
68 and partnership and associations are
governed by the provisions of this Code
concerning partnerships.
Elements of Domicile
a. Physical presence in a fixed place
b. Intention to remain permanently
(animus manendi)
MARRIAGE
A special contract of permanent
union between a man and a woman
entered into in accordance with law
for the establishment of conjugal
and family life.
Its nature,
consequences and incidents are fixed
by law and cannot be the subject of
stipulation.
Kinds of Domicile
1. Domicile of origin - received by a
person at birth.
2. Domicile of choice - the place freely
chosen by a person sui juris.
3. Constructive domicile - assigned to a
child by law at the time of his birth.
II. FAMILY CODE
took effect August 3, 1988
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
years [and are without legal
impediment to marry each
other; and
e. The solemnizing officer must
execute a sworn statement that
he
had
ascertained
the
qualifications of the parties and
that he had found no legal
impediment to their marriage
4. in articulo mortis
5. in remote places
NOTE: A marriage license is valid only
for 120 days from date of issue, in any
part of the Philippines.
Foreign Marriages
Validity of marriage:
GENERAL RULE: Where one or both
parties to the marriage are citizens of
the Philippines, the foreign marriage is
valid in this country if solemnized in
accordance with the laws of the country
of celebration.
EXCEPTIONS: Foreign marriages shall
not be recognized in the Philippines if
prohibited because: (MABB-PIP)
1. contracted by a national who is
below 18 years of age
2. bigamous or polygamous (except
as provided for in Art. 41, FC)
3. contracted through mistake of
one party as to the identity of
the other
4. contracted
following
the
annulment or declaration of
nullity of a previous marriage
but before partition
5. void
due
to
psychological
incapacity
6. incestuous
7. void for reasons of public policy
Validity of divorce:
GENERAL RULE: A divorce validly
obtained abroad by the alien spouse,
capacitating him/her to remarry can
allow the Filipino to remarry.
EXCEPTION: The rule will not apply if
the divorce was obtained by the Filipino
spouse.
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
VOID
VOIDABLE
Decree of nullity
Decree
of
annulment
Never be ratified
Ratified by free
cohabitation
Attacked directly or Attacked
directly
collaterally
only
Co-ownership
Conjugal
Partnership
Always void
Valid until annulled
Action for
Action prescribes
declaration of
nullity does not
prescribe
Psychological Incapacity
no exact definition but is restricted
to psychological incapacity to
comply with the essential marital
obligations of marriage
involves a senseless, protracted and
constant refusal to comply with the
essential marital obligations by one
or both of the spouses although he,
she or they are physically capable of
performing such obligations (Chi
Ming Tsoi vs. CA)
JURISPRUDENTIAL GUIDELINES:
(Republic vs. Molina)
1. burden of proof belongs to the
plaintiff
2. root cause of the psychological
incapacity must be:
a. medically or clinically identified
b. alleged in the complaint
c. sufficiently proven by experts
d. explained in the decision
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
3. incapacity must be existing at the
time of the celebration of marriage
4. incapacity must be permanent or
incurable
5. illness is grave enough to bring about
disability
to
assume
marital
obligations
6. marital obligations refer to Art. 6871 of FC as well as Art. 220,221 and
225 of the FC
7. interpretations of the National
Appellate Matrimonial Tribunal of
the
Catholic
Church
of
the
Philippines while not controlling
should be given great respect.
8. trial
court
must
order
the
prosecuting attorney or fiscal and
the Solicitor General to appear for
the state.
JUDICIAL OF DECLARATION OF NULLITY
The absolute nullity of a
previous marriage may be
invoked
for
purposes
of
remarriage on the basis solely of
a final judgment declaring such
previous marriage void.
NOTES:
For purposes of remarriage, the only
legally acceptable basis for declaring
a previous marriage an absolute
nullity is a final judgment declaring
such previous marriage void, whereas,
for purposes other than remarriage,
other
evidence
is
acceptable.
(Domingo vs. CA)
In a case for concubinage, the
accused need not present a final
judgment declaring his marriage void
for he can adduce evidence in the
criminal case of the nullity of his
marriage other than proof of a final
judgment declaring his marriage void.
Hence, the pendency of the civil
action for nullity of marriage does not
pose a prejudicial question in a
criminal case for concubinage.
Parties to the marriage should not be
permitted to judge for themselves its
nullity, for the same must be
submitted to the judgment of the
competent courts and only when the
nullity of the marriage is so declared
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
10
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
that at the time of the marriage, she
was Pregnant by a man other than
her husband;
3. Concealment
of
a
Sexually
transmissible disease, regardless of
its nature, existing at the time of
the marriage; and
4. Concealment of Drug addiction,
habitual alcoholism, homosexuality
or lesbianism existing at the time of
the marriage.
NOTES:
Misrepresentation as to character,
health, rank, fortune or chastity is
not a ground for annulment.
The enumeration in Article 46 is
EXCLUSIVE. (Anaya vs. Palaroan)
Ground
(F2I2NS)
Persons
Who May
Sue
1.Force,
Injured party
intimidation
, or undue
influence
2. Fraud
Injured party
4. Insanity
(a)
sane
spouse who
has
no
knowledge of
the insanity
(b) relatives,
guardians or
persons having
legal
charge of the
insane
(c)
insane
spouse
Prescripti
ve Period
5. Nonconsent
6. STD
IN
(a)
parent/
legal
guardian
having charge
of the noconsent
party
(b)
no
consent
party
Injured party
CIVIL LAW
(a) anytime
before the
no
consent
party
reaches 21
(b) w/in 5
years after
reaching 21
w/in
5
years after
the
celebration
of
the
marriage
w/in
5
years from
the
time
the force,
intimidatio
n, or undue
influence
ceased
w/in
5
years from
the
discovery
of
fraud
w/in
5
years after
the
celebration
of
the
marriage
(a) anytime
before the
death
of
either party
(b) anytime
before the
death
of
either party
(c) during
lucid
interval or
after
regaining
sanity
ADDITIONAL
REQUIREMENTS
FOR
ANNULMENT OR DECLARATION OF
NULLITY
1.Prosecuting attorney or fiscal should:
a. Take steps to prevent collusion
between the parties
b. Take care that evidence is not
fabricated or suppressed
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
12
LEGAL SEPARATION
Grounds: (SAMBA-LIPAD)
1. repeated physical violence or
grossly abusive conduct directed
against the petitioner, a common
child, or a child of the petitioner
2. attempt of the respondent to
corrupt or induce the petitioner, a
common child, or a child of the
petitioner, to engage in prostitution,
or connivance in such corruption or
inducement
3. attempt by the respondent against
the life of the petitioner
4. final judgment sentencing the
respondent to imprisonment of more
than 6 years even if pardoned
5. drug
addiction
or
habitual
alcoholism of the respondent
6. lesbianism or homosexuality of the
respondent
7. abandonment of the petitioner by
the respondent without justifiable
cause for more than 1 year
8. physical violence or moral pressure
to compel petitioner to change
religious or political affiliation
9. contracting by respondent of a
subsequent bigamous marriage; and
10. sexual infidelity or perversion.
NOTES:
Cooling-off Period 6 months
period designed to give the parties
enough time to further contemplate
their positions with the end in view
of attaining reconciliation between
them.
The enumeration in Article 55
regarding
legal
separation
is
EXCLUSIVE. (Lacson vs. San JoseLacson)
Grounds for denial of petition:
(CCCC-MP-DR)
a. Condonation -NOTE: failure of the
husband to look for his adulterous
wife is NOT condonation to wife's
adultery. (Ocampo vs. Florenciano)
b. Consent
c. Connivance
d. Collusion
e. Mutual Guilt
f. Prescription
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
14
Requisites:
made before celebration of marriage
in writing (even modifications)
signed by the parties
not prejudice third persons unless
registered in the civil registry
5. to fix terms and conditions of their
property relations
6. additional signatories
a. 18-21: parents
b. civil interdictees & disabled:
guardian
1.
2.
3.
4.
DONATIONS
PROPTER
NUPTIAS
rules on ordinary
donations except
that if future
property is
donated, it must
conform with
formalities of wills
ORDINARY
DONATIONS
Governed
by rules on
donations
(Arts. 725773, NCC)
Grounds
Art. 86, FC
for
revocation
Arts. 760,
764, & 765,
NCC
EXCEPTIONS:
1. moderate gifts on occasions of
family celebrations
2. donations mortis causa
NOTE:
This rule also applies to
common-law spouses. (Article 87,
Family Code)
Grounds for Revocation (VIRAL-CN)
1. marriage Not celebrated or declared
Void ab initio except those made in
marriage settlements
2. marriage without parental Consent
3. marriage is Annulled and donee is in
bad faith
4. upon Legal separation, the donee
being the guilty spouse
5. complied Resolutory condition
6. donee commits acts of Ingratitude
SYSTEM OF ABSOLUTE COMMUNITY (AC)
The property regime of the spouses
in the absence of a marriage
settlement or when the marriage is
void. This is so because it is more in
keeping with Filipino culture.
GENERAL RULE: Community property
shall consist of all property owned by the
spouses at the time of the marriage or
acquired thereafter.
EXCEPTIONS: (BEG)
1. property acquired before the
marriage by either spouse who
has legitimate descendants by a
former marriage
2. property for personal and
exclusive use except jewelry
3. property acquired during the
marriage by gratuitous title,
except when the donor, testator
or grantor expressly provides
otherwise
NOTE: No waiver of rights allowed
during the marriage except in case of
judicial separation of property. The
waiver must be in a public instrument.
Administration of the community
property
GENERAL RULE: It shall belong to both
spouses jointly.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. In
case
of
disagreement,
husbands decision shall prevail.
2. In
case
one
spouse
is
incapacitated or unable to
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
participate in the administration
of the common properties, other
spouse may assume sole powers.
NOTE: These powers do not
include:
a. Disposition
b. encumbrance
NOTE: Any alienation or encumbrance is
void if without the written consent of
the other spouse
Rule on Game of Chance
LOSS: Shall be borne by the loserspouse and shall not be charged to
the community property
WINNINGS: Shall form part of the
community property
Steps in Liquidation of AC: (IP-DDP)
1. Inventory
a. Inventory of Community Property
b. Inventory of separate property of
the wife
c. Inventory of separate property of
the husband
2. Payment of Community Debts
4.
5.
6.
7.
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
16
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
e. spouse
granted
power
of
administration
in
marriage
settlement abused such power; and
f. at the time of the petition, spouses
are separated in fact for at least 1
year and the possibility for
reconciliation is highly improbable.
NOTE: The spouses contribute to the
family expenses proportionately with
their income and the value of their
properties. However, the liability of the
spouses to the creditors for family
expenses is solidary.
PROPERTY
REGIME
WITHOUT MARRIAGE
Art. 147
Applicability
1. Without
legal
impediment to
marry
2. Void
marriages due
to absence of
formal
requisite
OF
UNIONS
Art. 148
1. With legal
impediment to
marry
2. Adulterous
relationships
3. Bigamous or
polygamous
marriages
4. Incestuous
void marriages
under Art. 37
5. Void
marriages by
reason of
public policy
under Art. 38
Separately
owned by the
parties
Governed by
the rules on
coownership
Presumption
(prima
facie)
Presumption
of joint
acquisition
and equal
sharing as to
Owned by
them in
common in
proportion to
their
respective
contributions
No
presumption of
joint
acquisition.
When there is
IN
property
acquired
while they
live
together.
one of the
parties is in
good faith,
the share of
the party in
bad faith in
the coownership
shall be
forfeited:
a. in favor
of their
common
children; or
b. in default
of or in case
of waiver by
any or all of
the common
children or
their
descendants,
in favor of
the innocent
party.
CIVIL LAW
evidence of
joint
acquisition but
none as to the
extent of
actual
contribution,
there is a
presumption of
equal sharing.
If one of the
parties is
validly married
to another,
his/her share
in the coownership
shall accrue to
the absolute
community or
conjugal
partnership
existing in
such valid
marriage.
If the party
who acted in
bad faith is not
validly married
to another or
if both parties
are in bad
faith, such
share shall be
forfeited in
the manner
provided in the
last paragraph
of Article 147.
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
18
FAMILY HOME
GENERAL RULE: The family home is
exempt from execution, forced sale or
attachment.
EXCEPTIONS: (PLMN)
1. debts
incurred
prior
to
constitution
2. debts
due
to
laborers,
mechanics, architects, builders,
material men and others who
have
rendered
service
or
furnished materials for the
construction of the building
3. debts secured by mortgages
4. non-payment of taxes
Guidelines:
1. deemed constituted from time of
actual occupation as a family
residence
2. must
be
owned
by
person
constituting it
3. must be permanent
4. rule applies to valid and voidable
and even to common-law spouses
under Articles 147 and 148
5. continues despite death of one or
more spouses or unmarried head of
the family for 10 years, or as long as
a minor beneficiary lives
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
1. physical impossibility of the husband
to have sexual intercourse with his
wife within the 1st 120 days of the
300 days immediately preceding the
childs birth, due to:
a. physical incapacity of the
husband;
b. husband and the wife were living
separately; or
c. serious illness of the husband
which
absolutely
prevented
sexual intercourse
2. biological or scientific proof that the
child could not have been that of the
husband; and
3. written authorization or ratification
of either parent for artificial
insemination was obtained through
mistake,
fraud,
violence,
intimidation or undue influence.
B. Prescriptive periods
1. one year, from knowledge of birth or
recording in the civil register, if
husband or heirs lives in the SAME
city/municipality
2. two years, if resides in the Phils.
3. three years, if abroad
C. Parties
GENERAL RULE: Only the husband may
impugn
EXCEPTION: The heirs, if the husband
dies before the end of the prescription
of the action, or after filing complaint,
or child was born after death
NOTE: The question of legitimacy cannot
be collaterally attacked, it can be
impugned only in a direct action.
Rule on the Status of Children born
after 300 days following Termination of
Marriage
A. Requisites (TS-WBN)
1. first marriage terminated
2. mother
contracted
subsequent
marriage
3. subsequent marriage was contracted
within 300 days after termination of
previous marriage
4. child was born
5. no evidence as to status of child
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
20
Baluyut)
Rights of the Children
LEGITIMATE
ILLEGITIMATE
Use of father &
mothers surname
Receive support
from parents
Entitled to the
legitime & other
successional rights
Use of mothers
surname
NOTE: However, RA
9255 amended
Article 176, FC
Receive support
according to FC
Legitime is of the
legitime of a
legitimate child
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
d. in possession of full civil
capacity or legal rights
e. at least 16 years older than the
adoptee, except when:
1) adopter is the biological
parent of the adoptee
2) adopter is the spouse of the
adoptees parent
f. has not been convicted of any
crime involving moral turpitude
g. emotionally and psychologically
capable of caring for children
2. Alien:
a. same qualifications as a Filipino
b. country has diplomatic relations
with the Phil.
c. has been living in the Phil. for at
least three (3) continuous years
prior to the application for
adoption and maintains such
residence until the adoption
decree is entered, except when
1) former Filipino citizen who
seeks to adopt a relative
within the 4th degree of
consanguinity or affinity
2) one who seeks to adopt the
legitimate or illegitimate
child of his/her Filipino
spouse
3) one who is married to a
Filipino citizen and seeks to
adopt jointly with his/her
spouse a relative within the
4th degree of consanguinity
or affinity of the Filipino
spouse
d. certified to have legal capacity
to adopt by his/her diplomatic or
consular office
e. certified by said office that his
government allows the adoptee
to enter his/her country as
his/her adopted child
3. Guardian with respect to the ward
after termination of the guardianship
and clearance of his/her financial
accountabilities
Pre-Adoption Services
the DSWD shall provide for the
following services:
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
22
Effects:
a.
Parental authority of adoptees
biological parents or legal custody of
DSWD shall be restored if adoptee is still
a minor or incapacitated.
b.
Reciprocal rights and obligations
of the adopter(s) and the adoptee to
each other shall be extinguished.
c.
The amended certificate of birth
of the adoptee shall be cancelled and its
original shall be restored.
d.
Succession rights shall revert to
its status prior to the adoption, but
vested rights shall not be affected.
B. Inter-Country Adoption Act of 1995
(R.A. No. 8043)
Inter-Country Adoption
Filipino
citizen
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
24
SUPPORT
everything
indispensable
for
sustenance,
dwelling,
clothing,
medical attendance, education and
transportation in keeping with the
financial capacity of the family
Kinds: (LJC)
1. Legal that which is required or
given by law
2. Judicial required by the court to be
given whether pendente lite or in a
final judgment
3. Conventional given by agreement
Characteristics: (PIN-ERV)
1. Personal
2. Intransmissible
3. Not
subject
to
waiver
or
compensation
4. Exempt
from
attachment
or
execution
5. Reciprocal on the part of those who
are by law bound to support each
other
6. Variable
Persons obliged to support each other:
1. spouses
2. legitimate
ascendants
and
descendants
3. parents and their legitimate children
and the legitimate and illegitimate
children of the latter
4. parents and their illegitimate
children and the legitimate and
illegitimate children of the latter
5. legitimate brothers and sisters
whether full or half-blood
NOTE: Support shall be in proportion to
the resources or means of the giver and
to the necessities of the recipient.
Order of liability if several persons are
obliged to give support:
1. spouse
2. descendants in the nearest degree
3. ascendants in the nearest degree
4. brothers and sisters
NOTES:
When the obligation to give support
falls upon 2 or more persons
payment shall be divided between
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
of age unless unfit or disqualified
3. actual custodian unless unfit or
disqualified
Persons Exercising Special PA:
1. school
2. administrators and teachers
3. individual, entity or institution
engaged in child care
NOTES:
Parental authority and responsibility
are inalienable and may not be
transferred and renounced except in
cases authorized by law.
Parents may exercise parental
authority over their childs property
Kinds of Properties of a Minor
ADVENTITIOUS
PROFECTITIOUS
1. earned or acquired
by the child through
his work or industry by
onerous or gratuitous
title
2. owned by the child
1. property given by
the parents to the
child for the latter to
administer
the
2. owned by
parents
3. parents are
usufructuary
4.
property
administered by the
child
Termination of PA
PERMANENT
1. death of the
parents
2. death of the
child
3. emancipation of
the child
4. subjected child
to sexual abuse
the
TEMPORARY
1. adoption of the
child
2. appointment of a
general guardian
3.
judicial
declaration
of
abandonment
4. final judgment
divesting
the
parents of parental
authority
5.
judicial
declaration
of
absence or incapacity
of
the
parents exercising
parental authority
over the child
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
26
3.
PRESUMPTION OF DEATH
ORDINARY
ABSENCE
EXTRAORDINARY/
QUALIFIED
ABSENCE
a. 7 YEARS, person
presumed dead for all
purposes except for
those
of
opening
succession
b.
10 YEARS, person
presumed dead for
purposes of opening
succession except if he
disappeared after the
age of 75, in which
case, a period of 5
years is sufficient
c.
4 YEARS, person
presumed dead for
purposes of remarriage
of the spouse present
For
all
purposes
including
those
of
opening succession, a
period of 4 YEARS, and
for
purposes
of
remarriage
of
the
spouse
present,
a
period of 2 YEARS, is
sufficient under the
following
circumstances:
a. person on board a
vessel lost during a sea
voyage or an aeroplane
which is missing; period
is counted from the
loss of the vessel or
aeroplane
b. person in the armed
forces who has taken
part in war
c. person in danger of
death
under
other
circumstances and his
existence has not been
known
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)